More often than not, analyst recommendations help investors make
investment decisions in order to realize their long-term
objectives. The analyst can present before investors a
comprehensive research report containing valuable information about
the company and the industry, competition and business models,
financial performance, dividend payouts and many others (see 11
Great Dividend ETFs).
Analysts put in a lot of time and effort trying to decipher the
minutest of intricacies present in the business models of
companies. Their research reports assign ratings like buy, sell and
hold, to individual company stocks. Based on the ratings,
recommendation and rationale, investors often decide their future
plan of action (read Play A Consumer Recovery With These
Discretionary ETFs).
However, it is prudent to note that the ratings and
recommendations should not be viewed as ‘universal truths’, by all
classes of investors. For example, a highly risky short-term
investment with a good rating by an analyst might be a good option
for a 30-year-old employee, but not for a 65-year-old retired
person.
Investors should also note that while a great deal of work is
often put into the recommendations, unfavorable market
conditions—and a focus on central banks instead of stock specific
events—can make otherwise solid predictions relatively useless.
This has especially been the case for markets over the past few
months as stocks have fallen across the board and European events
have dominated the headlines.
Still, assuming that markets eventually start trading on
fundamentals again, analyst recommendations could be a key item
that many investors should still look at when researching a
particular opportunity (read Real Estate ETFs: Unexpected Safe
Haven).
For investors looking to take these recommendations in a basket
approach, there are a few ETFs that utilize their advice in order
to construct portfolios. Below, we highlight two ETFs that use
these principles for their investment theses and discuss whether
investors should consider these products or go with cheaper, broad
index based funds instead:
PowerShares Morningstar StockInvestor Core ETF
(PYH)
Launched in December of 2006, PYH seeks to match the performance
and yield of the Morningstar StockInvestor Core Index before fees
and expenses by investing at least 90% of its total assets in
stocks from the index.
The index portfolio is rebalanced monthly and is comprised of 50
stocks that are considered to be of high quality, based on certain
parameters as laid down by Morningstar. So while it isn’t a ‘pure’
analyst recommendation fund, the product arguably takes into
account analyst recommendations in order to come up with its
portfolio.
Having existed for almost six years with an average daily volume
of 2,174 shares, and total assets of $14.94 million, questions
about its liquidity and popularity have arisen (see Ten Biggest
U.S. Equity Market ETFs).
In terms of sectors, PYH lays maximum emphasis on the
Information Technology and Financial sectors which have been the
two best performing sectors this year. It has only 46 securities in
its portfolio but it does well in allocating 38.03% of its assets
in the top 10 holdings.
However, active management decisions have led to 50 basis points
charged in fees and expenses to investors. Just like any other
broad market ETF, this product also faced a tough time during the
broader market slump last year (read Utility ETFs: Slumping Sector
In Rebounding Market).
The active management and continuous rebalancing of the fund
(which is the main reason for such a steep expense structure) also
could not always help the fund sail through the slump. The lack of
liquidity and a comparatively higher expense ratio also adds to
investor worries.
However, the ETF has also seen an uptrend since the start of
2012. The product has added about 4.7% since the start of the year
while it also pays out a decent yield of about 1.6%.
Guggenheim Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF
(RYJ)
RYJ is another relatively expensive product that targets the
broader markets. It charges investors 0.75% in fees and expenses.
The equity ETF tracks the Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index (SB
refers to Strong Buy).
The index holds securities that have been ranked under ‘Strong
Buy 1’ by the financial services conglomerate Raymond James and
Associates. The high expense ratio can be attributed to this unique
investment methodology adopted by the ETF.
The product debuted in May of 2006. Since then it has managed
$82.41 million dollars in its asset base. The fund is well
diversified as it holds less that 1% of its total assets in every
security it holds (read Create a Diversified Portfolio Using ETFs).
Presently the holdings consist of 191 securities. However, the
average daily volume is somewhat low, coming in at 32,529
shares.
Despite including all highly rated securities, the fund could
not prevent facing a bearish trend last year pushing the fund lower
by 2.1% in the last one year period. However, since the start of
2012, the product has witnessed an uptrend and has fetched
investors roughly 8%.
This was an overview of some expensive products from the multi
cap-blend space which targets the broader markets. The table below
shows a tabular comparison between these two funds and other low
cost choices for investors that target the segment. As you can see,
while the analyst recommendation-focused ETFs may have some
strengths, most haven’t been able to beat out their index focused
counterparts, suggesting that some investors would be better served
by looking at expenses rather than analyst recommendations:
ETF
|
Inception
|
1 Year Return (%)
|
Yield (%)
|
% in top 10
|
Expense ratio
|
# of holdings
|
ADV
|
Total Assets
|
PYH
|
December 2006
|
0.70
|
1.56
|
38.03
|
0.50%
|
46
|
2,174
|
$14.94 million
|
RYJ
|
May 2006
|
-2.10
|
0.12
|
6.98
|
0.75%
|
191
|
32,529
|
$82.41 million
|
SCHB
|
November 2009
|
1.70
|
1.73
|
16.77
|
0.06%
|
1734
|
309,307
|
$1.03 billion
|
IWV
|
May 2000
|
1.50
|
1.67
|
16.75
|
0.20%
|
2940
|
325,864
|
$3.32 billion
|
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research?
Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30
Days. Click to get this free report >>
ISHARS-RS 3K (IWV): ETF Research Reports
PWRSH-MS STKINV (PYH): ETF Research Reports
GUGG-RJ SB-1 EQ (RYJ): ETF Research Reports
SCHWAB-US BR MK (SCHB): ETF Research Reports
To read this article on Zacks.com click here.
Zacks Investment Research
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research?
Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click
to get this free report
Schwab US Broad Market (AMEX:SCHB)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024
Schwab US Broad Market (AMEX:SCHB)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024