NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by PerkinElmer, Inc. (the “Company”), in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (the “U.S.” or the "United States") and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information in the footnote disclosures of the financial statements has been condensed or omitted where it substantially duplicates information provided in the Company’s latest audited consolidated financial statements, in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
January 1, 2017
, filed with the SEC (the “
2016
Form 10-K”). The balance sheet amounts at
January 1, 2017
in this report were derived from the Company’s audited
2016
consolidated financial statements included in the
2016
Form 10-K. The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The results of operations for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
, respectively, are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year or any future period.
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday nearest December 31. The Company reports fiscal years under a 52/53 week format and as a result, certain fiscal years will contain 53 weeks. The fiscal year ending
December 31, 2017
("
fiscal year 2017
") will include
52
weeks, and the fiscal year ended
January 1, 2017
("
fiscal year 2016
") included
52
weeks.
Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") and are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective dates. Unless otherwise discussed, such pronouncements did not have or will not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows or do not apply to the Company’s operations.
In May 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Accounting
("ASU 2017-09")
,
which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. ASU 2017-09 provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. If an entity modifies its awards and concludes that it is not required to apply modification accounting under the standard, it must still consider whether the modification affects its application of other guidance. Additionally, if a significant modification does not result in incremental compensation cost, entities are required to disclose the “lack of” incremental compensation cost resulting from such significant modification. The standard also removes the guidance in Topic 718 stating that modification accounting is not required when an entity adds an antidilution provision as long as that modification is not made in contemplation of an equity restructuring. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied on a prospective basis to awards modified on or after the effective date. ASU 2017-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In March 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-07,
Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
("ASU 2017-07")
,
which amends the requirements in Topic 715 related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for an entity’s sponsored defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. ASU 2017-07 requires entities to (1) disaggregate the current-service-cost component from the other components of net benefit cost (the “other components”) and present it with other current employee compensation costs in the income statement and (2) present the other components elsewhere in the income statement and outside of income from operations, and disclose the income statement lines that contain the other components if they are not presented on appropriately described separate lines. Additionally, the standard requires that only the service-cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization (e.g., as part of inventory or property, plant, and equipment). The change in income statement presentation requires retrospective application, while the change in capitalized benefit cost is to be applied prospectively. ASU 2017-07 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The standard provides a practical expedient that permits entities to use the components of cost disclosed in prior years as a basis for the retrospective application of the new income statement presentation. Entities need to disclose the use of the practical expedient. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04,
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other Topic (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
("ASU 2017-04")
,
which amends Topic 350 to simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. ASU 2017-04 requires that an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize the impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value, however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider the income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied on a prospective basis. ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 and will apply the provisions of this standard in its interim or annual goodwill impairment tests subsequent to January 2, 2017.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business
("ASU 2017-01"), which amends Topic 805 to provide a screen to determine when a set of assets and liabilities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. If the screen is not met, the standard (1) requires that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The standard provides a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The standard also provides a framework that includes two sets of criteria to consider that depend on whether a set has outputs and a more stringent criteria for sets without outputs. Lastly, the standard narrows the definition of the term "output" so that the term is consistent with how outputs are described in Topic 606,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied prospectively. ASU 2017-01 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted in limited circumstances. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Restricted Cash
("ASU 2016-18"), which amends Topic 230 to add or clarify guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The standard requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. ASU 2016-18 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-16,
Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory
("ASU 2016-16"). ASU 2016-16 removes the prohibition in ASC 740 against the immediate recognition of the current and deferred income tax effects of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. The standard requires entities to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. ASU 2016-16 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact of its adoption on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
("ASU 2016-15"). ASU 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are
presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230 and other topics. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented, and if it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, ASU 2016-15 allows the amendments for those issues to be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. ASU 2015-16 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact of its adoption on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-13,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
("ASU 2016-13"). ASU 2016-13 changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard requires entities to use the expected loss impairment model and will apply to most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments, including trade and other receivables, loans, held-to-maturity debt securities, net investments in leases and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Entities are required to estimate the lifetime “expected credit loss” for each applicable financial asset and record an allowance that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The standard also amends the impairment model for available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities and requires entities to determine whether all or a portion of the unrealized loss on an AFS debt security is a credit loss. An entity will recognize an allowance for credit losses on an AFS debt security as a contra-account to the amortized cost basis rather than as a direct reduction of the amortized cost basis of the investment. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a modified-retrospective approach. A prospective transition approach is required for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact of its adoption on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02,
Leases
. The new guidance requires lessees to recognize a lease liability and right-of-use asset on the balance sheet for financing and operating leases. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied using a modified retrospective approach and are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the requirements of this guidance and has not yet determined the impact of its adoption on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company does not intend to early adopt the provisions of this standard.
In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-11,
Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory
. Under this new guidance, companies that use inventory measurement methods other than last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method should measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The provisions of this guidance are to be applied prospectively and are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-11 at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
("ASU 2014-09"). Under this new guidance, an entity should use a five-step process to recognize revenue, depicting the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also requires new disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Subsequent to the issuance of the standard, the FASB decided to defer the effective date for one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. In May 2016, the FASB also issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-12,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients
("ASU 2016-12")
,
which amended its revenue recognition guidance in ASU 2014-09 on transition, collectibility, non-cash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes. In April 2016, the FASB also issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-10,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing
("ASU 2016-10")
,
which amended its revenue recognition guidance in ASU 2014-09 on identifying performance obligations to allow entities to disregard items that are immaterial in the context of the contract, clarify when a promised good or service is separately identifiable (i.e., distinct within the context of the contract) and allow an entity to elect to account for the cost of shipping and handling performed after control of a good has been transferred to the customer as a fulfillment cost (i.e., an expense). ASU 2016-10 also clarifies how an entity should evaluate the nature of its promise in granting a license of intellectual property ("IP") and requires entities to classify IP in one of two categories: functional IP or symbolic IP, which will determine whether it recognizes revenue over time or at a point in time. ASU 2016-10
also address how entities should consider license renewals and restrictions and apply the exception for sales- and usage-based royalties received in exchange for licenses of IP. ASU 2016-12, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2014-09 may be adopted either using a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the requirements of the foregoing standards and has not yet determined the impact of their adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The Company intends to adopt these standards using the modified retrospective approach, and the Company does not intend to early adopt these standards.
While the Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new revenue standard, the Company believes the key changes in the standard that impact revenue recognition relate to the accounting for certain transactions with multiple elements or “bundled” arrangements (for example, sales of software subscriptions or sales of licenses and maintenance for which the Company does not have vendor-specific objective evidence ("VSOE") for maintenance and/or support) because the requirement to have VSOE for undelivered elements under current accounting standards is eliminated under the new standard. Accordingly, the Company will be required to recognize the license revenue upon transfer of control of the applicable software, as compared to the current requirement of recognizing the entire sales price ratably over the maintenance period.
Note 2: Business Combinations
Acquisitions in fiscal year 2017
During the first
six
months of
fiscal year 2017
, the Company completed the acquisition of Tulip Diagnostics Private Limited (“Tulip”), a company based in Goa, India, for a total consideration of
$127.3 million
. The Company has a potential obligation to pay the shareholders of Tulip up to INR
1.6 billion
, currently equivalent to
$24.9 million
, that will be accounted for as compensation expense in the Company's financial statements over a two year period and is excluded from the purchase price allocation shown below. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the acquired business' net assets represents cost and revenue synergies specific to the Company, as well as non-capitalizable intangible assets, such as the employee workforce acquired, and has been allocated to goodwill, which is not tax deductible. The Company has reported the operations for this acquisition within the results of the Company's Diagnostics segment from the acquisition date. Identifiable definite-lived intangible assets, such as core technology, trade names and customer relationships, acquired as part of this acquisition had a weighted average amortization period of
11.4 years
.
The total purchase price for the acquisition in
fiscal year 2017
has been allocated to the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 Acquisition
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Fair value of business combination:
|
|
Cash payments
|
$
|
126,007
|
|
Other liability
|
1,273
|
|
Less: cash acquired
|
(2,429
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
124,851
|
|
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
Current assets
|
$
|
15,825
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
9,643
|
|
Other assets
|
1,084
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
Core technology
|
3,500
|
|
Trade names
|
3,000
|
|
Customer relationships
|
43,000
|
|
Goodwill
|
72,454
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
(15,414
|
)
|
Liabilities assumed
|
(8,241
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
124,851
|
|
During the second quarter of
fiscal year 2017
, the Company entered into a Share Sale and Transfer Agreement with Prof. Dr. Winfried Stöcker (the “Controlling Shareholder”) and his affiliated investment holding company Stöcker Vermögensverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (“Stöcker KG”), which together hold a majority equity interest in EUROIMMUN Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG (“EUROIMMUN”), pursuant to which the Company or a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Purchaser”) will acquire up to
100%
of the outstanding securities of EUROIMMUN, and EUROIMMUN will become a subsidiary of the Purchaser (the “Acquisition”). In addition to the majority equity interest in EUROIMMUN that the Controlling Shareholder and Stöcker KG will exchange for cash at the closing of the Acquisition, the Controlling Shareholder has undertaken to seek to enter into option agreements with all other shareholders in EUROIMMUN, which would, upon exercise by the Controlling Shareholder at the closing of the Acquisition result in such shareholders receiving the same per share price for their shares as will be received by the Controlling Shareholder and Stöcker KG. If the Acquisition is completed with
100%
equity participation, EUROIMMUN’s shareholders will receive an aggregate consideration of
€1.2 billion
in cash, without interest thereon and subject to any tax withholding. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and is currently anticipated to close in the
fourth quarter
of
fiscal year 2017
following the receipt of required standard regulatory approvals. EUROIMMUN is based in Lübeck, Germany, has approximately
2,400
employees, and is widely recognized as a global leader in autoimmune testing and an emerging force in infectious disease and allergy testing.
Acquisitions in fiscal year 2016
During
fiscal year 2016
, the Company completed the acquisition of two businesses for a total consideration of
$72.3 million
in cash. The acquired businesses were Bioo Scientific Corporation, which was acquired for total consideration of
$63.5 million
in cash, and one other business acquired for a total consideration of
$8.8 million
in cash. The excess of the purchase prices over the fair values of each of the acquired businesses' net assets represents cost and revenue synergies specific to the Company, as well as non-capitalizable intangible assets, such as the employee workforce acquired. As a result of the acquisitions, the Company recorded goodwill of
$43.6 million
, which is not tax deductible, and intangible assets of
$22.1 million
. The Company has reported the operations for these acquisitions within the results of the Company's Diagnostics and Discovery & Analytical Solutions segments from the acquisition dates. Identifiable definite-lived intangible assets, such as core technology, trade names and customer relationships, acquired as part of these acquisitions had a weighted average amortization period of
9.4 years
.
The total purchase price for the acquisitions in
fiscal year 2016
has been allocated to the estimated fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Acquisitions
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Fair value of business combination:
|
|
Cash payments
|
$
|
72,497
|
|
Working capital and other adjustments
|
(261
|
)
|
Less: cash acquired
|
(2,152
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
70,084
|
|
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
Current assets
|
$
|
7,153
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
7,542
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
Core technology
|
6,600
|
|
Trade names
|
570
|
|
Customer relationships
|
14,900
|
|
Goodwill
|
43,588
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
(8,284
|
)
|
Liabilities assumed
|
(1,985
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
70,084
|
|
The preliminary allocations of the purchase prices for acquisitions are based upon initial valuations. The Company's estimates and assumptions underlying the initial valuations are subject to the collection of information necessary to complete its valuations within the measurement periods, which are up to
one year
from the respective acquisition dates. The primary areas of the preliminary purchase price allocations that are not yet finalized relate to the fair value of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, assets and liabilities related to income taxes and related valuation allowances, and residual goodwill. The Company expects to continue to obtain information to assist in determining the fair values of the net assets acquired at the acquisition dates during the measurement periods. During the measurement periods, the Company will adjust assets or liabilities if new information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition dates that, if known, would have resulted in the recognition of those assets and liabilities as of those dates. These adjustments will be made in the periods in which the amounts are determined and the cumulative effect of such adjustments will be calculated as if the adjustments had been completed as of the acquisition dates. All changes that do not qualify as adjustments made during the measurement periods are also included in current period earnings.
Allocations of the purchase price for acquisitions are based on estimates of the fair value of the net assets acquired and are subject to adjustment upon finalization of the purchase price allocations. The accounting for business combinations requires estimates and judgments as to expectations for future cash flows of the acquired business, and the allocation of those cash flows to identifiable intangible assets, in determining the estimated fair values for assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The fair values assigned to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including contingent consideration, are based on management’s estimates and assumptions, as well as other information compiled by management, including valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques. Contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date, based on the probability that revenue thresholds or product development milestones will be achieved during the earnout period, with changes in the fair value after the acquisition date affecting earnings to the extent it is to be settled in cash. Increases or decreases in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities primarily result from changes in the estimated probabilities of achieving revenue thresholds, changes in discount rates or product development milestones during the earnout period.
During the
second
quarter of
fiscal year 2017
, the Company obtained information relevant to determining the fair values of certain tangible and intangible assets acquired, and liabilities assumed, related to recent acquisitions and adjusted its purchase price allocation. Based on this information, for the Tulip acquisition, the Company recognized an increase in intangible assets of
$4.5 million
and deferred tax liabilities of
$0.4 million
, with a corresponding decrease in goodwill of
$4.1 million
.
As of
July 2, 2017
, the Company may have to pay contingent consideration related to an acquisition with an open contingency period of up to
$83.0 million
. As of
July 2, 2017
, the Company has recorded contingent consideration obligations with an estimated fair value of
$64.1 million
, of which
$15.3 million
was recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and
$48.8 million
was recorded in long-term liabilities. As of
January 1, 2017
, the Company had recorded contingent consideration obligations with an estimated fair value of
$63.2 million
, of which
$15.4 million
was recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and
$47.8 million
was recorded in long-term liabilities. The expected maximum earnout period for the acquisition with an open contingency period does not exceed
2.3 years
from the acquisition date, and the remaining weighted average expected earnout period at
July 2, 2017
was
1.5 years
. If the actual results differ from the estimates and judgments used in these fair values, the amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements could result in a possible impairment of the intangible assets and goodwill, require acceleration of the amortization expense of definite-lived intangible assets or the recognition of additional contingent consideration which would be recognized as a component of operating expenses from continuing operations.
Total transaction costs related to acquisition and divestiture activities for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
were
$3.7 million
and
$6.3 million
, respectively. Total transaction costs related to acquisition activities for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
were
$0.2 million
and
$0.5 million
, respectively. These transaction costs were expensed as incurred and recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Note 3: Disposition of Businesses and Assets
As part of the Company’s continuing efforts to focus on higher growth opportunities, the Company has discontinued certain businesses. When the discontinued operations represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company's operations and financial statements, the Company has accounted for these businesses as discontinued operations and accordingly, has presented the results of operations and related cash flows as discontinued operations. Any business deemed to be a discontinued operation prior to the adoption of ASU 2014-08,
Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of An Entity,
continues to be reported as a discontinued operation, and the results of operations and related cash flows are presented as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Any remaining assets and liabilities of
these businesses have been presented separately, and are reflected within assets and liabilities of discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
.
On May 1, 2017 (the "Closing Date"), the Company completed the sale of its Medical Imaging business to Varex Imaging Corporation ("Varex") pursuant to the terms of the Master Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated December 21, 2016 (the “Agreement”), by and between the Company and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. ("Varian") and the subsequent Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated January 27, 2017, between Varian and Varex, pursuant to which Varian assigned its rights under the Agreement to Varex. On the Closing Date, the Company received consideration of approximately
$277.4 million
for the sale of the Medical Imaging business, subject to post-closing working capital adjustments. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2017, the Company recorded a pre-tax gain of
$180.4 million
and income tax expense of
$36.8 million
related to the sale of the Medical Imaging business in discontinued operations and dispositions. The corresponding tax liability was recorded within the other tax liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and the Company expects to utilize tax attributes to minimize the tax liability.
Following the closing, the Company is providing certain customary transitional services during a period of up to
12 months
. Commercial transactions between the parties following the closing of the transaction are not expected to be significant.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016, the Company presented its Medical Imaging business as discontinued operations in the Company's consolidated financial statements. Financial information in this report relating to the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect this discontinued operation. The results of discontinued operations during the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
include the results of the Medical Imaging business through April 30, 2017.
The summary pre-tax operating results of the discontinued operations, were as follows for the
three and six
months ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Revenue
|
$
|
8,249
|
|
|
$
|
36,458
|
|
|
$
|
44,343
|
|
|
$
|
77,224
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
8,138
|
|
|
24,729
|
|
|
32,933
|
|
|
50,484
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
1,926
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
5,869
|
|
|
6,049
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
1,294
|
|
|
3,139
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
6,953
|
|
Restructuring and contract termination charges, net
|
—
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
621
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
$
|
(3,109
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,927
|
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
13,117
|
|
The table below provides a reconciliation of the carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations to the amounts presented separately in the consolidated balance sheets at
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
January 1,
2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Current assets of discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
28,400
|
|
Inventories
|
—
|
|
|
26,977
|
|
Prepaid income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
425
|
|
Other current assets
|
—
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
Total current assets of discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
|
58,985
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
—
|
|
|
25,219
|
|
Intangible assets
|
—
|
|
|
3,292
|
|
Goodwill
|
—
|
|
|
38,794
|
|
Other assets, net
|
—
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
Long-term assets of discontinued operations
|
—
|
|
|
68,389
|
|
Total assets of discontinued operations
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
127,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
16,770
|
|
Accrued restructuring and contract termination charges
|
—
|
|
|
209
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
6,373
|
|
|
9,992
|
|
Total current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
6,373
|
|
|
26,971
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
7,851
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
7,109
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
14,960
|
|
Total liabilities of discontinued operations
|
$
|
6,373
|
|
|
$
|
41,931
|
|
Note 4: Restructuring and Contract Termination Charges, Net
The Company has undertaken a series of restructuring actions related to the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, the alignment of the Company's operations with its growth strategy, the integration of its business units and its productivity initiatives. The current portion of restructuring and contract termination charges is recorded in accrued restructuring and contract termination charges and the long-term portion of restructuring and contract termination charges is recorded in long-term liabilities. The activities associated with these plans have been reported as restructuring and contract termination charges, net, as applicable, and are included as a component of income from continuing operations.
The Company implemented a restructuring plan in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 consisting of workforce reductions principally intended to realign resources to emphasize growth initiatives (the "Q1 2017 Plan"). The Company implemented a restructuring plan in the third quarter of fiscal year 2016 consisting of workforce reductions principally intended to focus resources on higher growth product lines (the "Q3 2016 Plan"). The Company implemented a restructuring plan in the second quarter of fiscal year 2016 consisting of workforce reductions principally intended to focus resources on higher growth end markets (the "Q2 2016 Plan"). Details of the plans initiated in previous years (“Previous Plans”) are discussed more fully in Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements in the
2016
Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes the reductions in headcount, the initial restructuring or contract termination charges by operating segment, and the dates by which payments were substantially completed, or the dates by which payments are expected to be substantially completed, for restructuring actions implemented during
fiscal years 2017 and 2016
in continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce Reductions
|
|
Closure of Excess Facility
|
|
Total
|
|
(Expected) Date Payments Substantially Completed by
|
|
Headcount Reduction
|
|
Discovery & Analytical Solutions
|
|
Diagnostics
|
|
Discovery & Analytical Solutions
|
|
Diagnostics
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
Excess Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except headcount data)
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2017 Plan
|
90
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,631
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
6,697
|
|
|
Q2 FY2018
|
|
Q2 FY2018
|
Q3 2016 Plan
|
22
|
|
1,779
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
Q4 FY2017
|
|
—
|
Q2 2016 Plan
|
72
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,667
|
|
|
Q3 FY2017
|
|
—
|
The Company does not currently expect to incur any future charges for these plans. The Company expects to make payments under the Previous Plans for remaining residual lease obligations, with terms varying in length, through fiscal year
2022
.
In connection with the termination of various contractual commitments, the Company recorded additional pre-tax charges of
$2.9 million
during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, in the Discovery & Analytical Solutions segment.
At
July 2, 2017
, the Company had
$14.2 million
recorded for accrued restructuring and contract termination charges, of which
$8.6 million
was recorded in short-term accrued restructuring and contract termination charges,
$2.7 million
was recorded in long-term liabilities, and
$2.9 million
was recorded in other reserves. At
January 1, 2017
, the Company had
$10.5 million
recorded for accrued restructuring and contract termination charges, of which
$7.5 million
was recorded in short-term accrued restructuring and contract termination charges and
$3.0 million
was recorded in long-term liabilities. The following table summarizes the Company's restructuring and contract termination accrual balances and related activity by restructuring plan, as well as contract termination accrual balances and related activity, during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
|
2017 Charges
|
|
2017 Changes in Estimates, Net
|
|
2017 Amounts Paid
|
|
Balance at July 2, 2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Severance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2017 Plan
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,631
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2,665
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
Q3 2016 Plan
|
1,208
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
443
|
|
Q2 2016 Plan
|
1,436
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2017 Plan
|
—
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Plans
|
7,780
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2,063
|
)
|
|
5,717
|
|
Restructuring
|
10,424
|
|
|
6,697
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(5,948
|
)
|
|
11,173
|
|
Contract Termination
|
117
|
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
3,046
|
|
Total Restructuring and Contract Termination
|
$
|
10,541
|
|
|
$
|
9,606
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
(5,973
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,219
|
|
Note 5: Interest and Other Expense, Net
Interest and other expense, net, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Interest income
|
$
|
(490
|
)
|
|
$
|
(127
|
)
|
|
$
|
(710
|
)
|
|
$
|
(237
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
10,672
|
|
|
9,939
|
|
|
21,536
|
|
|
19,780
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposition of businesses and assets, net
|
301
|
|
|
(5,562
|
)
|
|
301
|
|
|
(5,562
|
)
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
(5,278
|
)
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
(4,326
|
)
|
|
2,498
|
|
Total interest and other expense, net
|
$
|
5,205
|
|
|
$
|
5,393
|
|
|
$
|
16,801
|
|
|
$
|
16,479
|
|
Foreign currency transaction gains were
$1.2 million
and
$2.7 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively. Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses were
$(0.6) million
and
$3.5 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, respectively. Net gains from forward currency hedge contracts were
$4.1 million
and
$1.7 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively. Net losses (gains) from forward currency hedge contracts were
$1.8 million
and
$(1.0) million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, respectively. These amounts were included in other expense, net.
Note 6: Inventories
Inventories as of
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
January 1,
2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Raw materials
|
$
|
94,210
|
|
|
$
|
79,189
|
|
Work in progress
|
8,155
|
|
|
6,561
|
|
Finished goods
|
172,720
|
|
|
161,097
|
|
Total inventories
|
$
|
275,085
|
|
|
$
|
246,847
|
|
Note 7: Income Taxes
The Company regularly reviews its tax positions in each significant taxing jurisdiction in the process of evaluating its unrecognized tax benefits. The Company makes adjustments to its unrecognized tax benefits when: (i) facts and circumstances regarding a tax position change, causing a change in management’s judgment regarding that tax position; (ii) a tax position is effectively settled with a tax authority at a differing amount; and/or (iii) the statute of limitations expires regarding a tax position.
The total provision for (benefits from) income taxes included in the consolidated financial statements consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Continuing operations
|
$
|
8,066
|
|
|
$
|
3,117
|
|
|
$
|
11,987
|
|
|
$
|
10,864
|
|
Discontinued operations and dispositions
|
35,925
|
|
|
(1,182
|
)
|
|
37,143
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
Total
|
$
|
43,991
|
|
|
$
|
1,935
|
|
|
$
|
49,130
|
|
|
$
|
12,147
|
|
At
July 2, 2017
, the Company had gross tax effected unrecognized tax benefits of
$28.9 million
, of which
$27.2 million
, if recognized, would affect the continuing operations effective tax rate. The remaining amount, if recognized, would affect discontinued operations.
The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that approximately
$3.8 million
of its uncertain tax positions at
July 2, 2017
, including accrued interest and penalties, and net of tax benefits, may be resolved over the next twelve months as a result of lapses in applicable statutes of limitations and potential settlements. Various tax years after
2010
remain open to examination by certain jurisdictions in which the Company has significant business operations, such as Finland, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. The tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction.
During the first
six
months of
fiscal years 2017 and 2016
, the Company recorded net discrete income tax
benefit
s of
$4.9 million
and
$5.4 million
, respectively. The discrete tax benefits in the first
six
months of
fiscal year 2017
and 2016 included the recognition of excess tax benefits on stock compensation of
$3.4 million
and
$3.8 million
, respectively.
As a result of the sale of the Medical Imaging business, the Company sold assets and liabilities of certain foreign operations and therefore the Company plans to liquidate the related foreign entity and repatriate approximately
$55.0 million
of previously unremitted earnings. As a result of the planned repatriation, the Company has provided for the estimated taxes on the repatriation of those earnings and recorded an increase to the Company’s tax provision of
$3.5 million
in discontinued operations and dispositions for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
. The Company expects to utilize tax attributes to minimize the cash taxes paid on the repatriation.
Taxes have not been provided for unremitted earnings that the Company continues to consider indefinitely reinvested, the determination of which is based on its future operational and capital requirements. The Company continues to maintain its indefinite reinvestment assertion with regards to the remaining unremitted earnings of its foreign subsidiaries, and therefore does not accrue U.S. tax for the repatriation of its remaining unremitted foreign earnings. As of
July 2, 2017
, the amount of foreign earnings that the Company has the intent and ability to keep invested outside the United States indefinitely and for which no U.S. tax cost has been provided was approximately
$1.2 billion
. It is not practical to calculate the unrecognized deferred tax liability on those earnings.
Note 8: Debt
Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility.
The Company's senior unsecured revolving credit facility provides for
$1.0 billion
of revolving loans and has an initial maturity of
August 11, 2021
. As of
July 2, 2017
, undrawn letters of credit in the aggregate amount of
$11.4 million
were treated as issued and outstanding when calculating the borrowing availability under the senior unsecured revolving credit facility. As of
July 2, 2017
, the Company had
$988.6 million
available for additional borrowing under the facility. The Company uses the senior unsecured revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes, which may include working capital, refinancing existing indebtedness, capital expenditures, share repurchases, acquisitions and strategic alliances. The interest rates under the senior unsecured revolving credit facility are based on the Eurocurrency rate or the base rate at the time of borrowing, plus a margin. The base rate is the higher of (i) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as its "prime rate," (ii) the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points or (iii) an adjusted one-month Libor plus 1.00%. As of
July 2, 2017
, the senior unsecured revolving credit facility had
no
outstanding borrowings, and
$3.8 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs. As of
January 1, 2017
, the senior unsecured revolving credit facility had
no
outstanding borrowings, and
$4.3 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs. The credit agreement for the facility contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants and events of default. The financial covenants include a debt-to-capital ratio that remains applicable for so long as the Company's debt is rated as investment grade. In the event that the Company's debt is not rated as investment grade, the debt-to-capital ratio covenant is replaced with a maximum consolidated leverage ratio covenant and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio covenant.
5%
Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2021.
On October 25, 2011, the Company issued
$500.0 million
aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due in 2021 (the “2021 Notes”) in a registered public offering and received
$496.9 million
of net proceeds from the issuance. The 2021 Notes were issued at
99.372%
of the principal amount, which resulted in a discount of
$3.1 million
. As of
July 2, 2017
, the 2021 Notes had an aggregate carrying value of
$496.2 million
, net of
$1.6 million
of unamortized original issue discount and
$2.3 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs. As of
January 1, 2017
, the 2021 Notes had an aggregate carrying value of
$495.8 million
, net of
$1.7 million
of unamortized original issue discount and
$2.5 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs. The 2021 Notes mature in
November 2021
and bear interest at an annual rate of
5%
. Interest on the 2021 Notes is payable semi-annually on May 15th and November 15th each year. Prior to August 15, 2021 (three months prior to their maturity date), the Company may redeem the 2021 Notes in whole or in part, at its option, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest in respect to the 2021 Notes being redeemed, discounted on a semi-annual basis, at the Treasury Rate plus 45 basis points, plus accrued and
unpaid interest. At any time on or after August 15, 2021 (three months prior to their maturity date), the Company may redeem the 2021 Notes, at its option, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2021 Notes to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing the 2021 Notes) and a contemporaneous downgrade of the 2021 Notes below investment grade, each holder of 2021 Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase such holder's 2021 Notes for
101%
of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
1.875%
Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026.
On July 19, 2016, the Company issued
€500.0 million
aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due in 2026 (the “2026 Notes”) in a registered public offering and received approximately
€492.3 million
of net proceeds from the issuance. The 2026 Notes were issued at
99.118%
of the principal amount, which resulted in a discount of
€4.4 million
. The 2026 Notes mature in
July 2026
and bear interest at an annual rate of
1.875%
. Interest on the 2026 Notes is payable annually on July 19th each year. The proceeds from the 2026 Notes were used to pay in full the outstanding balance of the Company's previous senior unsecured revolving credit facility. As of
July 2, 2017
, the 2026 Notes had an aggregate carrying value of
$561.8 million
, net of
$4.6 million
of unamortized original issue discount and
$4.5 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs. As of
January 1, 2017
, the 2026 Notes had an aggregate carrying value of
$517.8 million
, net of
$4.5 million
of unamortized original issue discount and
$4.8 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs.
Prior to April 19, 2026 (three months prior to their maturity date), the Company may redeem the 2026 Notes in whole at any time or in part from time to time, at its option, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the 2026 Notes to be redeemed, or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest in respect to the 2026 Notes being redeemed, discounted on an annual basis, at the applicable Comparable Government Bond Rate (as defined in the indenture governing the 2026 Notes) plus 35 basis points; plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, at any time on or after April 19, 2026 (three months prior to their maturity date), the Company may redeem the 2026 Notes, at its option, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2026 Notes due to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Upon a change of control (as defined in the indenture governing the 2026 Notes) and a contemporaneous downgrade of the 2026 Notes below investment grade, the Company will, in certain circumstances, make an offer to purchase the 2026 Notes at a price equal to
101%
of their principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
Financing Lease Obligations.
In fiscal year 2012, the Company entered into agreements with the lessors of certain buildings that the Company is currently occupying and leasing to expand those buildings. The Company provided a portion of the funds needed for the construction of the additions to the buildings, and as a result the Company was considered the owner of the buildings during the construction period. At the end of the construction period, the Company was not reimbursed by the lessors for all of the construction costs. The Company is therefore deemed to have continuing involvement and the leases qualify as financing leases under sale-leaseback accounting guidance, representing debt obligations for the Company and non-cash investing and financing activities. As a result, the Company capitalized
$29.3 million
in property, plant and equipment, net, representing the fair value of the buildings with a corresponding increase to debt. The Company has also capitalized
$11.5 million
in additional construction costs necessary to complete the renovations to the buildings, which were funded by the lessors, with a corresponding increase to debt. At
July 2, 2017
, the Company had
$36.5 million
recorded for these financing lease obligations, of which
$1.2 million
was recorded as short-term debt and
$35.3 million
was recorded as long-term debt. At
January 1, 2017
, the Company had
$37.1 million
recorded for these financing lease obligations, of which
$1.2 million
was recorded as short-term debt and
$35.9 million
was recorded as long-term debt. The buildings are being depreciated on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases to their estimated residual values, which will equal the remaining financing obligation at the end of the lease term. At the end of the lease term, the remaining balances in property, plant and equipment, net and debt will be reversed against each other.
Note 9: Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period less restricted unvested shares. Diluted earnings per share was computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents, primarily shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method. The following table reconciles the number of shares utilized in the earnings per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Number of common shares—basic
|
109,894
|
|
|
108,970
|
|
|
109,681
|
|
|
109,690
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
668
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
675
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
200
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
155
|
|
Number of common shares—diluted
|
110,762
|
|
|
109,844
|
|
|
110,484
|
|
|
110,520
|
|
Number of potentially dilutive securities excluded from calculation due to antidilutive impact
|
457
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
674
|
|
Antidilutive securities include outstanding stock options with exercise prices and average unrecognized compensation cost in excess of the average fair market value of common stock for the related period. Antidilutive options were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share and could become dilutive in the future.
Note 10: Industry Segment Information
The Company discloses information about its operating segments based on the way that management organizes the segments within the Company for making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on revenue and operating income. Intersegment revenue and transfers are not significant. The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements in the
2016
Form 10-K.
Effective October 3, 2016, the Company realigned its businesses to better organize around customer requirements, positioning the Company to grow in attractive end markets and expand share with the Company's core product offerings. Diagnostics became a standalone operating segment and the Company formed a new operating segment, Discovery & Analytical Solutions. The results reported for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
reflect this new alignment of the Company's operating segments. Financial information in this report relating to the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect this change to the Company's operating segments.
The principal products and services of the Company's
two
operating segments are:
|
|
•
|
Discovery & Analytical Solutions
. Provides products and services targeted towards the environmental, industrial, food, life sciences research and laboratory services markets.
|
|
|
•
|
Diagnostics
. Develops diagnostics, tools and applications focused on clinically-oriented customers, especially within the reproductive health, emerging market diagnostics and applied genomics markets. The Diagnostics segment serves the diagnostics market.
|
The Company has included the expenses for its corporate headquarters, such as legal, tax, audit, human resources, information technology, and other management and compliance costs, as well as the activity related to the mark-to-market adjustment on postretirement benefit plans, as “Corporate” below. The Company has a process to allocate and recharge expenses to the reportable segments when these costs are administered or paid by the corporate headquarters based on the extent to which the segment benefited from the expenses. These amounts have been calculated in a consistent manner and are included in the Company’s calculations of segment results to internally plan and assess the performance of each segment for all purposes, including determining the compensation of the business leaders for each of the Company’s operating segments. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, the Company changed the manner in which certain shared functional costs are allocated to the operating segments. Segment financial information relating to the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect this change to the cost allocation methodology. Accordingly, for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, operating income from continuing operations from the Discovery & Analytical Solutions segment
decreased by
$2.5 million
and
$6.2 million
, respectively, with a corresponding increase in operating income from continuing operations of the Diagnostics segment.
Revenue and operating income (loss) from continuing operations by operating segment are shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Discovery & Analytical Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
$
|
227,290
|
|
|
$
|
236,513
|
|
|
$
|
442,450
|
|
|
$
|
455,919
|
|
Service revenue
|
155,838
|
|
|
144,991
|
|
|
302,438
|
|
|
282,032
|
|
Total revenue
|
383,128
|
|
|
381,504
|
|
|
744,888
|
|
|
737,951
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations
|
51,481
|
|
|
41,617
|
|
|
82,060
|
|
|
81,086
|
|
Diagnostics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
127,711
|
|
|
120,462
|
|
|
246,265
|
|
|
225,409
|
|
Service revenue
|
36,123
|
|
|
34,276
|
|
|
69,924
|
|
|
70,898
|
|
Total revenue
|
163,834
|
|
|
154,738
|
|
|
316,189
|
|
|
296,307
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations
|
37,641
|
|
|
37,840
|
|
|
71,051
|
|
|
71,614
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss from continuing operations
|
(13,125
|
)
|
|
(13,191
|
)
|
|
(25,535
|
)
|
|
(25,857
|
)
|
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
355,001
|
|
|
356,975
|
|
|
688,715
|
|
|
681,328
|
|
Service revenue
|
191,961
|
|
|
179,267
|
|
|
372,362
|
|
|
352,930
|
|
Total revenue
|
546,962
|
|
|
536,242
|
|
|
1,061,077
|
|
|
1,034,258
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations
|
75,997
|
|
|
66,266
|
|
|
127,576
|
|
|
126,843
|
|
Interest and other expense, net (see Note 5)
|
5,205
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
16,801
|
|
|
16,479
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
$
|
70,792
|
|
|
$
|
60,873
|
|
|
$
|
110,775
|
|
|
$
|
110,364
|
|
Note 11: Stockholders’ Equity
Comprehensive Income:
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
January 1,
2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
$
|
(63,523
|
)
|
|
$
|
(100,923
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service costs, net of income taxes
|
399
|
|
|
399
|
|
Unrealized net losses on securities, net of income taxes
|
(303
|
)
|
|
(337
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
$
|
(63,427
|
)
|
|
$
|
(100,861
|
)
|
Stock Repurchases:
On July 27, 2016, the Board of Directors (the "Board") authorized the Company to repurchase up to
8.0 million
shares of common stock under a stock repurchase program (the "Repurchase Program"). The Repurchase Program will expire on July 26, 2018 unless terminated earlier by the Board, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. During the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, the Company had
no
stock repurchases under the Repurchase Program. As of
July 2, 2017
,
8.0 million
shares remained available for repurchase under the Repurchase Program.
In addition, the Board has authorized the Company to repurchase shares of common stock to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards granted pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plans and to satisfy obligations related to the exercise of stock options made pursuant to the Company's equity incentive plans. During the
three
months ended
July 2, 2017
, the Company repurchased
7,591
shares of common stock for this purpose at an aggregate cost of
$0.5 million
. During the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, the
Company repurchased
70,540
shares of common stock for this purpose at an aggregate cost of
$3.8 million
. The repurchased shares have been reflected as additional authorized but unissued shares, with the payments reflected in common stock and capital in excess of par value.
Dividends:
The Board declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of
$0.07
per share for the first
two
quarters of
fiscal year 2017
and in each quarter of
fiscal year 2016
. At
July 2, 2017
, the Company has accrued
$7.7 million
for dividends declared on
April 28, 2017
for the
second
quarter of
fiscal year 2017
that will be payable on
August 10, 2017
. On
July 24, 2017
, the Company announced that the Board had declared a quarterly dividend of
$0.07
per share for the
third
quarter of
fiscal year 2017
that will be payable on
November 10, 2017
. In the future, the Board may determine to reduce or eliminate the Company’s common stock dividend in order to fund investments for growth, repurchase shares or conserve capital resources.
Note 12: Stock Plans
In addition to the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Company utilizes
one
stock-based compensation plan, the 2009 Incentive Plan (the “2009 Plan”). Under the 2009 Plan,
10.0 million
shares of the Company's common stock are authorized for stock option grants, restricted stock awards, performance units and stock grants as part of the Company’s compensation programs. In addition to shares of the Company’s common stock originally authorized for issuance under the 2009 Plan, the 2009 Plan includes shares of the Company’s common stock previously granted under the Amended and Restated 2001 Incentive Plan and the 2005 Incentive Plan that were canceled or forfeited without the shares being issued.
The following table summarizes total pre-tax compensation expense recognized related to the Company’s stock options, restricted stock, performance restricted stock units, performance units and stock awards, included in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Cost of revenue
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
377
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
400
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
6,183
|
|
|
5,294
|
|
|
10,522
|
|
|
8,781
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
6,841
|
|
|
$
|
5,829
|
|
|
$
|
11,767
|
|
|
$
|
9,675
|
|
The total income tax benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for stock-based compensation was
$5.1 million
and
$8.0 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for stock-based compensation was
$5.3 million
and
$7.3 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, respectively. Stock-based compensation costs capitalized as part of inventory were
$0.4 million
and
$0.6 million
as of
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
, respectively.
Stock Options
:
The fair value of each option grant is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company’s weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three and Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Expected term
|
5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Expected stock volatility
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
|
|
Total
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
(In millions)
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2017
|
2,287
|
|
|
$
|
37.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
451
|
|
|
53.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(432
|
)
|
|
30.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
(6
|
)
|
|
50.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 2, 2017
|
2,300
|
|
|
$
|
42.04
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
$
|
46.2
|
|
Exercisable at July 2, 2017
|
1,359
|
|
|
$
|
37.09
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
$
|
34.0
|
|
The weighted-average per-share grant-date fair value of options granted during the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
was
$13.27
and
$11.74
, respectively. The weighted-average per-share grant-date fair value of options granted during the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
was
$12.49
and
$10.13
, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
was
$9.1 million
and
$12.2 million
, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
was
$10.3 million
and
$11.9 million
, respectively. Cash received from option exercises for the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
was
$13.2 million
and
$9.0 million
, respectively.
The total compensation expense recognized related to the Company’s outstanding options was
$1.2 million
and
$2.4 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively, and
$1.2 million
and
$2.3 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, respectively.
There was
$8.4 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted as of
July 2, 2017
. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.1
years.
Restricted Stock Awards
:
The following table summarizes restricted stock award activity for the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-
Date Fair
Value
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2017
|
521
|
|
|
$
|
46.48
|
|
Granted
|
217
|
|
|
53.92
|
|
Vested
|
(204
|
)
|
|
45.57
|
|
Forfeited
|
(15
|
)
|
|
49.00
|
|
Nonvested at July 2, 2017
|
519
|
|
|
$
|
49.87
|
|
The fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
was
$1.5 million
and
$9.3 million
, respectively. The fair value of restricted stock awards vested during the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
was
$0.9 million
and
$7.8 million
, respectively. The total compensation expense recognized related to the Company’s outstanding restricted stock awards was
$3.0 million
and
$5.4 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively, and
$2.8 million
and
$4.9 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, respectively.
As of
July 2, 2017
, there was
$18.4 million
of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.8
years.
Performance Restricted Stock Units:
As part of the Company's executive compensation program, the Company granted
54,337
performance restricted stock units during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, that will vest based on performance of the Company. The weighted-average per-share grant date fair value of performance restricted stock units granted during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
was
$52.78
. During the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
,
no
performance restricted stock units were forfeited. The total compensation expense recognized related to the performance restricted stock units was
$0.2 million
and
$0.5 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively. As of
July 2, 2017
, there were
54,337
performance restricted stock units outstanding.
Performance Units
:
As part of the Company's executive compensation program, the Company granted
49,845
and
77,453
performance units during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
, respectively. The weighted-average per-share grant-date fair value of performance units granted during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
was
$52.69
and
$42.47
, respectively. During the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
,
no
performance units were forfeited. The total compensation expense recognized related to performance units was
$1.7 million
and
$2.8 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively, and
$1.1 million
and
$1.7 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, respectively. As of
July 2, 2017
, there were
179,620
performance units outstanding and subject to forfeiture, with a corresponding liability of
$5.7 million
recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities.
Stock Awards
:
The Company’s stock award program provides non-employee directors an annual equity award. The Company granted
1,598
and
1,821
shares to each non-employee member of the Board during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
, respectively. The weighted-average per-share grant-date fair value of the stock awards granted during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
was
$62.56
and
$54.91
, respectively. The total compensation expense recognized related to these stock awards was
$0.7 million
for each of the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
:
During the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, the Company issued
18,483
shares of common stock under the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan at a weighted-average price of
$64.73
per share. During the
six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, the Company issued
23,898
shares of common stock under the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan at a weighted-average price of
$49.80
per share. At
July 2, 2017
, an aggregate of
0.9 million
shares of the Company’s common stock remained available for sale to employees out of the
5.0 million
shares authorized by shareholders for issuance under this plan.
Note 13: Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net
The Company tests goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets at least annually for possible impairment. Accordingly, the Company completes the annual testing of impairment for goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets on the later of January 1 or the first day of each fiscal year. In addition to its annual test, the Company regularly evaluates whether events or circumstances have occurred that may indicate a potential impairment of goodwill or non-amortizing intangible assets.
The process of testing goodwill for impairment involves the determination of the fair value of the applicable reporting units. The test consists of a two-step process. The first step is the comparison of the fair value to the carrying value of the reporting unit to determine if the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The second step measures the amount of an impairment loss, and is only performed if the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company performed its annual impairment testing for its reporting units as of
January 2, 2017
, its annual impairment date for
fiscal year 2017
. The Company concluded based on the first step of the process that there was no goodwill impairment, and the fair value exceeded the carrying value by more than
20.0%
for each reporting unit, except for the Company's Informatics reporting unit which had a fair value that was less than 20% but greater than 10% more than its carrying value. The range of the long-term terminal growth rates for the Company’s reporting units was
0.0%
to
3.00%
for the
fiscal year 2017
impairment analysis. The range for the discount rates for the reporting units was
9.0%
to
13.5%
. Keeping all other variables constant, a
10.0%
change in any one of these input assumptions for the various reporting units, except for the Informatics reporting unit, would still allow the Company to conclude, based on the first step of the process, that there was no impairment of goodwill. As of January 2, 2017, the Company's Informatics reporting unit, which had a goodwill balance of
$211.0 million
, was at increased risk of an impairment charge given its ongoing weakness due to a highly competitive industry. Despite the increased risk associated with this reporting unit, the Company does not currently expect a significant change in the key estimates or assumptions driving the fair value of this reporting unit that would lead to a material impairment charge.
The Company has consistently employed the income approach to estimate the current fair value when testing for impairment of goodwill. A number of significant assumptions and estimates are involved in the application of the income approach to forecast operating cash flows, including markets and market share, sales volumes and prices, costs to produce, tax rates, capital spending, discount rates and working capital changes. Cash flow forecasts are based on approved business unit operating plans for the early years’ cash flows and historical relationships in later years. The income approach is sensitive to changes in long-term terminal growth rates and the discount rates. The long-term terminal growth rates are consistent with the Company’s historical long-term terminal growth rates, as the current economic trends are not expected to affect the long-term terminal growth rates of the Company. The Company corroborates the income approach with a market approach.
The Company has consistently employed the relief from royalty model to estimate the current fair value when testing for impairment of non-amortizing intangible assets. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the non-amortizing intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a non-amortizing intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss in an amount equal to that excess is recognized
.
In addition, the Company evaluates the remaining useful lives of its non-amortizing intangible assets at least annually to determine whether events or circumstances continue to
support an indefinite useful life. If events or circumstances indicate that the useful lives of non-amortizing intangible assets are no longer indefinite, the assets will be tested for impairment. These intangible assets will then be amortized prospectively over their estimated remaining useful lives and accounted for in the same manner as other intangible assets that are subject to amortization. The Company performed its annual impairment testing as of
January 2, 2017
, and concluded that there was no impairment of non-amortizing intangible assets. An assessment of the recoverability of amortizing intangible assets takes place when events have occurred that may give rise to an impairment. No such events occurred during the first
six
months of
fiscal year 2017
.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discovery & Analytical Solutions
|
|
Diagnostics
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Balance at January 1, 2017
|
$
|
1,303,936
|
|
|
$
|
944,030
|
|
|
$
|
2,247,966
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
21,771
|
|
|
16,699
|
|
|
38,470
|
|
Acquisitions and other
|
(1,800
|
)
|
|
72,054
|
|
|
70,254
|
|
Balance at July 2, 2017
|
$
|
1,323,907
|
|
|
$
|
1,032,783
|
|
|
$
|
2,356,690
|
|
Identifiable intangible asset balances at
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
by category were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
January 1,
2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Patents
|
$
|
39,930
|
|
|
$
|
39,901
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(33,758
|
)
|
|
(32,408
|
)
|
Net patents
|
6,172
|
|
|
7,493
|
|
Trade names and trademarks
|
43,900
|
|
|
40,086
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(26,135
|
)
|
|
(24,017
|
)
|
Net trade names and trademarks
|
17,765
|
|
|
16,069
|
|
Licenses
|
50,983
|
|
|
57,767
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(41,111
|
)
|
|
(46,507
|
)
|
Net licenses
|
9,872
|
|
|
11,260
|
|
Core technology
|
295,956
|
|
|
304,187
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(229,848
|
)
|
|
(233,720
|
)
|
Net core technology
|
66,108
|
|
|
70,467
|
|
Customer relationships
|
422,291
|
|
|
383,303
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(219,052
|
)
|
|
(213,062
|
)
|
Net customer relationships
|
203,239
|
|
|
170,241
|
|
IPR&D
|
84,252
|
|
|
78,515
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
(4,933
|
)
|
|
(4,405
|
)
|
Net IPR&D
|
79,319
|
|
|
74,110
|
|
Net amortizable intangible assets
|
382,475
|
|
|
349,640
|
|
Non-amortizing intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
Trade name
|
70,584
|
|
|
70,584
|
|
Total
|
$
|
453,059
|
|
|
$
|
420,224
|
|
Total amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets was
$17.5 million
and
$34.6 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively, and
$18.4 million
and
$37.0 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 3, 2016
, respectively. Estimated amortization expense related to definite-lived intangible assets for each of the next five years is
$34.7 million
for the remainder of fiscal year
2017
,
$69.1 million
for fiscal year
2018
,
$57.5 million
for fiscal year
2019
,
$49.2 million
for fiscal year
2020
, and
$36.3 million
for fiscal year
2021
.
Note 14: Warranty Reserves
The Company provides warranty protection for certain products usually for a period of one year beyond the date of sale. The majority of costs associated with warranty obligations include the replacement of parts and the time for service personnel to respond to repair and replacement requests. A warranty reserve is recorded based upon historical results, supplemented by management’s expectations of future costs. Warranty reserves are included in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
A summary of warranty reserve activity for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
8,937
|
|
|
$
|
9,751
|
|
|
$
|
9,012
|
|
|
$
|
9,843
|
|
Provision charged to income
|
3,391
|
|
|
3,793
|
|
|
6,380
|
|
|
7,452
|
|
Payments
|
(3,412
|
)
|
|
(3,699
|
)
|
|
(7,137
|
)
|
|
(7,614
|
)
|
Adjustments to previously provided warranties, net
|
(24
|
)
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
515
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation and acquisitions
|
196
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
318
|
|
|
164
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
9,088
|
|
|
$
|
9,596
|
|
|
$
|
9,088
|
|
|
$
|
9,596
|
|
Note 15: Employee Postretirement Benefit Plans
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic pension credit for the Company’s various defined benefit employee pension and postretirement plans for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement
Medical Benefits
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Service cost
|
$
|
1,222
|
|
|
$
|
1,096
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Interest cost
|
4,133
|
|
|
4,727
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
36
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(6,541
|
)
|
|
(6,174
|
)
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
(259
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
(48
|
)
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net periodic pension credit
|
$
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
$
|
(406
|
)
|
|
$
|
(224
|
)
|
|
$
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement
Medical Benefits
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Service cost
|
$
|
2,436
|
|
|
$
|
2,188
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
Interest cost
|
8,260
|
|
|
9,457
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
72
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(13,041
|
)
|
|
(12,362
|
)
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
(518
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
(95
|
)
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net periodic benefit credit
|
$
|
(2,440
|
)
|
|
$
|
(826
|
)
|
|
$
|
(449
|
)
|
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
During the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
, the Company contributed
$4.1 million
and
$5.2 million
, respectively, in the aggregate, to pension plans outside of the United States.
The Company recognizes actuarial gains and losses, unless an interim remeasurement is required, in operating results in the fourth quarter of the year in which the gains and losses occur, in accordance with the Company's accounting method for defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefits as described in Note 1 of the Company's audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in its
2016
Form 10-K. Such adjustments for gains and losses are primarily driven by
events and circumstances beyond the Company's control, including changes in interest rates, the performance of the financial markets and mortality assumptions.
Note 16: Derivatives and Hedging Activities
The Company uses derivative instruments as part of its risk management strategy only, and includes derivatives utilized as economic hedges that are not designated as hedging instruments. By nature, all financial instruments involve market and credit risks. The Company enters into derivative instruments with major investment grade financial institutions and has policies to monitor the credit risk of those counterparties. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for trading or other speculative purposes, nor does the Company use leveraged financial instruments. Approximately
60%
of the Company’s business is conducted outside of the United States, generally in foreign currencies. As a result, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can increase the costs of financing, investing and operating the business.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into foreign exchange contracts for periods consistent with its committed exposures to mitigate the effect of foreign currency movements on transactions denominated in foreign currencies. The intent of these economic hedges is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures from these currencies, with gains and losses resulting from the forward currency contracts that hedge these exposures. Transactions covered by hedge contracts include intercompany and third-party receivables and payables. The contracts are primarily in European and Asian currencies, have maturities that do not exceed
12
months, have no cash requirements until maturity, and are recorded at fair value on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The unrealized gains and losses on the Company’s foreign currency contracts are recognized immediately in interest and other expense, net. The cash flows related to the settlement of these hedges are included in cash flows from operating activities within the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.
Principal hedged currencies include the British Pound, Euro, Swedish Krona, Japanese Yen and Singapore Dollar. The Company held forward foreign exchange contracts, designated as economic hedges, with U.S. dollar equivalent notional amounts totaling
$128.6 million
,
$137.5 million
and
$131.5 million
at
July 2, 2017
,
January 1, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
, respectively, and the fair value of these foreign currency derivative contracts was insignificant. The gains and losses realized on these foreign currency derivative contracts are not material. The duration of these contracts was generally
30
days or less during each of the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
.
In addition, in connection with certain intercompany loan agreements utilized to finance its acquisitions and stock repurchase program, the Company enters into forward foreign exchange contracts intended to hedge movements in foreign exchange rates prior to settlement of such intercompany loans denominated in foreign currencies. The Company records these hedges at fair value on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. The unrealized gains and losses on these hedges, as well as the gains and losses associated with the remeasurement of the intercompany loans, are recognized immediately in interest and other expense, net. The cash flows related to the settlement of these hedges are included in cash flows from financing activities within the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.
The outstanding forward exchange contracts designated as economic hedges, that were intended to hedge movements in foreign exchange rates prior to the settlement of certain intercompany loan agreements included combined Euro notional amounts of
€23.5 million
and combined U.S. Dollar notional amounts of
$133.3 million
as of
July 2, 2017
, combined Euro notional amounts of
€58.6 million
and combined Swedish Krona notional amounts of
kr969.5 million
as of
January 1, 2017
, and combined Euro notional amounts of
€45.4 million
as of
July 3, 2016
. The net gains and losses on these derivatives, combined with the gains and losses on the remeasurement of the hedged intercompany loans were not material for each of the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
. The Company paid
$4.3 million
and received
$1.3 million
during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
and
July 3, 2016
, respectively, from the settlement of these hedges.
In connection with the issuance of the 2026 Notes during the fiscal year 2016, the Company designated the 2026 Notes to hedge its investments in certain foreign subsidiaries. Realized and unrealized translation adjustments from these hedges were included in the foreign currency translation component of accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), which offsets translation adjustments on the underlying net assets of foreign subsidiaries. The cumulative translation gains or losses will remain in AOCI until the foreign subsidiaries are liquidated or sold. As of
July 2, 2017
, the total notional amount of foreign currency denominated debt designated to hedge investments in foreign subsidiaries was
€495.9 million
. The unrealized foreign exchange loss recorded in AOCI related to the net investment hedge was
$36.4 million
and
$43.5 million
for the
three and six
months ended
July 2, 2017
, respectively.
On June 27, 2017, in connection with the planned acquisition of EUROIMMUN, the Company entered into several foreign currency forward contracts to partly mitigate the currency exchange risk associated with the payment of the Euro-denominated purchase price. The currency purchased was Euro, with an aggregate notional amount totaling
$1.14 billion
. These currency forward contracts were not designated as hedging instruments and therefore the change in the derivative fair
value was marked to market through the condensed consolidated statement of operations, which resulted in a
$6.3 million
gain
being included in other expense, net during the
three and six
months ended July 2, 2017.
The Company does
no
t expect any material net pre-tax gains or losses to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into interest and other expense, net within the next twelve months.
Note 17: Fair Value Measurements
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, derivatives, marketable securities and accounts receivable. The Company believes it had no significant concentrations of credit risk as of
July 2, 2017
.
The Company uses the market approach technique to value its financial instruments and there were no changes in valuation techniques during the
six
months ended
July 2, 2017
. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are primarily comprised of marketable securities, derivative contracts used to hedge the Company’s currency risk, and acquisition-related contingent consideration. The Company has not elected to measure any additional financial instruments or other items at fair value.
Valuation Hierarchy:
The following summarizes the three levels of inputs required to measure fair value. For Level 1 inputs, the Company utilizes quoted market prices as these instruments have active markets. For Level 2 inputs, the Company utilizes quoted market prices in markets that are not active, broker or dealer quotations, or utilizes alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. For Level 3 inputs, the Company utilizes unobservable inputs based on the best information available, including estimates by management primarily based on information provided by third-party fund managers, independent brokerage firms and insurance companies. A financial asset’s or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible.
The following tables show the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
classified in one of the three classifications described above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at July 2, 2017 Using:
|
|
Total Carrying Value at July 2, 2017
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Marketable securities
|
$
|
1,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,893
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative assets
|
7,057
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,057
|
|
|
—
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities
|
(1,946
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,946
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
(64,076
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(64,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at January 1, 2017 Using:
|
|
Total Carrying Value at January 1, 2017
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Marketable securities
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative assets
|
1,208
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
—
|
|
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities
|
(1,370
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,370
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
(63,201
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(63,201
|
)
|
Level 1 and Level 2 Valuation Techniques:
The Company’s Level 1 and Level 2 assets and liabilities are comprised of investments in equity and fixed-income securities as well as derivative contracts. For financial assets and liabilities that utilize Level 1 and Level 2 inputs, the Company utilizes both direct and indirect observable price quotes, including common stock price quotes, foreign exchange forward prices and bank price quotes. Below is a summary of valuation techniques for Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets and liabilities.
Marketable securities:
Include equity and fixed-income securities measured at fair value using the quoted market prices in active markets at the reporting date.
Foreign exchange derivative assets and liabilities:
Include foreign exchange derivative contracts that are valued using quoted forward foreign exchange prices at the reporting date. The Company’s foreign exchange derivative contracts are subject to master netting arrangements that allow the Company and its counterparties to net settle amounts owed to each other. Derivative assets and liabilities that can be net settled under these arrangements have been presented in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet on a net basis and are recorded in other assets. As of both
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
, none of the master netting arrangements involved collateral.
Level 3 Valuation Techniques:
The Company’s Level 3 liabilities are comprised of contingent consideration related to acquisitions. For liabilities that utilize Level 3 inputs, the Company uses significant unobservable inputs. Below is a summary of valuation techniques for Level 3 liabilities.
Contingent consideration:
Contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date using projected milestone dates, discount rates, probabilities of success and projected revenues (for revenue-based considerations). Projected risk-adjusted contingent payments are discounted back to the current period using a discounted cash flow model.
During fiscal year 2015, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities from Vanadis Diagnostics AB. Under the terms of the acquisition, the initial purchase consideration was
$32.0 million
, net of cash and the Company will be obligated to make potential future milestone payments, based on completion of a proof of concept, regulatory approvals and product sales, of up to
$93.0 million
ranging from 2016 to 2019. The fair value of the contingent consideration as of the acquisition date was estimated at
$56.9 million
. During the
second
quarter of
fiscal year 2017
, the Company updated the fair value of the contingent consideration and recorded a liability of
$64.1 million
as of
July 2, 2017
. The key assumptions used to determine the fair value of the contingent consideration as of
July 2, 2017
included projected milestone dates of
2018
to
2019
, discount rates ranging from
2.4%
to
7.1%
, conditional probabilities of success of each individual milestone ranging from
90%
to
95%
and cumulative probabilities of success for each individual milestone ranging from
65.8%
to
95%
. A significant delay in the product development (including projected regulatory milestone) achievement date in isolation could result in a significantly lower fair value measurement; a significant acceleration in the product development (including projected regulatory milestone) achievement date in isolation would not have a material impact on the fair value measurement; a significant change in the discount rate in isolation would not have a material impact on the fair value measurement; and a significant change in the probabilities of success in isolation could result in a significant change in fair value measurement.
The fair values of contingent consideration are calculated on a quarterly basis based on a collaborative effort of the Company’s regulatory, research and development, operations, finance and accounting groups, as appropriate. Potential valuation adjustments are made as additional information becomes available, including the progress towards completion of a proof of concept, regulatory approvals and product sales as compared to initial projections, the impact of market competition and market landscape shifts from non-invasive prenatal testing products, with the impact of such adjustments being recorded in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.
As of
July 2, 2017
, the Company may have to pay contingent consideration related to an acquisition with open contingency period of up to
$83.0 million
. The expected maximum earnout period for the acquisition with an open contingency period does not exceed
2.3 years
from the acquisition date, and the remaining weighted average earnout period at
July 2, 2017
was
1.5 years
.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending Level 3 net liabilities for contingent consideration is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
July 2,
2017
|
|
July 3,
2016
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
$
|
(63,978
|
)
|
|
$
|
(58,579
|
)
|
|
$
|
(63,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
(57,350
|
)
|
Amounts paid and foreign currency translation
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
100
|
|
Change in fair value (included within selling, general and administrative expenses)
|
(98
|
)
|
|
(4,305
|
)
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
(5,628
|
)
|
Balance at end of period
|
$
|
(64,076
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,878
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,076
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,878
|
)
|
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities. If measured at fair value, cash and cash equivalents would be classified as Level 1.
As of
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
, the Company’s senior unsecured revolving credit facility, which provides for
$1.0 billion
of revolving loans, had
no
outstanding borrowings. The interest rate on the Company’s senior unsecured revolving credit facility is reset at least monthly to correspond to variable rates that reflect currently available terms and conditions for similar debt. The Company had no change in credit standing during the first
six
months of
fiscal year 2017
.
The Company's 2021 Notes, with a face value of
$500.0 million
, had an aggregate carrying value of
$496.2 million
, net of
$1.6 million
of unamortized original issue discount and
$2.3 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs as of
July 2, 2017
. The 2021 Notes had an aggregate carrying value of
$495.8 million
, net of
$1.7 million
of unamortized original issue discount and
$2.5 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs as of
January 1, 2017
. The 2021 Notes had a fair value of
$545.7 million
and
$539.2 million
as of
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
, respectively. The fair value of the 2021 Notes is estimated using market quotes from brokers and is based on current rates offered for similar debt.
The Company's 2026 Notes, with a face value of
€500 million
, had an aggregate carrying value of
$561.8 million
, net of
$4.6 million
of unamortized original issue discount and
$4.5 million
of unamortized debt issuance costs as of
July 2, 2017
. The 2026 Notes had a fair value of
€504.7 million
and
€507.5 million
as of
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
, respectively. The fair value of the 2026 Notes is estimated using market quotes from brokers and is based on current rates offered for similar debt.
The Company's financing lease obligations had an aggregate carrying value of
36.5 million
and
$37.1 million
as of
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
, respectively. The carrying values of the Company's financing lease obligations approximated their fair value as there has been minimal change in the Company's incremental borrowing rate.
As of
July 2, 2017
, the 2021 Notes, 2026 Notes and financing lease obligations were classified as Level 2.
As of
July 2, 2017
, there has not been any significant impact to the fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities due to credit risk. Similarly, there has not been any significant adverse impact to the Company’s derivative assets based on the evaluation of its counterparties’ credit risks.
Note 18: Contingencies
The Company is conducting a number of environmental investigations and remedial actions at current and former locations of the Company and, along with other companies, has been named a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for certain waste disposal sites. The Company accrues for environmental issues in the accounting period that the Company’s responsibility is established and when the cost can be reasonably estimated. The Company has accrued
$9.9 million
as of
July 2, 2017
and
January 1, 2017
, which represents its management’s estimate of the cost of the remediation of known environmental matters, and does not include any potential liability for related personal injury or property damage claims. These amounts were included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The Company's environmental accrual is not discounted and does not reflect the recovery of any material amounts through insurance or indemnification arrangements. The cost estimates are subject to a number of variables, including the stage of the environmental investigations, the magnitude of the possible contamination, the nature of the potential remedies, possible joint and several liability, the time period over which remediation may occur, and the possible effects of changing laws and regulations. For sites where the Company has been named a PRP, management does not currently anticipate any additional liability to result from the inability of other significant named parties to contribute. The Company expects that the majority of such accrued amounts could be paid out over a period of up to
ten
years. As assessment and remediation activities progress at each individual site, these liabilities are reviewed and adjusted to reflect additional information as it becomes available. There have been no environmental problems to date that have had, or are expected to have,
a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. While it is possible that a loss exceeding the amounts recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements may be incurred, the potential exposure is not expected to be materially different from those amounts recorded.
The Company is subject to various claims, legal proceedings and investigations covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities. Although the Company has established accruals for potential losses that it believes are probable and reasonably estimable, in the opinion of the Company’s management, based on its review of the information available at this time, the total cost of resolving these contingencies at
July 2, 2017
would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. However, each of these matters is subject to uncertainties, and it is possible that some of these matters may be resolved unfavorably to the Company.