Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. __)

 

Filed by the Registrant      
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant      

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Trustmark Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

  

 

  

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

  (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

  (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

  (3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

  (4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

  (5)

Total fee paid:

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

  1)

Amount Previously Paid:

  2)

Form, Schedule or Registration No.:

  3)

Filing Party:

  4)

Date Filed:


Table of Contents

LOGO

 

 

 

 

LOGO             


Table of Contents

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark) will be held as follows:

DATE AND TIME

Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. CT

VIRTUAL ATTENDANCE

Due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Annual Meeting will be held virtually. You will be able to attend, vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021 and entering the 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow on your proxy card or printed on your voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials, or email previously received.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

1) To elect a board of 12 directors to hold office for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected and qualified.

2) To provide advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation.

3) To ratify the selection of Crowe LLP as Trustmark’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

4) To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

RECORD DATE

Shareholders of record on March 1, 2021, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting.

PROXY VOTING/REVOCATION

Your vote is important. You are urged to vote your shares as soon as possible, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. Please vote your shares in one of the following ways:

 

 

You may vote your shares by Internet by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card.

 

If you received a printed copy of the proxy statement, you may also vote your shares by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed reply envelope.

 

If you attend the meeting, you may revoke your proxy prior to the voting thereof. You may also revoke your proxy by following the instructions on page 4 of the proxy statement.

 

LOGO

Granville Tate, Jr.

Secretary

March 15, 2021

 

 

LOGO             


Table of Contents

 

 

LOGO


Table of Contents
LOGO  

Trustmark Corporation

P. O. Box 291

Jackson, Mississippi 39205

March 15, 2021

Dear Shareholder:

On behalf of your Board of Directors, we cordially invite you to attend Trustmark’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on April 27, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. CT. Due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting will be held virtually. At the meeting, you will have the opportunity to elect twelve directors who bring diverse perspectives and valuable leadership skills to Trustmark. Their guidance will enable us to successfully compete in an evolving industry and continue our steadfast commitment to the customers, associates, shareholders and communities we have the privilege of serving. Your vote is important to us. The proposals to be considered are described in this proxy statement, and instructions on how to vote your shares may be found on page 4. We encourage you to vote your shares in advance of the meeting to ensure the presence of a quorum.

This past year has been an extremely challenging time for everyone. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the ways in which we live, work and interact with one another. As an essential business in the communities we serve, our associates quickly adapted and found new ways to serve customers and meet their financial needs during these unprecedented times. Customers embraced our digital banking platforms, and many associates transitioned to a remote work environment. While not without challenges, our associates never missed a beat. We also leveraged investments in technology and learned lessons that have strengthened the organization.

During 2020, we continued to build upon and expand customer relationships as reflected by solid growth in our banking, mortgage banking, wealth management and insurance businesses. Net income and diluted earnings per share reached record levels, and we continued investments to enhance our franchise and competitive position. We also returned capital to shareholders through consistent quarterly dividends, and we made significant contributions to strengthen our communities. We invite you to review our Form 10-K and our 2020 Year in Review, both of which are available at investorrelations. trustmark.com or in hard copy upon request. These documents will provide more detailed information about your company.

Thank you for your continued support of Trustmark and your participation in this important process.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO    LOGO

Gerard R. Host

  

Duane A. Dewey

Executive Chairman

  

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

LOGO


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXY SUMMARY

     1  

Information About the 2021 Annual Meeting

     1  

Proposals

     1  

Financial Highlights - 2020

     1  

Corporate Governance Highlights

     1  

Executive Compensation Highlights

     2  

Corporate Social Responsibility

     2  

GENERAL INFORMATION

     3  

Introduction

     3  

Meeting Date and Time

     3  

Shareholders Entitled to Vote

     3  

Required Vote

     3  

How to Vote

     4  

Revoking Your Proxy

     4  

Voting on Other Matters

     4  

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     4  

Overview

     4  

Recent Developments

     5  

Key Features of Trustmark’s Corporate Governance

     5  

Meetings of the Board of Directors

     5  

Director Attendance at the Annual Meeting

     6  

Director Independence

     6  

Board Leadership

     6  

Committees of the Board of Directors

     6  

Audit & Finance Committee

     7  

Enterprise Risk Committee

     7  

Executive Committee

     7  

Human Resources Committee

     7  

Nominating Committee

     8  

Board Oversight of Risk Management

     8  

Committee Membership

     8  

Communications with Directors

     9  

Nomination of Directors

     9  

Corporate Social Responsibility

     9  

Director Qualifications

     10  

Personal Traits

     10  

Leadership Qualities

     10  

Individual Competencies

     11  

Specific Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills

     11  

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     12  

The Nominees

     12  

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     17  

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

     17  

Guiding Philosophy

     17  

Key Elements of Compensation

     17  

Alignment Between Pay and Performance

     18  

2020 Say on Pay Vote

     18  

Board and Committee Process

     18  

Role of the Compensation Consultant

     19  

Benchmarking

     19  

Peer Group Data

     19  

Market Data

     20  

Compensation Mix

     20  

Base Salaries

     21  

Cash Bonuses

     21  

Annual Management Incentive Plan

     21  

Discretionary Bonuses

     23  


Table of Contents

Mortgage Production Bonus

     23  

Equity-Based Compensation

     23  

Performance Awards

     24  

Time-based Awards

     24  

Retirement Benefits

     25  

Executive Deferral Plan

     25  

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

     26  

Perquisites; Other Benefits

     26  

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

     26  

Deductibility of Compensation

     27  

Policy Against Hedging and Limitations on Pledging

     27  

Stock Ownership Guidelines

     27  

Executive Compensation Recoupment

     27  

Analysis of Risk Associated with Trustmark’s Compensation Policies and Practices

     27  

Summary Compensation Table for 2020

     29  

All Other Compensation for 2020

     30  

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020

     31  

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End

     32  

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2020

     33  

Pension Benefits for 2020

     34  

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2020

     34  

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

     35  

Human Resources Committee Report

     36  

Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

     36  

2020 Pay Ratio Disclosure

     36  

Employment and Change in Control Agreements with NEOs

     36  

Employment Agreements with Mr. Host

     36  

First Host Agreement

     37  

Second Host Agreement

     37  

Employment Agreement with Mr. Dewey

     38  

Certain Defined Terms Used in Second Host Agreement and Dewey Agreement

     38  

Change in Control Agreements with Other NEOs

     39  

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

     40  

Director Compensation for 2020

     41  

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     41  

PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

     42  

AUDIT & FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

     42  

Principal Accountant Fees

     42  

Pre-Approval Policy

     43  

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

     43  

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF TRUSTMARK STOCK

     45  

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

     46  

PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS

     46  

COST OF PROXY SOLICITATION

     46  

AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

     47  


Table of Contents

PROXY SUMMARY

 

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. Please read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting as this is only a summary.

Information About the 2021 Annual Meeting

 

Time/Date:    Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. CT

Virtual Attendance:

   www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021 You will be asked to enter your 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability.
Record Date:    March 1, 2021

Proposals

 

 

Proposal

 

  

 

Description

 

  

 

Board Recommendation

 

 

Proposal 1

  

 

Election of 12 directors to hold office for the ensuing year or until their
successors are elected and qualified

 

  

 

“FOR”

(for each nominee)

 

Proposal 2

 

  

 

Advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation

 

  

 

“FOR”

 

 

Proposal 3

  

 

Ratification of selection of Crowe LLP as Trustmark’s independent
auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021

 

  

 

“FOR”

Financial Highlights - 2020

 

  Record net income totaled $160.0 million, up 6.4% from prior year

 

  Diluted earnings per share totaled $2.51, up 8.2% from prior year

 

  Quarterly dividends of $0.23 per share, or $0.92 per share annually

 

  Return on average tangible equity of 12.58%, up from 12.45% in prior year (See “Alignment Between Pay and Performance” on page 18 for a description of return on average tangible equity)
  Loans held for investment increased $488.9 million, or 5.2%, to $9.8 billion from prior year

 

  Mortgage loan production reached record level of $3.0 billion, up 69.4% from prior year

 

  Deposits increased $2.8 billion, or 24.9%, to $14.0 billion from prior year

 

  Total risk-based capital ratio of 14.12% at year-end 2020, up from 13.25% at the end of the prior year

 

  Supported local communities with loan originations totaling $970.0 million through SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program
 

 

Corporate Governance Highlights

 

  Nine members of the Board of Directors of Trustmark (the Board) are independent.

 

  Directors must notify Trustmark of changes in professional responsibilities and residence and comply with a directors’ attendance policy.

 

  Directors are subject to Trustmark stock ownership requirements.

 

  The Board has adopted, and annually reviews, formal charters for the Board and its committees to address the governance guidelines and responsibilities of each.

 

  A CEO succession planning process is in place to promote continuity of leadership and an orderly transition upon the CEO’s retirement or other termination of employment.
  Directors are required to retire at the age of 70.

 

  The Board has the authority to seek advice or counsel from external advisors as needed.

 

  In the event the Board Chairman is not independent, the Chairman of the Executive Committee, an independent director, serves as Lead Director.

 

  Independent directors meet without management present.

 

  The Board has adopted codes of conduct/ethics for directors, senior financial officers and associates.

 

  The Executive Committee of the Board reviews the corporate governance structure and annually evaluates each director’s performance against specific performance criteria designed to evaluate the director’s contributions.
 

 

1


Table of Contents

Executive Compensation Highlights

 

What we do:

 

LOGO   Substantial portion of executive pay based on performance
against goals set by the Board
LOGO   Stock ownership requirements for executive officers
LOGO   Independent compensation consultant regularly advises the Human Resources Committee
LOGO   Minimum vesting periods of not less than three years for equity awards, with three-year cliff vesting of time-based awards
LOGO   Clawback provisions that permit Trustmark to recover incentive-based compensation under certain circumstances
LOGO   Use of peer company data to help set executive compensation
LOGO   Annual advisory votes on executive compensation
LOGO   Oversight of compensation by Human Resources Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors
What we don’t do:
LOGO   No automatic or guaranteed annual salary increases
LOGO   No guaranteed bonuses or guaranteed long-term incentive awards
LOGO   No tax gross-ups for executive officers
LOGO   No “single-trigger” change in control severance payments
LOGO   No hedging of Trustmark stock
LOGO   No excessive perquisites
 

Corporate Social Responsibility

  Committed to robust community engagement, volunteerism and philanthropy to strengthen communities; enhanced focus with appointment of Director of Corporate Social Responsibility in 2020
  Community-based contributions and sponsorships of $5.3 million in 2020 with focus on supporting at-risk children and families and financial literacy
  Expanded commitment to financial literacy through EVERFI, Inc.; 9,500 students participated in Trustmark’s Financial Scholars program in 2020
  Provided financial literacy and individual counseling through partnership with Operation HOPE, Inc. in Memphis, TN; program will expand to Montgomery, AL and Jackson, MS in 2021
  Dedicated to serving diverse and underserved communities; enhanced product offerings to meet special credit needs of low-to-moderate income individuals and communities
 

 

2


Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION

 

Introduction

Trustmark Corporation (Trustmark) is holding its 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) on Tuesday, April 27, 2021. This proxy statement is being sent on or about March 15, 2021, in connection with the solicitation by the Board of proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Trustmark is furnishing this proxy statement over the Internet to most shareholders. These shareholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy statement and proxy card, and instead will receive a Notice of Internet Availability containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability, please see “Availability of Proxy Materials” on page 47 for additional information.

Meeting Date and Time

The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual-only format on Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. CT. Due to the public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and so that we may support the health and well-being of our associates, shareholders and the community, the Board has directed that the Annual Meeting be held virtually to allow remote participation by shareholders at the Annual Meeting. To attend the meeting virtually and to vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting, you may visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021 and enter the 16-digit control number printed in the box marked by the arrow on your proxy card or printed on your voting instruction form, notice of internet availability of proxy materials, or email previously received.

Shareholders Entitled to Vote

Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2021, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, Trustmark had outstanding 63,537,431 shares of common stock.

Required Vote

A majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote constitutes a quorum to transact business at the Annual Meeting. Each share is entitled to one vote on each proposal.

The required vote for each proposal is as follows:

 

   

Directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in order to be elected (that is, the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of shares voted “against” that director). If a nominee who is an incumbent director is not elected, and no successor is elected, such nominee must tender his or her resignation to the Board. For additional information, please see “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” on page 12.

   

The advisory vote to approve Trustmark’s executive compensation will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal.

   

The ratification of the selection of Crowe LLP (Crowe) as independent auditor will be approved if the votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the votes cast opposing the proposal.

While abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as shares present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum, they are not otherwise counted and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors

or any other proposal.

Applicable rules determine whether proposals presented at shareholder meetings are considered routine or non-routine. If a proposal is considered routine, a bank, broker or other holder of record which holds shares for an owner in street name generally may vote on the proposal without receiving voting instructions from the beneficial owner. If a proposal is non-routine, the bank, broker or other holder of record generally may vote on the proposal only if the beneficial owner has provided voting instructions. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker or other entity returns a signed proxy card but does not vote shares on a particular proposal because the proposal is not a routine matter and the broker or other entity has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. The ratification of the selection of Crowe as independent auditor is considered a routine matter, while the other proposals, i.e., the election of directors and the advisory vote to approve Trustmark’s executive compensation, are considered non-routine matters.

All valid proxies received by Trustmark will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated in such proxies. As noted above, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record and you do not give voting instructions, your bank, broker or other record holder of the shares is not permitted to vote your shares on any proposal other than Proposal 3, which is the only routine proposal on the agenda. If no instructions are indicated in an otherwise properly executed proxy, it will be voted FOR each director nominee named in Proposal 1, FOR advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation in Proposal 2, FOR ratification of the selection of Crowe as independent auditor in Proposal 3 and on all other matters in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.

 

3


Table of Contents

How to Vote

Shareholders of record can vote at the Annual Meeting or by proxy without attending the Annual Meeting.

To vote by proxy:

 

  (1)

Vote by Internet (instructions are on the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy card), or

  (2)

If you received a printed copy of this proxy statement, complete the enclosed proxy card and sign, date and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, your bank, broker or other holder of record will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, and you plan to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, you should complete the voting instructions form that the bank, broker or other holder of record will provide to you, or use the telephone or Internet voting arrangements described on the voting instructions form or other materials that the bank, broker or other holder of record will provide to you.

You will receive multiple Notices of Internet Availability or printed copies of the proxy materials if you hold your shares in different ways (e.g., individually, by joint tenancy, through a trust or custodial account, etc.) or in multiple accounts. Please vote the shares represented by each Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

Revoking Your Proxy

If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before the shares are voted by proxy during the meeting. A shareholder may revoke a proxy by delivering written notice to the Secretary at or prior to the Annual Meeting or by timely delivery to the Secretary of a subsequently dated proxy card or by submitting a later vote by Internet (instructions are on the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy card). In the case of multiple submissions regarding the same shares, the proxy with the latest date will be counted. The address for the Secretary is c/o Trustmark Corporation, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205.

If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record, your ability to revoke your proxy depends on the voting procedures of the bank, broker or other holder of record. Please follow the directions provided to you by your bank, broker or other holder of record.

Voting on Other Matters

The Board is not aware of any additional matters to be brought before the meeting. If other matters do come before the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy or their substitutes will vote the shares represented by such proxies in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Overview

Trustmark’s governance structure enables the Board to effectively and efficiently address key, specific issues such as business growth, human capital, enterprise risk management and technology, among others. This is accomplished through five standing Board committees and through the effective utilization of the directors’ combined wisdom and diverse experience and business knowledge.

 

The role of the Board and its committees is to foster Trustmark’s long-term success consistent with its fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders. As part of this role, Trustmark’s Board is responsible for:

 

●  Providing strategic guidance and oversight

  

●  Ensuring that management’s operations contribute to Trustmark’s financial soundness

   

●  Acting as a resource on strategic issues and in matters of planning and policy-making

  

●  Promoting social responsibility and ethical business conduct

   

●  Providing insight and guidance on complex business issues and problems in the banking and financial services industries

  

●  Ensuring that an effective system is in place to facilitate the selection, succession planning and compensation of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)

   

●  Monitoring risks facing Trustmark and providing oversight of Trustmark’s stress testing and other risk evaluation processes

  

●  Ensuring Trustmark’s compliance with all relevant legal and regulatory requirements

 

4


Table of Contents

Recent Developments

On January 1, 2021, Gerard R. Host became Executive Chairman of Trustmark and Trustmark National Bank (the Bank), and Duane A. Dewey succeeded Mr. Host as President and CEO of Trustmark and CEO of the Bank and continued as President of the Bank. Richard H. Puckett remains as Chairman of the Executive and Nominating Committees and Lead Director of the Board and the Board of Directors of the Bank (the Bank Board). On March 1, 2021, Louis E. Greer retired as Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Trustmark and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the Bank. Following Mr. Greer’s retirement, Thomas C. Owens succeeded Mr. Greer as Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Trustmark and CFO of the Bank. In addition, on March 1, 2021, George T. (Tom) Chambers, Jr. succeeded Mr. Greer as Principal Accounting Officer of Trustmark and became Chief Accounting Officer of the Bank, and Maria L. Sugay succeeded Mr. Owens as Bank Treasurer.

Key Features of Trustmark’s Corporate Governance

Trustmark’s governance structure has a number of key features that are designed to ensure effective and efficient oversight of the company, including the following:

 

   

Nine members of the Board are independent.

   

Directors are required to retire at the age of 70.

   

Directors are subject to Trustmark stock ownership requirements, as described under the heading “Director Compensation.”

   

The Board has adopted, and annually reviews, formal charters for the Board and its committees to address the governance guidelines and responsibilities of each.

   

Trustmark’s bylaws and Board Charter provide that when the Board Chairman is also the CEO, or otherwise is not independent, as is the case currently, the Chairman of the Executive Committee, who shall be an independent director, shall serve as Lead Director. See “Board Leadership” on page 6 for additional information.

   

Directors must notify Trustmark of changes in professional responsibilities and residence and are expected to comply with a directors’ attendance policy.

   

The Board has adopted codes of conduct/ethics for directors, senior financial officers and associates.

   

The Board has the authority to seek advice or counsel from external advisors as needed.

   

Trustmark has a CEO succession planning process to promote continuity of leadership and an orderly transition upon the CEO’s retirement or other termination of employment.

   

Independent directors meet without management present.

   

The Executive Committee of the Board reviews the corporate governance structure and annually evaluates each director’s performance against specific performance criteria designed to evaluate the director’s contributions to the Board’s deliberations and processes.

The Code of Conduct for Trustmark Directors, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers of Trustmark, Code of Ethics and Procedure to Report Violations of Law or Accounting or Audit Irregularities (Whistleblower Procedures) are available at investorrelations.trustmark.com or may be obtained, without charge, by written request addressed to the Secretary, Trustmark Corporation, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205. Trustmark intends to provide required disclosure of any amendment to or waiver of its codes of conduct/ethics that applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, at investorrelations.trustmark.com promptly following any such amendment or waiver. Trustmark may also elect to disclose any such amendment or waiver in a report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information contained on or connected to Trustmark’s website is not incorporated by reference in this proxy statement and should not be considered part of this or any other document that Trustmark files with the SEC.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board met eight times in 2020. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and Board committees of which the director was a member in 2020. The Board meets jointly with the Bank Board, and since 2017, all members of the Board have also served as members of the Bank Board.

 

5


Table of Contents

Director Attendance at the Annual Meeting

Directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders, and in 2020, all of our directors were present at the annual meeting.

Director Independence

The Board has determined that the following current directors and director nominees are “independent directors” (within the meaning of Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules):

 

  Adolphus B. Baker    Tracy T. Conerly    J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.   
  William A. Brown    Toni D. Cooley    Harris V. Morrissette   
  Augustus L. Collins    Marcelo Eduardo    Richard H. Puckett   

In conjunction with these independence determinations, the Board considered certain relationships, including through family members and business affiliates, that (i) Messrs. Brown and Puckett, General Collins, Dr. Hays, and Ms. Cooley have as customers of the Bank’s subsidiary, Fisher Brown Bottrell Insurance, Inc. (Fisher Brown Bottrell) and (ii) Messrs. Baker, Brown, Eduardo and Puckett, General Collins and Dr. Hays have as customers of the wealth management and trust services division of the Bank. The Board also noted that a number of directors, including through business affiliates, have customer relationships with the Bank in the form of routine deposit, credit card and/or loan products in the ordinary course. In each case, the Board concluded that the business relationship did not interfere with the individual’s ability to exercise independent judgment as a director of Trustmark.

Board Leadership

Under Trustmark’s governance guidelines, which are contained in the Board Charter, the Board has the responsibility to determine the most appropriate leadership structure for the company, including whether it is best for the company at a given point in time for the roles of Board Chairman and CEO to be separate or combined.

Trustmark maintained separate Board Chairman and CEO positions from 2011 until 2020. Following the retirement of the prior Board Chairman at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders, Trustmark combined the roles of Board Chairman and CEO in order to facilitate a smooth and seamless transition of both Board and executive leadership, consistent with Trustmark’s ongoing succession process. Mr. Host served as Board Chairman and CEO through December 31, 2020. During this period of transition, the Board determined that Trustmark would benefit from Mr. Host occupying both roles while leading the Board in its oversight function and consideration of broader corporate strategy. On January 1, 2021, Mr. Dewey succeeded Mr. Host as CEO of Trustmark and the Bank, with Mr. Host becoming Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank. In his role as Executive Chairman, Mr. Host focuses on issues involving board governance, corporate strategy, corporate development, investor relations, industry engagement and civic leadership. The Board believes Mr. Host’s long tenure provides him with valuable insights regarding Trustmark’s business, which enable him to offer strategic advice and guidance in his role as Executive Chairman.

Trustmark’s Board Charter and Bylaws provide that if the Board Chairman and CEO positions are occupied by the same individual or if the Board Chairman is otherwise not independent, an independent director shall serve as Chairman of the Executive Committee as well as the Board’s Lead Director. Accordingly, Mr. Puckett has served as the Chairman of the Executive Committee and Lead Director since the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders. The Lead Director’s responsibilities include (i) chairing meetings and executive sessions of the independent directors, Executive Committee and meetings on matters for which the Board Chairman recuses himself and other meetings in the Board Chairman’s absence, (ii) coordinating with the Board Chairman to develop Board meeting agendas and schedules, (iii) communicating with and advising the Board Chairman, (iv) referring to the appropriate Board committee any issue brought to his attention by shareholders, directors or others, (v) serving as the primary communicator between the independent directors and the CEO and (vi) providing an alternative communication channel for all directors, including non-executive directors. The Board believes an independent Lead Director serves an important function in providing independent leadership of the Board and strengthening the Board’s oversight of Trustmark’s business. The Board Charter is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Committees of the Board of Directors

There are five standing Board committees: Audit & Finance, Enterprise Risk, Executive, Human Resources and Nominating. All of these Board committees, other than the Nominating Committee, are joint committees of the Board and the Bank Board. The Audit & Finance, Human Resources and Nominating committees are comprised solely of independent directors and otherwise satisfy the requirements applicable to such committees under Nasdaq listing standards.

 

6


Table of Contents

Audit & Finance Committee

The Audit & Finance Committee meets regularly throughout the year including meeting with the external and internal auditors without management present. The Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

   

Sole responsibility for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the external auditor.

   

Assuring the objectivity and independence of the internal audit department and the external auditor.

   

Reviewing and concurring in the appointment, replacement, reassignment, performance or dismissal of the director of internal audit, who reports directly to the Committee.

   

Inquiring of management, the director of internal audit, and the external auditor about significant risks or exposures and assessing steps that management has taken to minimize such risks to Trustmark.

   

Considering and reviewing with the director of internal audit and the external auditor the adequacy of Trustmark’s internal controls.

   

General oversight of the preparation and review of Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis, critical accounting policies, interim financial statements, and other matters relating to financial reporting.

   

Reviewing Trustmark’s annual budget and monitoring its performance.

   

Oversight and review of the system for monitoring compliance with laws and regulations.

The role and responsibilities of the Audit & Finance Committee are described in greater detail in its Charter, which is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Enterprise Risk Committee

The Enterprise Risk Committee is responsible for monitoring risks that are being taken by Trustmark. The Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

   

Understanding and analyzing the enterprise-wide effect of those risks.

   

Reporting on risks to the Board.

   

Monitoring capital stress testing results and comparison to risk appetite and other risk evaluation processes.

   

Receiving reports from other committees of the Board and Bank Board about risks that are under the committees’ specific purview.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board if a matter requires Board action before a meeting of the Board can be held. The Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

   

Providing guidance to management on the strategic planning process and issues of strategic importance, including business growth and expansion, material transactions and technology.

   

Oversight of Trustmark’s capital planning process.

   

Oversight of Trustmark’s capital stress testing activities.

   

Reviewing the corporate governance structure.

   

Evaluating, annually, each director’s performance against specific performance criteria designed to evaluate the director’s contributions to the Board’s deliberations and processes.

   

Reviewing Trustmark’s cybersecurity activities and corporate technology strategy.

Human Resources Committee

The Human Resources Committee is responsible for overseeing the development of a program to compensate Trustmark’s management in accordance with Trustmark’s compensation philosophy and objectives. The Committee also ensures that appropriate policies and practices are in place to facilitate the development of management talent and orderly CEO succession. In fulfilling its role, the Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

   

Approving management-developed guidelines that shape Trustmark’s compensation strategy and approach.

   

Recommending the skills and experience required of a CEO candidate, subject to final approval by the Board.

   

Recommending the CEO’s compensation and performance evaluation procedures, for final approval by the Board.

   

Recommending compensation for officers who are members of the Executive Strategy Committee and officers of Trustmark, for final approval by the Bank Board and the Board, as applicable.

   

Recommending awards under Trustmark’s equity compensation plans, for final approval by the Board, subject to limited discretion by the CEO for specified awards.

   

Recommending compensation for directors.

   

Reviewing and approving Trustmark’s compensation disclosures.

   

Overseeing the review of Trustmark’s compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk management.

All members of the Committee during 2020 and currently are “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), “outside directors” within the meaning of

 

7


Table of Contents

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and “independent directors” within the meaning of Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq listing rules. The Human Resources Committee Charter is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee is charged with assisting the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become Board members. In fulfilling its role, the Committee’s responsibilities include:

 

   

Seeking, interviewing and recommending individuals for Board service.

   

Identifying qualified individuals for membership on committees of the Board.

   

Providing periodic presentations to Trustmark’s Board.

The Nominating Committee Charter is posted at investorrelations.trustmark.com.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

Trustmark believes that its governance and leadership structures allow the Board to provide effective risk oversight. In addition to the reports from the Enterprise Risk Committee, Trustmark’s directors receive and discuss regular reports prepared by Trustmark’s senior management, including the CFO and the Chief Risk Officer. Through these reports, Trustmark’s directors receive information on areas of material risk to the company, including credit, liquidity, market/interest rate, compliance, operational, technology, strategic, financial and reputational risks. These reports enable Trustmark’s directors to understand the risk identification, risk management and risk mitigation strategies employed by Trustmark’s management and the Enterprise Risk Committee. Since the first quarter of 2020, Trustmark’s directors have been receiving regular updates and reports from Trustmark’s senior management regarding various risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including credit, liquidity, market/interest rate, and operational risk.

The Board and the Enterprise Risk Committee will request supplemental reports from Trustmark’s management with regard to risk management and risk mitigation strategies as appropriate. This reporting and governance structure ensures that information from the Enterprise Risk Committee, the other committees of the Board and the Bank Board, and management is analyzed and reported to the Board, and enables the Board and its committees to coordinate the risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships.

As part of its overall oversight of risk management, the Board provides oversight of management’s efforts to address cybersecurity risk by receiving periodic reports at meetings of the Enterprise Risk Committee, Audit & Finance Committee and Executive Committee, as well as presentations at the Board level. These reports to the Board and its Committees address the threat environment, vulnerability assessments, specific cyber incidents and management’s efforts to monitor, detect and prevent cyber threats.

Committee Membership

The following table shows, for 2020, the membership of each committee and the number of meetings held by each committee during the year:

 

  Director       Audit & Finance           Enterprise Risk               Executive                   Human Resources                   Nominating        

Adolphus B. Baker

      X   Chair   X

William A. Brown

  X   X      

Augustus L. Collins (1)

  X   X      

James N. Compton (2)

  X   X      

Tracy T. Conerly

  Chair     X     X

Toni D. Cooley

    Chair   X     X

Marcelo Eduardo (3)

  X        

J. Clay Hays Jr., M.D.(4)

    X     X  

Gerard R. Host

      X    

Harris V. Morrissette

  X       X  

Richard H. Puckett (5)

      Chairman/Lead Director   X   Chair

R. Michael Summerford (6)

      X   X   X

Harry M. Walker

      X    

LeRoy G. Walker, Jr. (7)

  X        

William G. Yates III

      X            

2020 Meetings

  5   4   6   6   3
  (1)

General Collins has served on the Audit & Finance Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee since April 28, 2020.

  (2)

Mr. Compton retired from the Board on April 28, 2020. Prior to his retirement, he served as a member of the Audit & Finance Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee.

  (3)

Mr. Eduardo has served on the Audit & Finance Committee since April 28, 2020.

 

8


Table of Contents
  (4)

Dr. Hays has served on the Human Resources Committee since April 28, 2020.

  (5)

Mr. Puckett has served as Lead Director of the Board, Chairman of the Executive Committee and Chair of the Nominating Committee since April 28, 2020.

  (6)

Mr. Summerford retired from the Board on April 28, 2020. Prior to his retirement, he served as Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Executive Committee, Chair of the Nominating Committee and as a member of the Human Resources Committee.

  (7)

Mr. L. Walker retired from the Board on April 28, 2020. Prior to his retirement, he served as a member of the Audit & Finance Committee.

Communications with Directors

Shareholders desiring to contact Trustmark’s Board may do so by sending written correspondence to Board of Directors, Trustmark Corporation, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205 or by email addressed to boardofdirectors@trustmark.com. Communications will be referred to the Chairman of the Executive Committee, who will determine the appropriate committee to receive the communication and take any action deemed necessary by that committee.

Pursuant to Trustmark’s Whistleblower Procedures, any violations of law or complaints or concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters should be reported to (i) Trustmark’s independent online reporting center at www.reportlineweb.com/trustmark, (ii) Trustmark’s independent hotline at 1-866-979-3769, or (iii) Trustmark’s Ethics Committee Chair at 601-208-6867. Complaints will be investigated by Trustmark’s General Counsel and Director of Audit and reported to the Audit & Finance Committee.

Nomination of Directors

Nominations for election to the Board may be made by or on behalf of the Board or by any shareholder of any outstanding class of capital stock of Trustmark entitled to vote in the election of directors at an annual meeting.

Nominations other than those made by or on behalf of the Board must be made in accordance with procedures set forth in Trustmark’s bylaws. These procedures require that such nominations be in writing and that they be delivered or mailed to Trustmark’s Chairman and received (a) not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the mailing date of Trustmark’s proxy statement in connection with the last annual meeting of shareholders, or (b) if no annual meeting was held in the prior year or the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the prior year’s annual meeting, not less than 90 days before the date of the annual meeting. The bylaws also require that such notification contain the following information to the extent known to the notifying shareholder: (a) the name and address of each proposed nominee, (b) the principal occupation of each proposed nominee, (c) the total number of shares of capital stock of Trustmark that will be voted for each proposed nominee, (d) the name and residence address of the notifying shareholder, (e) the number of shares of capital stock of Trustmark owned by the notifying shareholder, (f) such other information regarding such proposed nominee as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC had the proposed nominee been nominated by the Board, (g) a representation that the notifying shareholder is the owner of shares entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the proposed nominee, and (h) the written consent of each proposed nominee to serve as a director of Trustmark if so elected.

Nominations not made in accordance with the above bylaw procedure may be disregarded by the Chairman of the annual meeting at his discretion, and upon his instruction, all votes cast for each such nominee may be disregarded.

Trustmark’s bylaws permit direct nominations by shareholders. Therefore, the Nominating Committee does not have a policy for considering nominations by shareholders other than through the bylaw process outlined above. However, if a shareholder wishes to recommend an individual for Board service, rather than directly nominate the individual as set forth above, the shareholder may submit the individual’s name to the Nominating Committee in writing addressed to Trustmark Corporation Nominating Committee, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205 or by email to boardofdirectors@trustmark.com. In order to give the Nominating Committee adequate time to consider any such individual for nomination as a director at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, such recommendations should be delivered no later than October 1, 2021. In considering an individual recommended by a shareholder but not directly nominated, the Nominating Committee will use the same guidelines as set forth in the Director Qualifications section below.

When identifying potential candidates for director nominees, the Nominating Committee may solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management or others.

Corporate Social Responsibility

Trustmark is committed to fulfilling its responsibilities to its associates, customers, communities and shareholders. Trustmark believes building strong customer relationships is the result of knowing its customers and supporting its communities. Robust community engagement, volunteerism, and philanthropy are some of the ways in which Trustmark continues to serve its communities. Trustmark is also committed to diversity and social inclusion throughout the organization and supports practices that encourage environmental sustainability. In furtherance of these commitments, Trustmark appointed a Director of Corporate Social Responsibility in 2020 to advance its efforts.

In 2020, Trustmark invested $5.3 million in the form of contributions and sponsorships to local organizations, including $1.5 million given to Mississippi youth and family-based charities providing services and programs for the welfare and development of children as part of Trustmark’s commitment under the Mississippi Children’s Promise

 

9


Table of Contents

Act. In response to community needs that surfaced because of the COVID-19 pandemic, Trustmark contributed more than $400,000 to support local food pantries throughout its service areas. Additional contributions included funds for school supplies and computer headsets to support virtual learning.

Trustmark continued to focus on financial literacy, partnering with EVERFI, Inc. to provide online financial literacy courses in approximately 100 schools, educating 9,500 students on financial matters through Trustmark’s Financial Scholars Program. During the year, Trustmark expanded its relationship with EVERFI to utilize the Engage platform, which will allow Trustmark associates to conduct community-based financial literacy sessions, both in-person and virtually.

Trustmark also partnered with Operation HOPE, Inc., a national non-profit organization, to provide financial literacy and counseling support to individuals within the Memphis, Tennessee market. This partnership, called HOPE Inside, provides over 5,000 City of Memphis employees with opportunities to receive financial tools and education to strengthen their financial security. Trustmark committed $200,000 to the two-year partnership, providing a dedicated financial wellness coach to conduct financial literacy seminars, individualized counseling sessions and referrals to disaster relief services. In 2020, more than 1,200 services were provided through this partnership. In recognition of the anticipated long-term impact of the program, Trustmark developed plans to replicate the partnership with Operation HOPE and city governments in the Montgomery, Alabama and Jackson, Mississippi markets in 2021.

Trustmark’s commitment to building and supporting resilient communities includes revitalizing and strengthening underserved communities. Its investments in low-to-moderate income areas included more than $211 million in home mortgage loans and $139 million in small business loans and small farm loans in 2020 and approximately $85 million in community development loans. Also in 2020, Trustmark provided low-to-moderate income borrowers more than $436 million in home mortgage loans. The company’s collaborative work with community service providers, developers, realtors, housing advocates and others resulted in more than $16 million in investments that provide affordable housing, employment and community services for those with low-to-moderate incomes. Trustmark also enhanced its mortgage product offerings during the year to meet the special credit needs of low-to-moderate income individuals and communities.

During 2020, Trustmark promoted environmental sustainability with the sponsorship of numerous community shredding events to encourage recycling initiatives. Additionally, an LED light conversion project was continued across the organization to increase energy efficiency.

Collectively, these efforts reflect Trustmark’s core values of Integrity, Service, Accountability, Relationships and Solutions and its commitment to strengthen the communities it serves.

Director Qualifications

The Board believes that in order to appropriately carry out its roles, directors must demonstrate a variety of personal traits, leadership qualities and individual competencies. In considering nominees submitted by the Board or management and any recommendations submitted by shareholders, the Nominating Committee will use these personal traits, leadership qualities and individual competencies to assess future director nominees’ suitability for Board service. The Nominating Committee also evaluates each director nominee’s qualities in the context of how that nominee would relate to the Board as a whole, in light of the Board’s current composition and Trustmark’s evolving needs.

Although Trustmark has no formal policy regarding diversity, the Nominating Committee believes that the Board should include directors with diverse skills, experience and business knowledge, and whose backgrounds, ages, geographical representation and community involvement contribute to an overall diversity of perspective that enhances the quality of the Board’s deliberations and decisions. The Nominating Committee may consider these factors as it deems appropriate in connection with the general qualifications of each director nominee.

Personal Traits

Board service is an extremely important, high profile role and carries with it significant responsibility. For that reason, it is important that all directors possess a certain set of personal traits, including:

 

●   Personal and Professional Integrity

 

●   High Performance Standards

●   Accountability

 

●   Initiative/Responsiveness

●   Informed Business Judgment

 

●   Business Credibility

●   Mature Confidence

 

Leadership Qualities

For individuals considered for Board leadership roles, the following skill sets are required:

 

●   Communication Skills

 

●   Facilitation Skills

●   Crisis Management Skills

 

●   Relationship Building/Networking Skills

 

10


Table of Contents

Individual Competencies

There are certain competencies that must be represented collectively by the directors on each Board committee, but each individual director need not necessarily possess all of them. The specific competencies vary by committee, as illustrated in the chart below:

 

Individual Director Competencies   

 

Board Committees

  

    Audit &    

Finance

 

  

    Enterprise    

Risk

      Executive      

Human

    Resources    

      Nominating    

1. Financial Acumen

           

Accounting and finance knowledge

            
           

Financial statement analysis

                  
           

Knowledge of capital markets

            
           

Financial planning

                

Ability to communicate financial concepts in lay terms

                

2. Organizational Effectiveness

           

Talent management

                  
           

Understanding of compensation issues

            
           

Ability to discern candidate qualifications

                

3. Strategic Direction

           

Vision

                
           

Strategic perspective

          
           

Technology knowledge

                  
           

Industry knowledge

          

4. Risk Management Experience

           

Experience managing risk exposures

                  

Specific Director Experience, Qualifications, Attributes and Skills

The Board believes that each person nominated for election at the Annual Meeting possesses the personal traits described above and that each director nominee who has served in a position of Board leadership also demonstrates the additional leadership qualities described above. In considering the director nominees’ individual competencies, the Board believes that the appropriate competencies are represented for the Board as a whole and for each of the Board’s committees. In addition, each nominee possesses characteristics that led the Board to conclude that such person should serve as a director. The specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that the Board believes each nominee possesses are discussed under Proposal 1 in the table entitled “The Nominees,” beginning on page 12.

 

11


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

The Board has fixed the number of directors for the coming year at 12. The nominees listed herein have been proposed by the Board for election at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Walker will retire at the Annual Meeting. Shares represented by valid proxies will, unless authority to vote is withheld, be voted in favor of the proposed slate of 12 nominees. Directors must receive a majority of the votes cast in order to be elected (that is, the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of shares voted “against” that director). If a nominee who is an incumbent director is not elected to the Board, and no successor is elected, such nominee must tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Nominating Committee will then make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether to take other action. The director who tenders his or her resignation may not participate in the recommendation of the Nominating Committee or the decision of the Board with respect to his or her resignation. Each director is elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until a successor is elected and qualified.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “for” the proposed nominees.

The Nominees

 

 

 

LOGO  

 

  Adolphus B. Baker, 64

 

   Director of Trustmark since 2007

  (Independent Director)

 

  Trustmark Corporation Committees:         

 

●   Executive

 

●   Human Resources (Chair)

 

●   Nominating

  

 

Career Highlights:

 

●   Chairman and CEO, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

(Producer and Distributor of Shell Eggs)

 

Other Public Company Boards:

 

●   Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Baker is chairman and chief executive officer of a publicly-traded company that is the largest producer and distributor of shell eggs in the United States. His position has provided him with significant business leadership skills and experience in evaluating strategic alternatives that focus on maximizing shareholder value. Mr. Baker’s years of service as a director of the Bank, and particularly as the former chairman of the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee, provide him with an intrinsic understanding of Trustmark’s strategy for managing liquidity, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function.

 

 

LOGO   

 

         William A. Brown, 63

 

         Director of Trustmark since 2017

         (Independent Director)

 

         Trustmark Corporation Committees:

 

●   Audit & Finance

 

●   Enterprise Risk

 

 

Career Highlights:

 

●   President and CEO, Brown Bottling Group, Inc.

(Beverage Distributor)

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Brown serves as president and chief executive officer of a regional beverage distributor based in Mississippi. He serves on the Boards of the Pepsi Cola Bottlers Association and Wis-Pak/WP Beverages as well as trade associations, including the Mississippi Beverage Association. His extensive experience in this industry has provided him with significant marketing and business leadership skills as well as in-depth understanding of the business climate and customer base in significant Trustmark markets. Mr. Brown has also served on the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee, providing him with an understanding of Trustmark’s credit culture and philosophy, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function.

 

12


Table of Contents

 

 

 

LOGO  

 

   Augustus L. Collins, 63

 

   Director of Trustmark since 2020

   (Independent Director)

 

   Trustmark Corporation Committees:        

 

●   Audit & Finance

 

●   Enterprise Risk

  

 

Career Highlights:

 

●   CEO, MINACT Inc.

(Job Training, Development and Management)

 

Other Public Company Boards:

 

●   Huntington Ingalls Industries

Experience and qualifications: General Collins has served as the CEO of MINACT Inc., a job training, development and management company, since 2016. He retired with the rank of Major General in the Mississippi National Guard, having served as Adjutant General of both the Mississippi Army National Guard and the Mississippi Air National Guard from 2012 to 2016. His 35 years of combined military service in the U.S. Army and the Mississippi National Guard included the command of the 155th Brigade Combat Team in Iraq, where he was responsible for security operations in the southern and western provinces. He was previously appointed by the Governor to the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission where he served as the commission’s representative of labor. General Collins’ years of service and leadership provide him with valuable experience in strategic and financial planning as well as human resources.

 

 

LOGO  

 

   Tracy T. Conerly, 56

 

   Director of Trustmark since 2015

   (Independent Director)

 

   Trustmark Corporation Committees:

 

●   Audit & Finance (Chair)

 

●   Executive

 

●   Nominating

  

 

Career Highlights:        

 

●   Partner Emeritus, Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC

(Accounting)

Experience and qualifications: Mrs. Conerly is a certified public accountant and a certified valuation analyst. Her experience as a former partner at a large certified public accounting firm and former director of a publicly traded financial institution, which was acquired by Trustmark in 2013, has provided her with significant financial and accounting expertise, particularly in the areas of auditing, business valuation and tax, and qualifies her for service as one of the Board’s audit committee financial experts. Mrs. Conerly’s years of service as a director of a publicly traded financial institution provide her with valuable experience in financial institution governance and an understanding of markets that are a strategic focus for Trustmark. Mrs. Conerly also serves on the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee, providing her with an understanding of Trustmark’s balance sheet strategy, which is a skill essential to the Board’s risk oversight function. She is a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

 

 

 

13


Table of Contents

 

 

LOGO  

   Toni D. Cooley, 60

   Director of Trustmark since 2013

   (Independent Director)

 

   Trustmark Corporation Committees:

 

●   Enterprise Risk (Chair)

 

●   Executive

 

●   Nominating

  

        Career Highlights:

●  CEO, Systems Electro Coating

(Provider of Electrocoating and Related Services to Original Equipment Manufacturers)

 

        Other Public Company Boards:

●  Sanderson Farms, Inc.

 

Experience and qualifications: Ms. Cooley is the chief executive officer of the Systems Group of Companies, which includes Systems Electro Coating, a Tier One supplier to Nissan, and Systems Automotive Interiors, a Tier One supplier to Toyota. She holds a Juris Doctor degree and is a director for another publicly-traded company as well as several nonpublic organizations. She was appointed a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, New Orleans Branch, in 2019. In addition, Ms. Cooley has served on the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee, which has given her a solid understanding of Trustmark’s core business and conservative values. Her leadership experience and business knowledge, with expertise in fields ranging from law to operations and technology, equip Ms. Cooley with the ability to contribute invaluable insight and broad perspective to Board discussions.

 

 

 

LOGO  

   Duane A. Dewey, 62

 

 

   Director of Trustmark since 2020

 

   Trustmark Corporation Committees:

 

●   Executive

  

        Career Highlights:

 

●   President and Chief Executive Officer, Trustmark Corporation

 

●   President and Chief Executive Officer, Trustmark National Bank

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Dewey became president and chief executive officer of Trustmark and the Bank on January 1, 2021. He was formerly president and chief operating officer of the Bank from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. He served as chief operating officer of the Bank from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, and as President of Corporate Banking from 2008 to 2018. Mr. Dewey, with 18 years of experience at Trustmark and 36 years in the financial services industry, has worked in diverse geographic markets and in numerous lines of banking businesses. His executive management responsibilities in retail and institutional banking, mortgage, wealth management and insurance services enable him to provide valuable operational, strategic and financial perspectives to the Board.

 

 

 

LOGO  

   Marcelo Eduardo, 58

 

   Director of Trustmark since 2020

   (Independent Director)

 

   Trustmark Corporation Committees:

●   Audit & Finance

  

        Career Highlights:

 

●   Dean, School of Business, Mississippi College

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Eduardo has served as the Dean of the School of Business at a private college in Mississippi since 2003. He holds Ph.D. (Finance) and MBA degrees and serves as the Anderson Distinguished Professor of Finance at Mississippi College. Mr. Eduardo, an accomplished academic, has authored numerous articles on a variety of topics, including investment management, compliance, capital management and the pricing of retail banking services, which have been published in national and international journals. His expertise in banking and corporate finance, combined with his proven marketing and leadership skills, will provide valuable marketing, strategic and financial perspectives to the Board. Mr. Eduardo also serves on the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee.

 

 

 

14


Table of Contents

 

 

LOGO   

 

 J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D., 55

 

 Director of Trustmark since 2017

 (Independent Director)

 

 Trustmark Corporation Committees:

 

●   Enterprise Risk

●   Human Resources

  

 

        Career Highlights:

 

●   Cardiologist, Partner, President, Jackson Heart Clinic, PA

 

Experience and qualifications: Dr. Hays is president of Jackson Heart Clinic, PA, one of the largest cardiology groups in Mississippi. He serves as chairman of the Mississippi Healthcare Solutions Institute and as director and secretary of the Medical Assurance Company of Mississippi, a statewide medical malpractice insurer. He is also a director and immediate past president of the Mississippi State Medical Association. With extensive experience in the medical industry, Dr. Hays is uniquely positioned to advise Trustmark on the healthcare industry. Dr. Hays also serves on the Bank Board’s Asset/Liability Committee.

 

 

 

LOGO  

 

 Gerard R. Host, 66

 Director of Trustmark since 2010

 Chairman of Trustmark Board from

 April 2020 to December 2020

 Executive Chairman of Trustmark Board

 since January 2021

 

 Trustmark Corporation Committees:

●   Executive

  

 

        Career Highlights:

 

●   Executive Chairman, Trustmark Corporation and Trustmark National Bank

 

●   Former President and CEO, Trustmark Corporation

 

●   Former President and CEO, Trustmark National Bank

 

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Host became Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank on January 1, 2021. Mr. Host served as president and chief executive officer of Trustmark and chief executive officer of the Bank from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2020, and served as president of the Bank from 2011 to December 31, 2019. He also served as a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta from 2012 until the end of his second term on December 31, 2018. Throughout his 37-year tenure with Trustmark, Mr. Host has served in a variety of executive management capacities, including chief financial officer, chief investment officer and president of various divisions. Mr. Host’s in-depth knowledge of Trustmark’s operations and of the financial services industry enables him to provide both historical and strategic perspectives in Board discussions regarding corporate strategy and governance matters. Mr. Host will continue to serve as Executive Chairman of the Trustmark Board following the Annual Meeting.

 

 

 

LOGO  

 Harris V. Morrissette, 61

 

 Director of Trustmark since 2016

 (Independent Director)

 

 Trustmark Corporation Committees:

 

●   Audit & Finance

 

●   Human Resources

  

        Career Highlights:

 

●   President, China Doll Rice & Beans, Inc.

 

●   Former President and CEO,
Marshall Biscuit Company, Inc.

 

        Other Directorships:

 

●   Williamsburg Investment Trust

 

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Morrissette serves as the president of a regional packaged food and food services company based in Alabama. His prior years of service as a director of a publicly-traded financial institution provide him with valuable experience in financial institution governance and an understanding of markets that are a strategic focus for Trustmark. In addition, Mr. Morrissette’s background and business acumen provide him with the skills necessary to contribute invaluable insight and broad perspectives to Board discussions and qualify him for service as one of the Board’s audit committee financial experts. He also serves on the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee.

 

 

 

15


Table of Contents

 

 

LOGO  

 Richard H. Puckett, 66

 

 Director of Trustmark since 1995

 Lead Director of Trustmark since 2020

 (Independent Director)

 

 Trustmark Corporation Committees:

 

●   Executive (Chairman)

 

●   Human Resources

 

●   Nominating (Chair)

  

        Career Highlights:

 

●   Chairman and CEO, Puckett Machinery Company

(Distributor of Heavy Earth Moving Equipment and Engine Power Systems)

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Puckett is the chairman and chief executive officer of a heavy equipment distribution and rental company with facilities located in Mississippi and eastern Louisiana that provide heavy equipment, engine power solutions and related supplies to a variety of industries. Mr. Puckett brings marketing and business leadership skills to the Board, as well as an in-depth understanding of the business climate and customer base in Trustmark’s major legacy markets. His experience and Board tenure provide valuable perspective to his service as Chair of the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee.

 

 

 

LOGO  

 William G. Yates III, 48

 

 Director of Trustmark since 2009

 

 Trustmark Corporation Committees:

 

●   Enterprise Risk

  

        Career Highlights:

 

●   President and CEO, W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company

 

Experience and qualifications: Mr. Yates is the president and chief executive officer of a commercial construction company with operating divisions located throughout the Southeast, many of which are within markets served by Trustmark. Mr. Yates’ knowledge of these markets, as well as his leadership experience in the various aspects of the construction industry, including employee relations matters, contract negotiations and risk management, provide the Board with an important resource for assessing and managing risks and planning for corporate strategy. He is also a member of the Bank Board’s Credit Policy Committee. In January 2021, Mr. Yates was appointed a director of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, New Orleans Branch. In addition, he serves as a director and is former chairman of the Mississippi Economic Counsel.

 

 

 

16


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Guiding Philosophy. The guiding philosophy of the Human Resources Committee of the Board (the Committee) is to attract and retain highly qualified executives and to motivate them to maximize shareholder value while managing risk appropriately and maintaining the safety and soundness of the organization. The Committee believes that executive compensation should be linked to Trustmark’s performance and significantly aligned with both the short-term and long-term interests of Trustmark’s shareholders. The Committee also believes that executive compensation should be designed to allow Trustmark to recruit, retain and motivate employees who play a significant role in the organization’s current and future success. Further, compensation policies and practices should be designed to help develop management talent, promote teamwork among, and high morale with, executive management, establish effective corporate governance, and set compensation at competitive levels.

Trustmark’s compensation policies reflect the Committee’s guiding philosophy, as shown below:

 

  What we do:

    Substantial portion of executive pay based on performance against goals set by the Board

 

    Stock ownership requirements for executive officers

 

    Independent compensation consultant regularly advises the Committee

 

    Minimum vesting periods of not less than three years for equity awards, with three-year cliff vesting of time-based awards

 

    Clawback provisions that permit Trustmark to recover incentive-based compensation under certain circumstances

 

    Use of peer company data to help set executive compensation

 

    Annual advisory votes on executive compensation

 

    Oversight of compensation by the Human Resources Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors

  What we don’t do:

    No automatic or guaranteed annual salary increases

 

    No guaranteed bonuses or guaranteed long-term incentive awards

 

    No tax gross-ups for executive officers

 

    No “single-trigger” change in control severance payments

 

    No hedging of Trustmark stock

 

    No excessive perquisites
 

 

Key Elements of Compensation. The following table summarizes key elements of Trustmark’s executive compensation program and the primary objectives each element supports. The Committee believes these elements are standard compensation components for named executive officers (NEOs) at Trustmark’s peer companies:

 

Key Elements         Objectives

Base salary

     

Attract and retain highly qualified executives

     

Reward prior performance, industry and job specific knowledge, experience and leadership ability

 

Annual cash bonuses

     

Reward achievement of annual corporate goals and, where applicable, line-of-business goals

 

Performance-based restricted stock

     

Reward achievement of long-term objectives

     

Create a direct link between management’s performance and shareholder value

 

Time-based restricted stock

     

Align shareholder and management interests

     

Retain key executives

     

Supports achievement of stock ownership goals

 

 

17


Table of Contents

Alignment Between Pay and Performance. Trustmark is committed to aligning the compensation of its executive officers with Trustmark’s financial and operational performance. The Committee believes that its current executive compensation program is helping to achieve these goals by aligning compensation with Trustmark’s performance. Key financial and core operating results for 2020 included the following:

 

   

record net income totaled $160.0 million, up 6.4% from prior year,

   

diluted earnings per share totaled $2.51, up 8.2% from prior year,

   

quarterly dividends of $0.23 per share, or $0.92 per share annually,

   

return on average tangible equity of 12.58%, up from 12.45% in prior year,

   

loans held for investment increased $488.9 million, or 5.2%, to $9.8 billion from prior year,

   

mortgage loan production reached record level of $3.0 billion, up 69.4% from prior year,

   

deposits increased $2.8 billion, or 24.9%, to $14.0 billion from prior year,

   

total risk-based capital ratio of 14.12% at year-end 2020, up from 13.25% at end of prior year, and

   

supported local communities with loan originations totaling $970.0 million through SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program.

Return on average tangible equity is a non-GAAP financial measure, but does not have a comparable GAAP financial measure. Return on average tangible equity is calculated using net income adjusted for intangible amortization divided by total average tangible common equity (total shareholders’ equity less goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets).

The Committee uses both annual cash bonuses and equity awards to link executive pay with Trustmark’s performance. Payouts under the annual management incentive plan are based on Trustmark’s achievement of key corporate, strategic and line of business performance goals. A minimum achievement of the threshold is required to earn the minimum annual cash bonus, and Trustmark performance that exceeds the target results in higher bonus awards. In 2020, Trustmark’s performance resulted in average payouts for the NEOs under the annual management incentive plan of 172% of target, out of a maximum potential payout of 200%. In recent years, cash bonuses under the annual management incentive plan have averaged approximately 35% of the CEO’s and 26% of the other NEOs’ total annual compensation.

Total equity awards granted in 2020 represent approximately 28% for the CEO’s, and 20% for the other NEOs’, total annual compensation. Performance-based equity awards granted in 2020, which represented approximately 14% (for the CEO) and 10% (for the other NEOs) of each NEO’s total annual compensation, will be earned based on Trustmark’s achievement of return on average tangible equity (ROATE), compared to an absolute target level, and total shareholder return (TSR), which includes dividends, compared to Trustmark’s peer group, in each case over a three-year performance period. The performance-based equity awards granted in 2018 were earned based on Trustmark’s achievement of ROATE compared to an absolute target level and TSR, which includes dividends, compared to Trustmark’s peer group, in each case over a three-year performance period. Trustmark’s performance over the three years ended December 31, 2020, resulted in vesting of the performance-based restricted stock awards granted in 2018 at a 93.5% performance-level, out of a maximum potential vesting of 200%. For the same three-year period, Trustmark achieved 103.10% of absolute target level for ROATE and ranked in the 42nd percentile for TSR among the 19 peer companies utilized in Trustmark’s 2018 performance-based restricted stock awards.

Time-based equity awards, which in 2020 represented approximately 14% of total annual compensation (for the CEO) and 10% (for the other NEOs), further encourage a focus on long-term growth and financial success by aligning the interests of management and Trustmark’s shareholders.

As a result of the structure of Trustmark’s annual management incentive plan and its performance-based equity awards, the Committee believes that compensation paid to its NEOs is effectively aligned with Trustmark’s performance. Average payouts of annual cash bonuses under the management incentive plan of 123.7% of the target amount for each of the NEOs for the past three years relates directly to Trustmark’s achievement with respect to corporate and line of business budget targets for those years. Vesting of the performance -based equity awards of 93.5%, 73% and 78% for the three years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, reflects how the amount of this incentive compensation earned depends on Trustmark’s performance, including compared to its peer companies.

2020 Say on Pay Vote. In 2020, the advisory shareholder vote on Trustmark’s executive compensation received approval of over 98.5% of the votes cast on the proposal. In light of such strong support, during the remainder of 2020 and in 2021, the Committee has continued to apply the same compensation philosophy that was described in the 2020 proxy statement in determining amounts and types of executive compensation.

Board and Committee Process. In considering appropriate levels of compensation for executives, the Committee takes into account Trustmark’s performance and individual performance and experience, as well as peer and broader financial services industry comparisons (referred to as market data) and company affordability analysis. When deemed appropriate, the Committee will request that its independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (Pearl Meyer), provide it with survey data of executive compensation for financial services companies that are comparable to Trustmark, generally based on line of business and asset size. The Committee does not request such

 

18


Table of Contents

market data from Pearl Meyer every year, and in years when such data is not requested, Trustmark will apply customary aging methods to estimate appropriate updates to salary data.

The Chair of the Committee works with the CEO and the Human Resources department to establish the agenda for Committee meetings. The CEO and Human Resources department also interface with the Committee in connection with the Committee’s executive compensation decision-making, providing comparative market data as well as making recommendations. The Committee periodically meets with the CEO and members of the Human Resources department to assess progress toward meeting objectives set by the Board for both annual and long-term compensation. The Committee also meets in executive session without management present when appropriate.

The Committee reviews all of the components of compensation in making determinations on the mix, amount and form of executive compensation. In making compensation decisions, the Committee seeks to promote teamwork among, and high morale within, executive management, including the NEOs. While the Committee does not use any quantitative formula or multiple for comparing or establishing compensation for executive management, it is mindful of internal pay equity considerations and assesses the relationship of the compensation of each executive to other members of executive management.

Role of the Compensation Consultant. The Committee relies on Pearl Meyer to provide information, analyses and advice to aid in the determination of competitive executive and non-employee director pay consistent with Trustmark’s compensation philosophy, and periodically engages Pearl Meyer to test Trustmark’s pay-for-performance alignment. The Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer pursuant to SEC and Nasdaq rules and has concluded that the advice it receives from Pearl Meyer is objective and not influenced by other relationships that could be viewed as conflicts of interest.

With respect to Trustmark’s compensation program for executives and non-employee directors for 2020, Pearl Meyer’s services for the Committee included:

 

   

providing market data regarding executive compensation in the banking and financial services industry,

   

providing recommendations regarding compensation for newly appointed executive officers and certain changes in executive compensation,

   

providing recommendations regarding director compensation,

   

providing recommendations regarding equity vesting practices impacting directors and executives,

   

providing recommendations regarding changes to director and executive stock ownership guidelines,

   

providing input on leadership succession planning for 2020 and 2021,

   

providing recommendations regarding the composition of Trustmark’s peer group, and

   

reviewing drafts of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Benchmarking. When determining the amount and form of compensation for executives, the Committee considers comparative executive compensation information provided by Pearl Meyer that is derived from two primary data sources: peer group data and market data from the banking and financial services industry. The Committee uses peer group data primarily to establish performance goals for long-term incentive awards to assist in the evaluation of its pay-for-performance alignment. The Committee also uses the peer group data and, as applicable, market survey data, to assist with assessing Trustmark’s compensation competitiveness. Recognizing that comparative pay assessments have inherent limitations, due to the lack of precise comparability of executive positions between companies, as well as the companies themselves, the comparative data are used only as a guide and the Committee does not fix any NEO’s compensation (or individual compensation elements) to a particular compensation level within this comparative data. In exercising its judgment to set pay levels, the Committee looks beyond the comparative data and also considers individual job responsibilities, individual performance, experience, compensation history (both at Trustmark and at prior employers in the case of newly hired associates), company performance and company goals.

Peer Group Data. The peer group data is gathered by Pearl Meyer from the proxy statements of a peer group of financial institutions in the United States. The peer group consists of a minimum of 15 financial institutions and is updated annually by the Committee, based on a process that includes recommendations from internal sources, including the Human Resources department, and external sources such as Pearl Meyer, to reflect the companies against which Trustmark competes for executive talent or for shareholder investment. The specific characteristics of the financial institutions comprising the peer group vary from year to year, but the companies are chosen based on a combination of various factors that include asset size and business mix. Additionally, the peer group is limited to financial institutions with at least $10 billion in total consolidated assets, as the Dodd-Frank Act and its implementing regulations impose various additional regulatory and operational requirements on bank holding companies with $10 billion or more in total consolidated assets.

As of December 31, 2019, Trustmark’s peer group consisted of 19 peer companies all of which had assets within a range of approximately 93% to 238% of Trustmark’s asset size, which the Committee considers an appropriate range for comparison purposes. The specific asset sizes for the peer companies listed in the report presented to the Committee in February 2020 ranged from approximately $12.6 billion to $32.2 billion, and the market capitalizations ranged from approximately $1.9 billion to $7.7 billion. Although Trustmark’s market capitalization and asset size were both substantially below the median for this peer group, the Committee felt it appropriate to limit the peer group to

 

19


Table of Contents

institutions with at least $10 billion in total consolidated assets, as these institutions are subject to the same regulatory mandates as Trustmark.

For 2020, Trustmark’s peer group consisted of the following companies:

 

    Company Name    Ticker      Company Name      Ticker      Company Name    Ticker    

    BancorpSouth Bank

   BXS     

Hancock Whitney Corporation

     HWC     

UMB Financial Corporation

   UMBF    

    Banner Corporation

   BANR     

Old National Bancorp

     ONB     

Umpqua Holdings Corporation

   UMPQ    

    Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

   CBSH     

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

     PNFP     

United Bankshares, Inc.

   UBSI    

    First Financial Bancorp.

   FFBC     

Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.

     PB     

United Community Banks, Inc.

   UCBI    

    First Midwest Bancorp, Inc.

   FMBI     

Renasant Corporation

     RNST     

Webster Financial Corporation

   WBS    

    Fulton Financial Corporation

   FULT     

Simmons First National Corporation

     SFNC        

    Glacier Bancorp, Inc.

   GBCI     

South State Corporation

     SSB        

Market Data. In making its 2020 compensation recommendations, the Committee considered market data comparisons prepared by Pearl Meyer in August 2017, including an analysis of the 25th, 50th (median) and 75th percentile of the compensation for base salary (aged forward using a predetermined factor), annual cash incentive, long-term equity incentives and the total of these elements as a point of reference for each NEO. In August and November 2019, respectively, Pearl Meyer provided market data regarding Trustmark’s equity practices in addition to more recent data for the positions of CEO and the President and COO.

Compensation Mix. While the Committee considers the overall mix of executives’ pay between base salary, annual cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation, the Committee does not target a specific allocation among the various compensation components. Generally, more than one-half of the CEO’s compensation is contingent on performance, and approximately one-half of the compensation provided to the other NEOs is contingent on performance. In allocating compensation among salary, bonus and equity-based compensation, the Committee believes that the compensation of the senior-most levels of management with the greatest ability to influence Trustmark’s performance should be significantly performance-based, while lower levels of management should receive a greater portion of their compensation in base salary. The Committee also makes allocations between short-term and long-term compensation for NEOs. Consistent with its executive compensation philosophy and goals, in 2020, the Committee provided that for the senior-most levels of management 100% of annual cash incentive payments and 50% of long-term equity-based awards would be determined based on achievement of performance targets.

The approximate percentages of salary, bonus and equity-based (using grant date fair value) compensation compared to the total of such compensation (referred to as total annual compensation) for 2020 for the CEO and other NEOs (averaged) were as follows:

 

LOGO

The compensation elements for the CEO for 2020 were allocated as follows: 28% for base salary, 44% for cash bonus, and 28% for equity awards. On average, the compensation elements for the other NEOs for 2020 were allocated as follows: 38% for base salary, 42% for cash bonus, and 20% for equity awards. Equity awards consist of both performance-based awards and time-vesting awards. Variable pay includes cash incentives, performance-based equity awards and time-vesting equity awards, the value of which varies with changes in Trustmark’s stock price. The equity awards percentage in the above calculations were valued as of the grant date based on the fair market value of the underlying stock. Other benefits, including Trustmark’s allocations and contributions to benefit plans and perquisites, are not considered in the above calculations. For more information on these benefits, please see “All Other Compensation for 2020” table on page 30.

 

20


Table of Contents

Base Salaries. Trustmark’s goal is to provide its executive management with fixed cash compensation in the form of base salary that will attract and retain highly qualified executives. Trustmark also uses base salary to reward top performance, industry and job specific knowledge, experience and leadership ability. The base salaries for Trustmark’s NEOs are typically established in the first quarter of the year after Trustmark’s financial information and performance results from the previous year are available, although mid-year adjustments are made occasionally to reflect changes in responsibility or other developments.

In establishing the CEO’s base salary, the Committee typically considers Pearl Meyer’s recommendations based on an analysis of peer group data and market data and also considers internal data provided by human resources personnel and the CEO’s individual performance and contributions relative to Trustmark’s corporate goals. In establishing base salaries of Trustmark’s other NEOs, the Committee typically considers the recommendations of the CEO, which are based on individual responsibility level, individual and company performance, total compensation histories for each NEO, the market data provided by Pearl Meyer for similar positions and a general understanding of executive compensation in the financial services industry. The CEO evaluates the other NEOs’ performance using the same metrics normally used for determining annual management incentive plan awards. The Committee considers each of these factors but does not assign a specific value to any of them. The Committee’s process also involves a subjective component in evaluating each NEO’s overall span of responsibility and control, knowledge and leadership ability.

Effective March 1, 2020, the Board approved a 2% increase in base salary for Mr. Host and a 3% base salary increase for Mr. Greer, and the Bank Board approved a 2% increase in base salary for Mr. Harvey. Effective January 1, 2020, Mr. Dewey was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer of the Bank. His salary change reflects his promotion. The base salaries in effect during 2019 and 2020 were as shown below:

 

  Name   

2020

Base Salaries

($ )

    

2019

Base Salaries

($ )

    

% Change                

(%)                

Gerard R. Host

   $805,980      $790,176        2%                

Duane A. Dewey

   $500,000      $450,000      11%                

Louis E. Greer

   $400,000      $389,676        3%                

Robert B. Harvey

   $364,140      $357,000        2%                

Breck W. Tyler

   $324,729      $324,729        0%                

Cash Bonuses. The Committee typically awards cash bonuses utilizing a structured, objective approach based upon the achievement of performance objectives set forth in an annual management incentive plan. Cash bonuses constitute the largest cash component tied specifically to company performance.

Annual Management Incentive Plan. At the beginning of each year, Trustmark develops a bonus matrix for the management incentive plan. The performance goals are keyed to various corporate, strategic and, where applicable, line of business objectives, and the performance results at or slightly above the target levels are intended to be achievable, but challenging. The CEO recommends the bonus matrix to the Committee, including overall incentive target payout levels for each NEO, stated as a percentage of base salary. The CEO also recommends the performance measures and the weightings to be assigned to the performance measures for each NEO.

The Committee reviews the CEO’s recommendations along with, as applicable, market data to ensure that proposed target payout levels provide an appropriate opportunity to earn bonuses and are competitive with the companies in Trustmark’s peer group. The Committee then makes a recommendation to the Board for approval. In making its recommendation, the Committee may consider events outside the influence or control of the NEOs and may adjust the performance goals to exclude the effect of these events. The Committee did not include any such adjustments when recommending the performance goals for 2020.

After the target levels and performance goals and weightings have been approved by the Board, the Committee retains the discretion to adjust the target levels and performance goals and weightings during the year, on an individual or group basis, if the Committee determines additional adjustments are appropriate for this purpose. The Committee did not make any such adjustments during 2020. Following the end of a year, the Committee also has discretion to increase or decrease the amount of an award earned under the plan, change the individual weightings or adjust the threshold payout level and minimum performance goals, including when the minimum performance goals are not achieved. The Committee’s exercise of discretion is intended to ensure the management incentive plan appropriately rewards performance and neither overpays for results nor under rewards accomplishments achieved during the year.

 

21


Table of Contents

The following are the primary features of the management incentive plan for 2020:

 

   

uses EPS as the sole corporate goal to enhance the alignment of performance measures with Trustmark’s key strategic priorities,

   

includes corporate strategic operational drivers, with a weighting of at least 10% for each goal,

   

for certain executives working in a line of business, includes a line of business performance goal for net income to mitigate incentive risks and reflect total performance of the business unit, and

   

includes a range of potential payouts from 50% to 200% of target payout level to make the incentive payouts variable relative to performance.

The following table shows the threshold, target and potential maximum bonus payout levels established for each NEO under the management incentive plan, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for 2020:

 

  Name   

Below Threshold

Bonus Payout Level

(as percentage of salary) (1)

  

Threshold Bonus

Payout Level
(as percentage of salary)

 

Target Bonus

Payout Level

(as percentage of salary)

 

        Potential Maximum        

Bonus Payout Level

(as percentage of

salary)

Gerard R. Host (2)

              45.0 %       90 %       180 %

Duane A. Dewey

              32.5 %       65 %       130 %

Louis E. Greer

              25.0 %       50 %       100 %

Robert B. Harvey

              25.0 %       50 %       100 %

Breck W. Tyler

              20.0 %       40 %       80 %

 

  (1)

If performance is below the threshold level for each of an NEO’s goals under the management incentive plan, no bonus is earned under the plan absent exercise of discretion by the Committee.

  (2)

Mr. Host’s overall target bonus payout level for 2020 is established in his employment agreement.

Depending on achievement against the stated goals, the payout percentage, if any, for 2020 could range from a level of 50% of the target bonus payout (for threshold performance achievement) to a level of 100% (for target performance achievement) to a level of 200% (for maximum performance achievement). If performance is below the threshold level for each of an NEO’s goals under the management incentive plan, no bonus is earned under the plan absent exercise of discretion by the Committee.

For 2020, overall incentive targets for NEOs were allocated among a corporate performance goal, corporate strategic operational drivers and, for NEOs working in specific lines of business unless part of the Executive Strategy Committee, a line of business goal. The following table shows the weightings of these goals for each NEO for 2020:

 

  Name   

Corporate

Performance Goal

  

Corporate Strategic

Operational Drivers

  

        Line of Business        

Goal

Gerard R. Host

       50 %        50 %       

Duane A. Dewey

       50 %        50 %       

Louis E. Greer

       50 %        50 %       

Robert B. Harvey

       50 %        50 %       

Breck W. Tyler

       30 %        30 %        40 %

For 2020, the threshold and maximum performance levels continue to reflect the uncertainty of achieving the goals and provide variability in pay for changes in performance while also requiring high performance to reach the maximum payout level. For the 2020 bonus matrix, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the following threshold and maximum performance levels for the NEOs:

 

  Performance Goal   

Threshold

Performance Level

(as percentage of performance goal)

  

Maximum

Performance Level

    (as percentage of performance goal)    

Corporate Performance Goal (all NEOs):

         

EPS

       85 %        115 %

Corporate/Strategic Operational Drivers (all NEOs):

         

Efficiency Ratio

       110 %        90 %

Non-performing assets/total loans + ORE

       120 %        80 %

Line of Business Goal (Tyler):

         

Mortgage Services

         

Net income

       85 %        115 %

 

22


Table of Contents

The following table shows the relevant performance goals established for 2020 under the management incentive plan and the extent to which such goals were achieved:

 

   Performance Goals   

2020

  Targets  

 

2020 Results as

Approved by the

Committee

 

      Percentage      

      of Target Level      

      Achieved      

($ in millions)

            

Corporate Goal (all NEOs):

            

EPS

     $ 2.16     $ 2.52       116.67 %

Corporate Strategic/Operational Drivers (all NEOs):

            

Efficiency ratio

       66.67 %       64.05 %       104.09 %

Non-performing assets/total loans + ORE

       0.79 %       0.73 %       108.22 %

Line of Business Goal (Tyler):

            

Mortgage Services

            

Net income

     $  12.88     $  69.45       539.21 %

The Committee determined bonus payments for each NEO by applying the relevant weighting to the achievement of the applicable performance goals for each NEO. The calculated bonus payments align with the strong 2020 financial performance described above. The bonus amounts for all NEOs were approved by the Committee and by the Board on February 17, 2021. On or about March 15, 2021, Trustmark will pay the following annual cash bonuses for 2020 performance under the management incentive plan:

 

   Name   

Total 2020 Annual Cash
Bonus Paid

($)

  

Total Annual Cash

Bonus Paid as Percentage of
Base Salary
(1)

(%)

 

      2020 Payment as      

      Percentage of Target (2)      

      (%)       

Gerard R. Host

     $ 1,229,684        152.57 %   169.52%

Duane A. Dewey

     $ 550,950        110.19 %   169.52%

Louis E. Greer

     $ 339,040        84.76 %   169.52%

Robert B. Harvey

     $ 308,645        84.76 %   169.52%

Breck W. Tyler

     $ 235,948        72.66 %   181.65%

 

  (1)

Calculated using base salary as of March 1, 2020.

 

  (2)

Performance achieved can range from 0% to a maximum of 200%, with target performance achievement being 100%. If performance achievement is below the threshold for an NEO, no bonus is earned under the plan absent exercise of discretion by the Committee.

These 2020 annual cash bonus amounts are presented as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation for 2020 in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020” on page 29, including Mr. Tyler’s mortgage production bonus of $300,000.

Discretionary Bonuses.   During 2020, Mr. Harvey completed the implementation of amendments to FASB-AU 2016-13 for the new accounting standard commonly referred to as Current Expected Credit Losses (CECL) as issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). In recognition of his leadership in managing external and internal resources to design, model, validate, and implement the CECL methodology, and in light of the substantial complexity resulting in the successful implementation of CECL, the Board approved payment of a one-time discretionary bonus to Mr. Harvey in the amount of $25,000, which was paid in August 2020. In addition, the Committee recommended a discretionary payment of an additional $25,000 to Mr. Harvey in recognition of his management of the Payroll Protection Program during 2020. These 2020 discretionary bonus amounts are presented as Bonus for 2020 in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020” on page 29.

Mortgage Production Bonus.   Recognizing that a production bonus is very common for executives in mortgage banking, and in an effort to remain competitive with Trustmark’s peer companies, Mr. Tyler receives a quarterly production bonus based on the mortgage division’s production, in addition to the annual cash bonus under the management incentive plan. Mr. Tyler’s production bonus is based on a percentage of total mortgage production above a threshold production level each quarter for mortgages that conform to the Bank’s origination guidelines, subject to an annual cap. The specific formula is not publicly disclosed for competitive reasons.

Equity-Based Compensation.   Equity-based awards generally constitute the largest non-cash component of each NEO’s total compensation package. Pearl Meyer provides the Committee with peer company data and published surveys to assist the Committee in setting the amount of annual equity-based awards. For 2020, Messrs. Host and Dewey received annual equity-based awards tailored to their positions as CEO and COO. All other members of the Executive Strategy Committee received the same annual equity-based award and, all other members of executive management received the same, but smaller annual equity-based award. In establishing award levels, the Committee generally does not consider the equity ownership levels of the recipients or prior awards that are fully vested. Equity-based awards and the related performance goals for NEOs are recommended by the Committee and approved by the Board generally during the first quarter of each year. Awards are typically made as early as practicable in the year to maximize the time-period for achieving performance goals associated with the awards. Equity-based awards are

 

23


Table of Contents

granted under the Trustmark Corporation Amended and Restated Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan (Amended and Restated Stock Plan).

For long-term equity incentive (LTI) awards made in 2020, performance-based equity awards and time-based equity awards each represented 50% of the total award. The Committee believes that performance-based restricted stock provides an effective means of delivering incentive compensation, a reward for achievement of long-term objectives and an effective means of executive retention, with normal vesting not occurring for three years. The Committee also believes that time-based equity awards, which have a three-year cliff vesting feature, promote an important goal of executive retention and help encourage greater levels of stock ownership by executives, while also having an incentive effect as a result of their value being linked to Trustmark’s stock price. The Committee will review the mix of LTI awards from time to time and make adjustments in the mix as needed to reflect its objectives for such awards.

Performance Awards.   Beginning in 2020, performance-based equity awards consist of an award of restricted stock units (known as performance units) that also includes the potential to earn an equal number of additional restricted stock units (known as achievement units). The performance period began January 1, 2020, and continues through December 31, 2022. Consistent with past years, the performance units and achievement units vest based on the achievement of company performance goals related to ROATE and TSR over a three-year period. The performance units vest to the extent the aggregate vesting percentage ranges from 0% to 100%, and the achievement units vest to the extent the aggregate vesting percentage exceeds 100% (up to a maximum of 200%). The performance units and achievement units are settled in unrestricted shares following the end of the performance period. The executive generally must remain employed by Trustmark through the end of the performance period for the performance units and achievement units to vest fully (to the extent earned). Dividend equivalents are accumulated on the performance units, but not the achievement unit portion of the award. No interest is paid on accumulated dividend equivalents.

As noted above, the performance goals of ROATE and TSR are measured over a three-year performance period. The performance target of ROATE is established on the date of grant and is based on a forecasted three-year average of ROATE. The performance target of TSR is Trustmark’s TSR ranking as it relates to a defined peer group. The aggregate of the ROATE results and TSR results create a combined attainment.

The threshold, target and maximum levels are shown below for each performance goal as results are calculated and achievement is attained:

 

          Threshold        Target        Maximum
  Performance Goal                                      Results   Attainment          Results   Attainment          Results   Attainment  

  ROATE Performance Level

          80%   25.00%            100%       50%            120%       100%

       (3 year average - actual to performance target)

                                         

  TSR Ranking

          30th percentile   17.50%            50th percentile       50%            75th percentile       100%

       (as a percentile compared to Peers)

                                                                   

  Aggregate Vesting Attained

                42.50%                      100%                      200%

Prior to 2020, Trustmark granted performance-based equity awards consisting of a dual award of restricted stock and an equal number of achievement units. These awards have attributes similar to those described above.

Time-based Awards.   The time-based units granted in 2020 vest 100% at February 19, 2023, if the executive remains employed through such date (subject to certain exceptions). Dividend equivalents on any time-based restricted stock units are accumulated and will vest and be paid only when and to the extent the shares to which they relate vest, subject to a six-month delay when required by Section 409A. In 2020, time-based awards were enhanced to provide for additional vesting upon retirement at or after age 65 with the consent of the Human Resources Committee. Retirement of the executive prior to the first anniversary of the grate date results in vesting of one-third of granted units, and retirement after the first anniversary of the grant date results in full vesting of granted units, in each case subject to a six-month delay when required by Section 409A.

 

24


Table of Contents

The following table reflects the grant date fair values of the performance units and achievement units and time-based units granted to the NEOs in 2020:

 

   Name   

Value of

Performance

Units

($)

  

Value of

Achievement Units (1)

($)

  

Value of

Time-Based

RSUs

($)

  

        Total         

        ($)         

    

Gerard R. Host

     $   395,651        ---      $   395,780      $   791,431  

Duane A. Dewey

     $ 173,092        ---      $ 173,162      $   346,254  

Louis E. Greer

     $ 98,937        ---      $ 98,945      $   197,882  

Robert B. Harvey

     $ 98,937        ---      $ 98,945      $   197,882  

Breck W. Tyler

     $ 59,349        ---      $ 59,373      $   118,722  

 

  (1)

Reflects the anticipated earning of the achievement unit portion of the performance-based equity award based on achievement of performance measures at a 100% level of achievement; achievement units will only be earned if, and only to the extent, the award’s aggregate ROATE and TSR vesting percentage exceeds 100%. The anticipated earning of the achievement unit portion of the performance unit award is projected to be zero, as the award’s ROATE and TSR vesting percentage is projected to be less than or equal to 100%.

The following table reflects the values realized by the NEOs on vesting of performance-based restricted stock awards and time-based restricted stock awards that vested during 2020 from grants made in prior years. See the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2020” table on page 33 for more information.

 

   Name   

Value of

Performance-Based

Shares Vested (1)

($)

    

Value of

Time-Based

Shares Vested (2)

($)

    

        Total         

        ($)         

      

Gerard R. Host

     $  302,541          $  205,857        $  508,398    

Duane A. Dewey

     $    69,817          $    47,518        $  117,335    

Louis E. Greer

     $    69,817          $    47,518        $  117,335                 

Robert B. Harvey

     $    69,817          $    47,518        $  117,335    

Breck W. Tyler

     $    55,886          $    38,001        $    93,887    

 

  (1)

Reflects 73% vesting of performance-based shares granted in 2017, based on Trustmark’s 3-year ROATE and TSR performance against its peer companies.

  (2)

Reflects vesting of time-based shares granted in 2017.

Retirement Benefits.  Trustmark maintains certain plans providing retirement benefits in which the NEOs and certain other associates participate, as described below.

Executive Deferral Plan.  Because of the limits for tax qualified retirement plans, Trustmark maintains a defined benefit supplemental retirement plan (Executive Deferral Plan) that provides additional retirement benefits to selected executives. The Committee believes the plan is competitive with Trustmark’s peer financial institutions and is an important tool in attracting and retaining executive management.

NEOs selected for plan participation by the Committee receive retirement benefits generally equal to 50% of their covered salaries. The retirement benefit is payable for life, but not less than ten years, and commences at normal retirement age, which is 65, whether or not the participant is still employed, unless the early retirement or death provisions described below apply. Benefits payable pursuant to the plan are not subject to reduction for social security benefits.

The plan provides retirement and pre-retirement death benefits based upon a retirement benefit amount for each participant established by the Committee. The retirement benefit amount is based on the participant’s level of responsibilities and, in part, on his specified covered salary.

The following table shows, as to each NEO, annual retirement benefits anticipated to be paid at normal retirement:

 

   Name   

        Annual Benefit        

($)

Gerard R. Host

     $   300,000

Duane A. Dewey

     $   100,000

Louis E. Greer

     $   100,000

Robert B. Harvey

     $   100,000

Breck W. Tyler

     $   100,000

The plan permits early retirement at or after age 55 with five years of plan participation. Benefits at early retirement are actuarially reduced. The plan also provides a deferred vested benefit payable at normal retirement age to a participant terminating for reasons other than retirement with at least one year of plan participation or retiring early with a pre-existing election to be paid commencing at his or her normal retirement date. Normally, the deferred benefit is accrued and vests at the rate of 1/10th of the anticipated normal retirement benefit for each year of plan participation for a maximum of ten years. However, certain incremental increases vest over the time period ending in the year the participant reaches age 64. If a participant does not complete at least one year of plan participation, plan benefits are forfeited (except where the cessation of employment is due to death, retirement, total disability or just

 

25


Table of Contents

cause as defined in the plan). Should a participant die prior to retirement and prior to when the participant’s retirement benefit commences to be paid, the participant’s beneficiary will receive a death benefit equal to a percentage (100% for the first year and 75% for the remaining years) of a specified covered salary amount (which amount is twice the anticipated normal retirement benefit) for ten years or until the participant would have reached normal retirement age, whichever is later. Life insurance contracts have been purchased to fund payments under the plan.

In 2019, Mr. Host became eligible for payments under the Executive Deferral Plan. However, the plan provides that payments shall be delayed if such payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, payments to Mr. Host for 2019 and 2020 were delayed.

See the “Pension Benefits for 2020” table on page 34 for more information regarding this plan.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.  Trustmark also provides a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the NQDC Plan) that provides additional cash compensation deferral opportunities for executives who are impacted by the compensation and contribution limits that restrict participation in Trustmark’s 401(k) plan. The Committee believes the plan is competitive with those offered by Trustmark’s peer financial institutions and is an important tool in attracting and retaining executive management. The plan allows executives, including NEOs, to defer on a pre-tax basis up to 90% of annual base salary and/or cash bonus. No contribution is made to this plan by Trustmark. Each executive’s deferred income is credited to an account, which is deemed invested in and mirrors the performance of one or more designated investment funds available under the plan and selected at the option of the executive. Distributions can be received under this plan upon retirement, death, long-term disability, termination of employment or during employment at specified dates.

In 2020, Mr. Host had a scheduled distribution from the NQDC Plan. However, the plan provides that any distribution shall be delayed if such distribution would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, the scheduled distribution to Mr. Host for 2020 was delayed.

See the “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2020” table on page 34 for more information regarding this plan and see the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020” on page 29 and the “All Other Compensation for 2020” table on page 30 for more information regarding Trustmark’s contribution to Trustmark’s 401(k) Plan.

Perquisites; Other Benefits.  Perquisites provided to each NEO are reviewed annually within the context of Trustmark’s executive compensation program, market practices and the nature of each NEO’ s responsibilities. Generally, Trustmark limits the types of perquisites offered to NEOs as shown in the “All Other Compensation for 2020” table on page 30.

The Committee believes the currently-offered perquisites are minimal in overall cost and competitively necessary to attract and retain talented executives. Consistent with most other financial institutions in its peer group, Trustmark encourages executive management to belong to a golf or social club so that there is an appropriate entertainment forum for customers and appropriate interaction with the executives’ communities. Trustmark pays the initiation fee and annual dues for a club membership for some of the NEOs. In addition, Trustmark provides Messrs. Host and Dewey with use of a company-owned automobile. In addition, the Board authorizes an annual allowance of up to 15 hours and 10 hours of personal use of Trustmark’s airplane for the Executive Chairman and CEO, respectively, which provides an efficient way to maximize each executive’s available time for company business.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits.  Upon any termination of employment, NEOs would be entitled to receive their vested benefits under the 401(k) plan, NQDC Plan and supplemental retirement plan (Executive Deferral Plan), although these benefits generally would not be increased or accelerated (except for the acceleration of additional years of service provided under the Executive Deferral Plan under certain circumstances).

Trustmark believes that additional severance benefits are appropriate for executive management because it may be difficult for senior executives to find comparable employment within a short period of time. As discussed above, Trustmark’s restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards provide for accele rated vesting upon a change in control and upon certain termination events, and an incremental benefit is provided under the Executive Deferral Plan upon certain termination events following a change in control.

In light of the CEO’s and other NEOs’ role and importance to the success of Trustmark, the Committee believes that it is appropriate to provide for severance and change in control benefits in written agreement s. The Committee further believes that providing change in control benefits to the CEO and other NEOs should eliminate any reluctance to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of shareholders. Trustmark also believes that the severance and change in control benefits it provides are customary among its peers.

With the exception of the accelerated vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, Trustmark’s change in control benefits provided to the CEO and other NEOs are generally “double trigger,” which means that the benefits are payable only if the executive’s employment is terminated other than for cause, death or disability or if the executive resigns for good reason, in each case within a specified period following a change in control. Trustmark believes that these benefits are consistent with the general practice among its peers. In addition, Trustmark believes the use of a double trigger in most cases reasonably balances the needs of the executive and Trustmark by protecting the legitimate interests of executives in employment security without unduly burdening Trustmark or shareholder value.

Trustmark does not provide any tax gross-ups related to severance or other compensation or benefits that

 

26


Table of Contents

executives may receive in connection with a change in control. Change in control benefits are provided on a “best net” approach, under which an executive’s change in control benefits are reduced to avoid the golden parachute excise tax only if such a reduction would cause the executive to receive more after-tax compensation than without a reduction.

For additional information on Trustmark’s employment and change in control agreements with its NEOs, please see “Employment and Change in Control Agreements with NEOs” beginning on page 36.

Deductibility of Compensation.  In making compensation decisions, the Committee considers Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which limits the tax deductibility of certain compensation in excess of $1 million paid to Trustmark’s NEOs.

Although tax deductibility continues to be a consideration when determining executive compensation levels, the Committee believes that factors other than tax deductibility should take precedence in certain situations. Given the competitive market for outstanding executives, for example, the Committee believes that it is important to retain the flexibility to determine compensation elements consistent with Trustmark’s compensation philosophy, even if some executive compensation is not fully deductible under Section 162(m). Accordingly, the Committee does approve elements of compensation for certain executives that are not fully deductible by Trustmark and reserves the right to do so in the future when appropriate. In 2020, a portion of Messrs. Host’s and Dewey’s compensation was not deductible by Trustmark under Section 162(m).

Policy Against Hedging and Limitations on Pledging.  To ensure that Trustmark directors, officers and employees bear the full risks of stock ownership, Trustmark’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits Trustmark directors, officers and employees from engaging in any form of hedging transactions relating to Trustmark stock. With limited exceptions, directors and executive officers are also prohibited from pledging or creating a security interest in any Trustmark stock they hold, and no director or executive officer currently holds any Trustmark stock that is pledged or otherwise subject to a security interest.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.  To help mitigate risks associated with Trustmark’s compensation programs and encourage management to focus on long-term growth and financial success, Trustmark has guidelines that require the CEO, Executive Chairman and other members of executive management of the Bank to own, at minimum, the number of shares of Trustmark stock equal in value to a multiple of their base salary.

The guidelines as of January 1, 2021 are as follows:

 

      Multiple of Base Salary

CEO

   5x

Executive Chairman

   5x

Executive Strategy Committee

   2x

Other Executive Management

   1.5x

The guidelines calculate the number of shares to be owned by reference to an executive’s base salary as of March 1 of each year and the 10-day trading average share price through March 31 each year. Shares of unvested time-based restricted stock are counted as shares owned for purposes of the guidelines. Pledged shares are not considered to be owned for purposes of the stock ownership guidelines. The Human Resources Committee reviews stock ownership levels of executive management annually. Until an executive has reached the applicable ownership level, the executive is required to hold 100% of the shares received from any Trustmark stock awards. Based on the most recent review of ownership level attainment in 2020, Messrs. Host, Greer and Tyler owned the minimum number of shares required to satisfy the guidelines. Mr. Dewey is expected to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines, over time, which increased as a result of his new position as CEO. Mr. Harvey is expected to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines as of March 1, 2021.

Executive Compensation Recoupment.   Since 2011, the Committee has included clawback provisions in performance awards and the management incentive plan with respect to annual cash bonuses that may be earned under the plan. Under these provisions, any performance awards or restricted stock unit award that vests or cash bonus paid is subject to recovery by Trustmark as required by applicable federal law and/or such basis as the Board determines. The Committee anticipates adopting a comprehensive executive clawback policy if the SEC publishes final rules implementing the clawback requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act.

Analysis of Risk Associated with Trustmark’s Compensation Policies and Practices. In late 2020 and early 2021, the Committee, together with Trustmark’s risk officers, conducted an in-depth risk assessment of Trustmark’s compensation policies and practices. Management prepared detailed materials regarding the operation of Trustmark’s various compensation arrangements with its associates and submitted the materials to Trustmark’s risk officers, who reviewed the materials with the members of management most closely involved with the respective compensation arrangements. Trustmark’s risk officers identified the key enterprise risks to which Trustmark is subject, including credit, liquidity, market/interest rate, compliance, operational, technology, strategic, reputational and other risks, and focused their review on the compensation arrangements most likely to implicate those risks. Trustmark’s Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Chief Risk Officer presented the risk officers’ conclusions and

 

27


Table of Contents

supporting materials to the Committee, which reviewed and discussed the analysis at its meeting on February 16, 2021.

The Committee has concluded that Trustmark’s compensation policies and practices have sufficient mitigating features and controls to maintain an appropriate balance between prudent business risk and resulting compensation and encourage appropriate risk behavior consistent with Trustmark’s risk appetite, business strategy and profit goals. Some of the mitigating features and controls used are the overall compensation mix, weighting of performance metrics, timing of awards in relation to performance measurement period, use of full value equity -based awards with multi-year vesting periods, and establishment of targets with payouts at multiple levels of performance, chargeback provisions on returned or unearned commissions, capped upside opportunities, and oversight by executive management and the Board. In addition, Trustmark’s incentive compensation arrangements are subject to a system of internal controls to ensure that incentive compensation is properly tracked, approved and paid. Trustmark’s internal controls include comparisons throughout the year of performance results against performance requirements, approval by appropriate levels of management, the Committee, the Board and/or the Bank Board of incentive compensation payouts, with separate review and approval by division controllers of lines of business that have significant incentive compensation payouts, and coordination among human resources, accounting, and payroll personnel to ensure that incentive compensation payouts that have been approved are appropriately reconciled to those approvals before and after payment is made. As a result, the Committee concluded that Trustmark’s compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Trustmark, do not encourage imprudent risk -taking behavior and are consistent with maintaining the organization’s safety and soundness.

 

28


Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table for 2020  

The following table summarizes the compensation components for the CEO, the CFO and each of the next three most highly compensated executive officers during 2020 and indicates their positions as of December 31, 2020. Although considered “officers” of Trustmark Corporation under the Exchange Act, the NEOs’ compensation, except for equity awards under Trustmark’s stock and incentive compensation plans, is paid by the Bank. The amounts reported in the “Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” column were not paid to the NEOs in any year shown. These amounts represent the annual change in the present value of potential future benefits the NEOs might receive upon retirement, assuming the benefits have vested.  

 

                                     Change in          
                                     Pension Value          
                                     and Non-          
                                Non-Equity    Qualified          
                          Option    Incentive Plan    Deferred    All Other     
  Name and Principal               Bonus    Stock    Awards    Compensation    Compensation    Compensation     
  Position          Salary    (1)    Awards (2)    (3)    (4)    Earnings (5)    (6)    Total
      Year    ($)    ($)    ($)    ($)    ($)    ($)    ($)    ($)

Gerard R. Host (7)

       2020        $   803,346        ---        $   791,431        ---        $   1,229,684      $    638,447      $   153,434      $   3,616,342

President and CEO,

       2019        $ 787,594      $   13,889      $ 818,183        ---        $ 700,254      $ 660,550      $ 114,795      $ 3,095,265

Trustmark

                                                           

Corporation;

       2018        $ 772,150        ---        $ 818,362        ---        $ 756,322        ---        $ 75,746      $ 2,422,580

CEO,

                                                      

Trustmark National

                                                      

Bank

                                                           

Duane A. Dewey (9)

       2020        $ 500,001        ---        $ 346,254        ---        $ 550,950      $ 210,606      $ 41,988      $ 1,649,799

President and Chief

                                                      

Operating

       2019        $ 450,000        ---        $ 306,839        ---        $ 265,905      $ 251,586      $ 34,196      $ 1,308,526

Officer, Trustmark

       2018        $ 368,982        ---        $ 204,606        ---        $ 190,538      $ --      $ 31,627      $ 795,753

National Bank

                                                 

Louis E. Greer (8)

       2020        $ 398,279        ---        $ 197,882        ---        $ 339,040      $ 77,129      $ 35,073      $ 1,047,403

Treasurer,

       2019        $ 388,403        ---        $ 204,571        ---        $ 191,876      $ 275,726      $ 34,232      $ 1,094,808

Principal Financial

       2018        $ 380,787        ---        $ 204,606        ---        $ 207,216      $ 15,453      $ 33,080      $ 841,142   

Officer and Principal

                                                 

Accounting Officer,

                                            

Trustmark

                                                   

Corporation;

                                                 

Executive Vice

                                                 

President and

                                                 

Chief Financial

                                            

Officer,

                                                   

Trustmark National

                                                 

Bank

                                                 

Robert B. Harvey

       2020        $ 362,950      $ 50,000      $ 197,882        ---        $ 308,645      $ 236,474      $ 25,709      $ 1,181,660

Executive Vice

                                            

President and Chief

                                                 

Credit Officer,

                                                 

Trustmark

                                                 

National Bank

                                                 

Breck W. Tyler

       2020        $ 324,729        ---        $ 118,722        ---        $ 535,948      $ 229,166      $ 22,266      $ 1,230,831

President-Mortgage

       2019        $ 323,668      $ 45,000      $ 122,736        ---        $ 329,559      $ 254,493      $ 21,346      $ 1,096,802

Services, Trustmark

       2018        $ 317,322        ---        $ 122,764        ---        $ 322,231        ---        $ 21,125      $ 783,442

National Bank

                                            

 

  (1)

No discretionary bonus was awarded to the NEOs for 2018. The 2020 amount shown for Mr. Harvey is a $25,000 discretionary bonus for his implementation of CECL, and a $25,000 discretionary bonus for his management of the Payroll Protection Program. Both were recommended by the CEO and approved by the Board. The 2019 amount shown for Mr. Host represents a recognition for his service and time spent serving as President of the Board for the Mississippi Bankers Association in 2018. The 2019 amount shown for Mr. Tyler is a discretionary bonus which was recommended by the CEO and approved by the Board for the exceptional year in Mortgage Production.

 

  (2)

The amounts in this column reflect restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted to the NEOs during 2020, 2019, and 2018 and are disclosed as the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, based, in the case of performance awards, on the then-anticipated outcome and excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures. These awards include performance awards that will vest only if the related performance measures are achieved. For the performance awards granted in 2020, 2019 and 2018, the amounts reported in this column reflect the grant date fair value based on the achievement of less than the maximum performance level. The grant date fair values, based on achievement of the maximum performance level, would be as follows for the awards granted:

 

     2020      2019      2018

Host

   $588,113      $672,950      $587,145    

Dewey

   $257,291      $252,390      $146,821    

Greer

   $147,064      $168,279      $146,821    

Harvey

   $147,064      ---        ---  

Tyler

   $  88,219            $100,945            $  88,101    

 

   

Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 16 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021.

 

  (3)

No stock option awards were made during 2020, 2019, or 2018. Trustmark does not have any stock options outstanding currently.

 

29


Table of Contents
  (4)

This column shows the value of annual cash bonuses earned under Trustmark’s management incentive plan. Non-equity incentive plan compensation for Mr. Tyler includes both his annual cash bonus earned under Trustmark’s management incentive plan and his quarterly mortgage department production bonus incentives.

 

  (5)

The amounts shown in the table above reflect the changes in actuarial present value of the NEO’s accumulated benefits under the Executive Deferral Plan, determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those used in Trustmark’s audited financial statements and exclude amounts which the NEO may not have been entitled to receive because such amounts were not yet vested. In 2020 and 2019, increases in pension value of the Executive Deferral Plan benefits were largely the result of a decrease in the 2020 and 2019 discount rates; conversely in 2018, decreases in pension value of the Executive Deferral Plan benefits were largely the result of an increase in the 2018 discount rate. Negative changes in pension values in 2018 were as follows: Host — $(131,158); Dewey — $(71,128); Tyler — $(32,392). The incremental increase in benefits for Mr. Greer was greater than the negative effects of the increase in discount rate. There is no above-market interest or earnings to report with respect to deferred compensation.

 

  (6)

See the following table for details of all other compensation for 2020.

 

  (7)

Mr. Host became Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank effective January 1, 2021.

 

  (8)

Mr. Greer retired as Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of Trustmark and Executive Vice President and CFO of the Bank effective March 1, 2021.

 

  (9)

Mr. Dewey became President and CEO of Trustmark and CEO of the Bank effective January 1, 2021.

All Other Compensation for 2020

The detail of all other compensation for 2020 is included in the following table:

 

  Name   

Use of

Company

Airplane (1)

($)

  

Automobile

Allowance/Use of

Company-Provided

Automobile (2)

($)

  

Dividends on

Unvested Time-

Based Restricted

Stock (3)

($)

  

Club

Dues

($)

  

401(k)        

Match        

($)         

  

Total

  ($)

Gerard R. Host

     $   83,558      $   9,664      $   34,438      $   8,674      $   17,100      $ 153,434        

Duane A. Dewey

       ---        $   4,054      $   12,150      $   8,684      $   17,100      $ 41,988        

Louis E. Greer

       ---          ---        $ 8,609      $   9,364      $   17,100      $ 35,073        

Robert B. Harvey

       ---          ---        $ 8,609        ---        $   17,100      $ 25,709        

Breck W. Tyler

       ---          ---        $ 5,166        ---        $   17,100      $ 22,266        

 

  (1)

The aggregate incremental cost of Mr. Host’s personal use of the company airplane is calculated based on the annual cost of operating the company airplane. Operating costs include depreciation, fuel, maintenance, insurance, flight crew expenses (including pilot salaries), landing fees and hangar expenses, and other miscellaneous expenses. Total annual operating costs are divided by the total number of hours the company airplane was used during the year to determine the average operating cost per hour. The average operating cost per hour is then multiplied by the hours Mr. Host used the company airplane for personal use to determine Trustmark’s aggregate incremental cost.

 

  (2)

The aggregate incremental cost of Messrs. Host’s and Dewey’s personal use of a company-owned automobile is calculated based on the annual cost to Trustmark to own and operate each automobile (taking into account depreciation, insurance, taxes, repairs, maintenance and fuel) multiplied by the percentage that Messrs. Host and Dewey respectively, used the automobile for personal rather than business travel.

 

  (3)

The amounts in this column reflect the dividends credited to shares of unvested time-based restricted stock held by the NEOs on each dividend payment date during 2020. These dividends are accumulated and will vest and be paid only when and to the extent the related restricted shares vest, subject to a six-month delay when required by Section 409A.

 

30


Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020

The following table presents information regarding incentive-based cash bonuses and equity awards granted to the NEOs during or for the year ended December 31, 2020, under Trustmark’s annual management incentive plan (cash), the mortgage department production bonus incentive for Mr. Tyler (cash) and Amended and Restated Stock Plan (restricted stock/restricted stock units) and, in the case of incentive-based awards, reflects the amounts that could be earned or received under such awards:

 

                                          All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of
   All Other
Option
Awards:
   Exercise   

Grant

Date Fair

                           Estimated Future Payouts    Shares    Number of    or Base    Value of
            Estimated Possible Payouts    Under Equity Incentive    of    Securities    Price of    Stock and
            Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)    Plan Awards (2)    Stock or    Underlying    Option    Option
                                          Units              Awards
     Grant      Threshold    Target    Maximum    Threshold    Target    Maximum    (3)    Options    Awards    (4)
  Name    Date      ($)    ($)    ($)    (#)    (#)    (#)    (#)    (#)    ($/Sh)    ($)

Gerard R. Host

      $362,691    $725,382    $1,450,764    ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---  
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---      2,165    12,373    24,746    ---      ---      ---      $395,651
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      12,372    ---      ---      $395,780

Duane A. Dewey

      $162,500    $325,001    $  650,002    ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---  
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---        947      5,413    10,826    ---      ---      ---      $173,092
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---        5,413    ---      ---      $173,162

Louis E. Greer

      $100,000    $200,000    $  400,000    ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---  
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---        541      3,094      6,188    ---      ---      ---      $  98,937
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---        3,093    ---      ---      $  98,945

Robert B. Harvey

      $  91,035    $182,070    $  364,140    ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---  
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---        541      3,094      6,188    ---      ---      ---      $  98,937
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---        3,093    ---      ---      $  98,945

Breck W. Tyler

      $  64,946    $129,892    $  259,784    ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---  
      ---      ---      $  300,000    ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---  
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---        325      1,856      3,712    ---      ---      ---      $  59,349
     2/19/2020      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---      ---        1,856    ---      ---      $  59,373

 

  (1)

The amounts shown in these columns reflect possible payouts under the annual management incentive plan for 2020. The minimum possible payment level (threshold) was 50% of the target amount shown, and the maximum possible payment was 200% of the target. All of these amounts are percentages of the executive’s base salary as of March 1, 2020. The amount of the award actually earned by the NEOs was recommended by the Committee on February 16, 2021 and approved by the Board on February 17, 2021. For Mr. Tyler, the amounts shown in the second row reflect the maximum amount he can earn annually under a quarterly production incentive based on the mortgage department’s origination, above a threshold production level, of mortgages that conform to the Bank’s mortgage origination guidelines. The production incentive does not have a threshold or target level. Amounts actually earned for 2020 are reported as Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020” on page 29.

 

  (2)

Reflects the performance units and achievement units granted on February 19, 2020. For a description of the vesting conditions and other features of the performance awards, please see “Equity-Based Compensation” beginning on page 23.

 

  (3)

Reflects the number of time-based units granted on February 19, 2020. For a description of the vesting conditions and other features of the time-based units, please see “Equity-Based Compensation” beginning on page 23.

 

  (4)

The amounts in this column reflect the grant date fair value of the performance units and achievement units computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, in each case based on the then-anticipated outcome and the grant date fair value of the time-based units computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718.

 

31


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End

The following table presents information regarding unvested equity awards held by NEOs at December 31, 2020. All awards in the table below were granted under the Amended and Restated Stock Plan. None of the NEOs held any unexercised options at December 31, 2020.

 

     Stock Awards
                        Equity Incentive
                   Equity Incentive    Plan Awards:
                   Plan Awards:    Market or Payout
         Number of    Market Value of    Number of    Value of Unearned
         Shares or Units of    Shares or Units of    Unearned Shares, Units    Shares, Units or Other
         Stock That Have    Stock That Have    or Other Rights That    Rights That Have Not
         Not Vested (1)    Not Vested (2)    Have Not Vested (1)    Vested (2)
  Name    Grant Date    (#)     ($)      (#)     ($)

Gerard R. Host

       2/15/2018  (3)       12,829      $ 350,360        ---           ---      
       2/15/2018  (4)       ---           ---              11,995      $ 327,583
       2/14/2019  (3)       12,232        334,056        ---           ---      
       2/14/2019  (5)       ---           ---              12,233        334,083
       2/19/2020  (3)       12,372        337,879        ---           ---      
       2/19/2020  (6)       ---           ---              12,373        337,907
           37,433      $  1,022,295        36,601      $ 999,573

Duane A. Dewey

       2/15/2018  (3)       3,207      $ 87,583        ---           ---      
       2/15/2018  (4)       ---           ---              2,999      $ 81,903
       2/14/2019  (3)       4,587        125,271        ---           ---      
       2/14/2019  (5)       ---           ---              4,588        125,298
       2/19/2020  (3)       5,413        147,829        ---           ---      
       2/19/2020  (6)       ---           ---              5,413        147,829
           13,207      $ 360,683        13,000      $ 355,030

Louis E. Greer

       2/15/2018  (3)       3,207      $ 87,583        ---           ---      
       2/15/2018  (4)       ---           ---              2,999      $ 81,903
       2/14/2019  (3)       3,058        83,514        ---           ---      
       2/14/2019  (5)       ---           ---              3,059        83,541
       2/19/2020  (3)       3,093        84,470        ---           ---      
       2/19/2020  (6)       ---           ---              3,094        84,497
           9,358      $ 255,567        9,152      $ 249,941

Robert B. Harvey

       2/15/2018  (3)       3,207      $ 87,583        ---           ---      
       2/15/2018  (4)       ---           ---              2,999      $ 81,903
       2/14/2019  (3)       3,058        83,514        ---           ---      
       2/14/2019  (5)       ---           ---              3,059        83,541
       2/19/2020  (3)       3,093        84,470        ---           ---      
       2/19/2020  (6)       ---           ---              3,094        84,497
           9,358      $ 255,567        9,152      $  249,941

Breck W. Tyler

       2/15/2018  (3)       1,924      $ 52,544        ---           ---      
       2/15/2018  (4)       ---           ---              1,800      $ 49,158
       2/14/2019  (3)       1,835        50,114        ---           ---      
       2/14/2019  (5)       ---           ---              1,835        50,114
       2/19/2020  (3)       1,856        50,687        ---           ---      
       2/19/2020  (6)       ---           ---              1,856        50,687
           5,615      $ 153,345        5,491      $ 149,959

 

  (1)

Dividends on the restricted shares are accumulated, vest and are paid only when and to the extent the underlying restricted shares vest, subject to a six-month delay when required by Section 409A. No interest is paid on accumulated dividends. No dividend equivalents are accumulated on the achievement units. Accelerated vesting of these shares and units may occur based on the executive’s death, disability, retirement at or after age 65 with consent of the Committee and where cause for termination is not present, termination by Trustmark without cause, termination by the executive for good reason if provided in the executive’s employment agreement or a change in control.

 

  (2)

The market value of shares or units that have not vested is the number of reported shares or units, as applicable, multiplied by the closing market price of Trustmark’s common stock on December 31, 2020, which was $27.31 per share.

 

  (3)

Reflects time-based restricted stock and restricted units granted, which vests 100% on the third anniversary of the grant date, if the executive remains employed through such date. See footnote (1) above for information regarding dividend accumulation and the events that may trigger accelerated vesting with respect to these shares.

 

32


Table of Contents
  (4)

For awards granted on February 15, 2018, reflects the number of performance-based restricted shares that vested under the award on February 16, 2021. The vesting percentages of the performance-based restricted stock and potential restricted stock units are based on performance goals of a three-year average of Trustmark’s ROATE compared to a target level, and TSR compared to a defined peer group. Because the achievement of the performance-based vesting level with respect to the ROATE and TSR targets was less than 100% in the aggregate (93.5% out of a maximum of 200%), no additional shares were issued. Also see footnote (1) above for information regarding dividend accumulation on the restricted shares.

 

  (5)

For awards granted on February 14, 2019, reflects the target (100%) number of performance-based restricted shares granted. The awards vest over a January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2021, performance period. Vesting percentages of the performance-based restricted stock and potential achievement units are based on performance goals of a three-year average of Trustmark’s ROATE compared to a target level and TSR which is compared to a defined peer group. Also see footnote (1) above for information regarding dividend accumulation on the restricted shares and the events that may trigger partial time-weighted performance vesting.

 

  (6)

For awards granted on February 19, 2020, reflects the target (100%) number of performance units granted. The awards vest over a January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2022, performance period. For a description of the vesting conditions and other features of the performance-based restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards, please see “Equity-Based Compensation” beginning on page 23. Also see footnote (1) above for information regarding dividend accumulation on the restricted shares and the events that may trigger partial time-weighted performance vesting.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2020

The following table presents information regarding restricted stock that vested during 2020 for each of the NEOs. None of the NEOs held or exercised options during 2020.

 

     Stock Awards      
  Name   

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting (1)

(#)

        

Value Realized

on Vesting (2) 

($)

     

Gerard R. Host

       15,893           $ 508,398                    

Duane A. Dewey

       3,668                              $ 117,335     

Louis E. Greer

       3,668           $ 117,335     

Robert B. Harvey

       3,668           $ 117,335     

Breck W. Tyler

       2,935           $ 93,887     

 

  (1)

Represents the total number of restricted shares that vested during 2020, without taking into account any shares that were surrendered or withheld for applicable tax obligations.

 

  (2)

Value realized is the gross number of shares multiplied by the market price of Trustmark’s common stock on the date of vesting.

 

33


Table of Contents

Pension Benefits for 2020

The Executive Deferral Plan is discussed in more detail under “Executive Deferral Plan” on page 25.

The following table shows the present value at December 31, 2020, of accumulated benefits payable to each NEO, including the number of years of service credited, under the Executive Deferral Plan, determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions included in Note 15 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021.

 

  Name            Plan Name   

Number of Years

Credited Service (1)

(#)

 

Present Value of

Accumulated Benefit (2)(3)

($)

 

Payments During

Last Fiscal Year (4)

($)

Gerard R. Host

   Executive Deferral Plan        28     $  5,297,737       ---  

Duane A. Dewey

   Executive Deferral Plan        17     $  1,584,830       ---  

Louis E. Greer

   Executive Deferral Plan        22     $   1,630,226       ---  

Robert B. Harvey

   Executive Deferral Plan        15     $   1,422,618       ---  

Breck W. Tyler

   Executive Deferral Plan        20     $   1,465,968       ---  

 

  (1)

This column reflects years of participation in the Executive Deferral Plan. Benefits accrue during a specified vesting period, which may be less that the years of credited service shown above.

 

  (2)

Excludes amounts under the Executive Deferral Plan which Messrs. Harvey and Tyler would not currently be entitled to receive because such amounts are not vested. In connection with a previous increase in their annual retirement benefits, they become vested in the increased amount over time through the year each attains age 64.

 

  (3)

The present value of accumulated benefit is the discounted value of the vested annual benefit payable at retirement age as of December 31, 2020.

 

  (4)

Mr. Host became eligible to receive benefit payments under the Executive Deferral Plan on September 1, 2019. The plan provides that payments shall be deferred if such payments would not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, all payments due to Mr. Host in 2019 and 2020 were deferred.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2020

The NQDC Plan is discussed in more detail under “Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan” on page 26. The following table presents information relating to each NEO’s participation in the plan:

 

     Executive    Trustmark    Aggregate    Aggregate      Aggregate Balance  
     Contributions in    Contributions in    Earnings in    Withdrawals/    at Last Fiscal
     Last Fiscal Year (1)    Last Fiscal Year    Last Fiscal Year (2)    Distributions    Year-End (3)
  Name    ($)    ($)    ($)    ($)    ($)

Gerard R. Host

   $  630,229    ---    $1,119,547    ---    $  8,836,000

Duane A. Dewey

   $    59,886    ---    $     41,725    $ (96,842)    $     365,894

Louis E. Greer

   $  100,000    ---    $     35,409    ---    $     263,849

Robert B. Harvey

   ---    ---    $    142,387    ---    $     859,314

Breck W. Tyler

   ---    ---    $    312,800    ---    $  2,074,393

 

  (1)

These amounts are included in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020” on page 29.

 

  (2)

The amounts in this column consist of investment gains for 2020 and do not include any above-market earnings.

 

  (3)

Of the amounts disclosed in this column, the following amounts were previously reported as compensation to the NEO in a summary compensation table prior to 2020: Host -- $4,657,965, Dewey -- $218,045, Greer -- $57,500 and Tyler -- $458,158.

 

34


Table of Contents

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The following table describes the potential payments that would be made to each of the NEOs in various termination and change in control scenarios based on compensation, benefit and equity levels in effect on December 31, 2020. The amounts shown are estimates and assume that the termination or change in control event occurred on December 31, 2020. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of an NEO’s actual termination of employment or an actual change in control of Trustmark.

In accordance with SEC regulations, the following table does not report any amount to be provided to an NEO that does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of Trustmark’s executive officers and which is available generally to all salaried employees, and excludes (i) amounts accrued through December 31, 2020, that would be paid in the normal course of continued employment, such as accrued but unpaid salary and bonus amounts, (ii) vested account balances under the Executive Deferral Plan, NQDC Plan and 401(k) plan, and (iii) already vested equity awards.

The amounts shown for Mr. Host and Mr. Dewey in the table below are determined based on their respective employment agreement and change in control agreement in effect as of December 31, 2020, and references to such agreements in the footnotes below refer to the agreements in effect as of December 31, 2020. Effective January 1, 2021, Mr. Host and Mr. Dewey entered into new employment agreements, and Mr. Dewey’s change in control agreement was terminated. For a description of the prior agreements and the new employment agreements, please see

“Employment and Change in Control Agreements with NEOs” beginning on page 36.

 

  Name   Incremental Compensation and Benefit Payments   

Non-CIC

Termination by Company

Without Cause or

by Executive for Good

Reason under

Agreement

  

CIC

    Termination by Company    

Without Cause or

by Executive for Good

    Reason under     

Agreement (1)

Gerard R. Host (2)

  Severance (3)    ---    $ 1,549,782
  Covenant Payment (3)(4)    $ 3,099,564    3,099,564
  Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)    1,306,328    1,306,328
  Executive Deferral Plan    ---    —  
  Health & Welfare Benefits (8)          71,306         106,959
  Totals    $ 4,477,198    $ 6,062,633

Duane A. Dewey

  Severance (3)    ---    $ 1,456,446
  Covenant Payment    ---    —  
  Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)    $ 472,133         472,133
  Executive Deferral Plan (6)    ---    —  
  Health & Welfare Benefits (8)    ---          49,883
  Totals    $ 472,133    $ 1,978,462

Louis E. Greer

  Severance (3)    ---    $ 1,195,650
  Covenant Payment    ---    —  
  Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)    $ 326,633         326,633
  Executive Deferral Plan    ---    —  
  Health & Welfare Benefits (8)    ---          40,167
  Totals    $ 326,633    $ 1,562,450

Robert B. Harvey

  Severance (3)    ---    $ 1,091,528
  Covenant Payment    ---    —  
  Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)    $ 326,633         326,633
  Executive Deferral Plan (6)(7)    ---         129,323
  Health & Welfare Benefits (8)    ---          26,877
  Totals    $ 326,633    $ 1,574,361

Breck W. Tyler

  Severance (3)    ---    $   870,944
  Covenant Payment    ---    —  
  Restricted Stock -- Accelerated Vesting (5)    $ 196,002         196,002
  Executive Deferral Plan (6)(7)    ---         118,862
  Health & Welfare Benefits (8)    ---          55,562
  Totals    $ 196,002    $ 1,241,370

 

  (1)

Mr. Host’s employment agreement and the other NEOs’ change in control agreements provide for change in control benefits on a “best net” approach, under which the executive’s change in control benefits will be reduced to avoid the golden parachute excise tax under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code only if such a reduction would cause the executive to receive more after-tax compensation than without a reduction. The amounts shown in this column do not reflect any reduction that might be made in this regard.

 

35


Table of Contents
  (2)

If during the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Host’s employment is terminated due to disability or if he dies, he or his designated beneficiary, spouse or estate will be entitled to a lump sum payment of a time-weighted pro-rata share of his annual bonus target amount for that year ($725,382 for 2020), in addition to accrued but unpaid compensation to date of termination.

 

  (3)

The executive must sign a general release in order to be entitled to receive these amounts. In the case of the NEOs other than Mr. Host, Trustmark has the right to retain these amounts if the executive breaches the confidentiality, non-solicitation or non-competition covenants contained in the executive’s change in control agreement.

 

  (4)

Payments pursuant to Mr. Host’s employment agreement in consideration of covenants relating to confidentiality and two-year non-solicitation and non-competition commitments, with one-half of the payment paid in 12 equal monthly installments and one-half paid in a lump sum.

 

  (5)

Upon a change in control without termination of employment, or upon death or disability, retirement at or after age 65 with consent of the Committee and where cause for termination is not present, termination by Trustmark not for cause or termination by the executive for good reason if provided in the executive’s employment agreement, the executive is entitled to accelerated vesting of a pro-rata portion of his unvested restricted stock and achievement units and 100% of time-based restricted stock units (plus accumulated dividends attributable to the shares of restricted stock vesting), based on actual service in the case of time-based restricted stock and actual service and actual performance in the case of performance-based restricted stock and achievement units. The value of the restricted stock and achievement units upon vesting is based on the closing market price per share of $ 27.31 as of December 31, 2020, plus the amount of accumulated cash dividends attributable to the shares of restricted stock vesting.

 

  (6)

Upon death, an incremental pre-retirement death benefit may be payable to the executive’s beneficiary under the Executive Deferral Plan.

 

  (7)

Upon termination within three years following a change in control, the executive is entitled to accelerated vesting of a portion of his unvested benefit under the Executive Deferral Plan by adding up to five years of service to the executive’s service under the plan. The incremental benefit amount shown in this column is equal to the present value of the amount of the benefit for which vesting would have been accelerated in connection with such a termination as of December 31, 2020. The actuarial assumptions used to calculate the incremental benefit are the same as the assumptions in the “Pension Benefits for 2020” table using a 1.95% rate for present value computations. Messrs. Host, Greer and Dewey were already fully vested as of December 31, 2020, and would not have received any incremental benefits from this provision. Messrs. Harvey and Tyler each would have received the incremental benefits shown in the table in connection with the unvested portions of the previous increase in their annual retirement benefit.

 

  (8)

Mr. Host is entitled to 24 months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination if his employment is terminated by Trustmark without cause or if he resigns for good reason, and 36 months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination upon such events in the case of a change in control. The other NEOs are entitled to 18 months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination if within two years after a change in control the executive’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than due to death, disability or for cause or if he resigns for good reason.

Human Resources Committee Report

The Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, and based on such review and discussions, the Human Resources Committee, as listed below, recommended to the Audit & Finance Committee, acting on behalf of the Board, that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

 

Adolphus B. Baker (Chair)    Harris V. Morrissette
J. Clay Hays, Jr. M.D.    Richard H. Puckett

Human Resources Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No current or former executive officer or associate of Trustmark or any of its subsidiaries currently serves or has served as a member of the Human Resources Committee or has been involved in any related party transaction as discussed in the section beginning on page 43.

2020 Pay Ratio Disclosure

For 2020, the ratio of the total compensation of Trustmark’s CEO to the total compensation of Trustmark’s median employee was 60 to 1. To calculate this ratio, Trustmark identified its median employee as of December 31, 2020 based on employees’ gross earnings, less before-tax benefit deductions, as reported in Box 5 of the United States Internal Revenue Service Form W-2. Compensation was annualized for employees who worked less than a full year, and compensation for part-time employees was annualized but not converted into a full-time equivalent. Once identified, the median employee’s total compensation for 2020 was determined in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K to be $60,154, as compared to total compensation of $3,616,342 for Trustmark’s CEO.

Employment and Change in Control Agreements with NEOs

Employment Agreements with Mr. Host. In connection with his election as President and CEO of Trustmark and the Bank, Trustmark and Mr. Host entered into an employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011 (the First Host Agreement). This agreement was subsequently amended effective February 15, 2018 (the First Amendment) and amended a second time, effective December 10, 2019 (the Second Amendment). Pursuant to the Second Amendment, Mr. Host ceased serving as President of the Bank, effective January 1, 2020.

The First Host Agreement terminated upon Mr. Host’s retirement as President and CEO of Trustmark and CEO of the Bank on December 31, 2020. On October 27, 2020 Trustmark and Mr. Host entered into a new employment agreement, effective January 1, 2021 (the Second Host Agreement) in connection with Mr. Host’s appointment as Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank.

 

36


Table of Contents

First Host Agreement. Pursuant to the First Host Agreement, Mr. Host was guaranteed a minimum base salary of $550,000 annually, subject to annual review.

The First Host Agreement provided that Mr. Host was eligible to earn an annual cash bonus, with a bonus target amount of 90% of his base salary. Mr. Host was also eligible to receive equity compensation awards on such basis as the Committee determines and was eligible to participate in any benefit plans or programs that are offered to senior executives generally.

On any cessation of employment, Mr. Host was entitled to his earned but unpaid base salary and annual bonus and, except in the case of termination for Cause (as defined in the First Host Agreement), any accrued vacation (earned compensation). Mr. Host was entitled to additional severance benefits in the event his employment ends as a result of his death or disability, or in the event his employment was terminated by Trustmark without Cause whether in connection with a change in control of Trustmark or not, or in the event Mr. Host resigned for Good Reason (as defined in the First Host Agreement) whether in connection with a change in control of Trustmark or not.

Under the First Host Agreement, Mr. Host was subject to standard confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition obligations during the term of the First Host Agreement and for two years after his employment ends. As partial consideration for these obligations after his employment ends, if Mr. Host’s employment was terminated by Trustmark without Cause or if he resigned for Good Reason, he would have been entitled to payments equal to two times the sum of (i) his annual base salary, and (ii) the average of his annual bonuses earned for the three years prior to the end of his employment (the Covenant Payments), with one-half of the Covenant Payments paid in 12 equal monthly installments commencing 60 days after termination and one-half paid in a lump sum 60 days after termination.

If Mr. Host’s employment was terminated by Trustmark without Cause or he resigned for Good Reason, in each case within two years after a change in control, he would have been entitled to the following benefits in addition to the Covenant Payments and earned compensation: (i) a lump sum payment equal to one times his base salary and the average of his annual bonuses earned for the three years prior to the change in control, (ii) thirty-six months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination, and (iii) accelerated vesting of any unvested stock options.

If Mr. Host’s employment was terminated by Trustmark without Cause or he resigned for Good Reason where he is not entitled to such change in control enhanced severance benefits, he would have been entitled to twenty-four months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination, in addition to the Covenant Payments and earned compensation.

If Mr. Host’s employment was terminated due to disability or if he died during the term, he or his designated beneficiary, spouse or estate would have been entitled to a lump sum payment of his earned compensation plus a time-weighted pro-rata share of his annual bonus target amount for that year.

The amounts which would have been payable to Mr. Host assuming a termination event on December 31, 2020, are addressed in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” table beginning on page 35.

The above is a summary of the material terms and provisions of the First Host Agreement. For the complete First Host Agreement, including the definitions of the defined terms used therein, refer to the copies of the First Host Agreement that has been filed with the SEC on September 14, 2010, as Exhibit 10-z to Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K, the First Amendment to the First Host Agreement that has been filed with the SEC on February 20, 2018, as Exhibit 10-v to Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Second Amendment to the First Host Agreement that has been filed with the SEC on December 10, 2019, as Exhibit 10.1 to Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K, and are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

Second Host Agreement. In connection with Mr. Host’s election and appointment as Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank, effective January 1, 2021, Trustmark and Mr. Host entered into the Second Host Agreement.

The Second Host Agreement provides for Mr. Host to serve as Executive Chairman of Trustmark and the Bank for a term beginning January 1, 2021 and continuing until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Under the Second Host Agreement, Mr. Host is guaranteed a minimum annual base salary of $700,000. Mr. Host’s base salary may be reduced, however, below $700,000, if Trustmark reduces the base salaries of other senior executives. Mr. Host will be eligible to earn an annual cash bonus, with a bonus target amount of 60% of his base salary. The Human Resources Committee will have the discretion to increase the annual bonus above or decrease the annual bonus below the bonus target amount for that year. Mr. Host will also be eligible to receive equity compensation awards on such basis as the Human Resources Committee of Trustmark’s Board of Directors determines.

On any cessation of employment, Mr. Host will be entitled to his unpaid earned base salary and, except in the case of termination for Cause (as defined below), any unpaid earned annual bonus for the prior year (earned compensation). He will be entitled to additional severance benefits in the event his employment ends as a result of his death or disability, or in the event his employment is terminated by Trustmark without Cause in connection with a change in control of Trustmark or not, or in the event Mr. Host resigns for Good Reason (as defined below) in connection with a change in control (as defined below) of Trustmark or not.

If Mr. Host’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than for Cause, death or disability or if he resigns for Good Reason, in each case not in connection with a change in control of Trustmark, he will be entitled to earned compensation and a payment equal to two times the sum of (1) his annual base salary and (2) the average of his annual

 

37


Table of Contents

bonuses for the three years prior to the end of his employment. He will also be entitled to 24 months of continuing medical, dental and vision coverage (or a cash payment in lieu thereof) on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination.

If Mr. Host’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than for Cause, death or disability or he resigns for Good Reason, in each case within two years after a change in control during the term of the Second Host Agreement, he will be entitled to the following additional severance benefits (in addition to earned compensation): (1) a payment equal to three times the sum of (x) his annual base salary immediately prior to the change in control and (y) the average of his annual bonuses for the three years prior to the change in control, (2) 36 months of continuing medical, dental and vision coverage (or a cash payment in lieu thereof) on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination, and (3) accelerated vesting of any unvested equity incentive awards, with any time-or service-based vesting conditions deemed to be satisfied and any performance-based vesting conditions to be based on performance as of the end of the calendar quarter ending on or prior to the change in control.

If Mr. Host’s employment is terminated due to disability or if he dies during the term, he or his designated beneficiary, spouse or estate will be entitled to his earned compensation plus a lump-sum payment of the time-weighted pro-rata share of his annual bonus target amount for that year.

Employment Agreement with Mr. Dewey. In connection with Mr. Dewey’s election and appointment as President and designation as CEO of Trustmark and the Bank, effective January 1, 2021, Trustmark and Mr. Dewey entered into an employment agreement (the Dewey Agreement) to replace Mr. Dewey’s change in control agreement. The Dewey Agreement is effective as of January 1, 2021. The Dewey Agreement provides for Mr. Dewey to serve as President and CEO of Trustmark and the Bank for a term of five years beginning January 1, 2021.

Under the Dewey Agreement, Mr. Dewey will be guaranteed a minimum annual base salary of $700,000, subject to annual review. Mr. Dewey’s base salary may be reduced, however, below $700,000, if Trustmark reduces the base salaries of other senior executives. Mr. Dewey will be eligible to earn an annual cash bonus, with a bonus target amount of 75% of his base salary, or for years after 2021, such greater percentage of his base salary up to a maximum of 100% as may be approved by Trustmark’s Board of Directors. The Human Resources Committee will have the discretion to increase the annual bonus above or decrease the annual bonus below the bonus target amount for that year. Mr. Dewey will also be eligible to receive equity compensation awards on such basis as the Human Resources Committee of Trustmark’s Board of Directors determines.

The Dewey Agreement provides that on any cessation of employment, Mr. Dewey will be entitled to his unpaid earned base salary and, except in the case of termination for Cause (as defined below), any unpaid earned annual bonus for the prior year (earned compensation). He will be entitled to additional severance benefits in the event his employment ends as a result of his death or disability, or in the event his employment is terminated by Trustmark without Cause in connection with a change in control of Trustmark or not, or in the event Mr. Dewey resigns for Good Reason (as defined below) in connection with a change in control (as defined below) of Trustmark or not.

If Mr. Dewey’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than for Cause, death or disability or if he resigns for Good Reason, in each case not in connection with a change in control of Trustmark, he will be entitled to earned compensation and a payment equal to two times the sum of (i) his annual base salary and (ii) the average of his annual bonuses for the three years prior to the end of his employment. He will also be entitled to 24 months of continuing medical, dental and vision coverage (or a cash payment in lieu thereof) on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination.

If Mr. Dewey’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than for Cause, death or disability or he resigns for Good Reason, in each case within two years after a change in control during the term of the Dewey Agreement, he will be entitled to the following additional severance benefits (in addition to earned compensation): (i) a payment equal to three times the sum of (x) his annual base salary immediately prior to the change in control and (y) the average of his annual bonuses for the three years prior to the change in control, (ii) 36 months of continuing medical, dental and vision coverage (or a cash payment in lieu thereof) on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination, and (iii) accelerated vesting of any unvested equity incentive awards, with any time- or service-based vesting conditions deemed to be satisfied and any performance-based vesting conditions to be based on performance as of the end of the calendar quarter ending on or prior to the change in control.

If Mr. Dewey’s employment is terminated due to disability or if he dies during the term, he or his designated beneficiary, spouse or estate will be entitled to his earned compensation plus a lump-sum payment of the time-weighted pro-rata share of his annual bonus target amount for that year.

Certain Defined Terms Used in Second Host Agreement and Dewey Agreement. For purposes of the Second Host Agreement and the Dewey Agreement, the terms “Cause,” “Good Reason” and “change of control” have the meanings provided below.

“Cause” means (i) commission of an act of personal dishonesty, embezzlement or fraud, (ii) misuse of alcohol or drugs, (iii) failure to pay any obligation owed to Trustmark or any affiliate, (iv) breach of a fiduciary duty or deliberate disregard of any rule of Trustmark or any affiliate, (v) commission of an act of willful misconduct or the intentional failure to perform stated duties, (vi) willful violation of any law, rule or regulation (other than misdemeanors, traffic violations or similar offenses) or any final cease-and-desist order, (vii) unauthorized disclosure of any confidential information of Trustmark or any affiliate or engaging in any conduct constituting unfair

 

38


Table of Contents

competition or inducing any customer of Trustmark or any affiliate to breach a contract with Trustmark or any affiliate, (viii) conviction of, or entry of a guilty plea or plea of no contest to, any felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, (ix) continual failure to perform substantially his duties and responsibilities (other than any such failure resulting from incapacity due to disability) after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered which specifically identifies the manner in which he has not substantially performed his duties and responsibilities, (x) violation in any material respect of Trustmark’s policies or procedures, including the Code of Ethics, or (xi) conduct that has resulted, or if it became known by any regulatory or governmental agency or the public is reasonably likely to result, in the good faith judgment of the Board, in material injury to Trustmark, whether monetary, reputational or otherwise.

“Good Reason” means (i) a material diminution the executive officer’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material breach of the agreement by Trustmark, or (iii) a relocation of Trustmark’s offices to a location more than fifty miles outside of Jackson, Mississippi, without the executive’s consent.

“Change in control” means (i) the acquisition by any person of the power to vote, or the acquisition of, more than 20% ownership of Trustmark’s voting stock, (ii) the acquisition by any person of control over the election of a majority of the Board, (iii) the acquisition by any person or by persons acting as a “group” for securities law purposes of a controlling influence over Trustmark’s management or policies, or (iv) during any two year period, a more than one-third change in the Board (Existing Board), treating any persons approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Existing Board as ongoing members of the Existing Board. However, in the case of (i), (ii), and (iii), ownership or control of Trustmark’s voting stock by a company-sponsored or a company subsidiary-sponsored employee benefit plan will not constitute a change in control.

The foregoing descriptions are summaries of the material terms and provisions of the Second Host Agreement and the Dewey Agreement. For the complete Second Host Agreement and Dewey Agreement, including the exact definitions of the defined terms used therein, refer to the copies of the Second Host Agreement and Dewey Agreement that have been filed with the SEC on October 27, 2021, as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to Trustmark’s Current Report on Form 8-K and are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

Change in Control Agreements with Other NEOs. In February 2014, upon the recommendation of the Committee and approval of the Board, Trustmark entered into identical change in control agreements with each of the NEOs (each a CIC Agreement), other than Mr. Host whose employment agreement already provided change in control benefits. In addition, Mr. Dewey’s CIC Agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2021 because the Dewey Agreement provides change in control benefits. Under the CIC Agreement, if the executive’s employment is terminated by Trustmark other than due to death or disability or for Cause or he resigns for Good Reason, in each case within two years after a change in control, he will be entitled to the following benefits in addition to any previously earned compensation: (i) a lump sum payment within 60 days after termination equal to two times the sum of his base salary in effect immediately prior to the change in control and the average of his annual bonuses earned for the two years prior to the year in which the change in control occurs (the CIC Severance Benefit), and (ii) eighteen months of continuing medical, dental, vision and group life coverage on the same premium cost sharing basis as prior to termination (the CIC Continuing Benefit). Each CIC Agreement includes standard confidentiality obligations during and after the executive’s employment. In addition, each CIC Agreement includes standard non-solicitation and non-competition obligations during the executive’s employment and for twelve months after the executive’s employment ends when the executive is eligible to receive the CIC Severance Benefit. Each CIC Agreement also provides that Trustmark may retain the CIC Severance Benefit if the executive violates the confidentiality, non-solicitation or non-competition obligation. Each executive is required to sign a release agreement with Trustmark prior to receiving the CIC Severance Benefit and the CIC Continuing Benefit after termination.

For purposes of the CIC Agreements, “Cause” and “change in control” have substantially the same meanings as in the First Host Agreement, and “Good Reason” means (i) a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a material diminution in the executive’s base compensation, (iii) a material breach of the agreement by Trustmark, or (iv) a relocation of Trustmark’s offices to a location more than fifty miles outside of Jackson, Mississippi, provided such relocation is considered a material change in the location where the executive must perform services.

The amounts which would have been payable to the NEOs other than Mr. Host under the CIC Agreements assuming a change in control and termination event on December 31, 2020, are addressed in the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” table beginning on page 35.

The above is a summary of the material terms and provisions of the CIC Agreements. For a complete CIC Agreement, including the exact definitions of the defined terms used therein, refer to the form of CIC Agreement that has been filed with the SEC on February 7, 2014, as Exhibit 10-ad to Trustmark’s Form 8-K Current Report, and is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

 

39


Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

Non-employee director compensation is determined by the Board, based on the recommendation of the Human Resources Committee. Directors who are employed by Trustmark receive no compensation for Board or committee service. During 2020, each non-employee director who served on the Board also served on the Bank Board.

The Board periodically reviews non-employee director compensation to determine if changes are needed, including by comparing it to non-employee director compensation at peer companies.

For 2020, cash compensation for non-employee directors was comprised of an annual retainer of $45,000 for their combined service on the Trustmark Board and the Bank Board. In addition, the independent Chairman of the Board received an annual retainer of $50,000. The Lead Director received an annual cash retainer of $30,000. The Chairs of certain Trustmark Board committees received an annual retainer ($20,000 for the Chair of the Audit & Finance Committee, $15,000 for the Chairs of the Human Resources Committee and the Enterprise Risk Committee, and $5,000 for the Chair of the Nominating Committee), and the Chairs of certain Bank Board committees received an annual retainer ($10,000 for the Chairs of the Asset/Liability Committee and the Credit Policy Committee). All members of Board and Bank Board committees, other than the Chairmen, also received an annual retainer of $2,500 per committee. In addition, Mrs. Conerly served on the Emerald Coast Community Bank Advisory Board and received a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended. Mr. Morrissette served on the Mobile/Baldwin County, Alabama Community Bank Advisory Board and received a fee of $750 for each meeting attended.

Annual retainer fees were paid monthly. Directors are also eligible to be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.

For 2020, each director also received an award of time-based restricted stock under the Amended and Restated Stock Plan valued at approximately $55,000. To help align the interests of directors with shareholders and encourage a focus on long-term growth, Trustmark has guidelines that require non-executive directors to own a minimum number of shares of Trustmark stock in an amount equal to a multiple of six times the annual cash retainer as in effect from time to time. The number of shares required to be owned is calculated by reference to the 10-day trading average share price through March 31 each year. Shares of unvested time-based restricted stock are counted as shares owned for purposes of the guidelines.

Based on the most recent review of ownership level attainment in 2020, all of the current directors, except General Collins, Mr. Eduardo and Dr. Hays, meet the stock ownership requirements. Until a director has reached the minimum requirement, the director is required to hold 100% of the shares received from any Trustmark stock awards. To ensure that directors bear the full risks of stock ownership, Trustmark’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits directors, among others, from engaging in options trading, short sales or hedging transactions relating to Trustmark stock. Directors are also prohibited from pledging or creating a security interest in any Trustmark stock they hold.

Trustmark maintains a Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan for non-employee directors who became directors prior to 2003 and who elected to participate in the plan. Under the plan, participating directors were required to defer $12,000 of their fees annually to fund a portion of the cost of their defined retirement benefits and death benefits. The amount of the retirement benefit and death benefit has been determined based upon the participant’s annual contribution amount, the length of Board service and the age of the director at date of entry into the plan. The Board amended the plan in 2009 to cease future benefit accruals under and contributions by directors to the plan effective March 1, 2010. The plan requires retirement benefits to commence at a director’s normal retirement date (defined in the plan as March 1 following age 65). Thus, should a director continue service beyond normal retirement date, retirement benefits would begin prior to cessation of Board service. Depending on a number of factors, the vested annual benefit at retirement is payable for the longer of life or twenty-five years and, as of December 31, 2020, ranges from $51,000 to $78,000 (taking into account the March 1, 2010, benefit accrual freeze) for current directors who elected to participate in the plan. Trustmark has purchased life insurance contracts on participating directors to fund the benefits under this plan.

Non-employee directors may defer all or a part of their annual retainer fees pursuant to the NQDC Plan. The compensation deferred is credited to an account, which is deemed invested in and mirrors the performance of one or more designated investment funds available under the plan and selected at the option of the director. The deferred compensation account will be paid in a lump sum or in annual installments at a designated time upon the occurrence of an unforeseen emergency or upon a director’s retirement or cessation of service on the Board.

 

40


Table of Contents

Director Compensation for 2020

The following table provides director compensation information for the year ended December 31, 2020.

 

  Name (1)   

Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
(2)

($)

   Stock
Awards 
(3)
($)
   Option
Awards 
(4)
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  

Change in
Pension Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
(5)

($)

   All Other
Compensation 
(6)
($)
  

Total

($)

Adolphus B. Baker

     $ 65,000      $  54,447        ---        ---      $ 136,778      $ 4,449      $ 260,674

William A. Brown

     $  50,000      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $ 4,449      $ 108,896

Augustus L. Collins (7)

     $ 33,333      $ 59,065        ---        ---        ---      $ 1,566      $ 93,964

James N. Compton (8)

     $ 17,500      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $ 1,112      $ 73,059

Tracy T. Conerly

     $ 72,667      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $ 4,449      $ 131,563

Toni D. Cooley

     $ 65,000      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $ 4,449      $ 123,896

Marcelo Eduardo (7)

     $ 33,333      $ 59,065        ---        ---        ---      $ 1,566      $ 93,964

J. Clay Hays Jr., M.D.

     $ 51,667      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $ 4,449      $ 110,563

Harris V. Morrissette

     $ 53,250      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $ 4,449      $ 112,146

Richard H. Puckett

     $ 82,500      $ 54,447        ---        ---      $ 107,139      $ 4,449      $ 248,535

R. Michael Summerford (8)

     $ 34,167      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $  1,112      $ 89,726

Harry M. Walker

     $ 60,000      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $ 4,449      $ 118,896

LeRoy G. Walker, Jr. (8)

     $ 17,500      $ 54,447        ---        ---      $ 49,677      $ 1,112      $ 122,736

William G. Yates III

     $ 50,000      $ 54,447        ---        ---        ---      $ 4,449      $ 108,896

 

  (1)

Mr. Host and Mr. Dewey are not included in this table as they are associates of Trustmark and thus received no compensation for their service as a director. The compensation received by Messrs. Host and Dewey as associates of Trustmark is shown in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020” on page 29.

 

  (2)

Amounts include fees earned or paid for service on both the Trustmark Board and the Bank Board and their respective committees. The amounts in this column include fees deferred pursuant to the NQDC Plan. For Mrs. Conerly, the amount also includes fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Emerald Coast Community Bank Advisory Board of Directors. For Mr. Morrissette, the amount also includes fees paid for attendance at meetings of the Mobile, Alabama, Community Bank Advisory Board of Directors.

 

  (3)

On February 19, 2020, each non-employee director, except General Collins and Mr. Eduardo, received 1,702 shares of time-based restricted stock units, valued on a 10-day average closing stock price up to and including the date of the grant. On April 28, 2020, General Collins and Mr. Eduardo each received 2,270 shares of time-based restricted stock units, valued on a 10-day average closing stock price up to and including the date of the grant. Subject to accelerated vesting in full upon a change in control, upon retirement at or after age 65 or cessation of Board service at the end of an elected term, in each case with consent of the Human Resources Committee and where cause for termination is not present, or upon disability, death or termination without cause, the February 19, 2020 grants of restricted units vested on February 19, 2021 and the April 28,2020 grants of restricted units will vest on April 28, 2021, if the director is still serving at the time. The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value (computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718 excluding the impact of estimated forfeitures). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 16 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021. At December 31, 2020, each non-employee director, except General Collins and Mr. Eduardo, held 4,836 shares of unvested time-based restricted stock and General Collins and Mr. Eduardo held 2,270 shares of unvested time-based restricted stock.

 

  (4)

No stock option awards were made during 2020. At December 31, 2020, none of the non-employee directors held any stock options.

 

  (5)

The amounts shown in the table above reflect the changes in actuarial present value of the directors’ accumulated benefits under Trustmark’s Directors’ Deferred Fee Plan. The increases were determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions included in Note 15 to Trustmark’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 18, 2021.

 

  (6)

The amounts in this column reflect the dividends credited to shares of unvested time-based restricted stock held by the directors on each dividend payment date during 2020. These dividends are accumulated and will vest and be paid only when and to the extent the related restricted shares vest.

 

  (7)

General Collins and Mr. Eduardo joined the Board on April 28, 2020.

 

  (8)

Messrs. Compton, Summerford and L. Walker retired from the Board on April 28, 2020.

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires that Trustmark’s shareholders have the opportunity to provide an advisory vote to approve Trustmark’s executive compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules. Accordingly, Trustmark’s shareholders are hereby given the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve or not approve the compensation of Trustmark’s NEOs as described above, by voting for or against this proposal.

The Human Resources Committee and Board have designed Trustmark’s executive compensation to recruit, retain and motivate employees who play a significant role in the organization’s current and future success. Trustmark, through the Human Resources Committee, the Board and the contributions of an outside compensation consultant, structures executive compensation to motivate these employees to maximize shareholder value by achieving performance goals while limiting risk appropriately and maintaining the safety and soundness of the organization. For a full description of these executive compensation practices, please see the description provided under the heading

 

 

41


Table of Contents

“Executive Compensation,” including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and the tabular disclosures of NEO compensation and related disclosures that follow.

This proposal gives you as a shareholder the opportunity to vote for or against the following resolution: “RESOLVED, that the shareholders hereby approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to Trustmark’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion disclosed in this proxy statement on pages 17 to 28.

Trustmark believes that its executive compensation and compensation practices and policies are reasonable in comparison to its peer group, are focused on pay-for-performance principles, are strongly aligned with the long-term interest of shareholders and are necessary to attract and retain experienced, highly-qualified executives important to Trustmark’s long-term success and the enhancement of shareholder value. The Board believes that Trustmark’s executive compensation achieves these objectives, and, therefore, recommends that shareholders vote “for” the proposal.

Because this vote is advisory, it will not be binding on the Board and will not be construed as overruling any decision made by the Board. The Human Resources Committee and the Board will take into account the outcome of this advisory vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements, but they are not required to do so.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “for” this proposal to provide advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation.

PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

 

Trustmark has engaged Crowe as its independent auditor since December 21, 2015, and the Audit & Finance Committee reaffirmed Crowe’s engagement as the independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. The Board recommends that shareholders vote in favor of ratifying the selection of Crowe. If shareholders do not ratify the selection of Crowe, the Audit & Finance Committee will consider a change in independent auditor for the next year.

The Audit & Finance Committee is responsible for approving the compensation paid to Crowe as Trustmark’s independent auditor. In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit & Finance Committee periodically considers whether there should be regular rotation of the independent auditing firm. The members of the Audit & Finance Committee and the Board believe that continued retention of Crowe to serve as Trustmark’s independent auditor is in the best interest of Trustmark and its shareholders.

Representatives of Crowe are expected to be present at the annual meeting with the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and to be available to respond to appropriate questions during the period generally allotted for questions at the meeting.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “for” ratification of the selection of Crowe as Trustmark’s independent auditor.

AUDIT & FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

 

Trustmark’s Audit & Finance Committee conducts the usual and necessary activities in connection with the audit functions of Trustmark. The Committee reviewed and discussed with management and Crowe the consolidated audited financial statements as of and for the three years ended December 31, 2020. The Committee also discussed with Crowe the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from Crowe required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and discussed the independence of Crowe. Based on this review, the Committee recommended to the Board that the consolidated audited financial statements be included in Trustmark’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.

All of the following members of Trustmark’s Audit & Finance Committee are independent directors as defined by Nasdaq Listing Rules:

 

Tracy T. Conerly (Chair)

  

Marcelo Eduardo

William A. Brown

  

Harris V. Morrissette

Augustus L. Collins

  

The Board has determined that Tracy T. Conerly and Harris V. Morrissette each qualify as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to the requirements of the SEC.

Principal Accountant Fees

The following table presents the fees for professional audit services rendered by Crowe for the audit of Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, and fees billed for other services rendered by Crowe during those periods. All services reflected below for 2020 and

 

42


Table of Contents

2019 were pre-approved in accordance with the policy of the Audit & Finance Committee. Information related to audit fees for 2020 includes amounts billed through December 31, 2020, and additional amounts estimated to be billed for the 2020 period for audit services rendered.

 

Year   

Audit

Fees (1)

   Audit-Related
Fees
(2)
  

All Other

Fees (3)

   Total

2020

   $1,163,900    $375,839    ---    $ 1,539,739

2019

   $1,114,000    $226,271    --    $ 1,340,271

 

  (1)

Audit fees include fees for professional services in connection with the audit of Trustmark’s consolidated financial statements, audit of internal control over financial reporting, review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

 

  (2)

Audit-related fees include assurance and related services that are traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm and include compliance testing and reporting, internal control reviews and agreed upon procedure reports. The increase in audit-related fees for 2020 was primarily due to fees associated with the issuance of Trustmark’s 3.625% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due December 1, 2030.

 

  (3)

Crowe did not provide any tax services to Trustmark in 2020 or 2019.

Pre-Approval Policy

The Audit & Finance Committee has adopted a policy that sets forth guidelines and procedures for the pre-approval of services to be performed by the independent auditor, as well as the fees associated with those services. Annually, the Committee reviews and establishes the types of services and fee levels to be provided by the independent auditor. Any additional services or fees in excess of the approved amounts require specific pre-approval by the Committee. The Committee has delegated to its Chair the authority to evaluate and approve services and fees in the event that pre-approval is required between meetings. If the Chair grants such approval, she will report that approval to the full Committee at its next meeting. Non-audit services, prohibited by the SEC, are likewise prohibited under the Committee’s pre-approval policy.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

This section provides information regarding certain transactions between Trustmark and its subsidiaries and certain of our directors and officers.

The Bank has made loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders and their related interests in 2020 and in prior years and continues to do so in 2021. Such loans were made in the course of ordinary business, were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the Bank, and do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Loan transactions with directors, executive officers and principal shareholders and their related interests are approved by the Board as part of the Bank’s loan review policy under Regulation O.

The Bank made a payment of approximately $275,000 in 2020 to Bloomfield Equities, LLC, for the naming rights to the Mississippi Braves AA Baseball Stadium, known as “Trustmark Park.” Ninety percent (90%) of Bloomfield Equities, LLC, is owned indirectly by Trustmark director William G. Yates III and his family through Spectrum Capital, LLC, which is owned thirty-three percent (33%) by Mr. Yates III and sixty-seven percent (67%) by his family and a family trust. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the transaction was approximately $81,675. The collective dollar value of this transaction to the Yates family (excluding Mr. Yates) was approximately $165,825. The Bank expects to make a payment of $275,000 in 2021 to Bloomfield Equities, LLC, for naming rights to Trustmark Park. The specific dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the 2021 transaction is not known at this time.

In addition, Trustmark paid $5,000 in 2020 to Spectrum Events, LLC for the sponsorship of a high school baseball tournament played at Trustmark Park. (Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020 Governor’s Cup college baseball games scheduled to be played at Trustmark Park, for which Trustmark had purchased a sponsorship, were cancelled.) Spectrum Events, LLC is wholly owned by Spectrum Capital, LLC. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the transaction was approximately $1,650, and the collective dollar value of this transaction to the Yates family (excluding Mr. Yates) was approximately $3,350. Trustmark expects to pay $14,000 for sponsorship of high school and college baseball series to be held at Trustmark Park in 2021. The specific dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the 2021 transactions is not known at this time.

In addition, Trustmark paid Bloomfield Holdings, LLC $60,000 in 2020 for, among other things, exclusive banking rights at the Outlets of Mississippi, which is owned by Bloomfield Holdings, LLC. Ninety percent (90%) of Bloomfield Holdings, LLC is owned indirectly by Spectrum Capital, LLC. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in the transactions was approximately $17,820. The collective dollar value of these transactions to the Yates family (excluding Mr. Yates) was approximately $36,180. Trustmark anticipates paying Bloomfield Holdings, LLC $60,000 in 2021 for, among other things, exclusive banking rights at the Outlets of Mississippi.

During 2013, in connection with the New Markets Tax Credit Program, the Bank purchased approximately $4.4 million of state and federal tax credits for approximately $2.8 million through two entities in each of which the Bank holds a 99.99% interest. The federal tax credit, which totaled approximately $2.0 million, was allocated to this transaction by SCC Sub-CDE 2, LLC (SCC Sub), a subsidiary of Southern Community Capital, LLC (SCC), which in turn was allocated the federal tax credit by SCC, a subsidiary of the Bank. SCC owns 0.01% of SCC Sub, with a

 

43


Table of Contents

managing member distribution for that percentage paid back to SCC on a quarterly basis. Of the Bank’s approximately $2.8 million investment, approximately $2.0 was ultimately loaned to Bloomfield Holdings, LLC by SCC Sub in connection with a qualifying real estate development project. The loan by SCC Sub to Bloomfield Holdings, LLC has an annual interest rate of 1.00% and a term of 30 years. These tax-credit transactions were unwound and the loan’s outstanding balance was repaid in 2020.

During 2020, the Bank paid approximately $3.4 million in construction management fees to W. G. Yates & Sons Construction Company (WGY&S) in connection with the construction of new facilities located in Jackson and Brandon, Mississippi. WGY&S is wholly-owned by Mr. Yates III and his family, and Mr. Yates III serves as its President and CEO. Trustmark expects to pay approximately $1.0 million in construction management fees to WGY&S relating to the Brandon, Mississippi, project in 2021.

In addition, during 2020, Trustmark paid approximately $65,000 to WGY&S for assistance with hurricane disaster response, recovery and repairs for branch offices located in Bay County, Florida, following Hurricane Michael in October 2018.

During 2020, WGY&S and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates paid premiums for employee benefits insurance policies to third party insurance companies. Fisher Brown Bottrell received commissions of approximately $1.3 million from such insurance companies for placing these policies. Trustmark believes the premiums and the terms of the insurance policies are no more favorable than could be obtained from a nonrelated party in an arm’s length transaction. Fisher Brown Bottrell continues to serve as insurance agent for these policies for WGY&S in 2021. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in this transaction is not known at this time. In addition, during 2020, WGY&S and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates paid the Bank an aggregate of approximately $290,000 in fees for trust and investment management services, including for serving as trustee of certain 401(k) plans for such affiliates. Trustmark believes these fees are no more favorable than could be obtained from a nonrelated party in an arm’s length transaction. The Bank continues to provide these services for WGY&S in 2021. The dollar value of Mr. Yates III’s interest in this transaction is not known at this time.

During 2020, MINACT, Inc. and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries and affiliates paid premiums for employee benefits insurance policies to third party insurance companies. General Collins is the CEO of MINACT. Fisher Brown Bottrell received commissions of approximately $281,000 from such insurance companies for placing these policies. Trustmark believes the premiums and the terms of the insurance policies are no more favorable than could be obtained from a nonrelated party in an arm’s length transaction. Fisher Brown Bottrell continues to serve as insurance agent for these policies for MINACT in 2021.

Trustmark’s Audit & Finance Committee has adopted and manages a written policy that governs the review, approval or ratification of related party transactions. For purposes of this policy, a “related party transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or a series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which Trustmark is, or will be, a participant and in which a “related party” has a direct or indirect material interest where the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000. A “related party” is (i) an executive officer, director or nominee for director of Trustmark, (ii) a shareholder owning in excess of 5% of Trustmark’s outstanding equity securities, (iii) a person who is an immediate family member of someone listed in (i) or (ii), or (iv) an entity (a) which is controlled by someone listed in (i), (ii) or (iii), (b) in which someone listed in (i), (ii) or (iii) above owns 5% or more of the outstanding equity securities, or (c) of which someone listed in (i), (ii) or (iii) is an executive officer or general partner.

The policy provides that any related party transaction must be reported to the General Counsel and may be consummated or may continue only if the Audit & Finance Committee determines that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is not inconsistent with the best interests of Trustmark. Generally, a transaction that is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party will be presumed to not be inconsistent with the best interests of Trustmark. Certain categories of transactions are deemed to be pre-approved by the Audit & Finance Committee and do not require separate approval. These include, among other things, compensation or benefits arrangements approved by the Human Resources Committee and extensions of credit made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, of those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to Trustmark and not presenting more than the normal risk of collectability or other unfavorable features.

The Audit & Finance Committee considered and approved, or ratified, the payments, as applicable, to Bloomfield Equities, LLC, Spectrum Events, LLC, Bloomfield Holdings, LLC, and WGY&S, and, therefore, to Mr. Yates III, as well as the business relationships between Fisher Brown Bottrell, the Bank and WGY&S and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, and the business relationship between Fisher Brown Bottrell and MINACT, Inc.

 

44


Table of Contents

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF TRUSTMARK STOCK

 

The following table reflects the number of Trustmark shares beneficially owned by (a) persons known by Trustmark to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of its outstanding shares, (b) current directors and director nominees, (c) each of the NEOs within the Executive Compensation section, and (d) current directors and executive officers of Trustmark as a group. The persons listed below have sole voting and investment authority for all shares except as indicated. The percentage of outstanding shares of common stock owned is not shown where less than 1%. All percentage computations are based on 63,694,153 shares of Trustmark common stock outstanding as of February 2, 2021, which includes unvested restricted stock. For certain of the directors, the number of shares beneficially owned includes shares underlying restricted stock units that vest within 60 days of February 2, 2021. As of February 2, 2021, there were no options outstanding.

 

Name   

Shares
Beneficially
Owned

as of 02/02/21

  Percent of            
Outstanding            
Shares            

BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055

       7,147,909     (1)       11.2 %            

The Robert M. Hearin Foundation
The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation
Post Office Box 16505
Jackson, Mississippi 39236

       5,558,024     (2)       8.7 %            

The Vanguard Group
100 Vanguard Boulevard
Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

       5,554,831     (3)       8.7 %            

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
Dimensional Place
6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One
Austin, Texas 78746

       4,022,520     (4)       6.3 %            

Adolphus B. Baker

       38,134     (5)    

William A. Brown

      
13,964    
(5) (6)
   

Augustus L. Collins

       1,453        

Tracy T. Conerly

       12,402     (5)    

Toni D. Cooley

      
16,769    
(5)
   

Duane A. Dewey

       52,649     (7)    

Marcelo Eduardo

       1,418     (8)    

Louis E. Greer

      
52,984    
(9) (10)
   

Robert B. Harvey

       35,559     (9)    

J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.

       9,671     (5) (11)    

Gerard R. Host

       279,481     (12)    

Harris V. Morrissette

       18,206     (5)    

Richard H. Puckett

       110,974     (5) (13)    

Breck W. Tyler

       28,241     (14)    

Harry M. Walker

       61,161     (5) (15)    

William G. Yates III

       20,231     (5)    

Directors and executive officers of Trustmark as a group

       858,545     (16)       1.3 %

 

  (1)

According to Amendment No. 12 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 27, 2021, by BlackRock, Inc., as of December 31, 2020, BlackRock, Inc., through its subsidiaries, has sole voting power with respect to 7,040,817 shares of Trustmark common stock and sole investment power with respect to 7,147,909 shares of Trustmark common stock. The foregoing information has been included solely in reliance upon the disclosures contained in the referenced amended Schedule 13G.

 

  (2)

Based solely on information provided to Trustmark by The Robert M. Hearin Foundation on behalf of The Robert M. Hearin Foundation, The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation, Capitol Street, LLC, Galaxie Corporation, Bay Street, LLC, Harbor Street, Inc. and H-H Corporation, (collectively, Hearin Foundation), as of December 31, 2020, the Hearin Foundation beneficially owns 5,558,024 shares of Trustmark common stock including 376,578 shares owned by The Robert M. Hearin Foundation, 3,519,482 shares owned by The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation, 1,388,964 shares owned by Capitol Street, LLC, 23,000 shares owned by Bay Street, LLC and 250,000 shares owned by Harbor Street, Inc. Capitol Street, LLC is 100% owned by Galaxie Corporation, which may be deemed to be controlled by The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation. Bay Street, LLC and Harbor Street, Inc. may also be deemed to be controlled by The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation, which owns an indirect 50% interest in each of Bay Street, LLC and Harbor Street, Inc. Voting and investment decisions concerning shares beneficially owned by The Robert M. Hearin Foundation and The Robert M. Hearin Support Foundation are made by the Foundations’ trustees: Robert M. Hearin, Jr., Matthew L. Holleman, III, Steve M. Hendrix, E. E. Laird, Jr., Laurie H. McRee and Alan W. Perry.

 

45


Table of Contents
  (3)

According to Amendment No. 8 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021, by The Vanguard Group, as of December 31, 2020, The Vanguard Group, through its subsidiaries, has sole voting power with respect to zero shares of Trustmark common stock and sole investment power with respect to 5,441,054 shares of Trustmark common stock. The aggregate amount beneficially owned by each reporting person was 5,554,831 shares of Trustmark common stock. The foregoing information has been included solely in reliance upon the disclosures contained in the referenced amended Schedule 13G.

 

  (4)

According to Amendment No. 4 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021, by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, as of December 31, 2020, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP, through its subsidiaries, has sole voting power with respect to 3,888,660 shares of Trustmark common stock and sole investment power with respect to 4,022,520 shares of Trustmark common stock. The aggregate amount beneficially owned by each reporting person was 4,022,520 shares of Trustmark common stock. The foregoing information has been included solely in reliance upon the disclosures contained in the referenced amended Schedule 13G.

 

  (5)

Includes 3,134 shares of time-based restricted stock with respect to which Directors Baker, Brown, Conerly, Cooley, Hays, Morrissette, Puckett, H. Walker, and Yates each has sole voting power but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting.

 

  (6)

Includes 500 shares held in trust of which Mr. Brown is the co-trustee and sole beneficiary.

 

  (7)

Includes 15,590 shares of restricted stock with respect to which Mr. Dewey has sole voting power but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting and 32,107 shares as to which Mr. Dewey shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

 

  (8)

Includes 1,316 shares owned by his spouse as to which Mr. Eduardo has no voting or investment control.

 

  (9)

Includes 12,532 shares of restricted stock with respect to which Messrs. Greer and Harvey each has sole voting power, but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting.

 

  (10)

Includes 40,448 shares as to which Mr. Greer shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

 

  (11)

Includes 200 shares as to which Dr. Hays shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

 

  (12)

Includes 50,123 shares of restricted stock with respect to which Mr. Host has sole voting power but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting and 100,000 shares held in trust of which Mr. Host’s spouse is trustee.

 

  (13)

Includes 75,138 shares owned by his spouse as to which Mr. Puckett has no voting or investment control.

 

  (14)

Includes 7,519 shares of restricted stock with respect to which Mr. Tyler has sole voting power but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting.

 

  (15)

Includes 56,044 shares as to which Mr. Walker shares voting and investment power with his spouse.

 

  (16)

Includes shares held directly or indirectly by 21 individuals: the currently-serving directors and NEOs listed herein, as well as Trustmark’s other remaining executive officers. Of these, a total of 166,604 are shares of restricted stock with respect to which the individuals have sole voting power, but which cannot be transferred prior to vesting. None of these shares are pledged as security.

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires Trustmark’s directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of Trustmark’s common stock to file reports of their ownership and changes in ownership of Trustmark’s common stock. Trustmark prepares these reports for the directors and executive officers who request it on the basis of information obtained from them and Trustmark’s records. Trustmark believes that applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements were met during 2020, except that, due to an inadvertent error, a Form 4 was filed late for Maria L. Sugay relating to the acquisition of 1,500 shares of common stock on July 28, 2020.

PROPOSALS OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

Shareholders may submit proposals to be considered at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders if they do so in accordance with Trustmark’s bylaws and applicable regulations of the SEC. In accordance with Trustmark’s bylaws as more fully described under “Corporate Governance — Nomination of Directors” beginning on page 9, any shareholder intending to nominate a candidate for election to the Board at Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit notice to the Secretary no earlier than December 15, 2021, and no later than January 14, 2022. Any shareholder intending to propose a matter for consideration at Trustmark’s 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (other than a director nomination) must submit such proposal in writing to the Secretary at Trustmark Corporation, Post Office Box 291, Jackson, MS 39205 no later than January 29, 2022; however, in order to be considered for inclusion in Trustmark’s proxy statement for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the proposal must meet the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 and be submitted to the Secretary no later than November 15, 2021. In addition, the proxy solicited by the Board for the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will confer discretionary authority to vote on any shareholder proposal presented at the meeting if Trustmark has not received notice of such proposal by January 29, 2022.

COST OF PROXY SOLICITATION

 

Solicitation of proxies will be primarily by mail and electronic delivery. Associates of Trustmark and its subsidiaries may be used to solicit proxies by means of telephone or personal contact but will not receive any additional compensation for doing so. Banks, brokers, trustees and nominees will be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of such shares. The total cost of the solicitation will be borne by Trustmark.

 

46


Table of Contents

AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

 

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Tuesday, April 27, 2021:

This proxy statement, a form of the proxy card and Trustmark’s 2020 Year in Review are available at investorrelations.trustmark.com. As permitted by rules adopted by the SEC, Trustmark is furnishing these proxy materials over the Internet to most shareholders. Those shareholders will not receive printed copies of these documents and instead will receive a Notice of Internet Availability containing instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet. The Notice of Internet Availability also contains instructions on how each of those shareholders can request a printed copy of the proxy materials including this proxy statement, a proxy card and Trustmark’s 2020 Year in Review. Shareholders who do not receive a Notice of Internet Availability will receive a printed copy of the proxy materials by mail.

 

47


Table of Contents
      

 

LOGO

 

                                         P.O. BOX 291

                                         JACKSON, MS 39205-0291

  

 

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com

 

      
  

Shareholders may use the Internet to transmit their voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2021, for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 21, 2021, for shares held in a Plan. To vote online, have the proxy card in hand, access the website above and follow the instructions given.

 
  

 

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021

 
    
  

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Trustmark Corporation in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via email or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years.

 
  

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Shareholders should mark, sign and date their proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided or return it to Trustmark Corporation, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

                    KEEP THIS PORTION  FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— —  —— — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

  TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

 

Items of Business

 

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all

nominees listed in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.

      

                

 

        

 

       1.      

Election of Directors - To elect a board of twelve directors to hold office for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected and qualified.

     
      Nominees:   For   Against   Abstain
      1a.     Adolphus B. Baker      
      1b.   William A. Brown      
      1c.   Augustus L. Collins      
      1d.   Tracy T. Conerly      
      1e.   Toni D. Cooley      
      1f.   Duane A. Dewey      
      1g.   Marcelo Eduardo      
      1h.   J. Clay Hays, Jr., M.D.      
      1i.   Gerard R. Host      
               
                    
               
    For   Against   Abstain    
      1j.      Harris V. Morrissette          
      1k.     Richard H. Puckett          
      1l.      William G. Yates III          
  2.    

To provide advisory approval of Trustmark’s executive compensation.

         
  3.    

To ratify the selection of Crowe LLP as Trustmark’s independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021.

         
  4.    

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

         
 
                    
 

  

 

            

 

                    

    

            

 

                    

  

                    

    Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]                       Date           

                           

 

Signature (Joint Owners)                                                  Date        

  


Table of Contents

 

 

 

LOGO

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement, 2020 Year in Review and 2020 Form 10-K

are available at www.proxyvote.com.

 

 

 

 

— — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  —— — — — — 

 

 

TRUSTMARK CORPORATION

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

APRIL 27, 2021

The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Richard H. Puckett and Tracy T. Conerly, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his/her substitute, and hereby authorize(s) them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this proxy card, all of the shares of Common Stock of Trustmark Corporation that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/TRMK2021 on Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. Central Time. The 16-digit control number included on this proxy card will be required to access the meeting.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED BY THE SHAREHOLDER(S). IF NO SUCH DIRECTIONS ARE MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE, “FOR” ADVISORY APPROVAL OF TRUSTMARK’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND “FOR” RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF CROWE LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021.

PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE OR VOTE BY INTERNET (SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR MORE INFORMATION).

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE

 

 

Trustmark (NASDAQ:TRMK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Trustmark Charts.
Trustmark (NASDAQ:TRMK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024 Click Here for more Trustmark Charts.