NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – Significant Accounting Policies:
Nature of Business
Founded in 1938, Tractor Supply Company (the “Company” or “we” or “our” or “us”) is the largest rural lifestyle retailer in the United States (“U.S.”). The Company is focused on supplying the needs of recreational farmers, ranchers, and all those who enjoy living the rural lifestyle (which we refer to as the “Out Here” lifestyle), as well as tradesmen and small businesses. Stores are located primarily in towns outlying major metropolitan markets and in rural communities. The Company also owns and operates Petsense, LLC (“Petsense”), a small-box pet specialty supply retailer focused on meeting the needs of pet owners, primarily in small and mid-sized communities, and offering a variety of pet products and services. At December 28, 2019, the Company operated a total of 2,024 retail stores in 49 states (1,844 Tractor Supply and Del’s retail stores and 180 Petsense retail stores) and also offered an expanded assortment of products online at TractorSupply.com and Petsense.com.
Basis of Presentation
In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company adopted lease accounting guidance as discussed in Note 6 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Adoption of the new lease accounting guidance had a material impact to our Consolidated Balance Sheets and related disclosures, and resulted in the recording of additional right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $2.08 billion as of the date of adoption. This guidance was applied using the optional transition method which allowed the Company to not recast comparative financial information but rather recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date in the period of adoption. No adjustment to retained earnings was made as a result of the adoption of this guidance. Consistent with the optional transition method, the financial information in the Consolidated Balance Sheets prior to the adoption of this new lease accounting guidance has not been adjusted and is therefore not comparable to the current period presented. The standard did not materially impact our Consolidated Statements of Income, Comprehensive Income, Stockholders’ Equity, or Cash Flows. For additional information, including the required disclosures, related to the impact of adopting this standard, see Note 6 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities,” using the modified retrospective transition method. This method allows for a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings, as of the effective date in the period of adoption, for previously recorded amounts of hedge ineffectiveness. Upon adoption of the guidance, we recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment of $0.7 million from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. For additional information on the required disclosures related to the impact of adopting this guidance, see Note 5 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company adopted accounting guidance that allowed for a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”). This guidance was applied retrospectively, which resulted in the reclassification of $0.6 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, and Statements of Comprehensive Income as of and for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017. No other periods presented were affected by the adoption of this accounting guidance.
Fiscal Year
The Company’s fiscal year includes 52 or 53 weeks and ends on the last Saturday of the calendar year. The fiscal years ended December 28, 2019, December 29, 2018, and December 30, 2017, all consisted of 52 weeks.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Management Estimates
The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) inherently requires estimates and assumptions by management of the Company that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates and assumptions by management primarily impact the following key financial statement areas:
Inventory Valuation
Inventory Impairment Risk
The Company identifies potentially excess and slow-moving inventory by evaluating turn rates, historical and expected future sales trends, age of merchandise, overall inventory levels, current cost of inventory, and other benchmarks. The Company has established an inventory valuation reserve to recognize the estimated impairment in value (i.e., an inability to realize the full carrying value) based on the Company’s aggregate assessment of these valuation indicators under prevailing market conditions and current merchandising strategies. The Company does not believe its merchandise inventories are subject to significant risk of obsolescence in the near term. However, changes in market conditions or consumer purchasing patterns could result in the need for additional reserves.
Shrinkage
The Company performs physical inventories at least once a year for each store that has been open more than 12 months, and the Company has established a reserve for estimating inventory shrinkage between physical inventory counts. The reserve is established by assessing the chain-wide average shrinkage experience rate, applied to the related periods’ sales volumes. Such assessments are updated on a regular basis for the most recent individual store experiences. The estimated store inventory shrink rate is based on historical experience. The Company believes historical rates are a reasonably accurate reflection of future trends.
Vendor Funding
The Company receives funding from substantially all of its significant merchandise vendors, in support of its business initiatives, through a variety of programs and arrangements, including guaranteed vendor support funds (“vendor support”) and volume-based rebate funds (“volume rebates”). The amounts received are subject to terms of vendor agreements, most of which are “evergreen,” reflecting the on-going relationship with our significant merchandise vendors. Certain of the Company’s agreements, primarily volume rebates, are renegotiated annually, based on expected annual purchases of the vendor’s product. Vendor funding is initially deferred as a reduction of the purchase price of inventory, and then recognized as a reduction of cost of merchandise as the related inventory is sold.
During interim periods, the amount of vendor support and volume rebates are estimated based upon initial commitments and anticipated purchase levels with applicable vendors. The estimated purchase volume (and related vendor funding) is based on the Company’s current knowledge of inventory levels, sales trends and expected customer demand, as well as planned new store openings and relocations. Although the Company believes it can reasonably estimate purchase volume and related volume rebates at interim periods, it is possible that actual year-end results could be different from previously estimated amounts.
Freight
The Company incurs various types of transportation and delivery costs in connection with inventory purchases and distribution. Such costs are included as a component of the overall cost of inventories (on an aggregate basis) and recognized as a component of cost of merchandise sold as the related inventory is sold.
Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company self-insures a significant portion of its workers’ compensation and general liability (including product liability) insurance plans. The Company has stop-loss insurance policies to protect it from individual losses over specified dollar values. Our deductible or self-insured retention, as applicable, for each claim involving workers’ compensation insurance and general liability insurance is limited to $500,000 and our Texas Work Injury Policy is limited to $500,000. Further, we maintain a commercially reasonable umbrella/excess policy that covers liabilities in excess of the primary insurance policy limits.
The full extent of certain workers’ compensation and general liability claims may not become fully determined for several years. Therefore, the Company estimates potential obligations based upon historical claims experience, loss development factors, severity factors, and other actuarial assumptions. Although the Company believes the reserves established for these obligations are reasonably estimated, any significant change in the number of claims or costs associated with claims made under these plans could have a material effect on the Company’s financial results. At December 28, 2019, the Company had net insurance reserves for workers' compensation and general liability plans of $64.6 million compared to $60.5 million at December 29, 2018.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, including lease assets, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
When evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment, the Company first compares the carrying value of the asset or asset group to its estimated undiscounted future cash flows. The evaluation for long-lived assets is performed at the lowest level of identifiable cash flows, which is generally the individual store level. The significant assumptions used to determine estimated undiscounted cash flows include cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of those assets in operations, including margin on net sales, payroll and related items, occupancy costs, insurance allocations and other costs to operate a store. If the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the related asset, the Company calculates an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the related asset or asset group to its estimated fair value, which may be based on an estimated future cash flow model, market valuation, or other valuation technique, as appropriate. The Company recognizes an impairment loss if the amount of the asset’s carrying value exceeds the asset’s estimated fair value. If the Company recognizes an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis will be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining estimated useful life of that asset.
No significant impairment charges were recognized in fiscal 2019, 2018, or 2017. Impairment charges, if recognized, are included in selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are evaluated for impairment annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
In accordance with the accounting standards, an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill or an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If after such assessment an entity concludes that the asset is not impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the asset using a quantitative impairment test, and if impaired, the associated assets must be written down to fair value.
The quantitative impairment test for goodwill compares the fair value of a reporting unit with the carrying value of its net assets, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value of the reporting unit, an impairment charge would be recorded to the Company’s operations, for the amount in which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. We determine fair values for each reporting unit using the market approach, when available and appropriate, the income approach, or a combination of both. The income approach involves forecasting projected financial information (such as revenue growth rates, profit margins, tax rates, and capital expenditures) and selecting a discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in estimated future cash flows. Under the market approach, the fair value is based on observed market data. If multiple valuation methodologies are used, the results are weighted appropriately.
The quantitative impairment test for other indefinite-lived intangible assets involves comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the sum of the discounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the implied fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge would be recorded to the Company’s operations.
No significant impairment charges were recognized in fiscal 2019, 2018, or 2017. Impairment charges, if recognized, are included in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Revenue Recognition and Sales Returns
The Company recognizes revenue at the time the customer takes possession of merchandise. If the Company receives payment before completion of its customer obligations (as per the Company’s special order and layaway programs), the revenue is deferred until the customer takes possession of the merchandise and the sale is complete.
The Company is required to collect certain taxes and fees from customers on behalf of government agencies and remit such collections to the applicable governmental agency on a periodic basis. These taxes and fees are collected from customers at the time of purchase, but are not included in net sales. The Company records a liability upon collection from the customer and relieves the liability when payments are remitted to the applicable governmental agency.
The Company estimates a liability for sales returns based on a rolling average of historical return trends, and the Company believes that its estimate for sales returns is an accurate reflection of future returns associated with past sales. However, as with any estimate, refund activity may vary from estimated amounts. The Company had a liability for sales returns of $11.9 million and $11.3 million as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively.
The Company recognizes revenue when a gift card or merchandise return card is redeemed by the customer and recognizes income when the likelihood of the gift card or merchandise return card being redeemed by the customer is remote (referred to as “breakage”). The gift cards and merchandise return card breakage rate is based upon historical redemption patterns and income is recognized for unredeemed gift cards and merchandise return cards in proportion to those historical redemption patterns. The Company recognized breakage income of $3.0 million, $2.6 million, and $2.4 million in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Cost of Merchandise Sold
Cost of merchandise sold includes the total cost of products sold; freight and duty expenses associated with moving merchandise inventories from vendors to distribution facilities, from distribution facilities to retail stores, from one distribution facility to another, and directly to our customers; tariffs on imported products; vendor support; damaged, junked or defective product; cash discounts from payments to merchandise vendors; and adjustments for shrinkage (physical inventory losses), lower of cost or net realizable value, slow moving product, and excess inventory quantities.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SG&A expenses include payroll and benefit costs for retail, distribution facility, and corporate employees; share-based compensation expenses; occupancy costs of retail, distribution, and corporate facilities; advertising; tender costs, including bank charges and costs associated with credit and debit card interchange fees; outside service fees; and other administrative costs, such as computer maintenance, supplies, travel, and lodging.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs consist of expenses incurred in connection with digital and social media offerings, newspaper circulars, and customer-targeted direct e-mail and direct mail, as well as limited television, radio, and other limited media channels. Costs are expensed when incurred with the exception of television advertising and circular and direct mail promotions, which are expensed upon first showing. Advertising expenses were approximately $86.6 million, $83.4 million, and $81.3 million for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Prepaid advertising costs were approximately $0.6 million and $1.3 million as of December 28, 2019, and December 29, 2018, respectively.
Warehousing and Distribution Facility Costs
Costs incurred at the Company’s distribution facilities for receiving, warehousing, and preparing product for delivery are expensed as incurred and are included in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Because the Company does not include these costs in cost of sales, the Company’s gross margin may not be comparable to other retailers that include these costs in the calculation of gross margin. Distribution facility costs including depreciation were approximately $231.5 million, $209.7 million, and $182.1 million for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Pre-Opening Costs
Non-capital expenditures incurred in connection with opening new stores, primarily payroll and rent, are expensed as incurred. Pre-opening costs were approximately $8.1 million, $8.5 million, and $10.8 million for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company has share-based compensation plans covering certain members of management and non-employee directors, which include incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock units, and performance-based restricted share units. In addition, the Company offers an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) to most employees that work at least 20 hours per week.
The Company estimates the fair value of its stock option awards at the date of grant utilizing a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. However, key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model are adjusted to incorporate the unique characteristics of the Company’s stock option awards. Option pricing models and generally accepted valuation techniques require management to make subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility, expected dividend yield, risk-free interest rate, and expected term. The Company relies on historical volatility trends to estimate future volatility assumptions. The risk-free interest rates used were actual U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity rates for bonds matching the expected term of the option on the date of grant. The expected term of the option on the date of grant was estimated based on the Company’s historical experience for similar options.
In addition to the key assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model, the estimated forfeiture rate at the time of valuation (which is based on historical experience for similar options) is a critical assumption, as it reduces expense ratably over the vesting period. The Company adjusts this estimate periodically, based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.
The fair value of the Company’s restricted stock units and performance-based restricted share units is the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock the day preceding the grant date, discounted for the expected dividend yield over the term of the award.
The Company believes its estimates are reasonable in the context of historical experience. Future results will depend on, among other matters, levels of share-based compensation granted in the future, actual forfeiture rates, and the timing of option exercises.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation includes expenses related to all retail, distribution facility, and corporate assets. Amortization includes expenses related to definite-lived intangible assets.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are anticipated to be in effect when temporary differences reverse or are settled. The effect of a tax rate change is recognized in the period in which the law is enacted in the provision for income taxes. The Company records a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Tax Contingencies
The Company’s income tax returns are periodically audited by U.S. federal and state tax authorities. These audits include questions regarding tax filing positions, including the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. At any time, multiple tax years are subject to audit by the various tax authorities. In evaluating the exposures associated with the Company’s various tax filing positions, the Company records a liability for uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which the Company has established a reserve, is audited and fully resolved or clarified. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax
positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company adjusts its tax contingencies reserve and income tax provision in the period in which actual results of a settlement with tax authorities differs from the established reserve, the statute of limitations expires for the relevant tax authority to examine the tax position or when more information becomes available.
Sales Tax Audit Reserve
A portion of the Company’s sales are to tax-exempt customers, predominantly agricultural-based. The Company obtains exemption information as a necessary part of each tax-exempt transaction. Many of the states in which the Company conducts business will perform audits to verify the Company’s compliance with applicable sales tax laws. The business activities of the Company’s customers and the intended use of the unique products sold by the Company create a challenging and complex tax compliance environment. These circumstances also create some risk that the Company could be challenged as to the accuracy of the Company’s sales tax compliance.
The Company reviews past audit experience and assessments with applicable states to continually determine if it has potential exposure for non-compliance. Any estimated liability is based on an initial assessment of compliance risk and historical experience with each state. The Company continually reassesses the exposure based on historical audit results, changes in policies, preliminary and final assessments made by state sales tax auditors, and additional documentation that may be provided to reduce the assessment. The reserve for these tax audits can fluctuate depending on numerous factors, including the complexity of agricultural-based exemptions, the ambiguity in state tax regulations, the number of ongoing audits, and the length of time required to settle with the state taxing authorities.
Net Income Per Share
The Company presents both basic and diluted net income per share on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average diluted shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive shares are computed using the treasury stock method for share-based awards. Performance-based restricted share units are included in diluted shares only if the related performance conditions have been considered satisfied as of the end of the reporting period.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Temporary cash investments, with a maturity of three months or less when purchased, are considered to be cash equivalents. The majority of payments due from banks for customer credit cards are classified as cash and cash equivalents, as they generally settle within 24 - 48 hours.
Sales generated through the Company’s private label credit cards are not reflected as accounts receivable. Under an agreement with Citi Cards, a division of Citigroup, consumer and business credit is extended directly to customers by Citigroup. All credit program and related services are performed and controlled directly by Citigroup. Payments due from Citigroup are classified as cash and cash equivalents as they generally settle within 24 - 48 hours.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term receivables, trade payables, debt instruments, and interest rate swaps. Due to their short-term nature, the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term receivables, and trade payables approximate current fair value at each balance sheet date. The Company had $397.5 million and $408.8 million in borrowings under our debt facilities (as discussed in Note 4) as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively. Based on current market interest rates (Level 2 inputs), the carrying value of our borrowings under our debt facilities approximates fair value for each period reported. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swaps
is determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows using forward rate curves (a Level 2 input). As described in further detail in Note 5, the fair value of the interest rate swaps, excluding accrued interest, was a net asset of $0.3 million and $5.8 million as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with applicable accounting standards for such instruments and hedging activities, which require that all derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting.
Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge a certain portion of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply the hedge accounting standards.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, as determined by the average cost method, or net realizable value. Inventory cost consists of the direct cost of merchandise including freight, duties, and tariffs. Inventories are net of shrinkage, obsolescence, other valuations, and vendor allowances.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are initially recorded at cost. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Improvements to leased premises are amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining term of the lease or the useful life of the improvement, whichever is less. The following table summarizes the Company's property and equipment balances and includes the estimated useful lives which are generally applied (in thousands, except estimated useful lives):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Useful Lives
|
|
December 28,
2019
|
|
December 29,
2018
|
Land
|
|
|
$
|
100,343
|
|
|
$
|
100,767
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
1 – 35 years
|
|
1,242,544
|
|
|
1,110,767
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
5 – 10 years
|
|
729,272
|
|
|
645,702
|
|
Computer software and hardware
|
2 – 7 years
|
|
440,222
|
|
|
349,500
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
39,110
|
|
|
130,812
|
|
Property and equipment, gross
|
|
|
2,551,491
|
|
|
2,337,548
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(1,387,535)
|
|
|
(1,203,084)
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
$
|
1,163,956
|
|
|
$
|
1,134,464
|
|
The Company entered into agreements with various governmental entities in the states of Kentucky, Georgia, and Tennessee to implement tax abatement plans related to its distribution center in Franklin, Kentucky (Simpson County), its distribution center in Macon, Georgia (Bibb County), and its Store Support Center in Brentwood, Tennessee (Williamson County). The tax abatement plans provide for reduction of real property taxes for specified time frames by legally transferring title to its real property in exchange for industrial revenue bonds. This property was then leased back to the Company. No cash was exchanged.
The lease payments are equal to the amount of the payments on the bonds. The tax abatement period extends through the term of the lease, which coincides with the maturity date of the bonds. At any time, the Company has the option to purchase the real property by paying off the bonds, plus $1. The terms and amounts authorized and drawn under each industrial revenue bond agreement are outlined as follows, as of December 28, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond Term
|
|
Bond Authorized Amount
(in millions)
|
|
Amount Drawn
(in millions)
|
Franklin, Kentucky Distribution Center
|
|
30 years
|
|
$54.0
|
|
$51.8
|
Macon, Georgia Distribution Center
|
|
15 years
|
|
$58.0
|
|
$49.9
|
Brentwood, Tennessee Store Support Center
|
|
10 years
|
|
$78.0
|
|
$75.3
|
Due to the form of these transactions, the Company has not recorded the bonds or the lease obligation associated with the sale lease-back transaction. The original cost of the Company’s property and equipment is recorded on the balance sheet and is being depreciated over its estimated useful life.
Capitalized Software Costs
The Company capitalizes certain costs related to the acquisition and development of software and amortizes these costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, which is two to seven years. Computer software consists of software developed for internal-use and third-party software purchased for internal-use. A subsequent addition, modification or upgrade to internal-use software is capitalized to the extent that it enhances the software’s functionality or extends its useful life. These costs are included in computer software and hardware in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain software costs not meeting the criteria for capitalization are expensed as incurred.
Store Closing Costs
The Company regularly evaluates the performance of its stores and periodically closes those stores that are underperforming. The Company records a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity when the liability is incurred, usually in the period the store closes. Store closing costs were not significant to the results of operations for any of the fiscal years presented.
Leases
Operating lease assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date. Operating lease liabilities represent the present value of lease payments not yet paid. Operating lease assets represent our right to use an underlying asset and are based upon the operating lease liabilities adjusted for prepayments or accrued lease payments, initial direct costs, lease incentives, and impairment, if any, of operating lease assets. To determine the present value of lease payments not yet paid, we estimate incremental borrowing rates corresponding to the reasonably certain lease term. As substantially all of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we estimate our collateralized incremental borrowing rate based upon a synthetic credit rating and yield curve analysis at commencement or modification date in determining the present value of lease payments.
Assets under finance leases are amortized in accordance with the Company’s normal depreciation policy for owned assets or over the lease term, if shorter, and the related charge to operations is included in depreciation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Note 2 – Share-Based Compensation:
Share-based compensation includes stock options, restricted stock units, performance-based restricted share units, and certain transactions under the Company’s ESPP. Share-based compensation expense is recognized based on the grant date fair value of all stock options, restricted stock units, and performance-based restricted share units plus a 15% discount on shares purchased by employees as a part of the ESPP. The discount under the ESPP represents the difference between the purchase date market value and the employee’s purchase price.
There were no significant modifications to the Company's share-based compensation plans since the adoption of the 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”) on May 10, 2018, which replaced the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. Following the adoption of the 2018 Plan, no further grants may be made under the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.
Under our share-based compensation plans, awards may be granted to officers, non-employee directors, other employees, and independent contractors. The per share exercise price of options granted shall not be less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant and such awards will expire no later than ten years from the date of grant. Vesting of awards commences at various anniversary dates following the dates of each grant and certain awards will vest only upon established performance conditions being met. At December 28, 2019, the Company had approximately 11.8 million shares available for future equity awards under the Company’s 2018 Plan.
Share-based compensation expense, including changes in expense for modifications, if any, of awards, was $31.1 million, $28.9 million, and $29.2 million for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Stock Options
The fair value is separately estimated for each option grant. The fair value of each option is recognized as compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. The Company has estimated the fair value of all stock option awards as of the date of the grant by applying a Black-Scholes pricing valuation model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense. The ranges of key assumptions used in determining the fair value of options granted during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, as well as a summary of the methodology applied to develop each assumption, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Expected price volatility
|
26.4 - 27.6%
|
|
26.4 - 27.0%
|
|
25.1 - 26.0%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.6 - 2.5%
|
|
2.5 - 3.0%
|
|
1.7 - 1.9%
|
Weighted average expected term (in years)
|
4.5
|
|
4.5
|
|
4.4
|
Forfeiture rate
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Expected Price Volatility — This is a measure of the amount by which a price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. The Company applies a historical volatility rate. To calculate historical changes in market value, the Company uses daily market value changes from the date of grant over a past period generally representative of the expected life of the options to determine volatility. The Company believes the use of historical price volatility provides an appropriate indicator of future volatility. An increase in the expected volatility will increase compensation expense.
Risk-Free Interest Rate — This is the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity rate over a term equal to the expected term of the option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.
Weighted Average Expected Term — This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding and is based on historical experience. Options granted generally have a maximum term of ten years. An increase in the expected term will increase compensation expense.
Forfeiture Rate — This is the estimated percentage of options granted that are expected to be forfeited or canceled before becoming fully vested. This estimate is based on historical experience. An increase in the forfeiture rate will decrease compensation expense.
Dividend Yield — This is the estimated dividend yield for the weighted average expected term of the option granted. An increase in the dividend yield will decrease compensation expense.
The Company issues shares for options when exercised. A summary of stock option activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Activity
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted Average Fair Value
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 29, 2018
|
|
4,053,386
|
|
|
$
|
72.49
|
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
$
|
46,472
|
|
Granted
|
|
395,701
|
|
|
89.78
|
|
|
$
|
20.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(1,556,917)
|
|
|
71.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled
|
|
(74,651)
|
|
|
76.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 28, 2019
|
|
2,817,519
|
|
|
$
|
75.34
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
$
|
47,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 28, 2019
|
|
1,629,075
|
|
|
$
|
74.81
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
$
|
28,502
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic values in the table above represent the total difference between the Company’s closing stock price at each year-end and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options at each year-end. As of December 28, 2019, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was approximately $7.7 million with a weighted average expense recognition period of 1.6 years.
There were no material modifications to options in fiscal 2019, 2018, or 2017.
Other information relative to options activity during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Total fair value of stock options vested
|
$
|
16,060
|
|
|
$
|
18,247
|
|
|
$
|
15,996
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
$
|
45,101
|
|
|
$
|
43,476
|
|
|
$
|
9,237
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
The Company issues shares for restricted stock units once vesting occurs and related restrictions lapse. The fair value of the restricted stock units is the closing price of the Company’s common stock the day preceding the grant date, discounted for the expected dividend yield over the term of the award. The units generally vest over a one to three-year term; some plan participants have elected to defer receipt of shares of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units, and as a result, those shares are not issued until a later date. A summary of restricted stock unit activity is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Activity
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted at December 29, 2018
|
|
438,070
|
|
|
$
|
64.09
|
|
Granted
|
|
255,500
|
|
|
88.02
|
|
Vested
|
|
(116,118)
|
|
|
71.49
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(34,046)
|
|
|
73.28
|
|
Restricted at December 28, 2019
|
|
543,406
|
|
|
$
|
73.55
|
|
Other information relative to restricted stock unit activity during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Total grant date fair value of restricted stock units vested and issued
|
$
|
8,301
|
|
|
$
|
5,325
|
|
|
$
|
3,301
|
|
Total intrinsic value of restricted stock units vested and issued
|
$
|
10,623
|
|
|
$
|
5,364
|
|
|
$
|
3,465
|
|
There were no material modifications to restricted stock units in fiscal 2019, 2018, or 2017.
As of December 28, 2019, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested restricted stock units was approximately $19.6 million with a weighted average expense recognition period of 1.8 years.
Performance-Based Restricted Share Units
We issue performance-based restricted share units to senior executives that represent shares potentially issuable in the future, subject to the achievement of specified performance goals. The performance metrics for the units are growth in net sales and growth in earnings per diluted share over a specified performance period. Issuance is based upon the level of achievement of the relative performance targets. The fair value of the performance-based restricted share units is the closing price of the Company’s common stock the day preceding the grant date, discounted for the expected dividend yield over the term of the awards. A summary of performance-based restricted share unit activity is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Activity
|
|
Performance-Based Restricted Share Units
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted at December 29, 2018
|
|
41,310
|
|
|
$
|
63.90
|
|
Granted (a)
|
|
58,115
|
|
|
85.51
|
|
Performance adjustment
|
|
29,001
|
|
|
63.90
|
|
Vested
|
|
(28,792)
|
|
|
70.68
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(6,173)
|
|
|
85.04
|
|
Restricted at December 28, 2019
|
|
93,461
|
|
|
$
|
75.97
|
|
(a)Assumes 100% target level achievement of the relative performance targets. The actual number of shares that will be issued, which may be higher or lower than the target, will be determined by the level of achievement of the relative performance targets.
Other information relative to performance-based restricted share unit activity during fiscal 2019 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Total grant date fair value of performance-based restricted share units vested and issued
|
$
|
2,035
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total intrinsic value of performance-based restricted share units vested and issued
|
$
|
2,666
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
There were no material modifications to performance-based restricted share units in fiscal 2019, 2018, or 2017.
As of December 28, 2019, total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested performance-based restricted share units was approximately $2.3 million with a weighted average expense recognition period of 1.8 years.
Shares Withheld to Satisfy Tax Withholding Requirements
For the majority of restricted stock units and performance-based restricted share units granted, the number of shares issued on the date these stock awards vest is net of shares withheld by the Company to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements, which the Company pays on behalf of its employees. The Company issued 103,124, 53,714, and 39,314 shares as a result of vested restricted stock units and performance-based restricted share units during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Although shares withheld are not issued, they are treated similar to common stock repurchases as they reduce the number of shares that would have been issued upon vesting. The amounts are net of 41,786, 17,131, and 11,755 shares withheld to satisfy $3.8 million, $1.4 million, and $0.8 million of employees’ tax obligations during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The ESPP provides Company employees the opportunity to purchase, through payroll deductions, shares of common stock at a 15% discount. Pursuant to the terms of the ESPP, the Company issued 61,678, 77,458, and 83,155 shares of common stock during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The total cost related to the ESPP, including the compensation expense calculations, was approximately $1.1 million, $1.1 million, and $1.0 million in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. There is a maximum of 16.0 million shares of common stock that are reserved under the ESPP. At December 28, 2019, there were approximately 11.9 million remaining shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the ESPP.
Note 3 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
Goodwill
The Company had approximately $93.2 million of goodwill at December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018. Goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment. Goodwill is not amortized, but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill for all reporting units and no impairment was identified. The Company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit (including goodwill) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit.
Other Intangible Assets
The Company had approximately $31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018. The intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the Petsense tradename, which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. The Company determined that the fair value of the intangible asset was in excess of the carrying value.
Note 4 – Debt:
The following table summarizes the Company’s outstanding debt as of the dates indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28,
2019
|
|
December 29,
2018
|
|
|
Senior Notes
|
|
$
|
150.0
|
|
|
$
|
150.0
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2016 Term Loan
|
|
145.0
|
|
|
165.0
|
|
|
|
June 2017 Term Loan
|
|
87.5
|
|
|
93.8
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit loans
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding borrowings
|
|
397.5
|
|
|
408.8
|
|
|
|
Less: unamortized debt issuance costs
|
|
(1.0)
|
|
|
(1.4)
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
396.5
|
|
|
407.4
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt
|
|
(30.0)
|
|
|
(26.3)
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
366.5
|
|
|
$
|
381.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding letters of credit
|
|
$
|
32.0
|
|
|
$
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes
On August 14, 2017, the Company entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell $150 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due August 14, 2029 (the “2029 Notes”) in a private placement. The 2029 Notes bear interest at 3.70% per annum with interest payable semi-annually in arrears on each annual and semi-annual anniversary of the issuance date. The obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement are unsecured, but guaranteed by each of the Company’s material subsidiaries.
The Company may from time to time issue and sell additional senior unsecured notes (the “Shelf Notes”) pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, in an aggregate principal amount of up to $150 million. The Shelf Notes will have a maturity date of no more than 12 years after the date of original issuance and may be issued through August 14, 2020, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the terms of the Note Purchase Agreement.
Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, the 2029 Notes and any Shelf Notes (collectively, the "Notes") are redeemable by the Company, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at 100% of the principal amount of the Notes being redeemed, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon and a make whole amount calculated by discounting all remaining scheduled payments on the Notes by the yield on the U.S. Treasury security with a maturity equal to the remaining average life of the Notes plus 0.50%.
Senior Credit Facility
On February 19, 2016, the Company entered into a senior credit facility (the “2016 Senior Credit Facility”) consisting of a $200 million term loan (the “February 2016 Term Loan”) and a $500 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) with a sublimit of $50 million for swingline loans. This agreement is unsecured and matures on February 19, 2022.
On June 15, 2017, pursuant to an accordion feature available under the 2016 Senior Credit Facility, the Company entered into an incremental term loan agreement (the “June 2017 Term Loan”) which increased the term loan capacity under the 2016 Senior Credit Facility by $100 million. This agreement is unsecured and matures on June 15, 2022.
The February 2016 Term Loan of $200 million requires quarterly payments totaling $10 million per year in years one and two and $20 million per year in years three through the maturity date, with the remaining balance due in full on the maturity date of February 19, 2022. The June 2017 Term Loan of $100 million requires quarterly payments totaling $5 million per year in years one and two and $10 million per year in years three through the maturity date, with the remaining balance due in full on the maturity date of June 15, 2022. The 2016 Senior Credit Facility also contains a $500 million revolving credit facility (with a sublimit of $50 million for swingline loans).
Borrowings under the February 2016 Term Loan and Revolver bear interest at either the bank’s base rate (4.750% at December 28, 2019) or the London Inter-Bank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”) (1.799% at December 28, 2019) plus an additional amount ranging from 0.500% to 1.125% per annum (0.750% at December 28, 2019), adjusted quarterly based on our leverage ratio. The Company is also required to pay, quarterly in arrears, a commitment fee for unused capacity ranging from 0.075% to 0.200% per annum (0.125% at December 28, 2019), adjusted quarterly based on the Company’s leverage ratio. Borrowings under the June 2017 Term Loan bear interest at either the bank’s base rate (4.750% at December 28, 2019) or LIBOR (1.799% at December 28, 2019) plus an additional 1.000% per annum. As further described in Note 5, the Company has entered into interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge our exposure to variable rate interest payments associated with each of the term loans under the 2016 Senior Credit Facility.
Proceeds from the 2016 Senior Credit Facility may be used for working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, share repurchases, and other matters. There are no compensating balance requirements associated with the 2016 Senior Credit Facility.
Covenants and Default Provisions of the Debt Agreements
The 2016 Senior Credit Facility and the Note Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “Debt Agreements”) require quarterly compliance with respect to two material covenants: a fixed charge coverage ratio and a leverage ratio. Both ratios are calculated on a trailing twelve-month basis at the end of each fiscal quarter. The fixed charge coverage ratio compares earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, share-based compensation and rent expense (“consolidated EBITDAR”) to the sum of interest paid and rental expense (excluding any straight-line rent adjustments). The fixed charge coverage ratio shall be greater than or equal to 2.00 to 1.0 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The leverage ratio compares rental expense (excluding any straight-line rent adjustments) multiplied by a factor of six plus total debt to consolidated EBITDAR. The leverage ratio shall be less than or equal to 4.00 to 1.0 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The Debt Agreements also contain certain other restrictions regarding additional indebtedness, capital expenditures, business operations, guarantees, investments, mergers, consolidations and sales of assets, transactions with subsidiaries or affiliates, and liens. As of December 28, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
The Debt Agreements contain customary events of default, including payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to other material indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, material judgments, certain ERISA events and invalidity of loan documents. Upon certain changes of control, payment under the Debt Agreements could become due and payable. In addition, under the Note Purchase Agreement, upon an event of default or change of control, the make whole payment described above may become due and payable.
The Note Purchase Agreement also requires that, in the event the Company amends its 2016 Senior Credit Facility, or any subsequent credit facility of $100 million or greater, such that it contains covenant or default provisions that are not provided in the Note Purchase Agreement or that are similar to those contained in the Note Purchase Agreement but which contain percentages, amounts, formulas or grace periods that are more restrictive than those set forth in the Note Purchase Agreement or are otherwise more beneficial to the lenders thereunder, the Note Purchase Agreement shall be automatically amended to include such additional or amended covenants and/or default provisions.
Note 5 – Interest Rate Swaps:
The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement which became effective on March 31, 2016, with a maturity date of February 19, 2021. The notional amount of this swap agreement began at $197.5 million (the principal amount of the February 2016 Term Loan borrowings as of March 31, 2016) and will amortize at the same time and in the same amount as the February 2016 Term Loan borrowings as described in Note 4, up to the maturity date of the interest rate swap agreement on February 19, 2021. As of December 28, 2019, the notional amount of the interest rate swap was $145.0 million.
The Company entered into a second interest rate swap agreement which became effective on June 30, 2017, with a maturity date of June 15, 2022. The notional amount of this swap agreement began at $100 million (the principal amount of the June 2017 Term Loan borrowings as of June 30, 2017) and will amortize at the same time and in the same amount as the June 2017 Term Loan borrowings as described in Note 4. As of December 28, 2019, the notional amount of the interest rate swap was $87.5 million.
The Company’s interest rate swap agreements are executed for risk management and are not held for trading purposes. The objective of the interest rate swap agreements is to mitigate interest rate risk associated with future changes in interest rates. To accomplish this objective, the interest rate swap agreements are intended to hedge the variable cash flows associated with the variable rate term loan borrowings under the 2016 Senior Credit Facility. Both interest rate swap agreements entitle the Company to receive, at specified intervals, a variable rate of interest based on LIBOR in exchange for the payment of a fixed rate of interest throughout the life of the agreement, without exchange of the underlying notional amount.
The Company has designated its interest rate swap agreements as cash flow hedges and accounts for the underlying activity in accordance with hedge accounting. The interest rate swaps are presented within the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. In accordance with hedge accounting, the gains and losses on interest rate swaps that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (“OCI”), net of related income taxes, and reclassified into earnings in the same income statement line and period during which the hedged transactions affect earnings.
As of December 28, 2019, amounts to be reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) into interest during the next twelve months are not expected to be material. No significant amounts were excluded from the assessment of cash flow hedge effectiveness as of December 28, 2019.
The assets and liabilities measured at fair value related to the Company’s interest rate swaps, excluding accrued interest, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated
as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
December 28, 2019
|
|
December 29, 2018
|
Interest rate swaps (short-term portion)
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
558
|
|
|
$
|
2,601
|
|
Interest rate swaps (long-term portion)
|
|
Other assets
|
|
91
|
|
|
3,222
|
|
Total derivative assets
|
|
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
|
$
|
5,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (short-term portion)
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Interest rate swaps (long-term portion)
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
292
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total derivative liabilities
|
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The offset to the interest rate swap asset or liability is recorded as a component of equity, net of deferred taxes, in AOCI, and will be reclassified into earnings over the term of the underlying debt as interest payments are made.
The following table summarizes the changes in AOCI, net of tax, related to the Company’s interest rate swaps (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Beginning fiscal year AOCI balance
|
|
$
|
3,814
|
|
|
$
|
3,358
|
|
Current fiscal year (loss)/gain recognized in OCI
|
|
(4,332)
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative adjustment as a result of ASU 2017-12 adoption
|
|
717
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/gain, net of tax
|
|
(3,615)
|
|
|
456
|
|
Ending fiscal year AOCI balance
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
3,814
|
|
Cash flows related to the interest rate swaps are included in operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table summarizes the impact of pre-tax gains and losses derived from the Company’s interest rate swaps (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statement Location
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Amount of (losses)/gains recognized in OCI
during the period
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss)/income
|
|
$
|
(5,556)
|
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
2,240
|
|
The following table summarizes the impact of taxes affecting AOCI as a result of the Company’s interest rate swaps (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Income tax (benefit)/expense of interest rate swaps on AOCI
|
|
$
|
(1,224)
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
Credit-risk-related contingent features
In accordance with the underlying interest rate swap agreements, the Company could be declared in default on its interest rate swap obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness (i.e., the Company’s term loans) is accelerated by the lender due to the Company's default on such indebtedness.
If the Company had breached any of the provisions in the underlying agreements at December 28, 2019, it could have been required to post full collateral or settle its obligations under the Company’s interest rate swap agreements. However, as of December 28, 2019, the Company had not breached any of these provisions or posted any collateral related to the underlying interest rate swap agreements.
Note 6 – Leases:
The Company leases the majority of its retail store locations, two distribution sites, its Merchandise Innovation Center, and certain equipment under various non-cancellable operating leases. The leases have varying terms and expire at various dates through 2037. Store leases typically have initial terms of between 10 and 15 years, with two to four optional renewal periods of five years each. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion. The Company has included lease renewal options in the lease term for calculations of its right-of-use assets and liabilities when it is reasonably certain that the Company plans to renew these leases. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
The Company accounts for lease components (e.g., fixed payments including rent, real estate taxes, and insurance costs) together with non-lease components (e.g., fixed payment common-area maintenance) as a single component for all classes of underlying assets. Certain lease agreements require variable payments based upon actual costs of common-area maintenance, real estate taxes, and insurance. Further, certain lease agreements require variable payments based upon store sales above agreed-upon sales levels for the year and others require payments adjusted periodically for inflation. As substantially all of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we estimate our collateralized incremental borrowing rate based upon a synthetic credit rating and yield curve analysis at commencement or modification date in determining the present value of lease payments.
The Company has elected not to recognize leases with an original term of one year or less on the balance sheet. Short-term lease cost during the periods presented was immaterial.
In addition to the operating lease right-of-use assets presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, assets, net of accumulated amortization, under finance leases of $30.9 million are recorded within the Property and equipment, net line on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 28, 2019.
The following table summarizes the Company’s classification of lease cost (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
Statement of Income Location
|
|
December 28, 2019
|
Finance lease cost:
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of lease assets
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
4,281
|
|
Interest on lease liabilities
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
1,629
|
|
Operating lease cost
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
353,961
|
|
Variable lease cost
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
73,768
|
|
Net lease cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
433,639
|
|
The following table summarizes the future maturities of the Company’s lease liabilities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Leases (a)
|
|
Finance Leases
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
369,079
|
|
|
$
|
5,663
|
|
|
$
|
374,742
|
|
2021
|
|
350,527
|
|
|
5,723
|
|
|
356,250
|
|
2022
|
|
326,908
|
|
|
4,601
|
|
|
331,509
|
|
2023
|
|
301,783
|
|
|
3,409
|
|
|
305,192
|
|
2024
|
|
268,255
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
271,679
|
|
After 2024
|
|
1,169,671
|
|
|
21,818
|
|
|
1,191,489
|
|
Total lease payments
|
|
2,786,223
|
|
|
44,638
|
|
|
2,830,861
|
|
Less: Interest
|
|
(507,962)
|
|
|
(10,213)
|
|
|
(518,175)
|
|
Present value of lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,278,261
|
|
|
$
|
34,425
|
|
|
$
|
2,312,686
|
|
(a) Operating lease payments exclude $212.8 million of legally binding minimum lease payments for leases signed, but not yet commenced.
The following table summarizes the Company’s lease term and discount rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28, 2019
|
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
|
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
10.0
|
Operating leases
|
|
9.0
|
Weighted-average discount rate:
|
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Operating leases
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
The following table summarizes the other information related to the Company’s lease liabilities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
December 28, 2019
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
|
|
|
Financing cash flows from finance leases
|
|
$
|
3,709
|
|
Operating cash flows from finance leases
|
|
1,629
|
|
Operating cash flows from operating leases
|
|
360,580
|
|
The Company adopted new lease accounting guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, as discussed in Note 1 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, and as required, the following disclosure is provided for periods prior to adoption. As of December 29, 2018 future minimum payments, by year and in the aggregate, under leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Leases
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
2019
|
|
|
$
|
5,215
|
|
|
$
|
344,836
|
|
2020
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
328,589
|
|
2021
|
|
|
5,294
|
|
|
306,572
|
|
2022
|
|
|
4,172
|
|
|
284,327
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
260,518
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
20,169
|
|
|
1,175,972
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
43,064
|
|
|
$
|
2,700,814
|
|
Amount representing interest
|
|
(10,148)
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments
|
|
32,916
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
(3,646)
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
29,270
|
|
|
|
Total rent expense was approximately $342.2 million and $319.5 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. Total contingent rent expense was insignificant for fiscal 2018 and 2017.
Note 7 – Capital Stock and Dividends:
Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of common stock and preferred stock. The Company is authorized to issue 400 million shares of common stock. The Company is also authorized to issue 40 thousand shares of preferred stock, with such designations, rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s Board of Directors.
Dividends
During fiscal 2019 and 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors declared the following cash dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Declared
|
|
Dividend Amount
Per Share of Common Stock
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Date Paid
|
November 6, 2019
|
|
$0.35
|
|
|
November 25, 2019
|
|
December 10, 2019
|
August 7, 2019
|
|
$0.35
|
|
|
August 26, 2019
|
|
September 10, 2019
|
May 8, 2019
|
|
$0.35
|
|
|
May 28, 2019
|
|
June 11, 2019
|
February 6, 2019
|
|
$0.31
|
|
|
February 25, 2019
|
|
March 12, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 7, 2018
|
|
$0.31
|
|
|
November 26, 2018
|
|
December 11, 2018
|
August 8, 2018
|
|
$0.31
|
|
|
August 27, 2018
|
|
September 11, 2018
|
May 9, 2018
|
|
$0.31
|
|
|
May 29, 2018
|
|
June 12, 2018
|
February 7, 2018
|
|
$0.27
|
|
|
February 26, 2018
|
|
March 13, 2018
|
It is the present intention of the Company’s Board of Directors to continue to pay a quarterly cash dividend; however, the declaration and payment of future dividends will be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors in its sole discretion and will depend upon the earnings, financial condition, and capital needs of the Company, along with any other factors which the Company’s Board of Directors deem relevant.
On February 5, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.35 per share of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The dividend will be paid on March 10, 2020, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 24, 2020.
Note 8 – Treasury Stock:
The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized common stock repurchases under a share repurchase program. As of December 29, 2018, the Company had remaining authorization under the share repurchase program of $520.0 million. On May 8, 2019, the Board of Directors authorized a $1.5 billion increase to the existing share repurchase program, bringing the total amount authorized since the inception of the program up to $4.5 billion, exclusive of any fees, commissions or other expenses related to such repurchases. The repurchases may be made from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and amount of any shares repurchased under the program will depend on a variety of factors, including price, corporate and regulatory requirements, capital availability and other market conditions. Repurchased shares are accounted for at cost and will be held in treasury for future issuance. The program may be limited or terminated at any time without prior notice. As of December 28, 2019, the Company had remaining authorization under the share repurchase program of $1.49 billion, exclusive of any fees, commissions or other expenses.
The following table provides the number of shares repurchased, average price paid per share, and total amount paid for share repurchases in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Total number of shares repurchased
|
5,384
|
|
|
4,987
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
Average price paid per share
|
$
|
99.05
|
|
|
$
|
70.14
|
|
|
$
|
62.35
|
|
Total cash paid for share repurchases
|
$
|
533,319
|
|
|
$
|
349,776
|
|
|
$
|
369,403
|
|
Note 9 – Net Income Per Share:
Net income per share is calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
Shares
|
|
Per Share
Amount
|
Basic net income per share:
|
$
|
562,354
|
|
|
119,727
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
Dilutive effect of share-based awards
|
—
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
(0.04)
|
|
Diluted net income per share:
|
$
|
562,354
|
|
|
120,743
|
|
|
$
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
Shares
|
|
Per Share
Amount
|
Basic net income per share:
|
$
|
532,357
|
|
|
122,651
|
|
|
$
|
4.34
|
|
Dilutive effect of share-based awards
|
—
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
(0.03)
|
|
Diluted net income per share:
|
$
|
532,357
|
|
|
123,471
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
Shares
|
|
Per Share
Amount
|
Basic net income per share:
|
$
|
422,599
|
|
|
127,588
|
|
|
$
|
3.31
|
|
Dilutive effect of share-based awards
|
—
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
(0.01)
|
|
Diluted net income per share:
|
$
|
422,599
|
|
|
128,204
|
|
|
$
|
3.30
|
|
Anti-dilutive share-based awards excluded from the above calculations totaled approximately 0.4 million, 3.1 million, and 3.9 million shares in fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Note 10 – Income Taxes:
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Current tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
$
|
128,490
|
|
|
$
|
123,388
|
|
|
$
|
207,986
|
|
State
|
25,091
|
|
|
15,597
|
|
|
14,516
|
|
Total current
|
153,581
|
|
|
138,985
|
|
|
222,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
11,770
|
|
|
9,650
|
|
|
22,469
|
|
State
|
(4,328)
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
4,953
|
|
Total deferred
|
7,442
|
|
|
12,043
|
|
|
27,422
|
|
Total provision
|
$
|
161,023
|
|
|
$
|
151,028
|
|
|
$
|
249,924
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 28, 2019
|
|
December 29, 2018
|
Tax assets:
|
|
|
|
Inventory valuation
|
$
|
16,676
|
|
|
$
|
14,417
|
|
Accrued employee benefits costs
|
12,002
|
|
|
15,333
|
|
Accrued sales tax audit reserve
|
4,173
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
Rent expenses in excess of cash payments required
|
30,975
|
|
|
25,628
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
14,836
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
Workers’ compensation insurance
|
10,154
|
|
|
9,900
|
|
General liability insurance
|
6,025
|
|
|
5,410
|
|
Lease exit obligations
|
2,087
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
Income tax credits
|
6,377
|
|
|
5,773
|
|
Other
|
5,768
|
|
|
9,160
|
|
|
109,073
|
|
|
108,648
|
|
Tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Inventory basis difference
|
(4,667)
|
|
|
(4,590)
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
(2,024)
|
|
|
(1,912)
|
|
Depreciation
|
(93,919)
|
|
|
(87,417)
|
|
Amortization
|
(8,230)
|
|
|
(6,039)
|
|
Other
|
(386)
|
|
|
(2,083)
|
|
|
(109,226)
|
|
|
(102,041)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax (liability)/asset
|
$
|
(153)
|
|
|
$
|
6,607
|
|
The Company has evaluated the need for a valuation allowance for all or a portion of the deferred tax assets. The Company believes that all of the deferred tax assets will more likely than not be realized through future earnings. The Company had state tax credit carryforwards of $6.2 million and $5.7 million as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively, with varying dates of expiration through 2031. The Company provided no valuation allowance as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018 for state tax credit carryforwards, as the Company believes it is more likely than not that all of these credits will be utilized before their expiration dates.
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amounts computed at the federal statutory rate is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Tax provision at statutory rate
|
$
|
151,909
|
|
|
$
|
143,511
|
|
|
$
|
235,383
|
|
Tax effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefits
|
19,722
|
|
|
18,019
|
|
|
14,320
|
|
Section 162(m) limitation
|
2,572
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
Tax credits, net of federal tax benefits
|
(7,768)
|
|
|
(7,140)
|
|
|
(5,060)
|
|
Share-based compensation programs
|
(4,484)
|
|
|
(4,522)
|
|
|
(1,040)
|
|
Enactment of tax legislation
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,856
|
|
Other
|
(928)
|
|
|
(1,421)
|
|
|
242
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
$
|
161,023
|
|
|
$
|
151,028
|
|
|
$
|
249,924
|
|
The Company and its affiliates file income tax returns in the U.S. and various state and local jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to federal, state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2015. Various states have completed an examination of our income tax returns for 2015 through 2017 with minimal adjustments.
The total amount of unrecognized tax positions that, if recognized, would decrease the effective tax rate, is $2.3 million at December 28, 2019. In addition, the Company recognizes current interest and penalties accrued related to these uncertain tax positions as interest expense, and the amount is not material to the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company has considered the reasonably possible expected net change in uncertain tax positions during the next 12 months and does not expect any material changes to our liability for uncertain tax positions through December 26, 2020.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits (exclusive of interest and penalties) is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
$
|
2,451
|
|
|
$
|
1,993
|
|
|
$
|
1,579
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
650
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
527
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
59
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
14
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
(400)
|
|
|
(420)
|
|
|
(127)
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
$
|
2,760
|
|
|
$
|
2,451
|
|
|
$
|
1,993
|
|
Note 11 – Retirement Benefit Plans:
The Company has a defined contribution benefit plan, the Tractor Supply Company 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which provides retirement benefits for eligible employees. The Company matches (in cash) 100% of the employee’s elective contributions up to 3% of eligible compensation plus 50% of the employee’s elective contributions from 3% to 6% of eligible compensation. In no event shall the total Company match made on behalf of the employee exceed 4.5% of the employee’s eligible compensation. All current contributions are immediately vested. Company contributions to the 401(k) Plan were approximately $9.8 million, $8.5 million, and $7.4 million during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
The Company offers, through a deferred compensation program, the opportunity for certain qualifying employees to elect to defer a portion of their annual base salary and/or their annual incentive bonus. Under the deferred compensation program, a percentage of the participants’ salary deferral is matched by the Company, limited to a maximum annual matching contribution of $4,500. The Company’s contributions, including accrued interest, were $0.7 million, $0.6 million, and $0.5 million during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies:
Construction and Real Estate Commitments
At December 28, 2019, the Company had no material contractual commitments related to construction projects extending greater than twelve months.
Letters of Credit
At December 28, 2019, there were $32.0 million outstanding letters of credit under the 2016 Senior Credit Facility.
Litigation
The Company is involved in various litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that, based upon information currently available, any estimated loss related to such matters has been adequately provided for in accrued liabilities to the extent probable and reasonably estimable. Accordingly, the Company currently expects these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, litigation and other legal matters involve an element of uncertainty. Future developments in such matters, including adverse decisions or settlements or resulting required changes to the Company’s business operations, could affect our consolidated operating results when resolved in future periods or could result in liability or other amounts material to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 13 – Segment Reporting:
The Company has one reportable segment which is the retail sale of products that support the rural lifestyle. The following table indicates the percentage of net sales represented by each major product category during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Net Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
Product Category:
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Livestock and Pet
|
47
|
%
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
47
|
%
|
Hardware, Tools and Truck
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
22
|
|
Seasonal, Gift and Toy Products
|
20
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
19
|
|
Clothing and Footwear
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
8
|
|
Agriculture
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
Note 14 – New Accounting Pronouncements:
New Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” This update requires a dual approach for lessee accounting under which a lessee will account for leases as finance leases or operating leases. Both finance leases and operating leases will result in the lessee recognizing a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability on its balance sheet, with differing methodology for income statement recognition. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, “Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842.” This update permits an entity to elect an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate land easements that exist or expired before the entity’s adoption of ASU 2016-02 and that were not accounted for as leases under previous lease guidance. In July 2018, ASU 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases,” was issued to provide more detailed guidance and additional clarification for implementing ASU 2016-02. Furthermore, in July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements,” which provides an optional transition method in addition to the existing modified retrospective transition method by allowing a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. These new leasing standards are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. In March of 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-01, “Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements” which was issued to provide more detailed guidance and clarification for implementing ASU 2016-02.
The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and as a part of that process, made the following elections:
•The Company elected the optional transition method which allows for the lessee to not recast comparative financial information but rather recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date in the period of adoption. No such adjustment to retained earnings was made as a result of the adoption of this guidance.
•The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard which, among other things, allowed us to carry forward our prior lease classification under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 840.
•The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient for all leases.
•The Company elected to make the accounting policy election for short-term leases resulting in lease payments being recorded as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
•The Company elected the land easement practical expedient.
Adoption of the new standard had a material impact to our Consolidated Balance Sheets and related disclosures, and resulted in the recording of additional right-of-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $2.08 billion as of the date of adoption. The standard did not materially impact our Consolidated Statements of Income, Comprehensive Income, Stockholders’ Equity, or Cash Flows.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities,” which amends and simplifies existing guidance in order to allow companies to more accurately present the economic effects of risk management activities in the financial statements. This update expands and refines hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and aligns the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. Additionally, the amendments in ASU 2017-12 provide new guidance about income statement classification and eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in ASU 2017-12 require that an entity with cash flow or net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption apply a cumulative-effect adjustment to eliminate the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the entity adopts this guidance. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance should be adopted prospectively. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment of $0.7 million from retained earnings to accumulated other comprehensive income. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes” which expands the permissible benchmark interest rates to include the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) to be eligible as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for purposes of applying hedge accounting under Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted if an entity has previously adopted ASU 2017-12. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" which amends the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the currently used incurred loss methodology, which will result in more timely recognition of losses. The new guidance applies to financial assets measured at amortized cost basis, including receivables that result from revenue transactions and held-to-maturity debt securities. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption was permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company does
not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement,” which amends the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying and adding certain disclosures. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract.” This update clarifies the accounting treatment for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement (hosting arrangement) by providing guidance for determining when the arrangement includes a software license. This guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The amendments may be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company will adopt this guidance on a prospective basis in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.