Hiru Corporation (PK) (HIRU) Quote

💹3.3M+ $HIRU Historic XPERT✅BUYS💹✅💹 https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/hiru-pk-HIRU/trades


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

💹✅Perfect Time to BUY💹Xperts Buying LOTS✅💹 wow!


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

💹5.9M+ $HIRU Historic XPERT✅BUYS💹✅💹 https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/hiru-pk-HIRU/trades


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

I did not see your post when I made my last post. I agree there are mixed signals here. I don't think the corporation filing cancels out the red flags though, but does give some reason to believe its not abandoned as you said why bother. This is a confusing unknown situation.

Well I thought they might have abandoned the company but someone pointed out they recently filed an update with the state of Georgia on their corporation. That's not a sign of abandonment. So a bit confusing what's going on. Differently red flags though.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176294471

They updated the Georgia Secretary of State filing on May 30. If they were going to walk away from this, why would they bother?

Good find and is a good indication of where the much bigger case is going as No new lawyers have been appointed.

It certainly looks like they have abandoned this company. I mean how hard is it to put out an update to shareholders?

Definately something to ponder. Thanks satter

Personally, I see red flags. In their April 29th/2025 OTC Disclosure and news service press release Hiru included this:-

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/HIRU/news/HIRU-Corporation-Provides-Update-on-Late-Filing-Corporate-Transformation-and-Strategic-Outlook?id=475225

Additionally, a dedicated legal team has been engaged to protect the company's interests and reputation, including addressing actions stemming from the prior ownership and management.

We know that, so far they have not responded to a plaintiff's motion for summary judgment seeking millions in damages. In that case Hiru's lawyer withdrew and no new lawyer has been assigned to the case, or if so, they have not notified the court. Some say its frivolous and related to prior management. Well, the above states they engaged a new legal team to address exactly that.

However, I found another case where past employees sued claiming they were not paid overtime pay. In that case Hiru a defendant, did not respond, and a default judgment was issued on June 11th, 2025. Granted it was a very small amount $117,623 but it just does not add up to me. They say it themselves to defend their reputation, that they have a new dedicated legal team for it. And with all this sheik Arab money, what's the problem? why no operational websites? I don't know what's going on, just think there are reasons to be concerned.


Complaint.


Isaac P. Hernandez, Esq. (SBN 025537)
Thunderbird Law Group
361 E. Coronado Rd., Ste. 201
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Tel: 602.753.2933
Fax: 855.592.5876
isaac@thunderbirdlawgroup.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
Mirna Bernal Ayon, Arnulfo Bernal
Ayon and Elvira Carolina Ayon
Pedroza,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Hiru Corporation, a Georgia
corporation, AZ Custom Bottled
Water, LLC, a Nevada corporation,
Salome Water and Ice, LLC, a
Nevada corporation, Joel Natario, an
individual and Kathryn Gavin, an
individual,
Defendants.
Case No. CV2023-020218
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Mirna Bernal Ayon, Arnulfo Bernal Ayon and Elvira Carolina
Ayon Pedroza (“Plaintiffs”), hereby allege in support of their Complaint against
Defendants Hiru Corporation, AZ Custom Bottled Water, LLC, Salome Water and
Ice, LLC, Joel Natario, and Kathryn Gavin (“Defendants”), as follows:

NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act
(“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq., and the Arizona Minimum Wage Act
(“AMWA”), A.R.S. §23-362, et seq.

2. Plaintiffs contend that Defendants failed to compensate Plaintiffs for
all hours of work and failed to compensate Plaintiff the overtime rate for certain
time periods in which they worked more than forty hours in a workweek, thereby
depriving Plaintiffs of compensation to which they are entitled.

3. Plaintiffs seek backpay for nonpayment and underpayment of wages
and overtime, liquidated damages, attorney’s fees and costs, and other relief
available under the FLSA, AMWA, and any other applicable law.

PARTIES
4. Plaintiff Mirna Bernal Ayon (“Plaintiff Mirna”) was at all times
relevant to this matter a resident of Maricopa County, Arizona.
5. Plaintiff Elvira Carolina Ayon Pedroza (“Plaintiff Elvira”) was at all
times relevant to this matter a resident of Maricopa County, Arizona.
6. Plaintiff Arnulfo Bernal Ayon (“Plaintiff Arnulfo”) was at all times
relevant to this matter a resident of Maricopa County, Arizona.
7. Defendant Hiru Corporation, (“HIRU) is a Georgia corporation
conducting business in Maricopa County, Arizona and throughout the State of
Arizona.
8. Defendant AZ Custom Bottled Water, LLC, (“AZCBW”) is a Nevada
corporation conducting business in Maricopa County, Arizona and throughout the
State of Arizona.
9. Defendant Salome Water and Ice, LLC, (“SWI”) is a Nevada
corporation conducting business in Maricopa County, Arizona and throughout the
State of Arizona.
10. Upon information and belief, Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI
shared common ownership and management during the relevant time period.
11. Upon information and belief, Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI
share common human resources personnel and functions.
12. Upon information and belief, Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI
share legal counsel/
13. Upon information and belief, Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI
share IT personnel and functions.
14. Upon information and belief, Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI
share computer systems and networks.
15. Upon information and belief, employees transfer between Defendants
HIRU, AZCBW and SWI.
16. Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI were part of a single integrated
enterprise during the relevant time period.
17. Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI were joint employers during the
relevant time period.
18. Defendant Joel Natario was at all times relevant to this matter an
owner, manager, and/or agent of Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI, and in that
capacity he exercised economic control and control over the nature and structure
over Plaintiffs’ employment by exercising his authority to hire and fire employees,
implementing employment policies and practices, and determining work
assignments, work schedules, and rates of pay.
19. Defendant Kathryn Gavin was at all times relevant to this matter an
owner, manager, and/or agent of Defendants HIRU, AZCBW and SWI and in that
capacity she exercised economic control and control over the nature and structure
over Plaintiffs’ employment by exercising her authority to hire and fire employees,
implementing employment policies and practices, and determining work
assignments, work schedules, and rates of pay.
20. At all relevant times Defendants, HIRU, AZCBW, SWI, Joel Natario
and Kathryn Gavin were employers as defined under §29 U.S.C. 203(d) and A.R.S.
§23-362(B).

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

21. Defendants caused events to occur in Arizona out of which this VENUE
Complaint arises.
22. Jurisdiction and Venue are proper in this Court because the acts,
events, or omissions giving rise to Plaintiffs’ claims occurred in whole, or in part,
in Maricopa County, Arizona

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Mirna

23. Plaintiff Mirna was a full-time employee of Defendants from January
4, 2022 through August 26, 2022. Throughout her employment with Defendants
she performed work as a carboard box assembler.
24. When she began her employment with Defendants she was promised
a starting hourly rate of $14.50 and an increase to $15.00 per hour after three months
of employment.
25. During the first four to six weeks of her employment Plaintiff Mirna
worked between 40 to 45 hours per week, and received between $800 and $850
every two weeks.
26. From around mid-February 2022 through August 2022 when she left
her employment with Defendants, Plaintiff Mirna worked 50 to 60 hours per week,
and received payment of between $700 and $900 every two weeks.

Plaintiff Arnulfo

27. Plaintiff Arnulfo Bernal was a full-time employee of Defendants from
January 4, 2022 through August 26, 2022. Throughout his employment with
Defendants he performed work as a water box stacker and forklift driver.
28. When he began his employment with Defendants, he was promised a
starting hourly rate of $15.00.
29. During the first four to six weeks of his employment Plaintiff Arnulfo
worked between 40 to 45 hours per week and received between $800 and $850
every two weeks.
30. From around mid-February 2022 through August 2022 when the left
his employment with Defendants, Plaintiff Arnulfo worked 60 to 65 hours per week,
and received payment of between $700 and $900 every two weeks.

Plaintiff Elvira

31. Plaintiff Elvira was a full-time employee of Defendants from January
4, 2022, through August 26, 2022. Throughout her employment with Defendants
she performed work on a water-bottle assembly line.
32. When she began her employment with Defendants, she was promised
a starting hourly rate of $15.00.
33. During the first four to six weeks of her employment Plaintiff Elvira
worked between 40 to 45 hours per week and received between $800 and $850
every two weeks.
34. From around mid-February 2022 through August 2022 when she left
her employment with Defendants, Plaintiff Elvira worked 50 to 60 hours per week,
and received payment of between $700 and $900 every two weeks.
35. Upon information and belief, Defendants knew or should have known
that Plaintiffs did not receive any wages for certain work time.
36. Upon information and belief, Defendants knew that Plaintiffs and
other employees were not receiving the corresponding hourly rate and overtime
premium rate when they worked more than 40 hours in a work week.
37. Prior to and during the applicable statutory period Defendants
implemented policies and practices that Defendants knew or should have known
would violate Plaintiffs’ rights under the FLSA and AMWA.
38. Prior to and during the applicable statutory period Defendants
knowingly and intentionally failed to take any action to prohibit or monitor the
accrual of unpaid wages and overtime.

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
FLSA-Minimum Wages

39. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the preceding paragraphs of this
Complaint as if specifically set forth herein.
40. By failing to pay Plaintiffs at all for certain hours of work, Defendants
violated their rights under the FLSA, including but not limited to, 29 U.S.C. §206.
41. Defendants’ failure to pay Plaintiffs for all hours of work was
knowing, willful, and in reckless disregard of their rights under the FLSA.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
FLSA-Unpaid Overtime

42. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the preceding paragraphs of this
Complaint as if specifically set forth herein.
43. By failing to pay Plaintiffs one-and-one-half times their regular hourly
rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours per work week, Defendants violated
their rights under the FLSA, including but not limited to 29 U.S.C. §207.
44. Defendants’ failure to pay Plaintiffs one-and-a-half times their regular
hourly rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours per work week was knowing,
willful, and in reckless disregard of their rights under the FLSA.

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
AMWA-Minimum Wages

45. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the preceding paragraphs of this
Complaint as if specifically set forth herein.
46. By failing to pay Plaintiffs at all for certain hours of work, Defendants
violated their rights under the AMWA, including but not limited to, A.R.S. §23-
363.
47. Defendants’ failure to pay Plaintiffs for all hours of work was
knowing, willful, and in reckless disregard of their rights under the AMWA.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs prays for relief against Defendants as follows:
A. Award Plaintiffs backpay for nonpayment and underpayment of wages
and overtime;

B. Award Plaintiff double or liquidated damages under the AMWA and
FLSA in an amount equal to their unpaid wages and overtime;
C. Order Defendants to pay reasonable attorney’s fees and costs;
D. Order Defendants to pay pre-judgment interest on all amounts for
which pre-judgment interest is legally allowable, at the highest lawful
rate;
E. Order Defendants to pay post-judgment interest at the highest lawful
rate for all amounts, including attorney fees, awarded against
Defendant; and
F. Order all other relief, whether legal, equitable or injunctive, as may be
necessitated to effectuate full relief to Plaintiffs.

JURY DEMAND
Plaintiffs request a jury trial.
Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January 2024.
Thunderbird Law Group
By: /s/ Isaac P. Hernandez
Isaac P. Hernandez
Attorney for Plaintiff


Entry of Default Judgment June 11th, 2025

Could not copy & paste.

Rheddle, It sure would be nice. These guys have been so quiet lately was gonna sell but maybe there is life here. Don't want this to turn into another LAHO. Also run by so called wealthy arabs. Pure scam that was.

Low volume, so too early to call it, but could the bottom of hit? Seem to be lifting slightly. Would be nice to see one of those big volume ask slap afternoons prior to news

Do we know when HIRU will be moved to the expert market?

💹✅Perfect Time to BUY💹Xperts Buying LOTS✅💹 wow!


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

And?

I'm the 78,000th post. GLTA LONGS

💹3.6M+ $HIRU Historic XPERT✅BUYS💹✅💹 https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/hiru-pk-HIRU/trades


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

He told you another few days and that passed. SMH, did you see what you asked him? Aren't you the pot calling the kettle black. 

Of all people why would you ask him that? Information if he could answer, would be nonpublic material.

Would it because he seems to have implied before with info from a source though when challenged he denies having.

I don't know if he has or not, but I believe it's no coincidence you choose to ask him if we may hear something this week.

Maybe we hear something this week dbob?

💹✅Perfect Time to BUY💹Xperts Buying LOTS✅💹 wow


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

Reading complaints about Miro makes me LOL.

Ha! Good ol Miro.

I’ve been warning IHUB sheep about him and his IHUB, undisclosed posters for 20 years or more.

Yes, he used to pay scammers to post here.

And here you are, a member of the sheep herd complaining about him. Humorous IMO.

Go figure.

They apparently fell behind of their 6 month plan written sometime in december as we are now at that level. The problems with this pos Miro have been difficult but he is totally out of the picture. Unfortunately things take time. If things start to develop now we should see much loftier numbers based on their 6 and 12 to 18 month read outs.

Hey dbob, thanks for your input. Hope your info is correct on the yield sign. Hopefully we can see .005 again or even something higher soon. 

why do you say i am trading on insider info? Now you are making some real wild claims. Can you substantiate anything waterchaser? Please come at me. Your a poor soul of a man.

I would never ask/suggest someone stop contributing. But it's fair to challenge comments be made on behalf of the Corporation. When they don't pan out,w you in then should question the reliability of your source like below.


https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176291518


That should come to light by end of this week. Attorney will handle that frivolous matter very very soon

It's not illegal to be told a few filings are being worked on. It would be illegal to know the content of those filings. Big difference.

Who on the inside is feeding you intel?
Trading on non-public intel is illegal.
I'd be careful if I were you.

Keep it coming, I appreciate it cheers.

Just be patient another few days. If I am being told wrong then I will stop posting also.

No, I am looking to find out if your inside information is accurate or not. You being told they hired a new law firm that is not documented anyway is insider information.

I and likely anyone else other than you can not make that claim because we do not have insider information. Unless you're just speculating? Speculating, or insider information?

On one had, you say you have no insider information, but on the other hand you say this is what you are being told. TOLD BY WHO?

You are contradicting yourself. To be told the filings are done and will be completed is information assuming it's accurate. If not, then your just misleading folks pretending to have instead sources.

Correct, I’m not a buyer of this stock.

My purpose for posting on the HIRU Board is to warn the less informed about the plethora of scam pumpers trying to dupe others into buying their worthless stock.

It’s very simple and straightforward.

waterchaser is just another basher. He is not a buyer of this stock so who cares

Waterchaser is trying to get you to stop posting stuff that gives those holding here hope regarding the filings. Thanks for posting your thoughts on it and keep it up !

I guess we will find out in the next filings, I only know they have hired a firm nothing more. You guys are looking for inside information. I don't have that.

I have no personal contact to any people inside of hiru. All I know is the filings are being done and will be completed and filed in order to get the yield sign off very very soon. That is an ambiguous remark but that is what I am being told.

Thanks Dbob.

💹✅Perfect Time to BUY💹Xperts Buying LOTS✅💹 wow!


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

What are the names of the new attorneys? I am sure the Court would like to know.

How is the lawsuit being dealth with? if its frivolous why have they failed to respond to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment within the deadline? seems to me it would be fairly simple then. For that matter they have not even filed a motion announcing new counsel. That would take about 15 minutes.

What is your position within the HIRU company?

You always seem to have up-to-the-minute intel on what’s going on inside HIRU.

The proper thing to do is disclose your inside association with HIRU.

i have been a buyer since lst october my position dwarfs most on the board. I do not have inside information. I am close to people close to the deal but i have no absolute facts except that a new secretary is in town and handling the filings. New attorneys have been engaged. That is all i know. That is not to say that I may be not getting the facts straight. But your information is way off. Filings are in the process of getting done.

You are obviously privy to a lot of inside information that no one else is. The court documents say otherwise. They are behind on financials. These are facts. 2nd quarter is over and they should be preparing. Recent history says they will not file on time. These are facts. Share price is going down. I am not the only one that has the opion that things are not good. How many share are you buying today? I bet none. And the reason is you also know things are not good

No they are not even close to 2 quarters behind. That is a false statement. What a surprise sprouting from your lips? The current quarter will be filed imminently and all subsequent filings will be done on time. The new Corporate Secretary is fully capable of handling all of those matters. The person was just brought on recently. new office new regime. It will be done. The lawsuit you keep speaking of is being dealt with and it is just a frivolous b.s. deal. Stop with the negativity.

Somebody dumped about 20 million today split up into a few trades taking out all the .0007 bid stack.

HIRU will soon be 2 quarters behind in submitting financial reports.

They are also awaiting final costs of financial judgement against them that they have not contested.

Previous statements about caring about shareholders are plainly worthless. Same as this company.

💹12M+ $HIRU Historic XPERT✅BUYS💹✅💹 https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/hiru-pk-HIRU/trades


'......wow Xpert Traitors.......wow"

Hopefully current by end of week wen your in georgia and dealing with people in qatar it is not simple.

Would be nice to see these filings soon ! Good morning. I still didn't get a reply from anybody.