Foreign Currency Translation
The aggregate transaction gain or loss included in operations was insignificant for the three months ended March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019.
Newly Adopted and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard
|
Description
|
Financial Statement Effect or Other Significant Matters
|
|
|
|
ASU No. 2016-13
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)
|
The standard replaces the incurred loss model with the current expected credit loss (CECL) model to estimate credit losses for financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. The CECL model requires a Company to estimate credit losses expected over the life of the financial assets based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The provisions of the standard are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendment requires a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.
|
The Company adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2020. The standard changed the way entities recognize impairment of most financial assets. Short-term and long-term financial assets, as defined by the standard, are impacted by immediate recognition of estimated credit losses in the financial statements, reflecting the net amount expected to be collected. The adoption of this standard had an immaterial impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Date of adoption: Q1 2020
|
ASU No. 2018-13
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)
|
The standard removes the disclosure requirements for the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The provisions of this ASU are effective for years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.
|
This ASU did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements, as it only includes changes to disclosure requirements.
Date of adoption: Q1 2020
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard
|
Description
|
Financial Statement Effect or Other Significant Matters
|
ASU No. 2018-14
Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic 715-20)
|
The standard includes updates to the disclosure requirements for defined benefit plans including several additions, deletions and modifications to the disclosure requirements. The provisions of this ASU are effective for years beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted.
|
This ASU does not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements, as it only includes changes to disclosure requirements.
Planned date of adoption: Q1 2021
|
ASU No. 2019-12
Income Taxes (Topic 740), Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes
|
The amendments in this update simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and improve consistent application by clarifying and amending existing guidance. The amendments of this standard are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not been issued, with the amendments to be applied on a respective, modified retrospective or prospective basis, depending on the specific amendment.
|
The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of this standard. The standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
Planned date of adoption: Q1 2021
|
ASU No. 2020-04
Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848), Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting
|
The amendments in Update 2020-04 are elective and apply to all entities that have contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform. The new guidance provides the following optional expedients: simplify accounting analyses under current U.S. GAAP for contract modifications, simplify the assessment of hedge effectiveness, allow hedging relationships affected by reference rate reform to continue and allow a one-time election to sell or transfer debt securities classified as held to maturity that reference a rate affected by reference rate reform.
|
The amendments are effective for all entities from the beginning of an interim period that includes the issuance date of the ASU. An entity may elect to apply the amendments prospectively through December 31, 2022. After 2021, it is unclear whether banks will continue to provide LIBOR submissions to the administrator of LIBOR, and no consensus currently exists as to what benchmark rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.
|
We consider the applicability and impact of all ASUs. ASUs not listed above were assessed and determined to be either not applicable, or had or are expected to have minimal impact on our financial statements and related disclosures.
2) Revenue
Revenue is recognized when, or as, the Company transfers control of promised products or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring those products or services. Sales shown on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations are from contracts with customers.
Payment terms and conditions vary by contract, although terms generally include a requirement of payment within a range from 30 to 90 days after the performance obligation has been satisfied; or in certain cases, up-front deposits. In circumstances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that the Company's contracts generally do not include a significant financing component. Taxes collected from customers, which are subsequently remitted to governmental authorities, are excluded from sales.
The Company recognizes an asset for the incremental, material costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if the Company expects the benefit of those costs to be longer than one year and the costs are expected to be recovered. These incremental costs include, but are not limited to, sales commissions incurred to obtain a contract with a customer. As of March 28, 2020, the Company does not have material incremental costs on any open contracts with an original expected duration of greater than one year.
The Company recognizes an asset for certain, material costs to fulfill a contract if it is determined that the costs relate directly to a contract or an anticipated contract that can be specifically identified, generate or enhance resources that will be used in satisfying performance obligations in the future, and are expected to be recovered. Such costs are amortized on a systematic basis that is consistent with the transfer to the customer of the goods to which the asset relates. Start-up costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized fulfillment costs are included in Inventories in the accompanying Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets. Should future orders not materialize or it is determined the costs are no longer probable of recovery, the capitalized costs are written off. As of March 28, 2020, the Company does not have material capitalized fulfillment costs.
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account. The majority of our contracts have a single performance obligation as the promise to transfer the individual goods or services is not separately identifiable from other promises in the contracts which are, therefore, not distinct. Thus, the contract's transaction price is the revenue recognized when or as that performance obligation is satisfied. Promised goods or services that are immaterial in the context of the contract are not separately assessed as performance obligations.
Some of our contracts have multiple performance obligations, most commonly due to the contract covering multiple phases of the product lifecycle (development, production, maintenance and support). For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the contract’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation using our best estimate of the standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract. The primary method used to estimate standalone selling price is the expected cost plus margin approach, under which expected costs are forecast to satisfy a performance obligation and then an appropriate margin is added for that distinct good or service. Shipping and handling activities that occur after the customer has obtained control of the good are considered fulfillment activities, not performance obligations.
Some of our contracts offer price discounts or free units after a specified volume has been purchased. The Company evaluates these options to determine whether they provide a material right to the customer, representing a separate performance obligation. If the option provides a material right to the customer, revenue is allocated to these rights and recognized when those future goods or services are transferred, or when the option expires.
Contract modifications are routine in the performance of our contracts. Contracts are often modified to account for changes in contract specifications or requirements. In most instances, contract modifications are for goods or services that are distinct, and, therefore, are accounted for as new contracts. The effect of modifications has been reflected when identifying the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, determining the transaction price and allocating the transaction price.
The majority of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers is recognized at a point in time, when the customer obtains control of the promised product, which is generally upon delivery and acceptance by the customer. These contracts may provide credits or incentives, which may be accounted for as variable consideration. Variable consideration is estimated at the most likely amount to predict the consideration to which the Company will be entitled, and only to the extent it is probable that a subsequent change in estimate will not result in a significant revenue reversal when estimating the amount of revenue to recognize. Variable consideration is treated as a change to the sales transaction price and based on an assessment of all information (i.e., historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available to the Company, and estimated at contract inception and updated at the end of each reporting period as additional information becomes available. Most of our contracts do not contain rights to return product; where this right does exist, it is evaluated as possible variable consideration.
For contracts that are subject to the requirement to accrue anticipated losses, the company recognizes the entire anticipated loss in the period that the loss becomes probable.
For contracts with customers in which the Company promises to provide a product to the customer that has no alternative use to the Company and the Company has enforceable rights to payment for progress completed to date inclusive of profit, the Company satisfies the performance obligation and recognizes revenue over time, using costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs at completion to measure progress toward satisfying our performance obligations. Incurred cost represents work performed, which corresponds with, and thereby best depicts, the transfer of control to the customer. Contract costs include labor, material and overhead.
The Company also recognizes revenue from service contracts (including service-type warranties) over time. The Company recognizes revenue over time during the term of the agreement as the customer is simultaneously receiving and consuming the benefits provided throughout the Company’s performance. The Company typically recognizes revenue on a straight-line basis throughout the contract period.
On March 28, 2020, we had $369.4 million of remaining performance obligations, which we refer to as total backlog. We expect to recognize approximately $268.1 million of our remaining performance obligations as revenue in 2020. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company received order cancellations from customers subsequent to the period ending March 28,
2020. Of the Company’s backlog at March 28, 2020 of $369.4 million, $3.0 million is no longer expected to be recognized as revenue as a result of order cancellations received subsequent to quarter end in the Aerospace segment.
Costs in excess of billings includes unbilled amounts resulting from revenues under contracts with customers that are satisfied over time and when the cost-to-cost measurement method of revenue recognition is utilized and revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer, and right to payment is not just subject to the passage of time. Amounts may not exceed their net realizable value. Costs in excess of billings are classified as current assets, within Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts on our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet.
Billings in excess of cost includes billings in excess of revenue recognized as well as other elements of deferred revenue, which includes advanced payments, up-front payments, and progress billing payments. Billings in excess of cost are reported in our Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet classified as current liabilities, within Customer Advance Payments and Deferred Revenue, and non-current liabilities, within Other Liabilities. To determine the revenue recognized in the period from the beginning balance of billings in excess of cost, the contract liability as of the beginning of the period is recognized as revenue on a contract-by-contract basis when the Company satisfies the performance obligation related to the individual contract. Once the beginning contract liability balance for an individual contract has been fully recognized as revenue, any additional payments received in the period are recognized as revenue once the related costs have been incurred.
We recognized $8.7 million and $8.2 million during the three months ended March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, respectively, in revenues that were included in the contract liability balance at the beginning of the period.
The Company's contract assets and contract liabilities consist primarily of costs and profits in excess of billings and billings in excess of cost and profits, respectively. The following table presents the beginning and ending balances of contract assets and contract liabilities during the three months ended March 28, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Contract Assets
|
Contract Liabilities
|
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2020
|
|
$
|
19,567
|
|
$
|
38,758
|
|
Ending Balance, March 28, 2020
|
|
$
|
17,127
|
|
$
|
37,750
|
|
The following table presents our revenue disaggregated by Market Segments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Transport
|
|
$
|
102,775
|
|
|
$
|
141,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
Military
|
|
18,113
|
|
20,953
|
|
|
|
|
Business Jet
|
|
15,006
|
|
19,837
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
5,176
|
|
5,933
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace Total
|
|
141,070
|
|
188,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test Systems Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor
|
|
1,634
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense
|
|
14,880
|
|
16,319
|
|
|
|
|
Test Systems Total
|
|
16,514
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
157,584
|
|
|
$
|
208,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents our revenue disaggregated by Product Lines as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Power & Motion
|
|
$
|
69,456
|
|
|
$
|
92,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lighting & Safety
|
|
37,922
|
|
48,605
|
|
|
|
|
Avionics
|
|
22,143
|
|
33,861
|
|
|
|
|
Systems Certification
|
|
3,331
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
|
|
Structures
|
|
3,042
|
|
5,947
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
5,176
|
|
5,933
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace Total
|
|
141,070
|
|
188,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test Systems
|
|
16,514
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
157,584
|
|
|
$
|
208,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Finished Goods
|
$
|
33,452
|
|
|
$
|
33,434
|
|
Work in Progress
|
29,742
|
|
|
25,594
|
|
Raw Material
|
88,604
|
|
|
86,759
|
|
|
$
|
151,798
|
|
|
$
|
145,787
|
|
The Company has evaluated the carrying value of existing inventories and believe they are properly reflected at their lower of carrying value or net realizable value. Future changes in demand or other market developments could result in future inventory charges. The Company is actively managing inventories and aligning them to meet known current and future demand.
4) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Land
|
$
|
9,795
|
|
|
$
|
9,802
|
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
74,817
|
|
|
74,723
|
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
116,906
|
|
|
115,202
|
|
Construction in Progress
|
5,752
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
|
207,270
|
|
|
205,180
|
|
Less Accumulated Depreciation
|
95,748
|
|
|
92,681
|
|
|
$
|
111,522
|
|
|
$
|
112,499
|
|
Additionally, net Property, Plant and Equipment of $1.5 million are classified in Assets Held for Sale at December 31, 2019. Refer to Note 18.
5) Intangible Assets
The following table summarizes acquired intangible assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Weighted
Average Life
|
|
Gross Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
Gross Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Patents
|
11 years
|
|
$
|
2,146
|
|
|
$
|
1,826
|
|
|
$
|
2,146
|
|
|
$
|
1,804
|
|
Non-compete Agreement
|
4 years
|
|
11,318
|
|
|
8,363
|
|
|
11,318
|
|
|
7,696
|
|
Trade Names
|
10 years
|
|
11,433
|
|
|
6,797
|
|
|
11,438
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
Completed and Unpatented Technology
|
9 years
|
|
48,192
|
|
|
22,268
|
|
|
48,201
|
|
|
21,196
|
|
Customer Relationships
|
15 years
|
|
142,194
|
|
|
53,021
|
|
|
142,212
|
|
|
50,776
|
|
Total Intangible Assets
|
12 years
|
|
$
|
215,283
|
|
|
$
|
92,275
|
|
|
$
|
215,315
|
|
|
$
|
88,022
|
|
All acquired intangible assets other than goodwill and one trade name are being amortized. Amortization expense for acquired intangibles is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization Expense
|
|
$
|
4,265
|
|
|
$
|
4,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets expected for 2020 and for each of the next five years is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2020
|
$
|
17,198
|
|
2021
|
$
|
15,404
|
|
2022
|
$
|
14,973
|
|
2023
|
$
|
13,938
|
|
2024
|
$
|
12,917
|
|
2025
|
$
|
10,994
|
|
6) Goodwill
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 28, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
Impairment Charges
|
|
Foreign
Currency
Translation
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
Aerospace
|
$
|
123,038
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(73,704)
|
|
|
$
|
(269)
|
|
|
$
|
49,065
|
|
Test Systems
|
21,932
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
21,932
|
|
|
$
|
144,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(73,704)
|
|
|
$
|
(269)
|
|
|
$
|
70,997
|
|
Goodwill Impairment Testing
The Company tests goodwill at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
In the first quarter of 2020, the World Health Organization characterized COVID-19 a pandemic, and the President of the United States declared the COVID-19 outbreak a national emergency. The United States, France, Canada and many other countries have issued formal stay-at-home orders to combat the pandemic, which require residents to stay home and non-essential businesses to temporarily close.
Beginning in the first quarter of 2020 the pandemic negatively impacted the global economy and aerospace industry resulting in an abrupt and significant decrease of airline passenger travel. In response, the global airlines grounded a significant portion of
their fleet and are likely to defer or cancel aircraft scheduled for delivery this year. Additionally, airlines have announced plans to reduce capital and discretionary spending to conserve cash in the immediate future. In turn, aircraft manufacturers and tier one suppliers have experienced a disruption in production and demand as their customers defer delivery of new aircraft, resulting in slowed or halted production at facilities throughout the world. Commercial airlines and manufacturers are focusing on conserving cash to preserve liquidity, which will have a negative impact on airframe and aftermarket sales as compared with pre-pandemic forecasts.
Management considered these qualitative factors and the impact to each reporting unit’s revenue and earnings, and determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of several reporting units is less than its carrying value. Therefore, we performed a quantitative test for all eight reporting units with goodwill as of March 28, 2020.
Quantitative testing requires a comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. We use the discounted cash flow method to estimate the fair value of our reporting units. The discounted cash flow method incorporates various assumptions, the most significant being projected sales growth rates, operating margins and cash flows, the terminal growth rate and the weighted average cost of capital. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and any loss must be measured. Accordingly, goodwill impairment is measured as the amount by which a reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill.
We determined that the estimated fair value of four of the eight reporting units with goodwill significantly exceeded their respective carrying values and therefore, did not result in a goodwill impairment.
For the remaining four reporting units with goodwill, we determined that the estimated fair value was less than their respective carrying values. As a result, we recorded non-cash goodwill impairment charges of approximately $73.7 million in the Aerospace segment, reported within the Impairment Loss line of the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations in the three months ended March 28, 2020.
We recognized full impairments of the goodwill of our Astronics Connectivity Systems and Certification (“ACSC”), PGA and Custom Control Concepts (“CCC”) reporting units, and a partial impairment of the goodwill of our PECO reporting unit. The goodwill remaining in our PECO reporting unit after the write off is $32.8 million. For the PECO reporting unit with a partial goodwill write-off, the Company performed sensitivity analyses, utilizing reasonably possible changes in the assumption for the discount rate and revenue growth rates to demonstrate the potential impacts to the estimated fair value. In isolation, a 100 basis point increase to the discount rate or a 100 basis point decrease to the normalized revenue growth rate, would result in incremental impairment charges of $9.3 million or $4.4 million, respectively.
There is greater risk of future impairments in the reporting unit with partial impairment as any further deterioration in its performance compared to forecast, as well as any changes in economic forecasts and expected recovery in the aerospace industry, may require the Company to complete additional interim impairment tests in future quarters and could result in the reporting unit’s fair value again falling below carrying value in subsequent quarters. Further, if the composition of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities were to change and result in an increase in the reporting unit’s carrying value, it could lead to additional impairment testing and further impairment losses.
7) Long-term Debt and Notes Payable
The Company's Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) provided for a $500 million revolving credit line with the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. The maturity date of the loans under the Agreement is February 16, 2023. At March 28, 2020, there was $333.0 million outstanding on the revolving credit facility and there remained $165.5 million available, net of outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees. The credit facility allocates up to $20 million of the $500 million revolving credit line for the issuance of letters of credit, including certain existing letters of credit. At March 28, 2020, outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees totaled $1.5 million.
The maximum permitted leverage ratio of funded debt, net of cash to Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the Agreement) was 3.75 to 1, increasing to 4.50 to 1 for up to four fiscal quarters following the closing of an acquisition permitted under the Agreement, subject to limitations. The Company was in compliance with its financial covenant at March 28, 2020. The Company paid interest on the unpaid principal amount of the facility at a rate equal to one-, three- or six-month LIBOR plus between 1.00% and 1.50% based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company also paid a commitment fee to the lenders in an amount equal to between 0.10% and 0.20% on the undrawn portion of the credit facility, based upon the Company’s leverage ratio.
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the global economy, and particularly the aerospace industry, resulting in reduced expectations of the Company’s future operating results. As a result, the Company was projected to exceed its maximum permitted leverage ratio in the fourth quarter of 2020. Accordingly, on May 4, 2020, the Company executed an amendment to the Agreement (the “amended facility”), which reduced the revolving credit line from $500 million to $375 million. There remains the option to increase the line by up to $150 million. The amended facility suspends the application of the leverage ratio up through and including the second quarter of 2021 (the “suspension period”). The maximum net leverage ratio will be 6.00 to 1 for the third quarter of 2021, 5.50 to 1 for the fourth quarter of 2021, 4.50 to 1 for the first quarter of 2022, and return to 3.75 to 1 for each quarter thereafter.
During the suspension period, the amended facility requires the Company to maintain minimum liquidity, defined as unrestricted cash plus the unused revolving credit commitments, of $180 million at all times, and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 1.75x on a quarterly basis, except for the first quarter of 2021, which is set at 1.50x. During the suspension period, the Company will pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the amended facility at a rate equal to one-, three- or six-month LIBOR (which shall be at least 1.00%) plus 2.25%. The Company will also pay a commitment fee to the lenders in an amount equal to 0.35% on the undrawn portion of the credit facility. After the suspension period, the Company will pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the amended facility at a rate equal to one-, three- or six-month LIBOR (which shall be at least 1.00%) plus between 1.00% to 2.25% based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company will also pay a commitment fee to the lenders in an amount equal to 0.10% to 0.35% on the undrawn portion of the credit facility, based upon the Company’s leverage ratio. The amended facility provides for the payment of a consent fee of 15 basis points of the commitment for each consenting lender.
The amended facility also temporarily restricts certain activities, including acquisitions and share repurchases, and requires mandatory repayments during the suspension period when the Company’s cash balance exceeds $100 million. We expect to make a mandatory repayment in the second quarter of 2020 under this requirement.
The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement as amended are jointly and severally guaranteed by each domestic subsidiary of the Company other than non-material subsidiaries. The obligations are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ assets.
In the event of voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy of the Company or any subsidiary, all unpaid principal and other amounts owing under the Credit Agreement automatically become due and payable. Other events of default, such as failure to make payments as they become due and breach of financial and other covenants, change of control, judgments over a certain amount, and cross default under other agreements give the agent the option to declare all such amounts immediately due and payable.
8) Product Warranties
In the ordinary course of business, the Company warrants its products against defects in design, materials and workmanship typically over periods ranging from twelve to sixty months. The Company determines warranty reserves needed by product line based on experience and current facts and circumstances. Activity in the warranty accrual is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
$
|
7,660
|
|
|
$
|
5,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties Divested or Acquired
|
|
—
|
|
|
(123)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties Issued
|
|
877
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranties Settled
|
|
(691)
|
|
|
(588)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reassessed Warranty Exposure
|
|
(724)
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
$
|
7,122
|
|
|
$
|
4,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
9) Leases
The Company has operating and finance leases for leased office and manufacturing facilities and equipment leases. We have concluded that when an agreement grants us the right to substantially all of the economic benefits associated with an identified asset, and we are able to direct the use of that asset throughout the term of the agreement, we have a lease. We lease certain facilities and office equipment under finance leases, and we lease certain production facilities, office equipment and vehicles under operating leases. Some of our leases include options to extend or terminate the leases and these options have been included in the relevant lease term to the extent that they are reasonably certain to be exercised.
The weighted-average remaining term for the Company's operating and financing leases are approximately 7 years and 2 years, respectively. The weighted-average discount rates for the Company's operating and financing leases are approximately 3.3% and 5.3%, respectively.
The following is a summary of the Company's ROU assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
Operating Leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Right-of-Use Assets, Gross
|
$
|
28,988
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,788
|
|
|
|
Less Accumulated Right-of-Use Asset Impairment
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
Less Accumulated Amortization
|
5,260
|
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
Operating Right-of-Use Assets, Net
|
$
|
22,018
|
|
|
$
|
23,602
|
|
|
|
Short-term Operating Lease Liabilities
|
$
|
4,687
|
|
|
$
|
4,517
|
|
|
|
Long-term Operating Lease Liabilities
|
19,992
|
|
|
21,039
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Liabilities
|
$
|
24,679
|
|
|
$
|
25,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Right-of-Use Assets, Gross
|
$
|
3,484
|
|
|
$
|
3,484
|
|
|
|
Less Accumulated Amortization
|
1,275
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
Finance Right-of-Use Assets, Net — Included in Other Assets
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
|
$
|
2,464
|
|
|
|
Short-term Finance Lease Liabilities — Included in Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
$
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
Long-term Finance Lease Liabilities — Included in Other Liabilities
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
Finance Lease Liabilities
|
$
|
4,276
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,737
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Company's total lease costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Lease Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of ROU Assets
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Lease Liabilities
|
63
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Finance Lease Cost
|
$
|
318
|
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Cost
|
$
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right-of-Use Asset Impairment
|
691
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Lease Cost
|
272
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Lease Cost (excluding month-to-month)
|
67
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Sublease and Rental (Income) Expense
|
(331)
|
|
|
|
(212)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Lease Cost
|
$
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Lease Cost
|
$
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the Company's maturity of lease liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
Finance Leases
|
2020
|
|
$
|
3,933
|
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
2021
|
|
5,470
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
2022
|
|
5,278
|
|
|
743
|
|
2023
|
|
3,904
|
|
|
—
|
|
2024
|
|
2,837
|
|
|
—
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
5,941
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Lease Payments
|
|
$
|
27,363
|
|
|
$
|
4,529
|
|
Less: Interest
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
253
|
|
Total Lease Liability
|
|
$
|
24,679
|
|
|
$
|
4,276
|
|
10) Income Taxes
The effective tax rates were approximately 3.3% and 22.6% for the three months ended March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019, respectively. The 2020 tax rate was impacted by permanently non-deductible goodwill impairments and a Federal valuation allowance recorded during the three months ended March 28, 2020 of approximately $7.0 million.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted in response to the economic uncertainty resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act includes many measures to assist companies, including temporary changes to income and non-income based laws, some of which were enacted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”). Some of the key changes include eliminating the 80% of taxable income limitation by allowing corporate entities to fully utilize net operating losses (“NOL”) to offset taxable income in 2018, 2019 and 2020, allowing NOLs originating in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to be carried back five years and retroactively clarifying the immediate recovery of qualified improvement property costs rather than over a 39-year recovery period. During the three months ended March 28, 2020, the Company recorded a $0.7 million benefit relating to the NOL carryback provisions and the technical correction for qualified improvement property provided for in the CARES Act. The Company will continue to monitor additional guidance issued and assess the impact that various provisions will have on its business.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and its adverse effects on the global economy and aerospace industry that began to take shape in the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company is now forecasting to generate a taxable loss in 2020 which can be carried back under the CARES Act to recover previously paid income taxes. After consideration of deferred tax liabilities that reverse in 2021 and beyond, the Company must rely on future taxable income in 2021 and beyond for purposes of asserting that the Company’s remaining U.S. Federal deferred tax assets are realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis as required under ASC 740. Losses in recent periods and projected losses, combined with the significant uncertainty brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, is collectively considered significant negative evidence under ASC 740 when assessing whether an entity can use projected income as a basis for concluding that deferred tax assets are realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis. Accordingly, during the three months ended March 28, 2020, the Company determined that a portion of its deferred tax assets are not expected to be realizable in the future. As a result, the Company recorded a partial valuation allowance of approximately $7.0 million during the three months ended March 28, 2020 against its U.S. Federal deferred tax assets.
11) Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares - Basic
|
|
30,814
|
|
|
32,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options
|
|
—
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares - Diluted
|
|
30,814
|
|
|
33,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options with exercise prices greater than the average market price of the underlying common shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they are out-of-the-money and the effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The number of common shares covered by out-of-the-money stock options was approximately 785,000 shares as of
March 28, 2020 and 154,000 shares as of March 30, 2019. Further, due to our net loss in the three month period ended March 28, 2020, the assumed exercise of stock compensation had an antidilutive effect and therefore was excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share. The number of instruments not included in the computation of diluted loss per share was 440,211 as of March 28, 2020.
12) Shareholders' Equity
Share Buyback Program
The Company’s Board of Directors from time to time authorizes the repurchase of common stock, which allows the Company to purchase shares of its common stock in accordance with applicable securities laws on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Most recently, on September 17, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a repurchase of up to $50 million. Approximately 282,000 shares were repurchased in the first quarter of 2020 at a cost of $7.7 million before the 10b5-1 plan associated with the share repurchase program was terminated on February 3, 2020.
Comprehensive (Loss) Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
$
|
(9,346)
|
|
|
$
|
(7,042)
|
|
Retirement Liability Adjustment – Before Tax
|
(10,596)
|
|
|
(10,868)
|
|
Tax Benefit of Retirement Liability Adjustment
|
2,225
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
Retirement Liability Adjustment – After Tax
|
(8,371)
|
|
|
(8,586)
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
$
|
(17,717)
|
|
|
$
|
(15,628)
|
|
The components of other comprehensive (loss) income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
$
|
(2,304)
|
|
|
$
|
(270)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Liability Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications to General and Administrative Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
|
101
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses
|
171
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Benefit
|
(57)
|
|
|
(36)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Liability Adjustment
|
215
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
$
|
(2,089)
|
|
|
$
|
(120)
|
|
|
|
|
|
13) Supplemental Retirement Plan and Related Post Retirement Benefits
The Company has two non-qualified supplemental retirement defined benefit plans (“SERP” and “SERP II”) for certain executive officers. The following table sets forth information regarding the net periodic pension cost for the plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Cost
|
209
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
|
97
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses
|
162
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Cost
|
$
|
523
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants in the SERP are entitled to paid medical, dental and long-term care insurance benefits upon retirement under the plan. The following table sets forth information regarding the net periodic cost recognized for those benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Cost
|
9
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Net Actuarial Losses
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Cost
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
14) Sales to Major Customers
The Company has a significant concentration of business with two major customers, each in excess of 10% of consolidated sales. The loss of either of these customers would significantly, negatively impact our sales and earnings.
Sales to these two customers represented 17% and 9% of consolidated sales for the three months ended March 28, 2020. Sales to these customers were primarily in the Aerospace segment. Accounts receivable from these customers at March 28, 2020 was approximately $30.1 million. Sales to these two customers represented 13% and 14% of consolidated sales for the three months ended March 30, 2019.
15) Legal Proceedings
On December 29, 2010, Lufthansa Technik AG (“Lufthansa”) filed a Statement of Claim in the Regional State Court of Mannheim, Germany. Lufthansa’s claim asserted that a subsidiary of the Company, AES, sold, marketed, and brought into use in Germany a power supply system that infringes upon a German patent held by Lufthansa. Lufthansa sought an order requiring AES to stop selling and marketing the allegedly infringing power supply system, a recall of allegedly infringing products sold to commercial customers in Germany since November 26, 2003, and compensation for damages related to direct sales of the allegedly infringing power supply system in Germany (referred to as “direct sales”). The claim did not specify an estimate of damages and a related damages claim is being pursued by Lufthansa in separate court proceedings in an action filed in July 2017, as further discussed below.
In February 2015, the Regional State Court of Mannheim, Germany rendered its decision that the patent was infringed. The judgment did not require AES to recall products that are already installed in aircraft or had been sold to other end users. On July 15, 2015, Lufthansa advised AES of their intention to enforce the accounting provisions of the decision, which required AES to provide certain financial information regarding direct sales of the infringing product in Germany to enable Lufthansa to make an estimate of requested damages.
The Company appealed to the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe. On November 15, 2016, the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe issued its ruling and upheld the lower court’s decision. The Company submitted a petition to grant AES leave for appeal to the German Federal Supreme Court. On April 18, 2018, the German Federal Supreme Court granted Astronics’ petition in part, namely with respect to the part concerning the amount of damages. On January 8, 2019, the German Federal Supreme Court held the hearing on the appeal. By judgment of March 26, 2019, the German Federal Supreme Court dismissed AES's appeal. With this decision, the above-mentioned proceedings are complete.
In July 2017, Lufthansa filed an action in the Regional State Court of Mannheim for payment of damages caused by the court’s decision that AES infringed the patent, specifically related to direct sales of the product into Germany (associated with the original December 2010 action discussed above). In this action, which was served to AES on April 11, 2018, Lufthansa claimed payment of approximately $6.2 million plus interest. An oral hearing was held on September 13, 2019. A first instance decision in this matter was handed down on December 6, 2019. According to this ruling, Lufthansa was awarded damages in the amount of approximately $3.2 million plus interest. Inclusive of interest, this equates to approximately $4.5 million through December 31, 2019. Interest will continue to accrue at a statutory rate until final payment to Lufthansa. In February 2020, and again in April 2020, we received notice that Lufthansa’s intention is to provide a security and to enforce payment on the first instance judgment. If Lufthansa provides a security deposit or a bank guarantee in a sufficient amount, as they have stated is their intention, the Company will be required to remit the payment. Based on this information, we believe payment for damages and interest on the direct sales claim will be required in 2020. AES has appealed this decision and the appeal is currently pending before the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe. If the first instance judgment is later reversed on appeal, the Company could
reclaim any amounts that were previously paid to Lufthansa as far as the payments exceed the amount awarded by the appellate court, but there can be no assurances that we will be successful on such appeal. Prior to 2019, the Company had accrued $1.0 million related to this matter. As a result of the judgment on direct sales into Germany, the Company has reflected an incremental reserve of $3.5 million in its December 31, 2019 financial statements related to this matter, for a total reserve of $4.5 million. Interest accrues at a rate of 5% above the European Central Bank rate until final payment to Lufthansa. Inclusive of accrued interest, the reserve for the direct claim is $4.7 million at March 28, 2020.
On December 29, 2017, Lufthansa filed another infringement action against AES in the Regional State Court of Mannheim claiming that sales by AES to its international customers have infringed Lufthansa's patent if AES's customers later shipped the products to Germany (referred to as “indirect sales”). This action, therefore, addresses sales other than those covered by the action filed on December 29, 2010, discussed above. In this action, served on April 11, 2018, Lufthansa sought an order obliging AES to provide information and accounting and a finding that AES owes damages for the attacked indirect sales.
Moreover, Lufthansa sought accounting and a finding that the sale of individual components of the EmPower system – either directly to Germany or to international customers if these customers later shipped these products to Germany – constitutes an indirect patent infringement of Lufthansa's patent in Germany. In addition, Lufthansa sought an order obliging AES to confirm by an affidavit that the accounting provided in September 2015 was accurate and a finding that AES is also liable for damages for the sale of modified products if the modification of the products was not communicated to all subsequent buyers of the products. No amount of claimed damages has been specified by Lufthansa.
An oral hearing in this matter was held on September 13, 2019, as part of the oral hearing for the direct sales damages claim discussed above. A first instance decision in this matter was handed down on December 6, 2019. According to this judgment, Lufthansa's claims were granted in part. The court granted Lufthansa's claims for a finding that indirect sales (as defined above) by AES to international customers constitute a patent infringement under the conditions specified in the judgment and that the sale of components of the EmPower system to Germany constitutes an indirect patent infringement. Moreover, the Court granted Lufthansa's request for an affidavit confirming that the accounting provided in September 2015 was accurate. The Court rejected Lufthansa's request for a finding that AES is also liable for damages for the sale of modified products as inadmissible. This is relevant, as it provides that once AES modified the system to remove the infringing feature, any subsequent outlets are deemed not to be infringing outlets for purposes of calculating damages. AES and Lufthansa both appealed this decision and the appeal is currently pending before the Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe. In its appeal, Lufthansa extended its action by requesting an additional finding that AES shall be held liable for all damages that Lufthansa incurred due to an alleged incorrect accounting of its past sales. No amount was quantified in Lufthansa's additional motion. The appeal is not likely to be settled in 2020.
If the decision is confirmed on appeal, AES would be responsible for payment of damages for indirect sales of patent-infringing EmPower in-seat power supply systems in the period from December 29, 2007 to May 22, 2018. AES modified the outlet units at the end of 2014 and substantially all of the modified outlet units sold from 2015 do not infringe the patent of Lufthansa. Since only sales of systems comprising patent-infringing outlet units trigger damages claims, the period for which AES is liable for damages in connection with indirect sales substantially finished at the end of 2014.
After the accounting, Lufthansa is expected to enforce its claim for damages in separate court proceedings. These proceedings would probably be tried before the Mannheim Court again, which makes it probable that the Mannheim court will determine the damages for the indirect sales on the basis of the same principles as in the direct sales proceedings (unless the latter ruling of the Mannheim court is reversed on appeal). Based on the information available currently, we estimate that the resulting damages would be approximately $11.6 million plus approximately $4.5 million of accrued interest at the end of 2019, for a total of approximately $16.1 million at December 31, 2019. Similar to the direct sales claim, interest will accrue at a rate of 5% above the European Central Bank rate until final payment to Lufthansa. Inclusive of accrued interest, the reserve for the indirect claim is approximately $16.2 million at March 28, 2020.
Based upon the determination of the damages in the direct sales claim discussed above, in the March 28, 2020 consolidated financial statements, we have reflected a total accrual (inclusive of interest through December 31, 2019) of $4.7 million related to the direct sales claim, and $16.2 million related to the indirect sales claim as management’s best estimate of the total exposure related to these matters that is probable and that can be reasonably estimated at this time. Interest accrued for the three months ended March 28, 2020 was approximately $0.3 million and is recorded within Selling, General and Administrative Expense in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations. We estimate that payment for the damages and related interest of the direct sales claim will be paid before December 31, 2020, therefore the liability related to this matter, totaling $4.7 million, is classified within Other Accrued Expenses (current) in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2019. In connection with the indirect sales claims, we currently believe it is unlikely that the appeals process will be completed and the damages and related interest will be paid before December 31, 2020. Therefore the liability related to this matter, totaling $16.2 million, is classified within Other Liabilities (non-current) in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 28, 2020.
In December 2017, Lufthansa filed patent infringement cases in the United Kingdom (“UK”) and in France against AES. The Lufthansa patent expired in May 2018. In those cases, Lufthansa accuses AES of having manufactured, used, sold and offered for sale a power supply system, and offered and supplied parts for a power supply system that infringed upon a Lufthansa patent in those respective countries. In the UK matter, LHT has also brought proceeding against two of AES’s customers in relation to acts done by them with AES supplied parts and a combined trial has been scheduled for June 2020 to address the issues of infringement and validity. The France and UK claims are separate and apart from the claims in Germany and validity and infringement of the Lufthansa patent will first need to be determined by the courts in these countries, whose laws differ from those in Germany. Also the principles of calculating damages in German patent infringement proceedings differ substantially from the calculation methods in the UK and France. Therefore the Company has assessed this separate from the German claims. However, it is reasonably possible that additional damages and interest could be incurred if the courts in France and the UK were to rule in favor of Lufthansa, but at this time we cannot reasonably estimate the range of loss. As loss exposure is neither probable nor estimable at this time, the Company has not recorded any liability with respect to these matters as of March 28, 2020.
On November 26, 2014, Lufthansa filed a complaint in the United States District for the Western District of Washington. Lufthansa’s complaint in that action alleges that AES manufactures, uses, sells and offers for sale a power supply system that infringes upon a U.S. patent held by Lufthansa. The patent at issue in the U.S. action is based on technology similar to that involved in the German action. On April 25, 2016, the Court issued its ruling on claim construction, holding that the sole independent claim in the patent is indefinite, rendering all claims in the patent indefinite. Based on this ruling, AES filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the Court’s ruling that the patent is indefinite renders the patent invalid and unenforceable. On July 20, 2016, the U.S. District Court granted the motion for summary judgment and issued an order dismissing all claims against AES with prejudice.
Lufthansa appealed the District Court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On October 19, 2017, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision, holding that the sole independent claim of the patent is indefinite, rending all claims on the patent indefinite. Lufthansa did not file a petition for en banc rehearing or petition the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. Therefore, there is no longer a risk of exposure from that lawsuit.
16) Segment Information
Below are the sales and operating profit by segment for the three months ended March 28, 2020 and March 30, 2019 and a reconciliation of segment operating profit to income before income taxes. Operating profit is net sales less cost of products sold and other operating expenses excluding interest and corporate expenses. Cost of products sold and other operating expenses are directly identifiable to the respective segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
March 30, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace
|
|
$
|
141,137
|
|
|
$
|
188,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Intersegment Sales
|
|
(67)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Aerospace Sales
|
|
141,070
|
|
|
188,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test Systems
|
|
16,553
|
|
|
19,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Intersegment Sales
|
|
(39)
|
|
|
(51)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Test Systems Sales
|
|
16,514
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consolidated Sales
|
|
$
|
157,584
|
|
|
$
|
208,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (Loss) Profit and Margins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace
|
|
$
|
(63,145)
|
|
|
$
|
25,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.8)
|
%
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Test Systems
|
|
722
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating (Loss) Profit
|
|
(62,423)
|
|
|
27,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.6)
|
%
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Additions/Deductions from Operating (Loss) Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Sale of Business
|
|
—
|
|
|
80,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Expenses and Other
|
|
5,521
|
|
|
5,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
(69,277)
|
|
|
$
|
100,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
March 28, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Aerospace
|
|
$
|
545,378
|
|
|
$
|
629,371
|
|
Test Systems
|
|
104,866
|
|
|
110,994
|
|
Corporate
|
|
199,782
|
|
|
42,351
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
850,026
|
|
|
$
|
782,716
|
|
17) Fair Value
A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Fair value is based upon an exit price model. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and involves consideration of factors specific to the asset or liability.
The Company follows a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value.
On a Recurring Basis:
A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The terms of the Diagnosys acquisition allow for a potential earn-out of up to an additional $13.0 million over the three years post-acquisition based on achievement of new order levels of over $72.0 million during that period. The fair value assigned to the earn-out is determined using the real options method, which requires Level 3 inputs such as new order forecasts, discount rate, volatility factors, and other market variables to assess the probability of Diagnosys achieving certain order levels over the period.
There were no other financial assets or liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis at December 31, 2019 or March 28, 2020.
On a Non-recurring Basis:
The Company tests goodwill at the reporting unit level on an annual basis or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, the Company estimates the fair value of reporting units, utilizing unobservable Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs require significant management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices or observable inputs for assets of a similar nature. The inputs underlying the fair value measurement of the reporting unit under the step-one analysis of the quantitative goodwill impairment test are classified as Level 3 inputs.
As further discussed in Note 6, on March 28, 2020, we performed interim quantitative assessments for the reporting units which had goodwill. Based on our quantitative assessment, the Company recorded non-cash goodwill impairment charges associated with four Aerospace reporting units, totaling approximately $73.7 million in the March 28, 2020 within the Impairment Loss line in the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations. The impairment loss was calculated as the difference between the fair value of the goodwill reporting unit (which was calculated using level 3 inputs) and the carrying value of the unit.
Long-lived assets are evaluated for recoverability whenever adverse effects or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The recoverability test consists of comparing the undiscounted projected cash flows of the asset or asset group (which are Level 3 inputs) with the asset of asset group’s carrying amount. Should the carrying amount exceed undiscounted projected cash flows, an impairment loss would be recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds fair value. In conjunction with the deteriorating economic conditions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, we recorded an impairment charge to ROU assets of approximately $0.7 million incurred in the Aerospace segment within the Impairment Loss line in the Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations in the three months ended March 28, 2020.
The Freedom and Diagnosys intangible assets were valued using a discounted cash flow methodology, as of their respective acquisitions dates, and are classified as Level 3 inputs.
Due to their short-term nature, the carrying value of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable approximate fair value. The carrying value of the Company’s variable rate long-term debt instruments also approximates fair value due to the variable rate feature of these instruments.
18) Acquisition and Divestiture Activities
Acquisitions
Diagnosys Inc. and its affiliates
On October 4, 2019, the Company acquired the stock of the primary operating subsidiaries as well as certain other assets from mass transit and defense market test solution provider, Diagnosys Test Systems Limited for $7.0 million in cash, plus an earn-out estimated at a fair value of $2.5 million. The terms of the acquisition allow for a potential earn-out of up to an additional $13.0 million over the three years post-acquisition based on achievement of new order levels of over $72.0 million during that period. The acquired business has operations in Westford, Massachusetts as well as Ferndown, England, and an engineering
center of excellence in Bangalore, India. Diagnosys is included in our Test Systems segment. Diagnosys is a developer and manufacturer of comprehensive automated test equipment providing test, support, and repair of high value electronics, electro-mechanical, pneumatic and printed circuit boards focused on the global mass transit and defense markets.
The purchase price allocation for this acquisition has not yet been finalized. Purchased intangible assets and goodwill are not expected to be deductible for tax purposes. This transaction was not considered material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Freedom Communication Technologies, Inc.
On July 1, 2019, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Freedom. Freedom, located in Kilgore, Texas, is a leader in wireless communication testing, primarily for the civil land mobile radio market. Freedom is included in our Test Systems segment. The total consideration for the transaction was $21.8 million, net of $0.6 million in cash acquired. The purchase price allocation for this acquisition has not yet been finalized. Purchased intangible assets and goodwill are not expected to be deductible for tax purpose. This transaction was not considered material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Divestitures
Semiconductor Test Business
On February 13, 2019, the Company completed a divestiture of its semiconductor business within the Test Systems segment. The business was not core to the future of the Test Systems segment. The total proceeds of the divestiture amounted to $103.8 million. The Company recorded a pre-tax gain on the sale of $80.1 million in the first quarter of 2019. The income tax expense relating to the gain was $19.7 million.
The transaction also included two elements of contingent earnouts. The First Earnout is calculated based on a multiple of all future sales of existing and certain future derivative products to existing and future customers in each annual period from 2019 through 2022. The First Earnout may not exceed $35.0 million in total. The Second Earnout is calculated based on a multiple of future sales related to an existing product and program with an existing customer exceeding an annual threshold for each annual period from 2019 through 2022. The Second Earnout is not capped. For the Second Earnout, if the applicable sales in an annual period do not exceed the annual threshold, no amounts will be paid relative to such annual period; the sales in such annual period do not carry over to the next annual period. Due to the degree of uncertainty associated with estimating the future sales levels of the divested business and its underlying programs, and the lack of reliable predictive market information, the Company will recognize such earnout proceeds, if received, as additional gain on sale when such proceeds are realized or realizable. No amounts were payable to the Company under the First Earnout for the year ending December 31, 2019.
Airfield Lighting Product Line
On July 12, 2019, the Company sold intellectual property and certain assets with its Airfield Lighting product line for $1.0 million in cash. The Airfield Lighting product line, part of the Aerospace segment, was not core to the business and represented less than 1% of revenue. The Company recorded a pre-tax loss on the sale of approximately $1.3 million during the third quarter of 2019.
Other Disposal Activity
As of December 31, 2019, the Company had agreed to sell certain facilities within the Aerospace segment. Accordingly, the property, plant and equipment assets associated with these facilities of $1.5 million was classified as held for sale in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheet at December 31, 2019. The sale was completed in the first quarter of 2020.
19) Restructuring Charges
In the fourth quarter of 2019, in an effort to reduce the significant operating losses at our AeroSat business, we initiated a restructuring plan to reduce costs and minimize losses of our AeroSat antenna business. The plan narrows the initiatives for the AeroSat business to focus primarily on near-term opportunities pertaining to business jet connectivity. The plan has a downsized manufacturing operation remaining in New Hampshire, with significantly reduced personnel and operating expenses. Impairments and restructuring charges were recorded in 2019 as a result of the restructuring plan.
The Company incurred $0.3 million in additional restructuring charges associated with severance during the three months ended March 28, 2020.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending liability for restructuring charges relating to the Company’s restructuring plan described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Charges in the
three months ended March 28, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Accrual as of December 31, 2019
|
|
Cost of Products Sold
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
Cash Paid
|
|
Accrual as of March 28, 2020
|
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
|
$
|
613
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
(298)
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
4,577
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,577
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,190
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
$
|
(298)
|
|
|
$
|
5,207
|
|
The charge to Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities is comprised of employee termination benefits expected to be paid in 2020 as well as the current portions of payments to be made under non-cancelable inventory purchase commitments. The charge to Other Liabilities represents the non-current portions of payments to be made under non-cancelable inventory purchase commitments. The non-cancelable purchase commitments are for inventory in the future which is not expected to be purchased prior to the expiration date of such agreements as a result of the restructuring plan.
20) Subsequent Events
In response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, we have implemented actions to maintain our financial health and liquidity, as discussed in detail in our Form 8-K’s filed on March 31, 2020 and May 6, 2020. In addition to these measures, we amended our revolving credit facility on May 4, 2020, as further described in Note 7. We are also monitoring the impacts of COVID-19 on the fair value of assets. We do not currently anticipate any material impairments on assets as a result of COVID-19 beyond the goodwill impairment charges previously discussed in Note 6. However, should future changes in sales, earnings and cash flows differ significantly from our expectations, long-lived assets to be held and used and goodwill could become impaired in the future.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company received order cancellations from customers subsequent to the period ending March 28, 2020. Of the Company’s backlog at March 28, 2020 of $369.4 million, $3.0 million is no longer expected to be recognized as revenue as a result of order cancellations received subsequent to quarter end in the Aerospace segment.