Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements-Restated
For The Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Business:
Next Generation Management Corp was incorporated in the State of Nevada in November 1980 as Micro Tech
Industries
, with an official name change to Next Generation Media Corp in April 1997 and an official name change to Next Generation Energy Corp in July 2010
, and
official name change to Next Generation Management Corp in June 2014
. The Company is an independent oil and natural gas company engaged in the exploration, development, and production of predominantly natural gas properties located onshore in the United States.
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. The company uses the straight line method in computing depreciation for financial statement purposes.
Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to income, and renewals and replacements are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the assets and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts.
Estimated useful lives are as follows:
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment
|
7-10 years
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
10 years
|
Vehicles
|
5 years
|
Computers & Software
|
5 years
|
Software Development
|
5 years
|
Buildings
|
40 years
|
The Company did not record any depreciation expense for 2012 or 2011.
Advertising Expense:
The Company expenses the cost of advertising and promotions as incurred. The Company incurred no advertising costs in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Revenue Recognition:
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 605-10, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605-10”). ASC 605-10 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. The Company defers any revenue for which the product has not been delivered or is subject to refund until such time that the Company and the customer jointly determine that the product has been delivered or no refund will be required.
ASC 605-10 incorporates Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 605-25, Multiple-Element Arraignments (“ASC 605-25”). ASC 605-25 addresses accounting for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The effect of implementing ASC 605-25 on the Company’s financial position and results of operations was not significant.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 360-10, Property, plant and equipment (“ASC 360-10”). The Statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses, or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undiscounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 360-10 also requires assets to be disposed of be reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell. The Based on management’s review of its assets no impairment was recognizedin 2012 or 2011
Comprehensive Income:
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 220-10, Comprehensive Income (“ASC 220-10”) which establishes standards for the reporting and displaying of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of a business during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owners sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The Company does not have any items of comprehensive income in any of the periods presented.
Segment Information:
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 280-10, Segment Reporting - Overall - Disclosure ("ASC 280-10") which establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information for those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. ASC 280-10 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance.
Stock Based Compensation:
Effective for the year beginning January 1, 2006, the Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 718-10, Compensation (“ASC 718-10”). The Company made no employee stock-based compensation grants before December 31, 2005 and therefore has no unrecognized stock compensation related liabilities or expense unvested or vested prior to 2006. Stock-based compensation expense recognized under ASC 718-10 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1,070,056 and $0, respectively.
Liquidity:
As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company recorded a net (loss) of ($1,720,306) and ($898,471) during the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company's total liabilities exceeded its total assets by $444,922 as of December 31, 2012.
Concentration of Credit Risk:
Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade receivables. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with high credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of the financial statement in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if any, at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the respective reporting periods. The Company bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions and information that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be perceived with certainty and, accordingly, these estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the Company’s operating environment changes. Actual results may differ from the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s most significant areas of estimation and assumption are:
|
·
|
Estimation of future cash flows used to assess the recoverability of long-lived assets
|
|
·
|
Estimation of the net deferred income tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
·
|
Determination of the appropriate assumptions to use to estimate the fair value of stock-based compensation for purposes of recording stock-based compensation
|
Gas and Oil Properties:
The Company will follow the full cost method of accounting for the exploration, development, and acquisition of gas and oil reserves. Under this method, all such costs (productive and nonproductive) including salaries, benefits, and other internal costs directly attributable to these activities are capitalized and amortized on an aggregate basis over the estimated lives of the properties using the units-of-production method. The Company excludes all costs of unevaluated properties from immediate amortization. The Company’s unamortized costs of natural gas and oil properties are limited to the sum of the future net revenues attributable to proved natural gas and oil reserves discounted at 10 percent plus the lower of cost or market value of any unproved properties. If the Company’s unamortized costs in natural gas and oil properties exceed this ceiling amount, a provision for additional depreciation, depletion and amortization is required. Decreases in market prices, as well as changes in production rates, levels of reserves, and the evaluation of costs excluded from amortization, could result in future ceiling test impairments.
Asset Retirement Obligations:
Accounting Standards Codification 410, Asset retirement and environmental obligations (“ASC 410”) was adopted by the Company. ASC 410 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and that the associated asset retirement costs be capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Company has an option to purchase natural gas and oil properties which may require expenditures to plug and abandon the wells when reserves in the wells are depleted. These expenditures under ASC 410 will be recorded in the period the liability is incurred (at the time the wells are drilled or acquired).
Amortization:
Oil and gas producing property costs are amortized using the unit of production method. The Company did not record any amortization expense in the twelve months ended December 31, 2012.
Research and Development:
The Company accounts for research and development costs in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 730-10, Research and Development (“ASC 730-10”). Under ASC 730-10, all research and development costs must be charged to expense as incurred. Accordingly, internal research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Third-party research and developments costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed or as milestone results have been achieved. Company-sponsored research and development costs related to both present and future products are expensed in the period incurred. The Company did not incur expenditures on research and product development for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Income Taxes:
The Company follows Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 740-10, Income Taxes (“ASC 740-10”) for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability during each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change. Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.
Income tax returns for years subsequent to 2009 are subject to audit by the various tax authorities.
Risks and Uncertainties:
The Company at times may have cash deposits in excess of federally insured limits.
Earnings Per Common Share:
The Company calculates its earnings per share pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" ("SFAS No. 128"). Under SFAS No. 128, basic earnings per share are computed by dividing reported earnings available to common stockholders by weighted average shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution assuming the issuance of common shares for all potential dilative common shares outstanding during the period. The Company had 800,000 options issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012 to purchase stock at a weighted average exercise price of $0.30.
Principles of Consolidation:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the parent company, Next Generation Management Corp and its subsidiary Next Generation Royalties, LLC for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
New Accounting Pronouncements:
The Company did not adopt any new accounting standards that had a material impact on the financial statements.
NOTE 2 – NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable at December 31, 2012 and 2011 consists of the following:
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Note payable-Forge, LLC, bearing interest at 18.00% per annum, the loan is payable at maturity in July 2012 plus accrued interest. (2)
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
Note payable – Asher Enterprises, bearing interest at 8.00% per annum, all principle and accrued interest is payable at maturity in March 2012.(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
Note payable – Asher Enterprises, bearing interest at 8.00% per annum, all principle and accrued interest is payable at maturity in May 2012.(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
Note payable-Knox County, LLC, bearing interest at 6.00% per annum, all principle and accrued interest is payable at maturity in March 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Note payable – Actual Investments, LLC, bearing interest at 6.00% per annum, all principle and accrued interest is payable at maturity in October 2013
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
238,000
|
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
238,000
|
|
Long term portion
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
(1)
|
Obligation to Forge, LLC for $150,000, bearing interest at 18.00% per annum, the loan in payable at maturity in July 2012 plus accrued interest. The note is secured by certain oil and gas properties owned by Knox Gas, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company. The note is convertible to common stock at a conversion price equal to 75% of the average of the closing prices of the Common Stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding a conversion date. The balance outstanding at December 31, 2012 was $150,000 plus accrued interest of $33,812.50. Our obligation to Forge, LLC contains an embedded
beneficial
conversion
feature since the fair value of our common stock on the date of issuance was in excess of the effective conversion price. The embedded
beneficial
conversion
feature was recorded by allocating a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of the feature to “Additional paid-in-capital”. The intrinsic value of the feature is calculated on the issuance date by multiplying the difference between the quoted market price of our common stock and the effective conversion price by the number of common shares into which the note may be converted. The resulting discount on the immediately convertible shares is recorded within “Additional paid-in capital” and is amortized over the period from the date of issuance of the to the stated maturity date. The amount of the discount was $50,000, of which $22,055 was amortized in 2010 and the balance in 2011.
|
(2)
|
The company entered into a promissory note with Actual Investment, LLC on November 27, 2012. The note is unsecured and accrue interest 6% per annum payable on maturity October 26, 2013.
|
(3)
|
During 2011, the Company entered into two Convertible Promissory Notes. The Convertible Notes are unsecured and accrue interest 8% per annum payable upon maturity. The note holders have the option to convert any unpaid principal and accrued interest at any time to the Company’s common stock at a rate of 55% of the average three trading days low out of the immediately preceding ten trading days. The amount of the discount on these notes was $88,000 of which $46,887 was amortized in 2011 and the balance of $41,113 in 2012. 10,000,000 shares were issued on December 17, 2012 at market price to settle the two convertible promissory notes to Asher Enterprise.
|
NOTE 3 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company may become party to various legal matters encountered in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management and legal counsel, the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or the future results of operations.
NOTE 4 – INCOME TAXES
Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis.
Management has provided a valuation allowance for the total net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, as they believe that it is more likely than not that the entire amount of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The company will file a consolidated return, with a tax liability of $0 for the year 2012.
NOTE 5 – COMMON STOCK
The Board of Directors approved an increase in the number of authorized common shares on December 3, 2012. The Company's authorized capital stock changed to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. There were 113,853,237 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012.
On May 18, 2010, the Company affected a 1 for 1,000 reverse split of its common stock. In lieu of issuing fractional shares resulting from the split, the Company paid cash equal to $18.50 per share to each shareholder that would have received less than one share as a result of the reverse split, and rounded up all other fractional shares to the next whole number. The Company’s principal purpose in effecting a large reverse split was to eliminate many small shareholders to reduce future administrative costs. As a result of the reverse split, the Company cancelled 32,202 pre-split shares and eliminated 586 shareholders, which left the Company with about 100 total shareholders. The purchase price for the fractional shares was equal to the last trading price of the common stock as the date the Company approved the reverse split, adjusted for the 1 for 1,000 reverse split. All share amounts for 2010 have been adjusted to give effect to the reverse split.
On May 6, 2010, the Company’s board of directors passed resolutions to amend its Articles of Incorporation to (1) change the Company’s name to “Next Generation Energy Corp.” and (2) increase the authorized shares of common stock back to 50,000,000 shares from the 50,000 shares that resulted from the reverse split described above. The amendments were effective July 23, 2010.
During 2011 the Company issued shares of common stock in the following transaction:
|
·
|
In September 2011, we issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Darryl Reed, our chief executive officer, in satisfaction of $600,000 of accrued compensation;
|
|
·
|
In September 2011, we issued 800,000 shares for the exercise of options, of which $47,135 is outstanding as a stock subscription receivable;
|
|
·
|
In the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued 600,000 shares to consultants valued at $172,000;
|
|
·
|
In September 2011, we issued 10,000,000 shares to Seawright Holdings, Inc. in satisfaction of a note payable to Seawright in the original principal amount of $600,000.
|
|
·
|
During the fourth quarter of 2011, we issued 150,000 shares valued at $12,000 in exchange for an extension of a convertible note payable.
|
During 2012 the Company issued shares of common stock in the following transaction:
|
·
|
In the quarter ended March 2012, we issued 1,333,804 shares of common stock upon the conversion of $62,967 of convertible notes;
|
|
·
|
On December 3, 2012, we issued 70,000,000 shares of common stock to Darryl Reed, our chief executive officer, in payment of any accounts payable or accrued expenses owed. The shares were valued at the market price of $0.0175 for $1,225,000 on the date of approval by the board of directors.
|
|
·
|
On December 17, 2012, we issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock, valued at $120,000, to Actual Investments in satisfaction of a note payable by the Company to Asher Enterprise.
|
Options/Warrants
Transactions involving options issued in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are summarized below:
|
|
Options/Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted average
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
800,480
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
0.167 to 0.40
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
0.167 to 0.40
|
|
Cancelled/Expired
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
500.00
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2011
|
|
|
800,300
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled/Expired
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2012
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense recognized by for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 attributable to the issuance of options was $0 and $126,590, respectively. The weighted-average significant assumptions used to determine the fair those fair values, using a Black-Scholes option pricing model are as follows:
2011
Significant assumptions (weighted-average):
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Risk-free interest rate at grant date
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
56.03
|
%
|
Expected dividend payout
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected option life (in years)
|
|
3.8 years
|
|
2012
Significant assumptions (weighted-average):
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
Risk-free interest rate at grant date
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
22.79
|
%
|
Expected dividend payout
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected option life (in years)
|
|
2.8 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average remaining contractual life of the options and warrants issued by the Company as of December 31, 2012 is set forth below.
Date of Issuance
|
|
Number
of Options
/Warrants
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
|
|
October 22, 2010
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
0.30
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Stock and Option Plans
On October 22, 2010, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance for services rendered or to be rendered the Company under the Company's 2010 Stock Option Plan (the "Option Plan"). During 2010, the Company issued 1,100,000 options under the Option Plan.
On October 22, 2010, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register up to 1,500,000 shares of common stock for issuance for services rendered or to be rendered under the Company's 2010 Employee, Consultant and Advisor Stock Compensation Plan. During 2010, the Company issued 1,250,000 shares of common stock under the Plan, of which 500,000 were issued to officers and directors of the Company.
NOTE 6 – RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain amounts on the 2011 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on net income.
NOTE 7 - OIL AND NATURAL GAS PROPERTIES
If the Company begins drilling activities it will use the full cost method of accounting for its investment in oil and natural gas properties. Under this method of accounting, all costs of acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves (including such costs as leasehold acquisition costs, geological expenditures, dry hole costs, tangible and intangible development costs and direct internal costs) are capitalized as the cost of oil and natural gas properties when incurred. To the extent capitalized costs of evaluated oil and natural gas properties, net of accumulated depletion exceed the discounted future net revenues of proved oil and natural gas reserves net of deferred taxes, such excess capitalized costs are charged to expense. Beginning December 31, 2009, full cost companies use the unweighted arithmetic average first day of the month price for oil and natural gas for the 12-month period preceding the calculation date to calculate the future net revenues of proved reserves.
The Company assesses all items classified as unevaluated property on a quarterly basis for possible impairment or reduction in value. The Company assesses properties on an individual basis or as a group if properties are individually insignificant. The assessment includes consideration of the following factors, among others: intent to drill; remaining lease term; geological and geophysical evaluations; drilling results and activity; the assignment of proved reserves; and the economic viability of development if proved reserves are assigned. During any period in which these factors indicate an impairment, the cumulative drilling costs incurred to date for such property and all or a portion of the associated leasehold costs are transferred to the full cost pool and are then subject to amortization.
NOTE 8 – ACQUISITION OF ASSETS
On March 22, 2011, the Company purchased all of the membership interests of Knox Gas, LLC for $500,000. The purchase price is payable pursuant to two promissory notes in the amount of $250,000 each that are payable to Joel Sens and Barbara Reed. Mr. Sens is an officer and director of the Company. Mrs. Reed is the spouse of Darryl Reed, who is an officer and director of the Company.
Knox Gas, LLC owns a lease of 100 acres, which contains five drilled wells; a lease of 20.2 acres, which contains two drilled wells; a lease of 700 acres which contains no wells, and a lease of 400 acres, which contains three drilled wells. The properties have been appraised, as an operator, at $624,360 by an independent valuation firm. However, the intended use of the property is to convert the leases into royalty interest. Prior to the Company’s acquisition of Knox Gas, LLC, Knox Gas, LLC had agreed to guarantee a loan obtained by the Company in July 2011 in the amount of $150,000, and pledged its interest in the wells to secure the guarantee. See Note 1 – Notes Payable.
Subequently, it was determined that the carrying value of the assets underlying the membership interest purchased were overstated. See Note 15 - Restatement
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company purchased four royalty interests in existing oil or gas wells on three different properties for aggregate consideration of $30,269. The Company sold one of the interests in the fourth quarter for $7,925 and recognized a loss of $3,889
NOTE 9 – DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
On March 22, 2011, the Company conveyed its 35% interest in Dynatech, LLC to Darryl Reed, the Company’s chief executive officer, for $10. At the time of the conveyance, Dynatech’s only asset was an office building in Virginia. The office building’s principal tenant was United Marketing Solutions, Inc., which went out of business in early 2010, and its other tenants had vacated the premises as well. As a result of the loss of tenants, Dynatech was unable to pay the mortgages on the property. As of the Company’s December 31, 2010 financial statements, the building had a book value of $3,395,247 and was subject to indebtedness of $3,700,000, plus accrued interest, plus cross collateralization of $500,000.
NOTE 10- CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES PAYABLE
The Company entered into a Convertible Promissory Note in July 2010, under which it received $150,000 of loan proceeds. The Convertible Note accrues interest at 18% per annum which is payable and due quarterly. The noteholder has the option to convert any unpaid note principal and accrued interest to the Company's common stock at a rate of 75% of the average closing price of the last ten days of trading any time after the issuance date of the note.
During 2011, the Company entered into two Convertible Promissory Notes, under which it received an aggregate of $88,000 of loan proceeds. The Convertible Notes accrue interest 8% per annum payable upon maturity. The note holders have the option to convert any unpaid principal and accrued interest at any time to the Company’s common stock at a rate of 55% of the average three trading days low out of the immediately preceding ten trading days. In accordance ASC 470-20, the Company allocated, on a relative fair value basis, the net proceeds amongst the common stock, convertible notes and warrants issued to the investors. The two convertible note were settled on December 17, 2012 by issuance of 10 million shares at the market price of $0.012. The company suffered a loss of $44,871 for the conversion.
NOTE 11 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company had one reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and accordingly is not required to present financial information by segment.
NOTE 12 – PREFERRED STOCK
We may issue shares of preferred stock in one or more classes or series within a class as may be determined by our board of directors, who may establish the number of shares to be included in each class or series, may fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such class or series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. Any preferred stock so issued by the board of directors may rank senior to the common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of us, or both. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock or the existence of the un-issued preferred stock might tend to discourage or render more difficult a merger or other change in control. We have designated two series of preferred stock, one for 500,000 shares that is referred to as “Callable Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (Series A Preferred Stock)” and the other for 500,000 shares that is referred to as “Redeemable Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock).” There are no shares outstanding of either series.
NOTE 13 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company leased office space from Capitol Home Remodeling, LC, which was partially owned by Darryl Reed, our chief executive officer. The lease was terminated on August 31, 2012. As of December 3, 2012, we owed Capital Home Remodeling, LLC $32,550 for accrued but unpaid rental expense. The expense was settled by issuance of shares, to Darryl Reed on December 3, 2012.
On December 3, 2012, we issued 70,000,000 shares (post-split) of common stock to Darryl Reed for $1,225,000, or $0.0175 per share, which was the market price on the date of issuance. Mr. Reed is our chairman and chief executive officer. Mr. Reed paid for the shares by crediting the purchase price against amounts owed to him for accrued wages and other payables, and the remainder as bonus compensation
On March 25, 2010, we loaned $125,000 to Seawright Holdings, Inc. (“Seawright”) pursuant to a promissory note that bears interest at 6% per annum, and is payable in full 24 months after the date of the note. The loan proceeds were used by Knox County Minerals, LLC (“Knox Minerals”), a subsidiary of Seawright, to pay the down payment on an option to purchase the oil and gas mineral rights under 6,615 acres of land in Knox County, Kentucky for $1,575,000. On April 16, 2010, Knox Minerals assigned its rights under the option agreement to the Company. A portion of the consideration for the assignment was a promissory note payable by the Company to Knox Minerals in the amount of $600,000 payable with interest at the rate of 6% per annum five years after the date of the note. The parties agreed that the promissory note would be secured by the oil and gas properties in the event we completed the purchase of the properties, which we did not do. Joel Sens is the principal shareholder and sole director and officer of Seawright. At the time both notes were issued, Mr. Sens was not an officer, director or shareholder of the Company. After April 16, 2010, Mr. Sens became an officer and director of the Company, and as a result both notes are reflected as related party obligations on our financial statements. As of December 31, 2012, Seawright was indebted to us for principal of $125,000 and accrued interest of $20,795. There was also a non-interest advance of $65,000. The total amount of $210, 795 was adjusted against the allowance for bad debt reserve.
On March 22, 2011, the Company purchased all of the membership interests of Knox Gas, LLC for $500,000. The purchase price is payable pursuant to two promissory notes in the amount of $250,000 each that are payable to Joel Sens and Barbara Reed. Mr. Sens is an officer and director of the Company. Ms. Reed is the spouse of Darryl Reed, who is an officer and director of the Company. Knox Gas, LLC owns a lease of 100 acres, which contains five drilled wells; a lease of 20.2 acres, which contains two drilled wells; a lease of 700 acres which contains no wells, and a lease of 400 acres, which contains three drilled wells. The properties have been appraised at $624,360 by an independent valuation firm. As of December 31, 2012, the fair value was established at $213,881, and an impairment loss of $286,119 was entered.
The note payable to related parties, Joel Sens and Barbara Reed, was forgiven for principal balance and accrued interest and fees on December 15, 2012. Subsequently, it was determined that the underlying assets cost was $71,000 and was paid by the Company. As a result the Company has restated the financial statements to reflect the proper cost, removed the related notes payable, accrued interest and impairment. See Note 15 – Restatement.
On March 22, 2011, the Company conveyed its 35% interest in Dynatech, LLC to Darryl Reed, the Company’s chief executive officer, for $10. At the time of the conveyance, Dynatech’s only asset was an office building in Virginia. The office building’s principal tenant was United Marketing Solutions, Inc., which went out of business in early 2010, and its other tenants had vacated the premises as well. As a result of the loss of tenants, Dynatech was unable to pay the mortgages on the property. As of the Company’s December 31, 2010 financial statements, the building had a book value of $3,395,247 and was subject to indebtedness of $3,700,000, plus accrued interest, plus cross collateralization of $500,000.
On September 22, 2011, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Darryl Reed, our chief executive officer in payment of accrued compensation of $600,000. The shares were valued at the market price on the date of approval by the board of directors. Mr. Reed waived $11,795 of compensation as part of the settlement.
On September 22, 2011, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to Seawright Holdings, Inc. in satisfaction of a note payable by the Company to Seawright in the original principal amount of $600,000. Joel Sens, one of our officers and directors, is also an officer and director and significant shareholder of Seawright. The shares were valued at the market price on the date of approval by the board of directors. Seawright waived $60,420 of interest as part of the settlement.
During 2011, we made advances to Knox Gas, LLC totaling $55,000 for the acquisition of oil and gas leases. See Note 15- Restatement
NOTE 14 – GOING CONCERN MATTERS
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company has incurred operating losses of ($1,720,306) and ($681,989), respectively. In addition, the Company has a deficiency in stockholder’s equity of ($444,922) and ($194,718) at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These factors among others may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
The Company’s existence is dependent upon management’s ability to develop profitable operations. Management is devoting substantially all of its efforts to establishing its business and there can be no assurance that the Company’s efforts will be successful. However, the planned principal operations have not fully commenced and no assurance can be given that management’s actions will result in profitable operations or the resolution of its liquidity problems. The accompanying statements do not include any adjustments that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
In order to improve the Company’s liquidity, the Company is currently trying to raise capital through conversion of ownership of wells into royalty interests. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its efforts to secure additional equity financing.
NOTE 15 – RESTATEMENT
The Company is restating its financial statements to properly account for the 2011 acquisition of Knox Gas LLC. The amendment is necessary to report the actual cost incurred by the Company in acquiring the assets that were conveyed to the company through the purchase of all membership interests. The original transaction was recorded as a purchase in exchange for two promissory notes of $250,000 each issued to Joel Senes and Barabara Reed. The actual cost to acquire these leases was $71,000.During the audit of the 2013 financial statements, it was determined that the Company had actually made and expensed the payments to acquire the assets held by Knox Gas LLC during 2010 and 2011. In addition, a operator is currently extracting gas from the properties and paying royalties directly to the land owners. Negotiations with the operator to pay a royalty to the Company failed during the first quarter of 2014. The Company intends to file suit to protect its rights to the income generated by the wells. As of the date of this amendment the Company has not taken legal action. The impact of the restatement on the financial statements was as follows:
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Restated
|
|
2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated Oil & Gas Properties
|
|
$
|
213,881
|
|
|
$
|
71,000
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
$
|
14,038,295
|
|
|
$
|
13,482,569
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
$
|
(14,454,189
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,041,344
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,036,343
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,720,306
|
)
|
Loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.04
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated Oil & Gas Properties
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
71,000
|
|
Accrued interest payable-related party
|
|
$
|
25,808
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Note payable-related party
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
$
|
(12,417,846
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,321,038
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(979,279
|
)
|
|
$
|
(898,471
|
)
|
Loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.05
|
)
|
NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)
For subsequent events through April 14, 2014 see the audited financial statement for the years ended December 31, 2013 and the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Management has evaluated the Company’s activity since April 14, 2014 and in their opinion has determined that additional material subsequent events occurred as follows:
On April 25, 2014, the Company through its subsidiary signed a lease for a new medical marijuana dispensary in Hollywood California for $8,000 per month. The lease has an effective date of May 1, 2014 and has a two year term with a 3% escalation clause in year two.
During May and June of 2014, he Company entered into a sublease agreement with Highway 2 Health, LLC, loaned it $150,000 and executed a five year consulting agreement for $6,000 per month.
During the period April 1, 2014 through June 26, 2014 the Company borrowed $95,000 from a consultant of the Company and $299,900 from other parties. In addition, Actual investments converted a portion of its loan to 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
F-21