Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) News

I buy when I can. 
Company justice is in final hours imho. 
Happy trading. 

I never would have guessed this wouldn't have gone up and held the gains for more than a day? Its getting tiresome .

lol

Unless someone is really shorting this today, I do not understand this price movement. Pretty light volume. Maybe the word hasn't gotten out quite yet?

I just checked NLST's OS base - it's still listed at 271.84M shares. So, there's no dilution reported yet.

The OTC Short Interest report for the period ending March 14th will be published later on this afternoon. But it won't show any data for today.

well they ate well and scared that poor man to death over on the other side of the world.......they'll be back when there done do'n what there do'n...

one thing i know you have to trade it that makes it pofitable for you

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175972023

SilviaJ $NLST Un-stay the Samsung/Google Case, let the trial begin.

D.I. 127-02 at -34172 see Samsung statement that “Netlist"is well known in the industry as a company that created a system for LRDIMM technology”.

After presenting its LRDIMM technology to Samsung, Google, and much of the industry, Netlist’s LRDIMM designs were copied by Samsung and others and subsequently purchased and used by Google.

Rather than take a license, Google instead purchased and customized LRDIMMs from other entities. Google’s procurement of LRDIMMs include, without limitation, the DDR4 LRDIMMs identified in Netlist’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions, served on April 27, 2023.

Netlist intends to seek injunctive relief against Google.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2778749/default.jpeg

we already figured it out. we pop when we get paid. the dawgs come back home yet from yesterdays attempt to run lol !!!

Stay classy. that was funny........but as unscrupulous as olmalvaney is, i wouldnt put it past them to try it.

I wished I knew I can't figure it out anymore..

Yea, since there was no pop in pps, do I want to hold the shares I bought last week in anticipation of this pop? I surely don't want to take them back into the Red Zone!!!

Not sure why this isn't going up, a yr ago that news would have it up .50

Condolences. 
Stay classy. 

lol your probably right what ever it takes but ONE OF THESE DAYS

they won't beable to hold it down forever...

Now, knowing Sammy, they will use the death as a stalling event.  Company is in 40 days of mourning.

Thank you President Trump
nlst
btw 3 of the hounds never came back last night, I think Sammies in trouble :<)

SilviaJ $NLST Something that was posted by @4realdoe a few days ago seems to have gone unnoticed. It is a shame that it won't affect the 024 patent case (a big numbers case/affecting over $30 Bil worth of product) but it is about PTAB vs District courts.

In the new, pro-patent directive it essentially says, if there is a district court case that has already started, the PTAB won't initiate an IPR.

If that had been in effect before our Samsung case in TX, the HBM and DDR5 patents would never have been allowed to have been challenged at the PTAB.

If there was no IPR, we would have been paid by now (over $1 Bil for past infringement & continuing royalties).

I think pro-patent directives and legislation are just starting under this Comm. Secretary (see my previous comments on Lutnick)

"patent owners may feel emboldened by the rescindment of the 2022 memorandum as the PTAB can now revert back to wider discretion to deny institution based on parallel district court litigation"
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/focus-on-fintiv-shift-in-patent-office-4159849/

let s Goo gooo to google and micron
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2120/us-press-release.html?airportNewsID=eb7d2867-15e2-4118-8769-096fb4ecb3f9

Netlist will host a conference call at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 27, 2025.

Irell Secures Jury Verdict Finding Samsung in Material Breach of Joint Development and License Agreement
03.2025

Irell secured a trial victory for client Netlist in a suit against Samsung, which involves patents relating to computer memory technology. This is the fifth victory for Netlist in the past two years.
The case centers on allegations that Samsung breached a 2015 agreement to supply crucial NAND and DRAM memory products at a competitive price in exchange for licenses to Netlist memory patents.
The jury returned its verdict in less than two hours agreeing with Netlist that Samsung breached the agreement. https://www.irell.com/ourwork-recent-matters-347

NLST IRVINE, CA / ACCESS Newswire / March 25, 2025 / Netlist, Inc. (OTCQB:NLST) announced today that it will report its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year ended December 28, 2024, before 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, March 27, 2025.
Netlist will host a conference call at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 27, 2025. Netlist encourages participants to pre-register for the conference call. Callers who pre-register will be given a unique PIN to gain immediate access to the call and bypass the live operator. To pre-register, click (on Website).
For those who would like to join the call but have not pre-registered, they can do so by dialing +1 (412) 317-5443 and requesting the "Netlist Conference Call."
https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2120/us-press-release.html?airportNewsID=17fcb6b4-985f-4e69-8573-ed4aeefba545

everything will work out in its own time frame, but i will never be involved again with a litigation play. i'm too old for this shit anymore!!!

just lovely!!! UNANIMOUSLY.........

here you go

C.K. Hong , Netlist's Chief Executive Officer, said, "The unanimous jury decision confirmed Samsung breached the Agreement and does not have a license to Netlist's patent portfolio. On behalf of all stakeholders, we remain committed to protecting our patents from unauthorized use and securing fair value for them."
As the largest memory manufacturer in the world, Samsung faces significant exposure from its tens of billions of dollars in annual memory revenue. In April 2023 and November 2024 , Netlist received jury awards for the willful infringement of its patents against Samsung and was awarded $303 million and $118 million in damages, respectively. This brings total damages awarded to Netlist against Samsung to date to $421 million .

Maybe the new ceo will look at NLST differently and settle,

sammy co - ceo dies of heart attack at 63
https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/24/tech/samsung-co-ceo-han-jong-hee-death-intl-hnk?cid=ios_app

"cafc will think there crazy and say the verdict stands!!!"

The CAFC has nothing to say regarding this licensing contract trial. This is 100 percent a CONTRACT case and nott a patent case. It is only reviewable by the Ninth Circus and the appeal will be there, nott the CAFC.

Unlike this case, often cases involve a mix of contract and patent law claims, in which case the contract issues are appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals in which jurisdiction that District Court resides and the patent issues are often separately appealed to the CAFC. As there are frequently claims that are mixed contract and patent, which this instant case does nott have, then the appellant can file in the CAFC for all its appealable issues (contract and patent) and the CAFC will generally accept. However, generally appeals that clearly involve patent issues, such as validity, infringement, inequitable conduct in patent prosecution and enforceability generally re: affirmative defenses will go to the CAFC - at least for those specific patent issues being appealed. The appellant has a little bit of discretion as to whether to file appellate contract claims along with the patent matters in a single appeal to the CAFC or to segregate the contract issues in a separate appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the local District Court. Even then, it is possible for the appellee to move to consolidate both types of subject matter in a single CAFC case.

As usual in law, almost everything can be argued almost endlessly - including which appellate court(s) should hear the appeal(s). However, the present case is pretty clearly solely a contract matter and so in this case the Ninth Circus will be the appellate court hearing the appeal by Samsung.

BTW, you guys killed the Samsung co-CEO from stress: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/25/samsung-electronics-says-co-ceo-han-jong-hee-has-passed-away.html

This (stress and endless argumentation) is why litigation sucks. High-stakes commercial litigators tend to die young from cardiovascular disease (at least the male litigators). I knew one litigator (guy) in Chicago who was getting his SECOND 4-way CABG at age 44 - and redo CABGs are very tough and risky because of all the scar tissue around the grafts from the first CABG, especially a 4-vessel. Or you can read about my very good friend, Dan Furniss, a patent litigator who came to work one morning and just keeled over dead at his desk from a heart attack - in his 50s. High stakes commercial litigation is a brutal lifestyle. And it is tough on the families too. High-end commercial litigators (of both genders) often have one or more divorces under their belt. It is a quite unhealthy lifestyle both physically and in regard to mental health and relationship stability.

I sense from your many posts that you have personally gotten a small taste of the endless frustration and stress - just from observation and whatever small amount of munny you have at stake. Multiply that by 100 or more and mebbe you can appreciate the stress and frustration the litigators feel. You stand to lose a few bucks, butt they stand to lose their future business opportunities and more if things go south. And there is always another new unexpected fire (motion, etc.) popping up and requiring quick response. Very much like military staffs managing a war. Very much coffee is consumed, especially at trial - and sleep is catnaps at best, as in trial you're working at night and early morning to prepare for the next day and any motions/replies/oppositions that need to be filed first thing in the AM, in addition to preparing your witness examination in view of the prior day(s) trial testimony(ies). It is always a moving target and no matter how much you have tried to pre-bake your witness exam/cross before the trial, the twists and turns as the trial unfolds requires you to change your gameplan constantly - like an NFL coach during a game or a commander during a battle.

Like managing a war, this can be exciting and certainly nott boring. Butt IMO, it is a brutal lifestyle. In WW2 photos and films you can often see Eisenhower with a cigarette. He smoked more than three packs a day while he was SACEUR in WW2. That is the level of stress that top-end, bett-the-company commercial litigators live. Nott for a few years like Ike, butt for their entire professional careers. And, unlike with Ike, all that is at stake in court/arbitration litigation is only money - nott human lives.

Well, mebbe excepting that of co-CEO Han Jong Hee (intended in jest).

It's just munny - nott really that important enough to surrender your life and personal well-being fighting over endlessly.

Samsung has 30 days to file an appeal, starting when Hsu submits his final verdict.

But once Hsu does that, I suspect we’ll see Samsung file a slew of motions (JMOL, demand for a new trial, etc) that will set that 30 day time back a bit, because Hsu will have to address each motion made.

Look over the time line for the 00463 case. It might very well follow along with that time line.

I've been here for awhile, just lurking and hoping for a better outcome this time. Much better company and much better board here with a great crew keeping us informed with factual information. I saw you posted a few weeks ago and was glad to see you're still kicking. There's a few of us here by the way, not just you and I. Well hope this pops some as word of the win spreads, good luck to all of us.

Hey man, didn't know you were here!

Correct, this is an upbeat crew with good information always coming, and no one's died nor gone completely insane, yet [smile]. Plus, we've got excellent counsel and a great company (knock wood). God willing I'll be 79 in July so I already put all my holdings in my kids's name, but promised her I'd come back and haunt the crap outta her if she even thinks about selling any of this play. Gotta admit, tho', the one that went south on us was pretty entertaining, and with some interesting folks. I've been here for years but laying low and trying to control my big mouth. In any case, I think we got ourselves a winner here, brother, altho' I sure as hell didn't advise anyone to get on board like I did last time -- I took a lot of gas for that, but had fun laughing at them for taking advice from just another Bozo on the bus in the first place.

Hope I'll still be around to celebrate together. Cheers!!

this effects everything going forward. we will win all the trials in any court room we set our feet in, and get paid for them as well. micrap owes us huge, sk will renew. the average return on the money they stole from nlst is 5-7%. even at that rate we're talking billions...........

New Litigation Chart 03/24/2025 - Courtesy Of Stokd

Any chance this affects dealings with Micron or SK Hynix? Bringing revenue forward from them would be a wonderful thing to do.

yes, thats how there saying it, but we know there stealing it, doesnt matter. what matters is todays trial said there stealing it and thats in the article as well.........i think it was that one......but its all irrelevant at the moment. we won, its over!!!

i want to see unanimous!!!

Stokd *Netlist Litigation Chart*
Netlist's litigation journey is propelling Sheasby to become a legend in the field...and Netlist (Chuck/patents) provide the goods, with which Sheasby can work his magic...solid patents & attorney!

Every case/trial we have completed in Dist Crt was won by Netlist with Sheasby as lead….all other cases are stayed — just look at the chart with all the blue (wins)...it's quite something!

The DE Samsung & Google case on the 523 CAFC affirmed patent is currently stayed pending BOC final judgment to be issued by the judge sometime post trial.

A positive from the judge recusal is that unlike Scarsi, most other district judges follows the appropriate procedure with regard to issuing final judgment prior taking up post trial motions/JMOLs.

The significance is so the winning party can move on with any preclusive effect from affirmation of the winning verdict…though it could just be the practice at this district unlike TX/Gilsrap. We'll see if Hsu follows.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2769897/default.png

thats smooth!!! and got a new chart for ya........ https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2769386/default.png

lol I'm not talking about the shares I'm talking about the articals you post, first one says NLST can cancel Samsung patents licenses...
or didn't you read what you post??? rotflol ahh I'd cancel the shares also :+)

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/2765905/default.jpg

I doubt that juror dismissal will lead to anything.

The reason why they have jurors as possible substitutes is to replace any jurors who become unfit (for whatever reason) to continue.

We don’t know at this point why the juror was dismissed.

As far as Samsung appealing? Everyone following these legal battles knows that Samsung is going to appeal, no matter what. If there was a “betting pool” on whether or not an appeal would or wouldn’t take place? I’d remortgage my house and bet every dollar of it that they will appeal. In 29-30 days after Hsu gives a final verdict? You’ll see it.

Before that happens, we’ll have to go through all the BS motions for the JMOL and requests for retrial.

Wanting to see the jury score card just for fun!

Exactly. Looks like it was done by Hsu, to preclude any objections by Samsung before the case was handed to the Jury.

thank you guys for the news. If the win is correct, as colleagues have reported. The important question remains: the negotiations. That could take longer. I think Netlist will run a very long marathon, and we'll have to wait for a profit until at least the end of 2026.

cafc will think there crazy and say the verdict stands!!!

yes sir, todays event opened up doors that will not close on us!!!

i think that meant we dont have to worry about it ???

lots of good stuff over there.

i hope its something stupid easy like they didnt need them. anything else is insane and you know you couldnt tell me any different !!!

lol!!! actually its a bit more than charm!!!

we won the boc trial!!!