SVTE Service Team Inc (CE)

 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

  

 

For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2014

 

 

For the transition period from _________ to __________

 

Commission file number: 333-178210

 

 

 

  

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  x    No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).         Yes  x    No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes  o    No  x

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of January 5, 2015:  12,525,647 common shares and no preferred stock has been issued.

 

 

 

---

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  

Item 1. Financial Statements.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

---

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

---

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

  

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

SERVICE TEAM, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AT NOVEMBER 30, 2014 AND NOVEMBER 30, 2013

 

 

 

Service Team Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada on June 6, 2011.  The Company was organized to comply with the warranty obligations of electronic devices manufactured by companies outside of the United States.  The business proved to be unprofitable and the Company reduced its warranty and repair operations.  On June 5, 2013, Service Team Inc. acquired Trade Leasing, Inc. for 4,000,000 shares of its common stock, a commonly held company.  Trade Leasing, Inc., a California corporation, was incorporated on November 1, 2011, and commenced business January 1, 2013.  Trade Leasing, Inc. is principally involved in the manufacturing, maintenance and repair of truck bodies.  

 

The Company has established a fiscal year end of August 31.

 

 

 

The consolidated financial statements presented in this report are the combined financial reports of Trade Leasing, Inc. and Service Team Inc. 

 

The Company maintains its accounting records on an accrual basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP).

 

The consolidated financial statements present the Balance Sheet, Statements of Operations, Shareholders’ Deficit and Cash Flows of the Company. These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars. The accompanying audited, consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q.  All adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods have been made and are of a recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed herein.

 

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Service Team Inc. and Trade Leasing, Inc. both of which are under common control and ownership. The condensed consolidated financial statements herein contain the operations of the wholly-owned subsidiaries listed above. All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in the preparation of these financial statements. 

 

 

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

 

 

---

  

 

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.  However, we have incurred continued losses, ongoing negative cash flows from operations, have a net working capital deficiency of $134,861, and have an accumulated deficit of approximately $1,129,221 as of November 30, 2014.  There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in order to continue as a going concern. The Company is funding its operations by issuing common shares and debt. As of November 30, 2014, the Company had sold 6,000,000 shares to Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. at $0.001 per share for net funds to the Company of $6,000 and received capital contributions of $23,027. The Company has also sold 1,969,014 shares to various individuals and received net funds of $340,383.  Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. has also loaned the Company $219,215.  The major shareholder, Hallmark Venture Group, Inc., has committed to advancing additional funds as may be required for the operation of the Company. We cannot be certain that capital will be provided when it is required.

 

 

Cash and equivalents include investments with initial maturities of three months or less. The Company maintains its cash balances at credit-worthy financial institutions that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $250,000. There were no cash equivalents at November 30, 2014 or August 31, 2014.

 

 

Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are cash and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of FDIC insurance limits.

 

 

All accounts receivable are due thirty (30) days from the date billed. If the funds are not received within thirty (30) days the customer is contacted to arrange payment. The Company uses the allowance method to account for uncollectable accounts receivable. All accounts were considered collectable at period end and no allowance for bad debts was considered necessary.  The allowance for doubtful accounts as of November 30, 2014 and August 31, 2014 was $18,488 and $2,802, respectively.

 

 

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Trade Leasing, Inc., has more than 400 customers. Three customers represented about 23%, 11% and 10% of total receivables as of November 30, 2014.One customer represented about 20% of total receivables as of August 31, 2014.  

 

During the three months ended November 30, 2014, the Company had one customer that represented 19% of total sales.  During the three months ended November 30, 2013, the Company had one customer that represented about 22% of total sales. 

 

 

The Company does not own inventory, materials are purchased as needed from local suppliers; therefore, there was no additional inventory on hand at November 30, 2014 or August 31, 2014.

 

---

  

 

Equipment, vehicles and furniture, which are recorded at cost, consist primarily of fabrication equipment and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (generally fifteen years or less). Costs incurred for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and expenditures for major replacements and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated remaining useful lives. There was $497 of depreciation expense during the three months ended November 30, 2014.  There was no depreciation expense recorded during the three months ended November 30, 2013. 

 

Net property and equipment were as follows at November 30, 2014 and August 31, 2014: 

 

 

 

Service Team Inc. leases a manufacturing facility at 10633 Ruchti Road, South Gate, California 90280 on a year-to-year basis for $7,000 per month.  The location consists of three acres of land with two buildings a fabrication building of 6,000 square feet and a final assembly building of 12,000 square feet.  The final assembly building includes a large spray booth capable of accommodating large trucks and office space for four offices. 

 

Our principal executive offices are located in 600 square feet in a building at 18482 Park Villa Place, Villa Park, California 92861. The space is furnished by Hallmark Venture Group, Inc., a related party, at no charge. As a result of this contribution of office space, $0 and $1,500 of imputed rent expense was recorded for the three months ended November 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

 

 

From time to time, the Company may issue convertible notes that may contain an imbedded beneficial conversion feature. A beneficial conversion feature exists on the date a convertible note is issued when the fair value of the underlying common stock to which the note is convertible into is in excess of the remaining unallocated proceeds of the note after first considering the allocation of a portion of the note proceeds to the fair value of warrants, if related warrants have been granted. The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature is recorded as a debt discount with a corresponding amount to additional paid in capital. The debt discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the note using the effective interest method.

 

 

The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 on June 6, 2011. Under this FASB, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Under GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and FASB ASC 820-10-50 details the disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value.

 

---

   

The Company has various financial instruments that must be measured under the new fair value standard including: cash, convertible notes payable, accrued expenses, promissory notes payable, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:  

 

Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.  The fair value of the Company’s cash is based on quoted prices and therefore classified as Level 1. 

 

Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

 

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

 

Cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, promissory notes and accrued expenses reported on the balance sheet are estimated by management to approximate fair market value due to their short term nature.

 

The following table presents assets that were measured and recognized at fair value as of November 30, 2014 on a recurring basis:

 

 

The following table presents assets that were measured and recognized at fair value as of August 31, 2014 on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the level of historical operating results and the uncertainty of the economic conditions, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets at November 30, 2014 and August 31, 2014 where it cannot conclude that it is more likely than not that those assets will be realized.

 

---

  

 

Trade Leasing Division

 

The Trade Leasing Division receives orders from customers to build or repair truck bodies. The company builds the requested product. At the completion of the product the truck is delivered to the customer.  If the customer accepts the product Trade Leasing Inc. issues an invoice to the customer for the job. The invoice is entered into our accounting system and is recognized as revenue at that time.

 

In the Trade Leasing Division we use the completed contract method for truck bodies built, which typically have construction periods of 15 days or less. Contracts are considered complete when title has passed, the customer has accepted the product and we do not retain risks or rewards of ownership of the truck bodies. Losses are accrued if manufacturing costs are expected to exceed manufacturing contract revenue.  Manufacturing expenses are primarily composed of aluminum cost, which is the largest component of our raw materials cost and the cost of labor. 

 

Service Products Division

 

 

 

The Company accounts for the issuance of equity instruments to acquire goods and/or services based on the fair value of the goods and services or the fair value of the equity instrument at the time of issuance, whichever is more readily determinable. The Company's accounting policy for equity instruments issued to consultants and vendors in exchange for goods and services follows the provisions of standards issued by the FASB. The measurement date for the fair value of the equity instruments issued is determined at the earlier of (i) the date at which a commitment for performance by the consultant or vendor is reached or (ii) the date at which the consultant or vendor's performance is complete. In the case of equity instruments issued to consultants, the fair value of the equity instrument is recognized over the term of the consulting agreement.

 

 

---

 

In December of 2004, the FASB issued a standard which applies to transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services and also applies to liabilities an entity may incur for goods or services that are based on the fair value of those equity instruments. For any unvested portion of previously issued and outstanding awards, compensation expense is required to be recorded based on the previously disclosed methodology and amounts. Prior periods presented are not required to be restated. We adopted the standard as of inception.  The Company has not issued any stock options to its Board of Directors and officers as compensation for their services.  If options are granted, they will be accounted for at a fair value as required by the FASB ASC 718.

  

 

The Company adopted the standard issued by the FASB, which requires presentation of basic earnings or loss per share and diluted earnings or loss per share. Basic income (loss) per share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share (“Diluted EPS”) are similarly calculated using the treasury stock method except that the denominator is increased to reflect the potential dilution that would occur if dilutive securities at the end of the applicable period were exercised. As of November 30, 2014 and 2013, because the Company does not have any potentially dilutive securities, the accompanying presentation is only of basic loss per share.

 

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation, to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

 

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11: Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. The new guidance requires that unrecognized tax benefits be presented on a net basis with the deferred tax assets for such carryforwards. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not expect the adoption of the new provisions to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

---

 

The Company’s authorized capital is 74,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share and 100,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.  

 

During the three months ended November 30, 2014 the Company sold 40,000 shares for $4,000.

No preferred shares have been issued.

 

As of November 30, 2014 and August 31, 2014 the Company has not granted any stock options.  

 

We have accounted for stock based compensation under the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards codification (ASC) 718-10-55.  (Prior authoritative literature:  FASB Statement 123 (R), Share-based payment.)  This statement requires us to record any expense associated with the fair value of stock based compensation.  Determining fair value requires input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility.  Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

 

---

 

On June 21, 2013, for value received, the Company gave a convertible promissory note to Howard Nunn, Jr., in the original principal amount of $23,003 (the “Nunn Note”). The Nunn Note has a maturity date of September 30, 2013, and principle and accrued interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%). The Note holder has an option to convert the Note into Common Stock at the price of $0.50 per share.  During the three months ended November 30, 2013, the Company repaid $5,000 to Howard Nunn under the same note.

On August 10, 2014, Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. acquired the Note, with principal of $27,158 and accrued interest of $3,987, to Howard Nunn, Jr. for 80,000 shares of Service Team Inc. Common Stock owned by Hallmark Venture Group, Inc.  The Note was then canceled and the amounts due on the Note were added to the amounts due Hallmark Venture Group, Inc.  The option to convert to shares was voided.

The Company evaluated the Nunn Note and determined that the shares issuable pursuant to the conversion option were determinate due to the Fixed Conversion Price and, as such, does not constitute a derivative liability as the appropriate number of shares will be available or issuable for settlement to occur. The beneficial conversion feature discount resulting from the conversion price of $0.75 below the market price on June 21, 2013 of $1.25 provided a value of $23,003; which was recorded as an increase to additional paid in capital and a reduction of debt due to the discount. The discount was amortized accordingly to the effective interest method over the term of the convertible note in the amounts of $6,833 during the three months ended November 30, 2013. Accrued interest was $0 and $0 as of November 30, 2014 and August 31, 2014, respectively.

 

 

Our principal executive offices are located in 600 square feet in a building at 18482 Park Villa Place, Villa Park, California 92861. The space is furnished by Hallmark Venture Group, Inc., a related party, at no charge. As a result of this contribution of office space, $0 and $1,500 of imputed rent expense was recorded for the three months ended November 30, 2014 and November 30, 2013.

    

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under standards issued by the FASB. Under those standards, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax benefits or consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is provided for significant deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that such assets will not be realized through future operations.

 

No provision for federal income taxes has been recorded due to the net operating loss carry forwards totaling approximately $567,316 as of November 30, 2014 that will be offset against future taxable income.  The available net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $567,316 will expire in various years through 2032. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have not been recognized in these financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the future tax loss carry forwards.

 

---

The actual income tax provisions differ from the expected amounts calculated by applying the statutory income tax rate to the Company’s loss before income taxes.  The components of these differences are as follows at November 30, 2014 and August 31, 2014:

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

There were no subsequent events through the date that the financial statements were issued. 

 

 

---

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Overview of Our Company

 

Service Team Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Nevada on June 6, 2011.  The Company was organized to comply with the warranty obligations of electronic devices manufactured by companies outside of the United States.  The business proved to be unprofitable and the Company reduced its warranty and repair operations.  On June 5, 2013, Service Team Inc. acquired 25,000 common shares of Trade Leasing, Inc., granting 100% ownership, for 4,000,000 shares of its common stock; in addition, both entities are under common control.   Trade Leasing, Inc., a California corporation, was incorporated on November 1, 2011, and commenced business January 1, 2013.  Trade Leasing, Inc. is principally involved in the manufacturing, maintenance and repair of truck bodies.  Service Team Inc. and Trade Leasing Inc. have not been involved in a bankruptcy, receivership or any similar proceeding. The acquisition of Trade Leasing Inc. is a major change in the operations of the company. Trade Leasing is being operated as a separate division of Service Team Inc.

 

Trade Leasing Division.  This division is involved in the manufacture and repair of truck bodies.  The Company manufactures truck bodies that are attached to a truck chassis which consists of an engine, drive train, a frame with wheels, and in some cases, a cab.  The truck chassis is manufactured by third parties that are major automotive or truck companies.  These companies do not typically build specialized truck bodies.  The company is also involved in other products used by the trucking industry.   The company operates a complete manufacturing and repair facility in South Gate, California.  The facility manufactures both custom and standard production truck bodies in approximately 70 different models designed to fill the specialized demands of the user.   The vans are available for hauling dry freight or refrigerated freight.  The refrigerated vans are built with two to four inches of foam insulating that is sprayed in place for hauling refrigerated products such as meats, vegetables, flowers and similar products.  The Company installs different types of cooling systems in the trucks.  This varies from motor driven units installed outside the van body or refrigeration units driven off the engine of the truck.  Some refrigerated trucks use a system called “cold plate” where a large metal plate is cooled by power while the truck is parked.  The power is then unplugged and the truck will stay cool for many hours.  The Company’s customers are auto dealers and users of trucks; such as dairies, food distributors and local delivery. The company has approximately 400 customers. One customer South Bay Ford represented more than 10% of sale in the last 12 months. The company is not dependent on a few major customers. Trade Leasing purchases raw materials from approximately 25 suppliers.  There are several hundred similar suppliers of comparable materials in the local area. Trade Leasing Inc. purchases refrigeration units from Thermoking Corporation a division of United Technologies and Carrier Corporation, a division of Ingersol Rand Corporation. The two companies represent more than 80% of the refrigeration unit market. There are several other manufactures of refrigeration units that represent a small part of the market. Trade Leasing Inc. employs 23 factory workers and 3 management personnel.  The management personnel make all of the sales and manage the factory. The company has all of the government licenses necessary to conduct its business. These include 9 different city, county and state licenses covering vehicle transportation, air quality, hazard waste (Paint), land or building use, and sales tax.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

As of November 30, 2014, we had assets of $241,274 including current assets of $223,032.   We have accounts payable of $249,913, related party notes payable (Hallmark Venture Group) of $10,158, contingent liabilities of $54,100, accrued interest of $3,297 and accrued expenses of $40,425. The Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. funds were advanced to pay our on-going expenses.   Hallmark Venture Group, Inc. is prepared to advance us additional funds as needed. There is no firm payback date. It is to be repaid when we have funds available. Accrued expenses are for work performed by employees during the organizational and operational stages of the Company. There is no firm date which these are to be paid. It is to be repaid when we have funds available.  Since inception we have also raised $354,382 from the sale of our common stock.  We believe our ability to achieve commercial success and continued growth will be dependent upon our continued access to capital either through additional sale of our equity or cash generated from operations. We will seek to obtain additional working capital through the sale of our securities. We will attempt to obtain additional capital through bank lines of credit; however, we have no agreements or understandings with third parties at this time.   Management believes that the acquisition of Trade Leasing, Inc. adds sales of more than one million dollars per year and a projected profit of more than one hundred thousand dollars.

 

---

   

Rescission Offer

 

The Company has a contingent liability associated with the rescission offer (as noted below) made to investors due to the sale of unregistered stock.  The liability is equal to the number of shares of common stock sold of 541,000 times the selling price of $0.10 per share which equals $54,100.  As of November 30, 2014 and August 31, 2014 the estimated dollar value of the contingent liability is $54,100 and $54,100, respectively.

 

During the period from November 29, 2011, until June 1, 2012, the Company sold 541,000 shares to various individuals for a total cash consideration of $54,100.  The funds were used for operating capital of the Company including rent and payroll. These sales of our shares sold after the filing date of our S-1 Registration (November 29, 2011) may not be covered by a valid private placement exemption from the registration requirements due to possible integration with the public offering.  To be certain of our position we have elected to offer rescission for all private sales made after November 29, 2011.  Our rescission offer covers twenty-five shareholders (25) for a total of 541,000 shares originally sold for $54,100. 

 

Results of Operations

 

Three Months Ended November 30, 2014 compared to the Three Months Ended November 30, 2013

 

Sales during the three month period ended November 30, 2014 were $553,627 compared to $477,223 for the three month period ending November 30, 2013.   Our cost of revenues was $513,383. Our operating expenses were $59,222. We had losses from operations of $18,978.  Our interest expense was $466; leaving a net loss of $19,444.  

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

Not Applicable

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(c) and 15d – 15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

  

Inherent Limitations of Internal Controls

 

Our Principal Executive Officer does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. Although our disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, a control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented if there exists in an individual a desire to do so. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, other than those stated above, during our most recent quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

---

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

 

None.

 

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable.

    

Item 5. Other Information.

 

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

 

31.1  Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Section 302.

 

31.2  Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Section 302.

 

32.l  Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

 

32.2  Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

 

101   Interactive Data Files

 

 

 

---

SIGNATURES

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

---

Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

I,  Carlos Arreola  certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Service Team Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation: and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: January 12, 2015

 

 

/s/ Carlos Arreola

By:  Carlos Arreola,

Chief Executive Officer and President

Principal Executive Officer

 

Exhibit 31.2

I,  Robert L. Cashman certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Service Team Inc..;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation: and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: January 12, 2015

 

 

/s/ Robert L. Cashman

By: Robert L. Cashman, 

Principal Executive Officer

 

 

 

I, Robert L. Cashman, Vice President, Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, of Service Team Inc.,  a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The report on Form 10-Q of Service Team Inc. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2014 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: January 12, 2015

/s/ Robert L. Cashman

Name: Robert L. Cashman

Title:   Chief Financial Officer

Service Team (CE) (USOTC:SVTE)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024

Service Team (CE) (USOTC:SVTE)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024