UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 1-11238
NYMAGIC, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New York
|
|
13-3534162
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
919 Third Avenue
|
|
10022
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
212 551-0600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at May 1, 2009
|
Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share
|
|
8,422,738 shares
|
FORWARDLOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain forward-looking statements concerning the Companys operations,
economic performance and financial condition, including, in particular, the likelihood of the
Companys success in developing and expanding its business. Any forward-looking statements
concerning the Companys operations, economic performance and financial condition contained herein,
including statements related to the outlook for the Companys performance in 2009 and beyond, are
made under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These statements are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates which inherently are subject
to uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Some of
these assumptions may not materialize and unanticipated events may occur which could cause actual
results to differ materially from such statements. These include, but are not limited to, the
cyclical nature of the insurance and reinsurance industry, premium rates, investment results, hedge
fund results, the estimation of loss reserves and loss reserve development, uncertainties
associated with asbestos and environmental claims, including difficulties with assessing latent
injuries and the impact of litigation settlements, bankruptcies and potential legislation, the
uncertainty surrounding the loss amounts related to the attacks of September 11, 2001, and
hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Ike, the occurrence and effects of wars and acts of terrorism, net
loss retention, the effect of competition, the ability to collect reinsurance receivables and the
timing of such collections, the availability and cost of reinsurance, the possibility that the
outcome of any litigation or arbitration proceeding is unfavorable, the ability to pay dividends,
regulatory changes, changes in the ratings assigned to the Company by rating agencies, failure to
retain key personnel, the possibility that our relationship with Mariner Partners, Inc. could
terminate or change, and the fact that ownership of our common stock is concentrated among a few
major stockholders and is subject to the voting agreement, as well as assumptions underlying any of
the foregoing and are generally expressed with words such as intends, intend, intended,
believes, estimates, expects, anticipates, plans, projects, forecasts, goals,
could have, may have and similar expressions. These risks could cause actual results for the
2009 year and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.
The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity at amortized cost (fair value $38,010,391 and $42,329,432)
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
Available for sale at fair value (amortized cost $206,169,634 and $149,402,001)
|
|
|
207,087,830
|
|
|
|
144,978,426
|
|
Trading at fair value (amortized cost $15,048,511 and $22,203,883)
|
|
|
13,236,400
|
|
|
|
17,399,090
|
|
Equity securities trading at fair value (cost $0 and $15,159,200)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,822,620
|
|
Commercial loans at fair value (amortized cost $6,804,466 and $6,907,368)
|
|
|
2,593,554
|
|
|
|
2,690,317
|
|
Limited partnerships at equity (cost $85,871,127 and $98,101,553)
|
|
|
113,653,278
|
|
|
|
122,927,697
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
145,781,524
|
|
|
|
110,249,779
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
40,231,853
|
|
|
|
75,672,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and investments
|
|
|
582,965,252
|
|
|
|
546,986,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
2,655,280
|
|
|
|
4,978,920
|
|
Premiums and other receivables, net
|
|
|
34,587,548
|
|
|
|
23,426,525
|
|
Receivable for investments disposed
|
|
|
10,244,257
|
|
|
|
25,415,261
|
|
Reinsurance receivables on unpaid losses, net
|
|
|
214,735,813
|
|
|
|
213,906,569
|
|
Reinsurance receivables on paid losses, net
|
|
|
23,468,952
|
|
|
|
28,429,945
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
18,478,515
|
|
|
|
14,663,710
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
22,354,796
|
|
|
|
19,225,185
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
31,759,889
|
|
|
|
35,514,597
|
|
Property, improvements and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,046,594
|
|
|
|
10,033,489
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
24,893,551
|
|
|
|
23,895,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
977,190,447
|
|
|
$
|
946,476,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
552,449,162
|
|
|
$
|
548,749,589
|
|
Reserve for unearned premiums
|
|
|
99,379,385
|
|
|
|
83,364,396
|
|
Ceded reinsurance payable
|
|
|
27,298,402
|
|
|
|
23,809,871
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
336,670
|
|
|
|
671,059
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
26,572,454
|
|
|
|
25,808,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
806,036,073
|
|
|
|
782,403,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
15,750,715
|
|
|
|
15,742,215
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
49,981,616
|
|
|
|
49,539,886
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
614,727
|
|
|
|
(2,875,317
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
192,843,907
|
|
|
|
189,702,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,190,965
|
|
|
|
252,109,353
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 7,333,977 shares
|
|
|
(88,036,591
|
)
|
|
|
(88,036,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
171,154,374
|
|
|
|
164,072,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
977,190,447
|
|
|
$
|
946,476,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-2-
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
$
|
40,129,597
|
|
|
$
|
44,904,978
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
|
6,551,912
|
|
|
|
(13,016,622
|
)
|
Net realized investment (loss)
|
|
|
(416,698
|
)
|
|
|
(32,247,889
|
)
|
Commission and other income
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
59,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
46,270,009
|
|
|
|
(300,372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
20,682,328
|
|
|
|
26,020,614
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
9,296,480
|
|
|
|
9,835,229
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,044,249
|
|
|
|
8,766,454
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,680,213
|
|
|
|
1,676,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
41,703,270
|
|
|
|
46,299,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
4,566,739
|
|
|
|
(46,599,407
|
)
|
Income tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
(786,715
|
)
|
|
|
(210,318
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
1,875,451
|
|
|
|
(16,641,282
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1,088,736
|
|
|
|
(16,851,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,478,003
|
|
|
$
|
(29,747,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-basic
|
|
|
8,411,121
|
|
|
|
8,707,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
.41
|
|
|
$
|
(3.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
8,590,238
|
|
|
|
8,707,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
.40
|
|
|
$
|
(3.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.04
|
|
|
$
|
.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-3-
NYMAGIC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash flows used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,478,003
|
|
|
$
|
(29,747,807
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred taxes
|
|
|
1,875,450
|
|
|
|
(16,641,282
|
)
|
Net realized investment loss
|
|
|
416,698
|
|
|
|
32,247,889
|
|
Equity in (earnings) loss of limited partnerships
|
|
|
(1,212,026
|
)
|
|
|
3,028,051
|
|
Net amortization from bonds and commercial loans
|
|
|
80,034
|
|
|
|
41,066
|
|
Depreciation and other, net
|
|
|
293,149
|
|
|
|
236,594
|
|
Trading portfolio activities
|
|
|
15,974,640
|
|
|
|
(93,809,262
|
)
|
Commercial loan activities
|
|
|
107,619
|
|
|
|
(7,301,555
|
)
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other receivables
|
|
|
(11,161,023
|
)
|
|
|
(22,903,085
|
)
|
Reinsurance receivables paid and unpaid, net
|
|
|
4,131,749
|
|
|
|
7,825,534
|
|
Ceded reinsurance payable
|
|
|
3,488,531
|
|
|
|
(183,253
|
)
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
2,323,640
|
|
|
|
222,592
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(3,814,805
|
)
|
|
|
(4,620,878
|
)
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
(3,129,611
|
)
|
|
|
(425,947
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(997,649
|
)
|
|
|
(433,371
|
)
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
3,699,573
|
|
|
|
(746,867
|
)
|
Reserve for unearned premiums
|
|
|
16,014,989
|
|
|
|
15,438,244
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
763,785
|
|
|
|
(6,157,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
28,854,743
|
|
|
|
(94,182,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
32,332,746
|
|
|
|
(123,930,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity fixed maturities matured, repaid and redeemed
|
|
|
1,428,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale fixed maturities acquired
|
|
|
(152,809,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale fixed maturities sold
|
|
|
95,147,313
|
|
|
|
11,230,349
|
|
Available for sale fixed maturities matured, repaid and redeemed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributed to limited partnerships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000,000
|
)
|
Distributions and redemptions from limited partnerships
|
|
|
10,486,447
|
|
|
|
19,180,662
|
|
Net (purchase) sale of short-term investments
|
|
|
(35,669,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable for investments disposed and not yet settled
|
|
|
15,171,004
|
|
|
|
9,805,945
|
|
Acquisition of property & equipment, net
|
|
|
(1,306,254
|
)
|
|
|
(934,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(67,552,166
|
)
|
|
|
24,282,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock issuance and other
|
|
|
450,230
|
|
|
|
167,854
|
|
Cash dividends paid to stockholders
|
|
|
(671,059
|
)
|
|
|
(701,881
|
)
|
Net purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(466,380
|
)
|
Payable for treasury stock purchased and not yet settled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,490,714
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(220,829
|
)
|
|
|
(2,491,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(35,440,249
|
)
|
|
|
(102,139,345
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
75,672,102
|
|
|
|
204,913,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
40,231,853
|
|
|
$
|
102,773,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
3,250,031
|
|
|
$
|
3,250,031
|
|
Federal income tax paid
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
-4-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(1) Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies:
Basis of presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all material
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results have been reflected for such periods.
Adjustments to financial statements consist of normal recurring items. The results of operations
for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. These financial
statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
thereto contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and claims and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassification
Certain accounts in the prior years financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
2009 presentation.
Adoption of new accounting pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting No. 160, Non-controlling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160), which requires non-controlling
interests (previously referred to as minority interests) to be treated as a separate component of
equity, not as a liability or other item outside of permanent equity. SFAS 160 is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have an
impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which
permits a one-year deferral of the application of SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The Company
adopted SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on January 1, 2009 and its
adoption did not have an impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS
161). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging
activities and specifically requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for
using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of, and gains and losses on,
derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have an impact on the Companys financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 163, Accounting for
Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts (SFAS 163). SFAS 163 clarifies how FASB Statement No. 60,
Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprise, applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts issued by insurance enterprises, including the recognition and measurement of premium
revenue and claim liabilities. It also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee
insurance contracts. The provisions of SFAS 163 are effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and all interim periods within those fiscal years,
except for disclosures about the insurance enterprises risk-management activities, which are
effective the first period (including interim periods) beginning after May 23, 2008. The adoption
of SFAS 163 did not have an impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity.
On June 16, 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force Issues No. 03-6-1, Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (EITF
03-6-1). EITF 03-6-1 provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities
and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method.
EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The adoption of EITF 03-6-1 did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In December 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting No. 141(R), Business
Combinations ( SFAS 141(R)), which requires most identifiable assets, liabilities,
non-controlling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business combination to be recorded at
full fair value. Under SFAS 141(R), all business combinations will be accounted for by
applying the acquisition method (referred to as the purchase method in SFAS 141, Business
Combinations). SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008 and is to be applied to business combinations occurring after the effective date. The
adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not have an impact on the Companys operations, financial
position or liquidity unless an acquisition occurs after the effective date of SFAS 141(R).
-5-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(1) Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies (continued):
Future adoption of new accounting pronouncements
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining the Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset and Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly. The FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is
permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional
guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB 157, Fair Value Measurements,
when the volume and level of activity of the asset or liability have significantly decreased
and on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The Company
will adopt FSP FAS 157-4 during the second quarter 2009 and has not yet determined the
impact adoption will have on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. The FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after
March 15, 2009. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 modifies the requirements for recognizing
other-than-temporarily impaired debt securities, the presentation of other-than-temporary
impairment losses and increases the frequency of and expands the required disclosures about
other-than-temporary impairment for debt and equity securities. The Company will adopt FSP
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 during the second quarter, 2009 and has not yet determined the
impact adoption will have on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and ABP 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments. The FSP is effective for interim reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial
statements. The Company has not yet determined the impact on its disclosures, if any, of
adopting FSP FAS 107-1 and ABP 28-1.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets. The FSP requires an employer to provide certain
disclosures about plan assets of its defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.
The disclosures required include the investment policies and strategies of the plans, the
fair value of the major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation techniques used
to develop fair value measurements and a description of significant concentrations of risk
in plan assets. The FSP is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The
adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will not have an impact on the Companys operations, financial
position or liquidity.
-6-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(2) Investments:
A summary of the Companys investment components at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity (amortized
cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
40,418,176
|
|
|
|
6.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,783,969
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
%
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
125,653,607
|
|
|
|
21.55
|
%
|
|
|
90,483,461
|
|
|
|
16.54
|
%
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
41,016,047
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
|
13,710,996
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
207,087,830
|
|
|
|
35.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
144,978,426
|
|
|
|
26.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities trading (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
$
|
13,236,400
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,399,090
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities trading
|
|
$
|
13,236,400
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,399,090
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
280,705,043
|
|
|
|
48.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
223,623,728
|
|
|
|
40.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities trading (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,822,620
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,822,620
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
186,013,377
|
|
|
|
31.91
|
%
|
|
|
185,921,881
|
|
|
|
33.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities, equity securities, cash
and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
466,718,420
|
|
|
|
80.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
421,368,229
|
|
|
|
77.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans (fair value)
|
|
|
2,593,554
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
|
|
2,690,317
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
Limited partnership hedge funds (equity)
|
|
|
113,653,278
|
|
|
|
19.50
|
%
|
|
|
122,927,697
|
|
|
|
22.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment portfolio
|
|
$
|
582,965,252
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
546,986,243
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
As of March 31, 2009, 97.50% of the carrying value of the Companys fixed income and short-term
investment portfolios were considered investment grade by S&P. As of March 31, 2009, the Company
invested approximately $11.7 million in fixed maturities that were below investment grade.
-7-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(2) Investments (continued):
Details of the mortgage-backed securities portfolio as of March 31, 2009, including publicly
available qualitative information, are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Support
|
|
S&P
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Security description
|
|
Issue date
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Value % (1)
|
|
|
Score (2)
|
|
|
Rate (3)
|
|
|
Level (4)
|
|
Rating
|
|
Rating
|
|
AHMA 2006-3
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
$
|
12,168,950
|
|
|
$
|
7,342,288
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
AAA
|
|
Caa1
|
CWALT 2005-69
|
|
|
11/2005
|
|
|
|
7,704,248
|
|
|
|
5,736,343
|
|
|
|
82.1
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
AAA
|
|
Ba3
|
CWALT 2005-76
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
7,654,266
|
|
|
|
5,200,636
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
AAA
|
|
B2
|
RALI 2005-QO3
|
|
|
10/2005
|
|
|
|
7,778,661
|
|
|
|
4,801,528
|
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
AAA
|
|
B1
|
WaMu 2005-AR17
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
6,608,981
|
|
|
|
4,291,127
|
|
|
|
75.3
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
AAA
|
|
A1
|
WaMu 2006-AR9
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
|
9,109,824
|
|
|
|
5,234,951
|
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
B
|
|
Ba1
|
WaMu 2006-AR13
|
|
|
9/2006
|
|
|
|
9,355,883
|
|
|
|
5,403,518
|
|
|
|
76.4
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
AAA
|
|
B3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
|
$
|
38,010,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The dollar-weighted average amortized loan-to-original value of the underlying loans at
April 25, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Average original FICO of remaining borrowers in the loan pool at April 25, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The percentage of the current outstanding principal balance that is more than 60 days
delinquent as of April 25, 2009. This includes loans that are in foreclosure and real estate
owned.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The current credit support provided by subordinate ranking tranches within the overall
security structure at April 25, 2009.
|
The Company has investments in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) amounting to $60.4
million at March 31, 2009. These securities are classified as held to maturity after the Company
transferred these holdings from the available for sale portfolio effective October 1, 2008. The
adjusted cost basis of these securities is based on a determination of the fair value of these
securities on the date they were transferred.
The fair value of each RMBS investment is determined under SFAS 157. Fair Value is determined by
estimating the price at which an asset might be sold on the measurement date. There has been a
considerable amount of turmoil in the U.S. housing market since 2007, which has led to market
declines in such securities. Because the pricing of these investments is complex and has many
variables affecting price including, projected delinquency rates, projected severity rates,
estimated loan to value ratios, vintage year, subordination levels, projected prepayment speeds and
expected rates of return required by prospective purchasers, the estimated price of such securities
will differ among brokers depending on these facts and assumptions. While many of the inputs
utilized in pricing are observable, many other inputs are unobservable and will vary depending upon
the broker. During periods of market dislocation, such as the current market conditions, it is
increasingly difficult to value such investments because trading becomes less frequent and/or
market data becomes less observable. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions
that are less observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods
that are more complex. For example, assumptions regarding projected delinquency and severity rates
have become increasingly pessimistic due to uncertainties associated with the residential real
estate markets. Additionally, there are only a limited number of prospective purchasers of such
securities that demand high expected returns in the current market. This has resulted in lower
quotes from securities dealers, who are, themselves, reluctant to position such securities because
of financing uncertainties. Accordingly, the dealer quotes used to establish fair value may not be
reflective of the expected future cash flows from a security and, therefore, not reflective of its
intrinsic value. Additionally, there are government sponsored programs that may affect the
performance of the Companys residential mortgage-backed securities. The Company is uncertain as to
the impact these programs will have on fair value on its residential mortgage backed securities.
The fair value of such securities at March 31, 2009 was approximately $38 million.
-8-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(2) Investments (continued):
The Company performs a cash flow analysis for each of these securities, which attempts to estimate
the likelihood of any future impairment. While the Company does not believe there are any
other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) currently, future estimates may change depending upon the
actual performance statistics reported for each security to the Company. This may result in future
charges based upon revised estimates for delinquency rates, severity or prepayment patterns. These
changes in estimates may be material. These securities are collateralized by pools of Alt-A
mortgages, and receive priority payments from these pools. The Companys securities rank senior to
subordinated tranches of debt collateralized by each respective pool of mortgages. The Company has
collected all applicable interest and principal repayments on such securities to date. As of
April 25, 2009, the levels of subordination ranged from 27% to 52% of the total debt outstanding
for each pool. Delinquencies within the underlying mortgage pools ranged from 22% to 45% of total
amounts outstanding. In March 2008, delinquencies ranged from 3.4% to 21.2%. Delinquency rates are
not the same as severity rates, or actual loss, but are an indication of the potential for losses
of some degree in future periods. In each case, pool subordination levels by individual security
remain in excess of pool delinquency rates as of April 25, 2009.
The Company has both the ability and the intent to hold such securities until maturity. Prior to
the transfer to the held to maturity classification, the Company incurred cumulative write-downs
from OTTI declines in the fair value of these securities, amounting to $40.7 million in 2008. The
collection of principal repayments on these securities through March 31, 2009 resulted in
approximately $545,000 in realized investment gains.
These RMBS investments, as of December 31, 2008 were rated AAA/Aaa by S&P/Moodys. As of March 31,
2009, these securities are rated B to AAA by S&P and Caa1 to A1 by Moodys.
The gross unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities held to maturity and available for sale
at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(22,370,422
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,010,391
|
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities available for
sale
|
|
|
38,894,722
|
|
|
|
1,523,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,418,176
|
|
|
|
40,418,176
|
|
Municipal obligations available for sale
|
|
|
126,799,975
|
|
|
|
1,061,987
|
|
|
|
(2,208,355
|
)
|
|
|
125,653,607
|
|
|
|
125,653,607
|
|
Corporate securities available for sale
|
|
|
40,474,936
|
|
|
|
595,644
|
|
|
|
(54,533
|
)
|
|
|
41,016,047
|
|
|
|
41,016,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
266,550,446
|
|
|
$
|
3,181,085
|
|
|
$
|
(24,633,310
|
)
|
|
$
|
245,098,221
|
|
|
$
|
267,468,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities held to
maturity
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,916,780
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,329,432
|
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities available for
sale
|
|
|
38,917,878
|
|
|
|
1,866,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,783,969
|
|
|
|
40,783,969
|
|
Municipal obligations available for sale
|
|
|
97,166,677
|
|
|
|
220,718
|
|
|
|
(6,903,934
|
)
|
|
|
90,483,461
|
|
|
|
90,483,461
|
|
Corporate securities available for sale
|
|
|
13,317,446
|
|
|
|
395,344
|
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
13,710,996
|
|
|
|
13,710,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
210,648,213
|
|
|
$
|
2,482,153
|
|
|
$
|
(25,822,508
|
)
|
|
$
|
187,307,858
|
|
|
$
|
206,224,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(2) Investments (continued):
Net investment income (loss) from each major category of investments for the periods indicated is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of limited partnerships
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income (loss)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income(loss)
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details related to investment income (loss) from commercial loans and trading activities presented
in the preceding table are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest and dividends earned
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
Net realized losses
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
Net unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
(loss) from commercial loans
and trading activities
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemptions in investments held to maturity or disposals of investments available for
sale for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $96,575,435 and $11,230,349,
respectively. Gross gains of $545,363 were realized on repayments of held to maturity investments
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Gross gains of $786,025 and $148,547 and gross losses of
$1,610,475 and $0 were realized on sales, maturities, repayments and/or redemptions of available
for sale investments for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company
recorded declines in values of investments considered to be other-than-temporary of $0 and
$32,396,436 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Substantially all of
the other-than-temporary declines recorded during the first quarter of 2008 were from the
residential mortgage-backed securities portfolio. The decision to write down such securities was
based upon the Companys uncertainty at March 31, 2008 that such securities would be held until the
fair value decline recovered.
(3) Fair Value Measurements:
The Companys estimates of fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are
based on the framework established in SFAS 157. The framework is based on the inputs used in
valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and requires that
observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The disclosure of fair value estimates
in the SFAS 157 hierarchy is based on whether the significant inputs into the valuation are
observable. In determining the level of the hierarchy in which the estimate is disclosed,
the highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and the lowest
priority to unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys significant market assumptions. The
standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value and categorize
the assets and liabilities within the hierarchy:
Level 1
Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are
accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. These prices generally provide the
most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available. Active markets are
defined as having the following for the measured asset/liability: i) many transactions, ii)
current prices, iii) price quotes not varying substantially among market makers, iv) narrow
bid/ask spreads and v) most information publicly available.
-10-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(3) Fair Value Measurements (continued):
The Companys Level 1 assets are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities, which are highly
liquid and traded in active exchange markets.
The Company uses the quoted market prices as fair value for assets classified as Level 1. The
Company receives quoted market prices from a third party, a nationally recognized pricing service.
Prices are obtained from available sources for market transactions involving identical assets. For
the majority of Level 1 investments, the Company receives quoted market prices from an independent
pricing service. The Company validates primary source prices by back testing to trade data to
confirm that the pricing services significant inputs are observable. The Company also compares
the prices received from the third party service to alternate third party sources to validate the
consistency of the prices received on securities.
Level 2
Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full
term of the asset through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 inputs include quoted
market prices in active markets for similar assets, non-binding quotes in markets that are not
active for identical or similar assets and other market observable inputs (e.g., interest rates,
yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities, etc.).
The Companys Level 2 assets include municipal debt obligations and corporate debt
securities.
The Company generally obtains valuations from third party pricing services and/or security
dealers for identical or comparable assets or liabilities by obtaining non-binding broker quotes
(when pricing service information is not available) in order to determine an estimate of fair
value. The Company bases all of its estimates of fair value for assets on the bid price as it
represents what a third party market participant would be willing to pay in an arms length
transaction. Prices from pricing services are validated by the Company through comparison to
prices from corroborating sources and are validated by back testing to trade data to confirm that
the pricing services significant inputs are observable. Under certain conditions, the Company may
conclude the prices received from independent third party pricing services or brokers are not
reasonable or reflective of market activity or that significant inputs are not observable, in
which case it may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing information or quotes received and
apply internally developed values to the related assets or liabilities. In such cases, those
valuations would be generally classified as Level 3. Generally, the Company utilizes an
independent pricing service to price its municipal debt obligations and corporate debt securities.
Currently, these securities are exhibiting low trade volume. The Company considers such
investments to be in the Level 2 category.
Level 3
Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs that are
supported by little or no market activity for the asset. These inputs reflect the Companys
understanding about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability.
The Companys Level 3 assets include its RMBS(which are held to maturity) and commercial
loans, as they are illiquid and trade in inactive markets. These markets are considered inactive
as a result of the low level of trades of such investments.
All prices provided by primary pricing sources are reviewed for reasonableness, based on the
Companys understanding of the respective market. Prices may then be determined using valuation
methodologies such as discounted cash flow models, as well as matrix pricing analyses performed on
non-binding quotes from brokers or other market-makers. As of March 31, 2009, the Company utilized
cash flow models, matrix pricing and non-binding broker quotes obtained from the primary pricing
sources to determine the fair value of its RMBS and commercial loan investments. Because pricing
of these investments is complex and has many variables affecting price including, delinquency
rate, severity rate, loan to value ratios, vintage year, discount rate, subordination levels and
prepayment speeds, the price of such securities will differ by broker depending on the weight
given to the various inputs. While many of the inputs utilized in pricing are observable, some
inputs are unobservable and the weight given these unobservable inputs will vary depending upon
the broker. During periods of market dislocation, such as the current market conditions, it is
increasingly difficult to value such investments because trading becomes less frequent and/or
market data becomes less observable. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions
that are less observable or require
greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods that are more complex. For
example, prepayment speeds and severity rates have become increasingly stressed by brokers due to
market uncertainty connected with these types of investments resulting in lower quoted prices.
These inputs are used in pricing models to assist the broker in determining a current price for
these investments. After considering all of the relevant information at March 31, 2009, the
Company adjusted the price received for two commercial loan investments. As such, because the
establishment of fair valuation is significantly reliant upon unobservable inputs, the Company
considers such investments to be in the Level 3 category.
-11-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(3) Fair Value Measurements (continued):
The following are the major categories of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis
for the period ended March 31, 2009, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
(Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Total at
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
40,418,176
|
|
|
$
|
166,669,654
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
207,087,830
|
|
Fixed maturities trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,236,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,236,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,593,554
|
|
|
|
2,593,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,418,176
|
|
|
$
|
179,906,054
|
|
|
$
|
2,593,554
|
|
|
$
|
222,917,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The investments classified as Level 3 in the above table consist of commercial loans, for
which the Company has determined that quoted market prices of similar investments are not
determinative of fair value. Since the broker quotes do not reflect current market information
from actual transactions, the Company has elected to deviate from quoted prices using a matrix
pricing analysis. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending
balances for all investments measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs during the quarter ended
March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
2,690,317
|
|
|
$
|
2,690,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)
|
|
|
(96,763
|
)
|
|
|
(96,763
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, maturities, repayments, redemptions and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers to Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,593,554
|
|
|
$
|
2,593,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no investments classified as Level 3 for the period ending March 31, 2008.
-12-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(3) Fair Value Measurements (continued):
The Company elected the fair value option for approximately $8.3 million in commercial loans upon
its adoption of SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have an
impact on the Companys results of operations, financial position or liquidity. The Company
utilized the fair value election under SFAS 159 for all of its $10.3 million of commercial loan
purchases during the first three months of 2008. Management believes that the use of the fair
value option to record commercial loan purchases was consistent with its trading objective for
such investments. As such, the entire commercial loan portfolio of $2.6 million at March 31, 2009
was recorded at fair value. The amortized cost of the commercial loan portfolio at March 31, 2009
was $6.8 million. All loans are current with respect to interest payments. The Company did not
utilize the fair value election under SFAS 159 for any investment purchases during the first three
months of 2009.
The changes in the fair value of these debt instruments were recorded in investment income.
Investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 reflected net realized losses
from sales and repayments of $0, unrealized losses from fair value changes of $6,139 and
interest income earned of $111,185. Investment income for the three months ended March 31,
2008 reflected realized losses from repayments of $0, unrealized losses from fair value
changes of $1,426,934 and interest income earned of $417,977.
(4) Income Taxes:
The Company files tax returns subject to the tax regulations of federal, state and local tax
authorities. A tax benefit taken in the tax return but not in the financial statements is known as
an unrecognized tax benefit. The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits at either March 31,
2009 or March 31, 2008. The Companys policy is to record interest and penalties related to
unrecognized tax benefits to income tax expense. The Company did not incur any interest or
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits for each of the three-month periods ended March 31,
2009 and 2008.
The Company is subject to federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for tax year
2005 and subsequent. The Company had federal, state and local deferred tax assets amounting to
potential future tax benefits of approximately $31.8 million and $35.5 million at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has recorded a valuation
allowance of $17.6 million with respect to the uncertainty in the realization of capital loss
carryforwards. The Company considered various tax planning strategies to support the recoverability
of existing deferred income taxes for capital loss carryforwards. This included an analysis of the
timing and availability of unrealized positions in the fixed income maturity portfolio. Management
believes the deferred tax asset, net of the recorded valuation allowance account, as of March 31,
2009 will more-likely-than-not be fully realized.
(5) Comprehensive Income
The Companys comparative comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net income(loss)
|
|
$
|
3,478
|
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities, net of
deferred tax expense (benefit) of $1,733 and $(11,219)
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
(20,836
|
)
|
Less
: reclassification adjustment for (losses) realized
in net income, net of tax benefit of $(146) and
$(11,287)
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(20,961
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income(loss)
|
|
$
|
6,968
|
|
|
$
|
(29,623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-13-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(6) Common Stock Repurchase Plan:
Under the Common Stock Repurchase Plan, the Company may purchase up to $75 million of the Companys
issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the open market. During the first three months of
2008, there were 20,300 shares repurchased at a total cost of approximately $466,000. There were no
repurchases of the Companys common stock during the first three months of 2009.
(7) Earnings per share:
Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) computations for each of the periods reported herein are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per
|
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
(Numerator)
|
|
|
(Denominator)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
$
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
|
$
|
.41
|
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
|
8,707
|
|
|
$
|
(3.42
|
)
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity awards and purchased
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
$
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
8,590
|
|
|
$
|
.40
|
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
|
8,707
|
|
|
$
|
(3.42
|
)
|
(8) Share Based Incentive Compensation Plans:
The Company maintains three share-based incentive compensation plans (the Plans) for employees
and directors. A presentation of awards granted under the Plans at March 31, 2009 follows:
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Per
|
|
|
Aggregate Fair
|
|
Restricted and Deferred Share Units
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
257,233
|
|
|
$
|
26.59
|
|
|
$
|
3,138,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, end of period
|
|
|
136,400
|
|
|
$
|
26.92
|
|
|
$
|
1,664,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, there was approximately $2,594,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related
to restricted and deferred share units, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining
weighted-average vesting period of 1.1 years.
-14-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(8) Share Based Incentive Compensation Plans (continued):
1991,
2002 and 2004 Stock Option Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
|
|
Shares Under Option
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
285,950
|
|
|
$
|
15.96
|
|
|
3.7 years
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
168,450
|
|
|
$
|
15.83
|
|
|
3.6 years
|
|
$
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, there was approximately $328,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related
to stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting
period of 3.7 years.
The total compensation cost recognized in results of operations for all share-based incentive
compensation awards was approximately $710,000 and $506,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The related tax benefit recognized in results of operations was
approximately $248,000 and $177,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Executive Compensation Agreements:
The Company entered into a new employment agreement with A. George Kallop, the Companys President
and Chief Executive Officer, effective January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010 (the Kallop
Employment Agreement). Under his new employment agreement, Mr. Kallop is entitled to an annual
base salary of $525,000 and a target annual incentive award of $393,750. Mr. Kallop also received
two grants of 8,000 restricted share units, which will vest on December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2010, respectively, provided that he continues to be employed by the Company on those dates; a
long-term incentive award with maximum, target and threshold awards of 12,000, 6,000 and 3,000
performance units, respectively, in each of two one-year performance periods beginning on January
1, 2009 and January 1, 2010; and, a supplemental performance compensation award in the amount of
25,000 performance units. Under the long term incentive award, the number of performance units
eligible to be earned for each of these two one-year performance periods is based on target
increases in the market price of the Common Stock in the applicable performance period. The
supplemental performance compensation award of 25,000 units is earned if there is a change in
control of the Company as defined in the employment agreement. Mr. Kallops new employment
agreement also includes provisions governing termination for death, disability, cause, without
cause and change of control, which include a severance benefit of one year salary, pro rata annual
incentive awards at target, and accelerated vesting of stock and performance unit grants in the
event of his termination without cause prior to a change of control.
In connection with the Kallop Employment Agreement, the Company entered into a Performance Share
Award Agreement (the Kallop Award Agreement) with Mr. Kallop on the same date. Under the terms of
the Kallop Award Agreement, the aforementioned performance share units will be earned for each of
the two one-year performance periods based on predetermined market price targets of the daily
closing price of the Companys common stock in each of the requisite performance periods. The
performance share units award is contingent upon the satisfaction of certain market conditions
relating to the fair market value of the Companys stock. Depending on the performance of the
Companys common stock for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 an award may be
issued up to 12,000 performance share units per year upon the achievement of certain predetermined
share closing price requirements. The fair value of the performance share award has been estimated
as of the initial grant-date using a Monte Carlo Simulation. The inputs for expected dividends,
expected volatility, expected term and risk-free interest rate used in the calculation of the
grant-date fair value of this award were 1.67%, 79.6%, 3 years for 2009 performance period and
0.370% and 1.67%, 63.4%, 4 years and 0.76% for 2010 performance period, respectively. Pursuant to
the completion of the 2009 and 2010 annual performance periods, performance shares for each year,
will vest on the second anniversary of the last day of the applicable performance period, provided
that the executive is employed by the Company on that date.
-15-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(9) Nature of Business and Segment Information:
The Companys subsidiaries include three insurance companies and three insurance agencies. These
subsidiaries underwrite commercial insurance in three major lines of business. The Company
considers ocean marine, inland marine/fire and other liability as appropriate segments for purposes
of evaluating the Companys overall performance. A final segment includes the runoff operations in
the aircraft business. The Company ceased writing any new policies covering aircraft risks
subsequent to March 31, 2002. The Company evaluates revenues and income or loss by the
aforementioned segments. Revenues include premiums earned and commission income. Income or loss
includes premiums earned and commission income less the sum of losses incurred and policy
acquisition costs.
The financial information by segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
13,289
|
|
|
$
|
7,024
|
|
|
$
|
17,823
|
|
|
$
|
7,313
|
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
Other liability
|
|
|
25,686
|
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
25,359
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
40,130
|
|
|
|
10,151
|
|
|
|
44,905
|
|
|
|
9,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income(loss)
|
|
|
6,552
|
|
|
|
6,552
|
|
|
|
(13,016
|
)
|
|
|
(13,016
|
)
|
Net realized investment (loss) gains
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
(32,248
|
)
|
|
|
(32,248
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,044
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,766
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,680
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,677
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,089
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,270
|
|
|
$
|
3,478
|
|
|
$
|
(300
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) Related Party Transactions:
The Company entered into an investment management agreement with Mariner Partners, Inc. (Mariner)
effective October 1, 2002, which was amended and restated on December 6, 2002. Under the terms of
this agreement, Mariner manages the Companys and its subsidiaries, New York Marine And General
Insurance Companys and Gotham Insurance Companys investment portfolios. Fees to be paid to
Mariner are based on a percentage of the investment portfolios as follows: .20% of liquid
assets,
.30% of fixed maturity investments and 1.25% of limited partnership (hedge fund) and equity
security investments. Another of the Companys subsidiaries, Southwest Marine and General Insurance
Company, entered into an investment management agreement, the substantive terms of which are
identical to those set forth above, with a subsidiary of Mariner, Mariner Investment Group, Inc.
(Mariner Group) effective March 1, 2007. William J. Michaelcheck, a Director of the Company, is
the Chairman and the beneficial owner of a substantial number of shares of Mariner. George R.
Trumbull, a Director of the Company, A. George Kallop, a Director and the President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and William D. Shaw, Jr., Vice Chairman and a Director of the
Company, are also associated with Mariner. Investment fees incurred under the agreements with
Mariner were $511,922 and $879,469 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
-16-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(10) Related Party Transactions (continued):
On April 4, 2008, the Company renewed its consulting agreement (the Shaw Consulting Agreement),
effective January 1, 2008, with William D. Shaw, Jr., a member of the Companys Board of Directors
and Vice Chairman, pursuant to which Mr. Shaw will provide certain consulting services to the
Company relating to the Companys asset management strategy including (i) participate in meetings
with rating agencies; (ii) participate in meetings with research analysts; and (iii) certain other
investor relations services. Mr. Shaws compensation under the Consulting Agreement was $100,000
per year, payable in four equal quarterly payments of $25,000. From January 1, 2008 through
March 31, 2008, he was paid $25,000 under the Shaw Consulting Agreement. The Shaw Consulting
Agreement terminated on December 31, 2008 and was not renewed for 2009.
On May 21, 2008, George R. Trumbull stepped down as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Effective
as of that date, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Trumbull, pursuant to
which the Trumbull Employment Agreement, which was previously filed as Exhibit 10.59 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, was novated and the
vesting of 5,000 restricted share units granted to Mr. Trumbull on January 1, 2008, was accelerated
to May 21, 2008.
The Company entered into the consulting agreement with Mr. Trumbull, a member of the Companys
Board of Directors, on June 16, 2008 (the Trumbull Consulting Agreement), which was made
effective as of May 21, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, Mr. Trumbull will perform
consulting services in the form of providing assistance to the Companys Chairman of the Board of
Directors as he may request in connection with Board matters and to the President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company as he may request in connection with various issues that may arise
in the Companys operating and risk bearing subsidiaries. Mr. Trumbulls compensation under the
Trumbull Consulting Agreement is $100,000 per year, payable in four equal quarterly payments of
$25,000 each, the first of which was paid on August 21, 2008. From January 1, 2009 through
March 31, 2009, he was paid $25,000 under the Trumbull Consulting Agreement. The Company is also
obligated to reimburse Mr. Trumbull for all reasonable and necessary expenses incurred in
connection with the services he provides under the Trumbull Consulting Agreement. Unless extended
by mutual agreement, the Trumbull Consulting Agreement terminates on May 21, 2009. The Trumbull
Consulting Agreement is also subject to termination by Mr. Trumbull or the Company on 30 days prior
notice. The Company may terminate the Trumbull Consulting Agreement at any time in the event Mr.
Trumbull ceases to be a member of the Companys Board of Directors. The agreement automatically
terminates immediately upon the merger or consolidation of the Company into another corporation;
the sale of all or substantially all of its assets; its dissolution and/or liquidation; or, the
death of Mr. Trumbull.
On July 8, 2008, the Company entered into a three-year engagement agreement with Robert G. Simses,
the Companys current Chairman of the Board of Directors (the Simses Engagement Agreement),
effective May 21, 2008 through May 21, 2011. Under the terms of the Simses Engagement Agreement,
Mr. Simses is entitled to an annual retainer, payable quarterly, beginning on August 21, 2008, of
not less than $150,000, subject to review for increase at the discretion of the Human Resource
Committee of the Board of Directors. From January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009 Mr. Simses was
paid $37,500 under the Simses Engagement Agreement. Mr. Simses is also entitled to receive a grant
of 30,000 restricted share units as of the effective date of the agreement. These shares vest
ratably over the term of the agreement, beginning on May 21, 2009. The Simses Engagement Agreement
also provides for reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of Mr. Simses
duties, and includes provisions governing termination for death, disability, cause, without cause
and change of control, which includes payment through the end of the term of the agreement and
accelerated vesting of stock unit grants in the event of his termination without cause, for good
cause or upon a change of control.
-17-
NYMAGIC, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements March 31, 2009 and 2008
(10) Related Party Transactions (continued):
In 2003, the Company acquired a 100% interest in a limited partnership hedge fund, Mariner
Tiptree (CDO) Fund I, L.P. (Tiptree), subsequently known as Tricadia CDO Fund, L.P.
(Tricadia) and since June 2008 known as Altrion Capital, L.P. (Altrion). Altrion was
originally established to invest in collateralized debt obligation (CDO) securities,
commercial loan obligation (CLO) securities, credit related structured (CRS) securities and
other structured products, as well as commercial loans, that are arranged, managed or advised by
a Mariner affiliated company. In 2003, the Company made an investment of $11.0 million in
Altrion. Additional investments of $4.65 million, $2.7 million and $6.25 million were made in
2004, in 2005 and 2007, respectively. On August 18, 2006, the Company entered into an Amended
and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, effective August 1, 2006, with Tricadia Capital, LLC
(Tricadia Capital), the general partner, and the limited partners named therein (the Amended
Agreement), to amend and restate the existing Limited Partnership Agreement of Mariner Tiptree
(CDO) Fund I, L.P. entered into in 2003 (the Original Agreement).
The Company was previously committed to providing an additional $15.4 million, or a total of
approximately $40 million, in capital to Altrion by August 1, 2008. Altrion, however, waived its
right to require the Company to contribute its additional capital commitment of $15.4 million
and accordingly, the Companys obligation to make such capital contribution has expired. In
addition, the Company withdrew $10 million of its capital from Altrion during July 2008.
Withdrawals require one years prior written notice to the hedge fund manager. The Company has
submitted a redemption notice to Altrion for the full value estimated at $34 million, which will
be effective December 31, 2009. The Company is uncertain as to whether cash and/or securities
will be received as payment of the redemption proceeds.
Under the provisions of both the Original Agreement and the Amended Agreement, the Mariner
affiliated company was entitled to 50% of the net profit realized upon the sale of certain
investments held by the Company.
Investment expenses incurred under the Amended Agreement for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 amounted to $0 and $133,607, respectively. These amounts were based upon the fair value of
certain investments held as of March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, as well as certain
investments sold during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The limited
partnership agreements also provide for other fees payable to the manager based upon the operations
of the hedge fund. There were no other fees incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The Company is the only limited partner in Altrion and reports its investment
using the equity method of accounting. The amounts reported in the balance sheet caption Limited
partnerships related to Altrion at March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $34 million and $42.8 million,
respectively.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company held approximately $62.6 million in limited partnership and
limited liability company interests in hedge funds, which are directly or indirectly managed by
Mariner.
(11) Legal Proceedings:
The Company previously entered into reinsurance contracts with a reinsurer that is now in
liquidation. On October 23, 2003, the Company was served with a Notice to Defend and a Complaint
by the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, who is the liquidator of this
reinsurer, alleging that approximately $3 million in reinsurance claims paid to the Company in
2000 and 2001 by the reinsurer are voidable preferences and are therefore subject to recovery by
the liquidator. The claim was subsequently revised by the liquidator to approximately $2 million.
The Company filed Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs Complaint, denying that the payments are
voidable preferences and asserting affirmative defenses. These Preliminary Objections were
overruled on May 24, 2005 and the Company filed its Answer in the proceedings on June 15, 2005.
On December 7, 2006 the liquidator filed a motion of summary judgment to which the Company
responded on December 19, 2006 by moving for a stay, pending the resolution of a similar case
currently pending before the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. As of May 1, 2009,
the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has issued a ruling in the similar case
that supports the Companys position, but there has been no ruling on the Companys position, and
no trial date has been set for this matter. The Company intends to defend itself vigorously in
connection with this lawsuit, and the Company believes it has strong defenses against these
claims; however, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of this litigation.
-18-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Description of Business
NYMAGIC, INC., a New York corporation (the Company or NYMAGIC), is a holding company
which owns and operates insurance companies, risk bearing entities and insurance underwriters and
managers.
Insurance Companies:
New York Marine And General Insurance Company (New York Marine)
Gotham Insurance Company (Gotham)
Southwest Marine And General Insurance Company (Southwest Marine)
Insurance Underwriters and Managers:
Mutual Marine Office, Inc. (MMO)
Pacific Mutual Marine Office, Inc. (PMMO)
Mutual Marine Office of the Midwest, Inc. (Midwest)
New York Marine and Gotham each currently holds a financial strength rating of A
(Excellent) and Southwest Marine currently holds a financial strength rating of A- (Excellent)
and an issuer credit rating of a- from A.M. Best Company. These are the third and fourth highest
of fifteen rating levels in A.M. Bests classification system. The Companys insureds rely on
ratings issued by rating agencies. Any adverse change in the ratings assigned to New York Marine,
Gotham or Southwest Marine may adversely impact their ability to write premiums.
The Company specializes in underwriting ocean marine, inland marine/fire and other
liability insurance through insurance pools managed by the Companys insurance underwriters and
managers, MMO, PMMO and Midwest (collectively referred to as MMO). The original members of the
pools were insurance companies that were not affiliated with the Company. Subsequently, New York
Marine and Gotham joined the pools. Over the years, New York Marine and Gotham steadily increased
their participation in the pools, while the unaffiliated insurance companies reduced their
participation or withdrew from the pools entirely. Since January 1, 1997, New York Marine and
Gotham have been the only members of the pools, and therefore we now write 100% of all of the
business produced by the pools.
In prior years, the Company issued policies covering aircraft insurance; however, the
Company ceased writing any new policies covering aircraft risks as of March 31, 2002. The Company
decided to exit the commercial aviation insurance business, because it is highly competitive,
generated underwriting losses during the 1990s and is highly dependent on the purchase of
substantial amounts of reinsurance, which became increasingly expensive after the events of
September 11, 2001. This decision has enabled the Company to concentrate on its core lines of
business, which include ocean marine, inland marine/fire and other liability.
In 2005, the Company formed Arizona Marine And General Insurance Company, which was
renamed Southwest Marine And General Insurance Company (Southwest Marine) in July 2006, as a
wholly owned subsidiary in the State of Arizona. Its application to the State of Arizona Department
of Insurance for authority to write commercial property and casualty insurance in Arizona was
approved in May 2006. Southwest Marine writes, among other lines of insurance, excess and surplus
lines in New York.
-19-
During the three months ended March 31, 2008 the Company acquired a book of professional
liability business oriented to insurance brokers and agents and also formed MMO Agencies, which
will focus on generating additional premium growth through a network of general agents with binding
authority subject to underwriting criteria established and monitored by MMO.
Results of Operations
The Company reported net income for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009 of
$3.5 million, or $.40 per share, compared with a net loss of $29.7 million, or $3.42 per diluted
share, for the first quarter of 2008. The increase in results of operations for the first quarter
of 2009 when compared to the same period of 2008 was primarily attributable to stronger investment
results from trading activities and limited partnership income. For the three months ended March
31, 2008 the Company recorded after tax other-than-temporary write downs of $21.0 million from
residential mortgage backed securities and losses from limited partnerships and trading portfolio.
Shareholders equity increased to $171.2 million as of March 31, 2009 compared to $164.1
million as of December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to net income for the
period and increases in other comprehensive income.
The Companys gross premiums written, net premiums written and net premiums earned
decreased by 6%, 12% and 11%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009, when
compared to the same period of 2008.
Premiums for each segment were as follows:
NYMAGIC Gross Premiums Written By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
20,084
|
|
|
$
|
22,241
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
6,196
|
|
|
|
3,568
|
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
41,300
|
|
|
|
45,774
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
67,580
|
|
|
|
71,583
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
67,664
|
|
|
$
|
71,628
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMAGIC Net Premiums Written By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
14,218
|
|
|
$
|
17,554
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
36,916
|
|
|
|
41,044
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
53,041
|
|
|
|
59,839
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
53,015
|
|
|
$
|
59,917
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20-
NYMAGIC Net Premiums Earned By Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
13,289
|
|
|
$
|
17,823
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
Other liability
|
|
|
25,686
|
|
|
|
25,359
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
40,157
|
|
|
|
44,827
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,130
|
|
|
$
|
44,905
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ocean marine gross premiums written for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased by
10%, primarily reflecting reduced volume in the cargo class. The first quarter of 2008 reflected
$3.0 million in gross cargo premiums arising from one of the
Companys program management agreements which was terminated at the end of 2007. This compared to no premiums in the same
period of 2009. Excluding the decline in cargo premiums, increases were recorded in other ocean
marine classes largely due to additional production in the marine liability class and firmer rates
in the energy classes. Rates in the other ocean marine classes were slightly down when compared to
the prior years comparable period.
Ocean marine net premiums written and net premiums earned for the three months ended March 31,
2009 decreased by 19% and 25% respectively, when compared to the same period of 2008. Net written
and earned premiums for three months ended March 31, 2009 largely reflected the decline in gross
cargo premiums written in addition to declines in hull business earned over the past year.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company maintained its $5 million per risk net loss retention
in the ocean marine line that was in existence during 2008. In addition, the Companys net
retention could be as low as $1 million for certain classes within ocean marine. The 80% quota
share reinsurance protection for energy business, which commenced in 2006, also remains in effect
for 2009 and the net retention from losses arising from energy business is subject to inclusion
within the ocean marine reinsurance program.
Inland marine/fire gross premiums written and net premiums written increased by 74% and 54%
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 when compared to the same period of 2008. Net premiums
earned for the three months ended March 31, 2009 decreased by 28%. Gross premiums written in the
first three months of 2008 reflect increases in production largely relating to two property risks
written on a nation wide basis. Partially offsetting this increase were declines in production in
certain surety business largely resulting from lower construction activity. Premiums reflect mildly
lower market rates when compared to the prior year. The decrease in net premiums earned reflected
decreases in surety, inland marine and fire premium production from the prior year.
Other liability gross premiums written and net premiums written each decreased 10%,
respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008.
Net premiums earned for the three months ended March 31, 2009 increased by 1% when compared to the
same period in 2008. The decrease in premiums written is primarily due to declines in the excess
workers compensation, contractors liability and commercial auto premiums that were largely the
result of declines in production largely as a result of reduced construction and commercial
activities.
The Company writes excess workers compensation insurance on behalf of certain self-insured
workers compensation trusts. Gross and net premiums written in the excess workers compensation
class decreased to $21.6 million and $20.1 million, respectively, in the first three months of 2009
from $24.8 million and $23.0 million, respectively, in the same period of 2008.
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred as a percentage of net premiums earned (the
loss ratio) was 51.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to 57.9% for the same
period of 2008. The lower loss ratio in 2009 was partly attributable to a lower current accident
year loss ratio in the ocean marine and other liability lines of business and partly attributable
to larger amounts of favorable reserve development. The lower ocean marine loss ratio was due in
part to the non-renewal of certain unprofitable hull business. The lower other liability loss ratio
was due in part to lower loss estimates used for contractors liability business. Partially
offsetting this was a higher loss ratio in the inland marine/fire segment as the prior years first
quarter reflected larger amounts of favorable loss reserve development.
-21-
The Company reported favorable development of prior year loss reserves of
$3.1 million and $1.0 million during the first three months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, as a
result of favorable reported loss trends arising from the ocean marine and other liability lines of
business in 2009 and favorable reported loss trends in the inland marine and ocean marine lines of
business in 2008. Partially offsetting the overall redundancy in 2008 was approximately $400,000 of
adverse development in the aviation line.
Policy acquisition costs as a percentage of net premiums earned (the acquisition cost
ratio) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 were 23.2% and 21.9%,
respectively. The slightly lower 2008 ratio is due in part to lower acquisition cost ratios in the
ocean marine line and other liability line of business, largely resulting from the impact of lower
excess of loss reinsurance costs on the acquisition cost ratio.
General and administrative expenses increased by 14.6% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 when compared to the same period of 2008. Larger expenses were incurred in 2009 to
service the growth in the Companys business operations, including increased staffing from MMO
Agencies personnel as well as computer system implementation expenditures.
The Companys combined ratio (the loss ratio, the acquisition cost ratio and general and
administrative expenses divided by net premiums earned) was 99.7% for the three months ended March
31, 2009 as compared with 99.4% for the same period of 2008.
Interest expense of $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was comparable
to the same period of 2008.
Net investment income(loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $6.6 million as
compared to $(13.0) million for the same period of 2008. Net investment income in 2009 reflected
increases in income in trading, limited partnerships and commercial loan portfolios. The net
investment (loss) in 2008 reflected trading portfolio losses and losses from limited partnerships.
Trading portfolio losses of ($10.8) million resulted primarily from the fair value changes in
municipal obligations ($2.7) million, preferred stocks ($2.2) million, economic hedged positions
($4.0) million and exchange traded funds ($1.9) million. Income from our investment in Altrion was
$0.1 million and $0.2 million for the first quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Limited
partnership income for the first quarter of 2009 increased from the prior years first quarter as a
result of higher returns amounting to 1.0% as compared to (1.6%) for the same period of 2008. For
the first quarter of 2009, fixed income hedge fund strategies reported higher returns than the
prior years comparable period.
Investment income (loss) , net of investment fees, from each major category of
investments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Fixed maturities, held to maturity
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Fixed maturities, trading securities
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income (loss)
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 investments in limited partnerships amounted to
approximately $113.7 million and $181.1 million, respectively. The equity method of accounting is
used to account for the Companys limited partnership hedge fund investments. Under the equity
method, the Company records all changes in the underlying value of the limited partnership hedge
fund to results of operations.
-22-
As of March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008 investments in the trading and commercial loan
portfolios collectively amounted to approximately $15.8 million and $126.3 million, respectively.
Net investment income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 reflected
approximately $3.2 million and ($11.9) million, respectively, derived from combined trading
portfolio and commercial loan activities before investment expenses. These activities primarily
include the trading of commercial loans, municipal obligations, preferred stocks and exchange
traded funds. The Companys trading and commercial loan portfolios are marked to market with the
change recognized in net investment income during the current period. Any realized gains or losses
resulting from the sales of trading and commercial loan investments are also recognized in net
investment income.
The Companys investment income results may be volatile depending upon the level of
limited partnerships, commercial loans and trading portfolio investments held. If the Company
invests a greater percentage of its investment portfolio in limited partnership hedge funds, and/or
if the fair value of trading and/or commercial loan investments held varies significantly during
different periods, there may also be a greater volatility associated with the Companys investment
income.
Commission and other income decreased to $5,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009
from $59,000 for the same period in the prior year.
Net realized investment losses were $417,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as
compared to net realized investment losses of $32.2 million for the same period in the prior
year. Net realized investment losses in 2009 reflect losses from the sales of municipal bonds that
were partially offset by realized gains of $545,000. Net realized investment losses for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 include write-downs from other-than-temporary declines in the fair
value of securities amounting to $32.4 million. There were no write-downs of investment balances
during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The write downs in 2008 was primarily attributable to
the decline in the fair value of super senior residential mortgage backed securities held by the
Company. The Company has collected all applicable interest and principal repayments on such
securities to date. The decision to write down such securities as of March 31, 2008 was based upon
the uncertainty that we may not hold such securities until the fair value decline is recovered.
Total income tax expense (benefit) amounted to $1.0 million and ($16.9) million,
respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Total income tax
expense or benefit as a percentage of income or (loss) before taxes was 23.8% and 36.2% for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The lower percentage in 2009 was largely attributable
to greater investments in tax exempt municipal bonds.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and total investments increased from $547.0 million at December 31, 2008 to
$583.0 million at March 31, 2009, principally as a result of the fair value increases of its
investments and favorable cash flows from operations. The level of cash and short-term investments
of $186.0 million at March 31, 2009 reflected the Companys high liquidity position.
Cash flows provided by operating activities were $32.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $123.9 million for the
same period in 2008. Trading portfolio and commercial loan activities of $16.0 million favorably
affected cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 while such activities adversely
affected cash flows by $101.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. Trading portfolio
activities include the purchase and sale of preferred stocks, municipal bonds and exchange traded
funds. Commercial loan activities include the purchase and sale of middle market loans made to
commercial companies. As the Companys trading and commercial loan portfolio balances may fluctuate
significantly from period to period, cash flows from operating activities may also be significantly
impacted by such activities. Contributing to an increase in operating cash flows, other than
trading and commercial loan activities, during the first quarter of 2009 was the collection of
premiums and reinsurance recoverable balances. Contributing to a reduction in operating cash flows,
other than trading and commercial loan activities, during the first quarter of 2008 was the payment
of gross losses in the ocean marine line of business for hurricane losses in 2005, substantially
all of which were reinsured and to be collected from reinsurers in subsequent periods.
Cash flows used in investing activities were $67.6 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as compared to cash flows provided by investing activities of $24.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008. The cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were
adversely impacted by the net purchase of fixed maturity available for sale investments.
Contributing to cash flows from investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were
the net sale of fixed maturity available for sale investments.
Cash flows used in financing activities were $221,000 and $2.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In 2008, a substantial portion of the use of
cash flows was attributable to the repurchase of the Companys common stock.
On March 10, 2009, the Company declared a dividend to shareholders of four (4) cents per
share amounting to $337,000, payable on April 7, 2009 to shareholders of record on March 31, 2009.
On March 6, 2008, the Company declared a dividend of eight (8) cents per share amounting to
$697,000 to shareholders of record on March 31, 2008, payable on April 3, 2008.
-23-
New York Marine and Gotham did not declare any ordinary dividends to the Company during the
first three months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Under the NYMAGIC, INC. Amended and Restated 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the LTIP), the
Company granted 8,000 restricted share units, and up to 49,000 performance share units and 100,000 stock options to
the President and Chief Executive Officer during the three months ended March 31, 2009. The market
price per share and option price per share on the grant date of the stock option were
$9.88 and $15.00 per share, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, 8,000 and
5,000 restricted share units were granted to the President and Chief Executive Officer and the
former Chairman of the Board of Directors, respectively.
Under the NYMAGIC, INC. non-qualified 2002 Stock Option Plan, 10,000 stock options were
awarded to a Director during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Under the Common Stock Repurchase Plan, the Company may purchase up to $75 million of the
Companys issued and outstanding shares of common stock on the open market. During the first three
months of 2008, there were 20,300 shares repurchased at a total cost of approximately $466,000.
There were no repurchases of the Companys common stock during the first three months of 2009.
Premiums and other receivables, net increased to $34.6 million as of March 31, 2009 from
$23.4 million as of December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of excess workers compensation gross
writings, which are substantially written during the first quarter of the calendar year.
Deferred income taxes at March 31, 2009 decreased to $31.8 million from $35.5 million at
December 31, 2008, primarily due to reductions in deferred tax benefits arising from the increase
in the fair value of investments. Management believes the Companys total deferred tax asset, net
of the recorded valuation allowance account, as of March 31, 2009 will more-likely-than-not be
fully realized.
Reserve for unearned premiums increased to $99.4 million as of March 31, 2009 from
$83.4 million as of December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of excess workers compensation gross
writings, which are substantially written during the first quarter of the calendar year.
Reinsurance receivables on paid balances, net at March 31, 2009, decreased to $23.5 million
from $28.4 million at December 31, 2008 largely as a result of the collection of reinsurance
balances on gross losses paid on prior year hurricane claims.
Property, improvements and equipment, net at March 31, 2009, increased to $11.0 million from
$10.0 million at December 31, 2008 largely as a result of capitalized expenditures relating to
information technology infrastructure initiatives.
Other assets at March 31, 2009 increased to $24.9 million from $23.9 million at December 31,
2008 largely as a result of an increase in federal income tax recoverables.
Reinsurance payable at March 31, 2009 increased to $27.3 million from $23.8 million at
December 31, 2008 primarily due to the timing of payments of certain reinsurance expense.
-24-
Investments
A summary of the Companys investment components at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Fixed maturities held to maturity (amortized
cost):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities held to maturity
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
61,246,212
|
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
$
|
40,418,176
|
|
|
|
6.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,783,969
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
%
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
|
125,653,607
|
|
|
|
21.55
|
%
|
|
|
90,483,461
|
|
|
|
16.54
|
%
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
41,016,047
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
|
13,710,996
|
|
|
|
2.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities available for sale
|
|
$
|
207,087,830
|
|
|
|
35.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
144,978,426
|
|
|
|
26.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities trading (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal obligations
|
|
$
|
13,236,400
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,399,090
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities trading
|
|
$
|
13,236,400
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
17,399,090
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
280,705,043
|
|
|
|
48.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
223,623,728
|
|
|
|
40.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities trading (fair value):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,822,620
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,822,620
|
|
|
|
2.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
186,013,377
|
|
|
|
31.91
|
%
|
|
|
185,921,881
|
|
|
|
33.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities, equity securities, cash
and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
466,718,420
|
|
|
|
80.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
421,368,229
|
|
|
|
77.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans (fair value)
|
|
|
2,593,554
|
|
|
|
0.44
|
%
|
|
|
2,690,317
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
Limited partnership hedge funds (equity)
|
|
|
113,653,278
|
|
|
|
19.50
|
%
|
|
|
122,927,697
|
|
|
|
22.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment portfolio
|
|
$
|
582,965,252
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
546,986,243
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
As of March 31, 2009, 97.50% of the carrying value of the Companys fixed income and short-term
investment portfolios were considered investment grade by S&P. As of March 31, 2009, the Company
invested approximately $11.7 million in fixed maturities that were below investment grade.
-25-
Details of the mortgage-backed securities portfolio as of March 31, 2009, including publicly
available qualitative information, are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
FICO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Support
|
|
S&P
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Security description
|
|
Issue date
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Value % (1)
|
|
|
Score (2)
|
|
|
Rate (3)
|
|
|
Level (4)
|
|
Rating
|
|
Rating
|
|
AHMA 2006-3
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
$
|
12,168,950
|
|
|
$
|
7,342,288
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
45.2
|
|
AAA
|
|
Caa1
|
CWALT 2005-69
|
|
|
11/2005
|
|
|
|
7,704,248
|
|
|
|
5,736,343
|
|
|
|
82.1
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
49.4
|
|
AAA
|
|
Ba3
|
CWALT 2005-76
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
7,654,266
|
|
|
|
5,200,636
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
45.0
|
|
|
50.3
|
|
AAA
|
|
B2
|
RALI 2005-QO3
|
|
|
10/2005
|
|
|
|
7,778,661
|
|
|
|
4,801,528
|
|
|
|
82.0
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
AAA
|
|
B1
|
WaMu 2005-AR17
|
|
|
12/2005
|
|
|
|
6,608,981
|
|
|
|
4,291,127
|
|
|
|
75.3
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
51.7
|
|
AAA
|
|
A1
|
WaMu 2006-AR9
|
|
|
7/2006
|
|
|
|
9,109,824
|
|
|
|
5,234,951
|
|
|
|
75.7
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
B
|
|
Ba1
|
WaMu 2006-AR13
|
|
|
9/2006
|
|
|
|
9,355,883
|
|
|
|
5,403,518
|
|
|
|
76.4
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
AAA
|
|
B3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,380,813
|
|
|
$
|
38,010,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The dollar-weighted average amortized loan-to-original value of the underlying loans at
April 25, 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Average original FICO of remaining borrowers in the loan pool at April 25, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The percentage of the current outstanding principal balance that is more than 60 days
delinquent as of April 25, 2009. This includes loans that are in foreclosure and real estate
owned.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The current credit support provided by subordinate ranking tranches within the overall
security structure at April 25, 2009.
|
The Company has investments in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) amounting
to $60.4 million at March 31, 2009. These securities are classified as held to maturity
after the Company transferred these holdings from the available for sale portfolio
effective October 1, 2008. The adjusted cost basis of these securities is based on a
determination of the fair value of these securities on the date they were transferred.
The fair value of each RMBS investment is determined under SFAS 157. fair value is
determined by estimating the price at which an asset might be sold on the measurement
date. There has been a considerable amount of turmoil in the U.S. housing market in 2007,
2008 and 2009, which has led to market declines in such securities. Because the pricing
of these investments is complex and has many variables affecting price including,
projected delinquency rates, projected severity rates, estimated loan to value ratios,
vintage year, subordination levels, projected prepayment speeds and expected rates of
return required by prospective purchasers, the estimated price of such securities will
differ among brokers depending on these facts and assumptions. While many of the inputs
utilized in pricing are observable, many other inputs are unobservable and will vary
depending upon the broker. During periods of market dislocation, such as the current
market conditions, it is increasingly difficult to value such investments because trading
becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes less observable. As a result, valuations
may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation
and judgment as well as valuation methods that are more complex. For example, assumptions
regarding projected delinquency and severity rates have become increasingly pessimistic
due to uncertainties associated with the residential real estate markets. Additionally,
there are only a limited number of prospective purchasers of such securities that demand
high expected returns in the current market. This has resulted in lower quotes from
securities dealers, who are, themselves, reluctant to position such securities because of
financing uncertainties. Accordingly, the dealer quotes used to establish fair value may
not be reflective of the expected future cash flows from a security and, therefore, not
reflective of its intrinsic value. Additionally, there are government sponsored programs
that may affect the performance of the Companys residential mortgage-backed securities.
The Company is uncertain as to the impact these programs will have on fair value on its
residential mortgage backed securities. The fair value of such securities at March 31,
2009 was approximately $38 million.
-26-
The Company performs a cash flow analysis for each of these securities, which attempts to
estimate the likelihood of any future impairment. While the Company does not believe
there are any other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) currently, future estimates may
change depending upon the actual performance statistics reported for each security to the
Company. This may result in future charges based upon revised estimates for delinquency
rates, severity or prepayment patterns. These changes in estimates may be material. These
securities are collateralized by pools of Alt-A mortgages, and receive priority
payments from these pools. The Companys securities rank senior to subordinated tranches
of debt collateralized by each respective pool of mortgages. The Company has collected
all applicable interest and principal repayments on such securities to date. As of
April 25, 2009, the levels of subordination ranged from 26.8% to 51.7% of the total debt
outstanding for each pool. Delinquencies within the underlying mortgage pools ranged from
22.3% to 45.0% of total amounts outstanding. In March 2008, delinquencies ranged from
3.4% to 21.2%. Delinquency rates are not the same as severity rates, or actual loss, but
are an indication of the potential for losses of some degree in future periods. In each
case, pool subordination levels by individual security remain in excess of pool
delinquency rates as of April 25, 2009.
The Company has both the ability and the intent to hold such securities until maturity. Prior to
the transfer to the held to maturity classification, the Company incurred cumulative write-downs
from OTTI declines in the fair value of these securities, amounting to $40.7 million in 2008.
The collection of principal repayments on these securities through March 31, 2009 resulted in
approximately $545,000 in realized investment gains.
These RMBS investments, as of December 31, 2008, were rated AAA/Aaa by S&P/Moodys. As of March
31, 2009, these securities are rated B to AAA by S&P and Caa1 to A1 by Moodys.
Fair value measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, which establishes a consistent
framework for measuring fair value. The framework is based on the inputs used in
valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and requires
that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The disclosure of fair
value estimates in the SFAS 157 hierarchy is based on whether the significant inputs into
the valuation are observable. In determining the level of the hierarchy in which the
estimate is disclosed, the highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs that reflect the Companys
significant market assumptions. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be
used to measure fair value and categorize the assets and liabilities within the
hierarchy:
Level 1
Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are
accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. These prices generally
provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available.
Active markets are defined as having the following for the measured asset/liability: i)
many transactions, ii) current prices, iii) price quotes not varying substantially among
market makers, iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and v) most information publicly available.
The Companys Level 1 assets are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities and preferred
stock, which are highly liquid and traded in active exchange markets.
The Company uses the quoted market prices as fair value for assets classified as Level 1.
The Company receives quoted market prices from a third party, a nationally recognized
pricing service. Prices are obtained from available sources for market transactions
involving identical assets. For the majority of Level 1 investments, the Company receives
quoted market prices from an independent pricing service. The Company validates primary
source prices by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing services
significant inputs are observable. The Company also compares the prices received from the
third party service to alternate third party sources to validate the consistency of the
prices received on securities.
Level 2
Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are
observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term
of the asset through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 inputs include
quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets, non-binding quotes in markets
that are not active for identical or similar assets and other market observable inputs
(e.g., interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates and loss
severities).
The Companys Level 2 assets include municipal debt obligations and corporate debt
securities.
-27-
The Company generally obtains valuations from third party pricing services and/or
security dealers for identical or comparable assets or liabilities by obtaining
non-binding broker quotes (when pricing service information is not available) in order to
determine an estimate of fair value. The Company bases all of its estimates of fair value
for assets on the bid price as it represents what a third party market participant would
be willing to pay in an arms length transaction. Prices from pricing services are
validated by the Company through comparison to prices from corroborating sources and are
validated by back testing to trade data to confirm that the pricing services significant
inputs are observable. Under certain conditions, the Company may conclude the prices
received from independent third party pricing services or brokers are not reasonable or
reflective of market activity or that significant inputs are not observable, in which
case it may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing information or quotes received
and apply internally developed values to the related assets or liabilities. In such
cases, those valuations would be generally classified as Level 3. Generally, the Company
utilizes an independent pricing service to price its municipal debt obligations and
corporate debt securities. Currently, these securities are exhibiting low trade volume.
The Company considers such investments to be in the Level 2 category.
Level 3
Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs that
are supported by little or no market activity for the asset. These inputs reflect the
Companys understanding about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability.
The Companys Level 3 assets include its RMBS and commercial loans, as they are illiquid
and trade in inactive markets. These markets are considered inactive as a result of the
low level of trades of such investments.
All prices provided by primary pricing sources are reviewed for reasonableness, based on
the Companys understanding of the respective market. Prices may then be determined using
valuation methodologies such as discounted cash flow models, as well as matrix pricing
analyses performed on non-binding quotes from brokers or other market-makers. As of
March 31, 2009, the Company utilized cash flow models, matrix pricing and non-binding
broker quotes obtained from the primary pricing sources to evaluate the fair value of its
RMBS and commercial loan investments. Because pricing of these investments is complex and
has many variables affecting price including, delinquency rate, severity rate, loan to
value ratios, vintage year, discount rate, subordination levels and prepayment speeds,
the price of such securities will differ by broker depending on the weight given to the
various inputs. While many of the inputs utilized in pricing are observable, some inputs
are unobservable and the weight given these unobservable inputs will vary depending upon
the broker. During periods of market dislocation, such as the current market conditions,
it is increasingly difficult to value such investments because trading becomes less
frequent and/or market data becomes less observable. As a result, valuations may include
inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation and
judgment as well as valuation methods that are more complex. For example, prepayment
speeds and severity rates have become increasingly stressed by brokers due to market
uncertainty connected with these types of investments resulting in lower quoted prices.
These inputs are used in pricing models to assist the broker in determining a current
price for these investments. After considering all of the relevant information at
March 31, 2009, the Company adjusted the price received for two of its commercial loan
investments. As such, because the establishment of fair valuation is significantly
reliant upon unobservable inputs, the Company considers such investments to be in the
Level 3 category.
The Company maintains cash and short-term investments of $186.0 million at March 31,
2009, which is more than adequate to meet its immediate liquidity requirements.
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses for each segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Ocean marine
|
|
$
|
163,985
|
|
|
$
|
96,457
|
|
|
$
|
169,478
|
|
|
$
|
101,830
|
|
Inland marine/fire
|
|
|
22,762
|
|
|
|
9,513
|
|
|
|
21,057
|
|
|
|
8,971
|
|
Other liability
|
|
|
245,749
|
|
|
|
206,259
|
|
|
|
239,026
|
|
|
|
197,658
|
|
Runoff lines (Aircraft)
|
|
|
119,953
|
|
|
|
25,484
|
|
|
|
119,189
|
|
|
|
26,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
552,449
|
|
|
$
|
337,713
|
|
|
$
|
548,750
|
|
|
$
|
334,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-28-
Our long tail business is primarily in ocean marine liability, aircraft and non-marine
liability insurance. These classes historically have extended periods of time between the
occurrence of an insurable event, reporting the claim to the Company and final settlement. In such
cases, we estimate reserves, with the possibility of making several adjustments, because of
emerging differences in actual versus expected loss development, which may result from shock losses
(large losses), changes in loss payout patterns and material adjustments to case reserves due to
adverse or favorable judicial or arbitral results during this time period.
By contrast, other classes of insurance that we write, such as property, which includes
certain ocean marine classes (hull and cargo) and our inland marine/fire segment, and claims-made
non-marine liability, historically have had shorter periods of time between the occurrence of an
insurable event, reporting of the claim to the Company and final settlement. The reserves for these
classes are estimated as described above, but these reserves are less likely to be readjusted,
because it is not likely that they will have significant differences resulting from expected loss
development, shock or large losses, changes in loss payout patterns and material adjustments to
case reserves over their short tails.
As the Company increases its production in its other liability lines of business, its
reported loss reserves from period to period may vary depending upon the long tail, short tail and
product mix within this segment. Our professional liability class, for example, is written on a
claims-made basis, but other sources of recent production, such as excess workers compensation,
are derived from liability classes written on an occurrence basis. Therefore, the overall level of
loss reserves reported by the Company at the end of any reporting period may vary as a function of
the level of writings achieved in each of these classes.
The process of establishing reserves for claims involves uncertainties and requires the use of
informed estimates and judgments. Our estimates and judgments may be revised as claims develop and
as additional experience and other data become available and are reviewed, as new or improved
methodologies are developed or as current laws change. The Company realized $3.1 million in
favorable development for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as a result of favorable reported
loss trends arising from the ocean marine and other liability lines of business. The Company
recorded losses in 2008 from its exposure to offshore oil rigs, cargo interests and property as a
result of hurricanes Gustav and Ike. The ultimate gross and net losses resulting from these
catastrophes, as well as the reinsurance recoveries attributable to them and applicable
reinstatement premium costs, are based upon the Companys best estimate derived from an evaluation
of claims notices received and a review of historic loss development. The low frequency and high
severity of the risks we insure make it difficult to assess the adequacy of such loss reserves. As
such, the Companys ultimate liability may change from the amount provided currently. If these
reserves or reinstatement premium costs are insufficient to cover our actual losses and loss
adjustment expenses, we would have to augment our liabilities and incur a charge to our earnings.
These charges could be material. Other than specifically disclosed herein, there were no
significant changes in assumptions made in the evaluation of loss reserves during 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management considers certain accounting policies to be critical with respect to the
understanding of the Companys financial statements. Such policies require significant management
judgment and the resulting estimates have a material effect on reported results and will vary to
the extent that future events affect such estimates and cause them to differ from the estimates
provided currently. These critical accounting policies include unpaid losses and loss adjustment
expenses, allowance for doubtful accounts, impairment of investments, limited partnerships and
trading portfolios, reinstatement reinsurance premiums and stock compensation.
-29-
The Company maintains reserves for the future payment of losses and loss adjustment
expenses with respect to both case (reported) and IBNR (incurred but not reported) losses under
insurance policies issued by the Company. IBNR losses are those losses, based upon historical
experience, industry loss data and underwriter expectations, that the Company estimates will be
reported under these policies. Case loss reserves are determined by evaluating reported claims on
the basis of the type of loss involved, knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the claim and
the policy provisions relating to the type of loss. Case reserves can be difficult to estimate
depending upon the class of business, claim complexity, judicial interpretations and legislative
changes that affect the estimation process. Case reserves are reviewed and monitored on a regular
basis, which may result in changes (favorable or unfavorable) to the initial estimate until the
claim is ultimately paid and settled. Unpaid losses with respect to asbestos/environmental risks
are difficult for management to estimate and require considerable judgment due to the uncertainty
regarding the significant issues surrounding such claims. Unpaid losses with respect to catastrophe
losses, such as hurricanes Katrina and Rita that occurred in 2005 and hurricanes Ike and Gustav in
2008, are also difficult to estimate due to the high severity of the risks we insure. Unpaid losses
and loss adjustment expenses amounted to $552.4 million and $548.7 million at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance
amounted to $337.7 million and $334.8 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. Management continually reviews and updates the estimates for unpaid losses, and any
changes resulting therefrom are reflected in operating results currently. The potential for future
adverse or favorable loss development is highly uncertain and subject to a variety of factors
including, but not limited to, court decisions, legislative actions and inflation.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on managements review of amounts due from
insolvent or financially impaired companies. Allowances are estimated for both premium receivables
and reinsurance receivables. Management continually reviews and updates such estimates for any
changes in the financial status of companies. The allowance for doubtful accounts for both premiums
and reinsurance receivables amounted to $19.4 million and $21.7 million at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The decrease in the allowance was primarily the result of the
settlement of disputed balances with reinsurers and the reevaluation of the remaining reserve for
doubtful accounts.
Impairment of investments, included in realized investment gains or losses, results from
declines in the fair value of investments which are considered by management to be
other-than-temporary. Management reviews investments for impairment based upon specific criteria
that include the duration and extent of declines in fair value of the security below its cost or
amortized cost. The Company performs a qualitative and quantitative review of all securities in a
loss position in order to determine if any impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary. The
Company also reviews all securities with any rating agency declines during the reporting period.
This review includes considering the effect of rising interest rates and the Companys intent and
ability to hold impaired securities in the foreseeable future to recoup any losses. In addition to
subjecting its securities to the objective tests of percent declines in fair value and downgrades
by major rating agencies, when it determines whether declines in the fair value of its securities
are other-than-temporary, the Company also considers the facts and circumstances that may have
caused the declines in the value of such securities. As to any specific security, it may consider
general market conditions, changes in interest rates, adverse changes in the regulatory environment
of the issuer, the duration for which the Company expects to hold the security and the length of
any forecasted recovery. Approximately $0 and $32.4 million were charged to results from operations
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, resulting from fair value
declines considered to be other-than-temporary. Gross unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity
investments available for sale amounted to approximately $3.2 million and $2.3 million,
respectively, at March 31, 2009. Gross unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity investments
available for sale amounted to approximately $2.5 million and $6.9 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2008. The Company believes the unrealized losses are temporary and result from changes
in market conditions, including interest rates or sector spreads.
The Company utilizes the equity method of accounting to account for its limited partnership
hedge fund investments. Under the equity method, the Company records all changes in the underlying
value of the limited partnership to net investment income in results of operations. Net investment
income (loss) derived from investments in limited partnerships amounted to $1.2 million and $(3.0)
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. See Item 3 Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk with respect to market risks associated with
investments in limited partnership hedge funds.
The Company maintained a trading portfolio and commercial loan portfolio at March 31, 2009
consisting of municipal obligations, and commercial loans. These investments are marked to market
with the change recognized in net investment income during the current period. Any realized gains
or losses resulting from the sales of such securities are also recognized in net investment income.
The Company recorded $3.2 million and $(11.9) million in combined net trading portfolio and
commercial loan portfolio income (loss) before expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. See Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
with respect to market risks associated with investments in illiquid investments.
Reinsurance reinstatement premiums are recorded, as a result of losses incurred by the Company, in
accordance with the provisions of our reinsurance contracts. Upon the occurrence of a large
severity or catastrophe loss, the Company may be obligated to pay additional reinstatement premiums
under its excess of loss reinsurance treaties up to the amount of the original premium paid under
such treaties. Reinsurance reinstatement premiums incurred for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008 were each $0.1 million.
Total stock compensation cost recognized in earnings for all share-based incentive
compensation awards was approximately $710,000 and $506,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
-30-
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, which establishes a consistent
framework for measuring fair value. The framework is based on the inputs used in valuation and
gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and requires that observable inputs
be used in the valuations when available. The disclosure of fair value estimates in the SFAS 157
hierarchy is based on whether the significant inputs into the valuation are observable. For an
updated discussion of the application of estimates and assumptions around the valuation of
investments, see Fair value measurements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The investment portfolio has exposure to market risks, which include the effect on the
investment portfolio of adverse changes in interest rates, credit quality, hedge fund values, and
illiquid securities including commercial loans and residential mortgage-backed securities. Interest
rate risk includes the changes in the fair value of fixed maturities based upon changes in interest
rates. Credit quality risk includes the risk of default by issuers of debt securities. Hedge fund
risk includes the potential loss from the diminution in the value of the underlying investment of
the hedge fund. Illiquid securities risk includes exposure to the private placement market
including its lack of liquidity and volatility in changes in market prices. The only significant
change to the Companys exposure to market risks during the three months ended March 31, 2009 as
compared to those disclosed in the Companys financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2008 related to the level of investments in limited partnerships and the interest rate and credit
risk associated with an increase in the level of fixed income investments relating to corporate
and municipal bonds. The investment in limited partnerships amounted to $113.7 million and
$122.9 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The investments in
municipal obligations and corporate bonds increased from $121.6 million as of December 31, 2008 to
$179.9 million as of March 31, 2009.
At March 31, 2009, the Company held $2.6 million of commercial loans, which consist of loans
from middle market companies. The Company has elected to account for such debt instruments
utilizing the fair value election under SFAS 159. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value of
these debt instruments are recorded in investment income. The markets for these types of
investments can be illiquid and, therefore, the price obtained from dealers on these investments is
subject to change, depending upon the underlying market conditions of these investments, including
the potential for downgrades or defaults on the underlying collateral of the investment. The
Company seeks to mitigate market risk associated with such investments by maintaining a small
portion of its investment portfolio in such investments. As such, less than 1% of the Companys
investment portfolio is maintained in such investments at March 31, 2009.
Hedge fund risk includes the potential loss from the diminution in the value of the
underlying investment of the hedge fund. Hedge fund investments are subject to various economic and
market risks. The risks associated with hedge fund investments may be substantially greater than
the risks associated with fixed income investments. Consequently, our hedge fund portfolio may be
more volatile, and the risk of loss greater, than that associated with fixed income investments. In
accordance with the investment policy for each of the Companys New York insurance company
subsidiaries, hedge fund investments are limited to the greater of 30% of invested assets or 50% of
policyholders surplus. The Companys Arizona insurance subsidiary does not invest in hedge funds.
The Company also seeks to mitigate market risk associated with its investments in hedge funds
by maintaining a diversified portfolio of hedge fund investments. Diversification is achieved
through the use of many investment managers employing a variety of different investment strategies
in determining the underlying characteristics of their hedge funds. The Company is dependent upon
these managers to obtain market prices for the underlying investments of the hedge funds. Some of
these investments may be difficult to value and actual values may differ from reported amounts. The
hedge funds in which we invest usually impose limitations on the timing of withdrawals from the
hedge funds (most are within 90 days), and may affect our liquidity.
The Company increased its investments in municipal obligations and corporate bonds from $121.6
million as of December 31, 2008 to $179.9 million as of March 31, 2009. The purchases consisted of
investment grade mid term duration securities. The Company seeks to mitigate interest risk of its
investment portfolio by properly matching the duration of its assets and liabilities. The Company
seeks to mitigate credit risk associated with its portfolio by investing in a diversified portfolio
of investment grade securities.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report was made under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer. Based upon this evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (a) are
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted
under the Securities Exchange Act is timely recorded, processed, summarized and reported and
(b) include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
-31-
Changes in Internal Controls
There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) that occurred during the period
covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company previously entered into reinsurance contracts with a reinsurer that is
now in liquidation. On October 23, 2003, the Company was served with a Notice to Defend and a
Complaint by the Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, who is the
liquidator of this reinsurer, alleging that approximately $3 million in reinsurance claims paid
to the Company in 2000 and 2001 by the reinsurer are voidable preferences and are therefore
subject to recovery by the liquidator. The claim was subsequently revised by the liquidator to
approximately $2 million. The Company filed Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs Complaint,
denying that the payments are voidable preferences and asserting affirmative defenses. These
Preliminary Objections were overruled on May 24, 2005 and the Company filed its Answer in the
proceedings on June 15, 2005. On December 7, 2006 the liquidator filed a motion of summary
judgment to which the Company responded on December 19, 2006 by moving for a stay, pending the
resolution of a similar case currently pending before the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. As of May 1, 2009, the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has
issued a ruling in the similar case that supports the Companys position, but there has been no
ruling on the Companys position, and no trial date has been set for this matter. The Company
intends to defend itself vigorously in connection with this lawsuit, and the Company believes
it has strong defenses against these claims; however, there can be no assurance as to the
outcome of this litigation.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There were no material changes in the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
-32-
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Charter of NYMAGIC, INC. (Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 16, 2003 (File
No. 1-11238) and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws. (Filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1999 (Commission File No. 1-11238) and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
|
Certification of A. George Kallop, Chief Executive Officer, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas J. Iacopelli, Chief Financial Officer, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
|
Certification of A. George Kallop, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas J. Iacopelli, Chief Financial Officer,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYMAGIC, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2009
|
|
/s/ A. George Kallop
A. George Kallop
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2009
|
|
/s/ Thomas J. Iacopelli
Thomas J. Iacopelli
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
-33-
Nymagic (NYSE:NYM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Nymagic (NYSE:NYM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024