UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy Statement
Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
☑ |
Filed by the Registrant |
☐ |
Filed by a party other than the Registrant |
|
CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX: |
☐ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission
Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☑ |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
☐ |
|
Definitive Additional
Materials |
☐ |
|
Soliciting Material under
§240.14a-12 |

Palo Alto Networks Inc.
(Name of Registrant
as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK ALL BOXES
THAT APPLY): |
☑ |
|
No fee required |
☐ |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary
materials |
☐ |
|
Fee computed on table in exhibit
required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11 |

WHAT WE DO
|
|
OUR VISION |
|
|
|
We
innovate to stay ahead of the evolving threat landscape, so
organizations can embrace our technology with confidence. We
provide next-gen cybersecurity to thousands of customers globally,
across all sectors. Our cybersecurity platforms and services are
backed by industry-leading threat intelligence and strengthened by
state-of-the-art automation.
Whether
deploying our products to enable the Zero Trust Enterprise,
responding to a security incident, or partnering to deliver better
security outcomes through a world-class partner ecosystem, we're
committed to helping ensure each day is safer than the one
before.
|
|
Our
vision is a world where each day is safer and more secure than the
one before
|
|
|
Letter from the Chair and the Lead Independent
Director
|
At Palo
Alto Networks, we are rebuilding cybersecurity based on the
principles of Zero Trust, fueled by rigorous analytics and
automation. We are here to secure the way forward by making cyber
security stronger yet simpler so that each day is safer than the
one before. We’ve Got Next and so will you. 
|
|
 |
Dear Fellow Stockholders:
Fiscal
2022 was another year of achievement at Palo Alto Networks. Our
billings exceeded $7.4 billion, reflecting a growth rate of 37%
year over year, and our revenues exceeded $5.5 billion – 29%
year-over-year growth. In July, we celebrated our 10th anniversary
as a public company. At the close of trading on the day of our
initial public offering, our market capitalization was $3.5
billion, reflecting the value of a company that pioneered a new era
of security through its groundbreaking firewall technology. Today,
as our market capitalization exceeds $51 billion (at the close of
trading on October 28, 2022), we are confident in the strong
foundation we have built and eager to tackle the challenges of the
next ten years.
As
always, innovation drives our success. During the past year, we
deployed 49 major product releases as compared to 29 in fiscal
2021, including advancements in next generation cloud access
security broker (CASB), cloud code security, cloud next generation
firewall and, in an industry first, agent and agentless cloud
security posture management (CSPM) – just to name a few. We deliver
to our customers best-of-breed capabilities across a platform of
network security, cloud security and security operations. Simply
put, we remain the cybersecurity leader, serving tens of thousands
of customers worldwide, many of whom are still in the early stages
of their cybersecurity transformations.
Of
course, none of these accomplishments would have been possible
without the dedication and engagement of our employees. We continue
to prioritize their health, safety and professional fulfillment
through FLEXWORK, an employee-centric strategy that offers over
12,500 employees an expanded set of choices. These choices include
where individual work is completed, time spent in the office,
personalized learning paths, and flexibility of benefits. We are
proud of the workplace recognitions that the company received in
fiscal 2022, including Most Loved Workplaces (Newsweek), Top 100 of
America’s Most JUST Companies (Just Capital), Next Gen honoree
(Ripplematch), and Best Company in Bay Area
(Comparably).
Finally,
we recognize the contributions and character of Mark McLaughlin and
Asheem Chandna, neither of whom will stand for reelection to the
Board of Directors when their terms expire at the conclusion of our
2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Mark’s leadership as the
company’s chief executive officer from August 2011 until June 2018,
and his continued service on our Board of Directors since then,
have been instrumental in driving the company’s growth and
nurturing our unique culture. Likewise, without Asheem’s technical
expertise, financial acumen and, most notably, keen discernment of
emerging technology trends, our transformation into the company we
are today would have been less complete and consequential. On
behalf of our employees and the entire Board of Directors, we
express our deep appreciation to Mark and Asheem for their profound
impacts on Palo Alto Networks.
* * * *
*
As in
the past, this year’s Proxy Statement is constructed to maximize
clarity and understanding about the company’s strategies, successes
and challenges. Several of our key initiatives are worth prefacing
here.
Stockholder Engagement. We
remain guided by, and appreciative of, the perspectives of our
stockholders as expressed through their engagement with us.
Throughout fiscal 2022, we once again executed an extensive
stockholder outreach program. In total, we engaged in discussions
with stockholders holding approximately 60% of our outstanding
shares as of June 30, 2022. John, as our Lead Independent Director,
remained at the forefront of our engagement efforts and
participated in 30 meetings with stockholders holding approximately
39% of our outstanding shares as of June 30, 2022. In addition to
our financial outlook, our stockholders conversed with us about our
executive compensation, sustainability, corporate governance
practices, inclusion and diversity, as well as other topics of
import to them. We will continue this valuable dialogue with our
investors in the coming year, and are committed to maintaining
outreach that is truly a dialogue with our stockholders.
Letter
from the Chair and the Lead Independent Director
Executive Compensation. We
implemented the commitments that we made to our stockholders in our
2021 proxy statement. We maintained an executive compensation
program closely tied to our financial performance, 100% of our
named executive officers’ equity compensation awards (aside from
new hire awards) were performance-based, with different performance
targets than the cash incentive plan awards, added an ESG modifier
to our cash incentive plan, increased the stock ownership
guidelines for our executive officers, and established a one-year
equity post vesting holding period for all named executive
officers. The compensation discussion and analysis (CD&A)
section of this Proxy Statement describes our performance against
these commitments. We encourage you to read the letter from our
Compensation and People Committee accompanying the CD&A for
their views on our executive compensation program, particularly as
it relates to our pay-for-performance philosophy and how we
performed against that backdrop.
Our Commitment to ESG. We
continue to take seriously our commitment to environmental
sustainability, social responsibility and corporate governance
(ESG). In fiscal 2022, in direct response to the feedback we
received from our stockholders, your Board of Directors adopted
majority voting for uncontested elections of directors and a
resignation policy in the event a director does not receive a
majority of the vote. Elsewhere in Proxy Statement, we discuss our
ESG successes in fiscal 2022 and provide an overview of our ESG
programs and commitments, and how your Board and executive
leadership team oversee our ESG efforts.
You are
cordially invited to attend the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. to be held on Tuesday, December 13,
2022 at 12:15 P.M., Pacific Time.
This
year’s annual meeting will be a virtual meeting conducted via a
live webcast. You will be able to listen to the annual meeting,
submit your questions, and vote during the live webcast of the
meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/PANW2022 and
entering the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or
in the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. If you
did not receive a 16-digit control number, please reach out to your
broker for further instructions.
On
behalf of our Board, we thank you for your investment in Palo Alto
Networks and for your continued trust. We look forward to the
annual meeting on December 13, 2022.
Thank
you,
 |
|
 |
Nikesh
Arora |
|
John
M. Donovan |
Chair
and |
|
Lead
Independent |
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
Director |
4 |
|
|
Palo
Alto Networks, Inc.
|
Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
|
Voting
Items
Proposals |
|
Board Vote
Recommendation |
For Further Details |
1. |
To elect two Class II directors named
in the accompanying proxy statement to serve until our 2025 annual
meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected
and qualified. |
 |
“FOR”
each director nominee |
Page 40 |
2. |
To ratify the appointment of Ernst
& Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting
firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2023. |
 |
“FOR” |
Page 57 |
3. |
To approve, on an advisory basis, the
compensation of our named executive officers. |
 |
“FOR” |
Page 60 |
4. |
To approve an amendment to the 2021
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan to increase the
number of plan shares reserved for issuance. |
 |
“FOR” |
Page 98 |
Stockholders
will also act on such other business that may properly come before
the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements
thereof.
YOUR
VOTE IS IMPORTANT. Please act as soon as possible to vote your
shares, even if you plan to attend the annual meeting online.
For instructions to vote your shares and more information, see
“About the Annual Meeting” on page 112.
We
appreciate your continued support of Palo Alto Networks and look
forward to receiving your proxy.
By
Order of the Board of Directors,

Bruce Byrd
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
November 3, 2022
HOW
TO VOTE
ONLINE |
BY
PHONE |
BY
MAIL |
Visit
www.proxyvote.com. prior to the Annual Meeting, 24 hours a day,
seven days a week. |
Call
the phone number located on the accompanying proxy card or voting
instruction form. |
Complete,
sign, date and return the accompanying proxy card or voting
instruction form in the envelope provided. |
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL
MEETING TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 13, 2022: THE NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL
STOCKHOLDERS’ MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT AND THE 2022 ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K ARE AVAILABLE AT
WWW.PROXYVOTE.COM.
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
About Us
Our
Company
Palo
Alto Networks is a global cybersecurity provider with a vision of a
world where each day is safer and more secure than the one before.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 2005 and are headquartered in
Santa Clara, California. Our principal executive offices are
located at 3000 Tannery Way, Santa Clara, CA 95054.
We
empower enterprises, organizations, service providers, and
government entities to protect themselves against today’s most
sophisticated cyber threats. Our cybersecurity platforms and
services help secure enterprise users, networks, clouds, and
endpoints by delivering comprehensive cybersecurity backed by
industry leading artificial intelligence and automation. We are a
leading provider of zero trust solutions, starting with
next-generation zero trust network access to secure today’s remote
hybrid workforces and extending to securing all users, applications
and infrastructure with zero trust principles. Our security
solutions are designed to reduce customers’ total cost of ownership
by improving operational efficiency and eliminating the need for
siloed point products. Our Company focuses on delivering value in
five fundamental areas: Network Security, Secure Access Service
Edge, Cloud Security, Security Operations, and Threat Intelligence
and Security Consulting.
|
|
|
|
|
Our Corporate Values
Our
corporate decisions are guided by our corporate values, which were
co-created by our employees. Foremost among these is integrity,
which is the foundation of everything we do and every decision we
make. We believe that collaboration enhances our ability to disrupt
entrenched beliefs, which we think ultimately leads to innovation.
Our ability to execute on our innovations and deliver products and
services that address the cybersecurity needs of our customers is
critical to our long-term success. Finally, we are intentional
about including diverse points of view, perspectives, experiences,
backgrounds and ideas in our decision-making process. True
inclusion and diversity exists when we have representation of all
ethnicities, orientations and identities, and cultures in our
workforce. We believe that our core values make us a better
company.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
“...Palo
Alto is
#10 in our list
of the 50 best
companies to
work for women;
list created
from millions
of anonymous
employer ratings
and reviews by
working women” |
“...for
the third
consecutive year,
received a perfect
score on the Human
Rights Campaign
Foundation’s 2021 Corporate
Equality Index
(CEI) and achieved
designation as a
Best Place to Work
for LGBTQ Equality” |
“...Palo
Alto
Networks in the top
10% of companies
on Comparably in
its diversity score,
[which] provides
insights into how
diverse employees
feel and rate their
work experience
across various
culture dimensions” |
“...the
companies that
made this list are
delivering the respect,
care, and appreciation
that it takes to create
a positive workplace
that nurtures talent
[.]” Newsweek
recognized PANW
in the top 100 most
loved workplaces of
the Year |
Sept. 2021
(InHerSight) |
Jan. 2022 (Human
Rights Campaign
Foundation) |
Sept. 2021
(Comparably) |
Oct. 2021
(Newsweek) |
About
Us
|
|
|
|
Our
2022
Financial
and Business
Highlights
We
delivered another year of outstanding results for our stockholders
in fiscal 2022, with a strong year of financial performance and
execution. Highlights include:
|
• Total
revenue increased to $5.5 billion, or by approximately 29% compared
to fiscal 2021.
•
Total
billings increased to $7.5 billion, or by approximately 37%
compared to fiscal 2021.1
• Next-Gen
Security ARR increased to $1.89 billion, or by approximately 60%
compared to fiscal 2021.2
• In
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022, we achieved GAAP
profitability.
• Continued
to return capital to our stockholders through our stock repurchase
program, totaling $0.9 billion for fiscal 2022, for a total of $3.6
billion during fiscal 2019 through fiscal 2022.
• Accelerated
our product innovation efforts, with 49 major product
releases.3
|
Building
a Stronger
Palo Alto Networks
TOTAL REVENUE ($ in
millions) |
|
TOTAL BILLINGS ($ in
millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEXT-GEN
SECURITY ARR
|
|
PRODUCT INNOVATION
Major Product
Releases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security Operations |
|
|
Cloud Security |
|
|
Network Security |
|
|
RETURN OF CAPITAL |
|
|
|
Fiscal
2022 |
Fiscal
2019-2022 |
|
|
$0.9 Billion |
$3.6 Billion |
1. |
|
Total
billings is a key financial metric calculated as total revenue plus
change in total deferred revenue, net of total acquired deferred
revenue. Appendix A includes a calculation of total
billings. |
2. |
|
Next-Gen
Security ARR is annualized allocated revenue of all active
contracts as of the final day of the reporting period for Prisma
and Cortex offerings inclusive of the VM-Series and related
services, and certain cloud-delivered security
services. |
3. |
|
Major
product release is defined as full or dot release with significant
new capability, new or add-on modules, or subscription services,
new software or hardware appliance models, significant PAN-OS,
acquired capabilities and significant new platform
support. |
8 |
|
About
Us
Stockholder
Engagement
We are
proud of our investor engagement program, and committed to
maintaining outreach that is truly a dialogue with our
stockholders. Our relationship with our stockholders is an
important part of our Company’s success. In fiscal 2022, we once
again engaged in robust stockholder engagement, with a focus on
executive compensation, environmental sustainability, social
responsibility, and corporate governance (ESG), and other matters
of particular import to our stockholders. Our Lead Independent
Director played a central role in developing and implementing our
program, and once again actively participated in our stockholder
engagement efforts in fiscal 2022.
Our
Lead Independent Director and management team regularly update our
Board and Board committees on our engagement efforts, providing
summaries and analyses of our stockholders’ feedback. The feedback
that we received from our stockholders resulted in significant
improvement in our compensation and corporate governance practices,
as described in detail in this proxy statement, including our
adoption of majority voting for uncontested elections of our
directors in May 2022.
We believe that our approach to engaging directly and openly with
our investors drives increased corporate accountability, improves
decision making, and ultimately creates long-term value.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
We
reached out to stockholders representing 68% of our outstanding
shares.
|
We
engaged in discussions with investors representing 60% of our
outstanding shares (which is all stockholders that indicated a
willingness to engage with us).
|
Our
Lead Independent Director participated in discussions (30 meetings)
with investors representing 39% of our outstanding
shares.
|
|
*
Stockholder ownership, to our knowledge, as of June 30,
2022. |
|
|
|
Below
are the key elements of our stockholder engagement
cycle:

About
Us
Executive
Compensation
Our Compensation Best Practices
In
fiscal 2022, we implemented our redesigned executive compensation
programs, meeting the commitments we made to our stockholders in
our 2021 proxy statement. Our compensation programs reflect
recognized best practices and principles that align the
compensation of our named executive officers with the long-term
interests of our stockholders, and are supported by market
benchmarks.
10 |
|
About
Us
Significant At-Risk Compensation
Our
executive compensation program is tied to our financial and
operational performance. The graphs below illustrate the
predominance of at-risk and performance-based components of our
fiscal 2022 compensation program for our Chief Executive Officer
and other named executive officers.
CEO
|
AVERAGE OF OTHER NEOs(2)
|
 |
 |
(1) |
Graph
reflects Mr. Arora’s target base salary of $1 million, a
significant portion of which he elected to forgo.
|
(2) |
Excludes
Mr. Jenkins’ new hire RSUs which were granted to compensate him for
a portion of our estimated value of the unvested equity that he
forfeited upon joining us.
|
This
page intentionally left blank.
This
document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All
statements other than statements of historical or current facts,
including statements regarding our social, environmental and
sustainability plans and goals, and executive compensation plans,
made in this document are forward-looking. We use words such as
anticipates, plan, believes, expects, future, intends, and similar
expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements reflect management’s current expectations and are
inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ materially for a
variety of reasons. Risks and uncertainties that could cause our
actual results to differ significantly from management’s
expectations are described in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Unless otherwise provided herein, all statements in this proxy
statement are as of November 3, 2022.
References
to our website in this proxy statement are not intended to function
as a hyperlink and the information contained on our website is not
intended to be part of this proxy statement.
In this
proxy statement, the terms “the Company”, “we,” and “our” refer to
Palo Alto Network, Inc. and the term “Board” refers to the Board of
Directors of Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
To the
extent that this proxy statement has been or will be specifically
incorporated by reference into any other filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the sections of this proxy
statement titled “Report of the Audit Committee” and “Report of the
Compensation Committee” shall not be deemed to be so incorporated,
unless specifically stated otherwise in such
filing.
Our Board at a Glance
Our
Board consists of a diverse group of highly qualified leaders in
their respective fields who bring unique perspectives to the Board.
All directors have either held senior leadership positions at large
companies or otherwise gained significant and wide-ranging
management experience in their respective fields (including
strategic, financial, public company financial reporting,
compliance, risk management, and leadership development). Many of
our directors also have public company experience (serving as chief
executive officer, chief operating officer, or chief financial
officer, or on boards of directors and board committees), and as a
result have a deep understanding of corporate governance practices,
including risk and management oversight.
14 |
|
Our
Board at a Glance

Our Corporate Governance at a Glance

• |
Consider nominees and candidates in light of current skill sets and
needs |
• |
All candidates and nominees evaluated and considered for their
expertise, experience, leadership and diversity, including gender,
ethnicity and background |
• |
Board comprised of diverse directors, including gender, ethnic,
racial and experiential diversity |
|
º |
Appointed four new directors since 2019, including three who
brought gender, ethnic and/or racial diversity to the
Board |
• |
Board leadership reviewed annually |
• |
Clearly defined roles for Board leadership |
• |
Strong Lead Independent Director, who leads executive sessions of
the Board |
• |
Strong Board independence, with nine independent
directors |
• |
Independent Board committees, with frequent executive
sessions |
• |
Strong partnership between Chair and Lead Independent
Director |
• |
Annual Board evaluation process includes assessments and reviews of
the Board, committees and individual directors |
• |
Director orientation and continuing director education |
• |
High standards of corporate governance |
• |
Board meeting agendas set by Chair in collaboration with Lead
Independent Director |
• |
Frequent review of oversight, including over significant
risks |
|
º |
culture, employee retention and human capital management
(Compensation and People Committee oversight) |
|
º |
sustainability and corporate governance (ESG and Nominating
Committee) |
|
º |
security and cybersecurity (Security
Committee) |
|
º |
financial reporting, internal controls over financial reporting,
and enterprise risk relating to financial matters (Audit
Committee) |
|
º |
M&A and strategic transactions (Corporate Development
Committee) |
• |
Engaged in setting corporate strategy |
• |
Engaged in management succession planning to ensure next generation
of leadership |
• |
Strong Lead Independent Director, who actively engages in
management oversight |
• |
Transparent lines of accountability to our stockholders |
• |
A robust and interactive stockholder engagement program based on
dialogue, transparency and responsiveness to stockholder
concerns |
|
º |
In response to stockholder feedback, adopted majority voting for
uncontested elections of directors, including a resignation policy
in the event a director does not receive a majority of the
vote |
• |
Appropriate director compensation structured in a manner that is
aligned with stockholder interests |
16 |
|
ESG at Palo Alto Networks
An Overview of Our ESG Strategies
Our
values of execution, disruption, collaboration, inclusion and
integrity are the foundation of everything we do—which extend into
our approach to environmental, social and corporate governance
(“ESG”) practices. From our climate commitments, our people
strategy based on FLEXWORK, and our supplier responsibility
initiatives, to our social impact programs and our dedication to
integrity, ethics, security and privacy, we believe we are
executing meaningful outcomes that reinforce our intention to
respect our planet, uplift our communities and advance our
industry. The content that follows summarizes the actions we have
taken, the impact we believe we have had and our ongoing journey to
demonstrate leadership in ESG.
ESG Oversight and Governance
ESG at Palo
Alto Networks is overseen and governed at the highest levels and
includes Board and committee oversight, executive-level leadership,
and subject-matter experts who lead our ESG efforts across our
business.
Board Oversight.
The Board and its applicable committees provide guidance and
oversight to management with respect to ESG matters. During fiscal
2022, we reconstituted our Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee as the ESG and Nominating Committee to enhance the
Board’s oversight of ESG matters and reinforce the important role
that ESG practices play in our business. The ESG and Nominating
Committee is responsible for setting our ESG priorities and
monitoring our performance. Our Compensation and People Committee,
Audit Committee and Security Committee also serve an important role
in ESG oversight. Our Lead Independent Director and management team
share feedback received from our stockholders with the
Board.
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
Management Leadership.
A cross-functional, executive-level ESG leadership team sets our
overall ESG strategy, objectives and initiatives, provides guidance
on program implementation, and oversees the continuing enhancement
of our approach to ESG. This committee which is led by our Chief
Executive Officer and includes our General Counsel, Chief People
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, receives analysis and
presentations regarding current and emerging ESG-related risk
topics and the status of our ESG programs.
Our
executive-level ESG leadership team also empowers our ESG steering
committee to implement our ESG programs and to pursue activities to
achieve our objective and goals. The ESG steering committee is a
cross functional team of employees, consisting of representatives
from our accounting, internal audit, corporate responsibility,
legal, investor relations and operations teams, and oversees the
work of our subject matter experts in the implementation of our ESG
programs.
18 |
|
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
Environmental
Climate
change is a global crisis and we are committed to doing our part to
reduce our environmental impacts. Aligned to the Climate
Commitments we declared in early 2021, in fiscal 2022 we evolved
our comprehensive Sustainability Strategy focused on three pillars:
operational excellence (Sustainable Operations), a Sustainable
Value Chain, and a Sustainable Ecosystem. In fiscal 2022, we
engaged with external consultancies, conducted a comprehensive
analysis of our global environmental footprint, and obtained third
party assurance of our analysis and related emissions data, across
all three pillars.
 |
SUSTAINABLE
OPERATIONS
Accelerate
carbon and waste free growth across our FLEXWORK footprint through
energy efficiency, decarbonization, renewable energy and
science-based targets.
|
 |
SUSTAINABLE
VALUE CHAIN
Collaborate
and partner with stakeholders throughout our value chain to drive
to zero carbon, zero waste, 100% renewable energy and 100% circular
cybersecurity products.
|
 |
SUSTAINABLE
ECOSYSTEM
Drive
leading public commitments, policy advocacy and partnerships to
elevate our thought leadership position in sustainable
cybersecurity.
|
Raising Our Ambition
We
raised the ambition of our Climate Commitments through developing
and setting Science-Based Targets (“SBTs”) aligned to a climate
scenario of 1.5° celsius. They are:
• |
Scope 1 and 2: Sustainable Operations |
Palo
Alto Networks commits to reduce Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 35%
by the end of fiscal 2027, as compared to fiscal 2021.
• |
Scope 3: Sustainable Supply Chain |
Palo
Alto Networks commits to get 65% of our suppliers (measured by
total spend) to set Science-Based Targets by the end of fiscal
2027.
• |
Scope 3: Sustainable Customers (Use of Sold
Products) |
Palo
Alto Networks commits to reduce emissions from our customers’ use
of our products by 40% by the end of fiscal 2027.
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
Our
SBTs were submitted to the Science-Based Targets Initiative for
verification, which we expect to obtain in 2023.
In
fiscal 2022, in line with the most reputable non-governmental
organizations (“NGOs”), we refined and elevated our Carbon Neutral
goal to be defined as “Net Zero” targets:
• |
We
intend to achieve Net Zero across our Scope 1 and 2 emissions by
fiscal 2030, by reducing emissions by 90%, as compared to fiscal
2021, and mitigating any remaining emissions through carbon removal
investments. |
• |
We
intend to achieve Net Zero across all Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions by
fiscal 2040, aligned with The Climate Pledge, by reducing emissions
by 90%, as compared to fiscal 2021, and mitigating any remaining
emissions through carbon removal investments. |
Through
our climate ambition across our operations, value chain and
ecosystem, we are confident that we can achieve these goals by the
dates above.
Sustainable Operations
Early
in fiscal 2022, we elevated our operational goals by committing to
purchasing 100% true renewable energy, expanding operational
excellence through deep energy efficiency, and driving
decarbonization throughout our real estate footprint.
We
continued to execute our sustainable approach to real estate and
opened new LEED certified offices in multiple cities, including
London and Bangalore, and expanded our LEED footprint through
certifications in Tel Aviv, Bangalore and San Francisco. We
launched multiple sustainability work groups to evaluate and act on
implementing green packaging, waste reduction and resource
conservation. To address the digital divide, promote reuse and
reduce our e-waste, we engaged in an external partnership to
efficiently donate obsolete equipment, accessories and furnishings
for social benefit.
Sustainable Value Chain |
|
Through
our carbon footprint assessment, we gained a complete understanding
of where our greatest impacts - and best opportunities - are, and
we set 1.5° Celsius aligned Science-Based Targets to effectively
address them. We set critical Scope 1 and 2 SBTs, but we know that
our greatest impact is in our Scope 3 emissions. Because of this,
we have set what we believe are ambitious SBTs to drive a
Sustainable Value Chain across our purchased goods and services and
the use by our customers of the products we sell to
them. |

Achieved
a Supplier Engagement
Rating of A- from CDP (2021)
|
Throughout
fiscal 2022, we began the journey to engage stakeholders throughout
our value chain, from suppliers to customers, to drive to zero
carbon, zero waste, 100% renewable energy and 100% circularity in
our cybersecurity products.
Sustainable Ecosystem |
|
Recognizing
that addressing climate change will require collaboration on
systemic issues, we increased and expanded our engagements with
environmental coalitions. By joining The Climate Pledge, formally
committing to emissions reductions through the Science-Based Target
initiative, our ongoing participation in the World Economic Forum’s
Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders and other partnerships, we
continued to demonstrate our eagerness to engage with others on
this critical issue. |
Achieved
an Environmental
QualityScore of 1 by Institutional
Shareholder Services (2022)
Highest score available,
corresponding to the top decile
|
|
|
We
believe thoughtful and ardent policy advocacy is one of the most
effective tools for addressing climate change. In fiscal 2022, we
signed on to a letter from Ceres supporting the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s proposed rule mandating climate disclosure.
We also engaged directly with several policy makers to reinforce
the importance of climate action and its intersectionality with
cybersecurity.
We
remained committed to transparency by submitting our 2022 CDP
Climate and Supply Chain disclosures for the third year in a
row.
20 |
|
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
Social
During
fiscal 2022, we continued to execute our People strategy and
philosophy of FLEXWORK, engaged with our supply chain to reinforce
our Code of Conduct expectations and invested in our
Communities.
Our People
We
believe our ongoing success depends on our employees. Development
and investment in our people is, and will always be, central to who
we are. Our People Strategy, built upon our philosophy of FLEXWORK,
is a comprehensive approach to source, hire, onboard, integrate,
develop, engage and reward employees. Caring for our global
workforce of over 12,500, and inspiring them to do the best work of
their careers is a critical element of our overall Company strategy
and a demonstration of our values in action.
FLEXWORK |
|
Throughout
the COVID-19 pandemic, while prioritizing the health and safety of
our employees, we have learned how to collaborate in a distributed
hybrid work reality and to create opportunities for employees to
maintain a sense of belonging and focus on well-being. Moving into
the future, we aim to continue to disrupt the nature of work. Our
philosophy is simple: place our employees at the center of their
working life by providing them with flexibility, personalization,
and choice regarding how they work, the benefits they choose, the
way they consume learning and, where possible, when and where they
work. We truly believe that the more our employees have choice and
demonstrate mutual trust and respect, the more engaged they will
be. We believe that FLEXWORK is a significant factor in positioning
Palo Alto Networks as the cybersecurity workplace of
choice. |
Recognized
by Newsweek among
100 of America’s “Most Loved
Workplaces”
|
FLEXWORK
adds even more opportunity to scale our efforts to improve
inclusion and diversity. It further enables us to recognize each
individual as unique, with their own priorities and needs, and
gives the employee greater agency to personalize their decisions
and utilize our programs and initiatives to meet those interests
and desires.
Source
& Hire
Sourcing
and hiring diverse talent and enabling them to create and execute
is central to our comprehensive approach to talent acquisition,
which we refer to as “The Way We Hire.” Our talent acquisition team
utilizes a number of methods to find subject experts in their
respective fields, including the use of a variety of channels that
focus on reaching underrepresented talents. Our university
relations team partners with hundreds of academic institutions,
including colleges and universities that focus on serving diverse
populations, to provide career pathways for early-in-career
candidates. Current employees also provide qualified candidates
through our Employee Referral Program. During fiscal 2022, we
“welcomed home” numerous employees who voluntarily left Palo Alto
Networks and found they wanted to return. Through our Internal
Mobility program, numerous hires during fiscal 2022 were internal,
and many of those internal hires resulted in promotions for those
individuals. We equip hiring managers with training so that they
are made aware of potential unconscious biases and interview for
the values and competencies that we believe enhance our culture. We
require diverse interview panels to deliver a quality interview
experience to a diverse slate of candidates.
Onboard
& Integrate
We
believe that a positive onboarding experience results in employees
thriving and therefore rapid productivity. During the COVID-19
pandemic, we built and utilized virtual learning platforms and
employee communication channels to provide new employees with
inspirational, often personalized, onboarding experiences. For
every employee, onboarding is a journey of integration that extends
through the first year at Palo Alto Networks. In addition, we have
built specialist learning tracks for interns and new graduates that
have been recognized as best in class externally. As part of our
merger and acquisition strategy, we have also established a robust
integration program with the goal to enable individuals joining our
teams to feel part of our culture at speed.
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
Develop
& Motivate |
|
Because
we value disruption and innovation, we created FLEXLearn—a unique
approach to personalized employee development. FLEXLearn is a
learning experience platform that provides employees with a path
based on their needs, interests, style, and career journey. Through
FLEXLearn employees have full agency to direct their growth at
their pace and choosing. Development information about core
business elements, professional skill sets, working in a
distributed hybrid environment, as well as required compliance
training, such as Code of Conduct, privacy and security,
anti-discrimination, anti-harassment, and anti-bribery training, is
also deployed through the FLEXLearn platform for all employees. In
addition, FLEXLearn provides employees with events and activities
that motivate and spark critical thinking, on topics ranging from
inclusion, to well-being and collaboration. On average, employees
had completed 16 hours of development through the FLEXLearn
platform during fiscal 2022. |

Recognized
among the “Top Workplaces for the Next Generation of Talent” as
evaluated by Ripplematch (2021)
|
Because
we know that business leaders have unique learning and development
needs and interests, we also created FLEXLead. Focused on providing
tools and resources to those who manage teams and drive business
functions, FLEXLead aims to increase the awareness of inclusion and
diversity, coaching and mentorship, and the capacity for leaders to
align employee priorities with our strategic business
priorities.
Engage
& Reward
We
conduct regular executive listening sessions and “pulse surveys” to
better understand employee engagement, sentiment, well-being, and
the agility to transition to a distributed work model. These
sessions and surveys, including employee feedback to external
surveys and crowdsourcing platforms, have informed our holistic
People Strategy and influenced our FLEXWORK philosophy, inclusion
and diversity strategies, and Internal Mobility program. For
example, our FLEXCircle program is the result of employee input,
requesting new opportunities to meet and interact with employees
who share common interests. And our FLEXAssist program was
developed based on suggestions from employees looking for tools
that help them identify key employee milestones and facilitate
increased communication and collaboration.
Employee
sentiment has continued to be highly positive, and we are proud of
the external recognition we have received about our culture. We
continue to use insights from an anonymous global employee
engagement survey we conducted in fiscal 2021 to execute action
plans that reinforce our culture of engagement. The survey
indicated that employees have a strong sense of belonging,
confidence in leadership, and an understanding of how their work
contributes to the Company’s goals. Equally important, our internal
pulse surveys and other feedback mechanisms, including insights
from external employee sentiment sources and employer brand
recognition, indicate that employees continue to view Palo Alto
Networks as a great place to work, with strong benefits, a
commitment to inclusion and diversity and respected
leadership.
Our
comprehensive compensation program includes competitive base pay.
In addition, all employees participate in one of two variable pay
programs our sales incentive plans or our variable incentive
program. All employees are also eligible to participate in our
stock-based offerings through a generous Employee Stock Purchase
Plan and a competitive Equity Incentive Plan, both of which are
available to all of our employees where regulations permit. We
conduct annual external audits of our pay practices. Our fairness
and equity analysis includes gender for all global employees and
race and ethnicity for employees in the U.S. As a result of these
measures and corrections, we believe that our employees are paid
fairly and equitably regardless of race/ethnicity (in the U.S.) or
gender (globally). |
Recognized
by Comparably in 7 “Best of ” categories including “Best
Compensation” (#9)(2022)
|
As a
global employer with a diverse employee population, we understand
everyone’s benefit needs are different. Our benefit plans include a
variety of health, time-off, wellness and voluntary options. And,
our FLEXBenefits program provides all employees with a funding
allowance from which they can choose to obtain additional
benefits. |
Recognized
by Comparably in 7 “Best of ” categories including “Perks &
Benefits” (#75)(2022)
|
22 |
|
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
We
believe in an always-on feedback and rewards philosophy. From
recurring 1:1 sessions and multiple feedback channels to use of our
Cheers for Peers peer recognition program, employees get regular
input about the value they bring to the organization. And while
always-on practices are useful in providing real-time feedback, we
also execute a Company-wide semi-annual performance review process
so that leaders and employees have recurring constructive
conversations aimed at elevating performance, increasing capability
and executing with excellence.
Inclusion
& Diversity
We are
intentional about including diverse points of view, perspectives,
experiences, backgrounds and ideas in our decision-making
processes. We deeply believe that true diversity exists when we
have representation of all ethnicities, genders, orientations and
identities, and cultures in our workforce. Our inclusion and
diversity (“I&D”) programs continue to advance those
visions.
The
diversity of our Board, with women representing 33% of the Board is
an example of that vision in action. We have nine employee network
groups (“ENGs”) which are employee-led groups that play a vital
role in building understanding and awareness. Our ENGs are provided
with a budget to fund activities for their communities and to make
charitable grants to organizations advancing their causes. We
involve our ENGs in listening sessions with executive teams and we
work in partnership to develop our annual I&D plans, because we
believe employee involvement is critical.
As
referenced above, our I&D philosophy is fully embedded in our
talent acquisition, learning and development and rewards and
recognition programs. We believe that outcomes such as increases in
gender and ethnic diversity, no differential in attrition based on
gender or ethnicity, equity in performance evaluation and internal
mobility are indicators that our efforts are making the desired
progress. Further, the awards and recognition the Company has
received during fiscal 2022, most of which are the direct result of
employee input, reinforce our growth in this crucial
topic.
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
by
Comparably in
7 “Best of ” categories
including “Best CEOs for
Diversity ” (#15)(2022) |
Achieved
a perfect
score of 100% on the
Human Rights Campaign
Corporate Equality Index
(2022, 2021 & 2020) |
Achieved
a perfect score of 100%
on the Disability Equality Index as
evaluated by Disability:IN (2022) |
Achieved
“Gold”
status as a Military
Friendly Employer as
evaluated by Military
Friendly (2022) |
Our Supply Chain
Through
the deployment of our Global Supplier Code of Conduct, we continued
to reach across our supply chain to communicate our expectations
regarding labor standards, business practices and workplace health
and safety conditions. During fiscal 2022, we maintained our
affiliate membership in the Responsible Business Alliance and
maintained our commitment to Supplier Diversity.
Our
codes of conduct are useful in documenting our expectations that
materials suppliers honor our commitment to human rights. That
said, beyond communicating our expectations, we follow industry
best practices when assessing risks for incidents of human rights
violations within our supply chain. We take a risk-based and
business impact approach and leverage the risk assessment resources
of the Responsible Business Alliance to help identify suppliers who
may be at high risk for child, forced or compulsory labor issues.
If we believe additional research into a suppliers’ ethical
practices is necessary, we take action to do so.
We
focus our risk assessments on suppliers where we have large annual
spend, where Palo Alto Networks is a significant portion of their
annual revenue, where the supplier’s technology impacts our
business, and where we have an overall strategic partnership with a
supplier. Understanding risks related to human rights, among
others, that these suppliers may pose is critical, from both a
socially conscious and business impact perspective.
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
In
addition, suppliers who may provide commodities or be within
industries historically known to have high risks for labor
incidents are subject to additional vetting processes. Lastly,
suppliers who may be located in countries or regions where labor
conditions have historically not been prioritized within those
countries or regions are also considered high risk and managed
appropriately.
We
believe our strength as a company comes from building an inclusive
environment and collaborating with individuals who bring diverse
experiences. This extends to our global supply chain and our
commitment to increase our awareness of and engagement with women-
and minority-owned businesses. A cross-functional working group
continues to explore best practices and is working with partners
such as Western Regional Minority Supplier Development Council, to
support our work to enhance our procurement policies and establish
metrics to measure our progress in growing the diversity of our
supply chain.
Our Communities |
|
We
value our role as a good corporate citizen and in fiscal 2022
continued to execute our social impact programs. In addition to
ongoing efforts to help colleagues and communities impacted by the
COVID-19 pandemic, we invested in cybersecurity awareness,
education programs, scholarships, diversity and basic needs. Our
employees continue to actively support the communities in which we
live and work. |
Recognized
by Just Capital among Top 100 Companies Supporting Families and
Communities (2022 & 2021)
|
Investing
in Education and Key Cause Areas
We
expanded our work to provide cybersecurity activities and
curriculum to schools, universities and nonprofit organizations to
help youth protect their digital way of life and to prepare diverse
adults for careers in cybersecurity. Through our ongoing
partnership with Girl Scouts of the USA hundreds of thousands of
cybersecurity badges have been earned, including troops in
Singapore through USA Girl Scouts Overseas. Moreover, our Cyber
A.C.E.S. program continues to grow—not only reaching youth in the
U.S. and Canada but now being used in Australia, Japan, Scotland,
Singapore, and elsewhere. Our Cybersecurity Academy is now
providing curriculum to thousands of high schools, colleges and
universities in hundreds of countries around the world. In
addition, by partnering with the IIT (BHU) Foundation and the
Thurgood Marshall College Fund, we are funding scholarships to help
make higher education more accessible to those in need.
Because
inclusion and diversity is important to Palo Alto Networks, we
allocate charitable funding to our ENGs to enable them to support
non-profit organizations committed to reaching the needs of
underrepresented communities. In fiscal 2022, we supported dozens
of organizations to help them achieve their respective
missions.
In
addition to making charitable grants to support causes like mental
health and wellness, hunger and basic needs, we invested in
expanding the talent pipeline to underrepresented communities. We
also supported environmental and social justice causes. Lastly, to
address the digital divide, promote reuse, and reduce our e-waste
we engaged in an external partnership to efficiently donate
obsolete equipment, accessories and furnishings for social
benefit.
Engaging
Employees to Increase Impact
Employees
continued to participate in our giving, matching and volunteer
programs to make impacts in their local
communities.
Aligned
with our FLEXWORK philosophy, we continued to offer virtual
volunteer projects so that employees had choice in how they support
their communities, while at the same time supporting in-person
volunteer activities. Employees volunteered as individuals and
often in groups to make a meaningful difference. While employees
always have choice in the causes they support, on occasion we also
highlight causes through “drives” such as our Annual Hunger
Campaign as well as relief for natural disasters and humanitarian
efforts. Between our “Dollar-for-Doers” volunteer and matching gift
programs, thousands of causes received funding.
24 |
|
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
Corporate Behavior
Ethics & Compliance
Palo
Alto Networks is committed to conducting business with high degrees
of honesty and integrity wherever we operate. Integrity is one of
our core values and we respect our customers, partners, employees
and stockholders.
Our
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics summarizes the ethical
standards and key policies that guide the business conduct of the
directors, officers and employees of the Company, and we have a
public Global Supplier Code of Conduct, both available on our
corporate website. All employees, contractors and suppliers are
informed about our governance expectations through our Codes of
Conduct and compliance training programs.
We also
have a policy focused on respect in the workplace and a
corresponding training through our FLEXLearn platform. All new
hires must complete the training and existing global employees are
required to complete the training every other year. The training
includes anti-discrimination, antiharassment and anti-retaliation
lessons and hypotheticals. Our Audit Committee and ESG and
Nominating Committee of the Board are responsible for oversight of
our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics compliance program. Our
Ethics Hotline is also publicly available.
Information
Security & Privacy
Palo
Alto Networks maintains a written information security program that
is managed by our Chief Information Security Officer, who is
responsible for overseeing and implementing the program; includes
administrative, technical and physical safeguards reasonably
designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and
availability of end user data; and is appropriate to the nature,
size and complexity of Palo Alto Networks’ business operations. The
Security Committee of our Board of Directors reviews data privacy
and cybersecurity strategies and risks and provides oversight over
risk mitigation related to cyber threats. Eight of our 12 Board
Directors have cybersecurity and IT technology expertise. We
provide annual information security and compliance training to all
of our employees.
We
engage external agencies to conduct background checks for
personnel. We also maintain a security process to conduct
appropriate due diligence prior to engaging contractors; assess the
security capabilities of subcontractors on a periodic basis; and
require subcontractors to adhere to our key information security
policies and standards. We also restrict access to, control and
monitor physical areas where we process end user data. Data centers
that we operate are in alignment with industry standards such as
ISO 27001 and SSAE 16 or ISAE 3402.
We
deploy firewall technology and an intrusion detection system to
generate, monitor and respond to alerts which could indicate
potential compromise of our network. We also apply security by
design principles throughout the software development lifecycle,
track vulnerabilities of open-source software, and run internal and
external network scans at least quarterly and after any material
change in the network configuration. We conduct application
security assessments using a qualified third party, such as our
annual assessment for internet-facing applications that collect,
transmit or display end user data.
Palo
Alto Networks also develops, implements and maintains a business
continuity management program to address the needs of the business
and the products we provide to customers. To that end, we complete
a minimum level of business impact analysis, crisis management,
business continuity and disaster recovery planning.
Privacy
is important to our customers and helps us build trust. Our privacy
practices are informed by several key principles
including:
• |
Accountability. We are
responsible for the protection of personal information entrusted to
us. |
• |
Transparency and Control. We
inform customers about our collection of their personal information
and honor their preferences. |
• |
Third Parties Processing Our Information.
We choose trustworthy vendors and suppliers to process personal
information and we require them to commit to adequate privacy and
data security standards. |
• |
Privacy by Design. We
continue to build on this principle when designing and implementing
products. |
ESG at
Palo Alto Networks
• |
Data Integrity and Proportionality. We
collect personal information for specific and legitimate business
purposes and store it safely and accurately. |
• |
Customer Benefit/Value for Customers. We
share with our customers the benefits and value we derive from
processing their personal information. |
• |
Security. We
implement technical, organizational and physical security measures
to confirm an appropriate level of security of the personal
information we process. This includes employee
training. |
Our ESG Journey
Palo
Alto Networks has always been a values-based company, and the core
principles of ESG have been part of our day-to-day operations.
Still, the Company has made a dedicated focus to continuously
improve and further integrate ESG into the business. From elevated
environmental initiatives, such as setting emissions reduction
goals aligned to Science-Based Targets and constantly evolving
social strategies like FLEXWORK to increased transparency in our
governance and disclosures, including our fiscal 2021 ESG
Supplement released in October 2021, we have made strides to
advance our ESG journey.
We have
made improvements and yet we recognize that we have more work to
do, particularly as stakeholders become more and more interested in
our efforts and as regulatory matters and ESG frameworks evolve.
During fiscal 2022, our overall ESG performance improved across all
of the rating institutions we measure against. We monitor these
ratings so that we remain diligent in our practices and execute a
path to achieve our place as industry leaders in ESG.
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
by Sustainalytics as
“Industry Top Rated” for our overall ES
performance (2022, 2021) |
Recognized
by Institutional Shareholder
Services (ISS) as Prime (2022) |
Achieved
“Gold” rating by EcoVadis
(2021) |
Recognized
by JUST Capital as a
“Top 100 Most JUST Company in America”
(2022) |
26 |
|
Board of Directors Corporate
Governance
Highlights
Our
Board is governed by our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are
amended from time to time to incorporate certain current best
practices in corporate governance. Our Corporate Governance
Guidelines may be found on our website at
https://investors.paloaltonetworks.com.
In
addition to a strong, independent Board, we are committed to
corporate governance structures that promote long-term stockholder
value creation through a sound leadership structure and by
providing our stockholders with both the opportunity to provide
direct feedback, and substantive rights and policies to ensure
accountability.
|
|
THE
BOARD’S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AND STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: |
✓Majority
voting for uncontested elections of board members, with an
associated resignation policy
✓Strong
Lead Independent Director
✓Board
Composed of 75% Independent Directors
✓100%
Independent Audit Committee, ESG and Nominating Committee,
Compensation and People Committee and Security
Committee
✓Annual
Review of Board leadership Structure
✓Board
Refreshment
✓Director
Changes in Circumstances Actively Evaluated
✓Board
and Committee Access to Management
✓Annual
Board and Committee Evaluations
✓Independent
Compensation and People Committee Consultant
✓Board
Authority to Retain Outside Advisors
✓Board
and Committee Risk Oversight, including Security
✓Board
Continuing Education Program
✓No
Poison Pill
✓Single
Class of Shares
|
✓Formed
the Security Committee of our Board to enhance oversight over
security issues, including cybersecurity
✓Annual
Review of Committee Charters and Governance Policies
✓Fair
Director Compensation Practices
✓Active
Management Succession Oversight
✓Active
Management of Director Conflicts of Interest
✓Annual
Say-on-Pay Vote
✓Continuous
Stockholder Engagement Program
✓Stock
Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive
Officers
✓Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and
Employee
✓Anti-Hedging
Policy
✓Restrictive
Pledging Policy
✓Clawback
Policy
✓Regular
Meetings of Independent Directors Without Management
Present
✓Proxy
Access Bylaws
|
Corporate
Governance
Board Responsiveness to Investors in
FY2022
Our
Board is committed to actively engaging with our stockholders, and
committed to maintaining outreach that is truly a dialogue with our
stockholders. Through year-round engagement and outreach, we
regularly provide stockholders with opportunities to deliver
feedback on our corporate governance, executive and director
compensation, and environmental and sustainability practices. We
regularly meet with investors, prospective investors, and
investment analysts. These meetings can include participation by
our Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Chief Products Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary or
other business leaders, and are often focused on company strategy,
financial performance, product strategy and ESG philosophy. Members
of our Investor Relations team also participate in meetings with
our stockholders and, on occasion, members of the Board participate
as appropriate. In fiscal 2022, our Lead Independent Director
participated in 30 meetings with our stockholders.
Following
our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, we reinvigorated our
approach and practices to stockholder engagement and implemented a
strategy that focused on extensive engagement on a wide range of
topics. Our Lead Independent Director played an active and central
role in our stockholder engagement efforts in fiscal 2022, and our
management team regularly communicated topics discussed and
stockholder feedback to the Board and our Board committees for
consideration in their decision-making.
 |
Who we
met with |
•Investors
holding
60% of
shares outstanding engaged with in discussions
•Investors
holding
39% of
shares outstanding engaged by Lead Independent
Director
|
 |
Our Primary
engagement
team |
•Lead
Independent Director (participated in
30 meetings)
•Investor
Relations team
•General
Counsel & Corporate Secretary
•People
Team (human resources)
•Corporate
responsibility team
|
 |
What we
discussed |
•Executive
compensation
•Board
structure
•Board
composition and governance, including Board refreshment and
diversity
•Board
oversight
•Board
leadership
•Stockholder
engagement
•ESG
initiatives
•ESG
disclosure and governance
|
28 |
|
Corporate
Governance
WHAT WE HEARD |
HOW WE RESPONDED |
Board
Governance
Plurality voting for directors, dual role of CEO and Chairman and
annual election of all Board members |
•Adopted
a majority voting requirement for uncontested elections of
directors, including a resignation policy in the event a director
does not receive a majority of the vote.
•Committed
to maintaining our practice of annually reviewing our Board
leadership structure, including whether an independent director
should be the Chair of our Board.
•Committed
to maintaining our practice of annually reviewing whether
maintaining a classified Board is appropriate for our
Company.
|

Board
Oversight of Risks, Including Cybersecurity and ESG
Risks
How the Board is addressing oversight of increased, varied and new
risks. |
•Formed
the Security Committee of our Board to enhance oversight over
security issues facing our Company, including
cybersecurity.
•Reconstituted
our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as the ESG and
Nominating Committee to enhance the Board’s oversight of ESG
matters.
•Reallocated
ESG responsibilities among our Board Committees, clearly
identifying the responsibilities of each Committee.
•Added
additional disclosure in this proxy statement relating to Board
oversight.
|

Board
Diversity and Refreshment
The duration of Board service by certain long-standing directors,
and the makeup of the Board and the rationale
therefore. |
•The
Board appointed Ms. Bawa and Dr. Gayle to our Board during fiscal
2021, increasing the gender, racial and ethnic diversity of the
Board. Presently, four of our twelve directors are
women.
•During
the period between April 2019 and May 2021, we appointed four new
independent directors: Ms. Bawa, Dr. Gayle, Ms. Twohill and Rt Hon
Sir John Key.
•Expanded
disclosure in this proxy statement of the rationales as to why each
of our directors continue to serve on our Board.
|

Stockholder
Engagement
Continued 1:1 investor outreach on compensation, ESG and other
matters of interest to our stockholders. |
•Conducted
extensive stockholder and investor outreach.
•Engaged
in discussion with stockholders holding 60% of our outstanding
shares.
•Our
Lead Independent Director participated in 30 investor meetings and
engaged in discussion with stockholders holding 39% of our
outstanding shares.
|
Corporate
Governance
WHAT WE HEARD |
HOW WE RESPONDED |
ESG Initiatives, Disclosure and
Governance
Would
like to see more information about how we develop and manage
environmental, social and governance initiatives.
|
• Published
our first ESG report in fiscal 2022, in which we report on our
carbon emissions.
• Added
more disclosure in our annual report on Form 10-K and this proxy
statement describing our ESG initiatives and our ESG
governance.
• Adopted
a set of Climate Commitments that include our strategies to be
carbon neutral by 2030, use 100% renewable energy, reduce emissions
aligned to Science-Based Targets and advocate for climate
action.
• Increased
our social impact programs, to leverage our core competency in
cybersecurity and align those efforts to help develop a diverse
talent pipeline while uplifting communities.
• Formed
the Palo Alto Networks Cybersecurity Education Fund with a mission
to fund education programs focused on cybersecurity that inspire
youth.
• Reconstituted
our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as the ESG and
Nominating Committee to enhance our focus on ESG
matters.
• Formalized
our ESG governance structure by forming an ESG Steering Committee,
with employees from accounting, internal audit, operations, legal
and corporate responsibility to recommend strategies and lead
implementation of ESG programs, which reports regularly to our ESG
Executive Leadership Team and the Board.
|
Executive Compensation
Modifications
to the structure of our executive compensation program and enhanced
disclosure.
|
• 100% of
our NEOs’ equity compensation (aside from new hire awards) is
performance-based, with different performance targets than the cash
incentive plan awards.
• Increased
our stock ownership guidelines for our NEOs, including our Chief
Executive Officer.
• Added
an ESG modifier to our cash incentive plan.
• Established
a one-year post-vesting holding period for all NEOs, including our
Chief Executive Officer.
|
30 |
|
Corporate
Governance
Leadership Structure
Our
Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Board is free to
choose its chairperson (the “Chair”) based on our Board’s view of
what is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders.
The Chair and the Chief Executive Officer may, but need not be, the
same person.
Annual Evaluation of Leadership Structure and Annual Election of
Lead Independent Director
As part
of its annual review and evaluation process, the Board reviews its
leadership structure and whether combining or separating the roles
of Chair and Chief Executive Officer is in the best interests of
the Company and our stockholders. The Board also
considers:
• |
The
effectiveness of the policies, practices, and people in place at
the Company to help ensure strong, independent Board
oversight. |
• |
The
importance of consistent, unified leadership to execute and oversee
the Company’s strategy. |
• |
The
strength of Mr. Arora’s vision for the Company and the quality of
his leadership. |
• |
Our
performance and the effect the leadership structure could have on
our performance. |
• |
The
Board’s performance and the effect the leadership structure could
have on the Board’s performance. |
• |
The
meaningful and robust responsibilities and the performance of our
Lead Independent Director. |
• |
The
views of our stockholders through our ongoing engagement
efforts. |
• |
The
practices at other companies and trends in governance. |
• |
The
current state of our Company. |
In the
circumstance that the Board determines that it remains in the best
interests of the Company and its stockholders that our Chief
Executive Officer serve as our Chair, the independent members of
the Board then elect a Lead Independent Director as provided in our
Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Corporate
Governance
Why Our Leaders Are Ideally Suited For Their
Roles
The
Board believes that the independent Board members should have the
flexibility to respond to changing circumstances and choose the
Board leadership structure that best fits the then-current
situation. As it does annually, in August 2022, the Board reviewed
our leadership structure. Following that review, the Board
determined that the combination of the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer roles, along with the robust authority given to our
experienced Lead Independent Director, effectively maintains
independent oversight of management. The Board consists of nine
independent directors, and exercises a strong, independent
oversight function through frequent executive sessions, independent
Board committees and by having a strong Lead Independent Director
with clearly delineated and comprehensive duties.
The
Board strongly believes that its leadership structure strikes the
right balance of allowing our Chair and Chief Executive Officer to
promote a clear, unified vision of the Company’s strategies, while
ensuring robust, independent oversight by the Board and our Lead
Independent Director. The Board also believes there is value in
presenting a single face to our customers through combining the
Chair and Chief Executive Officer roles, and that this structure of
having the Board and management operate under the unified
leadership of a highly experienced Chief Executive Officer best
positions the Company to successfully implement its next phase of
growth.
Accordingly,
in August 2022, the Board determined that it is in the best
interests of our stockholders for Mr. Arora to serve as Chair and
John Donovan to serve as Lead Independent
Director.

|
Nikesh
Arora
Chief
Executive Officer
and Chairman
|
|
John
M. Donovan
Lead
Independent
Director
|
•
Substantial knowledge and deep understanding of our business and
the challenges we face
•
Substantial international business experience and business acumen
and valued strategic, financial and operational
insights
•
Day-to-day insight into our prospects, opportunities, strategies
and challenges facilitates the timely deliberation by the Board of
the most important matters
•
Brings a unique, stockholder-focused insight to assist the Company
to most effectively execute its strategy and business plans to
maximize stockholder value
•
Serves as an important bridge between the Board and management, and
provides critical leadership for carrying out our strategic
initiatives and confronting our challenges
•
Provides the Board with more complete and timely information about
the Company
•
Provides a unified structure and consistent leadership direction
internally and externally
•
Proven success in leading Palo Alto Networks since joining the
Company
|
•
Independence, confidence and gravitas, enabling strong oversight of
executive leadership
•
Deep understanding of our business
•
Strong working relationship with our Chair and Chief Executive
Officer
•
Strong working relationship with other management and our
independent directors
•
Substantial experience leading large multinational
companies
•
Strong background in corporate governance
• Dedicated
to his service as Lead Independent Director, as demonstrated by the
fact that he met with stockholders holding 39% of our outstanding
shares during fiscal 2022
•
Strength and effectiveness of communication with Mr. Arora,
resulting in active and visible oversight of the issues, plans and
prospects of Palo Alto Networks
•
Promotes a collaborative and collegial environment for Board
decision making
|
32 |
|
Corporate
Governance
|
|
OVERVIEW
OF LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES
|
The
responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director are well-defined.
The Lead Independent Director engages in regular communication
between the independent directors and Mr. Arora, keeping Mr. Arora
apprised of any concerns, issues, or determinations made during the
independent sessions, and consults with Mr. Arora on other matters
pertinent to the Company and the Board. As part of the Board’s
annual review and evaluation, the Board further defined the role
and responsibilities of our Lead Independent Director to
include:
• |
Presiding
at meetings of the Board at which the Chair is not present,
including executive sessions of the independent
directors. |
• |
Serving
as liaison between the Chair and the independent
directors. |
• |
Developing
agendas for Board meetings in collaboration with the Chair, and
communicating with independent Board members to ensure that matters
of interest are being included on agendas for Board
meetings. |
• |
Communicating
with independent Board members and with management to affirm that
appropriate briefing materials are being provided to Board members
sufficiently in advance of Board meetings to allow for proper
preparation and participation at meetings. |
• |
Having
the authority to call meetings of the independent
directors. |
• |
Preparing
agendas for meetings of the independent directors. |
• |
Organizing
and leading the Board’s evaluation of the Chief Executive
Officer. |
• |
Leading
the Board’s annual self-evaluation. |
• |
If
requested by major stockholders, ensuring that he is available, as
necessary after discussions with the Chair and Chief Executive
Officer, for consultation and direct communication. |
In
addition to the responsibilities outlined above, our Lead
Independent Director also:
• |
Has
biennial one-on-one discussions with each independent director, as
part of the Board’s annual evaluation process. |
• |
Has
access to all committee materials. |
• |
Has the
authority to engage independent consultants. |
• |
Interviews
Board candidates. |
• |
Spends
time with senior management outside of Board meetings (as
necessary) to ensure a deep understanding of the business and
strategy of the Company. |
• |
Participates
in stockholder engagement planning and activities. |
Corporate
Governance
Independent Directors Sessions
A
meeting of the independent directors is scheduled at every regular
Board meeting and the independent directors meet in an executive
session. These independent sessions are organized and chaired by
our Lead Independent Director, and our Lead Independent Director
provides direct feedback to Mr. Arora after these executive
sessions.
Independent Committee Leadership
The
Audit, Compensation and People, Security, and ESG and Nominating
Committees are each composed solely of, and led by, independent
directors, and provide independent oversight of management. In
addition:
• |
Each
committee chair meets with management in advance of meetings to
review and refine agendas, add topics of interest, and review and
comment on materials to be delivered to the committee. |
• |
Every
independent director has access to all committee
materials. |
• |
Each
committee chair provides a report summarizing committee meetings to
the full Board at each regular meeting of the Board. |
• |
Each
committee meeting includes adequate time for executive session and
the committees meet in executive session on a regular basis with no
members of management present (unless otherwise requested by the
committee). |
• |
Each
committee effectively manages its Board-delegated duties and
communicates regularly with the Chair, Lead Independent Director,
the Board, and members of management. |
Furthermore,
the Compensation and People Committee has an effective process for
monitoring and evaluating Mr. Arora’s compensation and performance,
as well as succession planning.
Board’s Role in Strategy Oversight
Our Board is responsible for overseeing the development of the
Company’s strategy (including product development roadmaps), which
articulates objectives for the business, helps establish and
maintain effective risk management and internal controls
frameworks, and provides direction to senior management to
determine which business opportunities to pursue. The Board is also
actively engaged in ensuring that Palo Alto Networks culture
reflects our commitment to our core values of
disruption,
execution,
collaboration,
integrity and inclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annually holds a
strategy offsite, receiving detailed presentations from, and
engagement with, senior management across the Company |
|
Annually reviews and
approves the Palo Alto Networks operating plan |
|
Quarterly engagement
with senior management on critical business matters that tie to
Palo Alto Network’s overall strategy |
|
Regularly interacts
with the next generation of leadership to ensure the talent
pipeline remains diverse, inclusive and up to the task |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Corporate
Governance
Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Risk is
inherent with every business, including strategic, financial,
business and operational, legal and compliance, and reputational.
We have designed and implemented processes to manage risk in our
operations. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management
of risks our Company faces, while our Board, as a whole and
assisted by its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of
risk management. In its risk oversight role, our Board has the
responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes
designed and implemented by management are appropriate and
functioning as designed.
Our
Board believes that open communication between management and our
Board is essential for effective risk management and
oversight.
While
our Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight, our Board
committees assist our Board in fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities in certain areas of risk.
Corporate
Governance
Annual Board and Committee
Self-Evaluations
Our
Board and each of its committees perform an annual self-assessment
to evaluate the effectiveness of our Board and its committees in
fulfilling their respective obligations. As part of this annual
self-assessment, directors are able to provide feedback on the
performance of other directors.
Our
Lead Independent Director, who is also the Chair of our ESG and
Nominating Committee, leads our Board in its review of the results
of the annual self-assessment and takes further action as needed.
In connection with the annual evaluation, each director receives a
survey to complete to evaluate the Board and separate surveys for
each committee on which they serve. These surveys include detailed
questions regarding: the effectiveness and performance of the Board
and committees; Board and committee composition and refreshment;
timing, agenda, and content of Board and committee meetings; Board
dynamics and function; peer reviews of other members; access to and
performance of management; and executive succession planning. At
least biennially our Lead Independent Director also conducts
one-on-one meetings with each director to receive their feedback
and assessment of the Board and its committees. A summary of the
results is presented to the Board and each committee on an
anonymous basis.
In
addition, all members of our Board have the opportunity to attend
director education programs to assist them in remaining current
with best practices and developments in corporate
governance.

36 |
|
Corporate
Governance
Succession Planning
Our
Board and management team recognize the importance of continually
developing our talented employee base. Accordingly, our management
team conducts an annual talent review of the current senior
leadership positions. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer
annually reviews a succession plan for the Chief Executive Officer
position, using formal criteria to evaluate potential internal and
external successors and interim candidates in the event of an
emergency situation. In conducting its evaluation, our Board
considers organizational needs, competitive challenges, leadership
and management potential, and development and emergency situations.
As a result of succession planning, BJ Jenkins became our President
in August 2021 and Dipak Golechha became Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer in March 2021.
Director Independence
Our
common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). Under
Nasdaq listing standards, independent directors must comprise a
majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, the
listing standards of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified
exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit and
compensation committees be independent, and that the nomination of
all directors be by either a majority of its independent directors
or a committee comprised solely of independent directors. Under
Nasdaq regulations, a director will only qualify as an “independent
director” if, in the opinion of that listed company’s board of
directors, that director does not have a relationship with the
listed company, either directly or indirectly, that would interfere
with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the
responsibilities of a director.
Audit
committee members must also satisfy the additional independence
criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and Nasdaq
listing standards. In order to be considered independent for
purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of a listed company’s audit
committee may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of
the audit committee, the board of directors, or any other board
committee: (1) accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting,
advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any
of its subsidiaries; or (2) be an affiliated person of the listed
company or any of its subsidiaries.
Compensation
committee members must also satisfy the additional independence
criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and Nasdaq
listing standards. In order for a member of a listed company’s
compensation committee to be considered independent for purposes of
Nasdaq listing standards, the listed company’s board of directors
must consider all factors specifically relevant to determining
whether a director has a relationship to the listed company that is
material to that director’s ability to be independent from
management in connection with the duties of a compensation
committee member, including, but not limited to: (1) the source of
compensation of such director, including any consulting, advisory,
or other compensatory fee paid by the listed company to such
director; and (2) whether such director is affiliated with the
listed company, a subsidiary of the listed company, or an affiliate
of a subsidiary of the listed company.
Our
Board has undertaken a review of the independence of each of our
directors. Based on information provided by each director
concerning his or her background, employment, and affiliations, our
Board has determined that each of Mmes. Bawa, McCarthy and Twohill,
Dr. Gayle and each of Messrs. Chandna, Donovan, Eschenbach, Goetz,
and the Rt Hon Sir John Key do not have a material relationship
with our Company, either directly or indirectly, that would
interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out
the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors
is “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules
and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq listing standards. In making
these determinations, our Board considered the current and prior
relationships that each non-employee director has with our Company
and all other facts and circumstances our Board deemed relevant in
determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership
of our common stock by each non-employee director and the
transactions involving them described in the section titled
“Related Person Transactions.” There are no family relationships
among any of the Company’s directors or executive
officers.
Corporate
Governance
Communications with the Board of Directors
Interested
parties wishing to communicate with our Board or with an individual
member or members of our Board may do so by writing to the Board or
to the particular member or members of our Board, and mailing the
correspondence to our General Counsel or our Legal Department, at
Palo Alto Networks, Inc., 3000 Tannery Way, Santa Clara, California
95054. Our General Counsel or our Legal Department, in consultation
with appropriate members of our Board, as necessary, will review
all incoming communications and, if appropriate, all such
communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member or
members of our Board, or if none is specified, to the
Chair.
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics
Our
Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines
address items such as the qualifications and responsibilities of
our directors and director candidates and corporate governance
policies and standards applicable to us in general. In addition,
our Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to all our employees, officers and directors, including our
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other
executive and senior financial officers. Our Corporate Governance
Guidelines and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are posted
on the Investor Information portion of our website at
investors.paloaltonetworks.com. We will post amendments to our Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics or waivers of our Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics for directors and executive officers on the same
website.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Our
Board believes that our directors should hold a meaningful
financial stake in our Company in order to further align their
interests with those of our stockholders and therefore adopted
stock ownership guidelines in fiscal 2017. Under the guidelines,
each non-employee director must own Company stock with a value of
five times the annual retainer for board service within five years
of such director’s initial appointment or election date. All of our
non-employee directors comply with our stock ownership
guidelines.
Compensation and People Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation
None of
the members of our Compensation and People Committee is, or has
been, an officer or employee of our Company. None of our executive
officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a
member of the board or compensation committee (or other board
committee performing equivalent functions) of any entity that has
one or more of its executive officers serving on our Board or
Compensation and People Committee.
38 |
|
Voting Roadmap
|
PROPOSAL 1
Election of Directors
|
 |
|
 |
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the nominees named
below. |
|
|
Our Board is comprised of 12 members
and is divided into three staggered classes of directors. At each
annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be
elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term
is then expiring.
The following Class II directors have
been nominated for election to the Board at the 2022 annual meeting
of stockholders:
|
|
|
|
● Dr.
Helene D. Gayle |
● James
J. Goetz |
|
|
|
|
See page
40. |
|
|
PROPOSAL 2
Ratification of Appointment of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
 |
|
 |
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
Our
Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”),
independent registered public accountants, to audit our financial
statements for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2023. EY has served
as our independent registered public accounting firm since
2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See page 57. |
|
|
PROPOSAL 3
Advisory Vote on the Compensation
of our Named Executive Officers
|
 |
|
 |
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of
the compensation of our named executive officers. |
|
|
We are
providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve,
on an advisory or non-binding basis, the compensation of our named
executive officers as disclosed in the “Executive Compensation”
section of this proxy statement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See page 60. |
|
|
PROPOSAL 4
Approve Amendment to Palo Alto
Networks, Inc. 2021 Equity Incentive Plan
|
 |
|
 |
The
Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our
2021 Equity Incentive Plan to increase plan shares reserved for
issuance. |
|
|
We are
asking stockholders to approve an amendment to our equity incentive
plan to increase plan shares reserved for issuance. The ability to
grant equity awards is crucial to recruiting and retaining the best
personnel. If stockholders do not approve the amendment to 2021
Equity Incentive Plan at our Annual Meeting, we may be unable to
continue to grant equity awards as needed, which could prevent us
from successfully attracting and retaining the highly skilled
talent we need. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See page
98. |
|
 |
39 |
PROPOSAL NO. 1
Election of
Directors
Our Board is comprised of 12 members and is divided into three
staggered classes of directors. At each annual meeting of
stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year
term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring. Each
director’s term continues until the election and qualification of
his or her successor, or such director’s earlier death,
resignation, or removal. Any increase or decrease in the number of
directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as
nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our
directors. This classification of our Board may have the effect of
delaying or preventing changes in control of the Company.
The following Class II directors have been nominated for election
to the Board at the Annual Meeting:
● Dr.
Helene D. Gayle |
● James
J. Goetz |
Mark McLaughlin and Asheem Chandna will not stand for reelection to
the Board of Directors when their terms expire at the conclusion of
our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Board recognizes the
contributions and character of Mark’s leadership as the company’s
chief executive officer from August 2011 until June 2018, and his
continued service on our Board of Directors since then, which have
been instrumental in driving the company’s growth and nurturing our
unique culture. Likewise, without Asheem’s technical expertise,
financial acumen and, most notably, keen discernment of emerging
technology trends, our transformation into the company we are today
would have been less complete and consequential. On behalf of our
employees and the entire Board of Directors, we express our deep
appreciation to Mark and Asheem for their profound impacts on Palo
Alto Networks.
The sections titled “Board Skills and Experience Matrix” and
“Directors” on pages 42 and 43 of this proxy statement contain more
information about the leadership skills and other experiences that
caused the ESG and Nominating Committee and our Board to determine
that these nominees should serve as directors of the Company.
Immediately after the Annual Meeting, it is anticipated that the
Board will be comprised of ten members.
Following the Annual Meeting, we expect that our Board will reduce
the number of members of the Board from twelve to ten, and will
move a director, who currently serves as a Class I or Class III
director, to serve as a Class II in order to distribute the number
of directors among the three classes as evenly as possible.
REQUIRED VOTE
We have implemented a majority voting standard for elections of
directors. Each director nominee will be elected by a vote of the
majority of the votes cast. A majority of the votes cast means the
number of votes cast “For” such nominee’s election exceeds the
number of votes cast “Against” that nominee. You may vote “For,”
“Against,” or “Abstain” with respect to each director nominee.
Broker non-votes and abstentions, if any, will have no effect on
the outcome of the election.
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a director shall
promptly tender his or her resignation if he or she fails to
receive the required number of votes for re-election. The ESG and
Nominating Committee will act on a prompt basis to determine
whether to recommend that our Board accept the director’s
resignation and will submit such recommendation for prompt
consideration by our Board. Our Board may accept the resignation,
refuse the resignation, or refuse the resignation subject to such
conditions as our Board may impose. The Board will act within 90
days following certification of the stockholder vote, and will
promptly publicly disclose its decision in a filing with the SEC.
Additional details about this process are specified in our
Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our
Investor Relations website at
https://investors.paloaltonetworks.com.
|
|
|
|
|
Majority Voting
Standard

|
In May 2022, adopted majority voting
for uncontested elections of directors, including a resignation
policy in the event a director does not receive a majority of
the vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
If you are a stockholder of record and you sign your proxy card or
vote by telephone or over the Internet, but do not give
instructions with respect to the voting of directors, your shares
will be voted “For” the re-election of Dr. Gayle and Mr. Goetz. We
expect that each of Dr. Gayle and Mr. Goetz will accept such
nomination; however, in the event that a director nominee is unable
or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual
Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who shall be
designated by our Board to fill such vacancy. If you wish to give
specific instructions with respect to the voting of directors, you
may do so by indicating your instructions on the accompanying proxy
card or when you vote by telephone or over the Internet. If you are
a street name stockholder and you do not give voting instructions
to your broker or nominee, your shares will not be voted on this
matter.
|
Recommendation of the Board |
|
The Board recommends that you vote “FOR”
each of the nominees named above. |
Director Tenure and Refreshment
The Board generally believes that a mix of long- and
shorter-tenured directors promotes an appropriate balance of views
and insights and allows the Board as a whole to benefit from the
historical and institutional knowledge that longer-tenured
directors possess and the fresh perspectives contributed by newer
directors. With the additions of Aparna Bawa, Dr. Helene Gayle,
Lorraine Twohill and Rt Hon Sir John Key in fiscal 2019 through
fiscal 2021, we added directors who have brought their experiences
and fresh perspectives to our Board’s deliberations.
As of July 31, 2022, our independent directors will have served an
average of 7.6 years on the Board. Overall, our Board, including
both independent and non-independent directors, will have an
average tenure of 8.3 years. We believe that this mix of tenure on
the Board represents a collection of individuals with both new
perspectives and deep institutional knowledge.
Board Diversity
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines embody our Board’s commitment
to actively seek out women and minority candidates as well as
candidates with diverse backgrounds, experiences and skills. Our
Board believes representation of gender, race, ethnic, geographic,
cultural or other diverse perspectives expands the Board’s
understanding of the needs and viewpoints of our customers,
partners, employees and other stakeholders worldwide.
Our directors reflect diverse perspectives, including a
complementary mix of skills, experience and backgrounds that we
believe are paramount to our ability to represent your interests as
stockholders. As part of our ongoing commitment to creating a
balanced Board with diverse viewpoints and deep industry expertise,
we added four new independent directors in fiscal 2019 through
fiscal 2021 to infuse new ideas and fresh perspectives in the
boardroom, two of whom were women of color. As of July 31, 2022,
56% of our independent directors as a group and 50% of our full
Board can be considered diverse based on self-identified
demographic background and 33% of our Board members self-identify
as women.
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECTOR TENURE
7.6 years
(independent directors)
8.3 years
(all directors)
Since
2019:
4
new independent directors
BOARD DIVERSITY

50% of our Board can
be considered diverse
based on self-identified
demographic
background
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors
Board
Skills and Experience Matrix
Our Board has taken a thoughtful approach to board composition to
ensure that our directors have backgrounds that collectively add
significant value to the strategic decisions made by the Company
and that enable them to provide oversight of management to ensure
accountability to our stockholders. The Board and the ESG and
Nominating Committee believe the skills, qualities, attributes,
experience and diversity of backgrounds of our directors provide us
with a diverse range of perspectives to effectively address our
evolving needs and represent the best interests of our
stockholders.
|
|
Arora |
Bawa |
Chandna |
Donovan |
Eschenbach |
Gayle |
Goetz |
Key |
McCarthy |
McLaughlin |
Twohill |
Zuk |
 |
Industry and IT/Technical
Expertise
Deep insight in the cybersecurity and
IT technology industry to oversee our business and the risks we
face.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Senior Leadership
Experience
Experience in senior leadership
positions to analyze, advise and oversee management in decision
making, operations and policies.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Financial Knowledge and
Expertise
Knowledge of financial markets,
financing and accounting and financial reporting
processes.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Diverse Backgrounds and
Experiences
Diverse backgrounds and experiences
provide unique perspectives and enhance decision-making.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Cybersecurity / Information
Security / Security
Expertise to oversee cybersecurity,
privacy, and information security management.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Sales, Marketing and Brand
Management Experience
Sales, marketing, and brand management
experience to provide expertise and guidance to grow sales and
enhance our brand.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Global/International
Experience
Experience and knowledge of global
operations, business conditions and culture to advise and oversee
our global business.
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Risk Management
Experience in risk oversight and
management.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Emerging Technologies and Business
Models Experience
Experience identifying and developing
emerging technologies and business models to advise, analyze and
strategize regarding emerging technologies, business models and
potential acquisitions.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Human Capital
Management
Experience attracting and retaining
top talent to advise and oversee our people and compensation
policies in our competitive environment.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Public Company Board Experience and
Corporate Governance
Experience to understand the dynamics
and operation of a public company, and corporate governance
requirements and compliance.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
42 |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
DIRECTORS
Nominee Directors |
|
Dr. Helene D. Gayle INDEPENDENT |
 |
Age:
66
Director
Since: 2021
Skills
and Experience:
 |
Committee
Membership:
ESG
and Nominating Committee, Security Committee
Other
Current Public Company Boards:
Organon,
The Coca-Cola Company
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Dr. Helene D. Gayle has served as a member of our Board since May
2021. Dr. Gayle has been President of Spelman College since July
2022. Prior to this position, Dr. Gayle served as President and
Chief Executive Officer of The Chicago Community Trust, a community
foundation dedicated to improving the Chicago region through
strategic grant making, civic engagement and inspiring
philanthropy, from 2017 to 2022. Dr. Gayle previously served as
Chief Executive Officer of McKinsey Social Initiative, an
independent non-profit organization, from 2015 to 2017 and as
President and Chief Executive Officer of CARE USA, a leading
international humanitarian organization, from 2006 to 2015. From
2001 to 2006, she was an executive in the Global Health program at
the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr. Gayle began her career
in public health at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in 1984,
and held positions of increasing responsibility over her 20-year
tenure there, ultimately becoming the director of the National
Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention and achieving the rank of
Assistant Surgeon General and Rear Admiral in the United States
Public Health Service. Dr. Gayle earned a Bachelor of Arts degree
in Psychology from Barnard College of Columbia University, an M.D.
from University of Pennsylvania and a Masters in Public Health from
Johns Hopkins University. She currently serves as a member of the
board of directors of The Coca-Cola Company, a beverage company,
and Organon & Co., a pharmaceutical company. Dr. Gayle
previously served as a member of the board of directors of
Colgate-Palmolive Company, a global consumer products company, from
2010 to 2021.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND
EXPERIENCE
Dr. Gayle was selected to serve on our Board because of her senior
leadership and chief executive officer experience and broad
international exposure and emerging market experience, as well as
her governmental and non-profit expertise, risk management
expertise and corporate governance experience as a director of
private and public companies.
|
James J. Goetz INDEPENDENT |
|
 |
Age:
56
Director
Since: 2005
Skills
and Experience:
 |
Committee
Membership:
Audit
Committee,
Security Committee
Other
Current Public
Company Boards: Intel
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
James J. Goetz has served as a member of our Board since April
2005. Mr. Goetz has been a managing member of Sequoia Capital
Operations, LLC, a venture capital firm, since June 2004, where he
focuses on cloud, mobile, and enterprise companies. Mr. Goetz
currently serves on the board of directors of Intel Corporation and
several privately held companies. Mr. Goetz has previously served
on the boards of directors of Barracuda Networks, Inc., a data
security and storage company from 2009 to 2017, Nimble Storage,
Inc., a data storage company, from 2007 to 2017, Jive Software,
Inc., a provider of social business software, from 2007 until 2015,
and Ruckus Wireless, Inc., a manufacturer of wireless (Wi-Fi)
networking equipment, from 2012 until 2015. Mr. Goetz holds an M.S.
in Electrical Engineering with a concentration in Computer
Networking from Stanford University and a B.S. in Electrical
Engineering with a concentration in Computer Engineering from the
University of Cincinnati.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Goetz was selected to serve on our Board because of his senior
leadership, technology, information technology (IT), business
development and cybersecurity experience, and knowledge of emerging
technologies, arising from his experience as a partner of a venture
capital firm, where he focuses on cloud mobile, and enterprise
technology investments, as well as providing guidance and counsel
to a wide variety of internet and technology companies. He also
brings his experience as a senior management leader in network,
data security and storage, software, and manufacturing companies,
through various senior roles and other board experiences. Mr. Goetz
also has extensive public company board experience.
|
 |
Industry and
IT/Technical |
 |
Senior
Leadership |
 |
Financial |
 |
Diverse Backgrounds
and Experiences |
 |
Cybersecurity |
 |
Sales, Marketing and
Brand Management |
 |
Global/International |
 |
Governance, Risk
Oversight and Compliance |
 |
Emerging Technologies
and Business Models |
 |
Human Capital
Management |
 |
Public Company Board
Experience |
Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors
Continuing Directors |
|
Nikesh Arora |
|
 |
Age:
54
Director
Since: 2018
Skills
and Experience:
|
Committee
Membership:
None
Other
Current Public Company Boards:
Compagnie
Financière Richemont
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Nikesh Arora has served as the Chair of our Board and Chief
Executive Officer since June 2018. Prior to joining us, from 2016
through 2018 Mr. Arora was an angel investor and from June 2016
through December 2017, Mr. Arora served as an advisor to SoftBank
Group Corp., a multinational conglomerate company (“SoftBank”).
From July 2015 through June 2016, Mr. Arora served as president and
chief operating officer of SoftBank and from July 2014 through June
2015, Mr. Arora served as vice chair and chief executive officer of
SoftBank Internet and Media, a subsidiary of SoftBank. Prior to
SoftBank, from December 2004 through July 2014, Mr. Arora held
multiple senior leadership operating roles at Google, Inc.,
including serving as senior vice president and chief business
officer, from January 2011 to June 2014. Mr. Arora also serves on
the board of Compagnie Financiere Richemont S.A., a public
Switzerland-based luxury goods holding company and is an advisor to
Zoom Video Communications, Inc., a video communications company.
Mr. Arora previously served on the boards of Sprint Corp., a
communications services company, from November 2014 to June 2016,
Colgate-Palmolive Company, a worldwide consumer products company
focused on the production, distribution and provision of household,
health care and personal care products, from March 2012 to
September 2014, SoftBank from 2014 to 2016, and Yahoo! Japan, an
internet company, from 2015 to 2016. Mr. Arora holds an M.S. in
Business Administration from Northeastern University, an M.S. in
Finance from Boston College, and a B.Tech in electrical engineering
from the Institute of Technology at Banaras Hindu University.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Arora was chosen to serve on our Board due to his leadership
skills and experience as the chief architect of the Company’s
strategic vision, as well as his thorough knowledge of all aspects
of our business. Through his extensive career in executive
leadership, he brings expertise in leading and scaling technology
businesses, risk management oversight, and in-depth knowledge of
the cybersecurity and technology sectors.
|
Aparna Bawa
INDEPENDENT |
|
 |
Age:
44
Director
Since: 2021
Skills
and Experience:
|
Committee
Membership:
Audit
Committee, Security Committee, Corporate Development
Committee
Other
Current Public
Company Boards: None
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Aparna Bawa has served as a member of our Board since May 2021. Ms.
Bawa has served as the Chief Operating Officer and Interim Chief
Legal Officer of Zoom Video Communications, Inc., a video
communications company, since May 2020. Ms. Bawa served as Zoom’s
Chief Legal Officer from August 2019 to May 2020, its General
Counsel from September 2018 to May 2020 and its Secretary from
December 2018 to November 2020. Prior to Zoom Video Communications,
Ms. Bawa served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of
Magento, Inc., an e-commerce platform company, from June 2017 until
its acquisition by Adobe Inc. in June 2018. From November 2012 to
May 2017, Ms. Bawa served as Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary of Nimble Storage, Inc., an enterprise flash storage
company, which was acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in April
2017. Ms. Bawa holds a B.Sc. in Accounting from Marquette
University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Ms. Bawa was selected to serve on our Board due to her senior
leadership and management experience at public technology
companies, risk management oversight expertise, and legal and
business operations expertise. She has extensive experience in
technology companies.
|
 |
Industry and IT/Technical |
 |
Senior Leadership |
 |
Financial |
 |
Diverse Backgrounds and Experiences |
 |
Cybersecurity |
 |
Sales, Marketing and Brand Management |
 |
Global/International |
 |
Governance, Risk Oversight and Compliance |
 |
Emerging Technologies and Business Models |
 |
Human Capital Management |
 |
Public Company Board Experience |
44 |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
John M. Donovan
LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR |
 |
Age:
61
Director
Since: 2012
Skills
and Experience:
|
Committee
Membership: Compensation and People Committee, ESG and
Nominating Committee (Chair), Security Committee (Chair), Corporate
Development Committee (Chair)
Other
Current Public Company Boards:
Lockheed
Martin
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
John M. Donovan has served as a member of our Board since September
2012. Since May 2019, Mr. Donovan has served as Chair of The
President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory
Committee. Mr. Donovan worked at AT&T Inc., a provider of
telecommunication services, since April 2008, first as Chief
Technology Officer and subsequently as Chief Executive
Officer—AT&T Communications until his resignation, effective
October 1, 2019. From November 2006 to April 2008, Mr. Donovan was
Executive Vice President of Product, Sales, Marketing and
Operations at Verisign. From November 2000 to November 2006, Mr.
Donovan served as Chair and CEO of inCode Telecom Group Inc., a
provider of strategy and consulting services to the
telecommunications industry. Prior to joining inCode, Mr. Donovan
was a Partner with Deloitte Consulting where he was the Americas
industry practice director for telecommunications. Mr. Donovan
serves on the board of directors of Lockheed Martin Corporation, an
aerospace, defense and technology company. Mr. Donovan holds a B.S.
in Electrical Engineering from the University of Notre Dame and an
M.B.A. from the University of Minnesota.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Donovan was selected to serve on our Board because of his
technical knowledge and extensive business leadership, management,
operations and risk management oversight experience, as a result of
serving as the Chief Technology Officer and later the Chief
Executive Officer of AT&T Communications. He is skilled in
overseeing global information, software development, supply chain,
network operations and big data organizations and has expertise in
cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and machine learning.
|
Carl Eschenbach
INDEPENDENT |
|
 |
Age:
55
Director
Since: 2013
Skills
and Experience:
|
Committee Membership:
Security Committee
Other Current Public Company
Boards: Zoom,
Workday, Snowflake, UiPath, Aurora Innovation |
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Carl Eschenbach has served as a member of our Board since May 2013.
Mr. Eschenbach has been a general partner at Sequoia Capital
Operations, LLC, a venture capital firm, since April 2016. Prior to
joining Sequoia Capital Operations, LLC, Mr. Eschenbach served as
Chief Operating Officer and President of VMware, Inc., a provider
of cloud and virtualization software and services, a role he held
from December 2012 to February 2016. Mr. Eschenbach previously
served as VMware’s President and Chief Operating Officer from April
2012 to December 2012, as VMware’s Co-President, Customer
Operations from January 2011 to April 2012 and as VMware’s
Executive Vice President of Worldwide Field Operations from May
2005 to January 2011. Prior to joining VMware in 2002, he was Vice
President of North America Sales at Inktomi from 2000 to 2002. Mr.
Eschenbach also held various sales management positions with 3Com
Corporation, Lucent Technologies Inc. and EMC. Mr. Eschenbach also
serves on the board of directors of Zoom Video Communications,
Inc., a video communications company, Workday, Inc., an on-demand
financial management and human capital management software vendor,
UiPath, Inc., a robotic process automation software company,
Snowflake Inc., a cloud data platform company, and Aurora
Innovation, a self-driving vehicle technology company. Mr.
Eschenbach received an electronics technician diploma from DeVry
University.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Eschenbach was selected to serve on our Board because of his
extensive experience in the technology industry and his previous
public company management experience. He brings to our Board over
30 years of operational and sales experience in the technology
industry, and has extensive experience in risk management oversight
and scaling large organizations, as well as a deep knowledge of
high-growth companies. Mr. Eschenbach also has extensive public
company board experience.
|
 |
Industry and IT/Technical |
 |
Senior Leadership |
 |
Financial |
 |
Diverse Backgrounds and Experiences |
 |
Cybersecurity |
 |
Sales, Marketing and Brand Management |
 |
Global/International |
 |
Governance, Risk Oversight and Compliance |
 |
Emerging Technologies and Business Models |
 |
Human Capital Management |
 |
Public Company Board Experience |
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
Right Honorable Sir John Key
INDEPENDENT |
 |
Age: 61
Director Since:
2019
Skills and
Experience:
 |
Committee
Membership: Audit Committee, Compensation and People
Committee (Chair), Security Committee
Other
Current Public Company Boards: ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd,
Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Right Honorable Sir John Key has served as a member of our Board
since April 2019. Sir John was a Member of Parliament for
Helensville in New Zealand until April 2017. Sir John served as
Prime Minister of New Zealand from November 2008 to December 2016
having commenced his political career as a Member of Parliament for
Helensville in July 2002. Prior to his political career, he had a
nearly twenty-year career in international finance, primarily for
Bankers Trust of New Zealand and Merrill Lynch in Singapore, London
and Sydney. Sir John serves as the chair and member of the board of
directors of ANZ Bank New Zealand Ltd and is a member of the board
of directors of the parent Australia & New Zealand Banking
Group Ltd, a public bank that provides various banking and
financial products and services and also serves on the board of
directors of several privately held companies. He previously served
on the board of directors of Air New Zealand Limited, a public
airline, from 2017 to 2020. Sir John has a Bachelor of Commerce in
Accounting from the University of Canterbury.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Sir John was selected to serve on our Board due to his global
business leadership and extensive financial, capital markets, and
management expertise as former Prime Minister of New Zealand, his
extensive background in foreign affairs, and his career in
investment banking and finance. He brings extensive experience in
policy-making and a global business perspective from his experience
and service on other boards, which is especially valuable to us as
we grow internationally.
|
Mary Pat McCarthy
INDEPENDENT |
 |
Age:
67
Director
Since: 2016
Skills
and Experience:
 |
Committee
Membership: Audit Committee (Chair), Security Committee,
Corporate Development Committee
Other
Current Public Company Boards: Micron Technology
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Mary Pat McCarthy has served as a member of our Board since October
2016. Ms. McCarthy, now retired, served as Vice Chair of KPMG LLP,
the U.S. member firm of the global audit, tax and advisory services
firm, until 2011 after attaining such position in 1998. She joined
KPMG LLP in 1977 and became a partner in 1987. She held numerous
senior leadership positions in the firm, including Executive
Director of the KPMG Audit Committee Institute from 2008 to 2011,
Leader of the KPMG Client Care program from 2007 to 2008, U.S.
Leader, Industries and Markets from 2005 to 2006, and Global
Leader, Information, Communication and Entertainment Practice from
1998 to 2004. Ms. McCarthy also served on KPMG’s Management and
Operations Committees. Ms. McCarthy earned a Bachelor of Science
degree in Business Administration from Creighton University and
completed the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School’s KPMG
International Development Program. Ms. McCarthy serves as a
director of Micron Technology, Inc., a producer of semiconductor
devices and previously served on the board of directors of Mutual
of Omaha, an insurance company, from 2012 to 2018 and Andeavor
Corporation (formerly Tesoro Corporation), a global energy
corporation from 2012 to 2018.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Ms. McCarthy was selected to serve on our Board because of her deep
technical expertise in financial and accounting matters from her
experience as the Vice Chair of KPMG LLP, advising numerous
companies on financial and accounting matters, as well as her
leadership experience as a member of management at KPMG. She is an
“audit committee financial expert” with over 40 years of experience
in finance, operations and risk management oversight of technology
companies, particularly publicly traded companies with knowledge of
complex global financial and business matters. In addition, she
brings a global business perspective and contributes valuable
insights and perspectives to our business and operations from her
service on other boards.
|
 |
Industry and IT/Technical |
 |
Senior Leadership |
 |
Financial |
 |
Diverse Backgrounds and Experiences |
 |
Cybersecurity |
 |
Sales, Marketing and Brand Management |
 |
Global/International |
 |
Governance, Risk Oversight and Compliance |
 |
Emerging Technologies and Business Models |
 |
Human Capital Management |
 |
Public Company Board Experience |
46 |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
Lorraine Twohill
INDEPENDENT |
|
 |
Age: 51
Director Since:
2019
Skills and
Experience:
 |
Committee
Membership:
Compensation and People Committee, ESG and Nominating Committee,
Security Committee
Other
Current Public Company Boards: None
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Lorraine Twohill has served as a member of our Board of directors
since April 2019. Ms. Twohill currently serves as Google LLC’s
(formerly Google, Inc.) Chief Marketing Officer, a position she has
held since June 2009. From July 2003 until June 2009, Ms. Twohill
served as Google’s Head of Marketing Europe, Middle East and
Africa. Ms. Twohill previously served on the board of directors of
Williams-Sonoma, Inc., a consumer retail company that sells
kitchenwares and home furnishings, from January 2012 until May
2017. Ms. Twohill holds joint honors degrees in International
Marketing and Languages from Dublin City University.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Ms. Twohill was selected to serve on our Board due to her
leadership skills and extensive marketing knowledge, with over 25
years of experience. She has deep management and business
operations experience, as well as risk management oversight
experience. She provides the Board with valuable insights into
brand management and the global issues facing technology companies
today.
|
Nir Zuk |
|
 |
Age: 51
Director Since:
2005
Skills and
Experience:
|
Committee
Membership: None
Other
Current Public Company Boards: None
|
BACKGROUND
Nir Zuk is one of our founders and has served as our Chief
Technology Officer and as a member of our Board since March 2005.
From April 2004 to March 2005, Mr. Zuk was Chief Security
Technologist at Juniper Networks, Inc., a supplier of network
infrastructure products and services. From September 2002 until its
acquisition by Juniper in April 2004, Mr. Zuk was Chief Technology
Officer at NetScreen Technologies, Inc., a provider of ASIC-based
Internet security systems. In December 1999, Mr. Zuk co-founded
OneSecure, Inc., a provider of prevention and detection appliances,
and was Chief Technical Officer until its acquisition by NetScreen
in September 2002. From 1994 to 1999, Mr. Zuk served in several
technical roles, including Principal Engineer at Check Point
Software Technologies Ltd., an enterprise software security
company. Mr. Zuk attended Tel Aviv University where he studied
Mathematics.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Zuk is a co-founder of Palo Alto Networks, a network security
expert and brings a wealth of network security knowledge and
industry experience to Palo Alto Networks. He brings business
leadership, operational experience, risk management oversight
experience, and experience developing technology. He has an
in-depth knowledge of the technology and cybersecurity
industries.
|
 |
Industry and IT/Technical |
 |
Senior Leadership |
 |
Financial |
 |
Diverse Backgrounds and Experiences |
 |
Cybersecurity |
 |
Sales, Marketing and Brand Management |
 |
Global/International |
 |
Governance, Risk Oversight and Compliance |
 |
Emerging Technologies and Business Models |
 |
Human Capital Management |
 |
Public Company Board Experience |
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
Non-Continuing Directors |
|
Asheem Chandna |
|
 |
Age: 58
Director Since:
2005
Skills and Experience:
|
Committee
Membership: ESG and Nominating Committee, Security
Committee, Corporate Development Committee
Other
Current Public Company Boards: None
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Asheem Chandna has served as a member of our Board since April
2005. Mr. Chandna has been a Partner at Greylock Partners, a
venture capital firm, since September 2003, where he focuses on
investments in enterprise IT, including security products. From
April 2003 to June 2013, Mr. Chandna was a director of Imperva,
Inc., a provider of cyber security solutions. From April 1996 to
December 2002, Mr. Chandna was Vice President, Business Development
and Product Management at Check Point Software. Mr. Chandna
currently serves on the board of directors of a number of privately
held companies. Mr. Chandna holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering
and an M.S. in Computer Engineering from Case Western Reserve
University.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Chandna was selected to serve on our Board because of his
specific experience with enterprise IT and security products,
background with information technology and cybersecurity companies,
and knowledge of emerging technologies. He also brings extensive
financial and investment expertise as a venture capitalist, where
he focuses investments in enterprise IT. He also brings perspective
from his service on other public and private company boards.
|
Mark D. McLaughlin |
|
 |
Age: 56
Director Since:
2011
Skills and
Experience:
|
Committee
Membership: Corporate Development Committee
Other
Current Public Company Boards: Qualcomm
|
|
|
|
BACKGROUND
Mark D. McLaughlin has served as our Vice Chair since June 2018,
and has been a member of our board of directors since August 2011.
During that period, from April 2012 until June 2018 he served as
Chair of our board of directors. Mr. McLaughlin served as our Chief
Executive Officer from August 2011 until June 2018 and also served
as President from August 2011 through August 2016. From August 2009
through July 2011, Mr. McLaughlin served as President and Chief
Executive Officer and as a director at VeriSign, Inc., a provider
of Internet infrastructure services, and from January 2009 to
August 2009, Mr. McLaughlin served as President and Chief Operating
Officer at VeriSign. From February 2000 through November 2007, Mr.
McLaughlin served in several roles at VeriSign, including as
Executive Vice President, Products and Marketing. Prior to joining
VeriSign, Mr. McLaughlin was Vice President, Sales and Business
Development at Signio Inc., an Internet payments company acquired
by VeriSign in February 2000. In January 2011, President Barack
Obama appointed Mr. McLaughlin to serve on the President’s National
Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee. Mr. McLaughlin
currently serves on, and is the Chair of, the board of directors of
Qualcomm, Inc., a global semiconductor company that designs and
markets wireless telecommunications products and services, and
previously served on the board of directors of Opower, Inc., a
provider of cloud based software to the utility industry, from 2013
to 2016. Mr. McLaughlin holds a B.S. from the U.S. Military Academy
at West Point and a J.D. from Seattle University School of Law.
|
|
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. McLaughlin was selected to serve on our Board because of his
perspective and experience as our former Chief Executive Officer,
and his operational and management experience at several technology
companies. He has an extensive background in the technology
industry and risk oversight expertise. Mr. McLaughlin also served
as Chair of The President’s National Security Telecommunications
Advisory Committee and serves as Chair of a large global
semiconductor company.
|
 |
Industry and IT/Technical |
 |
Senior Leadership |
 |
Financial |
 |
Diverse Backgrounds and Experiences |
 |
Cybersecurity |
 |
Sales, Marketing and Brand Management |
 |
Global/International |
 |
Governance, Risk Oversight and Compliance |
 |
Emerging Technologies and Business Models |
 |
Human Capital Management |
 |
Public Company Board Experience |
48 |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
The demographic information presented below for our directors is
based on voluntary self-identification by each director. Each of
the categories listed in the below table has the meaning as it is
used in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(f). Additional biographical
information of our directors and executive officers as of July 31,
2022 is set forth above.
BOARD
DIVERSITY MATRIX (AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 2022)
Total Number of Directors |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Female |
Male |
Non-Binary |
Did Not
Disclose Gender |
Part I: Gender Identity |
|
|
|
|
Directors |
4 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
Part II: Demographic Background |
|
|
|
|
African American or Black |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Alaskan Native or Native American |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Asian |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Hispanic or Latinx |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
White |
2 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
Two or More Races or Ethnicities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
LGBTQ+ |
|
|
0 |
|
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background |
|
|
3 |
|
Board Committees and
Responsibilities
Our Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation and People
Committee, Corporate Development Committee, ESG and Nominating
Committee and Security Committee, which have the composition and
responsibilities described below. Directors serve on these
committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by
our Board.
The membership and meetings during fiscal 2022 and the primary
functions of each of the standing committees are described
below.
Board of Directors |
Audit
Committee |
Compensation
and People
Committee |
Corporate
Development
Committee |
ESG and
Nominating
Committee |
Security
Committee |
Nikesh Arora |
|
|
|
|
|
Aparna Bawa* |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Asheem Chandna* |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
John M. Donovan* |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Carl Eschenbach* |
|
|
|
|
 |
Dr. Helene D. Gayle* |
|
|
|
 |
 |
James J. Goetz* |
 |
|
|
|
 |
Rt Hon Sir John Key* |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
Mary Pat McCarthy* |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Mark
D. McLaughlin |
|
|
 |
|
|
Lorraine Twohill* |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Nir Zuk |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Member |
 |
Committee Chair |
* |
Independent Director |
 |
Financial Expert |
Proposal
No. 1 Election of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee |
Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other
things: |
|
|
Chair:
Mary Pat
McCarthy
Members:
Aparna Bawa
James J. Goetz
Right Honorable
Sir John Key
Number of meetings in fiscal
2022: 7
|
• selecting
and hiring our independent registered public accounting firm,
including leading the review and selection of the lead audit
engagement partner;
• evaluating
the performance and independence of our independent registered
public accounting firm;
• approving
the audit and pre-approving any non-audit services to be performed
by our independent registered public accounting firm;
• reviewing
our financial statements and related disclosures and reviewing our
critical accounting policies and practices;
• reviewing
and participating in the selection of our chief audit executive and
periodically reviewing the activities and reports of the internal
audit function and any major issues encountered in the course of
the internal audit function’s work;
|
|
• reviewing
the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control policies and
procedures and our disclosure controls and procedures;
• overseeing
procedures for the treatment of complaints on accounting, internal
accounting controls, or audit matters;
• reviewing
and discussing with management and the independent registered
public accounting firm the results of our annual audit, our
quarterly financial statements, and our publicly filed periodic
reports;
• reviewing
and approving or ratifying any proposed related person
transactions; and
• preparing
the Audit Committee report that the SEC requires in our annual
proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of our Audit Committee meets the requirements for
independence for audit committee members under the listing
standards of Nasdaq and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Each
member of our Audit Committee also meets the financial literacy and
sophistication requirements of the listing standards of Nasdaq. In
addition, our Board has determined that Ms. McCarthy is an “audit
committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules and
regulations of the SEC.
Our Audit Committee operates under a written charter that was
adopted by our Board and satisfies the applicable rules and
regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq. A copy
of the charter of our Audit Committee is available on our website
at http://investors.paloaltonetworks.com.
50 |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
Our Compensation and People Committee is responsible for, among
other things: |
|
|
and People Committee
Chair:
Right Honorable
Sir John Key
Members:
John M. Donovan
Lorraine Twohill
Number of meetings in
fiscal 2022: 9
|
|
• reviewing
and approving our Chief Executive Officer’s and other executive
officers’ annual base salaries, incentive compensation
arrangements, including the specific goals and amounts, equity
compensation, employment agreements, severance arrangements and
change in control agreements, and any other benefits, compensation
or arrangements;
• establishing
and administering our equity compensation plans;
• overseeing
our overall compensation philosophy and compensation
plans;
|
|
• preparing
the Compensation and People Committee report that the SEC requires
to accompany the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in
this proxy statement;
• overseeing
our talent management and people management, including the
Company’s inclusion and diversity initiatives and results, the
Company’s pay equity reviews and results, and the Company’s
FLEXLearning, FLEXBenefits and FLEXWORK initiatives; and
• reviewing
and discussing with management the risks arising from the Company’s
compensation philosophy and practices applicable to employees to
mitigate such risks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of our Compensation and People Committee meets the
requirements for independence for Compensation Committee members
under the listing standards of Nasdaq and the rules and regulations
of the SEC. Each member of our Compensation and People Committee is
also a “non-employee director,” as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act, and an “outside director,” as
defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Our Compensation and People Committee operates under a written
charter that was adopted by our Board and satisfies the applicable
rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of
Nasdaq. A copy of the charter of our Compensation and People
Committee is available on our website at
http://investors.paloaltonetworks.com.
Our Compensation and People Committee may form subcommittees for
any purpose and may delegate to such subcommittees such power and
authority as our Compensation and People Committee deems
appropriate, except such power or authority required by law,
regulation or listing standard to be exercised by our Compensation
and People Committee as a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Development
Committee
Chair:
John M.
Donovan
Members:
Aparna Bawa
Asheem Chandna
Mary Pat McCarthy
Mark McLaughlin
|
|
Our Corporate Development Committee is responsible for, among other
things:
• assisting
the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to the
review, evaluation, and approval of certain acquisitions and
strategic investment transactions;
• reviewing
proposed acquisition and investment strategies with management;
and
• reporting
to the Board the Committee’s approval or recommendation of
acquisitions or investment transactions and of such activity in
general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Corporate Development Committee operates under a written
charter that was adopted by our Board.
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESG and |
|
Our ESG and Nominating Committee is responsible for, among other
things: |
|
|
Nominating Committee
Chair:
John M.
Donovan
Members:
Asheem Chandna
Dr. Helene D. Gayle
Lorraine Twohill
Number of meetings in fiscal
2022: 4
|
|
• identifying
and evaluating individuals who are qualified to become members of
the board of directors and selecting and recommending to the Board
individuals as director nominees and appointments to the board of
directors;
• evaluating
and making recommendations regarding the composition, organization,
and governance of our board of directors and its committees,
including issues of integrity, experience, expertise and diversity
of membership;
• considering
board of director leadership structure, including the separation of
the chairperson and chief executive officer roles and the
appointment of a lead independent director and making
recommendations to the board of directors;
|
|
• evaluating
and making recommendations regarding the creation of additional
committees or the change in mandate or dissolution of
committees;
• reviewing
and making recommendations with regard to our corporate governance
guidelines and compliance with laws and regulations;
• reviewing
and approving conflicts of interest of our directors and corporate
officers, other than related person transactions reviewed by our
Audit Committee;
• overseeing
our annual board of director and committee self-assessment
process;
• overseeing
our succession planning process for the chief executive officer and
members of the management team; and
• overseeing our ESG efforts and related policies
and programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of our ESG and Nominating Committee meets the
requirements for independence under the listing standards of Nasdaq
and the rules and regulations of the SEC.
In February 2022, we reconstituted our Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee as the ESG and Nominating Committee to enhance
our focus on ESG matters, giving it oversight of our ESG strategies
and initiatives, including our short- and long-term goals, and to
reinforce the important role that ESG practices play in our
business. The ESG and Nominating Committee is responsible for
setting our ESG priorities, and monitors our performance. The ESG
and Nominating Committee receives regular updates on priority ESG
issues, including information on actions and progress toward
goals.
Our ESG and Nominating Committee operates under a written charter
that was adopted by our Board and satisfies the applicable listing
standards of Nasdaq. A copy of the charter of our ESG and
Nominating Committee is available on our website at
http://investors.paloaltonetworks.com.
52 |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security |
|
Our Security Committee is responsible for, among other
things: |
|
|
Committee
Chair:
John M.
Donovan
Members:
Aparna Bawa
Asheem Chandna
Carl Eschenbach
Dr. Helene D. Gayle
James J. Goetz
Rt Hon Sir John Key
Mary Pat McCarthy
Lorraine Twohill
Number of meetings in fiscal
2022: 2
|
|
• overseeing
(i) our policies, plans, metrics and programs relating to the
physical security of our facilities and employees, and enterprise
cybersecurity and data protection risks associated with our
security-related infrastructure and related operations, and (ii)
the effectiveness of our programs and practices for identifying,
assessing and mitigating such risks across our business
operations;
• overseeing
our cyber crisis preparedness, security breach and incident
response plans, communication plans, and disaster recovery and
business continuity capabilities;
• overseeing
the safeguards used to protect the confidentiality, integrity,
availability, safety and resiliency of the Company’s employees,
facilities, intellectual property and business
operations;
• reviewing
and discussing with management the cybersecurity risks associated
with our outside partners (such as vendors, suppliers, operations
partners, etc.);
|
|
• overseeing
our compliance with applicable information security and data
protection laws and industry standards, new or updated legal
implications of security, data privacy, or other regulatory or
compliance risks to us or our employees, facilities and business
operations and the threat landscape facing our business
operations;
• reviewing
and advising on our physical and cybersecurity strategy, crisis or
incident management and security-related information technology
planning processes and review strategy for investing in our
security systems; and
• reviewing
and discussing with management our public disclosures relating to
the Company’s security of its employees, facilities and information
technology systems, including privacy, network security and data
security.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2021, our Board formed the Security Committee to
facilitate Board oversight of security issues, including product
security, data security, cybersecurity, security risk management,
risk exposure and related controls and enterprise risk management
related to these risks.
Our Security Committee operates under a written charter that was
adopted by our Board. A copy of the charter of our Security
Committee is available on our website at
http://investors.paloaltonetworks.com.
Proposal
No. 1 Election of Directors
Director Compensation
Our ESG and Nominating Committee has approved a policy for the
compensation of the non-employee members of our Board (the
“Director Compensation Policy”) to attract, retain and reward these
individuals and align their financial interests with those of our
stockholders. Only non-employee directors who are not affiliated
with investment funds that hold shares of our common stock are
eligible for compensation under the Director Compensation Policy.
There is no cash compensation paid under the Director Compensation
Policy.
Initial Award.
Under the Director Compensation
Policy, when an eligible director initially joins our Board, the
eligible director receives an initial award of restricted stock
units having a value of $1 million (as determined based on the
average closing price of our common stock on Nasdaq during the 30
calendar days prior to fifteenth day of the month in which the
grant is made). This initial award will vest as to one third of the
shares covered by the restricted stock unit award on the first
anniversary of the date the eligible director joined our board of
directors, and the remaining shares will vest quarterly over the
following two years, subject to the director’s continued service as
of each such date.
Annual Award.
Under the Director Compensation
Policy, at each annual meeting of stockholders, each eligible
director receives an annual restricted stock unit award having a
value equal to $300,000 (as determined based on the average closing
price of our common stock on Nasdaq during the 30 calendar days
ending on the date of the annual meeting). In addition, at each
annual meeting of stockholders, our Lead Independent Director
receives an additional annual restricted stock unit award having a
value equal to $50,000 (as determined based on the average closing
price of our common stock on Nasdaq during the 30 calendar days
ending on the date of the annual meeting). All annual awards,
including the annual awards to the Lead Independent Director, will
vest quarterly over a period of one year, subject to the director’s
continued service as of each such date.
Committee Awards.
At each annual meeting of
stockholders, the chairpersons and members of the five standing
committees of our Board will receive additional annual restricted
stock unit awards for committee service having the following values
(as determined based on the average closing price of our common
stock on Nasdaq during the 30 calendar days ending on the date of
the annual meeting):
Board
Committee(1) |
Chairperson
Retainer |
Member
Retainer |
Audit
Committee |
$35,000 |
$20,000 |
Compensation and
People Committee |
$25,000 |
$15,000 |
ESG and Nominating
Committee |
$15,000 |
$10,000 |
Security
Committee |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
|
(1) |
No additional compensation is paid for serving on
the Corporate Development Committee. |
Any eligible director who serves as chairperson of a committee is
not entitled to a member retainer for the same committee. The
committee awards will vest quarterly over a period of one year,
subject to the director’s continued service as of each such
date.
54 |
|
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
Fiscal 2022 Director Compensation Table
The following table presents summary information regarding the
compensation paid to our non-employee directors for our fiscal year
ended July 31, 2022.
Director |
Stock Awards(1) |
Total |
Aparna Bawa(2) |
— |
— |
Asheem Chandna(3) |
$347,988 |
$347,988 |
John M. Donovan(3) |
$415,638 |
$415,638 |
Carl Eschenbach(3) |
$338,763 |
$338,763 |
Dr. Helene D. Gayle(4) |
— |
— |
James J. Goetz(5) |
— |
— |
Rt Hon Sir John Key(3) |
$381,813 |
$381,813 |
Mary Pat McCarthy(3) |
$372,588 |
$372,588 |
Mark D. McLaughlin(6) |
— |
— |
Lorraine Twohill(3) |
$362,338 |
$362,338 |
|
(1) |
The amounts
reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair
value of these restricted stock units (“RSUs”) as computed in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation,
or ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used in the valuation of these
awards are set forth in the notes to our consolidated financial
statements, which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for our fiscal year ended July 31, 2022. These amounts do not
necessarily correspond to the actual value that may be recognized
by the director upon the vesting of such awards. |
|
(2) |
Ms. Bawa
received an initial equity award upon her appointment to the Board
in May 2021, which was reported in our fiscal 2021 proxy statement.
Pursuant to our director compensation policy, she will first be
eligible to receive equity grants equal to the value of the annual
board and committee stock awards, at the upcoming Annual Meeting.
As of July 31, 2022, Ms. Bawa held 5,697 RSUs (as adjusted for the
three-for-one stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend
in September 2022, or the “Stock Split”). |
|
(3) |
As of July
31, 2022, Mr. Chandna held 1,017 RSUs, Mr. Donovan held 1,215 RSUs,
Mr. Eschenbach held 990 RSUs, Rt Hon Sir John Key held 1,116 RSUs,
Ms. McCarthy held 1,089 RSUs and Ms. Twohill held 1,059 RSUs (as
adjusted for the Stock Split). |
|
(4) |
Dr. Gayle
received an initial equity award upon her appointment to the Board
in May 2021, which was reported in our fiscal 2021 proxy statement.
Pursuant to our director compensation policy, she will first be
eligible to receive equity grants equal to the value of the annual
board and committee stock awards at the upcoming Annual Meeting. As
of July 31, 2022, Dr. Gayle held 5,778 RSUs (as adjusted for the
Stock Split). |
|
(5) |
Mr. Goetz
receives no compensation under the Director Compensation
Policy. |
|
(6) |
Mr.
McLaughlin received no compensation for his services as a director.
For the compensation paid to him as an employee, see “Related
Person Transactions.” |
Identification and Evaluation of
Director Nominees
Our ESG and Nominating Committee uses a variety of methods for
identifying and evaluating director nominees. The ESG and
Nominating Committee regularly assess the appropriate size,
composition and needs of our Board and its respective committees,
and the qualification of candidates considering these needs. Some
of the qualifications that our ESG and Nominating Committee
considers include issues of character, integrity, judgment,
diversity (including gender and race), experience of relevance to
us and the Board, independence, age, area of expertise, potential
conflicts of interest and other commitments. These factors may be
weighted differently depending on the individual being considered
or the needs of the Board at the time.
Nominees must also be able to offer advice and guidance to our
Chief Executive Officer based on past experience in positions with
a high degree of responsibility and be leaders in the companies or
institutions with which they are affiliated. Director candidates
must have sufficient time available in the judgment of our ESG and
Nominating Committee to perform all Board and committee
responsibilities. Members of our Board are expected to prepare for,
attend, and actively participate in all Board and applicable
committee meetings.
Proposal
No. 1 Election of Directors
Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for
director nominees, although our ESG and Nominating Committee may
also consider such other factors as it may deem, from time to time,
are in our and our stockholders’ best interests. Our ESG and
Nominating Committee will also seek appropriate input from our
Chief Executive Officer, from time to time, in assessing the needs
of our Board for relevant background, experience, diversity and
skills of its members.
Our ESG and Nominating Committee considers diversity (whether based
on broader principles such as diversity of perspective,
experiences, and expertise, as well as factors commonly associated
with diversity such as gender, race or national origin) in
connection with its evaluation of director candidates, including
the evaluation and determination of whether to re-nominate
incumbent directors. The committee also considers these and other
factors as it oversees the annual Board and committee evaluations.
The committee seeks qualified and diverse director candidates,
including women and individuals from minority groups, to include in
the pool from which director candidates are chosen. Any search firm
retained by the committee to find director candidates would be
instructed to account for these considerations, including
diversity.
Stockholder Recommendations for
Nominations to the Board of Directors
Our ESG and Nominating Committee will consider candidates for
director recommended by stockholders, so long as such
recommendations comply with our certificate of incorporation,
amended and restated bylaws and applicable laws, rules and
regulations, including those promulgated by Nasdaq and the SEC. The
ESG and Nominating Committee will evaluate the recommendations in
accordance with its charter, our amended and restated bylaws, our
policies and procedures for director candidates, as well as the
regular director nominee criteria described above. This process is
designed to ensure that our Board includes members with diverse
backgrounds, skills and experience, including appropriate financial
and other expertise relevant to our business. Eligible stockholders
wishing to recommend a candidate for nomination should contact our
Corporate Secretary in writing. Such recommendations must include
information about the candidate, a statement of support by the
recommending stockholder, evidence of the recommending
stockholder’s ownership of our common stock and a signed letter
from the candidate confirming willingness to serve on our Board.
Our ESG and Nominating Committee has discretion to decide which
individuals to recommend for nomination as directors.
Director Attendance
During our fiscal year ended July 31, 2022, the Board held five
meetings (including regularly scheduled and special meetings), and
no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings
of the Board and the committees of which he or she was a
member.
Although we do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by
members of our Board at annual meetings of stockholders, we
encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend. Eleven of
our twelve directors attended our 2021 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, either telephonically or by video conference.
56 |
|
PROPOSAL NO. 2
Ratification
of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
Our Audit Committee has appointed Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”),
independent registered public accountants, to audit our financial
statements for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2023. EY has served
as our independent registered public accounting firm since
2009.
At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders are being asked to ratify
the appointment of EY as our independent registered public
accounting firm for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2023. Our Audit
Committee is submitting the selection of EY to our stockholders
because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent
registered public accounting firm and as a matter of good corporate
governance. Representatives of EY will be present at the Annual
Meeting, and they will have an opportunity to make statements and
will be available to respond to appropriate questions from our
stockholders.
Notwithstanding the selection of EY and even if our stockholders
ratify the selection, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may
appoint another independent registered public accounting firm at
any time during our fiscal year if our Audit Committee believes
that such a change would be in the best interests of Palo Alto
Networks and its stockholders. If our stockholders do not ratify
the appointment of EY, our Audit Committee may reconsider the
appointment.
Fees
Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The following table presents fees for professional audit services
and other services rendered to our Company by EY for our fiscal
years ended July 31, 2021 and 2022.
|
2021 |
2022 |
Audit
Fees(1) |
$6,757,000 |
$6,139,000 |
Audit-Related
Fees(2) |
688,000 |
— |
Tax
Fees(3) |
1,020,000 |
477,000 |
All Other
Fees(4) |
4,000 |
5,000 |
|
$8,469,000 |
$6,621,000 |
|
(1) |
Audit fees
consist of professional services rendered in connection with (a)
the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements,
including audited financial statements presented in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, (b) review of our quarterly consolidated
financial statements presented in our Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q, (c) professional services provided for new and existing
statutory audits of subsidiaries or affiliates of the Company, and
(d) other regulatory filings. |
|
(2) |
Audit-Related
fees consist of fees for professional services for assurance and
related services that are reasonably related to the performance of
the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and
are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services include
acquisition due diligence services, technical accounting guidance
and other attestation services. |
|
(3) |
Tax Fees
consist of fees for professional services for federal, state and
international tax compliance and tax planning. |
|
(4) |
All Other
Fees includes fees for professional services other than these
services reported above. These services specifically relate to
subscriptions to an accounting regulatory database. |
Auditor Independence
In our fiscal year ended July 31, 2022, there were no other
professional services provided by EY that would have required our
Audit Committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining
the independence of EY.
Proposal No. 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit
Committee Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit
Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
Consistent with requirements of the SEC and the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) regarding auditor
independence, our Audit Committee is responsible for the
appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of our
independent registered public accounting firm. In recognition of
this responsibility, our Audit Committee has established a policy
for the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit
services provided by our independent registered public accounting
firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related
services, tax services and other services.
Before engagement of the independent registered public accounting
firm for the next year’s audit, the independent registered public
accounting firm submits a detailed description of services expected
to be rendered during that year for each of the following
categories of services to our Audit Committee for approval:
|
• |
Audit services.
Audit services include work performed for the audit of our
financial statements and the review of financial statements
included in our quarterly reports, as well as subsidiary audits,
equity investment audits and other procedures required to be
performed by the independent auditor to be able to form an opinion
on our consolidated financial statements. |
|
• |
Audit-related services.
Audit-related services are for assurance and related services that
are (1) reasonably related to the performance of the audit or
review of our financial statements (2) are traditionally performed
by our independent registered public accounting firm and (3) not
covered above under “audit services.” |
|
• |
Tax services.
Tax services include all services performed by the independent
registered public accounting firm’s tax personnel for tax
compliance, tax advice and tax planning. |
|
• |
Other services.
Other services are those services not described in the other
categories. |
Our Audit Committee pre-approves particular services or categories
of services on a case-by-case basis. The fees are budgeted, and our
Audit Committee requires our independent registered public
accounting firm and management to report actual fees versus
budgeted fees periodically throughout the year by category of
service. During the year, circumstances may arise when it may
become necessary to engage the independent registered public
accounting firm for additional services not contemplated in the
original pre-approval. In those instances, (a) if the additional
services do not require specific approval by the Audit Committee, a
detailed description of the services will be submitted to the Chief
Financial Officer or Chief Accounting Officer, who will determine
whether such services are included within the list of services that
have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee and
the Audit Committee will be informed on a timely basis of any such
services rendered by the independent auditor, or (b) if the
additional services require specific approval by the Audit
Committee, they will be submitted for pre-approval to the Audit
Committee by both the independent auditor and the Chief Financial
Officer or Chief Accounting Officer, and shall only be submitted if
the independent auditor and such officer mutually agree that the
request or application is consistent with the SEC’s rules on
auditor independence. All fees paid to EY for our fiscal year ended
July 31, 2022 were pre-approved by our Audit Committee.
Required Vote
The ratification of the appointment of EY as our independent
registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of
a majority of the shares of our common stock present virtually or
by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.
Abstentions are treated as shares present virtually or by proxy and
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and, therefore, will have
the same effect as a vote “Against” this proposal. Any broker
non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
 |
Recommendation of
the Board |
|
The Board recommends that you
vote “FOR”
the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP. |
58 |
|
Proposal No. 2 Ratification of Appointment of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of the Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee consists of Mmes. Bawa and McCarthy, Mr. Goetz
and the Rt Hon Sir John Key. Each member of the committee is an
independent director as required by the listing standards of Nasdaq
and rules and regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee operates
under a written charter approved by the Board, which is available
on the Investor Information portion of our website at
https://investors.paloaltonetworks.com/. The composition of the
Audit Committee, the attributes of its members and the
responsibilities of the Audit Committee, as reflected in its
charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable
requirements for corporate audit committees. The Audit Committee
reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter and the Audit
Committee’s performance on an annual basis.
The Audit Committee assists our Board in the Board’s oversight and
monitoring of:
|
• |
our accounting and financial reporting
processes and internal controls as well as the audit and integrity
of our financial statements; |
|
• |
the qualifications, independence and
performance of our independent registered public accounting
firm; |
|
• |
the performance of our internal audit
function; |
|
• |
our compliance with applicable law;
and |
|
• |
risk assessment and risk management
pertaining to financial, accounting and tax matters of the
Company. |
With respect to the Company’s financial reporting process, the
management of the Company is responsible for (1) establishing and
maintaining internal controls and (2) preparing the Company’s
consolidated financial statements. Our independent registered
public accounting firm, EY, is responsible for auditing these
financial statements. It is the responsibility of the Audit
Committee to oversee these activities. It is not the responsibility
of the Audit Committee to prepare or certify our financial
statements or guarantee the audits or reports of the independent
auditors. These are the fundamental responsibilities of management
and our independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment,
compensation, retention, and oversight of the work performed by EY.
In fulfilling its oversight responsibility, the Audit Committee
carefully reviews the policies and procedures for the engagement of
the independent registered public accounting firm, including the
scope of the audit, audit fees, auditor independence matters,
performance of the independent auditors, and the extent to which
the independent registered public accounting firm may be retained
to perform non-audit services.
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee
has:
|
• |
reviewed and discussed the audited financial
statements with management and EY; |
|
• |
discussed with EY the applicable
requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC; and |
|
• |
received the written disclosures and the letter
from EY required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding
the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit
Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with EY its
independence. |
Based on the Audit Committee’s review and discussions with
management and EY, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board
that the audited financial statements be included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2022, for
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Respectfully submitted by the members of the Audit Committee of the
Board:
Mary Pat McCarthy (Chair)
Aparna Bawa
James J. Goetz
Rt Hon Sir John Key
PROPOSAL NO. 3
Advisory Vote on the Compensation
of our Named Executive Officers
We are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to
approve, on an advisory or non-binding basis, the compensation of
our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the
rules and regulations of the SEC in the “Executive Compensation”
section of this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a
“say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to
express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation
as a whole. This vote is not intended to address any specific item
of compensation or any specific named executive officer, but rather
the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the
philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy
Statement.
The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore is not binding on
us, our Compensation and People Committee or our Board. The
say-on-pay vote will, however, provide information to us regarding
stockholder sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy,
policies and practices, which our Compensation and People Committee
will be able to consider when determining executive compensation
for the remainder of the current fiscal year and beyond. Our Board
and our Compensation and People Committee value the opinions of our
stockholders and to the extent there is any significant vote
against the compensation of our named executive officers as
disclosed in this proxy statement, we will endeavor to communicate
with stockholders to better understand the concerns that influenced
the vote and our Compensation and People Committee will evaluate
whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. We
currently conduct advisory votes on our named executive officer
compensation on an annual basis, and we expect to conduct our next
advisory vote at our 2023 annual meeting of stockholders.
As a result of the feedback that we received from our stockholders
through our extensive engagement efforts, our Compensation and
People Committee made extensive changes to our executive
compensation program. We believe that the information we have
provided in this “Executive Compensation” section, and in
particular the information discussed in the sections titled
“Executive Compensation—Letter from our Compensation and People
Committee” and “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and
Analysis,” which describe these changes in detail, demonstrates
that our executive compensation program has been designed
appropriately and is working to ensure management’s interests are
aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value
creation. Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the
following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
“RESOLVED, that Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s stockholders approve, on
an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive
officers, as disclosed in Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s proxy
statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to
the compensation disclosure rules and regulations of the SEC,
including the compensation discussion and analysis, the
compensation tables and narrative discussion, and other related
disclosure.”
Required Vote
The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our
named executive officers requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares of our common stock present virtually or by
proxy at the virtual Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon to
be approved. You may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain” with
respect to this proposal. Abstentions are considered votes present
and entitled to vote on this proposal, and thus will have the same
effect as votes “against” this proposal. Broker non-votes will have
no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
Although the advisory vote is non-binding, our Board values our
stockholders’ opinions. The Compensation and People Committee will
review the results of the vote and, consistent with our record of
stockholder responsiveness, consider stockholders’ concerns and
take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future
decisions concerning our executive compensation program.
 |
Recommendation of
the Board |
|
The Board recommends that you vote
“FOR”
the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our
named executive officers. |
60 |
|
Executive Compensation
Letter from our Compensation and
People Committee
November 3, 2022
Dear Fellow Stockholders,
The Compensation and People Committee of the Palo Alto Networks
Board of Directors is committed to ensuring that we have the right
leadership team in place, and that our compensation programs
appropriately compensate our executives, allowing us to retain and
attract individuals of outstanding character and ability who are
champions of our culture and mission. As a committee, we strongly
believe in, and are committed to, executing a pay-for-performance
compensation philosophy that closely aligns executive compensation
to our financial and operational performance.
Fiscal 2022 was once again a year marked by disruption and
uncertainty. The COVID-19 pandemic continued to create significant
global economic and social uncertainty, as new variants of the
disease disrupted workplaces and contributed to organizational
disruption. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and other geopolitical
tensions disrupted the global economy, and contributed to global
economic uncertainty. Our management team once again embraced these
challenges by mobilizing our people and resources to keep our
employees healthy, safe and professionally fulfilled, while
delivering very strong financial and operational performance.
We believe that Palo Alto Networks is at an inflection point in our
mission to be the cybersecurity partner of choice. In speaking for
the entire Board, we believe that Nikesh Arora is one of only a few
leaders who can deliver the level of performance critical to our
successful accomplishment of the next phase of our growth. Further,
we believe that Nikesh has built a strong management team that we
are committed to retaining because we also believe that continuity
of our leadership team is critical to reaching our goals.
Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, we designed our
fiscal 2022 executive compensation program to provide strong
rewards for strong performance. In designing the program, we sought
the advice of independent compensation consultants, and carefully
evaluated and tied program parameters to metrics that we believe
significantly impact long-term value and return for our
stockholders and other stakeholders.
|
• |
Paid For Performance Based on Aggressive
Targets: We set our executive cash incentive and performance
stock unit (“PSU”) award targets above the guidance we provided in
our August 23, 2021 earnings release, which aligns with our
pay-for-performance philosophy of requiring strong performance for
strong rewards. |
|
• |
Adopted Multiple Year Measurement
Period: 100% of fiscal 2022 named executive officer equity
awards are performance based, require sustained performance over
multiple years for any payout, and include a relative total
stockholder return multiplier in addition to financial metrics,
which aligns a significant portion of our executive compensation to
long-term financial performance. |
|
• |
Eliminated Duplicative Metrics:
We eliminated duplicative performance metrics in our cash incentive
plan and PSU awards, ensuring alignment of compensation with a
broader set of financial performance metrics. |
|
• |
Tied Compensation to ESG Goals:
We added an ESG modifier to our cash incentive plan to ensure a
linkage between compensation and our ESG goals, which provided for
the calculated result to be adjusted up or down by up to 10% based
on an ESG scorecard with climate, inclusion and diversity, and
human capital metrics. |
|
• |
Implemented a One Year Holding Policy: We
implemented a policy requiring our name executive officers to hold
all net shares for one year following vesting, subject to certain
exceptions. |
Executive Compensation
We are confident that our 2022 executive compensation program
delivers on the commitments we made to our stockholders in our 2021
proxy statement.
We are again asking for your support of our executive compensation
program. After gathering extensive feedback from stockholders and
engaging an independent consulting firm, we believe that our
Compensation and People Committee has implemented a sustainable,
best-in-class program that is supported by market benchmarks
aligned with best practices and the interests of our
shareholders.
Thank you for your continued support and investment in Palo Alto
Networks.
Sincerely,
The Compensation and People Committee
Rt Hon Sir John Key (Chair)
John Donovan
Lorraine Twohill
62 |
|
Executive Compensation
Compensation Discussion and
Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes in
detail our executive compensation programs and the resulting pay
decisions for our named executive officers (“NEOs”).
Our Compensation and People Committee believes that the fiscal 2022
compensation of our NEOs is commensurate with our size and
performance, the significant scope of their roles and
responsibilities, and their strong leadership in a manner
consistent with our corporate values of disruption, collaboration,
execution, integrity and inclusion.
Named
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nikesh Arora Chief Executive Officer,
Chair of the Board |
|
Dipak Golechha Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer |
|
William “BJ” Jenkins President* |
|
Lee Klarich Executive Vice President, Chief Product
Officer |
|
Nir Zuk Executive Vice President, Founder, Chief
Technology Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Mr. Jenkins was appointed President in August 2021. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CD&A HIGHLIGHTS
• Our
employees, led by our NEOs, continued to deliver strong financial
results for our stockholders in fiscal 2022.
• Our
financial performance has led to strong financial returns, a
one-year total shareholder return (“TSR”) of 25.07% (or at the 92nd
percentile of our compensation peer group), and a return of capital
through our stock buyback program.
• We engaged
in discussions with stockholders holding 60% of our outstanding
shares (as of June 30, 2022), with a concentrated focus on the
issues that mattered to them, including our executive compensation
program.
• We
followed through on the commitments we made to our stockholders in
the proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting of
stockholders.
• Our fiscal
2022 executive compensation programs align with recognized best
practices.
|
|
|
|
Philosophy and Objectives
As a global cybersecurity provider based in the San Francisco Bay
Area, we operate in a highly competitive and rapidly evolving
market, and we expect competition among companies in our market to
continue to increase. We compete with many other technology
companies in seeking to attract and retain highly skilled top
talent. Our continued success has made our employees and executives
more attractive as candidates for employment with other companies,
and we are intently focused on maintaining competitive compensation
programs, in part, to address recruiting efforts by other companies
in the technology industry.
Executive Compensation
As a result, our compensation philosophy is designed to establish
and maintain a compensation program that attracts and rewards
talented individuals who possess the skills necessary to support
our near-term objectives and create long-term value for our
stockholders, grow our business and assist in the achievement of
our strategic goals. We believe that a performance-based culture is
crucial to our growth and success.
The specific objectives of our executive compensation program are
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Drive the development of a
successful and profitable business through our next phase of
growth. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Create sustainable long-term value for our
stockholders by
aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our
stockholders. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Reward our
executive officers for the successful achievement of our financial
and strategic growth objectives. |
|
|
|
|
 |
Attract, motivate and retain highly
qualified executives who possess the skills and leadership
necessary to continue to grow our business, and provide
compensation packages that are comparable to our peers and the overall
competitive market and that are heavily weighted to be
based on our performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While remaining true to our compensation objectives, as well as
sound compensation policies and practices, our compensation program
also has the flexibility to incorporate feedback and evolving
compensation practices that are important to us and our
stockholders, such as the addition of an ESG modifier to our NEOs’
cash incentive plan ensuring a linkage between NEO compensation and
our ESG commitments.
Stockholder Engagement in Fiscal 2022
In fiscal 2022, we once again undertook extensive engagement
efforts to obtain our stockholders’ views on executive
compensation, corporate governance and other matters, and to
determine how best to respond to that feedback. Our Lead
Independent Director once again played a central role in our
stockholder engagement efforts in fiscal 2022. The Chair of our
Compensation and People Committee also met with numerous
stockholders to discuss their views regarding our executive
compensation program.
Our Lead Independent Director and management team regularly update
our Board on our engagement efforts, providing summaries of our
stockholders’ feedback. The continuous feedback that we receive
from our stockholders has shaped the executive compensation program
and practices implemented by our Compensation and People
Committee.
The discussions with our stockholders also provided valuable
insights into the concerns that led to the low say-on-pay support
that we received at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, and
provided the foundation of our executive compensation program in
fiscal 2021 and 2022. At our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders,
we were pleased that approximately 81% of votes were cast in favor
of our say-on-pay proposal, which was significantly higher than the
approximately 40% support we received the prior year.
64 |
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We reached out to stockholders representing 68% of our outstanding
shares. |
|
We engaged in discussions with investors representing 60% of our
outstanding shares (which is all stockholders that indicated a
willingness to engage with us). |
|
Our Lead Independent Director participated in discussions (30
meetings) with investors representing 39% of our outstanding
shares. |
|
|
|
|
|
* Stockholder ownership, to our knowledge, as of
June 30, 2022. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHAT WE HEARD |
HOW WE RESPONDED |
|
|
Executive Compensation
Modifications to the structure of our executive compensation
program and enhanced disclosure.
|
• 100%
of our NEOs’ equity compensation (aside from new hire awards) is
performance-based, with different performance targets than the cash
incentive plan awards.
• We
increased our stock ownership guidelines for our NEOs, including
our Chief Executive Officer.
• We
added an ESG modifier to our cash incentive plan.
• We
established a one-year post-vesting holding period for all NEOs,
including our Chief Executive Officer.
|
Executive Compensation
Our Compensation Best Practices
In line with the feedback that we received from our stockholders
and our independent compensation consultants, we implemented
extensive changes to our executive compensation program in fiscal
2021, and maintained these compensation practices in fiscal
2022.
We believe our executive compensation program represents recognized
best practice and reflects principles that align the compensation
of our NEOs with the long-term interests of our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW FOR 2022 |
|
|
|
|
|
100% of equity
compensation (aside from new hire awards) is performance-based,
with different performance targets than the cash incentive
plan
Addition of ESG
modifier to cash incentive plan, which modifies the annual
incentive cash compensation (plus or minus 10%), based on our
performance relative to an ESG scorecard with climate, inclusion
and human capital metrics
|
Increase to
stock ownership guidelines
One-year
post-vesting holding period for all NEOs, including our Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROBUST AND INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION DECISION-MAKING, ALIGNED
WITH OUR CORPORATE VALUES |
|
|
|
|
100% independent
Compensation and People Committee
Independent
compensation consultants
|
Annual review of
compensation strategy
Consideration of
annual say-on-pay vote
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES |
|
|
|
|
|
Majority of
compensation is performance-based and at-risk
100% short-term
incentive cash compensation is performance-based and
at-risk
No single
trigger vesting of equity awards on occurrence of a change in
control
No dividends
paid on unvested equity
Robust stock
ownership guidelines
|
No hedging or
pledging, except limited pledging permitted with the prior approval
of the ESG and Nominating Committee
Meaningful
clawback policy
Limited
perquisites and personal benefits
No defined
benefit plans or SERPs
Implementing the
advice of independent compensation consultants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
Executive Compensation
We Followed Through On Our Commitments
In the proxy statement for our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders,
we made several commitments with respect to the design of our
executive compensation program and related policies. We made these
commitments following receipt of extensive feedback from our
stockholders and advice from two independent compensation
consultants, Pay Governance and Meridian Compensation Partners.
Summarized below are our fiscal 2022 commitments, and our follow
through in meeting those commitments.
OUR FISCAL 2022
COMMITMENTS |
 |
OUR FOLLOW
THROUGH |
Maintain a robust stockholder outreach program |
|
 |
Provide more transparency in our executive compensation
disclosures, as well as more robust CD&A
disclosures |
|
 |
Disclose the target value of equity grants to our NEOs for the
completed fiscal year in the CD&A |
|
 |
Increase the CEO stock ownership guidelines to 10x base
salary |
|
 |
Make any one-time awards to NEOs a majority performance based and
only make such grants in exceptional circumstances |
|
 |
Annual equity grants to our NEOs to be at least 75%
performance-based in line with market best practices |
|
 |
Require a one year minimum vesting period for all grants to our
Chief Executive Officer and other NEOs going forward, and implement
a policy to require our Chief Executive Officer and other NEOs to
hold all net shares for one year after vesting subject to certain
exceptions |
|
 |
Use a PSU award design that requires sustained performance over
multiple years for any payout |
|
 |
Include a relative TSR multiplier to our executive PSU
awards |
|
 |
Ensure that ongoing incentive goals are considered “challenging”
with targets set at or above management guidance |
|
 |
Disclose performance targets compared to actual results and
corresponding payout scale |
|
 |
Eliminate duplicate performance metrics in our cash incentive plan
and PSU awards |
|
 |
No upward discretion except for extraordinary circumstances (such
as the COVID-19 pandemic) |
|
 |
Incorporate an ESG metric into fiscal 2022 cash incentive plan to
ensure linkage between compensation and our ESG goals |
|
 |
Executive Compensation
Compensation-Setting Process
Compensation Timeline and Process
The compensation setting timeline and process of our Compensation
and People Committee is summarized below.

Our Compensation and People Committee makes compensation decisions
after considering factors that include:
|
• |
The performance and experience of each executive
officer; |
|
• |
The scope and strategic impact of the
executive officer’s responsibilities; |
|
• |
Our past business performance and
future expectations; |
|
• |
Our long-term goals and
strategies; |
|
• |
The performance of our executive team
as a whole; |
|
• |
An analysis of competitive market
conditions, with the assistance of its external compensation
consultant(s); |
|
• |
The incentives provided to our
executives to remain with the Company and drive the Company’s
continued growth; |
|
• |
The value of each executive’s unvested
equity holdings; |
|
• |
For each executive officer, other than
our CEO, the recommendation of our CEO based on an evaluation of
his performance; |
|
• |
The challenge and cost of replacing
high-performing leaders with in-demand skills; and |
|
• |
The internal parity of compensation among our
executive officers. |
Our Compensation and People Committee does not apply a formula or
assign relative weights to specific compensation elements.
68 |
|
Executive Compensation
Roles and Responsibilities
PARTICIPANT |
ROLE IN COMPENSATION DETERMINATION PROCESS |
Compensation and People Committee |
• Review,
evaluate and approve the compensation arrangements, plans,
policies, and practices for our NEOs
• Oversee
and administer cash-based and equity-based compensation
plans
• Review
our executive compensation program, from time to time, to determine
whether they are appropriate, properly coordinated, achieve their
intended purposes and to make any modifications to existing plans
and arrangements or to adopt new plans or
arrangements
• Retain
the services of external advisors, including compensation
consultants, legal counsel and other advisors, from time to time,
as it sees fit, in connection with carrying out its
duties
|
Management |
• Together
with our independent compensation consultants, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief People Officer assist the Compensation and
People Committee in the execution of its responsibilities by
providing information on corporate and individual performance,
market data with respect to compensation and management’s
perspective and recommendations on compensation
matters
• Chief
Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation and
People Committee regarding compensation matters, including the
compensation of executive officers (other than
himself)
• Chief
Executive Officer participates in meetings of the Compensation and
People Committee (other than portions of meetings that involve
discussions of his own compensation)
While our
Compensation and People Committee solicits the recommendations and
proposals of our Chief Executive Officer with respect to
compensation-related matters, these recommendations and proposals
are only one factor in our Compensation and People Committee’s
decision-making process.
|
Independent
Compensation Consultants
For
fiscal 2022 advice, the Compensation and People Committee engaged
Pay Governance and Meridian Compensation Partners, national
compensation consulting firms
|
• Assist
the Compensation and People Committee in executing the executive
compensation strategy and guiding principles, assessing the current
target total direct compensation opportunities of our executive
officers, including comparing them against competitive market
practices, developing a compensation peer group and advising on
executive compensation decisions
• Pay
Governance and Meridian Compensation Partners did not provide any
services to the Company other than the services provided to our
Compensation and People Committee
• Our
Compensation and People Committee assessed the independence of Pay
Governance and Meridian Partners taking into account, among other
things, the factors set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1 and the
listing standards of Nasdaq and has concluded that no conflict of
interest exists with respect to the work that Pay Governance and
Meridian Compensation Partners perform for our Compensation and
People Committee
|
Executive Compensation
Use of Competitive Data
To assess the competitiveness of our executive compensation program
and to assist in setting compensation levels, at the Compensation
and People Committee’s request, Compensia, Inc., our prior
independent compensation consultant, compiled market data from a
compensation peer group approved by our Compensation and People
Committee and industry surveys, including the Radford Global
Technology Executive Compensation Survey. The Compensation and
People Committee, with the assistance of Pay Governance and
Meridian Partners, then analyzed the market and survey data when
making fiscal 2022 compensation decisions.
Competitive Positioning
For fiscal 2022, our Compensation and People Committee continued to
compare and analyze our executive compensation program and each
component of executive compensation against data from a formal
compensation peer group of companies.
In the context of our annual executive compensation review, with
assistance from Compensia and input from management, in February
2021, our Compensation and People Committee reviewed the peer group
of publicly-traded technology companies used to provide information
regarding compensation practices for fiscal 2021 to determine if
any changes were appropriate for use for fiscal 2022 pay decisions.
In determining which companies to include in the peer group, our
Compensation and People Committee considered companies that met
some or all of the following updated criteria: (i) operated in a
high-technology industry; (ii) had annual revenue between
approximately $1.8 billion and $7.2 billion; (iii) had revenue
growth greater than 20%; (iv) had a market capitalization between
approximately $8.6 billion and $103.1 billion; and (v) had a market
capitalization that was at least three times annual revenue. Based
on our Compensation and People Committee’s review of this updated
criteria, no changes were made to the peer group, and the Company
was at the 61st percentile of the peer group in terms of revenue
and 51st percentile in terms of market capitalization.
The following publicly-traded companies made up our compensation
peer group for fiscal 2022:
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Arista Networks Inc.
Autodesk, Inc.
Cadence Design Systems
F5 Networks Inc. |
Fortinet Inc.
Norton LifeLock
Okta, Inc.
PayChex, Inc. |
ServiceNow, Inc.
Snap, Inc.
Splunk Inc.
Square, Inc. (now Block) |
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc.
Synopsys, Inc.
Twitter, Inc.
Workday, Inc. |
CEO and NEO Pay for Performance Alignment For Fiscal
2022
Pay for performance is a cornerstone of our compensation
philosophy. We balance our strong pay-for-performance
compensation philosophy – where the vast majority of our Chief
Executive Officer and other NEO compensation is at-risk and
performance-based – with our need to recruit, incentivize, and
retain talented executives in a highly competitive market. The
result is an executive compensation program that is significantly
weighted toward at-risk compensation tied to our financial and
operational performance. |
70 |
|
Executive
Compensation
The
graphs below illustrate the predominance of at-risk and
performance-based components of our fiscal 2022 compensation
program for our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive
officers.
CEO |
|
AVERAGE OF OTHER NEOs** |
|
|
|
* |
Graph
reflects Mr. Arora’s target base salary of $1 million, a
significant portion of which he elected to forego. |
** |
Excludes
Mr. Jenkins’ new hire RSUs which were granted to compensate him for
a portion of our estimated value of the unvested equity that he
forfeited upon joining us. |
In line
with our pay for performance compensation philosophy, our
Compensation and People Committee also focuses on awarding
compensation commensurate with the position and responsibilities
held by our NEOs. If an NEO’s position or responsibilities change,
our Compensation and People Committee undertakes a review of that
NEO’s compensation to ensure that it remains commensurate with the
new position and responsibilities.
How We
Compensate Our Chief Executive Officer
As a
result of feedback from our stockholders requesting detailed
insights into the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, we
include in this section a summary of the rationale for the
decisions reached by our Board and Compensation and People
Committee regarding Mr. Arora’s compensation since he joined the
Company in June 2018.
MR.
ARORA’S LEADERSHIP TRANSFORMED OUR COMPANY
After
Mr. Arora joined the Company, we set an ambition to become the
cybersecurity partner of choice, to innovate and to stay ahead of
the curve. To make this a reality, Mr. Arora established three
strategic priorities critical to our long-term success:
transforming network security, delivering comprehensive cloud
native security and revolutionizing security operations. Under Mr.
Arora’s leadership, our successful implementation of this strategy
has led to:
• |
A $27.8 billion increase in market capitalization (as measured by
our market capitalization as of July 31, 2019 and July 31,
2022). |
• |
$3.6 billion returned to our stockholders in fiscal 2019 through
fiscal 2022 through our stock repurchase program. |
• |
Compound annual growth rates of 24% and 29% in revenue and
billings, respectively, over fiscal 2019 through fiscal 2022,
culminating in fiscal year 2022 with record revenue of $5.5 billion
and record billings of $7.5 billion. |
• |
An acceleration of our product development efforts, from 22 major
product introductions in fiscal 2020 to 49 in fiscal
2022. |
Additionally,
Mr. Arora successfully steered the Company through the
unprecedented global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, without
laying off a single employee, and personally forgoing $1 million in
salary to donate to our COVID-19 pandemic relief fund in fiscal
2021. Mr. Arora subsequently forwent an additional $1 million in
salary.
Executive
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transformed
Our Business Through Innovation |
|
|
|
|
|
A transformation that has born a differentiated position that
spans our three platforms
•
Network Security –
Comprehensive SASE capability, market-leading VM position, and
innovation through advanced subscriptions
•
Cloud Security – 9
modules, broadest cloud security portfolio, and strong
consumption
•
Security Operations –
Pioneered XDR category, XSOAR and Xpanse point product
|
|
Became an innovation leader by delivering
• 49
product releases across our three platforms in fiscal
2022
• Next
generation cloud access security broker (CASB)
• Cloud
next generation firewall (NGFW)
• Cloud
code security
• Industry
first agent and agentless cloud security posture management
(CSPM)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivered Zero Trust Security |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivered
Strong Financial Performance
and Stockholder Return |
|
|
|
|
|
ACCELERATING REVENUE GROWTH |
|
DELIVERING
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER
RETURN
1-Year
TSR
Palo Alto Networks vs. Percentiles of Peer Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCELERATING NEXT-GEN SECURITY ARR GROWTH |
|
3-Year
TSR
Palo Alto Networks vs. Percentiles of Peer Group |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Executive
Compensation
MARKET
COMPETITIVE PAY LEVELS AND EVOLVING COMPENSATION IN DIRECT RESPONSE
TO STOCKHOLDER FEEDBACK
Our
Board believes that Mr. Arora is uniquely qualified to lead our
Company. In designing Mr. Arora’s compensation packages since he
joined the Company in 2018, our Board and Compensation and People
Committee sought to deliver market-competitive compensation
commensurate with Mr. Arora’s capabilities and experience and
reflective of the considerable challenge of leading the Company’s
transformation from a provider of hardware delivered security to a
provider of security delivered through the cloud, with multiple
products to protect our customers’ enterprise, cloud, endpoints,
security operation centers and more.
After a
disappointing “say-on-pay” vote at our 2020 annual meeting of
stockholders, we conducted a comprehensive review of our executive
compensation practices. Mr. Arora, in his capacity as Chair of the
Board, gave his full support to this process and encouraged our
Board and Compensation and People Committee to look at all aspects
of our executive compensation program and make the necessary
changes to respond to stockholder feedback and further align our
program with best practices. As a result of this root and branch
examination, our Compensation and People Committee significantly
reduced the size of the target value of Mr. Arora’s annual equity
grant to $15.0 million in fiscal 2022, from $21.0 million in fiscal
2021 and $22.0 million in fiscal 2020. Mr. Arora’s fiscal 2022
target direct compensation is at the 75th percentile of Company’s
compensation peer group. We delivered TSR at the 92nd percentile of
our compensation peer group for fiscal 2022.
Our
Compensation and People Committee also made other significant
changes to Mr. Arora’s compensation structure for fiscal
2022:
• |
A new design for PSUs featuring multi-year financial measures and a
relative TSR modifier that requires sustained performance above
target, for multiple years, to receive an above target
payout. |
• |
An increase in his stock ownership requirement to 10x base
salary. |
• |
A one-year post-vesting holding period for equity
awards. |
CEO
COMPENSATION
|
FY21 Target |
FY22 Target |
Annual Salary(1) |
$1.0M |
$1.0M |
Target Bonus |
$1.0M |
$1.0M |
Time-Based RSUs |
n/a |
n/a |
Performance Stock Units |
$21.0M
vesting over 4 years |
$15.0M |
Total Target |
$23M |
$17M |
Year-Over-Year Change (total compensation) |
-4.2% |
-26.1% |
Performance-Based (total compensation) |
95.7% |
94.1% |
(1) |
Mr.
Arora forwent a portion of his annual salary (in the case of fiscal
2021, in connection with our funding efforts to support colleagues
and communities impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic). He opted to
receive only approximately $0.3 million of his salary in fiscal
2021, approximately $0.25 million of his salary in fiscal 2022, and
approximately $0.75 million of his salary in fiscal
2023. |
Executive
Compensation
Fiscal
2022 Executive Compensation Program
Our
executive compensation programs are tied to the Company’s financial
and operational performance, support our commitment to good
compensation governance and provide market-based opportunities to
attract, retain and motivate our executives in an intensely
competitive market for qualified talent.
|
|
|
|
FISCAL
2022 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
• |
No base salary or target annual incentive opportunity increases in
fiscal 2022 for continuing NEOs. |
|
• |
Equity compensation granted in fiscal 2022 was 100%
performance-based PSUs (aside from new hire RSUs). |
|
• |
Performance measures aligned with business strategy. |
|
• |
Chief Executive Officer donated 75% of his fiscal 2022 base salary
and 25% of his fiscal 2023 base salary. |
|
• |
Mr. Jenkins appointed President. |
|
• |
Outstanding performance resulted in 150% achievement for our NEOs
for cash incentive plan and 100% performance for the portion of the
PSUs granted to our NEOs in July 2019 that were eligible to vest
based on fiscal 2022 annual revenue growth. |
The
following table lists the pay elements of our fiscal 2022 programs
and the purpose they served:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay
Element |
Purpose |
Performance
Period |
Performance
Metric |
Fixed
Pay
|
Base Salary |
Designed
to be market-competitive and attract and retain talent |
n/a |
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
Risk Pay |
Annual Cash
Incentive
Opportunity |
Incentivize
achievement of near-term financial and operational objectives,
consistent with longer-term goals |
Annual |
Annual
normalized billings for fiscal 2022
Annual
organic operating margin for fiscal 2022
|
Revenue/TSR
Performance
Stock Units
(PSU) |
Reward
long-term profitability and long-term performance relative to
peers
Create
alignment with stockholders
Facilitate
executive retention
|
Two
years and three years |
Annual
revenue growth for fiscal 2022, 2023, and 2024 and TSR of the
Company relative to indexed companies for fiscal 2022 through 2024
(“rTSR”) |
Quantum
of Compensation
Palo
Alto Networks delivered another year of outstanding results for our
stockholders in fiscal 2022, with a strong year of financial
performance and execution. Our TSR for fiscal 2022 was 25.07%,
placing us at the 92nd percentile of our compensation peer
group.
74 |
|
Executive
Compensation
The
table below shows the targeted value of total compensation to our
Chief Executive Officer and each other NEO for fiscal 2022, as
compared to fiscal 2021.
Name |
Targeted
Value of Total
Compensation
for fiscal 2021
|
Targeted
Value of Total
Compensation
for fiscal 2022
|
Percentage
Change
|
Mr. Arora |
$ 23,000,000 |
$ 17,000,000 |
-26.1% |
Mr. Golechha* |
$ 5,200,000 |
$ 5,200,000 |
0 |
Mr. Jenkins** |
n/a |
$ 15,500,000 |
n/a |
Mr. Klarich |
$ 11,100,000 |
$ 11,100,000 |
0 |
Mr. Zuk |
$ 3,900,000 |
$ 4,400,000 |
12.8% |
* |
Mr.
Golechha joined the Company in December 2020 and was promoted to
CFO in March 2021. Targeted value of total compensation for fiscal
2021 includes (a) annualized base salary and cash incentive
compensation as CFO for fiscal 2021 and (b) PSUs with a target
value of $4,000,000, but excludes RSUs with a target value of
$4,000,000 that he received in connection with his hire, which are
not reflected in the table. |
** |
Mr.
Jenkins joined the Company as President in August 2021. Targeted
value of total compensation for fiscal 2022 includes (a) annualized
base salary and cash incentive compensation as President for fiscal
2022 and (b) PSUs with a target value of $14,000,000, but excludes
RSUs with a target value of $10,000,000 that he received in
connection with his hire, which are not reflected in the table. See
“BJ Jenkins Compensation Arrangements” below for further
detail. |
Fiscal
2022 Executive Compensation Program Components
BASE
SALARY
Base
salary is the primary fixed component of our executive compensation
program. We use base salary to compensate our executive officers
for services rendered during the fiscal year and to ensure that we
remain competitive in attracting and retaining executive
talent.
Generally,
we establish the initial base salaries of our executive officers
through arm’s-length negotiation at the time of hire taking into
account his or her position, qualifications, experience, prior
salary level, and the base salaries of our other executive
officers. Thereafter, our Compensation and People Committee reviews
the base salaries of each NEO annually and makes adjustments as it
determines to be reasonable and necessary in line with the factors
described under “Compensation Timeline and Process”
above.
NO
INCREASE IN BASE SALARY FOR ANY NEO IN FISCAL 2022.
|
The
table below shows the base salary for each NEO for fiscal
2022.
Name |
Base Salary
End of Fiscal 2021 |
Base Salary
End of Fiscal 2022 |
Percentage
Increase |
Mr. Arora(1) |
$1,000,000 |
$1,000,000 |
0% |
Mr. Golechha |
600,000 |
$ 600,000 |
0% |
Mr. Jenkins(2) |
n/a |
$ 750,000 |
n/a |
Mr. Klarich |
$ 550,000 |
$ 550,000 |
0% |
Mr. Zuk(3) |
1,482,000 |
1,482,000(3) |
0% |
(1)
Mr. Arora has elected to forgo his base salary of $1 million for
the period beginning on November 1, 2021 through October 31,
2022.
(2)
Mr. Jenkins’ annual base salary for fiscal 2022 was set at $750,000
in connection with his hire in August 2021.
(3)
Mr. Zuk is employed by our Israel subsidiary and his base salary is
expressed in Israeli currency.
Executive Compensation
ANNUAL CASH
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
We use
annual cash incentive compensation to motivate our NEOs to achieve
our annual financial and operat