AZO AutoZone Inc

​

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.__)

Filed by the Registrant ☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐   Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒    Definitive Proxy Statement

☐    Definitive Additional Materials

☐    Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

​

AutoZone, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):

​

​

​

​

​

​

Dear Stockholders,

In connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the J. R. Hyde III, Store Support Center in downtown Memphis on December 18^th, 2024, it is my honor to address you, our owners, on key developments that have occurred since our last annual meeting.  

For the first time in nearly two decades, our board of directors (“board”) facilitated a rigorous and robust succession planning process which lasted over three years culminating in the selection of Phil Daniele, who on January 2^nd, 2024, became AutoZone’s fifth Chief Executive Officer in our rich history.  We recently completed our annual review processes of the board and its committees and during that exercise, every director reported being very pleased with the process and ecstatic with the outcome.

As part of the succession planning process, the board also requested that I remain Chairman of the Board and move into an Executive Chairman role.  In this role, I’m pleased to continue to work with Phil and our talented Executive Committee (the senior most leaders of the management team).  While I thoroughly enjoy working with the team in this capacity, sharing my experiences, perspectives and historical knowledge, it is important for everyone to have clarity – my role is one of advisor, coach, sounding board and mentor - Phil, in his role as President and CEO, is the ultimate decision maker.  These changes resulted in us splitting the roles of Chairman and CEO for the first time since 2007.  In our shareholder outreach, we’ve heard mixed perspectives on having these roles combined or split.  Our board believes in optimizing the structure based on the talents and capabilities of the leadership at the time and we will evaluate future structures when appropriate.  Today, our plan is to utilize this structure for the foreseeable future.  

Our board is constantly working to enhance its performance and, as part of this quest for continuous improvement, for the fourth time in the last 12 years, we hired a third party to lead and facilitate a formal 360 review process for each member of the board.  These reviews were both quantitative and qualitative and included feedback from several of our key Executive Committee members.  Also, this year, we comprehensively evaluated our corporate governance principles which were initially developed in the early 2000s.  Our fresh assessment of these principles led to robust discussions about important topics like age and tenure limits, committee rotations and the number of public boards on which our directors may serve.  The Board ultimately decided not to set arbitrary age or tenure limits.  Instead, it prefers to hold itself accountable to effectively self-govern and refresh when appropriate.  

We are proud of the diversity of the Board.  As we have learned over the years, diverse backgrounds, experiences and perspectives lead to better decisions and performance.  In evaluating our board today, we note that we have an emerging tenure issue, as our overall tenure is higher than the S&P 500.  Accordingly, we, as a board, are committed to refreshment and will do so in a thoughtful and disciplined manner.  Recently, two of our directors, Enderson Guimaraes and D. Bryan Jordan, have shared their intentions to not stand for re-election this December.  These changes will result in our board consisting of nine directors and we will begin a formal search process led by a third party to help us identify one or two incremental directors.  

I want to thank Enderson and Bryan for their service to our company for more than a decade.  They both have brought unique perspectives that they willingly share with our board and management team enriching the discussions and leading to better outcomes.  

Historically, our say-on-pay vote has been in the high eighties or low nineties.  Last year, our say-on-pay vote dropped into the high seventies.  In response to this lower percentage, the chair of our compensation committee, along with our Vice President of Investor Relations, reached out to our shareholders to discuss our compensation program.  We shared our approach and philosophy, resulting performance and we listened and have made changes to our program, which are reflected in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis report enclosed.  I recommend you review this in-depth disclosure, as we believe our program is a crucial part of our success.  

We continued our cadence of publishing our Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Report in mid-April.  This report reflects the progress we’ve made in pursuit of our 2025 and 2030 environmental goals and our work to meet our aspirational goal in 2050.  

Over the course of the last few months, we have held off-season engagement with you, our owners, representing approximately 50% of shares outstanding sharing these changes and listening to your thoughts and ideas.  We thank you for sharing and have taken your feedback to heart.  

On behalf of the Board, I invite you to join us for our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and as always, we appreciate your investment in us and your continued support.  

Sincerely,

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

PROXY SUMMARY

This Proxy Summary provides general information about AutoZone and highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. As it is only a summary, please refer to the entire Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2024 before you vote. In this Proxy Statement, we use the term “AutoZone,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “the Company” to refer to AutoZone, Inc.

MEETING INFORMATION

​

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

​

VOTING

We strongly encourage you to submit your vote as promptly as possible through the Internet, by telephone or by mailing your completed and signed proxy card (or voting instruction form, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or nominee). You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote in-person.

​

For more specific instructions on how to vote as well as how to attend the Annual Meeting, please see page 79.

ABOUT THESE MATERIALS

We began mailing our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to each shareholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on or about October 30, 2024. Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) has sent you this Proxy Statement to solicit your vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.

​

​

​

​

* Information reflected as of, and for the fiscal year ended, August 31, 2024, as applicable

Disclaimer: The contents of any websites, reports or other materials are not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and do not constitute a part of this proxy statement.

​

​

​

​

Forward Looking Statements: Certain statements contained in this proxy statement, including statements about our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies, constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These are based on assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are discussed in more detail in the “Risk Factors” section contained in Item 1A under Part 1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2024. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

​

​

Board of Directors Nominees

The following tables do not include information about Enderson Guimaraes and D. Bryan Jordan, each of whom have notified the Company of their intention not to stand for reelection.

​

​

​

​

BOARD Skills

​

BOARD COMPOSITION

​

Executive Committee AT-A-Glance

* Refers to leadership, support and promotion of the Company’s DEI initiatives, through serving as an Executive Sponsor of a BRG, a member of the DEI Council or a member of the DEI Steering Committee.

AutoZone is committed to continuing to build a diverse organization that represents our customers and the communities in which we serve. This commitment to diversity begins at the top, and we are proud of the quality, strength, experience, tenure and racial, ethnic and gender diversity of both our Board and our Executive Committee.

​

​

​

​

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

​

​

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

AutoZone has a long-standing commitment to promoting the long-term interests of our customers, AutoZoners and shareholders. In furtherance of this commitment, the Board has adopted a comprehensive governance framework to allow it to provide effective oversight and make informed decisions relating to the business, strategy, risk, culture and more. The following section discusses key aspects of our corporate governance structure, principles and practices.

Governance Framework

Board leadership structure

We do not have an express policy on whether the roles of Board Chairman and Chief Executive Officer should be combined or separated. Instead, the Board prefers to maintain the flexibility to determine which leadership structure best serves the interests of our shareholders. If the positions of the Chairman of the Board and CEO are held by the same person, or if the Chairman is employed by or not independent of AutoZone, then the Board will select an independent director to serve as the Lead Independent Director.

Currently, our Board believes that having an Executive Chairman, a Lead Independent Director, Independent Committee Chairs, Independent Committee members for all Standing Committees and a substantial majority of Independent Board members provides the best Board structure for AutoZone. Additionally, the Board believes having an Executive Chairman with a newly appointed CEO allows for a more thoughtful leadership transition among management and at the Board level. This structure, together with our other corporate governance practices, provides strong independent oversight of management while ensuring clear strategic alignment throughout the Company.

The Board has regularly reevaluated this leadership structure as part of the Board evaluation and Board succession planning processes to ensure these important governance matters are considered thoroughly and holistically.

Lead Independent Director

​

​

In addition, our Lead Independent Director, Mr. Graves, currently serves as Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which enables him to ensure the governance practices of the Board are best suited for the needs of the Company and its shareholders. In this capacity, Mr. Graves and the other independent members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversee Board evaluations and Board refreshment, among other things.

Director independence

As stated in AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, a substantial majority of the Board of Directors should be independent in accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The Board annually assesses each director’s independence after reviewing relevant relationships involving the director and AutoZone. As part of this review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board considered all such relationships involving AutoZone’s non-employee directors, including the below matters.

Ordinary Course Transactions and Business Relationships. The Company routinely procures goods or services from various entities for which a director or his or her immediate family member may be affiliated. During FY24, all such transactions were conducted in the ordinary course of business and on an arms-length basis.

Current or Prior Employment of Immediate Family Member. Directors may have an immediate family member who is an AutoZoner. In FY24, all such employment relationships were in a non-officer capacity and all compensation-related decisions were made in a manner that is consistent with internal practices and policies.

Charitable Contributions or Event Sponsorships. The Company periodically makes donations to not-for-profit organizations or sponsors events with which Board members or their immediate family members may be affiliated. During FY24, all such contributions were conducted in the ordinary course of business and consistent with AutoZone’s charitable giving guidelines or otherwise in furtherance of a business purpose.

As such, the Board concluded that none of these transactions were, individually or cumulatively, material to AutoZone and also did not materially benefit any director, directly or indirectly. Accordingly, the Board affirmatively determined that none of Mses. Goodspeed, King, or Soltau or Messrs. George, Graves, Guimaraes, Hannasch, Jordan or Mrkonic has a material relationship with the Company other than in their capacity as a Board member and that all of them are independent within the meaning of the AutoZone Corporate Governance Principles, the NYSE listing standards and applicable law. The Board also determined that Messrs. Rhodes and Daniele are not independent since each is an employee of the Company.

COMMITTEES. AutoZone’s Board has three standing committees, each consisting solely of independent directors—the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Standing Committees”). Additional information about each of the Committees is included below.

​

​

​

GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS. The key governance documents and policies adopted by the Board are:

The Board reviews these corporate governance documents and policies from time to time and revises them when it believes it serves the interests of the Company and its shareholders to do so, such as in response to changing governance practices or legal requirements. For example, in fiscal year 2024, following the CEO succession, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, together with input and feedback from all Board members, conducted a thorough review and update of the Corporate Governance Principles. Each of these documents is available on our website at investors.autozone.com and is also available, free of charge, in print to any shareholder who requests it.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL & GOVERNANCE REPORTS. As part of our commitment to continuous improvement and maximizing long-term shareholder value, the Company’s commitment to sustainability has expanded over time. AutoZone has published an ESG Report, and the most current version of this report covering the 2023 Fiscal Year is available on our website at www.investors.autozone.com.

Our website and the information contained therein or linked thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Proxy Statement. Further, our ESG Report is not, and will not be deemed to be, a part of this Proxy Statement or incorporated by reference herein or into any of our other filings with the SEC.

Risk Oversight

Oversight of risk management is a responsibility of the Board and is an integral part of the Board’s oversight of AutoZone’s business. The primary responsibility for the identification, assessment and management of the various risks faced by AutoZone resides with AutoZone’s management. The Board is primarily responsible for ensuring that management has established and adequately resourced processes for identifying and preparing the Company to manage risks effectively.

Strategic Planning and Operating Risks

The Board reviews the Company’s principal strategic and operating risks as part of its regular discussion and consideration of AutoZone’s strategy and operating results. The Board also regularly reviews with the General Counsel legal matters that may have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with laws, and any material reports received from regulatory agencies.

Financial Risks

The Audit Committee is involved in the Board’s oversight of risk management. At each of its regular meetings, the Audit Committee reviews the Company’s major financial exposures and the steps management has taken to identify, assess, monitor, control, remediate and report such exposures. The Audit Committee, along with management, also evaluates the effectiveness of the risk avoidance and mitigation processes in place.

​

​

Enterprise Risks

To assist with risk management and oversight, AutoZone has adopted the concept of Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) using the framework issued in 2004 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s Vice President of Internal Audit, who reports directly to the Audit Committee, has been charged with leading the Company’s ERM processes with the assistance of Company management. The Vice President of Internal Audit presents to the Audit Committee a comprehensive review of the Company’s ERM processes quarterly. This presentation includes an overview of all significant risks that have been identified and assessed and the strategies developed by management for managing such risks. The Vice President of Internal Audit leads open discussions with the Audit Committee members to analyze the significance of the risks identified and seeks to verify that the list is all-inclusive. Company management is also involved in these discussions to ensure that the Board gains a full understanding of the risks and the strategies that management has implemented to manage the risks.

Information Security Risks

The Audit Committee, in connection with its oversight of the Company’s ERM processes described above, reviews and discusses the Company’s information security risks directly with the Company’s Chief Information Security Officer. This review takes place at each routine, quarterly committee meeting and includes a discussion of significant threats, risk mitigation strategies, any IT security program assessments and identified improvements. Additionally, information security matters are included within a broader IT update which is periodically presented to the full Board of Directors.

Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)

The Board exercises its oversight responsibilities of ESG matters both as a full Board and through its committees as appropriate for the subject matter. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has primary responsibility for assisting the Board in overseeing Board governance policies and practices, AutoZone’s DEI efforts, ESG reporting and ESG-related shareholder engagement efforts. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews and discusses with management the alignment between AutoZone’s compensation programs and human capital management strategy. The Audit Committee provides oversight of the regulatory environment as part of ERM, including with respect to environmental and safety compliance.

Environmental risk is currently a matter of shared oversight. For example, reporting of initiatives and goals relating to our greenhouse gas emissions is overseen by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee as part of their oversight of ESG reporting; oversight of environmental-related compliance is overseen by the Audit Committee; and to the extent environmental matters present a strategic risk or opportunity, such issues are overseen by the full Board. Each of the Committees provide reports and feedback to the full Board for its collective review and discussion.

​

​

​

Board and Committee Meetings

Board Meetings and Attendance

During FY24, the Board held 4 meetings. The non-management members of our Board regularly meet in executive sessions in conjunction with each regularly scheduled Board meeting, with our Lead Independent Director, Mr. Graves, presiding at these sessions. All directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and their assigned committees during FY24. All directors are expected to attend our annual meetings of shareholders. At our 2023 Annual Meeting, all directors were present and available to answer questions.

Audit Committee

​

​

Compensation Committee

​

NOMINating and corporate governance Committee

​

​

​

Board Composition

Personal Characteristics and Core Competencies

The Board believes each individual director should possess certain personal characteristics, and that the Board as a whole should possess certain core competencies. Such personal characteristics are integrity and accountability, informed judgment, financial literacy, mature confidence, high performance standards, and passion. They should also have demonstrated the confidence to be truly independent, as well as be business savvy, have an owner orientation and have a genuine interest in AutoZone. Core competencies of the Board as a whole, include accounting and finance, business judgment, management expertise, crisis response, industry knowledge, international markets, strategy and vision. These characteristics and competencies are set forth in more detail in AutoZone’s Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on AutoZone’s website at investors.autozone.com.

DIRECTOR SKILLS

The Board believes it can be most effective in exercising its responsibilities when it is made up of individuals who collectively possess a diverse, yet balanced, set of skills, qualifications and expertise gained from different experiences and professional settings. As such, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the skills represented on the Board, which then provides a foundation for Board refreshment, Board succession planning and director nominations.

In 2023, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee refreshed its method of reviewing and evaluating Board skills in an effort to (i) develop a more meaningful skills matrix that reflects each individual’s strengths and expertise and (ii) better communicate to shareholders the key qualifications that each director nominee brings to the Board. In doing so, the Committee identified a certain set of “core skills” which nearly all directors possess because these skills are integral to carrying out the Board’s responsibilities. In addition to these “core skills,” the Committee identified certain “distinct strengths” which our directors possess. These strengths allow our Board, as a whole, to offer a comprehensive set of experiences, perspectives and expertise to guide our decision making. In some instances, we have intentionally sought more candidates with a specific attribute, such as CEO experience or retail industry experience, because such experience is particularly relevant to our business and valuable to our Board. In other instances, we have considered a candidate as a whole and concluded that he or she presents a variety of strengths that add to the richness of our Board. As a result, we may have a larger number of Board members with a particular strength or attribute; but it is our belief that all of these skills and experiences are of value and together allow for more thoughtful dialog and more effective execution of Board responsibilities.

​

​

​

​

​

​

BOARD DIVERSITY

​

​

​

Board Refreshment

The Board has a variety of mechanisms in place to promote Board refreshment in a manner that aligns with the long-term interests of AutoZone and its shareholders. In particular, the Board relies upon thorough and meaningful evaluations as well as a resignation policy in the event a director experiences a change in professional role or responsibility.

The Board does not have an age-based or tenure-based resignation policy. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and full Board reconsidered the issue this past fiscal year. After extensive discussion on the topic, the Board continues to believe neither can adequately assess an individual director’s contribution, engagement and value to the overall effectiveness of the Board. Instead, we believe thoughtful succession planning and reflection of the Board’s overall composition allow us to refresh the makeup of the Board in a more organic and intentional manner. In fact, this commitment to refreshment is evidenced by the fact that we have had eight directors with an average age of 66 choose not to stand for reelection over the last decade.

​

Director Tenure. The Board regularly considers the tenure of our independent directors, noting that Mr. Graves and Mr. Mrkonic have each served on the Board for greater than 15 years. Mr. Graves brings a wealth of experience and historical knowledge regarding the Board and how it has been most effective in executing its oversight responsibilities. Mr. Mrkonic has a deep understanding of both the Company as well as the retail industry as a whole, allowing him to challenge the status quo and offer insightful perspectives on matters of strategy, operations and corporate governance. For these reasons, the Board believes each of Mr. Graves and Mr. Mrkonic continues to be a valued member of the Board.

AutoZone has historically had a very tenured management team as is the case today. Just as we believe a “tenured” management team is a huge asset and key contributor of our tremendous success in delivering returns in excess of 15% compounded annually when measured over a 10, 20 or even 30-year period, we believe having seasoned board members is equally important. Similarly, our tenure on the management team could become a weakness if we didn’t successfully recruit new AutoZoners who have differentiated skills and experiences as we have done with the addition of four new Executive Committee members from outside the company in the last five years. We have the same beliefs on our Board composition. Overall, we need to have a broad set of skills and experiences. As we work through Board succession and overall tenure, we don’t simply apply a first-in-first-out methodology. Instead, we thoughtfully explore the skills, contributions and experiences we believe are most important in the ensuing years while also ensuring we have sufficient objectivity, freshness of perspectives and independence.

​

​

Board Evaluations

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews and approves the process by which the Board, its Committees and the individual directors conduct an evaluation. These evaluations help inform Board succession planning as well as contribute to different enhancements that may allow the Board to carry out its roles and responsibilities more effectively. The annual Board and Committee evaluation process is typically administered by the Corporate Secretary’s office. However, the Board has routinely engaged a third-party consultant to administer the process every few years to ensure the process remains dynamic and intentional. For example, for the fourth time in the past 11 years, at the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board evaluation was administered by an independent, third-party in 2024 and consisted of both survey data and one-on-one interviews. These findings were then aggregated, analyzed and reported to the full Board collectively and specific feedback was provided to each individual director. These qualitative and quantitative assessments provide detailed feedback to each director on their strengths and opportunities for enhanced contributions. They also facilitate more open dialog regarding directors’ intentions on service and serve as a key tool to Board succession planning.

Director Nominations

Prior to each annual meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers incumbent directors and other qualified individuals, if appropriate, as potential director nominees. In evaluating a potential nominee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the personal characteristics described above, reviews the composition of the full Board and reflects upon learnings from the Board evaluations to determine the areas of expertise and core competencies needed to enhance the effectiveness of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Board also consider the specific experiences and skills that an individual nominee possesses and how such experiences might be of value to the Board and the management team. Finally, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also consider other factors such as the size of the Board, whether a candidate is independent, the listing standards requirements of the NYSE and how many other public company directorships a candidate holds.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying potential nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through current Board members, shareholders or other persons. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may retain a search firm or other consulting firm from time to time to identify potential nominees. Nominees recommended by shareholders in accordance with the procedure described below, i.e., submitted in writing to AutoZone’s Secretary, accompanied by the biographical and business experience information regarding the nominee and the other information required by Article III, Section 1 of AutoZone’s Eighth Amended and Restated By-Laws (the “By-Laws”), will receive the same consideration as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s other potential nominees.

​

Director Nominations by Shareholders

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s policy is to consider director candidate recommendations from shareholders if they are submitted in writing to AutoZone’s Secretary in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article III, Section 1 of By-Laws, including biographical and business experience, information regarding the nominee and other information required by such provision in the By-laws. Copies of the By-Laws will be provided upon written request to AutoZone’s Corporate Secretary and are also available on AutoZone’s website at investors.autozone.com.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under AutoZone’s By-laws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than AutoZone’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) no later than October 19, 2025.

​

​

Director Compensation

AutoZone’s current director compensation program became effective January 1, 2024 (the “Director Compensation Program”).

Annual Retainer Fees. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer fee (the “Annual Retainer”). Furthermore, each director is eligible to receive an additional fee (“Additional Fee”), the amount of which varies depending on his or her role. The Additional Fees and the Annual Retainer, enumerated below, together comprise the “Director Compensation”. There are no meeting fees.

​

​

Under the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Award Plan (the “2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan”) and Director Compensation Program, non-employee directors receive Director Compensation in the form of immediately vested Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”). A non-employee director may elect to receive a fixed portion of the Annual Retainer plus any Additional Fees in the form of cash, paid in quarterly installments (the “Cash Election”), with the remainder of the Annual Retainer paid in the form of RSUs. The Cash Election during calendar year 2024 was $100,000 but all directors elected to receive compensation fully in RSUs. All RSUs are granted on January 1 of the applicable calendar year.

If a non-employee director is elected to the Board, or assumes a different position, after January 1, he or she will receive the Annual Retainer and/or Additional Fees, prorated based on the number of days remaining in the calendar year, for RSUs, or the number of days remaining in the quarter, for cash, as applicable.

RSUs granted to non-employee directors are fully vested on the date of grant and become payable, or are settled, on the date on which the non-employee director ceases to be a director (the “Payment Date”), or at the director’s election, on the first or fifth anniversary of the grant date. Upon timely delivery of an election form, a non-employee director may elect to receive payment on the date on which he or she ceases to be a director. RSUs are payable in shares of AutoZone common stock no later than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of the tax year in which such Payment Date occurs.

COMPENSATION-SETTING PROCESS. The Compensation Committee reviews the Board’s compensation on a biennial basis to ensure that non-employee directors are reasonably compensated in relation to AutoZone’s peer group companies (discussed in detail under Benchmarking) and to comparable U.S. companies in general. AutoZone’s 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan contains a dollar limit of $750,000 on the total amount of annual compensation payable to its non-employee directors, provided that the Board may make exceptions to this limit under extraordinary circumstances.

​

​

​

Director Compensation Table

This table shows the compensation paid to our non-employee directors during the 2024 fiscal year.

​

​

​

​

​

​

Stock Ownership Requirement. The Board has established a stock ownership requirement for non-employee directors. Each director is required to own AutoZone common stock and/or RSUs having a cumulative fair market value in an amount equal to seven times the value of the cash Annual Retainer payable pursuant to the Director Compensation Program within five years of joining the Board, and to maintain such ownership level thereafter. Exceptions to this requirement may only be made by the Board under compelling mitigating circumstances. Shares, Stock Units and RSUs issued under the AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan, the 2003 Director Compensation Plan, the 2011 Equity Plan, the Amended 2011 Equity Plan and the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan count toward this requirement. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, each director meets or exceeds his or her obligations under the requirement.

OTHER PREDECESSOR PLANS. The AutoZone, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Director Compensation Plan was terminated in December 2002 and was replaced by the AutoZone, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2003 Director Compensation Plan (the “2003 Director Compensation Plan”) and the AutoZone, Inc. First Amended and Restated 2003 Director Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Director Stock Option Plan”). The 2003 Director Compensation Plan and the 2003 Director Stock Option Plan were terminated in December 2010 and replaced by the 2011 Equity Plan. The 2011 Equity Plan was terminated in December 2015 and replaced with the Amended 2011 Equity Plan. In December 2020, shareholders approved the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan and no further grants have been made under the Amended 2011 Equity Plan. However, grants made under those plans continue in effect under the terms of the grant made and are included in the aggregate awards outstanding shown above.

​

​

​

Shareholder Engagement

We value our relationships with our shareholders, and we have a long-standing practice of engaging with our shareholders on matters of Board governance, executive compensation, long-term strategy and corporate social responsibility. We believe our engagement efforts allow us to better understand the priorities, perspectives, and concerns of our shareholders, strengthen our relationships with our shareholders and make more informed decisions for the benefit of our shareholders.

Engagement Team. Our engagement team typically includes one or more of our Executive Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Vice President of Investor Relations. However, depending on the specific topic that our investors may wish to discuss, we may have independent members of the Board, other members of our Executive Committee or internal subject-matter leaders participate.

​

​

​

Engagement Framework. Our engagement program has evolved over the years, consistent with the expectations of our investors. Historically, we have taken a more organic approach to shareholder engagement, primarily focused on financial performance and long-term strategy. In recent years, we invited shareholders to discuss governance or ESG topics with us, with the majority of these calls occurring “off-season” or not in connection with the annual meeting of shareholders. Today, we have a more intentional and proactive approach to shareholder engagement, in which we both invite and seek feedback and perspectives on a variety of topics during the year. We believe these various engagement efforts, whether they are part of a broad-based discussion or the result of a targeted outreach effort we have initiated, are invaluable as they allow us to better understand the priorities, perspectives and suggestions or concerns of our shareholders, strengthen our relationships and make more informed decisions for their benefit.

​

Recent Actions in Response to Shareholder Feedback. Below is a sample of new or revised practices we’ve adopted in direct response to feedback we’ve received from our shareholders.

​

FY24 Shareholder Engagement—Governance. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, we invited our top shareholders to a general structured discussion on a variety of topics as well as any other feedback or suggestions they might have for the Board to consider.