ADVFN
Registration Strip Icon for charts Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
Netlist Inc (QB)

Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST)

0.639
0.00
(0.00%)
Closed July 18 4:00PM

Empower your portfolio: Real-time discussions and actionable trading ideas.

Premium

Netlist Inc (QB) (NLST) News

Official News Only

NLST Discussion

View Posts
Redoocs Redoocs 8 minutes ago
Happy Birthday.

Here's to 85 more!
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 hours ago
microby many N patents have been filed worldwide, not just this example of the HBM basis 060/160
I also believe many aspects of the LRDIMM. The current generation of gen4 LRDIMM lives on in gen5 MRDIMM.

The two gen5 PMIC patents 918/054 actually also? 😉Possible.

(understand the background to the large number of court cases)

And with these inventions, we are still talking about the conventional way of connecting memory/storage.
Not yet about computational storage model, which is the way Hong could go with its own upcoming device hybrid-X
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5363350/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5363353/default.png
👍️0
Rick1997 Rick1997 3 hours ago
Thanks for the readier digest explanation and the birthday wishes. !
Rick
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 1 🏆️ 1 👍️ 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 10 hours ago
Stokd $NLST It's not hard to fathom the possibility that Samsung went too far in their desperate pursuit of undoing their 3rd BOC loss.

We witnessed and understand the lengths Samsung has gone, and will go, to avoid losing their license/BOC case.

Any improprieties legally/procedurally can be investigated and exposed through an evidentiary hearing, as Netlist sought.

They could've pushed it and crossed lines in their attempt to find something, craft anything, which I'm sure gets more challenging with each trial...what do they have left but to get more creative, and with little legal options left, one can imagine what they're capable of.

We'll see what happens and if anything other than juror interviews is addressed. But if they dive in to Samsung's involvement and approach with the jurors—as Netlist wants/sought—who knows what comes out.

Pic below shows what Netlist sought for the evidentiary hearing if the judge was going to hold one for their juror bias allegations. Do us right Hsu!

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5341147/default.png

https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/621445510
👍 2 💯 2
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 10 hours ago
Stokd $NLST For clarity, here's what happened and where we are with respect to the BOC case and interviewing of jurors.

There was a hearing July 11 to address how the judge will elicit testimony from 3 jurors. That hearing was held and minutes (pic 1 below) were released today stating — "The matter was called, and counsel stated their appearances. Court and counsel confer. The Court discusses the procedure for examination of jurors."

Also today the judge scheduled an evidentiary hearing. Remember that in the parties joint status report, Netlist requested as part of their position that (pic 2 below) — "Finally, to the extent that the Court conducts an evidentiary hearing on Samsung’s allegations on juror bias, any such hearing should also address facts relating to Samsung’s waiver of this argument and its contact with jurors."

So there's a lot we don't know right now regarding specifics on what is involved with the interviews and evidentiary hearing...could be looking into aspects in pic 3.

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5337923/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5337932/default.png
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5337997/default.png

https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/621433984
👍 3
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 10 hours ago
i like the way your thinking on this issue. i would think for starters he would be looking for double digit billions if hes gonna sell it. just speculation on my part.
👍 2
Ooou812 Ooou812 10 hours ago
Perhaps. He will entertain legitimate offers only of course. Everything is for sale at the right price. 
👍️ 2
choo choo trader choo choo trader 17 hours ago
Nah, I don't think Hong is interested in selling his baby Netlist. But, if your gonna dream, dream big! How about a bidding war to buy Netlist between SK, Micron, Samsung, and Google. Or maybe a consolidated buyout of Netlist by these previously mentioned infringers pooling their resources buying out Netlist and getting them all off the hook at once plus having free past and future access to all of Netlist's technologies. I wonder how many billions Netlist is worth to these companies. I wonder how many billions it would take to persuade Chuck to sell his baby. Many I would suppose.
👍️ 3
Ooou812 Ooou812 20 hours ago
For all the near-term noise, the 2026 outlook for HBM remains robust, with Hynix expected to remain dominant. "We see upside in overall cloud AI demand... the stock is not discounting our LT ROE average estimate (‘26-30E) of 23.4% (CoE 10.1%)," UBS said.
SK your perfect acquisition Netlist is ready. 
👍️ 1
Ooou812 Ooou812 20 hours ago
"Investing.com -- High-bandwidth memory, or HBM, is poised for a breakthrough year in 2026 as AI’s compute-hungry needs continues to reshape the memory landscape, UBS analysts said in a recent note.“Our channel checks continue to indicate that SK Hynix Inc (KS:000660) will likely secure a largely stable market share in the HBM market in 2026 around 50% of total bits,” the analysts said, underscoring its expectation that Hynix will keep its grip on next-generation memory, even as contract negotiations and rival ambitions swirl."
👍️ 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 21 hours ago
Stokd $NLST And minutes from the Scheduling Conference in the Samsung/Micron/Avnet TX case in the 087 & 731 patents.

"Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap (Lead 2:25-cv-557 and Member 2:25-cv-558): Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference held on 7/16/2025 from 09:34 AM - 10:44 AM. Counsel for the parties appeared. Court: (1) asked whether the parties consented to trial before the U.S. Magistrate Judge; and (2) provided Claim Construction and Jury Selection/Trial dates. (Court Reporter - Shawn McRoberts) (Text entry only; no document attached) (aeb) (Entered: 07/17/2025)"
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5335392/default.jpeg
👍 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 22 hours ago
"IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL 784 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu:The Court schedules an evidentiary hearing regarding Defendant's Motion for New Trial (Docket No. 784) for July 30, 2025, at 3 PM. Parties may each designate two representatives to join the hearing."

Stokd

https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5335267/default.jpeg
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 2 🎯 2 👍️ 2
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 23 hours ago
i dont trust the source, but here it is anyway..........

Saucerhead
4:47 PM

$NLST 07/17/2025 810 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL 784 by Judge Wesley L. Hsu:The Court schedules an evidentiary hearing regarding Defendant's Motion for New Trial (Docket No. 784) for July 30, 2025, at 3 PM. Parties may each designate two representatives to join the hearing. The hearing will proceed in-person at the First Street Courthouse, Courtroom 9B. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 07/17/2025)

https://stocktwits.com/Saucerhead/message/621406515
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 23 hours ago
not exactly what we're looking for, https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5332708/default.png
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 23 hours ago
$NLST doc Judge Hsu July 17, 2025, Motion hearing is a Pacer buy.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17206527/netlist-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 1 🎯 1 👍️ 2
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 23 hours ago
and only a 2 cent variance on price for the day.
👍️0
Ooou812 Ooou812 24 hours ago
43k share buy block at the close today. I like this enthusiasm. 
👍️ 2 💯 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 1 day ago
cool, but i must admit i got the distinct impression you were much much younger, congrats, and happy birthday!!!

in regards to your question. its just one big company crying the blues over the new uspto rules because vidals bs is no longer being applied at the ptab....... so for us, nlst.......we're not going to get railroaded with major delays on our patents that are on trial. meaning if we're in action, in court, or have started a new case. the infringers cant use ptab to delay the process because the estimated date of the ptab process would take longer than the trial. that is my understanding of it all. anyone have anything to add just chime on in.........

happy birthday brother!!!
👍️ 3
gdog gdog 1 day ago
He does put the time in here for sure...
👍️ 1
Rick1997 Rick1997 1 day ago
Striper you continue to amaze me with all you do and for no direct financial remuneration. could you just offer your respected opinion what this means for NLST. Im 85 tomorrow and it's day today so calculating who of my closest friends will benefit from NLST in years to come. I do have over 60K in Roth account alone.
👍️ 2
gdog gdog 1 day ago
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/micron-technology-MU/stock-news/96449146/micron-shares-dip-following-goldman-sachs-downgrad
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 1 day ago
Amici Have Their Say in SAP’s Challenge to USPTO Recission of Vidal Discretionary Denial Guidance
“In many instances… discretionary power is the only legal mechanism that can prevent the abusive use of IPRs by large infringers to suppress inventors and small companies and to discourage the enforcement of their patents.” – USIJ amicus brief

Several amici have weighed in this week on a petition challenging the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) recission of former USPTO Director Kathi Vidal’s guidance on discretionary denial—and retroactive application of the new, interim guidance—which SAP America, Inc. argues violated its right to due process.

SAP filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in June seeking to compel the USPTO “to apply its June 21, 2022, ‘binding agency guidance’ to SAP’s petitions, and all still-active petitions filed before February 28, 2025, and to not pressure SAP or any IPR petitioner into forfeiting in parallel district court litigation an invalidity ground it could not have reasonably asserted in their IPR petition.”

SAP brought several inter partes review (IPR) petitions against claims of Cyandia, Inc.’s patents in October 2024 and filed a so-called Sotera Stipulation in February 2025 “agreeing (contingent on institution) not to pursue any ground of unpatentability in district court that was raised or reasonably could have been raised in any instituted IPR…” Under the Vidal memo on discretionary denial, the PTAB would not “deny institution of an IPR or PGR under Fintiv (i) when a petition presents compelling evidence of unpatentability; (ii) when a request for denial under Fintiv is based on a parallel ITC proceeding; or (iii) where a petitioner stipulates not to pursue in a parallel district court proceeding the same grounds as in the petition or any grounds that could have reasonably been raised in the petition.”

But on February 28, 2025, USPTO Acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart rescinded that memo and explained that “[t]o the extent any other PTAB or Director Review decisions rely on the Memorandum, the portions of those decisions relying on the Memorandum shall not be binding or persuasive on the PTAB.” Then, on March 24, the Office issued a memo “announcing that the February 28 rescission would apply not only prospectively to petitions filed after that date, but also retroactively to ‘any case in which the Board has not issued an institution decision, or where a request for rehearing or Director Review of an institution decision was filed and remains pending,” according to SAP’s petition.

On April 27, 2025, the PTAB denied institution of SAP’s IPRs, finding in part that “SAP’s Sotera stipulation had ‘limited practical effect’ because it did not cover the prior art system described in part by the printed publications cited in the IPR.” SAP’s request for Director Review of the denial was summarily denied in a one-sentence order. SAP is now arguing that mandamus relief is its only recourse and appropriate. “Due process and separation of powers are clear and indisputable legal rights applicable to SAP, and SAP’s rights were violated,” the petition argues.

Specifically, since SAP filed its IPR in October 2024 and the memo was not rescinded by Stewart until February and retroactive application was not announced until March, SAP argues that the legal landscape was greatly changed “leading to severe consequences for past actions SAP had taken in reliance on the Vidal Memo’s binding agency guidance.” The petition also argues that the Board’s assertion that “to clear the discretionary denial hurdle, SAP needed to also agree, upon institution, to forgo unpatentability challenges based on system art that it could not have raised in IPR” violates the separation of powers because it at odds with Congress’ intent in the statute. “This new policy is an unconstitutional agency end run around the statute,” says the petition.

Amici this week included Patent and Trademark Attorneys, Agents, and Applicants for Restoration and Maintenance of Integrity in Government (PTAAARMIGAN LLC); the Public Interest Patent Law Institute (PIPLI); and the Alliance of U.S. Startups and Inventors for Jobs (USIJ). While PIPLI urged the CAFC to grant mandamus relief, echoing SAP’s arguments that retroactive application of the Stewart guidance “violates the principle of the rule of law,” PTAAARMIGAN and USIJ support denial of the mandamus petition.

USIJ said that the USPTO Director should have broad discretion to deny institution of IPR because “in many instances that discretionary power is the only legal mechanism that can prevent the abusive use of IPRs by large infringers to suppress inventors and small companies and to discourage the enforcement of their patents.” USIJ’s brief further noted that Vidal’s memo was only interim guidance until a formal rule was promulgated, which the Office “never succeeded in doing.” Once a new Secretary of Commerce was appointed in February 2025 with the stated goal of reducing the USPTO’s backlog as quickly as possible, that interim guidance became moot, said the brief. Due process could not have been denied because petitioners do not have a right to institution of IPRs.

PTAAARMIGAN argued in its brief that “SAP’s petition is oddly and ambiguously framed” in that it never actually challenges the IPR at issue but instead “appears to be a challenge to a rule.” The CAFC thus has no mandamus jurisdiction, said the brief. SAP has other options for challenging the denial of institution in district court and therefore the extraordinary relief of mandamus review is not available.

Cyandia filed its response to SAP’s mandamus petition on July 14, arguing that “SAP has not even attempted to show a clear and compelling duty to institute inter partes review—because there isn’t one.” While a petitioner might be able to seek mandamus relief in a case where it alleged the institution decision itself was unconstitutional due to, for example, “an unconstitutional delegation of legislative powers,” here, SAP’s challenge is a procedural one, said Cyandia.

The CAFC on July 14 also granted the USPTO’s motion for an extension of time to file a response to SAP’s petition until July 21.

https://ipwatchdog.com/2025/07/16/amici-say-saps-challenge-uspto-recission-vidal-discretionary-denial/id=190428/
👍 1
Ooou812 Ooou812 2 days ago
Not trying to do anything other than state a valid opinion.  Easy pal. 
👍️ 1 💯 1
Jetmek_03052 Jetmek_03052 2 days ago
You're talking about authorized shares, not shares that are outstanding.

Authorized shares that are not outstanding are not figured into the dilution of the share price.
👍️0
Jetmek_03052 Jetmek_03052 2 days ago
He's trying to pump it up, obviously.

There is no indication that SK Hynix is thinking of buying out NLST. Would I like to see them make a good offer to do so? Sure! Would it likely help SK Hynix to own all of NLST patents? I'm sure it would. If it is true they are using NLST IP in HBM memory (and I think it is)? Then it would definitely be a good move to acquire them.

But in all seriousness, there is no reason to think it is in anyway "imminent".

Many scenarios are possible.
👍️ 2
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 days ago
no doubt, we'll all be ok once the money starts flowing.
👍 2 💯 1
Ooou812 Ooou812 2 days ago
When SK Hynix makes their offer finally you'll be feeling just fine. 
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 days ago
no need to worry, you can always say whatever you want. i know how pissed off any of us can get holding this position because i do it as well. i'm just keeping most of my feelings over it under wrap, for the most part that is lol!!!
👍 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 days ago
only the shadow knows.......i have no clue why. i'm just trying to stay focused on the boc decision, and the cafc litigation that is awaiting trial date, or just plain out, the you lost decision without trial needed. however they do it is fine by me. no need in over thinking anything anymore, for me anyway....

viva la chunk!!!
💯 1
gdog gdog 2 days ago
BULLISH
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 days ago
when we get paid is my best guess!!! other than that i dont know any more than you.... 😶
👍️0
gdog gdog 2 days ago
One small problem with that statement you need at the very least a $2.00 share price.
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 2 days ago
Bowlsketball $NLST Hong is getting the Board of Directors and the external audit firm all lined up so that after we collect money after the upcoming CAFC decisions (or settlement) we can be re-listed on the NASDAQ. Hong has previously said this is the plan and I like that he is getting things ready ahead of these CAFC rulings. It means that we will be able to move quickly following the CAFC decisions. We should have both the 294 and 463 rulings by the end of 2026 with the 294 one possibly coming this year (oral hearing will be some time between August and January).
https://stocktwits.com/Bowlsketball/message/621161830
👍️ 1 💯 1
Ooou812 Ooou812 2 days ago
Not much sympathy given to those who streal IP as they have against Netlist. Stay the course. 
👍️ 2
Se7enthstring Se7enthstring 2 days ago
Not sure why you're posting that 🤔
👍️0
Ooou812 Ooou812 2 days ago
Net positive Buyside trade volumes continue this week. SK Hynix offer in due course. Have a great day 😎
👍️ 2 💯 1
Ooou812 Ooou812 2 days ago
Buyside trade volumes continue this week. SK Hynix offer in due course. Have a great day 😎
👍️ 1
Jetmek_03052 Jetmek_03052 2 days ago
New Litigation chart (07/15/2025) & CAFC/PTAB flow chart (07/09/2025) Courtesy of Stokd



🎈 1 🎉 1 🎊 1 🎯 1 👍️ 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
$NLST doc filed today 2:55pm notice filed by micron, link is below.

Date Filed Description

Jul 15, 2025

USCA Notice of Docketing NOA

Jul 15, 2025

NOTICE of Docketing Notice of Appeal from USCA re 197 Notice of Appeal - FEDERAL CIRCUIT filed by Micron Semiconductor Products Inc, Micron Technology Inc, MICRON TECHNOLOGY TEXAS, LLC. USCA Case Number 25-1936 (NKL)

Link: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
Stokd $NLST ***LITIGATION CHART*** 7-15-25
All eyes on the new Netlist consolidated case against Samsung/Micron/Avnet on the 087 & 731 patents in TX with Gilstrap ----- Scheduling / Case Management Conference tomorrow.
https://media.stocktwits-cdn.com/api/3/media/5250754/default.png


https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/621074033
👍️ 1 💯 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
microby $NLST
a good day starts with a good breakfast, i know Rob, you won't have time for that tomorrow, I really wish you would!!!

such a multi-layered Sheasby surprise piece 😀
you will be surprised every now and then!
For a long time there was no real proof that N in DDR5 has gen ingredients (Hong mentioned it) in 00557 he has now carefully proven it with a previously unknown ingredient 😉 731.

I have no doubts!!!

patents on memory modules, 087 even acts in the production of DRAM, called HBM stone, a breeze within the fabrication, the known previously acted on the module

38 more new CSD memory high power ingredients now in the hands of Hong. Another surprise that will pay off with the upcoming hybrid-X.

Rob, have a good trip!!! Offside a good word!
I greet you among friends,
bake yourself one of these, I have already delighted the family
https://stocktwits.com/microby/message/621071305
👍️ 1 💯 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
i thought you might like this cuz i know you seen a lot of guys play a guitar. this guy can play all kind of styles and even a standard 6 string lol !!! yeah hes really good........tell me... he even knows hes throw'n out some bad ass licks!!!

👍️ 1 😀 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
hope for the best and the sooner the better, cuz somthins up, what idk........
👍️ 1
justus1 justus1 3 days ago
Glad to see both of them invested and making decisions in the best interest of all the SHers now and in the future!
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
Netlist, Inc. Jul 15, 2025 : SEC Filing, 3/A filings https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3210/us-sec-filing.html?format=convpdf&secFilingId=05ac6dc5-0e21-4d59-8cd2-30eb83dfbaf4&shortDesc=Amended%20Statement%20of%20Beneficial%20Ownership

and the 2nd........

https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3210/us-sec-filing.html?shortDesc=Amended%20Statement%20of%20Beneficial%20Ownership&secFilingId=e5d42707-6c31-4627-88b6-0efac7f93ccb&format=convpdf
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
more than likely scums hired talent is good to very good. just under paid and over worked. not too mention doesnt agree with the hierarchy in management about being put under pressure to reverse engineer something they cant accomplish, and suffer the consequences of their immoral business practices. so why not go somewhere and do your job the right way. that would be my over all assessment......
👍️0
Redoocs Redoocs 3 days ago
Seeing that scamscums products suck, why would skh want to hire them.
scamscums top talent, what a joke.
👍️0
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
Why Samsung is losing its top talent to SK hynix
https://www.chosun.com/english/companies-en/2025/07/15/K2D2LNU34JEM7IRZEEEM2OYUEU/
💯 1
gdog gdog 3 days ago
not until 2026 or we get bought out lol either way the dogs will be releast
👍️ 1
100lbStriper 100lbStriper 3 days ago
i'm beginning to embrace the grandiose elation of holding this pos with euphoria beyond my wildest dreams. release dem dawgs!!!
👍️ 2 💯 2

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock