DAN: TSX-V (Canada)
JE9N: FSE (Germany)
DRRSF: OTCQX (USA)
-favourable internal economics surrounding a
downstream facility with a pre-tax NPV (8) of US$4.5B, IRR of 32% and payback of 3
years
SAGUENAY, QC, June 27,
2024 /CNW/ - Arianne Phosphate (the "Company" or
"Arianne") (TSXV: DAN) (OTC: DRRSF) (FRANKFURT: JE9N)
, a development-stage phosphate mining company,
advancing the Lac à Paul project in Quebec's Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region, today
is pleased to announce results from its prefeasibility study
("PFS"). As per the Company's Press Release of January 30, 2024, Arianne commissioned a PFS to
consider the viability of constructing a purified phosphoric acid
("PPA") plant in the Saguenay region of Quebec to transform igneous-based phosphate
concentrate into a battery-grade phosphoric acid for use in the
lithium-iron-phosphate ("LFP") battery.
As studied, the downstream facility would be capable of
producing 350,000 tonnes (100% P2O5 basis)
annually of PPA, making the plant the largest producer outside of
China. At 350,000 tonnes,
Arianne's supply could address roughly 350 GWh of yearly Western
gigafactory demand. Industry analysts such as CRU, Benchmark and
McKinsey, see a significant shortage of PPA by the end of the
decade as traditional demand from food additives and surging demand
from the LFP battery greatly increase the needs for PPA, well
beyond current supply availability.
In addition, Arianne's facility would produce 220,000 tonnes
(100% P2O5 basis) annually of a secondary
phosphoric acid used in the production of specialty fertilizers and
animal feeds. The market for this product will also be facing
severe restrictions as current producers of this product are
limiting their output due to operating constraints.
"Opportunities like this don't come along often," said
Brian Ostroff, President of Arianne
Phosphate. "Access to a high-quality phosphate concentrate, the
ability to economically produce PPA for use in specialty
applications and the advent and growth of the LFP battery provide
extremely compelling economics with a pre-tax NPV of over
US$4.5 billion. Further, the study
also demonstrates the opportunity for our Lac à Paul mine to
have a local customer. In looking at the two projects in their
entirety, the Arianne companies would provide enormous benefit to
its stakeholders and unlock significant value for its
shareholders."
Economics
Capex
The full downstream operation is projected to have an initial
Capex of roughly US$1.65 billion,
which includes a contingency of approximately US$240 million. The Capex covers logistics for a
phosphate concentrate transportation system on the south shore of
the Saguenay River, an on-site sulphur plant for the production of
sulphuric acid and, both a merchant grade acid ("MGA") and purified
phosphoric acid plant.
Opex
The primary determinant in the operating costs for the PPA
facility is the input cost of the phosphate concentrate (79%), the
cost of sulphur used in the production of sulphuric acid (14%) and
other miscellaneous operational costs such as maintenance, staffing
and consumables (7%).
For the purposes of the economic model, internally built based
on the Company's PFS, Arianne used an input cost of $213/t for the phosphate concentrate which is
consistent with the Company's previously published bankable
feasibility study ("BFS") for its Lac à Paul project. As per the
BFS (October 24, 2013), at a sale
price of $213/t, the Lac à Paul mine
had a NPV (8) of roughly US $1.9B.
Using $213/t, the cash operating cost
for the PPA facility would be $1,195/t. According to Benchmark Mineral
Intelligence (Phosphoric Acid Market Outlook, Q1 2024), any
production under $1,450/t would be
regarded as a low-cost producer of PPA.
As well, the 220,000 tonnes of secondary acid would be a
byproduct of the PPA production process and thus, would not have an
additional production cost associated with it. Revenue derived from
the sale of this acid would be a direct credit adding to the PPA
facility's bottom-line profitability.
Table 1: Sensitivity analysis related to phosphate
concentrate (~40% P2O5) input cost (pre-tax
basis)
$US (at
1:1.35)
|
-30 %
|
-20 %
|
-10 %
|
Base
Case
|
+10 %
|
+20 %
|
+30 %
|
|
$149.10/t
|
$170.40/t
|
$191.70/t
|
$213.00/t
|
$234.3/t
|
$255.6/t
|
$276.9/t
|
NPV (8)
M's
|
$5,440
|
$5,130
|
$4,819
|
$4,508
|
$4,198
|
$3,887
|
$3,577
|
IRR
|
37.1 %
|
35.7 %
|
34.2 %
|
32.8 %
|
31.3 %
|
29.8 %
|
28.3 %
|
Payback
(yrs.)
|
2.69
|
2.79
|
2.91
|
3.03
|
3.17
|
3.32
|
3.50
|
Opex (cash cost)
M's
|
$906
|
$1,002
|
$1,098
|
$1,195
|
$1,291
|
$1,387
|
$1,483
|
Gross annual Profit
M's
|
$751
|
$717
|
$683
|
$650
|
$616
|
$582
|
$549
|
Revenue
The PPA facility would generate revenue through the sale of its
finished products. These products include 350,000 tonnes of PPA at
$2,300/t, 220,000 tonnes of secondary
acid at $1,200/t and 3 million tonnes
of gypsum at $10/t, a product
produced through the conversion of phosphate concentrate into
phosphoric acid. These prices are based on reported sales prices
from several data providers and publicly available sources. The
sales prices of the two classes of phosphoric acid represent a
discounted 3-year average. The project would also generate surplus
electricity that could be sold into the grid however, this has not
been accounted for in the Company's internal revenue model.
Prices
sensitivity
|
-30 %
|
-20 %
|
-10 %
|
Base
Case
|
+10 %
|
+20 %
|
+30 %
|
Purified Phosphoric
Acid
|
$1,610
|
$1,840
|
$2,070
|
$2,300
|
$2,530
|
$2,760
|
$2,990
|
Merchant Grade
Acid
|
$840
|
$960
|
$1,080
|
$1,200
|
$1,320
|
$1,440
|
$1,560
|
Gypsum
|
$7
|
$8
|
$9
|
$10
|
$11
|
$12
|
$13
|
NPV (8) – pre-tax
basis
|
$1,487
|
$2,494
|
$3,501
|
$4,508
|
$5,515
|
$6,523
|
$7,530
|
Environmental Factors
According to the study, the downstream PPA facility would be
able to take advantage of numerous operational benefits designed to
mitigate its environmental impact. By having access to a
high-quality, low-contaminant phosphate concentrate, the facility
would require less input material thus requiring less transport and
handling of the feedstock versus other facilities. As well, by
using an igneous-based phosphate concentrate, the facility's output
of PPA would be at a much higher ratio than most other operations
allowing for a smaller operational footprint for its production
size and superior economics.
The facility would also consist of a sulphuric acid production
plant. The study shows that by choosing to construct its own plant
to produce sulphuric acid, the operation would substantially reduce
the environmental risk associated with transporting material in
acid form and, greatly reduce the needs from a transportation
infrastructure by moving three times less the material.
Further, by producing sulphuric acid through the direct input of
sulphur, the facility would be able to be a net producer of
electricity through the capture of steam through turbines that will
generate electricity. This power would allow the facility to run
without the requirement of external energy sources and allow the
facility to sell its excess electricity into the electrical grid
for the benefit of the regional community.
Lastly, a byproduct in the production of phosphoric acid is
gypsum. As most phosphate concentrates contain radioactive
contaminants, the gypsum produced is a hazardous material that
needs to be stored, creating a legacy environmental issue and
operating expense. As per the PFS, in the case of the Arianne
facility, the use of a high-purity, low-contaminant phosphate
concentrate would allow the production of a marketable gypsum,
generating revenue for the operation where many other operations
incur a legacy cost. Further, the environmental footprint and
impact would be greatly reduced as the gypsum would not have to be
stacked and maintained on the property.
Operational and Economic Benefits
In addition to the significant environmental benefits that would
be provided by Arianne's downstream facility, the study highlights
operational and economic benefits as well. By using high-purity
igneous phosphate concentrate, the downstream product mix will be
targeted towards specialty markets projected to be in significant
shortages in coming years allowing less competition and higher
margins. The production of additional marketable products such as
gypsum and electricity, would also allow for revenue streams beyond
traditional phosphate-based products. Input of higher purity
concentrate also allows for greatly improved operating margins as
lower input volumes [and costs] will generate higher revenues.
Geographically, the project has numerous advantages. By
situating the downstream project in Saguenay, Quebec, the facility will have easy
availability of high-quality igneous phosphate with access to the
necessary infrastructure required to build and operate a project of
this size and scope. In place there is a preexisting port, rail and
a road network to provide for easy transportation logistics
allowing access to the emerging Western battery ecosystem in
Quebec, Ontario and, the American auto manufacturing
markets in Michigan and the
southeast United States. The
Saguenay region also provides the availability of a highly skilled
workforce and has shown strong social acceptability for large scale
industrial projects.
"A lot of factors have come together that allow for this
opportunity," said Raphael
Gaudreault, COO of Arianne. "As this study clearly shows,
the opportunity is here for the Saguenay to become a major player
in the essential phosphoric acid industry. The project checks so
many boxes; security of supply, easy logistical access to a
critical mineral, minimal operational challenge and very impressive
economics, all within the context of a high ESG standard. As a
mining professional of over 20 years, I can say that it is
extremely rare to have everything come together in such a coherent
fashion."
Geopolitical
Phosphate has been known primarily as an agricultural commodity
necessary to enhance crop yields and provide the food we need. Many
jurisdictions, including North & South America, Western Europe and parts of Asia run deficits and require imports to meet
this growing demand. These deficits have been offset through
imports from jurisdictions that historically have suffered from
periods of unrest or jurisdictions that have competed with the West
to secure natural resources. Today, although most phosphate is
still used for fertilizer (~85%), the advent of new advanced
technologies, such as the LFP battery, have placed an additional
demand on phosphate.
Understanding the necessity of phosphate in both food production
and technologies required for the transition away from fossil
fuels, several jurisdictions have placed phosphate on their
critical mineral lists. Most recently Canada has joined two of its Provinces,
Quebec and Ontario along with the European Union in
adding phosphate to its Critical Mineral List. The addition
recognizes the importance of the mineral as well as the very
challenging "security of supply" issue.
The Lithium-Iron-Phosphate Battery ("LFP")
The LFP battery was originally developed in the mid-1990s and
today is one of the more prominent battery chemistries. Last year,
the LFP accounted for roughly 35% of all batteries and, as more
Western car companies (Tesla, Volkswagen, GM, Ford) have announced
that they will be adopting the technology, the LFP battery is
projected to be the most widely used chemistry. Superior
characteristics such as safety, lifespan, charging efficiency and
cost have all driven the demand for these batteries and made access
to the LFP a growing priority.
As well, beyond the EV, the LFP's attributes have made it the
premiere battery for use in Energy Storage Systems ("ESS").
Analysts such as Wood Mackenzie see the growth in the ESS market
accelerating demand for LFPs and believe that over 30% of all LFPs
will be used in the market segment by 2030.
A significant challenge for the West is Chinese dominance in LFP
battery production. Today, China
produces over 95% of all LFPs with two companies alone (BYD &
CATL) representing 70% of the entire market. Growing tensions
between China and the West have
led to a policy shift, with many of these governments now having
adopted programs to accelerate the manufacturing of these advanced
technologies in the West. Beyond Western manufacturing, many of
these government programs also incentivize the sourcing of key
critical minerals from Western jurisdictions.
The LFP battery requires PPA, a product that China also dominates. Growing demand for the
LFP, along with current uses for PPA, have industry analysts
predicting a significant deficit by the end of the decade.
Benchmark Mineral Intelligence forecasts a deficit reaching 1
million tonnes annually by 2030, thus requiring a significant
buildout of supply and, in particular, if the West is to become
self-sufficient, this supply will need to be built in the West.
Arianne's Opportunity
Situated in Quebec, Canada
- the PPA plant would be a safe, reliable Western source of
battery-grade acid
- the facility is geographically close to its end markets
(Western gigafactories)
- the Company would be able to benefit from attractive economic
incentives provided for critical mineral projects
Facility will have access to high-quality [igneous] phosphate
concentrate in the region (possibly including Arianne's Lac à Paul
project)
- Allows for a favorable phosphate product mix targeting high
margin products
- Allows for easy access to necessary inputs for the
facility
- Allows for additional revenue sources beyond phosphate-based
products
Strong [Base Case] Economics (Pre-tax)
- Low Opex cash cost
- NPV (8) of US $4.5B
- IRR of 32.8%
- Payback of roughly 3 years
In closing, Mr. Ostroff added, "the publishing of this study
should be very helpful as we look to conclude on our discussions
with potential partners and financiers. Between the strong
operational benefits, the strong economics and the acknowledgement
of phosphate's importance by its addition to both the Federal and
Provincial critical mineral lists along with the governments'
willingness to help, there is no reason why Arianne can't be the
premiere operation in the West and, arguably the world."
Source Information
Capex/Opex estimate:
PPA-MGA Plant by Bantrel
SAP by Atkins Realis
Logistics and integration by CIMA+
Macro:
CRU, Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, Wood Mackenzie, McKinsey &
Company
Economics/Pricing:
Israel Chemical (2023 Annual Report)
Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (Phosphoric Acid Market Outlook Q1
2024)
CRU (weekly phosphate product pricing)
Statista (Average Price of Crude Gypsum 2010-2023)
About Arianne Phosphate:
Arianne Phosphate ("Arianne Phosphate Inc.")
(www.arianne-inc.com) is developing the Lac à Paul phosphate
deposits located approximately 200 km north of the Saguenay/Lac St.
Jean area of Quebec, Canada.
These deposits will produce a high-quality igneous apatite
concentrate grading 39% P2O5 with little or
no contaminants (Feasibility Study released in 2013). The Company
has 202,890,210 shares outstanding.
Qualified Person
Raphael Gaudreault, eng.,
Qualified Person by NI 43-101, has approved this release. Mr.
Gaudreault is also the Company's Chief Operating Officer.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its
Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the
policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for
the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Follow Arianne on:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ariannephosphate
Twitter: http://twitter.com/arianne_dan
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArianneResources
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/arianneresources
Resource Investing
News: http://resourceinvestingnews.com/?s=Arianne
Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward Looking
Information
This news release contains "forward-looking statements"
and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable
securities regulations in Canada
and the United States
(collectively, "forward-looking information"). Forward-looking
information includes, but is not limited to,
anticipated quality and production of the apatite concentrate
at the Lac à Paul project. Often, but not always, forward-looking
information can be identified by the use of words such as "plans",
"expects, "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates",
forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", or "believes", or the
negatives thereof or variations of such words and phrases or
statements that certain actions, events or results "may", "could",
"would", "might", or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved.
Forward-looking information is subject to be known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual
results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the
Company to be materially different from those expressed or implied
by such forward-looking information, including but not limited to:
volatile stock price; risks related to changes in commodity prices;
sources and cost of power facilities; the estimation of initial and
sustaining capital requirements; the estimation of labour and
operating costs; the general global markets and economic
conditions; the risk associated with exploration, development and
operations of mineral deposits; the estimation of mineral reserves
and resources; the risks associated with uninsurable risks arising
during the course of exploration, development and production; risks
associated with currency fluctuations; environmental risks;
competition faced in securing experienced personnel; access to
adequate infrastructure to support mining, processing, development
and exploration activities; the risks associated with changes in
the mining regulatory regime governing the Company; completion of
the environmental assessment process; risks related to regulatory
and permitting delays; risks related to potential conflicts of
interest; the reliance on key personnel; financing, capitalization
and liquidity risks including the risk that the financing necessary
to fund continued exploration and development activities at Lac à
Paul project may not be available on satisfactory terms, or at all;
the risk of potential dilution through the issue of common shares;
the risk of litigation. Forward-looking information is based on
assumptions management believes to be reasonable at the time such
statements are made, including but not limited to, continued
exploration activities, no material adverse change in commodity
prices, exploration and development plans proceeding in accordance
with plans and such plans achieving their stated expected outcomes,
receipt of required regulatory approval, and such other assumptions
and factors as set out herein. Although the Company has attempted
to identify important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking
information, there may be other factors that cause results not to
be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance
that such forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as
actual results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such forward-looking information. Accordingly,
readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
information. Forward-looking information is made as of the date of
this press release, and the Company does not undertake to update
such forward-looking information except in accordance with
applicable securities laws.
SOURCE Arianne Phosphate Inc.