SUDBURY,
ON, Jan. 17, 2024 /CNW/ - SPC Nickel
Corp. (TSXV: SPC) ("SPC Nickel" or the "Company"), is
pleased to announce the maiden Mineral Resource Estimate
("MRE") for the West Graham Project ("West Graham" or the
"Project"), part of the Company's large-scale Ni-Cu property
(Figure 1 & 2) in the southwest corner of the
Sudbury Basin, referred to as the
Lockerby East Property.
The MRE shows Indicated Resources of 224.8 million pounds of
contained nickel and 155.0 million pounds of contained copper and
further Inferred Resources of 86.2 million pounds of contained
nickel and 57.5 million pounds of contained copper (Table
3).
The MRE, in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 ("NI
43-101") is effective as of December 4,
2023, was produced following the consolidation of the
Project in January 2023 (see News
Release dated January 23, 2023)
through an agreement with Vale Canada. Following that
consolidation, SPC Nickel completed a diamond drilling program (67
holes totalling 14,180 metres) in connection with producing the
MRE.
Highlights:
- In-Pit Resource at a 0.3% NiEq1 Cutoff Grade
- Indicated Resource of 19.3 Mt at 0.42% Ni, 0.28% Cu
(0.57% NiEq2)
- Inferred Resource of 3.3 Mt at 0.37% Ni, 0.28% Cu
(0.53% NiEq2)
- In-Pit Resource extends from surface to a vertical depth of
435 metres.
- Future Expansion: Potential to expand the 'higher-grade'
(>0.9% NiEq2) zones within the In-Pit Resource with
additional infill drilling.
- Out-of-Pit Resource at a 0.7% NiEq1 Cutoff
Grade
- Indicated Resource of 3.2 Mt at 0.63% Ni, 0.47% Cu
(0.92% NiEq2)
- Inferred Resource of 3.9 Mt at 0.69% Ni, 0.43% Cu
(0.97% NiEq2)
- Exploration Upside: Significant potential to expand the
Out-of-Pit Resource with additional infill drilling.
*Please see Mineral Resource Estimate Notes at the end of
this release.
Grant Mourre, CEO and President
of SPC Nickel commented, "SPC Nickel is very pleased to deliver
this maiden Mineral Resource representing yet another major
milestone for the Company as we continue to grow and advance the
West Graham Project. To produce a Mineral Resource Estimate within
12 months of signing an agreement to consolidate the asset with
Vale in January 2023, is a tremendous
achievement by our team.
The geometry of the mineralization at West Graham, its
amenability to low-cost open-pit mining methods, the availability
of local skilled labour, proximity to power, transportation and
processing infrastructure, including both nickel sulphide mills and
smelters, favourably positions the project for a near-term path to
production. The West Graham Deposit, as well as the larger Lockerby
East Property, retains remarkable exploration upside and our maiden
Mineral Resource is a vital step towards unlocking and realising
that potential."
Mineral Resources
The Mineral Resources at West Graham were estimated by SGS
Geological Services and are summarized in Table 1.
Sensitivity to cutoff grade is summarized in Table 2, and
contained metal summarized in Table 3. Mineral Resources
include near surface mineralization with potential for open-pit
mining, as well as higher grade mineralization amenable to
conventional underground mining methods (Figure 2). The full
technical report, which is being prepared in accordance with NI
43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects will be
available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) under the Company's issuer
profile within 45 days from this news release.
Table 1: West Graham Project Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate
effective December 4, 2023.
*Please see Mineral Resource Estimate Notes at the end of
this release.
Area
|
Category
|
NiEq
Cuttoff1
|
Tonnes
|
Ni %
|
Cu %
|
Co %
|
Pt
g/t
|
Pd
g/t
|
Au
g/t
|
Ag
g/t
|
NiEq
%2
|
West Graham In-Pit
Resource
|
In-Pit
|
Indicated
|
0.3
|
19,326,000
|
0.42
|
0.28
|
0.01
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
1.47
|
0.57
|
In-Pit
|
Inferred
|
0.3
|
3,283,000
|
0.37
|
0.28
|
0.01
|
0.10
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
1.24
|
0.53
|
West Graham
Out-of-Pit Resource
|
Out-of-Pit
|
Indicated
|
0.7
|
3,238,000
|
0.63
|
0.47
|
0.02
|
0.24
|
0.06
|
0.07
|
2.64
|
0.92
|
Out-of-Pit
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
3,867,000
|
0.69
|
0.43
|
0.03
|
0.22
|
0.06
|
0.06
|
2.20
|
0.97
|
(1)
|
NiEq cutoff grades
consider metal prices of $9.50/lb Ni, $3.50/lb Cu, $22.00/lb Co,
$1000/oz Pt, $1,800/oz Pd and $1,700/oz Au and consider metal
recoveries of 90% for Ni, 90% for Cu, 56% for Co, 69% for Pt, 68%
for Pd and 68% for Au. Ag is not used.
|
(2)
|
NiEq grades are
calculated using this formula: Ni (%) + [Cu (%) * 0.369] + [Co (%)
* 2.318] + [Pt / 31.1 * 4.779] + [Pd / 31.1 * 8.602] + [Au / 31.1 *
8.124] with price assumptions of $9.50/lb Ni, $3.50/lb Cu,
$22.00/lb Co, $1000/oz Pt, $1,800/oz Pd and $1,700/oz Au. Ag is not
used.
|
Table 2: West Graham Resources, Sensitivity to cutoff grade. West
Graham In-Pit Resource and Out-of-Pit Resource.
NiEq
Cutoff1
|
Tonnes
|
Ni
%
|
Cu %
|
Co %
|
Pt
g/t
|
Pd
g/t
|
Au
g/t
|
Ag
g/t
|
NiEq
%2
|
West Graham In-Pit
Indicated Resource
|
0.2
|
20,800,000
|
0.40
|
0.27
|
0.01
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
1.42
|
0.55
|
0.3
|
19,326,000
|
0.42
|
0.28
|
0.01
|
0.06
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
1.47
|
0.57
|
0.4
|
15,508,000
|
0.46
|
0.31
|
0.01
|
0.07
|
0.02
|
0.03
|
1.54
|
0.63
|
0.5
|
10,330,000
|
0.53
|
0.34
|
0.01
|
0.08
|
0.02
|
0.03
|
1.66
|
0.72
|
0.6
|
6,534,000
|
0.61
|
0.38
|
0.02
|
0.09
|
0.02
|
0.03
|
1.77
|
0.82
|
0.7
|
4,085,000
|
0.69
|
0.41
|
0.02
|
0.10
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
1.85
|
0.92
|
0.8
|
2,618,000
|
0.78
|
0.44
|
0.02
|
0.10
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
1.93
|
1.02
|
0.9
|
1,641,000
|
0.87
|
0.47
|
0.02
|
0.11
|
0.03
|
0.04
|
2.02
|
1.12
|
1.0
|
1,044,000
|
0.95
|
0.48
|
0.02
|
0.11
|
0.03
|
0.04
|
2.11
|
1.22
|
West Graham In-Pit
Inferred Resource
|
0.2
|
3,350,000
|
0.37
|
0.28
|
0.01
|
0.10
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
1.22
|
0.53
|
0.3
|
3,283,000
|
0.37
|
0.28
|
0.01
|
0.10
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
1.24
|
0.53
|
0.4
|
2,857,000
|
0.39
|
0.30
|
0.01
|
0.10
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
1.29
|
0.56
|
0.5
|
1,723,000
|
0.43
|
0.33
|
0.01
|
0.12
|
0.03
|
0.04
|
1.38
|
0.62
|
0.6
|
758,000
|
0.51
|
0.37
|
0.02
|
0.14
|
0.03
|
0.04
|
1.46
|
0.72
|
0.7
|
341,000
|
0.59
|
0.40
|
0.02
|
0.15
|
0.04
|
0.04
|
1.60
|
0.82
|
0.8
|
151,000
|
0.65
|
0.46
|
0.02
|
0.16
|
0.04
|
0.05
|
1.69
|
0.91
|
0.9
|
68,000
|
0.71
|
0.52
|
0.02
|
0.17
|
0.04
|
0.05
|
1.98
|
1.00
|
1.0
|
24,000
|
0.80
|
0.55
|
0.02
|
0.17
|
0.04
|
0.05
|
2.61
|
1.11
|
NiEq
Cutoff1
|
Tonnes
|
Ni
%
|
Cu %
|
Co %
|
Pt
g/t
|
Pd
g/t
|
Au
g/t
|
Ag
g/t
|
NiEq
%2
|
West Graham
Out-of-Pit Indicated Resource
|
0.6
|
5,184,000
|
0.55
|
0.42
|
0.02
|
0.22
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
2.29
|
0.81
|
0.7
|
3,238,000
|
0.63
|
0.47
|
0.02
|
0.24
|
0.06
|
0.07
|
2.64
|
0.92
|
0.8
|
1,982,000
|
0.72
|
0.52
|
0.02
|
0.25
|
0.06
|
0.06
|
2.95
|
1.04
|
0.9
|
1,240,000
|
0.81
|
0.56
|
0.02
|
0.25
|
0.08
|
0.08
|
3.14
|
1.16
|
1.0
|
794,000
|
0.92
|
0.60
|
0.03
|
0.27
|
0.08
|
0.08
|
3.29
|
1.29
|
1.1
|
596,000
|
0.99
|
0.63
|
0.03
|
0.26
|
0.05
|
0.05
|
3.44
|
1.37
|
1.2
|
451,000
|
1.05
|
0.66
|
0.03
|
0.21
|
0.10
|
0.14
|
3.59
|
1.45
|
West Graham
Out-of-Pit Inferred Resource
|
0.6
|
6,152,000
|
0.59
|
0.39
|
0.02
|
0.20
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
2.01
|
0.85
|
0.7
|
3,867,000
|
0.69
|
0.43
|
0.03
|
0.22
|
0.06
|
0.06
|
2.20
|
0.97
|
0.8
|
2,627,000
|
0.78
|
0.44
|
0.03
|
0.24
|
0.07
|
0.05
|
2.26
|
1.08
|
0.9
|
1,728,000
|
0.90
|
0.45
|
0.03
|
0.24
|
0.07
|
0.05
|
2.18
|
1.21
|
1.0
|
1,298,000
|
0.99
|
0.45
|
0.03
|
0.26
|
0.07
|
0.05
|
2.08
|
1.30
|
1.1
|
993,000
|
1.08
|
0.44
|
0.04
|
0.25
|
0.06
|
0.03
|
1.97
|
1.39
|
1.2
|
756,000
|
1.16
|
0.42
|
0.04
|
0.25
|
0.08
|
0.04
|
1.77
|
1.47
|
(1)
|
NiEq cutoff grades
consider metal prices of $9.50/lb Ni, $3.50/lb Cu, $22.00/lb Co,
$1000/oz Pt, $1,800/oz Pd and $1,700/oz Au and consider metal
recoveries of 90% for Ni, 90% for Cu, 56% for Co, 69% for Pt, 68%
for Pd and 68% for Au. Ag is not used.
|
(2)
|
NiEq grades are
calculated using this formula: Ni (%) + [Cu (%) * 0.369] + [Co (%)
* 2.318] + [Pt / 31.1 * 4.779] + [Pd / 31.1 * 8.602] + [Au / 31.1 *
8.124] with price assumptions of $9.50/lb Ni, $3.50/lb Cu,
$22.00/lb Co, $1000/oz Pt, $1,800/oz Pd and $1,700/oz Au. Ag is not
used.
|
Table 3: West Graham Resources, Contained Metal in West Graham
In-Pit Resource and Out-of-Pit Resource.
NiEq
Cutoff1
|
Category
|
Tonnes
|
Ni lbs
(Millions)
|
Cu lbs
(Millions)
|
Co lbs
(Millions)
|
Pt
(ozs)
|
Pd
(ozs)
|
Au
(ozs)
|
Ag
(ozs)
|
West Graham In-Pit
Contained Metals
|
0.3
|
Indicated
|
19,326,000
|
179.1
|
121.0
|
5.1
|
39,000
|
12,000
|
15,000
|
911,000
|
0.3
|
Inferred
|
3,283,000
|
26.7
|
20.6
|
0.8
|
10,000
|
3,000
|
3,000
|
131,000
|
West Graham
Out-of-Pit Contained Metals
|
0.7
|
Indicated
|
3,238,000
|
45.7
|
34.0
|
1.5
|
25,000
|
6,000
|
7,000
|
275,000
|
0.7
|
Inferred
|
3,867,000
|
59.5
|
36.9
|
2.4
|
27,000
|
7,600
|
7,000
|
273,000
|
(1)
|
NiEq cutoff grades
consider metal prices of $9.50/lb Ni, $3.50/lb Cu, $22.00/lb Co,
$1000/oz Pt, $1,800/oz Pd and $1,700/oz Au and consider metal
recoveries of 90% for Ni, 90% for Cu, 56% for Co, 69% for Pt, 68%
for Pd and 68% for Au. Ag is not used.
|
In addition to the West Graham Deposit, the property also hosts
the 100% owned high-grade LKE Deposit (formerly called the Lockerby
East Deposit). Located 200 metres down-dip of the West Graham
Resource (Figure 2), the deposit is comprised of a lens of
high-grade Ni-Cu-PGM massive sulphide where historical drilling
returned values as high as 5.60% Ni and 1.26% Cu over a core length
of 10.0 metres (see reference section). In 2009, First
Nickel Inc published a historical resource for the LKE Deposit,
that contained 0.18 Mt at 2.32% Ni, 0.78% Cu in the indicated
category and 0.04 Mt at 2.90% Ni, 0.80% Cu in the inferred category
(see reference section). SGS Geological Services is
currently updating the historical resource to current standards
based on a validated historical database and a revised resource
model and will incorporate this resource estimate update in the
full technical report.
Mineral Resource Estimate Notes:
(1)
|
The Mineral Resource
Estimate was estimated by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P. Geo. of SGS
Geological Services and is an independent Qualified Person as
defined by NI 43-101. Dr Armitage conducted a site visit to the
Lockerby East Property on July 24, 2023.
|
(2)
|
The classification
of the current Mineral Resource Estimates for the West Graham
Deposit into Indicated and Inferred is consistent with current 2014
CIM Definition Standards - For Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves.
|
(3)
|
All figures are
rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the
estimate and numbers may not add due to
rounding.
|
(4)
|
All mineral
resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by
continuous 3D wireframe models (the constraining volumes), and are
considered to have reasonable prospects for eventual economic
extraction.
|
(5)
|
Mineral resources
which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of
confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and
must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably
expected that most of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be
upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued
exploration.
|
(6)
|
The validated
database for the West Graham Deposit provided by SPC Nickel for the
MRE includes data for 560 surface and underground diamond drill
holes and 26 surface rock channels totalling 182,936 m. The
database totals 20,294 assay intervals representing 27,388 m of
drilling and channeling. The database includes data for 85 drill
holes completed by SPC totalling 19,393 m and including 7,093 assay
samples. The average assay sample length of all drilling is 1.35
m.
|
(7)
|
The West Graham
resource model is based on 256 mineralized intercepts from 236
drill holes and 17 rock channels, including mineralized intercepts
from all 85 drill holes completed by SPC. The mineralized database
included 7,953 assay samples, average length of 1.30 m and
7,119 1.5 m composites.
|
(8)
|
The West Graham
Mineral Resource Estimate is based on a three-dimensional ("3D")
resource model, constructed in GEOVIA GEMS version 6.8.3 software
("GEMS").
|
(9)
|
Grades for nickel,
copper, cobalt, platinum, palladium, gold and silver were estimated
were interpolated into a block model, with block dimensions of 10 *
x 5 (y) x 5 (z) m, using 1.5 m capped composites assigned to that
model. To generate grade within the blocks, the inverse distance
squared (ID2) interpolation method was used. The
resource estimate search parameters are based on drill hole
spacing, and size, shape and orientation of the resource domain.
The classification of resource into Inferred and Indicated is based
primarily on drill hole spacing.
|
(10)
|
An average density
value for the West Graham Deposit was assigned based on a database
of 6,295 mineralized samples. A value of 2.92 is used for West
Graham. Values ranging from 2.85 to 3.00 are used for waste. Waste
densities are based on a database of 7,039 samples.
|
(11)
|
The West Graham
Deposit mineralization is considered amenable to open-pit and
underground extraction.
|
(12)
|
It is envisioned
that parts of the West Graham Deposit may be mined using open pit
mining methods. In-pit mineral resources for the West Graham
Deposit are reported at a base case cutoff grade of 0.3 % NiEq
within a conceptual pit shell. Whittle™ pit optimization software
(GEOVIA Whittle 2022) was used for pit optimization. The results
from the pit optimization are used solely for the purpose of
testing the "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" by an
open-pit and do not represent an attempt to estimate mineral
reserves. There are no mineral reserves on the Property. The
results are used as a guide to assist in the preparation of a
Mineral Resource statement and to select an appropriate resource
reporting cutoff grade. The West Graham in-pit Mineral Resource
grade blocks are quantified above the base case cutoff grade, above
the constraining pit shell, below topography and within the
constraining mineralized domain (the constraining
volumes).
|
(13)
|
Underground Mineral
Resources for the West Graham Deposit are estimated from out of the
pit shell and are reported at a base case cutoff grade of 0.7 %
NiEq. The West Graham underground resource grade blocks were
quantified above the base case cutoff grade, out of the
constraining pit shell and within the constraining mineralized
domain (the constraining volume).
|
(14)
|
Based on the size,
shape and orientation of the deposit, it is envisioned that the
West Graham underground resource may be mined using the longhole
open stoping mining method (a bulk mining method that has long been
utilized in the Sudbury region).
|
(15)
|
NiEq cutoff grades
consider metal prices of $9.50/lb Ni, $3.50/lb Cu, $22.00/lb Co,
$1000/oz Pt, $1,800/oz Pd and $1,700/oz Au and consider metal
recoveries of 90% for Ni, 90% for copper, 56% for Co, 69% for Pt,
68% for Pd and 68% for Au. Silver is not used.
|
(16)
|
NiEq grades are
calculated using this formula: Ni (%) + [Cu (%) * 0.369] + [Co (%)
* 2.318] + [Pt / 31.1 * 4.779] + [Pd / 31.1 * 8.602] + [Au / 31.1 *
8.124] with price assumptions of $9.50/lb Ni, $3.50/lb Cu,
$22.00/lb Co, $1000/oz Pt, $1,800/oz Pd and $1,700/oz Au. Silver is
not used.
|
(17)
|
For the West Graham
Deposit, pit optimization and the in-pit base case cutoff grade of
0.3% NiEq considers a mining cost of US$2.50/t rock and processing,
treatment and refining, transportation and G&A cost of
US$38.00/t mineralized material, and an overall pit slope of 55
degrees, metal prices and process recoveries. The underground base
case cutoff grade of 0.7 % NiEq considers a mining cost of
US$45.00/t rock and processing, treatment and refining,
transportation, G&A cost of US$42.50/t mineralized material and
process recoveries.
|
(18)
|
The estimate of
Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental,
permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or
other relevant issues.
|
Reference
Technical Report on the 2009 Resource Estimate for the Depth,
East and Upper West Zones, Lockerby Mine, Sudbury, Ontario, prepared by First Nickel
Inc., February 23, 2009.
News Release, First Nickel Reports: 10 Metres Of 5.60% Ni and
1.26% Cu Hosted in Footwall from Lockerby East Zone, February 7th, 2006.
Quality Assurance, Quality Control
and Qualified Persons
The Mineral Resource Estimate was estimated by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P. Geo. of SGS Geological
Services who is an independent Qualified Person as defined by NI
43-101. Dr Armitage conducted a site visit to the Lockerby East
Property on July 24, 2023.
Technical elements of this news release have been approved by
Mr. Grant Mourre, P.Geo. (PGO), CEO
and President of SPC Nickel Corp. and a Qualified Person under
National Instrument 43-101.
About the West Graham
Deposit
The West Graham Project is located in the heart of the Sudbury
Mining District where nine mines are currently in operation and two
more are in the development phase. The region benefits from its
proximity to well-developed transportation infrastructure including
roads, railways, and electrical grid. In addition, West Graham is
situated close to processing, smelting and refining assets which
include two mills, two smelters and one nickel refinery. Local
operators include global mining corporations Vale, Glencore and
KGHM.
About SPC Nickel Corp.
SPC Nickel Corp. is a Canadian public corporation focused on
exploring for Ni-Cu-PGMs within the world class Sudbury Mining
Camp. SPC Nickel is currently exploring its key 100% owned
exploration project Lockerby East located in the heart of the
historic Sudbury Mining Camp that includes the West Graham Resource
and the Crean Hill 3 property under option from Vale. SPC Nickel
also holds three additional projects across Canada including the large camp-scale Muskox
Project (located in Nunavut), the
past producing Aer-Kidd Project (located in the Sudbury Mining
Camp) and the Janes Project (located 50 km northwest of
Sudbury). The corporate focus is
on Sudbury, and SPC Nickel
continues to look for new opportunities to add shareholder value.
Additional information regarding SPC Nickel and its projects can be
found at www.spcnickel.com.
Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking
Information
Except for statements of historical fact contained herein, the
information in this news release constitutes "forward-looking
information" within the meaning of Canadian securities law. Such
forward-looking information may be identified by words such as
"plans", "proposes", "estimates", "intends", "expects", "believes",
"may", "will" and include without limitation, statements regarding
estimated capital and operating costs, expected production
timeline, benefits of updated development plans, foreign exchange
assumptions and regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance
that such statements will prove to be accurate; actual results and
future events could differ materially from such statements. Factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially include, among
others, metal prices, competition, risks inherent in the mining
industry, and regulatory risks. Most of these factors are outside
the control of SPC Nickel. Investors are cautioned not to put undue
reliance on forward-looking information. Except as otherwise
required by applicable securities statutes or regulation, SPC
Nickel expressly disclaims any intent or obligation to update
publicly forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture
Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of
this release.
SOURCE SPC Nickel Corp.