chazzy1
4 hours ago
Yes, nmuny, nothing but meaningful posts now that I, too, have been enjoying the IGNORE feature. I agree with you and DesktopDR that, the fact that this reconsideration decision is taking so long, bodes well for VPLM. The way I look at it is that, if the judge were sticking to his original decision of noninfringement, then a simple response of "motion denied" would have sufficed. However, a reconsideration decision would require a thorough re-thinking of his original premise, involving an in-depth analysis of Mr. Hudnell's compelling argument in support of a reconsideration, and result in a total rewrite of his earlier ruling. All of this could take much more time to work throuh, which comports with what we are seeing. Besides, I do not believe that this judge would be comfortable standing on a ruling which he believes may likely be overturned on appeal. JMHO.
nyt
9 hours ago
Rut roh.... looks like we "touched" the fives today. Pps went to .006. There is no number lower than that, which is not into the 5's, thus no space in between, therefore 5's were touched. Anyhoo, not to worry, it's all part and parcel of the "BEST POSITION EVER", pkg.
Hey, where's that answer from the good judge, Allbright and ROCKET DOCKET!!!???
Looks like the rocket is sittin on the docket of the bay...😢🤪
ORCA
11 hours ago
LOW TODAY WAS .006.WOW.IT WAS OVER 12 YEARS AGO THAT WAS TRADING LOWER THAN .006.IT IS ONLY .001 ABOVE .005.THAT INSIDERS CAN MAKE MONEY.THEY STILL MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS AT .006.LOL.
THE DIRT BAGS REMEMBER WHEN THEY WERE SELLING AT .08 AND .11??WOW
1 MILLION SHARES AT .11 THEN=$110,000.00 CRISPY.NOW 1 MILLION SHARES COST $6,000.00.UNREAL.
THE GUY THAT HAS 200 MILLION SHARES HE IS DOWN $21,000,000.00.HOLY CRAP.SERIOUS DOUGH.
DB ON HIS 10 MILLION SHARES AVERAGE OF .012S HE IS ALSO DOWN 50%.BUT HE WAS UP OVER $1 MILLION WHEN THE STOCK WAS AT .11.NOW HIS 10 MILLION =$60,000.00.HE IS DOWN $60,000.00 FROM HIS INVESTMENT.
THE GUY SLEEPS IN HIS CAR ALL THIS TIME,BECAUSE HE THOUGHT HE WOULD BE MULTI MILLIONER FROM VPLM.
VPLM HAS GONE SILENT LATELY.THIS BOARD IS DYING DOWN OTHER THAN ME POSTING AND THE REGULAR NEGATIVES.IF I LOSE NO PROBLIEMA AS THE RUSSIANS SAY.NO PROBLIEMA.LOL.
I WILL MAKE IT UP ON ANOTHER STOCK.ACTUALLY THE MONEY THAT I MADE ON VDRM RECENTLY ON ITS RUN
BOUGHT ME ALL THESE MILLIONS OF SHARES ON VPLM.
nyt
11 hours ago
Admittedly, I never much subscribed to the missing entities theory too much however, at this point, with so many missing for so long, in contrast to the past, can't help but consider it to be the case.......but......it could also be that most, if not all of them, became so embarrassed at the development, that they decided the only thing to do was to disassociate from it all. But that doesn't even hold as much water as the former, because I don't see any of them capable of experiencing embarrassment or free willed enough to disassociate from the mess. Thus, being privy to the actual identities would be very interesting to see.
nyt
11 hours ago
Some twits (now banned twit, so touching sub twit or whatever is below a twit), even though they claim to be schooled in higher math, do not even understand basic math. You cannot "touch zero". You can only touch the zeroes or the many numbers that begin with 2 zeroes after the decimal, in the case of the vplm realm of prices that we deal with. As explained many times, moving upwards, you could never "touch" the next whole number because more numbers after the decimal could be added, indefinitely. However, on the way down, it works differently. Once you are at a whole number, for instance "1", there is no "space" left to go any lower in the ones, before entering the realm of zeroes. In other words, if you are at 1, then you must therefore be "touching" the zeroes (but not zero itself), because you cannot go any lower than a 1 without entering the zeroes. Boom. Simple.. That's why, when I see the price hit say, 2 cents, it's true to say at that point, the price is now touching the ones, because ANYTHING lower than 2 has to be in the ones.
And similar to never being able to reach a temp of absolute zero, same is true that you can never touch zero because there are an infinite number of decimals that can be added IN BETWEEN. In between means there is space left. There is no space between 1 and any number or amount that is below 1.
ORCA
11 hours ago
THE SS HAS BEEN UPDATED.23 MILLION SHARES HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE FLOAT BY INSIDERS.I NEVER THOUGHT I WILL BE ADDING .0061 BUT IT DID FILL TODAY.INSIDERS ARE BROKE.AND THEY SELL AT WHAT EVER PRICES.LOOK BOLD THE CHANGE.
VPLM Security Details
Share Structure
Market Cap Market Cap
24,287,133
12/03/2024
Authorized Shares
8,000,000,000
11/29/2024
Outstanding Shares
3,624,945,275
11/29/2024
Restricted
1,493,728,610
11/29/2024
Unrestricted
2,131,216,665
11/29/2024
Outstanding Shares
3,624,945,275
11/19/2024
Restricted
1,516,728,610
11/19/2024
Unrestricted
2,108,216,665
11/19/2024
nyt
12 hours ago
Vplm, aka lord emu of eGipped, states that they invented/brought forth/made possible.... Wifi calling. OMG....the blatant LIES you ppl allow them to get away with (by the boatloads and for many years). You FULLY DESERVE WHAT YOU'RE GETTING BACK FROM VPLM for allowing them to get away with one whopper after another. Either that or you're so naive, it's a wonder how you make it thru your day.
Wifi calling has been around for a long time and before Vplm was even a thought. Not only that, but Vplm never invented anything. They simply bought the core patents from digi-phony-ca. Digi-phony-ca didn't want them, which is pretty strange considering the big emu says digi hired some 20 engineers, paying some $17 mil to create them. And then they did nothing with them and sold for dirt cheap to their buds. Sounds like utter nonsense... and most likely, it is. And to make it even utterly more nonsensical, soon as Vplm bought them and finished getting them approved, they ALSO tried to get rid of them like a hot potato. Again, makes no sense, does it? Of course not...
It was a bullshit, deceptive scam from the git. They never had the slightest intention of selling the patents. They used the patents a carrot, along with the blatant lying PRs for 2 to 3 yrs, in order to build the everlasting GIANT MEAN Green, fiat, SHARE PRINTING/SELLING SHARES MACHINE WITH THE OPTIONAL INSIDER ATM ATTACHMENT (batteries included).
Never, to my knowledge, has Vplm so much as uttered the word wifi, much less claimed to have invented it.
Wifi calling, happens to be one of those things that's highly limited. It could NEVER REPLACE regular cellular calling and the suggestion in the antitrust and monopoly suits recently started, that wifi calling should replace cellular network.....is such utter bull that those who accept and agree with this idea put forth in the suits, ought to be deported to some dummy colony...
Wifi calling is only a working choice when using one's home internet or at some Hotspot. It's not a mobile thing. Mobile phones are a mobile thing, designed to work wherever you go, within certain limitations. You CANNOT DO WIFI CALLS WHILE YOU ARE ON THE MOVE! ONLY WHEN YOU'RE STATIONARY WITH A WIFI SIGNAL. Now, just because cellular service is able to let calls switch back and forth between cellular and wifi seamlessly, IS NOT, I REPEAT, NOT A REASON TO CLAIM CUSTOMERS ARE BEING RIPPED OFF BY THE CELL COMPANIES BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO SWITCH YOUR CALL OVER TO WIFI WHEN AVAILABLE, THEREBY SAVING MONEY THAT THEY ARE ALLEGEDLY NOT PASSING ON TO THE CONSUMERS.
THEY MOST CERTAINLY ARE PASSING THOSE SAVINGS ON TO THE CUSTOMERS, AS WITNESSED BY THE OBVIOUS FACT THAT CELLULAR PRICES HAVE BEEN COMING DOWN SURELY AND STEADILY OVER THE YEARS. TO THE POINT WHERE YOU GET SO MUCH SERVICE (and often hardware as well) for so little nowadays, it's amazing! It's a ridiculous notion that vplm is claiming, that the answer is to provide wifi phone service seperate from cellular, for a much cheaper price. OBVIOUSLY, that's never gonna happen because no one, unless I suppose, they are non ambulatory, can use wifi calling as their main gig. But YES....NOW you can be switched back and forth automatically by the system and now most if not all phones have the wifi capability built in. But the main point here is that their phone and carrier must be able to handle both technologies. You CANNOT SIT ALL DAY LONG AT A MCDONALD'S OR AT HOME OR SOME HOTSPOT WITH A LAPTOP OR A WIFI CAPABLE PHONE AND DO IT LIKE THAT! IT'S NOT PRACTICAL. YOU NEED TO MOVE. YOU CANNOT MOVE WITH WIFI ONLY! YOU MUST HAVE BOTH WIFI AND CELLULAR AVAILABLE AND WORKING. THE ONLY EXCEPTION IS IF YOU WERE CHRONICALLY BEDRIDDEN. Then, you would not need a handset. You would simply use a mic from computer and use wifi if you had home internet...
So the whole concept touted by the emu and the rest of the bozos promulagating the choice of customers to get dirt cheap wifi calling........ IS AS MUCH A JOKE AND A FARCE AS VPLM TRILLION DOLLAR PATENTS ARE!!!
While I'm at it, JUST AS RIDICULOUS......IS THE BOGUS NOTION THAT THERE IS A MONOPOLY GOING ON BY THE CELL COMPANIES... THERE IS NO SUCH THING... IN FACT, THE OPPOSITE, IS AND HAS BEEN LONG IN PLACE. THERE ARE 4 MAIN CELL COMPANIES, NOW DOWN TO 3 SINCE SPRINT WAS BOUGHT OUT. A MONOPOLY IS PERPETRATED BY ONE COMPANY, NOT 3! FURTHERMORE, it's really not 3 anyway, because approx half of the cell companies providing service today are MVNOs. They rent out the infrastructure to all those smaller companies. They have varying deals and services available. So in actual fact, the 3 main companies PLUS all the many MVNOs, have and do PROMOTE A HUGE AMOUNT OF COMPETITION AMONGST EA OTHER WHICH HAS INDEED RESULTED IN WAAAAY LOWER PRICES AND WAAAAAY MORE INCLUDED SERVICES!!! THAT, MY DEAR FREINDS IS COMPETITIVENESS AT ITS FINEST AND HAS RESULTED IN SO MUCH MORE VALUE FOR ALL CONSUMERS, ACROSS THE BOARD!
FOR ABOVE REASONS......THESE SO CALLED ANTITRUST AND MONOPOLY SUITS WILL BE SO LAUGHED OUT OF COURT, IT WON'T EVEN BE FUNNY.
NOW.....GO AHEAD AND IGNORE ALL I'VE SAID ABOVE.......or HAVE THE BALLS TO REFUTE! (yeah, like that's gonna happen...)
nyt
2 days ago
52 week lows are quite significant as well, even for the likes of Vplm. Can't help wondering if it's getting beyond the control of the MMs, in terms of what they can get away with......although, it kind of seems like Vplm is allowed to get away with whatever they want, regardless. One need only to look at the huge list of mystery names and non descript reasons for tons of payouts/payoffs found on any and every quarterly and yearly filings. For a "company" that can't sell a damn thing cept shares, there sure are alot of mystery payouts of kazillions of shares anytime you look.
As to "own", ironically, my guess of "blown" is close to the same meaning. I learn many terms from you...as when I'm not familiar, I always look it up. Lots of times I'm thinking it's a typo but turns out to be a word. Remembering the defs is another story. I seem to have reached my capacity......so I have to toss a few old ones out to make room for the new, lol.
nyt
2 days ago
That's because Vplm is in its best position, ever! (for falling prices, that is...)
It's enough to make you "anti-trust" them..
They look good in double zeroes. They wear them well! They'll be stunning in trips!
They are now well past the 30 day mark for not closing above a penny, necessary for maintaining QB status on the OTC and depending on where the count starts, we'll into the 180 day period, where you must periodically achieve a string of days above a penny (or something similar to that) in order to not fall back into the lowly pink level where they were for years. Looks like they're headin back home.
In any event, the MMs will undoubtedly keep a market going here, for themselves and as the ones who are part of the cabal. Vplm is a solid, long term money maker........just not for the common retail shareholders. It's very dependable source of income for the inside and has been for many years.
VVVVVV
3 days ago
Fung_derf….useless you’ve been living under a rock, no one believes the guy knows anything, that hasn’t already been made public. Investment Relations, doesn’t give out insider information. PERIOD!
You may want to look up the definition of embellish. Something not true, could very well be saying “something happening soon”. One can call it whatever you want, aka, hyperbole, embellishing, encouragement, etc. Most intelligent people understand all the nonsense.
Pretrial conference was happening soon. Anticipation of the upcoming ‘606 RBR trial, and the Mobile Gateway reexamination decision, could be happening soon. Only an idiot would think saying “good things to come”, is knowing something others don’t know.
You’re the one that may just need to get their eyeballs checked.
You may want to check but, it’s interesting that every time VPLM puts out a press release, the PPS seems likely to go down.
To be clear, I’ve bantered back and forth many times on this board with him. It was all in good fun. But, I have never corresponded with him directly, I’ve never spoken, texted or emailed him once. From what I’ve been told by a few shareholders, he’s a good guy.
IMHO
fung_derf
3 days ago
Listen, from what I’ve been told, the guy doesn’t know anything that’s not already been made public. Speaking in hyperbole, excitement, enthusiasm, wishful thinking, embellishing and encouraging shareholders, isn’t illegal.
em·bel·lish
/?m'beliSH/
verb
make (a statement or story) more interesting or entertaining by adding extra details, especially ones that are not true.
"she had real difficulty telling the truth because she liked to embellish things"
Ahhhh, but here's the difference, "the guy" in question has been claiming for years that he gets his info directly from the insiders within the company. You are right, he DOESN'T know anything, he just claims he does.....and most likely based on his efforts, is paid to do so. Why else would he be getting booted on another website and yet, keep making new aliases (with the same name), to keep posting that he DOES have insider info?
As for "needed eyeballs"....this is EXACTLY the purpose of IHUB. They even track stuff here like most interest boards and most new posts. Considering the company has no product and derives all income from printing and selling their new shares to the public, other than "needed eyeballs", what else is there? Why else would the CEO go to an entirely new PAID PROMOTION website to post his thoughts if not for new eyeballs?
Lastly, if you don't realize the company's legal team is losing badly, you have your eyes closed. The "high powered" law firm has used facts and past cases to win. In fact, they've won so badly, the Judge (who tends to favor plaintiffs), rewarded legal fees to the defendants. AND, the company has gone a completely different direction to keep this scam alive so they can dump more shares. Surely knowing a class action suit does nothing for shareholders.
What part are you unaware of? Perhaps you are in need of some new needed eyeballs?
chazzy1
3 days ago
I cannot speak for others, but I purchased shares in VPLM for a number of reasons, none of which have anything to do with message board hype, pro or con. After reading the filings and press releases, and doing my own DD, I have added to my position in VPLM. I have not sold a single share based on any negative hype on ihub, nor have I purchased a single share based on any message board "enthusiasm." I am grateful for the expert legal analysis and opinions by certain contributors to this forum, however, I am certainly not affiliated with, nor have I ever communicated with company insiders, nor do I possess any "insider" information. I do have the right to express my opinions in this public forum, which is exactly what I have done, and I would encourage others to do the same. The most plausible explanation for why we haven't seen many posts lately lies in the fact that there has been no news or recent developements to digest. I really do not have an opinion about the antitrust and class action cases, however, I remain optimistic about the strength of Mr. Hudnell's motion for reconsideration. I agree with DesktopDR in that all we can do now is sit on our hands and wait for Judge Albright's response to that motion. IMHO.
ORCA
6 days ago
BROKE LOL.BTW VPLM IS MY B$TCH.I WILL MAKE A TON OF MONEY HERE AGAIN.I AM ACCUMULATING WEEKLY.
THE TIME WILL COME WHEN I SAY BOOOMMMMMMMM THAT DAY THE LEVEL II WILL GOT BANANAS
I AM WAITING FOR THE RIGHT TIME.TO HIT WITH NO REMORSE AND GET EVEN.VPLM TIME WILL COME
KEEP WATCHING.
BTW MAKE THAT $58,589.66 FOR NOVEMBER.WITH THE TODAYS NET PROFIT PROBABLY $60,000.00 FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER.BROKE ORCA.LOL.WHEN IT COMES TO TRADING ORCA HAS YET TO POST FAKE TRADES
STRAIGHT FROM THE SCHWAB.GUESS WHAT???I BEAT THESE PROS WITH ONE ACCOUNT IMAGINE THAT HUH?
BEATING THEM ON PENNY STOCKS WITH ALMOST NO VOLUMES.LOL.THE GREATEST OF ALL TIMES.
BTW. NO ONE HAS 95% SUCCESS RATE,IF I GO TO TRADE ON BIG BOARDS,THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY TOAST.,I WILL TAKE EVERY FREAKEN CENT OUT OF THEIR WALLETS.I WENT ON BIG BOARDS IN FEBRUARY 2021 FOR COUPLE MONTHS.GUESS WHAT??I WAS MAKING MONEY SOOOOO EASY IT WAS CRAZY.I HAD ABOUT 50 FLIPS IN ONE DAY.
THAT WAS MY BEST MONTH EVER.I MADE $185,000.00 JUST FOR FEBRUARY.IF I STAYED ON BIG BOARDS.THESE GUYS WOULD HAVE LOST THEIR SHIRTS.I FELT SORRY FOR THEM.AND I LEFT THE BIG BOARDS.THERE WAS ZERO CHALLENGE FOR ME THERE.ABSOLUTE ZERO.IF THESE DIRT BAGS CAN NOT BEAT ME ON STOCKS WITH NO VOLUMES.HOW CAN THEY BEAT ME ON STOCKS WITH ENORMOUS VOLUMES??THEY ARE TOAST.ALL THAT WITH ONE ACCOUNT.LOL
I AM FURIOUS BEYOND BELIEF WITH THEIR STUPID ALGO SYSTEM THAT I AM GOING TO BIG BOARDS IN 2025.
THEY ARE GOING TO BE SOOOOOOOOOOO FD.THE REASON I WILL CREATE SHORT COVERS.,AND DESTROY THAT ENTIRE GROUP OF SHORT SELLERS.ONCE AND FOR ALL.I CAN NOT WAIT.
ORCA
1 week ago
THE SS HAS BEEN UPDATED.WHILE THE O/S IS THE SAME.THE UNRESTRICTED SHARES ARE UP TO 2,108 BILLION
FROM 2,105 BILLION.SO THE INSIDERS SOLD 3 MILLION SHARES.ADDED TO THE FLOAT.SELLING AT .007 IS VERY SCARRY.FOR THE STOCK.WE WILL STAY DOWN HERE,AND SHAKE THEM OUT AT DIRT LOWS.F THEM.
I OWN 9 MILLION NOW.AVERAGE ON THE 6 MILLION IS AT .0072.ON THE STUPID FIDELITY ACCOUNT ON 3 MILLION AVERAGE IS .011.I HAVE NOT LOGGED IN TO POS FIDELITY EVER SINCE THEY PULLED THEIR GARBAGE ON PENNY STOCKS.SCAMBAGS.ANYWAYS.VPLM IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE UNLESS WE SHAKE OUT THE INSIDERS AT THE LOWEST PRICES POSSIBLE.WHEN I DETECT THEM SELLING,I WILL SELL TOO.IF THEY UNDER CUT ME I WILL TOO.TO DEATH.F YOU ALGO SYSTEM.F YOU.
Outstanding Shares
3,624,945,275
11/19/2024
Restricted
1,516,728,610
11/19/2024
Unrestricted
2,108,216,665
11/19/2024
nyt
1 week ago
Here's how it's done, truthfully, logically and factually...
Around a couple weeks ago, someone posted what I think was called exhibit A of the anti-trust or monopoly suit. I think it was 1 page and it was the 1st and only document I've read where the lawyers explained how the big dogs were acting as a monopoly. I read it and concluded it to be a ridiculous non sequitor complaint that was based on such nonsense, it was hard to believe it was serious.
So I immediately posted exactly what I perceived to be wrong with it, with detail. No one commented on it even tho it poked a huge hole in the bs suit.
A week later, or so, I think it was sun (I forget) was good enough to post the exhibit A rebuttal from Verizon. Sorry if I'm not properly naming the documents, I'm not good with that.....but what the defendant lawyers had to say against the complaint was nice and crystal clear to me and agreed, to the letter, with what I had earlier posted as my take on the suit.
I guess my simply coming on now and claiming this is not enough, so I'll take the time and try to find both posts for display here to backup my contention. That'll give yall time to call bs and hopefully I can find the posts. I had it NAILED!
chazzy1
1 week ago
There has been expressed some question as to whether or not a judge in the Western District of Texas is required to respond to a motion for reconsideration, if that judge does not intend to reverse his final ruling. I believe that the judge must respond, and for the following reason.
There is a specific time limit in which to appeal a decision from a district court. However, the clock does not start on that until after the district court judge makes a ruling on the motion for reconsideration. Actually, this makes sense because, otherwise, a district court judge could conceivably run out the clock, leaving the agrieved party no time to execute an appeal.
Thus, my opinion is that Judge Albright must respond to VoIP-Pal's motion for reconsideration, regardless of which way he may decide. As to a specific time limit imposed on a judge for responding to a motion for reconsideration, I think that it would be the same as it is for all motions, as defined in the judge's standing orders.