Company wants governments to ensure surveillance is accurate,
unbiased
By Jay Greene and Douglas MacMillan
This article is being republished as part of our daily
reproduction of WSJ.com articles that also appeared in the U.S.
print edition of The Wall Street Journal (December 7, 2018).
Microsoft Corp. is urging governments world-wide to enact
regulation of facial-recognition technology next year that requires
independent assessment of accuracy and bias and prohibits ongoing
surveillance of specific people without a court order.
The technology giant's push to police the emerging technology
comes as rivals including Facebook Inc. and Alphabet Inc.'s Google,
face increasing backlash over their privacy practices from
lawmakers and others.
Microsoft, which competes with both companies as well as
Amazon.com Inc. in the emerging market for facial-recognition
products, but has been vocal in calling for government regulation
of the technology, with a blog post in July arguing that change
couldn't happen if a few companies adopt new standards while rivals
ignore them.
Brad Smith, Microsoft's president and chief legal officer,
dialed up the urgency on Thursday, arguing that delays to enacting
new rules could "exacerbate societal issues." Society is ill-served
"by a commercial race to the bottom, with tech companies forced to
choose between social responsibility and market success," he wrote
in a blog post.
Mr. Smith also was scheduled to speak about Microsoft's position
Thursday at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., the same
day a group of tech leaders from Microsoft and other companies
visited the White House for a summit on issues including artificial
intelligence.
Microsoft's advocacy of regulation underlines the ambivalence
over powerful new technologies enabled by advances in AI. Adoption
of facial recognition is proceeding quickly -- especially in China,
where the government uses it extensively for surveillance --
stirring concerns about potential misuse.
Mr. Smith declined to say if Microsoft would sell
facial-recognition technology to China.
This year, dozens of civil-rights organizations called on Amazon
to stop selling its facial-recognition technology to
law-enforcement organizations. Asked about those concerns at a
press conference last week, Andy Jassy, chief executive of Amazon
Web Services, said the company hasn't seen any abuses of the
technology. He stopped short of calling for regulation, saying
"countries themselves have to decide" on rules.
In his blog post, Mr. Smith listed benefits of
facial-recognition including identifying missing children.
Microsoft's product, called Face, is used by customers such as Uber
Technologies Inc., whose drivers take selfies to verify their
identity when they launch the app to start picking up
passengers.
But Mr. Smith highlighted three areas where governments should
focus legislation: racial and gender bias, privacy and mass
government surveillance. He cited George Orwell's dystopian novel,
"1984," in which a government tracks citizens' every movement, as a
cautionary tale.
"Today technology makes that type of future possible," Mr. Smith
wrote.
He said that new laws should notify people -- and get their
consent -- when facial-recognition technology is being used. And he
said that governments need to continue to move quickly to address
abuses that arise.
He acknowledged that Microsoft's interests in regulating the
technology are competitive as well.
"If a responsible company turns down business because it regards
a particular use of facial recognition as likely to increase
discrimination or abuse human rights, and then it sees its
competitors go forward and gain those sales, you not only put
people's rights at risk, you risk tipping the market towards an
approach that is less socially responsible," Mr. Smith said in an
interview.
Microsoft has discussed its ideas for legislation with both
federal and state lawmakers, though Mr. Smith declined to name
them. It also has talked about the need for regulation with its
rivals and says he is "optimistic" they will join Microsoft.
Others calling for regulation of facial-recognition include
rights advocacy groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union
and the AI Now Institute. In a report published Thursday, AI Now
echoed Microsoft's calls for federal laws to provide oversight and
transparency into the use of facial recognition.
Tech giants have adopted ethical principles around artificial
intelligence, such as Google's pledge earlier this year not to use
AI in military weapons. Those principles were crafted to avoid
missteps in developing new technology that could have harmful side
effects. But they don't go far in enough in holding large companies
accountable, said AI Now co-founder Meredith Whittaker.
"It is great these companies are realizing they have a
responsibility to ethical conduct," said Ms. Whitaker, who also
leads a research group at Google. But company-issued guidelines
"are effectively promises by these corporations, on their own
terms."
AI Now, whose other co-founder is a Microsoft researcher,
operates independently from those companies.
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
December 07, 2018 02:47 ET (07:47 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024