Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) Quote

You've been wrong on everything else, I'd bet your wrong on this also.

well,,,,dont tell no one ok !!!

all variables are to be taken into consideration but you have to like the aggression we've initiated.

yea I spotted it right off

I think they filed for an injuction so Samsung, as well as the other infringers, see that this is the next step in the Netlist litigation playbook. They're very willing use this tactic. It really is all up to CAFC. If the infringers fear the result of CAFC they will settle in the next year or 2. If they have some 'sway' over CAFCs (horrific to consider but not out of realms of possibility since just about everything in government is corrupt), they'll just wait and play it out.

yup, and i wont lie. i love the sound of it. cutting into their revenue wont sit well with them!!!

Very good question and honestly, I have no idea!

Maybe Sheasby got a hair across, maybe Hong did too and told him to file one. No idea.

Just have to wait and see what happens. 😀

ahhhhh.....

fair enough!!!

what your saying is feasible but, why would we file for an injunction if theres an appeal coming anyway?

the hand writing :+)

lol!!! what gave it away?

i dont know. dont be doubtful the tide has turned!!!

emmm been here 6yrs I hope your right but won't hold my breath.
if indeed the worm has turned then I'll be celebrating whenI see Strap grant it.

i cant say.......but i will say, the pps will move when we get paid money.

when strap grants or denies the motion, no idea, but the 293 will get appealed to cafc in 30 days or so. maybe they include the injunction as part of the verdict??? i dont know. dont be doubtful the tide has turned!!!

I'm fairly certain that an injunction will not happen while there is the possibility of an appeal, and the final outcome of the trial is in doubt. Yes, I realize that Samsung has not yet made an appeal (because they have 30 days after the final verdict in which to make one). In this case, I'll bet that Gilstrap waits at least thirty days to rule on the injunction, specifically so that Samsung has the proper time in which to lodge the appeal. Once it is lodged, I do not think an injunction can be made.

Be honest , you are Stokd over on that thread aren't cha?

I wished he'd add for Hong to stop diluting.

i feel the same, i just have my inner battle with patience!!!
Stokd
28m

$NLST Part-1
My words of advice and wisdom…LET IT ALL PLAY OUT!

No one knows how things will unfold and ultimately conclude…not us, not the CEO, not the legal team, nor the infringers. That’s the reality, and anyone coming to conclusions on what they think will or will not happen, on any aspect, is playing a foolish and futile game, IMO.

Given what we know with the DD/research done and developments that have occurred, my thesis is intact and I’m a believer in an ultimately bullish outcome to at least a degree enough to make the investment well worthwhile. Choice is a personal one for each to make, after which, LET IT PLAY OUT, without getting emotionally caught up with the nuances and semantics of patent litigation, which has many twists and turns with unexpected events that can make your head spin, as well as developments/changes in law, governance, and procedure…all constantly evolving.

These things take time, being patient and staying confident is not easy, but our time will come!

$NLST Part-2
There are also so many factors and dynamics with all the cases combined, very fluid, but most important is any one trial or patent or aspect of litigation is just one piece of the whole big puzzle/picture that is Netlist’s litigation as a whole, which is greater than the sum of its parts…that's key and what we’re working with. Winning the war is the objective, over any one/few battles.

Hold on for the ride and enjoy the show if you want to see it through. Who knows what the stock does in the meantime, you can accumulate at lows or come back to perhaps buy higher, as any unexpected catalyst can increase the price with sticking power—meaning it would have to be a monetary event that improves Netlist’s fundamentals. Or we may still hover around $1 till then, aside anything unexpected/unpredictable that's favorable.

In 2025 SK Hynix will have to renegotiate their licensing agreement with Netlist, some CAFC appeal decisions will come, and DE Samsung/Google case should resume.

If it did happen we go to $5.00 in two wks

well heck we been sayin thats what they should have done for 2 yrs now, Glad Chuck is catching on lol
now how long will it take to hear whether we get it or not?? In my mind its doubtful

it means if successful they cant sell their goods in the usa!!! they lose big money!!! its like forcing them to settle or we slap an injunction on them. so now its no longer efficient infringement. and check on the water periodically!!! dont want them havin one big ice cube to lick!!!

what excatly is this injuction doing? I want this clear in my head forcing what?
then I gotta go water the dogs LOL

sk renewing ahead of contract expiration would also show positive initiative in us moving forward.

personally i dont get out too much anymore. i dont want too, been there done that, i'm retired, leave me alone!!! lol!!! but by all means, let the dogs run!!!!!!!!!!

Would love to see SK start neg. on a new contract with much higher value. Apply pressure from all sides and see what pops. I'm wait for" Katie to bar the door" when the hounds come running! We do get out once in awhile Lol! And forget the Limo just Paddlin' Madelin' Home!

whatever happens is one thing but its showing aggression on our part which usually indicates a position of leverage in my book of business. after 3 successful jury awards of willful infringement it gives us the back bone to ask for one in a reasonable context according to law. i'll laugh my ass off with glee if it is granted!!!

I love the idea of an injuction. We need to force their hand! But wouldn't the appeal just override the injunction? I assume it would get them to appeal faster rather than waste time waiting the month or whatever the time period they have to appeal.

VIVA LA ROID!!!

Sell off over for the most part imho. I'm ready for the climb out of this. 

INJUNCTION BABY!!! GET SOME!!! hong just grew a set of balls!!! my man !!!

Stokd $NLST Was nice to get away for a bit. I see we have Final Judgment by Gilstrap in the Samsung 293 case with the recently concluded trial….that was quick!

Gilstrap fully affirmed the jury verdict and awarded pre & post judgment interest, as expected. This is progress and things are moving along nicely…on to the next step.

Just filed this morning is a sealed motion by Netlist in this same Samsung 293 case/trial, and it’s very interesting….finally increasing the pressure and going for it!!!

INJUNCTION -🔥- PRELIMINARY AND THEN PERMANENT...now we're talking!!!
"Netlist's Motion For A Preliminary Injunction And Then A Subsequent Permanent Injunction Upon The Resolution Of All Post-Trial Motions"

Let's see what happens, Gilstrap did not award enhanced damages, perhaps he thinks an injunction is warranted.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/619983/default.png

roger that... i always kept my responsibility to my job. responsibility is a trait you must earn and respect in all that you do.

well I have kinda instilled in him when your on your own as a self employeed Builder you have to be very responsible meaning don't miss any work if you don't have to as you'll have a reputation to keep up.

thats great but i think the 8 degrees would of kept me home!!!

actually I was out this morning I staked out the crawl space for my grand son, he turned 19 a couple months ago and got his builders license and starting to build a new spec home. with the wind chill its about 8 degress good old MI.


nlst wait and buy cheaper Baby

Got filled. 1200 shares bought @ $.90!

My order was filled weirdly.

1K shares bought @ 09:55
75 shares bought @ 10:02
100 shares bought @ 10:04:51
25 shares bought @ 10:04:54

yup, that sounds oh so familiar!!! i just tell her, dont let me stop ya, you can go anywhere ya want............

we will win the 463 and it will set precedent for all the rest. then the pps goes up!!! i like my wager.

Ya the wife tells me that all ther time

lol!!! just a thought......maybe you should get out a little more often???

lol!!! the main issue is hong isnt the first person to know his job stone cold and excel at it. his issue is he doesnt know how to run a business!!!

gm, like i told ya...your gonna be here for awhile. the pps will not bust a move that holds in an area till we get paid. and that amount of time we have for starters is 3rd q 26 as by when we get a cafc ruling on our 463 case. of course anything can happen, mean time we do have an end date to look at that will be the beginning of the other settlements starting to roll in. until then........its all torture!!!

Not bizarre at all, IMO. They are smart. That's why they're doing it like they are. Using shares costs the company nothing. Loans add to the companies debt and cost more money in interest payments. And now there will be cries that it's unfair to the shareholders to do it that way. I disagree. Yes, it does dilute shareholder value at this time. People don't like it. I get it.

So right now, most of us are under water with our shares anyways. If the CAFC appeals don't go NLST's way? Then the share price will PLUMMET anyways. What difference will a few hundred million more shares make?? WE will all just have larger losses.

However. IF NLST can win the CAFC appeals, everything will change. They will get damage awards, and then royalties paid every year, for every chip out there (having NLST patented technology) that is being used. IF this happens, the outstanding share base (even adding all the warrant shares) will seem small, for the revenue of the company. The share price will do nothing but go up.

We are where we have always been. Gambling that the company wins the infringement battles. If they don't, we all lose. If they do, everyone goes home in a limo.

As that old saying goes: $118 in the pocket would sure look better than $421 million in the bushes!

lol I never heard that old saying b4 :+)

it always does, an ageless truth.

if and when the pay offs start coming in the share count probably won't matter that much as it stands now MHO ( no more diluition Chuck) But Its a killer when we wait and know that most everyone is down 1% 20% on thier investment.
The money we have invested place in some of the stocks I'm playing now would have made 5 -10% profit so NLST is dead money period.
I hope Chuck gets the message from share holders before he needs another influx of cash.

It's just so bizarre. These are smart people. Why they can't find non-dilutive funding is annoying and concerning. I guess it's just quick and easy to issue shares and help their buddy Suji. It's just shows blatant disregard for the shareholders. But they keep getting their personal shares. Grrr

Yep, Hong and Gail will kill the company / share price with all these warrants

With these warrants were not going anywhere just keep emptying out the water in a boat with buckets

Looks like $118m isn't even worth a penny rise in pps!
As that old saying goes: $118 in the pocket would sure look better than $421 million in the bushes!

Netlist Secures Final Judgment Against Samsung Confirming Willful Infringement and $118 Million in Damages
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2120/us-press-release.html?airportNewsID=27a423ac-44f3-480e-bbb2-94165686ab7d

IRVINE, CA / ACCESSWIRE / December 4, 2024 / Netlist, Inc. (OTCQB:NLST) today announced the entry of a Final Judgment in the case of Netlist v. Samsung Electronics Co. LTD., et. al., (EDTX Case 2:22-cv-00293-JRG) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.


The Court's Final Judgment upheld the jury's verdict in the November 2024 trial and confirmed that Samsung willfully infringed Netlist's patented technologies. Chief Judge Gilstrap ordered Netlist receive $118 million for Samsung's infringement of Netlist's patents.

C.K. Hong, Netlist's Chief Executive Officer, said, "The Final Judgment by the court validates the jury's verdict, the damages award, and confirms that Samsung willfully infringed Netlist's patented technologies and that none of the asserted claims are invalid. Netlist is committed to securing fair value for the unauthorized use of its patents and remains confident that the Court's ruling in this case will remain intact through any post-judgment motions and appeal."

In April 2023, Netlist received a separate jury award for the willful infringement of its patents against Samsung and was awarded $303 million in damages. This brings total damages awarded to Netlist against Samsung to $421 million.

About Netlist
Netlist is a leading innovator in advanced memory and storage solutions, pushing the boundaries of technology to deliver unparalleled performance and reliability. With a rich portfolio of patented technologies, Netlist inventions are foundational to the advancement of AI which is revolutionizing computing and empowering businesses and industries to thrive in the digital age. To learn more about Netlist, please visit www.netlist.com.

Safe Harbor Statement
This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical facts and often address future events or Netlist's future performance. Forward-looking statements contained in this news release include statements about Netlist's ability to execute on its strategic initiatives. All forward-looking statements reflect management's present expectations regarding future events and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, among others: risks that a counterparty may appeal a jury verdict or judgment which could cause a lengthy delay in Netlist's ability to collect the damage award or overturn the verdict or judgment or reduce the damages award; potential delays in expected litigation and other milestones; risks related to Netlist's plans for its intellectual property, including its strategies for monetizing, licensing, expanding, and defending its patent portfolio; risks associated with patent infringement litigation initiated by Netlist, or by others against Netlist, as well as the costs and unpredictability of any such litigation; risks associated with Netlist's product sales, including the market and demand for products sold by Netlist and its ability to successfully develop and launch new products that are attractive to the market; the success of product, joint development and licensing partnerships; the competitive landscape of Netlist's industry; and general economic, political and market conditions, including quarantines, factory slowdowns and/or shutdowns, acts of terrorism, war and other conflicts. All forward-looking statements reflect management's present assumptions, expectations and beliefs regarding future events and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements. These and other risks and uncertainties are described in Netlist's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for its most recently completed quarter ended September 28, 2024, filed on November 7, 2024, and the other filings it makes with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time, including any subsequently filed quarterly and current reports. In light of these risks, uncertainties and other factors, these forward-looking statements should not be relied on as predictions of future events. These forward-looking statements represent Netlist's assumptions, expectations and beliefs only as of the date they are made, and except as required by law, Netlist undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

For more information, please contact:
Investors/Media
The Plunkett Group
Mike Smargiassi
NLST@theplunkettgroup.com
(212) 739-6729

SOURCE: Netlist, Inc.



View the original press release on accesswire.com