Northwest Biotherapeutics Inc (QB) News - NWBO | ADVFN

Customized watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, OTC Markets Small-Cap, LSE and more.

Get Started

Home
Investing
Stocks
USA
USOTC
Northwest Biotherapeutics Inc (QB) (NWBO)
Northwest Biotherapeutics Inc (QB) (NWBO) News

Northwest Biotherapeutics Inc (QB) (NWBO)

0.2799

0.01132

(4.21%)

Closed December 03 4:00PM

Delayed by 15 minutes

Empower your portfolio: Real-time discussions and actionable trading ideas.

Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)]

Form 8-K - Current report

Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities

Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities

Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)]

Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities

Form 8-K - Current report

Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities

Biophma Announces Exclusive In License for Dendritic Cell Technology, Sending Shares Higher

Imagine a new weapon in the fight against cancer, a personalized therapy that utilizes the body's own immune system to attack tumors. Science...

Form 8-K - Current report

Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements

Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements

Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)]

Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405

Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities

1
Next

flipper44

flipper44 5 minutes ago

Really? Defendants have already waited a week without informing the judge of the indirect rulings against their issues. You think the judge is just going to sit there twiddling his thumbs?

You misstated the Phunware ruling.

dstock07734

dstock07734 7 minutes ago

ILT,

I was thinking there are probably huge number of counterfeit shares created by MMs.

exwannabe

exwannabe 8 minutes ago

Really? You sure they have time before the magistrate’s recommendation?
I would be 100% certain the Magistrate would not issue an R&R taking into account the NWBO arguments presented today w/o giving time for defendants to respond.

I would expect in the next week or so to see a response from the MMs saying among other things that the Phumware order was mute on the issue of damage from sales more than a few seconds past the spoof.

To clarify, both defenses argue that the sale by the company (that is the damage) must be close in time to the spoof. In Phumware, they could show sells within seconds (as they were using an ATM that constantly dribbles shares into the market). In NWBO, they have said 1 hour is soon enough. The MM defense in NWBO asserts anything over a few seconds is too long to matter.

In PHUM, the Judge said they would not decide on exactly how long the time could be as PHUM had asserted seconds and that was enough.

ilovetech

ilovetech 14 minutes ago

WOW! and double WOW! So much for attempts to stonewall subpoenas, at least with respect to the jaw dropping data increase.

flipper44

flipper44 21 minutes ago

Really? You sure they have time before the magistrate’s recommendation?

dennisdave

dennisdave 22 minutes ago

They don't have to respond , doesn't mean they will not respond or ask for an opportunity to respond
There is a big difference

exactly seems you live in the real world they will ask the court permission to respond, which will be granted, and then they have their delay that is the whole point. Flipflop making a huge deal out of this is beyond me

flipper44

flipper44 23 minutes ago

Really? You sure they have time before the magistrate’s recommendation?

dennisdave

dennisdave 24 minutes ago

sure you removed your sick part in your post. Its you who started calling names for no reason what so ever

manibiotech

manibiotech 28 minutes ago

They don't have to respond , doesn't mean they will not respond or ask for an opportunity to respond
There is a big difference

👍️ 1 👿 1 ☠️ 1

JTORENCE

JTORENCE 34 minutes ago

branster THANKS

dstock07734

dstock07734 35 minutes ago

TJ,

You think I care about the daily changes behind the decimal point? I cannot blame you thinking this way since you are completely ignorant on how revolutionary DCVax-L is. That's why in the end I'll have generational wealth and you most likely continue earning your living paid by posting BS. Seriously, it is not a job you can be proud of yourself.

Did I hear you say the science is okay? No offense. You are not equipped with the appropriate IQ to comment about science.

Let me remind you one simple fact: For this specific company, all it matters is science. Everything else is just noise. That's why no matter how much the daily oscillation is. I can still sleep like a baby.

🏆️ 2 👍 2 👍️ 1

Checkmate 36

Checkmate 36 36 minutes ago

…mk, if you say so.

flipper44

flipper44 39 minutes ago

Spoofing allegations against-Phunware-increase from 873 to 7672 after-plaintiffs-received-discovery.

Wow!!! Difference between 1st amended complaint and Second (post discovery) Amended complaint.

Pre-discovery, NWBO claim 2,849 spoofing events against them.

👍️ 3 💯 3 🔐 1 🔑 2 🚀 1

learningcurve2020

learningcurve2020 43 minutes ago

Here a basher is just another name for someone who speaks with very few mistakes.

👿 1 🚫 1 ☠️ 1 ❌️ 1

scotty3371

scotty3371 44 minutes ago

Green hod close.
There's a first for everything.

flipper44

flipper44 49 minutes ago

You realize DD just said defendants don’t necessarily have to respond to a notice. You know, the Judge magistrate could rule on the MTD tonight if Dennis is right. It’s been a week since the Phunware ruling was published. Curious. Phunware was defendant’s primary case, but it turned against them.

Dennis Dave said:

the defendant can respond to a plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority filed in support of the plaintiff's opposition to the defendant's motion to dismiss. Such notices are typically submitted to inform the court of new legal developments or authorities that may impact the case. While not always required, responding to these notices allows the defendant to address the relevance and implications of the new authority presented

👍️ 5 💯 3 🚀 2

RobotDroid

RobotDroid 1 hour ago

It's all much ado about nothing. The excuses will fly whenever mtd is denied and the stock goes to .25. Then more excuses in 2025 when UK approval MIGHT go thru and the stock goes to .30. NWBO is DOA, and inept mute nonmanagement is MIA.

👿 1 ☠️ 1

Legend431

Legend431 1 hour ago

The only clowns are ones left holding bags of worthless or near worthless stock. I'll save my breath and check back with you after approval of it happens to see what your next goal post will be another 109 yards down the field.

For someone invested so heavily in NWBO you sure do like to chirp a lot. Maybe wait until the stock is over $1 before you chirp. For now $.26. Down almost 75% in the last 2 years alone. Talk about all the science you want. I'm and investor and while the science is ok the stock price sucks. SUCKS!!!!! It ain't manipulation. It's DILUTION!!

👿 1 ☠️ 1

scotty3371

scotty3371 1 hour ago

Stock can't handle 1.7 billion shares for sale. Endless share pukes.

👍 2 👿 1 ☠️ 1

dstock07734

dstock07734 1 hour ago

You made money from the manipulation of sp. You don't own any share any more and you don't short. Why are you still here? Let me guess why. You are scared like hell that you have to return the money. Did I get that right?

🏆️ 2 👍️ 3

Doc logic

Doc logic 1 hour ago

laser777,

Well he moved the business to Florida along with himself so seeking to gain some influence there seems like something he would do too; ). Best wishes.

georgebailey

georgebailey 1 hour ago

Billionaire Ken Griffin, former DeSantis donor, on sidelines for GOP presidential primary
Published Mon, Sep 18 202310:06 AM EDTUpdated Tue, Mar 5 20243:41 PM EST
thumbnail
Brian Schwartz
@schwartzbCNBC
Key Points
Billionaire and Citadel CEO Ken Griffin says he is sitting on the sidelines for the 2024 Republican presidential primary.
Griffin explained that so far he’s not impressed with what he’s seeing from the alternatives to the Republican front-runner in former President Donald Trump and has yet to decide who he plans to help.
As for Ron DeSantis, Griffin doesn’t understand the strategy of the Florida governor’s presidential campaign and takes issue with the battle being waged with Disney.

manibiotech

manibiotech 2 hours ago

Not going to happen in a week or two . You file respond asap if you have an argument that can make you win not otherwise . In other scenario you stretch it as long as possible . That's how real world works .

👿 1 ☠️ 1

laser777

laser777 2 hours ago

My recollection is that Griffin was a big donor to Ron Desantis.

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

Again, it happened in this very case, and last time it did, it took MM seven days to also weigh in on new intervening case law (from the time of Posner’s notice), not months.

👍️ 2 🔥 1

dennisdave

dennisdave 2 hours ago

The will strethc the time to respond. Stretching time is what losing parties do, you naif simpleton. HGt your ass out of Google and talk to people in the real world.

Im done here I actually do have a life to get back to, you not so much

bas2020

bas2020 2 hours ago

Believe me, there are plenty I know who are buying dips at this point. Tell your handlers 'thanks' for us!

👍️ 4 💯 2

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

??? Strange nonsensical outbursts.

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

Good golly man, last time this happened in this very case, it took one week, not months for a response. Can’t you read?

dennisdave

dennisdave 2 hours ago

If I would go that way I would choose any breathing guy on the globe over you you old rimpled sicko. I never said “Adorable” fucking freak

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

Very weird responses.

dennisdave

dennisdave 2 hours ago

anyway

the defendant can respond to a plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority filed in support of the plaintiff's opposition to the defendant's motion to dismiss. Such notices are typically submitted to inform the court of new legal developments or authorities that may impact the case. While not always required, responding to these notices allows the defendant to address the relevance and implications of the new authority presented

So that could, as I said mean more delay in the decision on the MTD

dennisdave

dennisdave 2 hours ago

wow you making that connotation is really sick flipper.

Romantic
adjective
1.
conducive to or characterized by the expression of love.
"a romantic candlelit dinner"
2.
characterized by, or suggestive of an idealized view of reality.
"a romantic attitude to the past"

I clearly meant meaning nr 2 sicko /weirdo
Brrrrrrrrr

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

Again, read

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175471037

One week, not months.

manibiotech

manibiotech 2 hours ago

Pronto-- sure they are dying to do it .
Not sure what world you live in . They are going to squeeze as much time as possible from this . Pronto and judicial system are not used in same sentence , just like in reg approval which I also said a year ago

👿 1 ☠️ 1

iclight

iclight 2 hours ago

Wow.. for a drug that is such a failure .

Over 4 years since data lock. 10 years since the trial started. Almost 30 years since the company was founded.

And nothing.

It's as much a failure as your ability to count.

👿 1 ☠️ 1

manibiotech

manibiotech 2 hours ago

I know daily humungous and increasing volume and share price is glaring evidence of investors keep buying . And before you say MM manipulating the price - they can't manipulate daily volume every day for a year.
But then someone needs common sense

👍️ 1 👿 1 ☠️ 1

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

Nonsensical and inaccurate response. Anyway, read this post.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175471037

dennisdave

dennisdave 2 hours ago

Romantic? Hardly, defendants used it as their primary precedent and the latest ruling turned it against them. I’d guess they need to go to confession, pronto. JMHO.
The romantic part Im referring to is you suggesting that the defendants will not respond to this notion because it would be the right thing todo.
You keep shadow-debating with me as if I have ever claimed that the notion isn't a smart move on Posners part, which I never said.

defendants used it as their primary precedent and the latest ruling turned it against them. I never said anything else.

bas2020

bas2020 2 hours ago

I've made plenty of money trading this stock. I know when a stock is being targeted and manipulated by MMs, with their paid FUDsters working the board, and have learned to trade the swings they fabricate. Now is the time to load up!

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

Nope. See post 735386. ☝️ (Aka:the post before this one)

(Aka: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175471037 )

( Aka: push “prev”)

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

Defendants responded one week later.

flipper44
Member Level
Re: flipper44 post# 735378
Tuesday, 12/03/2024 2:17:01 PM
Don’t forget, early on in the (NWBO) case, the market makers also used an out of date case where Ms. Posner brought the latest case law to the court’s attention through a Notice.

Harrington II

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590344/gov.uscourts.nysd.590344.127.0.pdf

👍️ 4 💯 5 🔑 2

iclight

iclight 2 hours ago

A month? Pretty sure all the "longs" who have come and gone said the same thing 10 years ago. Flipper and sentiment_stocks are still around and I'm still telling them they should get out of the stock market completely. So should you.

Let's recap. I've made money on this turd and you haven't. And I've never shorted any stock in my life.

👍️ 1 👿 2 ☠️ 2

Investor082

Investor082 2 hours ago

Phunware stock is pretty much unchanged since the decision. Ultimately, none of this matters except execution, and institutional investor support. NWBO will continue to struggle in both departments. One month away from UK approval and still no hiring! Tells you all you need to know about whats coming.

👍️ 1 👿 1 ☠️ 1

iclight

iclight 2 hours ago

The MHRA waiting for information from an RFI that NWBO can not give or does not want to give is not a material event.

"Please proved the patient level data for your external control arm."

If NWBO does not respond they can continue to dump shares and pay for Advent while their useful idiots provide made up excuses to various social media and websites (like this one). The MHRA can do nothing at that point.

👍️ 1 👿 1 ☠️ 1

manibiotech

manibiotech 2 hours ago

Exactly
I said a year ago that this year will go by in motions for MTD and most of next year in motions for discovery
That's just how judicial system works for those have not been involved in actual litigations

👿 1 ☠️ 1

manibiotech

manibiotech 2 hours ago

The point is they can ask magistrate to be able to respond and another two months may go by before they Sorry megistrate
And then another two months after that for ruling

That's the point

👿 1 ☠️ 1

flipper44

flipper44 2 hours ago

Don’t forget, early on in the case, the market makers also used an out of date case where Ms. Posner brought the latest case law to the court’s attention through a Notice.

Harrington II

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590344/gov.uscourts.nysd.590344.127.0.pdf

flipper44

flipper44 3 hours ago

Romantic? Hardly, defendants used it as their primary precedent and the latest ruling turned it against them. I’d guess they need to go to confession, pronto. JMHO.

H2R

H2R 3 hours ago

The Defendant Strategy Backfires!

Thanks Flipper, this is quite the filing.

In briefing their Motion to Dismiss, Defendants repeatedly referred to the allegations in Phunware as “identical” (Mot. to Dismiss at 1 and 13), and a “mirror image of this case” (Mot. to Dismiss at 2), urging this Court to follow Phunware’s “on-point precedent” regarding “materially identical spoofing allegations.”

I wonder how the MM's legal eagles will wiggle out of this filing!

Best of luck to Patients, NWBO, and Longs!

👍️ 22 💥 6 💯 4 🔥 2

Northwest Biotherapeutics (QB)

Delayed Upgrade Clock