U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarter ended: September 30, 2020

 

Or

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Transition Period from ___________ to____________

 

Commission File Number: 000-55406

 

Nightfood Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada   46-3885019
(State or Other Jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)   Identification No.)
     

520 White Plains Road, Suite 500

Tarrytown, New York

  10591
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

 

888-888-6444

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes   No 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company
  Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   No 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class   Trading Symbol(s)   Name of each exchange on which registered
Nightfood Holdings, Inc Common Stock   NGTF   OTCQB

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. At November 20, 2020, the registrant had outstanding 66,741,706  shares of common stock.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
     
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) 1
     
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 2
     
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 8
     
Item 4. Controls and Procedures. 8
     
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
     
Item 1. Legal Proceedings. 9
     
Item 1A.   Risk Factors. 9
     
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. 9
     
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. 9
     
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. 9
     
Item 5. Other Information. 9
     
Item 6. Exhibits. 9
     
Signatures 10

 

i

 

 

Nightfood Holdings, Inc.

 

  

Financial Statements

For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

Financial Statements  
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2020 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2020 F-1
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 F-2
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 F-3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 F-4
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements F-5 - F-22

 

1

 

 

Nightfood Holdings, Inc.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

    September 30,     June 30,  
    2020     2020  
    (Unaudited)        
ASSETS            
Current assets:            
Cash   $ 8,360     $ 197,622  
Accounts receivable – net     65,053       61,013  
Inventories     213,384       275,605  
Other current assets     272,032       398,085  
Total current assets     558,829       932,325  
                 
Total assets   $ 558,829     $ 932,325  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT                
Current liabilities:                
Accounts payable   $ 1,147,502     $ 1,286,149  
Accrued expense-related party     9,974       9,974  
Accrued expense     56,923       -  
Accrued interest     214,402       192,625  
Short term borrowings – line of credit     2,794       3,897  
Convertible notes payable – net of discount     2,348,239       2,330,189  
Fair value of derivative liabilities     1,357,245       1,590,638  
Total current liabilities   $ 5,137,079       5,413,472  
                 
Commitments and contingencies     -       -  
                 
Stockholders’ deficit:                
Preferred stock, ($0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, and 1,000 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020 and 1,000 outstanding as of June 30, 2020, respectively)     1       1  
Common stock, ($0.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, and 65,085,597 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020 and 61,796,680 outstanding as of June 30, 2020, respectively)     65,086       61,797  
Additional paid in capital     13,931,609       13,088,177  
Accumulated deficit     (18,574,946 )     (17,631,122 )
Total stockholders’ deficit     (4,578,250 )     (4,481,147 )
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit   $ 558,829     $ 932,325  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-1

 

 

Nightfood Holdings, Inc.

 

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    For the
three months
ended
September 30,
2020
    For the
three months
ended
September 30,
2019
 
Revenues   $ 126,983     $ 46,497  
                 
Operating expenses                
Cost of product sold     229,696       146,500  
Selling, general and administrative     433,330       28,107  
Amortization of intangibles     -       166,667  
Total operating expenses     663,026       341,274  
                 
Loss from operations     (536,043 )     (294,777 )
                 
Interest expense – bank debt     337       -  
Interest expense – shareholder     83,955       26,598  
Loss on extinguishment of debt upon notes conversion     188,397       -  
Change in derivative liability     (207,524 )     (190,062 )
Interest expense – other     322,739       382,267  
Other expense- non cash     19,877       -  
Total other expense     407,781       218,803  
                 
Provision for income tax     -       -  
                 
Net loss   $ (943,824 )   $ (513,580 )
                 
Basic and diluted net loss per common share   $ (0.01 )   $ (0.01 )
                 
Weighted average shares of capital outstanding – basic and diluted     63,442,930       54,482,700  

  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-2

 

 

Nightfood Holdings, Inc.

 

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019

 

    Common Stock     Preferred Stock     Additional
Paid-in
    Accumulated     Total Stockholders’  
    Shares     Par Value     Shares     Par Value     Capital     Deficit     Deficit  
Balance, June 30, 2019     53,773,856     $ 53,774       1,000     $       1     $ 10,692,679     $ (13,219,059 )   $ (2,472,605 )
Common stock issued for services     122,762       123       -       -       49,274       -       49,397  
Common stock issued for interest     110,404       110                       26,487       -       26,597  
Issuance of common stock for debt conversion     1,409,349       1,409                       335,591       -       337,000  
Derivative liability reclassed upon debt conversion     -       -                       213,739       -       213,739  
Net loss     -       -       -       -       -       (513,580 )     (513,580 )
Balance, Three Months ended September 30, 2019     55,416,371     $ 55,416       1,000     $ 1     $ 11,317,770     $ (13,732,639 )   $ (2,359,452 )
                                                         
Balance, June 30, 2020     61,796,680     $ 61,797       1,000     $ 1     $ 13,088,177     $ (17,631,122 )   $ (4,481,147 )
Common stock issued for interest     312,938       313                       36,165       -       36,478  
Issuance of common stock for debt conversion     2,975,979       2,976                       344,024       -       347,000  
Issuance of warrants                                     65,711               65,711  
Loss on fair value of shares issued  upon debt conversion     -       -                       397,532       -       397,532  
Net loss                                             (943,824 )     (943,824 )
      65,085,597     $ 65,086     $ 1,000     $ 1     $ 13,931,609       (18,574,946 )   $ (4,578,250 )

  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-3

 

 

Nightfood Holdings, Inc.

 

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

    For the
three months
ended
September 30,
2020
    For the
three months
ended
September 30,
2019
  
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:            
Net loss   $ (943,824 )   $ (513,580 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations activities:                
Warrants issued for services     65,711       -  
Stock issued for services     -       49,397  
Stock issued for interest     -       26,598  
Amortization of debt discount     322,739       382,267  
Deferred financing fees and financing cost     45,577       -  
Change in derivative liability     (207,524)       (190,062 )
Loss on extinguishment of debt upon notes conversion     188,397       -  
Amortization of intangible assets     -       166,667  
Change in operating assets and liabilities                
Change in accounts receivable     (4,040 )     (135,967 )
Change in inventory     62,221       (30,583 )
Change in other current assets     126,053       (520,000 )
Change in accounts payable     (81,725 )     804,181  
Change in accrued expenses     58,256       (12,001 )
Net cash used in operating activities     (368,159 )     26,916  
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                
Cash paid for purchase of intangible assets     -       (1,000,000 )
Net cash used in investing activities     -       -  
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
Proceeds from the issuance of debt-net     180,000       1,050,000  
Borrowings on line of credit     (1,103 )     -  
Net cash provided by financing activities     178,897       1,050,000  
                 
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS     (189,262 )     76,916  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period     197,622       30,142  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 8,360     $ 107,058  
                 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:                
Cash Paid For:                
Interest   $

337

    $    
Income taxes   $ -     $ -  
Summary of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Information:                
Initial derivative liability and debt discount accounted   $ 126,029     $ 845,903  
Derivative liability reclassed to loss on extinguishment of debt upon notes conversion   $ 189,257     $ -  
Stock issued for conversion of debt   $ 347,000     $ 337,000  
Stock Issued for Interest   $ 36,478     $ 26,597  
True-up adjustment in debt discount and derivative liability   $ 37,360     $ -  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

F-4

 

 

Nightfood Holdings, Inc.

 

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. Description of Business   Nightfood Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Nevada Corporation organized October 16, 2013 to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Nightfood, Inc., a New York Corporation from its sole shareholder, Sean Folkson.  All of its operations are conducted by its two subsidiaries: Nightfood, Inc. (“Nightfood”) and MJ Munchies, Inc. (“Munchies”). Nightfood’s business model is to manufacture and distribute snack products specifically formulated for nighttime snacking to help consumers satisfy nighttime cravings in a better, healthier, more sleep friendly way.  Management believes Nightfood is the first brand to achieve mainstream distribution of snacks focused on better sleep, and expects the category of “sleep-friendly” snacking to become an important segment of the total snacking market in coming years. Munchies has acquired a portfolio of intellectual property around the brand name Half-Baked, and intends to license said IP to operators in the cannabis edibles space and other related spaces.
       
    The Company’s fiscal year end is June 30.
       
    The Company currently maintains its corporate address in Tarrytown, New York.

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Management is responsible for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements, prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

 

  Interim Financial Statements  

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three (3) months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, reflect all adjustments including normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, which are included in the Company’s June 30, 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on October 13, 2020. The Company assumes that the users of the interim financial information herein have read, or have access to, the audited consolidated financial statements for the preceding period, and that the adequacy of additional disclosure needed for a fair presentation may be determined in that context. The results of operations for the three (3) months ended September 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year ending June 30, 2021.

 

We made certain reclassifications to prior period amounts to conform with the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated statement of financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

  Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates are used in the determination of depreciation and amortization, the valuation for non-cash issuances of common stock, and the website, income taxes and contingencies, valuing convertible notes for BCF and derivative liability, among others.

 

F-5

 

 

  Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company classifies as cash and cash equivalents amounts on deposit in the banks and cash temporarily in various instruments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase.
       
  Fair Value of Financial Instruments Statement of financial accounting standard FASB Topic 820, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires that the Company disclose estimated fair values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statements of financial position for assets and liabilities qualifying as financial instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value.
       
  Inventories Inventories consisting of packaged food items and supplies are stated at the lower of cost (FIFO) or net realizable value, including provisions for spoilage commensurate with known or estimated exposures which are recorded as a charge to cost of sales during the period spoilage is incurred. The Company has no minimum purchase commitments with its vendors.

 

  Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed when incurred and are included in advertising and promotional expense in the accompanying statements of operations. Although not traditionally thought of by many as “advertising costs”, the Company includes expenses related to graphic design work, package design, website design, domain names, and product samples in the category of “advertising costs”. The Company reported advertising costs of $185,289 and $198,270 for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively Further, as discussed on footnote 3, due to the reclassification $396,250 expenses was reversed and set off with the advertising costs incurred during 2019. 

       
  Income Taxes The Company has not generated any taxable income, and, therefore, no provision for income taxes has been provided.
       
    Deferred income taxes are reported for timing differences between items of income or expense reported in the financial statements and those reported for income tax purposes in accordance with FASB Topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, which requires the use of the asset/liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes and tax benefits are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for tax loss and credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company provides for deferred taxes for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards when realization is more likely than not.
       
    A valuation allowance has been recorded to fully offset the deferred tax asset even though the Company believes it is more likely than not that the assets will be utilized.
       
    The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the statutory rates associated with taxing jurisdictions because of permanent and temporary timing differences as well as a valuation allowance.
       
  Revenue Recognition The Company generates its revenue by selling its nighttime snack products wholesale to retailers and wholesalers.

 

F-6

 

 

    All sources of revenue are recorded pursuant to FASB Topic 606 Revenue Recognition, to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This includes a five-step framework that requires an entity to: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In addition, this revenue generation requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.
       
    The Company offers sales incentives through various programs, consisting primarily of advertising related credits. The Company records advertising related credits with customers as a reduction to revenue as no identifiable benefit is received in exchange for credits claimed by the customer.  
       
   

The Company revenue from contracts with customers provides that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. 

 

The Company incurs costs associated with product distribution, such as freight and handling costs. The Company has elected to treat these costs as fulfillment activities and recognizes these costs at the same time that it recognizes the underlying product revenue. As this policy election is in line with the Company’s previous accounting practices, the treatment of shipping and handling activities under FASB Topic 606 did not have any impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and/or financial statement disclosures.

 

The adoption of ASC 606 did not result in a change to the accounting for any of the Company’s revenue streams that are within the scope of the amendments. The Company’s services that fall within the scope of ASC 606 are recognized as revenue as the Company satisfies its obligation to the customer.

 

      In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which updates revenue recognition guidance relating to contracts with customers. This standard states that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This standard is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after July 1, 2018. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 and its related amendments (collectively known as “ASC 606”) during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using the full retrospective method.

 

      Management reviewed ASC 606-10-32-25 which states “Consideration payable to a customer includes cash amounts that an entity pays, or expects to pay, to the customer (or to other parties that purchase the entity’s goods or services from the customer). Consideration payable to a customer also includes credit or other items (for example, a coupon or voucher) that can be applied against amounts owed to the entity (or to other parties that purchase the entity’s goods or services from the customer). An entity shall account for consideration payable to a customer as a reduction of the transaction price and, therefore, of revenue unless the payment to the customer is in exchange for a distinct good or service (as described in paragraphs 606-10-25-18 through 25-22) that the customer transfers to the entity. If the consideration payable to a customer includes a variable amount, an entity shall estimate the transaction price (including assessing whether the estimate of variable consideration is constrained) in accordance with paragraphs 606-10-32-5 through 32-13.”

 

      If the consideration payable to a customer is a payment for a distinct good service, then in accordance with ASC 606-10-32-26, the entity should account for it the same way that it accounts for other purchases from suppliers (expense). Further, “if the amount of consideration payable to the customer exceeds the fair value of the distinct good or service that the entity receives from the customer, then the entity shall account for such an excess as a reduction of the transaction price. If the entity cannot reasonably estimate the fair value of the good or service received from the customer, it shall account for all of the consideration payable to the customer as a reduction of the transaction price.”

 

      Under ASC 606-10-32-27, if the consideration payable to a customer is accounted for as a reduction of the transaction price, “an entity shall recognize the reduction of revenue when (or as) the later of either of the following events occurs:
       
      a) The entity recognizes revenue for the transfer of the related goods or services to the customer.
         
      b) The entity pays or promises to pay the consideration (even if the payment is conditional on a future event). That promise might be implied by the entity’s customary business practices.”
         
      Management reviewed each arrangement to determine if each fee paid is for a distinct good or service and should be expensed as incurred or if the Company should recognize the payment as a reduction of revenue.

F-7

 

 

      The Company recognizes revenue upon shipment based on meeting the transfer of control criteria. The Company has made a policy election to treat shipping and handling as costs to fulfill the contract, and as a result, any fees received from customers are included in the transaction price allocated to the performance obligation of providing goods with a corresponding amount accrued within cost of sales for amounts paid to applicable carriers.
       
  Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash deposits at financial institutions. At various times during the year, the Company may exceed the federally insured limits. To mitigate this risk, the Company places its cash deposits only with high credit quality institutions. Management believes the risk of loss is minimal. At September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the Company did not have any uninsured cash deposits.

 

  Beneficial Conversion Feature

For conventional convertible debt where the rate of conversion is below market value, the Company records any “beneficial conversion feature” (“BCF”) intrinsic value as additional paid in capital and related debt discount.

 

When the Company records a BCF, the relative fair value of the BCF is recorded as a debt discount against the face amount of the respective debt instrument. The discount is amortized over the life of the debt. If a conversion of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed.

       
  Debt Issue Costs The Company may pay debt issue costs in connection with raising funds through the issuance of debt whether convertible or not or with other consideration. These costs are recorded as debt discounts and are amortized over the life of the debt to the statement of operations as amortization of debt discount.
       
  Original Issue
Discount
If debt is issued with an original issue discount, the original issue discount is recorded to debt discount, reducing the face amount of the note and is amortized over the life of the debt to the statement of operations as amortization of debt discount. If a conversion of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed.
       
  Valuation of Derivative Instruments ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” requires that embedded derivative instruments be bifurcated and assessed, along with free-standing derivative instruments such as warrants, on their issuance date and measured at their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Trinomial Tree option pricing formula. Upon conversion of a note where the embedded conversion option has been bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative liability, the Company records the shares at fair value, relieves all related notes, derivatives and debt discounts and recognizes a net gain or loss on derivative liability under the line item “change in derivative liability”.
       
  Derivative Financial Instruments The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and then is revalued at each reporting date, with changes in fair value reported in the consolidated statement of operations. For stock based derivative financial instruments, Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Trinomial Tree option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.
       
      Once determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at the end of each reporting period. Any increase or decrease in the fair value from inception is made quarterly and appears in results of operations as a change in fair market value of derivative liabilities.

 

  Stock-Based Compensation   The Company accounts for share-based awards issued to employees in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Accordingly, employee share-based payment compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period.  Additionally, share-based awards to non-employees are expensed over the period in which the related services are rendered at their fair value. The Company applies ASC 718, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees”, with respect to options and warrants issued to non-employees.

 

F-8

 

 

  Customer Concentration During the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company had one customer account for approximately 39% of the gross sales. One other customer accounted for approximately 21% of gross sales, and two other customers accounted for over 9% of gross sales.  During the three months ended September 30, 2019, one customer accounted for approximately 34% of the gross sales while two other customers accounted for over 10% of gross sales.  As the Company continues to grow its distribution base, it is anticipated that revenue distribution will become less concentrated.
       
  Vendor Concentration   During the quarter ended June 30, 2020, three vendors accounted for more than 10% of our operating expenses. During the quarter ended June 30, 2019, two vendors accounted for more than 10% of our operating expenses.
       
  Receivables Concentration As of September 30, 2020, the Company had receivables due from seven customers, two customers of which each accounted for over 20% of the outstanding balance. Three of the other five, each accounted for 10% of the total balance. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had receivables due from seven customers, two of whom accounted for over 20% of the outstanding balance. Four of the other five accounted for over 10% of the total balance.
       
  Income/Loss Per Share Net income/loss per share data for both the three-month periods ending September 30, 2020 and 2019, are based on net income/loss available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average of the number of common shares outstanding. The Company does not present a diluted Earnings per share as the convertible debt and interest that is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock would not be included in this computation, as the Company is generating a loss and therefore these shares would be antidilutive.
       
  Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of FASB Topic 360, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. This statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Fair values are determined based on quoted market value, discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable.

 

During the period ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, the Management determined and impaired $-0- and $-0-, respectively as impairment on intangible asset

     
  Reclassification   The Company may make certain reclassifications to prior period amounts to conform with the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material effect on its consolidated statement of financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
       
  Recent Accounting Pronouncements  

The Company reviews all of the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s updates periodically to ensure the Company’s compliance of its accounting policies and disclosure requirements to the Codification Topics.

 

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, to establish ASC Topic 606, (ASC 606). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance includes a five-step framework that requires an entity to: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. 

 

F-9

 

 

     

The standard became effective for us beginning on July 1, 2018 and did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which requires all investments in equity securities with readily determinable fair value to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee). ASU 2016-01 is intended to enhance the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information and removes the requirement to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. For public companies, the new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within the fiscal year. For all other entities, including emerging growth companies, ASU 2016-01 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company evaluated the impact on the financial statements and implemented the provisions of ASU 2016-01 for the annual financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2020.  This new standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements or related disclosures.

       
     

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and subsequently amended the guidance relating largely to transition considerations under the standard in January 2017, to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. Most prominent among the changes in the standard is the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under current U.S. GAAP. Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. We will be required to recognize and measure leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented using a modified retrospective approach, with certain practical expedients available.

 

The standard became effective for us beginning July 1, 2019. We have reviewed this and have determined that there is no material impact on our financial statements.

       
      In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity and Derivatives and Hedging, which changes the accounting and earnings per share for certain instruments with down round features. The amendments in this ASU should be applied using a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the fiscal year or retrospective adjustment to each period presented and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those periods. We adopted this guidance effective July 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not materially impact our financial statements and related disclosures.
       
      In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASC Update No 2018-02 (Topic 220) Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income: Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.  This ASC update allows for a reclassification into retained earnings of the stranded tax effects in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) resulting from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”). The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018.  We adopted this guidance effective July 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not materially impact our financial statements and related disclosures.
       
     

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, to expand the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees and supersedes the guidance in Subtopic 505-50, Equity - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Under ASU 2018-07, equity-classified nonemployee share-based payment awards are measured at the grant date fair value on the grant date The probability of satisfying performance conditions must be considered for equity-classified nonemployee share-based payment awards with such conditions. ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this guidance effective July 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not materially impact our financial statements and related disclosures.

 

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-09 to provide clarification and correction of errors to the Codification. The amendments in this update cover multiple Accounting Standards Updates. Some topics in the update may require transition guidance with effective dates for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We adopted this guidance effective July 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not materially impact our financial statements and related disclosures.

       
      The Company will continue to monitor these emerging issues to assess any potential future impact on its financial statements.

 

F-10

 

 

3. Restatement of Prior Financial Information   Subsequent to Form 10K for the year ended June 30, 2019 filing, during the interim reviews and based on such reviews, the following determinations were made by the Company:
       
      Error in Accounting for Slotting and Set-up Fees
       
      During our review, we determined that the accounting treatment for the recognition of slotting fees and other fees paid or payable by the Company to certain strategic partners was incorrect. Specifically, it was determined that revenue relating to slotting fees, which were originally capitalized and amortized into expense over an 18-month period, should instead be treated as a reduction in revenue at the later of recognition of revenue for the transfer of the Nightfood product or when the Company pays or promised to pay the slotting fee. In addition, certain fees related to platforms to launch our products and advertising efforts should have been capitalized and recorded as an intangible asset. The Company previously recorded a portion of this fee as an intangible asset – placement fee and expensed the remaining amount as advertising expense in the Period Ended December 31, 2019.
       
      In accordance with the guidance provided by the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 99, Materiality (“SAB 99”) and Staff Accounting Bulletin 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements (“SAB 108”), the Company has determined that the impact of adjustments relating to the corrections of this accounting error are not material to previously issued annual audited and unaudited financial statements. Accordingly, these changes are disclosed herein and will be disclosed prospectively.

 

    As of June 30, 2019 (A)  
    Previously
Reported
    Adjustments     As Corrected  
Consolidated Balance Sheet                  
Current assets   $ 482,667     $ 487,500     $ 970,167  
Current liabilities   $ 2,955,272     $ 223,333     $ 3,178,605  
Working capital (deficit)   $ (2,472,605 )   $ 264,167     $ (2,208,438 )
Total assets   $ 482,667     $ 487,500     $ 970,167  
Total liabilities   $ 2,955,272     $ 223,333     $ 3,178,605  
Total stockholders' deficit   $ (2,472,605 )   $ 264,167     $ (2,208,438 )

 

(A) The balance sheet impact of the errors was corrected in the quarter ended September 30, 2019.

 

    As of September 30, 2019  
    Previously
Reported
    Adjustments     As Corrected  
Consolidated Balance Sheet                  
Current assets   $ 858,216     $ 387,917     $ 1,246,133  
Current liabilities   $ 3,287,252     $ 1,151,666     $ 4,438,918  
Working capital (deficit)   $ (2,429,036 )   $ (763,749 )   $ (3,192,785 )
Total assets   $ 858,216     $ 1,221,250     $ 2,079,466  
Total liabilities   $ 3,287,252     $ 1,151,666     $ 4,438,918  
Total stockholders' deficit   $ (2,429,036 )   $ 69,584     $ (2,359,452 )  

 

F-11

 

 

    For the Year Ended June 30, 2019 (A)  
    Previously Reported     Adjustments     As Corrected  
Consolidated Statements of Operations                  
Revenues   $ 352,172     $ -     $ 352,172  
Operating expenses   $ 2,263,722     $ (264,167 )   $ 1,999,555  
Loss from operations   $ (1,911,550 )   $ 264,167     $ (1,647,383 )
Other income (expenses)   $ 2,686,793     $ -     $ 2,686,793  
Net income (loss)   $ (4,598,343 )   $ 264,167     $ (4,334,176 )
Basic & diluted EPS   $ (0.09 )   $ -     $ (0.09 )

 

(A) The income statement impact of the errors was corrected in the quarter ended September 30, 2019.

 

   

For the Three Months Ended

September 30, 2019

 
    Previously Reported     Adjustments     As Corrected  
Consolidated Statements of Operations                  
Revenues   $ 206,497     $ (160,000 )   $ 46,497  
Operating expenses   $ 570,858     $ (229,584 )   $ 341,274  
Loss from operations   $ (364,361 )   $ 69,584     $ (294,777 )
Other income (expenses)   $ 218,803     $ -     $ 218,803  
Net income (loss)   $ (583,164 )   $ 69,584     $ (513,580 )
Basic & diluted EPS   $ (0.01 )   $ -     $ (0.01 )

 

F-12

 

 

3. Going Concern The Company’s financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. Because the business is new and has limited operating history and relatively few sales, no certainty of continuation can be stated.

 

    The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. For the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company had a net loss of $943,824, negative cash flow from operations and other expenses related to financing activities of $368,159 and accumulated deficit of $18,574,946. Management is taking steps to raise additional funds to address its operating and financial cash requirements to continue operations in the next twelve months. Management has devoted a significant amount of time in the raising of capital from additional debt and equity financing. However, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon raising additional funds through debt and equity financing and generating revenue. There are no assurances the Company will receive the necessary funding or generate revenue necessary to fund operations.
       
    The Company has limited available cash resources and we do not believe our cash on hand will be adequate to satisfy our ongoing working capital needs. The Company is continuing to raise capital through private placement of our common stock and through the use of convertible notes to finance the Company’s operations, of which it can give no assurance of success. However, the Company has a strong ongoing relationship with Eagle Equities and we expect to be able to continue to finance our operations as we have over the previous several quarters, although no assurance can be guaranteed. We believe that our current capitalization structure, combined with ongoing increases in revenues, will enable us to successfully secure required financing to continue our growth. In the short term, the Company plans to continue to utilize convertible notes as a financing vehicle, as it allows for today’s operating capital to be either repaid, or converted to equity at future valuations.
       
      Because the business is new and has limited operating history and sales, no certainty of continuation can be stated. Management has devoted a significant amount of time in the raising of capital from additional debt and equity financing. However, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon raising additional funds through debt and equity financing and generating revenue. There are no assurances the Company will receive the necessary funding or generate revenue necessary to fund operations.
       
      Even if the Company is successful in raising additional funds, the Company cannot give any assurance that it will, in the future, be able to achieve a level of profitability from the sale of its products to sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on recoverability and reclassification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

4. Accounts receivable The Company’s accounts receivable arise primarily from the sale of the Company’s ice cream. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates each customer account and based on the days outstanding of the receivable, history of past write-offs, collections, and current credit conditions, writes off accounts it considers uncollectible. With most of our retail and distribution partners, invoices will typically be due in 30 days. The Company does not accrue interest on past due accounts and the Company does not require collateral. Accounts become past due on an account-by-account basis. Determination that an account is uncollectible is made after all reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted. The Company has not provided any accounts receivable allowances for September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, respectively.

 

F-13

 

 

5. Inventories Inventory consists of the following at September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020,

 

    September 30,
2020
    June 30,
2020
 
Finished goods – ice cream   $ 141,602     $ 195,817  
Raw material – ingredients     24,515       26,309  
Packaging     47,267       53,479  
TOTAL   $ 213,384     $ 275,605  

 

      Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The Company periodically reviews the value of items in inventory and provides write-downs or write-offs of inventory based on its assessment of market conditions and the products relative shelf life. Write-downs and write-offs are charged to loss on inventory write down.

 

6. Other current assets Other current assets consist of the following vendor deposits at September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020.  The majority of this amount relates to deposits towards distribution and marketing partnerships,

  

    September 30,
2020
    June 30,
2020
 
Prepaid advertising costs   $ 263,822     $ 398,045  
Vendor deposits – Other   $ 8,210     $ 40  
TOTAL   $ 272,032     $ 398,085  

 

7. Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets consist of the following at September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020. The amount of the intangible assets represents fees and expenses in connection with the development and launch of platforms used to track conversions, optimize ads, and scale online customer growth through a hybrid distribution model.

 

    September 30,     June 30,  
    2020     2020  
Intangible assets   $ -     $ 1,000,000  
Amortization of intangible assets             -     (500,000 )
Impairment of intangible assets     -     (500,000 )
TOTAL   $ -     $ -  

 

During the quarter ending March 31, 2020, the Company determined it would be unable to generate sufficient traction from these digital assets. The Company made the decision to stop utilizing the assets and began conversations with the creditor about eliminating the remaining debt associated with the assets which was successfully negotiated in April 2020. As of the time of this filing, the balance sheet remains unchanged, as this successful renegotiation is conditional upon payment being completed prior to December 1, 2020, which would result in the elimination of $731,118 in total debt should payment be made totaling $166,224 in cash and approximately 4,000 pints of Nightfood ice cream. Should the Company make said payments and retire the debt prior to December 1, 2020, the Company would realize a Gain on Extinguishment of Debt of approximately $560,000. Because this reduction in debt is conditional, the full $731,118 is currently included in the liabilities section of our balance sheet.

 

F-14

 

 

8. Other Current Liabilities Other current liabilities consist of the following at September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020,

 

    September 30,
2020
    June 30,
2020
 
Accrued consulting fees – related party   $ 9,974     $ 9,974  
Accrued interest     214,402       192,625  
Accrued slotting fees     56,923       -  
TOTAL   $ 281,299     $ 202,599  

 

9. Notes Payable Notes Payable consist of the following at September 30, 2020,

 

      On April 30, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated April 30, 2018, in the amount of $225,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of April 30, 2019 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 60% of the lowest closing bid price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $225,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $287,174, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.24%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 202%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note exceeded the net proceeds from the $225k Notes, a charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note, for a net charge of $62,174. As of September 30, 2020, and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $0.

 

     

On November 16, 2018, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated November 16, 2018, in the amount of $130,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of November 16, 2019 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 65% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $130,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $131,898, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.71%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 150%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note exceeded the net proceeds from the $130k Notes, a charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note, for a net charge of $1,898.

 

This note has been successfully retired via conversion into shares during the three months ended September 30, 2019. The Company fair valued the notes as of conversion date and accounted for a gain on conversion of $25,398 included under line item “change in derivative liability” and also, reclassed the related $74,472 derivative liability balance into additional paid in capital.

 

      On February 14, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated February 14, 2019, in the amount of $104,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of February 14, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $104,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $90,567, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.53%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 136%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note did not exceed the net proceeds from the $104k Notes, no charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note.  As of September 30, 2020, and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $0 and $0, respectively. $50,000 of the note has been successfully retired via conversion into shares during the year ended June 30, 2020 and $54,000 of the note has been successfully retired via conversion into shares during the three months ended September 30, 2020.The Company fair valued the notes as of conversion date and accounted for a loss on conversion of $4,098 included under line item “Loss on debt extinguishment upon note conversion, net” during 2020 fiscal year and accounted for a loss on conversion of $36,242.

 

F-15

 

 

      On April 29, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated April 29, 2019, in the amount of $208,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of April 29, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $208,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $170,098, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.42%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 118%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note did not exceed the net proceeds from the $208k Notes, no charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note. As of September 30, 2020, and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $0 and $0, respectively. $208,000 of the note has been successfully retired via conversion into shares during the three months ended September 30, 2020. The Company fair valued the notes as of conversion date and accounted for a loss on conversion of $109,561 included under line item “Loss on debt extinguishment upon note conversion, net”.

  

      On June 11, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated June 11, 2019, in the amount of $300,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of June 11, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $300,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $240,217, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 2.05%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 16%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note did not exceed the net proceeds from the $300k Notes, no charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note.  As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $0 and $46,726, respectively. The Company fair valued the notes as of conversion date and accounted for a loss on conversion of $42,595 included under line item “Loss on debt extinguishment upon note conversion, net”.
       
      On July 5, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated July 5, 2019, in the amount of $300,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of July 5, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $300,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $239,759, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.98%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 118%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note did not exceed the net proceeds from the $300k Notes, no charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note.  As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $0 and $2,627, respectively.
       
      On August 8, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated August 8, 2019, in the amount of $300,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of August 8, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $300,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $254,082, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.79%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 113%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note did not exceed the net proceeds from the $300k Notes, no charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note.  As of September 30, 2020, and June 30, 2020 the debt discount was $0 and $26,452, respectively.

 

F-16

 

 

      On August 29, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated August 29, 2019, in the amount of $300,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of August 29, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $300,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $234,052, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.75%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 113%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note did not exceed the net proceeds from the $300k Notes, no charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note.  As of September 30, 2020, and June 30, 2020 the debt discount was $0 and $37,833.

 

      On September 24, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated September 24, 2019, in the amount of $150,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of September 24, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $150,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $118,009, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.78%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 113%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note did not exceed the net proceeds from the $150k Notes, no charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note.  As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $0 and $27,482.
       
      On November 7, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated November 7, 2019, in the amount of $150,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of November 7, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $150,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $121,875, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.58%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 122%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note did not exceed the net proceeds from the $150k Notes, no charge was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note.  As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $12,354 and $43,074, respectively.
       
      On December 31, 2019, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated December 31, 2019, in the amount of $150,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of December 31, 2020 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $150,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $189,172, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.59%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 115%, and expected dividend yield of zero. Because the fair value of the note exceeded the net proceeds from the $150k Notes, $39,172 was recorded to “Financing cost” for the excess of the fair value of the note.  As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $37,797 and $75,205, respectively.

 

F-17

 

 

     

On February 6, 2020, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated February 6, 2020, in the amount of $200,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of February 6, 2021 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $200,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $156,061, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.51%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 113%, and expected dividend yield of zero.  As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $54,728 and $94,064, respectively.

 

On February 26, 2020, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated February 26, 2020, in the amount of $187,000. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of February 6, 2021 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 70% of the lowest trading price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the fifteen (15) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $187,000 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $150,268, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 1.18%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 118%, and expected dividend yield of zero. As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $61,342 and $99,218, respectively.

       
      On April 30, 2020, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated April 30, 2020, in the amount of $205,700. This note carried an Original Discount of 10% or $18,700 which was included in interest expense at the time of valuation. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of April 30, 2021 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 78% of the lowest closing bid price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $205,700 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $128,369, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.16%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 106%, and expected dividend yield of zero. As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $74,560 and $106,916, respectively.

 

F-18

 

 

      On June 23, 2020, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated June 23, 2020, in the amount of $205,700. This note carried an Original Discount of 10% or $18,700 which was included in interest expense at the time of valuation. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of June 23, 2021 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 78% of the lowest closing bid price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $205,700 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $132,236, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.18%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 108%, and expected dividend yield of zero. As of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, the debt discount was $96,369 and $129,700, respectively.
       
      On August 12, 2020, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and a security purchase agreement dated August 12, 2020, in the amount of $205,700. This note carried an Original Discount of 10% or $18,700 which was included in interest expense at the time of valuation. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC. The notes have a maturity of August 12, 2021 and interest rate of 8% per annum and are convertible at a price of 78% of the lowest closing bid price on the primary trading market on which the Company’s Common Stock is then listed for the twenty (20) trading days immediately prior to conversion. The note may be prepaid, but carries a penalty in association with the remittance amount, as there is an accretion component to satisfy the note with cash. The convertible note qualifies for derivative accounting and bifurcation under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The fair value of the $205,700 Notes was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model at $126,029, with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 0.13%, expected life of 1 year, volatility of 101%, and expected dividend yield of zero. As of September 30, 2020, the debt discount was $109,110.

 

Below is a reconciliation of the convertible notes payable as presented on the Company’s balance sheet as of September 30, 2020:

 

    Principal
($)
    Debt Discount ($)     Net
Value
($)
 
Balance at June 30, 2019     1,748,000       (630,259 )     1,117,741  
Convertible notes payable issued during fiscal year ended June 30, 2020     2,148,400       -       2,148,400  
Notes converted into shares of common stock     (961,000 )     -       (961,000 )
Debt discount associated with new convertible notes     -       (1,684,711 )     (1,684,711 )
Amortization of debt discount     -       1,709,759       1,709,759  
Balance at June 30, 2020     2,935,400       (605,211 )     2,330,189  
Convertible notes payable issued during three months ended September 30, 2020     205,700       -       205,700  
Notes converted into shares of common stock     (347,000 )     -       (347,000 )
Debt discount associated with new convertible notes     -       (126,029 )     (126,029 )
Amortization of debt discount     -       322,739       322,739  
True-up adjustment in debt discount and derivative liability     -       (37,360)       (37,360)  
Balance at September 30, 2020     2,794,100       (445,861 )     2,348,239  

 

10. Derivative Liability   Due to the variable conversion price associated with some of these convertible promissory notes disclosed in Note 8 above, the Company has determined that the conversion feature is considered a derivative liability for instruments which are convertible and have not yet been settled. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the fair value of the derivatives on the date they are deemed to be derivative liabilities.
       
      During the three month period ended September 30, 2020, the Company recorded a change in fair value of derivative $207,524. The Company will measure the fair value of each derivative instrument in future reporting periods and record the change based on the change in fair value.

 

      Below is a reconciliation of the derivative liability as presented on the Company’s balance sheet as of September 30, 2020:

 

Derivative liability as of June 30, 2019   $ 1,306,748  
Initial derivative liability accounted for convertible notes payable issued during the period ended June 30, 2019     1,723,883  
Change in derivative liability during the period     (858,774 )
Reclassify derivative liability associated with Notes converted     (581,219 )
Derivative liability as of June 30, 2020   $ 1,590,638  
Initial derivative liability accounted for convertible notes payable issued during the period ended September  30, 2020     126,029  
True-up adjustment in debt discount and derivative liability     37,360  
Change in derivative liability during the period     (207,524 )
Reclassify derivative liability associated with Notes converted     (189,257)  
Balance at September 30, 2020   $ 1,357,245  

  

F-19

 

 

11. Line of Credit   On March 19, 2020, the Company secured a $200,000 line of credit with Celtic Bank Corporation. This LOC has a “Flex Credit” component of calculating interest, which means the interest rate on any draws taken against the LOC is set at the time of said draw. As of the date of this filing, the Company has made one draw against the credit line for a gross amount of $5,000 (including proceeds and draw fees). As of September 30, 2020, six payments had been made against this draw of approximately $368 each. Such payments will continue to be automatically deducted from the corporate checking account until the draw and all fees have been paid in full. The Company may or may not choose to use this line of credit for additional financing needs.

 

    Sept. 30,
2020
    June 30,
2020
 
Line of Credit   $ 2,794     $ 3,897  
Total borrowings     2,794       3,897  
Less: current portion     2,794       3,897  
Long term debt   $ -     $ -  

 

      Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, totaled $337 and $0, respectively.

 

12. Capital Stock Activity The Company had 65,085,597 and 61,796,680 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020 respectively.
       
    During the three months ended September 30, 2020 the Company issued 2,975,979 shares in regards to debt being converted into stock valued at $347,000, and issued 312,938 shares of common stock valued at $36,478 as part of a loan agreement and payment of interest as part of the debt conversion.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2019 the Company issued 122,762 shares of common stock for services valued at $49,397, issued 1,409,349 shares in regards to debt being converted into stock valued at $337,000, and issued 110,404 shares of common stock valued at $26,598 as part of a loan agreement and payment of interest as part of the debt conversion.

 

13. Warrants   The following is a summary of the Company’s outstanding common stock purchase warrants.  Of the 500,000 warrants shown below at an exercise price of $.15, these warrants were issued as compensation for a four-year advisory agreement.  150,000 warrants vested on July 24, 2018, another 150,000 on July 24, 2019, another 150,000 vested on July 24, 2020, and the remaining 50,000 will vest on July 24, 2021, should advisor complete the term of his engagement. These warrants were all accounted for in Fiscal 2020.
       
     

During the three months ended September 30, 2020 the Company entered into a warrant agreement with one of the Company’s vendors issuing 500,000 warrants at a strike price of $0.50 having a term of five years. The Company valued these warrants using the Black Scholes model utilizing a 107.93% volatility and a risk-free rate of 0.29%

       
      The aggregate intrinsic value of the warrants as of September 30, 2020 is $-0-.

 

      Outstanding at                 Outstanding  
Exercise Price     June 30,
2020
    Issued / (Exercised) in 2020     Expired     September 30
2020
 
$ 0.15       500,000       -       -       500,000  
$ 0.20       105,000       -       -       105,000  
$ 0.30       100,000       -       -       100,000  
$ 0.40       150,000       -       -       150,000  
$ 0.50       -       500,000       -       500,000  
$ 0.75       300,000       -       -       300,000  
          1,155,000       500,000       -       1,655,000  

 

F-20

 

 

14. Fair Value of Financial Instruments   Cash and Equivalents, Receivables, Other Current Assets, Short-Term Debt, Accounts Payable, Accrued and Other Current Liabilities.
       
      The carrying amounts of these items approximated fair value.
       
      Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. To increase the comparability of fair value measures, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 820-10-35 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements).
       
      Level 1—Valuations based on quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets.
       
      Level 2—Valuations based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
       
      Level 3—Valuations based on unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants. These valuations require significant judgment.
       
      The application of the three levels of the fair value hierarchy under Topic 820-10-35 to our assets and liabilities are described below:

 

    September 30, 2020 Fair Value Measurements  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total Fair
Value
 
Assets                        
Other assets   $           -     $           -     $ -     $ -  
Total   $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Liabilities                                
Short and long-term debt   $       $ -     $ 2,794,100     $ 2,794,100  
Total   $       $ -     $ 2,794,100     $ 2,794,100  

 

    Fiscal 2019 Fair Value Measurements  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total Fair
Value
 
Assets                        
Other assets   $ -     $           -     $ -     $ -  
Total   $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Liabilities                                
Short and long-term debt   $       $ -     $ 2,935,400     $ 2,935,400  
Total   $                $ -     $ 2,935,400     $ 2,935,400  

 

    Fiscal 2020 Fair Value Measurements  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total Fair
Value
 
Assets                        
Other assets   $ -     $           -     $ -     $ -  
Total   $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Liabilities                                
Derivative Liabilities   $       $ -     $ 1,357,245     $ 1,357,245  
Total   $                $ -     $ 1,357,245     $ 1,357,245  

 

    Fiscal 2020 Fair Value Measurements  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total Fair
Value
 
Assets                        
Other assets   $           -     $           -     $ -     $ -  
Total   $ -     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Liabilities                                
Derivative Liabilities   $       $ -     $ 1,590,638     $ 1,590,638  
Total   $       $ -     $ 1,590,638     $ 1,590,638  

 

Management considers all of its derivative liabilities to be Level 3 liabilities. At September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, respectively the Company had outstanding derivative liabilities, including those from related parties of $1,357,245 and $1,590,638, respectively.

F-21

 

 

15. Commitments and Contingencies:     The Company has entered into certain consulting agreements which carry commitments to pay advisors and consultants should certain events occur. An agreement is in place with one Company Advisor that calls for total compensation over the four year Advisor Agreement of 500,000 warrants with an exercise price of $.15 of which 450,000 have vested, should the advisor complete the entire term of the engagement, the remaining 50,000 warrants would vest on July 24, 2021. 
       
      In April, 2020, the Company successfully negotiated a Debt Incentive Agreement with one of its creditors to whom it owed $731,118. This Debt Incentive Agreement provides for the elimination of the entire debt should the Company make payments in calendar 2020 totaling $166,224 in cash, and approximately 4,000 pints of ice cream. Because this reduction in debt is conditional, the full $731,118 is currently included in the liabilities section of our balance sheet. Should the Company make the payment and retire the debt during calendar 2020, The Company would realize a Gain on Extinguishment of Debt of approximately $560,000.

 

     

Additional Consulting agreements call for certain Consultants to receive cash and stock bonuses for directly assisting the Company in hitting certain operational milestones, such as national television publicity, achieving revenues of $500,000 monthly, $1,000,000 monthly, and $3,000,000 quarterly.

 

CEO Sean Folkson has a consulting agreement which will reward him with 1,000,000 warrants at a strike price of $.50 when the Company records its first quarter with revenues over $1,000,000, an additional 3,000,000 warrants with a $.50 strike price when the Company records its first quarter with revenues over $3,000,000, and an additional 3,000,000 warrants with a $1 strike price when the Company records its first quarter with revenues over $5,000,000.

       
16. Related Party Transactions

During the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2015, Mr. Folkson began accruing a consulting fee of $6,000 per month which the aggregate of $18,000 is reflected in professional fees for the three month period ended September 30, 2020 and reflected in the accrued expenses – related party with a balance of $9,974 and $9,974 at September 30, 2020 and June 30, 2020, respectively.

 

On December 8, 2017, Mr. Folkson purchased Warrants, at a cost of $.15 per Warrant, to acquire up to 80,000 additional shares of NGTF stock at a strike price of $.20, and with a term of three (3) years from the date of said agreement. This purchase resulted in a reduction in the accrued consulting fees due him by $12,000. During the second quarter 2019 Mr. Folkson purchased 400,000 shares of stock at a strike price of $0.30 per share, valued at $120,000 which was charged to his accrual. During the three months ended September 30, 2020, Folkson had been paid $18,000 against his total accrued balance to date.

 

    In addition, the Company made bonuses available to Folkson upon the Company hitting certain revenue milestones of $1,000,000 in a quarter, $3,000,000 in a quarter, and $5,000,000 in a quarter.   Achieving those milestones would earn Folkson warrants with a $.50 and $1 strike price which would need to be exercised within 90 days of the respective quarterly or annual filing

 

17. Subsequent Events On October 13, 2020 the Company entered into a convertible promissory note and security purchase agreement dated and funded October 13, 2020, in the amount of $205,700. The lender was Eagle Equities, LLC.
       
   

Between the dates of October 1, 2020 and November 20, 2020, noteholder Eagle Equities converted a total of $133,533 of principal and interest from outstanding notes to Company stock. The average conversion price in these transactions was $.079. 1,697,409 shares were issued to the noteholder in these transactions. 

 

F-22

 

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT INFORMATION

 

Certain statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, and use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “project,” “will” and other words of similar meaning. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions, technological developments related to business support services and outsourced business processes, and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control.

 

Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein particularly in view of the current state of our operations, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a statement by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth under the headings “Business” and “Risk Factors” within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, as well as the other information set forth herein.

 

OVERVIEW

 

Nightfood Holdings runs two distinct operating companies, each serving a different market segment with different products.

 

MJ Munchies, Inc. is a Nevada corporation formed in January of 2018 to exploit legally compliant opportunities in the CBD and marijuana edibles and related spaces. To date, this subsidiary and its operations have had a nominal impact on the financial statements contained herein.

 

Since inception, MJ Munchies has applied for U.S. Trademark protection the brand name Half-Baked as it relates to certain categories of snacks. The Company also applied for, and was granted, trademark protection in the state of California for the name Half-Baked for snacks containing THC. In addition, The Company acquired HalfBaked.com, and has secured other intellectual property in its portfolio. The Company intends to license this IP to operators in the cannabis edibles space and other related spaces.

 

Nightfood, Inc. is a better-for-you snack company focused on manufacturing and distributing snacks with sleep-friendly formulations and ingredients. The national roll-out of Nightfood ice cream, the first Nightfood product with significant mainstream retail distribution, began in 2019. The Company has since secured distribution in multiple regional supermarket chains, and divisions of national supermarket chains, including divisions of Kroger (Harris Teeter), and divisions of Albertsons (Jewel-Osco, Shaw’s and Star Market).

 

Nightfood ice cream won the 2019 Product of the Year award in the ice cream category in a Kantar survey of over 40,000 consumers. The brand also won Best New Ice Cream at the 2019 World Dairy Innovation Awards. In early 2019, the Company proactively secured trademark protection for the Nightfood brand in several strategic international markets.

 

Management believes consumer demand exists for better nighttime snacking options, and that a new consumer category consisting of nighttime specific snacks will emerge in the coming years. This belief is supported by research from major consumer goods research firms such as IRI Worldwide, and Mintel, who identified nighttime specific foods and beverages as one of the “most compelling and category changing trends” for 2017 and beyond. In recent years, CEO’s and other executives from major consumer goods conglomerates such as Nestle, PepsiCo, Mondelez, and Kellogg’s have commented on consumer nighttime snack habits and the opportunity that exists in solving this problem for the marketplace.

 

In addition to those high-profile public statements, significant strategic interest in the nighttime and sleep-friendly nutrition space has been directly affirmed to Management in recent exploratory discussions initiated by a certain global food and beverage conglomerate. Management anticipates that the multi-national food and beverage companies will necessarily be drawn to the category Nightfood is pioneering because of the volume of nighttime snacking that occurs globally, and the importance of quality sleep to consumers around the world. Growth within the category that Nightfood is creating can bring competitive risk, but also the opportunity that comes with being the pioneer of a growing market segment and the strategic value that the Nightfood brand could deliver to a global partner with significant resources.

 

It is estimated that over $50 billion is spent annually in the United States on snacks that are consumed between dinner and bed. Company management believes that a meaningful percentage of that consumer spend will move from conventional snacks over to nighttime specific, sleep-friendly snacks in coming years.

 

2

 

 

The Nightfood Scientific Advisory Board is made up of leading sleep and nutrition experts, who help Nightfood deliver on its brand promise. The first member of this advisory board was Dr. Michael Grandner, Director of the Sleep and Health Research Program at the University of Arizona. Dr. Grandner has been conducting research on the link between nutrition and sleep for over ten years, and he believes improved nighttime nutritional choices can improve sleep, resulting in many short and long-term health benefits. In March of 2018, the Company added Dr. Michael Breus to their Scientific Advisory Board. Breus, known to millions as The Sleep Doctor™, is believed to be the Nation’s most prominent authority on sleep. He regularly appears in the national media to educate and inform consumers so they can sleep better and lead happier, healthier, more productive lives. In July, 2018, we added Lauren Broch, Ph.D, M.S. Dr. Broch is a sleep therapist and former Director of Education & Training at the Sleep-Wake Disorders Center at Weill Cornell Medical College. Dr. Broch also has a master’s degree in human nutrition. This unique combination allowed her to play an important role in the development of Nightfood ice cream. These experts work with Company management to ensure Nightfood products deliver on their nighttime-appropriate, and sleep-friendly promises.

 

In February 2020, Nightfood was named the Official Ice Cream of the American Pregnancy Association. Compared to regular ice cream, Nightfood is higher in calcium, magnesium, zinc, protein and fiber, and contains less sugar, fewer calories, and is lower glycemic. Ease of digestion and the impact of nighttime heartburn were also considerations that went in to Nightfood’s formulations. Management believes the designation and recommendation from the American Pregnancy Association could expose the brand to a large base of new consumers and drive a volume of new demand that will support an effective national roll-out of the ice cream line.

 

DEVELOPMENT PLANS

 

Nightfood has nine ice cream flavors in ongoing production, and an additional ten products have been developed or in late stages of development. Management has also done preliminary research on CBD infused ice cream, current FDA guidelines do not permit CBD to be used as an additive in conventional food. While Management has interest in such a development, it is likely such products will not be allowed under FDA guidelines for several quarters.

 

Nightfood is currently available in over 750 supermarket locations, and Management is expecting a meaningful increase in points of distribution in early 2021. Management believes that current marketing initiatives and existing sales velocity trends, along with securing the designation of being the Official Ice Cream of the American Pregnancy Association all bode well for securing additional expansion of the Nightfood brand. 

 

Aggressive supermarket expansion could result in additional “slotting fees”. Slotting fees are normal and customary in the consumer goods industry and are fees that certain retailers and distributors charge to introduce a new product into their available assortment.

 

In some cases, slotting fees, also called “new item placement fees” or “new item placement allowances” can be nominal. In other situations, slotting fees for certain retail and distribution partners could run hundreds of thousands of dollars. Slotting fees are not an auction for shelf (or freezer) space. One brand does not outbid others to get on shelf. Different retailers have established different standard slotting, and that is simply the cost of doing business with those specific partners.

 

Many large retailers do not charge slotting fees, but most do. The Management of any emerging brand could choose not to do business with retailers or distributors who charge slotting fees. Such a strategy, while possible, would greatly limit the distribution footprint a brand could establish. Investors should have the expectation that slotting fees will continue to be a significant investment over the next one to three fiscal years as the Nightfood brand moves towards its goal of national distribution.

 

Management had previously invested in initiatives relating to distribution and partnerships in the hotel and hospitality vertical. With COVID-19 and its impact on the travel habits of consumers, these initiatives have been impaired and put on hold at this time.

 

INFLATION

 

Inflation can be expected to have an impact on our operating costs. A prolonged period of inflation could cause a general economic downturn and negatively impact our results. However, the effect of inflation has been minimal over the past three years.

 

SEASONALITY

 

There is a significant amount of seasonality in the ice cream industry, with summer months historically delivering the highest consumption. As an early-stage and growing brand, it is unknown how seasonality will impact our brand at this time.

 

3

 

 

CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

 

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), including the measures to reduce its spread, and the impact on the economy, cannot fully be predicted. Indications to date are that there are somewhat offsetting factors relating to the impact on our Company. Industry data shows that supermarket sales remain up, with more people spending more time at home. Anecdotally and statistically, snacking activity is also up while consumers are reporting a decrease in sleep quality and sleep satisfaction. Industry sales data also shows ice cream as one of the categories experiencing the largest increase with year over year growth averaging over 30% through a series of five one-week periods between March 15 and April 12, 2020 according to IRI data.

 

The offsetting factors are the impact of the virus on the overall economy. Greater unemployment, recession, and other possible unforeseen factors could also have an impact. Research indicates that consumers are less likely to try new brands during economic recession and stress, returning to value and legacy brands.

 

With consumers generally making fewer shopping trips, while buying more on those occasions and reverting back to more familiar brands, certain brand-launch marketing tactics, such as in-store displays and product sampling, are either impaired or impermissible. So, while overall night snacking demand is up, and consumer need/desire for better sleep is also stronger, driving consumer trial and adoption has been more difficult and expensive during these circumstances.

 

From both public statements, and recent exploratory meetings conducted between Nightfood Management and certain global food and beverage conglomerates, it has been affirmed to Management that there is increased strategic interest in the nighttime nutrition space as a potential high-growth opportunity, partially due to recent declines in consumer sleep quality and increases in at-home nighttime snacking.

 

We have experienced no major issues with supply chain or logistics. Order processing function has been normal to date, and our manufacturers have assured us that their operations are “business as usual” as of the time of this filing.

 

While the virus temporarily disrupted the category review schedules and sell-in process for certain supermarket decision-makers during the spring and early summer, most major accounts seem to be back on schedule and are conducting business as usual with regard to review cycles. Meetings are now conducted virtually, and product samples are shipped to decision-makers. While some retailers told us they were limiting new item additions due to changes in consumer shopping behavior, others have confirmed that they view the increase in at-home entertainment and night snacking as a plus for Nightfood products.

 

It is possible that the fallout from the pandemic could make it more difficult in the future for the Company to access required growth capital, possibly rendering us unable to meet certain debts and expenses.

 

It is impossible to know what the future holds with regard to the virus, both for our company and in the broader sense. There are many uncertainties regarding the current coronavirus pandemic, and the Company is closely monitoring the impact of the pandemic on all aspects of its business, including how it will impact its customers, vendors, and business partners. It is difficult to know if the pandemic has materially impacted the results of operations, and we are unable to predict the impact that COVID-19 will have on our financial position and operating results due to numerous uncertainties. The Company expects to continue to assess the evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and intends to make adjustments accordingly, if necessary.

 

4

 

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED

 

September 30, 2020 and 2019.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 we had Net Revenues (Net Revenues are defined as Gross Sales, less Slotting Fees, Sales Discounts, and certain other revenue reductions) of $126,983 and $46,497 respectively and incurred an operating loss of $536,043 and $294,777 respectively.

 

In the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company recorded Gross Sales of $319,324, the highest quarterly gross sales in company history. Accounting standards require exclusion on the income statement of Gross Sales made to a customer to whom the Company is paying slotting fees (slotting fees are fees occasionally charged by retailers and distributors to add a new product into their product assortment). In those situations, the Gross Sales number is reduced, dollar for dollar, by the slotting fees, until the total cost of the slotting is covered. These slotting fees do not appear on the income statement as an expense. Rather, Slotting Fees, along with Sales Discounts, are applied against Gross Sales, resulting in Net Revenue, as shown below. The netting of Gross Sales against slotting and sales discounts, as described and shown below, results in the Net Revenue number at the top of the income statement. This is not a reflection of the amount of product shipped to customers, but rather a function of the way certain sales are accounted for when those sales are made to customers who are charging slotting fees.

 

The following tables summarize Gross Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019. Product sales are net of slotting fees (a typically one-time fee charged by supermarkets in order to have the product placed on their shelves) and sales discounts.

 

    Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
    2020     2019  
Gross product sales   $ 319,324     $ 210,383  
Less:                
Slotting fees   $ (134,222 )   $ (160,000 )
Sales discounts, promotions, and other reductions     (58,119 )     (3,886 )
Net Revenues   $ 126,983     $ 46,497  

  

The Company had an increase in cost of goods sold from $146,500 for the three months ending September 30, 2019 to $229,696 for the three months ending September 30, 2020 because we sold significantly more ice cream to our customers (supermarket chains and distributors) this quarter than the same quarter last year, when measured in Gross Sales.

 

Our income statement shows an increase in “Advertising and Promotional” from 198,270 for the three months ending September 30, 2019 to $185,289 for the three months ending September 30, 2020. This increase is due to the way certain marketing expenses were accounted for. Further, as discussed on above footnote 3, due to the reclassification $396,250 expenses was reversed and set off with the advertising costs incurred during 2019. The Company invested approximately $396,047 in marketing and distribution partnerships it determined would benefit operations for 2020 and beyond. Due to circumstances, including the global COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic, it does not appear these distribution partnerships will be as beneficial to the Company as envisioned when entered. In April, 2020, the Company successfully negotiated a Debt Incentive Agreement with a creditor to whom it owed $731,118, most of which is in conjunction with this impaired asset. This Debt Incentive Agreement provides for the elimination of the entire debt should the Company make payments in calendar 2020 totaling $166,224 in cash, and approximately 4,000 pints of ice cream. Because this reduction in debt is conditional, the full $731,118 is currently included in the liabilities section of our balance sheet. Should the Company make the payments and retire the debt during calendar 2020, the Company would realize a Gain on Extinguishment of Debt of approximately $560,000

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased from $101,834 for the three months ending September 30, 2019 to $118,167 for the three months ending September 30, 2020. This category includes expenses such as web hosting, web services, freight, warehousing, shipping, product liability insurance, investor relations and research & development of new products. Professional fees increased from $124,234 for the three months ending September 30, 2019 to $168,668 for the three months ending September 30, 2020. $65,700 of the professional fees in the current quarter are the result of accounting for 500,000 warrants issued to a Company consultant with a strike price of $.50.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2019 we experienced an increase in Loss on extinguishment of debt upon notes conversion of $188,397 compared to $0 in the three months ended September 30, 2020. For the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2020, we also experienced changes in derivative liabilities from ($190,062) to ($207,524) and total interest expense from $218,803 to $407,783, of which $382,267 and $322,739 respectively were entries directly related to the amortization of debt discounts and deferred financing fees related to loss on extinguishment of debt.  For the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company recorded “other expenses” of $19,877 compared to $0 for the three months ended September 30, 2019.  This was interest expenses related to loss on extinguishment of debt.

 

5

 

 

Customers

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company had one customer account for approximately 39% of the gross sales. One other customer accounted for approximately 21% of gross sales, and two other customers accounted for over 9% of gross sales. During the three months ended September 30, 2019, one customer accounted for approximately 34% of the gross sales while two other customers accounted for over 10% of gross sales.  As the Company continues to grow its distribution base, it is anticipated that revenue distribution will become less concentrated.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

As of September 30, 2020, we had cash on hand of $8,360, receivables of $65,053 and inventory value of $213,384.

 

The Company has limited available cash resources and we do not believe our cash on hand will be adequate to satisfy our ongoing working capital needs. The Company is continuing to raise capital through private placement of our common stock and through the use of convertible notes to finance the Company’s operations, of which it can give no assurance of success. However, the Company has a strong ongoing relationship with Eagle Equities and we expect to be able to fund our projected growth over the next several quarters. We believe that our current capitalization structure, combined with ongoing increases in revenues, will enable us to successfully secure required financing to continue our growth. In the short term, the Company plans to continue to take advantage of convertible notes as a financing vehicle, as it allows for today’s operating capital to be either repaid, or converted to equity at future valuations, as well as exploring other capitalization strategies.

 

Because the business has limited operating history and sales, no certainty of continuation can be stated. Management has devoted a significant amount of time in the raising of capital from additional debt and equity financing. However, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon raising additional funds through debt and equity financing and generating revenue. There are no assurances the Company will receive the necessary funding or generate revenue necessary to fund operations.

 

Even if the Company is successful in raising additional funds, the Company cannot give any assurance that it will, in the future, be able to achieve a level of profitability from the sale of its products to sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on recoverability and reclassification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Since our inception, we have sustained operating losses. During the three months ended September 30, 2020, we incurred a net loss of $943,824 compared to $513,580 for the three months ended September 30, 2019. Much of this loss is largely a function of the way certain financing activities are recorded, and does not represent actual operating losses.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2020, net cash used in operating activities was $368,159 compared to net cash provided of $26,916 for the three months ended September 30, 2019. Much of what shows as “net cash used in operating activities” is related to non-cash items associated with to the ongoing capitalization of the Company during the reporting period.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2020, net cash of $0 was used in investing activities, compared to $1,000,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2019.

 

6

 

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2020, net cash aggregating $178,897 was provided by financing activities, compared to $1,050,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2019.

 

From our inception in January 2010 through September 30, 2020, we have generated an accumulated deficit of approximately $18,574,946, compared to $17,631,122 from inception through June 30, 2020. Assuming we raise additional funds and continue operations, we expect to incur additional operating losses during the next two to three quarters and possibly thereafter. We plan to continue to pay or satisfy existing obligation and commitments and finance our operations, as we have in the past, primarily through the sale of our securities and other forms of external financing until such time that we are able to generate sufficient funds from the sale of our products to finance our operations, of which we can give no assurance.

  

We intend to rely on the sale of stock in private placements, and the issuance of new debt, to fund our operations. If we are unable to raise cash through the sale of our stock, we may be required to severely restrict our operations. The Company has received several tranches of capital from a friendly institutional investor, who has been our primary source of capital for the last 30 months. We expect this investor to continue to fund ongoing operations

 

Effective May 6, 2015, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Sean Folkson. The agreement was retroactive to January 1st, 2015. In exchange for services provided to the Company by Folkson, the Company agreed to pay Folkson $6,000 monthly. This compensation expense started accruing on January 1, 2015, and accrued on a monthly basis through June of 2018.

 

In June of 2018, and again in June of 2019, the Company entered into updated consulting agreements with Folkson, which included a modified compensation structure. Each new Consulting Agreement contained the identical cash compensation allowance of $6,000 monthly. In addition, Folkson would earn Warrants with a strike price of $.50 or $1 when the Company hit certain revenue milestones, such as when the Company records its first quarter with revenue greater than $1,000,000. All Warrants earned under Folkson’s current agreement would convert into restricted shares, shall carry a cashless provision, and must be exercised within 90 days of the filing of the 10Q or 10K on which such revenues are reported.

 

On October 12, 2018, Folkson opted to purchase 400,000 shares of common stock at $.30 per share, by exercising warrants. To make this purchase, Folkson used $120,000 in accrued Nightfood consulting fees.

 

On February 4, 2019, the Company entered into a “Lock-Up” Agreement with Folkson whereby Folkson agreed to not transfer, sell, or otherwise dispose of any shares of his NGTF stock during the next twelve months. As part of this agreement, Folkson received warrants to acquire 400,000 shares of NGTF common stock at an exercise price of $.30 per share. All warrants in this agreement carried a twelve month term and a cashless provision, and were to expire if not exercised within the twelve month term. Folkson did not have rights to transfer, sell, or otherwise dispose of these warrants at any time, as there were no transfer rights provided for in the Agreement. The warrants that were part of the February 2019 Lock Up Agreement expired unexercised, as the share price was below $.30 at the end of the Agreement.

 

On January 20, 2020, Folkson and the Company entered into a new Lock-Up Agreement which went into effect on February 4, 2020 and is in place for twelve months, with identical financial terms to the February 4, 2019 Agreement.

 

The foregoing accounts for the entirety of compensation earned by Folkson since inception.

 

On February 6, 2019, the Registrant entered into a “Leak-Out” Agreement with Peter Leighton, former affiliate and owner of 4,000,000 shares, which will restrict Leighton’s ability to sell, transfer, or otherwise dispose of his shares above a certain, mutually agreed-upon monthly threshold.

 

7

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate past judgments and our estimates, including those related to allowance for doubtful accounts, allowance for inventory write-downs and write offs, deferred income taxes, provision for contractual obligations and our ability to continue as a going concern. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. There were no significant changes in our critical accounting estimates during the three months ended September 30, 2020.

 

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

None.

  

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

No report required.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. Disclosure and control procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2020. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their desired control objectives. Additionally, in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures, management is required to apply its reasonable judgment. Based on the evaluation described above, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report because we did not document our Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 404 internal controls and procedures.

 

As funds become available to us, we expect to implement additional measures to improve disclosure controls and procedures such as implementing and documenting our internal controls procedures.

 

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting

 

There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

 

A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The Company’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and its Principal Financial Officer, do not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with associated policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

 

8

 

 

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

We are not engaged in any litigation at the present time, and management is unaware of any claims or complaints that could result in future litigation. Management will seek to minimize disputes with its customers but recognizes the inevitability of legal action in today’s business environment as an unfortunate price of conducting business.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

 

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

 

None.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

 

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

 

None.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

 

Exhibit   Exhibit Description
     
31.1   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Chief Executive Officer
     
32.1   Section 1350 certification of Chief Executive Officer
     
101.INS   XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

9

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  Nightfood Holdings, Inc.
     
Dated: November 20, 2020 By: /s/ Sean Folkson
    Sean Folkson,
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive, Financial and
Accounting Officer)

 

 

10