As filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2014

1933 Act Registration No. 33-57340

1940 Act Registration No. 811-07452

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM N-1A

  REGISTRATION STATEMENT  
 

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

  x

.

  Pre-Effective Amendment No.   ¨
  Post-Effective Amendment No. 60   x
  and/or  
 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

 
  THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940  
  Amendment No. 59   x

 

 

AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS)

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

 

 

11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000, Houston, TX 77046-1173
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code (713) 626-1919
John M. Zerr, Esquire
11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000, Houston, TX 77046-1173
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

 

Copy to:

Seba Kurian, Esquire   E. Carolan Berkley, Esquire
Invesco Advisers, Inc.   Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000   2005 Market Street, Suite 2600
Houston, Texas 77046-1173   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-7018

 

 

Approximate Date of Proposed Public Offering: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Amendment.

It is proposed that this filing will become effective (check appropriate box)

 

  ¨ immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
  ¨ on (date) pursuant to paragraph (b)
  ¨ 60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
  x on April 30, 2014 pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
  ¨ 75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
  ¨ on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485.

If appropriate, check the following:

 

  ¨ This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment.

 

 

 



 
Prospectus April 30, 2014
Series I shares
 

 
Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund
(formerly known as Invesco V.I. Utilities Fund)
 
Shares of the Fund are currently offered only to insurance company separate accounts funding variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies.
 
Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund’s investment objective is both capital appreciation and current income while managing portfolio volatility.
 
As with all other mutual fund securities, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not approved or disapproved these securities or determined whether the information in this prospectus is adequate or accurate. Anyone who tells you otherwise is committing a crime.
An investment in the Fund:
■  is not FDIC insured;
■  may lose value; and
■  is not guaranteed by a bank.


 

 
Table of Contents
Shares of the Fund are used as investment vehicles for variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies (variable products) issued by certain insurance companies. You cannot purchase shares of the Fund directly. As an owner of a variable product (variable product owner) that offers the Fund as an investment option, however, you may allocate
your variable product values to a separate account of the insurance company that invests in shares of the Fund.
Your variable product is offered through its own prospectus, which contains information about your variable product, including how to purchase the variable product and how to allocate variable product values to the Fund.
                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 

 
Fund Summary
Investment Objective(s)
 
The Fund’s investment objective is both capital appreciation and current income while managing portfolio volatility.
 
Fees and Expenses of the Fund
This table describes the fees and expenses that are incurred, directly or indirectly, when a variable product owner buys, holds, or redeems interest in an insurance company separate account that invests in the Series I shares of the Fund but does not represent the effect of any fees or other expenses assessed in connection with your variable product, and if it did, expenses would be higher.
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)
Class: Series I shares
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases (as a percentage of offering price) N/A

Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as a percentage of original purchase price or redemption proceeds, whichever is less) N/A

    
 
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a percentage of the value of your investment)
Class: Series I shares
Management Fees [ %]

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees [ ]

Other Expenses [ ]

Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses [ ]

Example. This Example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.
This Example does not represent the effect of any fees or expenses assessed in connection with your variable product, and if it did, expenses would be higher.
   
 
The Example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the Fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those periods. The Example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the Fund's operating expenses remain the same.
 
Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions, your costs would be:
   
  1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years
Series I shares [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ]

Portfolio Turnover. The Fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over” its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs. These costs, which are not reflected in annual Fund operating expenses or in the example, affect the Fund’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year, the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate was  % of the average value of its portfolio.
 
Principal Investment Strategies of the Fund
 
The Fund invests primarily in equity and fixed income securities, and derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities. The Fund will also invest in derivatives that Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the Adviser) believes will decrease the volatility level of the Fund’s annual returns.
The Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 65% of its net assets in income-producing equity investments. The Fund may invest in income-producing equity instruments (subject to the 65% policy above), debt securities and warrants or rights to acquire such securities, in such proportions as economic conditions indicate would best accomplish the Fund’s objectives. It is the current operating policy of the Fund to invest in
debt securities rated investment grade. It is also the operating policy of the Fund to invest not more than 10% of its net assets in debt securities rated BBB by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (S&P), Baa by Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. (Moody’s), or in securities determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. These operating policies do not apply to convertible securities which are selected primarily on the basis of their equity characteristics.
The Fund may invest in securities of issuers of all capitalization sizes; however, a substantial number of the issuers in which the Fund invests are large-capitalization issuers.
The Fund may invest in real estate investment trusts (REITs).
The Fund may invest in securities of foreign issuers or depository receipts.
The Fund can invest in derivative instruments including forward foreign currency contracts, futures contracts and options.
The Adviser also employs a risk management process intended to manage the volatility level of the Fund’s annual returns. The Adviser may sell exchange-traded futures contracts to target a maximum annual volatility level for the Fund’s returns of approximately 10%. The Adviser may sell futures contracts as often as daily to lower the Fund’s expected volatility level but does not expect to sell futures contracts when the Fund’s volatility level is within the target range. Due to market conditions or other factors, the actual or realized volatility of the Fund for any particular period of time may be materially higher or lower than the target maximum annual level. The Fund’s target maximum annual volatility level of 10% is not a total return performance target. It is possible for the Fund to maintain its volatility at or under its target maximum annual volatility level while having negative performance returns. Efforts to manage the Fund’s volatility could limit the Fund’s gains in rising markets, may expose the Fund to costs to which it would otherwise not have been exposed, and if unsuccessful may result in substantial losses.
In selecting securities, the Adviser focuses on a security’s potential for income with safety of principal and long-term growth of capital. The Adviser emphasizes a value style of investing, which focuses on undervalued companies with characteristics for improved valuations. This catalyst could come from within the company in the form of new management, operational enhancements, restructuring or reorganization. It could also be an external factor, such as an improvement in industry conditions or a regulatory change.
The Adviser may dispose of a security when it has reached the Adviser’s estimate of fair value or when the Adviser identifies a more attractive investment opportunity.
 
Principal Risks of Investing in the Fund
As with any mutual fund investment, loss of money is a risk of investing. An investment in the Fund is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency. The risks associated with an investment in the Fund can increase during times of significant market volatility. The principal risks of investing in the Fund are:
 
Call Risk. If interest rates fall, it is possible that issuers of debt securities with high interest rates will prepay or call their securities before their maturity dates. In this event, the proceeds from the called securities would likely be reinvested by the Fund in securities bearing the new, lower interest rates, resulting in a possible decline in the Fund's income and distributions to shareholders.
Convertible Securities Risk. The Fund may own convertible securities, the value of which may be affected by market interest rates, the risk that the issuer will default, the value of the underlying stock or the right of the issuer to buy back the convertible securities.
 
1                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
Credit Risk. The issuers of instruments in which the Fund invests may be unable to meet interest and/or principal payments, thereby causing its instruments to decrease in value and lowering the issuer’s credit rating.
Depositary Receipts Risk. Depositary receipts involve many of the same risks as those associated with direct investment in foreign securities. In addition, the underlying issuers of certain depositary receipts, particularly unsponsored or unregistered depositary receipts, are under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications to the holders of such receipts or to pass through to them any voting rights with respect to the deposited securities.
Derivatives Risk. The value of a derivative instrument depends largely on (and is derived from) the value of an underlying security, currency, commodity, interest rate, index or other asset (each referred to as an underlying asset). In addition to risks relating to the underlying assets, the use of derivatives may include other, possibly greater, risks, including counterparty, leverage and liquidity risks. Counterparty risk is the risk that the counterparty to the derivative contract will default on its obligation to pay the Fund the amount owed or otherwise perform under the derivative contract. Derivatives create leverage risk because they do not require payment up front equal to the economic exposure created by owning the derivative. As a result, an adverse change in the value of the underlying asset could result in the Fund sustaining a loss that is substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivative, which may make the Fund’s returns more volatile and increase the risk of loss. Derivative instruments may also be less liquid than more traditional investments and the Fund may be unable to sell or close out its derivative positions at a desirable time or price. This risk may be more acute under adverse market conditions, during which the Fund may be most in need of liquidating its derivative positions. Derivatives may also be harder to value, less tax efficient and subject to changing government regulation that could impact the Fund’s ability to use certain derivatives or their cost. Also, derivatives used for hedging or to gain or limit exposure to a particular market segment may not provide the expected benefits, particularly during adverse market conditions.
Equity Risk . Equity risk is the risk that the value of securities held by the Fund will fall due to general market and economic conditions, perceptions regarding the industries in which the issuers of securities held by the Fund participate or factors relating to specific companies in which the Fund invests, either directly or through derivative instruments. For example, an adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of securities held by the Fund; the price of securities may be particularly sensitive to general movements in the stock market; or a drop in the stock market may depress the price of most or all of the securities held by the Fund. In addition, securities of an issuer in the Fund portfolio may decline in price if the issuer fails to make anticipated dividend payments because, among other reasons, the issuer of the security experiences a decline in its financial condition.
 
Foreign Securities Risk. The Fund’s foreign investments may be affected by changes in a foreign country’s exchange rates, political and social instability, changes in economic or taxation policies, difficulties when enforcing obligations, decreased liquidity, and increased volatility. Foreign companies may be subject to less regulation resulting in less publicly available information about the companies.
 
Hedging Risk. A hedge is an investment made in order to reduce the risk of adverse price movements in a security by taking an offsetting position in a related security (often a derivative, such as an option or a short sale). Hedging may be ineffective due to unexpected changes in the market, changes in the values of the security and related security, or changes in the correlation of the security and related security. For gross currency hedges, there is an additional risk that these transactions create exposure to currencies in which the Fund’s securities are not denominated. Moreover, while hedging can reduce or eliminate losses it can also reduce or eliminate gains.
Income Risk. The income you receive from the Fund is based primarily on prevailing interest rates, which can vary widely over the short- and long-term. If interest rates drop, your income from the Fund may drop as well.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk refers to the risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise; conversely, bond prices generally rise as interest rates fall. Specific bonds differ in their sensitivity to changes in interest rates depending on their individual characteristics, including duration.
Management Risk. The investment techniques and risk analysis used by the Fund's portfolio managers may not produce the desired results. In addition, the Fund’s investment strategy to manage volatility may cause the Fund to underperform the broader markets in which the Fund invests during market rallies. Such underperformance could be significant during sudden or significant market rallies.
 
Market Risk. The prices of and the income generated by the Fund’s securities may decline in response to, among other things, investor sentiment, general economic and market conditions, regional or global instability, and currency and interest rate fluctuations.
 
Preferred Securities Risk. There are special risks associated with investing in preferred securities. Preferred securities may include provisions that permit the issuer, in its discretion, to defer or omit distributions for a certain period of time. If the Fund owns a security that is deferring or omitting its distributions, the Fund may be required to report the distribution on its tax returns, even though it may not have received this income. Further, preferred securities may lose substantial value due to the omission or deferment of dividend payments.
REIT Risk/Real Estate Risk. Investments in real estate related instruments may be affected by economic, legal, cultural, environmental or technological factors that affect property values, rents or occupancies of real estate related to the Fund's holdings. Real estate companies, including REITs or similar structures, tend to be small and mid cap companies, and their shares may be more volatile and less liquid. The value of investments in real estate related companies may be affected by the quality of management, the ability to repay loans, the utilization of leverage and financial covenants related thereto, whether the company carries adequate insurance and environmental factors. If a real estate related company defaults, the Fund may own real estate directly, which involves the following additional risks: environmental liabilities, difficulty in valuing and selling the real estate, and economic or regulatory changes.
Short Sales Risk. If the Fund sells short a security that it does not own and the security increases in value, the Fund will pay a higher price to repurchase the security. The more the Fund pays, the more it will lose on the transaction, which adversely affects its share price. As there is no limit on how much the price of the security can increase, the Fund’s exposure is unlimited.
 
Small- and Mid-Capitalization Risks. Stocks of small- and mid-sized companies tend to be more vulnerable to adverse developments and may have little or no operating history or track record of success, and limited product lines, markets, management and financial resources. The securities of small- and mid-sized companies may be more volatile due to less market interest and less publicly available information about the issuer. They also may be illiquid or restricted as to resale, or may trade less frequently and in smaller volumes, all of which may cause difficulty when establishing or closing a position at a desirable price.
 
Value Investing Style Risk. The Fund emphasizes a value style of investing, which focuses on undervalued companies with characteristics for improved valuations. This style of investing is subject to the risk that the valuations never improve or that the returns on value equity securities are less than returns on other styles of investing or the overall stock market. Value stocks also may decline in price, even though in theory they are already underpriced.
Volatility Management Risk. Volatility management risk is a risk that the Adviser’s strategy for managing portfolio volatility may not produce the
 
2                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
desired result or that the Adviser is unable to trade certain derivatives effectively or in a timely manner. There can be no guarantee that the Fund will maintain its target volatility level. Additionally, maintenance of the target volatility level will not ensure that the Fund will deliver competitive returns. The use of derivatives in connection with the Fund’s managed volatility strategy may expose the Fund to losses (some of which may be sudden) that it would not have otherwise been exposed to if it had only invested directly in equity and/or fixed income securities. Efforts to manage the Fund’s volatility could limit the Fund’s gains in rising markets and may expose the Fund to costs to which it would otherwise not have been exposed. The Fund’s managed volatility strategy may result in the Fund outperforming the general securities market during periods of flat or negative market performance, and underperforming the general securities market during periods of positive market performance. The gains and losses of the Fund’s futures positions may not correlate with the Fund’s direct investments in equity securities; as a result, these futures contracts may decline in value at the same time as the Fund’s direct investments in equity securities decline in value. The proprietary and third-party risk models used by the Adviser may perform differently than expected and may negatively affect performance and the ability of the Fund to maintain its volatility at or below its target maximum annual volatility level for various reasons, including errors in using or building the models, technical issues implementing the models and various non-quantitative factors (such as, market or trading system dysfunctions, and investor fear or over-reaction).
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk. The value, interest rates, and liquidity of non-cash paying instruments, such as zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities, are subject to greater fluctuation than other types of securities.
 
Performance Information
 
The bar chart and performance table provide an indication of the risks of investing in the Fund. The bar chart shows changes in the performance of the Fund from year to year as of December 31. For periods prior to April 30, 2004, performance shown relates to a predecessor fund advised by INVESCO Funds Group, Inc. (IFG), an affiliate of Invesco Advisers, Inc. All performance shown assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and the effect of the Fund's expenses. The performance table compares the Fund's performance to that of a broad-based securities market benchmark, two style specific benchmarks and a peer group benchmark comprised of funds with investment objectives and strategies similar to the Fund. The performance table below does not reflect charges assessed in connection with your variable product; if it did, the performance shown would be lower. The Fund's past performance is not necessarily an indication of its future performance. Updated performance information is available on the Fund's Web site at www.invesco.com/us.
 
Annual Total Returns
 

Best Quarter (ended [ ]): [ ]
Worst Quarter (ended [ ]): [ ]
 
 
Average Annual Total Returns (for the periods ended December 31, 2013)
  1
Year
5
Years
10
Years
Series I shares: Inception (12/30/1994) [ ]% [ ]% [ ]%

Russell 1000 ® Value Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 1 [ ] [ ] [ ]

S&P 500 ® Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 1 [ ] [ ] [ ]

Barclays U.S. Government Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 2 [ ] [ ] [ ]

Barclays U.S. Credit Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 2 [ ] [ ] [ ]

S&P 500 ® Utilities Sector Total Return Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 2 [ ] [ ] [ ]

Lipper VUF Equity Income Funds IX Index 3 [ ] [ ] [ ]

Lipper VUF Utility Funds Classification Average 3 [ ] [ ] [ ]

1 The Fund has elected to use the Russell 1000 ® Value Index to represent its broad-based specific benchmark rather than the S&P 500 ® Index because the Russell 1000 ® Value Index more closely reflects the performance of the types of securities in which the Fund invests.
2 The Fund has elected to use the Barclays U.S. Government Index and Barclays U.S. Credit Index to represent its style specific benchmarks rather than the S&P 500 ® Utilities Sector Total Return Index because the Barclays U.S. Government Index and Barclays U.S. Credit Index more closely reflect the performance of the types of securities in which the Fund invests.
3 The Fund has elected to use the Lipper VUF Equity Income Funds IX Index to represent its peer group benchmark rather than the Lipper VUF Utility Funds Classification Average because the Lipper VUF Equity Income Funds IX Index more closely reflects the performance of the types of securities in which the Fund invests.
 
Management of the Fund
Investment Adviser: Invesco Advisers, Inc.
 
Portfolio Managers Title Length of Service on the Fund
Thomas Bastian Portfolio Manager 2013

Chuck Burge Portfolio Manager 2013

Duy Nguyen Portfolio Manager 2013

Mary Jayne Maly Portfolio Manager 2013

Sergio Marcheli Portfolio Manager 2013

James Roeder Portfolio Manager 2013

 
Purchase and Sale of Fund Shares
You cannot purchase or sell (redeem) shares of the Fund directly. Please contact the insurance company that issued your variable product for more information on the purchase and sale of Fund shares. For more information, see “Other Information—Purchase and Redemption of Shares” in the prospectus.
Tax Information
The Fund expects, based on its investment objective and strategies, that its distributions, if any, will consist of ordinary income, capital gains, or some combination of both. Because shares of the Fund must be purchased through variable products, such distributions will be exempt from current taxation if left to accumulate within the variable product.
Payments to Insurance Companies
If you purchase the Fund through an insurance company or other financial intermediary, the Fund and the Fund’s distributor or its related companies may pay the intermediary for the sale of Fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing the insurance company or other intermediary and your salesperson or financial adviser to recommend the Fund over another investment. Ask your salesperson or financial adviser or visit your financial intermediary’s Web site for more information.
3                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund



Investment Objective(s), Strategies, Risks and Portfolio Holdings
    
Objective(s) and Strategies
 
The Fund’s investment objective is both capital appreciation and current income while managing portfolio volatility. The Fund’s investment objective may be changed by the Board of Trustees without shareholder approval.
The Fund invests primarily in equity and fixed income securities, and derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities. The Fund will also invest in derivatives that the Adviser believes will decrease the volatility level of the Fund’s annual returns.
The Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 65% of its net assets in income-producing equity investments. Income producing equity investments are dividend paying common or preferred stocks, interest paying convertible debentures or bonds, or zero coupon convertible securities (on which the Fund accrues income for tax and accounting purposes, but receives no cash). The Fund may invest in income-producing equity instruments (subject to the 65% policy above), debt securities and warrants or rights to acquire such securities, in such proportions as economic conditions indicate would best accomplish the Fund’s objectives. It is the current operating policy of the Fund to invest in debt securities rated investment grade. Investment grade securities are: (i) securities rated BBB- or higher by S&P, Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or an equivalent rating by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), or (ii) securities determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. It is also the operating policy of the Fund to invest not more than 10% of its net assets in debt securities rated BBB by S&P, Baa by Moody’s, or in securities determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. These operating policies do not apply to convertible securities which are selected primarily on the basis of their equity characteristics.
The Fund may invest in securities of issuers of all capitalization sizes; however, a substantial number of the issuers in which the Fund invests are large-capitalization issuers. The Fund considers an issuer to be a large-capitalization issuer if it has a market capitalization, at the time of purchase, within the range of the largest and smallest capitalized companies included in the Russell 1000 Index during the most recent 11-month period (based on month-end data) plus the most recent date during the current month. As of December 31, 2013, the capitalization of companies in the Russell 1000 Index ranged from $441.7 million to $500.7 billion.
The Fund may invest in real estate investment trusts (REITs). REITs pool investors’ funds for investment primarily in commercial real estate properties or real-estate related loans. REITs generally derive their income from rents on the underlying properties or interest on the underlying loans, and their value is impacted by changes in the value of the underlying property or changes in interest rates affecting the underlying loans owned by the REITs.
The Fund may invest in securities of foreign issuers or depository receipts. A depositary receipt is generally issued by a bank or financial institution and represents an ownership interest in the common stock or other equity securities of a foreign company.
The Fund can invest in derivative instruments including forward foreign currency contracts, futures contracts and options.
A forward foreign currency contract is an agreement between parties to exchange a specified amount of currency at a specified future time at a specified rate. The Fund can use forward foreign currency contracts to hedge against adverse movements in the foreign currencies in which portfolio securities are denominated.
A futures contract is a standardized agreement between two parties to buy or sell a specified quantity of an underlying asset at a specified price at a specified future time. The value of the futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of the underlying asset. Depending
on the terms of the particular contract, futures contracts are settled by purchasing an offsetting contract, physically delivering the underlying asset on the settlement date or paying of a cash settlement amount on the settlement date. The Fund can use futures contracts to seek exposure to certain asset classes and to hedge against adverse movements in the foreign currencies in which portfolio securities are denominated.
An option is a derivative financial instrument that represents a contract between two parties for a future transaction on an asset at a reference price. The buyer of the option gains the right, but not the obligation, to engage in that transaction, while the seller incurs the corresponding obligation to fulfill the transaction. The price of an option derives from the difference between the reference price and the value of the underlying asset (commonly a stock, a bond, a currency or a futures contract) plus a premium based on the time remaining until the expiration of the option. Other types of options exist, and options can in principle be created for any type of valuable asset. The Fund can use options to seek alpha (return on investments in excess of the Russell 1000 Value Index) or to mitigate risk and to hedge against adverse movements in the foreign currencies in which portfolio securities are denominated.
The Adviser also employs a risk management process intended to manage the volatility level of the Fund’s annual returns.
The Adviser may sell exchange-traded futures contracts to target a maximum annual volatility level for the Fund’s returns of approximately 10%. Volatility is a statistical measure of the magnitude of changes in the Fund’s returns without regard to the direction of those changes. To implement this volatility management strategy, the Adviser will monitor the forecasted annualized volatility of the Fund’s returns, placing a greater weight on recent historic data. The Adviser may sell futures contracts as often as daily to lower the Fund’s expected volatility level but does not expect to sell futures contracts when the Fund’s volatility level is within the target range.
Volatility is not a measure of investment performance. Volatility may result from rapid or dramatic price swings. Higher volatility generally indicates higher risk and is often reflected by frequent and sometimes significant movements up and down in value. The Fund could experience high levels of volatility in both rising and falling markets. Due to market conditions or other factors, the actual or realized volatility of the Fund for any particular period of time may be materially higher or lower than the target maximum annual level.
The Fund’s target maximum annual volatility level of 10% is not a total return performance target. The Fund does not expect its total return performance to be within any specified targeted range. It is possible for the Fund to maintain its volatility at or under its target maximum annual volatility level while having negative performance returns. Efforts to manage the Fund’s volatility could limit the Fund’s gains in rising markets, may expose the Fund to costs to which it would otherwise not have been exposed, and if unsuccessful may result in substantial losses.
In selecting securities, the Adviser focuses on a security’s potential for income with safety of principal and long-term growth of capital. The Adviser emphasizes a value style of investing, which focuses on undervalued companies with characteristics for improved valuations. This catalyst could come from within the company in the form of new management, operational enhancements, restructuring or reorganization. It could also be an external factor, such as an improvement in industry conditions or a regulatory change.
The Adviser may dispose of a security when it has reached the Adviser’s estimate of fair value or when the Adviser identifies a more attractive investment opportunity.
In anticipation of or in response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, the Adviser may temporarily use a different investment strategy for defensive purposes. If the Adviser does so, different factors could affect the Fund’s performance and the Fund may not achieve its investment objective.
 
4                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


The Fund’s investments in the types of securities described in this prospectus vary from time to time, and, at any time, the Fund may not be invested in all of the types of securities described in this prospectus. The Fund may also invest in securities and other investments not described in this prospectus.
For more information, see “Description of the Funds and Their Investments and Risks” in the Fund’s SAI.
Risks
The principal risks of investing in the Fund are:
 
Call Risk. If interest rates fall, it is possible that issuers of debt securities with high interest rates will prepay or call their securities before their maturity dates. In this event, the proceeds from the called securities would likely be reinvested by the Fund in securities bearing the new, lower interest rates, resulting in a possible decline in the Fund's income and distributions to shareholders.
Convertible Securities Risk. The values of convertible securities in which the Fund may invest may be affected by market interest rates. The values of convertible securities also may be affected by the risk of actual issuer default on interest or principal payments and the value of the underlying stock. Additionally, an issuer may retain the right to buy back its convertible securities at a time and price unfavorable to the Fund.
Credit Risk. The issuers of instruments in which the Fund invests may be unable to meet interest and/or principal payments. This risk is increased to the extent the Fund invests in junk bonds which may cause the Fund to incur higher expenses to protect its interests. The credit risks and market prices of lower-grade securities generally are more sensitive to negative issuer developments, such as reduced revenues or increased expenditures, or adverse economic conditions, such as a recession, than are higher-grade securities. An issuer’s securities may decrease in value if its financial strength weakens, which may reduce its credit rating and possibly its ability to meet its contractual obligations.
Depositary Receipts Risk. Depositary receipts involve many of the same risks as those associated with direct investment in foreign securities. In addition, the underlying issuers of certain depositary receipts, particularly unsponsored or unregistered depositary receipts, are under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications to the holders of such receipts or to pass through to them any voting rights with respect to the deposited securities.
Derivatives Risk. A derivative is an instrument whose value depends largely on (is derived from) the value of an underlying security, currency, commodity, interest rate, index or other asset (each referred to as an underlying asset). In addition to risks relating to the underlying assets, the use of derivatives may include other, possibly greater, risks, which are described below.
■  Counterparty Risk. Certain derivatives do not trade on an established exchange (referred to as over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives) and are simply financial contracts between the Fund and a counterparty. When the Fund is owed money on an OTC derivative, the Fund is dependent on the counterparty to pay or, in some cases, deliver the underlying asset, unless the Fund can otherwise sell its derivative contract to a third party prior to its expiration. Many counterparties are financial institutions such as banks and broker-dealers and their creditworthiness (and ability to pay or perform) may be negatively impacted by factors affecting financial institutions generally. In addition, in the event that a counterparty becomes bankrupt or insolvent, the Fund’s ability to recover the collateral that the Fund has on deposit with the counterparty could be delayed or impaired. For derivatives traded on a centralized exchange, the Fund generally is dependent upon the solvency of the relevant exchange clearing house (which acts as a guarantor for each contractual obligation under such derivatives) for payment on derivative instruments for which the Fund is owed money.
■  Leverage Risk. Many derivatives do not require a payment up front equal to the economic exposure created by owning the derivative, which creates a form of leverage. As a result, an adverse change in the value of the underlying asset could result in the Fund sustaining a loss that is substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivative. Leverage may therefore make the Fund’s returns more volatile and increase the risk of loss. The Fund segregates or earmarks liquid assets with a value at least equal to the amount that the Fund owes the derivative counterparty each day, if any, or otherwise holds instruments that offset the Fund’s daily obligation under the derivatives instrument. This process is sometimes referred to as “cover.” The amount of liquid assets needed as cover will fluctuate over time as the value of the derivative instrument rises and falls. If the value of the Fund’s derivative positions or the value of the assets used as cover unexpectedly decreases, the Fund may be forced to segregate additional liquid assets as cover or sell assets at a disadvantageous time or price to meet its derivative obligations or to meet redemption requests, which could affect management of the Fund and the Fund’s returns. In certain market conditions, losses on derivative instruments can grow larger while the value of the Fund’s other assets fall, resulting in the Fund’s derivative positions becoming a larger percentage of the Fund’s investments.
■  Liquidity Risk. There is a smaller pool of buyers and sellers for certain derivatives, particularly OTC derivatives, than more traditional investments such as stocks. These buyers and sellers are often financial institutions that may be unable or unwilling to buy or sell derivatives during times of financial or market stress. Derivative instruments may therefore be less liquid than more traditional investments and the Fund may be unable to sell or exit its derivative positions at a desirable time or price. This risk may be more acute under adverse market conditions, during which the Fund may be most in need of liquidating its derivative positions. To the extent that the Fund is unable to exit a derivative position because of market illiquidity, the Fund may not be able to prevent further losses of value in its derivatives holdings and the liquidity of the Fund and its ability to meet redemption requests may be impaired to the extent that a substantial portion of the Fund’s otherwise liquid assets must be used as margin or cover. Another consequence of illiquidity is that the Fund may be required to hold a derivative instrument to maturity and take or make delivery of the underlying asset that the Adviser would otherwise have attempted to avoid.
■  Other Risks. Compared to other types of investments, derivatives may be harder to value and may also be less tax efficient, as described under the “Taxes” section of the prospectus. In addition, changes in government regulation of derivative instruments could affect the character, timing and amount of the Fund’s taxable income or gains, and may limit or prevent the Fund from using certain types of derivative instruments as a part of its investment strategy, which could make the investment strategy more costly to implement or require the Fund to change its investment strategy. To the extent that the Fund uses derivatives for hedging or to gain or limit exposure to a particular market or market segment, there may be imperfect correlation between the value of the derivative instrument and the value of the instrument being hedged or the relevant market or market segment, in which case the Fund may not realize the intended benefits. There is also the risk that during adverse market conditions, an instrument which would usually operate as a hedge provides no hedging benefits at all. The Fund’s use of derivatives may be limited by the requirements for taxation of the Fund as a regulated investment company.
Equity Risk . Equity risk is the risk that the value of securities held by the Fund will fall due to general market and economic conditions, perceptions regarding the industries in which the issuers of securities held by the Fund participate or factors relating to specific companies in which the Fund
 
5                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
invests, either directly or through derivative instruments. For example, an adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of securities held by the Fund; the price of securities may be particularly sensitive to general movements in the stock market; or a drop in the stock market may depress the price of most or all of the securities held by the Fund. In addition, securities of an issuer in the Fund portfolio may decline in price if the issuer fails to make anticipated dividend payments because, among other reasons, the issuer of the security experiences a decline in its financial condition.
 
Foreign Securities Risk. The dollar value of the Fund’s foreign investments may be affected by changes in the exchange rates between the dollar and the currencies in which those investments are traded. The value of the Fund’s foreign investments may be adversely affected by political and social instability in their home countries, by changes in economic or taxation policies in those countries, or by the difficulty in enforcing obligations in those countries. Foreign companies generally may be subject to less stringent regulations than U.S. companies, including financial reporting requirements and auditing and accounting controls. As a result, there generally is less publicly available information about foreign companies than about U.S. companies. Trading in many foreign securities may be less liquid and more volatile than U.S. securities due to the size of the market or other factors.
 
Hedging Risk. A hedge is an investment made in order to reduce the risk of adverse price movements in a security by taking an offsetting position in a related security (often a derivative, such as an option or a short sale). While hedging strategies can be very useful and inexpensive ways of reducing risk, they are sometimes ineffective due to unexpected changes in the market. Hedging also involves the risk that changes in the value of the related security will not match those of the instruments being hedged as expected, in which case any losses on the instruments being hedged may not be reduced. For gross currency hedges, there is an additional risk that these transactions create exposure to currencies in which the Fund’s securities are not denominated. Moreover, while hedging can reduce or eliminate losses it can also reduce or eliminate gains.
Income Risk. The income you receive from the Fund is based primarily on prevailing interest rates, which can vary widely over the short- and long-term. If interest rates drop, your income from the Fund may drop as well.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk refers to the risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise; conversely, bond prices generally rise as interest rates fall. Specific bonds differ in their sensitivity to changes in interest rates depending on their individual characteristics. One measure of this sensitivity is called duration. The longer the duration of a particular bond, the greater its price sensitivity is to interest rates. Similarly, a longer duration portfolio of securities has greater price sensitivity. Falling interest rates may also prompt some issuers to refinance existing debt, which could affect the Fund's performance.
Management Risk. The investment techniques and risk analysis used by the Fund's portfolio managers may not produce the desired results. In addition, the Fund’s investment strategy to manage volatility may cause the Fund to underperform the broader markets in which the Fund invests during market rallies. Such underperformance could be significant during sudden or significant market rallies.
 
Market Risk. The prices of and the income generated by the Fund’s securities may decline in response to, among other things, investor sentiment, general economic and market conditions, regional or global instability, and currency and interest rate fluctuations.
 
Preferred Securities Risk. There are special risks associated with investing in preferred securities. Preferred securities may include provisions that permit the issuer, in its discretion, to defer or omit distributions for a certain period of time. If the Fund owns a security that is deferring or omitting its distributions, the Fund may be required to report the distribution on its tax returns, even though it may not have received this income. Further, preferred securities may lose substantial value due to the omission
or deferment of dividend payments. Preferred securities may be less liquid than many other securities, such as common stocks, and generally offer no voting rights with respect to the issuer. Preferred securities also may be subordinated to bonds or other debt instruments in an issuer’s capital structure, subjecting them to a greater risk of non-payment than more senior securities. In addition, in certain circumstances, an issuer of preferred securities may redeem the securities prior to a specified date, and this may negatively impact the return of the security.
REIT Risk/Real Estate Risk. Investments in real estate related instruments may be affected by economic, legal, cultural, environmental or technological factors that affect property values, rents or occupancies of real estate related to the Fund's holdings. Real estate companies, including REITs or similar structures, tend to be small and mid cap companies, and their shares may be more volatile and less liquid. The value of investments in real estate related companies may be affected by the quality of management, the ability to repay loans, the utilization of leverage and financial covenants related thereto, whether the company carries adequate insurance and environmental factors. If a real estate related company defaults, the Fund may own real estate directly, which involves the following additional risks: environmental liabilities, difficulty in valuing and selling the real estate, and economic or regulatory changes.
Short Sales Risk. If the Fund sells short a security that it does not own and the security increases in value, the Fund will pay a higher price to repurchase the security. The more the Fund pays, the more it will lose on the transaction, which adversely affects its share price. As there is no limit on how much the price of the security can increase, the Fund’s exposure is unlimited.
 
Small- and Mid-Capitalization Risks. Stocks of small- and mid-sized companies tend to be more vulnerable to adverse developments and may have little or no operating history or track record of success, and limited product lines, markets, management and financial resources. The securities of small- and mid-sized companies may be more volatile due to less market interest and less publicly available information about the issuer. They also may be illiquid or restricted as to resale, or may trade less frequently and in smaller volumes, all of which may cause difficulty when establishing or closing a position at a desirable price.
 
Value Investing Style Risk. The Fund emphasizes a value style of investing, which focuses on undervalued companies with characteristics for improved valuations. This style of investing is subject to the risk that the valuations never improve or that the returns on value equity securities are less than returns on other styles of investing or the overall stock market. Value stocks also may decline in price, even though in theory they are already underpriced.
Volatility Management Risk. Volatility management risk is a risk that the Adviser’s strategy for managing portfolio volatility may not produce the desired result or that the Adviser is unable to trade certain derivatives effectively or in a timely manner. There can be no guarantee that the Fund will maintain its target volatility level. Additionally, maintenance of the target volatility level will not ensure that the Fund will deliver competitive returns. The use of derivatives in connection with the Fund’s managed volatility strategy may expose the Fund to losses (some of which may be sudden) that it would not have otherwise been exposed to if it had only invested directly in equity and/or fixed income securities. Efforts to manage the Fund’s volatility could limit the Fund’s gains in rising markets and may expose the Fund to costs to which it would otherwise not have been exposed. The Fund’s managed volatility strategy may result in the Fund outperforming the general securities market during periods of flat or negative market performance, and underperforming the general securities market during periods of positive market performance. The gains and losses of the Fund’s futures positions may not correlate with the Fund’s direct investments in equity securities; as a result, these futures contracts may decline in value at the same time as the Fund’s direct investments in equity securities decline in value. The Adviser uses a combination of proprietary and third-party systems to help it estimate the Fund’s expected volatility.
 
6                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
Based on those estimates, the Adviser may adjust the Fund’s exposure to certain markets by selling exchange-traded futures contracts in an attempt to manage the Fund’s expected volatility. The proprietary and third-party risk models used by the Adviser may perform differently than expected and may negatively affect performance and the ability of the Fund to maintain its volatility at or below its target maximum annual volatility level for various reasons, including errors in using or building the models, technical issues implementing the models and various non-quantitative factors (such as, market or trading system dysfunctions, and investor fear or over-reaction).
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk. Zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities may be subject to greater fluctuation in value and less liquidity in the event of adverse market conditions than comparably rated securities paying cash interest at regular interest payment periods. Prices on non-cash-paying instruments may be more sensitive to changes in the issuer’s financial condition, fluctuation in interest rates and market demand/supply imbalances than cash-paying securities with similar credit ratings, and thus may be more speculative. Investors may purchase zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities at a price below the amount payable at maturity. Because such securities do not entitle the holder to any periodic payments of interest prior to maturity, this prevents any reinvestment of interest payments at prevailing interest rates if prevailing interest rates rise. On the other hand, because there are no periodic interest payments to be reinvested prior to maturity, zero coupon securities eliminate the reinvestment risk and may lock in a favorable rate of return to maturity if interest rates drop. Special tax considerations are associated with investing in certain lower-grade securities, such as zero coupon or pay-in-kind securities.
Exclusion of Adviser from Commodity Pool Operator Definition
With respect to the Fund, the Adviser has claimed an exclusion from the definition of “commodity pool operator” (CPO) under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and, therefore, is not subject to CFTC registration or regulation as a CPO. In addition, the Adviser is relying upon a related exclusion from the definition of “commodity trading advisor” (CTA) under the CEA and the rules of the CFTC with respect to the Fund.
As of January 1, 2013, the terms of the CPO exclusion require the Fund, among other things, to adhere to certain limits on its investments in “commodity interests.” Commodity interests include commodity futures, commodity options and swaps, which in turn include non-deliverable forwards. The Fund is permitted to invest in these instruments as further described in the Fund’s SAI. However, the Fund is not intended as a vehicle for trading in the commodity futures, commodity options or swaps markets. The CFTC has neither reviewed nor approved the Adviser’s reliance on these exclusions, or the Fund, its investment strategies or this prospectus.
 
Portfolio Holdings
A description of Fund policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of Fund portfolio holdings is available in the SAI, which is available at www.invesco.com/us.

Fund Management
    
The Adviser(s)
Invesco Advisers, Inc. (Invesco or the Adviser) serves as the Fund’s investment adviser. The Adviser manages the investment operations of the Fund as well as other investment portfolios that encompass a broad range of investment objectives, and has agreed to perform or arrange for the performance of the Fund’s day-to-day management. The Adviser is located at 1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. The Adviser, as successor in interest to multiple investment advisers, has been an investment adviser since 1976.
 
 
Adviser Compensation
 
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Adviser received compensation of [0.00]% of Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund's average daily net assets, after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement.
A discussion regarding the basis for the Board’s approval of the investment advisory agreement and investment sub-advisory agreements of the Fund is available in the Fund’s most recent semi-annual report to shareholders for the six-month period ended June 30.
 
Portfolio Managers
The following individuals are jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio:
 
■  Thomas Bastian, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010. From 2003 to 2010, he was associated with Van Kampen Asset Management in an investment management capacity.
■  Chuck Burge, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2002.
■  Duy Nguyen, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2000.
■  Mary Jayne Maly, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010. From 1992 to 2010, she was associated with Van Kampen Asset Management in an investment capacity.
■  Sergio Marcheli, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010. From 2002 to 2010, he was associated with Van Kampen Asset Management in an investment capacity.
■  James Roeder, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010. From 1999 to 2010, he was associated with Van Kampen Asset Management in an investment capacity.
 
More information on the portfolio managers may be found at www.invesco.com/us. The Web site is not part of this prospectus.
The Fund's SAI provides additional information about the portfolio managers’ investments in the Fund, a description of the compensation structure and information regarding other accounts managed.

Other Information
    
Purchase and Redemption of Shares
The Fund ordinarily effects orders to purchase and redeem shares at the Fund’s next computed net asset value after it receives an order. Insurance companies participating in the Fund serve as the Fund’s designee for receiving orders of separate accounts that invest in the Fund. The Fund may postpone the right of redemption only under unusual circumstances, as allowed by the SEC, such as when the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) restricts or suspends trading.
Although the Fund generally intends to pay redemption proceeds solely in cash, the Fund reserves the right to determine, in its sole discretion, whether to satisfy redemption requests by making payment in securities or other property (known as a redemption in kind).
Shares of the Fund are offered in connection with mixed and shared funding, i.e., to separate accounts of affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies funding variable products. The Fund currently offers shares only to insurance company separate accounts. In the future, the Fund may offer them to pension and retirement plans that qualify for special federal income tax treatment. Due to differences in tax treatment and other considerations,
7                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


the interests of Fund shareholders, including variable product owners and plan participants investing in the Fund (whether directly or indirectly through fund of funds), may conflict.
Mixed and shared funding may present certain conflicts of interest. For example, violation of the federal tax laws by one insurance company separate account investing directly or indirectly in a fund could cause variable products funded through another insurance company separate account to lose their tax-deferred status, unless remedial actions were taken. The Board will monitor for the existence of any material conflicts and determine what action, if any, should be taken. The Fund’s net asset value could decrease if it had to sell investment securities to pay redemption proceeds to a separate account (or plan) withdrawing because of a conflict.
Excessive Short-Term Trading Activity Disclosure
The Fund’s investment programs are designed to serve long-term investors and are not designed to accommodate excessive short-term trading activity in violation of our policies described below. Excessive short-term trading activity in the Fund’s shares (i.e., purchases of Fund shares followed shortly thereafter by redemptions of such shares, or vice versa) may hurt the long-term performance of the Fund by requiring it to maintain an excessive amount of cash or to liquidate portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous time, thus interfering with the efficient management of the Fund by causing it to incur increased brokerage and administrative costs. Where excessive short-term trading activity seeks to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities from stale prices for portfolio securities, the value of Fund shares held by long-term investors may be diluted. The Board has adopted policies and procedures designed to discourage excessive short-term trading of Fund shares. The Fund may alter its policies and procedures at any time without giving prior notice to Fund shareholders if Invesco believes the change would be in the best interests of long-term investors.
Pursuant to the Fund’s policies and procedures, Invesco and certain of its corporate affiliates (Invesco and such affiliates, collectively, the Invesco Affiliates) currently use the following tools designed to discourage excessive short-term trading in the Fund:
(1) trade activity monitoring; and
(2) the use of fair value pricing consistent with procedures approved by the Board.
Each of these tools is described in more detail below.
In addition, restrictions designed to discourage or curtail excessive short-term trading activity may be imposed by the insurance companies and/or their separate accounts that invest in the Fund on behalf of variable product owners. Variable product owners should refer to the applicable contract and related prospectus for more details.
Trade Activity Monitoring
To detect excessive short-term trading activities, the Invesco Affiliates will monitor, on a daily basis, selected aggregate purchase or redemption trade orders placed by insurance companies and/or their separate accounts. The Invesco Affiliates will seek to work with insurance companies to discourage variable product owners from engaging in abusive trading practices. However, the ability of the Invesco Affiliates to monitor trades that are placed by variable product owners is severely if not completely limited due to the fact that the insurance companies trade with the Fund through omnibus accounts, and maintain the exclusive relationship with, and are responsible for maintaining the account records of, their variable product owners. There may also be legal and technological limitations on the ability of insurance companies to impose restrictions on the trading practices of their variable product owners. As a result, there can be no guarantee that the Invesco Affiliates will be able to detect or deter market timing by variable product owners.
If, as a result of this monitoring, the Invesco Affiliates believe that a variable product owner has engaged in excessive short-term trading (regardless of whether or not the insurance company’s own trading restrictions are exceeded), the Invesco Affiliates will seek to act in a manner that they believe is consistent with the best interests of long-term investors,
which may include taking steps such as (1) asking the insurance company to take action to stop such activities, or (2) refusing to process future purchases related to such activities in the insurance company’s account with the Fund. The Invesco Affiliates will use reasonable efforts to apply the Fund’s policies uniformly given the potential limitations described above.
Fair Value Pricing
Securities owned by the Fund are to be valued at current market value if market quotations are readily available. All other securities and assets of the Fund for which market quotations are not readily available are to be valued at fair value determined in good faith using procedures approved by the Board. An effect of fair value pricing may be to reduce the ability of frequent traders to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities resulting from potentially “stale” prices of portfolio holdings. However, it cannot eliminate the possibility of frequent trading.
See “Pricing of Shares—Determination of Net Asset Value” for more information.
Risks
There is the risk that the Fund’s policies and procedures will prove ineffective in whole or in part to detect or prevent excessive short-term trading. Although these policies and procedures, including the tools described above, are designed to discourage excessive short-term trading, they do not eliminate the possibility that excessive short-term trading activity in the Fund will occur. Moreover, each of these tools involves judgments that are inherently subjective. The Invesco Affiliates seek to make these judgments to the best of their abilities in a manner that they believe is consistent with the best interests of long-term investors. However, there can be no assurance that the Invesco Affiliates will be able to gain access to any or all of the information necessary to detect or prevent excessive short-term trading by a variable product owner. While the Invesco Affiliates and the Fund may seek to take actions with the assistance of the insurance companies that invest in the Fund, there is the risk that neither the Invesco Affiliates nor the Fund will be successful in their efforts to minimize or eliminate such activity.
Pricing of Shares
Determination of Net Asset Value
The price of the Fund’s shares is the Fund’s net asset value per share. The Fund values portfolio securities for which market quotations are readily available at market value. The Fund values all other securities and assets for which market quotations are unavailable or unreliable at their fair value in good faith using procedures approved by the Board. The Board has delegated the daily determination of good faith fair value methodologies to Invesco’s Valuation Committee, which acts in accordance with Board approved policies. On a quarterly basis, Invesco provides the Board various reports indicating the quality and effectiveness of its fair value decisions on portfolio holdings. Securities and other assets quoted in foreign currencies are valued in U.S. dollars based on the prevailing exchange rates on that day.
Even when market quotations are available, they may be stale or they may be unreliable because the security is not traded frequently, trading on the security ceased before the close of the trading market or issuer specific events occurred after the security ceased trading or because of the passage of time between the close of the market on which the security trades and the close of the NYSE and when the Fund calculates its net asset value. Issuer specific events may cause the last market quotation to be unreliable. Such events may include a merger or insolvency, events which affect a geographical area or an industry segment, such as political events or natural disasters, or market events, such as a significant movement in the U.S. market. Where market quotations are not readily available, including where Invesco determines that the closing price of the security is unreliable, Invesco will value the security at fair value in good faith using procedures approved by the Board. Fair value pricing may reduce the ability of frequent traders to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities resulting from
8                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


potentially “stale” prices of portfolio holdings. However, it cannot eliminate the possibility of frequent trading.
Fair value is that amount that the owner might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale. Fair value requires consideration of all appropriate factors, including indications of fair value available from pricing services. A fair value price is an estimated price and may vary from the prices used by other mutual funds to calculate their net asset values.
Invesco may use indications of fair value from pricing services approved by the Board. In other circumstances, Invesco’s Valuation Committee may fair value securities in good faith using procedures approved by the Board. As a means of evaluating its fair value process, Invesco routinely compares closing market prices, the next day’s opening prices for the security in its primary market if available, and indications of fair value from other sources. Fair value pricing methods and pricing services can change from time to time as approved by the Board.
Specific types of securities are valued as follows:
Domestic Exchange Traded Equity Securities. Market quotations are generally available and reliable for domestic exchange traded equity securities. If market quotations are not available or are unreliable, Invesco will value the security at fair value in good faith using procedures approved by the Board.
 
Foreign Securities. If market quotations are available and reliable for foreign exchange traded equity securities, the securities will be valued at the market quotations. Because trading hours for certain foreign securities end before the close of the NYSE, closing market quotations may become unreliable. If between the time trading ends on a particular security and the close of the customary trading session on the NYSE events occur that are significant and may make the closing price unreliable, the Fund may fair value the security. If an issuer specific event has occurred that the Adviser determines, in its judgment, is likely to have affected the closing price of a foreign security, it will price the security at fair value. Invesco also relies on a screening process from a pricing vendor to indicate the degree of certainty, based on historical data, that the closing price in the principal market where a foreign security trades is not the current market value as of the close of the NYSE. For foreign securities where the Adviser believes, at the approved degree of certainty, that the price is not reflective of current market value, the Adviser will use the indication of fair value from the pricing service to determine the fair value of the security. The pricing vendor, pricing methodology or degree of certainty may change from time to time. Fund securities primarily traded on foreign markets may trade on days that are not business days of the Fund. Because the net asset value of Fund shares is determined only on business days of the Fund, the value of the portfolio securities of the Fund that invests in foreign securities may change on days when you will not be able to purchase or redeem shares of the Fund.
 
Fixed Income Securities. Government, corporate, asset-backed and municipal bonds and convertible securities, including high yield or junk bonds, and loans, normally are valued on the basis of prices provided by independent pricing services. Prices provided by the pricing services may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices, and may reflect appropriate factors such as institution-size trading in similar groups of securities, developments related to special securities, dividend rate, maturity and other market data. Prices received from pricing services are fair value prices. In addition, if the price provided by the pricing service and independent quoted prices are unreliable, Invesco's Valutation Committee will fair value the security using procedures approved by the Board.
Short-term Securities: The Fund’s short-term investments are valued at amortized cost when the security has 60 days or less to maturity.
Futures and Options. Futures contracts are valued at the final settlement price set by the exchange on which they are principally traded. Options are valued on the basis of market quotations, if available.
Swap Agreements. Swap Agreements are fair valued using an evaluated quote provided by an independent pricing service. Evaluated quotes provided by the pricing service are based on a model that may include end
of day net present values, spreads, ratings, industry and company performance.
Open-end Funds: To the extent the Fund invests in other open-end funds, other than open-end funds that are exchange traded, the investing Fund will calculate its net asset value using the net asset value of the underlying fund in which it invests. The Fund discloses portfolio holdings at different times to insurance companies issuing variable products that invest in the Fund, and in annual and semi-annual shareholder reports. Refer to such reports to determine the types of securities in which the Fund has invested. You may also refer to the SAI to determine what types of securities in which the Fund may invest. You may obtain copies of these reports or of the SAI from the insurance company that issued your variable product, or from the Adviser as described on the back cover of this prospectus. The Fund determines the net asset value of its shares on each day the NYSE is open for business, as of the close of the customary trading session, or earlier NYSE closing time that day.
Taxes
The Fund intends to qualify each year as a regulated investment company and, as such, is not subject to entity-level tax on the income and gain it distributes to shareholders. Insurance company separate accounts may invest in the Fund and, in turn, may offer variable products to investors through insurance contracts. Because the insurance company separate accounts generally are the shareholders in the Fund, all of the tax characteristics of the Fund’s investments flow into the separate accounts and not to each variable product owner. The tax consequences from each variable product owner’s investment in a variable product contract will depend upon the provisions of these contracts, and variable product owners should consult their contract prospectus for more information on these tax consequences.
Dividends and Distributions
The Fund expects, based on its investment objective and strategies, that its distributions, if any, will consist of ordinary income, capital gains, or some combination of both.
Dividends
The Fund generally declares and pays dividends from net investment income, if any, annually to separate accounts of insurance companies issuing the variable products.
Capital Gains Distributions
The Fund generally distributes long-term and short-term capital gains (net of any available capital loss carryovers), if any, at least annually to separate accounts of insurance companies issuing the variable products. Capital gains distributions may vary considerably from year to year as a result of the Fund’s normal investment activities and cash flows.
Share Classes
The Fund has two classes of shares, Series I shares and Series II shares. Each class is identical except that Series II shares have a distribution or “Rule 12b-1 Plan” that is described in the prospectus relating to the Series II shares.
Payments to Insurance Companies
Invesco Distributors, the distributor of the Fund and an Invesco Affiliate, and other Invesco Affiliates may make cash payments to the insurance company that issued your variable product or its affiliates in connection with promotion of the Fund and certain other marketing support services. Invesco Affiliates make these payments from their own resources. Invesco Affiliates make these payments as incentives to certain insurance companies to promote the sale and retention of shares of the Fund. The benefits Invesco Affiliates receive when they make these payments may include, among other things, adding the Fund to the list of underlying investment options in the insurance company’s variable products, and access (in some cases on a preferential basis over other competitors) to individual members of an insurance company’s sales force or to an insurance company’s
9                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


management. These payments are sometimes referred to as “shelf space” payments because the payments compensate the insurance company for including the Fund in its variable products (on its “sales shelf”). Invesco Affiliates compensate insurance companies differently depending typically on the level and/or type of considerations provided by the insurance companies. The payments Invesco Affiliates make may be calculated on sales of shares of the Fund (Sales-Based Payments), in which case the total amount of such payments shall not exceed 0.25% of the offering price of all shares sold through variable products during the particular period. Such payments also may be calculated on the average daily net assets of the Fund attributable to that particular insurance company (Asset-Based Payments), in which case the total amount of such cash payments shall not exceed 0.25% per annum of those assets during a defined period. Sales-Based Payments primarily create incentives to make sales of shares of the Fund and Asset-Based Payments primarily create incentives to retain assets of the Fund in insurance company separate accounts.
Invesco Affiliates are motivated to make the payments described above in order to promote the sale of Fund shares and the retention of those investments by clients of insurance companies. To the extent insurance companies sell more shares of the Fund or retain shares of the Fund in their variable product owners’ accounts, Invesco Affiliates may directly or indirectly benefit from the incremental management and other fees paid to Invesco Affiliates by the Fund with respect to those assets.
In addition to the payments listed above, Invesco may also reimburse insurance companies for certain administrative services provided to variable product owners. Under a Master Administrative Services Agreement between the Fund and Invesco, Invesco is entitled to receive from the Fund reimbursement of its costs or such reasonable compensation as may be approved by the Board. Under this arrangement, Invesco provides, or assures that insurance companies issuing variable products will provide, certain variable product owner-related services. These services include, but are not limited to, facilitation of variable product owners’ purchase and redemption requests; distribution to existing variable product owners of copies of Fund prospectuses, proxy materials, periodic Fund reports, and other materials; maintenance of variable product owners’ records; and fund services and communications. Currently, these administrative service payments made by the Fund to Invesco are subject to an annual limit of 0.25% of the average daily net assets invested in the Fund by each insurance company. Any amounts paid by Invesco to an insurance company in excess of 0.25% of the average daily net assets invested in the Fund are paid by Invesco out of its own financial resources, and not out of the Fund’s assets. Insurance companies may earn profits on these payments for these services, since the amount of the payments may exceed the cost of providing the service.
You can find further details in the SAI about these payments and the services provided by insurance companies. In certain cases these payments could be significant to the insurance company. Your insurance company may charge you additional fees or commissions on your variable product other than those disclosed in this prospectus. You can ask your insurance company about any payments it receives from Invesco Affiliates, or the Fund, as well as about fees and/or commissions it charges. The prospectus for your variable product may also contain additional information about these payments.

Benchmark Descriptions
    
 
Barclays U.S. Credit Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of publicly issued, SEC-registered U.S. corporate and specified foreign debentures and secured notes.
Barclays U.S. Government Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of fixed-income obligations issued by the U.S. Treasury, government agencies and quasi-federal corporations.
Lipper VUF Equity Income Funds IX is an unmanaged index considered representative of equity income variable insurance underlying funds tracked by Lipper.
Lipper VUF Utility Funds Classification Average represents an average of all variable insurance underlying funds in the Lipper Utility Funds classification.
Russell 1000 ® Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap value stocks. The Russell 1000 ® Value Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co.
 
S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market.
S&P 500 ® Utilities Sector Total Return Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the utilities market.
10                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 

 
Financial Highlights
The financial highlights show the Fund’s financial history for the past five fiscal years or, if shorter, the period of operations of the Fund or any of its share classes. The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. Series II shares are not offered in this prospectus.
The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund (assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions).
 
This information has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, whose report, along with the Fund’s financial statements, is included in the Fund’s annual report, which is available upon request.
 
 
 
11                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 

 
Hypothetical Investment and Expense Information
    
In connection with the final settlement reached between Invesco and certain of its affiliates with certain regulators, including the New York Attorney General’s Office, the SEC and the Colorado Attorney General’s Office (the settlement) arising out of certain market timing and unfair pricing allegations made against Invesco and certain of its affiliates, Invesco and certain of its affiliates agreed, among other things, to disclose certain hypothetical information regarding investment and expense information to Fund shareholders. The chart below is intended to reflect the annual and cumulative impact of Fund’s expenses, including investment advisory fees
and other Fund costs, on Fund’s returns over a 10-year period. The example reflects the following:
■  You invest $10,000 in the Fund and hold it for the entire 10-year period; and
■  Your investment has a 5% return before expenses each year.
There is no assurance that the annual expense ratio will be the expense ratio for the Fund for any of the years shown. The chart does not take into account any fees or other expenses assessed in connection with your variable product; if it did, the expenses shown would be higher, while the ending balance shown would be lower. This is only a hypothetical presentation made to illustrate what expenses and returns would be under the above scenarios; your actual returns and expenses are likely to differ (higher or lower) from those shown below.
 
Series I Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10
Annual Expense Ratio [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %]
Cumulative Return Before Expenses [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %]
Cumulative Return After Expenses [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %]
End of Year Balance [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ]
Estimated Annual Expenses [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ]

 
1 Your actual expenses may be higher or lower than those shown.
12                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund



Obtaining Additional Information
More information may be obtained free of charge upon request. The SAI, a current version of which is on file with the SEC, contains more details about the Fund and is incorporated by reference into this prospectus (is legally a part of this prospectus). Annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders contain additional information about the Fund’s investments. The Fund’s annual report also discusses the market conditions and investment strategies that significantly affected the Fund’s performance during its last fiscal year. The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the 1st and 3rd quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s most recent portfolio holdings, when filed on Form N-Q, will also be made available to insurance companies issuing variable products that invest in the Fund.
If you have questions about an Invesco Fund, or you wish to obtain a free copy of the Fund’s current SAI, annual or semi-annual reports, or Form N-Q, please contact the insurance company that issued your variable product, or you may contact us.
By Mail: Invesco Distributors, Inc.
P.O. Box 219078
Kansas City, MO 64121-9078
By Telephone: (800) 959-4246
On the Internet: You can send us a request by e-mail or
download prospectuses, SAIs, annual or
semi-annual reports via our Web site:
www.invesco.com/us
You can also review and obtain copies of the Fund’s SAI, annual or semi-annual reports, Forms N-Q and other information at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC; on the EDGAR database on the SEC’s Web site (http://www.sec.gov); or, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a letter to the SEC’s Public Reference Section, Washington, DC 20549-1520 or by sending an electronic mail request to publicinfo@sec.gov. Please call the SEC at 1-202-551-8090 for information about the Public Reference Room.
 
Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund
SEC 1940 Act file number: 811-07452
 
    
 
invesco.com/us VIMGV-PRO-1
 



 
Prospectus April 30, 2014
 
Series II shares

 
Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund
(formerly known as Invesco V.I. Utilities Fund)
 
Shares of the Fund are currently offered only to insurance company separate accounts funding variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies.
 
Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund’s investment objective is both capital appreciation and current income while managing portfolio volatility.
 
As with all other mutual fund securities, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has not approved or disapproved these securities or determined whether the information in this prospectus is adequate or accurate. Anyone who tells you otherwise is committing a crime.
An investment in the Fund:
■  is not FDIC insured;
■  may lose value; and
■  is not guaranteed by a bank.


 

 
Table of Contents
Shares of the Fund are used as investment vehicles for variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies (variable products) issued by certain insurance companies. You cannot purchase shares of the Fund directly. As an owner of a variable product (variable product owner) that offers the Fund as an investment option, however, you may allocate
your variable product values to a separate account of the insurance company that invests in shares of the Fund.
Your variable product is offered through its own prospectus, which contains information about your variable product, including how to purchase the variable product and how to allocate variable product values to the Fund.
                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 

 
Fund Summary
Investment Objective(s)
 
The Fund’s investment objective is both capital appreciation and current income while managing portfolio volatility.
 
Fees and Expenses of the Fund
This table describes the fees and expenses that are incurred, directly or indirectly, when a variable product owner buys, holds, or redeems interest in an insurance company separate account that invests in the Series II shares of the Fund but does not represent the effect of any fees or other expenses assessed in connection with your variable product, and if it did, expenses would be higher.
Shareholder Fees (fees paid directly from your investment)
Class: Series II shares
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases (as a percentage of offering price) N/A

Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load) (as a percentage of original purchase price or redemption proceeds, whichever is less) N/A

    
 
Annual Fund Operating Expenses (expenses that you pay each year as a percentage of the value of your investment)
Class: Series II shares
Management Fees [ %]

Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees [ ]

Other Expenses [ ]

Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses [ ]

Example. This Example is intended to help you compare the cost of investing in the Fund with the cost of investing in other mutual funds.
This Example does not represent the effect of any fees or expenses assessed in connection with your variable product, and if it did, expenses would be higher.
   
 
The Example assumes that you invest $10,000 in the Fund for the time periods indicated and then redeem all of your shares at the end of those periods. The Example also assumes that your investment has a 5% return each year and that the Fund's operating expenses remain the same.
 
Although your actual costs may be higher or lower, based on these assumptions, your costs would be:
   
  1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years
Series II shares [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ]

Portfolio Turnover. The Fund pays transaction costs, such as commissions, when it buys and sells securities (or “turns over” its portfolio). A higher portfolio turnover rate may indicate higher transaction costs. These costs, which are not reflected in annual Fund operating expenses or in the example, affect the Fund’s performance. During the most recent fiscal year, the Fund’s portfolio turnover rate was  % of the average value of its portfolio.
 
Principal Investment Strategies of the Fund
 
The Fund invests primarily in equity and fixed income securities, and derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities. The Fund will also invest in derivatives that Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the Adviser) believes will decrease the volatility level of the Fund’s annual returns.
The Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 65% of its net assets in income-producing equity investments. The Fund may invest in income-producing equity instruments (subject to the 65% policy above), debt securities and warrants or rights to acquire such securities, in such proportions as economic conditions indicate would best accomplish the Fund’s objectives. It is the current operating policy of the Fund to invest in
debt securities rated investment grade. It is also the operating policy of the Fund to invest not more than 10% of its net assets in debt securities rated BBB by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (S&P), Baa by Moody’s Investor Services, Inc. (Moody’s), or in securities determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. These operating policies do not apply to convertible securities which are selected primarily on the basis of their equity characteristics.
The Fund may invest in securities of issuers of all capitalization sizes; however, a substantial number of the issuers in which the Fund invests are large-capitalization issuers.
The Fund may invest in real estate investment trusts (REITs).
The Fund may invest in securities of foreign issuers or depository receipts.
The Fund can invest in derivative instruments including forward foreign currency contracts, futures contracts and options.
The Adviser also employs a risk management process intended to manage the volatility level of the Fund’s annual returns. The Adviser may sell exchange-traded futures contracts to target a maximum annual volatility level for the Fund’s returns of approximately 10%. The Adviser may sell futures contracts as often as daily to lower the Fund’s expected volatility level but does not expect to sell futures contracts when the Fund’s volatility level is within the target range. Due to market conditions or other factors, the actual or realized volatility of the Fund for any particular period of time may be materially higher or lower than the target maximum annual level. The Fund’s target maximum annual volatility level of 10% is not a total return performance target. It is possible for the Fund to maintain its volatility at or under its target maximum annual volatility level while having negative performance returns. Efforts to manage the Fund’s volatility could limit the Fund’s gains in rising markets, may expose the Fund to costs to which it would otherwise not have been exposed, and if unsuccessful may result in substantial losses.
In selecting securities, the Adviser focuses on a security’s potential for income with safety of principal and long-term growth of capital. The Adviser emphasizes a value style of investing, which focuses on undervalued companies with characteristics for improved valuations. This catalyst could come from within the company in the form of new management, operational enhancements, restructuring or reorganization. It could also be an external factor, such as an improvement in industry conditions or a regulatory change.
The Adviser may dispose of a security when it has reached the Adviser’s estimate of fair value or when the Adviser identifies a more attractive investment opportunity.
 
Principal Risks of Investing in the Fund
As with any mutual fund investment, loss of money is a risk of investing. An investment in the Fund is not a deposit in a bank and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency. The risks associated with an investment in the Fund can increase during times of significant market volatility. The principal risks of investing in the Fund are:
 
Call Risk. If interest rates fall, it is possible that issuers of debt securities with high interest rates will prepay or call their securities before their maturity dates. In this event, the proceeds from the called securities would likely be reinvested by the Fund in securities bearing the new, lower interest rates, resulting in a possible decline in the Fund's income and distributions to shareholders.
Convertible Securities Risk.  The Fund may own convertible securities, the value of which may be affected by market interest rates, the risk that the issuer will default, the value of the underlying stock or the right of the issuer to buy back the convertible securities.
 
1                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
Credit Risk. The issuers of instruments in which the Fund invests may be unable to meet interest and/or principal payments, thereby causing its instruments to decrease in value and lowering the issuer’s credit rating.
Depositary Receipts Risk. Depositary receipts involve many of the same risks as those associated with direct investment in foreign securities. In addition, the underlying issuers of certain depositary receipts, particularly unsponsored or unregistered depositary receipts, are under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications to the holders of such receipts or to pass through to them any voting rights with respect to the deposited securities.
Derivatives Risk. The value of a derivative instrument depends largely on (and is derived from) the value of an underlying security, currency, commodity, interest rate, index or other asset (each referred to as an underlying asset). In addition to risks relating to the underlying assets, the use of derivatives may include other, possibly greater, risks, including counterparty, leverage and liquidity risks. Counterparty risk is the risk that the counterparty to the derivative contract will default on its obligation to pay the Fund the amount owed or otherwise perform under the derivative contract. Derivatives create leverage risk because they do not require payment up front equal to the economic exposure created by owning the derivative. As a result, an adverse change in the value of the underlying asset could result in the Fund sustaining a loss that is substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivative, which may make the Fund’s returns more volatile and increase the risk of loss. Derivative instruments may also be less liquid than more traditional investments and the Fund may be unable to sell or close out its derivative positions at a desirable time or price. This risk may be more acute under adverse market conditions, during which the Fund may be most in need of liquidating its derivative positions. Derivatives may also be harder to value, less tax efficient and subject to changing government regulation that could impact the Fund’s ability to use certain derivatives or their cost. Also, derivatives used for hedging or to gain or limit exposure to a particular market segment may not provide the expected benefits, particularly during adverse market conditions.
Equity Risk . Equity risk is the risk that the value of securities held by the Fund will fall due to general market and economic conditions, perceptions regarding the industries in which the issuers of securities held by the Fund participate or factors relating to specific companies in which the Fund invests, either directly or through derivative instruments. For example, an adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of securities held by the Fund; the price of securities may be particularly sensitive to general movements in the stock market; or a drop in the stock market may depress the price of most or all of the securities held by the Fund. In addition, securities of an issuer in the Fund's portfolio may decline in price if the issuer fails to make anticipated dividend payments because, among other reasons, the issuer of the security experiences a decline in its financial condition.
 
Foreign Securities Risk. The Fund’s foreign investments may be affected by changes in a foreign country’s exchange rates, political and social instability, changes in economic or taxation policies, difficulties when enforcing obligations, decreased liquidity, and increased volatility. Foreign companies may be subject to less regulation resulting in less publicly available information about the companies.
 
Hedging Risk. A hedge is an investment made in order to reduce the risk of adverse price movements in a security by taking an offsetting position in a related security (often a derivative, such as an option or a short sale). Hedging may be ineffective due to unexpected changes in the market, changes in the values of the security and related security, or changes in the correlation of the security and related security. For gross currency hedges, there is an additional risk that these transactions create exposure to currencies in which the Fund’s securities are not denominated. Moreover, while hedging can reduce or eliminate losses it can also reduce or eliminate gains.
Income Risk. The income you receive from the Fund is based primarily on prevailing interest rates, which can vary widely over the short- and long-term. If interest rates drop, your income from the Fund may drop as well.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk refers to the risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise; conversely, bond prices generally rise as interest rates fall. Specific bonds differ in their sensitivity to changes in interest rates depending on their individual characteristics, including duration.
Management Risk. The investment techniques and risk analysis used by the Fund's portfolio managers may not produce the desired results. In addition, the Fund’s investment strategy to manage volatility may cause the Fund to underperform the broader markets in which the Fund invests during market rallies. Such underperformance could be significant during sudden or significant market rallies.
 
Market Risk. The prices of and the income generated by the Fund’s securities may decline in response to, among other things, investor sentiment, general economic and market conditions, regional or global instability, and currency and interest rate fluctuations.
 
Preferred Securities Risk. There are special risks associated with investing in preferred securities. Preferred securities may include provisions that permit the issuer, in its discretion, to defer or omit distributions for a certain period of time. If the Fund owns a security that is deferring or omitting its distributions, the Fund may be required to report the distribution on its tax returns, even though it may not have received this income. Further, preferred securities may lose substantial value due to the omission or deferment of dividend payments.
REIT Risk/Real Estate Risk. Investments in real estate related instruments may be affected by economic, legal, cultural, environmental or technological factors that affect property values, rents or occupancies of real estate related to the Fund's holdings. Real estate companies, including REITs or similar structures, tend to be small and mid cap companies, and their shares may be more volatile and less liquid. The value of investments in real estate related companies may be affected by the quality of management, the ability to repay loans, the utilization of leverage and financial covenants related thereto, whether the company carries adequate insurance and environmental factors. If a real estate related company defaults, the Fund may own real estate directly, which involves the following additional risks: environmental liabilities, difficulty in valuing and selling the real estate, and economic or regulatory changes.
Short Sales Risk. If the Fund sells short a security that it does not own and the security increases in value, the Fund will pay a higher price to repurchase the security. The more the Fund pays, the more it will lose on the transaction, which adversely affects its share price. As there is no limit on how much the price of the security can increase, the Fund’s exposure is unlimited.
 
Small- and Mid-Capitalization Risks. Stocks of small- and mid-sized companies tend to be more vulnerable to adverse developments and may have little or no operating history or track record of success, and limited product lines, markets, management and financial resources. The securities of small- and mid-sized companies may be more volatile due to less market interest and less publicly available information about the issuer. They also may be illiquid or restricted as to resale, or may trade less frequently and in smaller volumes, all of which may cause difficulty when establishing or closing a position at a desirable price.
 
Value Investing Style Risk. The Fund emphasizes a value style of investing, which focuses on undervalued companies with characteristics for improved valuations. This style of investing is subject to the risk that the valuations never improve or that the returns on value equity securities are less than returns on other styles of investing or the overall stock market. Value stocks also may decline in price, even though in theory they are already underpriced.
Volatility Management Risk. Volatility management risk is a risk that the Adviser’s strategy for managing portfolio volatility may not produce the
 
2                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
desired result or that the Adviser is unable to trade certain derivatives effectively or in a timely manner. There can be no guarantee that the Fund will maintain its target volatility level. Additionally, maintenance of the target volatility level will not ensure that the Fund will deliver competitive returns. The use of derivatives in connection with the Fund’s managed volatility strategy may expose the Fund to losses (some of which may be sudden) that it would not have otherwise been exposed to if it had only invested directly in equity and/or fixed income securities. Efforts to manage the Fund’s volatility could limit the Fund’s gains in rising markets and may expose the Fund to costs to which it would otherwise not have been exposed. The Fund’s managed volatility strategy may result in the Fund outperforming the general securities market during periods of flat or negative market performance, and underperforming the general securities market during periods of positive market performance. The gains and losses of the Fund’s futures positions may not correlate with the Fund’s direct investments in equity securities; as a result, these futures contracts may decline in value at the same time as the Fund’s direct investments in equity securities decline in value. The proprietary and third-party risk models used by the Adviser may perform differently than expected and may negatively affect performance and the ability of the Fund to maintain its volatility at or below its target maximum annual volatility level for various reasons, including errors in using or building the models, technical issues implementing the models and various non-quantitative factors (such as, market or trading system dysfunctions, and investor fear or over-reaction).
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk. The value, interest rates, and liquidity of non-cash paying instruments, such as zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities, are subject to greater fluctuation than other types of securities.
 
Performance Information
 
The bar chart and performance table provide an indication of the risks of investing in the Fund. The bar chart shows changes in the performance of the Fund from year to year as of December 31. Series II shares performance shown prior to the inception date is that of Series I shares adjusted to reflect the Rule 12b-1 fees applicable to Series II shares. Series II shares performance shown for 2004 is the blended return of Series II shares since their inception and restated performance of Series I shares adjusted to reflect the Rule 12b-1 fees applicable to Series II shares. For periods prior to April 30, 2004, performance shown relates to a predecessor fund advised by INVESCO Funds Group, Inc. (IFG), an affiliate of Invesco Advisers, Inc. All performance shown assumes the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains and the effect of the Fund's expenses. The performance table compares the Fund's performance to that of a broad-based securities market benchmark, two style specific benchmarks and a peer group benchmark comprised of funds with investment objectives and strategies similar to the Fund. The performance table below does not reflect charges assessed in connection with your variable product; if it did, the performance shown would be lower. The Fund's past performance is not necessarily an indication of its future performance. Updated performance information is available on the Fund's Web site at www.invesco.com/us. Series I shares are not offered by this prospectus. The Series I shares and Series II shares invest in the same portfolio of securities and will have substantially similar performance, except to the extent that the expenses borne by each share class differ. Series II shares have higher expenses (and therefore lower performance) resulting from its Rule 12b-1 plan, which provides for a maximum fee equal to an annual rate of 0.25% (expressed as a percentage of average daily net assets of the Fund).
 

Annual Total Returns
 

Best Quarter (ended [ ]): [ ]
Worst Quarter (ended [ ]): [ ]
   
Average Annual Total Returns (for the periods ended December 31, 2013)
  1
Year
5
Years
10
Years
Series II shares 1 : Inception (4/30/2004) [ ]% [ ]% [ ]%

Russell 1000 ® Value Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 2 [ ] [ ] [ ]

S&P 500 ® Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 2 [ ] [ ] [ ]

Barclays U.S. Government Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 3 [ ] [ ] [ ]

Barclays U.S. Credit Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 3 [ ] [ ] [ ]

S&P 500 ® Utilities Sector Total Return Index (reflects no deductions for fees, expenses or taxes) 3 [ ] [ ] [ ]

Lipper VUF Equity Income Funds IX Index 4 [ ] [ ] [ ]

Lipper VUF Utility Funds Classification Average 4 [ ] [ ] [ ]

 
1 Series II shares' performance shown prior to the inception date is that of Series I shares restated to reflect the 12b-1 fees applicable to the Series II shares. Series I shares' performance reflects any applicable fee waivers or expense reimbursements. The inception date of the Fund's Series I shares is December 30, 1994.
 
2 The Fund has elected to use the Russell 1000 ® Value Index to represent its broad-based specific benchmark rather than the S&P 500 ® Index because the Russell 1000 ® Value Index more closely reflects the performance of the types of securities in which the Fund invests.
3 The Fund has elected to use the Barclays U.S. Government Index and Barclays U.S. Credit Index to represent its style specific benchmarks rather than the S&P 500 ® Utilities Sector Total Return Index because the Barclays U.S. Government Index and Barclays U.S. Credit Index more closely reflect the performance of the types of securities in which the Fund invests.
4 The Fund has elected to use the Lipper VUF Equity Income Funds IX Index to represent its peer group benchmark rather than the Lipper VUF Utility Funds Classification Average because the Lipper VUF Equity Income Funds IX Index more closely reflects the performance of the types of securities in which the Fund invests.
 
Management of the Fund
Investment Adviser: Invesco Advisers, Inc.
 
Portfolio Managers Title Length of Service on the Fund
Thomas Bastian Portfolio Manager 2013

Chuck Burge Portfolio Manager 2013

Duy Nguyen Portfolio Manager 2013

Mary Jayne Maly Portfolio Manager 2013

Sergio Marcheli Portfolio Manager 2013

James Roeder Portfolio Manager 2013

 
Purchase and Sale of Fund Shares
You cannot purchase or sell (redeem) shares of the Fund directly. Please contact the insurance company that issued your variable product for more information on the purchase and sale of Fund shares. For more information, see “Other Information—Purchase and Redemption of Shares” in the prospectus.
Tax Information
The Fund expects, based on its investment objective and strategies, that its distributions, if any, will consist of ordinary income, capital gains, or some
3                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


combination of both. Because shares of the Fund must be purchased through variable products, such distributions will be exempt from current taxation if left to accumulate within the variable product.
Payments to Insurance Companies
If you purchase the Fund through an insurance company or other financial intermediary, the Fund and the Fund’s distributor or its related companies may pay the intermediary for the sale of Fund shares and related services. These payments may create a conflict of interest by influencing the insurance company or other intermediary and your salesperson or financial adviser to recommend the Fund over another investment. Ask your salesperson or financial adviser or visit your financial intermediary’s Web site for more information.

Investment Objective(s), Strategies, Risks and Portfolio Holdings
    
Objective(s) and Strategies
 
The Fund’s investment objective is both capital appreciation and current income while managing portfolio volatility. The Fund’s investment objective may be changed by the Board of Trustees without shareholder approval.
The Fund invests primarily in equity and fixed income securities, and derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities. The Fund will also invest in derivatives that the Adviser believes will decrease the volatility level of the Fund’s annual returns.
The Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 65% of its net assets in income-producing equity investments. Income producing equity investments are dividend paying common or preferred stocks, interest paying convertible debentures or bonds, or zero coupon convertible securities (on which the Fund accrues income for tax and accounting purposes, but receives no cash). The Fund may invest in income-producing equity instruments (subject to the 65% policy above), debt securities and warrants or rights to acquire such securities, in such proportions as economic conditions indicate would best accomplish the Fund’s objectives. It is the current operating policy of the Fund to invest in debt securities rated investment grade. Investment grade securities are: (i) securities rated BBB- or higher by S&P, Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or an equivalent rating by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), or (ii) securities determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. It is also the operating policy of the Fund to invest not more than 10% of its net assets in debt securities rated BBB by S&P, Baa by Moody’s, or in securities determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. These operating policies do not apply to convertible securities which are selected primarily on the basis of their equity characteristics.
The Fund may invest in securities of issuers of all capitalization sizes; however, a substantial number of the issuers in which the Fund invests are large-capitalization issuers. The Fund considers an issuer to be a large-capitalization issuer if it has a market capitalization, at the time of purchase, within the range of the largest and smallest capitalized companies included in the Russell 1000 Index during the most recent 11-month period (based on month-end data) plus the most recent date during the current month. As of December 31, 2013, the capitalization of companies in the Russell 1000 Index ranged from $441.7 million to $500.7 billion.
The Fund may invest in real estate investment trusts (REITs). REITs pool investors’ funds for investment primarily in commercial real estate properties or real-estate related loans. REITs generally derive their income from rents on the underlying properties or interest on the underlying loans, and their value is impacted by changes in the value of the underlying property or changes in interest rates affecting the underlying loans owned by the REITs.
The Fund may invest in securities of foreign issuers or depository receipts. A depositary receipt is generally issued by a bank or financial institution and represents an ownership interest in the common stock or other equity securities of a foreign company.
The Fund can invest in derivative instruments including forward foreign currency contracts, futures contracts and options.
A forward foreign currency contract is an agreement between parties to exchange a specified amount of currency at a specified future time at a specified rate. The Fund can use forward foreign currency contracts to hedge against adverse movements in the foreign currencies in which portfolio securities are denominated.
A futures contract is a standardized agreement between two parties to buy or sell a specified quantity of an underlying asset at a specified price at a specified future time. The value of the futures contract tends to increase and decrease in tandem with the value of the underlying asset. Depending on the terms of the particular contract, futures contracts are settled by purchasing an offsetting contract, physically delivering the underlying asset on the settlement date or paying of a cash settlement amount on the settlement date. The Fund can use futures contracts to seek exposure to certain asset classes and to hedge against adverse movements in the foreign currencies in which portfolio securities are denominated.
An option is a derivative financial instrument that represents a contract between two parties for a future transaction on an asset at a reference price. The buyer of the option gains the right, but not the obligation, to engage in that transaction, while the seller incurs the corresponding obligation to fulfill the transaction. The price of an option derives from the difference between the reference price and the value of the underlying asset (commonly a stock, a bond, a currency or a futures contract) plus a premium based on the time remaining until the expiration of the option. Other types of options exist, and options can in principle be created for any type of valuable asset. The Fund can use options to seek alpha (return on investments in excess of the Russell 1000 Value Index) or to mitigate risk and to hedge against adverse movements in the foreign currencies in which portfolio securities are denominated.
The Adviser also employs a risk management process intended to manage the volatility level of the Fund’s annual returns.
The Adviser may sell exchange-traded futures contracts to target a maximum annual volatility level for the Fund’s returns of approximately 10%. Volatility is a statistical measure of the magnitude of changes in the Fund’s returns without regard to the direction of those changes. To implement this volatility management strategy, the Adviser will monitor the forecasted annualized volatility of the Fund’s returns, placing a greater weight on recent historic data. The Adviser may sell futures contracts as often as daily to lower the Fund’s expected volatility level but does not expect to sell futures contracts when the Fund’s volatility level is within the target range.
Volatility is not a measure of investment performance. Volatility may result from rapid or dramatic price swings. Higher volatility generally indicates higher risk and is often reflected by frequent and sometimes significant movements up and down in value. The Fund could experience high levels of volatility in both rising and falling markets. Due to market conditions or other factors, the actual or realized volatility of the Fund for any particular period of time may be materially higher or lower than the target maximum annual level.
The Fund’s target maximum annual volatility level of 10% is not a total return performance target. The Fund does not expect its total return performance to be within any specified targeted range. It is possible for the Fund to maintain its volatility at or under its target maximum annual volatility level while having negative performance returns. Efforts to manage the Fund’s volatility could limit the Fund’s gains in rising markets, may expose the Fund to costs to which it would otherwise not have been exposed, and if unsuccessful may result in substantial losses.
In selecting securities, the Adviser focuses on a security’s potential for income with safety of principal and long-term growth of capital. The Adviser
 
4                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
emphasizes a value style of investing, which focuses on undervalued companies with characteristics for improved valuations. This catalyst could come from within the company in the form of new management, operational enhancements, restructuring or reorganization. It could also be an external factor, such as an improvement in industry conditions or a regulatory change.
The Adviser may dispose of a security when it has reached the Adviser’s estimate of fair value or when the Adviser identifies a more attractive investment opportunity.
In anticipation of or in response to market, economic, political, or other conditions, the Adviser may temporarily use a different investment strategy for defensive purposes. If the Adviser does so, different factors could affect the Fund’s performance and the Fund may not achieve its investment objective.
 
The Fund’s investments in the types of securities described in this prospectus vary from time to time, and, at any time, the Fund may not be invested in all of the types of securities described in this prospectus. The Fund may also invest in securities and other investments not described in this prospectus.
For more information, see “Description of the Funds and Their Investments and Risks” in the Fund’s SAI.
Risks
The principal risks of investing in the Fund are:
 
Call Risk. If interest rates fall, it is possible that issuers of debt securities with high interest rates will prepay or call their securities before their maturity dates. In this event, the proceeds from the called securities would likely be reinvested by the Fund in securities bearing the new, lower interest rates, resulting in a possible decline in the Fund's income and distributions to shareholders.
Convertible Securities Risk. The values of convertible securities in which the Fund may invest may be affected by market interest rates. The values of convertible securities also may be affected by the risk of actual issuer default on interest or principal payments and the value of the underlying stock. Additionally, an issuer may retain the right to buy back its convertible securities at a time and price unfavorable to the Fund.
Credit Risk. The issuers of instruments in which the Fund invests may be unable to meet interest and/or principal payments. This risk is increased to the extent the Fund invests in junk bonds which may cause the Fund to incur higher expenses to protect its interests. The credit risks and market prices of lower-grade securities generally are more sensitive to negative issuer developments, such as reduced revenues or increased expenditures, or adverse economic conditions, such as a recession, than are higher-grade securities. An issuer’s securities may decrease in value if its financial strength weakens, which may reduce its credit rating and possibly its ability to meet its contractual obligations.
Depositary Receipts Risk. Depositary receipts involve many of the same risks as those associated with direct investment in foreign securities. In addition, the underlying issuers of certain depositary receipts, particularly unsponsored or unregistered depositary receipts, are under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications to the holders of such receipts or to pass through to them any voting rights with respect to the deposited securities.
Derivatives Risk. A derivative is an instrument whose value depends largely on (is derived from) the value of an underlying security, currency, commodity, interest rate, index or other asset (each referred to as an underlying asset). In addition to risks relating to the underlying assets, the use of derivatives may include other, possibly greater, risks, which are described below.
■  Counterparty Risk. Certain derivatives do not trade on an established exchange (referred to as over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives) and are simply financial contracts between the Fund and a counterparty. When the Fund is owed money on an OTC derivative, the Fund is dependent on the counterparty to pay or, in some cases, deliver the
  underlying asset, unless the Fund can otherwise sell its derivative contract to a third party prior to its expiration. Many counterparties are financial institutions such as banks and broker-dealers and their creditworthiness (and ability to pay or perform) may be negatively impacted by factors affecting financial institutions generally. In addition, in the event that a counterparty becomes bankrupt or insolvent, the Fund’s ability to recover the collateral that the Fund has on deposit with the counterparty could be delayed or impaired. For derivatives traded on a centralized exchange, the Fund generally is dependent upon the solvency of the relevant exchange clearing house (which acts as a guarantor for each contractual obligation under such derivatives) for payment on derivative instruments for which the Fund is owed money.
■  Leverage Risk. Many derivatives do not require a payment up front equal to the economic exposure created by owning the derivative, which creates a form of leverage. As a result, an adverse change in the value of the underlying asset could result in the Fund sustaining a loss that is substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivative. Leverage may therefore make the Fund’s returns more volatile and increase the risk of loss. The Fund segregates or earmarks liquid assets with a value at least equal to the amount that the Fund owes the derivative counterparty each day, if any, or otherwise holds instruments that offset the Fund’s daily obligation under the derivatives instrument. This process is sometimes referred to as “cover.” The amount of liquid assets needed as cover will fluctuate over time as the value of the derivative instrument rises and falls. If the value of the Fund’s derivative positions or the value of the assets used as cover unexpectedly decreases, the Fund may be forced to segregate additional liquid assets as cover or sell assets at a disadvantageous time or price to meet its derivative obligations or to meet redemption requests, which could affect management of the Fund and the Fund’s returns. In certain market conditions, losses on derivative instruments can grow larger while the value of the Fund’s other assets fall, resulting in the Fund’s derivative positions becoming a larger percentage of the Fund’s investments.
■  Liquidity Risk. There is a smaller pool of buyers and sellers for certain derivatives, particularly OTC derivatives, than more traditional investments such as stocks. These buyers and sellers are often financial institutions that may be unable or unwilling to buy or sell derivatives during times of financial or market stress. Derivative instruments may therefore be less liquid than more traditional investments and the Fund may be unable to sell or exit its derivative positions at a desirable time or price. This risk may be more acute under adverse market conditions, during which the Fund may be most in need of liquidating its derivative positions. To the extent that the Fund is unable to exit a derivative position because of market illiquidity, the Fund may not be able to prevent further losses of value in its derivatives holdings and the liquidity of the Fund and its ability to meet redemption requests may be impaired to the extent that a substantial portion of the Fund’s otherwise liquid assets must be used as margin or cover. Another consequence of illiquidity is that the Fund may be required to hold a derivative instrument to maturity and take or make delivery of the underlying asset that the Adviser would otherwise have attempted to avoid.
■  Other Risks. Compared to other types of investments, derivatives may be harder to value and may also be less tax efficient, as described under the “Taxes” section of the prospectus. In addition, changes in government regulation of derivative instruments could affect the character, timing and amount of the Fund’s taxable income or gains, and may limit or prevent the Fund from using certain types of derivative instruments as a part of its investment strategy, which could make the investment strategy more costly to implement or require the Fund to change its investment strategy. To the extent that the Fund uses derivatives for hedging or to gain or limit exposure to a
 
5                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
  particular market or market segment, there may be imperfect correlation between the value of the derivative instrument and the value of the instrument being hedged or the relevant market or market segment, in which case the Fund may not realize the intended benefits. There is also the risk that during adverse market conditions, an instrument which would usually operate as a hedge provides no hedging benefits at all. The Fund’s use of derivatives may be limited by the requirements for taxation of the Fund as a regulated investment company.
Equity Risk . Equity risk is the risk that the value of securities held by the Fund will fall due to general market and economic conditions, perceptions regarding the industries in which the issuers of securities held by the Fund participate or factors relating to specific companies in which the Fund invests, either directly or through derivative instruments. For example, an adverse event, such as an unfavorable earnings report, may depress the value of securities held by the Fund; the price of securities may be particularly sensitive to general movements in the stock market; or a drop in the stock market may depress the price of most or all of the securities held by the Fund. In addition, securities of an issuer in the Fund's portfolio may decline in price if the issuer fails to make anticipated dividend payments because, among other reasons, the issuer of the security experiences a decline in its financial condition.
 
Foreign Securities Risk. The dollar value of the Fund’s foreign investments may be affected by changes in the exchange rates between the dollar and the currencies in which those investments are traded. The value of the Fund’s foreign investments may be adversely affected by political and social instability in their home countries, by changes in economic or taxation policies in those countries, or by the difficulty in enforcing obligations in those countries. Foreign companies generally may be subject to less stringent regulations than U.S. companies, including financial reporting requirements and auditing and accounting controls. As a result, there generally is less publicly available information about foreign companies than about U.S. companies. Trading in many foreign securities may be less liquid and more volatile than U.S. securities due to the size of the market or other factors.
 
Hedging Risk. A hedge is an investment made in order to reduce the risk of adverse price movements in a security by taking an offsetting position in a related security (often a derivative, such as an option or a short sale). While hedging strategies can be very useful and inexpensive ways of reducing risk, they are sometimes ineffective due to unexpected changes in the market. Hedging also involves the risk that changes in the value of the related security will not match those of the instruments being hedged as expected, in which case any losses on the instruments being hedged may not be reduced. For gross currency hedges, there is an additional risk that these transactions create exposure to currencies in which the Fund’s securities are not denominated. Moreover, while hedging can reduce or eliminate losses it can also reduce or eliminate gains.
Income Risk. The income you receive from the Fund is based primarily on prevailing interest rates, which can vary widely over the short- and long-term. If interest rates drop, your income from the Fund may drop as well.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk refers to the risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise; conversely, bond prices generally rise as interest rates fall. Specific bonds differ in their sensitivity to changes in interest rates depending on their individual characteristics. One measure of this sensitivity is called duration. The longer the duration of a particular bond, the greater its price sensitivity is to interest rates. Similarly, a longer duration portfolio of securities has greater price sensitivity. Falling interest rates may also prompt some issuers to refinance existing debt, which could affect the Fund's performance.
Management Risk. The investment techniques and risk analysis used by the Fund's portfolio managers may not produce the desired results. In addition, the Fund’s investment strategy to manage volatility may cause the Fund to underperform the broader markets in which the Fund invests during
market rallies. Such underperformance could be significant during sudden or significant market rallies.
 
Market Risk. The prices of and the income generated by the Fund’s securities may decline in response to, among other things, investor sentiment, general economic and market conditions, regional or global instability, and currency and interest rate fluctuations.
 
Preferred Securities Risk. There are special risks associated with investing in preferred securities. Preferred securities may include provisions that permit the issuer, in its discretion, to defer or omit distributions for a certain period of time. If the Fund owns a security that is deferring or omitting its distributions, the Fund may be required to report the distribution on its tax returns, even though it may not have received this income. Further, preferred securities may lose substantial value due to the omission or deferment of dividend payments. Preferred securities may be less liquid than many other securities, such as common stocks, and generally offer no voting rights with respect to the issuer. Preferred securities also may be subordinated to bonds or other debt instruments in an issuer’s capital structure, subjecting them to a greater risk of non-payment than more senior securities. In addition, in certain circumstances, an issuer of preferred securities may redeem the securities prior to a specified date, and this may negatively impact the return of the security.
REIT Risk/Real Estate Risk. Investments in real estate related instruments may be affected by economic, legal, cultural, environmental or technological factors that affect property values, rents or occupancies of real estate related to the Fund's holdings. Real estate companies, including REITs or similar structures, tend to be small and mid cap companies, and their shares may be more volatile and less liquid. The value of investments in real estate related companies may be affected by the quality of management, the ability to repay loans, the utilization of leverage and financial covenants related thereto, whether the company carries adequate insurance and environmental factors. If a real estate related company defaults, the Fund may own real estate directly, which involves the following additional risks: environmental liabilities, difficulty in valuing and selling the real estate, and economic or regulatory changes.
Short Sales Risk. If the Fund sells short a security that it does not own and the security increases in value, the Fund will pay a higher price to repurchase the security. The more the Fund pays, the more it will lose on the transaction, which adversely affects its share price. As there is no limit on how much the price of the security can increase, the Fund’s exposure is unlimited.
 
Small- and Mid-Capitalization Risks. Stocks of small- and mid-sized companies tend to be more vulnerable to adverse developments and may have little or no operating history or track record of success, and limited product lines, markets, management and financial resources. The securities of small- and mid-sized companies may be more volatile due to less market interest and less publicly available information about the issuer. They also may be illiquid or restricted as to resale, or may trade less frequently and in smaller volumes, all of which may cause difficulty when establishing or closing a position at a desirable price.
 
Value Investing Style Risk. The Fund emphasizes a value style of investing, which focuses on undervalued companies with characteristics for improved valuations. This style of investing is subject to the risk that the valuations never improve or that the returns on value equity securities are less than returns on other styles of investing or the overall stock market. Value stocks also may decline in price, even though in theory they are already underpriced.
Volatility Management Risk. Volatility management risk is a risk that the Adviser’s strategy for managing portfolio volatility may not produce the desired result or that the Adviser is unable to trade certain derivatives effectively or in a timely manner. There can be no guarantee that the Fund will maintain its target volatility level. Additionally, maintenance of the target volatility level will not ensure that the Fund will deliver competitive returns. The use of derivatives in connection with the Fund’s managed volatility strategy may expose the Fund to losses (some of which may be sudden)
 
6                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 
that it would not have otherwise been exposed to if it had only invested directly in equity and/or fixed income securities. Efforts to manage the Fund’s volatility could limit the Fund’s gains in rising markets and may expose the Fund to costs to which it would otherwise not have been exposed. The Fund’s managed volatility strategy may result in the Fund outperforming the general securities market during periods of flat or negative market performance, and underperforming the general securities market during periods of positive market performance. The gains and losses of the Fund’s futures positions may not correlate with the Fund’s direct investments in equity securities; as a result, these futures contracts may decline in value at the same time as the Fund’s direct investments in equity securities decline in value. The Adviser uses a combination of proprietary and third-party systems to help it estimate the Fund’s expected volatility. Based on those estimates, the Adviser may adjust the Fund’s exposure to certain markets by selling exchange-traded futures contracts in an attempt to manage the Fund’s expected volatility. The proprietary and third-party risk models used by the Adviser may perform differently than expected and may negatively affect performance and the ability of the Fund to maintain its volatility at or below its target maximum annual volatility level for various reasons, including errors in using or building the models, technical issues implementing the models and various non-quantitative factors (such as, market or trading system dysfunctions, and investor fear or over-reaction).
Zero Coupon Bonds Risk. Zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities may be subject to greater fluctuation in value and less liquidity in the event of adverse market conditions than comparably rated securities paying cash interest at regular interest payment periods. Prices on non-cash-paying instruments may be more sensitive to changes in the issuer’s financial condition, fluctuation in interest rates and market demand/supply imbalances than cash-paying securities with similar credit ratings, and thus may be more speculative. Investors may purchase zero coupon and pay-in-kind securities at a price below the amount payable at maturity. Because such securities do not entitle the holder to any periodic payments of interest prior to maturity, this prevents any reinvestment of interest payments at prevailing interest rates if prevailing interest rates rise. On the other hand, because there are no periodic interest payments to be reinvested prior to maturity, zero coupon securities eliminate the reinvestment risk and may lock in a favorable rate of return to maturity if interest rates drop. Special tax considerations are associated with investing in certain lower-grade securities, such as zero coupon or pay-in-kind securities.
Exclusion of Adviser from Commodity Pool Operator Definition
With respect to the Fund, the Adviser has claimed an exclusion from the definition of “commodity pool operator” (CPO) under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and, therefore, is not subject to CFTC registration or regulation as a CPO. In addition, the Adviser is relying upon a related exclusion from the definition of “commodity trading advisor” (CTA) under the CEA and the rules of the CFTC with respect to the Fund.
As of January 1, 2013, the terms of the CPO exclusion require the Fund, among other things, to adhere to certain limits on its investments in “commodity interests.” Commodity interests include commodity futures, commodity options and swaps, which in turn include non-deliverable forwards. The Fund is permitted to invest in these instruments as further described in the Fund’s SAI. However, the Fund is not intended as a vehicle for trading in the commodity futures, commodity options or swaps markets. The CFTC has neither reviewed nor approved the Adviser’s reliance on these exclusions, or the Fund, its investment strategies or this prospectus.
 
Portfolio Holdings
A description of Fund policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of Fund portfolio holdings is available in the SAI, which is available at www.invesco.com/us.

Fund Management
    
The Adviser(s)
Invesco Advisers, Inc. (Invesco or the Adviser) serves as the Fund’s investment adviser. The Adviser manages the investment operations of the Fund as well as other investment portfolios that encompass a broad range of investment objectives, and has agreed to perform or arrange for the performance of the Fund’s day-to-day management. The Adviser is located at 1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. The Adviser, as successor in interest to multiple investment advisers, has been an investment adviser since 1976.
 
 
Adviser Compensation
 
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Adviser received compensation of [0.00]% of Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund's average daily net assets, after fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement.
A discussion regarding the basis for the Board’s approval of the investment advisory agreement and investment sub-advisory agreements of the Fund is available in the Fund’s most recent semi-annual report to shareholders for the six-month period ended June 30.
 
Portfolio Managers
The following individuals are jointly and primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio:
 
■  Thomas Bastian, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010. From 2003 to 2010, he was associated with Van Kampen Asset Management in an investment management capacity.
■  Chuck Burge, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2002.
■  Duy Nguyen, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2000.
■  Mary Jayne Maly, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010. From 1992 to 2010, she was associated with Van Kampen Asset Management in an investment capacity.
■  Sergio Marcheli, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010. From 2002 to 2010, he was associated with Van Kampen Asset Management in an investment capacity.
■  James Roeder, Portfolio Manager, who has been responsible for the Fund since 2013 and has been associated with Invesco and/or its affiliates since 2010. From 1999 to 2010, he was associated with Van Kampen Asset Management in an investment capacity.
 
More information on the portfolio managers may be found at www.invesco.com/us. The Web site is not part of this prospectus.
The Fund's SAI provides additional information about the portfolio managers’ investments in the Fund, a description of the compensation structure and information regarding other accounts managed.
7                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund



Other Information
    
Purchase and Redemption of Shares
The Fund ordinarily effects orders to purchase and redeem shares at the Fund’s next computed net asset value after it receives an order. Insurance companies participating in the Fund serve as the Fund’s designee for receiving orders of separate accounts that invest in the Fund. The Fund may postpone the right of redemption only under unusual circumstances, as allowed by the SEC, such as when the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) restricts or suspends trading.
Although the Fund generally intends to pay redemption proceeds solely in cash, the Fund reserves the right to determine, in its sole discretion, whether to satisfy redemption requests by making payment in securities or other property (known as a redemption in kind).
Shares of the Fund are offered in connection with mixed and shared funding, i.e., to separate accounts of affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies funding variable products. The Fund currently offers shares only to insurance company separate accounts. In the future, the Fund may offer them to pension and retirement plans that qualify for special federal income tax treatment. Due to differences in tax treatment and other considerations, the interests of Fund shareholders, including variable product owners and plan participants investing in the Fund (whether directly or indirectly through fund of funds), may conflict.
Mixed and shared funding may present certain conflicts of interest. For example, violation of the federal tax laws by one insurance company separate account investing directly or indirectly in a fund could cause variable products funded through another insurance company separate account to lose their tax-deferred status, unless remedial actions were taken. The Board will monitor for the existence of any material conflicts and determine what action, if any, should be taken. The Fund’s net asset value could decrease if it had to sell investment securities to pay redemption proceeds to a separate account (or plan) withdrawing because of a conflict.
Excessive Short-Term Trading Activity Disclosure
The Fund’s investment programs are designed to serve long-term investors and are not designed to accommodate excessive short-term trading activity in violation of our policies described below. Excessive short-term trading activity in the Fund’s shares (i.e., purchases of Fund shares followed shortly thereafter by redemptions of such shares, or vice versa) may hurt the long-term performance of the Fund by requiring it to maintain an excessive amount of cash or to liquidate portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous time, thus interfering with the efficient management of the Fund by causing it to incur increased brokerage and administrative costs. Where excessive short-term trading activity seeks to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities from stale prices for portfolio securities, the value of Fund shares held by long-term investors may be diluted. The Board has adopted policies and procedures designed to discourage excessive short-term trading of Fund shares. The Fund may alter its policies and procedures at any time without giving prior notice to Fund shareholders if Invesco believes the change would be in the best interests of long-term investors.
Pursuant to the Fund’s policies and procedures, Invesco and certain of its corporate affiliates (Invesco and such affiliates, collectively, the Invesco Affiliates) currently use the following tools designed to discourage excessive short-term trading in the Fund:
(1) trade activity monitoring; and
(2) the use of fair value pricing consistent with procedures approved by the Board.
Each of these tools is described in more detail below.
In addition, restrictions designed to discourage or curtail excessive short-term trading activity may be imposed by the insurance companies and/or their separate accounts that invest in the Fund on behalf of variable product owners. Variable product owners should refer to the applicable contract and related prospectus for more details.
Trade Activity Monitoring
To detect excessive short-term trading activities, the Invesco Affiliates will monitor, on a daily basis, selected aggregate purchase or redemption trade orders placed by insurance companies and/or their separate accounts. The Invesco Affiliates will seek to work with insurance companies to discourage variable product owners from engaging in abusive trading practices. However, the ability of the Invesco Affiliates to monitor trades that are placed by variable product owners is severely if not completely limited due to the fact that the insurance companies trade with the Fund through omnibus accounts, and maintain the exclusive relationship with, and are responsible for maintaining the account records of, their variable product owners. There may also be legal and technological limitations on the ability of insurance companies to impose restrictions on the trading practices of their variable product owners. As a result, there can be no guarantee that the Invesco Affiliates will be able to detect or deter market timing by variable product owners.
If, as a result of this monitoring, the Invesco Affiliates believe that a variable product owner has engaged in excessive short-term trading (regardless of whether or not the insurance company’s own trading restrictions are exceeded), the Invesco Affiliates will seek to act in a manner that they believe is consistent with the best interests of long-term investors, which may include taking steps such as (1) asking the insurance company to take action to stop such activities, or (2) refusing to process future purchases related to such activities in the insurance company’s account with the Fund. The Invesco Affiliates will use reasonable efforts to apply the Fund’s policies uniformly given the potential limitations described above.
Fair Value Pricing
Securities owned by the Fund are to be valued at current market value if market quotations are readily available. All other securities and assets of a Fund for which market quotations are not readily available are to be valued at fair value determined in good faith using procedures approved by the Board. An effect of fair value pricing may be to reduce the ability of frequent traders to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities resulting from potentially “stale” prices of portfolio holdings. However, it cannot eliminate the possibility of frequent trading.
See “Pricing of Shares—Determination of Net Asset Value” for more information.
Risks
There is the risk that the Fund’s policies and procedures will prove ineffective in whole or in part to detect or prevent excessive short-term trading. Although these policies and procedures, including the tools described above, are designed to discourage excessive short-term trading, they do not eliminate the possibility that excessive short-term trading activity in the Fund will occur. Moreover, each of these tools involves judgments that are inherently subjective. The Invesco Affiliates seek to make these judgments to the best of their abilities in a manner that they believe is consistent with the best interests of long-term investors. However, there can be no assurance that the Invesco Affiliates will be able to gain access to any or all of the information necessary to detect or prevent excessive short-term trading by a variable product owner. While the Invesco Affiliates and the Fund may seek to take actions with the assistance of the insurance companies that invest in the Fund, there is the risk that neither the Invesco Affiliates nor the Fund will be successful in their efforts to minimize or eliminate such activity.
Pricing of Shares
Determination of Net Asset Value
The price of the Fund’s shares is the Fund’s net asset value per share. The Fund values portfolio securities for which market quotations are readily available at market value. The Fund values all other securities and assets for which market quotations are unavailable or unreliable at their fair value in good faith using procedures approved by the Board. The Board has delegated the daily determination of good faith fair value methodologies to
8                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


Invesco’s Valuation Committee, which acts in accordance with Board approved policies. On a quarterly basis, Invesco provides the Board various reports indicating the quality and effectiveness of its fair value decisions on portfolio holdings. Securities and other assets quoted in foreign currencies are valued in U.S. dollars based on the prevailing exchange rates on that day.
Even when market quotations are available, they may be stale or they may be unreliable because the security is not traded frequently, trading on the security ceased before the close of the trading market or issuer specific events occurred after the security ceased trading or because of the passage of time between the close of the market on which the security trades and the close of the NYSE and when the Fund calculates its net asset value. Issuer specific events may cause the last market quotation to be unreliable. Such events may include a merger or insolvency, events which affect a geographical area or an industry segment, such as political events or natural disasters, or market events, such as a significant movement in the U.S. market. Where market quotations are not readily available, including where Invesco determines that the closing price of the security is unreliable, Invesco will value the security at fair value in good faith using procedures approved by the Board. Fair value pricing may reduce the ability of frequent traders to take advantage of arbitrage opportunities resulting from potentially “stale” prices of portfolio holdings. However, it cannot eliminate the possibility of frequent trading.
Fair value is that amount that the owner might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale. Fair value requires consideration of all appropriate factors, including indications of fair value available from pricing services. A fair value price is an estimated price and may vary from the prices used by other mutual funds to calculate their net asset values.
Invesco may use indications of fair value from pricing services approved by the Board. In other circumstances, Invesco’s Valuation Committee may fair value securities in good faith using procedures approved by the Board. As a means of evaluating its fair value process, Invesco routinely compares closing market prices, the next day’s opening prices for the security in its primary market if available, and indications of fair value from other sources. Fair value pricing methods and pricing services can change from time to time as approved by the Board.
Specific types of securities are valued as follows:
Domestic Exchange Traded Equity Securities. Market quotations are generally available and reliable for domestic exchange traded equity securities. If market quotations are not available or are unreliable, Invesco will value the security at fair value in good faith using procedures approved by the Board.
 
Foreign Securities. If market quotations are available and reliable for foreign exchange traded equity securities, the securities will be valued at the market quotations. Because trading hours for certain foreign securities end before the close of the NYSE, closing market quotations may become unreliable. If between the time trading ends on a particular security and the close of the customary trading session on the NYSE events occur that are significant and may make the closing price unreliable, the Fund may fair value the security. If an issuer specific event has occurred that the Adviser determines, in its judgment, is likely to have affected the closing price of a foreign security, it will price the security at fair value. Invesco also relies on a screening process from a pricing vendor to indicate the degree of certainty, based on historical data, that the closing price in the principal market where a foreign security trades is not the current market value as of the close of the NYSE. For foreign securities where the Adviser believes, at the approved degree of certainty, that the price is not reflective of current market value, the Adviser will use the indication of fair value from the pricing service to determine the fair value of the security. The pricing vendor, pricing methodology or degree of certainty may change from time to time. Fund securities primarily traded on foreign markets may trade on days that are not business days of the Fund. Because the net asset value of Fund shares is determined only on business days of the Fund, the value of the portfolio
 
securities of the Fund that invests in foreign securities may change on days when you will not be able to purchase or redeem shares of the Fund.
Fixed Income Securities. Government, corporate, asset-backed and municipal bonds and convertible securities, including high yield or junk bonds, and loans, normally are valued on the basis of prices provided by independent pricing services. Prices provided by the pricing services may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices, and may reflect appropriate factors such as institution-size trading in similar groups of securities, developments related to special securities, dividend rate, maturity and other market data. Prices received from pricing services are fair value prices. In addition, if the price provided by the pricing service and independent quoted prices are unreliable, Invesco's Valutation Committee will fair value the security using procedures approved by the Board.
Short-term Securities: The Fund’s short-term investments are valued at amortized cost when the security has 60 days or less to maturity.
Futures and Options. Futures contracts are valued at the final settlement price set by the exchange on which they are principally traded. Options are valued on the basis of market quotations, if available.
Swap Agreements. Swap Agreements are fair valued using an evaluated quote provided by an independent pricing service. Evaluated quotes provided by the pricing service are based on a model that may include end of day net present values, spreads, ratings, industry and company performance.
Open-end Funds: To the extent the Fund invests in other open-end funds, other than open-end funds that are exchange traded, the investing Fund will calculate its net asset value using the net asset value of the underlying fund in which it invests. The Fund discloses portfolio holdings at different times to insurance companies issuing variable products that invest in the Fund, and in annual and semi-annual shareholder reports. Refer to such reports to determine the types of securities in which the Fund has invested. You may also refer to the SAI to determine what types of securities in which the Fund may invest. You may obtain copies of these reports or of the SAI from the insurance company that issued your variable product, or from the Adviser as described on the back cover of this prospectus. The Fund determines the net asset value of its shares on each day the NYSE is open for business, as of the close of the customary trading session, or earlier NYSE closing time that day.
Taxes
The Fund intends to qualify each year as a regulated investment company and, as such, is not subject to entity-level tax on the income and gain it distributes to shareholders. Insurance company separate accounts may invest in the Fund and, in turn, may offer variable products to investors through insurance contracts. Because the insurance company separate accounts generally are the shareholders in the Fund, all of the tax characteristics of the Fund’s investments flow into the separate accounts and not to each variable product owner. The tax consequences from each variable product owner’s investment in a variable product contract will depend upon the provisions of these contracts, and variable product owners should consult their contract prospectus for more information on these tax consequences.
Dividends and Distributions
The Fund expects, based on its investment objective and strategies, that its distributions, if any, will consist of ordinary income, capital gains, or some combination of both.
Dividends
The Fund generally declares and pays dividends from net investment income, if any, annually to separate accounts of insurance companies issuing the variable products.
Capital Gains Distributions
The Fund generally distributes long-term and short-term capital gains (net of any available capital loss carryovers), if any, at least annually to separate accounts of insurance companies issuing the variable products. Capital
9                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


gains distributions may vary considerably from year to year as a result of the Fund’s normal investment activities and cash flows.
Share Classes
The Fund has two classes of shares, Series I shares and Series II shares. Each class is identical except that Series II shares have a distribution or “Rule 12b-1 Plan” that is described in the prospectus relating to the Series II shares.
Distribution Plan
The Fund has adopted a distribution or “Rule 12b-1” plan for its Series II shares. The plan allows the Fund to pay distribution fees to life insurance companies and others to promote the sale and distribution of Series II shares. The plan provides for a maximum fee equal to an annual rate of 0.25% (expressed as a percentage of average daily net assets of the Fund). Because the Fund pays these fees out of its assets on an ongoing basis, over time these fees will increase the cost of your investment and may cost you more than paying other types of charges.
Payments to Insurance Companies
Invesco Distributors, the distributor of the Fund and an Invesco Affiliate, and other Invesco Affiliates may make cash payments to the insurance company that issued your variable product or its affiliates in connection with promotion of the Fund and certain other marketing support services. Invesco Affiliates make these payments from their own resources. Invesco Affiliates make these payments as incentives to certain insurance companies to promote the sale and retention of shares of the Fund. The benefits Invesco Affiliates receive when they make these payments may include, among other things, adding the Fund to the list of underlying investment options in the insurance company’s variable products, and access (in some cases on a preferential basis over other competitors) to individual members of an insurance company’s sales force or to an insurance company’s management. These payments are sometimes referred to as “shelf space” payments because the payments compensate the insurance company for including the Fund in its variable products (on its “sales shelf”). Invesco Affiliates compensate insurance companies differently depending typically on the level and/or type of considerations provided by the insurance companies. The payments Invesco Affiliates make may be calculated on sales of shares of the Fund (Sales-Based Payments), in which case the total amount of such payments shall not exceed 0.25% of the offering price of all shares sold through variable products during the particular period. Such payments also may be calculated on the average daily net assets of the Fund attributable to that particular insurance company (Asset-Based Payments), in which case the total amount of such cash payments shall not exceed 0.25% per annum of those assets during a defined period. Sales-Based Payments primarily create incentives to make sales of shares of the Fund and Asset-Based Payments primarily create incentives to retain assets of the Fund in insurance company separate accounts.
Invesco Affiliates are motivated to make the payments described above in order to promote the sale of Fund shares and the retention of those investments by clients of insurance companies. To the extent insurance companies sell more shares of the Fund or retain shares of the Fund in their variable product owners’ accounts, Invesco Affiliates may directly or indirectly benefit from the incremental management and other fees paid to Invesco Affiliates by the Fund with respect to those assets.
In addition to the payments listed above, Invesco may also reimburse insurance companies for certain administrative services provided to variable product owners. Under a Master Administrative Services Agreement between the Fund and Invesco, Invesco is entitled to receive from the Fund reimbursement of its costs or such reasonable compensation as may be approved by the Board. Under this arrangement, Invesco provides, or assures that insurance companies issuing variable products will provide, certain variable product owner-related services. These services include, but are not limited to, facilitation of variable product owners’ purchase and redemption requests; distribution to existing variable product owners of
copies of Fund prospectuses, proxy materials, periodic Fund reports, and other materials; maintenance of variable product owners’ records; and fund services and communications. Currently, these administrative service payments made by the Fund to Invesco are subject to an annual limit of 0.25% of the average daily net assets invested in the Fund by each insurance company. Any amounts paid by Invesco to an insurance company in excess of 0.25% of the average daily net assets invested in the Fund are paid by Invesco out of its own financial resources, and not out of the Fund’s assets. Insurance companies may earn profits on these payments for these services, since the amount of the payments may exceed the cost of providing the service.
You can find further details in the SAI about these payments and the services provided by insurance companies. In certain cases these payments could be significant to the insurance company. Your insurance company may charge you additional fees or commissions on your variable product other than those disclosed in this prospectus. You can ask your insurance company about any payments it receives from Invesco Affiliates, or the Fund, as well as about fees and/or commissions it charges. The prospectus for your variable product may also contain additional information about these payments.

Benchmark Descriptions
    
 
Barclays U.S. Credit Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of publicly issued, SEC-registered U.S. corporate and specified foreign debentures and secured notes.
Barclays U.S. Government Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of fixed-income obligations issued by the U.S. Treasury, government agencies and quasi-federal corporations.
Lipper VUF Equity Income Funds IX is an unmanaged index considered representative of equity income variable insurance underlying funds tracked by Lipper.
Lipper VUF Utility Funds Classification Average represents an average of all variable insurance underlying funds in the Lipper Utility Funds classification.
Russell 1000 ® Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap value stocks. The Russell 1000 ® Value Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co.
 
S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market.
S&P 500 ® Utilities Sector Total Return Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the utilities market.
10                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 

 
Financial Highlights
The financial highlights show the Fund’s financial history for the past five fiscal years or, if shorter, the period of operations of the Fund or any of its share classes. The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the Fund’s financial performance. Certain information reflects financial results for a single Fund share. Series I shares are not offered in this prospectus.
The total returns in the table represent the rate that an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the Fund (assuming reinvestment of all dividends and distributions).
 
This information has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, whose report, along with the Fund’s financial statements, is included in the Fund’s annual report, which is available upon request.
 
 
 
11                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund


 

 
Hypothetical Investment and Expense Information
    
In connection with the final settlement reached between Invesco and certain of its affiliates with certain regulators, including the New York Attorney General’s Office, the SEC and the Colorado Attorney General’s Office (the settlement) arising out of certain market timing and unfair pricing allegations made against Invesco and certain of its affiliates, Invesco and certain of its affiliates agreed, among other things, to disclose certain hypothetical information regarding investment and expense information to Fund shareholders. The chart below is intended to reflect the annual and cumulative impact of Fund’s expenses, including investment advisory fees
and other Fund costs, on Fund’s returns over a 10-year period. The example reflects the following:
■  You invest $10,000 in the Fund and hold it for the entire 10-year period; and
■  Your investment has a 5% return before expenses each year.
There is no assurance that the annual expense ratio will be the expense ratio for the Fund for any of the years shown. The chart does not take into account any fees or other expenses assessed in connection with your variable product; if it did, the expenses shown would be higher, while the ending balance shown would be lower. This is only a hypothetical presentation made to illustrate what expenses and returns would be under the above scenarios; your actual returns and expenses are likely to differ (higher or lower) from those shown below.
 
Series II Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10
Annual Expense Ratio [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %]
Cumulative Return Before Expenses [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %]
Cumulative Return After Expenses [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %] [ %]
End of Year Balance [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ]
Estimated Annual Expenses [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ] [$ ]

 
1 Your actual expenses may be higher or lower than those shown.
12                                   Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund



Obtaining Additional Information
More information may be obtained free of charge upon request. The SAI, a current version of which is on file with the SEC, contains more details about the Fund and is incorporated by reference into this prospectus (is legally a part of this prospectus). Annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders contain additional information about the Fund’s investments. The Fund’s annual report also discusses the market conditions and investment strategies that significantly affected the Fund’s performance during its last fiscal year. The Fund also files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the 1st and 3rd quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s most recent portfolio holdings, when filed on Form N-Q, will also be made available to insurance companies issuing variable products that invest in the Fund.
If you have questions about an Invesco Fund, or you wish to obtain a free copy of the Fund’s current SAI, annual or semi-annual reports, or Form N-Q, please contact the insurance company that issued your variable product, or you may contact us.
By Mail: Invesco Distributors, Inc.
P.O. Box 219078
Kansas City, MO 64121-9078
By Telephone: (800) 959-4246
On the Internet: You can send us a request by e-mail or
download prospectuses, SAIs, annual or
semi-annual reports via our Web site:
www.invesco.com/us
You can also review and obtain copies of the Fund’s SAI, annual or semi-annual reports, Forms N-Q and other information at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC; on the EDGAR database on the SEC’s Web site (http://www.sec.gov); or, after paying a duplicating fee, by sending a letter to the SEC’s Public Reference Section, Washington, DC 20549-1520 or by sending an electronic mail request to publicinfo@sec.gov. Please call the SEC at 1-202-551-8090 for information about the Public Reference Room.
 
Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund
SEC 1940 Act file number: 811-07452
 
    
 
invesco.com/us VIMGV-PRO-2
 


LOGO

  
  
  

 

  

Statement of Additional Information

 

   April 30, 2014
  

 

   AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds)   
     
     
     
     

This Statement of Additional Information (SAI) relates to each portfolio (each a Fund, collectively the Funds) of AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) listed below. Each Fund offers Series I and Series II shares of the following Prospectuses:

 

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund 1

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

   Series I and Series II

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

   Series I and Series II

 

1 Formerly known as Invesco V.I. Utilities Fund


LOGO

     
     
  

 

  

Statement of Additional Information

 

   April 30, 2014
  

 

   AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds)   
     
     
     
     

This SAI is not a Prospectus, and it should be read in conjunction with the Prospectuses for the Funds listed below. Portions of each Fund’s financial statements are incorporated into this SAI by reference to such Fund’s most recent Annual Report to shareholders. You may obtain, without charge, a copy of any Prospectus and/or Annual Report for any Fund listed below from an authorized dealer or by writing to:

Invesco Distributors, Inc.

P.O. Box 219078

Kansas City, Missouri 64121-9078

or by calling (800) 959-4246

or on the Internet: www.invesco.com/us

This SAI, dated April 29, 2013, relates to Series I and Series II shares of the following Prospectuses:

 

Fund    Series I      Series II  

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

     April 30, 2014         April 30, 2014   

The Trust has established other funds which are offered by separate prospectuses and a separate SAI.


STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Table of Contents

 

     Page  

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE TRUST

     1   

Fund History

     1   

Shares of Beneficial Interest

     1   

Share Certificates

     2   

DESCRIPTION OF THE FUNDS AND THEIR INVESTMENTS AND RISKS

     3   

Classification

     3   

Investment Strategies and Risks

     3   

Equity Investments

     3   

Foreign Investments

     5   

Exchange-Traded Funds

     8   

Exchange-Traded Notes

     9   

Debt Investments

     9   

Other Investments

     20   

Investment Techniques

     23   

Derivatives

     28   

Fund Policies

     41   

Portfolio Turnover

     45   

Policies and Procedures for Disclosure of Fund Holdings

     45   

MANAGEMENT OF THE TRUST

     48   

Board of Trustees

     48   

Management Information

     53   

Trustee Ownership of Fund Shares

     57   

Compensation

     57   

Retirement Plan For Trustees

     58   

Deferred Compensation Agreements

     59   

Code of Ethics

     59   

Proxy Voting Policies

     59   

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES

     60   

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES

     60   

Investment Adviser

     60   

Investment Sub-Advisers

     64   

Services to the Subsidiary

     65   

Portfolio Managers

     65   

Securities Lending Arrangements

     65   

Service Agreements

     66   

Other Service Providers

     66   

BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES

     67   

Brokerage Transactions

     67   

Commissions

     69   

Broker Selection

     69   

 

i


Directed Brokerage (Research Services)

     71   

Regular Brokers

     72   

Allocation of Portfolio Transactions

     72   

Allocation of Initial Public Offering (IPO) Transactions

     72   

PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES

     72   

Calculation of Net Asset Value

     73   

Redemptions In Kind

     75   

Payments to Participating Insurance Companies and/or their Affiliates

     76   

DIVIDENDS, DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAX MATTERS

     76   

Dividends and Distributions

     76   

Tax Matters

     77   

DISTRIBUTION OF SECURITIES

     88   

Distributor

     88   

Distribution Plan

     88   

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     90   

PENDING LITIGATION

     90   

APPENDICIES :

  

RATINGS OF DEBT SECURITIES

     A-1   

PERSONS TO WHOM INVESCO PROVIDES NON-PUBLIC PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS ON AN ONGOING BASIS

     B-1   

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

     C-1   

TRUSTEE COMPENSATION TABLE

     E-1   

PROXY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

     E-1   

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES

     F-1   

MANAGEMENT FEES

     G-1   

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS

     H-1   

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FEES

     I-1   

BROKERAGE COMMISSIONS AND COMMISSIONS ON AFFILIATED TRANSACTIONS

     J-1   

DIRECTED BROKERAGE (RESEARCH SERVICES) AND PURCHASES OF SECURITIES OF REGULAR BROKERS OR DEALERS

     K-1   

CERTAIN FINANCIAL ADVISORS THAT RECEIVE ONE OR MORE TYPES OF PAYMENTS

     L-1   

AMOUNTS PAID TO INVESCO DISTRIBUTORS, INC. PURSUANT TO DISTRIBUTION PLANS

     M-1   

ALLOCATION OF ACTUAL FEES PAID PURSUANT TO DISTRIBUTION PLAN

     N-1   

 

ii


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE TRUST

Fund History

AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) (the Trust) is a Delaware statutory trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end series management investment company. The Trust was originally organized as a Maryland corporation on January 22, 1993 and re-organized as a Delaware statutory trust on May 1, 2000. Under the Trust’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust, as amended (the Trust Agreement), the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the Board) is authorized to create new series of shares without the necessity of a vote of shareholders of the Trust. Prior to April 30, 2014, Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund was known as Invesco V.I. Utilities Fund. Prior to April 29, 2013, Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities was known as Invesco Van Kampen V.I. Value Opportunities Fund. Prior to April 30, 2012, Invesco Van Kampen V.I. Value Opportunities Fund was known as Invesco V.I. Basic Value Fund. Prior to April 30, 2010, the Trust was known as AIM Variable Insurance Funds and the Funds were known as AIM V.I. Basic Value Fund, AIM V.I. Core Equity Fund, AIM V.I. Diversified Income Fund, AIM V.I. Global Health Care Fund, AIM V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, AIM V.I. Government Securities Fund, AIM V.I. High Yield Fund, AIM V.I. International Growth Fund, AIM V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund, AIM V.I. Money Market Fund, AIM V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund, AIM V.I. Technology Fund and AIM V.I. Utilities Fund.

Shares of Beneficial Interest

Shares of beneficial interest of the Trust are redeemable at their net asset value at the option of the shareholder or at the option of the Trust.

The Trust allocates moneys and other property it receives from the issue or sale of shares of each of its series of shares, and all income, earnings and profits from such issuance and sales, subject only to the rights of creditors, to the appropriate Fund. These assets constitute the underlying assets of each Fund, are segregated on the Trust’s books of account, and are charged with the expenses of such Fund and its respective classes. The Trust allocates any general expenses of the Trust not readily identifiable as belonging to a particular Fund subject to oversight by the Board, primarily on the basis of relative net assets, or other relevant factors.

Each share of each Fund represents an equal proportionate interest in that Fund with each other share and is entitled to such dividends and distributions out of the income belonging to such Fund as are declared by the Board.

Each class of shares represents an interest in the same portfolio of investments. Expenses will result in differing net asset values and dividends and distributions. Upon any liquidation of the Trust, shareholders of each class are entitled to share pro rata in the net assets belonging to the applicable Fund allocable to such class available for distribution after satisfaction of outstanding liabilities of the Fund allocable to such class.

The Trust is not required to hold annual or regular meetings of shareholders. Meetings of shareholders of a Fund or class will be held from time to time to consider matters requiring a vote of such shareholders in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act, state law or the provisions of the Trust Agreement. It is not expected that shareholder meetings will be held annually.

The Trust understands that insurance company separate accounts owning shares of the Funds will vote their shares in accordance with the instructions received from owners of variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies (Contract Owners), annuitants and beneficiaries. Fund shares held by a separate account as to which no instructions have been received will be voted for or against any proposition, or in abstention, in the same proportion as the shares of that separate account as to which instructions have been received. Fund shares held by a separate account that are not attributable to Contract Owners will also be voted for or against any proposition in the same proportion as the shares for which voting instructions are received by that separate account. If an insurance company determines, however, that it is permitted to vote any such shares of the Funds in its own right, it may elect to do so, subject to the then current interpretation of the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder.

 

1


Each share of a Fund generally has the same voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights; however, each class of shares of a Fund is subject to different class-specific expenses. Only shareholders of a specific class may vote on matters relating to that class’s distribution plan.

Except as specifically noted above, shareholders of each Fund are entitled to one vote per share (with proportionate voting for fractional shares), irrespective of the relative net asset value of the shares of a Fund. However, on matters affecting an individual Fund or class of shares, a separate vote of shareholders of that Fund or class is required. Shareholders of a Fund or class are not entitled to vote on any matter which does not affect that Fund or class but that requires a separate vote of another Fund or class. An example of a matter that would be voted on separately by shareholders of each Fund is the approval of the advisory agreement with Invesco Advisers, Inc. (the Adviser or Invesco). When issued, shares of each Fund are fully paid and nonassessable, have no preemptive, conversion or subscription rights, and are freely transferable. Shares do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that when shareholders elect trustees, holders of more than 50% of the shares voting for the election of trustees can elect all of the trustees of the Trust, and the holders of fewer than 50% of the shares voting for the election of trustees will not be able to elect any trustees.

Under Delaware law, shareholders of a Delaware statutory trust shall be entitled to the same limitation of personal liability extended to shareholders of private for-profit corporations organized under Delaware law. There is a remote possibility, however, that shareholders could, under certain circumstances, be held liable for the obligations of the Trust to the extent the courts of another state, which does not recognize such limited liability, were to apply the laws of such state to a controversy involving such obligations. The Trust Agreement disclaims shareholder liability for acts or obligations of the Trust and requires that notice of such disclaimer be given in each agreement, obligation or instrument entered into or executed by the Trust or the trustees to all parties, and each party thereto must expressly waive all rights of action directly against shareholders of the Trust. The Trust Agreement provides for indemnification out of the property of a Fund for all losses and expenses of any shareholder of such Fund held liable on account of being or having been a shareholder. Thus, the risk of a shareholder incurring financial loss due to shareholder liability is limited to circumstances in which a Fund is unable to meet its obligations and the complaining party is not held to be bound by the disclaimer.

The trustees and officers of the Trust will not be liable for any act, omission or obligation of the Trust or any trustee or officer; however, a trustee or officer is not protected against any liability to the Trust or to the shareholders to which a trustee or officer would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his or her office with the Trust (Disabling Conduct). The Trust’s Bylaws generally provide for indemnification by the Trust of the trustees, officers and employees or agents of the Trust, provided that such persons have not engaged in Disabling Conduct. Indemnification does not extend to judgments or amounts paid in settlement in any actions by or in the right of the Trust. The Trust Agreement also authorizes the purchase of liability insurance on behalf of trustees and officers. The Trust’s Bylaws provide for the advancement of payments of expenses to current and former trustees, officers and employees or agents of the Trust, or anyone serving at their request, in connection with the preparation and presentation of a defense to any claim, action, suit or proceeding, for which such person would be entitled to indemnification; provided that any advancement of expenses would be reimbursed unless it is ultimately determined that such person is entitled to indemnification for such expenses.

Share Certificates

Shareholders of the Funds do not have the right to demand or require the Trust to issue share certificates and share certificates are not issued.

 

2


DESCRIPTION OF THE FUNDS AND THEIR INVESTMENTS AND RISKS

Classification

The Trust is an open-end management investment company. Each of the Funds except for Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund are “diversified” for purposes of the 1940 Act. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund is “non-diversified” for purposes of the 1940 Act, which means these Funds can invest a greater percentage of their assets in a small number of issuers or any one issuer than a diversified fund can.

Investment Strategies and Risks

Set forth below are detailed descriptions of the various types of securities and investment techniques that Invesco and/or the Sub-Advisers (as defined herein) may use in managing the Funds, as well as the risks associated with those types of securities and investment techniques. The descriptions of the types of securities and investment techniques below supplement the discussion of principal investment strategies and risks contained in each Fund’s Prospectus. Where a particular type of security or investment technique is not discussed in a Fund’s Prospectus, that security or investment technique is not a principal investment strategy.

Any percentage limitations relating to the composition of a Fund’s portfolio identified in the Fund’s prospectus or this SAI apply at the time the Fund acquires an investment. Subsequent changes that result from market fluctuations generally will not require a Fund to sell any portfolio security. However, a Fund may be required to sell its illiquid securities holdings, or reduce its borrowings, if any, in response to fluctuations in the value of such holdings.

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund will seek to gain exposure to commodities primarily through investments in the Invesco Cayman Commodity Fund IV Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Fund organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the Subsidiary). The Fund may invest up to 25% of its total assets in the Subsidiary.

The Funds’ investment objectives, policies, strategies and practices described below are non-fundamental unless otherwise indicated.

Equity Investments

Common Stock . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund, Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may invest in common stock. Common stock is issued by a company principally to raise cash for business purposes and represents an equity or ownership interest in the issuing company. Common stockholders are typically entitled to vote on important matters of the issuing company, including the selection of directors, and may receive dividends on their holdings. A Fund participates in the success or failure of any company in which it holds common stock. In the event a company is liquidated or declares bankruptcy, the claims of bondholders, other debt holders, owners of preferred stock and general creditors take precedence over the claims of those who own common stock.

The prices of common stocks change in response to many factors including the historical and prospective earnings of the issuing company, the value of its assets, general economic conditions, interest rates, investor perceptions and market liquidity.

Preferred Stock . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may invest in preferred stock. Preferred stock, unlike common stock, often offers a specified dividend rate payable from a company’s earnings. Preferred stock also generally has a preference over common stock on the distribution of a company’s assets in the event the company is liquidated or declares bankruptcy; however, the rights of preferred stockholders on the distribution of a company’s assets in the event of a liquidation or bankruptcy are generally subordinate to the rights of the company’s debt holders and general creditors. If interest rates rise, the fixed dividend on preferred stocks may be less attractive, causing the price of preferred stocks to decline.

 

3


Some fixed rate preferred stock may have mandatory sinking fund provisions which provide for the stock to be retired or redeemed on a predetermined schedule, as well as call/redemption provisions prior to maturity, which can limit the benefit of any decline in interest rates that might positively affect the price of preferred stocks. Preferred stock dividends may be “cumulative,” requiring all or a portion of prior unpaid dividends to be paid before dividends are paid on the issuer’s common stock. Preferred stock may be “participating,” which means that it may be entitled to a dividend exceeding the stated dividend in certain cases. In some cases an issuer may offer auction rate preferred stock, which means that the interest to be paid is set by auction and will often be reset at stated intervals.

Convertible Securities . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may invest in convertible securities. Convertible securities are generally bonds, debentures, notes, preferred stocks or other securities or investments that may be converted or exchanged (by the holder or by the issuer) into shares of the underlying common stock (or cash or securities of equivalent value) at a stated exchange ratio or predetermined price (the conversion price). A convertible security is designed to provide current income and also the potential for capital appreciation through the conversion feature, which enables the holder to benefit from increases in the market price of the underlying common stock. A convertible security may be called for redemption or conversion by the issuer after a particular date and under certain circumstances (including a specified price) established upon issue. If a convertible security held by a Fund is called for redemption or conversion, the Fund could be required to tender it for redemption, convert it into the underlying common stock, or sell it to a third party, which may have an adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives. Convertible securities have general characteristics similar to both debt and equity securities.

A convertible security generally entitles the holder to receive interest paid or accrued until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Before conversion, convertible securities have characteristics similar to non-convertible debt obligations and are designed to provide for a stable stream of income with generally higher yields than common stocks. However, there can be no assurance of current income because the issuers of the convertible securities may default on their obligations. Convertible securities rank senior to common stock in a corporation’s capital structure and, therefore, generally entail less risk than the corporation’s common stock. Convertible securities are subordinate in rank to any senior debt obligations of the issuer, and, therefore, an issuer’s convertible securities entail more risk than its debt obligations. Moreover, convertible securities are often rated below investment grade or not rated because they fall below debt obligations and just above common stock in order of preference or priority on an issuer’s balance sheet. To the extent that a Fund invests in convertible securities with credit ratings below investment grade, such securities may have a higher likelihood of default, although this may be somewhat offset by the convertibility feature.

Convertible securities generally offer lower interest or dividend yields than non-convertible debt securities of similar credit quality because of the potential for capital appreciation. The common stock underlying convertible securities may be issued by a different entity than the issuer of the convertible securities.

The value of convertible securities is influenced by both the yield of non-convertible securities of comparable issuers and by the value of the underlying common stock. The value of a convertible security viewed without regard to its conversion feature (i.e., strictly on the basis of its yield) is sometimes referred to as its “investment value.” The investment value of the convertible security typically will fluctuate based on the credit quality of the issuer and will fluctuate inversely with changes in prevailing interest rates. However, at the same time, the convertible security will be influenced by its “conversion value,” which is the market value of the underlying common stock that would be obtained if the convertible security were converted. Conversion value fluctuates directly with the price of the underlying common stock, and will therefore be subject to risks relating to the activities of the issuer and general market and economic conditions. Depending upon the relationship of the conversion price to the market value of the underlying security, a convertible security may trade more like an equity security than a debt instrument.

 

4


If, because of a low price of the common stock, the conversion value is substantially below the investment value of the convertible security, the price of the convertible security is governed principally by its investment value. Generally, if the conversion value of a convertible security increases to a point that approximates or exceeds its investment value, the value of the security will be principally influenced by its conversion value. A convertible security will sell at a premium over its conversion value to the extent investors place value on the right to acquire the underlying common stock while holding an income-producing security.

While a Fund uses the same criteria to rate a convertible debt security that it uses to rate a more conventional debt security, a convertible preferred stock is treated like a preferred stock for the Fund’s financial reporting, credit rating and investment limitation purposes.

Alternative Entity Securities . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may invest in alternative entity securities, which are the securities of entities that are formed as limited partnerships, limited liability companies, business trusts or other non-corporate entities that are similar to common or preferred stock of corporations.

Foreign Investments

Foreign Securities . Each Fund may invest in foreign securities. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund may invest up to 100% of its assets in foreign securities.

Foreign securities are equity or debt securities issued by issuers outside the U.S., and include securities in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), European Depositary Receipts (EDRs), or other securities representing underlying securities of foreign issuers (foreign securities). ADRs are receipts, issued by U.S. banks, for the shares of foreign corporations, held by the bank issuing the receipt. ADRs are typically issued in registered form, denominated in U.S. dollars and designed for use in the U.S. securities markets. EDRs are similar to ADRs, except they are typically issued by European banks or trust companies, denominated in foreign currencies and designed for use outside the U.S. securities markets. ADRs and EDRs entitle the holder to all dividends and capital gains on the underlying foreign securities, less any fees paid to the bank. Purchasing ADRs or EDRs gives a Fund the ability to purchase the functional equivalent of foreign securities without going to the foreign securities markets to do so. ADRs or EDRs that are “sponsored” are those where the foreign corporation whose shares are represented by the ADR or EDR is actively involved in the issuance of the ADR or EDR, and generally provides material information about the corporation to the U.S. market. An “unsponsored” ADR or EDR program are those where the foreign corporation whose shares are held by the bank is not obligated to disclose material information in the United States, and, therefore, the market value of the ADR or EDR may not reflect important facts known only to the foreign company.

Foreign debt securities include corporate debt securities of foreign issuers, certain foreign bank obligations (see Bank Instruments) and U.S. dollar or foreign currency denominated obligations of foreign governments or their subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities (see Foreign Government Obligations), international agencies and supranational entities.

The Funds consider various factors when determining whether a company is in a particular country, including whether (1) it is organized under the laws of a country; (2) it has a principal office in a country; (3) it derives 50% or more of its total revenues from businesses in a country; and/or (4) its securities are traded principally on a stock exchange, or in an over-the-counter market (OTC), in a particular country.

Investments by a Fund in foreign securities, including ADRs and EDRs, whether denominated in U.S. dollars or foreign currencies, may entail all of the risks set forth below in addition to those accompanying an investment in issuers in the U.S.

Currency Risk. The value in U.S. Dollars of the Fund’s non-dollar denominated foreign investments will be affected by changes in currency exchange rates. The U.S. dollar value of a foreign security decreases when the value of the U.S. dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and increases when the value of the U.S. dollar falls against such currency.

 

5


Political and Economic Risk. The economies of many of the countries in which the Funds may invest may not be as developed as the United States’ economy and may be subject to significantly different forces. Political, economic or social instability and development, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, and limitations on the removal of funds or other assets could also adversely affect the value of the Funds’ investments.

Regulatory Risk. Foreign companies are generally not subject to the regulatory controls imposed on U.S. issuers and, as a consequence, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign securities than is available about domestic securities. Foreign companies may not be subject to uniform accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, corporate governance practices and requirements comparable to those applicable to domestic companies. Therefore, financial information about foreign companies may be incomplete, or may not be comparable to the information available on U.S. companies. Income from foreign securities owned by the Funds may be reduced by a withholding tax at the source, which tax would reduce dividend income payable to the Funds’ shareholders.

There is generally less government supervision and regulation of securities exchanges, brokers, dealers, and listed companies in foreign countries than in the U.S., thus increasing the risk of delayed settlements of portfolio transactions or loss of certificates for portfolio securities. Foreign markets may also have different clearance and settlement procedures. If a Fund experiences settlement problems it may result in temporary periods when a portion of the Fund’s assets are uninvested and could cause the Fund to miss attractive investment opportunities or a potential liability to the Fund arising out of the Fund’s inability to fulfill a contract to sell such securities.

Market Risk. Investing in foreign markets generally involves certain risks not typically associated with investing in the United States. The securities markets in many foreign countries will have substantially less trading volume than the United States markets. As a result, the securities of some foreign companies may be less liquid and experience more price volatility than comparable domestic securities. Obtaining and/or enforcing judgments in foreign countries may be more difficult, which may make it more difficult to enforce contractual obligations. Increased custodian costs as well as administrative costs (such as the need to use foreign custodians) may also be associated with the maintenance of assets in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, transaction costs in foreign securities markets are likely to be higher, since brokerage commission rates in foreign countries are likely to be higher than in the United States.

Risks of Developing/Emerging Markets Countries. Each Fund (excluding Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may invest up to 5%, Invesco V.I. Technology Fund and Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund (formerly known as Invesco V.I. Basic Value Fund) may invest up to 10%, Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund and Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund may invest up to 15%, Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund and Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund may invest up to 20%, and Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund may invest all of their respective net assets in securities of companies located in developing and emerging markets countries. Unless a Fund’s prospectus includes a different definition, the Funds consider developing and emerging market countries to be those countries that are not included in the MSCI World Index.

Investments in developing and emerging markets countries present risks in addition to, or greater than, those presented by investments in foreign issuers generally, and may include the following risks:

 

  i. Restriction, to varying degrees, on foreign investment in stocks;

 

  ii. Repatriation of investment income, capital, and the proceeds of sales in foreign countries may require foreign governmental registration and/or approval;

 

  iii. Greater risk of fluctuation in value of foreign investments due to changes in currency exchange rates, currency control regulations or currency devaluation;

 

6


  iv. Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates may have negative effects on the economies and securities markets of certain developing and emerging markets countries;

 

  v. Many of the developing and emerging markets countries’ securities markets are relatively small or less diverse, have low trading volumes, suffer periods of relative illiquidity, and are characterized by significant price volatility; and

 

  vi. There is a risk in developing and emerging markets countries that a future economic or political crisis could lead to price controls, forced mergers of companies, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, seizure, nationalization, or creation of government monopolies.

Foreign Government Obligations. Each Fund (other than Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund, Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund and Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund) may invest in debt securities of foreign governments. Debt securities issued by foreign governments are often, but not always, supported by the full faith and credit of the foreign governments, or their subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities, that issue them. These securities involve the risks discussed above under Foreign Securities. Additionally, the issuer of the debt or the governmental authorities that control repayment of the debt may be unwilling or unable to pay interest or repay principal when due. Political or economic changes or the balance of trade may affect a country’s willingness or ability to service its debt obligations. Periods of economic uncertainty may result in the volatility of market prices of sovereign debt obligations, especially debt obligations issued by the governments of developing countries. Foreign government obligations of developing countries, and some structures of emerging market debt securities, both of which are generally below investment grade, are sometimes referred to as “Brady Bonds”.

Foreign Exchange Transactions . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) that may invest in foreign currency-denominated securities has the authority to purchase and sell put and call options on foreign currencies (foreign currency options), foreign currency futures contracts and related options, currency-related swaps and may engage in foreign currency transactions either on a spot (i.e., for prompt delivery and foreign settlement) basis at the rate prevailing in the currency exchange market at the time or through forward foreign currency contracts (see also “Forward Foreign Currency Contracts”). Because forward foreign currency contracts and currency-related swap contracts are privately negotiated transactions, there can be no assurance that a counterparty will honor its obligations.

The Funds will incur costs in converting assets from one currency to another. Foreign exchange dealers may charge a fee for conversion. In addition, dealers may realize a profit based on the difference between the prices at which they buy and sell various currencies in the spot and forward markets.

A Fund will generally engage in foreign exchange transactions in order to complete a purchase or sale of foreign currency denominated securities The Funds may also use foreign currency options, forward contracts and currency-related swap contracts to increase or reduce exposure to a foreign currency, or to shift exposure from one foreign currency to another in a cross currency foreign exchange hedge, or to enhance returns. Forward contracts are intended to minimize the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of the hedged currencies; however, at the same time, they tend to limit any potential gain which might result should the value of such currencies increase. Open positions in forward contracts used for non-hedging purposes will be covered by the segregation of a sufficient amount of liquid assets.

A Fund also may purchase and write currency options in connection with currency futures or forward contracts. Currency futures contracts are similar to forward foreign currency exchange contracts, except that they are traded on exchanges and have standard contract sizes and delivery dates. Most currency futures contracts call for payment or delivery in U.S. dollars. The uses and risks of currency futures are similar to those of futures relating to securities or indices (see also Futures and Options). Currency futures values can be expected to correlate with exchange rates but may not reflect other factors that affect the value of the Fund’s investments.

Whether or not any hedging strategy will be successful is highly uncertain, and use of hedging strategies may leave a Fund in a less advantageous position than if a hedge had not been established. Moreover, it is impossible to forecast with precision the market value of portfolio securities at the expiration of a foreign currency forward contract. Accordingly, a Fund may be required to buy or sell additional currency on the spot market (and bear the expense of such transaction) if Invesco’s or the Sub-Advisers’ predictions regarding the movement of foreign currency or securities markets prove inaccurate.

 

7


Certain Funds may hold a portion of their assets in bank deposits denominated in foreign currencies, so as to facilitate investment in foreign securities as well as protect against currency fluctuations and the need to convert such assets into U.S. dollars (thereby also reducing transaction costs). To the extent these monies are converted back into U.S. dollars, the value of the assets so maintained will be affected favorably or unfavorably by changes in foreign currency exchange rates and exchange control regulations. Foreign exchange transactions may involve some of the risks of investments in foreign securities. For a discussion of tax considerations relating to foreign currency transactions, see “Dividends, Distributions, and Tax Matters – Tax Matters – Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions – Foreign currency transactions.”

The CFTC and SEC have recently defined many OTC derivative instruments, including non-deliverable foreign exchange forwards and OTC foreign exchange options, as “swaps.” Therefore, these instruments are now included in calculating a Fund’s derivatives exposure.

Foreign Bank Obligations . Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. High Yield and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may invest in foreign bank obligations. Foreign bank obligations include certificates of deposit, banker’s acceptances and fixed time deposits and other obligations (a) denominated in U.S. dollars and issued by a foreign branch of a domestic bank (Eurodollar Obligations), (b) denominated in U.S. dollars and issued by a domestic branch of a foreign bank (Yankee dollar Obligations), and (c) issued by foreign branches of foreign banks. Foreign banks are not generally subject to examination by any U. S. government agency or instrumentality.

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund will limit its aggregate investments in foreign bank obligations, including Eurodollar obligations and Yankee dollar obligations, to 50% of its total assets at the time of purchase, provided that there is no limitation upon the Fund’s investments in (a) Eurodollar Obligations (as defined below), if the domestic parent of the foreign branch issuing the obligation is unconditionally liable in the event that the foreign branch for any reason fails to pay on the Eurodollar obligation; and (b) Yankee Dollar Obligations (as defined below), if the U.S. branch of the foreign bank is subject to the same regulation as U.S. banks.

Exchange-Traded Funds

Exchange-Traded Funds. Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may purchase shares of exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Most ETFs are registered under the 1940 Act as investment companies. Therefore, a Fund’s purchase of shares of an ETF may be subject to the restrictions on investments in other investment companies discussed under “Other Investment Companies.” ETFs have management fees, which increase their cost. The Funds may invest in ETFs advised by PowerShares Capital. Invesco, the Sub-Advisers and PowerShares Capital are affiliates of each other as they are all indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of Invesco Ltd.

ETFs hold portfolios of securities, commodities and/or currencies that are designed to replicate, as closely as possible before expenses, the price and/or yield of (i) a specified market or other index, (ii) a basket of securities, commodities or currencies, or (iii) a particular commodity or currency. The performance results of ETFs will not replicate exactly the performance of the pertinent index, basket, commodity or currency due to transaction and other expenses, including fees to service providers, borne by ETFs. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the portfolio of securities, commodities and/or currencies purchased by an ETF will replicate a particular index or basket or price of a commodity or currency. Some ETFs are actively managed and instead of replicating, they seek to outperform a particular index or basket or price of a commodity or currency. ETF shares are sold and redeemed at net asset value only in large blocks called creation units and redemption units, respectively. ETF shares also may be purchased and sold in secondary market trading on national securities exchanges, which allows investors to purchase and sell ETF shares at their market price throughout the day.

 

8


Investments in ETFs generally present the same primary risks as an investment in a conventional mutual fund that has the same investment objective, strategy and policies. Investments in ETFs further involve the same risks associated with a direct investment in the commodity or currency, or in the types of securities, commodities and/or currencies included in the indices or baskets the ETFs are designed to replicate. In addition, shares of an ETF may trade at a market price that is higher or lower than their net asset value and an active trading market in such shares may not develop or continue. Moreover, trading of an ETF’s shares may be halted if the listing exchange’s officials deem such action to be appropriate, the shares are de-listed from the exchange, or the activation of market-wide “circuit breakers” (which are tied to large decreases in stock prices) halts stock trading generally.

Exchange-Traded Notes

Exchange-Traded Notes . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund may invest in exchange-traded notes. Exchange-traded notes (ETNs) are senior, unsecured, unsubordinated debt securities whose returns are linked to the performance of a particular market benchmark or strategy, minus applicable fees. ETNs are traded on an exchange (e.g., the New York Stock Exchange) during normal trading hours; however, investors can also hold the ETN until maturity. At maturity, the issuer pays to the investor a cash amount equal to the principal amount, subject to the day’s market benchmark or strategy factor. ETNs do not make periodic coupon payments or provide principal protection. ETNs are subject to credit risk, including the credit risk of the issuer, and the value of the ETN may drop due to a downgrade in the issuer’s credit rating, despite the underlying market benchmark or strategy remaining unchanged. The value of an ETN may also be influenced by time to maturity, level of supply and demand for the ETN, volatility and lack of liquidity in underlying assets, changes in the applicable interest rates, changes in the issuer’s credit rating, and economic, legal, political, or geographic events that affect the referenced underlying asset. When Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund invests in ETNs (directly or through the Subsidiary) it will bear its proportionate share of any fees and expenses borne by the ETN. A decision by Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund or the Subsidiary to sell ETN holdings may be limited by the availability of a secondary market. In addition, although an ETN may be listed on an exchange, the issuer may not be required to maintain the listing, and there can be no assurance that a secondary market will exist for an ETN.

ETNs are also subject to tax risk. No assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will accept, or a court will uphold, how Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund or the Subsidiary characterizes and treats ETNs for tax purposes. Further, the IRS and Congress are considering proposals that would change the timing and character of income and gains from ETNs.

An ETN that is tied to a specific market benchmark or strategy may not be able to replicate and maintain exactly the composition and relative weighting of securities, commodities or other components in the applicable market benchmark or strategy. Some ETNs that use leverage can, at times, be relatively illiquid, and thus they may be difficult to purchase or sell at a fair price. Leveraged ETNs are subject to the same risk as other instruments that use leverage in any form.

The market value of ETNs may differ from their market benchmark or strategy. This difference in price may be due to the fact that the supply and demand in the market for ETNs at any point in time is not always identical to the supply and demand in the market for the securities, commodities or other components underlying the market benchmark or strategy that the ETN seeks to track. As a result, there may be times when an ETN trades at a premium or discount to its market benchmark or strategy.

Debt Investments

U.S. Government Obligations . Each Fund may invest in U.S. Government obligations, which include obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, including bills, notes and bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, as well as “stripped” or “zero coupon” U.S. Treasury obligations.

U.S. Government Obligations may be, (i) supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury, (ii) supported by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury, (iii) supported by the

 

9


discretionary authority of the U.S. Government to purchase the agency’s obligations, or (iv) supported only by the credit of the instrumentality. There is a risk that the U.S. Government may choose not to provide financial support to U.S. Government-sponsored agencies or instrumentalities if it is not legally obligated to do so. In that case, if the issuer were to default, a Portfolio holding securities of such issuer might not be able to recover its investment from the U.S. Government. For example, while the U.S. Government has recently provided financial support to Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), no assurance can be given that the U.S. Government will always do so, since the U.S. Government is not so obligated by law. There also is no guarantee that the government would support Federal Home Loan Banks. Accordingly, securities of Fannie Mae, FHLMC and Federal Home Loan Banks, and other agencies, may involve a risk of non-payment of principal and interest.

Temporary Investments . Each Fund may invest a portion of its assets in affiliated money market funds or in the types of money market instruments in which those Funds would invest or other short-term U.S. Government securities for cash management purposes. The Fund may invest up to 100% of its assets in investments that may be inconsistent with the Fund’s principal investment strategies for temporary defensive purposes in anticipation of or in response to adverse market, economic, political or other conditions, or atypical circumstances such as unusually large cash inflows or redemptions. As a result, the Fund may not achieve its investment objective.

Rule 2a-7 Requirements . As permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, as amended, Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund, a money market fund, seeks to maintain a stable price of $1.00 per share by using the amortized cost method to value portfolio securities and rounding the share value to the nearest cent. Rule 2a-7 imposes requirements as to the diversification of each Portfolio, quality of portfolio securities and maturity of the Portfolio and of individual securities.

Diversification . In summary, Rule 2a-7 requires that a Portfolio may not invest in the securities of any issuer if, as a result, more than 5% of the Portfolio’s total assets would be invested in that issuer; provided that, each Portfolio may invest up to 25% of its total assets in the First Tier Securities of a single issuer for up to three business days after acquisition. Certain securities are not subject to this diversification requirement. These include: a security subject to a guarantee from a non-controlled person (as defined in Rule 2a-7) of the issuer of the security; U.S. Government securities; certain repurchase agreements; and shares of certain money market funds. Rule 2a-7 imposes a separate diversification test upon the acquisition of a guarantee or demand feature. (A demand feature is, in summary, a right to sell a security at a price equal to its approximate amortized cost plus accrued interest).

For purposes of these diversification requirements with respect to issuers of Municipal Securities (defined under the caption Municipal Securities), each state (including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico), territory and possession of the United States, each political subdivision, agency, instrumentality, and authority thereof, and each multi-state agency of which a state is a member is a separate “issuer.” When the assets and revenues of an agency, authority, instrumentality, or other political subdivision are separate from the government creating the subdivision and the security is backed only by assets and revenues of the subdivision, such subdivision would be deemed to be the sole issuer. Similarly, in the case of an industrial development bond or private activity bond, if such bond is backed only by the assets and revenues of the non-governmental user, then such non-governmental user would be deemed to be the sole issuer.

In summary, a “First Tier Security” is rated (or issued by an issuer that is rated) in the highest short-term rating category by the “Requisite NRSROs,” or, if unrated, is determined by the Portfolios’ investment adviser (subject to oversight and pursuant to guidelines established by the Board) to be of comparable quality to such a rated security. Securities issued by a registered investment company that is a money market fund and U.S. Government securities are also considered to be “First Tier Securities.” The term “Requisite NRSRO” means (a) any two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs) that have issued a rating with respect to a security or class of debt obligations of an issuer, or (b) if only one NRSRO has issued a rating with respect to such security or issuer at the time a Portfolio acquires the security, that NRSRO.

 

10


Quality . The Portfolios may invest only in U.S. dollar denominated securities that the Portfolio’s investment adviser (subject to oversight and pursuant to guidelines established by the Board) determines present minimal credit risk and that are “Eligible Securities” as defined in Rule 2a-7. Rule 2a-7 defines an Eligible Security, in summary, as a security with a remaining maturity of 397 calendar days or less that has been rated (or whose issuer has been rated) by the Requisite NRSROs in one of the two highest short-term rating categories. Eligible Securities may also include unrated securities determined by the Portfolios’ investment adviser (subject to oversight and pursuant to guidelines established by the Board) to be of comparable quality to such rated securities. The eligibility of a security with a guarantee may be determined based on whether the guarantee is an Eligible Security.

The Portfolios will limit investments to those which are First Tier Securities at the time of acquisition.

Maturity . Under Rule 2a-7, each Portfolio may invest only in securities having remaining maturities of 397 days or less and maintains a dollar weighted average portfolio maturity of 90 days or less. The maturity of a security is determined in compliance with Rule 2a-7, which permits, among other things, certain securities bearing adjustable interest rates to be deemed to have a maturity shorter than their stated maturity.

Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund, Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund, Invesco V.I. Technology Fund and Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fundmay invest in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities are mortgage-related securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, or issued by nongovernment entities. Mortgage-related securities represent ownership in pools of mortgage loans assembled for sale to investors by various government agencies such as the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and government-related organizations such as FNMA and FHLMC, as well as by nongovernment issuers such as commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, mortgage bankers and private mortgage insurance companies. Although certain mortgage-related securities are guaranteed by a third party or otherwise similarly secured, the market value of the security, which may fluctuate, is not so secured. These securities differ from conventional bonds in that the principal is paid back to the investor as payments are made on the underlying mortgages in the pool. Accordingly, a Fund receives monthly scheduled payments of principal and interest along with any unscheduled principal prepayments on the underlying mortgages. Because these scheduled and unscheduled principal payments must be reinvested at prevailing interest rates, mortgage-backed securities do not provide an effective means of locking in long-term interest rates for the investor.

In addition, there are a number of important differences among the agencies and instrumentalities of the U.S. Government that issue mortgage-related securities and among the securities they issue. Mortgage-related securities issued by GNMA include GNMA Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (also known as GNMAs) which are guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest. That guarantee is backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury. GNMA is a corporation wholly owned by the U.S. Government within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Mortgage-related securities issued by FNMA include FNMA Guaranteed Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (also known as FNMAs) and are guaranteed as to payment of principal and interest by FNMA itself and backed by a line of credit with the U.S. Treasury. FNMA is a government-sponsored entity wholly owned by public stockholders. Mortgage-related securities issued by FHLMC include FHLMC Mortgage Participation Certificates (also known as FHLMCs) guaranteed as to payment of principal and interest by FHLMC itself and backed by a line of credit with the U.S. Treasury. FHLMC is a government-sponsored entity wholly owned by public stockholders.

On September 7, 2008, FNMA and FHLMC were placed under the conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) to provide stability in the financial markets, mortgage availability and taxpayer protection by preserving FNMA and FHLMC’s assets and property and putting FNMA and FHLMC in a sound and solvent position. Under the conservatorship, the management of FNMA and FHLMC was replaced.

 

11


Since 2009, both FNMA and FHLMC have received significant capital support through U.S. preferred stock purchases and Federal Reserve purchases of the entities’ mortgage-backed securities.

In February 2011, the Obama Administration produced a report to Congress outlining proposals to wind down FNMA and FHLMC and reduce the government’s role in the mortgage market. Discussions among policymakers continue, however, as to whether FNMA and FHLMC should be nationalized, privatized, restructured, or eliminated altogether. FNMA and FHLMC also are the subject of several continuing legal actions and investigations over certain accounting, disclosure or corporate governance matters, which (along with any resulting financial restatements) may continue to have an adverse effect on the guaranteeing entities. Importantly, the future of the entities is in question as the U.S. Government considers multiple options regarding the future of FNMA and FHLMC.

Asset-backed securities are structured like mortgage-backed securities, but instead of mortgage loans or interests in mortgage loans, the underlying assets may include such items as motor vehicle installment sales contracts or installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, and receivables from credit card agreements and from sales of personal property. Regular payments received on asset-backed securities include both interest and principal. Asset-backed securities typically have no U.S. Government backing. Additionally, the ability of an issuer of asset-backed securities to enforce its security interest in the underlying assets may be limited.

If a Fund purchases a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed security at a premium, the premium may be lost if there is a decline in the market value of the security whether resulting from changes in interest rates or prepayments in the underlying collateral. As with other interest-bearing securities, the prices of such securities are inversely affected by changes in interest rates. Although the value of a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed security may decline when interest rates rise, the converse is not necessarily true, since in periods of declining interest rates the mortgages and loans underlying the securities are prone to prepayment, thereby shortening the average life of the security and shortening the period of time over which income at the higher rate is received. When interest rates are rising, the rate of prepayment tends to decrease, thereby lengthening the period of time over which income at the lower rate is received. For these and other reasons, a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed security’s average maturity may be shortened or lengthened as a result of interest rate fluctuations and, therefore, it is not possible to predict accurately the security’s return. In addition, while the trading market for short-term mortgages and asset-backed securities is ordinarily quite liquid, in times of financial stress the trading market for these securities may become restricted.

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs) . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund and Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund may invest in CMOs. A CMO is a hybrid between a mortgage-backed bond and a mortgage pass-through security. A CMO is a type of mortgage-backed security that creates separate classes with varying maturities and interest rates, called tranches. Similar to a bond, interest and prepaid principal is paid, in most cases, semiannually. CMOs may be collateralized by whole mortgage loans, but are more typically collateralized by portfolios of mortgage pass-through securities guaranteed by GNMA, FHLMC, or FNMA, and their income streams.

CMOs are structured into multiple classes, each bearing a different fixed or floating interest rate and stated maturity. Actual maturity and average life will depend upon the prepayment experience of the collateral. CMOs provide for a modified form of call protection through a de facto breakdown of the underlying pool of mortgages according to how quickly the loans are repaid. Monthly payment of principal received from the pool of underlying mortgages, including prepayments, is first returned to investors holding the shortest maturity class. Investors holding the longer maturity classes receive principal only after the first class has been retired. An investor is partially guarded against a sooner than desired return of principal because of the sequential payments.

In a typical CMO transaction, a corporation (issuer) issues multiple series (e.g., Series A, B, C and Z) of CMO bonds (Bonds). Proceeds of the Bond offering are used to purchase mortgages or

 

12


mortgage pass-through certificates (Collateral). The Collateral is pledged to a third party trustee as security for the Bonds. Principal and interest payments from the Collateral are used to pay principal on the Bonds in the following order: Series A, B, C and Z. The Series A, B, and C Bonds all bear current interest. Interest on a Series Z Bond is accrued and added to principal and a like amount is paid as principal on the Series A, B, or C Bond currently being paid off. Only after the Series A, B, and C Bonds are paid in full does the Series Z Bond begin to receive payment. With some CMOs, the issuer serves as a conduit to allow loan originators (primarily builders or savings and loan associations) to borrow against their loan portfolios.

CMOs that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or by any of its agencies or instrumentalities will be considered U.S. Government securities by the Funds, while other CMOs, even if collateralized by U.S. Government securities, will have the same status as other privately issued securities for purposes of applying the Funds’ diversification tests.

FHLMC CMOs are debt obligations of FHLMC issued in multiple classes having different maturity dates which are secured by the pledge of a pool of conventional mortgage loans purchased by FHLMC. Payments of principal and interest on the FHLMC CMOs are made semiannually. The amount of principal payable on each semiannual payment date is determined in accordance with FHLMC’s mandatory sinking fund schedule, which, in turn, is equal to approximately 100% of FHA prepayment experience applied to the mortgage collateral pool. All sinking fund payments in the FHLMC CMOs are allocated to the retirement of the individual classes of bonds in the order of their stated maturities. Payment of principal on the mortgage loans in the collateral pool in excess of the amount of FHLMC’s minimum sinking fund obligation for any payment date are paid to the holders of the FHLMC CMOs as additional sinking fund payments. Because of the “pass-through” nature of all principal payments received on the collateral pool in excess of FHLMC’s minimum sinking fund requirement, the rate at which principal of the FHLMC CMOs is actually repaid is likely to be such that each class of bonds will be retired in advance of its scheduled maturity date. If collection of principal (including prepayments) on the mortgage loans during any semiannual payment period is not sufficient to meet FHLMC CMO’s minimum sinking fund obligation on the next sinking fund payment date, FHLMC agrees to make up the deficiency from its general funds.

Classes of CMOs may also include interest only (IOs) and principal only (POs). IOs and POs are stripped mortgage-backed securities representing interests in a pool of mortgages the cash flow from which has been separated into interest and principal components. IOs (interest only securities) receive the interest portion of the cash flow while POs (principal only securities) receive the principal portion. IOs and POs can be extremely volatile in response to changes in interest rates. As interest rates rise and fall, the value of IOs tends to move in the same direction as interest rates. POs perform best when prepayments on the underlying mortgages rise since this increases the rate at which the investment is returned and the yield to maturity on the PO. When payments on mortgages underlying a PO are slow, the life of the PO is lengthened and the yield to maturity is reduced.

CMOs are generally subject to the same risks as mortgage-backed securities. In addition, CMOs may be subject to credit risk because the issuer or credit enhancer has defaulted on its obligations and a Fund may not receive all or part of its principal. Obligations issued by U.S. Government-related entities are guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest, but are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The performance of private label mortgage-backed securities, issued by private institutions, is based on the financial health of those institutions. Although GNMA guarantees timely payment of GNMA certificates even if homeowners delay or default, tracking the “pass-through” payments may, at times, be difficult.

Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may invest in CDOs. A CDO is a security backed by a pool of bonds, loans and other debt obligations. CDOs are not limited to investing in one type of debt and accordingly, a CDO may own corporate bonds, commercial loans, asset-backed securities, residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities, and emerging market debt. The CDO’s securities are typically divided into several classes, or bond tranches, that have differing levels of investment grade or credit tolerances. Most CDO issues are structured in a way that enables the senior bond classes and mezzanine classes to

 

13


receive investment-grade credit ratings. Credit risk is shifted to the most junior class of securities. If any defaults occur in the assets backing a CDO, the senior bond classes are first in line to receive principal and interest payments, followed by the mezzanine classes and finally by the lowest rated (or non-rated) class, which is known as the equity tranche. Similar in structure to a collateralized mortgage obligation (described above) CDOs are unique in that they represent different types of debt and credit risk.

Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs). Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund may invest in CLOs, which are debt instruments backed solely by a pool of other debt securities. The risks of an investment in a CLO depend largely on the type of the collateral securities and the class of the CLO in which the Fund invests. Some CLOs have credit ratings, but are typically issued in various classes with various priorities. Normally, CLOs are privately offered and sold (that is, they are not registered under the securities laws) and may be characterized by the Fund as illiquid securities; however, an active dealer market may exist for CLOs that qualify for Rule 144A transactions. In addition to the normal interest rate, default and other risks of fixed income securities, CLOs carry additional risks, including the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments, the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default, the Fund may invest in CLOs that are subordinate to other classes, values may be volatile, and disputes with the issuer may produce unexpected investment results.

Credit Linked Notes (CLNs) . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund and Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund invest in CLNs. A CLN is a security with an embedded credit default swap allowing the issuer to transfer a specific credit risk to credit investors.

CLNs are created through a Special Purpose Company (SPC), or trust, which is collateralized with AAA-rated securities. The CLN’s price or coupon is linked to the performance of the reference asset of the second party. Generally, the CLN holder receives either fixed or floating coupon rate during the life of the CLN and par at maturity. The cash flows are dependent on specified credit-related events. Should the second party default or declare bankruptcy, the CLN holder will receive an amount equivalent to the recovery rate. In return for these risks, the CLN holder receives a higher yield. The Fund bears the risk of default by the second party and any unforeseen movements in the reference asset, which could lead to loss of principal and receipt of interest payments. As with most derivative instruments, valuation of a CLN may be difficult due to the complexity of the security.

Bank Instruments . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may invest in bank instruments. Bank instruments are unsecured interest bearing bank deposits. Bank instruments include, but are not limited to, certificates of deposits, time deposits, and banker’s acceptances from U.S. or foreign banks as well as Eurodollar certificates of deposit (Eurodollar CDs) and Eurodollar time deposits (Eurodollar time deposits) of foreign branches of domestic banks. Some certificates of deposit is a negotiable interest-bearing instrument with a specific maturity issued by banks and savings and loan institutions in exchange for the deposit of funds, and can typically be traded in the secondary market prior to maturity. Other certificates of deposit, like time deposits, are non-negotiable receipts issued by a bank in exchange for the deposit of funds which earns a specified rate of interest over a definite period of time; however, it cannot be traded in the secondary market. A bankers’ acceptance is a bill of exchange or time draft drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank.

An investment in Eurodollar CDs or Eurodollar time deposits may involve some of the same risks that are described for Foreign Securities.

Commercial Instruments . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco V.I. High Yield and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may invest in commercial instruments, including commercial paper, master notes and other short-term corporate instruments, that are denominated in U.S. dollars or foreign currencies.

 

14


Commercial instruments are a type of instrument issued by large banks and corporations to raise money to meet their short term debt obligations, and are only backed by the issuing bank or corporation’s promise to pay the face amount on the maturity date specified on the note. Commercial paper consists of short-term promissory notes issued by corporations. Commercial paper may be traded in the secondary market after its issuance. Master notes are demand notes that permit the investment of fluctuating amounts of money at varying rates of interest pursuant to arrangements with issuers who meet the credit quality criteria of the Funds. The interest rate on a master note may fluctuate based on changes in specified interest rates or may be reset periodically according to a prescribed formula or may be a set rate. Although there is no secondary market in master demand notes, if such notes have a demand feature, the payee may demand payment of the principal amount of the note upon relatively short notice. Master notes are generally illiquid and therefore subject to the Funds’ percentage limitations for investments in illiquid securities. Commercial instruments may not be registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Synthetic Municipal Instruments . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund and Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund may invest in synthetic municipal instruments, the value of and return on which are derived from underlying securities. The types of synthetic municipal instruments in which the Fund may invest include tender option bonds and variable rate trust certificates. Both types of instruments involve the deposit into a trust or custodial account of one or more long-term tax-exempt bonds or notes (Underlying Bonds), and the sale of certificates evidencing interests in the trust or custodial account to investors such as the Fund. The trustee or custodian receives the long-term fixed rate interest payments on the Underlying Bonds, and pays certificate holders short-term floating or variable interest rates which are reset periodically. A “tender option bond” provides a certificate holder with the conditional right to sell its certificate to the sponsor or some designated third party at specified intervals and receive the par value of the certificate plus accrued interest (a demand feature). A “variable rate trust certificate” evidences an interest in a trust entitling the certificate holder to receive variable rate interest based on prevailing short-term interest rates and also typically provides the certificate holder with the conditional demand feature the right to tender its certificate at par value plus accrued interest.

Typically, a certificate holder cannot exercise the demand feature until the occurrence of certain conditions, such as where the issuer of the Underlying Bond defaults on interest payments. Moreover, because synthetic municipal instruments involve a trust or custodial account and a third party conditional demand feature, they involve complexities and potential risks that may not be present where a municipal security is owned directly.

The tax-exempt character of the interest paid to certificate holders is based on the assumption that the holders have an ownership interest in the Underlying Bonds; however, the IRS has not issued a ruling addressing this issue. In the event the IRS issues an adverse ruling or successfully litigates this issue, it is possible that the interest paid to the Fund on certain synthetic municipal instruments would be deemed to be taxable. The Fund relies on opinions of special tax counsel on this ownership question and opinions of bond counsel regarding the tax-exempt character of interest paid on the Underlying Bonds.

Municipal Securities . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may invest in Municipal Securities. “Municipal Securities” include debt obligations of states, territories or possessions of the United States and the District of Columbia and their political subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities, issued to obtain funds for various public purposes, including the construction of a wide range of public facilities such as airports, bridges, highways, housing, hospitals, mass transportation, schools, streets and water and sewer works. Other public purposes for which Municipal Securities may be issued include the refunding of outstanding obligations, obtaining funds for general operating expenses and lending such funds to other public institutions and facilities.

The principal and interest payments for industrial development bonds or pollution control bonds are often the sole responsibility of the industrial user and therefore may not be backed by the taxing power of the issuing municipality. The interest paid on such bonds may be exempt from federal income tax, although current federal tax laws place substantial limitations on the purposes and size of such issues. Such obligations are considered to be Municipal Securities provided that the interest paid

 

15


thereon, in the opinion of bond counsel, qualifies as exempt from federal income tax. However, interest on Municipal Securities may give rise to a federal alternative minimum tax (AMT) liability and may have other collateral federal income tax consequences. Interest received by the Fund from tax-exempt Municipal Securities may be taxable to shareholders if the Fund fails to qualify to pay exempt-interest dividends by failing to satisfy the requirement that at the close of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year at least 50% of the Fund’s total assets consists of Municipal Securities.

The two major classifications of Municipal Securities are bonds and notes. Bonds may be further classified as “general obligation” or “revenue” issues. General obligation bonds are secured by the issuer’s pledge of its full faith, credit and taxing power for the payment of principal and interest. Revenue bonds are payable from the revenues derived from a particular facility or class of facilities, and in some cases, from the proceeds of a special excise or other specific revenue source, but not from the general taxing power. Tax-exempt industrial development bonds are in most cases revenue bonds and do not generally carry the pledge of the credit of the issuing municipality. Notes are short-term instruments which usually mature in less than two years. Most notes are general obligations of the issuing municipalities or agencies and are sold in anticipation of a bond sale, collection of taxes or receipt of other revenues.

Municipal Securities also include the following securities:

 

    Bond Anticipation Notes usually are general obligations of state and local governmental issuers which are sold to obtain interim financing for projects that will eventually be funded through the sale of long-term debt obligations or bonds.

 

    Tax Anticipation Notes are issued by state and local governments to finance the current operations of such governments. Repayment is generally to be derived from specific future tax revenues. Tax anticipation notes are usually general obligations of the issuer.

 

    Revenue Anticipation Notes are issued by governments or governmental bodies with the expectation that future revenues from a designated source will be used to repay the notes. In general, they also constitute general obligations of the issuer.

 

    Tax-Exempt Commercial Paper (Municipal Paper) is similar to taxable commercial paper, except that tax-exempt commercial paper is issued by states, municipalities and their agencies.

The Fund also may purchase participation interests or custodial receipts from financial institutions. These participation interests give the purchaser an undivided interest in one or more underlying Municipal Securities.

After purchase by the Fund, an issue of Municipal Securities may cease to be rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s) or Standard and Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P), or another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO), or the rating of such a security may be reduced below the minimum credit quality rating required for purchase by the Fund. Neither event would require the Fund to dispose of the security. To the extent that the ratings applied by Moody’s, S&P or another NRSRO to Municipal Securities may change as a result of changes in these rating systems, the Fund will attempt to use comparable credit quality ratings as standards for its investments in Municipal Securities.

Since the Fund invests in Municipal Securities backed by insurance companies and other financial institutions, changes in the financial condition of these institutions could cause losses to the Fund and affect its share price.

The Fund may invest in Municipal Securities that are insured by financial insurance companies. Since a limited number of entities provide such insurance, the Fund may invest more than 25% of its assets in securities insured by the same insurance company.

 

16


The Fund may also invest in taxable municipal securities. Taxable municipal securities are debt securities issued by or on behalf of states and their political subdivisions, the District of Columbia, and possessions of the United States, the interest on which is not exempt from federal income tax.

The yields on Municipal Securities are dependent on a variety of factors, including general economic and monetary conditions, money market factors, conditions of the Municipal Securities market, size of a particular offering, and maturity and rating of the obligation. Because many Municipal Securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those related to education, health care, transportation and various utilities, conditions in those sectors and the financial condition of an individual municipal issuer can affect the overall municipal market. The market values of the Municipal Securities held by the Fund will be affected by changes in the yields available on similar securities. If yields increase following the purchase of a Municipal Security, the market value of such Municipal Security will generally decrease. Conversely, if yields decrease, the market value of a Municipal Security will generally increase.

Municipal Lease Obligations . Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may invest in municipal lease obligations by purchasing such obligations directly or through participation interests.

Municipal lease obligations, a type of Municipal Security, may take the form of a lease, an installment purchase contract or a conditional sales contract. Municipal lease obligations are issued by state and local governments and authorities to acquire land, equipment and facilities such as state and municipal vehicles, telecommunications and computer equipment, and other capital assets. Interest payments on qualifying municipal lease obligations are generally exempt from federal income taxes.

Municipal lease obligations are generally subject to greater risks than general obligation or revenue bonds. State laws set forth requirements that states or municipalities must meet in order to issue municipal obligations, and such obligations may contain a covenant by the issuer to budget for, appropriate, and make payments due under the obligation. However, certain municipal lease obligations may contain “non-appropriation” clauses which provide that the issuer is not obligated to make payments on the obligation in future years unless funds have been appropriated for this purpose each year. If not enough money is appropriated to make the lease payments, the leased property may be repossessed as security for holders of the municipal lease obligation. In such an event, there is no assurance that the property’s private sector or re-leasing value will be enough to make all outstanding payments on the municipal lease obligation or that the payments will continue to be tax-free. Additionally, it may be difficult to dispose of the underlying capital asset in the event of non-appropriation or other default. Direct investments by the Fund in municipal lease obligations may be deemed illiquid and therefore subject to the Funds’ percentage limitations for investments in illiquid securities and the risks of holding illiquid securities.

Investment Grade Debt Obligations . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund) may invest in U.S. dollar-denominated debt obligations issued or guaranteed by U.S. corporations or U.S. commercial banks, U.S. dollar-denominated obligations of foreign issuers and debt obligations of foreign issuers denominated in foreign currencies. Debt obligations include, among others, bonds, notes, debentures and variable rate demand notes.

The Adviser considers investment grade securities to include: (i) securities rated BBB- or higher by (“S&P”) or Baa3 or higher by Moody’s or an equivalent rating by another NRSRO, (ii) securities with comparable short-term NRSRO ratings, or (iii) unrated securities determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. The description of debt securities ratings may be found in Appendix A.

In choosing corporate debt securities on behalf of a Fund, portfolio managers may consider:

 

  (i) general economic and financial conditions;

 

  (ii) the specific issuer’s (a) business and management, (b) cash flow, (c) earnings coverage of interest and dividends, (d) ability to operate under adverse economic conditions, (e) fair market value of assets, and (f) in the case of foreign issuers, unique political, economic or social conditions applicable to such issuer’s country; and,

 

  (iii) other considerations deemed appropriate.

 

17


Debt securities are subject to a variety of risks, such as interest rate risk, income risk, prepayment risk, inflation risk, credit risk, currency risk and default risk.

Non-Investment Grade Debt Obligations (Junk Bonds) . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund and Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund may invest in lower-rated or non-rated debt securities commonly known as junk bonds. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund may invest up to 25% of its net assets in junk bonds, including junk bonds of companies located in developing countries.

Bonds rated below investment grade (as defined above in “Investment Grade Debt Obligations”) are commonly referred to as “junk bonds.” Analysis of the creditworthiness of junk bond issuers is more complex than that of investment-grade issuers and the success of the Fund’s adviser in managing these decisions is more dependent upon its own credit analysis than is the case with investment-grade bonds. Description of debt securities ratings are found in Appendix A.

The capacity of junk bonds to pay interest and repay principal is considered speculative. While junk bonds may provide an opportunity for greater income and gains, they are subject to greater risks than higher-rated debt securities. The prices of and yields on junk bonds may fluctuate to a greater extent than those of higher-rated debt securities. Junk bonds are generally more sensitive to individual issuer developments, economic conditions and regulatory changes than higher-rated bonds. Issuers of junk bonds are often issued by smaller, less-seasoned companies or companies that are highly leveraged with more traditional methods of financing unavailable to them. Junk bonds are generally at a higher risk of default because such issues are often unsecured or otherwise subordinated to claims of the issuer’s other creditors. If a junk bond issuer defaults, a Fund may incur additional expenses to seek recovery. The secondary markets in which junk bonds are traded may be thin and less liquid than the market for higher-rated debt securities and a Fund may have difficulty selling certain junk bonds at the desired time and price. Less liquidity in secondary trading markets could adversely affect the price at which a Fund could sell a particular junk bond, and could cause large fluctuations in the net asset value of that Fund’s shares. The lack of a liquid secondary market may also make it more difficult for a Fund to obtain accurate market quotations in valuing junk bond assets and elements of judgment may play a greater role in the valuation.

Loans, Loan Participations and Assignments . Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund may invest, subject to an overall 15% limit on loans, in loan participations or assignments.

Loans and loan participations are interests are interests in amounts owed by a corporate, governmental or other borrowers to another party. They may represent amounts owed to lenders or lending syndicates, to suppliers of goods or services, or to other parties. The Fund will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation and only upon receipt by the lender of the payments from the borrower. In connection with purchasing participations, the Fund generally will have no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the loan, nor any rights of set-off against the borrower, and the Fund may not directly benefit from any collateral supporting the loan in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, the Fund will be subject to the credit risk of both the borrower and the lender that is selling the participation. In the event of the insolvency of the lender selling a participation, a Fund may be treated as a general creditor of the lender and may not benefit from any set-off between the lender and the borrower.

When the Fund purchases assignments from lenders, it acquires direct rights against the borrower on the loan. However, because assignments are arranged through private negotiations between potential assignees and potential assignors, the rights and obligations acquired by a Fund as the purchaser of an assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the assigning lender. In addition, if the loan is foreclosed, the Fund could be part owner of any collateral and could bear the costs and liabilities of owning and disposing of the collateral.

 

18


Investments in loans, loan participations and assignments present the possibility that the Fund could be held liable as a co-lender under emerging legal theories of lender liability. The Fund anticipates that loans, loan participations and assignments could be sold only to a limited number of institutional investors. If there is no active secondary market for a loan, it may be more difficult to sell the interests in such a loan at a price that is acceptable or to even obtain pricing information. In addition, some loans, loan participations and assignments may not be rated by major rating agencies and may not be protected by the securities laws.

Structured Notes and Indexed Securities. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund and Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund may invest in structured notes or other indexed securities.

Structured notes are derivative debt instruments, the interest rate or principal of which is linked to currencies, interest rates, commodities, indices or other financial indicators (reference instruments). Indexed securities may include structured notes and other securities wherein the interest rate or principal are determined by a reference instrument.

Most structured notes and indexed securities are fixed income securities that have maturities of three years or less. The interest rate or the principal amount payable at maturity of an indexed security may vary based on changes in one or more specified reference instruments, such as a floating interest rate compared with a fixed interest rate. The reference instrument need not be related to the terms of the indexed security. Structured notes and indexed securities may be positively or negatively indexed (i.e., their principal value or interest rates may increase or decrease if the underlying reference instrument appreciates), and may have return characteristics similar to direct investments in the underlying reference instrument or to one or more options on the underlying reference instrument.

Structured notes and indexed securities may entail a greater degree of market risk than other types of debt securities because the investor bears the risk of the reference instrument. Structured notes or indexed securities also may be more volatile, less liquid, and more difficult to accurately price than less complex securities and instruments or more traditional debt securities. In addition to the credit risk of the structured note or indexed security’s issuer and the normal risks of price changes in response to changes in interest rates, the principal amount of structured notes or indexed securities may decrease as a result of changes in the value of the underlying reference instruments. Further, in the case of certain structured notes or indexed securities in which the interest rate, or exchange rate in the case of currency, is linked to a referenced instrument, the rate may be increased or decreased or the terms may provide that, under certain circumstances, the principal amount payable on maturity may be reduced to zero resulting in a loss to the Fund.

Investment in Wholly-Owned Subsidiary . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund will invest up to 25% of its total assets in its wholly-owned and controlled Subsidiary, which is expected to invest primarily in commodity swaps and futures and option contracts, as well as fixed income securities and other investments intended to serve as margin or collateral for the Subsidiary’s derivative positions. As a result, Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund may be considered to be investing indirectly in these investments through the Subsidiary.

The Subsidiary will not be registered under the 1940 Act but will be subject to certain of the investor protections of that Act. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, as sole shareholder of the Subsidiary, will not have all of the protections offered to investors in registered investment companies. However, since Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund wholly-owns and controls the Subsidiary, and the Subsidiary is managed by the Adviser, it is unlikely that the Subsidiary will take action contrary to the interests of Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund or its shareholders. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund’s Trustees have oversight responsibility for the investment activities of Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, including its investments in the Subsidiary, and its role as sole shareholder of the Subsidiary. Also, in managing the Subsidiary’s portfolio, the Adviser will be subject to the same investment restrictions and operational guidelines that apply to the management of Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund.

 

19


Changes in the laws of the United States and/or the Cayman Islands, under which Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund and the Subsidiary, respectively, are organized, could result in the inability of Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund or the Subsidiary to operate as described in this SAI and could negatively affect Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund and its shareholders. For example, the Government of the Cayman Islands does not currently impose any income, corporate or capital gains tax, estate duty, inheritance tax, gift tax or withholding tax on the Subsidiary. If Cayman Islands law changes such that the Subsidiary must pay Cayman Islands taxes, Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund shareholders would likely suffer decreased investment returns.

Other Investments

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund) may invest up to 15% of its total assets in equity interests and/or debt obligations issued by REITs. Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund may invest all of its total assets in equity and/or debt securities issued by REITs.

REITs are trusts that sell equity or debt securities to investors and use the proceeds to invest in real estate or interests therein. Equity REITs invest the majority of their assets directly in real property and derive income primarily from the collection of rents. Equity REITs can also realize capital gains by selling property that has appreciated in value. Mortgage REITs invest the majority of their assets in real estate mortgages and derive income from the collection of interest payments.

Investments in REITS may be subject to many of the same risks as direct investments in real estate. These risks include difficulties in valuing and trading real estate, declines in the value of real estate, risks related to general and local economic conditions, adverse changes in the climate for real estate, environmental liability risks, increases in property taxes and operating expenses, changes in zoning laws, casualty or condemnation losses, limitations on rents, changes in neighborhood values, the appeal of properties to tenants, heavy cash flow dependency and increases in interest rates. To the extent that a Fund invests in REITs, the Fund could conceivably own real estate directly as a result of a default on the REIT interests or obligations it owns.

In addition to the risks of direct real estate investment described above, equity REITs may be affected by any changes in the value of the underlying property owned by the trusts, while mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of any credit extended. REITs are also subject to the following risks: they are dependent upon management skill and on cash flows; are not diversified; are subject to defaults by borrowers, self-liquidation, and the possibility of failing to maintain an exemption from the 1940 Act; and are subject to interest rate risk. A Fund that invests in REITs will bear a proportionate share of the expenses of the REITs.

Other Investment Companies . Each Fund may purchase shares of other investment companies, including ETFs. For each Fund, the 1940 Act imposes the following restrictions on investments in other investment companies: (i) a Fund may not purchase more than 3% of the total outstanding voting stock of another investment company; (ii) a Fund may not invest more than 5% of its total assets in securities issued by another investment company; and (iii) a Fund may not invest more than 10% of its total assets in securities issued by other investment companies. The 1940 Act and related rules provide certain exemptions from these restrictions. For example, under certain conditions, a Fund may acquire an unlimited amount of shares of mutual funds that are part of the same group of investment companies as the acquiring fund. In addition, these restrictions do not apply to investments by the Funds in investment companies that are money market funds, including money market funds that have Invesco or an affiliate of Invesco as an investment adviser (the Affiliated Money Market Funds).

When a Fund purchases shares of another investment company, including an Affiliated Money Market Fund, the Fund will indirectly bear its proportionate share of the advisory fees and other operating expenses of such investment company and will be subject to the risks associated with the portfolio investments of the underlying investment company.

 

20


Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) . Operating earnings flow directly to the unitholders of MLPs in the form of cash distributions. Although the characteristics of MLPs closely resemble a traditional limited partnership, a major difference is that MLPs may trade on a public exchange or in the over-the-counter market. The ability to trade on a public exchange or in the over-the-counter market provides a certain amount of liquidity not found in many limited partnership investments.

The risks of investing in an MLP are similar to those of investing in a partnership and include less restrictive governance and regulation, and therefore less protection for the MLP investor, than investors in a corporation. Additional risks include those risks traditionally associated with investing in the particular industry or industries in which the MLP invests.

Defaulted Securities . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund and Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund may invest in defaulted securities.

Defaulted securities are debt securities on which the issuer is not currently making interest payments. In order to enforce its rights in defaulted securities, the Fund may be required to participate in legal proceedings or take possession of and manage assets securing the issuer’s obligations on the defaulted securities. This could increase the Fund’s operating expenses and adversely affect its net asset value. Risks in defaulted securities may be considerably higher as they are generally unsecured and subordinated to other creditors of the issuer. Any investments by the Fund in defaulted securities will also be considered illiquid securities subject to the limitations described herein, unless Invesco and/or the Sub-Advisers determines that such defaulted securities are liquid under guidelines adopted by the Board.

Variable or Floating Rate Instruments . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund, Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may invest in variable or floating rate instruments.

Variable or floating rate instruments are securities that provide for a periodic adjustment in the interest rate paid on the obligation. The interest rates for securities with variable interest rates are readjusted on set dates (such as the last day of the month or calendar quarter) and the interest rates for securities with floating rates are reset whenever a specified interest rate change occurs. Variable or floating interest rates generally reduce changes in the market price of securities from their original purchase price because, upon readjustment, such rates approximate market rates. Accordingly, as market interest rates decrease or increase, the potential for capital appreciation or depreciation is less for variable or floating rate securities than for fixed rate obligations. The Fund’s adviser, or Sub-adviser, as applicable, may determine that an unrated floating rate or variable rate demand obligation meets the Fund’s rating standards by reason of being backed by a letter of credit or guarantee issued by a bank that meets those rating standards.

Zero-Coupon and Pay-in-Kind Securities . To the extent consistent with its investment objective, Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund, Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund, Invesco V.I. Technology Fund and Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund may invest in zero-coupon or pay-in-kind securities.

Zero-coupon securities do not pay interest or principal until final maturity unlike debt securities that traditionally provide periodic payments of interest (referred to as a coupon payment). Investors must wait until maturity to receive interest and principal, which increases the interest rate and credit risks of a zero coupon security. Pay-in-kind securities are securities that have interest payable by delivery of additional securities. Upon maturity, the holder is entitled to receive the aggregate par value of the securities. Zero-coupon and pay-in-kind securities may be subject to greater fluctuation in value and less liquidity in the event of adverse market conditions than comparably rated securities paying cash interest

 

21


at regular interest payment periods. Investors may purchase zero coupon and pay in kind securities at a price below the amount payable at maturity. The difference between the purchase price and the amount paid at maturity represents “original issue discount” on the security.

Premium Securities . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund and Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund may invest in premium securities. Premium securities are securities bearing coupon rates higher than the then prevailing market rates.

Premium securities are typically purchased at a “premium”, in other words, at a price greater than the principal amount payable on maturity. The Fund will not amortize the premium paid for such securities in calculating its net investment income. As a result, in such cases the purchase of premium securities provides the Fund a higher level of investment income distributable to shareholders on a current basis than if the Fund purchased securities bearing current market rates of interest. However, the yield on these securities would remain at the current market rate. If securities purchased by the Fund at a premium are called or sold prior to maturity, the Fund will realize a loss to the extent the call or sale price is less than the purchase price. Additionally, the Fund will realize a loss of principal if it holds such securities to maturity.

Stripped Income Securities . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund may invest in stripped income securities.

Stripped income securities are obligations representing an interest in all or a portion of the income or principal components of an underlying or related security, a pool of securities, or other assets. Stripped income securities may be partially stripped so that each class receives some interest and some principal. However, they may be completely stripped, where one class will receive all of the interest (the interest only class or the IO class), while the other class will receive all of the principal (the principal-only class or the PO class).

The market values of stripped income securities tend to be more volatile in response to changes in interest rates than are conventional income securities. In the case of mortgage-backed stripped income securities, the yields to maturity of IOs and POs may be very sensitive to principal repayments (including prepayments) on the underlying mortgages resulting in a Fund being unable to recoup its initial investment or resulting in a less than anticipated yield. The market for stripped income securities may be limited, making it difficult for the Fund to dispose of its holding at an acceptable price.

Privatizations . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund and Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund may invest in privatizations.

The governments of certain foreign countries have, to varying degrees, embarked on privatization programs to sell part or all of their interests in government owned or controlled companies or enterprises (privatizations). A Fund’s investments in such privatizations may include: (i) privately negotiated investments in a government owned or controlled company or enterprise; (ii) investments in the initial offering of equity securities of a government owned or controlled company or enterprise; and (iii) investments in the securities of a government owned or controlled company or enterprise following its initial equity offering.

In certain foreign countries, the ability of foreign entities such as the Fund to participate in privatizations may be limited by local law, or the terms on which the Fund may be permitted to participate may be less advantageous than those for local investors. There can be no assurance that foreign governments will continue to sell companies and enterprises currently owned or controlled by them, that privatization programs will be successful, or that foreign governments will not re-nationalize companies or enterprises that have been privatized. If large blocks of these enterprises are held by a small group of stockholders the sale of all or some portion of these blocks could have an adverse effect on the price.

Participation Notes . Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund may invest in participation notes. Participation notes, also known as participation certificates, are issued by banks or broker-dealers and are designed to replicate the performance of foreign companies or foreign securities markets and can be

 

22


used by the Fund as an alternative means to access the securities market of a country. Participation notes are generally traded OTC. The performance results of participation notes will not replicate exactly the performance of the foreign company or foreign securities market that they seek to replicate due to transaction and other expenses. Investments in participation notes involve the same risks associated with a direct investment in the underlying foreign companies or foreign securities market that they seek to replicate. In addition, participation notes are subject to counterparty risk, currency risk, and reinvestment risk. Counterparty risk is the risk that the broker-dealer or bank that issues them will not fulfill its contractual obligation to complete the transaction with the Fund. Participation notes constitute general unsecured contractual obligations of the banks or broker-dealers that issue them, and a Fund is relying on the creditworthiness of such banks or broker-dealers and has no rights under a participation note against the issuer of the underlying assets. Additionally, there is a currency risk since the dollar value of the Fund’s foreign investments will be affected by changes in the exchange rates between the dollar and (a) the currencies in which the notes are denominated, such euro denominated participation notes, and (b) the currency of country in which foreign company sits. Also, there is a reinvestment risk because the amounts from the note may be reinvested in a less valuable investment when the note matures.

Investment Techniques

Forward Commitments, When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Securities. Each Fund may purchase or sell securities on a forward commitment, when-issued or delayed-delivery basis.

Forward commitments, when-issued or delayed-delivery basis delivery and payment that take place in the future after the date of the commitment to purchase or sell the securities at a pre-determined price and/or yield. Settlement of such transactions normally occurs a month or more after the purchase or sale commitment is made. Typically, no interest accrues to the purchaser until the security is delivered. Forward commitments also include “To be announced” (TBA) mortgage backed securities, which are contracts for the purchase or sale of mortgage-backed securities to be delivered at a future agreed upon date, whereby the specific mortgage pool numbers or the number of pools that will be delivered to fulfill the trade obligation or terms of the contract are unknown at the time of the trade. A Fund may also enter into buy/sell back transactions (a form of delayed delivery agreement). In a buy/sell back transaction, a Fund enters a trade to sell securities at one price and simultaneously enters a trade to buy the same securities at another price for settlement at a future date. Although a Fund generally intends to acquire or dispose of securities on a forward commitment, when-issued or delayed delivery basis, a Fund may sell these securities or its commitment before the settlement date if deemed advisable.

When purchasing a security on a forward commitment, when-issued or delayed-delivery basis, a Fund assumes the rights and risks of ownership of the security, including the risk of price and yield fluctuation, and takes such fluctuations into account when determining its net asset value. Securities purchased on a forward commitment, when-issued or delayed-delivery basis are subject to changes in value based upon the public’s perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer and changes, real or anticipated, in the level of interest rates. Accordingly, securities acquired on such a basis may expose a Fund to risks because they may experience such fluctuations prior to actual delivery. Purchasing securities on a forward commitment, when-issued or delayed delivery basis may involve the additional risk that the yield available in the market when the delivery takes place actually may be higher than that obtained in the transaction itself.

Investment in these types of securities may increase the possibility that the Fund will incur short-term gains subject to federal taxation or short-term losses if the Fund must engage in portfolio transactions in order to honor its commitment. Until the settlement date, a Fund will segregate liquid assets of a dollar value sufficient at all times to make payment for the forward commitment, when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. Such segregated liquid assets will be marked-to-market daily, and the amount segregated will be increased if necessary to maintain adequate coverage of the delayed delivery commitments. No additional forward, when-issued or delayed delivery commitments will be made by a Fund if, as a result, more than 25% of the Fund’s total assets would become so committed. The delayed delivery securities, which will not begin to accrue interest or dividends until the settlement date, will be recorded as an asset of a Fund and will be subject to the risk of market fluctuation. The purchase price of the delayed delivery securities is a liability of a Fund until settlement.

 

23


Short Sales . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may engage in short sales. A Fund (except Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund) does not currently intend to engage in short sales other than short sales against the box.

A short sale involves the sale of a security which a Fund does not own in the hope of purchasing the same security at a later date at a lower price. To make delivery to the buyer, a Fund must borrow the security from a broker. The Fund normally closes a short sale by purchasing an equivalent number of shares of the borrowed security on the open market and delivering them to the broker. A short sale is typically effected when the Fund’s adviser believes that the price of a particular security will decline. Open short positions using options, futures, swaps or forward foreign currency contracts are not deemed to constitute selling securities short.

To secure its obligation to deliver the securities sold short to the broker, a Fund will be required to deposit cash or liquid securities with the broker. In addition, the Fund may have to pay a premium to borrow the securities, and while the loan of the security sold short is outstanding, the Fund is required to pay to the broker the amount of any dividends paid on shares sold short. In addition to maintaining collateral with the broker, a Fund will set aside an amount of cash or liquid securities equal to the difference, if any, between the current market value of the securities sold short and any cash or liquid securities deposited as collateral with the broker-dealer in connection with the short sale. The collateral will be marked to market daily. The amounts deposited with the broker or segregated with the custodian do not have the effect of limiting the amount of money that the Fund may lose on a short sale. Short sale transactions covered in this manner are not considered senior securities and are not subject to the Fund’s fundamental investment limitations on senior securities and borrowings.

Short positions create a risk that a Fund will be required to cover them by buying the security at a time when the security has appreciated in value, thus resulting in a loss to the Fund. A short position in a security poses more risk than holding the same security long. Because a short position loses value as the security’s price increases, the loss on a short sale is theoretically unlimited. The loss on a long position is limited to what the Fund originally paid for the security together with any transaction costs. The Fund may not always be able to borrow a security the Fund seeks to sell short at a particular time or at an acceptable price. It is possible that the market value of the securities the Fund holds in long positions will decline at the same time that the market value of the securities the Fund has sold short increases, thereby increasing the Fund’s potential volatility. Because the Fund may be required to pay dividends, interest, premiums and other expenses in connection with a short sale, any benefit for the Fund resulting from the short sale will be decreased, and the amount of any ultimate gain or loss will be decreased or increased, respectively, by the amount of such expenses.

The Fund may also enter into short sales against the box. Short sales against the box are short sales of securities that a Fund owns or has the right to obtain (equivalent in kind or amount to the securities sold short). If a Fund enters into a short sale against the box, it will be required to set aside securities equivalent in kind and amount to the securities sold short (or securities convertible or exchangeable into such securities) and will be required to hold such securities while the short sale is outstanding. The Fund will incur transaction costs including interest expenses, in connection with opening, maintaining, and closing short sales against the box.

Short sales against the box result in a “constructive sale” and require a Fund to recognize any taxable gain unless an exception to the constructive sale applies. See “Dividends, Distributions and Tax Matters – Tax Matters-Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions – Options, futures, forward contracts, swap agreements and hedging transactions.”

Margin Transactions .The Funds will not purchase any security on margin, except that each Fund may obtain such short-term credits as may be necessary for the clearance of purchases and sales of portfolio securities. The payment by a Fund of initial or variation margin in connection with futures, swaps or related options transactions will not be considered the purchase of a security on margin.

 

24


Interfund Loans . The SEC has issued an exemptive order permitting the Invesco Funds to borrow money from and lend money to each other for temporary or emergency purposes. The Invesco Funds’ interfund lending program is subject to a number of conditions, including the requirements that: (1) an interfund loan generally will occur only if the interest rate on the loan is more favorable to the borrowing fund than the interest rate typically available from a bank for a comparable transaction and the rate is more favorable to the lending fund than the rate available on overnight repurchase transactions; (2) an Invesco Fund may not lend more than 15% of its net assets through the program (measured at the time of the last loan); and (3) an Invesco Fund may not lend more than 5% of its net assets to another Invesco Fund through the program (measured at the time of the loan). A Fund may participate in the program only if and to the extent that such participation is consistent with the Fund’s investment objective and investment policies. Interfund loans have a maximum duration of seven days. Loans may be called with one day’s notice and may be repaid on any day.

Borrowing . The Funds may borrow money to the extent permitted under the Fund Policies. Such borrowings may be utilized (i) for temporary or emergency purposes; (ii) in anticipation of or in response to adverse market conditions; or, (iii) for cash management purposes. Invesco V.I. High Yield, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund and Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund may also borrow money to purchase additional securities when Invesco or the Sub-Adviser deems it advantageous to do so. All borrowings are limited to an amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of a Fund’s total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings). Any borrowings that exceed this amount will be reduced within three business days to the extent necessary to comply with the 33 1/3% limitation even if it is not advantageous to sell securities at that time.

If there are unusually heavy redemptions, a Fund may have to sell a portion of its investment portfolio at a time when it may not be advantageous to do so. Selling Fund securities under these circumstances may result in a lower net asset value per share or decreased dividend income, or both. Invesco and the Sub-Advisers believe that, in the event of abnormally heavy redemption requests, a Fund’s borrowing ability would help to mitigate any such effects and could make the forced sale of their portfolio securities less likely.

The ability of Invesco V.I. High Yield, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund and Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund to borrow money to purchase additional securities gives these Funds greater flexibility to purchase securities for investment or tax reasons and not to be dependent on cash flows. To the extent borrowing costs exceed the return on the additional investments, the return realized by the Fund’s shareholders will be adversely affected. The Fund’s borrowing to purchase additional securities creates an opportunity for a greater total return to the Fund, but, at the same time, increases exposure to losses. The Fund’s willingness to borrow money for investment purposes, and the amount it borrows depends upon many factors, including investment outlook, market conditions and interest rates. Successful use of borrowed money to purchase additional investments depends on Invesco’s or the Sub-Adviser’s ability to predict correctly interest rates and market movements; such a strategy may not be successful during any period in which it is employed.

The Funds may borrow from a bank, broker-dealer, or an Invesco Fund. Additionally, the Funds are permitted to temporarily carry a negative or overdrawn balance in their account with their custodian bank. To compensate the custodian bank for such overdrafts, the Funds may either (i) leave Funds as a compensating balance in their account so the custodian bank can be compensated by earning interest on such Funds; or (ii) compensate the custodian bank by paying it an agreed upon rate. A Fund may not purchase additional securities when any borrowings from banks or broker-dealers exceed 5% of the Fund’s total assets or when any borrowings from an Invesco Fund are outstanding.

Lending Portfolio Securities . Each Fund may each lend its portfolio securities (principally to broker-dealers) to generate additional income. Such loans are callable at any time and are continuously secured by segregated collateral equal to no less than the market value, determined daily, of the loaned securities. Such collateral will be cash, letters of credit, or debt securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies. Each Fund may lend portfolio securities to the extent of one-third of its total assets. A Fund will loan its securities only to parties that Invesco has determined are in good standing and when, in Invesco’s judgment, the income earned would justify the risks.

 

25


A Fund will not have the right to vote securities while they are on loan, but it can call a loan in anticipation of an important vote. The Fund would receive income in lieu of dividends on loaned securities and may, at the same time, generate income on the loan collateral or on the investment of any cash collateral.

If the borrower defaults on its obligation to return the securities loaned because of insolvency or other reasons, the Fund could experience delays and costs in recovering securities loaned or gaining access to the collateral. If the Fund is not able to recover the securities loaned, the Fund may sell the collateral and purchase a replacement security in the market. Lending securities entails a risk of loss to the Fund if and to the extent that the market value of the loaned securities increases and the collateral is not increased accordingly.

Any cash received as collateral for loaned securities will be invested, in accordance with a Fund’s investment guidelines, in short-term money market instruments or Affiliated Money Market Funds. Investing this cash subjects that investment to market appreciation or depreciation. For purposes of determining whether a Fund is complying with its investment policies, strategies and restrictions, the Fund will consider the loaned securities as assets of the Fund, but will not consider any collateral received as a Fund asset. The Fund will bear any loss on the investment of cash collateral.

For a discussion of tax considerations relating to lending portfolio securities, see “Dividends, Distributions and Tax Matters – Tax Matters – Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions - Securities lending.”

Repurchase Agreements . Each Fund may engage in repurchase agreement transactions involving the types of securities in which it is permitted to invest. Repurchase agreements are agreements under which a Fund acquires ownership of a security from a broker-dealer or bank that agrees to repurchase the security at a mutually agreed upon time and price (which is higher than the purchase price), thereby determining the yield during a Fund’s holding period. A Fund may enter into a “continuing contract” or “open” repurchase agreement under which the seller is under a continuing obligation to repurchase the underlying securities from the Fund on demand and the effective interest rate is negotiated on a daily basis.

In any repurchase transaction, collateral for a repurchase agreement may include cash items, obligations issued by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities. Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may engage in repurchase agreements collateralized by securities that are rated investment grade and below investment grade by the requisite NRSROs or unrated securities of comparable quality, loan participations, and equities. For these types of repurchase agreement transactions, the Fund would look to the counterparty, and not the collateral, for determining diversification under Rule 2a-7. Thus, collateral for a repurchase agreement may include securities that a Fund could not hold directly.

Regardless of the collateral underlying the repurchase agreement, Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund must determine that the repurchase agreement with the particular counterparty involves minimal credit risk and satisfies the credit quality standards in compliance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act. Lower quality collateral and collateral with longer maturities may be subject to greater price fluctuations than higher quality collateral and collateral with shorter maturities. If the repurchase agreement counterparty were to default, lower quality collateral may be more difficult to liquidate than higher quality collateral.

If the seller of a repurchase agreement fails to repurchase the security in accordance with the terms of the agreement, a Fund might incur expenses in enforcing its rights, and could experience a loss on the sale of the underlying security to the extent that the proceeds of the sale including accrued interest are less than the resale price provided in the agreement, including interest. In addition, although the Bankruptcy Code and other insolvency laws may provide certain protections for some types of repurchase agreements, if the seller of a repurchase agreement should be involved in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, a Fund may incur delay and costs in selling the underlying security or may suffer a loss of principal and interest if the value of the underlying security declines or be deemed an unsecured

 

26


creditor and be required to return the securities to the seller. Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may enter into repurchase agreements that may be subject to a court ordered or other “stay” in the event of the seller’s bankruptcy or insolvency. A “stay” will prevent a Fund from selling the securities it holds under a repurchase agreement until permitted by a court or other authority. In these situations Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund will be subject to greater risk that the value of the securities will decline before they are sold, and that the Fund will experience a loss.

The securities underlying a repurchase agreement will be marked-to-market every business day so that the value of such securities is at least equal to the investment value of the repurchase agreement, including any accrued interest thereon. Custody of the securities will be maintained by the Fund’s custodian or subcustodian for the duration of the agreement.

The Funds may invest their cash balances in joint accounts with other Invesco Funds for the purpose of investing in repurchase agreements with maturities not to exceed 60 days and collateralized by cash or government securities (as defined by Rule 2a-7), and in certain other money market instruments with remaining maturities not to exceed 90 days.

Restricted and Illiquid Securities . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may invest up to 15% of its net assets in securities that are illiquid. Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities that are illiquid. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund and Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund may invest in Rule 144A securities.

Illiquid securities are securities that cannot be disposed of within seven days in the normal course of business at the price at approximately which they are valued. Illiquid securities may include a wide variety of investments, such as: (1) repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days (unless the agreements have demand/redemption features); (2) OTC options contracts and certain other derivatives (including certain swap agreements); (3) fixed time deposits that are not subject to prepayment or that provide for withdrawal penalties upon prepayment (other than overnight deposits); (4) loan interests and other direct debt instruments; (5) municipal lease obligations; (6) commercial paper issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 1933 Act); and (7) securities that are unregistered, that can be sold to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with Rule 144A under the 1933 Act, or that are exempt from registration under the 1933 Act or otherwise restricted under the federal securities laws.

Limitations on the resale of restricted securities may have an adverse effect on their marketability, which may prevent a Fund from disposing of them promptly at reasonable prices. The Fund may have to bear the expense of registering such securities for resale, and the risk of substantial delays in effecting such registrations. A Fund’s difficulty valuing and selling illiquid securities may result in a loss or be costly to the Fund.

If a substantial market develops for a restricted security or other illiquid investment held by a Fund, it may be treated as a liquid security, in accordance with procedures and guidelines approved by the Board. While Invesco monitors the liquidity of restricted securities on a daily basis, the Board oversees and retains ultimate responsibility for Invesco’s liquidity determinations. Invesco considers various factors when determining whether a security is liquid, including the frequency of trades, availability of quotations and number of dealers or qualified institutional buyers in the market.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements . Each Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements.

Reverse repurchase agreements are agreements that involve the sale of securities held by a Fund to financial institutions such as banks and broker-dealers, with an agreement that the Fund will repurchase the securities at an agreed upon price and date. During the reverse repurchase agreement period, the Fund continues to receive interest and principal payments on the securities sold. A Fund may employ reverse repurchase agreements (i) for temporary emergency purposes, such as to meet unanticipated net redemptions so as to avoid liquidating other portfolio securities during unfavorable market conditions; (ii) to cover short-term cash requirements resulting from the timing of trade settlements; or (iii) to take advantage of market situations where the interest income to be earned from the investment of the proceeds of the transaction is greater than the interest expense of the transaction.

 

27


Reverse repurchase agreements involve the risk that the market value of securities to be purchased by the Fund may decline below the price at which the Fund is obligated to repurchase the securities, or that the other party may default on its obligation, so that the Fund is delayed or prevented from completing the transaction. At the time the Fund enters into a reverse repurchase agreement, it will segregate, and maintain, liquid assets having a dollar value equal to the repurchase price. In the event the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, a Fund’s use of the proceeds from the sale of the securities may be restricted pending a determination by the other party, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce the Fund’s obligation to repurchase the securities. Reverse repurchase agreements are considered borrowings by a Fund under the 1940 Act

Mortgage Dollar Rolls. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund may engage in mortgage dollar rolls (a dollar roll).

A dollar roll is a type of transaction that involves the sale by a Fund of a mortgage-backed security to a financial institution such as a bank or broker-dealer, with an agreement that the Fund will repurchase a substantially similar (i.e., same type, coupon and maturity) security at an agreed upon price and date. The mortgage securities that are purchased will bear the same interest rate as those sold, but will generally be collateralized by different pools of mortgages with different prepayment histories. During the period between the sale and repurchase a Fund will not be entitled to receive interest or principal payments on the securities sold but is compensated for the difference between the current sales price and the forward price for the future purchase. In addition, cash proceeds of the sale may be invested in short-term instruments and the income from these investments, together with any additional fee income received on the sale, would generate income for a Fund. A Fund typically enters into a dollar roll transaction to enhance the Fund’s return either on an income or total return basis or to manage pre-payment risk.

Dollar roll transactions involve the risk that the market value of the securities retained by a Fund may decline below the price of the securities that the Fund has sold but is obligated to repurchase under the agreement. In the event the buyer of securities under a dollar roll transaction files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, a Fund’s use of the proceeds from the sale of the securities may be restricted pending a determination by the other party, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce the Fund’s obligation to repurchase the securities. Dollar rolls are considered borrowings by a Fund under the 1940 Act. At the time a Fund enters into a dollar roll transaction, a sufficient amount of assets held by the Fund will segregated to meet the forward commitment.

Unless the benefits of the sale exceed the income, capital appreciation or gains on the securities sold as part of the dollar roll, the investment performance of a Fund will be less than what the performance would have been without the use of dollar rolls. The benefits of dollar rolls may depend upon the Adviser or Sub-Adviser’s ability to predict mortgage repayments and interest rates. There is no assurance that dollar rolls can be successfully employed.

Derivatives

A derivative is a financial instrument whose value is dependent upon the value of other assets, rates or indices, referred to as an “underlying reference assets.” These underlying reference assets may include commodities, stocks, bonds, interest rates, currency exchange rates or related indices. Derivatives include swaps, options, warrants, futures and forward foreign currency contract. Some derivatives, such as futures and certain options, are traded on U.S. exchanges, while other derivatives, such as swap agreements, are privately negotiated and entered into in the OTC market. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act) and implementing rules will ultimately require many types of swaps to be traded on public facilities,

 

28


Derivatives may be used for “hedging,” which means that they may be used when the portfolio manager seeks to protect the Fund’s investments from a decline in value, which could result from changes in interest rates, market prices, currency fluctuations and other market factors. Derivatives may also be used when the portfolio manager seeks to increase liquidity, implement a tax or cash management strategy, invest in a particular stock, bond or segment of the market in a more efficient or less expensive way, modify the characteristics of the Fund’s portfolio investments, for example, duration, and/or to enhance return. However derivatives are used, their successful use is not assured and will depend upon, among other factors, the portfolio manager’s ability to predict and understand relevant market movements.

Because certain derivatives involve leverage, that is, the amount invested may be smaller than the full economic exposure of the derivative instrument and the Fund could lose more than it invested, federal securities laws, regulations and guidance may require the Fund to earmark assets or to otherwise hold instruments that offset the Fund’s obligations under the derivatives instrument. This process is known as “cover.” A Fund will not enter into any derivative transaction unless it can comply with SEC guidance regarding cover, and, If SEC guidance so requires, a Fund will earmark cash or liquid assets with a value sufficient to cover its obligations under a derivative transaction or otherwise “cover” the transaction in accordance with applicable SEC guidance. If a large portion of a Fund’s assets is used for cover, it could affect portfolio management or the Fund’s ability to meet redemption requests or other current obligations. The leverage involved in certain derivative transactions may result in a Fund’s net asset value being more sensitive to changes in the value of the related investment.

For swaps, forwards and futures that are contractually required to “cash-settle,” Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund are permitted to set aside liquid assets in an amount equal to Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Funds’ daily mark-to-market (net) obligations, if any (i.e., Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Funds daily net liabilities, if any), rather than the notional value (See Swap Agreements). By setting aside assets equal to only its net obligations under cash-settled swaps, forward and futures contracts, the Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund will have the ability to employ leverage to a greater extent than if Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund were required to segregate assets equal to the full notional value of such contracts. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund reserves the right to modify their asset segregation policies in the future to comply with any changes in the positions articulated from time to time by the SEC and its staff. The Subsidiary will comply with these asset segregation requirements to the same extent as Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund.

Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) Exclusions and Regulation:

For each Fund, other than the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund:

Exclusion of Adviser from commodity pool operator definition: With respect to each of these Funds, Invesco has claimed an exclusion from the definition of “commodity pool operator” (CPO) under the CEA and the rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and, therefore, is not subject to CFTC registration or regulation as a CPO. In addition, Invesco is relying upon a related exclusion from the definition of “commodity trading advisor” (CTA) under the CEA and the rules of the CFTC with respect to each of these Funds.

As of January 1, 2013, the terms of the CPO exclusion require each of these Funds, among other things, to adhere to certain limits on its investments in “commodity interests.” Commodity interests include commodity futures, commodity options and swaps, which in turn include non-deliverable forwards, as further described below. Because Invesco and the Funds intend to comply with the terms of the CPO exclusion, a Fund may, in the future, need to adjust its investment strategies, consistent with its investment objective(s), to limit its investments in these types of instruments. The Funds are not intended as vehicles for trading in the commodity futures, commodity options or swaps markets. The CFTC has neither reviewed nor approved Invesco’s reliance on these exclusions, or these Funds, their investment strategies or this SAI.

 

29


Generally, the exclusion from CPO regulation on which Invesco relies requires each of these Funds to meet one of the following tests for its commodity interest positions, other than positions entered into for bona fide hedging purposes (as defined in the rules of the CFTC): either (1) the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish the Fund’s positions in commodity interests may not exceed 5% of the liquidation value of the Fund’s portfolio (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions); or (2) the aggregate net notional value of the Fund’s commodity interest positions, determined at the time the most recent such position was established, may not exceed the liquidation value of the Fund’s portfolio (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions). In addition to meeting one of these trading limitations, these Funds may not market themselves as commodity pools or otherwise as vehicles for trading in the commodity futures, commodity options or swaps markets. If, in the future, a Fund can no longer satisfy these requirements, Invesco would withdraw its notice claiming an exclusion from the definition of a CPO, and Invesco would be subject to registration and regulation as a CPO with respect to the Fund. In that case, Invesco and the Fund would need to comply with all applicable CFTC disclosure, reporting, operational, and other regulations, which could increase Fund expenses.

For the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund:

Regulation under the CEA: The Adviser is registered as a CPO under the CEA and the rules of the CFTC and is subject to CFTC regulation with respect to the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund. The CFTC has recently adopted rules regarding the disclosure, reporting and recordkeeping requirements that will apply with respect to the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund as a result of Invesco’s registration as a commodity pool operator. Generally, these rules allow for substituted compliance with CFTC disclosure and shareholder reporting requirements, based on Invesco’s compliance with comparable SEC requirements. This means that for most of the CFTC’s disclosure and shareholder reporting requirements applicable to Invesco as the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund’s CPO, Invesco’s compliance with SEC disclosure and shareholder reporting requirements will be deemed to fulfill Invesco’s CFTC compliance obligations. However, as a result of CFTC regulation with respect to the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund, the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund may incur additional compliance and other expenses. The Adviser is also registered as a CTA but, with respect to the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund, relies on an exemption from CTA regulation available for a CTA that also serves as a Fund’s CPO. The CFTC has neither reviewed nor approved the Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund, their investment strategies, or this SAI.

General risks associated with derivatives:

The use by the Funds of derivatives may involve certain risks, as described below.

Counterparty Risk: The risk that the counterparty under the agreement will not live up to its obligations, including because of the counterparty’s bankruptcy or insolvency. Certain agreements may not contemplate delivery of collateral to support fully a counterparty’s contractual obligation; therefore, a Fund might need to rely on contractual remedies to satisfy the counterparty’s full obligation. As with any contractual remedy, there is no guarantee that a Fund will be successful in pursuing such remedies, particularly in the event of the counterparty’s bankruptcy. The agreement may allow for netting of the counterparty’s obligations with respect to a specific transactions, in which case a Fund’s obligation or right will be the net amount owed to or by the counterparty. The Fund will not enter into a derivative transaction with any counterparty that Invesco and/or the Sub-Advisers believe does not have the financial resources to honor its obligations under the transaction. Invesco monitors the financial stability of counterparties. Where the obligations of the counterparty are guaranteed, Invesco monitors the financial stability of the guarantor instead of the counterparty. If a counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of the derivative would also likely decline, potentially resulting in losses to a Fund.

A Fund will not enter into a transaction with any single counterparty if the net amount owed or to be received under existing transactions under the agreements with that counterparty would exceed 5% of the Fund’s net assets determined on the date the transaction is entered into.

 

30


Leverage Risk : Leverage exists when a Fund can lose more than it originally invests because it purchases or sells an instrument or enters into a transaction without investing an amount equal to the full economic exposure of the instrument or transaction. A Fund by segregates or earmarks assets or otherwise covers transactions that may give rise to leverage. Leverage may cause a Fund to be more volatile because it may exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the Fund’s portfolio securities. The use of some derivatives may result in economic leverage, which does not result in the possibility of a Fund incurring obligations beyond its initial investment, but that nonetheless permits the Fund to gain exposure that is greater than would be the case in an unlevered instrument. The Funds do not segregate or otherwise cover investments in derivatives with economic leverage.

Liquidity Risk: The risk that a particular derivative is difficult to sell or liquidate. If a derivative transaction is particularly large or if the relevant market is illiquid, it may not be possible to initiate a transaction or liquidate a position at an advantageous time or price, which may result in significant losses to the Fund.

Pricing Risk : The risk that the value of a particular derivative does not move in tandem or as otherwise expected relative to the corresponding underlying instruments.

CFTC Regulation Risk . The CFTC has recently adopted amendments to certain CFTC rules, and is promulgating new rules, which will subject Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, to regulation by the CFTC. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, will be required to operate subject to applicable CFTC requirements, including registration, disclosure and operational requirements. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, also will be subject to CFTC requirements related to processing derivatives transactions and tracking exposure levels to certain commodities. Compliance with these additional requirements will increase fund expenses. Certain of the requirements that would apply to Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund have not yet been adopted, and it is unclear what the effect of those requirements would be on Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund if they are adopted. The Adviser believes that it is possible that compliance with CFTC regulations, if they are adopted as proposed, may adversely affect the ability of Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund achieve its objectives.

Tax Risks : For a discussion of the tax considerations relating to derivative transactions, see “Dividends, Distributions and Tax Matters – Tax Matters – Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions.”

General risks of hedging strategies using derivatives:

The use by the Funds of hedging strategies involves special considerations and risks, as described below.

Successful use of hedging transactions depends upon Invesco’s and the Sub-Advisers’ ability to predict correctly the direction of changes in the value of the applicable markets and securities, contracts and/or currencies. While Invesco and the Sub-Advisers are experienced in the use of derivatives for hedging, there can be no assurance that any particular hedging strategy will succeed.

In a hedging transaction, there might be imperfect correlation, or even no correlation, between the price movements of an instrument used for hedging and the price movements of the investments being hedged. Such a lack of correlation might occur due to factors unrelated to the value of the investments being hedged, such as changing interest rates, market liquidity, and speculative or other pressures on the markets in which the hedging instrument is traded.

Hedging strategies, if successful, can reduce risk of loss by wholly or partially offsetting the negative effect of unfavorable price movements in the investments being hedged. However, hedging strategies can also reduce opportunity for gain by offsetting the positive effect of favorable price movements in the hedged investments. Investors should bear in mind that no Fund is obligated to actively engage in hedging. For example, a Fund may not have attempted to hedge its exposure to a particular foreign currency at a time when doing so might have avoided a loss.

 

31


Types of derivatives:

Swaps . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may enter into swap agreements.

Generally, swap agreements are contracts between a Fund and another party (the counterparty) involving the exchange of payment on specified terms over periods ranging from a few days to multiple years. A swap agreement may be negotiated bilaterally and traded OTC between the two parties (for an uncleared swap) or, in some instances, must be transacted through a futures commission merchant (FCM) and cleared through a clearing house that serves as a central counterparty (for a cleared swap). In a basic swap transaction, the Fund agrees with its counterparty to exchange the returns (or differentials in returns) earned or realized on a particular asset such as an equity or debt security, commodity, currency or interest rate, calculated with respect to a “notional amount.” The notional amount is the set amount selected by the parties to use as the basis on which to calculate the obligations that the parties to a swap agreement have agreed to exchange. The parties typically do not exchange the notional amount. Instead, they agree to exchange the returns that would be earned or realized if the notional amount were invested in given investments or at given interest rates. Examples of returns that may be exchanged in a swap agreement are those of a particular security, a particular fixed or variable interest rate, a particular foreign currency, or a “basket” of securities representing a particular index. Swap agreements can also be based on credit and other events. In some cases, such as cross currency swaps, the swap agreement may require delivery (exchange) of the entire notional value of one designated currency for another designated currency.

New swaps regulation . The Dodd-Frank Act and related regulatory developments have imposed comprehensive new regulatory requirements on swaps and swap market participants. The new regulatory framework includes: (1) registration and regulation of swap dealers and major swap participants; (2) requiring central clearing and execution of standardized swaps; (3) imposing margin requirements in swap transactions; (4) regulating and monitoring swap transactions through position limits and large trader reporting requirements; and (5) imposing record keeping and centralized and public reporting requirements, on an anonymous basis, for most swaps. The CFTC is responsible for the regulation of most swaps, and has completed most of its rules implementing the Dodd-Frank Act swap regulations. The SEC has jurisdiction over a small segment of the market referred to as “security-based swaps,” which includes swaps on single securities or credits, or narrow-based indices of securities or credits, but has not yet completed its rulemaking.

Uncleared swaps . In an uncleared swap, the swap counterparty is typically a brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution. In the event that one party to the swap transaction defaults, one of the parties may be required to make an early termination payment to the other. Although early termination payments are typically made by the defaulting party to the non-defaulting party, under certain circumstances (i.e., when the non-defaulting party is “in-the-money”) the non-defaulting party may be required to pay an early termination payment to the defaulting party. Early termination payments may be calculated in various ways, but generally represent the amount that the non-defaulting party would have to pay to replace the swap as of the date of default.

During the term of an uncleared swap, a Fund is usually required to pledge to the swap counterparty, from time to time, an amount of cash and/or other assets equal to the total net amount (if any) that would be payable by the Fund to the counterparty if the swap were terminated on the date in question, including any early termination payments. Periodically, changes in the amount pledged are made to recognize changes in value of the contract resulting from, among other things, interest on the notional value of the contract, market value changes in the underlying investment, and/or dividends paid by the issuer of the underlying instrument. Likewise, the counterparty may be required to pledge cash or other assets to cover its obligations to a Fund. However, the amount pledged may not always be equal to or more than the amount due to the other party. Therefore, if a counterparty defaults in its obligations to a Fund, the amount pledged by the counterparty and available to the Fund may not be sufficient to cover all the amounts due to the Fund and the Fund may sustain a loss.

 

32


Uncleared swaps are not traded on exchanges. As a result, swap participants may not be as protected as participants on organized exchanges. Performance of a swap agreement is the responsibility only of the swap counterparty and not of any exchange or clearinghouse.

Cleared Swaps . Certain standardized swaps are subject to mandatory central clearing. Central clearing is intended to reduce counterparty credit risk and increase liquidity, but central clearing does not make swap transactions risk-free. The Dodd-Frank Act and related regulatory developments will ultimately require the clearing and exchange-trading of many swaps. Mandatory exchange-trading and clearing will occur on a phased-in basis based on the type of market participant and CFTC approval of contracts for central clearing. To date, the CFTC has designated only certain credit default swaps and certain interest rate swaps as subject to mandatory clearing, but it is expected that additional categories of swaps will in the future be designated as subject to mandatory clearing.

In a cleared swap, a Fund’s ultimate counterparty is a central clearinghouse rather than a brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution. The Fund initially will enter into cleared swaps through an executing broker. Such transactions will then be submitted for clearing and, if cleared, will be held at regulated FCMs that are members of the clearinghouse that serves as the central counterparty. Cleared swaps are submitted for clearing immediately following execution of the transaction.

When a Fund enters into a cleared swap, it must deliver to the central counterparty (via the FCM) an amount referred to as “initial margin.” Initial margin requirements are determined by the central counterparty, but an FCM may require additional initial margin above the amount required by the central counterparty. During the term of the swap agreement, a “variation margin” amount may also be required to be paid by the Fund or may be received by the Fund in accordance with margin controls set for such accounts, depending upon changes in the price of the underlying reference instrument subject to the swap agreement. At the conclusion of the term of the swap agreement, if the Fund has a loss equal to or greater than the margin amount, the margin amount is paid to the FCM along with any loss in excess of the margin amount. If the Fund has a loss of less than the margin amount, the excess margin is returned to the Fund. If the Fund has a gain, the full margin amount and the amount of the gain is paid to the Fund.

Central clearing is designed to reduce counterparty credit risk and increase liquidity compared to bilateral swaps because central clearing interposes the central clearinghouse as the counterparty to each participant’s swap, but it does not eliminate those risks completely. There is also a risk of loss by a Fund of the initial and variation margin deposits in the event of bankruptcy of the FCM with which the Fund has an open position in a swap contract. The assets of a Fund may not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the FCM or central counterparty because the Fund might be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds and margin segregated on behalf of an FCM’s customers. If the FCM does not provide accurate reporting, a Fund is also subject to the risk that the FCM could use the Fund’s assets, which are held in an omnibus account with assets belonging to the FCM’s other customers, to satisfy its own financial obligations or the payment obligations of another customer to the central counterparty.

With cleared swaps, a Fund may not be able to obtain as favorable terms as it would be able to negotiate for a bilateral, uncleared swap. In addition, an FCM may unilaterally amend the terms of its agreement with a Fund, which may include the imposition of position limits or additional margin requirements with respect to the Fund’s investment in certain types of swaps. Central counterparties and FCMs generally can require termination of existing cleared swap transactions at any time, and can also require increases in margin above the margin that is required at the initiation of the swap agreement. Additionally, depending on a number of factors, the margin required under the rules of the clearinghouse and FCM may be in excess of the collateral required to be posted by a Fund to support its obligations under a similar uncleared swap. However, regulators are expected to adopt rules imposing certain margin requirements, including minimums, on uncleared swaps in the near future, which could change this comparison.

 

33


Finally, a Fund is subject to the risk that, after entering into a cleared swap with an executing broker, no FCM or central counterparty is willing or able to clear the transaction. In such an event, the Fund may be required to break the trade and make an early termination payment to the executing broker.

CFTC rules require the trading and execution of cleared swaps on public trading facilities, which will occur for each category of cleared swaps once one or more trading facilities become accredited and make such category of swaps available to trade. Moving trading to an exchange-type system may increase market transparency and liquidity but may require the Fund to incur increased expenses to access the same types of swaps that it has used in the past. In addition, clearance of swaps may not immediately produce the expected benefits and could, in fact, decrease liquidity until the market becomes comfortable with the clearing process.

Commonly used swap agreements include:

Credit Default Swaps (CDS) : A CDS is an agreement between two parties where the first party agrees to make one or more payments to the second party, while the second party assumes the risk of certain defaults, generally a failure to pay or bankruptcy of the issuer on a referenced debt obligation. CDS transactions are typically individually negotiated and structured. A Fund may enter into CDS to create long or short exposure to domestic or foreign corporate debt securities or sovereign debt securities.

A Fund may buy a CDS (buy credit protection). In this transaction the Fund makes a stream of payments based on a fixed interest rate (the premium) over the life of the swap in exchange for a counterparty (the seller) taking on the risk of default of a referenced debt obligation (the Reference Obligation). If a credit event occurs for the Reference Obligation, the Fund would cease making premium payments and it would deliver defaulted bonds to the seller. In return, the seller would pay the notional value of the Reference Obligation to the Fund. Alternatively, the two counterparties may agree to cash settlement in which the seller delivers to the Fund (buyer) the difference between the market value and the notional value of the Reference Obligation. If no event of default occurs, the Fund pays the fixed premium to the seller for the life of the contract, and no other exchange occurs.

Alternatively, a Fund may sell a CDS (sell credit protection). In this transaction the Fund will receive premium payments from the buyer in exchange for taking the risk of default of the Reference Obligation. If a credit event occurs for the Reference Obligation, the buyer would cease to make premium payments to the Fund and deliver the Reference Obligation to the Fund. In return, the Fund would pay the notional value of the Reference Obligation to the buyer. Alternatively, the two counterparties may agree to cash settlement in which the Fund would pay the buyer the difference between the market value and the notional value of the Reference Obligation. If no event of default occurs, the Fund receives the premium payments over the life of the contract, and no other exchange occurs.

Credit Default Index Swaps(CDX) . A CDX is a swap on an index of CDS. CDX allow an investor to manage credit risk or to take a position on a basket of credit entities (such as CDS or CMBS) in a more efficient manner than transacting in single name CDS. If a credit event occurs in one of the underlying companies, the protection is paid out via the delivery of the defaulted bond by the buyer of protection in return for payment of the notional value of the defaulted bond by the seller of protection or it may be settled through a cash settlement between the two parties. The underlying company is then removed from the index. New series of CDX are issued on a regular basis. A Commercial Mortgage-Backed Index (CMBX) is a type of CDX made up of 25 tranches of commercial mortgage-backed securities (See “Debt Instruments – Mortgage-Backed and Asset-Backed Securities”) rather than CDS. Unlike other CDX contracts where credit events are intended to capture an event of default CMBX involves a pay-as-you-go (PAUG) settlement process designed to capture non-default events that affect the cash flow of the reference obligation. PAUG involves ongoing, two-way payments over the life of a contract between the buyer and the seller of protection and is designed to closely mirror the cash flow of a portfolio of cash commercial mortgage-backed securities.

Foreign Exchange Swap : An agreement between two parties pursuant to which the parties exchange a U.S. dollar-denominated payment for a payment denominated in a different currency.

 

34


Interest Rate Swap : An agreement between two parties pursuant to which the parties exchange a floating rate payment for a fixed rate payment based on a specified principal or notional amount. In other words, Party A agrees to pay Party B a fixed interest rate multiplied by a notional amount and in return Party B agrees to pay Party A a variable interest rate multiplied by the same notional amount.

Swaptions . An option on a swap agreement, also called a “swaption,” is an option that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to enter into a swap on a future date in exchange for paying a market-based premium. A receiver swaption gives the owner the right to receive the total return of a specified asset, reference rate or index. Swaptions also include options that allow an existing swap to be terminated or extended by one of the counterparties.

Commodity Swaps . A commodity swap agreement is a contract in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in market value of a commodity-based underlying instrument (such as a specific commodity or commodity index) in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate or the total return from another commodity-based underlying instrument. In a total return commodity swap, a Fund receives the price appreciation of a commodity index, a portion of a commodity index or a single commodity in exchange for paying an agreed-upon fee.

Total Return Swap : An agreement in which one party makes payments based on a set rate, either fixed or variable, while the other party makes payments based on the return of an underlying asset, which includes both the income it generates and any capital gains.

Options . Each Fund (except for Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may invest in options.

An option is a contract that gives the purchaser of the option, in return for the premium paid, the right, but not the obligation, to buy from (in the case of a call) or sell to (in the case of a put) the writer of the option at the exercise price during the term of the option (for American style options or on a specified date for European style options), the security, currency or other instrument underlying the option (or in the case of an index option the cash value of the index). An option on a CDS or a futures contract (described below) gives the purchaser the right to enter into a CDS or assume a position in a futures contract.

The Funds may engage in certain strategies involving options to attempt to manage the risk of their investments or, in certain circumstances, for investment (e.g., as a substitute for investing in securities). Option transactions present the possibility of large amounts of exposure (or leverage), which may result in a Fund’s net asset value being more sensitive to changes in the value of the option.

The value of an option position will reflect, among other things, the current market value of the underlying investment, the time remaining until expiration, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price of the underlying investment, the price volatility of the underlying investment and general market and interest rate conditions.

A Fund will not write (sell) options if, immediately after such sale, the aggregate value of securities or obligations underlying the outstanding options would exceed 20% of the Fund’s total assets. A Fund will not purchase options if, immediately after such purchase, the aggregate premiums paid for outstanding options would exceed 5% of the Fund’s total assets.

A Fund may effectively terminate its right or obligation under an option by entering into an offsetting closing transaction. For example, a Fund may terminate its obligation under a call or put option that it had written by purchasing an identical call or put option, which is known as a closing purchase transaction. Conversely, a Fund may terminate a position in a put or call option it had purchased by writing an identical put or call option, which is known as a closing sale transaction. Closing transactions permit a Fund to realize profits or limit losses on an option position prior to its exercise or expiration.

Options may be either listed on an exchange or traded in OTC markets. Listed options are tri-party contracts (i.e., performance of the obligations of the purchaser and seller are guaranteed by the exchange or clearing corporation) and have standardized strike prices and expiration dates. OTC options

 

35


are two-party contracts with negotiated strike prices and expiration dates and differ from exchange-traded options in that OTC options are transacted with dealers directly and not through a clearing corporation (which guarantees performance). In the case of OTC options, there can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for any particular option at any specific time; therefore the Fund may be required to treat some or all OTC options as illiquid securities. Although a Fund will enter into OTC options only with dealers that are expected to be capable of entering into closing transactions with it, there is no assurance that the Fund will in fact be able to close out an OTC option position at a favorable price prior to exercise or expiration. In the event of insolvency of the dealer, a Fund might be unable to close out an OTC option position at any time prior to its expiration.

Types of Options:

Put Options on Securities : A put option gives the purchaser the right to sell, to the writer, the underlying security, contract or foreign currency at the stated exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option for American style options or on a specified date for European style options, regardless of the market price or exchange rate of the security, contract or foreign currency, as the case may be, at the time of exercise. If the purchaser exercises the put option, the writer of a put option is obligated to buy the underlying security, contract or foreign currency for the exercise price.

Call Options on Securities : A call option gives the purchaser the right to buy, from the writer, the underlying security, contract or foreign currency at the stated exercise price at any time prior to the expiration of the option (for American style options) or on a specified date (for European style options), regardless of the market price or exchange rate of the security, contract or foreign currency, as the case may be, at the time of exercise. If the purchaser exercises the call option, the writer of a call option is obligated to sell to and deliver the underlying security, contract or foreign currency to the purchaser of the call option for the exercise price.

Index Options : Index options (or options on securities indices) give the holder the right to receive, upon exercise, cash instead of securities, if the closing level of the securities index upon which the option is based is greater than, in the case of a call, or less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option. The amount of cash is equal to the difference between the closing price of the index and the exercise price of the call or put times a specified multiple (the multiplier), which determines the total dollar value for each point of such difference.

The risks of investment in index options may be greater than options on securities. Because index options are settled in cash, when a Fund writes a call on an index it cannot provide in advance for its potential settlement obligations by acquiring and holding the underlying securities. A Fund can offset some of the risk of writing a call index option by holding a diversified portfolio of securities similar to those on which the underlying index is based. However, the Fund cannot, as a practical matter, acquire and hold a portfolio containing exactly the same securities that underlie the index and, as a result, bears the risk that the value of the securities held will not be perfectly correlated with the value of the index.

CDS Option : A CDS option transaction gives the holder the right to enter into a CDS at a specified future date and under specified terms in exchange for a purchase price or premium. The writer of the option bears the risk of any unfavorable move in the value of the CDS relative to the market value on the exercise date, while the purchaser may allow the option to expire unexercised.

Options on Futures Contracts : Options on futures contracts give the holder the right to assume a position in a futures contract (to buy the futures contract if the option is a call and to sell the futures contract if the option is a put) at a specified exercise price at any time during the period of the option.

Option Techniques:

Writing Options . A Fund may write options to generate additional income and to seek to hedge its portfolio against market or exchange rate movements. As the writer of an option, the Fund may have no control over when the underlying instruments must be sold (in the case of a call option) or purchased (in the case of a put option) because the option purchaser may notify the Fund of exercise at any time

 

36


prior to the expiration of the option (for American style options). In general, options are rarely exercised prior to expiration. Whether or not an option expires unexercised, the writer retains the amount of the premium.

A Fund would write a put option at an exercise price that, reduced by the premium received on the option, reflects the price it is willing to pay for the underlying security, contract or currency. In return for the premium received for writing a put option, the Fund assumes the risk that the price of the underlying security, contract, or foreign currency will decline below the exercise price, in which case the put would be exercised and the Fund would suffer a loss.

In return for the premium received for writing a call option on a security the Fund holds, the Fund foregoes the opportunity for profit from a price increase in the underlying security, contract, or foreign currency above the exercise price so long as the option remains open, but retains the risk of loss should the price of the security, contract, or foreign currency decline.

If an option that a Fund has written expires, the Fund will realize a gain in the amount of the premium; however, such gain may be offset by a decline in the market value of the underlying security, contract or currency, held by the Fund during the option period. If a call option is exercised, a Fund will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security, contract or currency, which will be increased or offset by the premium received. The obligation imposed upon the writer of an option is terminated upon the expiration of the option, or such earlier time at which a Fund effects a closing purchase transaction by purchasing an option (put or call as the case may be) identical to that previously sold.

Purchasing Options .

A Fund may only purchase a put option on an underlying security, contract or currency owned by the Fund in order to protect against an anticipated decline in the value of the security, contract or currency held by the Fund; or purchase put options on underlying securities, contracts or currencies against which it has written other put options. The premium paid for the put option and any transaction costs would reduce any profit realized when the security, contract or currency is delivered upon the exercise of the put option. Conversely, if the underlying security, contract or currency does not decline in value, the option may expire worthless and the premium paid for the protective put would be lost.

A Fund may purchase a call option for the purpose of acquiring the underlying security, contract or currency for its portfolio, or on underlying securities, contracts or currencies against which it has written other call options. The Fund is not required to own the underlying security in order to purchase a call option. If the Fund does not own the underlying position, the purchase of a call option would enable a Fund to acquire the security, contract or currency at the exercise price of the call option plus the premium paid. So long as it holds a call option, rather than the underlying security, contract or currency itself, the Fund is partially protected from any unexpected increase in the market price of the underlying security, contract or currency. If the market price does not exceed the exercise price, the Fund could purchase the security on the open market and could allow the call option to expire, incurring a loss only to the extent of the premium paid for the option.

Straddles/Spreads/Collars. Each Fund (except for Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund), for hedging purposes, may enter into straddles, spreads and collars.

Spread and straddle options transactions. In “spread” transactions, a Fund buys and writes a put or buys and writes a call on the same underlying instrument with the options having different exercise prices, expiration dates, or both. In “straddles,” a Fund purchases a put option and a call option or writes a put option and a call option on the same instrument with the same expiration date and typically the same exercise price. When a Fund engages in spread and straddle transactions, it seeks to profit from differences in the option premiums paid and received and in the market prices of the related options positions when they are closed out or sold. Because these transactions require the Fund to buy and/or write more than one option simultaneously, the Fund’s ability to enter into such transactions and to liquidate its positions when necessary or deemed advisable may be more limited than if the Fund were to buy or sell a single option. Similarly, costs incurred by the Fund in connection with these transactions will in many cases be greater than if the Fund were to buy or sell a single option.

 

37


Option Collars. A Fund also may use option “collars.” A “collar” position combines a put option purchased by the Fund (the right of the Fund to sell a specific security within a specified period) with a call option that is written by the Fund (the right of the counterparty to buy the same security) in a single instrument. The Fund’s right to sell the security is typically set at a price that is below the counterparty’s right to buy the security. Thus, the combined position “collars” the performance of the underlying security, providing protection from depreciation below the price specified in the put option, and allowing for participation in any appreciation up to the price specified by the call option.

Warrants . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Government Securities and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may purchase warrants.

A warrant gives the holder the right to purchase securities from the issuer at a specific price within a certain time frame and is similar to a call option. The main difference between warrants and call options is that warrants are issued by the company that will issue the underlying security, whereas options are not issued by the company. Young, unseasoned companies often issue warrants to finance their operations.

Rights.  Each Fund may use Rights, which are equity securities representing a preemptive right of stockholders to purchase additional shares of a stock at the time of a new issuance, before the stock is offered to the general public. A stockholder who purchases rights may be able to retain the same ownership percentage after the new stock offering. A right usually enables the stockholder to purchase common stock at a price below the initial offering price. A Fund that purchases a right takes the risk that the right might expire worthless because the market value of the common stock falls below the price fixed by the right.

Futures Contracts . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may enter into futures contracts.

A futures contract is a two-party agreement to buy or sell a specified amount of a specified security, currency or commodity (or delivery of a cash settlement price, in the case of certain futures such as an index future or Eurodollar Future) for a specified price at a designated date, time and place (collectively, futures contracts). A “sale” of a futures contract means the acquisition of a contractual obligation to deliver the underlying instrument or asset called for by the contract at a specified price on a specified date. A “purchase” of a futures contract means the acquisition of a contractual obligation to acquire the underlying instrument or asset called for by the contract at a specified price on a specified date.

The Funds will only enter into futures contracts that are traded (either domestically or internationally) on futures exchanges and are standardized as to maturity date and underlying financial instrument. Futures exchanges and trading thereon in the United States are regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act and by the CFTC. Foreign futures exchanges and trading thereon are not regulated by the CFTC and are not subject to the same regulatory controls. In addition, futures contracts that are traded on non-U.S. exchanges may not be as liquid as those purchased on CFTC-designated contract markets. For a further discussion of the risks associated with investments in foreign securities, see “Foreign Investments” above.

Brokerage fees are incurred when a futures contract is bought or sold, and margin deposits must be maintained at all times when a futures contract is outstanding. “Margin” for a futures contracts is the amount of funds that must be deposited by a Fund in order to initiate futures contracts trading and maintain its open positions in futures contracts. A margin deposit made when the futures contract is entered (initial margin) is intended to ensure the Fund’s performance under the futures contract. The margin required for a particular futures contract is set by the exchange on which the futures contract is traded and may be significantly modified from time to time by the exchange during the term of the futures contract.

 

38


Subsequent payments, called “variation margin,” received from or paid to the futures commission merchant through which a Fund enters into the futures contract will be made on a daily basis as the futures price fluctuates making the futures contract more or less valuable, a process known as marking-to-market. When the futures contract is closed out, if the Fund has a loss equal to or greater than the margin amount, the margin amount is paid to the futures commission merchant along with any loss in excess of the margin amount. If the Fund has a loss of less than the margin amount, the excess margin is returned to the Fund. If the Fund has a gain, the full margin amount and the amount of the gain is paid to the Fund.

There is a risk of loss by a Fund of the initial and variation margin deposits in the event of bankruptcy of the FCM with which the Fund has an open position in a futures contract. The assets of a Fund may not be fully protected in the event of the bankruptcy of the FCM or central counterparty because the Fund might be limited to recovering only a pro rata share of all available funds and margin segregated on behalf of an FCM’s customers. If the FCM does not provide accurate reporting, a Fund is also subject to the risk that the FCM could use the Fund’s assets, which are held in an omnibus account with assets belonging to the FCM’s other customers, to satisfy its own financial obligations or the payment obligations of another customer to the central counterparty.

Closing out an open futures contract is effected by entering into an offsetting futures contract for the same aggregate amount of the identical financial instrument or currency and the same delivery date. There can be no assurance, however, that a Fund will be able to enter into an offsetting transaction with respect to a particular futures contract at a particular time. If a Fund is not able to enter into an offsetting transaction, it will continue to be required to maintain the margin deposits on the futures contract.

In addition, if a Fund were unable to liquidate a futures contract or an option on a futures contract position due to the absence of a liquid secondary market or the imposition of price limits, it could incur substantial losses. The Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with respect to the position. In addition, except in the case of purchased options, the Fund would continue to be required to make daily variation margin payments.

Types of Futures Contracts :

Commodity Futures . A commodity futures contract is an exchange-traded contract to buy or sell a particular commodity at a specified price at some time in the future. Commodity futures contracts are highly volatile; therefore, the prices of fund shares may be subject to greater volatility to the extent it invests in commodity futures.

Currency Futures: A currency futures contract is a standardized, exchange-traded contract to buy or sell a particular currency at a specified price at a future date (commonly three months or more). Currency futures contracts may be highly volatile and thus result in substantial gains or losses to the Fund.

A Fund may either exchange the currencies specified at the maturity of a currency futures contract or, prior to maturity, enter into a closing transaction involving the purchase or sale of an offsetting contract. A Fund may also enter into currency futures contracts that do not provide for physical settlement of the two currencies but instead are settled by a single cash payment calculated as the difference between the agreed upon exchange rate and the spot rate at settlement based upon an agreed upon notional amount. Closing transactions with respect to currency futures contracts are usually effected with the counterparty to the original currency futures contract.

Index Futures: A stock index futures contract is an exchange-traded contract that provides for the delivery, at a designated date, time and place, of an amount of cash equal to a specified dollar amount times the difference between the stock index value at the close of trading on the date specified in the contract and the price agreed upon in the futures contract; no physical delivery of stocks comprising the index is made.

 

39


Interest Rate Futures: An interest-rate futures contract is an exchange-traded contact in which the specified underlying security is either an interest-bearing fixed income security or an inter-bank deposit. Two examples of common interest rate futures contracts are U.S. Treasury futures and Eurodollar futures contracts. The specified security for U.S. Treasury futures is a U.S. Treasury security. The specified security for Eurodollar futures is the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) which is a daily reference rate based on the interest rates at which banks offer to lend unsecured funds to other banks in the London wholesale money market.

Security Futures: A security futures contract is an exchange-traded contract to purchase or sell, in the future, a specified quantity of a security (other than a Treasury security, or a narrow-based securities index) at a certain price.

The Funds, other than Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund and Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund will enter into futures contracts for hedging purposes only. For example, futures contracts may be sold to protect against a decline in the price of securities or currencies that the Fund owns, or purchased to protect the Fund against an increase in the price of securities or currencies it has committed to purchase or expects to purchase. Additionally, futures contracts may be used to hedge against certain portfolio risks such as interest rate risk, yield curve risk and currency exchange rates.

Options on Futures Contracts. Options on futures contracts are similar to options on securities or currencies except that options on futures contracts give the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in a futures contract (a long position if the option is a call and a short position if the option is a put) at a specified exercise price at any time during the period of the option. Upon exercise of the option, the delivery of the futures contract position by the writer of the option to the holder of the option will be accompanied by delivery of the accumulated balance in the writer’s futures contract margin account. The Fund currently may not invest in any security (including futures contracts or options thereon) that is secured by physical commodities.

Pursuant to federal securities laws and regulations, the Fund’s use of futures contracts and options on futures contracts may require the Fund to set aside assets to reduce the risks associated with using futures contracts and options on futures contracts. This process is described in more detail below in the section “Cover.”

Forward Foreign Currency Contracts . Each Fund (except Invesco V.I. Government Securities and Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund) may enter into forward foreign currency transactions in anticipation of, or to protect itself against, fluctuations in exchange rates.

A forward foreign currency contract is an obligation to buy or sell a particular currency at a specified price at a future date. Foreign Forward Currency Contracts are typically individually negotiated and privately traded by currency traders and their customers in the interbank market. A Fund may enter into forward foreign currency contracts with respect to a specific purchase or sale of a security, or with respect to its portfolio positions generally.

At the maturity of a forward foreign currency contract, a Fund may either exchange the currencies specified at the maturity of the contract or, prior to maturity, enter into a closing transaction involving the purchase or sale of an offsetting contract. Closing transactions with respect to forward foreign currency contracts are usually effected with the counterparty to the original forward contract. A Fund may also enter into forward foreign currency contracts that do not provide for physical settlement of the two currencies but instead are settled by a single cash payment calculated as the difference between the agreed upon exchange rate and the spot rate at settlement based upon an agreed upon notional amount (non-deliverable forwards).

The Funds will comply with guidelines established by the SEC with respect to “cover” requirements of forward foreign currency contracts (See Derivatives above). Generally, with respect to forward foreign currency contracts that are not contractually required to “cash-settle” (i.e., are deliverable), a Fund covers its open positions by setting aside liquid assets equal to the contracts’ full notional value. With respect to forward foreign currency contracts that are contractually required to “cash-settle”

 

40


(i.e., a non-deliverable forward (NDF) or the synthetic equivalent thereof), however, Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund sets aside liquid assets in an amount equal to its daily mark-to-market obligation (i.e., the Fund’s daily net liability, if any), rather than the contract’s full notional value. By setting aside assets equal to its net obligations under forward contracts that are cash-settled or treated as being cash-settled, Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund will have the ability to employ leverage to a greater extent than if it were required to segregate assets equal to the full notional value of such contracts. Segregated assets cannot be sold or transferred unless equivalent assets are substituted in their place or it is no longer necessary to segregate them. As a result, there is a possibility that segregation of a large percentage of a Fund’s assets could impede portfolio management or Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund’s ability to meet redemption requests or other current obligations.

Under definitions adopted by the CFTC and SEC, non-deliverable forwards are considered swaps, and therefore are included in the definition of “commodity interests.” Although non-deliverable forwards have historically been traded in the OTC market, as swaps they may in the future be required to be centrally cleared and traded on public facilities. For more information on central clearing and trading of cleared swaps, see “Swaps” and “Risks of Potential Regulation of Swaps and Other Derivatives.” Forward foreign currency contracts that qualify as deliverable forwards are not regulated as swaps for most purposes, and are not included in the definition of “commodity interests.” However these forwards are subject to some requirements applicable to swaps, including reporting to swap data repositories, documentation requirements, and business conduct rules applicable to swap dealers. CFTC regulation of forward foreign currency contracts, especially non-deliverable forwards, may restrict a Fund’s ability to use these instruments in the manner described above or subject Invesco to CFTC registration and regulation as a CPO.

The cost to a Fund of engaging in forward foreign currency contracts varies with factors such as the currencies involved, the length of the contract period, interest rate differentials and the prevailing market conditions. Because forward foreign currency contracts are usually entered into on a principal basis, no fees or commissions are typically involved. The use of forward foreign currency contracts does not eliminate fluctuations in the prices of the underlying securities a Fund owns or intends to acquire, but it does establish a rate of exchange in advance. While forward foreign currency contract sales limit the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of the hedged currencies, they also limit any potential gain that might result should the value of the currencies increase.

Fund Policies

Fundamental Restrictions . Except as otherwise noted below, each Fund is subject to the following investment restrictions, which may be changed only by a vote of such Fund’s outstanding shares. Fundamental restrictions may be changed only by a vote of the lesser of (i) 67% or more of the Fund’s shares present at a meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares are present in person or represented by proxy, or (ii) more than 50% of the Fund’s outstanding shares. Any investment restriction that involves a maximum or minimum percentage of securities or assets (other than with respect to borrowing) shall not be considered to be violated unless an excess over or a deficiency under the percentage occurs immediately after, and is caused by, an acquisition or disposition of securities or utilization of assets by the Fund.

(1) The Fund (except for Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund) is a “diversified company” as defined in the 1940 Act. The Fund will not purchase the securities of any issuer if, as a result, the Fund would fail to be a diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, as such statute, rules and regulations are amended from time to time or are interpreted from time to time by the SEC staff (collectively, the “1940 Act Laws and Interpretations”) or except to the extent that the Fund may be permitted to do so by exemptive order or similar relief (collectively, with the 1940 Act Laws and Interpretations, the “1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions”). In complying with this restriction, however, the Fund may purchase securities of other investment companies to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions.

(2) The Fund may not borrow money or issue senior securities, except as permitted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions.

 

41


(3) The Fund may not underwrite the securities of other issuers. This restriction does not prevent the Fund from engaging in transactions involving the acquisition, disposition or resale of its portfolio securities, regardless of whether the Fund may be considered to be an underwriter under the 1933 Act.

(4) The Fund (except for Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund and Invesco V.I. Technology Fund) will not make investments that will result in the concentration (as that term may be defined or interpreted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions) of its investments in the securities of issuers primarily engaged in the same industry. This restriction does not limit the Fund’s investments in (i) obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities, (ii) tax-exempt obligations issued by governments or political subdivisions of governments, or (iii) for Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund, bank instruments. In complying with this restriction, the Fund will not consider a bank-issued guaranty or financial guaranty insurance as a separate security.

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund will concentrate (as that term may be defined or interpreted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions) its investments in the securities of issuers engaged primarily in health care industries. Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund will concentrate (as that term may be defined or interpreted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions) its investments in the securities of domestic and foreign real estate and real estate-related companies. Invesco V.I. Technology Fund will concentrate (as that term may be defined or interpreted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions) its investments in the securities of issuers engaged primarily in technology-related industries.

(5) The Fund may not purchase real estate or sell real estate unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments. This restriction does not prevent the Fund from investing in issuers that invest, deal, or otherwise engage in transactions in real estate or interests therein, or investing in securities that are secured by real estate or interests therein.

(6) The Fund may not purchase physical commodities or sell physical commodities unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments. This restriction does not prevent the Fund from engaging in transactions involving futures contracts and options thereon or investing in securities that are secured by physical commodities. This restriction also does not prevent Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund from investing up to 25% of its total assets in the Subsidiary, thereby gaining exposure to the investment returns of commodities markets within the limitations of the federal tax requirements.

(7) The Fund may not make personal loans or loans of its assets to persons who control or are under common control with the Fund, except to the extent permitted by 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions. This restriction does not prevent the Fund from, among other things, purchasing debt obligations, entering into repurchase agreements, loaning its assets to broker-dealers or institutional investors, or investing in loans, including assignments and participation interests.

(8) The Fund may, notwithstanding any other fundamental investment policy or limitation, invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company with substantially the same fundamental investment objectives, policies and restrictions as the Fund.

The investment restrictions set forth above provide each of the Funds with the ability to operate under new interpretations of the 1940 Act or pursuant to exemptive relief from the SEC without receiving prior shareholder approval of the change. Even though each of the Funds has this flexibility, the Board has adopted non-fundamental restrictions for each of the Funds relating to certain of these restrictions which Invesco and, when applicable, the Sub-Advisers must follow in managing the Funds. Any changes to these non-fundamental restrictions, which are set forth below, require the approval of the Board.

 

42


Non-Fundamental Restrictions . Non-fundamental restrictions may be changed for any Fund without shareholder approval. The non-fundamental investment restrictions listed below apply to each of the Funds unless otherwise indicated.

(1) In complying with the fundamental restriction regarding issuer diversification, each Fund (except for Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund) will not, with respect to 75% of its total assets (and for Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund, with respect to 100% of its total assets), purchase the securities of any issuer (other than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities and securities issued by other investment companies), if, as a result, (i) more than 5% of the Fund’s total assets would be invested in the securities of that issuer, except, in the case of Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund, as permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, or (ii) the Fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of that issuer. Each Fund may purchase securities of other investment companies as permitted by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions.

In complying with the fundamental restriction regarding issuer diversification, any fund that invests in municipal securities will regard each state (including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico), territory and possession of the United States, each political subdivision, agency, instrumentality and authority thereof, and each multi-state agency of which a state is a member as a separate “issuer.” When the assets and revenues of an agency, authority, instrumentality or other political subdivision are separate from the government creating the subdivision and the security is backed only by assets and revenues of the subdivision, such subdivision would be deemed to be the sole issuer. Similarly, in the case of an Industrial Development Bond or Private Activity bond, if that bond is backed only by the assets and revenues of the non-governmental user, then that non-governmental user would be deemed to be the sole issuer. However, if the creating government or another entity guarantees a security, then to the extent that the value of all securities issued or guaranteed by that government or entity and owned by the Fund exceeds 10% of the Fund’s total assets, the guarantee would be considered a separate security and would be treated as issued by that government or entity. Securities issued or guaranteed by a bank or subject to financial guaranty insurance are not subject to the limitations set forth in the preceding sentence.

(2) In complying with the fundamental restriction regarding borrowing money and issuing senior securities, each Fund may borrow money in an amount not exceeding 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings).

(3) In complying with the fundamental restriction regarding industry concentration, the Fund (except for Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund, Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund and Invesco V.I. Technology) may invest up to 25% of its total assets in the securities of issuers whose principal business activities are in the same industry.

For purposes of Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund’s fundamental investment restriction regarding industry concentration, an issuer will be considered to be engaged in health care industries if (1) at least 50% of its gross income or its net sales are derived from activities in the health care industry; (2) at least 50% of its assets are devoted to producing revenues from the health care industry; or (3) based on other available information, Invesco determines that its primary business is within the health care industry.

For purposes of Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund’s fundamental restriction regarding industry concentration, real estate and real estate-related companies shall consist of companies (i) that can attribute at least 50% of their assets, gross income or net profits to ownership, construction, management, or sale of residential, commercial or industrial real estate, including listed equity REITs and other real estate operating companies that own property, or that make short-term construction and development mortgage loans or which invest in long-term mortgages or mortgage pools, or (ii) companies whose products and services are related to the real estate industry, such as manufacturers and distributors of building supplies and financial institutions which issue or service mortgages.

 

43


For purposes of Invesco V.I. Technology Fund’s fundamental investment restriction regarding industry concentration an issuer will be considered to be engaged in a technology-related industry if (1) at least 50% of its gross income or its net sales are derived from activities in technology-related industries; (2) at least 50% of its assets are devoted to producing revenues in technology-related industries; or (3) based on other available information, the Fund’s portfolio manager(s) determines that its primary business is within technology-related industries.

(4) Notwithstanding the fundamental restriction with regard to engaging in transactions involving futures contracts and options thereon or investing in securities that are secured by physical commodities, each Fund currently may not invest in any security (including futures contracts or options thereon) that is secured by physical commodities.

The Funds do not consider currencies or other financial commodities or contracts and financial instruments to be physical commodities (which include, for example, oil, precious metals and grains). Accordingly, the Funds will interpret the fundamental restriction and the related non-fundamental restriction to permit the Funds, subject to each Fund’s investment objectives and general investment policies (as stated in the Funds’ prospectuses and herein), to invest directly in foreign currencies and other financial commodities and to purchase, sell or enter into commodity futures contracts and options thereon, foreign currency forward contracts, foreign currency options, currency-, commodity- and financial instrument-related swap agreements, hybrid instruments, interest rate or securities-related or foreign currency-related hedging instruments or other currency-, commodity- or financial instrument-related derivatives, subject to compliance with any applicable provisions of the federal securities or commodities laws. The Funds also will interpret their fundamental restriction regarding purchasing and selling physical commodities and their related non-fundamental restriction to permit the Funds to invest in exchange-traded funds that invest in physical and/or financial commodities, subject to the limits described in the Funds’ prospectuses and herein.

(5) In complying with the fundamental restriction with regard to making loans, each Fund may lend up to 33  1 3 % of its total assets and may lend money to an Invesco Fund, on such terms and conditions as the SEC may require in an exemptive order.

(6) Notwithstanding the fundamental restriction with regard to investing all assets in an open-end fund, the Fund may currently not invest all of its assets in the securities of a single open-end management investment company with the same fundamental investment objectives, policies and restrictions as the Fund.

(7) (a) Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund invests under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities and in derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities.

(b) Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in securities of issuers engaged primarily in health care-related industries, and in derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities.

(c) Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in securities of real estate and real estate–related issuers and in derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities.

(d) Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in debt securities issued, guaranteed or otherwise backed by the U.S. Government, its agencies, instrumentalities or sponsored corporations and in derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities.

(e) Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in debt securities that are determined to be below investment grade quality and in derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities.

 

44


(f) Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of mid-capitalization companies and in derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities.

(g) Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of small-capitalization issuers.

(h) Invesco V.I. Technology Fund invests, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in securities of issuers engaged in technology-related industries and in derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to such securities.

(i)

For purposes of the foregoing, “assets” means net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes. Derivatives and other instruments that have economic characteristics similar to the securities in a Fund’s 80% policy may also be counted towards that Fund’s 80% policy. The Fund will provide written notice to its shareholders prior to any change to this policy, as required by the 1940 Act Laws, Interpretations and Exemptions.

Portfolio Turnover

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the portfolio turnover rates for each Fund, except for Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund, are presented in the table below. Unless otherwise indicated, variations in turnover rate may be due to a fluctuating volume of shareholder purchase and redemption orders, market conditions and/or changes in Invesco’s investment outlook.

 

FUND NAME

   2013    2012  

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund 1

        188

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

        44

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

        66

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

        43

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

        51

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

        118

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

        58

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

        24

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

        3

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

        59

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

        36

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

        42

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

        9

 

1   In addition to the factors set forth above, variations in portfolio turnover rate for this Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund was the result of re-allocation of assets.

Policies and Procedures for Disclosure of Fund Holdings

The Board has adopted policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio holdings (the Holdings Disclosure Policy). Invesco and the Board may amend the Holdings Disclosure Policy at any time without prior notice. Non-public holdings information may not be disclosed except in compliance with the Holdings Disclosure Policy.

General Disclosures

The Holdings Disclosure Policy permits Invesco to publicly release certain portfolio holdings information of the Funds from time to time. The Funds sell their shares to life insurance companies and their separate accounts to fund interests in variable annuity and variable life insurance policies issued by such companies, but not directly to the public. Accordingly, the Policy authorizes Invesco to disclose, pursuant to the following table, the Funds’ portfolio holdings information on a non-selective basis to all

 

45


insurance companies whose variable annuity and variable life insurance separate accounts invest in the Funds and with which the Funds have entered into participation agreements (Insurance Companies) and Invesco has entered into a nondisclosure agreement:

All Funds other than Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

 

Disclosure

 

Date Available/Lag

Month-end top ten holdings   Available 10 days after month-end (Holdings as of June 30 available July 10)
Calendar quarter-end complete holdings   Available 25 days after calendar quarter-end (Holdings as of June 30 available July 25)
Fiscal quarter-end complete holdings   Available 55 days after fiscal quarter-end (Holdings as of June 30 available August 24)

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

 

Information

 

Approximate Date of Website Posting

 

Information Remains Available on Website

Weighted average maturity information; thirty-day, seven-day and one-day yield information; daily dividend factor and total net assets   Next business day   Until posting of the following business day’s information
Complete portfolio holdings, and information derived there from, as of month-end or as of some other period determined by the Advisor in its sole discretion   1 day after month-end or any other period, as may be determined by the Advisor in its sole discretion   Until posting of the fiscal quarter holdings for the months included in the fiscal quarter
Complete portfolio holdings as of fiscal quarter-end   60-70 days after fiscal quarter-end   For one year

Selective Disclosures

Selective Disclosure – to Insurance Companies . The Policy permits Invesco to disclose Fund Portfolio Holdings Information to Insurance Companies, upon request/on a selective basis, up to five days prior to the scheduled release dates of such information to allow the Insurance Companies to post the information on their websites at approximately the same time that Invesco posts the same information. The Policy incorporates the Board’s determination that selectively disclosing portfolio holdings information to facilitate an Insurance Company’s dissemination of the information on its website is a legitimate business purpose of the Funds. Insurance Companies that wish to receive such portfolio holdings information in advance must sign a non-disclosure agreement requiring them to maintain the confidentiality of the information until the later of five business days or the scheduled release dates and to refrain from using that information to execute transactions in securities. Invesco does not post the portfolio holdings of the Funds to its website. Not all insurance companies that receive Fund portfolio holdings information provide such information on their websites. To obtain information about Fund portfolio holdings, please contact the life insurance company that issued your variable annuity or variable life insurance policy.

Selective disclosure of portfolio holdings pursuant to non-disclosure agreement. Employees of Invesco and its affiliates may disclose non-public full portfolio holdings on a selective basis only if the Internal Compliance Controls Committee (the ICCC) of Invesco approves the parties to whom disclosure of non-public full portfolio holdings will be made. The ICCC must determine that the proposed selective disclosure will be made for legitimate business purposes of the applicable Fund and is in the best interest of the applicable Fund’s shareholders. In making such determination, the ICCC will address any perceived conflicts of interest between shareholders of such Fund and Invesco or its affiliates as part of granting its approval.

 

46


The Board exercises continuing oversight of the disclosure of Fund portfolio holdings by (1) overseeing the implementation and enforcement of the Holdings Disclosure Policy and the Invesco Funds’ Code of Ethics by the Chief Compliance Officer (or his designee) of Invesco and the Invesco Funds and (2) considering reports and recommendations by the Chief Compliance Officer concerning any material compliance matters (as defined in Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act and Rule 206(4)-7 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended) that may arise in connection with the Holdings Disclosure Policy. Pursuant to the Holdings Disclosure Policy, the Board reviews the types of situations in which Invesco provides selective disclosure and approves situations involving perceived conflicts of interest between shareholders of the applicable Fund and Invesco or its affiliates brought to the Board’s attention by Invesco.

Invesco discloses non-public full portfolio holdings information to the following persons in connection with the day-to-day operations and management of the Invesco Funds:

 

    Attorneys and accountants;

 

    Securities lending agents;

 

    Lenders to the Invesco Funds;

 

    Rating and rankings agencies;

 

    Persons assisting in the voting of proxies;

 

    Invesco Funds’ custodians;

 

    The Invesco Funds’ transfer agent(s) (in the event of a redemption in kind);

 

    Pricing services, market makers, or other persons who provide systems or software support in connection with Invesco Funds’ operations (to determine the price of securities held by an Invesco Fund);

 

    Financial printers;

 

    Brokers identified by the Invesco Funds’ portfolio management team who provide execution and research services to the team; and

 

    Analysts hired to perform research and analysis to the Invesco Funds’ portfolio management team.

In many cases, Invesco will disclose current portfolio holdings on a daily basis to these persons. In these situations, Invesco has entered into non-disclosure agreements which provide that the recipient of the portfolio holdings will maintain the confidentiality of such portfolio holdings and will not trade on such information (Non-Disclosure Agreements). Please refer to Appendix B for a list of examples of persons to whom Invesco provides non-public portfolio holdings on an ongoing basis.

Invesco will also disclose non-public portfolio holdings information if such disclosure is required by applicable laws, rules or regulations, or by regulatory authorities having jurisdiction over Invesco and its affiliates or the Funds.

The Holdings Disclosure Policy provides that Invesco will not request, receive or accept any compensation (including compensation in the form of the maintenance of assets in any Fund or other mutual fund or account managed by Invesco or one of its affiliates) for the selective disclosure of portfolio holdings information.

Disclosure of certain portfolio holdings and related information without non-disclosure agreement . Invesco and its affiliates that provide services to the Funds, the Sub-Advisers and each of their employees may receive or have access to portfolio holdings as part of the day-to-day operations of the Funds.

From time to time, employees of Invesco and its affiliates may express their views orally or in writing on one or more of the Funds’ portfolio securities or may state that a Fund has recently purchased or sold, or continues to own, one or more securities. The securities subject to these views and statements may be ones that were purchased or sold since a Fund’s most recent quarter-end and

 

47


therefore may not be reflected on the list of the Fund’s most recent quarter-end portfolio holdings. Such views and statements may be made to various persons, including members of the press, brokers and other financial intermediaries that sell shares of the Funds. The nature and content of the views and statements provided to each of these persons may differ.

From time to time, employees of Invesco and its affiliates also may provide oral or written information (portfolio commentary) about a Fund, including, but not limited to, how the Fund’s investments are divided among various sectors, industries, countries, investment styles and capitalization sizes, and among stocks, bonds, currencies and cash, security types, bond maturities, bond coupons and bond credit quality ratings. This portfolio commentary may also include information on how these various weightings and factors contributed to Fund performance. Invesco may also provide oral or written information (statistical information) about various financial characteristics of a Fund or its underlying portfolio securities including, but not limited to, alpha, beta, R-squared, coefficient of determination, duration, maturity, information ratio, sharpe ratio, earnings growth, payout ratio, price/book value, projected earnings growth, return on equity, standard deviation, tracking error, weighted average quality, market capitalization, percent debt to equity, price to cash flow, dividend yield or growth, default rate, portfolio turnover, and risk and style characteristics. This portfolio commentary and statistical information about a Fund may be based on the Fund’s portfolio as of the most recent quarter-end or the end of some other interim period, such as month-end. The portfolio commentary and statistical information may be provided to various persons, including those described in the preceding paragraph. The nature and content of the information provided to each of these persons may differ.

Disclosure of portfolio holdings by traders . Additionally, employees of Invesco and its affiliates may disclose one or more of the portfolio securities of a Fund when purchasing and selling securities through broker-dealers, requesting bids on securities, obtaining price quotations on securities, or in connection with litigation involving the Funds’ portfolio securities. Invesco does not enter into formal Non-Disclosure Agreements in connection with these situations; however, the Funds would not continue to conduct business with a person who Invesco believed was misusing the disclosed information.

MANAGEMENT OF THE TRUST

Board of Trustees

The Trustees and officers of the Trust, their principal occupations during at least the last five years and certain other information concerning them are set forth in Appendix C.

Qualifications and Experience . In addition to the information set forth in Appendix C, the following sets forth additional information about the qualifications and experiences of each of the Trustees.

Interested Persons

Martin L. Flanagan Trustee

Martin L. Flanagan has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Group of Funds and their predecessor funds since 2007. Mr. Flanagan is president and chief executive officer of Invesco Ltd., a position he has held since August 2005. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of Invesco Ltd.

Mr. Flanagan joined Invesco Ltd. from Franklin Resources, Inc., where he was president and co-chief executive officer from January 2004 to July 2005. Previously he had been Franklin’s co-president from May 2003 to January 2004, chief operating officer and chief financial officer from November 1999 to May 2003, and senior vice president and chief financial officer from 1993 until November 1999.

Mr. Flanagan served as director, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Templeton, Galbraith & Hansberger, Ltd. before its acquisition by Franklin in 1992. Before joining Templeton in 1983, he worked with Arthur Andersen & Co.

 

48


Mr. Flanagan is a chartered financial analyst and a certified public accountant. He serves as vice chairman of the Investment Company Institute and a member of the executive board at the SMU Cox School of Business.

The Board believes that Mr. Flanagan’s long experience as an executive in the investment management area benefits the Funds.

Philip A. Taylor, Trustee

Philip A. Taylor has been a member of the Board of the Invesco Funds and their predecessor funds since 2006. Mr. Taylor has headed Invesco’s North American retail business as Senior Managing Director since April 2006. He previously served as chief executive officer of Invesco Trimark Investments since January 2002.

Mr. Taylor joined Invesco in 1999 as senior vice president of operations and client services and later became executive vice president and chief operating officer.

Mr. Taylor was president of Canadian retail broker Investors Group Securities from 1994 to 1997 and managing partner of Meridian Securities, an execution and clearing broker, from 1989 to 1994. He held various management positions with Royal Trust, now part of Royal Bank of Canada, from 1982 to 1989. He began his career in consumer brand management in the U.S. and Canada with Richardson-Vicks, now part of Procter & Gamble.

The Board believes that Mr. Taylor’s long experience in the investment management business benefits the Funds.

Wayne W. Whalen, Trustee

Wayne W. Whalen has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds and their predecessor funds since 2010.

Mr. Whalen is Of Counsel, and prior to 2010, Partner in the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.

Mr. Whalen is Chairman and Director of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library Foundation. From 1995 to 2010, Mr. Whalen served as Director or Trustee of investment companies in the Van Kampen Funds complex.

The Board believes that Mr. Whalen’s experience as a law firm Partner and his experience as a director of investment companies benefits the Funds.

Independent Trustees

Bruce L. Crockett, Trustee and Chair

Bruce L. Crockett has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 1978, and has served as Independent Chair of the Board of Trustees since 2004.

Mr. Crockett has more than 30 years of experience in finance and general management in the banking, aerospace and telecommunications industries. From 1992 to 1996, he served as president, chief executive officer and a director of COMSAT Corporation, an international satellite and wireless telecommunications company.

Mr. Crockett has also served, since 1996, as chairman of Crockett Technologies Associates, a strategic consulting firm that provides services to the information technology and communications industries. Mr. Crockett also serves on the Board of Directors of ACE Limited, a Zurich-based insurance company. He is a life trustee of the University of Rochester Board of Directors.

 

49


The Board of Trustees elected Mr. Crockett to serve as its Independent Chair because of his extensive experience in managing public companies and familiarity with investment companies.

David C. Arch, Trustee

David C. Arch has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds and their predecessor funds since 2010.

Mr. Arch is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blistex, Inc., a consumer health care products manufacturer. Mr. Arch is a member of the Board of the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association and the Board of Visitors, Institute for the Humanities, University of Michigan. Formerly, Mr. Arch was a member of the Heartland Alliance Advisory Board, a non-profit organization serving human needs based in Chicago. From 1984 to 2010, Mr. Arch served as Director or Trustee of investment companies in the Van Kampen Funds complex.

The Board believes that Mr. Arch’s experience as the CEO of a public company and his experience with investment companies benefits the Funds.

Frank S. Bayley, Trustee

Frank S. Bayley has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 1985.

Mr. Bayley is a business consultant in San Francisco. He is Chairman and a Director of the C. D. Stimson Company, a private investment company in Seattle.

Mr. Bayley serves as a Trustee of the Seattle Art Museum, a Trustee of San Francisco Performances, and a Trustee and Overseer of The Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia. He also serves on the East Asian Art Committee of the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the Visiting Committee for Art of Asia, Oceana and Africa of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.

Mr. Bayley is a retired general partner and of Counsel of the international law firm of Baker & McKenzie LLP, where his practice focused on business acquisitions and venture capital transactions. Prior to joining Baker & McKenzie LLP in 1986, he was a partner of the San Francisco law firm of Chickering & Gregory. He received his A.B. from Harvard College in 1961, his LL.B. from Harvard Law School in 1964, and his LL.M. from Boalt Hall at the University of California, Berkeley, in 1965. Mr. Bayley served as a Trustee of the Badgley Funds from inception in 1998 until dissolution in 2007.

The Board believes that Mr. Bayley’s experience as a business consultant and a lawyer benefits the Funds.

James T. Bunch, Trustee

James T. Bunch has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2000.

From 1988 to 2010, Mr. Bunch was Founding Partner of Green Manning & Bunch, Ltd. a leading investment banking firm located in Denver, Colorado. Green Manning & Bunch is a FINRA-registered investment bank specializing in mergers and acquisitions, private financing of middle-market companies and corporate finance advisory services. Immediately prior to forming Green Manning & Bunch, Mr. Bunch was Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and a Director of Boettcher & Company, then the leading investment banking firm in the Rocky Mountain region.

Mr. Bunch began his professional career as a practicing attorney. He joined the prominent Denver-based law firm of Davis Graham & Stubbs in 1970 and later rose to the position of Chairman and Managing Partner of the firm.

 

50


At various other times during his career, Mr. Bunch has served as Chair of the NASD Business District Conduct Committee, and Chair of the Colorado Bar Association Ethics Committee.

In June 2010, Mr. Bunch became the Managing Member of Grumman Hill Group LLC, a family office private equity investment manager.

The Board believes that Mr. Bunch’s experience as an investment banker and investment management lawyer benefits the Funds.

Rodney F. Dammeyer, Trustee

Rodney F. Dammeyer has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds and their predecessor funds since 2010.

Mr. Dammeyer is Chairman of CAC, LLC, a private company offering capital investment and management advisory services. Prior to this, Mr. Dammeyer was responsible for managing all of Sam Zell’s non-real estate investment activity as managing partner of Equity Group Corporate Investments.

From 1985 to 1995, Mr. Dammeyer was CEO of Itel Corporation, which later changed its name to Anixter International. From 1983 to 1985, Mr. Dammeyer was senior vice president and chief financial officer of Household International, Inc. He was executive vice president and chief financial officer of Northwest Industries, Inc. from 1979-1983.

After graduating from Kent State University in 1962, Mr. Dammeyer began his business career with Arthur Anderson & Co. and was admitted to partnership in 1970. He served as chairman of the firm’s advisory council and a member of the board of director’s nominating committee.

Mr. Dammeyer is a member of the boards of directors of Steircycle, Inc. and Quidel Corporation, in addition to several private companies. He also served on the School of Leadership and Education Sciences (SOLES) Advisory Board of the University of San Diego, the board of directors of High Tech charter schools, and the California Charter Schools Association.

From 1987 to 2010, Mr. Dammeyer served as Director or Trustee of investment companies in the Van Kampen Funds complex.

The Board believes that Mr. Dammeyer’s experience in executive positions at a number of public companies, his accounting experience and his experience serving as a director of investment companies benefits the Funds.

Albert R. Dowden, Trustee

Albert R. Dowden has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2000.

Mr. Dowden retired at the end of 1998 after a 24 -year career with Volvo Group North America, Inc. and Volvo Cars of North America, Inc. Mr. Dowden joined Volvo as general counsel in 1974 and was promoted to increasingly senior positions until 1991 when he was appointed president, chief executive officer and director of Volvo Group North America and senior vice president of Swedish parent company AB Volvo.

Since retiring, Mr. Dowden continues to serve on the boards of the Reich & Tang Funds, Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc. and The Boss Group. Mr. Dowden’s charitable endeavors currently focus on Boys & Girls Clubs where he has been active for many years as well as several other not-for-profit organizations.

 

51


Mr. Dowden began his career as an attorney with a major international law firm, Rogers & Wells (1967-1976), which is now Clifford Chance.

The Board believes that Mr. Dowden’s extensive experience as a corporate executive benefits the Funds.

Jack M. Fields, Trustee

Jack M. Fields has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 1997.

Mr. Fields served as a member of Congress, representing the 8th Congressional District of Texas from 1980 to 1997. As a member of Congress, Mr. Fields served as Chairman of the House Telecommunications and Finance Subcommittee, which has jurisdiction and oversight of the Federal Communications Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Fields co-sponsored the National Securities Markets Improvements Act of 1996, and played a leadership role in enactment of the Securities Litigation Reform Act.

Mr. Fields currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Twenty-First Century Group, Inc. in Washington, D.C., a bipartisan Washington consulting firm specializing in Federal government affairs.

Mr. Fields also serves as a Director of Insperity, Inc. (formerly Administaff), a premier professional employer organization with clients nationwide. In addition, Mr. Fields sits on the Board of the Discovery Channel Global Education Fund, a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing educational resources to people in need around the world through the use of technology.

The Board believes that Mr. Fields experience in the House of Representatives, especially concerning regulation of the securities markets, benefits the Funds.

Dr. Prema Mathai-Davis Trustee

Dr. Prema Mathai-Davis has been a member of the Board of Trustee of the Invesco Funds since 1998.

Prior to her retirement in 2000, Dr. Mathai-Davis served as Chief Executive Officer of the YWCA of the USA. Prior to joining the YWCA, Dr. Mathai-Davis served as the Commissioner of the New York City Department for the Aging. She was a Commissioner of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority of New York, the largest regional transportation network in the U.S. Dr. Mathai-Davis also serves as a Trustee of the YWCA Retirement Fund, the first and oldest pension fund for women, and on the advisory board of the Johns Hopkins Bioethics Institute. Dr. Mathai-Davis was the president and chief executive officer of the Community Agency for Senior Citizens, a non-profit social service agency that she established in 1981. She also directed the Mt. Sinai School of Medicine-Hunter College Long-Term Care Gerontology Center, one of the first of its kind.

The Board believes that Dr. Mathai-Davis extensive experience in running public and charitable institutions benefits the Funds.

Dr. Larry Soll, Trustee

Dr. Larry Soll has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 1997.

Formerly, Dr. Soll was chairman of the board (1987 to 1994), Chief Executive Officer (1982 to 1989; 1993 to 1994), and President (1982 to 1989) of Synergen Corp., a public company, and in such capacities supervised the activities of the Chief Financial Officer. Dr. Soll also has served as a director of three other public companies and as treasurer of a non-profit corporation. Dr. Soll currently serves as a Trustee and a member of the Audit Committee of each of the funds within the Invesco Funds.

 

52


The Board believes that Dr. Soll’s experience as a chairman of a public company and in academia benefits the Fund.

Hugo F. Sonnenschein, Trustee

Hugo F. Sonnenschein has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds and their predecessor funds since 2010.

Mr. Sonnenschein is the Distinguished Service Professor and President Emeritus of the University of Chicago and the Adam Smith Distinguished Service Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Chicago. Until July 2000, Mr. Sonnenschein served as President of the University of Chicago.

Mr. Sonnenschein is a Trustee of the University of Rochester and a member of its investment committee. He is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Philosophical Society, and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. From 1994 to 2010, Mr. Sonnenschein served as Director or Trustee of investment companies in the Van Kampen Funds complex.

The Board believes that Mr. Sonnenschein’s experiences in academia and in running a university, and his experience as a director of investment companies benefits the Funds.

Raymond Stickel, Jr., Trustee

Raymond Stickel, Jr. has been a member of the Board of Trustees of the Invesco Funds since 2006.

Mr. Stickel retired after a 35-year career with Deloitte & Touche. For the last five years of his career, he was the managing partner of the investment management practice for the New York, New Jersey and Connecticut region. In addition to his management role, he directed audit and tax services for several mutual fund clients.

Mr. Stickel began his career with Touche Ross & Co. (the Firm) in Dayton, Ohio, became a partner in 1976 and managing partner of the office in 1985. He also started and developed an investment management practice in the Dayton office that grew to become a significant source of investment management talent for the Firm. In Ohio, he served as the audit partner on numerous mutual funds and on public and privately held companies in other industries. Mr. Stickel has also served on the Firm’s Accounting and Auditing Executive Committee.

The Board believes that Mr. Stickel’s experience as a partner in a large accounting firm working with investment managers and investment companies, and his status as an Audit Committee Financial Expert, benefits the Funds.

Management Information

The Trustees have the authority to take all actions necessary in connection with the business affairs of the Trust, including, among other things, approving the investment objectives, policies and procedures for the Funds. The Trust enters into agreements with various entities to manage the day-to-day operations of the Funds, including the Funds’ investment advisers, administrator, transfer agent, distributor and custodians. The Trustees are responsible for selecting these service providers and approving the terms of their contracts with the Funds, and exercising general oversight of these service providers on an ongoing basis.

 

53


Certain trustees and officers of the Trust are affiliated with Invesco and Invesco Ltd., the parent corporation of Invesco. All of the Trust’s executive officers hold similar offices with some or all of the other Funds.

Leadership Structure and the Board of Trustees . The Board is currently composed of fourteen Trustees, including eleven Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act (collectively, the Independent Trustees and each an Independent Trustee). In addition to eight regularly scheduled meetings per year, the Board holds special meetings or informal conference calls to discuss specific matters that may require action prior to the next regular meeting. As discussed below, the Board has established five committees to assist the Board in performing its oversight responsibilities.

The Board believes that its leadership structure, which includes an Independent Trustee as Chairman, allows for effective communication between the trustees and Fund management, among the Board’s trustees and among its Independent Trustees. The existing Board structure, including its committee structure, provides the Independent Trustees with effective control over board governance while also providing insight from the two Interested Trustees who are active officers of the Funds’ investment adviser. The Board’s leadership structure promotes dialogue and debate, which the Board believes will allow for the proper consideration of matters deemed important to the Funds and their shareholders and result in effective decision-making.

The Board has appointed an Independent Trustee to serve in the role of Chairman. The Chairman’s primary role is to participate in the preparation of the agenda for meetings of the Board and the identification of information to be presented to the Board and matters to be acted upon by the Board. The Chairman also presides at all meetings of the Board and acts as a liaison with service providers, officers, attorneys, and other Trustees generally between meetings. The Chairman may perform such other functions as may be requested by the Board from time to time. Except for any duties specified herein or pursuant to the Trust’s Declaration of Trust or By-laws, the designation of Chairman does not impose on such Independent Trustee any duties, obligations or liability that is greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on such person as a member of the Board, generally. The Fund has substantially the same leadership structure as the Trust.

Risk Oversight . The Board considers risk management issues as part of its general oversight responsibilities throughout the year at regular meetings of the Investments, Audit, Compliance and Valuation, Distribution and Proxy Oversight Committees (as defined and further described below). These Committees in turn report to the full Board and recommend actions and approvals for the full Board to take.

Invesco prepares regular reports that address certain investment, valuation and compliance matters, and the Board as a whole or the Committees may also receive special written reports or presentations on a variety of risk issues at the request of the Board, a Committee or the Senior Officer. In addition, the Audit Committee of the Board meets regularly with Invesco Ltd.’s internal audit group to review reports on their examinations of functions and processes within Invesco that affect the Funds.

The Investments Committee and its sub-committees receive regular written reports describing and analyzing the investment performance of the Funds. In addition, the portfolio managers of the Funds meet regularly with the sub-committees of the Investment Committee to discuss portfolio performance, including investment risk, such as the impact on the Funds of the investment in particular securities or instruments, such as derivatives. To the extent that a Fund changes a particular investment strategy that could have a material impact on the Fund’s risk profile, the Board generally is consulted in advance with respect to such change.

Invesco provides regular written reports to the Valuation, Distribution and Proxy Oversight Committee that enable the Committee to monitor the number of fair valued securities in a particular portfolio, the reasons for the fair valuation and the methodology used to arrive at the fair value. Such reports also include information concerning illiquid securities within a Fund’s portfolio. In addition, the Audit Committee reviews valuation procedures and pricing results with the Fund’s independent auditors in connection with such Committee’s review of the results of the audit of the Fund’s year-end financial statement.

 

54


The Compliance Committee receives regular compliance reports prepared by Invesco’s compliance group and meets regularly with the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) to discuss compliance issues, including compliance risks. As required under SEC rules, the Independent Trustees meet at least quarterly in executive session with the CCO and the Fund’s CCO prepares and presents an annual written compliance report to the Board. The Compliance Committee recommends and the Board adopts compliance policies and procedures for the Fund and approves such procedures for the Fund’s service providers. The compliance policies and procedures are specifically designed to detect, prevent and correct violations of the federal securities laws

Committee Structure . The standing committees of the Board are the Audit Committee, the Compliance Committee, the Governance Committee, the Investments Committee, the Valuation, Distribution and Proxy Oversight Committee (the “Committees”).

The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. David C. Arch, Frank S. Bayley, James T. Bunch, Bruce L. Crockett, Rodney F. Dammeyer (Vice-Chair), Raymond Stickel, Jr. (Chair) and Dr. Larry Soll. The Audit Committee’s primary purposes are to: (i) oversee qualifications, independence and performance of the independent registered public accountants; (ii) appoint independent registered public accountants for the Funds; (iii) pre-approve all permissible audit and non-audit services that are provided to Funds by their independent registered public accountants to the extent required by Section 10A(h) and (i) of the Exchange Act; (iv) pre-approve, in accordance with Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X, certain non-audit services provided by the Funds’ independent registered public accountants to Invesco and certain other affiliated entities; (v) review the audit and tax plans prepared by the independent registered public accountants; (vi) review the Funds’ audited financial statements; (vii) review the process that management uses to evaluate and certify disclosure controls and procedures in Form N-CSR; (viii) review the process for preparation and review of the Funds’ shareholder reports; (ix) review certain tax procedures maintained by the Funds; (x) review modified or omitted officer certifications and disclosures; (xi) review any internal audits of the Funds; (xii) establish procedures regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters and other alleged violations; (xiii) set hiring policies for employees and proposed employees of the Funds who are employees or former employees of the independent registered public accountants; and (xiv) remain informed of (a) the Funds’ accounting systems and controls, (b) regulatory changes and new accounting pronouncements that affect the Funds’ net asset value calculations and financial statement reporting requirements, and (c) communications with regulators regarding accounting and financial reporting matters that pertain to the Funds. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Audit Committee met five times.

The members of the Compliance Committee are Messrs. Bayley, Bunch, Dammeyer (Vice-Chair), Stickel and Dr. Soll (Chair). The Compliance Committee is responsible for (i) recommending to the Board and the independent trustees the appointment, compensation and removal of the Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer; (ii) recommending to the independent trustees the appointment, compensation and removal of the Funds’ Senior Officer appointed pursuant to the terms of the Assurances of Discontinuance entered into by the New York Attorney General, Invesco and INVESCO Funds Group, Inc. (IFG); (iii) reviewing any report prepared by a third party who is not an interested person of Invesco, upon the conclusion by such third party of a compliance review of Invesco; (iv) reviewing all reports on compliance matters from the Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer, (v) reviewing all recommendations made by the Senior Officer regarding Invesco’s compliance procedures, (vi) reviewing all reports from the Senior Officer of any violations of state and federal securities laws, the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, or breaches of Invesco’s fiduciary duties to Fund shareholders and of Invesco’s Code of Ethics; (vii) overseeing all of the compliance policies and procedures of the Funds and their service providers adopted pursuant to Rule 38a-1 of the 1940 Act; (viii) receiving and reviewing quarterly reports on the activities of Invesco’s Internal Compliance Controls Committee; (ix) reviewing all reports made by Invesco’s Chief Compliance Officer; (x)reviewing and recommending to the independent trustees whether to approve procedures to investigate matters brought to the attention of Invesco’s ombudsman; (xi)risk management oversight with respect to the Funds and, in connection therewith, receiving and overseeing risk management reports from Invesco Ltd. that are applicable to the Funds or their service providers; and

 

55


(xii) overseeing potential conflicts of interest that are reported to the Compliance Committee by Invesco, the Chief Compliance Officer, the Senior Officer and/or the Compliance Consultant. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Compliance Committee met six times.

The members of the Governance Committee are Messrs. Arch, Crockett, Albert Dowden (Chair), Jack M. Fields (Vice-Chair), Dr. Prema Mathai-Davis and Hugo Sonnenschein. The Governance Committee is responsible for: (i) nominating persons who will qualify as independent trustees for (a) election as trustees in connection with meetings of shareholders of the Funds that are called to vote on the election of trustees, (b) appointment by the Board as trustees in connection with filling vacancies that arise in between meetings of shareholders; (ii) reviewing the size of the Board, and recommending to the Board whether the size of the Board shall be increased or decreased; (iii) nominating the Chair of the Board; (iv) monitoring the composition of the Board and each committee of the Board, and monitoring the qualifications of all trustees; (v) recommending persons to serve as members of each committee of the Board (other than the Compliance Committee), as well as persons who shall serve as the chair and vice chair of each such committee; (vi) reviewing and recommending the amount of compensation payable to the independent trustees; (vii) overseeing the selection of independent legal counsel to the independent trustees; (viii) reviewing and approving the compensation paid to independent legal counsel to the independent trustees; (ix) reviewing and approving the compensation paid to counsel and other advisers, if any, to the Committees of the Board; and (x) reviewing as they deem appropriate administrative and/or logistical matters pertaining to the operations of the Board. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Governance Committee met six times.

The Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by a shareholder to serve as trustees, provided: (i) that such person is a shareholder of record at the time he or she submits such names and is entitled to vote at the meeting of shareholders at which trustees will be elected; and (ii) that the Governance Committee or the Board, as applicable, shall make the final determination of persons to be nominated. Notice procedures set forth in the Trust’s bylaws require that any shareholder of a Fund desiring to nominate a trustee for election at a shareholder meeting must submit to the Trust’s Secretary the nomination in writing not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such shareholder meeting or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement is made of the shareholder meeting and not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the shareholder meeting.

The members of the Investments Committee are Messrs. Arch, Bayley (Chair), Bunch (Vice-Chair), Crockett, Dammeyer, Dowden, Fields (Vice-Chair), Martin L. Flanagan, Sonnenschein (Vice-Chair), Stickel, Philip A. Taylor and Drs. Mathai-Davis and Soll and Wayne Whalen. The Investments Committee’s primary purposes are to: (i) assist the Board in its oversight of the investment management services provided by Invesco Ltd. and the Sub-Advisers; and (ii) review all proposed and existing advisory and sub-advisory arrangements for the Funds, and to recommend what action the full Boards and the independent trustees take regarding the approval of all such proposed arrangements and the continuance of all such existing arrangements. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Investments Committee met six times.

The Investments Committee has established three Sub-Committees. The Sub-Committees are responsible for: (i) reviewing the performance, fees and expenses of the Funds that have been assigned to a particular Sub-Committee (for each Sub-Committee, the “Designated Funds”), unless the Investments Committee takes such action directly; (ii) reviewing with the applicable portfolio managers from time to time the investment objective(s), policies, strategies and limitations of the Designated Funds; (iii) evaluating the investment advisory, sub-advisory and distribution arrangements in effect or proposed for the Designated Funds, unless the Investments Committee takes such action directly; (iv) being familiar with the registration statements and periodic shareholder reports applicable to their Designated Funds; and (v) such other investment-related matters as the Investments Committee may delegate to the Sub-Committee from time to time.

The members of the Valuation, Distribution and Proxy Oversight Committee are Messrs. Dowden, Fields, Dr. Mathai-Davis (Chair), Sonnenschein (Vice-Chair), and Whalen. The primary purposes of the Valuation, Distribution and Proxy Oversight Committee are: (a) to address issues

 

56


requiring action or oversight by the Board of the Invesco Funds (i) in the valuation of the Invesco Funds’ portfolio securities consistent with the Pricing Procedures, (ii) in oversight of the creation and maintenance by the principal underwriters of the Invesco Funds of an effective distribution and marketing system to build and maintain an adequate asset base and to create and maintain economies of scale for the Invesco Funds, (iii) in the review of existing distribution arrangements for the Invesco Funds under Rule 12b-1 and Section 15 of the 1940 Act, and (iv) in the oversight of proxy voting on portfolio securities of the Invesco Funds; and (b) to make regular reports to the full Boards of the Invesco Funds.

The Valuation, Distribution and Proxy Oversight Committee is responsible for: (a) with regard to valuation, (i) developing an understanding of the valuation process and the Pricing Procedures, (ii) reviewing the Pricing Procedures and making recommendations to the full Board with respect thereto, (iii) reviewing the reports described in the Pricing Procedures and other information from Invesco Ltd. regarding fair value determinations made pursuant to the Pricing Procedures by Invesco’s internal valuation committee and making reports and recommendations to the full Board with respect thereto, (iv) receiving the reports of Invesco’s internal valuation committee requesting approval of any changes to pricing vendors or pricing methodologies as required by the Pricing Procedures and the annual report of Invesco Ltd. evaluating the pricing vendors, approving changes to pricing vendors and pricing methodologies as provided in the Pricing Procedures, and recommending annually the pricing vendors for approval by the full Board; (v) upon request of Invesco, assisting Invesco’s internal valuation committee or the full Board in resolving particular fair valuation issues; (vi) reviewing the reports described in the Procedures for Determining the Liquidity of Securities (the “Liquidity Procedures”) and other information from Invesco regarding liquidity determinations made pursuant to the Liquidity Procedures by Invesco and making reports and recommendations to the full Board with respect thereto, and (vii) overseeing actual or potential conflicts of interest by investment personnel or others that could affect their input or recommendations regarding pricing or liquidity issues; (b) with regard to distribution; (b) with regard to distribution and marketing, (i) developing an understanding of mutual fund distribution and marketing channels and legal, regulatory and market developments regarding distribution, (ii) reviewing periodic distribution and marketing determinations and annual approval of distribution arrangements and making reports and recommendations to the full Board with respect thereto, and (iii) reviewing other information from the principal underwriters to the Invesco Funds regarding distribution and marketing of the Invesco Funds and making recommendations to the full Board with respect thereto; and (c) with regard to proxy voting, (i) overseeing the implementation of the Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) and the Proxy Policies and Procedures (the “Proxy Procedures”) by Invesco Ltd. and the Sub-Advisers, reviewing the Quarterly Proxy Voting Report and making recommendations to the full Board with respect thereto, (ii) reviewing the Guidelines and the Proxy Procedures and information provided by Invesco and the Sub-Advisers regarding industry developments and best practices in connection with proxy voting and making recommendations to the full Board with respect thereto, and (iii) in implementing its responsibilities in this area, assisting Invesco Ltd. in resolving particular proxy voting issues. The Valuation, Distribution and Proxy Oversight Committee was formed effective January 1, 2008. It succeeded the Valuation Committee which existed prior to 2008. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Valuation, Distribution and Proxy Oversight Committee met six times.

Trustee Ownership of Fund Shares

The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each trustee (i) in the Funds and (ii) on an aggregate basis, in all registered investment companies overseen by the trustee within the Invesco Funds complex, is set forth in Appendix C.

Compensation

Each trustee who is not affiliated with Invesco is compensated for his or her services according to a fee schedule that recognizes the fact that such trustee also serves as a trustee of other Invesco Funds. Each such trustee receives a fee, allocated among the Invesco Funds for which he or she serves as a trustee that consists of an annual retainer component and a meeting fee component. The Chair of the Board and Chairs and Vice Chairs of certain committees receive additional compensation for their services. Information regarding compensation paid or accrued for each trustee of the Trust who was not

 

57


affiliated with Invesco during the year ended December 31, 2013 is found in Appendix D. Appendix D also provides information regarding compensation paid to Russell Burk, the Funds Senior Vice President and Senior Officer, during the year ended December 31, 2013.

Retirement Plan For Trustees

The Trustees have adopted a retirement plan funded by the Invesco Funds for the Trustees who are not affiliated with the Adviser. The Trustees also have adopted a retirement policy that permits each non-Invesco-affiliated Trustee to serve until December 31 of the year in which the Trustee turns 75. A majority of the Trustees may extend from time to time the retirement date of a Trustee.

Annual retirement benefits are available from the Funds and/or the other Invesco Funds for which a Trustee serves (each, a “Covered Fund”), for each Trustee who is not an employee or officer of the Adviser, who either (a) became a Trustee prior to December 1, 2008, and who has at least five years of credited service as a Trustee (including service to a predecessor fund) of a Covered Fund, or (b) was a member of the Board of Trustees of a Van Kampen Fund immediately prior to June 1, 2010 (“Former Van Kampen Trustee”), and has at least one year of credited service as a Trustee of a Covered Fund after June 1, 2010.

For Trustees other than Former Van Kampen Trustees, effective January 1, 2006, for retirements after December 31, 2005, the retirement benefits will equal 75% of the Trustee’s annual retainer paid to or accrued by any Covered Fund with respect to such Trustee during the twelve-month period prior to retirement, including the amount of any retainer deferred under a separate deferred compensation agreement between the Covered Fund and the Trustee. The amount of the annual retirement benefit does not include additional compensation paid for Board meeting fees or compensation paid to the Chair of the Board and the Chairs and Vice Chairs of certain Board committees, whether such amounts are paid directly to the Trustee or deferred. The annual retirement benefit is payable in quarterly installments for a number of years equal to the lesser of (i) sixteen years or (ii) the number of such Trustee’s credited years of service. If a Trustee dies prior to receiving the full amount of retirement benefits, the remaining payments will be made to the deceased Trustee’s designated beneficiary for the same length of time that the Trustee would have received the payments based on his or her service or, if the Trustee has elected, in a discounted lump sum payment. A Trustee must have attained the age of 65 (60 in the event of death or disability) to receive any retirement benefit. A Trustee may make an irrevocable election to commence payment of retirement benefits upon retirement from the Board before age 72; in such a case, the annual retirement benefit is subject to a reduction for early payment.

If the Former Van Kampen Trustee completes at least 10 years of credited service after June 1, 2010, the retirement benefit will equal 75% of the Former Van Kampen Trustee’s annual retainer paid to or accrued by any Covered Fund with respect to such Trustee during the twelve-month period prior to retirement, including the amount of any retainer deferred under a separate deferred compensation agreement between the Covered Fund and such Trustee. The amount of the annual retirement benefit does not include additional compensation paid for Board meeting fees or compensation paid to the Chair of the Board and the Chairs and Vice Chairs of certain Board committees, whether such amounts are paid directly to the Trustee or deferred. The annual retirement benefit is payable in quarterly installments for 10 years beginning after the later of the Former Van Kampen Trustee’s termination of service or attainment of age 72 (or age 60 in the event of disability or immediately in the event of death). If a Former Van Kampen Trustee dies prior to receiving the full amount of retirement benefits, the remaining payments will be made to the deceased Trustee’s designated beneficiary or, if the Trustee has elected, in a discounted lump sum payment.

If the Former Van Kampen Trustee completes less than 10 years of credited service after June 1, 2010, the retirement benefit will be payable at the applicable time described in the preceding paragraph, but will be paid in two components successively. For the period of time equal to the Former Van Kampen Trustee’s years of credited service after June 1, 2010, the first component of the annual retirement benefit will equal 75% of the compensation amount described in the preceding paragraph. Thereafter, for the period of time equal to the Former Van Kampen Trustee’s years of credited service after June 1, 2010, the second component of the annual retirement benefit will equal the excess of (x) 75% of the

 

58


compensation amount described in the preceding paragraph, over (y) $68,041 plus an interest factor of 4% per year compounded annually measured from June 1, 2010 through the first day of each year for which payments under this second component are to be made. In no event, however, will the retirement benefits under the two components be made for a period of time greater than 10 years. For example, if the Former Van Kampen Trustee completes 7 years of credited service after June 1, 2010, he or she will receive 7 years of payments under the first component and thereafter 3 years of payments under the second component, and if the Former Van Kampen Trustee completes 4 years of credited service after June 1, 2010, he or she will receive 4 years of payments under the first component and thereafter 4 years of payments under the second component.

Deferred Compensation Agreements

Edward K. Dunn and Carl Frishling (former Trustees of funds in the Invesco Funds complex), Messrs. Crockett and Fields, and Drs. Mathai-Davis and Soll (for purposes of this paragraph only, the “Deferring Trustees”) have each executed a Deferred Compensation Agreement (collectively, the “Compensation Agreements”). Pursuant to the Compensation Agreements, the Deferring Trustees have the option to elect to defer receipt of up to 100% of their compensation payable by the Funds, and such amounts are placed into a deferral account and deemed to be invested in one or more Invesco Funds selected by the Deferring Trustees.

Distributions from these deferral accounts will be paid in cash, generally in equal quarterly installments over a period of up to ten (10) years (depending on the Compensation Agreement) beginning on the date selected under the Compensation Agreement. If a Deferring Trustee dies prior to the distribution of amounts in his or her deferral account, the balance of the deferral account will be distributed to his or her designated beneficiary. The Compensation Agreements are not funded and, with respect to the payments of amounts held in the deferral accounts, the Deferring Trustees have the status of unsecured creditors of the Funds and of each other Invesco Fund from which they are deferring compensation.

Code of Ethics

Invesco, the Trust, Invesco Distributors and the Sub-Advisers each have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all Invesco Fund trustees and officers, and employees of Invesco, the Sub-Advisers and their affiliates, and governs, among other things, the personal trading activities of all such persons. Unless specifically noted, each Sub-Advisers’ Codes of Ethics do not materially differ from Invesco Code of Ethics discussed below. The Code of Ethics is intended to address conflicts of interest with the Trust that may arise from personal trading, including personal trading in most of the Invesco Funds. Personal trading, including personal trading involving securities that may be purchased or held by an Invesco Fund, is permitted under the Code of Ethics subject to certain restrictions; however, employees are required to pre-clear security transactions with the Compliance Officer or a designee and to report transactions on a regular basis.

Proxy Voting Policies

Invesco has adopted its own specific Proxy Voting Policies.

The Board has delegated responsibility for decisions regarding proxy voting for securities held by each Fund to the following Adviser/Sub-Adviser(s):

 

FUND NAME    Adviser/Sub-Adviser
Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.

 

59


FUND NAME    Adviser/Sub-Adviser
Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Technology Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.
Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund    Invesco Advisers, Inc.

Invesco (the Proxy Voting Entity). The Proxy Voting Entity will vote such proxies in accordance with the proxy policies and procedures as outlined above, which have been reviewed and approved by the Board, and which are found in Appendix E. Any material changes to the proxy policies and procedures will be submitted to the Board for approval. The Board will be supplied with a summary quarterly report of each Fund’s proxy voting record. Information regarding how the Funds voted proxies related to their portfolio securities during the 12 months ended June 30, 2013 is available without charge at our web site, www.invesco.com /us. This information is also available at the SEC website, http://www.sec.gov .

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES

Information about the ownership of each class of the Funds’ shares by beneficial or record owners of such Fund and by trustees and officers as a group is found in Appendix F. A shareholder who owns beneficially 25% or more of the outstanding shares of a Fund is presumed to “control” that Fund.

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES

Investment Adviser

Invesco serves as the Funds’ investment adviser. The Adviser managers the investment operations of the Funds as well as other investment portfolios that encompass a broad range of investment objectives, and has agreed to perform or arrange for the performance of the Funds’ day-to-day management. The Adviser, as successor in interest to multiple investment advisers, has been an investment adviser since 1976. Invesco is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. Invesco Ltd. and its subsidiaries are an independent global investment management group. Certain of the directors and officers of Invesco are also executive officers of the Trust and their affiliations are shown under “Management Information” herein.

As investment adviser, Invesco supervises all aspects of the Funds’ operations and provides investment advisory services to the Funds. Invesco obtains and evaluates economic, statistical and financial information to formulate and implement investment programs for the Funds. The Master Investment Advisory Agreement (Advisory Agreement) provides that, in fulfilling its responsibilities, Invesco may engage the services of other investment managers with respect to one or more of the Funds. The investment advisory services of Invesco are not exclusive and Invesco is free to render investment advisory services to others, including other investment companies.

Pursuant to an administrative services agreement with the Funds, Invesco is also responsible for furnishing to the Funds, at Invesco’s expense, the services of persons believed to be competent to perform all supervisory and administrative services required by the Funds, which in the judgment of the trustees, are necessary to conduct the respective businesses of the Funds effectively, as well as the offices, equipment and other facilities necessary for their operations. Such functions include the maintenance of each Fund’s accounts and records, and the preparation of all requisite corporate documents such as tax returns and reports to the SEC and shareholders.

The Advisory Agreement provides that each Fund will pay or cause to be paid all expenses of such Fund not assumed by Invesco, including, without limitation: brokerage commissions, taxes, legal,

 

60


auditing or governmental fees, custodian, transfer and shareholder service agent costs, expenses of issue, sale, redemption, and repurchase of shares, expenses of registering and qualifying shares for sale, expenses relating to trustee and shareholder meetings, the cost of preparing and distributing reports and notices to shareholders, the fees and other expenses incurred by the Trust on behalf of each Fund in connection with membership in investment company organizations, and the cost of printing copies of prospectuses and statements of additional information distributed to the Funds’ shareholders.

Invesco, at its own expense, furnishes to the Trust office space and facilities. Invesco furnishes to the Trust all personnel for managing the affairs of the Trust and each of its series of shares.

Pursuant to its Advisory Agreement with the Trust, Invesco receives a monthly fee from each Fund calculated at the annual rates indicated in the second column below, based on the average daily net assets of each Fund during the year. Each Fund allocates advisory fees to a class based on the relative net assets of each class.

 

Fund Name

  

Annual Rate/Net Assets Per Advisory Agreement

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

  

0.95% of the first $250 million

0.925% of the next $250 million

0.90% of the next $500 million

0.875% of the next $1.5 billion

0.85% of the next $2.5 billion

0.825% of the next $2.5 billion

0.80% of the next $2.5 billion

0.775% of the excess over $10 billion

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

  

0.65% of the first $250 million

0.60% of the excess over $250 million

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

  

0.60% of the first $250 million

0.55% of the excess over $250 million

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

  

0.75% of the first $250 million

0.74% of the next $250 million

0.73% of the next $500 million

0.72% of the next $1.5 billion

0.71% of the next $2.5 billion

0.70% of the next $2.5 billion

0.69% of the next $2.5 billion

0.68% of the excess over $10 billion

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

  

0.75% of the first $250 million

0.74% of the next $250 million

0.73% of the next $500 million

0.72% of the next $1.5 billion

0.71% of the next $2.5 billion

0.70% of the next $2.5 billion

0.69% of the next $2.5 billion

0.68% of the excess over $10 billion

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

  

0.50% of the first $250 million

0.45% of the excess over $250 million

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

  

0.625% of the first $200 million

0.55% of the next $300 million

0.50% of the next $500 million

0.45% of the excess over $1 billion

 

61


Fund Name

  

Annual Rate/Net Assets Per Advisory Agreement

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

  

0.75% of the first $250 million

0.70% of the excess over $250 million

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

       % of average daily net assets

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

  

0.725% of the first $500 million

0.700% of the next $500 million

0.675% of the next $500 million

0.65% of the excess over $1.5 billion

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

  

0.40% of the first $250 million

0.35% of the excess over $250 million

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

  

0.745% of the first $250 million

0.73% of the next $250 million

0.715% of the next $500 million

0.70% of the next $1.5 billion

0.685% of the next $2.5 billion

0.67% of the next $2.5 billion

0.655% of the next $2.5 billion

0.64% of the excess over $10 billion

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

  

0.75% of the first $250 million

0.74% of the next $250 million

0.73% of the next $500 million

0.72% of the next $1.5 billion

0.71% of the next $2.5 billion

0.70% of the next $2.5 billion

0.69% of the next $2.5 billion

0.68% of the excess over $10 billion

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

  

0.695% of the first $250 million

0.67% of the next $250 million

0.645% of the next $500 million

0.62% of the next $1.5 billion

0.595% of the next $2.5 billion

0.57% of the next $2.5 billion

0.545% of the next $2.5 billion

0.52% of the excess over $10 billion

Invesco may from time to time waive or reduce its fee. Voluntary fee waivers or reductions may be rescinded at any time without further notice to investors. During periods of voluntary fee waivers or reductions, Invesco will retain its ability to be reimbursed for such fee prior to the end of the respective fiscal year in which the voluntary fee waiver or reduction was made. Contractual fee waivers or reductions set forth in the Fee Table in a Prospectus may not be terminated or amended to the Funds’ detriment during the period stated in the agreement between Invesco and the Fund.

Invesco has contractually agreed through at least June 30, 2013, to waive advisory fees payable by each Fund in an amount equal to 100% of the advisory fee Invesco receives from the Affiliated Money Market Funds as a result of each Fund’s investment of uninvested cash in the Affiliated Money Market Funds. See “Description of the Funds and Their Investments and Risks – Investment Strategies and Risks – Other Investments – Other Investment Companies.”

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund may pursue its investment objective by investing in the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary has entered into a separate contract with the advisor whereby the advisor provides investment advisory and other services to the Subsidiary. In consideration of these services, the

 

62


Subsidiary pays the Adviser a management fee. The Adviser has contractually agreed to waive the advisory fee it receives from the Fund in an amount equal to the advisory fee and administration fee, respectively, paid to the advisor by the Subsidiary. This waiver may not be terminated by the Adviser and will remain in effect for as long as the Adviser’s contract with the Subsidiary is in place.

Invesco also has contractually agreed to waive advisory fees or reimburse expenses to the extent necessary to limit total annual fund operating expenses (excluding (i) interest; (ii) taxes; (iii) dividend expense on short sales; (iv) extraordinary or non-routine items, including litigation expenses; and (v) expenses that each Fund has incurred but did not actually pay because of an expense offset arrangement) for the following Funds’ shares:

 

Fund

   Expense Limitation  
     Expires
April 30, 2013
    Expires
June 30, 2013
    Expires
April 30, 2014
    Expires
June 30, 2014
 

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

        

Series I

     —          0.72     0.78     —     

Series II

     —          0.97     1.03     —     

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

        

Series I

     1.30     —          —          2.00

Series II

     1.45     —          —          2.25

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

        

Series I

     —          —          0.75     —     

Series II

     —          —          1.00     —     

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

        

Series I

     1.30     —          —          2.00

Series II

     1.45     —          —          2.25

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

        

Series I

     1.30     —          —          2.00

Series II

     1.45     —          —          2.25

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

        

Series I

     0.70     —          —          1.50

Series II

     0.95     —          —          1.75

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

        

Series I

     —          —          0.80     —     

Series II

     —          —          1.05     —     

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

        

Series I

     —          2.25     —          —     

Series II

     —          2.50     —          —     

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

        

Series I

     —                   —          —     

Series II

     —                   —          —     

 

63


Fund

   Expense Limitation  
     Expires
April 30, 2013
    Expires
June 30, 2013
     Expires
April 30, 2014
     Expires
June 30, 2014
 

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

          

Series I

     1.30     —           —           2.00

Series II

     1.45     —           —           2.25

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

          

Series I

     1.30     —           —           1.50

Series II

     1.45     —           —           1.75

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

          

Series I

     1.15     —           —           2.00

Series II

     1.40     —           —           2.25

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

          

Series I

     1.30     —           —           2.00

Series II

     1.45     —           —           2.25

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

          

Series I

     1.30     —           —           2.00

Series II

     1.45     —           —           2.25

The total annual fund operating expenses used in determining whether a fund meets or exceeds the expense limitations described above do not include Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses, which are required to be disclosed and included in the total annual fund operating expenses in a fund’s prospectus fee table. Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are not operating expenses of the Fund directly, but are fees and expenses, including management fees of the investment companies in which the Fund invest. As a result, the Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses After Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement may exceed a Fund’s expense limit.

If applicable, such contractual fee waivers or reductions are set forth in the Fee Table to each Fund’s Prospectus. Unless the Board of Trustees and Invesco mutually agree to amend or terminate the fee waiver agreement, it will terminate on the expiration dates disclosed above.

The management fees payable by each Fund, the amounts waived by Invesco and the net fees paid by each Fund for the last three fiscal years ended December 31 are found in Appendix G.

Investment Sub-Advisers

Invesco has entered into a Sub-Advisory Agreement with certain affiliates to serve as sub-advisers to each Fund, pursuant to which these affiliated sub-advisers may be appointed by Invesco from time to time to provide discretionary investment management services, investment advice, and/or order execution services to the Funds. These affiliated sub-advisers, each of which is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 are:

Invesco Asset Management Deutschland Gmbh (Invesco Deutschland)

Invesco Asset Management Limited (Invesco Asset Management)

Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited (Invesco Japan)

Invesco Australia Limited (Invesco Australia)

Invesco Canada Ltd. (Invesco Canada); (each a Sub-Adviser and collectively, the Sub-Advisers).

Invesco Hong Kong Limited (Invesco Hong Kong)

Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. (Invesco Senior Secured)

Invesco and each Sub-Adviser are indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Invesco Ltd.

 

64


The only fees payable to the Sub-Advisers under the Sub-Advisory Agreement are for providing discretionary investment management services. For such services, Invesco will pay each Sub-Adviser a fee, computed daily and paid monthly, equal to (i) 40% of the monthly compensation that Invesco receives from the Trust, multiplied by (ii) the fraction equal to the net assets of such Fund as to which such Sub-Adviser shall have provided discretionary investment management services for that month divided by the net assets of such Fund for that month. Pursuant to the Sub-Advisory Agreement, this fee is reduced to reflect contractual or voluntary fee waivers or expense limitations by Invesco, if any, in effect from time to time. In no event shall the aggregate monthly fees paid to the Sub-Advisers under the Sub-Advisory Agreement exceed 40% of the monthly compensation that Invesco receives from the Trust pursuant to its advisory agreement with the Trust, as reduced to reflect contractual or voluntary fees waivers or expense limitations by Invesco, if any.

Services to the Subsidiary

As with Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, Invesco is responsible for the Subsidiary’s day-to-day business pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Subsidiary. Under this agreement, Invesco provides the Subsidiary with the same type of management and sub-advisory services, under the same terms and conditions, as are provided to Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund. The advisory agreement of the Subsidiary provides for automatic termination upon the termination of the Advisory Agreement, respectively, with respect to Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund. The Subsidiary has also entered into separate contracts for the provision of custody, transfer agency and audit services with the same service providers that provide those services to Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund.

The Subsidiary will be managed pursuant to compliance policies and procedures that are the same, in all material respects, as the policies and procedures adopted by Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund. As a result, Invesco, in managing the Subsidiary’s portfolios, are subject to the same investment policies and restrictions that apply to the management of Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, and, in particular, to the requirements relating to portfolio leverage, liquidity, brokerage, and the timing and method of the valuation of the Subsidiary’s portfolio investments and shares of the Subsidiary. Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Funds’ Chief Compliance Officer oversees implementation of the Subsidiary’s policies and procedures and makes periodic reports to Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk-Allocation Funds’ Board regarding the Subsidiary’s compliance with its policies and procedures.

Portfolio Managers

Appendix H contains the following information regarding the portfolio managers identified in each Fund’s prospectus:

 

    The dollar range of the managers’ investments in each Fund.

 

    A description of the managers’ compensation structure.

Information regarding other accounts managed by the manager and potential conflicts of interest that might arise from the management of multiple accounts.

Securities Lending Arrangements

If a Fund engages in securities lending, Invesco will provide the Fund investment advisory services and related administrative services. The Advisory Agreement describes the administrative services to be rendered by Invesco if a Fund engages in securities lending activities, as well as the compensation Invesco may receive for such administrative services. Services to be provided include: (a) overseeing participation in the securities lending program to ensure compliance with all applicable regulatory and investment guidelines; (b) assisting the securities lending agent or principal (the agent) in determining which specific securities are available for loan; (c) monitoring the agent to ensure that securities loans are effected in accordance with Invesco’s instructions and with procedures adopted by

 

65


the Board; (d) preparing appropriate periodic reports for, and seeking appropriate approvals from, the Board with respect to securities lending activities; (e) responding to agent inquiries; and (f) performing such other duties as may be necessary.

Invesco’s compensation for advisory services rendered in connection with securities lending is included in the advisory fee schedule. As compensation for the related administrative services Invesco will provide, a lending Fund will pay Invesco a fee equal to 25% of the net monthly interest or fee income retained or paid to the Fund from such activities. Invesco currently waives such fee, and has agreed to seek Board approval prior to its receipt of all or a portion of such fee.

Service Agreements

Administrative Services Agreement. Invesco and the Trust have entered into a Master Administrative Services Agreement (Administrative Services Agreement) pursuant to which Invesco may perform or arrange for the provision of certain accounting and other administrative services to each Fund which are not required to be performed by Invesco under the Advisory Agreement. The Administrative Services Agreement provides that it will remain in effect and continue from year to year only if such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by the Board, including the independent trustees, by votes cast in person at a meeting called for such purpose. Under the Administrative Services Agreement, Invesco is entitled to receive from the Funds reimbursement of its costs or such reasonable compensation as may be approved by the Board. Currently, Invesco is reimbursed for the services of the Trust’s principal financial officer and her staff and any expenses related to fund accounting services.

In addition, Invesco contracts with Participating Insurance Companies to provide certain services related to operations of the Trust. These services may include, among other things: the printing of prospectuses, financial reports and proxy statements and the delivery of the same to existing Contract owners; the maintenance of master accounts; the facilitation of purchases and redemptions requested by Contract owners; and the servicing of Contract owner accounts.

Each Participating Insurance Company negotiates the fees to be paid for the provision of these services. The cost of providing the services and the overall package of services provided may vary from one Participating Insurance Company to another. Invesco does not make an independent assessment of the cost of providing such services.

The Funds agreed to reimburse Invesco for its costs in paying the Participating Insurance Companies that provide these services, currently subject to an annual limit of 0.25% of the average net assets invested in each Fund by each Participating Insurance Company. Any amounts paid by Invesco to a Participating Insurance Company in excess of 0.25% of the average net assets invested in each Fund are paid by Invesco out of its own financial resources.

Administrative services fees paid to Invesco by each Fund for the last three fiscal years ended December 31 are found in Appendix I.

For Invesco V.I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund, an agreement containing the same material, terms and provisions was entered into between Invesco and the Subsidiary.

Other Service Providers

Transfer Agent . Invesco Investment Services, Inc., (Invesco Investment Services), 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77046, a wholly owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd., is the Trust’s transfer agent.

The Transfer Agency and Service Agreement (the TA Agreement) between the Trust and Invesco Investment Services provides that Invesco Investment Services will perform certain services for the Funds. The TA Agreement provides that Invesco Investment Services will receive a per trade fee plus out-of-pocket expenses to process orders for purchases and redemptions of shares; prepare and transmit payments for dividends and distributions declared by the Funds; and maintain shareholder accounts.

 

66


Sub-Transfer Agent . Invesco Canada, 5140 Yonge Street, Suite 800, Toronto, Ontario M2N6X7, a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of Invesco Ltd., provides services to the Trust as a sub-transfer agent, pursuant to an agreement between Invesco Canada and Invesco Investment Services. The Trust does not pay a fee to Invesco Canada for these services. Rather Invesco Canada is compensated by Invesco Investment Services, as a sub-contractor.

For Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, an agreement containing the same material, terms and provisions was entered into between Invesco and the Subsidiary

Custodian . State Street Bank and Trust Company (the Custodian), 225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, is custodian of all securities and cash of the Funds (except Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund). The Bank of New York Mellon, 2 Hanson Place, Brooklyn, New York 11217-1431, is custodian of all securities and cash of Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund. The Bank of New York Mellon also serves as sub-custodian to facilitate cash management.

The custodians are authorized to establish separate accounts in foreign countries and to cause foreign securities owned by the Funds to be held outside the United States in branches of U.S. banks and, to the extent permitted by applicable regulations, in certain foreign banks and securities depositories. Invesco is responsible for selecting eligible foreign securities depositories and for assessing the risks associated with investing in foreign countries, including the risk of using eligible foreign securities’ depositories in a country. The Custodian is responsible for monitoring eligible foreign securities depositories.

Under its contract with the Trust, the Custodian maintains the portfolio securities of the Funds, administers the purchases and sales of portfolio securities, collects interest and dividends and other distributions made on the securities held in the portfolios of the Funds and performs other ministerial duties. These services do not include any supervisory function over management or provide any protection against any possible depreciation of assets.

For Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, an agreement containing the same material terms and provisions was entered into between the Custodian and the Subsidiary.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . The Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the financial statements of the Funds. The Audit Committee of the Board has appointed [                    ], as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the financial statements of the Funds. Such appointment was ratified and approved by the Board.

Counsel to the Trust . Legal matters for the Trust have been passed upon by Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, 2005 Market Street, Suite 2600, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-7018, which also serves as counsel to the Subsidiary.

BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES

The Sub-Advisers have adopted compliance procedures that cover, among other items, brokerage allocation and other trading practices. If all or a portion of a Fund’s assets are managed by one or more Sub-Advisers, the decision to buy and sell securities and broker selection will be made by the Sub-Adviser for the assets it manages. Unless specifically noted, the Sub-Advisers brokerage allocation procedures do not materially differ from Invesco’s procedures. The same procedures also apply to the Subsidiary.

Brokerage Transactions

Placing trades generally involves acting on portfolio manager instructions to buy or sell a specified amount of portfolio securities, including selecting one or more broker-dealers, including affiliated and third-party broker-dealers to execute the trades, and negotiating commissions and spreads. Various

 

67


Invesco Ltd. subsidiaries have created a global equity trading desk. The global equity trading desk has assigned local traders in six primary trading centers to place equity securities trades in their regions. Invesco Advisers’ Americas desk, located in Atlanta, Houston and Toronto, generally places trades of equity securities trading in North America, Canada and Latin America; the Hong Kong desk of Invesco Hong Kong (the Hong Kong Desk) generally places trades of equity securities in the Asia-Pacific markets, except Japan; the Japan trading desk of Invesco Japan generally placed trades of equity securities in the Japanese markets, the London trading desk of Invesco Global Investment Funds Limited (the London Desk) generally places trades of equity securities in European, Middle Eastern and African countries; the Australian desk, located in Sydney and Melbourne, for the execution of orders of equity securities trading in the Australian and New Zealand markets and the Taipei desk, located in Taipei, for the execution of orders of securities trading in Chinese market. Invesco, Invesco Canada, Invesco Australia, Invesco Japan, Invesco Deutschland, Invesco Hong Kong and Invesco Asset Management use the global equity trading desk to place equity trades. Other Sub-Advisers may use the global equity trading desk in the future. The trading procedures for the global trading desks are similar in all material respects.

References in the language below to actions by Invesco or a Sub-Adviser (other than Invesco Canada or Invesco Japan) making determinations or taking actions related to equity trading include these entities’ delegation of these determinations/actions to the Americas Desk, the Hong Kong Desk, and the London Desk. Even when trading is delegated by Invesco or the Sub-Adviser to the various arms of the global equity trading desk, Invesco or the Sub-Adviser that delegates trading is responsible for oversight of this trading activity.

Invesco or the Sub-Advisers make decisions to buy and sell securities for each Fund, selects broker-dealers (each, a Broker), effects the Funds’ investment portfolio transactions, allocates brokerage fees in such transactions and, where applicable, negotiates commissions and spreads on transactions. Invesco’s and the Sub-Advisers’ primary consideration in effecting a security transaction is to obtain best execution, which is defined as prompt and efficient execution of the transaction at the best obtainable price with payment of commissions, mark-ups or mark-downs which are reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage services provided by the Broker. While Invesco or the Sub-Advisers seek reasonably competitive commission rates, the Funds may not pay the lowest commission or spread available. See “Broker Selection” below.

Some of the securities in which the Funds invest are traded in over-the-counter markets. Portfolio transactions in such markets may be effected on a principal basis at net prices without commissions, but which include compensation to the Broker in the form of a mark-up or mark-down, or on an agency basis, which involves the payment of negotiated brokerage commissions to the Broker, including electronic communication networks. Purchases of underwritten issues, which include initial public offerings and secondary offerings, include a commission or concession paid by the issuer (not the Funds) to the underwriter. Purchases of money market instruments may be made directly from issuers without the payment of commissions.

Historically, Invesco and the Sub-Advisers did not negotiate commission rates on stock markets outside the United States. In recent years many overseas stock markets have adopted a system of negotiated rates; however, a number of markets maintain an established schedule of minimum commission rates.

In some cases, Invesco may decide to place trades on a “blind principal bid” basis, which involves combining all trades for one or more portfolios into a single basket, and generating a description of the characteristics of the basket for provision to potential executing brokers. Based on the trade characteristics information provided by Invesco, these brokers submit bids for executing all of the required trades at the market close price for a specific commission. Invesco generally selects the broker with the lowest bid to execute these trades.

Brokerage commissions paid by each of the Fund’s during the last three fiscal years ended December 31 are found in Appendix J.

 

68


Commissions

The Funds may engage in certain principal and agency transactions with banks and their affiliates that own 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of an Invesco Fund, provided the conditions of an exemptive order received by the Invesco Funds from the SEC are met. In addition, a Fund may purchase or sell a security from or to certain other Invesco Funds or other accounts (and may invest in the Affiliated Money Market Funds) provided the Funds follow procedures adopted by the Boards of the various Invesco Funds, including the Trust. These inter-fund transactions do not generate brokerage commissions but may result in custodial fees or taxes or other related expenses.

Broker Selection

Invesco’s or the Sub-Adviser’s primary consideration in selecting Brokers to execute portfolio transactions for a Fund is to obtain best execution. In selecting a Broker to execute a portfolio transaction in equity securities for a Fund, Invesco or the Sub-Advisers consider the full range and quality of a Broker’s services, including the value of research and/or brokerage services provided, execution capability, commission rate, and willingness to commit capital, anonymity and responsiveness. Invesco’s and the Sub-Advisers’ primary consideration when selecting a Broker to execute a portfolio transaction in fixed income securities for a Fund is the Broker’s ability to deliver or sell the relevant fixed income securities; however, Invesco and the Sub-Advisers will also consider the various factors listed above. In each case, the determinative factor is not the lowest commission or spread available but whether the transaction represents the best qualitative execution for the Fund. Invesco and the Sub-Advisers will not select Brokers based upon their promotion or sale of Fund shares.

In choosing Brokers to execute portfolio transactions for the Funds, Invesco or the Sub-Advisers may select Brokers that provide brokerage and/or research services (Soft Dollar Products) to the Funds and/or the other accounts over which Invesco and its affiliates have investment discretion. Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provides that Invesco or the Sub-Advisers, under certain circumstances, lawfully may cause an account to pay a higher commission than the lowest available. Under Section 28(e)(1), Invesco or the Sub-Advisers must make a good faith determination that the commissions paid are “reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided … viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or [Invesco’s or the Sub-Advisers’] overall responsibilities with respect to the accounts as to which [it] exercises investment discretion.” The services provided by the Broker also must lawfully and appropriately assist Invesco or the Sub-Advisers in the performance of its investment decision-making responsibilities. Accordingly, a Fund may pay a Broker commissions higher than those available from another Broker in recognition of the Broker’s provision of Soft Dollar Products to Invesco or the Sub-Advisers.

Invesco and the Sub-Advisers face a potential conflict of interest when they use client trades to obtain Soft Dollar Products. This conflict exists because Invesco and the Sub-Advisers are able to use the Soft Dollar Products to manage client accounts without paying cash for the Soft Dollar Products, which reduces Invesco’s or the Sub-Adviser’s expenses to the extent that Invesco or the Sub-Adviser would have purchased such products had they not been provided by Brokers. Section 28(e) permits Invesco or the Sub-Advisers to use Soft Dollar Products for the benefit of any account it manages. Certain Invesco-managed accounts (or accounts managed by the Sub-Advisers) may generate soft dollars used to purchase Soft Dollar Products that ultimately benefit other Invesco Advisers, Inc.-managed accounts (or Sub-Adviser-managed accounts), effectively cross subsidizing the other Invesco-managed accounts (or the other Sub-Adviser-managed accounts) that benefit directly from the product. Invesco or the Sub-Advisers may not use all of the Soft Dollar Products provided by Brokers through which a Fund effects securities transactions in connection with managing the Fund whose trades generated the soft dollars used to purchase such products.

Invesco presently engages in the following instances of cross-subsidization:

Fixed income funds normally do not generate soft dollar commissions to pay for Soft Dollar Products. Therefore, soft dollar commissions used to pay for Soft Dollar Products which are used to manage certain fixed income Invesco Funds are generated entirely by equity Invesco Funds and other

 

69


equity client accounts managed by Invesco. In other words, certain fixed income Invesco Funds are cross-subsidized by the equity Invesco Funds in that the fixed income Invesco Funds receive the benefit of Soft Dollar Products services for which they do not pay. Similarly, other accounts managed by Invesco or certain of its affiliates may benefit from Soft Dollar Products services for which they do not pay.

Invesco and the Sub-Advisers attempt to reduce or eliminate the potential conflicts of interest concerning the use of Soft Dollar Products by directing client trades for Soft Dollar Products only if Invesco or the Sub-Advisers conclude that the Broker supplying the product is capable of providing best execution.

Certain Soft Dollar Products may be available directly from a vendor on a hard dollar basis; other Soft Dollar Products are available only through Brokers in exchange for soft dollars. Invesco and the Sub-Advisers use soft dollars to purchase two types of Soft Dollar Products:

 

    proprietary research created by the Broker executing the trade, and

 

    other products created by third parties that are supplied to Invesco or the Sub-Advisers through the Broker executing the trade.

Proprietary research consists primarily of traditional research reports, recommendations and similar materials produced by the in-house research staffs of broker-dealer firms. This research includes evaluations and recommendations of specific companies or industry groups, as well as analyses of general economic and market conditions and trends, market data, contacts and other related information and assistance. Invesco periodically rates the quality of proprietary research produced by various Brokers. Based on the evaluation of the quality of information that Invesco receives from each Broker, Invesco develops an estimate of each Broker’s share of Invesco clients’ commission dollars and attempts to direct trades to these firms to meet these estimates.

Invesco and the Sub-Advisers also use soft dollars to acquire products from third parties that are supplied to Invesco or the Sub-Advisers through Brokers executing the trades or other Brokers who “step in” to a transaction and receive a portion of the brokerage commission for the trade. Invesco or the Sub-Advisers may from time to time instruct the executing Broker to allocate or “step out” a portion of a transaction to another Broker. The Broker to which Invesco or the Sub-Advisers have “stepped out” would then settle and complete the designated portion of the transaction, and the executing Broker would settle and complete the remaining portion of the transaction that has not been “stepped out.” Each Broker may receive a commission or brokerage fee with respect to that portion of the transaction that it settles and completes.

Soft Dollar Products received from Brokers supplement Invesco’s and or the Sub-Advisers’ own research (and the research of certain of its affiliates), and may include the following types of products and services:

 

    Database Services – comprehensive databases containing current and/or historical information on companies and industries and indices. Examples include historical securities prices, earnings estimates and financial data. These services may include software tools that allow the user to search the database or to prepare value-added analyses related to the investment process (such as forecasts and models used in the portfolio management process).

 

    Quotation/Trading/News Systems – products that provide real time market data information, such as pricing of individual securities and information on current trading, as well as a variety of news services.

 

    Economic Data/Forecasting Tools – various macro economic forecasting tools, such as economic data or currency and political forecasts for various countries or regions.

 

    Quantitative/Technical Analysis – software tools that assist in quantitative and technical analysis of investment data.

 

    Fundamental/Industry Analysis – industry specific fundamental investment research.

 

    Other Specialized Tools – other specialized products, such as consulting analyses, access to industry experts, and distinct investment expertise such as forensic accounting or custom built investment-analysis software.

 

70


If Invesco or the Sub-Advisers determines that any service or product has a mixed use (i.e., it also serves functions that do not assist the investment decision-making or trading process), Invesco or the Sub-Advisers will allocate the costs of such service or product accordingly in its reasonable discretion. Invesco or the Sub-Advisers will allocate brokerage commissions to Brokers only for the portion of the service or product that Invesco or the Sub-Advisers determine assists it in the investment decision-making or trading process and will pay for the remaining value of the product or service in cash.

Outside research assistance is useful to Invesco or the Sub-Advisers because the Brokers used by Invesco or the Sub-Advisers tend to provide more in-depth analysis of a broader universe of securities and other matters than Invesco’s or the Sub-Advisers’ staff follows. In addition, such services provide Invesco or the Sub-Advisers with a diverse perspective on financial markets. Some Brokers may indicate that the provision of research services is dependent upon the generation of certain specified levels of commissions and underwriting concessions by Invesco’s or the Sub-Advisers’ clients, including the Funds. However, the Funds are not under any obligation to deal with any Broker in the execution of transactions in portfolio securities. In some cases, Soft Dollar Products are available only from the Broker providing them. In other cases, Soft Dollar Products may be obtainable from alternative sources in return for cash payments. Invesco and the Sub-Advisers believe that because Broker research supplements rather than replaces Invesco’s or the Sub-Advisers’ research, the receipt of such research tends to improve the quality of Invesco’s or the Sub-Advisers’ investment advice. The advisory fee paid by the Funds is not reduced because Invesco or the Sub-Advisers receive such services. To the extent the Funds’ portfolio transactions are used to obtain Soft Dollar Products, the brokerage commissions obtained by the Funds might exceed those that might otherwise have been paid.

Invesco or the Sub-Advisers may determine target levels of brokerage business with various Brokers on behalf of its clients (including the Funds) over a certain time period. Invesco determines target levels based upon the following factors, among others: (1) the execution services provided by the Broker; and (2) the research services provided by the Broker. Portfolio transactions may be effected through Brokers that recommend the Funds to their clients, or that act as agent in the purchase of a Fund’s shares for their clients, provided that Invesco or the Sub-Advisers believe such Brokers provide best execution and such transactions are executed in compliance with Invesco’s policy against using directed brokerage to compensate Brokers for promoting or selling Invesco Fund shares. Invesco and the Sub-Advisers will not enter into a binding commitment with Brokers to place trades with such Brokers involving brokerage commissions in precise amounts.

Directed Brokerage (Research Services)

Directed brokerage (research services) paid by each of the Funds during the last fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 are found in Appendix K.

Affiliated Transactions

Invesco may place trades with Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (ICMI), a broker-dealer with whom it is under common control, provided Invesco determines that the affiliate’s trade execution abilities and costs are at least comparable to those of non-affiliated brokerage firms with which Invesco could otherwise place similar trades. ICMI receives brokerage commissions in connection with effecting trades for the Funds and, therefore, use of ICMI presents a conflict of interest for Invesco. Trades placed through ICMI, including the brokerage commissions paid to ICMI, are subject to procedures adopted by the Boards of the various Invesco Funds, including the Trust.

Brokerage commission on affiliated transactions paid by the Funds during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, are found in Appendix J.

 

71


Regular Brokers

Information concerning the Funds’ acquisition of securities of their Brokers during the last fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 is found in Appendix K.

Allocation of Portfolio Transactions

Invesco and the Sub-Advisers manage numerous Invesco Funds and other accounts. Some of these accounts may have investment objectives similar to the Funds. Occasionally, identical securities will be appropriate for investment by one of the Funds and by another Fund or one or more other accounts. However, the position of each account in the same security and the length of time that each account may hold its investment in the same security may vary. Invesco and the Sub-Adviser will also determine the timing and amount of purchases for an account based on its cash position. If the purchase or sale of securities is consistent with the investment policies of the Fund(s) and one or more other accounts, and is considered at or about the same time, Invesco or the Sub-Adviser will allocate transactions in such securities among the Fund(s) and these accounts on a pro rata basis based on order size or in such other manner believed by Invesco to be fair and equitable. Invesco or the Sub-Adviser may combine transactions in accordance with applicable laws and regulations to obtain the most favorable execution. Simultaneous transactions could, however, adversely affect a Fund’s ability to obtain or dispose of the full amount of a security which it seeks to purchase or sell.

Allocation of Initial Public Offering (IPO) Transactions

Certain of the Invesco Funds or other accounts managed by Invesco may become interested in participating in IPOs. Purchases of IPOs by one Invesco Fund or other accounts may also be considered for purchase by one or more other Invesco Funds or accounts. Invesco combines indications of interest for IPOs for all Invesco Funds and accounts participating in purchase transactions for that IPO. When the full amount of all IPO orders for such Invesco Funds and accounts cannot be filled completely, Invesco shall allocate such transactions in accordance with the following procedures:

Invesco or the Sub-Adviser may determine the eligibility of each Invesco Fund and account that seeks to participate in a particular IPO by reviewing a number of factors, including market capitalization/liquidity suitability and sector/style suitability of the investment with the Invesco Fund’s or account’s investment objective, policies, strategies and current holdings. Invesco will allocate securities issued in IPOs to eligible Invesco Funds and accounts on a pro rata basis based on order size.

Invesco Canada, Invesco Australia, Invesco Hong Kong and Invesco Japan allocate IPOs on a pro rata basis based on size of order or in such other manner which they believe is fair and equitable.

Invesco Asset Management allocates IPOs on a pro rata basis based on account size or in such other manner believed by Invesco Asset Management to be fair and equitable.

Invesco Deutschland and Invesco Senior Secured do not subscribe to IPOs.

PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF SHARES

The Trust offers the shares of the Funds, on a continuous basis, to both registered and unregistered separate accounts of affiliated and unaffiliated Participating Insurance Companies to fund variable annuity contracts (the Contracts) and variable life insurance policies (Policies). Each separate account contains divisions, each of which corresponds to a Fund in the Trust. Net purchase payments under the Contracts are placed in one or more of the divisions of the relevant separate account and the assets of each division are invested in the shares of the Fund which corresponds to that division. Each separate account purchases and redeems shares of these Funds for its divisions at net asset value without sales or redemption charges. Currently several insurance company separate accounts invest in the Funds.

 

72


The Trust, in the future, may offer the shares of its Funds to certain pension and retirement plans (Plans) qualified under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The relationships of Plans and Plan participants to the Fund would be subject, in part, to the provisions of the individual plans and applicable law. Accordingly, such relationships could be different from those described in this Prospectus for separate accounts and owners of Contracts and Policies, in such areas, for example, as tax matters and voting privileges.

The Board monitors for possible conflicts among separate accounts (and will do so for plans) buying shares of the Funds. Conflicts could develop for a variety of reasons. For example, violation of the federal tax laws by one separate account investing in a Fund could cause the contracts or policies funded through another separate account to lose their tax-deferred status, unless remedial actions were taken. For example, differences in treatment under tax and other laws or the failure by a separate account to comply with such laws could cause a conflict. To eliminate a conflict, the Board may require a separate account or Plan to withdraw its participation in a Fund. A Fund’s net asset value could decrease if it had to sell investment securities to pay redemptions proceeds to a separate account (or plan) withdrawing because of a conflict.

Calculation of Net Asset Value

For Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund: The net asset value per share of the Fund is determined daily as of 12:00 noon and the close of the customary trading session of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on each business day of the Fund. In the event the NYSE closes early (i.e. before 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on a particular day, the net asset value of the Fund is determined as of the close of the NYSE on such day. Net asset value per share is determined by dividing the value of the Fund’s securities, cash and other assets (including interest accrued but not collected) attributable to a particular class, less all of its liabilities (including accrued expenses and dividends payable) attributable to that class, by the number of shares outstanding of that class and rounding the resulting per share net asset value to the nearest one cent. Determination of the net asset value per share is made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The Fund uses the amortized cost method to determine its net asset value. Under the amortized cost method, each investment is valued at its cost and thereafter any discount or premium is amortized on a constant basis to maturity. While this method provides certainty of valuation, it may result in periods in which the amortized cost value of the Fund’s investments is higher or lower than the price that would be received if the investments were sold. During periods of declining interest rates, use by the Fund of the amortized cost method of valuing its portfolio may result in a lower value than the market value of the portfolio, which could be an advantage to new investors relative to existing shareholders. The converse would apply in a period of rising interest rates.

The Fund may use the amortized cost method to determine its net asset value so long as the Fund does not (a) purchase any instrument with a remaining maturity greater than 397 days (for these purposes, repurchase agreements shall not be deemed to involve the purchase by the Fund of the securities pledged as collateral in connection with such agreements) or (b) maintain a dollar-weighted average portfolio maturity in excess of 90 days, and otherwise complies with the terms of rules adopted by the SEC.

The Board has established procedures designed to stabilize the Fund’s net asset value per share at $1.00, to the extent reasonably possible. Such procedures include review of portfolio holdings by the trustees at such intervals as they may deem appropriate. The reviews are used to determine whether net asset value, calculated by using available market quotations, deviates from $1.00 per share and, if so, whether such deviation may result in material dilution or is otherwise unfair to investors or existing shareholders. In the event the trustees determine that a material deviation exists, they intend to take such corrective action as they deem necessary and appropriate. Such actions may include selling portfolio securities prior to maturity in order to realize capital gains or losses or to shorten average portfolio maturity, withholding dividends, redeeming shares in kind, or establishing a net asset value per share by using available market quotations, in which case the net asset value could possibly be more or less than $1.00 per share. Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund intends to comply with any amendments made to Rule 2a-7 which may require corresponding changes in the Fund’s procedures which are designed to stabilize the Fund’s price per share at $1.00.

 

73


Under the amortized cost method, each investment is valued at its cost and thereafter any discount or premium is amortized on a constant basis to maturity. While this method provides certainty of valuation, it may result in periods in which the amortized cost value of the Fund’s investments is higher or lower than the price that would be received if the investments were sold.

For All Other Funds: Each Fund determines its net asset value per share once daily as of the close of the customary trading session of the NYSE (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on each business day of the Fund. In the event the NYSE closes early (i.e., before 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on a particular day, each Fund determines its net asset value per share as of the close of the NYSE on such day. For purposes of determining net asset value per share, futures and option contracts generally will be valued 15 minutes after the close of the customary trading session of the NYSE. Futures contracts are valued at the final settlement price set by an exchange on which they are principally traded. Listed options are valued at the mean between the last bid and the ask prices from the exchange on which they are principally traded. Options not listed on an exchange are valued by an independent source at the mean between the last bid and ask prices. The Funds determine net asset value per share by dividing the value of a Fund’s securities, cash and other assets (including interest accrued but not collected) attributable to a particular class, less all its liabilities (including accrued expenses and dividends payable) attributable to that class, by the total number of shares outstanding of that class. Determination of a Fund’s net asset value per share is made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The net asset value for shareholder transactions may be different than the net asset value reported in the Fund’s financial statements due to adjustments required by generally accepted accounting principles made to the net assets of the Fund at period end.

Investments in open-end and closed-end registered investment companies that do not trade on an exchange are valued at the end of day net asset value per share. Investments in open-end and closed-end registered investment companies that trade on an exchange are valued at the last sales price or official closing price as of the close of the customary trading session on the exchange where the security is principally traded.

A security listed or traded on an exchange (excluding convertible bonds) held by a Fund is valued at its last sales price or official closing price on the exchange where the security is principally traded or, lacking any sales on a particular day, the security may be valued at the closing bid price on that day. Each equity security traded in the over-the-counter market is valued on the basis of prices furnished by independent pricing vendors or market makers. Debt securities (including convertible bonds) and unlisted equities are fair valued using an evaluated quote on the basis of prices provided by an independent pricing vendor. Evaluated quotes provided by the pricing vendor may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices, and may reflect appropriate factors such as institution-size trading in similar groups of securities, developments related to special securities, dividend rate, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, individual trading characteristics and other market data.

Securities for which market prices are not provided by any of the above methods may be valued based upon quotes furnished by independent sources and are valued at the last bid price in the case of equity securities and in the case of debt obligations, the mean between the last bid and ask prices. Short-term obligations having 60 days or less to maturity and commercial paper are priced at amortized cost, which approximates value.

Generally, trading in corporate bonds, U.S. Government securities and money market instruments is substantially completed each day at various times prior to the close of the customary trading session of the NYSE. The values of such securities used in computing the net asset value of the Fund’s shares are determined at such times. Occasionally, events affecting the values of such securities may occur between the times at which such values are determined and the close of the customary trading session of the NYSE. If Invesco believes a development/event has actually caused a closing price to no longer reflect current market value, the closing price may be adjusted to reflect the fair value of the affected security as of the close of the NYSE as determined in good faith using procedures approved by the Board.

 

74


Foreign securities are converted into U.S. dollar amounts using exchange rates as of the close of the NYSE. If market quotations are available and reliable for foreign exchange traded equity securities, the securities will be valued at the market quotations. Because trading hours for certain foreign securities end before the close of the NYSE, closing market quotations may become unreliable. If between the time trading ends on a particular security and the close of the customary trading session on the NYSE, events occur that are significant and may make the closing price unreliable, the Fund may fair value the security. If the event is likely to have affected the closing price of the security, the security will be valued at fair value in good faith using procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. Adjustments to closing prices to reflect fair value may also be based on a screening process from a pricing vendor to indicate the degree of certainty, based on historical data, that the closing price in the principal market where a foreign security trades is not the current market value as of the close of the NYSE. For foreign securities where Invesco believes, at the approved degree of certainty, that the price is not reflective of current market value, Invesco will use the indication of fair value from the pricing vendor to determine the fair value of the security. The pricing vendor, pricing methodology or degree of certainty may change from time to time. Multiple factors may be considered by the pricing vendor in determining adjustments to reflect fair value and may include information relating to sector indices, ADRs, domestic and foreign index futures, and exchange-traded funds.

Fund securities primarily traded in foreign markets may be traded in such markets on days that are not business days of the Fund. Because the net asset value per share of each Fund is determined only on business days of the Fund, the value of the portfolio securities of a Fund that invests in foreign securities may be significantly affected on days when an investor cannot exchange or redeem shares of the Fund.

Swap agreements are fair valued using an evaluated quote provided by an independent pricing service. Evaluated quotes provided by the pricing service are based on a model that may include end of day net present values, spreads, ratings, industry, and company performance.

Securities for which market prices are not provided by any of the above methods may be valued based upon quotes furnished by independent sources and are valued at the last bid price in the case of equity securities and in the case of debt obligations, the mean between the last bid and ask prices.

Securities for which market quotations are not readily available or are unreliable are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the supervision of the Trust’s officers following procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. Issuer specific events, market trends, bid/ask quotes of brokers and information providers and other market data may be reviewed in the course of making a good faith determination of a security’s fair value.

For financial reporting purposes and shareholder transactions on the last day of the fiscal quarter, transactions are normally accounted for on a trade date basis. For purposes of executing shareholder transactions in the normal course of business (other than shareholder transactions at a fiscal period-end), each non-money market fund’s portfolio securities transactions are recorded no later than the first business day following the trade date. Transactions in money market fund portfolio securities transactions are recorded no later than the first business day following the trade date. Transactions in money market fund portfolio securities are normally accounted for on a trade date basis.

Redemptions In Kind

Although the Funds, except Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund, generally intend to pay redemption proceeds solely in cash, the Funds reserve the right to determine, in their sole discretion, whether to satisfy redemption requests by making payment in securities or other property (known as a redemption in kind). For instance, a Fund may make a redemption in kind if a cash redemption would disrupt its operations or performance. Securities that will be delivered as payment in redemptions in kind will be valued using the same methodologies that the Fund typically utilizes in valuing such securities.

 

75


Shareholders receiving such securities are likely to incur transaction and brokerage costs on their subsequent sales of such securities, and the securities may increase or decrease in value until the shareholder sells them. The Trust, on behalf of the Funds, has made an election under Rule 18f-1 under the 1940 Act (a Rule 18f-1 Election), and therefore, the Trust, on behalf of the Fund, is obligated to redeem for cash all shares presented to such Fund for redemption by any one shareholder in an amount up to the lesser of $250,000 or 1% of that Fund’s net assets in any 90-day period. The Rule 18f-1 Election is irrevocable while Rule 18f-1 under the 1940 Act is in effect unless the SEC by order permits withdrawal of such Rule 18f-1 Election.

Payments to Participating Insurance Companies and/or their Affiliates

Invesco or Invesco Distributors may, from time to time, at their expense out of their own financial resources, make cash payments to Participating Insurance Companies and/or their affiliates, as an incentive to promote the Funds and/or to retain Participating Insurance Companies’ assets in the Funds. Such cash payments may be calculated on the average daily net assets of the applicable Fund(s) attributable to that particular Participating Insurance Company (Asset-Based Payments), in which case the total amount of such cash payments shall not exceed 0.25% per annum of those assets during a defined period. Invesco or Invesco Distributors may also make other cash payments to Participating Insurance Companies and/or their affiliates in addition to or in lieu of Asset-Based Payments, in the form of: payment for travel expenses, including lodging, incurred in connection with trips taken by qualifying registered representatives of those dealer firms and their families to places within or outside the United States; meeting fees; entertainment; transaction processing and transmission charges; advertising or other promotional expenses; or other expenses as determined in Invesco’s or Invesco Distributors’ discretion. In certain cases these other payments could be significant to the Participating Insurance Companies and/or their affiliates. Generally, commitments to make such payments are terminable upon notice to the Participating Insurance Company and/or their affiliates. However, Invesco and Invesco Distributors have entered into unique agreements with RiverSource Life Insurance Company and its affiliates (RiverSource), where the payment obligation of Invesco or Invesco Distributors can only be terminated on the occurrence of certain specified events. For example, in the event that RiverSource obtains an SEC order to substitute out such RiverSource assets in the Funds or such RiverSource assets in the Funds falls below a pre-determined level, payments by Invesco or Invesco Distributors to RiverSource can then be terminated. Any payments described above will not change the price paid by RiverSource for the purchase of the applicable Fund’s shares or the amount that any particular Fund will receive as proceeds from such sales. Invesco or Invesco Distributors determines the cash payments described above in its discretion in response to requests from RiverSource, based on factors it deems relevant. RiverSource may not use sales of the Funds’ shares to qualify for any incentives to the extent that such incentives may be prohibited by the laws of any state.

A list of certain entities that received payments as described in this SAI during the 2013 calendar year is attached as Appendix L. The list is not necessarily current and will change over time. Certain arrangements are still being negotiated, and there is a possibility that payments will be made retroactively to entities not listed below. Accordingly, please contact your Participating Insurance Company to determine whether they currently may be receiving such payments and to obtain further information regarding any such payments.

DIVIDENDS, DISTRIBUTIONS AND TAX MATTERS

Dividends and Distributions

The following discussion of dividends and distributions should be read in connection with the applicable sections in the Prospectus.

All dividends and distributions will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of the same class of a Fund (hereinafter, the Fund) unless the shareholder has requested in writing to receive such dividends and distributions in cash or that they be invested in shares of another Invesco Fund, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Prospectus under the caption “Purchasing Shares — Automatic Dividend and Distribution Investment.” Such dividends and distributions will be reinvested at the net asset value per share determined on the ex-dividend date.

 

76


The Fund calculates income dividends and capital gain distributions the same way for each class. The amount of any income dividends per share will differ, however, generally due to any differences in the distribution and service (Rule 12b-1) fees applicable to the classes, as well as any other expenses attributable to a particular class (Class Expenses). Class Expenses, including distribution plan expenses, must be allocated to the class for which they are incurred consistent with applicable legal principles under the 1940 Act.

In the event the Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund incurs or anticipates any unusual expense, loss or depreciation in the value of a portfolio investment that would adversely affect the net asset value per share of the Fund or the net income per share of a class of the Fund for a particular period, the Board would at that time consider whether to adhere to the present dividend policy described above or to revise it in light of then prevailing circumstances. For example, if the net asset value per share of the Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund was reduced or was anticipated to be reduced below $1.00, the Board might suspend further dividend payments on shares of the Fund until the net asset value returns to $1.00. Thus, such expense, loss or depreciation might result in a shareholder receiving no dividends for the period during which it held shares of the Fund and/or its receiving upon redemption a price per share lower than that which it paid.

Tax Matters

The following is a summary of certain additional tax considerations generally affecting the Fund and its shareholders that are not described in the Prospectus. No attempt is made to present a detailed explanation of the tax treatment of the Fund or its shareholders, and the discussion here and in the Prospectus is not intended as a substitute for careful tax planning.

This “Tax Matters” section is based on the Code and applicable regulations in effect on the date of this SAI. Future legislative, regulatory or administrative changes, including provisions of current law that sunset and thereafter no longer apply, or court decisions may significantly change the tax rules applicable to the Fund and its shareholders. Any of these changes or court decisions may have a retroactive effect.

For federal income tax purposes, the insurance company (rather than the purchaser of a variable contract) is treated as the owner of shares of the Fund selected as an investment option. This is for general information only and not tax advice. Holders of variable contracts should ask their own tax advisors for more information on their own tax situation, including possible federal, state, local and foreign taxes.

Taxation of the Fund . The Fund has elected and intends to qualify (or, if newly organized, intends to elect and qualify) each year as a “regulated investment company” (sometimes referred to as a regulated investment company, RIC or fund) under Subchapter M of the Code. If the Fund qualifies, the Fund will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of its investment company taxable income (i.e., generally, taxable interest, dividends, net short-term capital gains and other taxable ordinary income net of expenses without regard to the deduction for dividends paid) and net capital gain (i.e., the excess of net long-term capital gains over net short-term capital losses) that it distributes to shareholders.

Qualification as a regulated investment company . In order to qualify for treatment as a regulated investment company, the Fund must satisfy the following requirements:

 

    Distribution Requirement — the Fund must distribute an amount equal to the sum of at least 90% of its investment company taxable income and 90% of its net tax-exempt income, if any, for the tax year (certain distributions made by the Fund after the close of its tax year are considered distributions attributable to the previous tax year for purposes of satisfying this requirement).

 

77


    Income Requirement — the Fund must derive at least 90% of its gross income from dividends, interest, certain payments with respect to securities loans, and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies, or other income (including, but not limited to, gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived from its business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies and net income derived from qualified publicly traded partnerships (QPTPs).

 

    Asset Diversification Test — the Fund must satisfy the following asset diversification test at the close of each quarter of the Fund’s tax year: (1) at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s assets must consist of cash and cash items, U.S. Government securities, securities of other regulated investment companies, and securities of other issuers (as to which the Fund has not invested more than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets in securities of an issuer and as to which the Fund does not hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer); and (2) no more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets may be invested in the securities of any one issuer (other than U.S. Government securities or securities of other regulated investment companies) or of two or more issuers which the Fund controls and which are engaged in the same or similar trades or businesses, or, collectively, in the securities of QPTPs.

In some circumstances, the character and timing of income realized by the Fund for purposes of the Income Requirement or the identification of the issuer for purposes of the Asset Diversification Test is uncertain under current law with respect to a particular investment, and an adverse determination or future guidance by the IRS with respect to such type of investment may adversely affect the Fund’s ability to satisfy these requirements. See “Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions” with respect to the application of these requirements to certain types of investments. In other circumstances, the Fund may be required to sell portfolio holdings in order to meet the Income Requirement, Distribution Requirement, or Asset Diversification Test, which may have a negative impact on the Fund’s income and performance. In lieu of potential disqualification, the Fund is permitted to pay a tax for certain failures to satisfy the Asset Diversification Test or Income Requirement, which, in general, are limited to those due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect.

The Fund may use “equalization accounting” (in lieu of making some cash distributions) in determining the portion of its income and gains that has been distributed. If the Fund uses equalization accounting, it will allocate a portion of its undistributed investment company taxable income and net capital gain to redemptions of Fund shares and will correspondingly reduce the amount of such income and gains that it distributes in cash. However, the Fund intends to make cash distributions for each taxable year in an aggregate amount that is sufficient to satisfy the Distribution Requirement without taking into account its use of equalization accounting. If the IRS determines that the Fund’s allocation is improper and that the Fund has under-distributed its income and gain for any taxable year, the Fund may be liable for federal income and/or excise tax.

If for any taxable year the Fund does not qualify as a regulated investment company, all of its taxable income (including its net capital gain) would be subject to tax at regular corporate rates without any deduction for dividends paid to shareholders, and the dividends would be taxable to the shareholders as ordinary income (or possibly as qualified dividend income) to the extent of the Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. Failure to qualify as a regulated investment company thus would have a negative impact on the Fund’s income and performance. Subject to savings provisions for certain inadvertent failures to satisfy the Income Requirement or Asset Diversification Test which, in general, are limited to those due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, it is possible that the Fund will not qualify as a regulated investment company in any given tax year. Even if such savings provisions apply, the Fund may be subject to a monetary sanction of $50,000 or more. Moreover, the Board reserves the right not to maintain the qualification of the Fund as a regulated investment company if it determines such a course of action to be beneficial to shareholders.

Capital loss carryovers . The capital losses of the Fund, if any, do not flow through to shareholders. Rather, the Fund may use its capital losses, subject to applicable limitations, to offset its capital gains without being required to pay taxes on or distribute to shareholders such gains that are

 

78


offset by the losses. Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (RIC Mod Act), if the Fund has a “net capital loss” (that is, capital losses in excess of capital gains) for a taxable year beginning after December 22, 2010, the excess (if any) of the Fund’s net short-term capital losses over its net long-term capital gains is treated as a short-term capital loss arising on the first day of the Fund’s next taxable year, and the excess (if any) of the Fund’s net long-term capital losses over its net short-term capital gains is treated as a long-term capital loss arising on the first day of the Fund’s next taxable year. Any such net capital losses of the Fund that are not used to offset capital gains may be carried forward indefinitely to reduce any future capital gains realized by the Fund in succeeding taxable years. However, for any net capital losses realized in taxable years of the Fund beginning on or before December 22, 2010, the Fund is permitted to carry forward such capital losses for eight years as a short-term capital loss. Under a transition rule, capital losses arising in a taxable year beginning after December 22, 2010 must be used before capital losses realized in a taxable year beginning on or before December 22, 2010. The amount of capital losses that can be carried forward and used in any single year is subject to an annual limitation if there is more than 50% “change in ownership” of the Fund. An ownership change generally results when shareholders owning 5% or more of the Fund increase their aggregate holdings by more than 50% over a three-year look-back period. An ownership change could result in capital loss carryovers being used at a slower rate (or, in the case of those realized in taxable years of the Fund beginning on or before December 22, 2010, to expire), thereby reducing the Fund’s ability to offset capital gains with those losses. An increase in the amount of taxable gains distributed to the Fund’s shareholders could result from an ownership change. The Fund undertakes no obligation to avoid or prevent an ownership change, which can occur in the normal course of shareholder purchases and redemptions or as a result of engaging in a tax-free reorganization with another fund. Moreover, because of circumstances beyond the Fund’s control, there can be no assurance that the Fund will not experience, or has not already experienced, an ownership change.

Deferral of late year losses . The Fund may elect to treat part or all of any “qualified late year loss” as if it had been incurred in the succeeding taxable year in determining the Fund’s taxable income, net capital gain, net short-term capital gain, and earnings and profits. The effect of this election is to treat any such “qualified late year loss” as if it had been incurred in the succeeding taxable year, which may change the timing, amount, or characterization of Fund distributions (see, “Taxation of Fund Distributions – Capital gain dividends below). A “qualified late year loss” includes:

(i) any net capital loss, net long-term capital loss, or net short-term capital loss incurred after October 31 of the current taxable year (post-October losses), and

(ii) the excess, if any, of (1) the sum of (a) specified losses incurred after October 31 of the current taxable year, and (b) other ordinary losses incurred after December 31 of the current taxable year, over (2) the sum of (a) specified gains incurred after October 31 of the current taxable year, and (b) other ordinary gains incurred after December 31 of the current taxable year.

The terms “specified losses” and “specified gains” mean ordinary losses and gains from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of property (including the termination of a position with respect to such property), foreign currency losses and gains, and losses and gains resulting from holding stock in a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) for which a mark-to-market election is in effect. The terms “ordinary losses” and “ordinary gains” mean other ordinary losses and gains that are not described in the preceding sentence. Special rules apply to a fund with a fiscal year ending in November or December that elects to use its taxable year for determining its capital gain net income for excise tax purposes.

Undistributed capital gains . The Fund may retain or distribute to shareholders its net capital gain for each taxable year. The Fund currently intends to distribute net capital gains. If the Fund elects to retain its net capital gain, the Fund will be taxed thereon (except to the extent of any available capital loss carryovers) at the highest corporate tax rate (currently 35%). If the Fund elects to retain its net capital gain, it is expected that the Fund also will elect to have shareholders treated as if each received a distribution of its pro rata share of such gain, with the result that each shareholder will be required to report its pro rata share of such gain on its tax return as long-term capital gain, will receive a refundable tax credit for its pro rata share of tax paid by the Fund on the gain and will increase the tax basis for its shares by an amount equal to the deemed distribution less the tax credit.

 

79


Asset allocation funds . If the Fund is a fund of funds, asset allocation fund, or a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure (collectively referred to as a “fund of funds” which invests in one or more underlying funds taxable as regulated investment companies) distributions by the underlying funds, redemptions of shares in the underlying funds and changes in asset allocations may result in taxable distributions to shareholders of ordinary income or capital gains. A fund of funds (other than a feeder fund in a master-feeder structure) generally will not be able currently to offset gains realized by one underlying fund in which the fund of funds invests against losses realized by another underlying fund. If shares of an underlying fund are purchased within 30 days before or after redeeming at a loss other shares of that underlying fund (whether pursuant to a rebalancing of the Fund’s portfolio or otherwise), all or a part of the loss will not be deductible by the Fund and instead will increase its basis for the newly purchased shares. Also, except with respect to a qualified fund of funds, a fund of funds (a) is not eligible to pass-through to shareholders foreign tax credits from an underlying fund that pays foreign income taxes and (b) is not eligible to pass-through to shareholders exempt-interest dividends from an underlying fund. A qualified fund of funds, i.e. a fund at least 50 percent of the value of the total assets of which (at the close of each quarter of the taxable year) is represented by interests in other RICs, is eligible to pass-through to shareholders (a) foreign tax credits and (b) exempt-interest dividends. Also a fund of funds, whether or not it is a qualified fund of funds, is eligible to pass-through to shareholders dividends eligible for the corporate dividends-received deduction earned by an underlying fund (see, “Taxation of Fund Distributions-Corporate dividends received deduction” below). However, dividends paid to shareholders by a fund of funds from interest earned by an underlying fund on U.S. Government obligations are unlikely to be exempt from state and local income tax.

Federal excise tax . To avoid a 4% non-deductible excise tax, the Fund must distribute by December 31 of each year an amount equal to at least: (1) 98% of its ordinary income for the calendar year, (2) 98.2% of capital gain net income (the excess of the gains from sales or exchanges of capital assets over the losses from such sales or exchanges) for the one-year period ended on October 31 of such calendar year (or, at the election of a regulated investment company having a taxable year ending November 30 or December 31, for its taxable year), and (3) any prior year undistributed ordinary income and capital gain net income. The Fund may elect to defer to the following year any net ordinary loss incurred for the portion of the calendar year which is after the beginning of the Fund’s taxable year. Also, the Fund will defer any “specified gain” or “specified loss” which would be properly taken into account for the portion of the calendar after October 31. Any net ordinary loss, specified gain, or specified loss deferred shall be treated as arising on January 1 of the following calendar year. Generally, the Fund may make sufficient distributions to avoid liability for federal income and excise tax but can give no assurances that all or a portion of such liability will be avoided. In addition, under certain circumstances temporary timing or permanent differences in the realization of income and expense for book and tax purposes can result in the Fund having to pay an excise tax. However, in any calendar year in which the investment made by Invesco and its affiliates in the Fund does not exceed $250,000, the Fund may qualify for an exemption from the excise tax regardless of whether it has satisfied the foregoing distribution requirements. Funds that do not qualify for this exemption intend to make sufficient distributions to avoid imposition of the excise tax.

Foreign income tax . Investment income received by the Fund from sources within foreign countries may be subject to foreign income tax withheld at the source, and the amount of tax withheld generally will be treated as an expense of the Fund. The United States has entered into tax treaties with many foreign countries that entitle the Fund to a reduced rate of, or exemption from, tax on such income. Some countries require the filing of a tax reclaim or other forms to receive the benefit of the reduced tax rate; whether or when the Fund will receive the tax reclaims is within the control of the individual country. Information required on these forms may not be available such as shareholder information; therefore, the Fund may not receive the reduced treaty rates or potential reclaim. Other countries have conflicting and changing instructions and restrictive timing requirements which may cause the Fund not to receive the reduced treaty rates or potential reclaims. Other countries may subject capital gains realized by the Fund on sale or disposition of securities of that country to taxation. It is impossible to determine the effective rate of foreign tax in advance since the amount of the Fund’s assets to be invested in various countries is not known. Under certain circumstances, the Fund may elect to pass-through foreign tax credits to shareholders, although it reserves the right not to do so.

 

80


Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund — Investments in Commodities . Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund invests in derivatives, financially-linked instruments, and the stock of its own wholly-owned subsidiary (the Subsidiary) to gain exposure to the commodity markets. This strategy may cause the Fund to realize more ordinary income than would be the case if the Fund invested directly in commodities. Also, these commodity-linked investments and the income earned thereon must be taken into account by the Fund in complying with the Distribution and Income Requirements and the Asset Diversification Test as described below.

Distribution requirement . The Fund intends to distribute the Subsidiary’s income each year in satisfaction of the Fund’s Distribution Requirement. The Subsidiary will be classified for federal income tax purposes as a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) with respect to the Fund. As such, the Fund will be required to include in its gross income each year amounts earned by the Subsidiary during that year (subpart F income), whether or not such earnings are distributed by the Subsidiary to the Fund. Subpart F income will be distributed by the Fund to shareholders each year as ordinary income and will not be qualified dividend income eligible for taxation at long-term capital gain rates. The Subsidiary likely will also be classified as a PFIC as defined below in “Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions - PFIC Investments” but the CFC rules supersede the PFIC rules.

Income requirement . As described above, the Fund must derive at least 90% of its gross income from qualifying sources to qualify as a regulated investment company. Gains from the disposition of commodities, including precious metals, are not considered qualifying income for purposes of satisfying the Income Requirement. See, “Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions-Investments in commodities — structured notes, corporate subsidiary and certain ETFs.” Also, the IRS has issued a revenue ruling which holds that income derived from commodity-linked swaps is not qualifying income under Subchapter M of the Code. As a result, the Fund’s ability to directly invest in commodity-linked swaps as part of its investment strategy is limited to a maximum of 10% of its gross income. However, the IRS has issued a number of private letter rulings to other mutual funds, including to another Invesco fund (upon which only the fund that received the private letter ruling can rely), which indicate that income from a fund’s investment in a form of commodity-linked note and a wholly-owned foreign subsidiary that invests in commodity-linked derivatives, such as the Subsidiary, constitutes qualifying income. However, the IRS suspended issuance of any further private letter rulings in July 2011 pending a review of its position. Should the IRS issue guidance, or Congress enact legislation, that adversely affects the tax treatment of the Fund’s use of commodity-linked notes or its Subsidiary (which might be applied retroactively to the Fund), it could limit the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategy and the Fund might not qualify as a regulated investment company for one or more years. In this event, the Board may authorize a significant change in investment strategy or Fund liquidation. In lieu of potential disqualification, the Fund is permitted to pay a tax for certain failures to satisfy the Income Requirement, which, in general, are limited to those due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. The Fund also may incur transaction and other costs to comply with any new or additional guidance from the IRS.

Asset diversification test . For purposes of the Asset Diversification Test, the Fund’s investment in the Subsidiary would be considered a security of one issuer. Accordingly, the Fund intends to limit its investment in the Subsidiary to no more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets in order to satisfy the Asset Diversification Test.

Taxation of the Subsidiary . On the basis of current law and practice, the Subsidiary will not be liable for income tax in the Cayman Islands. Distributions by the Subsidiary to the Fund will not be subject to withholding tax in the Cayman Islands. In addition, the Subsidiary’s investment in commodity-linked derivatives and other assets held as collateral are anticipated to qualify for a safe harbor under Code Section 864(b) so that the Subsidiary will not be treated as conducting a U.S. trade or business. Thus, the Subsidiary should not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net basis. However, if certain of the Subsidiary’s activities were determined not to be of the type described in the safe harbor (which is not expected), then the activities of the Subsidiary may constitute a U.S. trade or business, or be taxed as such.

 

81


In general, a foreign corporation, such as the Subsidiary, that does not conduct a U.S. trade or business is nonetheless subject to tax at a flat rate of 30 percent (or lower tax treaty rate), generally payable through withholding, on the gross amount of certain U.S.-source income that is not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, subject to certain exemptions, including among others, exemptions for capital gains, portfolio interest and income from notional principal contracts. It is not anticipated that the Subsidiary will be subject to material amounts of U.S. withholding tax on its portfolio investments. The Subsidiary intends to properly certify its status as a non-U.S. person to each custodian and withholding agent to avoid U.S. backup withholding requirements.

Special Rules Applicable To Variable Contracts. The Fund intends to comply with the diversification requirements imposed by Section 817(h) of the Code and the regulations thereunder. These requirements, which are in addition to the diversification requirements imposed on the Fund by the 1940 Act and Subchapter M of the Code, place certain limitations on (i) the assets of the insurance company separate accounts that may be invested in securities of a single issuer and (ii) eligible investors. Because Section 817(h) and those regulations treat the assets of the Fund as assets of the corresponding division of the insurance company separate accounts, the Fund intends to comply with these diversification requirements. Specifically, the regulations provide that, except as permitted by the “safe harbor” described below, as of the end of each calendar quarter or within 30 days thereafter no more than 55% of the Fund’s total assets may be represented by any one investment, no more than 70% by any two investments, no more than 80% by any three investments and no more than 90% by any four investments. For this purpose, all securities of the same issuer are considered a single investment, and while each U.S. Government agency and instrumentality is considered a separate issuer, a particular foreign government and its agencies, instrumentalities and political subdivisions all will be considered the same issuer. Section 817(h) provides, as a safe harbor, that a separate account will be treated as being adequately diversified if the Asset Diversification is satisfied and no more than 55% of the value of the account’s total assets are cash and cash items (including receivables), government securities and securities of other RICs. The regulations also provide that the Fund’s shareholders are limited, generally, to life insurance company separate accounts, general accounts of the same life insurance company, an investment adviser or affiliate in connection with the creation or management of the Fund or the trustee of a qualified pension plan. Failure of the Fund to satisfy the Section 817(h) requirements would result in taxation of and treatment of the contract holders investing in a corresponding insurance company division other than as described in the applicable prospectuses of the various insurance company separate accounts.

Also, a contract holder should not be able to direct the Fund’s investment in any particular asset so as to avoid the prohibition on investor control. The Treasury Department may issue future pronouncements addressing the circumstances in which a variable contract owner’s control of the investments of a separate account may cause the contract owner, rather than the insurance company, to be treated as the owner of the assets held by the separate account. If the contract owner is considered the owner of the separate account, income and gains produced by those securities would be included currently in the contract owner’s gross income. It is not known what standards will be set forth in any such pronouncements or when, if at all, these pronouncements may be issued.

Taxation of Fund Distributions . The Fund anticipates distributing substantially all of its investment company taxable income and net capital gain for each taxable year.

Distributions of ordinary income . The Fund receives income generally in the form of dividends and/or interest on its investments. The Fund may also recognize ordinary income from other sources, including, but not limited to, certain gains on foreign currency-related transactions. This income, less expenses incurred in the operation of the Fund, constitutes the Fund’s net investment income from which dividends may be paid. In the case of a Fund whose strategy includes investing in stocks of corporations, a portion of the income dividends paid may be qualified dividends eligible for the corporate dividends received deduction.

Capital gain dividends . Taxes on distributions of capital gains are determined by how long the Fund owned the investments that generated them, rather than how long a shareholder has owned its shares. In general, the Fund will recognize long-term capital gain or loss on the sale or other disposition

 

82


of assets it has owned for more than one year, and short-term capital gain or loss on investments it has owned for one year or less. Distributions of net capital gain (the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss) that are properly reported by the Fund to shareholders as capital gain dividends generally will be taxable to a shareholder receiving such distributions as long-term capital gain. Distributions of net short-term capital gains for a taxable year in excess of net long-term capital losses for such taxable year generally will be taxable to a shareholder receiving such distributions as ordinary income.

Corporate dividends received deduction . Ordinary income dividends reported by the Fund to shareholders as derived from qualified dividends from domestic corporations will qualify for the 70% dividends received deduction generally available to corporations. The availability of the dividends-received deduction is subject to certain holding period and debt financing restrictions imposed under the Code on the corporation claiming the deduction. Income derived by the Fund from investments in derivatives, fixed-income and foreign securities generally is not eligible for this treatment.

Maintaining a $1 share price — Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund . Gains and losses on the sale of portfolio securities and unrealized appreciation or depreciation in the value of these securities may require the Fund to adjust its dividends to maintain its $1 share price. This procedure may result in under- or over-distributions by the Fund of its net investment income. This in turn may result in return of capital distributions, the effect of which is described in the following paragraph.

Return of capital distributions . Distributions by the Fund that are not paid from earnings and profits will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of (and in reduction of) the shareholder’s tax basis in his shares; any excess will be treated as gain from the sale of his shares. Thus, the portion of a distribution that constitutes a return of capital will decrease the shareholder’s tax basis in his Fund shares (but not below zero), and will result in an increase in the amount of gain (or decrease in the amount of loss) that will be recognized by the shareholder for tax purposes on the later sale of such Fund shares. Return of capital distributions can occur for a number of reasons including, among others, the Fund over-estimates the income to be received from certain investments such as those classified as partnerships or equity REITs. See “Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions — Investments in U.S. REITs”.

Pass-through of foreign tax credits. If more than 50% of the value of the Fund’s total assets at the end of a fiscal year is invested in foreign securities, or if the Fund is a qualified fund of funds (i.e. a fund at least 50 percent of the value of the total assets of which, at the close of each quarter of the taxable year, is represented by interests in other RICs), the Fund may elect to “pass through” to the Fund’s shareholders the amount of foreign income tax paid by the Fund (the Foreign Tax Election) in lieu of deducting such amount in determining its investment company taxable income. Pursuant to the Foreign Tax Election, shareholders will be required (i) to include in gross income, even though not actually received, their respective pro-rata shares of the foreign income tax paid by the Fund that are attributable to any distributions they receive; and (ii) either to deduct their pro-rata share of foreign tax in computing their taxable income or to use it (subject to various Code limitations) as a foreign tax credit against federal income tax (but not both). Shareholders may be unable to claim a credit for the full amount of their proportionate shares of the foreign income tax paid by the Fund due to certain limitations that may apply. The Fund reserves the right not to pass-through to its shareholders the amount of foreign income taxes paid by the Fund. Additionally, any foreign tax withheld on payments made “in lieu of” dividends or interest will not qualify for the pass-through of foreign tax credits to shareholders. See, “Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions – Securities lending” below.

Consent dividends . The Fund may utilize consent dividend provisions of Section 565 of the Code to make distributions. Provided that all shareholders agree in a consent filed with the income tax return of the Fund to treat as a dividend the amount specified in the consent, the amount will be considered a distribution just as any other distribution paid in money and reinvested back into the Fund.

Reportable transactions. Under Treasury regulations, if a shareholder recognizes a loss with respect to the Fund’s shares of $2 million or more for an individual shareholder or $10 million or more for a corporate shareholder (or certain greater amounts over a combination of years), the shareholder must file with the IRS a disclosure statement on Form 8886. The fact that a loss is reportable under these

 

83


regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.

Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions . Set forth below is a general description of the tax treatment of certain types of securities, investment techniques and transactions that may apply to a fund. This section should be read in conjunction with the discussion under “Description of the Funds and their Investments and Risks —Investment Strategies and Risks” for a detailed description of the various types of securities and investment techniques that apply to the Fund.

In general . In general, gain or loss recognized by a fund on the sale or other disposition of portfolio investments will be a capital gain or loss. Such capital gain and loss may be long-term or short-term depending, in general, upon the length of time a particular investment position is maintained and, in some cases, upon the nature of the transaction. Property held for more than one year generally will be eligible for long-term capital gain or loss treatment. The application of certain rules described below may serve to alter the manner in which the holding period for a security is determined or may otherwise affect the characterization as long-term or short-term, and also the timing of the realization and/or character, of certain gains or losses.

Certain fixed-income investments . Gain recognized on the disposition of a debt obligation purchased by a fund at a market discount (generally, at a price less than its principal amount) will be treated as ordinary income to the extent of the portion of the market discount that accrued during the period of time the fund held the debt obligation unless the fund made a current inclusion election to accrue market discount into income as it accrues. If a fund purchases a debt obligation (such as a zero coupon security or pay-in-kind security) that was originally issued at a discount, the fund generally is required to include in gross income each year the portion of the original issue discount that accrues during such year. Therefore, a fund’s investment in such securities may cause the fund to recognize income and make distributions to shareholders before it receives any cash payments on the securities. To generate cash to satisfy those distribution requirements, a fund may have to sell portfolio securities that it otherwise might have continued to hold or to use cash flows from other sources such as the sale of fund shares.

Investments in debt obligations that are at risk of or in default present tax issues for a fund. Tax rules are not entirely clear about issues such as whether and to what extent a fund should recognize market discount on a debt obligation, when a fund may cease to accrue interest, original issue discount or market discount, when and to what extent a fund may take deductions for bad debts or worthless securities and how a fund should allocate payments received on obligations in default between principal and income. These and other related issues will be addressed by a fund in order to ensure that it distributes sufficient income to preserve its status as a regulated investment company.

Options, futures, forward contracts, swap agreements and hedging transactions . In general, option premiums received by a fund are not immediately included in the income of the fund. Instead, the premiums are recognized when the option contract expires, the option is exercised by the holder, or the fund transfers or otherwise terminates the option (e.g., through a closing transaction). If an option written by a fund is exercised and the fund sells or delivers the underlying stock, the fund generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to (a) the sum of the strike price and the option premium received by the fund minus (b) the fund’s basis in the stock. Such gain or loss generally will be short-term or long-term depending upon the holding period of the underlying stock. If securities are purchased by a fund pursuant to the exercise of a put option written by it, the fund generally will subtract the premium received from its cost basis in the securities purchased. The gain or loss with respect to any termination of fund’s obligation under an option other than through the exercise of the option and related sale or delivery of the underlying stock generally will be short-term gain or loss depending on whether the premium income received by the fund is greater or less than the amount paid by the fund (if any) in terminating the transaction. Thus, for example, if an option written by a fund expires unexercised, the fund generally will recognize short-term gain equal to the premium received.

 

84


The tax treatment of certain futures contracts entered into by a fund as well as listed non-equity options written or purchased by the fund on U.S. exchanges (including options on futures contracts, broad-based equity indices and debt securities) may be governed by section 1256 of the Code (section 1256 contracts). Gains or losses on section 1256 contracts generally are considered 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gains or losses (60/40), although certain foreign currency gains and losses from such contracts may be treated as ordinary in character. Also, any section 1256 contracts held by a fund at the end of each taxable year (and, for purposes of the 4% excise tax, on certain other dates as prescribed under the Code) are “marked-to-market” with the result that unrealized gains or losses are treated as though they were realized and the resulting gain or loss is treated as ordinary or 60/40 gain or loss, as applicable. Section 1256 contracts do not include any interest rate swap, currency swap, basis swap, interest rate cap, interest rate floor, commodity swap, equity swap, equity index swap, credit default swap, or similar agreement.

In addition to the special rules described above in respect of options and futures transactions, a fund’s transactions in other derivative instruments (including options, forward contracts and swap agreements) as well as its other hedging, short sale, or similar transactions, may be subject to one or more special tax rules (including the constructive sale, notional principal contract, straddle, wash sale and short sale rules). These rules may affect whether gains and losses recognized by a fund are treated as ordinary or capital or as short-term or long-term, accelerate the recognition of income or gains to the fund, defer losses to the fund, and cause adjustments in the holding periods of the fund’s securities. These rules, therefore, could affect the amount, timing and/or character of distributions to shareholders. Moreover, because the tax rules applicable to derivative financial instruments are in some cases uncertain under current law, an adverse determination or future guidance by the IRS with respect to these rules (which determination or guidance could be retroactive) may affect whether a fund has made sufficient distributions and otherwise satisfied the relevant requirements to maintain its qualification as a regulated investment company and avoid a fund-level tax.

Certain of a fund’s investments in derivatives and foreign currency-denominated instruments, and the fund’s transactions in foreign currencies and hedging activities, may produce a difference between its book income and its taxable income. If a fund’s book income is less than the sum of its taxable income and net tax-exempt income (if any), the fund could be required to make distributions exceeding book income to qualify as a regulated investment company. If a fund’s book income exceeds the sum of its taxable income and net tax-exempt income (if any), the distribution of any such excess will be treated as (i) a dividend to the extent of the fund’s remaining earnings and profits (including current earnings and profits arising from tax-exempt income, reduced by related deductions), (ii) thereafter, as a return of capital to the extent of the recipient’s basis in the shares, and (iii) thereafter, as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset.

Foreign currency transactions . A fund’s transactions in foreign currencies, foreign currency-denominated debt obligations and certain foreign currency options, futures contracts and forward contracts (and similar instruments) may give rise to ordinary income or loss to the extent such income or loss results from fluctuations in the value of the foreign currency concerned. This treatment could increase or decrease a fund’s ordinary income distributions to you, and may cause some or all of the fund’s previously distributed income to be classified as a return of capital. In certain cases, a fund may make an election to treat such gain or loss as capital.

PFIC investments . A fund may invest in securities of foreign companies that may be classified under the Code as PFICs. In general, a foreign company is classified as a PFIC if at least one-half of its assets constitute investment-type assets or 75% or more of its gross income is investment-type income. When investing in PFIC securities, a fund intends to mark-to-market these securities under certain provisions of the Code and recognize any unrealized gains as ordinary income at the end of the fund’s fiscal and excise tax years. Deductions for losses are allowable only to the extent of any current or previously recognized gains. These gains (reduced by allowable losses) are treated as ordinary income that a fund is required to distribute, even though it has not sold or received dividends from these securities. You should also be aware that the designation of a foreign security as a PFIC security will cause its income dividends to fall outside of the definition of qualified foreign corporation dividends. These dividends generally will not qualify for the reduced rate of taxation on qualified dividends when

 

85


distributed to you by a fund. Foreign companies are not required to identify themselves as PFICs. Due to various complexities in identifying PFICs, a fund can give no assurances that it will be able to identify portfolio securities in foreign corporations that are PFICs in time for the fund to make a mark-to-market election. If a fund is unable to identify an investment as a PFIC and thus does not make a mark-to-market election, the fund may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” or gain from the disposition of such shares even if such income is distributed as a taxable dividend by the fund to its shareholders. Additional charges in the nature of interest may be imposed on a fund in respect of deferred taxes arising from such distributions or gains. Also see “Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund – Investments in Commodities” with respect to investments in the Subsidiary.

Investments in non-U.S. REITs . While non-U.S. REITs often use complex acquisition structures that seek to minimize taxation in the source country, an investment by a fund in a non-U.S. REIT may subject the fund, directly or indirectly, to corporate taxes, withholding taxes, transfer taxes and other indirect taxes in the country in which the real estate acquired by the non-U.S. REIT is located. The fund’s pro rata share of any such taxes will reduce the fund’s return on its investment. A fund’s investment in a non-U.S. REIT may be considered an investment in a PFIC, as discussed above in “Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions-PFIC investments.” Additionally, foreign withholding taxes on distributions from the non-U.S. REIT may be reduced or eliminated under certain tax treaties, as discussed above in “Taxation of the Fund – Foreign income tax.” Also, the fund in certain limited circumstances may be required to file an income tax return in the source country and pay tax on any gain realized from its investment in the non-U.S. REIT under rules similar to those in the United States which tax foreign persons on gain realized from dispositions of interests in U.S. real estate.

Investments in U.S. REITs. A U.S. REIT is not subject to federal income tax on the income and gains it distributes to shareholders. Dividends paid by a U.S. REIT, other than capital gain distributions, will be taxable as ordinary income up to the amount of the U.S. REIT’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. Capital gain dividends paid by a U.S. REIT to the fund will be treated as long term capital gains by the fund and, in turn, may be distributed by the fund to its shareholders as a capital gain distribution. Because of certain noncash expenses, such as property depreciation, an equity U.S. REIT’s cash flow may exceed its taxable income. The equity U.S. REIT, and in turn a fund, may distribute this excess cash to shareholders in the form of a return of capital distribution. However, if a U.S. REIT is operated in a manner that fails to qualify as a REIT, an investment in the U.S. REIT would become subject to double taxation, meaning the taxable income of the U.S. REIT would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates without any deduction for dividends paid to shareholders and the dividends would be taxable to shareholders as ordinary income (or possibly as qualified dividend income) to the extent of the U.S. REIT’s current and accumulated earnings and profits. Also, see “Tax Treatment of Portfolio Transactions — Investment in taxable mortgage pools (excess inclusion income)”

Investment in taxable mortgage pools (excess inclusion income) . Under a Notice issued by the IRS, the Code and Treasury regulations to be issued, a portion of a fund’s income from a U.S. REIT that is attributable to the REIT’s residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit (REMIC) or equity interests in a “taxable mortgage pool” (referred to in the Code as an excess inclusion) will be subject to federal income tax in all events. The excess inclusion income of a regulated investment company, such as a fund, will be allocated to shareholders of the regulated investment company in proportion to the dividends received by such shareholders, with the same consequences as if the shareholders held the related REMIC residual interest or, if applicable, taxable mortgage pool directly. In general, excess inclusion income allocated to shareholders (i) cannot be offset by net operating losses (subject to a limited exception for certain thrift institutions), (ii) will constitute unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) to entities (including qualified pension plans, individual retirement accounts, 401(k) plans, Keogh plans or other tax-exempt entities) subject to tax on UBTI, thereby potentially requiring such an entity that is allocated excess inclusion income, and otherwise might not be required to file a tax return, to file a tax return and pay tax on such income, and (iii) in the case of a foreign stockholder, will not qualify for any reduction in U.S. federal withholding tax. In addition, if at any time during any taxable year a “disqualified organization” (which generally includes certain cooperatives, governmental entities, and tax-exempt organizations not subject to UBTI) is a record holder of a share in a regulated investment company, then the regulated investment company will be subject to a tax equal to that portion of its

 

86


excess inclusion income for the taxable year that is allocable to the disqualified organization, multiplied by the highest federal income tax rate imposed on corporations. The Notice imposes certain reporting requirements upon regulated investment companies that have excess inclusion income. Code Section 860E(f) further provides that, except as provided in regulations (which have not been issued), with respect to any variable contract (as defined in section 817), there shall be no adjustment in the reserve to the extent of any excess inclusion. There can be no assurance that a fund will not allocate to shareholders excess inclusion income.

These rules are potentially applicable to a fund with respect to any income it receives from the equity interests of certain mortgage pooling vehicles, either directly or, as is more likely, through an investment in a U.S. REIT. It is unlikely that these rules will apply to a fund that has a non-REIT strategy.

Investments in partnerships and QPTPs . For purposes of the Income Requirement, income derived by a fund from a partnership that is not a QPTP will be treated as qualifying income only to the extent such income is attributable to items of income of the partnership that would be qualifying income if realized directly by the fund. While the rules are not entirely clear with respect to a fund investing in a partnership outside a master-feeder structure, for purposes of testing whether a fund satisfies the Asset Diversification Test, the fund generally is treated as owning a pro rata share of the underlying assets of a partnership. See, “Taxation of the Fund – Qualification as a regulated investment company.” In contrast, different rules apply to a partnership that is a QPTP. A QPTP is a partnership (a) the interests in which are traded on an established securities market, (b) that is treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, and (c) that derives less than 90% of its income from sources that satisfy the Income Requirement e.g., because it invests in commodities). All of the net income derived by a fund from an interest in a QPTP will be treated as qualifying income but the fund may not invest more than 25% of its total assets in one or more QPTPs. However, there can be no assurance that a partnership classified as a QPTP in one year will qualify as a QPTP in the next year. Any such failure to annually qualify as a QPTP might, in turn, cause a fund to fail to qualify as a regulated investment company. Although, in general, the passive loss rules of the Code do not apply to RICs, such rules do apply to a fund with respect to items attributable to an interest in a QPTP. Fund investments in partnerships, including in QPTPs, may result in the fund’s being subject to state, local or foreign income, franchise or withholding tax liabilities.

Investments in commodities – structured notes, corporate subsidiary and certain ETFs . Gains from the disposition of commodities including precious metals, will neither be considered qualifying income for purposes of satisfying the Income Requirement nor qualifying assets for purposes of satisfying the Asset Diversification Test. See “Taxation of the Fund – Qualification as a regulated investment company.” Also, the IRS has issued a revenue ruling which holds that income derived from commodity-linked swaps is not qualifying income for purposes of the Income Requirement. In a subsequent revenue ruling, as well as in a number of follow-on private letter rulings (upon which only the fund that received the private letter ruling may rely), the IRS provides that income from certain alternative investments which create commodity exposure, such as certain commodity index-linked or structured notes or a corporate subsidiary (such as the Subsidiary) that invests in commodities, may be considered qualifying income under the Code. However, as of the date of this SAI, the IRS suspended the issuance of any further private letter rulings in July 2011 pending a review of its position. Should the IRS issue guidance, or Congress enact legislation, that adversely affects the tax treatment of a fund’s use of commodity-linked notes, or a corporate subsidiary, the fund may no longer be able to utilize commodity-linked notes or a corporate subsidiary to gain commodity exposure. In addition, a fund may gain exposure to commodities through investment in QPTPs such as an exchange traded fund or ETF that is classified as a partnership and which invests in commodities. Accordingly, the extent to which a fund invests in commodities or commodity-linked derivatives may be limited by the Income Requirement and the Asset Diversification Test, which the fund must continue to satisfy to maintain its status as a regulated investment company. A fund also may be limited in its ability to sell its investments in commodities, commodity-linked derivatives, and certain ETFs or be forced to sell other investments to generate income due to the Income Requirement. If a fund does not appropriately limit such investments or if such investments (or the income earned on such investments) were to be recharacterized for U.S. tax purposes, the fund could fail to qualify as a regulated investment company. In lieu of potential disqualification, a fund is permitted to pay a tax for certain failures to satisfy the Asset Diversification Test or Income Requirement, which, in

 

87


general, are limited to those due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect. Also see “Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund — Investments in Commodities” with respect to investments in the Subsidiary.

Securities lending . While securities are loaned out by a fund, the fund generally will receive from the borrower amounts equal to any dividends or interest paid on the borrowed securities. For federal income tax purposes, payments made “in lieu of” dividends are not considered dividend income. These distributions will neither qualify for the reduced rate of taxation for individuals on qualified dividends nor the 70% dividends received deduction for corporations. Also, any foreign tax withheld on payments made “in lieu of” dividends or interest will not qualify for the pass-through of foreign tax credits to shareholders. Additionally, in the case of a fund with a strategy of investing in tax-exempt securities, any payments made “in lieu of” tax-exempt interest will be considered taxable income to the fund, and thus, to the investors, even though such interest may be tax-exempt when paid to the borrower.

Investments in convertible securities . Convertible debt is ordinarily treated as a “single property” consisting of a pure debt interest until conversion, after which the investment becomes an equity interest. If the security is issued at a premium (i.e., for cash in excess of the face amount payable on retirement), the creditor-holder may amortize the premium over the life of the bond. If the security is issued for cash at a price below its face amount, the creditor-holder must accrue original issue discount in income over the life of the debt. The creditor-holder’s exercise of the conversion privilege is treated as a nontaxable event. Mandatorily convertible debt (e.g., an exchange traded note or ETN issued in the form of an unsecured obligation that pays a return based on the performance of a specified market index, exchange currency, or commodity) is often, but not always, treated as a contract to buy or sell the reference property rather than debt. Similarly, convertible preferred stock with a mandatory conversion feature is ordinarily, but not always, treated as equity rather than debt. Dividends received generally are eligible for the corporate dividends received deduction. In general, conversion of preferred stock for common stock of the same corporation is tax-free. Conversion of preferred stock for cash is a taxable redemption. Any redemption premium for preferred stock that is redeemable by the issuing company might be required to be amortized under original issue discount (OID) principles.

Local Tax Considerations. Rules of state and local taxation of ordinary income, qualified dividend income and capital gain dividends may differ from the rules for U.S. federal income taxation described above. Distributions may also be subject to additional state, local and foreign taxes depending on each shareholder’s particular situation.

DISTRIBUTION OF SECURITIES

Distributor

The Trust has entered into a master distribution agreement relating to the Funds (the Distribution Agreement) with Invesco Distributors, a registered broker-dealer and a wholly owned subsidiary of Invesco, pursuant to which Invesco Distributors acts as the distributor of shares of the Funds. The address of Invesco Distributors is 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2500, Houston, Texas 77046-1173. Certain trustees and officers of the Trust are affiliated with Invesco Distributors. See “Management of the Trust.”

The Distribution Agreement provides Invesco Distributors with the exclusive right to distribute shares of the Funds on a continuous basis.

The Trust (on behalf of any class of any Fund) or Invesco Distributors may terminate the Distribution Agreement on sixty (60)  days’ written notice without penalty. The Distribution Agreement will terminate automatically in the event of its assignment.

Distribution Plan

The Trust has adopted a distribution plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act with respect to each Fund’s Series II shares (the Plan). Each Fund, pursuant to the Plan, pays Invesco Distributors compensation at the annual rate of 0.25% of average daily net assets of Series II shares.

 

88


The Plan compensates Invesco Distributors for the purpose of financing any activity which is primarily intended to result in the sale of Series II shares of the Funds. Distribution activities appropriate for financing under the Plan include, but are not limited to, the following: expenses relating to the development, preparation, printing and distribution of advertisements and sales literature and other promotional materials describing and/or relating to the Fund; expenses of training sales personnel regarding the Fund; expenses of organizing and conducting seminars and sales meetings designed to promote the distribution of the Series II shares; compensation to financial intermediaries and broker-dealers to pay or reimburse them for their services or expenses in connection with the distribution of the Series II shares to Fund variable annuity and variable insurance contracts investing directly in the Series II shares; compensation to sales personnel in connection with the allocation of cash values and premium of variable annuity and variable insurance contracts to investments in the Series II shares; compensation to and expenses of employees of Invesco Distributors, including overhead and telephone expenses, who engage in the distribution of the Series II shares; and the costs of administering the Plan.

Amounts payable by a Fund under the Plan need not be directly related to the expenses actually incurred by Invesco Distributors on behalf of each Fund. The Plan does not obligate the Funds to reimburse Invesco Distributors for the actual expenses Invesco Distributors may incur in fulfilling its obligations under the Plan. Thus, even if Invesco Distributors’ actual expenses exceed the fee payable to Invesco Distributors at any given time, the Funds will not be obligated to pay more than that fee. If Invesco Distributors’ expenses are less than the fee it receives, Invesco Distributors will retain the full amount of the fee. No provision of this Distribution Plan shall be interpreted to prohibit any payments by the Trust during periods when the Trust has suspended or otherwise limited sales. Payments pursuant to the Plan are subject to any applicable limitations imposed by rules of FINRA.

Invesco Distributors may from time to time waive or reduce any portion of its 12b-1 fee for Series II shares. Voluntary fee waivers or reductions may be rescinded at any time without further notice to investors. During periods of voluntary fee waivers or reductions, Invesco Distributors will retain its ability to be reimbursed for such fee prior to the end of each fiscal year. Contractual fee waivers or reductions set forth in the Fee Table in a Prospectus may not be terminated or amended to the Funds’ detriment during the period stated in the agreement between Invesco Distributors and the Fund.

Invesco Distributors has entered into agreements with Participating Insurance Companies and other financial intermediaries to provide the distribution services in furtherance of the Plan. Currently, Invesco Distributors pays Participating Insurance Companies and others at the annual rate of 0.25% of average daily net assets of Series II shares attributable to the Contracts issued by the Participating Insurance Company as compensation for providing such distribution services. Invesco Distributors does not act as principal, but rather as agent for the Funds, in making distribution service payments. These payments are an obligation of the Funds and not of Invesco Distributors.

See Appendix M for a list of the amounts paid by Series II shares to Invesco Distributors pursuant to the Plan for the year, or period, ended December 31, 2013 and Appendix N for an estimate by category of the allocation of actual fees paid by Series II shares of each Fund pursuant to its respective distribution plan for the year or period ended December 31, 2013.

As required by Rule 12b-1, the Plan approved by the Board, including a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Trust and who have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Plan or in any agreements related to the Plan (the “Rule 12b-1 Trustees). In approving the Plans in accordance with the requirements of Rule 12b-1, the Trustees considered various factors and determined that there is a reasonable likelihood that the Plan would benefit each Series II class of the Funds and its respective shareholders by, among other things, providing broker-dealers with an incentive to sell additional shares of the Trust, thereby helping to satisfy the Trust’s liquidity needs and helping to increase the Trust’s investment flexibility.

Unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, the Plan continues from year to year as long as such continuance is specifically approved, in person, at least annually by the Board, including a majority of the Rule 12b-1 Trustees. The Plan requires Invesco Distributors to provide the Board at least quarterly with a written report of the amounts expended pursuant to the Distribution Plan and the

 

89


purposes for which such expenditures were made. The Board reviews these reports in connection with their decisions with respect to the Plan. A Plan may be terminated as to any Fund or Series II shares by the vote of a majority of the Rule 12b-1 Trustees or, with respect to the Series II shares, by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Series II shares.

Any change in the Plan that would increase materially the distribution expenses paid by the Series II shares requires shareholder approval. No material amendment to the Plan may be made unless approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Rule 12b-1 Trustees cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting upon such amendment.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Fund’s financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2013 including the Financial Highlights pertaining thereto, and the reports of the independent registered public accounting firm thereon, are incorporated by reference into this SAI from such Fund’s most recent Annual Report to shareholders filed on Form N-CSR on                     .

The portions of such Annual Report that are not specifically listed above are not incorporated by reference into this SAI and are not a part of this Registration Statement.

 

90


APPENDIX A

RATINGS OF DEBT SECURITIES

The following is a description of the factors underlying the debt ratings of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch.

Moody’s Long-Term Debt Ratings

 

Aaa: Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.

 

Aa: Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.

 

A: Obligations rated A are considered upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.

 

Baa: Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics

 

Ba: Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.

 

B: Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.

 

Caa: Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.

 

Ca: Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.

 

C: Obligations rated C are the lowest rated class of bonds and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.

Note: Moody’s applies numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 in each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category.

Moody’s Short-Term Prime Rating System

P-1

Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-1 have a superior ability to repay short-term debt obligations.

P-2

Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-2 have a strong ability to repay short-term debt obligations.

P-3

Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Prime-3 have an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.

NP (Not Prime)

Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.

Note: In addition, in certain countries the prime rating may be modified by the issuer’s or guarantor’s senior unsecured long-term debt rating.

 

A-1


Moody’s MIG/VMIG US Short-Term Ratings

In municipal debt issuance, there are three rating categories for short-term obligations that are considered investment grade. These ratings are designated as Moody’s Investment Grade (MIG) and are divided into three levels – MIG 1 through MIG 3.

In addition, those short-term obligations that are of speculative quality are designated SG, or speculative grade.

In the case of variable rate demand obligations (VRDOs), a two-component rating is assigned. The first element represents Moody’s evaluation of the degree of risk associated with scheduled principal and interest payments. The second element represents Moody’s evaluation of the degree of risk associated with the demand feature, using the MIG rating scale.

The short-term rating assigned to the demand feature of VRDOs is designated as VMIG. When either the long- or short-term aspect of a VRDO is not rated, that piece is designated NR, e.g., Aaa/NR or NR/VMIG 1.

MIG ratings expire at note maturity. By contrast, VMIG rating expirations will be a function of each issue’s specific structural or credit features.

Gradations of investment quality are indicated by rating symbols, with each symbol representing a group in which the quality characteristics are broadly the same.

MIG 1/VMIG 1: This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.

MIG 2/VMIG 2: This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample although not as large as in the preceding group.

MIG 3/VMIG 3: This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash flow protection may be narrow and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well established.

SG: This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection.

Standard & Poor’s Long-Term Issue Credit Ratings

Issue credit ratings are based, in varying degrees, on Standard & Poor’s analysis of the following considerations:

 

    Likelihood of payment - capacity and willingness of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on an obligation in accordance with the terms of the obligation;

 

    Nature of and provisions of the obligation;

 

    Protection afforded by, and relative position of, the obligation in the event of bankruptcy, reorganization, or other arrangement under the laws of bankruptcy and other laws affecting creditors’ rights.

Issue ratings are an assessment of default risk, but may incorporate an assessment of relative seniority or ultimate recovery in the event of default. Junior obligations are typically rated lower than senior obligations, to reflect the lower priority in bankruptcy, as noted above. (Such differentiation may apply when an entity has both senior and subordinated obligations, secured and unsecured obligations, or operating company and holding company obligations.)

 

A-2


AAA

An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by Standard & Poor’s. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is extremely strong.

AA

An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is very strong.

A

An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is still strong.

BBB

An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

BB, B, CCC, CC and C

Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposures to adverse conditions.

BB

An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

B

An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

CCC

An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment, and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

CC

An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment.

C

A ‘C’ rating is assigned to obligations that are currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, obligations that have payment arrearages allowed by the terms of the documents, or obligations of an issuer that is the

 

A-3


subject of a bankruptcy petition or similar action which have not experienced a payment default. Among others, the ‘C’ rating may be assigned to subordinated debt, preferred stock or other obligations on which cash payments have been suspended in accordance with the instrument’s terms or when preferred stock is the subject of a distressed exchange offer, whereby some or all of the issue is either repurchased for an amount of cash or replaced by other instruments having a total value that is less than par.

D

An obligation rated ‘D’ is in payment default. The ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless Standard & Poor’s believes that such payments will be made within five business days, irrespective of any grace period. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized. An obligation’s rating is lowered to ‘D’ upon completion of a distressed exchange offer, whereby some or all of the issue is either repurchased for an amount of cash or replaced by other instruments having a total value that is less than par.

Plus (+) or minus (-)

The ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.

NR

This indicates that no rating has been requested, that there is insufficient information on which to base a rating, or that Standard & Poor’s does not rate a particular obligation as a matter of policy.

Standard & Poor’s Short-Term Issue Credit Ratings

A-1

A short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in the highest category by Standard & Poor’s. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on these obligations is extremely strong.

A-2

A short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitment on the obligation is satisfactory.

A-3

A short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead a weakened capacity of the obligor to meet its financial commitment on the obligation.

B

A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties which could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.

 

A-4


C

An obligor rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for it to meet its financial commitments.

D

A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in payment default. The ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless Standard & Poor’s believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action if payments on an obligation are jeopardized.

Standard & Poor’s Municipal Short-Term Note Ratings Definitions

A Standard & Poor’s U.S. municipal note rating reflects Standard & Poor’s opinion about the liquidity factors and market access risks unique to the notes. Notes due in three years or less will likely receive a note rating. Notes with an original maturity of more than three years will most likely receive a long-term debt rating. In determining which type of rating, if any, to assign, Standard & Poor’s analysis will review the following considerations:

 

    Amortization schedule - the larger final maturity relative to other maturities, the more likely it will be treated as a note; and

 

    Source of payment - the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be treated as a note.

Note rating symbols are as follows:

SP-1

Strong capacity to pay principal and interest. An issue determined to possess a very strong capacity to pay debt service is given a plus (+) designation.

SP-2

Satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest, with some vulnerability to adverse financial and economic changes over the term of the notes.

SP-3

Speculative capacity to pay principal and interest.

Standard & Poor’s Dual Ratings

Standard & Poor’s assigns “dual” ratings to all debt issues that have a put option or demand feature as part of their structure. The first rating addresses the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest as due, and the second rating addresses only the demand feature. The long-term rating symbols are used for bonds to denote the long-term maturity and the short-term rating symbols for the put option (for example, ‘AAA/A-1+’). With U.S. municipal short-term demand debt, note rating symbols are used with the short-term issue credit rating symbols (for example, ‘SP-1+/A-1+’)

The ratings and other credit related opinions of Standard & Poor’s and its affiliates are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell any securities or make any investment decisions. Standard & Poor’s assumes no obligation to update any information following publication. Users of ratings and credit related opinions should not rely on them in making any investment decision. Standard & Poor’s opinions and analysis do not address the suitability of any security. Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While Standard & Poor’s has obtained information from sources it believes to be

 

A-5


reliable, Standard & Poor’s does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Ratings and credit related opinions may be changed, suspended, or withdrawn at any time.

Fitch Credit Rating Scales

Fitch Ratings’ credit ratings provide an opinion on the relative ability of an entity to meet financial commitments, such as interest, preferred dividends, repayment of principal, insurance claims or counterparty obligations. Credit ratings are used by investors as indications of the likelihood of receiving the money owed to them in accordance with the terms on which they invested. The agency’s credit ratings cover the global spectrum of corporate, sovereign (including supranational and sub-national), financial, bank, insurance, municipal and other public finance entities and the securities or other obligations they issue, as well as structured finance securities backed by receivables or other financial assets.

The terms “investment grade” and “speculative grade” have established themselves over time as shorthand to describe the categories ‘AAA’ to ‘BBB’ (investment grade) and ‘BB’ to ‘D’ (speculative grade). The terms “investment grade” and “speculative grade” are market conventions, and do not imply any recommendation or endorsement of a specific security for investment purposes. “Investment grade” categories indicate relatively low to moderate credit risk, while ratings in the “speculative” categories either signal a higher level of credit risk or that a default has already occurred.

A designation of “Not Rated” or “NR” is used to denote securities not rated by Fitch where Fitch has rated some, but not all, securities comprising an issuance capital structure.

Credit ratings express risk in relative rank order, which is to say they are ordinal measures of credit risk and are not predictive of a specific frequency of default or loss.

Fitch Ratings’ credit ratings do not directly address any risk other than credit risk. In particular, ratings do not deal with the risk of a market value loss on a rated security due to changes in interest rates, liquidity and other market considerations. However, in terms of payment obligation on the rated liability, market risk may be considered to the extent that it influences the ability of an issuer to pay upon a commitment. Ratings nonetheless do not reflect market risk to the extent that they influence the size or other conditionality of the obligation to pay upon a commitment (for example, in the case of index-linked bonds).

In the default components of ratings assigned to individual obligations or instruments, the agency typically rates to the likelihood of non-payment or default in accordance with the terms of that instrument’s documentation. In limited cases, Fitch Ratings may include additional considerations (i.e. rate to a higher or lower standard than that implied in the obligation’s documentation). In such cases, the agency will make clear the assumptions underlying the agency’s opinion in the accompanying rating commentary.

Fitch Long-Term Rating Scales

Issuer Credit Rating Scales

Rated entities in a number of sectors, including financial and non-financial corporations, sovereigns and insurance companies, are generally assigned Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs). IDRs opine on an entity’s relative vulnerability to default on financial obligations. The “threshold” default risk addressed by the IDR is generally that of the financial obligations whose non-payment would best reflect the uncured failure of that entity. As such, IDRs also address relative vulnerability to bankruptcy, administrative receivership or similar concepts, although the agency recognizes that issuers may also make pre-emptive and therefore voluntary use of such mechanisms.

In aggregate, IDRs provide an ordinal ranking of issuers based on the agency’s view of their relative vulnerability to default, rather than a prediction of a specific percentage likelihood of default. For historical information on the default experience of Fitch-rated issuers, please consult the transition and default performance studies available from the Fitch Ratings website.

 

A-6


AAA: Highest credit quality.

‘AAA’ ratings denote the lowest expectation of default risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.

AA: Very high credit quality.

‘AA’ ratings denote expectations of very low default risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.

A: High credit quality.

‘A’ ratings denote expectations of low default risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.

BBB: Good credit quality.

‘BBB’ ratings indicate that expectations of default risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.

BB: Speculative.

‘BB’ ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability to default risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time; however, business or financial flexibility exists which supports the servicing of financial commitments.

B: Highly speculative.

‘B’ ratings indicate that material default risk is present, but a limited margin of safety remains. Financial commitments are currently being met; however, capacity for continued payment is vulnerable to deterioration in the business and economic environment.

CCC: Substantial credit risk.

Default is a real possibility.

CC: Very high levels of credit risk.

Default of some kind appears probable.

C: Exceptionally high levels of credit risk

Default is imminent or inevitable, or the issuer is in standstill. Conditions that are indicative of a ‘C’ category rating for an issuer include:

 

  a. the issuer has entered into a grace or cure period following non-payment of a material financial obligation;

 

  b. the issuer has entered into a temporary negotiated waiver or standstill agreement following a payment default on a material financial obligation; or

 

  c. Fitch Ratings otherwise believes a condition of ‘RD’ or ‘D’ to be imminent or inevitable, including through the formal announcement of a coercive debt exchange.

RD: Restricted default.

‘RD’ ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch Ratings’ opinion has experienced an uncured payment default on a bond, loan or other material financial obligation but which has not entered into bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal winding-up procedure, and which has not otherwise ceased business. This would include:

 

  a. the selective payment default on a specific class or currency of debt;

 

A-7


  b. the uncured expiry of any applicable grace period, cure period or default forbearance period following a payment default on a bank loan, capital markets security or other material financial obligation;

 

  c. the extension of multiple waivers or forbearance periods upon a payment default on one or more material financial obligations, either in series or in parallel; or

 

  d. execution of a coercive debt exchange on one or more material financial obligations.

D: Default.

‘D’ ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch Ratings’ opinion has entered into bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal winding-up procedure, or which has otherwise ceased business.

Default ratings are not assigned prospectively to entities or their obligations; within this context, non-payment on an instrument that contains a deferral feature or grace period will generally not be considered a default until after the expiration of the deferral or grace period, unless a default is otherwise driven by bankruptcy or other similar circumstance, or by a coercive debt exchange.

“Imminent” default typically refers to the occasion where a payment default has been intimated by the issuer, and is all but inevitable. This may, for example, be where an issuer has missed a scheduled payment, but (as is typical) has a grace period during which it may cure the payment default. Another alternative would be where an issuer has formally announced a coercive debt exchange, but the date of the exchange still lies several days or weeks in the immediate future.

In all cases, the assignment of a default rating reflects the agency’s opinion as to the most appropriate rating category consistent with the rest of its universe of ratings, and may differ from the definition of default under the terms of an issuer’s financial obligations or local commercial practice.

Note:

The modifiers “+” or “-” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories. Such suffixes are not added to the ‘AAA’ Long-Term IDR category, or to Long-Term IDR categories below ‘B’.

Fitch Short-Term Rating Scales

A short-term issuer or obligation rating is based in all cases on the short-term vulnerability to default of the rated entity or security stream and relates to the capacity to meet financial obligations in accordance with the documentation governing the relevant obligation. Short-Term Ratings are assigned to obligations whose initial maturity is viewed as “short term” based on market convention. Typically, this means up to 13 months for corporate, sovereign, and structured obligations, and up to 36 months for obligations in U.S. public finance markets.

F1: Highest short-term credit quality.

Indicates the strongest intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added “+” to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature.

F2: Good short-term credit quality.

Good intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments.

F3: Fair short-term credit quality.

The intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate.

B: Speculative short-term credit quality.

Minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus heightened vulnerability to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.

 

A-8


C: High short-term default risk.

Default is a real possibility.

RD: Restricted default.

Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Applicable to entity ratings only.

D: Default.

Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation.

 

A-9


APPENDIX B

Persons to Whom Invesco Provides

Non-Public Portfolio Holdings on an Ongoing Basis

(as of July 31, 2013)

 

Service Provider

  

Disclosure Category

ABN AMRO Financial Services, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Absolute Color    Financial Printer
Anglemyer & Co.    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP    Special Insurance Counsel
Barclays Capital, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Blaylock Robert Van LLC    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
BB&T Capital Markets    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Bear Stearns Pricing Direct, Inc.    Pricing Vendor (for certain Invesco Funds)
BLNS Securities Ltd.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
BOSC, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
BOWNE & Co.    Financial Printer
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.    Securities Lender (for certain Invesco Funds)
Cabrera Capital Markets    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Charles River Systems, Inc.    System Provider
Chas. P. Young Co.    Financial Printer
Cirrus Research, LLC    Trading System
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Commerce Capital Markets    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Crane Data, LLC    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
Credit Suisse International / Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Ltd.    Service Provider
Crews & Associates    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
D.A. Davidson & Co.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Dechert LLP    Legal Counsel
DEPFA First Albany    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
E.K. Riley Investments LLC    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Empirical Research Partners    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
Finacorp Securities    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
First Miami Securities    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
First Southwest Co.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
First Tryon Securities    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Fitch, Inc.    Rating & Ranking Agency (for certain Invesco Funds)
FT Interactive Data Corporation    Pricing Vendor
FTN Financial Group    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
GainsKeeper    Software Provider (for certain Invesco Funds)
GCom2 Solutions    Software Provider (for certain Invesco Funds)
George K. Baum & Company    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Glass, Lewis & Co.    System Provider (for certain Invesco Funds)
Global Trading Analytics, LLC    Software Provider
Global Trend Alert    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
Greater Houston Publishers, Inc.    Financial Printer
Hattier, Sanford & Reynoir    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Hutchinson, Shockey, Erley & Co.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
ICI (Investment Company Institute)    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)

 

B-1


Service Provider

  

Disclosure Category

ICRA Online Ltd.    Rating & Ranking Agency (for certain Invesco Funds)
iMoneyNet, Inc.    Rating & Ranking Agency (for certain Invesco Funds)
Initram Data, Inc.    Pricing Vendor
Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc.    Proxy Voting Service (for certain Invesco Funds)
Invesco Investment Services, Inc.    Transfer Agent
Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.    System Provider (for certain Invesco Funds)
Investment Company Institute    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
Investortools, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
ITG, Inc.    Pricing Vendor (for certain Invesco Funds)
J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.Citigroup Global Markets Inc.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.    Lender (for certain Invesco Funds)
J.P. Morgan Securities    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
John Hancock Investment Management Services, LLC    Sub-advisor (for certain sub-advised accounts)
Jorden Burt LLP    Special Insurance Counsel
KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP    Legal Counsel
Lebenthal & Co. LLC    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Lipper, Inc.    Rating & Ranking Agency (for certain Invesco Funds)
Loan Pricing Corporation    Pricing Service (for certain Invesco Funds)
Loop Capital Markets    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
M.R. Beal    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
MarkIt Group Limited    Pricing Vendor (for certain Invesco Funds)
Merrill Communications LLC    Financial Printer
Mesirow Financial, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Middle Office Solutions    Software Provider
Moody’s Investors Service    Rating & Ranking Agency (for certain Invesco Funds)
Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Morrison Foerster LLP    Legal Counsel
MS Securities Services, Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated    Securities Lender (for certain Invesco Funds)
Muzea Insider Consulting Services, LLC    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
Ness USA Inc.    System provider
Noah Financial, LLC    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
Omgeo LLC    Trading System
Piper Jaffray    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
Prager, Sealy & Co.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (for all Invesco Funds)
Protective Securities    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Ramirez & Co., Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
RBC Capital Markets    Analyst (for certain Invesco Funds)
RBC Dain Rauscher Incorporated    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Reuters America LLC    Pricing Service (for certain Invesco Funds)
Rice Financial Products    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
RR Donnelley Financial    Financial Printer
Ryan Beck & Co.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
SAMCO Capital Markets, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)

 

B-2


Service Provider

  

Disclosure Category

Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Siebert Brandford Shank & Co., L.L.C.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Simon Printing Company    Financial Printer
Southwest Precision Printers, Inc.    Financial Printer
Southwest Securities    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Standard and Poor’s/Standard and Poor’s Securities Evaluations, Inc.    Pricing Service and Rating and Ranking Agency (each, respectively, for certain Invesco Funds)
StarCompliance, Inc.    System Provider
State Street Bank and Trust Company    Custodian, Lender, Securities Lender, and System Provider (each, respectively, for certain Invesco Funds)
Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP    Legal Counsel
The Bank of New York    Custodian and Securities Lender (each, respectively, for certain Invesco Funds)
The MacGregor Group, Inc.    Software Provider
The Savader Group LLC    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Thomson Information Services Incorporated    Software Provider
UBS Financial Services, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
VCI Group Inc.    Financial Printer
Vining Sparks IBG    Broker (for Certain Invesco Funds)
W.H Mell Associates, Inc.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Wachovia National Bank, N.A.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
Western Lithograph    Financial Printer
Wiley Bros. Aintree Capital L.L.C.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
William Blair & Co.    Broker (for certain Invesco Funds)
XSP, LLCSolutions Plus, Inc.    Software Provider

 

B-3


APPENDIX C

TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS

As of January 31, 2014

 

 

The address of each trustee and officer is 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77046-1173. The trustees serve for the life of the Trust, subject to their earlier death, incapacitation, resignation, retirement or removal as more specifically provided in the Trust’s organizational documents. Each officer serves for a one year term or until their successors are elected and qualified. Column two below includes length of time served with predecessor entities, if any.

 

 

Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

Interested Persons

Martin L. Flanagan 1  – 1960

Trustee

   2007   

Executive Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Ltd. (ultimate parent of Invesco and a global investment management firm); Advisor to the Board, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.); Trustee, The Invesco Funds; Vice Chair, Investment Company Institute; and Member of Executive Board, SMU Cox School of Business

 

Formerly: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (registered investment adviser); Director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, IVZ Inc. (holding company), INVESCO Group Services, Inc. (service provider) and Invesco North American Holdings, Inc. (holding company); Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Holding Company Limited (parent of Invesco and a global investment management firm); Director, Invesco Ltd.; Chairman, Investment Company Institute and President, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Co-President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Franklin Resources, Inc. (global investment management organization).

   124    None

Philip A. Taylor 2  – 1954

Trustee, President and Principal Executive Officer

   2006    Head of North American Retail and Senior Managing Director, Invesco Ltd.; Director, Co-Chairman, Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser);    124    None

 

1   Mr. Flanagan is considered an interested person of the Trust because he is an officer of the adviser to the Trust, and an officer and a director of Invesco Ltd., ultimate parent of the adviser to the Trust.
2   Mr. Taylor is considered an interested person of the Trust because he is an officer and a director of the adviser to, and a director of the principal underwriter of, the Trust.

 

C-1


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

     

Director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Management Group, Inc.) (financial services holding company); Director and President, INVESCO Funds Group, Inc. (registered investment adviser and registered transfer agent); Director and Chairman, Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Investment Services, Inc.) (registered transfer agent) and IVZ Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as INVESCO Distributors, Inc.) (registered broker dealer); Director, President and Chairman, Invesco Inc. (holding company) and Invesco Canada Holdings Inc. (holding company); Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Corporate Class Inc. (corporate mutual fund company) and Invesco Canada Fund Inc. (corporate mutual fund company); Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Canada Ltd. (formerly known as Invesco Trimark Ltd./Invesco Trimark Ltèe) (registered investment adviser and registered transfer agent); Trustee, President and Principal Executive Officer, The Invesco Funds (other than AIM Treasurer’s Series Trust (Invesco Treasurer’s Series Trust) and Short-Term Investments Trust); Trustee and Executive Vice President, The Invesco Funds (AIM Treasurer’s Series Trust (Invesco Treasurer’s Series Trust) and Short-Term Investments Trust only); Director, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management); Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, Van Kampen Exchange Corp.

 

Formerly: Director and Chairman, Van Kampen Investor Services Inc.; Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, 1371 Preferred Inc. (holding company); and Van Kampen Investments Inc.; Director and President, AIM GP Canada Inc. (general partner for limited partnerships); and Van Kampen Advisors, Inc.; Director and Chief Executive Officer, Invesco Trimark Dealer Inc. (registered broker dealer); Director, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc.) (registered broker dealer); Manager, Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC; Director, Chief Executive Officer and

     

 

C-2


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

     

President, Invesco Advisers, Inc.; Director, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc.; President, Invesco Trimark Dealer Inc. and Invesco Trimark Ltd./Invesco Trimark Ltèe; Director and President, AIM Trimark Corporate Class Inc. and AIM Trimark Canada Fund Inc.; Senior Managing Director, Invesco Holding Company Limited; Trustee and Executive Vice President, Tax-Free Investments Trust; Director and Chairman, Fund Management Company (former registered broker dealer); President and Principal Executive Officer, The Invesco Funds (AIM Treasurer’s Series Trust (Invesco Treasurer’s Series Trust), Short-Term Investments Trust and Tax-Free Investments Trust only); President, AIM Trimark Global Fund Inc. and AIM Trimark Canada Fund Inc.

     

Wayne W. Whalen  3  – 1939

Trustee

   2010    Of Counsel, and prior to 2010, partner in the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, legal counsel to certain funds in the Fund Complex.    136    Director of the Mutual fund Directors Forum, a nonprofit membership organization for investment directors; Chairman and Director of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library Foundation; and Director of the Stevenson Center for Democracy

Independent Trustees

           

Bruce L. Crockett – 1944

Trustee and Chair

   1993   

Chairman, Crockett Technologies Associates (technology consulting company)

 

Formerly: Director, Captaris (unified messaging provider); Director, President and Chief Executive Officer COMSAT Corporation; and Chairman, Board of Governors of INTELSAT (international communications company)

   123    ACE Limited (insurance company); and Investment Company Institute

 

3   Mr. Whalen has been deemed to be an interested person of the Trust because of his prior service as counsel to the predecessor funds of certain Invesco open-end funds and his affiliation with the law firm that served as counsel to such predecessor funds and continues to serve as counsel to the Invesco Van Kampen closed-end funds.

 

C-3


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

David C. Arch – 1945

Trustee

   2010   

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blistex Inc., (consumer health care products manufacturer)

 

Retired. Formerly: Member of the Heartland Alliance Advisory Board, a nonprofit organization serving human needs based in Chicago

   136   

Board member of the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, Member of the Board of Visitors, Institute for the Humanities University of Michigan

Frank S. Bayley – 1939

Trustee

   2001   

Retired. Formerly: Director, Badgley Funds Inc. (registered investment company) (2 portfolios) and General Partner and Of Counsel, law firm of Baker & McKenzie, LLP

   123   

Director and Chairman, C.D. Stimson Company (a real estate company); Trustee and Overseer, The Curtis Institute of Music

James T. Bunch – 1942

Trustee

   2004   

Managing Member, Grumman Hill Group LLC (family office private equity management)

 

Formerly: Founder, Green Manning & Bunch Ltd. (investment banking firm) (1988-2010); Executive Committee, United States Golf Association; and Director, Policy Studies, Inc. and Van Gilder Insurance Corporation.

   123   

Chairman, Board of Governors, Western Golf Association, Chairman-elect, Evans Scholars Foundation and Director, Denver Film Society

Rodney F. Dammeyer – 1940

Trustee

   2010   

Chairman of CAC,LLC, (private company offering capital investment and management advisory services)

 

Formerly: Prior to 2001, Managing Partner at Equity Group Corporate Investments. Prior to 1995,Chief Executive Officer of Itel Corporation (formerly Anixter International) Prior to 1985, experience includes Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Household International, Inc., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Northwest Industries, Inc. and Partner of Arthur Andersen & Co.; From 1987 to 2010, Director/Trustee of investment companies in the Van Kampen Funds complex

   123
  

Director of Quidel Corporation and Stericycle, Inc. Prior to May 2008, Trustee of The Scripps Research Institute. Prior to February 2008, Director of Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.

 

C-4


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

Albert R. Dowden – 1941

Trustee

   2000   

Director of a number of public and private business corporations, including the Boss Group, Ltd. (private investment and management); and Reich & Tang Funds (5 portfolios) (registered investment company)

 

Formerly: Director, Homeowners of America Holding Corporation/Homeowners of America Insurance Company (property casualty company); Director, Continental Energy Services, LLC (oil and gas pipeline service); Director, CompuDyne Corporation (provider of product and services to the public security market) and Director, Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. (reinsurance company); Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, Volvo Group North America, Inc.; Senior Vice President, AB Volvo; Director of various public and private corporations; Chairman, DHJ Media, Inc.; Director, Magellan Insurance Company; and Director, The Hertz Corporation, Genmar Corporation (boat manufacturer), National Media Corporation; Advisory Board of Rotary Power International (designer, manufacturer, and seller of rotary power engines); and Chairman, Cortland Trust, Inc. (registered investment company)

   123    Director of Nature’s Sunshine Products, Inc.

Jack M. Fields – 1952

Trustee

   1997   

Chief Executive Officer, Twenty First Century Group, Inc. (government affairs company); Owner and Chief Executive Officer, Dos Angeles Ranch, L.P. (cattle, hunting, corporate entertainment); and Discovery Global Education Fund (non-profit)

 

Formerly: Chief Executive Officer, Texana Timber LP (sustainable forestry company); Director of Cross Timbers Quail Research Ranch (non-profit); and member of the U.S. House of Representatives

   123    Insperity, Inc. (formerly known as Administaff)

Prema Mathai-Davis – 1950

Trustee

   1998   

Retired. Formerly: Chief Executive Officer, YWCA of the U.S.A.

   123    None

Larry Soll – 1942

Trustee

   2004   

Retired. Formerly: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Synergen Corp. (a biotechnology company)

   123    None

 

C-5


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

Hugo F. Sonnenschein 1940

Trustee

   2010   

Distinguished Service Professor and President Emeritus of the University of Chicago and the Adam Smith Distinguished Service Professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Chicago

 

Formerly: President of the University of Chicago

   136   

Trustee of the University of Rochester and a member of its investment committee; Member of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Philosophical Society and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Raymond Stickel, Jr. – 1944

Trustee

   2005   

Retired. Formerly: Director, Mainstay VP Series Funds, Inc. (25 portfolios) and Partner, Deloitte & Touche

   123    None

Officers

           

Russell C. Burk – 1958

Senior Vice President and Senior Officer

   2005    Senior Vice President and Senior Officer, The Invesco Funds    N/A    N/A

John M. Zerr – 1962

Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

   2006    Director, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Management Group, Inc.) and Van Kampen Exchange Corp.; Senior Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Senior Vice President and Secretary, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc.); Director, Vice President and Secretary, Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Investment Services, Inc.) and IVZ Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as INVESCO Distributors, Inc.); Director and Vice President, INVESCO Funds Group, Inc.; Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, The Invesco Funds; Manager, Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC; Director, Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Investment Advisers LLC (formerly known as Van Kampen Asset Management); Secretary and General Counsel, Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (formerly known as Van Kampen Funds Inc.) and Chief Legal Officer, PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, PowerShares India    N/A    N/A

 

C-6


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

     

Exchange-Traded Fund Trust and PowerShares Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust

 

Formerly: Director and Vice President, Van Kampen Advisors Inc.; Director, Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Van Kampen Investor Services Inc.; Director, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc.); Director, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Invesco Aim Advisers, Inc. and Van Kampen Investments Inc.; Director, Vice President and Secretary, Fund Management Company; Director, Senior Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Vice President, Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc.; Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel, Liberty Ridge Capital, Inc. (an investment adviser); Vice President and Secretary, PBHG Funds (an investment company) and PBHG Insurance Series Fund (an investment company); Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, Old Mutual Investment Partners (a broker-dealer); General Counsel and Secretary, Old Mutual Fund Services (an administrator) and Old Mutual Shareholder Services (a shareholder servicing center); Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Old Mutual Capital, Inc. (an investment adviser); and Vice President and Secretary, Old Mutual Advisors Funds (an investment company)

     

 

C-7


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

Sheri Morris – 1964

Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer

   1999   

Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer, The Invesco Funds; Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); and Vice President, PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, PowerShares India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust and PowerShares Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust

 

Formerly: Vice President, Invesco Aim Advisers, Inc., Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc. and Invesco Aim Private Asset Management, Inc.; Assistant Vice President and Assistant Treasurer, The Invesco Funds and Assistant Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc., Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc. and Invesco Aim Private Asset Management, Inc.; and Treasurer, PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, PowerShares India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust and PowerShares Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust

   N/A    N/A

Karen Dunn Kelley – 1960

Vice President

   1993   

Senior Managing Director, Investments; Director, Co-President, Co-Chief Executive Officer, and Co-Chairman, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Chairman, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.; Senior Vice President, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Management Group, Inc.); Executive Vice President, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc.); Director, Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. and Invesco Management Company Limited; Director and President, INVESCO Asset Management (Bermuda) Ltd., Vice President, The Invesco Funds (other than AIM Treasurer’s Series Trust (Invesco Treasurer’s Series Trust) and Short-Term Investments Trust); and President and Principal Executive Officer, The Invesco Funds (AIM Treasurer’s Series Trust (Invesco Treasurer’s Series Trust) and Short-Term Investments Trust only)

 

Formerly: Director, INVESCO Global Asset Management Limited and INVESCO

   N/A    N/A

 

C-8


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

     

Management S.A.; Senior Vice President, Van Kampen Investments Inc. and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser); Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.); Director of Cash Management and Senior Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. and Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc.; President and Principal Executive Officer, Tax-Free Investments Trust; Director and President, Fund Management Company; Chief Cash Management Officer, Director of Cash Management, Senior Vice President, and Managing Director, Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc.; Director of Cash Management, Senior Vice President, and Vice President, Invesco Advisers, Inc. and The Invesco Funds (AIM Treasurer’s Series Trust (Invesco Treasurer’s Series Trust), Short-Term Investments Trust and Tax-Free Investments Trust only)

     

Crissie M. Wisdom – 1969

Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer

   2013    Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.) (registered investment adviser), Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. (formerly known as Van Kampen Funds Inc.), Invesco Distributors, Inc., Invesco Investment Services, Inc., Invesco Management Group, Inc., Van Kampen Exchange Corp., The Invesco Funds, Invesco Funds (Chicago), and PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, PowerShares India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, and PowerShares Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust; and Fraud Prevention Manager and Controls and Risk Analysis Manager for Invesco Investment Services, Inc.    N/A    N/A

Todd L. Spillane – 1958

Chief Compliance Officer

   2006    Senior Vice President, Invesco Management Group, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Management Group, Inc.) and Van Kampen Exchange Corp.; Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer, Invesco Advisers, Inc. (registered investment adviser) (formerly known as Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.); Chief Compliance Officer, The Invesco Funds; Vice President, Invesco Distributors, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc.) and Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (formerly known as Invesco Aim Investment Services, Inc.)    N/A    N/A

 

C-9


Name, Year of Birth and Position(s)
Held with the Trust

   Trustee
and/or
Officer
Since
  

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past 5 Years

   Number of Funds
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Trustee
  

Other

Trusteeship(s)/

Directorships(s)

Held by

Trustee/Director

During Past 5

Years

     

Formerly: Chief Compliance Officer, Invesco Funds (Chicago); Senior Vice President, Van Kampen Investments Inc.; Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer, Invesco Aim Advisers, Inc. and Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc.; Chief Compliance Officer, INVESCO Private Capital Investments, Inc. (holding company), Invesco Private Capital, Inc. (registered investment adviser), Invesco Global Asset Management (N.A.), Inc., Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. (registered investment adviser), Van Kampen Investor Services Inc., PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust, PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II, PowerShares India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust and PowerShares Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust; and Vice President, Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc. and Fund Management Company

     

 

C-10


Trustee Ownership of Fund Shares as of December 31, 2013

 

Name of Trustee

   Dollar Range of Equity Securities
Per Fund
   Aggregate Dollar Range of
Equity Securities in All
Registered Investment
Companies Overseen by
Trustee in Invesco Funds

Interested Persons

     

Martin L. Flanagan

   None    Over $100,000

Philip A. Taylor

   None    None

Wayne M. Whalen

   None    Over $100,000 4

Independent Trustees

     

David C. Arch

   None    Over $100,000

Frank S. Bayley

   None    Over $100,000

James T. Bunch

   None    Over $100,000 4

Bruce L. Crockett

   None    Over $100,000 4

Rodney F. Dammeyer

   None    Over $100,000

Albert R. Dowden

   None    Over $100,000

Jack M. Fields

   None    Over $100,000 4

Prema Mathai-Davis

   None    Over $100,000 4

Larry Soll

   None    Over $100,000 4

Hugo F. Sonnenschein

   None    Over $100,000 4

Raymond Stickel, Jr.

   None    Over $100,000

 

4   Includes the total amount of compensation deferred by the trustee at his or her election pursuant to a deferred compensation plan. Such deferred compensation is placed in a deferral account and deemed to be invested in one or more of the Invesco Funds

 

C-11


APPENDIX D

TRUSTEE COMPENSATION TABLE

Set forth below is information regarding compensation paid or accrued for each trustee of the Trust who was not affiliated with Invesco during the year ended December 31, 2013:

 

Trustee

   Aggregate
Compensation
from the Trust (1)
     Retirement
Benefits
Accrued by All
Invesco Funds (2)
     Estimated
Annual
Benefits upon
Retirement for
Invesco
Funds (3)
     Total
Compensation
from All
Invesco

Funds Paid to
Trustees (4)
 

Interested Trustees

           

Wayne W. Whalen

   $         $ 357,269       $ 204,000       $ 393,000   

Independent Trustees

           

David C. Arch

        202,943         204,000         406,250   

Frank S. Bayley

        227,815         204,000         377,900   

James T. Bunch

        333,951         204,000         345,700   

Bruce L. Crockett

        229,886         204,000         666,000   

Rodney F. Dammeyer

        345,145         204,000         357,087   

Albert R. Dowden

        322,755         204,000         372,900   

Jack M. Fields

        363,066         204,000         316,000   

Prema Mathai-Davis

        349,810         204,000         340,700   

Larry Soll

        371,889         225,769         377,900   

Hugo F. Sonnenschein

        345,145         204,000         426,700   

Raymond Stickel, Jr.

        259,883         204,000         402,600   

Officer

           

Russell Burk

        N/A         N/A         703,056   

 

(1)   Amounts shown are based on the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. The total amount of compensation deferred by all trustees of the Trust during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, including earnings, was $        .
(2)   During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the total amount of expenses allocated to the Trust in respect of such retirement benefits was $        .
(3)   These amounts represent the estimated annual benefits payable by the Invesco Funds upon the trustee’s retirement and assumes each trustee serves until his or her normal retirement date.
(4)   All trustees except Arch, Dammeyer, Sonnenschein and Whalen currently serve as trustee of 28 registered investment companies advised by Invesco. Messrs. Arch, Dammeyer, Sonnenschein and Whalen currently serve as trustee of 29 registered investment companies advised by Invesco.
(5) During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. the Trust paid              legal fees to Goodwin Procter LLP for services rendered by such firm as counsel to the independent trustees of the Trust.

 

D-1


Appendix E

 

LOGO

I.1.       PROXY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES – INVESCO ADVISERS

 

Applicable to    All Advisory Clients, including the Invesco Funds
Risk Addressed by Policy    breach of fiduciary duty to client under Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by placing Invesco personal interests ahead of client best economic interests in voting proxies
Relevant Law and Other Sources    Investment Advisers Act of 1940

Last ¨  Reviewed      þ Revised

by Compliance for Accuracy

   November, 2013
Policy/Procedure Owner    Advisory Compliance
Policy Approver    Invesco Advisers, Inc. Invesco Funds Board, Invesco Funds (Chicago) Board
Approved/Adopted Date    November, 2013

The following policies and procedures apply to all institutional and retail funds and accounts (collectively, the “Accounts”) managed by Invesco Advisers, Inc. (“Invesco”).

A. GUIDING PRINCIPLES

 

 

Invesco may be authorized by its clients, including the funds it manages (“Clients”), to vote proxies appurtenant to the securities owned by such Clients. If so authorized, Invesco carries out this responsibility by voting proxies in a manner reasonably designed to maximize the economic interests of its Clients and to minimize any real or perceived conflicts of interest. Invesco may determine not to vote proxies if it determines that the cost or restrictions placed on a Client are outweighed by the benefit to such Client of voting the proxy.

Invesco is guided by the following principles:

 

   

Invesco votes for proposals that maximize long-term shareholder value.

 

   

Invesco believes in corporate accountability and supports governance structures reinforcing management’s accountability to the board of directors and a board of directors’ accountability to shareholders.

 

   

In addition to the performance driven considerations noted above, Invesco believes that environmental, social and corporate governance proposals can influence long-term shareholder value and should be voted in a manner where such long-term shareholder value is maximized.

 

November 2013

E-1


B. OPERATING PROCEDURES AND RESPONSIBLE PARTIES

 

 

Proxy administration

Guided by its philosophy that proxy voting is an asset that is to be managed by each investment team, consistent with each team’s view as to the best economic interest of its shareholders, Invesco has created the Invesco US Proxy Advisory Committee (“IUPAC”). The IUPAC is an investments driven committee comprised solely of representatives from each investment management team at Invesco. The purpose of the IUPAC is to provide a forum for investment teams to monitor proxy voting trends, understand inconsistent votes within the complex, and to vote proxies where Invesco as a firm has a conflict of interest with an issuer or a member of the IUPAC has a personal conflict of interest with an issuer whose proxy he or she is charged with voting. The IUPAC also will consider and express a view on the proxies of the top twenty-five issuers held across all Client accounts, as measured by the total market value of shares held by Invesco Client accounts, and any other proxy brought to the IUPAC by an IUPAC member in an effort to build consensus around a proxy. Absent a conflict of interest, each investment team may deviate from the view formed by the IUPAC on any proxy. In cases where there is a firm-level or personal conflict of interest with a proxy, the IUPAC’s vote controls the proxy across all applicable Client accounts. Representatives of the IUPAC will have access to third party proxy advisory analyses provided by each of Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) as one of many research tools in determining how to vote a proxy and is not required to vote in accordance with the recommendations of either.

 

 

Important principles underlying the Invesco Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Guidelines”)

I. Corporate Governance

Management teams of companies are accountable to the boards of directors and directors of publicly held companies are accountable to shareholders. Invesco endeavors to vote the proxies of portfolio companies in a manner that will reinforce the notion of a board’s accountability. Consequently, Invesco generally votes against any actions that would impair the rights of shareholders or would reduce shareholders’ influence over the board or over management.

The following are specific voting issues that illustrate how Invesco applies this principle of accountability.

 

   

Elections of directors. In uncontested director elections for companies that do not have a controlling shareholder, Invesco generally votes in favor of slates if they are comprised of at least a majority of independent directors and if the boards’ key committees are fully independent. Key committees include the Audit, Compensation and Governance or Nominating Committees. Invesco’s standard of independence excludes directors who, in addition to the directorship, have any material business or family relationships with the companies they serve.

Contested director elections are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

 

   

Director performance. Invesco generally withholds votes from directors who exhibit a lack of accountability to shareholders, either through their level of attendance at meetings or by adopting or approving egregious corporate-governance or other policies. In cases of material financial restatements, accounting fraud, habitually late filings, adopting shareholder rights plan (“poison pills”) without shareholder

 

November 2013

E-2


 

approval, or other areas of poor performance, Invesco may withhold votes from some or all of a company’s directors. In situations where directors’ performance is a concern, Invesco may also support shareholder proposals to take corrective actions such as so-called “clawback” provisions.

 

   

Auditors and Audit Committee members . Invesco believes a company’s Audit Committee has a high degree of responsibility to shareholders in matters of financial disclosure, integrity of the financial statements and effectiveness of a company’s internal controls. Independence, experience and financial expertise are critical elements of a well-functioning Audit Committee. When electing directors who are members of a company’s Audit Committee, or when ratifying a company’s auditors, Invesco considers the past performance of the Committee and holds its members accountable for the quality of the company’s financial statements and reports.

 

   

Majority standard in director elections. The right to elect directors is the single most important mechanism shareholders have to promote accountability. Invesco supports the nascent effort to reform the U.S. convention of electing directors, and generally votes in favor of proposals to elect directors by a majority vote.

 

   

Classified boards. Invesco generally supports proposals to elect directors annually instead of electing them to staggered multi-year terms because annual elections increase a board’s level of accountability to its shareholders.

 

   

Supermajority voting requirements. Unless required by law in the state of incorporation, Invesco generally votes against actions that would impose any supermajority voting requirement, and generally supports actions to dismantle existing supermajority requirements.

 

   

Responsiveness. Invesco generally withholds votes from directors who do not adequately respond to shareholder proposals that were approved by a majority of votes cast the prior year.

 

   

Cumulative voting. The practice of cumulative voting can enable minority shareholders to have representation on a company’s board. Invesco generally supports proposals to institute the practice of cumulative voting at companies whose overall corporate-governance standards indicate a particular need to protect the interests of minority shareholders.

 

   

Shareholder access. On business matters with potential financial consequences, Invesco generally votes in favor of proposals that would increase shareholders’ opportunities to express their views to boards of directors, proposals that would lower barriers to shareholder action and proposals to promote the adoption of generally accepted best practices in corporate governance. Furthermore, Invesco generally votes for shareholder proposals that are designed to protect shareholder rights if a company’s corporate governance standards indicate that such additional protections are warranted.

II. Incentives

Invesco believes properly constructed compensation plans that include equity ownership are effective in creating incentives that induce management and employees of portfolio companies to create greater shareholder wealth. Invesco generally supports equity compensation plans that promote the proper alignment of incentives with shareholders’ long-term interests, and generally votes against plans that are overly dilutive to existing shareholders, plans that contain objectionable structural features, and plans that appear likely to reduce the value of the Client’s investment.

 

November 2013

E-3


Following are specific voting issues that illustrate how Invesco evaluates incentive plans.

 

   

Executive compensation. Invesco evaluates compensation plans for executives within the context of the company’s performance under the executives’ tenure. Invesco believes independent compensation committees are best positioned to craft executive-compensation plans that are suitable for their company-specific circumstances. Invesco views the election of independent compensation committee members as the appropriate mechanism for shareholders to express their approval or disapproval of a company’s compensation practices. Therefore, Invesco generally does not support shareholder proposals to limit or eliminate certain forms of executive compensation. In the interest of reinforcing the notion of a compensation committee’s accountability to shareholders, Invesco generally supports proposals requesting that companies subject each year’s compensation record to an advisory shareholder vote, or so-called “say on pay” proposals.

 

   

Equity-based compensation plans. Invesco generally votes against plans that contain structural features that would impair the alignment of incentives between shareholders and management. Such features include the ability to reprice or reload options without shareholder approval, the ability to issue options below the stock’s current market price, or the ability automatically to replenish shares without shareholder approval.

 

   

Employee stock-purchase plans. Invesco generally supports employee stock-purchase plans that are reasonably designed to provide proper incentives to a broad base of employees, provided that the price at which employees may acquire stock is at most a 15 percent discount from the market price.

 

   

Severance agreements. Invesco generally votes in favor of proposals requiring advisory shareholder ratification of executives’ severance agreements. However, we generally oppose proposals requiring such agreements to be ratified by shareholders in advance of their adoption. Given the vast differences that may occur in these agreements, it is necessary to note that IUPAC can and does evaluate some severance agreements on a case-by-case basis.

 

III. Capitalization

Examples of management proposals related to a company’s capital structure include authorizing or issuing additional equity capital, repurchasing outstanding stock, or enacting a stock split or reverse stock split. On requests for additional capital stock, Invesco analyzes the company’s stated reasons for the request. Except where the request could adversely affect the Client’s ownership stake or voting rights, Invesco generally supports a board’s decisions on its needs for additional capital stock. Some capitalization proposals require a case-by-case analysis. Examples of such proposals include authorizing common or preferred stock with special voting rights, or issuing additional stock in connection with an acquisition.

 

IV. Mergers, Acquisitions and Other Corporate Actions

Issuers occasionally require shareholder approval to engage in certain corporate actions such as mergers, acquisitions, name changes, dissolutions, reorganizations, divestitures and reincorporations and the votes for these types of corporate actions are generally determined on a case-by-case basis.

 

November 2013

E-4


V.

Anti-Takeover Measures

Practices designed to protect a company from unsolicited bids can adversely affect shareholder value and voting rights, and they create conflicts of interests among directors, management and shareholders. Except under special issuer-specific circumstances, Invesco generally votes to reduce or eliminate such measures. These measures include adopting or renewing “poison pills”, requiring supermajority voting on certain corporate actions, classifying the election of directors instead of electing each director to an annual term, or creating separate classes of common or preferred stock with special voting rights. Invesco generally votes against management proposals to impose these types of measures, and generally votes for shareholder proposals designed to reduce such measures. Invesco generally supports shareholder proposals directing companies to subject their anti-takeover provisions to a shareholder vote.

 

VI.

Environmental and Social Issues

Invesco will evaluate environmental and social proposals when it believes such proposals may influence long-term shareholder value. If Invesco votes on an environmental or social proposal, it shall do so in a manner it believes will maximize long-term shareholder value.

 

VII.

Routine Business Matters

Routine business matters rarely have the potential to have a material effect on the economic prospects of Clients’ holdings, so Invesco generally supports the board’s discretion on these items. However, Invesco generally votes against proposals where there is insufficient information to make a decision about the nature of the proposal. Similarly, Invesco generally votes against proposals to conduct other unidentified business at shareholder meetings.

 

 

C.

SUMMARY

These Guidelines provide an important framework for making proxy-voting decisions, and should give our Clients insight into the factors driving Invesco’s decisions. The Guidelines cannot address all potential proxy issues, however. Decisions on specific issues must be made within the context of these Guidelines. In addition, at the discretion of the portfolio managers, Invesco may also vote shares held on a Client-by-Client basis.

 

 

D.

EXCEPTIONS

Client Maintains Right to Vote Proxies

In the case of institutional Clients or sub-advised Clients, Invesco will vote the proxies in accordance with these Guidelines unless a Client, ERISA or non-ERISA, retains, in writing, the right to vote or the named fiduciary (e.g., the plan sponsor) of a Client retains in writing the right to direct the plan trustee or a third party to vote proxies.

Proxy Voting for Fixed Income Assets and Stable Value Wrap Agreements

Some of Invesco’s fixed income Clients hold interests in preferred stock of companies and some of Invesco’s stable value clients are parties to wrap agreements. From time to time, companies that have issued preferred stock or that are parties to wrap agreements request

 

November 2013

E-5


that Invesco’s Clients vote proxies on particular matters. Neither ISS nor GL currently provides proxy analysis or vote recommendations with respect to such proxy votes. Therefore, when a particular matter arises in this category, the portfolio managers responsible for the particular mandate will review the matter and make a recommendation as to how to vote the associated proxy.

Proxy Constraints

In certain circumstances, Invesco may refrain from voting where the economic cost of voting a company’s proxy exceeds any anticipated benefits of that proxy proposal. In addition, there may be instances in which Invesco is unable to vote a proxy despite using commercially reasonable efforts to vote all of its Clients’ proxies. Particular examples of such instances include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

   

When securities are participating in the securities lending program, Invesco makes a determination of whether to terminate the loan by weighing the benefit to the Clients of voting a particular proxy versus the revenue lost by terminating the loan and recalling the securities. In some countries the exercise of voting rights requires the Client to submit to “share-blocking.” Invesco generally refrains from voting proxies in share-blocking countries unless the portfolio manager determines that the benefit to the Client(s) of voting a specific proxy outweighs the Client’s temporary inability to sell the security.

 

   

An inability to receive proxy materials from our Clients’ custodians with enough time and enough information to make a voting decision sometimes precludes Invesco’s ability to vote proxies.

 

   

A requirement of some non-U.S. companies that in order to vote a proxy a representative in person must attend the proxy meeting. Invesco makes a determination as to whether the costs of sending a representative or signing a power-of-attorney outweigh the benefit of voting a particular proxy.

In the great majority of instances Invesco is able to vote U.S. and non-U.S. proxies successfully. It is important to note that Invesco makes voting decisions for non-U.S. issuers using these Guidelines as its framework, but also takes into account the corporate governance standards, regulatory environment and generally reasonable and governance-minded practices of the local market.

 

 

E. RESOLVING POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Firm Level Conflicts of Interest . A potential conflict of interest arises when Invesco votes a proxy for an issuer with which it also maintains a material business relationship. Examples could include issuers that are distributors of Invesco’s products, or issuers that employ Invesco to manage portions of their retirement plans or treasury accounts.

Invesco generally resolves such potential conflicts in one of the following ways: (1) if the proposal that gives rise to the potential conflict is specifically addressed by the Guidelines, Invesco may vote the proxy in accordance with the predetermined Guidelines; (2) Invesco may engage an independent third party to determine how the proxy should be voted; or (3) Invesco may establish an ethical wall or other informational barrier between the persons involved in the potential conflict and the persons making the proxy-voting decision in order to insulate the potential conflict from the decision makers.

 

November 2013

E-6


Because the Guidelines are pre-determined and crafted to be in the best economic interest of Clients, applying the Guidelines to vote Client proxies should, in most instances, adequately resolve any potential conflict of interest. As an additional safeguard against potential conflicts, persons from Invesco’s marketing, distribution and other customer-facing functions are not members of IUPAC.

Personal Conflicts of Interest. If any member of IUPAC has a personal conflict of interest with respect to a company or an issue presented for voting, that IUPAC member will inform IUPAC of such conflict and will abstain from voting on that company or issue. All IUPAC members shall sign an annual conflicts of interest memorandum.

Funds of Funds . Some Invesco Funds offering diversified asset allocation within one investment vehicle own shares in other Invesco Funds. A potential conflict of interest could arise if an underlying Invesco Fund has a shareholder meeting with any proxy issues to be voted on, because Invesco’s asset-allocation funds or target-maturity funds may be large shareholders of the underlying fund. In order to avoid any potential for a conflict, the asset-allocation funds and target maturity funds vote their shares in the same proportion as the votes of the external shareholders of the underlying fund.

 

F.

RECORDKEEPING

The Investments Administration team will be responsible for all Proxy Voting record keeping.

 

 

Policies and Vote Disclosure

A copy of these Guidelines and the voting record of each Invesco Retail Fund are available on Invesco’s web site, www.invesco.com . In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission regulations, all Invesco Funds file a record of all proxy-voting activity for the prior 12 months ending June 30th. That filing is made on or before August 31st of each year. In the case of institutional and sub-advised Clients, Clients may obtain information about how Invesco voted proxies on their behalf by contacting their client services representative.

 

November 2013

E-7


LOGO     

Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

 

LOGO

 

E-8


Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

Contents

 

Page

 

Section                                                                 

E-10

  1.   

Introduction

E-10

  2.   

Scope

E-11

  3.   

Responsible voting

E-11

  4.   

Voting procedures

E-12

  5.   

Dialogue with companies

E-12

  6.   

Non-routine resolutions and other topics

E-13

  7.   

Evaluation of companies’ environmental, social and governance arrangements (ESG)

E-13

  8.   

Disclosure and reporting

E-14

  9.   

UK Stewardship Code

E-16

    

Appendix 1 — Voting on shares listed outside of the UK, Europe and the US

 

E-9


Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

 

1. Introduction

Invesco Perpetual (IP), a business name of Invesco Asset Management Limited, has adopted a clear and considered policy towards its responsibility as a shareholder on behalf of all investors in portfolios managed by them. As part of this policy, IP will take steps to satisfy itself about the extent to which the companies in which it invests look after shareholder value in their companies and comply with local recommendations and practices, such as the UK Corporate Governance Code issued by the Financial Reporting Council and the U.S. Department of Labor Interpretive Bulletins.

IP has a responsibility to optimise returns to its clients. As a core part of the investment process, IP’s fund managers will endeavour to establish a dialogue with company management to promote company decision making that is in the best interests of shareholders, and is in accordance with good Corporate Governance principles.

Being a major shareholder in a company is more than simply expecting to benefit in its future earnings streams. In IP’s view, it is about helping to provide the capital a company needs to grow, about being actively involved in its strategy, when necessary, and helping to ensure that shareholder interests are always at the forefront of management’s thoughts.

IP primarily defines stewardship as representing the best interests of clients in its fiduciary role as a discretionary asset manager (not asset owner) and as an institutional shareholder, i.e. an organization which pools large sums of money and invest those sums in securities, real property and other investment assets. This is considered more appropriate than undertaking the stewardship of investee companies, which we believe should always remain the responsibility of the directors and executives of those companies. IP may at times seek to influence strategies of investee companies, where appropriate, on behalf of its clients, but IP will never seek to be involved in the day to day running of any investee companies.

IP considers that shareholder activism is fundamental to good Corporate Governance. Although this does not entail intervening in daily management decisions, it does involve supporting general standards for corporate activity and, where necessary, taking the initiative to ensure those standards are met, with a view to protecting and enhancing value for our investors in our portfolios.

Engagement will also be proportionate and will reflect the size of holdings, length of holding period and liquidity of the underlying company shares. This is because in most of IP’s investment jurisdictions, the only effective remedy of last resort available to shareholders, other than liquidating their share ownership, is the removal of directors.

 

2. Scope

The scope of this policy covers all portfolios that are managed by the IP investment teams located in Henley on Thames, United Kingdom and specifically excludes portfolios that are managed by other investment teams within the wider Invesco group that have their own voting, corporate governance and stewardship policies. As an example, within IP’s ICVC range the following funds are excluded: IP UK Enhanced Index, IP Hong Kong & China, IP Japanese Smaller Companies, IP Global Balanced Index, IP Global ex-UK Core Equity Index, IP Global ex-UK Enhanced Index and the IP Balanced Risk 6, 8 and 10 funds.

 

E-10


Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

 

3. Responsible voting

One important means of putting shareholder responsibility into practice is via the exercising of voting rights. In deciding whether to vote, IP will take into account such factors as the likely impact of voting on management activity, and where expressed, the preference of clients in portfolios managed by them. As a result of these two factors, IP will tend to vote on all UK, European and US shares but to vote on a more selective basis on other shares. (See Appendix I - Voting on shares listed outside of the UK, Europe and the US).

IP considers that the voting rights attached to its clients’ investments should be actively managed with the same duty of care as that applied to all other aspects of asset administration. As such, voting rights will be exercised on an informed and independent basis, and will not simply be passed back to the company concerned for discretionary voting by the Chairman.

In voting for or against a proposal, IP will have in mind three objectives, as follows:

 

  - To protect the rights of its clients

 

  - To minimise the risk of financial or business impropriety within the companies in which its clients are invested, and

 

  - To protect the long-term value of its clients’ investments.

It is important to note that, when exercising voting rights, the third option of abstention can also be used as a means of expressing dissatisfaction, or lack of support, to a board on any particular issue. Additionally, in the event of a conflict of interest arising between IP and its clients over a specific issue, IP will either abstain or seek instruction from each client.

IP will actively exercise the voting rights represented by the shares it manages on behalf of its clients where it is granted the discretion to do so. In certain circumstances the discretion is retained by the client, where they wish to be responsible for applying their own right to vote.

Note: Share blocking

Generally, IP will not vote where this results in shares being blocked from trading for a period of more than a few hours. IP considers that it is not in the interest of clients that their shares are blocked at a potentially sensitive time, such as the time around a shareholder meeting.

 

4. Voting procedures

IP will endeavour to keep under regular review with trustees, depositaries, custodians and third party proxy voting services the practical arrangements for circulating company resolutions and notices of meetings and for exercising votes in accordance with standing or special instructions. Although IP’s proxy voting service will provide research and recommendations for each resolution, each fund manager will cast their vote independently considering their own research and dialogue with company management.

Proxy voting research and services are currently provided by Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), part of the RiskMetrics Group.

IP will endeavour to review regularly any standing or special instructions on voting and where possible, discuss with company representatives any significant issues.

IP will take into account the implications of stock lending arrangements where this is relevant (that is, when stock is lent to the extent permitted by local regulations, the voting rights attaching to that stock pass to the borrower). However, IP does not currently enter into any stock lending arrangements as it believes the facility does not support active shareholder engagement.

 

E-11


Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

 

5. Dialogue with companies

IP will endeavour, where practicable and in accordance with its investment approach, to enter into a dialogue with companies’ management based on the mutual understanding of objectives. This dialogue is likely to include regular meetings with company representatives to explore any concerns about corporate governance where these may impact on the best interests of clients. In discussion with company boards and senior non-Executive Directors, IP will endeavour to cover any matters of particular relevance to investee company shareholder value.

Those people on the inside of a company, most obviously its executives, know their businesses much more intimately. Therefore, it is usually appropriate to leave strategic matters in their hands. However, if that strategy is not working, or alternatives need exploring, IP will seek to influence the direction of that company where practicable. In IP’s view, this is part of its responsibility to investors, where possible, in shaping strategy. Ultimately the business’ performance will have an impact on the returns generated by IP’s portfolios, whether it is in terms of share price performance or dividends, and IP wants to seek to ensure that the capital IP has invested on behalf of its clients is being used as effectively as possible. In the majority of cases IP is broadly in agreement with the direction of a company that it has invested in, as its initial decision to invest will have taken these factors into account. But these issues demand regular review, which can only be achieved through company meetings.

The building of this relationship facilitates frank and open discussion, and on-going interaction is an integral part of the fund manager’s role. The fact that IP has been a major shareholder in a number of companies for a long time, in particular within its domestic UK portfolios, reflects both the fact that IP’s original investments were based on a joint understanding of where the businesses were going and the ability of the companies’ management to execute that plan. Inevitably there are times when IP’s views diverge from those of the companies’ executives but, where possible, it attempts to work with companies towards a practical solution. However, IP believes that its status as part-owner of companies means that it has both the right and the responsibility to make its views known. The option of selling out of those businesses is always open, but normally IP prefers to push for change, even if this can be a slow process.

Specifically when considering resolutions put to shareholders, IP will pay attention to the companies’ compliance with the relevant local requirements. In addition, when analysing companies’ prospects for future profitability and hence returns to shareholders, IP will take many variables into account, including but not limited to, the following:

 

  - Nomination and audit committees

 

  - Remuneration committee and directors’ remuneration

 

  - Board balance and structure

 

  - Financial reporting principles

 

  - Internal control system and annual review of its effectiveness

 

  - Dividend and Capital Management policies

 

  - Socially Responsible Investing policies

 

6. Non-routine resolutions and other topics

These will be considered on a case-by-case basis and where proposals are put to the vote will require proper explanation and justification by (in most instances) the Board. Examples of such proposals would be all political donations and any proposal made by a shareholder or body of shareholders (typically a pressure group).

Apart from the three fundamental voting objectives set out under ‘Responsible Voting’ above, considerations that IP might apply to non-routine proposals will include:

 

  - The degree to which the company’s stated position on the issue could affect its reputation and/ or sales, or leave it vulnerable to boycott or selective purchasing

 

  - Peer group response to the issue in question

 

  - Whether implementation would achieve the objectives sought in the proposal

 

  - Whether the matter is best left to the Board’s discretion.

 

E-12


Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

 

7. Evaluation of companies’ environmental, social and governance arrangements

At IP, each fund manager is individually responsible for environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters, rather than utilising ESG professionals or an internal / external discrete team independent from the fund management process. ESG issues are deemed as an essential component of the fund manager’s overall investment responsibilities. Additionally, fund managers may call on the support of the IP Investment Management Operations team on any ESG matter.

As mentioned in Section 5, company meetings are an integral part of IP’s investment research approach and discussions at these meetings include all matters that might affect the share price, including ESG issues.

IP’s research is structured to give it a detailed understanding of a company’s key historical and future, long-term business drivers, such as demand for its products, pricing power, market share trends, cash flow and management strategy. This enables IP’s investment teams to form a holistic opinion of management strategy, the quality of the management, an opinion on a company’s competitive position, its strategic advantages/ disadvantages, and corporate governance arrangements, thus incorporating any inherent ESG issues.

IP will, when evaluating companies’governance arrangements, particularly those relating to board structure and composition, give due weight to all relevant factors brought to its attention.

 

8. Disclosure and reporting

Although IP acknowledges initiatives of transparency, it is also very aware of its fiduciary duty and the interests of all investors in portfolios managed by them. As such, IP is very cognisant that disclosure of any meeting specific information may have a detrimental effect in its ability to manage its portfolios and ultimately would not be in the best interests of all clients. Primarily, this is for investor protection and to allow IP’s fund managers to manage their portfolios in the interests of all its clients.

Although IP does not report specific findings of company meetings for external use, it will seek to provide regular illustrations to demonstrate that active engagement is at the heart of its investment process.

For clients with individual mandates, (i.e. not invested in a fund), IP may discuss specific issues where it can share details of a client’s portfolio with that specific client. Occasionally, where IP has expressed strong views to management over matters of governance, those views have gained media attention, but IP will never seek to encourage such debates in the media.

On request from investors, IP will in good faith provide records of voting instructions given to third parties such as trustees, depositaries and custodians provided that:

 

  - In IP’s view, it does not conflict with the best interests of other investors; and

 

  - It is understood that IP will not be held accountable for the expression of views within such voting instructions and

 

  - IP is not giving any assurance nor undertaking nor has any obligation to ensure that such instructions resulted in any votes actually being cast. Records of voting instructions within the immediate preceding three months will not normally be provided for activities within the funds managed by IP

Note:

The record of votes will reflect the voting instruction of the relevant fund manager. This may not be the same as votes actually cast as IP is entirely reliant on third parties complying promptly with such instructions to ensure that such votes are cast correctly. Accordingly, the provision of information relating to an instruction does not mean that a vote was actually cast, just that an instruction was given in accordance with a particular view taken.

 

E-13


Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

 

9. The UK Stewardship Code

The UK Stewardship Code (the Code) issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) aims to enhance the quality of engagement between institutional investors and companies to help improve long-term returns to shareholders and the efficient exercise of governance responsibilities. The Code sets out seven principles, which support good practice on engagement with UK investee companies and to which the FRC believes institutional investors should aspire. The Code is applied on a ‘comply or explain’ approach. IP sets out below how it complies with each principle or details why it chooses not to.

Principle 1

Institutional investors should publicly disclose their policy on how they will discharge their stewardship responsibilities.

IP complies with Principle 1 and publishes the Invesco Perpetual Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship, which sets out how it will discharge its stewardship responsibilities, on the ‘About us’ page on its website:

www.invescoperpetual.co.uk

The following is a summary:

IP primarily defines stewardship as representing the best interests of clients in its fiduciary role as a discretionary asset manager (not asset owner) and as an institutional shareholder, i.e. an organization which pools large sums of money and invest those sums in securities, and other investment assets. This is considered more appropriate than undertaking the stewardship of investee companies, which we believe should always remain the responsibility of the directors and executives of those companies. IP may at times seek to influence strategies of investee companies, where appropriate, on behalf of its clients, but IP will never seek to be involved in the day to day running of any investee companies. As a result, in the interests of the beneficiaries of the assets under its management, IP will engage with investee companies on strategy, share value performance, risk, capital structure, governance, culture, remuneration and other significant matters that may be subject to voting in a general meeting and of proportional interest in terms of value discovery in a business.

Principle 2

Institutional investors should have a robust policy on managing conflicts of interest in relation to stewardship and this policy should be publicly disclosed.

IP complies with Principle 2 by meeting its regulatory requirement of having an effective Conflicts of Interest Policy. Any conflicts of interest arising through its stewardship of investee companies will be handled in accordance with that policy.

In respect of stewardship, IP anticipates the opportunity for conflicts arising would be limited, e.g. where it invests in a company that is also a broker (i.e. dealing) of, or client of IP.

This Invesco UK Conflicts of Interest Policy is available on request and covers potential conflicts of interest in relation to stewardship. The Conflicts of Interest Policy defines a conflict of interest as ‘a situation where there is a material risk of damage to the interests of a client arising because of the interests of Invesco and our clients differ and any client and those of another client differ.’ As UK Stewardship is carried out in our clients’ interests, there are limited opportunities for conflicts of interest arising and, where they do, these are managed appropriately.

Principle 3

Institutional investors should monitor their investee companies.

As an active shareholder, IP complies with Principle 3. Through its investment process, fund managers endeavour to establish on a proportionate basis, on-going dialogue with company management and this is likely to include regular meetings. In discussions with company boards and senior non-Executive Directors, IP will explore any concerns about corporate governance where these may impact on the best interests of clients, together with any other matters of particular value to shareholders.

Meeting company boards of investee companies is a core part of IP’s investment process and IP is committed to keeping records of all future key engagement activities. As part of the engagement process IP fund managers may choose to be made insiders (i.e. to be made privy to material, non-public information) to protect and/or enhance investor value. In such circumstances they will follow IP’s regulatory required policy and processes to mitigate against market abuse, principally by systematically blocking any trading in insider securities.

When casting votes on behalf of investors, IP keeps detailed records of all instructions given in good faith to third parties such as trustees, depositories and custodians. Although the rationale for voting in a particular manner is not automatically captured through the voting process, the individually responsible fund manager would be expected to be able to clearly articulate their decision whenever required.

 

E-14


Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

 

9. The UK Stewardship Code

 

Principle 4

Institutional investors should establish clear guidelines on when and how they will escalate their activities as a method of protecting and enhancing shareholder value.

IP complies with Principle 4 with its fund managers managing corporate governance matters independently being a key part of their investment process to protect and add value on behalf investors. Initially any issues/concerns would be raised by its fund managers through IP’s process of on-going dialogue and company meetings. On occasions that a fund manager believes an issue is significant enough to be escalated, this will be done through IP’s Chief Investment Officer (CIO) and the IP Investment Management Operations team who will ensure the relevant internal resources are made available to support the fund manager in securing the most appropriate outcome for IP’s clients.

Principle 5

Institutional investors should be willing to act collectively with other investors where appropriate.

IP is supportive of collective engagement in cases where objectives between parties are mutually agreeable, there are no conflicts of interest and, as they pertain to the UK market, are not in breach of ‘concert party’ rules. Other shareholders can engage directly with the relevant fund manager or through an investment adviser. Alternatively, enquiries can be directed to any of the below:

 

  - Stuart Howard — Head of IP Investment Management Operations

 

  - Dan Baker — IP Investment Management Operations Manager

 

  - Charles Henderson — UK Equities Business Manager

Principle 6

Institutional investors should have a clear policy on voting and disclosure of voting activity.

As detailed in Section 3, IP is committed to voting on all the UK (together with European and US) stocks it holds for its underlying investors and where it has the full discretion to do so. Whilst comprehensive records of IP’s voting instructions are maintained, IP does not report specifically on its voting activity. Whilst being mindful of its fiduciary duty and the interest of all investors, IP believes that automatic public disclosure of its voting records may have a detrimental effect on its ability to manage its portfolios and ultimately would not be in the best interest of all clients.

On specific requests from clients, IP will in good faith provide records of voting instructions given to third parties such as trustees, depositaries and custodians subject to limitations detailed in Section 8.

IP uses ISS to process its voting decisions and the ABI’s IVIS service for research for UK securities. Its instructions to ISS include a default instruction to vote with management, which is used only on the rare occasion when instructions are not successfully transmitted to ISS. IP will also consider the need to attend and vote at general meetings if issues prevent the casting of proxy votes within required time limits.

IP does not enter into stock lending arrangements which might impact the voting process.

Principle 7

Institutional investors should report periodically on their stewardship and voting activities.

IP complies with Principle 7 through a commitment to provide regular illustrations of its engagement activities and to respond to voting record requests from investors in its portfolios on an individual basis.

Although IP does not report specific findings of company meetings for external use, we will seek to provide illustrations to demonstrate that active engagement is at the heart of its investment process. On request from investors, IP will in good faith provide records of voting instructions given to third parties such as trustees, depositaries and custodians subject to certain limitations outlined in Section 8. Although the rationale for its voting decision is not captured through the voting process, individual fund managers would be expected to articulate their decision whenever required.

IP currently does not obtain an independent opinion on its engagement and voting processes as it believes any value for its clients from such an opinion is outweighed by the costs of obtaining such an opinion. There is also no material demand from clients to provide such an independent assurance.

 

E-15


Invesco Perpetual

Policy on Corporate Governance and Stewardship

 

Appendix 1

Voting on shares listed outside of the UK, Europe and the US

When deciding whether to exercise the voting rights attached to its clients’ shares listed outside of the UK, Europe and the US, IP will take into consideration a number of factors. These will include the:

 

- Likely impact of voting on management activity, versus the cost to the client

 

- Portfolio management restrictions (e.g. share blocking) that may result from voting

 

- Preferences, where expressed, of clients

Generally, IP will vote on shares listed outside of the UK, Europe and the US by exception only, except where the client or local regulator expressly requires voting on all shares.

Note: Share blocking

Generally, IP will not vote where this results in shares being blocked from trading for a period of more than a few hours. IP considers that it is not in the interest of clients that their shares are blocked at a potentially sensitive time, such as that around a shareholder meeting.

 

E-16


Important information

As at 14 January 2013.

For more information on our funds, please refer to the most up to date relevant fund and share class-specific Key Investor Information Documents, the Supplementary Information Document, the ICVC ISA Key Features and Terms & Conditions, the latest Annual or Interim Short Reports and the latest Prospectus. This information is available using the contact details shown.

Telephone calls may be recorded.

The value of investments and any income will fluctuate (this may partly be the result of exchange rate fluctuations) and investors may not get back the full amount invested.

Where Invesco Perpetual has expressed views and opinions, these may change.

Invesco Perpetual is a business name of Invesco Asset Management Limited. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.

Invesco Asset Management Limited

Registered in England 949417

Registered Office: 30 Finsbury Square, London, EC2A 1AG

51781/PDF/300113

 

E-17


 

LOGO

 

 

B6. Proxy Voting

Policy Number: B-6     Implementation Date: May 1, 2001     Effective Date: December 2011

 

 

 

1. Purpose and Background

In its management of investment funds and separately managed portfolios (“SMP”), Invesco Canada Ltd. (“Invesco Canada”) must act in each investment fund and SMP’s best interest.

 

2. Application

Invesco Canada must exercise all voting rights with respect to securities held in the accounts (“Accounts”) that it acts as investment fund manager and/or adviser including separately managed portfolios (“SMPs”), investment funds offered in Canada (“Canadian Funds”), investment funds registered under and governed by the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and to which Invesco Canada provides advisory services (the “US Funds”) but excluding Accounts (“Sub-Advised Accounts”) that are sub-advised to affiliated advisers (“Sub-Advisers”). Exceptions to the requirement to exercise all voting rights are outlined in the Invesco Canada Proxy Voting Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), as amended from time to time, a copy of which is attached to this policy. Proxies for Sub-Advised Accounts must be voted in accordance with the Sub-Adviser’s proxy voting policy, unless the sub-advisory agreement between the Sub-Adviser and Invesco Canada provides otherwise. Voting rights will not be exercised in accordance with this policy or the Sub-Adviser’s proxy policy if the investment management agreement between the client and Invesco Canada governing the SMP provides otherwise.

Invesco Canada’s portfolio managers have responsibility for exercising all proxy votes and in doing so, for acting in the best interest of the Accounts. Portfolio managers must vote proxies in accordance with the Guidelines.

When a proxy is voted against the recommendation of the publicly traded company’s management, the portfolio manager or designate shall provide the reasons in writing to the proxy team within the Investment Operations and Support department (“Proxy Team”).

Invesco Canada may delegate to a third party the responsibility to vote proxies on behalf of all or certain Accounts, in accordance with the Guidelines.

 

E-18


LOGO

 

 

3. Proxy Administration, Records Management and Data Retention

 

3.1 Proxy Administration

Invesco Canada has a dedicated Proxy Team. This team is responsible for managing all proxy voting materials. The Proxy Team ensures that all proxies and notices are received from all issuers on a timely basis and that all proxies are voted on a timely basis.

Proxy voting circulars for all companies are received electronically through an external service provider. Circulars for North American companies and ADRs are generally also received in paper format.

Once a circular is received, the Proxy Team verifies that all shares and Accounts affected are correctly listed. The Proxy Team then gives a copy of the proxy ballot to each affected portfolio manager and maintains a tracking list to ensure that all proxies are voted within the prescribed deadlines.

Once voting information has been received from the portfolio managers, voting instructions are sent electronically to the service provider who then forwards the instructions to the appropriate proxy voting agent or transfer agent.

 

3.2 Records Management and Data Retention

For all Accounts, Invesco Canada shall maintain a record of all proxies received, a record of votes cast (unless retained by an external proxy service provider) and a copy of the reasons for voting against management. In addition, for the US Funds Invesco Canada will maintain a copy of any document created by Invesco Canada that was material to making a decision on how to vote proxies on behalf of a US Fund and that memorializes the basis of that decision.

The external proxy service provider retains, on behalf of Invesco Canada, electronic records of the votes cast and shall provide Invesco Canada with a copy of proxy records promptly upon request. The service provider must make all documents available to Invesco Canada for a period of 7 years.

All documents shall be maintained and preserved in an easily accessible place i) for a period of 2 years where Invesco Canada carries on business in Canada and ii) for a period of 5 years thereafter at the same location or at any other location.

 

4. Reporting

The Global Investments Director (or designate) must report on proxy voting to the Compliance Committees of the Invesco Canada Fund Advisory Board and the Boards of Directors of Invesco Canada Fund Inc. and Invesco Canada Corporate Class Inc. (collectively, the “Board Compliance Committees”) on an annual basis with respect to all Canadian Funds and investment funds managed by Invesco Canada that are Sub-Advised Accounts. The Global Investments Director (or designate) shall report on proxy voting to the Board of Directors of the US Funds as required from time to time.

 

E-19


LOGO

 

In accordance with National Instrument 81-106 – Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure (“NI 81-106”), proxy voting records for all Canadian mutual funds must be prepared annually (for the period ended June 30) and must be posted on Invesco Canada’s website no later than August 31st of each year.

The Invesco Canada Compliance department (“Compliance”) shall review a sample of the proxy voting records posted on Invesco Canada’s website on an annual basis to confirm that the records are posted by the August 31st deadline under NI 81-106. A summary of the review must be maintained and preserved by Compliance in an easily accessible place i) for a period of 2 years where Invesco Canada carries on business in Canada and ii) for a period of 5 years thereafter at the same location or at any other location.

 

E-20


LOGO

 

INVESCO CANADA

PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES

Purpose

The purpose of this document is to describe Invesco Canada’s general guidelines for voting proxies received from companies held in the accounts (“Accounts”) for which it acts as investment fund manager and/or adviser including separately managed portfolios (“SMPs”), investment funds offered in Canada (“Canadian Funds”) and investment funds registered under and governed by the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and to which Invesco Canada provides advisory services (the “US Funds”) but excluding Accounts (“Sub-Advised Accounts”) that are sub-advised by affiliated or third party advisers (“Sub-Advisers”). Proxies for Sub-Advised Accounts will be voted in accordance with the Sub-Adviser’s policy, unless the sub-advisory agreement provides otherwise. Voting rights will not be exercised in accordance with this policy or the Sub-Adviser’s proxy policy if the investment management agreement between the client and Invesco Canada governing the SMP provides otherwise.

As part of its due diligence, Compliance will review the proxy voting policies & procedures of any new sub-advisors to ensure that they are appropriate in the circumstances.

Introduction

Invesco Canada has a fiduciary obligation to act in the best long-term economic interest of the Accounts when voting proxies of portfolio companies.

The default is to vote with the recommendation of the publicly traded company’s management.

As a general rule, Invesco Canada shall vote against any actions that would:

 

   

reduce the rights or options of shareholders,

 

   

reduce shareholder influence over the board of directors and management,

 

   

reduce the alignment of interests between management and shareholders, or

 

   

reduce the value of shareholders’ investments.

At the same time, since Invesco Canada’s Canadian-based portfolio managers follow an investment discipline that includes investing in companies that are believed to have strong management teams, the portfolio managers will generally support the management of companies in which they invest, and will accord proper weight to the recommendations of company management. Therefore, in most circumstances, votes will be cast in accordance with the recommendations of company management.

 

E-21


LOGO

 

While Invesco Canada’s proxy voting guidelines are stated below, the portfolio managers will take into consideration all relevant facts and circumstances (including country specific considerations), and retain the right to vote proxies as deemed appropriate.

These guidelines may be amended from time to time.

Situations in which Voting Rights Proxies Will Not Be Exercised

Voting rights will not be exercised in situations where the securities have been sold subsequent to record date, administrative issues prevent voting or (where Invesco Canada sub-advises an Account for an unaffiliated third-party) securities to be voted have been loaned by the Manager.

Conflicts of Interest

When voting proxies, Invesco Canada’s portfolio managers assess whether there are material conflicts of interest between Invesco Canada’s interests and those of the Account. A potential conflict of interest situation may include where Invesco Canada or an affiliate manages assets for, provides other financial services to, or otherwise has a material business relationship with, a company whose management is soliciting proxies, and failure to vote in favour of management of the company may harm Invesco Canada’s relationship with the company. In all situations, the portfolio managers will not take Invesco Canada’s relationship with the company into account, and will vote the proxies in the best interest of the Account. To the extent that a portfolio manager has any personal conflict of interest with respect to a company or an issue presented, that portfolio manager should abstain from voting on that company or issue. Portfolio managers are required to report in writing to the relevant Investment Head any such conflicts of interest and/or attempts by outside parties to improperly influence the voting process. If the portfolio manager in question is an Investment Head, such conflicts of interest and/or attempts by outside parties to improperly influence the voting process shall be presented in writing to the Investment Leadership Team (“ILT”). The Global Investments Director (or designate) will report any conflicts of interest to the Invesco Canada Investment Compliance Committee and the Independent Review Committee on an annual basis.

 

I. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS

We believe that a board that has at least a majority of independent directors is integral to good corporate governance. Unless there are restrictions specific to a company’s home jurisdiction, key board committees, including audit and compensation committees, should be completely independent.

 

E-22


LOGO

 

Voting on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections

Votes in an uncontested election of directors are evaluated on a case-by-case basis, considering factors that may include:

 

   

Long-term financial company performance relative to a market index,

 

   

Composition of the board and key board committees,

 

   

Nominee’s attendance at board meetings,

 

   

Nominee’s time commitments as a result of serving on other company boards,

 

   

Nominee’s stock ownership position in the company,

 

   

Whether the chairman is also serving as CEO, and

 

   

Whether a retired CEO sits on the board.

Voting on Director Nominees in Contested Elections

Votes in a contested election of directors are evaluated on a case-by-case basis, considering factors that may include:

 

   

Long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry,

 

   

Management’s track record,

 

   

Background to the proxy contest,

 

   

Qualifications of director nominees (both slates),

 

   

Evaluation of what each side is offering shareholders as well as the likelihood that the proposed objectives and goals can be met, and

 

   

Stock ownership positions in the company.

Majority Threshold Voting for Director Elections

We will generally vote for proposals that require directors to be elected with an affirmative majority of votes cast unless the relevant portfolio manager believes that the company has adopted formal corporate governance principles that present a meaningful alternative to the majority voting standard.

 

E-23


LOGO

 

Separating Chairman and CEO

Shareholder proposals to separate the chairman and CEO positions should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

While we generally support these proposals, some companies have governance structures in place that can satisfactorily counterbalance a combined position. Voting decisions will take into account factors such as:

 

   

Designated lead director, appointed from the ranks of the independent board members with clearly delineated duties;

 

   

Majority of independent directors;

 

   

All-independent key committees;

 

   

Committee chairpersons nominated by the independent directors;

 

   

CEO performance is reviewed annually by a committee of independent directors; and

 

   

Established governance guidelines.

Majority of Independent Directors

While we generally support proposals asking that a majority of directors be independent, each proposal should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

We generally vote for proposals that request that the board’s audit, compensation, and/or nominating committees be composed exclusively of independent directors.

Stock Ownership Requirements

We believe that individual directors should be appropriately compensated and motivated to act in the best interests of shareholders. Share ownership by directors better aligns their interests with those of other shareholders. Therefore, we believe that meaningful share ownership by directors is in the best interest of the company.

We generally vote for proposals that require a certain percentage of a director’s compensation to be in the form of common stock.

Size of Boards of Directors

We believe that the number of directors is important to ensuring the board’s effectiveness in maximizing long-term shareholder value. The board must be large enough to allow it to adequately discharge its responsibilities, without being so large that it becomes cumbersome.

 

E-24


LOGO

 

While we will prefer a board of no fewer than 5 and no more than 16 members, each situation will be considered on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the specific company circumstances.

Classified or Staggered Boards

In a classified or staggered board, directors are typically elected in two or more “classes”, serving terms greater than one year.

We prefer the annual election of all directors and will generally not support proposals that provide for staggered terms for board members. We recognize that there may be jurisdictions where staggered terms for board members is common practice and, in such situations, we will review the proposals on a case-by-case basis.

Director Indemnification and Liability Protection

We recognize that many individuals may be reluctant to serve as corporate directors if they are personally liable for all lawsuits and legal costs. As a result, limitations on directors’ liability can benefit the corporation and its shareholders by helping to attract and retain qualified directors while providing recourse to shareholders on areas of misconduct by directors.

We generally vote for proposals that limit directors’ liability and provide indemnification as long as the arrangements are limited to the director acting honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company and, in criminal matters, are limited to the director having reasonable grounds for believing the conduct was lawful.

 

II. AUDITORS

A strong audit process is a requirement for good corporate governance. A significant aspect of the audit process is a strong relationship with a knowledgeable and independent set of auditors.

Ratification of Auditors

We believe a company should limit its relationship with its auditors to the audit engagement, and certain closely related activities that do not, in the aggregate, raise an appearance of impaired independence.

We generally vote for the reappointment of the company’s auditors unless:

 

   

It is not clear that the auditors will be able to fulfill their function;

 

E-25


LOGO

 

 

   

There is reason to believe the auditors have rendered an opinion that is neither accurate nor indicative of the company’s financial position; or

 

   

The auditors have a significant professional or personal relationship with the issuer that compromises their independence.

Disclosure of Audit vs. Non-Audit Fees

Understanding the fees earned by the auditors is important for assessing auditor independence. Our support for the re-appointment of the auditors will take into consideration whether the management information circular contains adequate disclosure about the amount and nature of audit vs. non-audit fees.

There may be certain jurisdictions that do not currently require disclosure of audit vs. non-audit fees. In these circumstances, we will generally support proposals that call for this disclosure.

 

III. COMPENSATION PROGRAMS

Appropriately designed equity-based compensation plans, approved by shareholders, can be an effective way to align the interests of long-term shareholders and the interests of management, employees and directors. Plans should not substantially dilute shareholders’ ownership interests in the company, provide participants with excessive awards or have objectionable structural features. We will consider each compensation plan in its entirety (including all incentives, awards and other compensation) to determine if the plan provides the right incentives to managers, employees and directors and is reasonable on the whole.

While we generally encourage companies to provide more transparent disclosure related to their compensation programs, the following are specific guidelines dealing with some of the more common features of these programs (features not specifically itemized below will be considered on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the general principles described above):

Cash Compensation and Severance Packages

We will generally support the board’s discretion to determine and grant appropriate cash compensation and severance packages.

Executive Compensation (“say on pay”)

Proposals requesting that companies subject each year’s compensation record to a non binding advisory shareholder vote, or so-called “say on pay” proposals will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

 

E-26


LOGO

 

Equity Based Plans — Dilution

Equity compensation plans can increase the number of shares of a company and therefore dilute the value of existing shares. While such plans can be an effective compensation tool in moderation, they can be a concern to shareholders and their cost needs to be closely watched. We assess proposed equity compensation plans on a case-by-case basis.

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

We will generally vote for the use of employee stock purchase plans to increase company stock ownership by employees, provided that shares purchased under the plan are acquired for no less than 85% of their market value. It is recognized that country specific circumstances may exist (e.g. tax issues) that require proposals to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Loans to Employees

We will vote against the corporation making loans to employees to allow employees to pay for stock or stock options. It is recognized that country specific circumstances may exist that require proposals to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Stock Option Plans – Board Discretion

We will vote against stock option plans that give the board broad discretion in setting the terms and conditions of the programs. Such programs should be submitted with detail and be reasonable in the circumstances regarding their cost, scope, frequency and schedule for exercising the options.

Stock Option Plans – Inappropriate Features

We will generally vote against plans that have any of the following structural features:

 

   

ability to re-price “underwater” options without shareholder approval,

 

   

ability to issue options with an exercise price below the stock’s current market price,

 

   

ability to issue “reload” options, or

 

   

automatic share replenishment (“evergreen”) features.

Stock Option Plans – Director Eligibility

While we prefer stock ownership by directors, we will support stock option plans for directors as long as the terms and conditions of director options are clearly defined

 

E-27


LOGO

 

Stock Option Plans — Repricing

We will vote for proposals to re-price options if there is a value-for-value (rather than a share-for-share) exchange.

Stock Option Plans — Vesting

We will vote against stock option plans that are 100% vested when granted.

Stock Option Plans – Authorized Allocations

We will generally vote against stock option plans that authorize allocation of 25% or more of the available options to any one individual.

Stock Option Plans – Change in Control Provisions

We will vote against stock option plans with change in control provisions that allow option holders to receive more for their options than shareholders would receive for their shares.

 

IV. CORPORATE MATTERS

We will review proposals relating to changes to capital structure and restructuring on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the impact of the changes on corporate governance and shareholder rights, anticipated financial and operating benefits, portfolio manager views, level of dilution, and a company’s industry and performance in terms of shareholder returns.

Common Stock Authorization

We will review proposals to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issue on a case-by-case basis.

Dual Class Share Structures

Dual class share structures involve a second class of common stock with either superior or inferior voting rights to those of another class of stock.

We will generally vote against proposals to create or extend dual class share structures where classes have different voting rights.

Stock Splits

We will vote for proposals to increase common share authorization for a stock split, provided that the increase in authorized shares would not result in excessive dilution given a company’s industry and performance in terms of shareholder returns.

 

E-28


LOGO

 

Reverse Stock Splits

We will vote for proposals to implement a reverse stock split, provided that the reverse split does not result in an increase of authorized but unissued shares of more than 100% after giving effect to the shares needed for the reverse split.

Share Repurchase Programs

We will vote against proposals to institute open-market share repurchase plans if all shareholders do not participate on an equal basis.

Reincorporation

Reincorporation involves re-establishing the company in a different legal jurisdiction.

We will generally vote for proposals to reincorporate the company provided that the board and management have demonstrated sound financial or business reasons for the move. Proposals to reincorporate will generally not be supported if solely as part of an anti-takeover defense or as a way to limit directors’ liability.

Mergers & Acquisitions

We will vote for merger & acquisition proposals that the relevant portfolio managers believe, based on their review of the materials:

 

   

will result in financial and operating benefits,

 

   

have a fair offer price,

 

   

have favourable prospects for the combined companies, and

 

   

will not have a negative impact on corporate governance or shareholder rights.

 

V. SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

We recognize that to effectively manage a corporation, directors and management must consider not only the interests of shareholders, but the interests of employees, customers, suppliers, and creditors, among others.

We believe that companies and their boards must give careful consideration to social responsibility issues in order to enhance long-term shareholder value.

We support efforts by companies to develop policies and practices that consider social responsibility issues related to their businesses.

 

E-29


LOGO

 

 

VI. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Shareholder proposals can be extremely complex, and the impact on the interests of all stakeholders can rarely be anticipated with a high degree of confidence. As a result, shareholder proposals will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis with consideration of factors such as:

 

   

the proposal’s impact on the company’s short-term and long-term share value,

 

   

its effect on the company’s reputation,

 

   

the economic effect of the proposal,

 

   

industry and regional norms in which the company operates,

 

   

the company’s overall corporate governance provisions, and

 

   

the reasonableness of the request.

We will generally support shareholder proposals that require additional disclosure regarding corporate responsibility issues where the relevant portfolio manager believes:

 

   

the company has failed to adequately address these issues with shareholders,

 

   

there is information to suggest that a company follows procedures that are not in compliance with applicable regulations, or

 

   

the company fails to provide a level of disclosure that is comparable to industry peers or generally accepted standards.

We will generally not support shareholder proposals that place arbitrary or artificial constraints on the board, management or the company.

Ordinary Business Practices

We will generally support the board’s discretion regarding shareholder proposals that involve ordinary business practices.

Protection of Shareholder Rights

We will generally vote for shareholder proposals that are designed to protect shareholder rights if the company’s corporate governance standards indicate that such additional protections are warranted.

 

E-30


LOGO

 

Barriers to Shareholder Action

We will generally vote for proposals to lower barriers to shareholder action.

Shareholder Rights Plans

We will generally vote for proposals to subject shareholder rights plans to a shareholder vote.

 

VII. OTHER

We will vote against any proposal where the proxy materials lack sufficient information upon which to base an informed decision.

We will vote against any proposals to authorize the company to conduct any other business that is not described in the proxy statement (including the authority to approve any further amendments to an otherwise approved resolution).

Reimbursement of Proxy Solicitation Expenses

Decisions to provide reimbursement for dissidents waging a proxy contest are made on a case-by-case basis.

 

E-31


 

LOGO

Voting Rights Policy

This document sets out the high level Proxy Voting policy of Invesco Asset Management GmbH and Invesco Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH. The principles within this policy are followed by both Invesco Asset Management GmbH and Invesco Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH or to any of its delegates as applicable

Introduction:

Invesco Asset Management GmbH and Invesco Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH is committed to the fair and equitable treatment of all its clients. As such Invesco Asset Management GmbH and Invesco Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH has put in place procedures to ensure that voting rights attached to securities within a UCITS for which it is the Management Company are exercised where appropriate and in the best interests of the individual UCITS itself. Where Invesco Asset Management GmbH and Invesco Kapitalanlagegesellschaft mbH delegates the activity of Investment Management it will ensure that the delegate has in place policies and procedures consistent with the principles of this policy.

Outline of Voting Rights Process :

Voting opportunities which exist in relation to securities within each individual UCITS are monitored on an ongoing basis in order to ensure that advantage can be taken of any opportunity that arises to benefit the individual UCITS.

It is has been identified that a voting opportunity exist, an investment decisions is taken whether or not the opportunity to vote should be exercised and, if relevant, the voting decision to be taken. Considerations which are taken into account include:

 

  the cost of participating in the vote relative to the potential benefit to the UCITS

 

  the impact of participation in a vote on the liquidity of the securities creating the voting opportunity due to the fact that some jurisdictions will require that the securities are not sold for a period if they are the subject of a vote.

 

  Other factors as deemed appropriate by the Investment Manager in relation to the investment objectives and policy of the individual UCITS.

It may be the case that an investment decision is taken not to participate in a vote. Such decisions can be equally appropriate due to the considerations applied by the investment team to determine the relative benefit to the individual UCITS, based on criteria such as fund size, investment objective, policy and investment strategy applicable.

 

E-32


Information on Voting Activity:

Further information on votes which were available to individual UCITS and actions taken are available to unitholders free of charge and by request to the UCITS Management Company.

Conflicts of Interest:

(name of management company) has a Conflict of Interest Policy which outlines the principles for avoiding, and where not possible, managing conflicts of interest. At no time will Invesco use shareholding powers in respect of individual UCITS to advance its own commercial interests, to pursue a social or political cause that is unrelated to a UCITS economic interests, or to favour another UCITS or client or other relationship to the detriment of others. This policy is available, free of cost, from the (name of Management Company.)

 

E-33


Invesco Hong Kong Limited

PROXY VOTING POLICY

1 February 2010

 

E-34


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Introduction

     E-36   

1. Guiding Principles

     E-37   

2. Proxy Voting Authority

     E-38   

3. Key Proxy Voting Issues

     E-40   

4. Internal Administration and Decision-Making Process

     E-42   

5. Client Reporting

     E-44   

 

E-35


INTRODUCTION

 

This policy sets out Invesco’s approach to proxy voting in the context of our broader portfolio management and client service responsibilities. It applies to Asia related equity portfolios managed by Invesco on behalf of individually-managed clients and pooled fund clients

Invesco’s proxy voting policy is expected to evolve over time to cater for changing circumstances or unforeseen events.

 

E-36


1. GUIDING PRINCIPLES

 

 

  1.1 Invesco recognises its fiduciary obligation to act in the best interests of all clients, be they retirement scheme trustees, institutional clients, unitholders in pooled investment vehicles or personal investors. The application of due care and skill in exercising shareholder responsibilities is a key aspect of this fiduciary obligation.

 

  1.2 The sole objective of Invesco’s proxy voting policy is to promote the economic interests of its clients. At no time will Invesco use the shareholding powers exercised in respect of its clients’ investments to advance its own commercial interests, to pursue a social or political cause that is unrelated to clients’ economic interests, or to favour a particular client or other relationship to the detriment of others.

 

  1.3 Invesco also recognises the broader chain of accountability that exists in the proper governance of corporations, and the extent and limitations of the shareholder’s role in that process. In particular, it is recognised that company management should ordinarily be presumed to be best placed to conduct the commercial affairs of the enterprise concerned, with prime accountability to the enterprise’s Board of Directors which is in turn accountable to shareholders and to external regulators and exchanges. The involvement of Invesco as an institutional shareholder will not extend to interference in the proper exercise of Board or management responsibilities, or impede the ability of companies to take the calculated commercial risks which are essential means of adding value for shareholders.

 

  1.4 The primary aim of the policy is to encourage a culture of performance among investee companies, rather than one of mere conformance with a prescriptive set of rules and constraints. Rigid adherence to a checklist approach to corporate governance issues is of itself unlikely to promote the maximum economic performance of companies, or to cater for circumstances in which non-compliance with a checklist is appropriate or unavoidable.

 

  1.5 Invesco considers that proxy voting rights are an asset which should be managed with the same care as any other asset managed on behalf of its clients.

 

E-37


2. PROXY VOTING AUTHORITY

 

 

  2.1 An important dimension of Invesco’s approach to corporate governance is the exercise of proxy voting authority at the Annual General Meetings or other decision-making forums of companies in which we manage investments on behalf of clients.

 

  2.2 An initial issue to consider in framing a proxy voting policy is the question of where discretion to exercise voting power should rest — with Invesco as the investment manager, or with each individual client? Under the first alternative, Invesco’s role would be both to make voting decisions on clients’ behalf and to implement those decisions. Under the second alternative, Invesco would either have no role to play, or its role would be limited solely to implementing voting decisions under instructions from our clients.

 

  2.3 In addressing this issue, it is necessary to distinguish the different legal structures and fiduciary relationships which exist as between individually-managed clients, who hold investments directly on their own accounts, and pooled fund clients, whose investments are held indirectly under a trust structure.

 

  2.4 Individually-Managed Clients

 

  2.4.1 As a matter of general policy, Invesco believes that unless a client’s mandate gives specific instructions to the contrary, discretion to exercise votes should normally rest with the investment manager, provided that the discretion is always exercised in the client’s interests alone.

 

  2.4.2 The reason for this position is that Invesco believes that, with its dedicated research resources and ongoing monitoring of companies, an investment manager is usually better placed to identify issues upon which a vote is necessary or desirable. We believe it is also more practical that voting discretion rests with the party that has the authority to buy and sell shares, which is essentially what investment managers have been engaged to do on behalf of their clients.

 

  2.4.3 In cases where voting authority is delegated by an individually-managed client, Invesco recognises its responsibility to be accountable for the decisions it makes. If a client requires, an appropriate reporting mechanism will be put in place.

 

  2.4.4 While it is envisaged that the above arrangements will be acceptable in the majority of cases, it is recognised that some individually-managed clients will wish to retain voting authority for themselves, or to place conditions on the circumstances in which it can be exercised by investment managers. In practice, it is believed that this option is generally only likely to arise with relatively large clients such as trustees of major superannuation funds or statutory corporations which have the resources to develop their own policies and to supervise their implementation by investment managers and custodians. In particular, clients who have multiple equity managers and utilise a master custody arrangement may be more likely to consider retaining voting authority in order to ensure consistency of approach across their total portfolio.

 

  2.4.5 In any event, whatever decision is taken as to where voting authority should lie, Invesco believes that the matter should be explicitly covered by the terms of the investment management agreement and clearly understood by the respective parties.

 

  2.4.6 Accordingly, Invesco will pursue the following policies with respect to the exercise of proxy voting authority for individually-managed clients:

 

E-38


PROXY VOTING AUTHORITY

Individually-Managed Clients

Unless an individually-managed client wishes to retain proxy voting authority, Invesco will assume proxy voting authority by way of delegation from the client, provided that the allocation of proxy voting responsibility is clearly set out in the investment management agreement.

In the case of clients who wish to place special conditions on the delegation of proxy voting powers, Invesco will endeavour to accommodate those clients’ requirements as far as practicable, subject to any administrative obstacles or additional costs that might arise in implementing the conditions.

 

  2.5 Pooled Fund Clients

 

  2.5.1 The legal relationship between an investment manager and its pooled fund clients is different in a number of important respects from that applying to individually-managed clients. These differences have a bearing on how proxy voting authority is exercised on behalf of pooled fund clients.

 

  2.5.2 These legal relationships essentially mean that the manager is required to act solely in the collective interests of unitholders at large rather than as a direct agent or delegate of each unitholder. On the issue of proxy voting, as with all other aspects of our client relationships, Invesco will naturally continue to be receptive to any views and concerns raised by its pooled fund clients. However, the legal relationship that exists means it is not possible for the manager to accept instructions from a particular pooled fund client as to how to exercise proxy voting authority in a particular instance.

 

  2.5.3 As in the case of individually-managed clients who delegate their proxy voting authority, Invesco’s accountability to pooled fund clients in exercising its fiduciary responsibilities is best addressed as part of the manager’s broader client relationship and reporting responsibilities.

 

  2.5.4 Accordingly, Invesco will pursue the following policies with respect to the exercise of proxy voting authority for pooled fund clients:

 

PROXY VOTING AUTHORITY

Pooled Fund Clients

In considering proxy voting issues arising in respect of pooled fund shareholdings, Invesco will act solely in accordance with its fiduciary responsibility to take account of the collective interests of unitholders in the pooled fund as a whole.

Invesco cannot accept instructions from individual unitholders as to the exercise of proxy voting authority in a particular instance.

 

E-39


3. KEY PROXY VOTING ISSUES

 

 

  3.1 This section outlines Invesco’s intended approach in cases where proxy voting authority is being exercised on clients’ behalf.

 

  3.2 Invesco will vote on all material issues at all company meetings where it has the voting authority and responsibility to do so. We will not announce our voting intentions and the reasons behind them.

 

  3.3 Invesco applies two underlying principles. First, our interpretation of ‘material voting issues’ is confined to those issues which affect the value of shares we hold on behalf of clients and the rights of shareholders to an equal voice in influencing the affairs of companies in proportion to their shareholdings. We do not consider it appropriate to use shareholder powers for reasons other than the pursuit of these economic interests. Second, we believe that a critical factor in the development of an optimal corporate governance policy is the need to avoid unduly diverting resources from our primary responsibilities to add value to our clients’ portfolios through investment performance and client service.

 

  3.4 In order to expand upon these principles, Invesco believes it is necessary to consider the role of proxy voting policy in the context of broader portfolio management and administrative issues which apply to our investment management business as a whole. These are discussed as follows.

 

  3.5 Portfolio Management Issues — Active Equity Portfolios

 

  3.5.1 While recognising in general terms that issues concerning corporate governance practices can have a significant bearing on the financial performance of companies, the primary criterion for the selection and retention of a particular stock in active equity portfolios remains our judgment that the stock will deliver superior investment performance for our clients, based on our investment themes and market analysis.

 

  3.5.2 In view of these dynamics, Invesco does not consider it feasible or desirable to prescribe in advance comprehensive guidelines as to how it will exercise proxy voting authority in all circumstances. The primary aim of Invesco’s approach to corporate governance is to encourage a culture of performance among the companies in which we manage investments in order to add value to our clients’ portfolios, rather than one of mere conformance with a prescriptive set of rules and constraints.

 

  3.5.3 Nevertheless, Invesco has identified a limited range of issues upon which it will always exercise proxy voting authority — either to register disapproval of management proposals or to demonstrate support for company initiatives through positive use of voting powers. These issues are outlined as follows:

 

KEY VOTING ISSUES

Major Corporate Proposals

Invesco will always vote on the following issues arising in company General Meetings where it has the authority to do so on behalf of clients.

 

  ä contentious issues (eg. issues of perceived national interest, or where there has been extensive press coverage or public comment);

 

  ä approval of changes of substantial shareholdings;

 

  ä mergers or schemes of arrangement; and

 

  ä approval of major asset sales or purchases.

As a general rule, Invesco will vote against any actions that will reduce the rights or options of shareholders, reduce shareholder influence over the board of directors and management, reduce the alignment of interests between management and shareholders, or reduce the value of shareholders’ investments, unless balanced by reasonable increase in net worth of the shareholding.

 

E-40


Where appropriate, Invesco will also use voting powers to influence companies to adopt generally accepted best corporate governance practices in areas such as board composition, disclosure policies and the other areas of recommended corporate governance practice.

Invesco’s approach to significant proxy voting issues which fall outside these areas will be addressed on their merits.

 

  3.6 Administrative Issues

 

  3.6.1 In addition to the portfolio management issues outlined above, Invesco’s proxy voting policy also takes account of administrative and cost implications, together with the size of our holdings as compared to the issue size, involved in the exercise of proxy voting authority on our clients’ behalf.

 

  3.6.2 There are practical constraints to the implementation of proxy voting decisions. Proxy voting is a highly seasonal activity, with most company Annual General Meetings being collapsed into a few months, with short deadlines for the distribution and return of notice papers, multiple resolutions from multiple companies being considered simultaneously, and under a legal system which is essentially dependent upon paper-based communication and record-keeping.

 

  3.6.3 In addition, for investment managers such as Invesco who do not invest as principals and who consequently do not appear directly on the share registers of companies, all of these communications are channelled through external custodians, among whom there is in turn a considerable variation in the nature and quality of systems to deal with the flow of information.

 

  3.6.4 While Invesco has the systems in place to efficiently implement proxy voting decisions when required, it can be seen that administrative and cost considerations by necessity play an important role in the application of a responsible proxy voting policy. This is particularly so bearing in mind the extremely limited time period within which voting decisions must often be made and implemented (which can in practice be as little as a few days). This factor also explains why Invesco resists any suggestion that there should be compulsory proxy voting on all issues, as in our view this would only increase the costs to be borne by our clients with very little practical improvement in corporate performance in most cases.

 

  3.6.5 These administrative constraints are further highlighted by the fact that many issues on which shareholders are in practice asked to vote are routine matters relating to the ongoing administration of the company — eg. approval of financial accounts or housekeeping amendments to Articles of Association. Generally in such cases, we will be in favour of the motion as most companies take seriously their duties and are acting in the best interests of shareholders. However, the actual casting of a “yes” vote on all such resolutions in our view would entail an unreasonable administrative workload and cost.

 

  3.6.6 Accordingly, Invesco believes that an important consideration in the framing of a proxy voting policy is the need to avoid unduly diverting resources from our primary responsibilities to add value to our clients’ investments through portfolio management and client service. The policies outlined below have been prepared on this basis.

 

KEY PROXY VOTING ISSUES

Administrative Constraints

In view of the administrative constraints and costs involved in the exercise of proxy voting powers, Invesco may (depending on circumstances) not exercise its voting right unless its clients’ portfolios in aggregate represent a significant proportion of the shareholdings of the company in question.

A significant proportion in this context means 5% or more of the market capitalisation of the company.

 

E-41


4. INTERNAL ADMINISTRATION & DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

 

 

  4.1 The following diagram illustrates the procedures adopted by Invesco for the administration of proxy voting:

 

LOGO

 

  4.2 As shown by the diagram, a central administrative role is performed by our Corporate Action Team, located within the Client Administration section. The initial role of the Corporate Action Team is to receive company notice papers via the range of custodians who hold shares on behalf of our clients, to ascertain which client portfolios hold the stock, and to initiate the decision-making process by distributing the company notice papers to the Primary Investment Manager responsible for the company in question.

 

  4.3 A voting decision on each company resolution (whether a yes or no vote, or a recommended abstention) is made by the Primary Investment Manager responsible for the company in question. Invesco believes that this approach is preferable to the appointment of a committee with responsibility for handling voting issues across all companies, as it takes advantage of the expertise of individuals whose professional lives are occupied by analysing particular companies and sectors, and who are familiar with the issues facing particular companies through their regular company visits.

 

  4.4 Moreover, the Primary Equity Manager has overall responsibility for the relevant market and this ensures that similar issues which arise in different companies are handled in a consistent way across the relevant market.

 

  4.5 The voting decision is then documented and passed back to the Corporate Action Team, who issue the voting instructions to each custodian in advance of the closing date for receipt of proxies by the company. At the same time, the Corporate Action Team logs all proxy voting activities for record keeping or client reporting purposes.

 

  4.6 A key task in administering the overall process is the capture and dissemination of data from companies and custodians within a time frame that makes exercising votes feasible in practice. This applies particularly during the company Annual General Meeting “season”, when there are typically a large number of proxy voting issues under consideration simultaneously. Invesco has no control over the former dependency and Invesco’s ability to influence a custodian’s service levels are limited in the case of individually-managed clients, where the custodian is answerable to the client.

 

E-42


  4.7 The following policy commitments are implicit in these administrative and decision-making processes:

 

INTERNAL ADMINISTRATION AND DECISION-MAKING PROCESS

Invesco will consider all resolutions put forward in the Annual General Meetings or other decision-making forums of all companies in which investments are held on behalf of clients, where it has the authority to exercise voting powers. This consideration will occur in the context of our policy on Key Voting Issues outlined in Section 3.

The voting decision will be made by the Primary Investment Manager responsible for the market in question.

A written record will be kept of the voting decision in each case, and in case of an opposing vote, the reason/comment for the decision.

Voting instructions will be issued to custodians as far as practicable in advance of the deadline for receipt of proxies by the company. Invesco will monitor the efficiency with which custodians implement voting instructions on clients’ behalf.

Invesco’s ability to exercise proxy voting authority is dependent on timely receipt of notification from the relevant custodians.

 

E-43


5. CLIENT REPORTING

 

 

  5.1 Invesco will keep records of its proxy voting activities.

 

  5.2 Upon client request, Invesco will regularly report back to the client on proxy voting activities for investments owned by the client.

 

  5.2 The following points summarise Invesco’s policy commitments on the reporting of proxy voting activities to clients (other than in cases where specific forms of client reporting are specified in the client’s mandate):

 

CLIENT REPORTING

Where proxy voting authority is being exercised on a client’s behalf, a statistical summary of voting activity will be provided on request as part of the client’s regular quarterly report.

Invesco will provide more detailed information on particular proxy voting issues in response to requests from clients wherever possible.

 

E-44


Guidelines on Exercising Shareholder Voting Rights and

Policies for Deciding on the Exercise of Shareholder Voting Rights

Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited

Enforcement Date: July 5, 2010

Revision Date: April 20, 2011

Authority to Amend or Abolish: Shareholders’ Voting Committee

 

E-45


Record of Amendments

 

Date   

Content

April 20, 2011                                 Revision associated with review of proxy voting guideline

 

E-46


Guidelines on Exercising of Shareholder Voting Rights and

Policy Decision Making Criteria

(Japanese Equities)

Policy and Objectives of Exercising Shareholder Voting Rights

Our company is cognizant of the importance of corporate governance, and exercises votes with the sole objective of maximizing the long term interests of trustors (investors) and beneficiaries, pursuant to our fiduciary duty as a trustee to the trustors (investors) and the beneficiaries. We will not conduct any voting with an objective of own interest or that of any third party other than the trustors (investors) or beneficiaries. The interests of trustors (investors) and beneficiaries means the increasing of corporate value or the increasing of the economic interests of shareholders or the preventing of damage thereto.

Significance of Guidelines on Exercising Shareholder Voting Rights

Our company has determined the Guidelines on Exercising of Shareholder Voting Rights in accordance with our policy on exercising the voting rights of shareholders, for the purpose of exercising votes in an appropriate manner, and will closely examine each proposal and determine the response pursuant to these Guidelines.

Guidelines on Exercising Shareholder Voting Rights

1. Procedural Proposal

(1) Financial Statements, Business Reports and Auditors Reports

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting approval of the financial statements, business reports and auditor reports, except in the following circumstances:

 

  - Concerns exist about the settlement or auditing procedures; or

 

  - The relevant company has not answered shareholders’ questions concerning matters that should be disclosed.

(2) Allocation of Earned Surplus and Dividends

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal requesting approval of the allocation of earned surplus and dividends will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the financial condition and the business performance of the relevant company as well as the economic interests of shareholders.

 

E-47


2. Election of Directors

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with electing a director will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the independence, suitability and existence or absence of any antisocial activities in the past on the part of a candidate for director. In the event that a candidate for director is a reelection candidate, we will decide in consideration, inter alia, of the director candidate’s engagement in corporate governance, accountability, the business performance of the company, and the existence or absence of any antisocial act by the company during his or her term in the office.

Definition of the independence:

A person considered to be independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the candidate for director other than that of being selected as a director.

(1) Independence

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to elect an external director, however, we will oppose a candidate for an external director who is perceived to have an interest in the relevant company.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for an external director who does not have independence in the case of a committees organized company, except where the majority of the board are independent.

 

   

Listed parent and subsidiary

If the relevant company has a listed parent and does not have at least one external director who is independent from the relevant company, we shall in principle oppose the candidates for directors of that company.

(2) Suitability

 

   

In principle we shall oppose a director candidate in the following case:

 

  - An attendance rate of less than 75 percent at meetings of the board of directors.

(3) Accountability

 

   

In the following circumstances we will consider opposing a candidate for reelection as a director:

 

  - If the relevant company has a problematic system as set forth bellow and if business performance of the relevant company during the term in office of the candidate experienced a deficit in three consecutive periods and no dividends were paid or they were inferior when compared to others in the same industry.

 

  - If a takeover defense strategy is introduced, that has not been approved by a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders.

(4) Business Performance of the Company

 

 

We will consider opposing a candidate for reelection as a director in the event that business performance of the relevant company during the term in office of the candidate experienced a deficit in three consecutive periods and no dividends were paid.

 

E-48


   

We will consider opposing a candidate for reelection as a director in the event that business performance of the relevant company during the term in office of the candidate was inferior when compared to others in the same industry.

(5) Antisocial Activities on the Part of the Company

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for reelection as a director in the event that during the term in office of the candidate a corporate scandal occurred that had a significant impact on society and caused or could cause damage to of shareholder value.

 

   

In principle we will consider opposing a candidate for reelection as a director in the event that during the term in office of the candidate window dressing or inappropriate accounting practices occurred on the part of the relevant company.

(6) Other

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for director in the event that information concerning the relevant candidate has not been sufficiently disclosed.

3. Amendment of the Composition of the Board of Directors and the Required Qualification of Directors

(1) Amendment of the Number of Directors or Composition of the Board of Directors

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal concerning amendment of the number of directors or the composition of the board of directors will be made by making a comparison with the existing situation and considering, inter alia, the impact on the relevant company and the economic interests of shareholders.

(2) Amendment of Required Qualifications of Directors, Their Terms of Office and Scope of Responsibilities

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal concerning amendment of the required qualifications of directors, their terms of office or scope of liabilities will be made by making a comparison with the existing situation and considering, inter alia, the impact on the relevant company and the economic interests of shareholders.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting retention of a certain number of a company’s own shares as a condition of installation or continuation in office of a director.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to restrict a term in office of a director.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to institute a normal retirement age of directors.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to reduce the liabilities of a director from liability in connection with financial damage as a result of a violation of the fiduciary duties.

 

E-49


(3) Amendment of the Procedural Method for Election of Directors

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal concerning amendment of the procedural method of electing directors will be made by making a comparison with the existing situation and considering, inter alia, the reasonability of the amendment.

4. Election of Statutory Auditors

A decision regarding a proposal concerning the election of statutory auditors will be made by considering, inter alia, the independence and the suitability of the candidate for statutory auditor.

Definition of the independence:

A person considered to be independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the candidate for statutory auditor other than that of being selected as a statutory auditor.

(1) Independence

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for an external statutory auditor if the candidate does not have independence.

(2) Suitability

 

   

In principle we shall oppose a statutory auditor candidate in the following case:

 

  - An attendance rate of less than 75 percent at meetings of the board of directors or meetings of the board of auditors

(3) Accountability

 

   

In principle we will consider opposing a candidate for reelection as a statutory auditor in the event that significant concerns exist in an audit report that has been submitted or audit proceedings.

(4) Antisocial Activities on the Part of the Company

 

   

In principle we will consider opposing a candidate for reelection as a statutory auditor in the event that during the term in office of the candidate a corporate scandal occurred that had a significant impact on society and caused or could cause damage to shareholder value.

 

   

In principle we will consider opposing a candidate for reelection as a statutory auditor in the event that during the term in office of the candidate window dressing or inappropriate accounting practices occurred on the part of the relevant company.

 

E-50


5. Election of Accounting Auditors

We will decide on proposals concerning the election of an accounting auditor by considering, inter alia, the suitability of the candidate for accounting auditor, and the level of audit fees.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for accounting auditor in the event that the accounting auditor can be determined to have expressed an opinion that is not accurate concerning the financial condition of the relevant company.

 

   

In principle we will oppose in the event that a contract for non-auditing work exists between the accounting auditor and the relevant company, and it is determined that the non-auditing work can be found to present a conflict of interest with the auditing work.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for accounting auditor in the event that an excessive auditing fee is paid.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting a change of accounting auditor in the event that the reason for the change can be determined to be a result of a difference in interpretation between the accounting auditor and the relevant company regarding accounting policy.

6. Compensation of Directors, Statutory Auditors, Officers and Employees

(1) Compensation (including bonus)

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal concerning compensation will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the levels of compensation, the business performance of the company, and the reasonability of the framework.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to obtain approval of compensation, except in the following cases:

 

  - A negative correlation appears to exist between the business performance of the company and compensation

 

  - A compensation framework or practice exists which presents an issue

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to pay compensation only by granting shares.

(2) Stock Option Plan

 

   

A proposal to introduce or amend a stock option plan will be decided in consideration of, inter alia, the impact that introducing or amending the plan will have on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, as well as the level of compensation, the scope of implementation, and the reasonability of the plan.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to reduce the exercise price of a stock option plan.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to request that an amendment of the exercise price of a stock option plan be made a matter for approval by the shareholders.

 

E-51


(3) Stock Purchase Plan

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal requesting the introduction or amendment of a stock purchase plan will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact that introducing or amending the plan will have on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, the scope of implementation, and the reasonability of the plan.

(4) Retirement Bonus of Directors or Statutory Auditors

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with awarding a retirement bonus to a director or a statutory auditor will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the extent of the persons who are to be recipients, the existence or absence of antisocial activities in the past on the part of the prospective recipients, the business performance of the company, and the existence or absence of antisocial activities on the part of the company.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to pay a retirement bonus of a director or a statutory auditor if all of the following conditions are satisfied.

 

  - Retirement bonus amount is disclosed.

 

  - The prospective recipients do not include an external director or an external statutory auditor.

 

  - None of the prospective recipients have committed a significant criminal conduct.

 

  - The business performance of the relevant company has not experienced a deficit for three consecutive periods and had no dividend or dividends or they were inferior when compared to others in the same industry.

 

  - During the terms of office of the prospective recipients there has been no corporate scandal that had a significant impact on society and caused or could cause damage to shareholder value.

 

  - During their terms in office there has been no window dressing or inappropriate accounting practices in the relevant company.

7. Equity Financing Policy

(1) Amendment of the Number of Authorized Shares

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal requesting an increase in the number of authorized shares will be made by considering, inter alia, the impact that amending the number of authorized shares will have on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, as well as the reasonability of the amendment of the number of authorized shares, and the impact on the listing of shares as well as on the continuity of the company.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting an increase in the number of authorized shares if it can be determined that unless an increase is made to the number of authorized shares the company will be delisted or that there is a risk of a significant impact on the continuity of the company.

 

E-52


   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to increase the number of authorized shares after the appearance of an acquirer.

(2) Issuing of New Shares

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with issuing of new shares will be made in consideration of, inter alia, reasons of issuing new shares, issuing conditions and terms, the impact of the dilution on the shareholders value and rights of shareholders as well as the impact on the listing of shares and the continuity of the company.

(3) Acquisition or Reissue by a Company of Its Own Shares

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal for a company to acquire or reissue its own shares shall be made by considering, inter alia, its reasonability.

(4) Stock Split

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal involving a stock split.

(5) Consolidation of Shares (Reverse Split )

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal involving a consolidation of shares (reverse split) shall be made by considering, inter alia, its reasonability.

(6) Preferred Shares

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting the creation of new preferred shares or increasing the authorized number of preferred shares, by way of a blank power of attorney that does not specify the voting rights, dividends, conversion or other rights.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to create new preferred shares or to increase the number of authorized preferred shares if the voting rights, dividends, conversion and other rights are stipulated and these rights can be determined to be reasonable.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to the effect that approval of issuing preferred shares is so be obtained from shareholders.

(7) Issuing of Convertible Bonds

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal to issue convertible bonds shall be made by considering, inter alia, the number of shares into which the bonds are to be converted, and the period to maturity of the bonds.

(8) Issuing of Non-Convertible Bonds, and Increasing a Borrowing Limit

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with the issuing of non-convertible bonds or increasing a borrowing limit shall be made by considering, inter alia the financial condition of the relevant company.

 

E-53


(9) Equitization of Debt

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal requesting an amendment of the number of authorized shares or issuing of shares of the company in relation to a debt restructuring shall be made in consideration of, inter alia, the conditions of amending the number of authorized shares or issuing shares of the company, the impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders, the reasonability thereof, and the impact on listing of the shares as well as on the continuity of the company.

(10) Capital Reduction

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with a capital reduction will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders, the reasonability of the capital reduction, as well as the impact on listing of the shares and on the continuity of the company.

 

   

In principle we will approve a proposal requesting a capital reduction in the form of a standard accounting processing.

(11) Financing Plan

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with a financing plan will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, as well as the reasonability thereof, and the impact on the listing of shares as well as on the continuity of the company.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting approval of a financing plan.

(12) Capitalization of Reserves

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting a capitalization of reserves.

 

8. Corporate Governance

(1) Amendment of Settlement Period

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting an amendment of the settlement period, except when it can be determined that the objective is to delay a general meeting of shareholders.

(2) Amendment of Articles of Incorporation

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with an amendment of the articles of incorporation will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders as well as the necessity and the reasonability of amending the articles of incorporation.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to amend the articles of incorporation if amendment of the articles of incorporation is necessary by law.

 

E-54


   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to amend the articles of incorporation if it can be determined that there is a risk that the rights of shareholders will be infringed or a risk that a reduction in shareholder value will occur as a result of the relevant amendment.

 

   

In principal we will vote in favor of a proposal submitted by the board in connection with transition to a committees organized company.

 

   

In principal we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting mitigation or abolishment of the requirements for special resolution.

(3) Amendment of the Quorum of a General Meeting of Shareholders

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with an amendment of the quorum of a general meeting of shareholders will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders as well as the customs of the region or country.

 

   

A proposal in connection with amending the quorum of a special resolution of a general meeting of shareholders will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders as well as the customs of the region or country.

(4) Omnibus Proposal of a General Meeting of Shareholders

 

   

In principle we will oppose an omnibus proposal at a general meeting of shareholders if the entire proposal will not be in the best interests of shareholders.

9. Corporate Behavior

(1) Amendment of Tradename or Location of Corporate Registration

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting amendment of a tradename.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting amendment of a location of corporate registration.

(2) Corporate Restructuring

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with a corporate reorganization as set forth below will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, the respective impact on the financial condition and business performance of the relevant company, as well as the reasonability thereof, and the impact on the listing of shares as well as on the continuity of the company:

Merger or acquisition;

Assignment or acquisition of business;

Company split (spin-off);

Sale of assets;

Being acquired; or

Liquidation.

 

E-55


(3) Proxy Contest

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with election of a director from among opposing candidates will be made in consideration of the independence, suitability, existence or absence of any antisocial activities in the past, actions in corporate governance and accountability on the part of the candidates for director, the business performance of the company, the existence or absence of antisocial activities of the company, and the background to the proxy contest.

 

   

A person who is considered to be independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the candidate for director other than that of being selected as a candidate director of the relevant company.

(4) Defense Strategy in Proxy Contest

 

   

Staggered Board

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting the introduction of a staggered board of directors.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting that the terms in office of directors be one year.

 

   

Authority to Dismiss Directors

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting more stringent requirements for the shareholders to be able to dismiss a director.

 

   

Cumulative Voting

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to introduce cumulative voting in connection with the election of directors.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting the abolition of cumulative voting in connection with the election of directors.

(5) Takeover Defense Strategies

 

   

Introduction or Amendment of Takeover Defense Strategy

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting to introduce or amend a takeover defense strategy that will reduce shareholder value or infringe the rights of shareholders.

 

   

Rights Plan (Poison Pill)

A decision regarding a proposal to introduce a rights plan (poison pill) will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the triggering conditions, the effective period, the conditions of disclosure of content, the composition of directors of the relevant company, and the status of introducing other takeover defense strategies.

 

E-56


  - In principal we will oppose a proposal in which, a triggering condition of the number of outstanding shares is less than 20%.

 

  - In principal we will oppose a proposal that the effective period is beyond 3 years.

 

  - In principal we will oppose a proposal that directors are not selected annually.

 

  - In principal we will oppose a proposal in the event that there are less than 2 directors or 20% of the board who are independent with no issue of the attendance records of the board meeting.

 

  - We will vote in favor for a proposal that a rights plan is considered by an independent committee before introducing such plan. We will vote in favor a proposal only if all special committee members are independent with no issue of the attendance records of the board meeting.

 

  - In principal we will oppose a proposal in the event that other takeover defense strategies exist.

 

  - In principal we will oppose a proposal in the event that the issuing date of invitation notice to shareholders is less than 3 weeks before the general shareholders meeting.

 

  - In principal we will oppose a proposal unless the introduction of takeover defense strategies is considered reasonably beneficial to interests of minority shareholders.

 

   

Relaxation of Requirements to Amend the Articles of Incorporation or Company Regulations

A decision regarding a proposal to relax the requirements to amend the articles of incorporation or company regulations will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders.

 

   

Relaxation of Requirements for Approval of a Merger

A decision regarding a proposal to relax the requirements to approve a merger will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders.

10. Social, Environmental and Political Problems

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with social, environmental or political problems will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact that the actions on the part of the company will have on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, or on the financial condition and business performance of the company, the reasonability of these actions, and the impact on the listing of shares as well as on the continuity of the company.

 

E-57


11. Information Disclosure

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal for which sufficient information is not disclosed for the purpose of making a voting decision.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to increase information disclosure, if all of the following standards are satisfied.

 

  - The information will be beneficial to shareholders.

 

  - The time and expense required for the information disclosure will be minimal.

12. Conflicts of Interest

We will abstain from exercising shareholder voting rights in a company that would constitute a conflict of interest.

The following company is determined to be a company that would constitute a conflict of interest:

 

- Invesco Limited.

13. Shareholder proposals

A decision regarding shareholders’ proposals will be made in accordance with the Guidelines along with company’s proposal, however, will be considered on the basis of proposed individual items.

 

E-58


Guidelines on Exercising of Shareholder Voting Rights and

Policy Decision Making Criteria

(Foreign Equities)

 

Policy and Objectives of Exercising Shareholder Voting Rights

Our company is cognizant of the importance of corporate governance, and exercises votes with the sole objective of maximizing the long term interests of trustors (investors) and beneficiaries, pursuant to our fiduciary duty as a trustee to the trustors (investors) and the beneficiaries. We will not conduct any voting with an objective of own interest or that of any third party other than the trustors (investors) or beneficiaries. The interests of trustors (investors) and beneficiaries means the increasing of corporate value or the increasing of the economic interests of shareholders or the preventing of damage thereto.

Significance of Guidelines on Exercising Shareholder Voting Rights

Our company has determined the Guidelines on Exercising of Shareholder Voting Rights in accordance with our policy on exercising the voting rights of shareholders, for the purpose of exercising votes in an appropriate manner, and will closely examine each proposal and determine the response pursuant to these Guidelines.

Guidelines on Exercising Shareholder Voting Rights

1. Procedural Proposal

(1) Procedures

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a selection of the chairman of a general meeting of shareholders, approval of the minutes, approval of the shareholders registry and other proposals in connection with procedures to hold a general meeting of shareholders.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a procedural proposal such as the following:

 

  - Opening of a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Closing of a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Confirming the proper convening of a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Satisfaction of the quorum for a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Confirming the agenda items of a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Election of a chairman of a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Designation of shareholders who will sign the minutes of a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Preparing and approving a registry of shareholders

 

E-59


  - Filing of legally prescribed documents in connection with a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Designation of an inspector or shareholder to inspect the minutes of a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Permission to ask questions

 

  - Approval of the issuing of minutes of a general meeting of shareholders

 

  - Approval of matters of resolution and granting to the board of directors the authority to execute matters that have been approved

(2) Financial Statements, Business Reports and Auditors Reports

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting approval of the financial statements, business reports and auditor reports, except in the following circumstances:

 

  - Concerns exist about the settlement or auditing procedures; or

 

  - The relevant company has not answered shareholders’ questions concerning matters that should be disclosed.

(3) Allocation of Earned Surplus and Dividends

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal requesting approval of the allocation of earned surplus and dividends will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the financial condition and the business performance of the relevant company as well as the economic interests of shareholders.

2. Election of Directors

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with electing a director will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the independence, suitability and existence or absence of any antisocial activities in the past on the part of a candidate for director. In the event that a candidate for director is a reelection candidate, we will decide in consideration, inter alia, of the director candidate’s engagement in corporate governance, accountability, the business performance of the company, and the existence or absence of any antisocial act by the company during his or her term in the office.

Definition of independence:

A person considered to be independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the candidate for director other than that of being selected as a director.

(1) Independence

(United States)

 

E-60


   

In the following circumstances we will in principle oppose or withhold approval of a candidate for an internal director, or a candidate for an external director who cannot be found to have a relationship of independence from the relevant company:

 

  - If the internal director or the external director who cannot be found to have a relationship of independence from the relevant company is a member of the compensation committee or the nominating committee;

 

  - If the audit committee, compensation committee, or nominating committee has not been established and the director functions as a committee member;

 

  - If the nominating committee has not been established;

 

  - If external directors who are independent from the relevant company do not constitute a majority of the board of directors;

 

  - A person who is independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the candidate for director other than that of being selected as a director.

(Other than United States)

A decision concerning the independence of the candidate for director will be made in consideration of the conditions of each country.

(2) Suitability

 

   

In principle we shall oppose or withhold approval of a director candidate in the following circumstances:

 

  - An attendance rate of less than 75 percent at meetings of any of the board of directors, the audit committee, the compensation committee, or the nominating committee;

 

  - Serving as a director of six or more companies; or

 

  - Serving as a CEO of another company and also serving as an external director of at least two other companies.

(3) Corporate Governance Strategies

 

   

In principle we will oppose or withhold approval of all candidates for reelection in the event that the board of directors employs a system of staggered terms of office and a problem of governance has occurred in the board of directors or committee but the responsible director is not made a subject of the current proposal to reelect directors.

 

   

In the following circumstances we will in principle oppose or withhold approval of a candidate for reelection of a director who is a member of the audit committee:

 

  - If an excessive auditing fee is being paid to the accounting auditor;

 

  - If the accounting auditor has expressed an opinion of non-compliance concerning the financial statements of the relevant company; or

 

E-61


  - If the audit committee has agreed with the accounting auditor to reduce or waive the liability of accounting auditor, such as by limiting the right of the company or the shareholders to take legal action against the accounting auditor.

 

   

In the following circumstances we will in principle oppose or withhold approval of a candidate for reelection as a director who is a member of the compensation committee:

 

  - If there appears to be a negative correlation between the business performance of the company and the compensation of the CEO;

 

  - If in the case of an option for which the stock price of the relevant company is less than the exercise price, an amendment of the exercise price or an exchange for cash or the like has been made without the approval of a general meeting of shareholders;

 

  - If an exchange (sale) of stock options which is limited to a single exercise has been made without obtaining the approval of a general meeting of shareholders;

 

  - If the burn rate has exceeded the level promised in advance to shareholders (the burn rate is the annual rate of dilution measured by the stock options or rights to shares with restriction on assignment that have been actually granted (otherwise known as the “run rate”)); or

 

  - If a compensation system or practice exists that presents a problem.

 

   

In the following circumstances we will in principle oppose or withhold approval of all candidates for reelection as directors:

 

  - If the board of directors has not taken appropriate action regarding a shareholder’s proposal even if there was a shareholder’s proposal which was approved by a majority of the overall votes in the previous period at a general meeting of shareholders.

 

  - If the board of directors has not taken appropriate action regarding a shareholders’ proposal even if a shareholders’ proposal has been approved by a majority of the valid votes in two consecutive periods at a general meeting of shareholders;

 

  - If the board of directors has not taken appropriate action such as withdrawing a takeover defense strategy, despite a majority of shareholders having accepted a public tender offer; or

 

  - If the board of directors has not taken appropriate action regarding the cause of opposition or withholding of approval even though at the general meeting of shareholders for the previous period there was a candidate for director who was opposed or for whom approval was withheld by a majority of the valid votes.

 

E-62


(4) Accountability

 

   

In the following cases we will consider opposing or withholding approval from a candidate for reelection as a director:

 

  - If a notice of convening states that there is a director with an attendance rate of less than 75% at meetings of the board of directors or committee meetings, but the name of the individual is not specifically stated.

 

  - If the relevant company has a problematic system as set forth below, and business performance of the relevant company during the term in office of candidate has been in a deficit and with no dividend or is inferior when compared to those in the same industry in three consecutive periods :

 

  - A system of staggered terms of office;

 

  - A system of special resolution that is not by simple majority;

 

  - Shares of stock with multiple votes;

 

  - A takeover defense strategy that has not been approved by a resolution of a general meeting of shares;

 

  - No clause for exceptions exists in the event that there are competing candidates, even though a system of majority resolution has been introduced for the election of directors;

 

  - An unreasonable restriction is imposed on the authority of shareholders to convene an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders; or

 

  - An unreasonable restriction is imposed on the shareholders’ right to seek approval or disapproval on the part of shareholders by means of a letter of consent by shareholders;

 

  - In principle we will oppose or withhold approval of all candidates for reelection as directors in the event that a dead hand or similar provision is included in a poison pill, until this provision is abolished.

 

  - In principle we will oppose or withhold approval of all candidates for reelection as directors in the event of introducing a new poison pill with an effective duration of 12 months or more (a long-term pill), or any renewal of a poison pill including a short-term pill with an effective period of less than 12 months, by the board of directors without the approval of a general meeting of shareholders.

Nevertheless we will in principle vote in favor of all candidates for reelection as directors in the event of a new introduction if a commitment is made by binding resolution to seek approval of the new introduction at a general meeting of shareholders.

 

  - In principle we will oppose or withhold approval of all candidates for reelection as directors in the event that a significant amendment to the disadvantage of shareholders is added to a poison pill, by the board of directors without the approval of a general meeting of shareholders.

 

E-63


(5) Business Performance of a Company

 

   

We will consider opposing or withholding a candidate for reelection as a director in the event that business performance of the relevant company during the term in office of the candidate experienced a deficit in three consecutive periods and no dividends were paid.

 

   

We will consider opposing or withholding candidate for reelection as a director in the event that business performance of the relevant company during the term in office of the candidate was inferior when compared to others in the same industry.

(6) Antisocial Activities on the Part of the Company

 

   

In principle we will oppose or withhold a candidate for reelection as a director in the event that during the term in office of the candidate a corporate scandal occurred that had a significant impact on society and caused or could cause damage to of shareholder value.

 

   

In principle we will oppose or withhold approval of a candidate for reelection as a director who was a member of the audit committee, if inappropriate accounting practices occurred at the relevant company such as window dressing, accounting treatment that deviates from GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles), or a significant omission in disclosure pursuant to Article 404 of the Sox Law.

(7) Other

 

   

In principle we will oppose or withhold a candidate for director in the event that information concerning the relevant candidate has not been sufficiently disclosed.

(8) Amendment of the Number and Composition of Directors

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal concerning amendment of the number of directors or the composition of the board of directors will be made by making a comparison with the existing situation and considering, inter alia, the impact on the relevant company and the economic interests of shareholders.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to diversify the composition of a board of directors.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to fix the number of members of a board of directors, except when it is determined that this is a takeover defense strategy.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to make shareholder approval unnecessary in connection with an amendment of the number of members or composition of the board of directors.

 

E-64


(9) Amendment of Qualification Requirements, Period of Service, or Extent of Liability of Directors

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal concerning amendment of the required qualifications of directors, their terms of office or scope of liabilities will be made by making a comparison with the existing situation and considering, inter alia, the impact on the relevant company and the economic interests of shareholders

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting retention of a certain number of a company’s own shares as a condition of installation or continuation in office of a director.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to restrict a term in office of a director.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to institute normal retirement age of directors.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to reduce the liabilities of a director from liability in connection with financial damage as a result of a violation of the fiduciary duties.

(10) Amendment of the Procedural Method for Election of Directors

 

   

We will decide on proposal concerning amendment of the procedural method of electing directors will be made by making a comparison with the existing situation and considering, inter alia, the reasonability of the amendment.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to require the approval of the majority of the valid votes for an election of a director.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to prohibit the US style voting system.

3. Election of Statutory Auditors

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with electing a statutory auditor shall be made by considering, inter alia, the independence and suitability of the statutory auditor candidate.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for reelection as a statutory auditor in the event that significant concerns exist in an audit report that has been submitted or audit proceedings.

 

   

A person who is independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the candidate for statutory auditor other than that of being selected as a statutory auditor.

4. Election of Accounting Auditor

We will decide on proposals concerning the election of an accounting auditor by considering, inter alia, the suitability of the candidate for accounting auditor, and the level of audit fees.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for accounting auditor in the event that the accounting auditor can be determined to have expressed an opinion that is not accurate concerning the financial condition of the relevant company.

 

E-65


   

In principle we will oppose in the event that a contract for non-auditing work exists between the accounting auditor and the relevant company, and it is determined that the non-auditing work can be found to present a conflict of interest with the auditing work.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a candidate for accounting auditor in the event that an excessive auditing fee is paid.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting a change of accounting auditor in the event that the reason for the change can be determined to be a result of a difference in interpretation between the accounting auditor and the relevant company regarding accounting policy.

5. Compensation of Directors, Statutory Auditors, Officers and Employees

(1) Compensation (Including Bonus)

 

   

Proposals concerning compensation will be decided in consideration of, inter alia, levels of compensation, business performance of the company, and the reasonability of the framework.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to obtain approval of compensation reports, except in the following cases:

 

  - A negative correlation appears to exist between the business performance of the company and compensation.

 

  - A compensation framework or practice exists which presents an issue.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to set an absolute level or maximum compensation.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to pay compensation only by granting shares.

(2) Stock Option Plan

 

   

A proposal to introduce or amend a stock option plan will be decided in consideration of, inter alia, the impact that introducing or amending the plan will have on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, as well as the level of compensation, the scope of implementation and the reasonability of the plan.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to reduce the exercise price of a stock option plan.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to request that an amendment of the exercise price of a stock option plan be made a matter for approval by the shareholders.

(3) Stock Purchase Plan

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal requesting the introduction or amendment of a stock purchase plan will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact that introducing or amending the plan will have on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, the scope of implementation and the reasonability of the plan.

 

E-66


(4) Retirement Bonus of Directors or Statutory Auditors

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with awarding a retirement bonus to a director or a statutory auditor will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the extent of the persons who are to be recipients, the existence or absence of antisocial activities in the past on the part of the prospective recipients, the business performance of the company, and the existence or absence of antisocial activities on the part of the company. In principle we will oppose awarding a retirement bonus in the event that a significant criminal act has been committed by the recipient during his or her term in office. Moreover we will also consider opposing the awarding of a retirement bonus in the event that the business performance of the relevant company during the term in office of the candidate experienced a deficit in three consecutive periods and no dividends were paid or they were inferior when compared to others in the same industry. In principle we will oppose awarding a retirement bonus in the event that during the term in office of the recipient inappropriate accounting practices occurred such as window dressing or accounting treatment that deviates from generally accepted accounting principles or a significant omission in disclosure, or a corporate scandal occurred, which had a significant impact on society and caused or could cause damage to shareholder value.

6. Equity Financing Policy

(1) Amendment of the Number of Authorized Shares

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal requesting an increase in the number of authorized shares of stock shall be made by considering, inter alia, the impact that amending the number of authorized shares will have on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, as well as the reasonability of the amendment of the number of authorized shares, and the impact on the listing of shares as well as on the continuity of the company.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting an increase in the number of authorized shares if it can be determined that unless an increase is made to the number of authorized shares the company will be delisted or that there is a risk of a significant impact on the continuity of the company.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to increase the number of authorized shares after the appearance of an acquirer.

(2) Issuing of New Shares

 

   

In principle if the existing shareholders will be granted new share subscription rights (pre-emptive purchase rights) we will vote in favor of a proposal to issue new shares up to 100 percent of the number of shares issued and outstanding.

 

   

If the existing shareholders will not be granted new share subscription rights (pre-emptive purchase rights) we will in principle vote in favor of a proposal to issue new shares up to 20 percent of the number of shares issued and outstanding.

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal to issue new shares after an acquirer has appeared.

 

E-67


(3) Acquisition or Reissue by a Company of Its Own Shares

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal for a company to acquire or reissue its own shares shall be made by considering, inter alia, its reasonability.

(4) Stock Split

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal involving a stock split.

(5) Consolidation of Shares (Reverse Split)

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal involving a consolidation of shares (reverse split) shall be made by considering, inter alia, its reasonability.

(6) Reduction in Par Value of Shares

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal reducing the par value of shares.

(7) Preferred Shares

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with creating new preferred shares or amending the number of authorized preferred shares shall be made by considering, inter alia, the existence or absence of voting rights, dividends, conversion or other rights to be granted to the preferred shares as well as the reasonability of those rights.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting the creation of new preferred shares or increasing the authorized number of preferred shares, by way of a blank power of attorney that does not specify the voting rights, dividends, conversion or other rights.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to create new preferred shares or to increase the number of authorized preferred shares if the voting rights, dividends, conversion and other rights are stipulated and these rights can be determined to be reasonable.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to make the issuing of preferred shares a matter for approval by the shareholders.

(8) Classified Shares

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting the creation of new shares with differing voting rights or increasing the authorized number of shares with differing voting rights.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to convert to a capital structure in which there is one vote per share.

(9) Issuing of Convertible Bonds

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal to issue convertible bonds shall be made by considering, inter alia, the number of shares into which the bonds are to be converted, and the period to maturity of the bonds.

 

E-68


(10) Issuing of Non-Convertible Bonds, and Increasing a Borrowing Limit

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal to issue non-convertible bonds will be made by considering, inter alia, the financial condition of the relevant company.

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal to increase a borrowing limit shall be made by considering, inter alia, the financial condition of the relevant company.

(11) Equitization of Debt

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal requesting an amendment of the number of authorized shares or issuing of shares of the company in relation to a debt restructuring shall be made in consideration of, inter alia, the conditions of amending the number of authorized shares or issuing shares of the company, the impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders, the reasonability thereof, as well as the impact on listing of the shares and on the continuity of the company.

(12) Capital Reduction

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with a capital reduction will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders, the reasonability of the capital reduction, as well as the impact on listing of the shares and on the continuity of the company.

 

   

In principle we will approve a proposal requesting a capital reduction in the form of a standard accounting processing.

(13) Financing Plan

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with a financing plan will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders, as well as the reasonability thereof, and the impact on the listing of shares as well as on the continuity of the company.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting approval of a financing plan.

(14) Capitalization of Reserves

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting a capitalization of reserves.

7. Corporate Governance

(1) Amendment of Settlement Period

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting an amendment of the settlement period, except when it can be determined that the objective is to delay a general meeting of shareholders.

 

E-69


(2) Amendment of Articles of Incorporation

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with an amendment of the articles of incorporation will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders as well as the necessity and the reasonability of amending the articles of incorporation.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to amend the articles of incorporation if amendment of the articles of incorporation is necessary by law.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to amend the articles of incorporation if it can be determined that there is a risk that the rights of shareholders will be infringed or a risk that a reduction in shareholder value will occur as a result of the relevant amendment.

(3) Amendment of the Quorum of a General Meeting of Shareholders

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with amending the quorum of a general meeting of shareholders and a special resolution of a general shareholders meeting will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders as well as the customs of the region or country.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to reduce the quorum of a general meeting of shareholders.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to reduce the quorum of a special resolution.

(4) Omnibus Proposal of a General Meeting of Shareholders

 

   

In principle we will oppose an omnibus proposal at a general meeting of shareholders if the entire proposal will not be in the best interests of shareholders.

(5) Other

(Anonymous Voting)

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting anonymous voting, an independent vote counter, an independent inspector, and separate disclosure of the results of voting on a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders.

(Authority to Postpone General Meetings of Shareholders)

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting to grant to a company the authority to postpone a general meeting of shareholders.

(Requirement of Super Majority Approval)

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting a relaxation or abolishment of the requirement for a super majority.

 

E-70


8. Corporate Behavior

(1) Amendment of Tradename or Location of Corporate Registration

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting amendment of a tradename.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting amendment of a location of corporate registration.

(2) Corporate Restructuring

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with a merger, acquisition, assignment or acquisition of business, company split (spin-off), sale of assets, being acquired, corporate liquidation or other corporate restructuring will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the respective impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders, the impact on the financial condition and on the business performance of the relevant company, as well as the reasonability thereof, and the impact on the listing of shares and on the continuity of the company.

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with a corporate reorganization as set forth below will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the respective impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders, the impact on the financial condition and on the business performance of the relevant company, as well as the reasonability thereof, and the impact on the listing of shares as well as on the continuity of the company:

Merger or acquisition;

Assignment or acquisition of business;

Company split (spin-off);

Sale of assets;

Being acquired; or

Liquidation.

(3) Proxy Contest

 

   

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with election of a director from among opposing candidates will be made in consideration of the independence, suitability, existence or absence of any antisocial activities in the past on the part of a candidate for director, the actions in corporate governance, accountability the business performance of the company, the existence or absence of antisocial activities of the company, and the background to the proxy contest.

 

   

A person who is considered to be independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the candidate for director other than that of being selected as a candidate director of the relevant company.

 

E-71


(4) Defense Strategy in Proxy Contest

 

   

Staggered Board

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting the introduction of staggered board of directors:

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting the introduction of a staggered board of directors.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting that the terms in office of directors be one year.

 

   

Authority to Dismiss Directors

In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting more stringent requirements for the shareholders to be able to dismiss a director.

 

   

Cumulative Voting

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to introduce cumulative voting in connection with the election of directors. However, in principle we will oppose a proposal which a majority of valid votes is required to elect a director except in the event that shareholders are able to write-in their own candidate in the convening notice or ballot of the company and the number of candidates exceeds a prescribed number.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal requesting the abolition of cumulative voting in connection with the election of directors.

 

   

Authority to Call an Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting a right of shareholders to call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to abolish restrictions on the right of shareholders to call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to restrict or prohibit the right of shareholders to call an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders.

 

   

Letter of Consent Seeking Approval or Disapproval from Shareholders

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting that shareholders have the right to seek approval or disapproval on the part of shareholders by means of a letter of consent.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to abolish restrictions on the right of shareholders to seek approval or disapproval on the part of shareholders by means of a letter of consent.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to restrict or prohibit the right of shareholders to seek approval or disapproval on the part of shareholders by means of a letter of consent.

 

E-72


(5) Takeover Defense Strategies

 

   

Rights Plan (Poison Pill)

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with introducing a rights plan (poison pill) will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the triggering conditions, the effective period, the conditions of disclosure of content, the composition of directors of the relevant company, and the status of introducing other takeover defense strategies.

 

   

Fair Price Conditions

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with introducing fair price conditions will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the triggering conditions, the decision-making process for triggering, and the reasonability of the plan.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting the introduction of fair price conditions, provided that the following is satisfied.

 

  - At the time of triggering the fair price provision, the approval of a majority or not more than a majority of shareholders without a direct interest in the acquisition is to be sought

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to reduce the number of approvals by shareholders that is necessary to trigger fair price provision.

 

   

Anti-Greenmail Provision

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with introducing an anti-greenmail provision will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the triggering conditions, the decision-making process for triggering, and the reasonability of the plan.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting the introduction of anti-greenmail provisions, provided that all of the following standards are satisfied:

 

  - The definition of greenmail is clear

 

  - If a buyback offer is to be made to a person who holds a large number of shares, that the buy-back offer will be made to all shareholders, or confirmation will be made that shareholders who do not have a direct interest in the takeover do not oppose the buyback offer to the person who holds a large number of shares.

 

  - No clause is included which would restrict the rights of shareholders, such as measures to deter being bought out.

 

   

Golden Parachute and Tin Parachute Conditions

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with introducing a golden parachute or a tin parachute will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the triggering conditions, the decision-making process for triggering, the level of compensation to be provided and the reasonability of the plan.

 

E-73


  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to introduce or amend a golden parachute or a tin parachute if all of the following criteria are satisfied:

 

  - The triggering of the golden parachute or the tin parachute will be determined by an independent committee.

 

  - The payable compensation shall be no more than three times the employment compensation payable for a year.

 

  - Payment of compensation shall be made after the transfer of control.

 

   

Classified Shares

In principle we will oppose a proposal in connection with creating new classified shares with multiple voting rights.

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with creating new classified shares with no voting rights or less voting rights will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the terms of the classified shares.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to create classified shares with multiple voting rights.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to create new classified shares with no voting rights or less voting rights if all of the following conditions are satisfied.

 

  - The objective of creating the new classified shares is to obtain financing while minimizing the dilution of the existing shareholders.

 

  - The creation of the new classified shares does not have an objective of protecting the voting rights of shareholders that have a direct interest in a takeover or of major shareholders.

 

   

Issuing New Shares to a White Squire or a White Knight

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with issuing shares to a white squire or a white knight will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the conditions of issuing the shares.

 

   

Relaxation of Requirements to Amend the Articles of Incorporation or Company Regulations

A decision regarding a proposal to relax the requirements to amend the articles of incorporation or company regulations will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders.

 

E-74


   

Relaxation of Requirements for Approval of a Merger

A decision regarding a proposal to relax the requirements to approve a merger will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact on shareholder value and on the rights of shareholders.

 

   

Introduction or Amendment of Takeover Defense Strategy

In principle we will oppose a proposal in connection with introducing or amending a takeover defense strategy that will reduce shareholder value or infringe the rights of shareholders.

9. Social, Environmental and Political Problems

A decision regarding a proposal in connection with a social, environmental or political problems will be made in consideration of, inter alia, the impact that the actions on the part of the company will have on shareholder value and the rights of shareholders, the impact on the financial condition and the business performance of the company, the reasonability of these actions, and the impact on the listing of shares as well as on the continuity of the company.

10. Information Disclosure

 

   

In principle we will oppose a proposal for which sufficient information is not disclosed for the purpose of making a voting decision.

 

   

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to increase information disclosure, if all of the following criteria are satisfied.

 

  - The information will be beneficial to shareholders.

 

  - The time and expense required for the information disclosure will be minimal.

11. Other

(1) Directors

 

   

Ex Post Facto Approval of Actions by Directors and Executive Officers

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting ex post facto approval of an action taken by the directors or executive officers as long as there are no material concerns such as having committed an act in violation of fiduciary duties.

 

   

Separation of Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to have a director who is independent from the relevant company serve as the chairman of the board of directors as long as there are not sufficient reasons to oppose the proposal, such as the existence of a corporate governance organization that will counter a CEO who is also serving as chairman.

 

E-75


  - A person considered to be independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the director other than that of being selected as a director.

 

   

Independence of Board of Directors

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to have directors who are independent from the relevant company account for at least a majority or more than two-thirds of the members of the board of directors.

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal that the audit committee, compensation committee and nominating committee of the board of directors shall be composed solely of independent directors.

 

  - A person considered to be independent shall mean a person for whom there is no relationship between the relevant company and the director other than that of being selected as a director.

(2) Statutory Auditors

 

   

Ex Post Facto Approval of Actions by Statutory Auditors

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting ex post facto approval of an action taken by a statutory auditor as long as there are no material concerns such as having committed an act in violation of fiduciary duties.

 

   

Attendance by a Statutory Auditor at a General Meeting of Shareholders

In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting that a statutory auditor attend a general meeting of shareholders.

(3) Accounting Auditor

 

   

Fees of an accounting auditor

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal requesting that the decision on the fees of an accounting auditor is left up to the discretion of the board of directors.

 

  - In principle we will oppose a proposal to reduce or waive the liability of an accounting auditor.

 

   

Selection of the Accounting Auditor by a General Meeting of Shareholders

 

  - In principle we will vote in favor of a proposal to make the selection of an accounting auditor a matter for resolution by a general meeting of shareholders.

 

E-76


12. Conflicts of Interest

We will abstain from exercising shareholder voting rights in a company that would constitute a conflict of interest.

The following company is determined to be a company that would constitute a conflict of interest:

 

- Invesco Limited.

13. Shareholder Proposals

A decision regarding shareholders’ proposals will be made in accordance with the Guideline along with company’s proposal, however, will be considered on the basis of proposed individual items.

 

E-77


1. Proxy Voting Policy

 

  1.1 Introduction

Invesco recognises its fiduciary obligation to act in the best interests of all clients, be they superannuation trustees, institutional clients, unit-holders in managed investment schemes or personal investors. One way Invesco represents its clients in matters of corporate governance is through the proxy voting process.

This policy sets out Invesco Australia’s approach to proxy voting in the context of portfolio management, client service responsibilities and corporate governance principles.

This policy applies to;

 

   

all Australian based and managed funds and mandates, in accordance with IFSA Standard No. 13.00 October 2004, clause 9.1 and footnote #3.

This policy does not apply;

 

   

where investment management of an international fund has been delegated to an overseas Invesco company, proxy voting will rest with that delegated manager.

In order to facilitate its proxy voting process and to avoid conflicts of interest where these may arise, Invesco may retain a professional proxy voting service to assist with in-depth proxy research, vote recommendations, vote execution, and the necessary record keeping.

 

  1.2 Guiding Principles

 

  1.2.1 The objective of Invesco’s Proxy Voting Policy is to promote the economic interests of its clients. At no time will Invesco use the shareholding powers exercised in respect of its clients’ investments to advance its own commercial interests, to pursue a social or political cause that is unrelated to clients’ economic interests, or to favour a particular client or other relationship to the detriment of others.

 

  1.2.2 The involvement of Invesco as an institutional shareholder will not extend to interference in the proper exercise of Board or management responsibilities, or impede the ability of companies to take the calculated commercial risks which are essential means of adding value for shareholders.

 

  1.2.3 The primary aim of the policy is to encourage a culture of performance among investee companies, rather than one of mere conformance with a prescriptive set of rules and constraints.

 

  1.2.4 Invesco considers that proxy voting rights are an important power, which if exercised diligently can enhance client returns, and should be managed with the same care as any other asset managed on behalf of its clients.

 

E-78


  1.2.5 Invesco may choose not to vote on a particular issue if this results in shares being blocked from trading for a period of more than 4 hours; it may not be in the interest of clients if the liquidity of investment holdings is diminished at a potentially sensitive time, such as that around a shareholder meeting.

 

  1.3 Proxy Voting Authority

 

  1.3.1 Authority Overview

An important dimension of Invesco’s approach to corporate governance is the exercise of proxy voting authority at the Annual General Meetings or other decision-making forums of companies in which we manage investments on behalf of clients.

Proxy voting policy follows two streams, each defining where discretion to exercise voting power should rest — with Invesco as the investment manager (including its ability to outsource the function), or with individual mandate clients.

Under the first alternative, Invesco’s role would be both to make voting decisions, for pooled funds and on individual mandate clients’ behalf, and to implement those decisions.

Under the second alternative, where IM clients retain voting control, Invesco has no role to play other than administering voting decisions under instructions from our clients on a cost recovery basis.

 

  1.3.2 Individually-Managed Clients

IM clients may elect to retain voting authority or delegate this authority to Invesco. If delegated, Invesco will employ either ISS or ASCI guidelines (selected at inception by the client) but at all times Invesco Investment Managers will retain the ability to override any decisions in the interests of the client. Alternate overlays and ad hoc intervention will not be allowed without Board approval.

In cases where voting authority is delegated by an individually-managed client, Invesco recognises its responsibility to be accountable for the decisions it makes.

Some individually-managed clients may wish to retain voting authority for themselves, or to place conditions on the circumstances in which it can be exercised by investment managers 1 .

The choice of this directive will occur at inception or at major review events only. Individually managed clients will not be allowed to move on an ad hoc basis between delegating control to the funds manager and full direct control.

 

1  

In practice, it is believed that this option is generally only likely to arise with relatively large clients such as trustees of major superannuation funds or statutory corporations that have the resources to develop their own policies and to supervise their implementation by investment managers and custodians. In particular, clients who have multiple equity managers and utilise a master custody arrangement may be more likely to consider retaining voting authority in order to ensure consistency of approach across their total portfolio. Such arrangements will be costed into administration services at inception.

 

E-79


  1.3.3 Pooled Fund Clients

The funds manager is required to act solely in the collective interests of unit holders at large rather than as a direct agent or delegate of each unit holder. The legal relationship that exists means it is not possible for the manager to accept instructions from a particular pooled fund client as to how to exercise proxy voting authority in a particular instance.

Invesco’s accountability to pooled fund clients in exercising its fiduciary responsibilities is best addressed as part of the manager’s broader client relationship and reporting responsibilities.

In considering proxy voting issues arising in respect of pooled fund shareholdings, Invesco will act solely in accordance with its fiduciary responsibility to take account of the collective interests of unit holders in the pooled fund as a whole.

All proxy voting decisions may be delegated to an outsourced provider, but Invesco investment managers will retain the ability to override these decisions in the interests of fund unit holders.

 

  1.4 Key Proxy Voting Issues

 

  1.4.1 Issues Overview

Invesco will consider voting requirements on all issues at all company meetings directly or via an outsourced provider. We will generally not announce our voting intentions and the reasons behind them.

 

  1.4.2 Portfolio Management Issues

Invesco does not consider it feasible or desirable to prescribe in advance comprehensive guidelines as to how it will exercise proxy voting authority in all circumstances. The primary aim of Invesco’s approach to corporate governance is to encourage a culture of performance among the companies in which we invest in order to add value to our clients’ portfolios, rather than one of mere conformance with a prescriptive set of rules and constraints.

As a general rule, Invesco will vote against any actions that will reduce the rights or options of shareholders, reduce shareholder influence over the board of directors and management, reduce the alignment of interests between management and shareholders, or reduce the value of shareholders’ investments, unless balanced by reasonable increase in net worth of the shareholding.

Where appropriate, Invesco will also use voting powers to influence companies to adopt generally accepted best corporate governance practices in areas such as board composition, disclosure policies and the other areas of recommended corporate governance practice.

Administrative constraints are highlighted by the fact that many issues on which shareholders are in practice asked to vote are routine matters relating to the ongoing administration of the company — eg. approval of financial accounts or housekeeping amendments to Articles of Association. Generally in such cases,

 

E-80


Invesco will be in favour of the motion as most companies take seriously their duties and are acting in the best interests of shareholders. However, reasonable consideration of issues and the actual casting of a vote on all such resolutions would entail an unreasonable administrative workload and cost. For this reason, Invesco may outsource all or part of the proxy voting function at the expense of individual funds. Invesco believes that an important consideration in the framing of a proxy voting policy is the need to avoid unduly diverting resources from our primary responsibilities to add value to our clients’ investments through portfolio management and client service.

 

  1.5 Internal Proxy Voting Procedure

In situations where an override decision is required to be made or where the outsourced provider has recused itself from a vote recommendation, the responsible Investment Manager will have the final say as to how a vote will be cast.

In the event that a voting decision is considered not to be in the best interests of a particular client or where a vote is not able to be cast, a meeting may be convened at any time to determine voting intentions. The meeting will be made up of at least three of the following:

Chief Executive Officer;

Head of Operations & Finance;

Head of either Legal or Compliance; and

Relevant Investment Manager(s).

 

  1.6 Client Reporting

Invesco will keep records of its proxy voting activities, directly or through outsourced reporting.

Upon client election, Invesco will report quarterly or annually to the client on proxy voting activities for investments owned by the client.

A record will be kept of the voting decision in each case by Invesco or its outsourced provider. Invesco will disclose on an annual basis, a summary of its proxy voting statistics on its website as required by IFSA standard No. 13 — Proxy Voting.

 

E-81


Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC

PROXY VOTING POLICY

For the exchange-traded funds in which Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC (“Invesco PowerShares”) serves as investment adviser, it retained Glass Lewis & Co. to provide in-depth proxy research and Broadridge to provide vote execution and the recordkeeping services necessary for tracking proxy voting. Invesco PowerShares intends to vote according to Glass Lewis & Co.’s voting recommendations. Glass Lewis & Co. specializes in providing a variety of fiduciary-level services related to proxy voting.

For investment companies in which Invesco PowerShares serves as the sub-adviser, Invesco PowerShares will vote in accordance with the proxy voting guidelines of the adviser as determined and approved by the Board of Directors/Trustees. Invesco PowerShares will vote in accordance with the proxy voting service’ guidelines and does not intend to form a committee to vote proxies.

For separately managed accounts, Invesco PowerShares will vote in accordance with instructions received by the client.

February 16, 2012

 

E-82


APPENDIX F

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES

To the best knowledge of the Trust, the names and addresses of the record and beneficial holders of 5% or more of the outstanding shares of each class of the Trust’s equity securities and the percentage of the outstanding shares held by such holders are set forth below. Unless otherwise indicated below, the Trust has no knowledge as to whether all or any portion of the shares owned of record are also owned beneficially.

A shareholder who owns beneficially 25% or more of the outstanding securities of a Fund is presumed to “control” that Fund as defined in the 1940 Act. Such control may affect the voting rights of other shareholders.

All information listed below is as of April     , 2014

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

HARTFORD LIFE & ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

           —     

HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE CO

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

           —     

OHIO NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

FBO ITS SEPARATE ACCOUNTS

1 FINANCIAL WAY

CINCINNATI, OH 45242-5851

     —           

PACIFIC SELECT VARIABLE ANNUITY

700 NEWPORT CENTER DR

NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6307

     —           

 

F-1


Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

GIAC 4CB

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PL.

EQUITY ACCOUNTING 3-SBETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

GIAC 4BC

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PL.

RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS FM&C NRO

BETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

GIAC 4CL

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PL.

EQUITY ACCOUNTING 3-SBETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

HARTFORD LIFE SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

              

IDS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

222 AXP FINANCIAL CTR.

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55474-0002

            —     

ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CO. CONVEYOR

ONE ORANGE WAY B3N

WINDSOR, CT 06095-4773

            —     

PRUCO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

ATTN: SEPARATE ACCTS TRADE CONFIRMS

213 WASHINGTON ST. FL 7

NEWARK, NJ 07102-2992

            —     

 

F-2


Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE CO.

ATTN: FINANCIAL CONTROL- CIGNA

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

            —     

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

GLAC PROPRIETARY

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

            —     

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

GLAC VA1

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

            —     

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE CO.

GLAC VA3

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

     —            

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE CO.

GLAC AIM VA1 AND SPVL -VL

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

            —     

GENERAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE

13045 TESSON FERRY RD.

ST LOUIS, MO 63128-3499

            —     

LINCOLN LIFE FLEXIBLE PREMIUM

VARIABLE LIFE ACCT M/VUL-1 SA-M

1300 CLINTON ST

MAIL STOP 4C01

FORT WAYNE, IN 46802-3506

            —     

 

F-3


Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

PRUDENTIAL ANNUITIES LIFE ASSURANCE.

ATTN: SEPARATE ACCTS TRADE CONFIRMS

P.O. BOX 883

1 CORPORATE DR.

SHELTON, CT 06484-6208

            —     

CM LIFE INSURANCE CO.

FUND OPERATIONS/N255

1295 STATE ST.

SPRINGFIELD, MA 01111-0001

            —     

COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

132 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 210

SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772-2132

            —     

IDS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

222 AXP FINANCIAL CTR.

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55474-0002

     —            

IDS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NY

222 AXP FINANCIAL CENTER

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55474-0014

     —            

MASS MUTUAL LIFE INS CO.

1295 STATE STREET MIP C105

SPRINGFIELD, MA 01111-0001

              

PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE CO CUST

FBO-PRINCIPAL INDIVIDUAL – PRINCIPAL 711 HIGH STREET G-012-S41

DES MOINES, IA 50392-0001

            —     

SECURITY BENEFIT LIFE

VARIABLE ANNUITY ACCOUNT XIV

1 SW SECURITY BENEFIT PL

TOPEKA, KS 66636-1000

            —     

 

F-4


Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
Shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of
Record
 

AUL AMERICAN INDIVIDUAL

VARIABLE ANNUITY UNIT TRUST B

AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE CO.

ONE AMERICAN SQUARE

P.O. BOX 368

INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46206-0368

            —     

AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP

AMERITAS VARIABLE SEPARATE ACCT VA2

ATTN: VARIABLE TRADES

5900 O STREET

LINCOLN, NE 68510-2234

            —     

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO

1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 11.022

NEW YORK, NY 10104-1472

     —            

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO

1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 11.022

NEW YORK, NY 10104-0101

     —            

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO

1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 11.022

NEW YORK, NY 10104-1472

     —            

CUNA MUTUAL VARIABLE ANNUITY ACCOUNT

2000 HERITAGE WAY

WAVERLY, IA 50677-9208

     —            

MET LIFE ANNUITY OPERATIONS

SECURITY FIRST LIFE SEPARATE AC

ATTN: SHAR NEVENHOVEN CPA

4700 WESTOWN PLSY., STE. 200

WEST DES MOINES, IA 50266

     —            

NATIONWIDE LIFE INS CO NWPP

C/O IPO PORTFOLIO ACCOUNTING

PO BOX 182029

COLUMBUS,OH 43218-2029

            —     

SECURITY BENEFIT LIFE

VARIABLE ANNUITY ACCOUNT XIV

1 SW SECURITY BENEFIT PL.

TOPEKA, KS 66636-1000

            —     

SYMETRA LIFE INSURANCE CO.

ATTN: MICHAEL ZHANG

SEP. ACCTS SC-15

777 108 TH AVE NE. STE 1200

BELLEVUE, WA 98004-5135

            —     

 

F-5


Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
Shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

CUNA MUTUAL VARIABLE ANNUITY ACCOUNT

2000 HERITAGE WAY

WAVERLY, IA 50677-9208

     —            

HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

              

HARTFORD LIFE SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

PROTECTIVE LIFE VARIABLE ANNUITY

INVESTMENT PRODUCTS SERVICES

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

P.O. BOX 10648

BIRMINGHAM, AL 35202-0648

     —            

SECURITY BENEFIT LIFE

SBL VARIABLE ANNUITY ACCOUNT XIV

ATTN: FINANCE DEPARTMENT

1 SW SECURITY BENEFIT PL.

TOPEKA, KS 66636-1000

     —            

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

GLAC PROPRIETARY

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

PO BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

            —     

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO

1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 11.022

NEW YORK, NY 10104-1472

     —            

 

F-6


Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

AUL AMERICAN INDIVIDUAL

VARIABLE ANNUITY UNIT TRUST B

AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INS CO.

ONE AMERICAN SQUARE

P.O. BOX 368

INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46206-0368

            —     

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO

1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 11.022

NEW YORK, NY 10019

     —            

HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

HARTFORD LIFE SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE

10350 Ormsby Park PI Suite 600

LOUISVILLE, KY 40223-6178

            —     

NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY NWVLI4

C/O IPO PORTFOLIO ACCOUNTING

P.O. BOX 182029

COLUMBUS, OH 43218-2029

            —     

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP

AMERITAS VARIABLE SEPARATE

ACCOUNT VA2

ATTN: VARIABLE TRADES

5900 O ST

LINCOLN, NE 68510-2234

            —     

 

F-7


Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE CO

VARIABLE EXTRA CREDIT

ATTN: VARIABLE ACCOUNTING

6610 W BROAD ST

RICHMOND, VA 23230-1702

     —            

HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

              

HARTFORD LIFE SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

IDS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

222 AXP FINANCIAL CTR.

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55474-0002

     —            

MET LIFE ANNUITY OPERATIONS SECURITY FIRST LIFE SEPARATE AC

ATTN: SHAR NEVENHOVEN CPA

4700 WESTOWN PLSY STE 200

WEST DES MOINES, IA 50266

     —            

NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE CO

NWPP

C/O IPO PORTFOLIO ACCOUNTING

P.O. BOX 182029

COLUMBUS, OH 43218-2029

            —     

NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE CO

NWLVI4

C/O IPO PORTFOLIO ACCOUNTING

P.O. BOX 182029

COLUMBUS, OH 43218-2029

            —     

NYLIAC

169 LACKAWANNA AVENUE

PARSIPPANY, NJ 07054-1007

            —     

 

F-8


Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE CO.

GLAC VA3

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

     —            

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

GLAC PROPRIETARY

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

            —     

AMERICAN NATL GROUP UNALLOCATED

1 MOODY PLZ

GALVESTON, TX 77550-7947

            —     

ANNUITY INVESTORS LIFE INSURANCE

ATTN: CHRIS ACCURSO

P.O. BOX 5423

CINCINNATI, OH 45201-5423

     —            

COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

132 TURNPIKE ROAD SUITE 210

SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772-2132

            —     

ZURICH AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO

ATTN: INVESTMENT ACCOUNTING LL-2W

PO BOX 19097

GREENVILLE, SC 29602-9097

            —     

 

F-9


Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE CO.

C/O PRUDENTIAL ANNUITIES

SEPERATE ACCTS

213 WASHINGTON ST

MAILSTOP NJ 02-07-01

NEWARK, NJ 07102-2917

     —            

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 11.022

NEW YORK, NY 10019

     —            

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO

1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 11.022

NEW YORK, NY 10104-1472

     —            

GIAC 4BG

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PLACE

RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS FM&C NRO

BETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

GIAC 4GB

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PLACE

EQUITY ACCOUNTING 3-S

BETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

GIAC 4GL

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PLACE

EQUITY ACCOUNTING 3-S

BETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

HARTFORD LIFE SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

HARTFORD LIFE & ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATIONS

PO BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

 

F-10


     Series I
shares
     Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
     Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

SECURITY BENEFIT LIFE

VARIABLE ANNUITY ACCOUNT XIV

1 SW SECURITY BENEFIT PL.

TOPEKA, KS 66636-1000

     —             

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE CO.

GLAC VA3

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

     —            

INVESCO V.I. BALANCED-RISK ALLOCATION

OMNIBUS ACCOUNT

C/O INVESCO ADVISERS

11 GREENWAY PLAZA SUITE 2500

HOUSTON, TX 77046-1134

            —     

JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE

10350 ORMSBY PARK PL STE 600

LOUISVILLE, KY 40223-6178

            —     

 

F-11


Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of
Record
 

AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE CO

1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 11.022

NEW YORK, NY 10104-0101

     —            

CUNA MUTUAL VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE

ATTN: VARIABLE PRODUCTS FINANCE

2000 HERITAGE WAY

WAVERLY, IA 50677-9208

            —     

GIAC 4BW

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PLACE

RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS FM&C NRO

BETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

GIAC 4WB

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PLACE

RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS FM&C NRO

BETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

GIAC 4WL

ATTN: PAUL IANNELLI

3900 BURGESS PLACE

RETIREMENT SOLUTIONS FM&C NRO

BETHLEHEM, PA 18017-9097

     —            

HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATIONS

PO BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

              

HARTFORD LIFE SEPARATE ACCOUNT

Attn: UIT OPERATIONS

PO BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

         

HARTFORD LIFE & ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

         

MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE CO.

ATTN: A6-5216

400 ROBERT ST. N

ST PAUL, MN 55101-2037

     —            

 

F-12


Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

 

     Series I
shares
     Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
     Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

PROTECTIVE LIFE VARIABLE ANNUITY

INFESTMENT PRODUCT SERVICES PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

PO BOX 10648

BIRMINGHAM, AL 35202-0648

     —             

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

 

     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

IDS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

222 AXP FINANCIAL CTR.

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55474-0002

            —     

MASS MUTUAL LIFE INS CO.

1295 STATE STREET MIP C105

SPRINGFIELD, MA 01111-0001

              

PRUDENTIAL ANNUITIES LIFE ASSURANCE

ATTN: SEPARATE ACCTS TRADE CONFIRMS

PO BOX 883

1 CORPORATE DR

SHELTON, CT 06484-0883

            —     

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

 

     Series I
shares
     Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
     Percentage
Owned of

Record
 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE CO.

AIM VI-AIM VA3

FINANCIAL CONTROL UNIT

P.O. BOX 94210

PALATINE, IL 60094-4210

     —             

 

F-13


     Series I
shares
    Series II
shares
 

Name and Address of Principal Holder

   Percentage Owned
of
Record
    Percentage Owned
of

Record
 

AMERICAN ENTERPRISE LIFE INS CO.

1497 AXP FINANCIAL CTR.

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55474-0014

     —            

COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

132 TURNPIKE ROAD, SUITE 210

SOUTHBOROUGH, MA 01772-2132

     —            

GE LIFE AND ANNUITY ASSURANCE CO.

VARIABLE EXTRA CREDIT

ATTN: VARIABLE ACCOUNTING

6610 W. BROAD ST.

RICHMOND, VA 23230-1702

     —            

HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

HARTFORD LIFE SEPARATE ACCOUNT

ATTN: UIT OPERATION

P.O. BOX 2999

HARTFORD, CT 06104-2999

            —     

SBLVARIABLE FLEX NQ NAVISYS

1 SW SECURITY BENEFIT PL

TOPKEA, KS 66606-2541

     —            

SECURITY BENEFIT LIFE

VARIFLEX Q NAVISYS

1 SW SECURITY BENEFIT PL

TOPKEA, KS 66636-1000

     —            

TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CO.

LANDMARK

ATTN: FMD OPERATIONAL ACCOUNTING

4333 EDGEWOOD RD. NE

CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52499-0001

     —            

TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE CO.

EXTRA

Attn: FMD OPERATIONAL ACCOUNTING

4333 EDGEWOOD RD. NE

CEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52499-0001

     —            

 

F-14


Management Ownership

As of                     , the trustees and officers as a group owned less than 1% of the shares outstanding of each class of any Fund.

 

F-15


APPENDIX G

MANAGEMENT FEES

For the last three fiscal years ended December 31, the management fees payable by each Fund, the amounts waived by Invesco and the net fees paid by each Fund were as follows:

 

Fund Name

  2013     2012     2011  
  Management
Fee Payable
    Management
Fee Payable
    Management
Fee Waivers
    Management
Fee Payable
    Management
Fee Waivers
    Management
Fee Payable
    Management
Fee Waivers
    Management
Fee Waivers
    Net
Management
Fee Paid
 

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

  $        $        $        $ 7,226,293      $ 3,473,065      $ 7,226,293      $ 3,473,065      $ —        $ —     

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

          7,136,331        194,333        7,136,331        194,333        325,026        8,130,305   

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

          140,005        140,005        140,005        140,005        146,059        —     

Invesco V.I. Global Health
Care Fund

          1,163,410        14,713        1,163,410        14,713        11,733        1,164,843   

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

          1,858,213        7,785        1,858,213        7,785        2,721        1,079,425   

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

          5,544,463        1,316,203        5,544,463        1,316,203        279,186        5,238,618   

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

          700,730        285,628        700,730        285,628        124,628        222,070   

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

          9,327,362        175,809        9,327,362        175,809        146,928        9,870,427   

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

          418,656        24,972        418,656        24,972        77,324        321,072   

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

          2,843,679        123,844        2,843,679        123,844        112,810        3,271,513   

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

          872,758        668,624        872,758        668,624        122,854        —     

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

          2,108,767        3,921        2,108,767        3,921        7,662        1,613,324   

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

          794,695        4,218        794,695        4,218        5,592        863,840   

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

          1,656,656        16,674        1,656,656        16,674        12,010        2,225,395   

 

G-1


APPENDIX H

PORTFOLIO MANAGERS

Portfolio Manager Fund Holdings and Information on Other Managed Accounts

Invesco’s portfolio managers develop investment models which are used in connection with the management of certain Invesco Funds as well as other mutual funds for which Invesco or an affiliate acts as sub-adviser, other pooled investment vehicles that are not registered mutual funds, and other accounts managed for organizations and individuals. The ‘Investments’ chart reflects the portfolio managers’ investments in the Funds that they manage. Accounts are grouped into three categories: (i) investments made directly in the Fund, (ii) investments made in an Invesco pooled investment vehicle with the same or similar objectives and strategies as the Fund, and (iii) any investments made in any Invesco Fund or Invesco pooled investment vehicle. The ‘Assets Managed’ chart reflects information regarding accounts other than the Funds for which each portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities. Accounts are grouped into three categories: (i) other registered investment companies, (ii) other pooled investment vehicles and (iii) other accounts. To the extent that any of these accounts pay advisory fees that are based on account performance (performance-based fees), information on those accounts is specifically broken out. In addition, any assets denominated in foreign currencies have been converted into U.S. Dollars using the exchange rates as of the applicable date.

Investments

The following information is as of December 31, 2013:

 

Portfolio Manager

   Dollar Range of
Investments in each
Fund 1
  Dollar Range of
Investments in Invesco
Funds and/or pooled
investment vehicles 2
   Dollar Range of all
Investments in Funds and
Invesco pooled investment
vehicles 3
Invesco V. I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund

Mark Ahnrud

   None 4   Over $1,000,000    Over $1,000,000

Chris Devine

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

Scott Hixon

   None 4   $500,001-$1,000,000    Over $1,000,000

Christian Ulrich

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

Scott Wolle

   None 4   Over $1,000,000    Over $1,000,000
Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

Tyler Dann, II

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

Brian Nelson

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    Over $1,000,000

Ronald Sloan

   None 4   Over $1,000,000    Over $1,000,000
Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

Chuck Burge

   None   N/A    $100,001-$500,000

Darren Hughes

   None   N/A    $500,001-$1,000,000

Scott Roberts

   None   N/A    $500,001-$1,000,000

 

1 This column reflects investments in a Fund’s shares beneficially owned by a portfolio manager (as determined in accordance with Rule 16a-1(a) (2) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Beneficial ownership includes ownership by a portfolio manager’s immediate family members sharing the same household.
2   This column reflects portfolio managers’ investments made either directly or through a deferred compensation or a similar plan in Invesco Funds and/or Invesco pooled investment vehicles with the same or similar objectives and strategies as the Fund as of the most recent fiscal year end of the Fund.
3   This column reflects the combined holdings from both the “Dollar Range of all Investments in Funds and Invesco pooled investment vehicles” and the “Dollar Range of Investments in each Fund” columns.
4   The Portfolio Manager manages and has made investments in an Invesco Fund with the same or similar objectives and strategies as the Fund (a Patterned Fund) as of the most recent fiscal year end of the Patterned Fund.

 

H-1


Portfolio Manager

   Dollar Range of
Investments in each
Fund 1
  Dollar Range of
Investments in Invesco
Funds and/or pooled
investment vehicles 2
   Dollar Range of all
Investments in Funds and
Invesco pooled investment
vehicles 3
Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

Derek Taner

   None 4   $50,001-$100,000    $100,001-$500,000
Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

Mark Blackburn

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $100,001-$500,000

James Cowen

   None   None    Over $1,000,000

Paul Curbo

   None   None    $100,001-$500,000

Joe Rodriguez, Jr.

   None   None    Over $1,000,000

Darin Turner

   None   None    $100,001-$500,000

Ping Ying Wang

   None   None    $100,001-$500,000
Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

Clint Dudley

   None 4   $1-$10,000    $100,001-$500,000

Brian Schneider

   None 4   $10,001-$50,000    $500,001-$1,000,000
Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

Darren Hughes

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

Scott Roberts

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000
Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

Brent Bates

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    Over $1,000,000

Steve Cao

   None 4   $50,001-$100,000    Over $1,000,000

Matthew Dennis

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    Over $1,000,000

Jason Holzer

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    Over $1,000,000

Mark Jason

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

Richard Nield

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

Clas Olsson

   None 4   Over $1,000,000    Over $1,000,000
Invesco Managed Volatility Fund

Thomas Bastian

       

Church Burge

       

Mary Jane Maly

       

Sergio Marcheli

       

Duy Nguyen

       

James Roeder

       
Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

Doug Asiello

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

Brian Nelson

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    Over $1,000,000

Ronald Sloan

   None 4   Over $1,000,000    Over $1,000,000
Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

Juliet Ellis

   None 4   Over $1,000,000    Over $1,000,000

Juan Hartsfield

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $500,001-$1,000,000
Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

Brian Nelson

   None 4   $1-$10,000    Over $1,000,000

Warren Tennant

   None 4   $10,001-$50,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

 

H-2


Portfolio Manager

   Dollar Range of
Investments in each
Fund 1
  Dollar Range of
Investments in Invesco
Funds and/or pooled
investment vehicles 2
   Dollar Range of all
Investments in Funds and
Invesco pooled investment
vehicles 3
Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

Devin Armstrong

   None 4   $1-$10,000    $500,001-$1,000,000

Kevin Holt

   None 4   $50,001-$100,000    Over $1,000,000

Yoginder Kak

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    $100,001-$500,000

Jason Leder

   None 4   Over $1,000,000    Over $1,000,000

Matthew Seinsheimer

   None 4   $100,001-$500,000    Over $1,000,000

James Warwick

   None   None    $100,001-$500,000

Assets Managed

The following information is as of December 31, 2013:

 

Portfolio Manager

   Other Registered Investment
Companies Managed (assets in
millions)
     Other Pooled Investment
Vehicles Managed (assets in
millions)
    Other Accounts Managed
(assets in millions) 5
 
   Number of
Accounts
     Assets      Number of
Accounts
    Assets     Number of
Accounts
    Assets  
Invesco V. I. Balanced Risk Allocation Fund   

Mark Ahnrud

     32       $ 21,446.0         4 6     $ 1,960.0 6       1      $ 96.05   

Chris Devine

     32       $ 21,446.0         4 6     $ 1,960.0 6       1      $ 96.05   

Scott Hixon

     32       $ 21,446.0         4 6     $ 1,960.0 6       1      $ 96.05   

Christian Ulrich

     32       $ 21,446.0         4 6     $ 1,960.0 6       1      $ 96.05   

Scott Wolle

     32       $ 21,446.0         4 6     $ 1,960.0 6       1      $ 96.05   
Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund   

Tyler Dann, II

     2       $ 6,547.9         1      $ 212.0        141 5     $ 37.9 5  

Brian Nelson

     6       $ 8,983.3         1      $ 101.2        2,994 5     $ 555.2 5  

Ronald Sloan

     3       $ 8,124.3         None        None        2,994 5     $ 555.2 5  
Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund   

Chuck Burge

     8       $ 15,344.1         7      $ 3,518.2        2      $ 285.6   

Darren Hughes

     9       $ 4,115.2         None        None        None        None   

Scott Roberts

     9       $ 4,115.2         1      $ 29.6        None        None   
Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund   

Derek Taner

     1       $ 1,103.9         2      $ 144.3        None        None   
Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund   

Mark Blackburn

     9       $ 6,635.5         8      $ 1,445.3        40 7     $ 11,711.8 7  

James Cowen

     4       $ 3,337.5         8      $ 1,445.3        40 7     $ 11,711.8 7  

 

5 These are accounts of individual investors for which Invesco provides investment advice. Invesco offers separately managed accounts that are managed according to the investment models developed by its portfolio managers and used in connection with the management of certain Invesco Funds. These accounts may be invested in accordance with one or more of those investment models and investments held in those accounts are traded in accordance with the applicable models.
6 This amount includes 1 fund that pays performance-based fees with $58.0M in total assets under management.
7 This amount includes 1 fund that pays performance-based fees with $ 145.4 M in total assets under management.

 

H-3


Portfolio Manager

   Other Registered Investment
Companies Managed (assets in
millions)
     Other Pooled Investment
Vehicles Managed (assets in
millions)
     Other Accounts Managed
(assets in millions) 5
 
   Number of
Accounts
     Assets      Number of
Accounts
     Assets      Number of
Accounts
    Assets  

Paul Curbo

     9       $ 6,635.5         8       $ 1,445.3         40 7     $ 11,711.8 7  

Joe Rodriguez, Jr.

     9       $ 6,635.5         8       $ 1,445.3         40 7     $ 11,711.8 7  

Darin Turner

     5       $ 5,731.5         8       $ 1,445.3         40 7     $ 11,711.8 7  

Ping Ying Wang

     8       $ 5,904.4         8       $ 1,445.3         40 7     $ 11,711.8 7  
Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund   

Clint Dudley

     2       $ 1,617.9         None         None         None        None   

Brian Schneider

     3       $ 1,182.4         2       $ 275.9         9      $ 493.9   
Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund   

Darren Hughes

     9       $ 4,023.8         None         None         None        None   

Scott Roberts

     9       $ 4,023.8         1       $ 29.6         None        None   
Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund   

Brent Bates

     None         None         None         None         None        None   

Steve Cao

     17       $ 16,420.2         2       $ 453.2         8,030 5     $ 3,318.6 5  

Matthew Dennis

     13       $ 12,212.4         5       $ 653.1         8,029 5     $ 3,066.9 5  

Jason Holzer

     20       $ 14,775.2         7       $ 1,455.5         8,030 5     $ 3,318.6 5  

Mark Jason

     13       $ 15,033.5         1       $ 211.5         8,029 5     $ 3,066.9 5  

Richard Nield

     4       $ 1,985.2         5       $ 1,002.3         None        None   

Clas Olsson

     17       $ 13,543.4         7       $ 1,455.5         8,030 5     $ 3,318.6 5  
Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund   

Thomas Bastian

                

Church Burge

                

Mary Jane Maly

                

Sergio Marcheli

                

Duy Nguyen

                

James Roeder

                
Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund   

Doug Asiello

     1       $ 2,449.1         None         None         2,853 5     $ 517.4 5  

Brian Nelson

     6       $ 9,749.4         1       $ 101.2         2,994 5     $ 555.2 5  

Ronald Sloan

     3       $ 8,890.3         None         None         2,994 5     $ 555.2 5  
Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity   

Juliet Ellis

     13       $ 5,581.5         1       $ 617.8         2      $ 1,667.0   

Juan Hartsfield

     14       $ 6,208.9         2       $ 649.1         2      $ 1,667.0   
Invesco V.I. Technology Fund   

Brian Nelson

     6       $ 10,029.5         1       $ 101.2         2,853 5     $ 517.4 5  

Warren Tennant

     2       $ 761.5         1       $ 101.2         None        None   
Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund   

Devin Armstrong

     10       $ 16,748.5         1       $ 119.8         3,290 5     $ 428.8 5  

Kevin Holt

     10       $ 16,748.5         1       $ 119.8         3,290 5     $ 428.8 5  

 

H-4


Portfolio Manager

   Other Registered
Investment
Companies Managed (assets in
millions)
     Other Pooled Investment
Vehicles Managed (assets in
millions)
     Other Accounts Managed
(assets in millions) 5
 
   Number of
Accounts
     Assets      Number of
Accounts
     Assets      Number of
Accounts
    Assets  

Yoginder Kak

     1       $ 887.5         None         None         None        None   

Jason Leder

     10       $ 16,748.5         1       $ 119.8         3,290 5     $ 428.8 5  

Matthew Seinsheimer

     10       $ 16,748.5         1       $ 119.8         3,290 5     $ 428.8 5  

James Warwick

     10       $ 16,748.5         1       $ 119.8         3,290 5     $ 428.8 5  

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one Fund or other account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple Funds and/or other accounts may be presented with one or more of the following potential conflicts:

 

  The management of multiple Funds and/or other accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each Fund and/or other account. The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser seek to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having portfolio managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Funds.

 

  If a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity which may be suitable for more than one Fund or other account, a Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of filled purchase or sale orders across all eligible Funds and other accounts. To deal with these situations, the Adviser, each Sub-Adviser and the Funds have adopted procedures for allocating portfolio transactions across multiple accounts.

 

  The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser determine which broker to use to execute each order for securities transactions for the Funds, consistent with its duty to seek best execution of the transaction. However, for certain other accounts (such as mutual funds for which Invesco or an affiliate acts as sub-adviser, other pooled investment vehicles that are not registered mutual funds, and other accounts managed for organizations and individuals), the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser may be limited by the client with respect to the selection of brokers or may be instructed to direct trades through a particular broker. In these cases, trades for a Fund in a particular security may be placed separately from, rather than aggregated with, such other accounts. Having separate transactions with respect to a security may temporarily affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the possible detriment of the Fund or other account(s) involved.

 

  Finally, the appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where the Adviser or Sub-Adviser has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of one Fund or account but not all Funds and accounts for which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.

The Adviser, each Sub-Adviser, and the Funds have adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

 

H-5


Description of Compensation Structure

For the Adviser and each affiliated Sub-Adviser

The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser seek to maintain a compensation program that is competitively positioned to attract and retain high-caliber investment professionals. Portfolio managers receive a base salary, an incentive bonus opportunity and an equity compensation opportunity. Portfolio manager compensation is reviewed and may be modified each year as appropriate to reflect changes in the market, as well as to adjust the factors used to determine bonuses to promote competitive Fund performance. The Adviser and each Sub-Adviser evaluate competitive market compensation by reviewing compensation survey results conducted by an independent third party of investment industry compensation. Each portfolio manager’s compensation consists of the following three elements:

Base Salary. Each portfolio manager is paid a base salary. In setting the base salary, the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser’s intention is to be competitive in light of the particular portfolio manager’s experience and responsibilities.

Annual Bonus. The portfolio managers are eligible, along with other employees of the Adviser and each Sub-Adviser, to participate in a discretionary year-end bonus pool. The Compensation Committee of Invesco Ltd. reviews and approves the amount of the bonus pool available for the Adviser and each of the Sub-Adviser’s investment centers. The Compensation Committee considers investment performance and financial results in its review. In addition, while having no direct impact on individual bonuses, assets under management are considered when determining the starting bonus funding levels. Each portfolio manager is eligible to receive an annual cash bonus which is based on quantitative (i.e. investment performance) and non-quantitative factors (which may include, but are not limited to, individual performance, risk management and teamwork).

Each portfolio manager’s compensation is linked to the pre-tax investment performance of the Funds/accounts managed by the portfolio manager as described in Table 1 below.

Table 1

 

Sub-Adviser

  

Performance time period 8

Invesco 9

Invesco Australia

Invesco Deutschland

Invesco Hong Kong 9

Invesco Asset Management

   One-, Three- and Five-year performance against Fund peer group.

Invesco- Invesco Real Estate 9,10

Invesco Senior Secured 9,11

   Not applicable
Invesco Canada 9   

One-year performance against Fund peer group.

 

Three- and Five-year performance against entire universe of Canadian funds.

Invesco Japan 12    One-, Three- and Five-year performance against the appropriate Micropol benchmark.

 

8   Rolling time periods based on calendar year-end.
9   Portfolio Managers may be granted an annual deferral award that vests on a pro-rata basis over a four year period and final payments are based on the performance of eligible Funds selected by the portfolio manager at the time the award is granted.
10   Portfolio Managers for Invesco Global Real Estate Fund, Invesco Real Estate Fund, Invesco Global Real Estate Income Fund and Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund base their bonus on new operating profits of the U.S. Real Estate Division of Invesco.
11 Invesco Senior Secured’s bonus is based on annual measures of equity return and standard tests of collateralization performance.

 

H-6


High investment performance (against applicable peer group and/or benchmarks) would deliver compensation generally associated with top pay in the industry (determined by reference to the third-party provided compensation survey information) and poor investment performance (versus applicable peer group) would result in low bonus compared to the applicable peer group or no bonus at all. These decisions are reviewed and approved collectively by senior leadership which has responsibility for executing the compensation approach across the organization.

Deferred / Long-Term Compensation. Portfolio managers may be granted an annual deferral award that allows them to select receipt of shares of certain Invesco Funds with a vesting period as well as common shares and/or restricted shares of Invesco Ltd. stock from pools determined from time to time by the Compensation Committee of Invesco Ltd.’s Board of Directors. Awards of deferred / long-term compensation typically vest over time, so as to create incentives to retain key talent.

Portfolio managers also participate in benefit plans and programs available generally to all employees.

 

12   Portfolio Managers for Invesco Pacific Growth Fund’s compensation is based on the one-, three- and five-year performance against the appropriate Micropol benchmark.

 

H-7


APPENDIX I

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FEES

The Funds paid Invesco the following amounts for administrative services for the last three fiscal periods:

 

Fund Name

   2013    2012      2011  

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

        1,566,467       $ 394,133   

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

        3,051,190         3,331,528   

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

        90,017         90,402   

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

        433,602         426,480   

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

        667,621         510,604   

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

        3,203,848         3,324,390   

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

        314,860         228,977   

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

        3,480,071         3,137,238   

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

        205,116         200,579   

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

        1,064,219         1,224,573   

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

        282,655         94,704   

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

        752,790         753,200   

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

        308,497         352,655   

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

        638,871         727,733   

 

I-1


APPENDIX J

BROKERAGE COMMISSIONS

AND COMMISSIONS ON AFFILIATED TRANSACTIONS

Set forth below are brokerage commissions 1 paid by each of the Funds listed below during the last three fiscal years or period ended December 31. Unless otherwise indicated, the amount of brokerage commissions paid by a Fund may change from year to year because of, among other things, changing asset levels, shareholder activity, and/or portfolio turnover:

 

     Total $ Amount of
Brokerage Commissions
Paid
     Total $ Amount of
Brokerage Commissions
Paid to Affiliated Brokers
     % of Total
Brokerage
Commissions
Paid to the
Affiliated
Brokers
    % of Total
Brokerage
Transactions
Effected
Through
Affiliated
Brokers
 

Fund

   2013      2012      2011      2013    2012      2011      2013     2013  

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

   $         $         $            $ 0         N/A                      

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

        1,083,036       $ 1,204,938            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Dividend Income Fund

        N/A         N/A            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

        136,763         257,639            963         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

        365,894         150,654            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

        N/A         N/A            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

        1,007         1000            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

        942,691         1,071,481            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

        7,882         20,153            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

        453,968         636,459            1,548         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

        N/A         N/A            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

        275,909         349,700            0         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

        116,912         149,198            968         N/A        

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

        77,024         122,050            77         N/A        

 

1   Disclosure regarding brokerage commissions is limited to commissions paid on agency trades and designated as such on the trade confirm.

 

J-1


APPENDIX K

DIRECTED BROKERAGE (RESEARCH SERVICES) AND PURCHASES OF

SECURITIES OF REGULAR BROKERS OR DEALERS

During the last fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, each Fund allocated the following amount of transactions to broker-dealers that provided Invesco with certain research, statistics and other information:

 

Fund Commissions*

   Transactions*      Related
Brokerage
 

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

   $ —         $ —     

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

     

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

     

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

     

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

     

 

* Amounts reported are inclusive of commissions paid to, and brokerage transactions placed with, certain brokers that provide execution, research and other services.

During the last fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, the Funds held securities issued by the following companies, which are “regular brokers” or dealers of the Fund identified below:

 

Fund / Issuer

   Security      Market Value (as of
December 31, 2013)
 

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

     

Bank of America Corp.

     Common Stock       $                

Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The)

     Common Stock      

Morgan Stanley

     Common Stock      

 

K-1


APPENDIX L

CERTAIN FINANCIAL ADVISERS THAT RECEIVE ONE OR MORE TYPES OF PAYMENTS

 

1st Global Capital Corporation

ACS HR Solutions

1st Partners, Inc.

401k Exchange, Inc.

401k Producer Services

A G Edwards & Sons, Inc.

ADP Broker Dealer, Inc.

AIG Retirement

Advantage Capital Corporation

Advest Inc.

Allianz Life

Allstate

Alliance Benefit Group

American Enterprise Investment

American Portfolios Financial Services Inc.

American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation

American United Life Insurance Company

Ameriprise Financial Services Inc.

Ameritrade

Ascensus

Associated Securities Corporation

AXA Advisors, LLC

AXA Equitable

Baden Retirement Plan Services

The Bank of New York

Bank of America

Bank of Oklahoma

Barclays Capital Inc.

BCG Securities

Bear Stearns Securities Corp.

Bear Stearns and Co. Inc.

Benefit Plans Administrators

Benefit Trust Company

BMO Harris Bank NA

BNP Paribas

BOSC, Inc.

Branch Banking & Trust Company

Brinker Capital

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.

Buck Kwasha Securities LLC

Cadaret Grant & Company, Inc.

Cambridge Investment Research, Inc.

Cantella & Co., Inc.

Capital One Investment Services LLC

Center for Due Diligence

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.

Centennial Bank

Charles Schwab & Company, Inc.

Chase Insurance Life Annuity

Chase Citibank, N.A.

Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

Citi Smith Barney

  

Citibank NA

Citistreet

City National

Comerica Bank

Commerce Bank

Commonwealth Financial Network LPL

Community National Bank

Compass Bank

Compass Brokerage, Inc.

Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc.

CPI Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc.

Credit Suisse Securities

Crowell Weedon & Co.

CUNA Brokerage Services, Inc.

CUSO Financial Services, Inc.

D.A. Davidson & Company

Daily Access Corporation

Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.

Diversified Investment Advisors

Dorsey & Company Inc.

Edward Jones & Co.

Equity Services, Inc.

Expertplan

Fidelity

Fifth Third Bank

Fifth Third Securities, Inc.

Financial Data Services Inc.

Financial Network Investment Corporation

Financial Planning Association

Financial Services Corporation

First Clearing Corp.

First Command Financial Planning, Inc.

First Financial Equity Corp.

First Southwest Company

Frost Brokerage Services, Inc.

Frost National Bank

FSC Securities Corporation

Fund Services Advisors, Inc.

Gardner Michael Capital, Inc.

GE Capital Life Insurance Company of New York

GE Life & Annuity Company

Genworth

Genworth Financial Securities Corp.

Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company

Goldman, Sachs & Co.

Great West Life

Guaranty Bank & Trust

Guardian

GunnAllen Financial

GWFS Equities, Inc.

Hare and Company

  

Hartford

H.D. Vest

Hewitt Financial Services

Hightower Securities, LLC

Hornor, Townsend & Kent, Inc.

Huntington Capital

Huntington National Bank

The Huntington Investment Company

ICMA Retirement Corporation

ING

Intersecurities, Inc.

INVEST Financial Corporation, Inc.

Investacorp, Inc.

Investment Centers of America, Inc.

Jackson National Life

Jefferson National Life Insurance Company

Jefferson Pilot Securities Corporation

J.M. Lummis Securities

JP Morgan

Kanaly Trust Company

Kemper

LaSalle Bank, N.A.

Lincoln Financial

Lincoln Investment Planning

Loop Capital Markets, LLC

LPL Financial Corp.

M & T Securities, Inc.

M M L Investors Services, Inc.

Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co., N.A.

Mass Mutual

Matrix

Mellon Bank N.A.

Mellon Financial

Mellon Financial Markets

Mercer Trust Company

Merrill Lynch

Metlife

Metropolitan Life

Meyer Financial Group, Inc.

Minnesota Life Insurance Co.

Money Concepts

Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc.

Morgan Stanley

MSCS Financial Services, LLC

Multi-Financial Securities Corporation

Municipal Capital Markets Group, Inc.

Mutual Service Corporation

Mutual Services, Inc.

N F P Securities, Inc.

NatCity Investments, Inc.

National Financial Services Corporation

National Planning Corporation

National Planning Holdings

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

 

L-1


National Retirement Partners Inc.

Nationwide

New York Life

Next Financial Group, Inc.

NFP Securities Inc.

NRP Financial

Northeast Securities, Inc.

Northwestern Mutual Investment Services

OneAmerica Financial Partners Inc.

Oppenheimer & Company, Inc.

Oppenheimer Securities

Oppenheimer Trust Company

Pacific Life

Penn Mutual Life

Penson Financial Services

Pershing LLC

PFS Investments, Inc.

Phoenix Life Insurance Company

Piper Jaffray

PJ Robb

Plains Capital Bank

Plan Administrators

Planco

PNC Bank, N.A.

PNC Capital Markets LLC

PNC Investments, LLC

Primevest Financial Services, Inc.

Princeton Retirement Group, Inc.

Principal Financial

Proequities, Inc.

Prudential

R B C Dain Rauscher, Inc.

RBC Wealth Management

Raymond James

Ridge Clearing

Robert W. Baird & Co.

  

Ross Sinclair & Associates LLC

Royal Alliance Associates

Riversource (Ameriprise)

RSBCO

S I I Investments, Inc.

SagePoint Financial, Inc.

Salomon Smith Barney

Sanders Morris Harris

SCF Securities, Inc.

Scott & Stringfellow, Inc.

Securities America, Inc.

Securian Financial Services, Inc.

Security Distributors, Inc.

Sentra Securities

Signator Investors, Inc.

Silverton Capital, Corp.

Simmons First Investment Group, Inc.

Smith Barney Inc.

Smith Hayes Financial Services

Southwest Securities

Sovereign Bank

Spelman & Company

State Farm

State Street Bank & Trust Company

Sterne Agee Financial Services, Inc.

Stifel Nicolaus & Company

Summit Brokerage Servcies, Inc.

Summit Equities, Inc.

SunAmerica Securities, Inc.

SunGard

Sun Life

SunTrust

SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.

SWS Financial Services, Inc.

Symetra Investment Services Inc.

TD Ameritrade

  

The (Wilson) William Financial Group

TFS Securities, Inc.

Transamerica Financial Advisors, Inc.

Transamerica Life

Transamerica Capital Inc.

Transamerica Treasury Curve, LLC

Treasury Strategies

T Rowe Price

Trust Management Network, LLC

U.S. Bancorp

UBS Financial Services Inc.

UMB Financial Services, Inc.

Union Bank

Union Bank of California, N.A.

Union Central

United Planners Financial

USB Financial Services, Inc.

US Bank

U.S. Bank, N.A.

UVEST

USI Securities, Inc.

The Vanguard Group

Vanguard Marketing Corp.

V S R Financial Services, Inc.

VALIC Financial Advisors, Inc.

Vining Sparks IBG, LP

Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC

Wachovia

Waddell & Reed, Inc.

Wadsworth Investment Co., Inc.

Wall Street Financial Group, Inc.

Waterstone Financial Group, Inc.

Wells Fargo

Woodbury Financial Services, Inc.

Zions Bank

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

 

L-2


APPENDIX M

AMOUNTS PAID TO INVESCO DISTRIBUTORS, INC. PURSUANT TO DISTRIBUTION PLAN

A list of amounts paid by each class of shares to Invesco Distributors, Inc. pursuant to the Plan for the fiscal year or period ended December 31, 2013 are as follows:

 

Fund

   Series I
shares
     Series II
shares
 

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

     N/A       $                

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatilty Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

     N/A      

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

     N/A      

 

M-1


APPENDIX N

ALLOCATION OF ACTUAL FEES PAID PURSUANT TO DISTRIBUTION PLAN

An estimate by category of the allocation of actual fees paid by Series II shares of the Funds during the fiscal year or period ended December 31, 2013 follows:

 

     Advertising      Printing
&
Mailing
     Seminars      Compensation
to
Dealer*
     Compensation
to Sales
Personnel
     Annual
Report
Total
 

Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund

     —           —           —         $                      —         $                

Invesco V.I. Core Equity Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Diversified Income Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Global Health Care Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Global Real Estate Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Government Securities Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. High Yield Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Managed Volatility Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Mid Cap Core Equity Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Small Cap Equity Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Technology Fund

     —           —           —              —        

Invesco V.I. Value Opportunities Fund

     —           —           —              —        

 

*   Compensation to financial intermediaries and broker-dealers to pay or reimburse them for their services or expenses in connection with the distribution of the Shares to fund variable annuity and variable insurance contracts investing directly in the Shares.

 

N-1


PART C

OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 28.       

Exhibits

a   (1)   -    (a) Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant, dated September 14, 2005. (26)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of December 21, 2005, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (26)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of July 3, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of January 9, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (27)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of July 3, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (27)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of May 1, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (28)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of May 24, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (28)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of June 12, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (28)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of July 5, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (28)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of November 6, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (28)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of December 21, 2006, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (28)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of May 1, 2007, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (29)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of May 1, 2008, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (31)
    -    (n) Amendment No. 13, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of July 31, 2008, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (32)
    -    (o) Amendment No. 14, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of November 12, 2009, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (34)

 

C-1


    -    (p) Amendment No. 15, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of February 10, 2010, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (39)
    -    (q) Amendment No. 16, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of February 12, 2010, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (39)
    -    (r) Amendment No. 17, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of February 26, 2010, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (39)
    -    (s) Amendment No. 18, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of June 15, 2010, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (41)
    -    (t) Amendment No. 19, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of September 15, 2010, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (43)
    -    (u) Amendment No. 20, dated September 14, 2005, effective as of April 11, 2011, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (43)
    -    (v) Amendment No. 21, dated December 1, 2011, effective as of April 11, 2011, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (44)
    -    (w) Amendment No. 22, dated May 8, 2012, effective as of April 11, 2011, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (45)
    -    (x) Amendment No. 23, dated July 16, 2012, effective as of April 11, 2011, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (45)
    -    (y) Amendment No. 24, dated April 29, 2013, effective as of April 11, 2011, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (46)
    -    (z) Form of Amendment No. 25, effective as of April 11, 2011, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant. (46)
b   (1)   -    (a) Amended and Restated By-Laws of Registrant, dated effective September 14, 2005. (26)
    -    (b) Amendment, adopted effective August 1, 2006, to Amended and Restated By-Laws of Registrant, dated effective September 14, 2005. (28)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, adopted effective March 23, 2007, to Amended and Restated By-Laws of Registrant, dated effective September 14, 2005. (28)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, adopted effective January 1, 2008, to Amended and Restated By-Laws of Registrant, dated effective September 14, 2005. (29)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, adopted effective April 30, 2010, to Amended and Restated By-Laws of Registrant, dated effective September 14, 2005. (41)

 

C-2


c     -    Instruments Defining Rights of Security Holders – All rights of security holders are contained in the Registrant’s Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust.
d   (1)   -    (a) Master Investment Advisory Agreement, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (14)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated, May 1, 2001 to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (15)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 7, 2001, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement of Registrant, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (18)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated May 1, 2002, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement of Registrant, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (20)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated August 29, 2003, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (22)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated April 30, 2004 to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (24)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated July 1, 2004, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (24)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated October 15, 2004, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (24)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated July 1, 2005, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (26)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated December 21, 2005, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (26)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated May 1, 2006, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated June 12, 2006, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, dated July 3, 2006, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (n) Amendment No. 13, dated November 6, 2006, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (o) Amendment No. 14, dated December 21, 2006, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (p) Amendment No. 15, dated May 1, 2007, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (29)
    -    (q) Amendment No. 16, dated July 1, 2007, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (29)

 

C-3


    -    (r) Amendment No. 17, dated October 22, 2008, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. (33)
    -    (s) Amendment No.18, dated January 1, 2010, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. (36)
    -    (t) Amendment No.19, dated February 12, 2010, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (39)
    -    (u) Amendment No. 20, dated March 3, 2010, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (41)
    -    (v) Amendment No. 21, dated April 30, 2010, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (41)
    -    (w) Amendment No. 22, dated January 7, 2011, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (43)
    -    (x) Amendment No. 23, dated May 2, 2011, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (44)
    -    (y) Amendment No. 24, dated December 1, 2011, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (44)
    -    (z) Amendment No. 25, dated July 16, 2012, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (45)
    -    (aa) Amendment No. 26, dated April 29, 2013, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (46)
    -    (bb) Amendment No. 27, dated April 29, 2013, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (46)
  (2)   -    (a) Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Global Asset Management (N.A.), Inc., Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc., Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and A I M Funds Management Inc. (30)
    -   

(b) Amendment No. 1, dated October 22, 2008, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Global Asset Management (N.A.), Inc., Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc., Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and A I M Funds Management Inc. (33)

    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated January 1, 2010, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco

 

C-4


       Australia Limited, Invesco Global Asset Management (N.A.), Inc., Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc., Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Trimark Ltd., formerly AIM Funds Management Inc. (36)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated February 12, 2010, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Trimark Ltd. (39)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated March 3, 2010, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Trimark Ltd. (39)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated April 30, 2010, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Trimark Ltd. (41)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated January 7, 2011, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Trimark Ltd. (43)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated December 1, 2011, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Canada Ltd. (formerly known as Invesco Trimark Ltd.) (44)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated July 16, 2012, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Canada Ltd. (formerly known as Invesco Trimark Ltd.) (45)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated April 29, 2013, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc.,

 

C-5


       successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Canada Ltd. (formerly known as Invesco Trimark Ltd.) (4 6 )
e   (1)   -    (a) First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement, dated July 16, 2001, between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (17)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated September 7, 2001, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement, between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc., dated July 16, 2001. (18)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated May 1, 2002, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors Inc., dated July 16, 2001. (20)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated August 29, 2003, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement, between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc., dated July 16, 2001. (22)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2004, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (24)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated October 15, 2004, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (24)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated July 1, 2005, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. ( 26)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated December 21, 2005, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (26)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated May 1, 2006, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (28)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated June 12, 2006, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (28)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated July 3, 2006, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (28)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated November 6, 2006, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (28)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, dated December 21, 2006, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (28)
    -    (n) Amendment No. 13, dated May 1, 2007, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and A I M Distributors, Inc. (29)
    -    (o) Amendment No. 14, dated October 22, 2008, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc. (33)

 

C-6


    -    (p) Amendment No. 15, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc. (39)
    -    (q) Amendment No. 16, dated March 3, 2010, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc. (39)
    -    (r) Amendment No. 17, dated April 30, 2010, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Registrant and Invesco Distributors, Inc. (41)
    -    (s) Amendment No. 18, dated January 7, 2011, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Distributors, Inc. (43)
    -    (t) Amendment No. 19, dated December 1, 2011, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Distributors, Inc. (44)
    -    (u) Amendment No. 20, dated July 16, 2012, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Distributors, Inc. (45)
    -    (v) Amendment No. 21, dated April 29, 2013, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Distributors, Inc. (46)
    -    (w) Amendment No. 22, dated April 29, 2013, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Distributors, Inc. (46)
f   (1)   -    Form of Invesco Funds Retirement Plan for Eligible Directors/Trustees, as approved by the Board of Directors/Trustees on December 31, 2011. (45)
  (2)   -    Form of Invesco Funds Trustee Deferred Compensation Agreement for Registrant’s Non-Affiliated Directors, as approved by the Board of Directors/Trustees on December 31, 2010. (43)
g   (1)   -    (a) Master Custodian Contract, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (15)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated May 1, 2000, to Master Custodian Contract, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (15)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated June 29, 2001, to Master Custodian Contract dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (20)
    -    (d) Amendment, dated April 2, 2002, to Master Custodian Contract dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (20)
    -    (e) Amendment, dated September 8, 2004, to Master Custodian Contract dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (24)
    -    (f) Amendment, dated February 6, 2006, to Master Custodian Contract dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (28)

 

C-7


    -    (g) Amendment, dated January 31, 2007, to Master Custodian Contract dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (28)
    -    (h) Amendment, dated June 1, 2010, to Master Custodian Contract dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (41)
  (2)   -    (a) Custody Agreement, dated September 19, 2000, between Registrant and The Bank of New York. (15)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 31, 2005, to Custody Agreement dated September 19, 2000, between Registrant and The Bank of New York. (28)
  (4)   -    Foreign Assets Delegation Agreement, dated November 6, 2006, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (29)
h   (1)   -    (a) Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 3, 2006, to Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated November 6, 2006, to Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated December 21, 2006, to Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (28)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated May 1, 2007, to Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and A I M Advisors, Inc. (29)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated October 22, 2008, to Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. (32)
       (g) Amendment No. 6, dated January 1, 2010, to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. (36)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated February 12, 2010, to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (41)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated March 3, 2010, to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (41)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated April 30, 2010, to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (41)

 

C-8


    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated January 7, 2011 to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (43)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated December 1, 2011 to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (44)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, dated July 1, 2012 to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (45)
    -    (n) Amendment No. 13, dated July 16, 2012 to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (45)
    -    (o) Amendment No. 14, dated April 29, 2013, to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (46)
    -    (p) Amendment No. 15, dated April 29, 2013, to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (46)
  (2)   -    (a) Amended and Restated Transfer Agency and Service Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and AIM Investment Services, Inc. (28)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 1, 2007, to the Amended and Restated Transfer Agency and Service Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and AIM Investment Services, Inc. (29)
    -    (c) Form of Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated Transfer Agency and Service Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Investment Services, Inc. (45)
  (3)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 25, 1993, between Registrant, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and A I M Distributors, Inc. (4)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 25, 1993, between Registrant, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Invesco Distributors, Inc. (42)
  (4)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 10, 1995, between Registrant and Citicorp Life Insurance Company. (4)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated February 3, 1997, to the Participation Agreement dated February 10, 1995, between Registrant and Citicorp Life Insurance Company. (6)
  (5)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 10, 1995, between Registrant and First Citicorp Life Insurance Company. (4)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated February 3, 1997, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 10, 1995, between Registrant and First Citicorp Life Insurance Company. (6)

 

C-9


  (6)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated December 19, 1995, between Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company. (4)
    -    (a)(i) Side Letter Agreement, dated December 1, 1995, among Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company. (5)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated November 7, 1997, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 19, 1995, between Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company. (7)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 2, 1997, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 19, 1995, between Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company. (6)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated January 26, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 19, 1995, between Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company. (7)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated May 1, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 19, 1995, between Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company. (7)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated January 12, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 19, 1995, between Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Insurance Company. (8)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated September 26, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 19, 1995, between Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Company. (20)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated May 1, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 19, 1995, between Registrant and Glenbrook Life and Annuity Insurance Company. (27)
  (7)   -    Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Empire Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (8)   -    Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Fidelity Investments Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (9)   -    Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Fidelity Security Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (10)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 8, 1996, between Registrant and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. (4)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 8, 1996, between Registrant and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 8, 1996, between Registrant and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company. (42)

 

C-10


  (11)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated September 21, 1996, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company. (5)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 1, 1997, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 21, 1996, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company. (6)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated August 1, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 21, 1996, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated November 8, 1999, to the Participation Agreement dated September 21, 1996, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 10, 2000, to the Participation Agreement dated September 21, 1996, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (f) Amendment dated November 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement dated September 21, 1996, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company. (29)
    -    (g) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 14, 1997, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (12)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 1996, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York. (5)
    -    (a)(i) Side Letter Agreement, dated October 1, 1996, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated November 7, 1997, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 1996, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York. (9)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated December 18, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 1996, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 1996, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 1996, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York. (43)
  (13)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (5)
    -    (a)(i) Side Letter Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated. (5)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 1997, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (6)

 

C-11


    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 13, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated February 16, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated May 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated October 5, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (g) Agreement No. 6, dated September 10, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated March 1, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (14)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (5)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 1997, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (6)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 3, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, by and between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (14)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated February 16, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (18)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated May 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (18)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated October 5, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated, December 18, 1996, between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (18)

 

C-12


    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated September 10, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (20)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated March 1, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and ML Life Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 18, 1996, between Registrant and Transamerica Advisors Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly ML Life Insurance Company of New York). (42)
  (15)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 14, 1997, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey. (5)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated November 8, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 14, 1997, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey. (14)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 10, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 14, 1997, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey. (14)
    -    (d) Amendment dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 14, 1997, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey. (27)
    -    (e) Amendment dated November 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 14, 1997, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey. (29)
    -    (f) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 14, 1997, between Registrant and Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey. (42)
  (16)   -    (a) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated January 31, 2007, between Registrant and The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (33)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated March 25, 2009, to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated January 31, 2007, between Registrant and The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (33)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated January 31, 2007, between Registrant and The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (42)
  (17)   -    (a) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2006, between Registrant and American Centurion Life Assurance Company and IDS Life Insurance Company of New York) (28)

 

C-13


    -    (b) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2006, between Registrant and Riversource Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly American Centurion Life Assurance Company, and IDS Life Insurance Company of New York) (42)
  (18)   -    (a) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2006, between Registrant and American Enterprise Life Insurance Company, American Partners Life Insurance Company and IDS Life Insurance Company). (28)
    -    (b) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2006, between Registrant and Riversource Life Insurance Company (formerly American Enterprise Life Insurance Company, American Partners Life Insurance Company and IDS Life Insurance Company). (42)
  (19)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated November 20, 1997, between Registrant and AIG Life Insurance Company. (6)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated October 11, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated November 20, 1997, between Registrant and AIG Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated November 20, 1997, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company of Delaware (formerly AIG Life Insurance Company). (43)
  (20)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated November 20, 1997, between Registrant and American International Life Assurance Company of New York. (6)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, between Registrant and American International Life Assurance Company of New York. (43)
  (21)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated November 4, 1997, between Registrant and Nationwide Life Insurance Company. (6)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated June 15, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated November 4, 1997, between Registrant and Nationwide Life Insurance Company. (7)
  (22)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated December 3, 1997, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver. (6)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated June 23, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 3, 1997, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver. (7)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated May 20, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 3, 1997, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company. (10)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated November 1, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 3, 1997, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company. (12)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated March 2, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 3, 1997, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company. (14)

 

C-14


    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated December 28, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 3, 1997, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated September 5, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 3, 1997, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company. (18)
  (23)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company. (6)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 23, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company. (12)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated February 12, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and Met Life Investors Insurance Company (formerly, Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company). (18)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated November 9, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and Met Life Investors Insurance Company (formerly, Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company). (37)
    -    (f) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and Met Life Investors Insurance Company (formerly, Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company). (43)
    -    (g) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company, MetLife Investors Insurance Company, First MetLife Investors Insurance Company and General American Insurance Company. (42)
  (24)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and Cova Financial Life Insurance Company .(6)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 23, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and Cova Financial Life Insurance Company. (10)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated February 12, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 23, 1999, between Registrant and Met Life Investors Insurance Company (formerly, Cova Financial Life Insurance Company). (18)
  (25)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, between Registrant and The Guardian Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 1, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, between Registrant and The Guardian Life Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (11)

 

C-15


    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated May 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, between Registrant and The Guardian Life Insurance & Annuity Company, Inc. (14)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated August 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, between Registrant and The Guardian Life Insurance & Annuity Company. (14)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated December 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, between Registrant and The Guardian Life Insurance and Annuity Company, Inc. (18)
    -    (f) Amendment, dated January 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, between Registrant and The Guardian Insurance and Annuity Company, Inc. (27)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 5, dated May 1, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, between Registrant and The Guardian Insurance and Annuity Company, Inc. (27)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 6, dated July 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998 between Registrant and The Guardian Insurance and Annuity Company, Inc. (32)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 7, dated May 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998 between Registrant and The Guardian Insurance and Annuity Company, Inc. (32)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 8, dated December 31, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998 between Registrant and The Guardian Insurance and Annuity Company, Inc. (33)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 9, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 2, 1998 between Registrant and The Guardian Insurance and Annuity Company, Inc. (44)
  (26)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 11, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (8)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated March 15, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (14)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated April 17, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (14)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated May 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S). (18)

 

C-16


    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated May 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (18)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated September 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (18)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated April 1, 2002 to the Participation Agreement dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (20)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated August 5, 2002, to the Participation Agreement dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (20)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated August 20, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada. (27)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated December 31, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (27)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (27)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, dated January 29, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (28)
    -    (n) Amendment No. 13, dated May 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (29)
    -    (o) Amendment No. 14, dated August 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (29)
    -    (p) Amendment No. 15, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (42)
    -    (q) Amendment No. 16, dated January 1, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 17, 1998, between Registrant and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.). (44)
  (27)   -    Participation Agreement, dated April 1, 1998, between Registrant and United Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (7)
  (28)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 21, 1998, between Registrant and Keyport Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 28, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 21, 1998, between Registrant and Keyport Life Insurance Company. (8)

 

C-17


    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated March 12, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 21, 1998, between Registrant and Keyport Life Insurance Company. (18)
  (29)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and PFL Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated June 30, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and PFL Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated November 27, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and PFL Life Insurance Company. (8)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated August 1, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and PFL Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated February 28, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and PFL Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated July 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (18)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated August 15, 2001, to the Participation Agreement dated May 1, 1998, between Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (18)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated May 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (20)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated July 15, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (20)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated December 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (20)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (27)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated December 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (27)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, dated May 1, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (27)
    -    (n) Amendment No. 13, dated September 1, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (27)

 

C-18


    -    (o) Amendment No. 14, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (27)
    -    (p) Amendment and Novation, dated May 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (29)
    -    (q) Amendment, dated July 30, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (29)
    -    (r) Amendment, dated January 10, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (30)
    -    (s) Amendment, dated June 10, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly, PFL Life Insurance Company). (37)
    -    (t) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly PFL Life Insurance Company) . (42)
    -    (u) Amendment No. 20, dated May 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Transamerica Life Insurance Company (formerly PFL Life Insurance Company) . (44)
  (30)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Fortis Benefits Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (n/k/a Union Security Insurance Company). (28)
  (31)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated January 1, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (9)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 29, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated February 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (14)

 

C-19


    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated November 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated May 14, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated October 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated January 15, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated January 1, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (28)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated August 31, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (29)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated February 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (30)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, dated September 15, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (32)
    -    (n) Amendment No. 13, dated December 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (32)
    -    (o) Amendment No. 14, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 1998, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (32)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated November 20, 1998, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (8)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated May 1, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated October 14, 1999, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (14)

 

C-20


    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated May 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated July 15, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated July 15, 2001, to the Participation Agreement dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and the Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (28)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated July 25, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 16, 1998, between Registrant and The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (45)
  (33)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 30, 1998, between Registrant and Aetna Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated October 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 30, 1998, between Registrant and AETNA Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (18)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated July 12, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 30, 1998, between Registrant and AETNA Life Insurance and Annuity Company (n/k/a ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company). (27)
  (34)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and The Union Central Life Insurance Company. (8)
    -    (b) Amendment 2, dated July 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and The Union Central Life Insurance Company. (28)

 

C-21


    -    (c) Amendment, dated January 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and The Union Central Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (d) Amendment, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and The Union Central Life Insurance Company (ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company). (27)
    -    (e) Amendment 4, dated June 30, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and The Union Central Life Insurance Company. (28)
    -    (f) Amendment, dated November 5, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and The Union Central Life Insurance Company. (29)
    -    (g) Amendment, dated November 3, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and The Union Central Life Insurance Company. (32)
    -    (h) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and The Union Central Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (35)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and United Investors Life Insurance Company. (8)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and United Investors Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1998, between Registrant and United Investors Life Insurance Company. (43)
  (36)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 29, 2002, to be effective as of November 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registration and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 20, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated June 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated November 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated May 1, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated May 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (32)

 

C-22


    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated May 1, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (33)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated July 27, 2009,to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (37)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated October 19, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (37)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 2, 1998, between Registrant and Hartford Life Insurance Company. (42)
(37)     -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 13, 1998, between Registrant and Keyport Benefit Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 28, 1998 to the Participation Agreement, dated July 13, 1998, between Registrant and Keyport Benefit Life Insurance Company. (8)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated March 12, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 13, 1998, between Registrant and Keyport Benefit Life Insurance Company. (27)
(38)     -    (a) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated July 31, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc., and Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Company (formerly, Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company). (29)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated March 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 31, 2007, between Registrant AIM Distributors, Inc., and Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Company (formerly, Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company). (30)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement, dated July 31, 2007, between Registrant and Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Company (formerly, Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (42)
(39)     -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (7)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated February 11, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (13)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 10, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated May 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated October 4, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (14)

 

C-23


    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated December 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated May 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated May 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (i) Amendment dated January 1, 2003 to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Registrant and First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (43)
  (40)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (9)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated February 15, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated May 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated July 15, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (e) Amendment, dated January 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated October 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (28)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated April 2, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (29)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (42)

 

C-24


    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated July 25, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 15, 1998, between Registrant and Lincoln Life & Annuity Insurance Company of New York. (45)
  (41)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated November 23, 1998, between Registrant and American General Annuity Insurance Company. (8)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 1, 1999, to the Participation Agreement dated November 23, 1998, between Registrant and American General Annuity Insurance Company. (11)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated August 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated November 23, 1998, between Registrant and American General Annuity Insurance Company. (14)
  (42)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 1997, between Registrant and Prudential Insurance Company of America. (6)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated March 8, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 1997, between Registrant and Prudential Insurance Company of America. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 1997, between Registrant and Prudential Insurance Company of America. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 1997, between Registrant and Prudential Insurance Company of America. (29)
    -    (e) Amendment, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 1997, between Registrant and Prudential Insurance Company of America. (42)
  (43)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 1, 1999, between Registrant and Sage Life Assurance of America, Inc. (9)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated October 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 1, 1999, between Registrant and Sage Life Assurance of America, Inc. (18)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated February 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 1, 1999, between Registrant and Sage Life Assurance of America, Inc. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 1, 1999, between Registrant and Sage Life Assurance of America, Inc. (27)

 

C-25


    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 1, 1999, between Registrant and Reassure America Life Insurance Company (formerly Sage Life Assurance of America, Inc.) (42)
  (44)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 1, 1999, between Registrant and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. (9)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 1, 1999, between Registrant and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. (18)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 1, 1999, between Registrant and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 1, 1999, between Registrant and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. (29)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 3, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 1, 1999, between Registrant and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. (42)
  (45)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 13, 1999, between Registrant and Western-Southern Life Insurance Company. (10)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 13, 1999, between Registrant and Western-Southern Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (46)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1999, between Registrant and Columbus Life Insurance Company. (10)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated April 25, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1999, between Registrant and Columbus Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1999, between Registrant and Columbus Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 1999, between Registrant and Columbus Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (47)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 26, 1999, between Registrant and First Variable Life Insurance Company. (10)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 26, 1999, between Registrant and Protective Life Insurance Company (formerly, First Variable Life Insurance Company). (27)
  (48)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated August 21, 1999, between Registrant and Life Investors Insurance Company of America. (11)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated July 12, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 21, 1999, between Registrant and Life Investors Insurance Company of America. (28)

 

C-26


    -    (c) Amendment and Novation, dated May 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 21, 1999, between Registrant and Life Investors Insurance Company of America. (29)
  (49)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and The Principal Life Insurance Company. (10)
    -    (b) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and The Principal Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (50)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (11)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated April 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated May 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (d) Amendment, dated August 15, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (e) Amendment. dated January 8, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (f) Amendment, dated February 14, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (g) Amendment, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (h) Amendment, dated April 29, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (29)
    -    (j) Amendment dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (44)
    -    (k) Tenth Amendment dated May 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 8, 1999, between Registrant and Principal Life Insurance Company. (44)
  (51)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 14, 1999, between Registrant and Security First Life Insurance Company. (11)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 14 1999, between Registrant and MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company (formerly Security First Life Insurance company). (29)

 

C-27


    -    (c) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 14 1999, between Registrant and MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company. (43)
  (52)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1999, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company. (11)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 20, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1999, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 1999, between Registrant and Allstate Life Insurance Company. (27)
  (53)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. (11)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. (28)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. (28)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. (42)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated October 11, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. (45)
  (54)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Preferred Life Insurance Company of New York. (11)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly, preferred Life Insurance Company of New York). (28)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly, preferred Life Insurance Company of New York). (42)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated October 11, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 27, 1999, between Registrant and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly, preferred Life Insurance Company of New York). (45)
  (55)   -    Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. (11)
  (56)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. (11)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated October 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. (27)

 

C-28


    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated December 31, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated September 5, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. (27)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated July 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. (32)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated September 15, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. (32)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated December 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. (33)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 31, 1999, between Registrant and The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York. (42)
  (57)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated November 1, 1999, between Registrant and AETNA Insurance Company of America. (12)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated November 17, 2000, to the Participation Agreement dated November 1, 1999, between Registrant and AETNA Insurance Company of America. (18)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated July 12, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated November 1, 1999, between Registrant and AETNA Insurance Company of America. (27)
  (58)   -    Participation Agreement, dated January 28, 2000, between Registrant and Northbrook Life Insurance Company. (13)
  (59)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2000, between Registrant and GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company. (14)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated January 12, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2000, between Registrant and GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 29, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2000, between Registrant and GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company. (27)

 

C-29


    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated February 27, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2000, between Registrant and Genworth Life and Annuity Assurance Company (formerly, GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company). (29)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated March 18, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2000, between Registrant and Genworth Life and Annuity Assurance Company (formerly, GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company). (30)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2000, between Registrant and Genworth Life and Annuity Assurance Company. (42)
  (60)   -    Participation Agreement, dated March 27, 2000, between Registrant and Reliastar Life Insurance Company of New York. (14)
  (61)   -    Participation Agreement, dated March 27, 2000, between Registrant and Northern Life Insurance Company. (14)
  (62)   -    Participation Agreement, dated March 27, 2000, between Registrant and Reliastar Life Insurance Company. (14)
  (63)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 10, 2000, between Registrant and Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (14)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 10, 2000, between Registrant and Allmerica Financial Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (18)
  (64)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 14, 2000, between Registrant and United Investors Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 14, 2000, between Registrant and United Investors Life Insurance Company. (27)
  (65)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (14)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 27, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (20)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 1, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (20)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated April 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (20)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated December 31, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (20)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5, dated August 20, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (27)

 

C-30


    -    (g) Amendment No. 6, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (27)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7, dated October 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (28)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated January 29, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (29)
    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, dated May 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (29)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, dated August 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (29)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (42)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, dated January 1, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2000, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (44)
  (66)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated August 1, 2000, between Registrant and Kansas City Life Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated October 31, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 1, 2000, between Registrant and Kansas City Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated August 1, 2000, between Registrant and Kansas City Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (67)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated September 25, 2000, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company. (14)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated September 5, 2001, to the Private Placement Participation Agreement, dated September 25, 2000, between Registrant and Security Life of Denver Insurance Company. (18)
  (68)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 26, 1999, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated November 1, 2000, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 26, 1999, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (18)

 

C-31


    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated October 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 26, 1999, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 26, 1999, between Registrant and American General Life Insurance Company. (43)
  (69)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 3, 2000, between Registrant and First Cova Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated February 12, 2001, to the Participation Agreement dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and First MetLife Investors Insurance Company (formerly, First Cova Life Insurance Company). (18)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2007, to the Participation Agreement dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and First MetLife Investors Insurance Company (formerly, First Cova Life Insurance Company). (29)
    -    (d) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company, MetLife Investors Insurance Company, First MetLife Investors Insurance Company and General American Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (e) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement dated December 31, 1997, between Registrant and First MetLife Investors Insurance Company (formerly, First Cova Life Insurance Company). (43)
  (70)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated February 1, 2001, between Registrant and Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated April 6, 2004, to the Participation Agreement between Registrant and Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment and Novation, dated May 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated February 1, 2001, between Registrant and People’s Benefit Life Insurance Company. (29)
  (71)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated March 28, 2001, between Registrant and Security Benefit Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 28, 2001, between Registrant and Security Benefit Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 29, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 28, 2001, between Registrant and Security Benefit Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated November 15, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 28, 2001, between Registrant and Security Benefit Life Insurance Company. (28)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 28, 2001, between Registrant and Security Benefit Life Insurance Company. (42)

 

C-32


  (72)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and Phoenix Life Insurance Company (formerly Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company) . (42)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 20, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and Phoenix Life Insurance Company (formerly Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company). (43)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated March 13, 2013, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and Phoenix Life Insurance Company (formerly Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company). (45)
  (73)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and Phoenix Life and Annuity Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and Phoenix Life and Annuity Company. (42)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 20, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and Phoenix Life and Annuity Company. (43)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated March 13, 2013, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and Phoenix Life and Annuity Company. (45)
  (74)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and PHL Variable Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated February 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and PHL Variable Insurance Company. (30)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and PHL Variable Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated September 20, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and PHL Variable Insurance Company. (43)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated March 13, 2013, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 29, 2001, between Registrant and PHL Variable Insurance Company. (45)
  (75)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 4, 2001, between Registrant and Annuity Investors Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 4, 2001, between Registrant and Annuity Investors Life Insurance Company. (27)

 

C-33


    -    (c) Amended, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 4, 2001, between Registrant and Annuity Investors Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amended, dated May 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 4, 2001, between Registrant and Annuity Investors life Insurance Company. (30)
    -    (e) Amended, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 4, 2001, between Registrant and Annuity Investors Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (76)   -    Participation Agreement, dated April 17, 2001, between Registrant and Sun Life Insurance and Annuity Company of New York. (18)
  (77)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2001, between Registrant and Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated April 30, 2001, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2001, between Registrant and Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated July 12, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2001, between Registrant and Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio. (28)
    -    (d) Amendment and Novation dated May 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2001, between Registrant and Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio. (29)
    -    (e) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2001, between Registrant and Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio. (42)
  (78)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 13, 2001, between Registrant and Golden American Life Insurance Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 13, 2001, between Registrant and Golden American Life Insurance Company. (27)
  (79)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 24, 2001, between Registrant and Lincoln Benefit Life Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 18, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 24, 2001, between Registrant and Lincoln Benefit Life Company. (20)

 

C-34


    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated January 1, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 24, 2001, between Registrant and Lincoln Benefit Life Company. (43)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 24, 2001, between Registrant and Lincoln Benefit Life Company. (43)
  (80)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2000, between Registrant and The Travelers Life and Annuity Company. (18)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2000, between Registrant and The Travelers Life and Annuity Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated March 31, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2000, between Registrant and The Travelers Life and Annuity Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment, dated April 28, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2000, between Registrant and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (formerly, The Travelers Life and Annuity Company). (30)
    -    (e) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company, MetLife Investors Insurance Company, First MetLife Investors Insurance Company and General American Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (f) Amendment, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2000, between Registrant and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (formerly, The Travelers Life and Annuity Company). (43)
  (81)   -    Participation Agreement, dated November 1, 2001, between Registrant and The American Life Insurance Company of New York. (18)
  (82)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between the Registrant and Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, to the Participation Agreement dated May 1, 2002, between the Registrant and Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company. (27)
  (83)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated March 4, 2002, between Registrant and Minnesota Life Insurance Company. (19)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 4, 2002, between Registrant and Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Inc. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 1, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 4, 2002, between Registrant and Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Inc. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated October 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 4, 2002, between Registrant and Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Inc. (28)

 

C-35


    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 4, 2002, between Registrant and Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Inc. (42)
  (84)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc. (20)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated July 12, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company (formerly, AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc.). (28)
    -    (d) Amendment and Novation, dated May 1, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company (formerly, AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc.). (29)
    -    (e) Amendment, dated July 30, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company (formerly, AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc.). (29)
    -    (f) Amendment, dated January 10, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company (formerly, AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc.). (30)
    -    (g) Amendment, dated June 1, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company (formerly, AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc.). (37)
    -    (h) Amendment, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company (formerly, AUSA Life Insurance Company, Inc.). (42)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8, dated May 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2002, between Registrant and Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company. (44)
  (85)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2002, between Registrant and CUNA Mutual Life Insurance Company. (20)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2002, between Registrant and CUNA Brokerage Services, Inc. (30)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated March 19, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2002, between Registrant and CUNA Brokerage Services, Inc. (30)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2002, between Registrant and CUNA Brokerage Services, Inc. (42)

 

C-36


    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated July 1, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 1, 2002, between Registrant and CMFG Life Insurance Company (formerly known as CUNA Brokerage Services, Inc.). (45)
  (86)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and SAFECO Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and SAFECO Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and SAFECO Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment, dated July 15, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and SAFECO Life Insurance Company (n/k/a Symetra Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (e) Amendment, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and Symetra Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (f) Amendment, dated April 1, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2000, between Registrant and Symetra Life Insurance Company. (44)
  (87)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 22, 2002, between Registrant and The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 22, 2002, between Registrant and the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 22, 2002, between Registrant and the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (88)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 21, 2002, between Registrant and First Security Benefit Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 21, 2002, between Registrant and First Security Benefit Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 29, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 21, 2002, between Registrant and First Security Benefit Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated November 15, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 21, 2002, between Registrant and First Security Benefit Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (28)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 21, 2002, between Registrant and First Security Benefit Life Insurance and Annuity Company. (42)
  (89)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2003, between Registrant and MONY Life Insurance Company. (27)

 

C-37


    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 19, 2010, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2003, between Registrant and MONY Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2003, between Registrant and MONY Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (90)   -    Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2003, between Registrant and MONY Life Insurance Company of America. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 19, 2010, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2003, between Registrant and MONY Life Insurance Company of America. (42)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2003, between Registrant and MONY Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (91)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated September 1, 2005, between Registrant and American National Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated March 2, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 1, 2005, between Registrant and American National Insurance Company. (29)
    -    (c) Amendment, dated April 30, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 1, 2005, between Registrant and American National Insurance Company. (44)
  (92)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated October 12, 1999, between Registrant and Security Equity Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated October 31, 2003, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 12, 1999, between Registrant and Security Equity Life Insurance Company. (27)
  (93)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated October 12, 1999, between Registrant and General American Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated September 2, 2002, to the Participation Agreement, dated October 12, 1999, between Registrant and General American Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company, MetLife Investors Insurance Company, First MetLife Investors Insurance Company and General American Insurance Company. (42)
  (94)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2003, between Registrant and Jefferson National Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2003, between Registrant and Jefferson National Life Insurance Company. (27)

 

C-38


    -    (c) Amendment, dated May 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2003, between Registrant and Jefferson National Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment, dated May 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2003, between Registrant and Jefferson National Life Insurance Company. (30)
    -    (e) Amendment, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated May 1, 2003, between Registrant and Jefferson National Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (95)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Midland National Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Midland National Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (c) Amendment dated April 1, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Midland National Life Insurance Company. (45)
  (96)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and National Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and National Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and National Life Insurance Company. (44)
  (97)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 28, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (32)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated September 30, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (37)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3 dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (e) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company, MetLife Investors Insurance Company, First MetLife Investors Insurance Company and General American Insurance Company. (42)
  (98)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation (formerly, Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company). (27)

 

C-39


    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 31, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation (formerly, Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company). (28)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated November 5, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation (formerly, Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company). (29)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated November 3, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation (formerly, Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company). (32)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Corporation (formerly, Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company). (42)
  (99)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Novation to Participation Agreement, dated February 26, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Company. (28)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 1, effective November 5, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. (29)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 2, effective November 3, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. (32)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 3, effective April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Ameritas Life Insurance Corp. (42)
  (100)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Business Men’s Assurance Company of America. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Liberty Life Insurance Company (formerly, Business Men’s Assurance Company of America). (42)
  (101)   -    Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and American Skandia Life Assurance Corp. (27)
  (102)   -    Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Standard Insurance Company. (42)
  (103)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and American United Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 1, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and American United Life Insurance Company. (33)

 

C-40


    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and American United Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (104)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2003, between Registrant and GE Capital Life Assurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 29, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2003, between Registrant and GE Capital Life Assurance Company of New York. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated February 27, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2003, between Registrant and Genworth Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly, GE Capital Life Assurance Company of New York). (29)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated March 18, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2003, between Registrant and Genworth Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly, GE Capital life Assurance Company of New York). (30)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated March 2, 2003, between Registrant and Genworth Life Insurance Company of New York (formerly, GE Capital life Assurance Company of New York). (42)
  (105)   -    Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and American Partners Life Insurance Company. (27)
  (106)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated July 1, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (32)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated May 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company. (45)
  (107)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and C.M. Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2010, between Registrant and C.M. Life Insurance Company. (42)
  (108)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 2005, between Registrant and AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated October 16, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 2005, between Registrant and AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company. (37)

 

C-41


    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 19, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 2005, between Registrant and AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 2005, between Registrant and AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated May 1, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated July 1, 2005, between Registrant and AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company. (45)
  (109)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated September 14, 2005, between Registrant and New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp. (27)
    -    (b) Addendum, dated March 17, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 14, 2005, between Registrant and New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 1, dated April 2, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 14, 2005, between Registrant and New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp. (33)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 2, dated August 1, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 14, 2005, between Registrant and New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp. (37)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 3, dated October 1, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 14, 2005, between Registrant and New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp. (37)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated September 14, 2005, between Registrant and New York Life Insurance and Annuity Corp. (42)
  (110)   -    Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Chase Insurance Life and Annuity Company. (27)
  (111)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 28, 2008, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company. (32)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated May 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and Zurich American Life Insurance Company (formerly known as Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company). (44)

 

C-42


  (112)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated January 6, 2003, between Registrant and Nationwide Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated January 6, 2003, between Registrant and Nationwide Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated July 1, 2005, to the Participation Agreement, dated January 6, 2003, between Registrant and Nationwide Life Insurance Company. (27)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated January 13, 2009, to the Participation Agreement, dated January 6, 2003, between Registrant and Nationwide Life Insurance Company. (33)
  (113)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc. and First Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (28)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated November 15, 2007, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc., and First Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (29)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated February 20, 2008, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc., and First Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (30)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated December 23, 2008, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc., and First Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (33)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc., and First Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (42)
  (114)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc., and Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (29)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 30, 2004, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc. and Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (28)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2, dated August 1, 2006, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc. and Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (28)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3, dated November 15, 2007, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc. and Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (29)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4, dated April 30, 2010, to the Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant, A I M Distributors, Inc. and Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company. (42)
  (115)   -    Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company of New York (effective January 1, 2005, John Hancock Life Insurance Company of New York). (28)

 

C-43


  (116)   -    Participation Agreement, dated April 30, 2004, between Registrant and The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) (effective January 1, 2005, John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.). (28)
  (117)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated December 1, 2008, between Registrant and Pacific Life & Annuity Company. (33)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated January 20, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 1, 2008, between Registrant and Pacific Life & Annuity Company. (45)
  (118)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated December 1, 2008, between Registrant and Pacific Life Insurance Company. (33)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated January 20, 2012, to the Participation Agreement, dated December 1, 2008, between Registrant and Pacific Life Insurance Company. (45)
  (119)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Integrity Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Integrity Life Insurance Company. (44)
  (120)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and National Integrity Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated May 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and National Integrity Life Insurance Company. (44)
  (121)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and National Security Life and Annuity Company. (42)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 16, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and National Security Life and Annuity Company. (44)
  (122)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Ohio National Life Assurance Corporation. (42)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 16, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Ohio National Life Assurance Corporation. (44)
  (123)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and The Ohio National Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated December 16, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and The Ohio National Life Insurance Company. (44)

 

C-44


  (124)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, between Registrant and First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company. (42)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, between Registrant and First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company. (43)
  (125)   -    (a) Participation Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, between Registrant and SunAmerica Annuity and Life Assurance Company. (42)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1, dated April 1, 2011, to the Participation Agreement, between Registrant and SunAmerica Annuity and Life Assurance Company. (43)
  (126)   -    Participation Agreement, dated June 1, 2010, between Registrant and Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company. (43)
  (127)   -    Participation Agreement, dated November 1, 2012, between Registrant and First Symetra National Life Insurance Company of New York. (45)
  (128)   -    Participation Agreement, dated January 17, 2013, between Registrant and Forethought Life Insurance Company. (45)
  (129)   -    Accounting Services Agreement, dated March 31, 1993, between the Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (4)
  (130)   -    Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated December 7, 1999, between Registrant and AIM Variable Insurance Funds. (12)
  (131)   -    Fourth Amended and Restated Interfund Loan Agreement, dated April 30, 2010, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. ( 43)
  (132)   -    Seventh Amended and Restated Memorandum of Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2013, between Registrant, on behalf of all funds, and Invesco Advisers, Inc., regarding securities lending. (4 6 )
  (133)   -    Memorandum of Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2013, between Registrant, on behalf of certain funds, and Invesco Advisers, Inc., regarding advisory fee waivers. (4 6 )
  (134)   -    Memorandum of Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2013, between Registrant, on behalf of all funds, and Invesco Advisers, Inc., regarding expense limitations. (4 6 )
  (135)   -    Memorandum of Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2011, between Registrant, and Invesco Distributors, Inc., regarding 12b-1 Fee Waivers. (44)
i        Legal Opinion - None
j     -    Consent of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP. (4 6 )
k     -    Omitted - Financial Statements.

 

C-45


l   (1)   -    (a) Agreements Concerning Initial Capitalization of the AIM V.I. Capital Appreciation Fund, the AIM V.I. Diversified Income Fund, the AIM V.I. Government Securities Fund, the AIM V.I. Growth Fund, the AIM V.I. International Equity Fund, the AIM V.I. Money Market Fund, and the AIM V.I. Value Fund. (4)
    -    (b) Agreements Concerning Initial Capitalization of the AIM V.I. Growth and Income Fund and the AIM V.I. Utilities Fund. (4)
    -    (c) Agreement Concerning Initial Capitalization of the AIM V.I. Aggressive Growth Fund, the AIM V.I. Balanced Fund, the AIM V.I. Capital Development Fund and the AIM V.I. High Yield Fund. (7)
    -    (d) Agreement Concerning Initial Capitalization of the AIM V.I. Blue Chip Fund. (11)
    -    (e) Agreement Concerning Initial Capitalization of the AIM V.I. Dent Demographic Trends Fund. (11)
    -    (f) Agreement Concerning Initial Capitalization of the AIM V.I. Basic Value Fund and the AIM V.I. Mid Cap Equity Fund, dated September 7, 2001. (18)
    -    (g) Agreement Concerning Initial Capitalization of AIM V.I. PowerShares ETF Allocation Fund, dated October 21, 2008. (33)
    -    (h) Agreement Concerning Initial Capitalization of Invesco V.I. Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund, dated April 14, 2011. (43)
m   (1)   -    (a) Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 for Series II shares. (17)
    -    (b) Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated September 7, 2001. (18)
    -    (c) Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated May 1, 2002. (20)
    -    (d) Amendment No. 3 to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated August 29, 2003. (22)
    -    (e) Amendment No. 4 to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated April 30, 2004. (24)
    -    (f) Amendment No. 5 to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated October 15, 2004. (24)
    -    (g) Amendment No. 6 to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated July 1, 2005. (26)
    -    (h) Amendment No. 7 to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated December 21, 2005. (26)
    -    (i) Amendment No. 8 to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated May 1, 2006. (28)

 

C-46


    -    (j) Amendment No. 9, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated June 12, 2006. (28)
    -    (k) Amendment No. 10, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, July 3, 2006. (28)
    -    (l) Amendment No. 11, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated November 6, 2006. (28)
    -    (m) Amendment No. 12, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated December 21, 2006. (28)
    -    (n) Amendment No. 13, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated May 1, 2007. (29)
    -    (o) Amendment No. 14, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated October 22, 2008. (33)
    -    (p) Amendment No. 15, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated February 12, 2010. (39)
    -    (q) Amendment No. 16, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated March 3, 2010. (41)
    -    (r) Amendment No. 17, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated April 30, 2010. (41)
    -    (s) Amendment No. 18, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated January 7, 2011. (43)
    -    (t) Amendment No. 19, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated December 1, 2011. (45)
    -    (u) Amendment No. 20, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan, dated July 16, 2012. (45)
    -    (v) Amendment No. 21, dated April 29, 2013, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan. (46)
    -    (w) Amendment No. 22, dated April 29, 2013, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan. (46)
n     -    Registrant’s Amended and Restated Multiple Class Plan, effective July 16, 2001, as amended and restated August 18, 2003. (22)
o     -    Reserved
p   (1)   -    Invesco Advisers, Inc. Code of Ethics, adopted January 1, 2011, relating to Invesco Advisers, Inc. and any of its subsidiaries (43)
  (2)   -    Invesco Asset Management Limited Code of Ethics dated 2011, relating to Invesco UK. (45)
  (3)   -    Invesco Ltd. Code of Conduct, dated October 2011, relating to Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited Code of Ethics. (44)

 

C-47


  (4)   -    Invesco Staff Ethics and Personal Share Dealing, dated January 2013, relating to Invesco Hong Kong Limited. (45)
  (5)   -    Invesco Ltd. Code of Conduct, revised October 2011, relating to Invesco Canada Ltd.; Invesco Canada Ltd., Policy No. D-6 Gifts and Entertainment, revised November 2011, and Policy No. D-7 Invesco Canada Personal Trading Policy, revised September 2012, together the Code of Ethics relating to Invesco Canada Ltd. (45)
  (6)   -    Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH Code of Ethics dated 2012, relating to Invesco Continental Europe. (45)
  (7)   -    Invesco Ltd. Code of Conduct, revised October 2011, relating to Invesco Australia Limited. (44)
  (8)   -    Invesco Senior Secured Management Code of Ethics. (45)
q     -    Powers of Attorney for Arch, Bayley, Bunch, Crockett, Dammeyer, Dowden, Fields, Flanagan, Mathai-Davis, Soll, Sonnenschein, Stickel, Taylor and Whalen. (42)

 

C-48


(1) Incorporated herein by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1, filed on April 19, 1993.
(2) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4, filed on November 3, 1994.
(3) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 6, filed on April 26, 1995.
(4) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 7, filed electronically on April 29, 1996.
(5) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 8, filed electronically on April 23, 1997.
(6) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 9, filed electronically on February 13, 1998.
(7) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 10, filed electronically on October 2, 1998.
(8) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11, filed electronically on February 18, 1999.
(9) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 12, filed electronically on April 29, 1999.
(10) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 13, filed electronically on July 13, 1999.
(11) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14, filed electronically on September 28, 1999.
(12) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15, filed electronically on February 16, 2000.
(13) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 16, filed electronically on February 17, 2000.
(14) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 18, filed electronically on February 16, 2001.
(15) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 19, filed electronically on April 12, 2001.
(16) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 20, filed electronically on May 29, 2001.
(17) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 21, filed electronically on July 18, 2001.
(18) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 22, filed electronically on February 12, 2002.
(19) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 24, filed electronically on April 30, 2002.
(20) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 25, filed electronically on April 29, 2003.
(21) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 26, filed electronically on June 18, 2003.
(22) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 27, filed electronically on February 13, 2004.
(23) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 28, filed electronically on April 13, 2004.
(24) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 29, filed electronically on February 28, 2005.
(25) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 30, filed electronically on April 29, 2005.
(26) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 31, filed electronically on February 14, 2006.
(27) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 32, filed electronically on April 27, 2006.
(28) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 33, filed electronically on April 27, 2007.
(29) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 34, filed electronically on February 11, 2008.
(30) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 35, filed electronically on April 28, 2008.
(31) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 36, filed electronically on August 8, 2008.
(32) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 37, filed electronically on October 22, 2008.
(33) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 38, filed electronically on April 28, 2009.
(34) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 39, filed electronically on November 25, 2009.
(35) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 40, filed electronically on February 5, 2010.
(36) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 41, filed electronically on February 11, 2010.
(37) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 42, filed electronically on February 12, 2010.
(38) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 43, filed electronically on February 18, 2010.
(39) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 44, filed electronically on April 27, 2010.
(40) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 45, filed electronically on April 28, 2010.
(41) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 46, filed electronically on October 4, 2010.
(42) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 47, filed electronically on January 6, 2011.
(43) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 54, filed electronically on April 28, 2011.
(44) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 56, filed electronically on April 26, 2012.
(45) Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 58, filed electronically on April 24, 2013.
(46) Filed herewith electronically.

 

Item 29. Persons Controlled by or Under Common Control with Registrant

None.

 

Item 30. Indemnification

Indemnification provisions for officers, trustees, and employees of the Registrant are set forth in Article VIII of the Registrant’s Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust and Article VIII of its Amended and Restated Bylaws, and are hereby incorporated by reference. See Items 28(a) and (b) above. Under the Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust, effective as of September 14, 2005, as amended (i) Trustees or officers, when acting in such capacity, shall not be personally liable for any act, omission or obligation of the Registrant or any Trustee or officer except by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of his office with the Trust; (ii) every Trustee, officer, employee or agent of the Registrant shall be indemnified to the fullest extent permitted under the Delaware Statutory Trust act, the Registrant’s Bylaws and other applicable law; (iii) in case any

 

C-49


shareholder or former shareholder of the Registrant shall be held to be personally liable solely by reason of his being or having been a shareholder of the Registrant or any portfolio or class and not because of his acts or omissions or for some other reason, the shareholder or former shareholder (or his heirs, executors, administrators or other legal representatives, or, in the case of a corporation or other entity, its corporate or general successor) shall be entitled, out of the assets belonging to the applicable portfolio (or allocable to the applicable class), to be held harmless from and indemnified against all loss and expense arising from such liability in accordance with the Bylaws and applicable law. The Registrant, on behalf of the affected portfolio (or class), shall upon request by the shareholder, assume the defense of any such claim made against the shareholder for any act or obligation of that portfolio (or class).

The Registrant and other investment companies and their respective officers and trustees are insured under a joint Mutual Fund Directors & Officers Liability Policy, issued by ICI Mutual Insurance Company and certain other domestic insurers, with limits up to a $80,000,000 (plus an additional $20,000,000 limit that applies to independent directors/trustees only).

Section 16 of the Master Investment Advisory Agreement between the Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc. (“Invesco Advisers”) provides that in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of obligations or duties hereunder on the part of Invesco Advisers or any of its officers, directors or employees, that Invesco Advisers shall not be subject to liability to the Registrant or to any series of the Registrant, or to any shareholder of any series of the Registrant for any act or omission in the course of, or connected with, rendering services hereunder or for any losses that may be sustained in the purchase, holding or sale of any security. Any liability of Invesco Advisers to any series of the Registrant shall not automatically impart liability on the part of Invesco Advisers to any other series of the Registrant. No series of the Registrant shall be liable for the obligations of any other series of the Registrant.

Section 10 of the Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds (the “Sub-Advisory Contract”) between Invesco Advisers, on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Canada Ltd. (each a “Sub-Adviser”, collectively the “Sub-Advisers”) provides that the Sub-Adviser shall not be liable for any costs or liabilities arising from any error of judgment or mistake of law or any loss suffered by any series of the Registrant or the Registrant in connection with the matters to which the Sub-Advisory Contract relates except a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of the Sub-Adviser in the performance by the Sub-Adviser of its duties or from reckless disregard by the Sub-Adviser of its obligations and duties under the Sub-Advisory Contract.

Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to trustees, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in such Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a trustee, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such trustee, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered hereby, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in such Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

 

C-50


Item 31. Business and Other Connections of Investment Advisor

The only employment of a substantial nature of the Advisers’ directors and officers is with Invesco Advisers and its affiliated companies. For information as to the business, profession, vocation or employment of a substantial nature of each of the officers and directors of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Limited., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Canada Ltd. (each a “Sub-Adviser”, collectively the “Sub-Advisers”) reference is made to Form ADV filed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 by each Sub-Adviser herein incorporated by reference. Reference is also made to the caption “Fund Management—The Adviser” of the Prospectuses which comprises Part A of this Registration Statement, and to the discussion under the caption “Management of the Trust” of the Statement of Additional Information which comprises Part B of this Registration Statement, and to Item 32(b) of this Part C.

 

Item 32. Principal Underwriters

 

(a) Invesco Distributors, Inc., the Registrant’s principal underwriter, also acts as a principal underwriter to the following investment companies:

AIM Counselor Series Trust (Invesco Counselor Series Trust)

AIM Equity Funds (Invesco Equity Funds)

AIM Funds Group (Invesco Funds Group)

AIM Growth Series (Invesco Growth Series)

AIM Investment Funds (Invesco Investment Funds)

AIM International Mutual Funds (Invesco International Mutual Funds)

AIM Investment Securities Funds (Invesco Investment Securities Funds)

AIM Sector Funds (Invesco Sector Funds)

AIM Tax-Exempt Funds (Invesco Tax-Exempt Funds)

AIM Treasurer’s Series Trust (Invesco Treasurer’s Series Trust)

Invesco Prime Income Trust

Invesco Senior Loan Fund (formerly known as Invesco Van Kampen Senior Loan Fund)

PowerShares Actively Managed Exchange-Traded Fund Trust

PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust

PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II

PowerShares India Exchange-Traded Fund Trust

Short-Term Investments Trust

 

C-51


(b) The following table sets forth information with respect to each director, officer or partner of Invesco Distributors, Inc.

 

Name and Principal

Business Address*

 

Position and Offices with

Underwriter

 

Positions and Offices

with Registrant

Robert C. Brooks   Director   None
Peter S. Gallagher   Director & President   Assistant Vice President
Andrew R. Schlossberg   Director   Assistant Vice President
Eric P. Johnson   Executive Vice President   None
Karen Dunn Kelley   Executive Vice President   Vice President
Gursh Kundan   Executive Vice President   None
Ben Utt   Executive Vice President   None
Eliot Honaker   Senior Vice President   None
LuAnn S. Katz   Senior Vice President   Assistant Vice President
Lyman Missimer III   Senior Vice President   Assistant Vice President
Greg J. Murphy   Senior Vice President   None
David J. Nardecchia   Senior Vice President   None
Miranda O’Keefe   Senior Vice President & Chief Compliance Officer   None
Gary K. Wendler   Senior Vice President   Assistant Vice President
John M. Zerr   Senior Vice President & Secretary   Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Secretary
Annette Lege   Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer   None
Crissie M. Wisdom   Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer   Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer

 

* 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77046-1173

 

(c) Not applicable

 

C-52


Item 33. Location of Accounts and Records

Invesco Advisers, Inc., 1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30309, will maintain physical possession of each such account, book or other document of the Registrant at the Registrant’s principal executive offices, 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77046-1173, except for those maintained at its Atlanta offices at the address listed above or at its Louisville, Kentucky offices, 400 West Market Street, Suite 3300, Louisville, KY 40202 or except for those relating to certain transactions in portfolio securities that are maintained by the Registrant’s Custodian, State Street Bank and Trust Company, 225 Franklin Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02110, and The Bank of New York Mellon, 2 Hanson Place, Brooklyn, New York 11217-1431, with respect to Invesco V.I. Money Market Fund and the Registrant’s Transfer Agent and Dividend Paying Agent, Invesco Investment Services, Inc., P. O. Box 219078, Kansas City, Missouri 64121-9078.

Records may also be maintained at the offices of:

Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH

An der Welle 5

1st Floor

Frankfurt, Germany 60322

Invesco Asset Management Limited

Perpetual Park

Perpetual Park Drive

Henley-on-Thames

Oxfordshire, RG91HH

United Kingdom

Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited

Roppongi Hills Mori Tower 14F

6-10-1 Roppongi, Minato-ku

Tokyo, Japan 106-6114

Invesco Australia Limited

333 Collins Street, Level 26

Melbourne Vic 3000, Australia

Invesco Hong Kong Limited

41/F, Citibank Tower

3 Garden Road, Central

Hong Kong

Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.

1166 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

Invesco Canada Ltd.

5140 Yonge Street

Suite 800

Toronto, Ontario

M2N 6X7 Canada

 

Item 34. Management Services

None.

 

Item 35. Undertakings

Not applicable.

 

C-53


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Amendment to its Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Houston, Texas on the 10th day of February, 2014.

 

Registrant:           

AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS

(INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS)

 

By:  

/s/ Philip A. Taylor

  Philip A. Taylor, President

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment to the Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

SIGNATURES

  

TITLE

  

DATE

/s/ Philip A. Taylor

   Trustee & President    February 10, 2014

(Philip A. Taylor)

   (Principal Executive Officer)   

/s/ David C. Arch*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(David C. Arch)

     

/s/ Frank S. Bayley*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Frank S. Bayley)

     

/s/ James T. Bunch*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(James T. Bunch)

     

/s/ Bruce L. Crockett*

   Chair & Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Bruce L. Crockett)

     

/s/ Rod Dammeyer*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Rod Dammeyer)

     

/s/ Albert R. Dowden*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Albert R. Dowden)

     

/s/ Martin L. Flanagan*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Martin L. Flanagan)

     

/s/ Jack M. Fields*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Jack M. Fields)

     

/s/ Carl Frischling*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Carl Frischling)

     

/s/ Prema Mathai-Davis*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Prema Mathai-Davis)

     


SIGNATURES

  

TITLE

  

DATE

/s/ Larry Soll*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Larry Soll)

     

/s/ Hugo F. Sonnenschein*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Hugo F. Sonnenschein)

     

/s/ Raymond Stickel, Jr.*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Raymond Stickel, Jr.)

     

/s/ Wayne W. Whalen*

   Trustee    February 10, 2014

(Wayne W. Whalen)

     

/s/ Sheri Morris

   Vice President & Treasurer    February 10, 2014

(Sheri Morris)

   (Principal Financial and   
   Accounting Officer)   

 

*By  

/s/ Philip A. Taylor

  Philip A. Taylor
  Attorney-in-Fact

 

* Philip A. Taylor, pursuant to powers of attorney dated November 30, 2011, filed in Registrant’s Post-Effective Amendment No. 52 on January 6, 2011.


INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

a(1)(y)   Amendment No. 24, dated April 29, 2013, effective as of April 11, 2011, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant
a(1)(z)   Form of Amendment No. 25, effective as of April 11, 2011, to Amended and Restated Agreement and Declaration of Trust of Registrant
d(1)(aa)   Amendment No. 26, dated April 29, 2013, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc.
d(1)bb   Amendment No. 27, dated April 29, 2013, to Master Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc.
d(2)(j)   Amendment No. 9, dated April 29, 2013, to Master Intergroup Sub-Advisory Contract for Mutual Funds, dated May 1, 2008 between Invesco Advisers, Inc., successor by merger to Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., on behalf of Registrant, and each of Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH, Invesco Asset Management Ltd., Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited, Invesco Australia Limited, Invesco Hong Kong Limited, Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc. and Invesco Canada Ltd. (formerly known as Invesco Trimark Ltd.)
e(1)(v)   Amendment No. 21, dated April 29, 2013, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Distributors, Inc.
e(1)(w)   Amendment No. 22, dated April 29, 2013, to First Amended and Restated Master Distribution Agreement between Registrant and Invesco Distributors, Inc.
h(1)(o)   Amendment No. 14, dated April 29, 2013, to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc.
h(1)(p)   (p) Amendment No. 15, dated April 29, 2013, to the Third Amended and Restated Master Administrative Services Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Registrant and Invesco Advisers, Inc.
h(132)   Seventh Amended and Restated Memorandum of Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2013, between Registrant, on behalf of all funds, and Invesco Advisers, Inc., regarding securities lending
h(133)   Memorandum of Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2013, between Registrant, on behalf of certain funds, and Invesco Advisers, Inc., regarding advisory fee waivers
h(134)   Memorandum of Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2013, between Registrant, on behalf of all funds, and Invesco Advisers, Inc., regarding expense limitations
j   Consent of Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP
m(1)(v)   Amendment No. 21, dated April 29, 2013, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan
m(1)(w)   Amendment No. 22, dated April 29, 2013, to the Registrant’s Master Distribution Plan
PIMCO Income Strategy Fu... (NYSE:PFN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more PIMCO Income Strategy Fu... Charts.
PIMCO Income Strategy Fu... (NYSE:PFN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more PIMCO Income Strategy Fu... Charts.