ITEM 3.
KEY
INFORMATION
A.
Selected financial
data
The
following selected consolidated financial data as of December 31,
2017 and 2016 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and
2015 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements of Fincera included in this Annual Report beginning on
page F-1. The following summary consolidated financial data as of
December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and for the years ended December
31, 2014 and 2013, have been derived from the audited consolidated
financial statements of Fincera. Such financial data is not
included in this Annual Report. The consolidated financial data for
all periods presented is retrospectively adjusted to reflect the
acquisition of Eastern Eagle International Ltd. (“Eastern
Eagle”) and its subsidiaries, which were under common control
with us both immediately before and after the acquisition. Prior
period amounts also have been adjusted to exclude discontinued
operations (refer to Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements). This information is only a summary and should be read
together with the consolidated financial statements, the related
notes, the section entitled “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Fincera” and other financial information included in this
Annual Report.
The
consolidated financial statements are prepared and presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States, or “U.S. GAAP.” The results of
operations of Fincera in any period may not necessarily be
indicative of the results that may be expected for any future
period. See “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this
Annual Report.
FINCERA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data –
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
171,910
|
1,123,296
|
722,301
|
469,241
|
172,017
|
277,878
|
Restricted
cash
|
19,553
|
127,762
|
42,517
|
1,019
|
6,046
|
7,585
|
Total current
assets
|
788,322
|
5,151,057
|
5,535,890
|
4,330,065
|
2,907,859
|
3,046,749
|
Total
assets
|
1,033,562
|
6,753,504
|
7,152,026
|
6,002,830
|
4,947,847
|
4,645,356
|
Total current
liabilities
|
925,376
|
6,046,590
|
6,101,855
|
3,571,732
|
2,338,780
|
2,688,952
|
Total
liabilities
|
1,051,868
|
6,873,117
|
6,994,973
|
4,357,528
|
3,296,109
|
2,981,951
|
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
(18,306
)
|
(119,613
)
|
157,053
|
1,645,302
|
1,651,738
|
1,663,405
|
Total shares
outstanding
|
47,531,799
|
47,531,799
|
47,123,898
|
47,101,986
|
47,099,288
|
47,077,838
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement
of Income Data –
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
156,691
|
1,023,851
|
875,925
|
452,978
|
123,027
|
32,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations before income taxes
|
(1,775
)
|
(11,596
)
|
(4,830
)
|
(77,771
)
|
(233,459
)
|
(176,815
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
(benefit) provision
|
(134
)
|
(878
)
|
8,534
|
(17,820
)
|
(44,909
)
|
(22,773
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from continuing operations
|
(1,641
)
|
(10,718
)
|
(13,364
)
|
(59,951
)
|
(188,550
)
|
(154,042
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
358
|
2,336
|
1,094
|
51,072
|
162,750
|
170,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income attributable to shareholders
|
(1,283
)
|
(8,382
)
|
(12,270
)
|
(8,879
)
|
(25,800
)
|
16,046
|
|
For the Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
earnings per share –
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
(0.03
)
|
(0.23
)
|
(0.28
)
|
(1.27
)
|
(4.00
)
|
(3.27
)
|
Discontinued
operations
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
0.02
|
1.08
|
3.44
|
3.63
|
|
(0.02
)
|
(0.18
)
|
(0.26
)
|
(0.19
)
|
(0.56
)
|
0.36
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
operations
|
(0.03
)
|
(0.23
)
|
(0.28
)
|
(1.27
)
|
(4.00
)
|
(3.27
)
|
Discontinued
operations
|
0.01
|
0.05
|
0.02
|
1.08
|
3.44
|
3.63
|
|
(0.02
)
|
(0.18
)
|
(0.26
)
|
(0.19
)
|
(0.56
)
|
0.36
|
B.
Capitalization and
Indebtedness
Not
required.
C.
Reasons for the Offer and
Use of Proceeds
Not
required.
D.
Risk
Factors
An investment in our securities involves risk. The discussion of
risks related to our business contained in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F comprises material risks of which we are aware. If any of
the events or developments described actually occurs, our business,
financial condition or results of operations would likely suffer.
The discussion of risks related to our business contained in this
Annual Report on Form 20-F also includes forward-looking
statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from
those discussed in these forward-looking statements. See
“Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements.”
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, together
with all of the other information included in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
We have made
significant changes to our business model, and our
new business model may not be successful.
We have
undergone a strategic shift which involves growing our new
internet-based businesses and ceasing our legacy commercial vehicle
sales, leasing and support business. Our first two internet-based
businesses, the CeraVest and CeraPay lending platforms, were
launched at the end of 2014. Since then we have launched three
ecommerce platforms: TruShip in October 2015; AutoChekk in March
2016 and PingPing in July 2016. We are also in the process of
developing and launching additional internet-based businesses.
There is no guarantee that our new businesses will be successful or
profitable, or that they will provide an equal or greater return on
investment as compared to the businesses we are winding down. For
more description of our new business model, please see “Item
4. Information on our Company – B. Business
Overview.
We have a limited operating history in China’s internet-based
financial services industry, which is itself an emerging and
evolving industry, making it difficult to evaluate our future
prospects.
China’s
internet-based financial services industry is relatively new and
may not develop as expected. As a new industry, there is limited
public information about comparable companies available for
potential investors to review in making a decision about whether to
invest in our company. In addition, borrowers may not view online
peer-to-peer lending obligations facilitated on our platform as
having the same consequences of default as other credit obligations
arising under more traditional loans provided by banks or other
commercial financial institutions. Any default on borrowers'
payment obligations may adversely affect investors' confidence in
the loan products on our online marketplace, which may lead to less
available loan capital. If our market does not develop as we
expect, if we fail to educate potential customers and funding
sources about the value of our platforms and services, or if we
fail to address the needs of our target customers, our reputation,
business and results of operations will be materially and adversely
affected.
We have
a limited operating history in the internet-based financial
services industry. It is difficult to effectively assess our future
prospects. There are many risks and challenges we are subject to
including, but not limited to:
●
Transitioning to
new business models;
●
Navigating an
evolving regulatory environment;
●
Achieving and
maintaining profitability and margins;
●
Attracting,
training and retaining qualified personnel;
●
Broadening our
product offering;
●
Maintaining
adequate control over our costs and expenses;
●
Maintaining the
security of our platforms and the confidentiality of the
information provided and utilized across our
platforms;
●
Managing credit
risk in our portfolio of loans; and
●
Responding to
competitive and changing market conditions.
If we
are unsuccessful in addressing any of the above risks, our business
may be materially and adversely affected.
Our new internet-based business may incur net losses in the
future.
Our
revenues of legacy commercial vehicle sales, leasing and support
business have declined as a result of our strategic shift towards
internet-based businesses. As we continue to grow and expand our
business, our operating expenses may increase in the future. Our
strategies include, among others, attracting new and potential
borrowers and investors, upgrading and developing our technologies,
enhancing our risk management system and launching new loan
products and services on our marketplace, each or all of which may
incur more expenses than we anticipate. Our revenue growth may be
insufficient to offset these expenses and therefore result in net
losses. We cannot assure you that our new internet-based businesses
will be able to generate sufficient revenues to generate net income
in the future.
We may not be able to maintain the growth rate we have experienced
in recent years and may not be able to manage our growth
effectively.
We may
not be able to maintain the growth that we have experienced since
2014, or continue to experience growth at all, in the volume of
loans facilitated on our online marketplace and the number of
users, including borrowers and investors. As we have a limited
operating history and our business has rapidly grown and changed in
recent years, our past financial performance may not be a sound
basis on which to evaluate our business prospects and future
financial performance. In addition, our new businesses are still in
the early stages of development, and we operate in a competitive
and uncertain environment with many risks, challenges,
unforeseeable expenses, difficulties, delays and complications,
including, among others, the PRC regulatory landscape. If we are
unsuccessful in addressing any of the following risks,
uncertainties and challenges, we may be unable to rapidly scale our
business and manage our growth:
●
navigating an
opaque regulatory and competitive environment;
●
attracting new and
retaining repeat borrowers and investors that use our
marketplace;
●
increasing the
volume of loans through our marketplace and the associated service
fees that we receive;
●
increasing our
market share and introducing new loan and investment products and
services;
●
fostering a healthy
traffic of loan transactions by boosting and balancing demand and
supply on our marketplace;
●
developing and
upgrading our credit assessment systems to enhance our risk
management capabilities and increase the effectiveness and
convenience of the system;
●
maintaining and
scaling our online marketplace and updating our mobile application
system to enhance operational efficiency;
●
enhancing the
infrastructure for our technology to support the growth of our
business;
●
optimizing use of
human and technology resources;
●
effectively
maintaining and scaling our financial and risk management controls
and procedures;
●
managing and
controlling the expenses incurred by a growing publicly traded
company, including but not limited to legal, accounting and other
compliance costs;
●
constantly
monitoring and upgrading the security of our systems and protecting
the confidential information we have gathered;
●
minimizing risks of
litigation, regulatory and administrative proceedings, claims of
intellectual property infringement, privacy infringement and other
claims; and
●
attracting,
utilizing and retaining qualified management members and
employees.
If our online lending services are deemed to violate any PRC laws
or regulations governing the online lending industry in China, our
business, financial condition and results of operations would be
materially and adversely affected.
Due to
the relatively short history of the online lending industry in
China, the PRC government has yet to establish a comprehensive
regulatory framework governing our industry. Before any
industry-specific regulations were introduced in mid-2015, the PRC
government relied on general and basic laws and regulations for
governing the online lending industry, including the PRC Contract
Law and related judicial interpretations promulgated by the Supreme
People's Court.
Since
mid-2015, the PRC government and relevant regulatory authorities
have issued various laws and regulations governing the online
lending industry, including, among others, the
Guidelines on Promoting the Healthy
Development of the Internet Finance Industry
, or the
Internet Finance Guidelines, the
Interim Measures for Administration of
Business Activities of Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
, or the Interim Measures, the
Guidelines on Online Lending Funds Custodian
Business
, or the Custodian Guidelines, and the
Guidelines on Information Disclosure of
Business Activities by Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
, or the Disclosure Guidelines. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Lending
Services."
According to the Interim Measures, the online lending information
intermediaries may not engage in certain activities, including,
among others, (i) fund-raising for the online lending information
intermediaries themselves, (ii) holding investors'
funds or setting up capital
pools with investors' fund, (iii) providing security or
guarantees to investors as
to the principals and returns of the investment, (iv) issuing or
selling any wealth management products, (v) splitting the terms of
any financing project, (vi) securitization, (vii) promoting its
financing project on physical premises, and (viii) equity
crowd-funding. The Interim Measures also imposed certain other
requirements on the online lending information intermediaries,
including, among others:
●
Record-Filing
. The Interim Measures
introduced a record-filing and licensing regime, which requires the
online lending information intermediaries to register with the
local financial regulatory authority. In November 2016,
the
China Banking
Regulatory Commission, or the CBRC, the Ministry of Industry and
Information Technology, or the MIIT, and the General Office of the
State Administration for Industry and Commerce, jointly issued the
Guidelines on Administration of
Record-filings of Online Lending Information Intermediaries
,
which provides general filing rules for online lending information
intermediaries, and authorizes local financial regulators to make
detailed implementation rules regarding filing procedures according
to their local practices. Since 2017, the local financial
regulators have been conducting thorough investigations and
inspections of online lending information intermediaries and
require a rectification if any illegality is discovered, and only
after local financing regulators have completed their investigation
and examination on us, we may be permitted to submit a filing
application. We are currently working with local regulators to
assist their evaluation and auditing of our lending platforms as
well as cooperating with any requested compliance related changes.
As the Hebei local financial regulatory authorities are still in
the process of drafting detailed implementation rules, we cannot
assure you that, once submitted, our application will be accepted
by the relevant government authorities. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Lending
Services—Regulations on Record-filings of Online Lending
Information Intermediary."
●
Value-Added Telecommunications Business
License
. The Interim Measures require the online lending
information intermediaries to apply for telecommunication business
operating licenses pursuant to the relevant provisions of the
competent authorities of communications. Our online lending
platform, operated by Qingyi Techonology, a subsidiary of our
consolidated variable interest entities, may be deemed to be
providing commercial internet information services, which would
require Qingyi Technology to obtain an ICP License. An ICP License
is a value-added telecommunications business license required for
provision of commercial internet information services. Although
Qingyi Technology has obtained an ICP License as a commercial
internet information provider, there is uncertainty as to which
type of license is required for online lending information
intermediaries as the detailed provision for such telecommunication
business operating licenses has not been published. Furthermore, as
we are providing mobile applications to mobile device users, it is
uncertain if Qingyi Technology will be required to obtain a
separate operating license in addition to the ICP License. Although
we believe that not obtaining such separate license is in line with
the current market practice, there can be no assurance that we will
not be required to apply for an operating license for our mobile
applications in the future. See "Regulation—Regulations
Relating to Internet-based Services—Regulations on
Value-Added Telecommunication Services."
●
Custody of Funds
. The Interim Measures
require the online lending information intermediaries to set up
custody accounts with qualified banks to hold customer funds. We
have entered into an agreement with XWBank, under which the bank
provides custodian services for funds of customers and investors
and we implemented the custodian system on March 20, 2018. However,
as we did not implement the custody program for customer funds by
the rectification period deadline of August 2017, we may be deemed
to be noncompliant with the Custodian Guidelines. Though the Hebei
financial regulatory department has not penalized us or issued any
warning for failing to become fully compliant within the 6-month
rectification period of the Custodian Guidelines, we cannot assure
you that the relevant regulatory authorities will not impose
sanctions on us for failing to comply within the rectification
period. Moreover, the
Notice on
Rectification and Inspection Acceptance of Risk of Online Lending
Information Intermediaries
, or Circular 57, issued by the
Online Lending Rectification Office on December 8, 2017, requires
the online lending information intermediaries to set up custody
accounts with qualified banks that have passed certain testing and
evaluation procedures run by the Online Lending Rectification
Office. If XWBank fails such testing and evaluation procedures, we
may have to seek an alternative custodian bank other than these
banks to satisfy the relevant regulatory requirement, which may
materially affect our rectification progress and record-filing
application, which in turn may materially and adversely affect our
business. See "Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online
Lending Services—Regulations on Custody of Funds of Online
Lending Information Intermediaries."
●
Discontinuation of
Risk Reserve Fund
.
The Interim Measures prohibit the online lending information
intermediaries from providing any security interest or guarantee to
investors on the principal or return of their investments, and
Circular 57 requires the online lending information intermediaries
to discontinue to set aside additional fund as risk reserve funds
or originate new risk reserve funds. In addition, the existing
balance of risk reserve funds shall be gradually reduced.
Currently, we are operating a “security deposit
program”, under which the
loans facilitated through our online
lending platform is guaranteed by the SMBs and 5.0 - 8.0% of the
principal balance of the loan is remitted to us as a security
deposit. Though we don’t consider our security deposit
program as a type of risk reserve fund prohibited under Circular
57, if the relevant regulatory departments think otherwise, we may
have to discontinue operating our security deposit program.
Also,
in order to provide liquidity for investors seeking to
transfer their loans on the secondary market, we may use our own
capital to purchase loans and act as a market maker when demand
from other investors are unable to meet the supply of secondary
loan transfers. Though we don’t consider this practice to be
providing guarantees to investors on principal and interest, if the
relevant regulatory departments think otherwise, we may have to
discontinue our market making practice.
The discontinuation of our security
deposit program or market making activities may materially and
adversely affect our business.
●
Prohibition of
Physical Promotion Activities
. The Interim Measures prohibit the
online lending information intermediaries from promoting
their financing
projects
on physical
premises. Currently, we acquire our borrowers almost entirely from
our nationwide physical sales network, and we have a broad physical
presence facilitates our sales, marketing and service efforts with
our target customers who are mostly in smaller cities and rural
areas that are not easily reached through online advertising and
our other media channels. Although we don’t consider our
physical promotion activities
as falling into such activities
prohibited by the Interim Measures as our promotion activities are
focusing on our branding instead of focusing on any specific
financing project, if the relevant regulatory departments think
otherwise, we may have to discontinue or rectify our current
physical promotion activities, which may have a material adverse
effect on our business.
●
Limitations to
Balance of Loans
.
The Interim Measures require that the balance of loans borrowed by
a natural person shall not exceed RMB200,000 (US$30,608) on a
single online lending information intermediary and not exceed RMB1
million (US$153,041) in total on all online lending information
intermediaries in the PRC, while the balance of loans borrowed by a
legal person or organization shall not exceed RMB1 million
(US$153,041) on a single online lending information intermediary
and not exceed RMB5 million (US$765,205) in total on all online
lending information intermediaries in the PRC. We currently do not
offer loans to the same individual in an aggregate amount exceeding
RMB200,000 (US$30,608) nor do we offer loans to the same company in
an aggregate amount exceeding RMB1 million (US$153,041). However,
we have outstanding loans totaling to RMB1.8 million issued to
three customers that exceed these limits and will take some time to
wind down or restructure in order to be fully in compliance.
Moreover, due to the lack of an industry-wide information sharing
arrangement, there can be no assurance that the aggregate amount
borrowed by a same natural person or a same legal
person/organization through our platform and other online lending
information intermediaries does not exceed the RMB1 million
(US$153,041) or RMB5 million (US$765,205) borrowing limit set out
by the Interim Measures, respectively.
●
Anti-Money
Laundering
. The
Interim Measures require the online lending information
intermediaries to comply with certain anti-money laundering
requirements, including the establishment of a customer
identification program, the monitoring and reporting of suspicious
transactions, the preservation of customer information and
transaction records, and the provision of assistance to the public
security department and judicial authority in investigations and
proceedings in relation to anti-money laundering matters. The PBOC
will formulate implementing rules to further specify the anti-money
laundering obligations of internet finance service providers. We
have adopted various policies and procedures, such as internal
controls and "know-your-customer" procedures, for anti-money
laundering purposes. We cannot assure you that the anti-money
laundering policies and procedures we have adopted will be
effective in protecting our marketplace from being exploited for
money laundering purposes or will be deemed to be in compliance
with applicable anti-money laundering implementing rules if and
when adopted. In addition, we rely on third-party service
providers, in particular our custody bank and third party payment
providers that handle the transfer of funds between borrowers and
lenders, to have their own appropriate anti-money laundering
policies and procedures. Custody banks and third party payment
providers are subject to anti-money laundering obligations under
applicable anti-money laundering laws and regulations and are
regulated in that respect by the PBOC. If any of our third-party
service provides fail to comply with applicable anti-money
laundering laws and regulations, our reputation could suffer and we
could become subject to regulatory intervention, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
To comply with existing laws, regulations, rules and governmental
policies relating to the online lending industry, we have
implemented and will continue to implement various policies and
procedures to conduct our business and operations, including, among
others:
●
we do not use
capital from Qingyi Technology, the operator of our online lending
platform, to invest in loans facilitated through our online
marketplace;
●
we do not commit to
provide guarantees to investors under any agreement for the full
return of loan principal and interest;
●
we have entered
into an agreement with XWBank, under which the bank provides
custodian services for funds of customers and investors, and we
implemented the custodian system on March 20, 2018;
●
we have obtained the ICP license
for
www.qingyidai.com
from the relevant local
counterpart for operating telecommunication
services;
●
we disclose on our
website, to the best of our ability, all relevant information to
investors and borrowers, such as disclosure to borrowers regarding
interest rates, payment schedule, service fees, and other charges
and penalties; and
●
we are making a
concerted effort to maintain the security of our platform and the
confidentiality of the information provided and utilized across our
platform.
Due to the lack of detailed rules from regulatory authorities and
the fact that the rules, laws and regulations are expected to
continue to evolve in this newly emerging industry, we cannot be
certain that our existing practices would not be deemed to violate
any existing or future rules, laws and regulations. In particular,
we cannot rule out the possibility that some of the services we
provide to investors, such as portfolio investment, might be viewed
as not being in full compliance. As of the date of this Annual
Report, we have never been subject to any material fines or other
penalties under any PRC laws or regulations, including those
governing the online lending industry in China. However, to the
extent that we are not able to fully comply with any existing or
new regulations when they are promulgated, our business, financial
condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely
affected.
If our online lending services are considered by PRC regulatory
authorities as providing direct loans to the customers, we may have
to obtain the relevant approval for such lending business, and the
failure to obtain such approval may have a material adverse effect
on our business.
In
December 2017, the Internet Finance Rectification Office and the
Online Lending Rectification Office in the PRC jointly issued the
Notice on Regulating and
Rectifying "Cash Loan" Business
, or the Circular 141,
outlining general requirements on the "cash loan" business
conducted by online microcredit companies, banking financial
institutions and online lending information intermediaries.
Circular 141 specifies that no organizations or individuals may
conduct the lending business without obtaining approvals for the
lending business.
Different
from our CeraVest product, which is an online lending information
intermediary and does not conduct the direct lending business, our
CeraPay product is an online credit transaction platform and has
features similar to traditional credit cards, which allows its
users to make purchases at participating merchants on credit. If
our CeraPay platform is considered to be a direct lending business,
we may have to obtain a necessary permit for such business. Also,
our subsidiaries that participate in market making loan purchases
on the CeraVest platform might also be considered to be a direct
lending business and would require a permit.
Over
the course of 2017, in order to wind-down the outstanding loan
balances of several large corporate borrowers to be in compliance
with online lending regulations, the Company restructured these
loans with new loans from the Ganglian Leasing entity. Currently,
the outstanding balance of the loans issued by Ganglian is RMB788
million. Give the large outstanding loan balance, if Ganglian is
considered to be directly lending to these borrowers, we may have
to obtain a lending permit as well for Ganglian.
If we
are required to obtain a “microcredit approval” and
establish an online microcredit company just like many other
industry peers have done for their direct online lending
businesses, we may encounter substantial obstacles, as Circular 141
requires the relevant regulatory authorities to suspend the
approval of the establishment of online microcredit companies and
the approval of any microcredit business conducted across
provincial jurisdictions. The failure to obtain such approval or
permit may have a material adverse effect on our business as we
believe the CeraPay is our primary profit driver. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Lending
Services—Regulations on Cash Loans" and
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Lending
Services—Regulations on Microcredit Companies."
Limited liquidity for the loans on our marketplace may adversely
affect the appeal of our marketplace to investors.
The
loan products we facilitate on our marketplace are designed
specifically for our marketplace. Transactions for our loan
products are only permitted on our marketplace. We operate a
secondary loan market on our platform where investors can transfer
the loans they hold to other investors before the loans reach
maturity. To facilitate the assignment of the loans, the template
loan agreement applicable to the lenders and borrowers on our
platform specifically provides that a lender has the right to
assign his/her rights under the loan agreement to any third parties
and the borrower agrees to such assignment. However, Notice 57 only
permits low-frequency debt transfers between the lender and the
borrower. Though there is no clear explanation of low-frequency
debt transfers, our secondary loan market may consider our
secondary loan products to be non-compliant, which may cause us to
modify our products, which may have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
In
addition, in order to provide flexible liquidity for investors
seeking to transfer their loans on the secondary market, we may use
our own capital under a separate subsidiary to provide liquidity
and act as a market maker when demand from other investors are
unable to meet the supply of secondary loan transfers. We may not
always have enough capital to provide liquidity to investors
seeking to transfer. Such action as a market maker may be deemed
non-compliant with online lending regulations and we may be ordered
to stop these market-making activities by financial
regulators.
If
investors cannot transfer their loans or exit with as much
flexibility as they desire, they may lose interest in our online
marketplace and may not invest as much on our platform, or at
all.
The transaction fees we charge borrowers and merchants may decline
in the future and any material decrease in such fees could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We
generate a substantial majority of our total revenues from
facilitation fees we charge borrowers and the service charges we
charge merchants. In the year ended December 31, 2017, transaction
fees comprised 42.3% of our total revenues. Any material decrease
in our transaction fees would have a substantial impact on our
margin. In the event that the amount of transaction fees we charge
for loan facilitation and credit transactions decrease
significantly in the future and we are not able to reduce our cost
of capital for funds from our marketplace investors or to adopt any
cost control initiatives, our business, financial condition and
results of operations will be harmed.
To
compete effectively, the transaction fees we charge borrowers and
merchants could be affected by a variety of factors, including the
creditworthiness and ability to repay of the borrowers, the
competitive landscape of our industry, our access to capital and
regulatory requirements. Our transaction fees may also be affected
by a change over time in the mix of the types of products we offer
and a change to our borrower engagement initiatives. Our
competitors may also offer more attractive fees, which may require
us to reduce our fees to compete effectively. Certain financing
solutions offered by traditional financial institutions may provide
lower fees than our transaction fees. Although we do not believe
there are many financing solutions that currently compete with our
products or target the same unserved or underserved borrowers in
China, such traditional financial institutions may decide to do so
in the future, which may have a material adverse effect as to the
financing service fees that we will be able to charge. Furthermore,
as our borrowers establish their credit profile over time, they may
qualify for and seek out other competing financing solutions with
lower fees, including those offered by traditional financial
institutions offline, and we may need to adjust our transaction
fees to retain such borrowers.
In
addition, our transaction fees are sensitive to many macroeconomic
factors beyond our control, such as inflation, recession, the state
of the credit markets, changes in market interest rates, global
economic disruptions, unemployment and fiscal and monetary
policies. Our transaction fees, to the extent they are fully or
partially deemed as interest, may also be subject to the
restrictions on interest rate as specified in applicable rules on
private lending. Our online lending platforms are required by
applicable law to comply with the 36% limit on annualized interest
rate set forth in the Private Lending Judicial Interpretations.
Loans funded under arrangements involving licensed financial
institutions, such as banks, the consumer finance company and the
trust companies, are not private lending transactions within the
meaning of the Private Lending Judicial Interpretations. Moreover,
Circular 141 requires that (i) the aggregated borrowing costs of
borrowers charged by institutions in the forms of interest and
various fees should be annualized and subject to the limit on
interest rate of private lending set forth in the Private Lending
Judicial Interpretations; and (ii) the online lending information
intermediaries are not permitted to deduct interest, handling fee,
management fee or deposit from the principal of loans provided to
the borrowers in advance.
The
effective annual percentage rate for our term loans currently
ranges from 14.1% to 20.8%, which comprises a nominal interest rate
and a loan facilitation fee we charge borrowers and also takes into
account the effect of the security deposit that we deduct in
advance. The interest rate component, which is stipulated in the
loan agreements, does not and is not expected to exceed the
mandatory limit for loan interest rates. However, to deter
borrowers from submitting later payments, we do contractually
charge high late fees of 10% one time and 0.1% daily, and these
fees combined on delinquent accounts would far exceed the limit of
36%.
In practice, we
often forgive or reduce these late fees if the borrower is
cooperative in negotiating a repayment schedule.
In addition, we currently deduct
the loan facilitation fee and certain deposit in advance from the
principal, which is not in compliance with such requirements
imposed by Circular 141. We will re-examine our fee policies and
make the necessary changes as required by the local financial
regulators. As transaction fees historically accounted for a
substantial majority of our revenue, any material reduction in the
amount of transaction fees we charge borrowers could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our business depends on our ability to collect payment on and
service the loans we facilitate.
Our
collection process is divided into distinct stages based on the
severity of delinquency, which dictates the level of collection
steps taken. For example, automatic reminders through text are sent
to a delinquent borrower as soon as the account becomes overdue.
Our collection team will also make phone calls to borrowers or
conduct in-person visits following missed payments and periodically
thereafter. During fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017, we recovered
RMB0.9 million (US$0.1 million), RMB7.4 million (US$1.1 million)
and RMB7.8 million (US$1.2 million), respectively, of principal and
penalty fees of loans that were more than 90 calendar days past
due.
Despite
our servicing and collection efforts, we cannot assure you that we
will be able to collect payments on the loans we facilitate as
expected. If borrowers default on their payment obligations,
investors that purchased these loans from our marketplace may
suffer losses and thus result in damage to our brand and
reputation. Therefore, our failure to collect payment on the loans
will have a material adverse effect on our business operations and
financial positions. In addition, we aim to control bad debts by
utilizing and enhancing our credit assessment system rather than
relying on collection efforts to maintain healthy credit
performances. As such, our collection team may not possess adequate
resources and manpower to collect payment on and service the loans
we facilitated. As the amount of loans facilitated by us increases
in the future, we may devote additional resources into our
collection efforts. However, there can be no assurance that we
would be able to utilize such additional resources in a
cost-efficient manner.
Moreover,
the current regulatory regime for debt collection in the PRC
remains unclear. Although we aim to ensure our collection efforts
comply with the relevant laws and regulations in the PRC and we
have established strict internal policies that our collections
personnel do not engage in overly aggressive practices, we cannot
assure you that such personnel will not engage in any misconduct as
part of their collection efforts. Any such misconduct by our
collection personnel or the perception that our collection
practices are considered to be overly aggressive and not in
compliance with the relevant laws and regulations in the PRC may
result in (i) harm to our reputation and business, which could
further reduce our ability to collect payments from borrowers, (ii)
a decrease in the willingness of prospective borrowers to apply for
and utilize our credit or (iii) fines and penalties imposed by the
relevant regulatory authorities, any of which may have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations.
If we are unable to maintain or increase the volume of loan
transactions facilitated on our marketplace or if we are unable to
attract new borrowers or investors, or retain existing borrowers or
investors, our business and results of operations will be adversely
affected.
We have
experienced considerable growth in the volume of loan transactions
facilitated on our marketplace. To continue to grow our business,
we must continue to increase the volume of loan transactions on our
marketplace by retaining existing borrowers and attracting a large
number of new borrowers who meet our qualifications, along with and
new and existing investors willing to invest in these
loans.
Furthermore,
if there are insufficient qualified loan requests, investors may be
unable to deploy their capital in a timely or efficient manner and
may seek other investment opportunities. If there are insufficient
investor commitments, borrowers may be unable to obtain capital
through our marketplace and may turn to other sources for their
borrowing needs and investors who wish to transfer their
investments prior to maturity may not be able to do so in a timely
manner.
Our
overall transaction volume may be affected by several factors,
including our brand recognition and reputation, the interest rates
offered to borrowers and investors relative to market rates, the
effectiveness of our risk control, the repayment rate of borrowers
on our marketplace, the efficiency of our platform, the
macroeconomic environment and other factors. In connection with the
introduction of new products or in response to general economic
conditions, we may also impose more stringent borrower
qualifications to ensure the quality of loans on our platform,
which may negatively affect the growth of loan volume. If any of
our current user acquisition channels becomes less effective, if we
are unable to continue to use any of these channels or if we are
not successful in using new channels, we may not be able to attract
new borrowers and investors in a cost-effective manner or convert
potential borrowers and investors into active borrowers and
investors, and may even lose our existing borrowers and investors
to our competitors. If we are unable to attract qualified borrowers
and sufficient investor commitments or if borrowers and investors
do not continue to participate in our marketplace at the current
rates, we might be unable to increase our loan transaction volume
and revenues as we expect, and our business and results of
operations may be adversely affected.
We may not be able to completely prevent fraudulent activity on our
marketplace, which may have a material adverse effect on our brand,
reputation, business and results of operations.
Fraudulent
activity on our online marketplace, including organized fraud
schemes and criminals fraudulently inducing investors to lend
capital, could lead to regulatory intervention, cause material
damage to our brand, reputation and market share, and require us to
take extra anti-fraud measures. The occurrence of fraudulent
activity will cause us to incur costs and divert management
attention, affecting our business and results of operations. We
cannot assure you that we will not experience any fraudulent
activities in the future that may cause harm to our business or
reputation. We believe our risk management system has stringent
controls and checks in place to minimize the incidence of fraud on
our marketplace. However, we have limited resources and our
technology and our risk management system may not be able to
completely prevent and detect all potential fraudulent
activities.
If we fail to promote and maintain our brand in an effective and
cost-efficient way, our ability to grow our business may be
impaired.
We
believe that developing and maintaining awareness of our brand
effectively is critical to attracting new and retaining existing
borrowers and investors to our marketplace. Factors that are vital
to this objective include but are not limited to our ability
to:
●
maintain the
quality and reliability of our platforms;
●
provide borrowers
and investors with a superior experience in our
marketplace;
●
enhance and improve
our credit assessment and decision-making models;
●
effectively manage
and resolve borrower and investor complaints; and
●
effectively protect
personal information and privacy of borrowers and
investors.
Successful
promotion of our brand and our ability to attract qualified
borrowers and sufficient investors depend largely on the
effectiveness of our marketing efforts and the success of the
channels we use to promote our marketplace. Our efforts to build
our brand have caused us to incur significant expenses, and it is
likely that our future marketing efforts will require us to incur
significant additional expenses. These efforts may not result in
increased revenues in the immediate future or at all and, even if
they do, any increases in revenues may not offset the expenses
incurred. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brand
while incurring substantial expenses, our results of operations and
financial condition would be adversely affected, which may impair
our ability to grow our business.
Any harm to our brand or reputation or any damage to the reputation
of the online lending industry may materially and adversely affect
our business and results of operations.
Any
malicious or innocent negative allegation made by the media or
other parties about our company, including but not limited to our
management, business, compliance with law, financial conditions or
prospects, whether with merit or not, could severely hurt our
reputation and harm our business and operating
results.
As the
market for online lending in China is new and the regulatory
framework for this market is also evolving, negative publicity
about this industry has and may arise from time to time. Negative
publicity about China’s online lending industry in general
may also have a negative impact on our reputation, regardless of
whether we have engaged in any inappropriate
activities.
Furthermore,
certain factors that may adversely affect our reputation are beyond
our control, including the risk of misconduct and errors by our
employees and third-party service providers. Our business depends
on our employees and third-party service providers to interact with
potential borrowers and investors, process large numbers of
transactions and support the loan collection process, all of which
involve the use and disclosure of personal information. We could be
materially adversely affected if transactions were redirected,
misappropriated or otherwise improperly executed, if personal
information was disclosed to unintended recipients or if an
operational breakdown or failure in the processing of transactions
occurred, whether as a result of human error, purposeful sabotage
or fraudulent manipulation of our operations or systems. In
addition, the manner in which we store and use certain personal
information and interact with borrowers and investors through our
internet-based finance platforms is governed by various PRC laws.
It is not always possible to identify and deter misconduct or
errors by employees or third-party service providers, and the
precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be
effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses. If
any of our employees or third-party service providers take, convert
or misuse funds, documents or data or fail to follow protocol when
interacting with borrowers and investors, we could be liable for
damages and subject to regulatory actions and penalties. We could
also be perceived to have facilitated or participated in the
illegal misappropriation of funds, documents or data, or the
failure to follow protocol, and therefore be subject to civil or
criminal liability.
We may not be able to attract sufficient loan capital from our
investors to meet the demands of the borrowers on our
marketplace.
Our
online lending business involves the matching of borrowers and
investors through our marketplace. The growth and success of our
future operations depend on the availability of adequate lending
capital to meet borrower demand for loans on our marketplace. In
order to maintain the requisite level of funding for the loans
facilitated on our marketplace to meet borrower demand, we may need
to optimize the investor composition of our marketplace to include
more investors generally and also a certain number of institutional
investors, which usually invest larger amounts compared to
individual investors. To the extent there is an insufficient number
of investors willing to accept the risk of default posed by
potential borrowers, our marketplace will be unable to fulfil all
of the loan requests. If adequate funds are not available to meet
borrowers' demand for loans when they arise, the volume of loans
facilitated on our marketplace may be significantly impacted. To
the extent that it is necessary to obtain additional lending
capital from investors, such lending capital may not be available
to our marketplace on acceptable terms, or at all. If our
marketplace is unable to provide potential borrowers with loans or
fund the loans on a timely basis due to insufficient lending
capital on our marketplace, we may experience a loss of market
share or slower than expected growth, which would harm our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Fluctuations in interest rates could negatively affect our
business.
The
profitability of our business depends on the interest rates at
which our customers are willing to borrow. If we fail to respond to
the fluctuations in market interest rates in a timely manner and
reprice our loan products, our loan products may become less
attractive to our customers. For example, in a falling interest
rate environment, potential customers may seek lower priced loans
from other channels if we do not lower the interest rates on our
loan products. Similarly, if we fail to respond to fluctuations in
market interest rates in a timely manner and reprice our investment
products, our investment products may lose competitiveness. For
example, in a rising interest rate environment, potential investors
may seek higher return investments from other channels if we do not
increase the return on our investment products. Moreover, if we are
unable to reprice our loan products and investment products
correspondingly, the spreads between the interest rates on our loan
products and the interest rates on our investment products may be
reduced, and our profitability may be adversely
affected.
If the loan and investment products and services in our present
portfolio and future pipeline are insufficiently attractive to our
customers, become obsolete or they fail to satisfy the demands of
borrowers or investors, our business and results of operations will
be materially affected.
We
intend to expand our product offering to borrowers to cater to
their different financing needs. We also intend to expand our
investor service offerings to meet the different needs of investors
and offer different risk-based returns. Loan and investment
products and services require significant expense and resources to
develop, acquire, and market. They also may not receive sufficient
market acceptance for a variety of reasons:
(i)
our estimate of
market demand may not be accurate, such that we may not be able to
launch products and services to align with and meet specific market
demands, or there may not be sufficient market demand for the loan
products and services;
(ii)
changes on our
marketplace, including the introduction of new platform services
and mobile application functions, may not be favorable to existing
users;
(iii)
defects, errors or
failures on our marketplace;
(iv)
any negative
publicity or news about our loan or investment products on our
marketplace;
(v)
delays in launching
the new loan or investment products or services; and
(vi)
competing loan or
investment products and services by our competitors.
If the
products in our present portfolio and future pipeline do not attain
sufficient market acceptance, become obsolete or otherwise fail to
satisfy the demands of borrowers and investors, we may be unable to
compete in the intense online lending industry and our target
market. Our market share may decline and negatively affect our
business and results of operations.
Our risk management system comprising our policy framework, credit
assessment and fraud detection technology and protocols may not be
adequate and may adversely affect the reliability of our
marketplace, and in turn damage our reputation, business and
results of operations.
The
success of our online marketplace relies heavily on our ability to
detect, assess and control credit risk, and therefore to prevent
fraud. We have stringent risk management protocols in place to
effectively assess borrower applicants' credit risk to prevent
fraud and minimize the risk of non-payment. After we receive a loan
or credit line application we request for the borrower applicant's
personal information supported by documentation, and we verify the
information against public information and data provided by
third-party suppliers. In order to prevent fraud and assess the
creditworthiness of each borrower, we conduct physical interviews
that are recorded and enhanced due diligence procedures, as needed,
to verify the borrower applicant's information and his or her
intent. Any suspicious applications would be denied for a loan and
blacklisted in our databases.
The
information and data we use may not be sufficient to allow us to
adequately capture a borrower applicant's credit risk. Such
information and data include, among others, demographic
information, credit history with us and with other financial
institutions, and employment information and blacklists maintained
by other forums and organizations. We constantly update and
optimize our risk management system but the system may have
loopholes or defects which may prevent us from effectively
identifying risks, or the data provided may be inaccurate or stale
or insufficient, such that we may misjudge the risk and misalign
the risk profile and loan price. The information may also not be
sufficient for prediction of future non-payment. Such risks and
errors may erode investor confidence in our marketplace and
therefore harm our reputation and adversely affect our business and
results of operations.
Since
we sometimes act as a market maker on our lending platforms, we are
therefore subject to the credit risk of our customers when we
purchase loans from the secondary market. We use various methods to
screen potential customers and establish appropriate credit limits,
but these methods cannot eliminate all potential credit risks and
may not always prevent us from approving customer applications that
are not credit worthy or are fraudulently completed. Changes in our
industry and customer demand may result in periodic increases to
customer credit limits and spending and, as a result, could lead to
increased credit losses. We may also fail to detect changes to the
credit risk of customers over time. Further, during a declining
economic environment, we experience increased customer defaults and
preference claims by bankrupt customers. If we fail to adequately
manage our credit risks, our bad debt expense could be
significantly higher than historic levels and adversely affect our
business, operating results and financial condition. If a
significant number of customers fail to make payments when due, we
may not be able to fully recover the outstanding principal of loans
we make, which could significantly affect our profitability. In
addition, under such a scenario, if we are unable to purchase
defaulting loans from investors and investors suffer losses, he or
she may lose confidence in our online marketplace. As a result, our
reputation may be harmed and we may not be able to attract and
retain investors to participate in our marketplace.
If any of the primary information provided by borrowers and data
obtained from third-party external sources we use for credit and
risk assessment is inaccurate or fraudulently provided, our
assessment may not sufficiently capture the credit risk of the
loan.
Borrowers
supply a variety of information that is included in the listings of
loans on our marketplace. We do not verify all the information we
receive from borrowers, and such information may be inaccurate or
incomplete. For example, we often do not verify a borrower's home
ownership status or intended use of loan proceeds. Although we do
take steps to ensure a borrower uses loan proceeds for specified
purposes, it is possible that we are unable to detect all instances
where a borrower may use loan proceeds for other purposes that may
involve increased risk than as originally provided. Moreover,
investors do not, and will not, have access to detailed financial
information about borrowers. If investors invest in loans through
our marketplace based on information supplied by borrowers that is
inaccurate, misleading or incomplete, those investors may not
receive their expected returns and our reputation may be harmed.
Moreover, inaccurate, misleading or incomplete borrower information
could also potentially subject us to liability as an intermediary
under the
PRC Contract Law
.
See "Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Lending
Services—Regulations on Private Loans."
Due to
the lack of a nationwide centralized credit reporting system in
China, we have had to rely on our own data collection efforts to
gather as much relevant credit information about borrower
applicants as possible. We collect third-party data from and
cross-check information gathered against the People's Bank of
China, or the PBOC credit reporting platforms, credit bureaus, data
vendors, and big data analytics companies. If the data points used
in our credit assessment are inaccurate, incomplete or outdated, as
we do not have the means to verify the third party data we obtain,
the outcome may not accurately reflect the credit risk of the
borrower. This could adversely affect the effectiveness of our
control over our default rates, which could in turn harm our
reputation and materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on our information technology, billing and credit control
systems, and any problems with these systems could interrupt our
operations, resulting in reduced cash flow.
Our
business cannot be managed effectively without our integrated
information technology system. Accordingly, we run various
“real time” integrated information technology
management systems for our financing business.
In
addition, sophisticated billing and credit control systems are
critical to our ability to increase revenue streams, avoid revenue
loss and potential credit problems, and bill customers in a proper
and timely manner. If adequate billing and credit control systems
and programs are unavailable, or if upgrades are delayed or not
introduced in a timely manner, or if we are unable to integrate
such systems and software programs into our billing and credit
systems, we may experience delayed billing, which may negatively
affect our cash flow and the results of operations.
In case
of a failure of our data storage system, we may lose critical
operational or billing data or important email correspondence with
our customers and suppliers. Any such data stored in the core data
center may be lost if there is a lapse or failure of the disaster
recovery system in backing up these data, or if the periodic
offline backup is insufficient in frequency or scope, which may
result in reduced cash flow and reduced revenues.
Any significant disruption in service on our platform or in our
computer systems, including events beyond our control, could
prevent us from processing payments or posting loans on our
marketplace, reduce the attractiveness of our online products and
result in a loss of users.
In the
event of an outage affecting our internet-based businesses and
physical data loss, our ability to perform our servicing
obligations, process payments, process applications or make loans
available to investors would be materially and adversely affected.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our
platforms and our underlying network infrastructure are critical to
our operations, customer service, reputation and our ability to
retain existing and attract new borrowers and investors. Although
all of our customer-facing services are hosted on Microsoft Azure
cloud servers and we periodically make backups to servers located
at our offices in Beijing and Shijiazhuang, some internal systems
are hosted on servers at our headquarters in Shijiazhuang, and an
outage there would disrupt our operations. Our operations depend on
our ability and our service provider’s ability to protect our
systems against damage or interruption from natural disasters,
power or telecommunications failures, air quality issues,
environmental conditions, computer viruses or attempts to harm our
systems, criminal acts and similar events. If there is a lapse in
service or damage to the Microsoft Azure cloud infrastructure or
our offices in Shijiazhuang and Beijing, we could experience
interruptions in our service as well as delays and additional
expense in arranging new facilities.
Any
interruptions or delays in our service, whether as a result of
third-party error, our error, natural disasters or security
breaches, whether accidental or willful, could harm our
relationships with our borrowers and investors and our reputation.
Additionally, in the event of damage or interruption, our insurance
policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that we
may incur. Our disaster recovery plan has not been tested under
actual disaster conditions, and we may not have sufficient capacity
to recover all data and services in the event of an outage. These
factors could prevent us from processing or posting payments on
loans, damage our brand and reputation, divert our employees’
attention, subject us to liability and cause borrowers and
investors to abandon our marketplace, any of which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our internet-based businesses and internal systems rely on software
that is highly technical and requires maintenance and constant
updates, and if it contains undetected errors or bugs, our business
could be adversely affected.
Our
internet-based businesses and internal systems rely on software
that is highly technical and complex. For example, our lending
platforms and internal systems depend on the ability of such
software to store, retrieve, process and manage immense amounts of
data. The software on which we rely has contained, and may now or
in the future contain, undetected errors or bugs. Some errors may
only be discovered after the code has been released for external or
internal use. Errors or other design defects within the software on
which we rely may result in a negative experience for our
customers, delay introductions of new features or enhancements,
result in errors or compromise our ability to protect customer data
or our intellectual property. Any errors, bugs or defects
discovered in the software on which we rely could result in harm to
our reputation, loss of customers or liability for damages, any of
which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
A security breach or malicious attack by way of hacking,
cyber-attacks, infiltration of computer viruses, or physical or
e-sabotage, could damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of
litigation and liability, disrupt our business or otherwise harm
our results of operations.
We are
an attractive target for cyber-attacks by criminals seeking to gain
access to our confidential and valuable information collected from
borrowers and investors. We and our third-party system security
service providers take measures to prevent such attacks and protect
our databases of confidential information, but these measures may
be breached accidentally or maliciously by unauthorized access. For
example, we have experienced Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)
attacks in the past that have temporarily caused us to suspend the
service of our websites while we defend against attacks. If
confidential information about our users and our offline
cooperation partner were stolen and used for criminal purposes, we
could be exposed to liability for loss of information and be
subject to time-consuming and expensive litigation and negative
publicity. In addition, the
Administrative Measures for the Security of
the International Network of Computer Information Network
,
effective on December 30, 1997 and amended on January 8, 2011,
requires us to report any data or security breaches to the local
offices of the PRC Ministry of Public Security within 24 hours of
any such breach. The Cybersecurity Law requires that when we
discover that our network products or services are subject to risks
such as security defects or bugs, we shall take remedial measures
immediately, including but not limited to, informing users of the
specific risks and reporting such risks to the relevant competent
departments. Technologies employed by hackers constantly evolve, so
that the security measures and our third-party system security
service providers may not be able to fully anticipate attacks and
implement necessary prevention measures, or do so in sufficient
time. Any security breach, whether actual or perceived, would harm
our reputation, and could cause us to lose borrowers, investors and
our offline cooperation partner and adversely affect our business
and results of operations. Our relationships with our users and our
offline cooperation partner may be harmed, negatively affecting our
business and credibility of our marketplace.
We do not prohibit borrowers from incurring other debt or impose
financial covenants on borrowers during the term of their loans,
which could increase the risk of non-payment on these
loans.
Subsequent
to our credit assessment, a borrower applicant may (i) become
delinquent in payment obligations; (ii) default on a pre-existing
debt obligation; (iii) commit to further indebtedness; and/or (iv)
experience events bringing about adverse financial
effects.
We do
not prohibit our borrowers from incurring additional indebtedness,
nor do we impose any financial covenants on the borrowers during
the terms of their loans. Further, we have no means to
independently determine whether a borrower applicant has
outstanding loans on other online lending marketplaces. We are
faced with the risk that borrowers borrow money from our platform
to pay off loans on other lending marketplaces, creating a snowball
effect of debt. Any additional indebtedness may impair the
borrower's ability to observe his or her payment obligations on the
loan product we facilitated, and therefore adversely affect the
relevant investor's returns. If a borrower becomes insolvent or
bankrupt or otherwise run into financial distress, any unsecured
loan (including those obtained through our marketplace) will rank
pari passu
to each other,
leaving delinquent borrowers to prioritize among creditors at his
or her discretion, and our investors may suffer losses as a result.
For secured loans, the ability of other secured investors to
exercise remedies against the assets of the borrower may impair the
borrower's ability to repay the loan to our investor. As a result,
investors may lose their confidence in us and our reputation and
business may be adversely affected.
Our borrowers acquired from referrals may take legal action against
us based on representations made by our franchise stores or third
parties, which may result in costly claims and disrupt our
business.
Some
borrowers and investors may be attracted to our marketplace after
reviewing information provided by our franchise stores or third
party partners. We do not review or approve any information
provided by our franchise stores or third party partners and, while
we do not believe we would have liability for such information, it
is possible that an unsatisfied borrower or investor could bring
claims against us based on any inaccurate information or
representations made by our franchise stores or other third party
partners. Such claims could be costly and time-consuming to defend
and would distract management's attention and create negative
publicity, which could adversely affect our reputation and business
operations.
If we cannot continue to maintain relationships with third-party
service providers, or if increases in fees are incurred by
third-party service providers, our profitability could be adversely
affected.
Our
relationships with various third parties are integral to the smooth
operation of our business and marketplace. Most of our agreements
with third-party service providers are non-exclusive and do not
prohibit third-party service providers from working with our
competitors or from offering competing services. If our
relationships with third-party service providers deteriorate or
third-party service providers decide to terminate our respective
business relationships for any reason, such as to work with our
competitors on more exclusive or more favorable terms, or if any of
our service providers become our competitors, our operations may be
disrupted. In addition, our third-party service providers may not
uphold the standard we expected under our agreements, or
disagreements or disputes may arise between us and our third-party
service providers. If these third-party service providers were to
increase the fees that they charge us, our profitability could be
adversely affected. Furthermore, we may not be able to offset any
increase in expenses incurred. We could also incur additional
expenses to find other suitable third-party service
providers.
We rely
on commercial banks and other third-party payment providers to
manage investor funds, originate and service loans, collect service
fees and ensure compliance with the relevant PRC laws and
regulations that may be relevant to our business. Third-party
payment agents in China are subject to oversight by the PBOC and
must comply with complex rules and regulations, licensing and
examination requirements, including, but not limited to: minimum
registered capital, maintenance of payment business licenses,
anti-money laundering regulations and management personnel
requirements. Some third-party payment providers have been required
by the PBOC to suspend their credit card pre-authorization and
payment services in certain areas of China. If our third-party
payment providers were to suspend, limit or cease their operations,
or if our relationships with our third-party payment providers were
to deteriorate or terminate, we would need to arrange substantially
similar arrangements with other third-party payment agents.
Negative publicity about our third-party payment providers or the
industry in general may also adversely affect investors' or
borrowers' confidence and trust in the use of third-party payment
providers to carry out the payment and custodian functions in
connection with the origination of loans on our marketplace. If any
of these were to happen, the operation of our platform could be
materially impaired and our results of operations would
suffer.
We may be subject to liabilities imposed by relevant governmental
regulations due to the personal data and other confidential
information of borrowers and investors that we access or
collect.
There
are numerous laws regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use,
disclosure and protection of personally identifiable information
and user data. We receive, transmit and store a large volume of
personally identifiable information and other confidential data
from borrowers and investors. Specifically, personally identifiable
and other confidential information is increasingly subject to
legislation and regulations in numerous domestic and international
jurisdictions, the intent of which is to protect the privacy of
personal information that is collected, processed and transmitted
in or from the governing jurisdiction. This regulatory framework
for privacy issues in China and worldwide is currently evolving and
is likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. In
addition, there may be limits on the cross-border transmission of
user data even to the extent that such transmission is within our
company. We could be adversely affected if legislation or
regulations are expanded to require changes in business practices
or privacy policies, or if governing jurisdictions interpret or
implement their legislation or regulations in ways that negatively
affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In November 2016, the Standing Committee of the National
People’s Congress released the
Cybersecurity Law of the PRC
, or the
Cybersecurity Law, which took effect in June 2017. The
Cybersecurity Law requires network operators to perform certain
functions related to internet security protection and the
strengthening of network information management. For instance,
under the Cybersecurity Law, network operators of key information
infrastructure generally shall, during their operations in the PRC,
store the personal information and important data collected and
produced within the territory of the PRC. We are in the process of
evaluating the potential impacts of the Cybersecurity Law on our
current business practices. We plan to further strengthen our
information management and privacy protection of the user data
stored in our system. However, we cannot assure you that the
measures we have taken or will take are adequate under the
Cybersecurity Law. If further changes in our business practices are
required under China's evolving regulatory framework for privacy
protection, our business, financial condition and results of
operations may be adversely affected. Further, we use certain data
collected from external data sources to make credit assessment. In
the event that the data collection and provision by any of our
external data sources is considered in violation of the
Cybersecurity Law, we may not be able to use relevant data for our
credit assessment and our business may be materially and adversely
affected.
In addition to
laws, regulations and other applicable rules regarding privacy and
privacy advocacy, industry groups or other private parties may
propose new and different privacy standards. Because the
interpretation and application of privacy and data protection laws
and privacy standards are still uncertain, it is possible that
these laws or privacy standards may be interpreted and applied in a
manner that is inconsistent with our practices. Any inability to
adequately address privacy concerns, even if unfounded, or to
comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws, regulations
and privacy standards, could result in additional cost and
liability for us, damage our reputation, inhibit the use of our
platform and harm our business. See "Regulation—Regulations
Relating to Internet-based Services—Regulations on
Cybersecurity" and "Regulation—Regulations Relating to
Internet-based Services—Regulations on Privacy
Protection."
The loss of any key members of the management team may impair our
ability to identify and secure new contracts with customers or
otherwise manage our business effectively.
Our
success depends on the continued services and contributions of our
senior management, particularly Mr. Yong Hui Li, the Chief
Executive Officer, and other executive officers named in this
Annual Report. In addition, the relationships and reputation that
members of our management team have established and maintained with
our customers contribute to our ability to maintain good customer
relations, which is important to the direct selling strategy that
we adopt. Employment contracts entered into between us and our
senior management cannot prevent our senior management from
terminating their employment, and the death, disability or
resignation of Mr. Yong Hui Li or any other member of our senior
management team may impair our ability to maintain business growth
and identify and develop new business opportunities or otherwise to
manage our business effectively.
Competition for employees is intense, and we may not be able to
attract and retain the qualified and skilled employees needed to
support our business.
We
believe our success depends on the efforts and talent of our
employees, including risk management, software engineering,
financial and marketing personnel. Our future success depends on
our continued ability to attract, develop, motivate and retain
qualified and skilled employees. Competition for highly skilled
technical, risk management and financial personnel is extremely
intense. We may not be able to hire and retain these personnel at
compensation levels consistent with our existing compensation and
salary structure. Some of the companies with which we compete for
experienced employees have greater resources than we have and may
be able to offer more attractive terms of employment.
In
addition, we invest significant time and expenses in training our
employees, which increases their value to competitors who may seek
to recruit them. If we fail to retain our employees, we could incur
significant expenses in hiring and training their replacements, and
the quality of our services and our ability to serve borrowers and
investors could diminish, resulting in a material adverse effect to
our business.
Our operations depend on the performance and stability of the
internet infrastructure and fixed telecommunications networks in
China.
Almost
all access to the internet in China is maintained through
state-owned telecommunication operators under the administrative
control and regulatory supervision of the Ministry of Industry and
Information Technology, or the MIIT. We heavily rely on the
internet infrastructure and telecommunications network in China for
our operations and the smooth running of our online marketplace. A
significant event or disaster, natural or man-made, including among
others, fires, power outages, floods, strikes, terrorist attacks,
coups d'etat or other catastrophic events or problems, may
adversely affect our online services and our offices. Our business
may be disrupted and we may lose critical data or experience
interruptions, delays and compromising of our business operations
and services. Our third party data suppliers and service providers,
including in particular our third-party payment providers, may also
be similarly affected and may not be able to provide our users and
us with the support needed. In particular, if our disaster recovery
plans prove to be ineffective or inadequate, the aforementioned
risks will be further worsened. We have limited access to
alternative networks or services in the event of disruptions,
failures or other problems with China’s internet
infrastructure or the fixed telecommunications networks provided by
telecommunication service providers. With the expansion of our
business, we may be required to upgrade our technology and
infrastructure to keep up with the increasing traffic on our
platform. We cannot assure you that the internet infrastructure and
the fixed telecommunications networks in China will be able to
support the demands associated with the continued growth in
internet usage.
In
addition, we have no control over the costs of the services
provided by telecommunication service providers. If the prices we
pay for telecommunications and internet services rise
significantly, our results of operations may be adversely affected.
Furthermore, if internet access fees or other charges to internet
users increase, our user traffic may decline and our business may
be harmed.
A downturn in the Chinese or global economy could reduce the demand
for consumer loans and investments, which could materially and
adversely affect our business and financial condition.
The
global financial markets experienced significant disruptions
between 2008 and 2009 and the United States, Europe and other
economies have experienced periods of recessions as a result. The
recovery from the economic downturns of 2008 and 2009 has been
uneven and is facing new challenges, including the announcement of
Brexit, which creates additional global economic uncertainty, and
the slowdown of Chinese economic growth since 2012. It is unclear
whether the Chinese economy will resume its high growth rate. There
is considerable uncertainty over the long-term effects of the
expansionary monetary and fiscal policies adopted by the central
banks and financial authorities of some of the world's leading
economies, including the United States and China. There have also
been concerns over unrest in the Middle East and Africa, which have
resulted in volatility in financial and other markets. There have
also been concerns about the economic effect of the tensions in the
relationship between China and surrounding Asian countries.
Economic conditions in China are sensitive to global economic
conditions. Any prolonged slowdown in the global or Chinese economy
may reduce the demand for consumer loans and investments and have a
negative impact on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. Additionally, continued turbulence in the
international markets may adversely affect our ability to access
the capital markets to meet liquidity needs.
The internet-based finance industry in China is becoming
increasingly competitive and such increasing competition may limit
our growth.
The
internet-based finance industry in China is intensely competitive
and evolving rapidly. Although we primarily focus on the
transportation industry vertical, in which we have many years of
operating experience, there are a large number of broader
internet-based financial product offerings and e-commerce platforms
that may compete with our products and may be provided by
competitors that are larger and more established than us. With
respect to lending competition, we primarily compete with offline
boutique financing providers and in some cases internet-based
financing providers. With respect to investors, we primarily
compete with other investment products and asset classes, such as
equities, bonds, investment trust products, bank savings accounts,
real estate and alternative asset classes. The competitors may also
attempt to copy or replicate our business model. If we are unable
to compete effectively, our business and results of operations
could be harmed. In addition, if we begin lending to other
industries, we will face more competition in those markets from
more established lenders, and new competition may also reduce our
growth prospects or level of profitability, which in turn could
have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operation.
Uncertainties relating to the growth of the retail industry in
China in general, and the online retail industry in particular,
could adversely affect revenues from our cash and merchandise
credit products and our business prospects.
We
generate our revenue from the provision of both cash and
merchandise credit products which we believe are mainly used for
day-to-day discretionary consumption purposes. As a result, our
cash and merchandise credit products businesses are affected by the
development of the retail industry, and in particular the online
retail industry, in China. The long-term viability and prospects of
various online retail business models in China remain relatively
untested. As such, demand for our credit products and our future
results of operation will depend on numerous factors affecting the
development of the online retail industry in China, which may be
beyond our control. These factors include:
●
the growth of
internet, broadband, personal computer and mobile penetration and
usage in China, and the rate of any such growth;
●
the trust and
confidence level of online retail and mobile commerce consumers,
including our users, in China, as well as changes in borrower
demographics and consumer tastes and preferences;
●
the selection,
price and popularity of merchandise that we and our competitors
offer online;
●
whether alternative
retail channels or business models that better address the needs of
consumers emerge in China; and
●
the development of
fulfillment, payment and other ancillary services associated with
retail and mobile commerce purchases
A
decline in the popularity of online shopping in general, especially
through the use of credit products, or any failure by us to adapt
our marketplace and improve the online shopping experience of our
users in response to trends and user requirements, may adversely
affect our prospects and results of operation.
Uncertainties relating to the growth of the truck logistics
industry in China could adversely affect revenues from our
trucking-related credit products and our business
prospects.
Currently, our
target customers are small and medium-sized business and individual
consumers. We primarily target customers in the trucking
transportation industry because of our experience operating in that
sector (for more details about our business model, please refer to
“Item 4. Information on our Company – B. Business
Overview – Our Business Model). The trucking transportation
industry in China faces many uncertainties and regulatory headwinds
and these factors may hinder any future growth. For example,
tougher emission standards and road safety regulations have
increased operation costs for truck owners in recent years. In
addition, as recent development has increased the wealth of rural
communities, fewer workers from these communities are entering the
trucking profession as drivers. Thus, driver wages are also
increasing and contributing to the decline in profitability of
trucking businesses. With the rise of large logistics companies
tailored to serve the ecommerce industry, the trucking industry
also faces the pressure of consolidation from these larger firms.
Our current business model is to serve SMBs within the trucking
industry; therefore, any consolidation in the industry by larger
firms may materially and adversely affect our prospects and results
of operation.
Seasonality with the trucking industry and online retail industry
could affect our interim results.
Truck
sales typically experiences peak volumes from September through
November and season lows from December until the Chinese New Year
holiday ends in February. Seasonality in truck transportation
activities vary across regions depending on the type of goods and
materials commonly transported in the region. We also experience
seasonality associated with the retail industry. For example, we
would expect less user traffic and purchase orders during national
holidays in China, particularly during the Chinese New Year holiday
season in the first quarter of each year. Furthermore, e-commerce
companies in China hold special promotional campaigns on November
11 each year, which could improve our results for that quarter.
Although seasonality related to our businesses may vary from year
to year given industry wide and regulatory influences, our
quarterly operating results could be affected by such seasonality.
Therefore, our quarterly results of operations, including our
operating revenue, expenses, net loss or income and other key
metrics, may vary significantly in the future, and period-to-period
comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful.
Accordingly, the results for any single quarter are not necessarily
an indication of future performance.
Stringent regulations on the trucking industry and the
proliferation of electric vehicles as transportation tools may have
a material adverse effect on our trucking related
businesses.
The
Ministry of Environmental Protection and the Ministry of Industry
and Information Technology have jointly issued new emission
standards with various classes of trucks and automobiles that must
be met prior to the sale and operation of trucks. Tougher emission
standards may increase the sale price of new trucks that meet the
standards and restrict the operating activities and age of current
trucks in operations that do not meet the standards. Operating
costs to maintain emission standards may also increase. Regulators
and law enforcement have also introduced rules to more tightly
regulate the safety standards of truck operators such as
regulations on cargo weight and trailer sizes. All of these factors
would reduce the profitability of trucking business and may affect
our customers in the industry. If our customers are affected by
such emission regulations, we may see a decrease in our loan
volumes and an increase in defaults. Furthermore, as electric
vehicles become more commonplace and trucking companies begin to
operate more electric trucks, our financing services for fuel
purchases would be adversely affected. All of the above could
adversely and materially affect our operating results. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to the Trucking
Industry."
Fluctuations in supply and demand for natural resources within
China may have an adverse and material effect on our trucking
related businesses.
The
trucking transportation industry is sensitive to fluctuation in
natural resources such as petroleum and natural gas because these
resources are the most common type of fuel for trucks. Large
temporary or longer term increases in diesel, LNG, or CNG prices
could cause trucking businesses to be unprofitable and truck owners
may choose to cease operations until fuel prices fall to a
reasonable range to ensure profitability. If any of our trucking
customers cease operations or cease to operate at a profit, we
could see our loan volumes fall and loan defaults rise. In
addition, as certain regions in China are producers and exporters
of natural resources such as coal and commodities, any reductions
in production or demand could adversely affect trucking operators
in the region that rely on transporting these materials. In such a
scenario, we may experience a fall in loan volume and a rise in
default rates from customers in these regions. All of such
fluctuations in supply and demand for natural resources could thus
adversely and materially affect our operating results.
We may not be able to prevent others from unauthorized use of our
intellectual property, which could harm our business and
competitive position.
We
regard our trademarks, domain names, know-how, proprietary
technologies and similar intellectual property as critical to our
success, and we rely on a combination of intellectual property laws
and contractual arrangements, including confidentiality, invention
assignment and non-compete agreements with our employees and others
to protect our proprietary rights.
It is
often difficult to register, maintain and enforce intellectual
property rights in China. Statutory laws and regulations are
subject to judicial interpretation and enforcement and may not be
applied consistently due to the lack of clear guidance on statutory
interpretation. Confidentiality, invention assignment and
non-compete agreements may be breached by counterparties, and there
may not be adequate remedies available to us for any such breach.
Accordingly, we may not be able to effectively protect our
intellectual property rights or to enforce our contractual rights
in China. Preventing any unauthorized use of our intellectual
property is difficult and costly and the steps we take may be
inadequate to prevent the misappropriation of our intellectual
property. In the event that we resort to litigation to enforce our
intellectual property rights, such litigation could result in
substantial costs and a diversion of our managerial and financial
resources. We can provide no assurance that we will prevail in such
litigation. In addition, our trade secrets may be leaked or
otherwise become available to, or be independently discovered by,
our competitors. To the extent that our employees or consultants
use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us or
use any unauthorized pirated software at work, disputes may arise
as to the rights in related know-how and inventions. Any failure in
protecting or enforcing our intellectual property rights could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims,
which may be expensive to defend and may disrupt our business and
operations.
We
cannot be certain that our operations or any aspects of our
business do not or will not infringe upon or otherwise violate
trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual
property rights held by third parties. We may be from time to time
in the future subject to legal proceedings and claims relating to
the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, there may
be third-party trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other
intellectual property rights that are infringed by our products,
services or other aspects of our business without our awareness.
Holders of such intellectual property rights may seek to enforce
such intellectual property rights against us in China, the United
States or other jurisdictions. If any third-party infringement
claims are brought against us, we may be forced to divert
management’s time and other resources from our business and
operations to defend against these claims, regardless of their
merits.
Additionally,
the application and interpretation of China’s intellectual
property right laws and the procedures and standards for granting
trademarks, patents, copyrights, know-how or other intellectual
property rights in China are still evolving and are uncertain, and
we cannot assure you that PRC courts or regulatory authorities
would agree with our analysis. If we were found to have violated
the intellectual property rights of others, we may be subject to
liability for our infringement activities or may be prohibited from
using such intellectual property, and we may incur licensing fees
or be forced to develop alternatives of our own. As a result, our
business and results of operations may be materially and adversely
affected.
Content displayed on our ecommerce websites by merchants may be
found objectionable by PRC regulatory authorities and may subject
us to penalties and other administrative actions.
The PRC
government has adopted regulations governing internet access and
the distribution of information over the internet. Under these
regulations, internet content providers and internet publishers are
prohibited from posting or displaying over the internet any content
that, among other things, violates PRC laws and regulations,
impairs the national dignity of China or the public interest, or is
obscene, superstitious, fraudulent or defamatory. Failure to comply
with these requirements may result in the revocation of licenses to
provide internet content or other licenses, the closure of the
concerned websites and reputational harm. The website operator may
also be held liable for the content displayed on or linked to its
website that is subject to censorship. If we are unable to control
and screen out inappropriate content posted by merchants on our
ecommerce sites, then our ecommerce sites may be subject to
penalties and other administrative actions.
We may be held liable for information or content displayed on,
retrieved from or linked to our mobile applications, which may
materially and adversely affect our business and operating
results.
In
addition to our website, we also offer online lending products on
our mobile applications, which are regulated by the
Administrative Provisions on Mobile Internet
Applications Information Services
, or the APP Provisions,
promulgated by the Cyberspace Administration of China, or the CAC,
in June 2016 and effective in August 2016. According to the APP
Provisions, the providers of mobile applications shall not create,
copy, publish or distribute information and content that is
prohibited by laws and regulations. We have implemented internal
control procedures screening the information and content on our
mobile applications to ensure their compliance with the APP
Provisions. However, we cannot assure that all the information or
content displayed on, retrieved from or linked to our mobile
applications complies with the requirements of the APP Provisions
at all times. If our mobile applications were found to be violating
the APP Provisions, we may be subject to relevant penalties,
including warning, service suspension or removal of our mobile
applications from the relevant mobile application store, which may
materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
See "Regulation—Regulations Relating to Internet-based
Businesses—Regulations on Mobile Internet Applications
Information Services."
We could be subject to allegations and lawsuits claiming that items
listed on our ecommerce websites by merchants are pirated,
counterfeit or illegal.
Goods
and services made available for sale by merchants on our ecommerce
platforms could be subject to allegations that they infringe
third-party copyrights, trademarks, patents or other intellectual
property rights. If we are unable to prevent counterfeiting and
infringement of intellectual property, we could be subject to
penalties, administrative actions and could face claims that we
should be held liable. If any material claim occurs in the future,
irrespective of the validity of such claims, we may incur
significant costs and efforts in either defending against or
settling such claims. If there is a successful claim against us, we
might be required to pay substantial damages or refrain from
further sale of the relevant merchandise. Potential liability under
PRC law if we negligently participated or assisted in infringement
activities associated with counterfeit goods includes injunctions
to cease infringing activities, rectification, compensation,
administrative penalties and even criminal liability. Moreover,
such claims or administrative penalties could result in negative
publicity and our reputation could be severely damaged. Any of
these events could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to claims under consumer protection laws,
including health and safety claims and product liability claims, if
property or people are harmed by the merchandise and services
offered on our marketplace.
Our
marketplace allows consumers to buy merchandise from third-party
merchandise suppliers, some of which may be defectively designed or
manufactured. Operators of online marketplaces in the PRC are
subject to certain provisions of consumer protection laws even
where the operator is not the supplier of the product or service
purchased by the consumer. As a result, sales of defective
merchandise could expose us to product liability claims relating to
personal injury or property damage or other actions. In addition,
if we do not take appropriate remedial action against merchandise
suppliers for actions they engage in that we know, or should have
known, would infringe upon the rights and interests of consumers,
we may be held jointly liable with the merchandise suppliers for
such infringement. Moreover, applicable consumer protection laws in
China provide that trading platforms will be held liable for
failing to meet any undertakings that the platforms make to
consumers with regard to merchandise listed on their websites or
mobile apps. Furthermore, we are required to report to the State
Administration of Industry and Commerce, or the SAIC, or its local
branches, any violation of applicable laws, regulations or SAIC
rules by merchandise suppliers or service providers, such as sales
of goods without proper license or authorization, and to take
appropriate remedial measures, including ceasing to provide
services to the relevant merchandise suppliers. We may also be held
jointly liable with merchandise suppliers who do not possess the
proper licenses or authorizations to sell goods or sell goods that
do not meet product standards. In addition, we may face activist
litigation in China by plaintiffs claiming damages based on
consumer protection laws, which may result in increased costs in
defending such suits and damages should we not prevail, which could
materially and adversely affect our reputation and brands and our
results of operations. We do not maintain product liability
insurance for merchandise offered on our marketplace, and our
rights of indemnity from our merchandise suppliers may not
adequately cover us for any liability we may incur. Even
unsuccessful claims could result in the expenditure of funds and
management time and resources and could materially reduce our net
income and profitability. See "Regulation—Regulations
Relating to Consumer Rights Protection."
Our interim period financial results can vary significantly due to
a host of variables and may not accurately reflect the underlying
performance of our business.
Our
interim period results of operations, including operating revenue,
expenses, the number of loans and other key performance indicators,
may fluctuate significantly such that comparisons of our operating
results period-on-period may not be meaningful. Results of any
interim period cannot accurately indicate future performance.
Fluctuations may be due to any number of variables, including some
beyond our control, such as:
●
our ability to grow
our users base by attracting new and retaining repeat borrowers and
investors;
●
the volume,
quality, and mix of loans and the acquisition of borrowers and
investors;
●
the level of
operating expenses in the acquisition of borrowers and investors,
the growth and maintenance of our business, operations and
infrastructure;
●
disruptions to
telecommunications networks or security breaches;
●
general
macroeconomic and socio-political factors affecting the market and
industry, particularly with respect to interest rates, consumer
spending and levels of disposable income;
●
seasonality of our
loan products, which are generally lower in the first quarter due
to the Chinese New Year national holiday;
●
our strategy with a
focus on long-term growth instead of immediate profitability;
and
●
the incurring of
expenses related to acquisitions activities of businesses or
technologies and potential future charges for impairment of
goodwill, if any.
Fluctuations
in our interim period results may affect the price of our stock in
an adverse manner.
Our use of investor cash incentives may result in substantial
reductions in our revenues.
We
provide investors with certain cash incentives to encourage greater
participation in the loan products we facilitate on our online
marketplace. We provide cash incentives to new investors under our
referral incentive program, as well as promotional cash incentives
to existing investors from time to time. Upon the satisfaction of
the terms and conditions under our referral incentive program or
promotional incentive programs, investors can redeem their cash
incentives for credit to be used on our online marketplace. We have
experienced rapid growth in the number of investors, repeat
investment and high transaction volume, partly attributable to our
investor cash incentive program. The investor cash incentive
program was intended to be a marketing tool to attract investors to
commit to loan products and help us increase the number of loan
product transactions so as to allow us to benefit from increased
transaction and service fees. In the future, we may offer similar
cash incentives to consumers on our ecommerce marketplaces.
However, such cash incentives are accounted for as reduction of
revenue and are paid to the investor before we are able to recoup
the costs associated with the investor cash incentives. Our
revenues may be reduced in periods where we have to issue an
increasing amount of investor cash incentives, which may result in
us incurring net losses and preventing us from achieving or
maintaining profitability on a quarterly or annual
basis.
Store closings result in unexpected costs that could result in
write downs and expenses related to the closings.
From
time to time, in the ordinary course of our business, we may close
certain underperforming office branches, generally based on
considerations of branch profitability, competition, strategic
factors and other considerations. Closing an office branch could
subject us to costs, including the write-down of leasehold
improvements, equipment, furniture and fixtures. In addition, we
could remain liable for future lease obligations.
If our internal controls over financial reporting are insufficient
or ineffective, we may not be able to accurately report our
financial results or prevent fraud.
Our
internal controls and procedures, especially over financial
reporting, may not be able to sufficiently identify any material
weaknesses and control deficiencies that could lead to inaccuracies
in our financial statements. As such, our ability to comply with
applicable financial reporting requirements and regulatory filings
in a timely manner may be impaired.
We are
listed in the United States and therefore subject to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of this Act requires that
we include a report of management on our internal control over
financial reporting in our annual report on Form 20-F. If we are
not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely
manner or if we or our independent registered public accounting
firm identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial
reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, we could be
subject to sanctions or investigations by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) or other regulatory authorities, which
would require additional financial and management resources. Any
failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures or
internal control over financial reporting could have a material
adverse effect on our business and operating results, and cause a
decline in the price of our ordinary shares.
The facilitation of loans through our marketplace could give rise
to liabilities under PRC laws and regulations that prohibit illegal
fundraising.
PRC
laws and regulations prohibit persons and companies from raising
funds through advertising to the public a promise to repay premium
or interest payments over time through payments in cash or in kind
except with the prior approval of the applicable government
authorities. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may
result in penalties imposed by the PBOC, the Administration for
Industry and Commerce, or AIC, and other governmental authorities,
and can lead to civil or criminal lawsuits.
To
date, our marketplace has not been subject to any fines or other
penalties under any PRC laws and regulations that prohibit illegal
fundraising. Our marketplace acts only as a service provider in the
facilitation of loans between borrowers and investors, and in this
capacity, we do not raise funds or promise repayment of premium or
interest obligations. Nevertheless, considerable uncertainties
exist with respect to the PBOC, AIC and other governmental
authorities' interpretations of the fundraising-related laws and
regulations in the PRC. While our agreements with investors require
investors to guarantee the legality of all funds from investors, we
do not verify the source of investors' funds separately, and
therefore, to the extent that investors' funds are obtained through
illegal fundraising, we may be negligently liable as a facilitator
of illegal fundraising. In addition, while our loan agreements
contain provisions that require borrowers to use the proceeds for
purposes listed in their loan applications, we cannot monitor and
verify all borrowers' use of funds and therefore, to the extent
that borrowers use proceeds from the loans for illegal activities,
we may be negligently liable as a facilitator of an illegal use.
Although we have designed and implemented procedures to identify
and eliminate instances of fraudulent conduct on our marketplace,
as the number of borrowers and investors on our platform increases,
we may not be able to identify all fraudulent conduct that may
violate illegal fundraising laws and regulations. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to Online Lending
Services—Regulations on Illegal Fund-Raising."
The facilitation of loans through our marketplace could give rise
to liabilities under PRC laws and regulations that prohibit
unauthorized public offerings.
The PRC
Securities Law stipulates that no organization or individual is
permitted to issue securities for public offering without obtaining
prior approval in accordance with the provisions of the law. The
following offerings are deemed to be public offerings under the PRC
Securities Law: (i) offering of securities to non- specific
targets; (ii) offering of securities to more than 200 specific
targets; and (iii) other offerings provided by the laws and
administrative regulations. Additionally, private offerings of
securities shall not be carried out through advertising, open
solicitation and disguised publicity campaigns. If any transaction
between one borrower and multiple investors on our marketplace is
identified as a public offering by PRC government authorities, we
may be subject to sanctions under PRC laws and our business may be
adversely affected. See "Regulation—Regulations Relating to
Online Lending Services—Regulations on Unauthorized Public
Offerings."
Adverse economic conditions in Shijiazhuang, China, that negatively
impact the demand for office space and hotel accommodations may
result in lower occupancy and rental rates for our property lease
and management business, which would adversely affect our results
of operations.
Generally
speaking, economic growth and employment levels in a local market
are important factors in determining the success of a local
property lease and management business. Since we only lease office
space and manage hotel operations in one building that is located
in Shijiazhuang, China, the economic conditions of this city are
likely to be important factors in determining the occupancy levels
and rental rates that our property lease and management business is
able to achieve. Therefore, any deterioration in the economic
conditions of Shijiazhuang may adversely affect the results of
operations of our property lease and management
business.
We face considerable competition in the leasing market and may be
unable to renew existing leases or re-let space on terms similar to
the existing leases, or we may spend significant capital in our
efforts to renew and re-let space, which may adversely affect our
results of operations.
In
addition to seeking to increase our average occupancy by leasing
current vacant space, we also concentrate our leasing efforts on
renewing existing leases. Because we compete with a number of other
developers, owners and operators of office and office-oriented,
mixed-use properties, we may be unable to renew leases with our
existing customers and, if our current customers do not renew their
leases, we may be unable to re-let the space to new customers. To
the extent that we are able to renew existing leases or re-let such
space to new customers, heightened competition resulting from
adverse market conditions may require us to utilize rent
concessions and tenant improvements to a greater extent than we
have historically. Further, changes in space utilization by our
customers due to technology, economic conditions and business
culture also affect the occupancy of our properties. As a result,
customers may seek to downsize by leasing less space from us upon
any renewal.
If our
competitors offer space at rental rates below current market rates
or below the rental rates we currently charge our customers, we may
lose existing and potential customers, and we may be pressured to
reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge in order to
retain customers upon expiration of their existing leases. Even if
our customers renew their leases or we are able to re-let the
space, the terms and other costs of renewal or re-letting,
including the cost of required renovations, increased tenant
improvement allowances, leasing commissions, reduced rental rates
and other potential concessions, may be less favorable than the
terms of our current leases and could require significant capital
expenditures. From time to time, we may also agree to modify the
terms of existing leases to incentivize customers to renew their
leases. If we are unable to renew leases or re-let space in a
reasonable time, or if our rental rates decline or our tenant
improvement costs, leasing commissions or other costs increase, our
financial condition and results of operations of the property lease
and management business could be materially and adversely
affected.
Bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants may decrease our revenue, net
income and available cash.
The
bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant could cause us to suffer
lower revenues and operational difficulties, including leasing the
remainder of the property. As a result, the bankruptcy or
insolvency of a major tenant could result in decreased revenue, net
income and funds available to pay our indebtedness.
We may not be successful in integrating or operating our recently
acquired hotel business.
In
August 2016 we entered into the hotel business with our acquisition
of Eastern Eagle. The profitability of this business depends on our
ability to effectively manage and integrate the acquired business
into our existing operations. In addition, the performance of the
hotel business may be affected by local economic conditions and
competition, among other factors, which may have adverse effects on
occupancy rates and on our ability to generate income from hotel
operations.
Our profitability will be adversely affected if we are unable to
successfully collect receivables from our commercial vehicle sales,
leasing and support business, which have been classified as
discontinued operations.
We have
discontinued our legacy truck leasing business by exiting the
leasing industry, though we continue to service the remaining
leases through their expiration and collect the outstanding amounts
due to us. If we are unable to effectively and efficiently collect
these amounts, the profitability of this discontinued business
segment will be reduced, which in turn will adversely affect our
profitability.
From time to time we may evaluate and potentially consummate
strategic investments or acquisitions, which could require
significant management attention, disrupt our business and
adversely affect our financial results.
We may
evaluate and consider strategic investments, combinations,
acquisitions or alliances to further increase the value of our
credit products and better serve borrowers and enhance our
competitive position. These transactions could be material to our
financial condition and results of operations if consummated. If we
are able to identify an appropriate business opportunity, we may
not be able to successfully consummate the transaction and, even if
we do consummate such a transaction, we may be unable to obtain the
benefits or avoid the difficulties and risks of such transaction,
which may result in investment losses.
A significant portion of our working capital is funded through
loans from related parties of our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Yong Hui
Li, some of which may be called by the lenders at any time, which
could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability
to fund and expand our business.
As of
December 31, 2017, we had outstanding borrowings from related
parties, including our Chairman and Chief Executive officer, Mr.
Yong Hui Li, of approximately RMB62,75 million. These borrowings
are interest bearing and carry various terms, and some are callable
at any time by the lenders. The lenders have not indicated to us if
there is a maximum amount they are willing to lend to us or that
they will not call the loans for repayment. In the event such
lenders determine to call these loans, we will have to repay the
loans from our cash reserves or financing provided by third-party
financial institutions. There can be no assurance that we will have
sufficient cash reserves or that we could secure additional
financing from third parties on favorable terms or at all. If cash
reserves or suitable financing were not available, we would have to
divert working capital from our core business to repay the loans,
and we would not be able to expand our core business as quickly as
expected.
We may need additional capital to pursue business objectives and
respond to business opportunities, challenges or unforeseen
circumstances, and financing may not be available on terms
acceptable to us, or at all.
Since
inception, we have issued equity securities to support the growth
of our business. As we intend to continue to make investments to
support the growth of our business, we may require additional
capital to pursue our business objectives and respond to business
opportunities, challenges or unforeseen circumstances, including
developing new products and services, increasing the amount of
transactions, further enhancing our risk management capabilities,
increasing our marketing expenditures to improve brand awareness
and diversifying our borrower engagement channels by collaborating
with other leading internet companies, enhancing our operating
infrastructure and acquiring complementary businesses and
technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt
financings to secure additional funds. However, additional funds
may not be available when we need them, on terms that are
acceptable to us, or at all. Repayment of the debts may divert a
substantial portion of cash flow to pay principal and interest on
such debt, which would reduce the funds available for expenses,
capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate
purposes; and we may suffer default and foreclosure on our assets
if our operating cash flow is insufficient to repay debt
obligations, which could in turn result in acceleration of
obligations to repay the indebtedness and limit our sources of
financing.
Volatility
in the credit markets may also have an adverse effect on our
ability to obtain debt financing. If we raise additional funds
through further issuances of equity or convertible debt securities,
our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and
any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences
and privileges superior to those of holders of our ordinary shares.
If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms
satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to
pursue our business objectives and to respond to business
opportunities, challenges or unforeseen circumstances could be
significantly limited, and our business, operating results,
financial condition and prospects could be adversely
affected.
We do not have any business insurance coverage for our
internet-based businesses.
Insurance
companies in China currently do not offer as extensive an array of
insurance products as insurance companies in more developed
economies. Currently, we carry certain insurance, such as business
interruption and property insurance, for our office leasing and
hotel businesses, but we do not have any business liability or
disruption insurance to cover our internet-based business
operations. We have determined that the costs of insuring for these
risks and the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance
on commercially reasonable terms make it impractical for us to have
such insurance. Any uninsured business disruptions may result in
our incurring substantial costs and the diversion of resources,
which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
If we cannot maintain our corporate culture as we grow, we could
lose the innovation, collaboration and focus that contribute to our
business.
We
believe that a critical component of our success is our corporate
culture, which we believe fosters innovation, encourages teamwork
and cultivates creativity. As we continue to develop the
infrastructure of a public company and continue to grow and change,
we may find it difficult to maintain these valuable aspects of our
corporate culture. Any failure to preserve our culture could
negatively impact our future success, including our ability to
attract and retain employees, encourage innovation and teamwork and
effectively focus on and pursue our corporate
objectives.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR CORPORATE STRUCTURE
Contractual arrangements in respect of certain companies in the PRC
may be subject to challenge by the relevant governmental
authorities and may affect our investment and control over these
companies and their operations.
Foreign ownership
of internet-based businesses, such as distribution of online
information, is subject to restrictions under current PRC laws and
regulations. For example, foreign investors are not allowed to own
more than 50% of the equity interests in a value-added
telecommunication service provider (except e-commerce) and any such
foreign investor must have experience in providing value-added
telecommunications services overseas and maintain a good track
record in accordance with the
Guidance Catalog of Industries for Foreign
Investment (2017 Revision)
issued jointly by the National
Development and Reform Commission and the MOFCOM, the
Provisions on Administration of Foreign
Invested Telecommunications Enterprises (2016 Revision)
promulgated by the State Council, and other applicable laws and
regulations.
We are
a Cayman Islands company and our PRC subsidiaries are considered as
foreign invested enterprises, which include (i) Hebei Anyong
Trading Co., Ltd., or Hebei Anyong Trading, a foreign invested
enterprise wholly owned by our Hong Kong subsidiary Eastern Eagle,
(ii) Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd., or Ganglian Finance
Leasing, a foreign invested enterprise wholly owned by our Hong
Kong subsidiary Fancy Think Limited, and (iii) Chuanglian Finance
Leasing Co., Ltd., or Chuanglian Finance Leasing, a foreign
invested enterprise jointly owned by Ganglian Finance Leasing and
Fancy Think Limited.
To
comply with PRC laws and regulations, we conduct our internet-based
businesses in China through a series of contractual arrangements
entered into by and among (i) Chuanglian Finance Leasing, (ii) each
of Hebei Xuhua Trading Co., Ltd. and Kaiyuan Auto Trade Co., Ltd.,
which are considered our variable interest entities, and (iii) the
nominee shareholders of these variable interest entities. The
relevant business licenses to carry out our internet-based
businesses are held by the subsidiaries of these variable interest
entities (for more information about our contractual arrangements,
please see note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). As a
result of these contractual arrangements, we exert control over our
variable interest entities and their subsidiaries and consolidate
their operating results in our financial statements under U.S.
GAAP.
However,
there can be no assurance that the relevant governmental authority
will not challenge the validity of these contractual arrangements.
It is also uncertain whether any new PRC laws, rules or regulations
relating to the variable interest entity structure will be adopted
or if adopted, what they would provide. In particular, in January
2015, the Ministry of Commerce, or the MOFCOM, published a
discussion draft of the proposed
Foreign Investment Law
for public
review and comments. Among other things, the draft
Foreign Investment Law
expands the
definition of foreign investment and introduces the principle of
"actual control" in determining whether a company is considered a
foreign invested enterprise. Under the draft
Foreign Investment Law
, variable
interest entities would also be deemed as foreign invested
enterprises if they are ultimately "controlled" by foreign
investors, and be subject to restrictions on foreign investments.
However, the draft law has not taken a position on what actions
will be taken with respect to the existing companies with the
variable interest entity structure, whether or not these companies
are controlled by Chinese parties. It is uncertain when the draft
would be signed into law and whether the final version would have
any substantial changes from the draft. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to Foreign
Investment—The Draft PRC Foreign Investment Law" and
"—Substantial uncertainties exist with respect to the
enactment timetable, interpretation and implementation of draft PRC
Foreign Investment Law and how it may impact the viability of our
current corporate structure, corporate governance and business
operations."
If the
ownership structure, contractual arrangements and business of our
company, our PRC subsidiary Chuanglian Finance Leasing or our
consolidated variable interest entities are found to be in
violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, or we
fail to obtain or maintain any of the required permits or
approvals, the relevant governmental authorities would have broad
discretion in dealing with such violation, including levying fines,
confiscating our income or the income of our PRC subsidiary
Chuanglian Finance Leasing or our consolidated variable interest
entities, revoking the business licenses or operating licenses of
our PRC subsidiary Chuanglian Finance Leasing or our consolidated
variable interest entities, shutting down our servers or blocking
our online platform, discontinuing or placing restrictions or
onerous conditions on our operations, requiring us to undergo a
costly and disruptive restructuring, restricting or prohibiting our
use of proceeds from public offering or private placement to
finance our business and operations in China, and taking other
regulatory or enforcement actions that could be harmful to our
business. Any of these actions could cause significant disruption
to our business operations and severely damage our reputation,
which would in turn materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. If any of these
occurrences results in our inability to direct the activities of
our consolidated variable interest entities, and/or our failure to
receive economic benefits from our consolidated variable interest
entities, we may not be able to consolidate its results into our
consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S.
GAAP.
Our contractual arrangements with our variable interest entities
may not be as effective as direct ownership and operational
management
.
We rely
and expect to continue to rely on contractual arrangements with our
variable interest entities to operate our online lending and
e-commerce platforms (for more information about our contractual
arrangements, please see note 20 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements). These contractual arrangements may not be as effective
as direct ownership in giving us full operational management and
control over our consolidated variable interest entities. We cannot
prevent our variable interest entities or their nominal
shareholders from breaching the contractual arrangements and
failing to conduct their business operations properly, such as
failing to maintain the website and online marketplace in a proper
and timely manner, or misusing the domain names and trademarks or
otherwise taking actions detrimental to our interests.
If we
directly owned our variable interest entities, we could elect
directors to the board and implement changes at the management and
operational levels. Currently we only have contractual rights in
relation to the performance and financial benefits of the variable
interest entities’ operations. The nominal shareholders of
our variable interest entities may not always act in our best
interests. Such risks exist throughout the period in which we
intend to operate our business through the contractual arrangements
with our consolidated variable interest entities. Although we have
the right to replace any shareholder of our consolidated variable
interest entities under the contractual arrangement, if any
shareholder of our consolidated variable interest entities is
uncooperative or any dispute relating to these contracts remains
unresolved, we will have to enforce our rights under these
contracts through the operations of PRC laws and arbitration,
litigation and other legal proceedings and therefore will be
subject to uncertainties in the PRC legal system. Therefore, our
contractual arrangements with our variable interest entities may
not be as effective in protecting our interests as direct ownership
and operational management would be.
Our founder, chairman and chief executive officer, Mr. Yong Hui Li,
also a controlling shareholder of us, exerts strong influence over
the board and Company affairs and strategy.
Our
founder, chairman and chief executive officer, Mr. Yong Hui Li,
exerts strong influence on our board of directors and management.
He plays an integral role in Company decisions and formulating our
corporate strategies. Mr. Yong Hui Li has considerable influence
over our corporate affairs, including matters that require
shareholder approval, including among others, the election of
directors, approving statutory mergers, and amending our
foundational documents. This concentration in control will limit
shareholder ability to influence corporate matters and may
discourage potential merger, takeover or other change of control
transactions, which could have the effect of depriving holders of
our ordinary shares of the opportunity to sell their shares at a
premium over the prevailing market price.
The nominal shareholders of our variable interest entities may have
potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and
adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We,
through our PRC subsidiary Chuanglian Finance Leasing, have
contractual arrangements with our variable interest entities and
their nominal shareholders. Although the nominal shareholders of
our variable interest entities have given undertakings to act in
our best interests, we cannot assure you that when conflicts arise,
these nominal shareholders will act in our best interests or that
conflicts will be resolved in our favor.
Contractual arrangements in relation to our variable interest
entities may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities and
they may determine that we, or our variable interest entities and
their subsidiaries, owe additional taxes, which could negatively
affect our financial condition and the value of your
investment.
Under
applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions
among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the
PRC tax authorities. The PRC enterprise income tax law requires
every enterprise in China to submit its annual enterprise income
tax return together with a report on transactions with its related
parties to the relevant tax authorities. The tax authorities may
impose reasonable adjustments on taxation if they have identified
any related party transactions that are inconsistent with arm's
length principles. We may face material and adverse tax
consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that the
contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiary Chuanglian
Finance Leasing, our variable interest entities and their nominal
shareholders were not entered into on an arm's length basis in such
a way as to result in an impermissible reduction in taxes under
applicable PRC laws, regulations and rules, and adjust income of
our variable interest entities in the form of a transfer pricing
adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other
things, result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by our
variable interest entities for PRC tax purposes, which could in
turn increase their tax liabilities without reducing our PRC
subsidiary Chuanglian Finance Leasing’s tax expenses. In
addition, if our PRC subsidiary Chuanglian Finance Leasing requests
the nominal shareholders of our variable interest entities to
transfer their equity interests at nominal or no value pursuant to
these contractual arrangements, such transfer could be viewed as a
gift and subject our PRC subsidiary Chuanglian Finance Leasing to
PRC income tax. Furthermore, the PRC tax authorities may impose
late payment fees and other penalties on our variable interest
entities for the adjusted but unpaid taxes according to the
applicable regulations. Our financial position could be materially
adversely affected if our variable interest entities’ tax
liabilities increase or if they are required to pay late payment
fees and other penalties
If our variable interest entities go bankrupt or become subject to
dissolutions or liquidation proceedings, we may not be able to
recover or claim ownership over the assets and networks of these
variable interest entities.
Our
variable interest entities and their subsidiaries hold assets
material to our business operations, including the ICP License,
domain names and trademarks and software licenses. Under our
present contractual arrangements, our variable interest entities
cannot, and their nominal shareholders shall not cause it to, in
any manner, sell, transfer, mortgage or dispose of their assets or
their legal or beneficial interests in the business without our
prior consent. However if the nominal shareholders of our variable
interest entities initiate liquidation proceedings in breach of our
contractual arrangements, such that these variable interest
entities undergo voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceedings,
or if they declare bankruptcy and all or part of their assets
become subject to the claims of third party creditors, liens or are
otherwise disposed of without our consent, we may not be able to
continue our business operations, which would materially and
adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
If any of our PRC subsidiaries or variable interest entities loses
its chop, or corporate seal, to the theft and use of unauthorized
persons, the corporate governance of these entities may be severely
and adversely compromised.
In the
PRC, a company chop or seal serves as the legal representation of
the company towards third parties even when unaccompanied by a
signature. Each legally registered company in the PRC is required
to maintain a company chop, which must be registered with the local
Public Security Bureau. In addition to this mandatory company chop,
companies may have several other chops which can be used for
specific purposes. The chops of our PRC subsidiaries and our
consolidated variable interest entities are generally held securely
by personnel designated or approved by us in accordance with our
internal control procedures. To the extent those chops are not kept
safely, are stolen or are used by unauthorized persons or for
unauthorized purposes, the corporate governance of these entities
could be severely and adversely compromised and those corporate
entities may be bound to abide by the terms of any documents so
chopped, even if they were chopped by an individual who lacked the
requisite power and authority to do so. In addition, if the chops
are misused by unauthorized persons, we could experience disruption
to our normal business operations.
RISKS RELATED TO DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA
Adverse changes in political and economic policies of the PRC
government could impede the overall economic growth of the PRC,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business and
result of operations.
We
conduct substantially all of our operations and generate all our
sales in the PRC. Accordingly, our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects are affected significantly by
economic, political and legal developments in the PRC. The PRC
economy differs, or may differ, from the economies of most
developed countries in many respects, including:
●
a higher level of
government involvement and regulation;
●
the early stage of
development of the market-oriented sector of the
economy;
●
a higher rate of
inflation;
●
a higher level of
control over foreign exchange; and
●
government control
over the allocation of many resources.
As the
PRC economy has been transitioning from a planned economy to a more
market-oriented economy, the PRC government has implemented various
measures to encourage economic growth and guide the allocation of
resources. While these measures may benefit the overall PRC
economy, they may also have a negative effect on us.
Although
the PRC government has in recent years implemented measures
emphasizing the utilization of market forces for economic reform,
the PRC government continues to exercise significant control over
economic growth in China through the allocation of resources,
controlling payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations,
setting monetary policy and imposing policies that impact
particular industries or companies in different ways.
In the
past 20 years, the PRC has been one of the world’s fastest
growing economies measured in gross domestic product. However, in
conjunction with recent slowdowns in economies of the United States
and the European Union, the growth rate in China has declined in
recent quarters. Any further adverse change in the economic
conditions or any adverse change in government policies in China
could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth
and the level of consumer and business related spending in China,
which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
The PRC legal system embodies uncertainties that could limit the
legal protections available to us.
The PRC legal system is based on written statutes and prior court
decisions have limited value as precedents. Since these laws and
regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues
to rapidly evolve, the interpretations of many laws, regulations
and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws,
regulations and rules involves uncertainties.
In particular, PRC laws and regulations concerning the online
lending industry are developing and evolving. Although we have
taken measures to comply with the laws and regulations that are
applicable to our business operations, including the regulatory
principles raised by the CBRC, and avoid conducting any
noncompliant activities under the applicable laws and regulations,
such as illegal fund-raising, forming fund collection or providing
guarantee to investors, the PRC government authority may promulgate
detailed implementation regulation of the Interim Measure, or other
new laws and regulations regulating the online lending industry in
the future. We cannot assure you that our practice would not be
deemed to violate any new PRC laws or regulations relating to the
online lending industry. Moreover, developments in the online
lending industry may lead to changes in PRC laws, regulations and
policies or in the interpretation and application of existing laws,
regulations and policies that may limit or restrict online lending
platforms, which could materially and adversely affect our business
and operations.
From time to time, we may have to resort to administrative and
court proceedings to enforce our legal rights. However, since PRC
administrative and court authorities have significant discretion in
interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it
may be more difficult to evaluate the outcome of administrative and
court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy than
in more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system
is based in part on government policies and internal rules (some of
which are not published in a timely manner or at all) that may have
retroactive effect. As a result, we may not be aware of our
violation of these policies and rules until sometime after the
violation. Such uncertainties, including uncertainty over the scope
and effect of our contractual, property (including intellectual
property) and procedural rights, could materially and adversely
affect our business and impede our ability to continue our
operations.
We may be adversely affected by the complexity, uncertainties and
changes in PRC regulation of internet-related businesses and
companies, and any lack of requisite approvals, licenses or permits
applicable to our business may have a material adverse effect on
our business and results of operations.
The PRC
government extensively regulates the internet industry, including
foreign ownership of, and the licensing and permit requirements
pertaining to, companies in the internet industry. These
internet-related laws and regulations are relatively new and
evolving, and their interpretation and enforcement involve
significant uncertainties. As a result, in certain circumstances it
may be difficult to determine what actions or omissions may be
deemed to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations. The
evolving PRC regulatory system for the internet industry may lead
to the establishment of new regulatory agencies. For example, in
May 2011, the State Council announced the establishment of a new
department, the State Internet Information Office (with the
involvement of the State Council Information Office, the Ministry
of Industry and Information Technology, or the MIIT, and the
Ministry of Public Security). The primary role of this new agency
is to facilitate the policy-making and legislative development in
this field, to direct and coordinate with the relevant departments
in connection with online content administration and to deal with
cross-ministry regulatory matters in relation to the internet
industry.
We have
only contractual control over our website. We do not directly own
the website due to the restriction of foreign investment in
businesses providing value-added telecommunication services in
China, including internet information provision services. The
interpretation and application of existing PRC laws, regulations
and policies and possible new laws, regulations or policies
relating to the internet industry have created substantial
uncertainties regarding the legality of existing and future foreign
investments in, and the businesses and activities of, internet
businesses in China, including our business. We cannot assure you
that we have obtained all the permits or licenses required for
conducting our business in China or will be able to maintain our
existing licenses or obtain new ones. If the PRC government
considers that we were operating without the proper approvals,
licenses or permits or promulgates new laws and regulations that
require additional approvals or licenses or imposes additional
restrictions on the operation of any part of our business, it has
the power, among other things, to levy fines, confiscate our
income, revoke our business licenses, and require us to discontinue
our relevant business or impose restrictions on the affected
portion of our business. Any of these actions by the PRC government
may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
We rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our
PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may
have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to
make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to conduct our business.
We are
a holding company, and we rely on dividends and other distributions
on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries for our cash and financing
requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and
other cash distributions to our shareholders and service any debt
we may incur. If our PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own
behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may
restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions
to us. In addition, the PRC tax authorities may require our PRC
subsidiary Chuanglian Finance Leasing to adjust its taxable income
under the contractual arrangements it currently has in place with
our variable interest entities and their subsidiaries, in a manner
that would materially and adversely affect their ability to pay
dividends and other distributions to us.
Under
PRC laws and regulations, our PRC subsidiaries, as wholly
foreign-owned enterprises in China, may pay dividends only out of
their respective accumulated after-tax profits as determined in
accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In
addition, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise is required to set
aside at least 10% of its accumulated after-tax profits each year,
if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the
aggregate amount of such funds reaches 50% of its registered
capital. At its discretion, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise may
allocate a portion of its after-tax profits based on PRC accounting
standards to staff welfare and bonus funds. These reserve funds and
staff welfare and bonus funds are not distributable as cash
dividends.
In
response to the persistent capital outflow and RMB's depreciation
against the U.S. dollar in the fourth quarter of 2016, the People's
Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, or
SAFE, have implemented a series of capital control measures over
recent months, including stricter vetting procedures for
China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas
acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments.
For instance, the People's Bank of China issued the
Circular on Further Clarification of Relevant
Matters Relating to Offshore RMB Loans Provided by Domestic
Enterprises
, or the PBOC Circular 306, in November 2016,
which provides that offshore RMB loans provided by a domestic
enterprise to offshore enterprises that it holds equity interests
in shall not exceed 30% of such equity interests. The PBOC Circular
306 may constrain our PRC subsidiaries' ability to provide offshore
loans to us. The PRC government may continue to strengthen its
capital controls and our PRC subsidiaries' dividends and other
distributions may be subjected to tighter scrutiny in the future.
Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay
dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and
adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or
acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay
dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business. See also
"—If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC
income tax purposes, such classification could result in
unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC
shareholders."
PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by
offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency
conversion may delay or prevent us from making loans to or making
additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries, which
could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability
to fund and expand our business.
Any funds
we transfer to our PRC subsidiaries, either as a shareholder loan
or as an increase in registered capital, are subject to filing or
registration with the relevant governmental authorities in China.
According to the relevant PRC regulations on foreign invested
enterprises in China, capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries
are subject to the requirement of making necessary filings in the
Foreign Investment Comprehensive Management Information System, or
FICMIS, and registration with other governmental authorities in
China. In addition, (a) any foreign loan procured by our PRC
subsidiaries is required to be registered with SAFE, or its local
branches, and (b) each of our PRC subsidiaries may not procure
loans which exceed the statutory limit. Any medium or long-term
loan to be provided by us to our variable interest entities must be
recorded and registered by the National Development and Reform
Committee and SAFE or its local branches. We may not complete such
recording or registrations on a timely basis, if at all, with
respect to future capital contributions or foreign loans by us to
our PRC subsidiaries. If we fail to complete such recording or
registration, our ability to use the proceeds of this offering and
to capitalize our PRC operations may be negatively affected, which
could adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and
expand our business.
In 2008, SAFE promulgated the
Notice of the
General Affairs Department of the State Administration of Foreign
Exchange on the Relevant Operating Issues concerning the
Improvement of the Administration of Payment and Settlement of
Foreign Currency Capital of Foreign Invested
Enterprises
, or
Circular 142, which used to regulate the conversion by foreign
invested enterprises of foreign currency into Renminbi by
restricting the usage of converted Renminbi. In March 2015, SAFE
promulgated the
Notice of the State
Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming the Administrative
Approach Regarding the Settlement of the Foreign Exchange Capitals
of Foreign Invested Enterprises
, or Circular 19. Circular 19 took
effect as of June 1, 2015 and superseded Circular 142 on the same
date. Circular 19 launched a nationwide reform of the
administration of the settlement of the foreign exchange capitals
of foreign invested enterprises and allows foreign invested
enterprises to settle their foreign exchange capital at their
discretion, but continues to prohibit foreign invested enterprises
from using the Renminbi fund converted from their foreign exchange
capitals for expenditures beyond their business scopes. In June
2016, SAFE promulgated the
Notice of the State
Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing
the Administrative Provisions on Capital Account Foreign Exchange
Settlement
, or
Circular 16. Circular 19 and Circular 16 continue to prohibit
foreign invested enterprises from, among other things, using the
Renminbi fund converted from its foreign exchange capitals for
expenditure beyond its business scope, investment and financing
(except for security investment or guarantee products issued by
bank), providing loans to non-affiliated enterprises or
constructing or purchasing real estate not for
self-use.
In light of the substantial capital outflows of China in 2016 due
to the weakening of Renminbi, the PRC government has imposed more
restrictive foreign exchange policies and increased scrutiny of
major outbound capital movement. More restrictions and substantial
vetting processes have been put in place by SAFE to regulate
cross-border transactions falling under the capital account. The
PRC government may
,
at its discretion, further restrict access to foreign currencies in
the future for current account transactions. If the foreign
exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient
foreign currencies to satisfy our foreign currency demands, we may
not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our
shareholders.
Fluctuations in exchange rates could result in foreign currency
exchange losses.
The
value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may
fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in
China’s political and economic conditions and foreign
exchange policies. The conversion of RMB into foreign currencies,
including U.S. dollars, is based on rates set by the People’s
Bank of China. The PRC government allowed the RMB to appreciate by
more than 20% against the U.S. dollar between July 2005 and July
2008. Between July 2008 and June 2010, this appreciation halted and
the exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S. dollar remained
within a narrow band. Since June 2010, the RMB has fluctuated
against the U.S. dollar, at times significantly and unpredictably,
and in recent years the RMB has depreciated significantly against
the U.S. dollar. Since October 1, 2016, the RMB has joined the
International Monetary Fund (IMF)’s basket of currencies that
make up the Special Drawing Right (SDR), along with the U.S.
dollar, the Euro, the Japanese yen and the British pound. In the
fourth quarter of 2016, the RMB has depreciated significantly in
the backdrop of a surging U.S. dollar and persistent capital
outflows of China. With the development of the foreign exchange
market and progress towards interest rate liberalization and
Renminbi internationalization, the PRC government may in the future
announce further changes to the exchange rate system and there is
no guarantee that the RMB will not appreciate or depreciate
significantly in value against the U.S. dollar in the future. It is
difficult to predict how market forces or PRC or U.S. government
policy may impact the exchange rate between the RMB and the U.S.
dollar in the future.
Significant
revaluation of the Renminbi may have a material and adverse effect
on your investment. For example, to the extent that we need to
convert U.S. dollars we receive from any offering or private
placement into Renminbi for our operations, appreciation of the
Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on
the Renminbi amount we would receive from the conversion.
Conversely, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars
for the purpose of making payments for dividends on our ordinary
shares or for other business purposes, appreciation of the U.S.
dollar against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on the
U.S. dollar amount available to us.
Very
limited hedging transactions are available in China to reduce our
exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. To date, we have not
entered into any hedging transactions in an effort to reduce our
exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. While we may decide to
enter into hedging transactions in the future, the availability and
effectiveness of these hedging transactions may be limited and we
may not be able to successfully hedge our exposure at all. In
addition, our currency exchange losses may be magnified by PRC
exchange control regulations that restrict our ability to convert
Renminbi into foreign currency.
If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC income
tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax
consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders.
Under
the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementation rules,
enterprises that are registered in countries or regions outside the
PRC but have their "
de
facto
management bodies" located within China may be
considered as PRC resident enterprises and are therefore subject to
PRC enterprise income tax at the rate of 25% on their worldwide
income.
We
believe none of our entities outside of China is a PRC resident
enterprise for PRC tax purposes. However, the tax resident status
of an enterprise is subject to determination by the PRC tax
authorities and uncertainties remain with respect to the
interpretation of the term "de facto management body." As most of
our management members are based in China, it remains unclear how
the tax residency rule will apply to our case. If the PRC tax
authorities determine that Fincera Inc. or any of our subsidiaries
outside of China is a PRC resident enterprise for PRC enterprise
income tax purposes, then Fincera Inc. or such subsidiary could be
subject to PRC tax at a rate of 25% on its worldwide income, which
could materially reduce our net income. In addition, we will also
be subject to PRC enterprise income tax reporting obligations.
Furthermore, if the PRC tax authorities determine that we are a PRC
resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes, dividends
we distribute to non-PRC resident holders may be subject to PRC
withholding tax, and gains realized on the sale or other
disposition of our ordinary shares may be subject to PRC tax, at a
rate of 10% in the case of non-PRC enterprises, or 20% in the case
of non-PRC individuals (in each case, subject to the provisions of
any applicable tax treaty), if such gains are deemed to be from PRC
sources. It is unclear whether non-PRC shareholders of our company
would be able to claim the benefits of any tax treaties between
their country of tax residence and the PRC in the event that we are
treated as a PRC resident enterprise. Any such tax may reduce the
returns on your investment in the ordinary shares. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to Tax—Regulations on
Enterprise Income Tax."
We may not be able to obtain certain benefits under relevant tax
treaty on dividends paid by our PRC subsidiaries to us through our
Hong Kong subsidiaries.
We are
a holding company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands
and as such rely on dividends and other distributions on equity
from our PRC subsidiaries to satisfy part of our liquidity
requirements. Pursuant to
Enterprise Income Tax Law of the PRC
, a
withholding tax rate of 10% currently applies to dividends paid by
a PRC "resident enterprise" to a foreign enterprise investor,
unless any such foreign investor's jurisdiction of incorporation
has a tax treaty with China that provides for preferential tax
treatment. Pursuant to the
Arrangement between the Mainland China and the
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double
Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income
, or the Double Tax
Avoidance Arrangement, such withholding tax rate may be lowered to
5% if a Hong Kong resident enterprise owns at least 25% of a PRC
enterprise. Pursuant to the
Notice
of the State Administration of Taxation on the Issues concerning
the Application of the Dividend Clauses of Tax Agreements
,
or Circular 81, the 5% withholding tax rate does not automatically
apply and certain requirements must be satisfied, including without
limitation that (a) the Hong Kong enterprise must be the beneficial
owner of the relevant dividends; and (b) the Hong Kong enterprise
must directly hold at least 25% share ownership in the PRC
enterprise during the 12 consecutive months preceding its receipt
of the dividends. However, a transaction or arrangement entered
into for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment
should not be a reason for the application of the favorable tax
treatment under the Double Tax Avoidance Arrangement. If a taxpayer
inappropriately is entitled to such favorable tax treatment, the
competent tax authority has the power to make appropriate
adjustments.
In
August 2015, the State Administration of Taxation promulgated the
Administrative Measures for
Non-Resident Taxpayers to Enjoy Treatments under Tax
Treaties
, or Circular 60, which became effective on November
1, 2015. Circular 60 provides that non-resident enterprises are not
required to obtain pre-approval from the relevant tax authority in
order to enjoy the reduced withholding tax rate. Instead,
non-resident enterprises and their withholding agents may, by
self-assessment and on confirmation that the prescribed criteria to
enjoy the tax treaty benefits are met, directly apply the reduced
withholding tax rate, and file necessary forms and supporting
documents when performing tax filings, which will be subject to
post-tax filing examinations by the relevant tax authorities.
However, if a competent tax authority finds out that it is
necessary to apply the general anti-tax avoidance rules, it may
start general investigation procedures for anti-tax avoidance and
adopt corresponding measures for subsequent administration.
Accordingly, our Hong Kong subsidiaries may be able to enjoy the 5%
withholding tax rate for the dividends they receive from our PRC
subsidiaries if they satisfy the conditions prescribed under
Circular 81 and other relevant tax rules and regulations. However,
according to Circular 81 and Circular 60, if the relevant tax
authorities consider the transactions or arrangements we have are
for the primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, the
relevant tax authorities may adjust the favorable withholding tax
in the future. See "Regulation—Regulations Relating to
Tax—Regulations on Withholding Tax for Dividend
Distribution."
We face uncertainty with respect to indirect transfers of equity
interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding
companies.
According
to the Announcement of the SAT on Several Issues Concerning the
Enterprise Income Tax on Indirect Property Transfer by Non-Resident
Enterprises, or Circular 7, promulgated by the SAT in February
2015, if a non-resident enterprise transfers the equity interests
of a PRC resident enterprise indirectly by transfer of the equity
interests of an offshore holding company (other than a purchase and
sale of shares issued by a PRC resident enterprise in public
securities market) without a reasonable commercial purpose, the PRC
tax authorities have the power to reassess the nature of the
transaction and the indirect equity transfer will be treated as a
direct transfer. As a result, the gain derived from such transfer,
which means the equity transfer price minus the cost of equity,
will be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10%.
Under the terms of Circular 7, a transfer meeting all of the
following circumstances shall be directly deemed as having no
reasonable commercial purposes: (i) over 75% of the value of the
equity interests of the offshore holding company are directly or
indirectly derived from PRC taxable properties; (ii) at any time
during the year before the indirect transfer, over 90% of the total
properties of the offshore holding company are investments within
PRC territory, or in the year before the indirect transfer, over
90% of the offshore holding company's revenue is directly or
indirectly derived from PRC territory; (iii) the function performed
and risks assumed by the offshore holding company are insufficient
to substantiate its corporate existence; or (iv) the foreign income
tax imposed on the indirect transfer is lower than the PRC tax
imposed on the direct transfer of the PRC taxable properties. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to Tax—Regulations on
Withholding Tax for Indirect Share Transfer."
We face
uncertainties as to the reporting and other implications of certain
past and future transactions where PRC taxable assets are involved,
such as offshore restructuring, sale of the shares in our offshore
subsidiaries or investments. Our company and our non-PRC resident
investors may be subject to filing obligations or taxed or subject
to withholding obligations in such transactions, under Circular 7.
See "Taxation—People's Republic of China Taxation." For
transfer of shares in our company by investors that are non-PRC
resident enterprises, our PRC subsidiaries may be requested to
assist in the filing under Circular 7. As a result, we may be
required to expend valuable resources to comply with Circular 7 or
to request the relevant transferors from whom we purchase taxable
assets to comply with these circulars, or to establish that our
company should not be taxed under these circulars, which may have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
PRC regulations relating to offshore investment activities by PRC
residents may limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to increase
their registered capital or distribute profits to us or otherwise
expose us or our PRC resident beneficial owners to liability and
penalties under PRC law.
SAFE
promulgated the
Circular on
Relevant Issues Relating to Domestic Resident's Investment and
Financing and Roundtrip Investment through Special Purpose
Vehicles
, or SAFE Circular 37, in July 2014 that requires
PRC residents or entities to register with SAFE or its local branch
in connection with their establishment or control of an offshore
entity established for the purpose of overseas investment or
financing. In addition, such PRC residents or entities must update
their SAFE registrations when the offshore special purpose vehicle
undergoes material events relating to any change of basic
information (including change of such PRC citizens or residents,
name and operation term), increases or decreases in investment
amount, transfers or exchanges of shares, or mergers or divisions.
SAFE Circular 37 is issued to replace the
Notice on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign
Exchange Administration for PRC Residents Engaging in Financing and
Roundtrip Investments via Overseas Special Purpose Vehicles
,
or SAFE Circular 75. SAFE promulgated the
Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving
the Administration of the Foreign Exchange Concerning Direct
Investment
in February 2015, which took effect on June 1,
2015. This notice has amended SAFE Circular 37 requiring PRC
residents or entities to register with qualified banks rather than
SAFE or its local branch in connection with their establishment or
control of an offshore entity established for the purpose of
overseas investment or financing.
If our
shareholders who are PRC residents or entities do not complete
their registration as required, our PRC subsidiaries may be
prohibited from distributing their profits and proceeds from any
reduction in capital, share transfer or liquidation to us, and we
may be restricted in our ability to contribute additional capital
to our PRC subsidiaries. Moreover, failure to comply with the SAFE
registration described above could result in liability under PRC
laws for evasion of applicable foreign exchange
restrictions.
To
our knowledge,
none of our shareholders
who directly or indirectly hold shares in our Cayman Islands
holding company
are deemed to
be
PRC residents defined
under SAFE Circular
37.
However,
we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents
or entities holding direct or indirect interest in our company, nor
can we compel our beneficial owners to comply with SAFE
registration requirements. As a result, we cannot assure you that
all of our shareholders or beneficial owners who are PRC residents
or entities have complied with, and will in the future make or
obtain any applicable registrations or approvals required by, SAFE
regulations. Failure by such shareholders or beneficial owners to
comply with SAFE regulations, or failure by us to amend the foreign
exchange registrations of our PRC subsidiaries, could subject us to
fines or legal sanctions, restrict our overseas or cross-border
investment activities, limit our PRC subsidiaries' ability to make
distributions or pay dividends to us or affect our ownership
structure, which could adversely affect our business and prospects.
See "Regulation—Regulations Relating to Foreign Exchange
Controls—Regulations on Foreign Exchange
Outbound."
Certain PRC rules and regulations establish complex procedures for
some acquisitions of Chinese companies by foreign investors, which
could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through
acquisitions in China.
The
Regulations on Mergers and
Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors
, or
the M&A Rules, adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in August
2006 and amended in 2009, and some other regulations and rules
concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional
procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition
activities by foreign investors more time consuming and complex,
including requirements in some instances that the MOFCOM be
notified in advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a
foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise.
Moreover, the
Anti-Monopoly
Law
requires that the MOFCOM shall be notified in advance of
any concentration of undertaking if certain thresholds are
triggered. In addition, the security review rules issued by the
MOFCOM that became effective in September 2011 specify that mergers
and acquisitions by foreign investors that raise "national defense
and security" concerns and mergers and acquisitions through which
foreign investors may acquire de facto control over domestic
enterprises that raise "national security" concerns are subject to
strict review by the MOFCOM, and the rules prohibit any activities
attempting to bypass a security review, including by structuring
the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement.
In the future, we may grow our business by acquiring complementary
businesses. Complying with the requirements of the above-mentioned
regulations and other relevant rules to complete such transactions
could be time consuming, and any required approval processes,
including obtaining approval from the MOFCOM or its local
counterparts, may delay or inhibit our ability to complete such
transactions, which could affect our ability to expand our business
or maintain our market share. See "Regulation—Regulations
Relating to Foreign Investment—Regulations on M&A by
Foreign Investors."
Any failure to comply with PRC regulations regarding the
registration requirements for employee stock incentive plans may
subject the PRC plan participants or us to fines and other legal or
administrative sanctions.
In
February 2012, SAFE promulgated the
Notices on Issues Concerning the Foreign
Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in
Stock Incentive Plan of Overseas Publicly-Listed Company
,
replacing earlier rules promulgated in March 2007. Pursuant to
these rules, PRC citizens and non-PRC citizens who reside in China
for a continuous period of not less than one year who participate
in any stock incentive plan of an overseas publicly listed company,
subject to a few exceptions, are required to register with SAFE
through a domestic qualified agent, which could be the PRC
subsidiary of such overseas listed company, and complete certain
other procedures. In addition, an overseas entrusted institution
must be retained to handle matters in connection with the exercise
or sale of stock options and the purchase or sale of shares and
interests. We and our executive officers and other employees who
are PRC citizens or who have resided in the PRC for a continuous
period of not less than one year and who have been granted options
or other awards will be subject to these regulations. Failure to
complete the SAFE registrations may subject them to fines and legal
sanctions and may also limit our ability to contribute additional
capital into our PRC subsidiaries and limit our PRC subsidiaries'
ability to distribute dividends to us. We also face regulatory
uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional
incentive plans for our directors, executive officers and employees
under PRC law. See "Regulation—Regulations Relating to
Employment—Regulations on Stock Incentive
Plans."
Increases in labor costs in the PRC may adversely affect our
profitability.
The
economy in China has experienced increases in inflation and labor
costs in recent years. As a result, average wages in the PRC are
expected to continue to increase. In addition, we are required by
PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee
benefits, including pension, housing fund, medical insurance,
work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity
insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our
employees. The relevant government agencies may examine whether an
employer has made adequate payments to the statutory employee
benefits and those employers who fail to make adequate payments may
be subject to late payment fees, fines and/or other penalties. We
expect that our labor costs, including wages and employee benefits,
will continue to increase. Unless we are able to control our labor
costs or pass on these increased labor costs to our users by
increasing the fees of our services, our financial condition and
results of operations may be adversely affected.
Failure to make adequate contributions to various employee benefit
plans as required by PRC regulations may subject us to
penalties.
We are
required under PRC laws and regulations to participate in various
government sponsored employee benefit plans, including certain
social insurance, housing funds and other welfare-oriented payment
obligations, and contribute to the plans in amounts equal to
certain percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances,
of our employees up to a maximum amount specified by the local
government from time to time at locations where we operate our
businesses. The requirement of employee benefit plans has not been
implemented consistently by the local governments in China given
the different levels of economic development in different
locations. We have not made adequate employee benefit payments in
the past and we may be required to make up the contributions for
these plans as well as to pay late fees and fines. If we are
subject to late fees or fines in relation to the underpaid employee
benefits, our profitability could be adversely affected. See
"Regulation—Regulations Relating to
Employment—Regulations on Employee Benefit
Plans."
RISKS RELATED TO OUR ORDINARY SHARES
Because we may not pay regular dividends on our ordinary shares,
shareholders will generally benefit from an investment in our
ordinary shares only if the shares appreciate in
value.
We
declared and paid special cash dividends in the amount of $0.25 and
$2.00 per ordinary share in February 2012 and June 2017,
respectively, to our shareholders. We have not declared any cash
dividends since June 2017 and may not declare or pay any regular
cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the future. We currently
intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in the operations
and expansion of the business. As a result, we do not anticipate
paying regular cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future
determination as to the declaration and payment of cash dividends
will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend
on factors that the Board of Directors deems relevant, including
among others, the results of operations, financial condition and
cash requirements, business prospects, and the terms of our credit
facilities and other financing arrangements. If no dividends are
paid, realization of a gain on a shareholder's investments will
depend solely on the appreciation of the price of our ordinary
shares. There is no guarantee that our ordinary shares will
appreciate in value.
Our ordinary shares are quoted on the over the counter market,
which may limit the liquidity and price of our ordinary shares more
than if the ordinary shares were quoted or listed on a National
Securities Exchange.
Our
ordinary shares are currently quoted on the over the counter
market, as opposed to being listed on a national securities
exchange such as the Nasdaq Stock Market or the New York Stock
Exchange. Quotation of our ordinary shares on the over the counter
market limits the liquidity and price of our ordinary shares more
than if the ordinary shares were quoted or listed on a national
securities exchange. In addition, certain institutional investors
may be prohibited from purchasing our ordinary shares because the
ordinary shares are not listed on a national securities
exchange.
The trading price of our ordinary shares may be volatile, which
could result in substantial losses to investors.
The
trading price of our ordinary shares may be volatile and could
fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen
because of broad market and industry factors, like the performance
and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with
business operations located mainly in China that have listed their
securities in the United States. A number of Chinese companies have
listed or are in the process of listing their securities on U.S.
stock markets. The securities of some of these companies have
experienced significant volatility. The trading performances of
these Chinese companies' securities may affect the attitudes of
investors toward Chinese companies listed in the United States in
general and consequently may impact the trading performance of our
ordinary shares, regardless of our actual operating
performance.
In
addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading
volume for our ordinary shares may be highly volatile for factors
specific to our own operations, including the
following:
(i)
variations in our
revenues, earnings, cash flow and data related to our user base or
user engagement;
(ii)
announcements of
new investments, acquisitions, strategic partnerships or joint
ventures by us or our competitors;
(iii)
announcements of
new products, services and expansions by us or our
competitors;
(iv)
changes in
financial estimates by securities analysts;
(v)
detrimental adverse
publicity about us, our services or our industry;
(vi)
additions or
departures of key personnel;
(vii)
release of lock-up
or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding equity securities
or sales of additional equity securities; and
(viii)
potential
litigation or regulatory investigations.
Any of
these factors may result in material and sudden changes in the
volume and price at which our ordinary shares will
trade.
In the
past, shareholders of public companies have often brought
securities class action suits against those companies following
periods of instability in the market price of their securities. If
we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a
significant amount of our management's attention and other
resources from our business and operations and require us to incur
significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our
results of operations. Any such class action suit, whether or not
successful, could harm our reputation and restrict our ability to
raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is
successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant
damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and results of operations.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or
reports about our business, or if they adversely change their
recommendations regarding our ordinary shares, the market price for
our ordinary shares and trading volume could decline.
The
trading market for our ordinary shares will be influenced by
research or reports that industry or securities analysts publish
about our business. If one or more analysts who cover us downgrade
our stock, the market price for our ordinary shares would likely
decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail
to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the
financial markets, which in turn could cause the market price or
trading volume for our ordinary shares to decline.
We may qualify as a passive foreign investment company, or
“PFIC,” which could result in adverse U.S. federal
income tax consequences to U.S. investors.
In
general, we will be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which
either (1) at least 75% of our gross income (looking through
certain 25% or more-owned corporate subsidiaries) is passive income
or (2) at least 50% of the average value of our assets (looking
through certain 25% or more-owned corporate subsidiaries) is
attributable to assets that produce, or are held for the production
of, passive income. Passive income generally includes, without
limitation, dividends, interest, rents, royalties, and gains from
the disposition of passive assets. If we are determined to be a
PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in
the holding period of a U.S. Holder (as defined in the section of
this Annual Report on Form 20-F captioned
“Taxation—United States Federal Income
Taxation—General”) of our ordinary shares, the U.S.
Holder may be subject to increased U.S. federal income tax
liability and may be subject to additional reporting requirements.
Based on the composition (and estimated values) of the assets and
the nature of the income of us and our subsidiaries for our 2017
taxable year, we do not believe that we would be a PFIC for the
taxable year ended December 31, 2017 and do not anticipate becoming
a PFIC in the foreseeable future. However, since we have not
performed a definitive analysis with respect to our PFIC status for
our 2017 taxable year, there can be no assurance with respect to
our status as a PFIC for such taxable year. There also can be no
assurance with respect to our PFIC status for any future taxable
year. We urge U.S. Holders to consult their own tax advisors
regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules. For a more
detailed explanation of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of
PFIC classification to U.S. Holders, see the section of this Annual
Report on Form 20-F captioned “Taxation—United States
Federal Income Taxation—Tax Consequences to U.S.
Holders—Passive Foreign Investment Company
Rules.”
Changes to U.S. tax law could materially impact us or our
shareholders.
U.S.
federal income tax laws and the administrative interpretations of
those laws may be amended at any time, potentially with retroactive
effect. For example, the recently enacted tax reform bill in the
U.S., informally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, made
significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws applicable
to individuals and corporations. Technical corrections or other
amendments to the TCJA or administrative guidance interpreting the
TCJA may be forthcoming at any time. We cannot predict the
long-term effect of the TCJA or any future changes on us or our
shareholders. Current and prospective shareholders are urged to
consult with their tax advisors with respect to the TCJA and any
other regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and
their potential effect on an investment in our securities. In
addition, future U.S. tax legislation, regulations, administrative
interpretations or court decisions cannot be predicted by us and
could adversely affect us or our shareholders.
Mr. Yong Hui Li, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is the
beneficial owner of a substantial amount of our ordinary shares and
Mr. Li may take actions with respect to such shares which are not
consistent with the interests of the other
shareholders.
Mr.
Yong Hui Li, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially
owns approximately 81.4% of the outstanding ordinary shares of us
as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, assuming that
there are no other changes to the number of ordinary shares
outstanding,. Mr. Li may take actions with respect to such shares
without the approval of other shareholders and which are not
consistent with the interests of the other shareholders, including
the election of the directors and other corporate actions such
as:
●
merger with or into
another company;
●
a sale of
substantially all of our assets; and
●
amendments to our
memorandum and articles of incorporation.
Certain judgments obtained against us by our shareholders may not
be enforceable.
We are
an exempted company limited by shares incorporated under the laws
of the Cayman Islands. We conduct substantially all of our
operations in China and substantially all of our assets are located
in China. In addition, a majority of our directors and executive
officers reside within China, and most of the assets of these
persons are located within China. We have appointed CT Corporation
System located at 111 Eighth Avenue, 13/F, New York, New York 10011
as our agent to receive service of process with respect to any
action brought against us in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York under the federal securities laws
of the United States or of any state in the United States or any
action brought against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New
York in the County of New York under the securities laws of the
State of New York, and intend to abide by judgments entered by such
courts in such actions.
However,
there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of
judgments obtained in the federal or state courts of the United
States (and the Cayman Islands are not a party to any treaties for
the reciprocal enforcement or recognition of such judgments). A
judgment obtained in such jurisdiction will be recognized and
enforced in the courts of the Cayman Islands at common law, without
any re-examination of the merits of the underlying dispute, by an
action commenced on the foreign judgment debt in the Grand Court of
the Cayman Islands, provided such judgment (a) is given by a
foreign court of competent jurisdiction, (b) imposes on the
judgment debtor a liability to pay a liquidated sum for which the
judgment has been given, (c) is final, (d) is not in respect of
taxes, a fine or a penalty, and (e) was not obtained in a manner
and is not of a kind the enforcement of which is contrary to
natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands.
However, the Cayman Islands courts are unlikely to enforce a
judgment obtained from the U.S. courts under civil liability
provisions of the U.S. federal securities law if such judgment is
determined by the courts of the Cayman Islands to give rise to
obligations to make payments that are penal or punitive in nature.
Because such a determination has not yet been made by a court of
the Cayman Islands, it is uncertain whether such civil liability
judgments from U.S. courts would be enforceable in the Cayman
Islands.
Furthermore,
the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are provided
for under the PRC Civil Procedures Law. PRC courts may recognize
and enforce foreign judgments in accordance with the requirements
of the PRC Civil Procedures Law based either on treaties between
China and the country where the judgment is made or on principles
of reciprocity between jurisdictions. China does not have any
treaties or other forms of reciprocity with the United States that
provide for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign
judgments. In addition, according to the PRC Civil Procedures Law,
the PRC courts will not enforce a foreign judgment against us or
our director and officers if they decide that the judgment violates
the basic principles of PRC laws or national sovereignty, security
or public interest. As a result, it is uncertain whether and on
what basis a PRC court would enforce a judgment rendered by a court
in the United States.
You may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your
ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited,
because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law.
We are
an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman
Islands with limited liability. Our corporate affairs are governed
by our memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Law
(2016 Revision) of the Cayman Islands and the common law of the
Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against
the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary
duties of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a
large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The
common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from
comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as
well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose
courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court
in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the
fiduciary duties of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not
as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial
precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In
particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of
securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as
Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted
bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition,
Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a
shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United
States.
Shareholders
of Cayman Islands exempted companies like us have no general rights
under Cayman Islands law to inspect corporate records or to obtain
copies of register of members of these companies. Our directors
have discretion under our articles of association to determine
whether or not, and under what conditions, our corporate records
may be inspected by our shareholders, but are not obliged to make
them available to our shareholders. This may make it more difficult
for you to obtain the information needed to establish any facts
necessary for a shareholder motion or to solicit proxies from other
shareholders in connection with a proxy contest.
Certain
corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our
home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies
incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the U.S. Currently, we
do not plan to rely on home country practice with respect to any
corporate governance matter. However, if we choose to follow home
country practice in the future, our shareholders may be afforded
less protection than they otherwise would under rules and
regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.
As a
result of all of the above, public shareholders may have more
difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions
taken by our management, members of the board of directors or
controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of
a company incorporated in the United States.
We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules
under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain
provisions applicable to United States domestic public
companies.
Because
we are a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are
exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and
regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S.
domestic issuers, including:
(i)
the rules under the
Exchange Act requiring the filing of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
or current reports on Form 8-K with the SEC;
(ii)
certain sections of
the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents,
or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the
Exchange Act;
(iii)
the sections of the
Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their
stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders
who profit from trades made in a short period of time;
and
(iv)
the selective
disclosure rules by issuers of material non-public information
under Regulation FD.
We will
be required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four
months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to
publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases,
distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the OTCQB.
Press releases relating to financial results and material events
will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the
information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will
be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be
filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may
not be afforded the same protections or information, which would be
made available to you if you were you investing in a U.S. domestic
issuer.
We may be subject to changes in laws, regulations, and standards
relating to corporate governance and public disclosure that could
cause us to incur significantly increased costs and divert
substantial additional attention of management to such matters and
away from revenue-generating activities.
Changing
laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance
and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public
companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and
making some activities more time-consuming. These laws, regulations
and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases
due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their
application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is
provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in
continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher
costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and
governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with
evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may
result in increased general and administrative expenses and a
diversion of management's time and attention from
revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our
efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ
from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due
to ambiguities related to their application and practice,
regulatory authorities may also initiate legal proceedings against
us and our business may be adversely affected.
We have granted, and may continue to grant, share incentive awards,
which may result in increased share-based compensation
expenses.
We
first adopted our stock option plan, or the 2009 Equity Incentive
Plan, in 2009 for purposes of granting share-based compensation
awards to employees, directors and consultants to incentivize their
performance and align their interests with ours. The 2009 Equity
Incentive Plan was later superseded by the 2015 Omnibus Equity
Incentive Plan, which took effect on September 24, 2015 and was
approved by shareholders at the Company’s annual meeting of
shareholders held on July 12, 2016. We account for compensation
costs for all share options using a fair-value based method and
recognize expenses in our consolidated statements of operations in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. Under the terms of the 2015 incentive
plan, 5,200,000 ordinary shares are reserved for issuance in
accordance with its terms (provided, however, that dividend
equivalent rights are payable solely in cash and therefore do not
reduce the number of shares that may be granted under the incentive
plan and that stock appreciation rights only reduce the number of
shares available for grant under the incentive plan by the number
of shares actually received by the grantee in connection with the
stock appreciation right, if any). All awards under the incentive
plan are made by our Board of Directors or its Compensation
Committee.
As of
December 31, 2017, 664,871 of these stock options had been
exercised, and we had recorded aggregate compensation expense of
RMB139.2 million based on the estimated fair value of the stock
options on their dates of grant. All of the exercised stock options
utilized a net exercise method, and therefore, the Company did not
receive any cash proceeds from their exercise. We believe the
granting of share incentive awards is of significant importance to
our ability to attract and retain employees, and we will continue
to grant share incentive awards to employees in the future. As a
result, our expenses associated with share-based compensation may
increase, which may have an adverse effect on our results of
operations.
ITEM
4.
INFORMATION
ON OUR COMPANY
A.
History and Development
of the Company
We were
incorporated in the Cayman Islands on October 16, 2007 under the
name “Spring Creek Acquisition Corp.” as a blank check
company formed for the purpose of acquiring an operating business
that had its principal operations in China.
On
April 9, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding securities of
AutoChina Group, Inc. ("ACG"), an exempt company incorporated in
the Cayman Islands, from Honest Best Int’l Ltd ("Honest
Best"). At the time of our acquisition of ACG, Honest Best was
wholly owned by Ms. Yan Wang, Mr. Li's wife. Prior to our
acquisition of ACG, we had no operating business. Promptly after
our acquisition of ACG, we changed our name to “AutoChina
International Limited.”
On
August 30, 2012, the Company’s independent directors
approved, and the Company entered into, an equity transfer
agreement through its wholly owned subsidiary, ACG, to purchase
100% of the equity of Heat Planet Holdings Limited (“Heat
Planet”) and its subsidiaries, whose primary asset consists
of 23 floors, or over 60,000 square meters, of newly constructed
office space in the Kaiyuan Financial Center building (the
“Kaiyuan Finance Center”). Heat Planet was controlled
by Mr. Li. The total transaction value of approximately RMB 1
billion ($159.3 million) was negotiated and approved by the
Company’s Audit Committee and equals the appraisal value that
was determined by a third party appraisal of the Kaiyuan Finance
Center. Located at 5 East Main Street in Shijiazhuang the 245-meter
tall Kaiyuan Finance Center is the tallest building in Shijiazhuang
and Hebei Province. The Company's headquarters are located in the
Kaiyuan Finance Center, which serves as the control center for the
Company’s operations throughout China. The Company does not
occupy the entire office space purchased, and has been leasing out
the unoccupied space, the proceeds from which are reported as
rental income. Additionally, the Kaiyuan Finance Center also
contains a Hilton Worldwide-operated hotel.
Heat
Planet’s equity was purchased for approximately $56.4
million. In connection with the acquisition, the Company assumed
approximately $102.9 million in debt, resulting in a total
transaction value of approximately $159.3 million.
In
November 2014, the Company launched its CeraPay product, also known
as Dianfubao in Chinese, which is a proprietary transaction
platform for participants in the transportation industry that
allows its users to make purchases at participating merchants on
credit. CeraPay has features similar to traditional credit cards,
such as no fees for users if the outstanding monthly balance is
paid on time. The Company charges transaction fees to merchants at
a fixed rate who accept CeraPay as a form of payment.
In
November 2014, the Company also launched its CeraVest product also
known as Qingyidai in Chinese, which is an online lending platform
that acts as an intermediary to provide short-term financing
primarily to small and medium sized business in the transportation
industry by connecting loan requests with investors seeking to
purchase loans for a fixed return. The Company earns transaction
fees for loans facilitated through CeraVest.
In June
2015 the Company changed its name from AutoChina International Ltd.
to Fincera Inc. to better suit its new internet-based
businesses.
In
October 2015 the Company launched TruShip, also known as Yihaoche
in Chinese, its first e-commerce platform, which allows trucking
industry merchants, such as dealerships and leasing companies, to
establish online store-fronts and conveniently conduct sales
transactions through CeraPay.
In
March 2016, the Company launched AutoChekk, also known as
Chekuaikuai in Chinese, its first e-commerce platform for the
passenger vehicle industry. AutoChekk provides consumers in China
with online tools and information designed to make researching and
purchasing passenger cars or maintenance services more convenient
and affordable.
In July
2016, the Company launched PingPing, an e-commerce platform that
allows small businesses to establish an online presence while
providing an online shopping portal for their
customers.
On
October 19, 2016, the Company closed its purchase of 100% of the
equity interest of Eastern Eagle and its subsidiaries, whose
primary asset consists of the remaining portions of the Kaiyuan
Finance Center that the company did not already own, namely 31
floors and an underground parking garage, together totaling over
119,000 square meters, which house the Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel.
Eastern Eagle was controlled by Mr. Li. The total transaction
value, as adjusted to account for changes in the net asset carrying
value determined for Eastern Eagle, was $409.3 million, consisting
of cash of $111.5 million and assumed liabilities of $297.8
million.
In May
2017, the Company launched Qingyifenqi, a consumer lending product
that provides zero-interest payment by installment financing for
purchases of consumer goods such as mobiles phones, large
appliances, furniture, home decoration materials, passenger
vehicles, etc.
In July
2017, the Company completed a special cash dividend of $2.00 per
share to all shareholders of record as of the close of business on
June 23, 2017.
In
September 2017, the Company changed its trading symbol from AUTCF
to YUANF. The new ticker YUANF pays homage to the Company's Chinese
name-Kaiyuan-which we believe has a degree of recognition in the
Chinese trucking industry.
In
November 2017, the Company conducted a two-for-one stock split of
the Company's outstanding shares of common stock in the form of a
100% stock dividend paid to shareholders of record on November 1,
2017.
The
following chart illustrates our corporate structure as of March 23,
2018:
(1)
The public company,
quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol
“YUANF”
(2)
Eastern Eagle
International and its subsidiaries were acquired in October 2016.
Eastern Eagle holds the ownership of the hotel segment of the
Kaiyuan Finance Center building.
(3)
On August 30, 2012,
the Company’s independent directors approved, and the Company
entered into, an equity transfer agreement through its wholly owned
subsidiary, ACG, to purchase 100% of the equity of Heat Planet and
its subsidiaries, whose primary asset consists of 23 floors, or
over 60,000 square meters, of newly constructed office space in the
Kaiyuan Finance Center. Heat Planet is currently in the process of
being wound up and its holdings were transferred to Hebei
Remittance Guarantee in November 2016.
(4)
Ganglian Finance
Leasing was formed in September 2010 for the purpose of conducting
our leasing business. It commenced the leasing business in the
fourth quarter of 2010.
(5)
Hebei Ruiliang
Trading holds the ownership of the office segment of Kaiyuan
Finance Center building.
(6)
Hebei Ruiliang
Property Services was formed in June 2013. It engages in property
management of the Kaiyuan Finance Center.
(7)
Shijiazhuang
Chuanglang Trade was formed in June 2017 to facilitate debt
collection activities of the new internet-based
businesses.
(8)
Hebei Remittance
Guarantee was formed in October 2014 to facilitate the CeraVest
business.
(9)
Chuangjin World
Investment was formed in September 2014 to facilitate the CeraVest
business.
(10)
Hebei Shengrong
Investment is an entity 100% indirectly controlled by Mr. Yong Hui
Li, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. (“Mr.
Li”)
(11)
In December 2016
Hebei Yarui Trading replaced Kai Yuan Real Estate in the corporate
structure.
(12)
Hebei Xuhua Trading
is the entity that Fincera indirectly acquired control of through
contractual arrangements and which held the cash consideration paid
to Fincera in connection with its sale of its automobile dealership
business in December 2009. Currently, its main purpose is to act as
an intermediary in the facilitation process for certain CeraVest
Loans.
(13)
Kaiyuan Auto Trade
Group was established in January 2008. Currently, its main purpose
is to act as an intermediary in the facilitation process for
certain CeraVest Loans.
(14)
Shenzhen Shijie
Kaiyuan Financial Services was formed in April 2015 to facilitate
the new internet-based businesses.
(15)
Shenzhen Kaiyuan
Inclusive Financial Services was formed in April 2015 to facilitate
the new internet-based businesses.
(16)
Qingyi Technology
was formed in September 2014 and operates the CeraVest
platform.
(17)
Dianfubao
Investment was formed in August 2014 to facilitate the CeraVest and
CeraPay businesses.
(18)
Beijing Yihaoche
Technology was originally formed in February 2012 as Kaiyuan
Information Processing. It engages in developing and management of
the Companies internet-based businesses.
(19)
Dianfubao
Information Technology was formed in February 2018 to facilitate
the CeraVest and CeraPay businesses.
Fincera’s
principal executive office is located at 27/F, Kaiyuan Finance
Center, No. 5, East Main Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei,
People’s Republic of China. Our telephone number is +86 311
8382 7688. Our principal website is located at
http://www.fincera.net. The information on our website is not part
of this Annual Report.
B.
Business
Overview
Fincera
focuses on providing innovative online lending and e-commerce
services for small and medium-sized businesses (“SMBs”)
and individuals in China. Our mission is to promote the success of
SMBs by giving them the tools to grow their business online while
providing them access to affordable credit. Through our product
offerings, we aim to enable a new era of inclusive finance and
Offline to Online shopping experiences in China.
Leveraging
deep knowledge of the transportation industry gained from our
extensive history as a commercial vehicle sales, leasing and
support business, our product platforms include complementary tools
that, beyond giving access to a source of capital, allow SMBs in
the transportation and other industries to streamline their
business processes and increase their sales. We encourage SMBs and
their customers to use our platforms to conduct transactions or
browse inventory by offering cross-platform incentives and
integration capabilities. Merchants who receive financing through
our CeraVest product are incentivized to conduct transactions with
their customers via CeraPay, our revolving credit product, on one
of our e-commerce platforms, such as TruShip. For the end
consumers, we can offer financing options for the purchases they
make from merchants using our e-commerce platforms. By providing
financial solutions to both sides of a transaction and providing a
convenient tool to facilitate the transaction, we can convert an
offline business scenario to an online revenue-generating
opportunity for our products.
We
currently operate in two distinct businesses segments: 1)
internet-based financial and e-commerce services and 2) property
lease and management. Our internet-based services are a single
reportable segment. Together, our online lending and e-commerce
services have contributed immensely to our transition and growth
from our discontinued leasing business. Our revenue increased by
93% from RMB452.98 million in the fiscal year ended December 31,
2015 to RMB875.93 million in the fiscal year ended December 31,
2016, and by 17% from RMB875.93 million in the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 to RMB1,023.85 million in the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017. Our property lease and management business has
two additional reportable segments: hotel and office leasing. We
are in the process of winding down our commercial vehicle sales,
leasing and support business and insurance agency business, which
are all classified as discontinued operations.
Internet-Based Services: Financial Services
Our
financial services platforms are CeraVest and CeraPay. CeraVest,
known as Qingyidai in China and launched at the end of 2014, is our
proprietary peer-to-peer lending platform, through which we offer
SMBs short-term financing at competitive interest rates. CeraPay,
known as Dianfubao in China and also launched at the end of 2014,
is our proprietary revolving credit product that also processes and
settles transactions between our borrowers and
merchants.
We
strive to offer competitive rates and fees on our online lending
platform for borrowers and attractive investment returns for loan
investors. We offer interest-free and fee-free credit-lines to
borrowers that are reusable within the customer’s credit
limit provided that the customer pays off the credit account in
full each month. For our fixed-term loans, our effective annual
percentage rate (EAPR) charged to borrowers, inclusive of fees and
security deposits, falls between 14.1 to 20.8%. Investors that
purchase loans on our online marketplace may receive annualized
returns from 7.3% to upwards of approximately 14% if the loans are
purchased on the secondary market.
The
total amount of loans facilitated and originated through our
lending platforms increased by 100.57% from the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015, to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and
by 9.48% from the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, to the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Cumulatively since the launch
of our online lending platforms, we have facilitated approximately
RMB 26.76 billion in total loans as of December 31,
2017.
CeraPay
CeraPay,
launched at the end of 2014, is our proprietary revolving credit
product that also processes and settles transactions between our
borrowers and merchants. CeraPay users are provided with a credit
line that can be utilized at participating CeraPay merchants or be
used to pay other CeraPay users. Having features similar to a
credit card, there are no fees (other than late fees and penalties
for CeraPay users who become delinquent on amounts borrowed) for
using the CeraPay payments service as long as any outstanding
balances are paid in full each month. We generated revenue from
CeraPay primarily by charging transaction fees, which were
approximately 2.4%, to merchants participating in the network.
Merchants may use CeraPay funds to make payments to other CeraPay
users or merchants or cash out the funds via transfer to a bank
account. CeraPay users are subject to an application and credit
approval process and provide guarantees and collateral before they
are provided with a credit line.
Previously,
we offered 30-day credit lines and 12-month installment loans via
CeraPay and collected transaction service fees from merchants
receiving the payment. However, since July 2017, in order to comply
with financial regulation, we replaced these products with similar
offerings from CeraVest where these loans are instead facilitated
by our peer-to-peer lending platform. The transaction fees
collected in this new format are then allocated to the investor of
the loan as interest payments and to the Company as a facilitation
fee.
CeraVest
Through
CeraVest, we now offer three types of financing services with
different terms and payment schedules for borrowers and offer three
corresponding investment products for investors. Previously, we
have offered 180-day loans with a different transaction process as
CeraVest Fixed and also offered CeraVest Flex as a highly liquid
investment option to our customers. CeraVest Fixed and CeraVest
Flex were phased out and terminated by December 2017 and February
2018, respectively, and replaced with new products listed below to
comply with the relevant regulations.
Loan Types
We now
offer the following three loan types to our customers. 30-day lines
of credit and 180 day term loans were launched with the inception
of the CeraPay and CeraVest platforms, while installment loans were
launched at the end of 2016.
30-day Lines of Credit
We
issue interest-free revolving credit lines to SMBs to fund their
short-term working capital needs. The credit lines have a 30-day
billing cycle and outstanding balances after the bill due date are
considered delinquent and will be subject to certain penalties. We
typically reduce or waive all penalties if the borrower is
cooperative in communicating a payment plan with us or submits the
payment shortly after the due date.
Similar
to credit cards, our credit lines contain no fees for borrowers to
use this service as long as any outstanding balances are paid in
full each month. We generate revenue primarily by charging
transaction fees, which are currently approximately 2.4%. Merchants
may use funds received from transactions to make payments to other
users or merchants or cash out the funds via transfer to a bank
account. Credit line users are subject to an application and credit
approval process and are required to provide us with guarantees and
collateral. For certain payments such as driver salary payments, a
fee is charged instead to the borrower since the merchant in these
scenarios typically will not accept paying a fee for such a
transaction.
In
partnership with SINOIOV, in October 2017, we began offering
SINOIOV-Sinopec co-branded diesel fuel cards to our trucking
customers. Our borrowers can use our credit lines to purchase these
fuel cards, and the cards are valid for fuel purchases at all
Sinopec service stations. We earn revenue from these arrangements
by collecting rebates from the merchants.
As of
December 31, 2017, we have originated and facilitated an aggregate
of RMB46.3 billion in 30-day lines of credit transactions. We
believe that our 30-day revolving lines of credit product will
become our primary profit driver. We are catering to substantial
demand from the trucking industry for short-term, low-cost credit
to fund working capital needs. Not only are we able to generate
high returns from transaction fees, but our 30-day credit product
is also highly scalable since we can benefit from repeat
transaction volumes from a one-time customer acquisition
expense.
180-Day Term Loans
Currently,
our 180-day term loans accrue interest at 4.25% (or 8.62% on an
annualized basis). We charge a facilitation fee between 2-5%
depending on the type of the loan. The fee portion is collected by
the Company while the investor holding the loan at maturity
receives the interest payment. In addition, the borrower remits
5-8% of the loan to the Company as a security deposit that is
refunded to the borrower upon timely repayment. Payment of
principal and interest is due in a lump sum at the maturity date at
the end of the 180-days. Outstanding balances after the maturity
date are considered delinquent, and the Company will keep the
security deposit as a one-time penalty fee and may assess
additional penalties. We typically reduce or waive all penalties if
the borrower is cooperative with arranging a payment plan or
submits the payment shortly after the maturity date.
As of
December 31, 2017, we have originated and facilitated an aggregate
of RMB13.3 billion in 180-day term loans.
Installment Loans
We
began offering installment loans to fund purchases of trucks and
consumer discretionary goods and services in December 2016. The
loans require an order to be completed on one of our e-commerce
websites with the borrowed purchase funds being transferred
directly to the merchant via our payment network. Given the term of
the loan and the type of purchase, we charge a fee between 6.9
– 8.6% to the merchant on the transaction and require some
borrowers to provide us with collateral to partially secure their
obligations. Terms of these installment loans may vary between 3-24
months; however, the majority of the installment loans carry a term
of 12 months. As of December 31, 2017, we have originated and
facilitated an aggregate RMB4.03 billion in installment loans, with
64.18% of the volume from trucking related purchases.
Borrowers
We
generally source our borrowers from our nationwide physical sales
network of over 280 company-owned offices, located in 30 provinces
and covering 301 cities across China. Also, we have established a
broad system of “associate stores,” “franchise
stores,” and “individual agents” that work on a
commission basis to refer borrowers, investors, and merchants to
use our products. We believe that using these multiple borrower
sourcing channels will allow us to grow our online business
rapidly.
As of
December 31, 2017, our borrowers consisted of 26.8% companies and
73.2% individuals, 50.68% are operating a trucking-related business
and 69.1% also borrow for consumer purchases. We typically lend to
SMB owners who are married and possess real property. We strictly
prohibit providing services to people with criminal records or
those listed on the national list of delinquent
debtors.
As a
result of industry knowledge we acquired through our legacy
operations, we emphasize bringing SMBs in the trucking industry to
our online lending platforms. These businesses may be individual
truck owner and operators, truck leasing companies, truck
dealerships, or logistic companies. Our borrowers in the trucking
industry typically require financing for working capital needs or
business expansions, and our online lending platform provides them
with the flexibility to choose a financing option that best meets
their needs. These borrowers typically reside in rural areas or
lower tier cities.
We also
offer consumer loans for retail purchases and other discretionary
purchases such as home furnishing and decoration, albeit on a much
smaller scale. The emerging middle class in China is a driver of
growing consumption of discretionary products and
services.
Investment Products
Each of
the three types of our loan products are available to retail
investors as fixed income investments on our Qingyidai marketplace.
180-day loans are named “Qingying” and provide
annualized returns of 8.62% with principal and returned in lump-sum
at maturity. 30-day loans are named “Yueying” and
provide annualized returns of 8.1% with the principal and interest
returned at maturity. Installment loans are named
“Zhongying” and provide annualized returns of 9.02%
with principal and interest returned monthly.
Investors
are also able to exit any of the loan investments before full
maturity by selling the loans to other investors on a secondary
market provided by our platform. Secondary transactions are
conducted based on a fixed pricing method by the Company where
interest returns to the selling investor is discounted and the
discounted amount passed on to boost the expected return of the
purchasing investor. Investors selling 180-day loans before
maturity will receive an annualized yield of 7.3% while the
purchasing investor can earn an annualized return of 8.62 –
14.64% depending on the time to maturity. Investors selling 30-day
loans before maturity will receive an annualized yield of 7.6%
while the purchasing investor can earn an annualized return of
8.1-10.08% depending on the time to maturity. Investors selling
installment loans will only receive the principal amount not yet
returned and forfeit any interest accumulated during the current
period.
In 2015
we launched the CeraVest Flex product, which gives investors
flexibility concerning the term of their investment. As opposed to
the fixed 180-day or 3-day term of the regular CeraVest product,
CeraVest Flex allowed investors to add or withdraw funds as they
please. To be compliant with China’s online lending
regulations, we no longer offer the CeraVest Flex products to our
customers.
At
times the Company voluntarily purchases defaulted loans at maturity
so that investors can retain their principal and the expected
interest income. The Company also willingly purchases notes from
investors on the secondary market if no other investors can buy the
notes within a specified period; after which the Company
immediately relists these loans for sale to other investors on the
secondary market. All of the Company’s loan purchases are
intended to provide the desired level of liquidity to investors;
these actions are part of the Company’s commitment to
providing the best investment experience to our
customers.
We
serve all investors domiciled in China and offer them investment
opportunities in loans available on our marketplace. Currently, we
focus our efforts on attracting individual investors and SMBs with
idle cash on hand. We plan to expand and diversify our investor
base to include institutional investors, such as banks, trust
funds, and fixed income funds, as well as additional high-net-worth
individuals who may invest more substantial amounts of funds. Due
to our reliance on our offline sales network across China, we
attract mostly investors located in lower tier cities since our
offices operate in these regions, and there is less competition of
investors as opposed to the 1
st
tier
cities.
As of
December 31, 2017, our investors profile consisted of 56% male and
44% female. In terms of age distribution, 25.3% of our investors
were in their 20's, 37.9% in their 30's, 22.9% in their 40's, and
13.3% were in their 50's or older. The majority of our investors
are located in the Hebei region as shown on the map
below:
Sales & Marketing
We
primarily utilize a highly targeted, multi-tiered approach to
selling and marketing our products. We employ a direct sales force,
partner with SMBs, use commission-only sales agents and rely on
word of mouth advertising to market our products. For branding and
promotional purposes, we invest a small portion of our budget on
ads on various traditional and digital media sources such as news
outlets, social media, app stores, and other third-party web or
mobile app platforms. While we currently rely heavily on our sales
network for customer acquisition, we expect digital and multimedia
marketing to be our main channels going forward as we build
capabilities in this area. As of December 31, 2017, 90.1% of
borrowers were introduced to us by our franchise stores and
associate stores while 45% of investors were referred to our
peer-to-peer lending platform by our offline sales
network.
Our
sales network comprises a hierarchy of company-owned stores,
associate stores, franchise stores, and individual agents. While
historically our company-owned truck leasing sales centers have
been located in rural areas, our new company-owned stores are
located in 2
nd
–
4
th
tier
cities and their chief sales and marketing related function are to
acquire and manage associate stores and franchise stores. As of
December 31, 2017, we have 287 company-owned stores in
operation.
Associate
stores are small businesses that have an extensive network of
business and customer relationships within their region that have a
keen interest in promoting our products. To become an associate
store, the owner of the small business signs an employment
agreement with the Company while his or her firm remains
independent. By becoming an employee of the Company, the business
owner of the associate store has a more significant legal
responsibility to us, and we have more recourse options in cases of
dispute or fraud. Associate stores are mandated to leverage their
regional relationships to onboard more small businesses as our
franchise stores as well as acquire borrowers and investors for our
financial products in exchange for a commission on transaction
volume adjusted for any delinquencies. We typically allow small
businesses that have a long and successful working relationship
with the Company to become our associate stores. As of December 31,
2017, we have established 135 associate stores that are actively
operating.
Franchise
stores are small businesses that have borrowing needs and a
customer base that need our financial products. To become a
franchise store, the business owner or manager has to complete a
full credit assessment and execute a franchise agreement with the
Company. The comprehensive credit assessment is necessary because
the majority of our franchise stores are also our borrowers and
because they will refer and acquire individual borrowers for us
from their customer base. Thus we need to ensure that our franchise
stores are creditworthy and have sound management to prevent
unnecessary concentration of risk in these franchise stores. If
authorized by us to do so, franchise stores can refer borrowers to
us and collect application information from the borrowers on our
behalf for a commission based on loan transaction volume adjusted
for delinquencies. Not all franchise stores are authorized to refer
borrowers to us, but all franchise stores are permitted to refer
investors to our peer-to-peer lending platform in exchange for a
commission on the average monthly invested balance. As of December
31, 2017, we had 35,837 franchise stores that are actively
operating.
Individual
agent is a concept introduced in the fourth quarter of 2017, and we
are currently testing the method nationwide. Individual agents
could be referred to the Company by any of our employees, associate
stores, or franchise stores. To become an individual agent, the
individual must demonstrate the possession of a broad personal
network that he or she could leverage to promote our various
products. Individual agents can refer franchise stores, borrowers,
and investors to the Company in exchange for a commission based on
transaction volume or average monthly invested balance. As of
December 31, 2017, we had contracted 920 individual
agents.
In
conjunction with our sales and customer acquisition efforts, we
also offer ongoing promotions that provide cash incentives to
first-time investors on our platform. Existing customers that refer
new investors to our platform can also receive a cash reward. From
time to time, we will also conduct promotional campaigns targeted
at specific segments of our existing customer base to retain or
increase a customer’s invested balance. For investors in the
Shijiazhuang region, we also offer room and dining vouchers for our
hotel during seasonal promotional events.
Risk Management
We have
extensive experience underwriting credit and managing risk
concerning SMBs in the transportation industry. To manage the
credit risk from the loans extended to customers, we have leveraged
this experience in our current risk management practices. Our risk
management efforts mainly focus on: i) thorough verification of
personal and asset information; ii) building robust evidence for
cases to collect through litigation; iii) maintaining and promoting
a “never-call-it-quits” culture when it comes to
collections; iv) developing our data-driven anti-fraud and credit
assessment and decision systems.
Screening and Verification
As
outlined in our transaction process, our verification of the
information provided in each credit application is a core process
of our risk management procedures. Each application begins with an
in-person meeting to collect information and record photo and video
evidence of the entire process. After our regional service
representatives submit the application information to our
headquarters for review, we verify the information provided against
third-party sources such as state authorized personal identity
databases, commerce bureau registration information, vehicle
registration data providers, telecom data providers, and more. We
also manually scrutinized the identification and documents provided
to spot any false documentation. Finally, we also conduct an
interview over the phone with the applicant to verify specific
information and that they have indeed submitted a credit
application for the purposes stated in the application materials.
Most importantly, since the majority of loans are trucking related,
we ensure that we verify the truck assets and ownership information
since trucks are income generating assets and this allows us to
determine whether the borrower can repay the loan.
Evidence and Case Building for Litigation
We have
developed a streamlined set of procedures to efficiently file
lawsuits against delinquent borrowers in local courts as well as
establish criminal cases against fraudulent borrowers with the
local police. In both scenarios, we must provide a robust record of
evidence that documents the loan agreement’s validity, the
borrower’s participation, and the borrower’s intent to
commit fraud (if applicable). Thus as part of our application
process, we emphasize that documents must be physically signed,
fingerprinted or stamped with the borrower's company chop,
witnessed by our service representative, and also require the
process to be documented by photo and video. Physical signatures
and multimedia records are strong evidence that we could use in
court against an uncooperative delinquent borrower. Similarly,
across all of our platforms and information systems, we keep
complete logs of all user account activity that could be provided
as evidence of the borrower committing fraud. In certain processes,
we may use facial recognition service provided by a third party to
verify the user conducting a transaction is, in fact, the
authorized and registered user named on the account.
Developing Data Driven Risk Management Systems
We are
in the process of implementing credit risk models that utilize both
internal and external data sources to rate borrowers’
creditworthiness and calculate default risk for future use in our
screening process. Since China has an underdeveloped credit rating
system, we must rely on our proprietary models and alternative data
to rate and underwrite prospective borrowers. Aside from internal
data sources such as transaction history and user activity on our
platform websites, we also purchase external data such as an
applicant’s cell phone activity, bank card activity, traffic
violations record, and highway toll data. Using a wide array of
data that we collect over time, we can optimize our risk models to
calculate default risk better.
Data-driven
risk management is an area in which we are striving for
improvement. Since our target customers have limited data that
could be collected and verified by reliable third parties, we are
continually experimenting with data sources that could help us
improve our data-driven anti-fraud and credit evaluation
processes.
Transaction Overview
Our
loan facilitation process is designed to ensure that our customers
can access the funds they need within a reasonable time while not
sacrificing the quality of our risk management measures. Typically,
our initial credit application process takes 1 business week, while
subsequent credit line drawdowns or loan funding requests are
processed instantaneously. The diagram below illustrates our
general transaction process.
Step 1 Application Submission
In most
of our loan facilitation scenarios, a borrower completes an initial
application with one of our service representatives in person. At
this stage, we ask the borrower to submit detailed documentation
regarding the borrower’s identity and creditworthiness. The
initial application and related agreements are signed in person and
witnessed by our service representative. A video is recorded of the
borrower signing agreements and citing that he or she acknowledges
the terms and that the information submitted is accurate and
complete. We also take photographs of assets such as the
borrower’s truck with the borrower appearing in the same
frame of the vehicle. All of the applicant information is submitted
electronically via our backend management systems to our
application review department for evaluation. Regional service
centers mail hard copies of signed agreements to our headquarters
for processing and record keeping.
Step 2: Screening and Verification
After
our regional service representatives send the borrower’s
credit application to our review department,
We
conduct a series of anti-fraud checks on each credit application to
ensure the information provided is true and complete. We use
third-party data sources to check information such as the
applicant’s cell phone activity, bank card activity, business
registration, and vehicle registration. We also call the applicant
to confirm specific details over the phone as well as contact the
family members listed to ensure the contact information is valid.
If any application information is deemed to be false or incorrect,
we may contact the service representative who processed the
application to make a correction or additional in-person
validation. If we believe that an applicant purposely submitted
false information or documentation, we will terminate the
application and take additional measures to prevent the applicant
from making use of our platform.
Step 3: Credit Assessment and Approval
Applications
that clear our rigorous screening procedures move on to our credit
assessment process for final credit approval. Our loan officers
follow established credit limit policies and approve credit limits
based on the verified information and collateral pledged by the
borrower. Because all of our credit products are either
interest-free or offered at a single fixed rate, we do not conduct
risk-based pricing. For lines of credit and term loans, once we
approve a credit limit, the borrower may request a drawdown of any
amount within the credit limit either online or by conducting a
transaction on our CeraPay platform. For our installment loans,
each loan is approved based on a purchase order on our e-commerce
platform and requires the borrower to complete the purchase at the
point of sale, in person, at the merchant’s place of
business.
Step 4: Loan Listing and Funding
When a
borrower requests a loan online or conducts a credit transaction on
our network, a loan request will list on our Qingyidai peer-to-peer
lending platform for funding by retail investors. Investors will
subscribe to a loan request, and once investors fully subscribe to
a loan, we will transfer the funds after deducting fees and the
deposit to the borrower’s platform account, from which the
borrower can withdraw to his bank account for use. If a loan is not
fully subscribed before the end of the day, the Company will use a
subsidiary that is not Qingyi Technology to purchase the unfunded
portion to ensure that we can fund the borrower’s loan
request on the same day without delay.
Step 5: Servicing and Collections
We
conduct collections for scheduled loan payments through an
automated online process. Borrowers just have to deposit funds into
their platform custody account before the scheduled time on the day
of repayment. The borrower’s account is delinquent if he or
she does not remit payment at the expected time and penalties would
apply. We employ a variety of sequenced collection procedures,
including working with delinquent borrowers to structure feasible
payment plans, to ensure that we, and our investors, are
repaid.
For
borrowers across all of our loan products that have difficulty
repaying delinquent balances within a reasonable time, we also
offer our 180-day term loans as a way for these borrowers to
restructure their delinquent loans. We may negotiate with
delinquent borrowers to create a payment plan to repay a portion of
the delinquent balance. Facilitation fees charged for these
restructuring loans are typically higher at 3-5%.
Beginning
in the fourth quarter of 2017, we began to sell certain delinquent
loans to third-party collection companies. Prices for the loan
sales are negotiated on a case by case basis. Alternatively, we may
sell loans that have been delinquent for an extended period and
have a low chance of being recovered at a significant discount to
recover as much as possible. As of December 31, 2017, we have sold
RMB 75.0 million of delinquent loans to third parties and incurred
RMB 3.7 million loss from it. The average age of the delinquent
loans sold as of December 31, 2017, is 314 days.
Internet-Based Services: E-Commerce
We have
several e-commerce products targeting different vertical markets
spanning the trucking, passenger vehicle, and retail industries. We
offer our e-commerce services in conjunction with our lending
services in an effort to establish an online presence for the
merchants in our network and to help them grow their online
business. Currently, our three primary e-commerce products are
TruShip, AutoChekk, and PingPing.
TruShip
TruShip,
launched in October 2015, is our online e-commerce platform whereby
trucking industry merchants, such as dealerships and leasing
companies, can establish an online store-front and conveniently
conduct sales transactions through CeraPay. In December 2015, we
launched the TruShip Logistics shipping marketplace on the
platform. It allows participants in China’s fragmented
long-haul trucking industry to publish, browse, and connect with
shipping jobs across the country at no cost. CeraPay can process
payment transactions resulting from connections made on TruShip
Logistics. The primary strategic objective of TruShip is to provide
our customers with a useful transaction platform that facilitates
the increased use of CeraPay.
AutoChekk
AutoChekk,
launched in March 2016, is our e-commerce platform for the
passenger vehicle industry. AutoChekk provides consumers in China
with a powerful and intuitive tool that makes researching and
purchasing passenger cars or maintenance services convenient and
affordable. The platform provides information regarding passenger
cars that are available for sale and facilitates purchases.
AutoChekk also provides consumers with search tools and a
procurement platform for maintenance services.
PingPing
PingPing,
launched in July 2016, is our e-commerce platform for small
businesses. PingPing provides businesses with an easy-to-use online
platform to establish an online presence while providing an
intuitive, full-service online shopping experience for their
customers. PingPing plans to offer B2B, B2C, and real estate
e-commerce services, which are all complemented by Fincera's core
financial service offerings. As with Fincera's TruShip and
AutoChekk platforms, payment transactions are processed using
CeraPay and other third-party payment platforms, and the resulting
data will be used as underwriting metrics for CeraVest loans to
small businesses.
Since
our installment loans primarily drive transaction volume on our
e-commerce websites, we are planning to consolidate our AutoChekk
and PingPing websites under our consumer lending brand: Qingyifenqi
by the end of the second quarter of 2018. This consolidation would
align all of our consumer and investor-related businesses under the
Qingyidai brand family, allowing for better recognition by our
customers.
Merchants
Merchants
in our payment and e-commerce network are primarily SMBs within the
trucking industry, while some are small retailers that have
customers that require our purchase financing services. Our
financing services support the sales efforts of our merchants by
attracting more customers that need purchase financing. In addition
to increasing merchant sales, we also help improve their cash flow
by reducing the number of customer receivables resulting from
merchants providing goods or services to their customers on credit,
a common practice in the trucking industry. For most of our
financing services, the merchant pays us a percentage of the
purchase amount as a transaction fee. The fee charged varies by
merchant type and the type of the financing service and terms.
Merchants can also invest their idle cash on our peer-to-peer
lending platform to earn additional interest income. In addition to
our financial services, merchants can also establish and manage
online stores on any of our e-commerce websites to market their
goods online.
As of
December 31, 2017, we had 27,001 merchants registered across all of
our platforms, 79.2% of which are trucking related and 20.8% of
which are non-trucking related retailers. The majority of our
merchants are located in mid-east China as shown on the map
below.
Property Lease and Management Business
We own
the Kaiyuan Finance Center, which is a 53-floor large-scale
commercial building with hotel, office and ancillary facilities,
erected on a land parcel with a site area of approximately 10,601
square meters in the central business district of Shijiazhuang,
China. The office space in the building comprises a total gross
floor area of roughly 62,701 square meters. Our corporate
headquarters is located in the building, and we lease out the space
that we do not occupy (about 54,696 square meters). As of December
31, 2017, we have leased out 88% of the area available for rent
pursuant to leases that expire on various dates through
2022.
The
Kaiyuan Finance Center also houses the Shijiazhuang Hilton Hotel.
This full-service hotel property totals over 119,000 square meters
and includes guest rooms, restaurants, conference facilities, a
fitness center, spa and an underground parking garage. The Company
has entered into a management and franchise agreement with Hilton
Worldwide Holdings Inc. to manage and operate the
hotel.
We
believe that the Kaiyuan Finance Center is one of the premier
commercial properties in Shijiazhuang, making it highly attractive
to both office tenants and hotel guests. It is currently the
tallest building in Hebei province and sits in a central location
next to a large luxury shopping mall, the Hebei Provincial Museum
and the Hebei Provincial Library. Its convenient location places it
steps away from one of Shijiazhuang’s main thoroughfares,
Zhongshan Road, where the city completed its first subway line in
2017.
Our
Chairman has significant experience developing, owning and
operating real estate assets. We aim to continually improve the
operating results of our existing property through concentrated
leasing, asset management, cost control and customer service
efforts. We focus on meeting our customers’ needs and
providing them with cost-effective services such as build-to-suit
construction and space modification, including tenant improvements
and expansions. Our property competes against similar properties
located in our market primarily by location, rent, services
provided and the design, quality, amenities, and condition of the
facilities.
Customers
Our
office leasing business mainly serves corporate clients with
operations in Shijiazhuang with a need for premier office space in
the city center. We attract many financial services companies as
our tenants as well as regional divisions of large
enterprises.
Our
hotel business mainly serves individual guests, corporate guests,
ballroom event or conference attendees, third-party travel
agencies, and hotel restaurant customers. The majority of our hotel
guests are Chinese nationals; however, approximately 6% of our past
guests have been foreign nationals.
Sales & Marketing
As one
of the premier office locations in Shijiazhuang, we require little
advertisement or marketing to attract tenants for our vacant office
space at Kaiyuan Finance Center. We maintain a staff of 7 team
members to manage tenant relationships, collect lease payments,
receive inbound inquiries from prospective tenants, negotiate lease
contracts, and coordinate tenant requests. When space is available
for lease, our sales sometimes may also proactively make sales
calls to reputable local enterprises currently leasing other
comparable high-end office spaces in the area. As of December 31,
2017, approximately 88% of the office space had been leased
out.
Our
hotel business follows sales and marketing guidelines set forth by
Hilton. Our Hilton sales and marketing department consists of 14
team members responsible for executing marketing strategy and
managing sales and promotions of all hotel products including space
rentals for conferences and other corporate functions. The
marketing team routinely advertises in traditional media such as
magazines, local radio, and outdoor ads at central locations to
target local customers. We also promote through social media and
partner with banks to reach customers using their channels. The
hotel will also conduct seasonal promotions to increase food and
dining revenue as well as annual charitable events to promote the
Shijiazhuang Hilton brand.
Competition & Competitive Strengths
We face
direct competition for borrowers from a multitude of financial
institutions and lending platforms in China. In the trucking
industry, our installment loans for truck purchases competes
against other leasing companies’ services as well as
financing services provided the manufacturer. Our 180-day term
loans compete against regional banks and private lenders that may
lend to small businesses within the trucking industry. Moreover,
our installment loans for consumer purchases of non-discretionary
goods compete directly against consumer loans offered consumer
lending platforms, consumer finance companies, micro-finance
companies, and commercial banks.
We also
face considerable competition for individual investors. We compete
with a multitude of different investment products in various asset
classes. These include but are not limited to equities, bonds,
peer-to-peer loans, investment trust products, bank savings
accounts, and real estate and alternative asset
classes.
Our
e-commerce businesses face competition from many nascent and
established internet companies. Our trucking platform TruShip faces
competition from well-funded logistics platforms such as Huochebang
and Loji. Our consumer e-commerce platforms Pingping and AutoChekk
directly compete against various consumer and new vehicle
e-commerce startups or subsidiaries of established e-commerce
companies such as JD.com and Alibaba.
Our
office leasing and hotel business face competition from other
premier office space for lease as well as internationally branded
hotel chains located in the city of Shijiazhuang.
Nevertheless,
we believe the following strengths make us competitive in this
environment:
Our experience developing proprietary credit controls and
information systems minimizes risk and potential
losses.
We have
several years of experience developing standardized underwriting
and credit control procedures. We believe that this knowledge and
expertise allows us to profitably service underserved market
segments with a minimum amount of risk. Our screening and approval
process helps to ensure that we only accept customers whom we
believe will be able to fulfill the terms of the loans facilitated
through our platform.
With
the rapid growth of our high-volume online lending platforms, we
are developing data-driven risk assessment systems in conjunction
with third-party consultants. Because we possess proprietary and
exclusive transaction data on borrowers that transact through our
e-commerce websites, we believe we have strong potential to develop
value-added risk models that will further improve our underwriting
and credit control procedures and better position us to compete in
the lending and payment processing markets.
We offer competitive rates and fees to our borrowers.
Our
30-day credit lines and 12-month purchase financing are
interest-free if borrowers are not late on their payments and our
180-day term loans currently carry an effective annual percentage
rate of 14 - 21%. We believe borrowers find that our rates and fees
can significantly lower their cost of capital for their business
financing needs. We believe our financing products offers unique
opportunities for businesses and consumers to access affordable
credit at rates and with fees that that few competitors can
match.
Our nationwide sales network provides us greater borrower
access.
We
believe that our vast sales network differentiates us from our
competitors. Our bricks-and-mortar locations span a broad
geographic footprint that facilitates our sales, marketing and
service efforts with our target customers, who are located mostly
in smaller cities and rural areas that are not readily reached
through online advertising or our other media
channels.
Our management team has significant experience operating in our
industries of focus.
Our
founder started one of the earliest commercial vehicle leasing
companies in 1994 and, by the time we began winding down our legacy
commercial vehicle business in 2015, we considered ourselves the
leading provider of commercial vehicle leases to owners and
owner-operators. Key members of the founding team remain in senior
sales and risk management positions with Fincera. Over time we have
accumulated significant experience in the trucking industry and
knowledge about its participants. We also have developed a strong
reputation and many business relationships through our commercial
vehicle sales, leasing and support business. Because the trucking
industry is the primary focus of our initial strategy, we believe
our over two-decade long experience in this sector as well as
working with SMBs will be crucial to making our new Internet-based
businesses successful in this industry and others.
Additionally,
our
founder has significant experience in developing, owning, and
operating real estate assets. Through Hebei Kaiyuan Real Estate
Development Co., Ltd. he has become one of the preeminent
developers of real estate in Shijiazhuang by developing several
landmark commercial and residential projects in the city center. He
leverages this expertise in owning and operating the Kaiyuan
Finance Center.
We offer flexible investment products that provide greater
liquidity for investors
Investors
that purchase any of our products are allowed to sell their
investments to other investors on a secondary market that we
operate. We determine the pricing of loans sold on the secondary
market and control certain aspects of the transactions to encourage
investors to purchase secondary market investments for increased
returns.
Corporate Strategy
Leveraging
our strengths and our risk management experience, we plan to
implement the following key strategies to continue to grow our
business volume and gain market share within our target
industries.
Broaden our selection of financing and e-commerce services and
increase our market share in the trucking industry
We are
leveraging our experience in the trucking industry to expand our
product lines within the industry. In the past two years, we have
launched new products to provide financing for truck purchases,
fuel card purchases, employee payments, and highway toll fees. We
plan to expand our product offerings to serve even more trucking
related businesses such as shipping agencies and repair shops. We
hope that by connecting even more trucking SMBs with financing
through our online lending platform, we can gain additional
customers and increase our market share in the industry. With the
increased traffic to our online lending platforms, we can then
monetize these expanded services by charging transaction fees or by
using the transaction data in our risk models to further decrease
default risk and related expenses.
Expand our financial services to retail and other
industries.
As we
grow our product offerings and business volume in the trucking
industry, we plan to expand our financial services to other
consumer-facing sectors and further diversify our lending
activities. Developments such as government policies on
environmental protection and the proliferation of electric vehicles
may affect the Chinese trucking industry. We seek to diversify into
other sectors to maintain our prospects for growth in the future.
We believe that our financial products are highly adaptable for use
in retail and other industries.
Expand and diversify our investor base and offer more investment
products
The
investors currently on our platform are geographically concentrated
around the Hebei province and surrounding regions in mid-east
China. Our investor base consists mainly of individuals or small
businesses, and their average investment tends to be higher than
the industry standard as the average age of our investors is 37. We
plan to expand and diversify our investor base by increasing sales
and marketing efforts in regions where we lack investors, and we
seek to attract younger investors that may increase their
investment profile with us over time. We are also seeking
relationships with institutional investors that have lower return
expectations and can help reduce the cost of capital to our
borrowers.
Continue to improve our risk management processes and risk modeling
capabilities
We plan
to continue to monitor and refine our risk management processes to
reduce the incidence of frauds and defaults. In addition to
gathering more data from our internal process to drive improvements
in our operations, we seek to interface with more data providers
that can supply us with various forms of credit data or other
personal information of borrowers to support our anti-fraud and
risk modeling mechanisms. We plan to strengthen our data analytics
and machine-learning development team to develop and refine
additional risk models as we produce different types of loan
products targeted at customers in various industries.
Invest in our technology platforms to increase the efficiency of
our operations
We plan
to continue to invest in our development teams and technology
platforms to provide more process automation and increase the
stability of our online services. In the past year, we have adopted
DevOps, a software engineering culture and practice that aims at
unifying software development (Dev) and software operation (Ops).
The main characteristic of the DevOps movement is to strongly
advocate automation and monitoring at all steps of software
construction, from integration, testing, releasing to deployment
and infrastructure management. DevOps aims at shorter development
cycles, increased deployment frequency, more dependable releases,
in close alignment with business objectives. We have spent a
considerable effort to automate our virtual environment creation,
code integration, testing, code deployment, and feature release
processes. We will continue to implement DevOps best practices to
increase our speed of feature releases and responses to service
interruptions. By doing so, we may improve the security and
stability of our online services, which will enhance our brand
reputation in the market.
Furthermore,
because our businesses require significant interaction between our
physical sales network across China and our information systems, we
plan to develop more convenient mobile-enabled applications to
support our sales efforts. We also intend to invest in and use
technologies to further enhance operational efficiencies in our
human resources, finance and accounting, and marketing
teams.
Maintain our status and market share as the premier office and
luxury hotel property in Shijiazhuang
We
believe that our Kaiyuan Finance Center is currently one of the
premier commercial properties in Shijiazhuang. It is the tallest
building in the Hebei province and is located in the city’s
financial and political center immediately next to the provincial
government’s offices. Office space in the Kaiyuan Finance
Center is in demand, and we have an occupancy rate of 88% as of
December 31, 2017. Our five-star, Hilton operated hotel is one of
the best five-star hotels in Hebei and was awarded Hilton’s
Connie Award in 2014 for Asia. We plan to maintain Kaiyuan Finance
Center’s status in the area by continuing to provide
excellent service to our customers. We also plan to leverage the
brand value of the Kaiyuan Finance Center to increase the brand
recognition of our online services in the region.
Increase public recognition of our brand through multi-channel
marketing
As we
continue to launch more consumer-facing online services, we plan to
increase our brand marketing through a multi-channel approach to
extend our reach beyond the trucking industry and the Hebei region
where we are based. We intend to invest prudently in online
advertising and to optimize our channel selection based on cost
efficiency. We also intend to invest in social media advertising.
We also seek to participate in more cross-platform and
cross-industry collaborations with well-branded companies that can
help elevate our brand recognition. Finally, we seek to gain brand
exposure through our offline merchant partners who may choose to
display our brand signage and promotional materials at their store
locations.
Seasonality
We
experience seasonality in both our internet and our hotel
businesses, reflecting effects from market seasonality and our
promotional activities. For our financial services, we typically
see seasonally low lending and borrowing activity around the
calendar year end and around the time of Chinese New Year when
business activity usually slows down. Consequently, we often
experience a season-high immediately after the Chinese New Year as
business activity rebounds in the spring. Also, for our
trucking-related financial and e-commerce services, we often
experience a season-high in the months of September and October, a
period regarded as high season for truck sales.
Our
hotel business typically sees decreased activity immediately before
and after the Chinese New Year when corporate clients are not as
active. Seasonal highs occur in the fourth quarter of each year as
corporate activity picks up close to year end. Food and beverage
sales also experience increases during summer and winter school
holidays from increased family activity and spending during this
period.
Capital Expenditures
Our
capital expenditure primarily includes leasehold improvements of
the Kaiyuan Finance Center that we acquired in September 2012. For
fiscal 2015 we incurred RMB7.5 million in leasehold improvement for
the Kaiyuan Finance Center. For fiscal 2016 we incurred RMB4.0
million in leasehold improvement for the Kaiyuan Finance Center.
For fiscal 2017 we incurred RMB5.1 million in leasehold improvement
for the Kaiyuan Finance Center.
Discontinued Operations
In late
2015 we began winding down the operations of our commercial vehicle
sales, leasing and support business because we felt that our
Internet-based business presented both a better opportunity and a
more efficient way to operate. Our commercial vehicle sales,
leasing and support business provided commercial vehicle leasing
solutions for small and medium-sized businesses in China’s
transportation industry. We offered sales-type leases that include
after-sales service and support for Class 8 heavy trucks (gross
vehicle weight rating “GVWR” of over 33,000 lbs). Our
insurance agency business, in which we established an insurance
agency company, Shijie Kaiyuan Insurance Agency Co., Ltd
(“Kaiyuan Insurance”), to act as a direct insurance
agent in China, is part of this segment. Due to this strategic
shift, we present our commercial vehicle sales, leasing and support
business as a discontinued operation in our financial
statements.
In
2017, we accelerated the wind-down of the tail-end portfolio by
selling our registered logistics subsidiaries to third parties
along with the leasing portfolio held by these subsidiaries. As of
December 31, 2017, our remaining leasing portfolio consists of
RMB47.6 million in receivables.
Our Technology Systems
We have
established a comprehensive suite of information technology systems
to operate our various business lines. We host most of these
technology systems on Microsoft Azure’s cloud computing
platforms. We believe using Microsoft’s cloud solution would
allow us to scale capacity quickly when needed and also reduces the
operational risks and costs from maintaining a cloud infrastructure
by ourselves. Microsoft’s services offer many layers of
security and redundancy to ensure the reliability and safety of our
systems. We also maintain our own set of Docker-based platform
infrastructure used to run our internal tools and testing
environments as well as for periodic data backup. We have plans to
establish a set of self-maintained platform infrastructure to serve
as a backup service for our customers in case of interruptions in
Microsoft’s cloud service.
Our
product development and IT teams comprise of 218 employees as of
December 31, 2017, and they focus primarily on developing our
front-end and backend systems and maintaining high-performance
operations of all of our technology systems and infrastructure. Our
technology systems consist of mainly the following:
1.
Front-end systems
: Customer facing
services such as websites and mobile apps developed entirely
in-house by our product development team based in Beijing. We
utilize a distributed infrastructure to allow for scalability and
high availability for all of our customer-facing
applications.
2.
Back-end management systems
: Internal
management systems used by our employees to operate the business
and include systems such as our CRM, call center, credit review,
financial, and accounting systems. Most of our back-end systems are
developed in-house as they require substantial customization for
our use cases, while some are purchased from third parties and
integrated with our core back-end management systems. We use
financial accounting software provided by SAP, office
administration software provided by Weaver Software, call center
software supplied by Udesk, reservation and point-of-sale systems
provided by Hilton for our hotel business, and Tencent’s
WeChat Enterprise for internal instant messaging.
3.
Development tools and monitoring
systems
: We have developed many in-house tools to increase
our development speed and help improve our product quality through
active monitoring. We can test in production-like environments
throughout our testing process and deploy in production without any
interruptions to our services since we can control the traffic that
can visit the newly released features. As part of our coding
practices, we insert monitoring code on all system services and
link log results to multiple graphic-interfaces that display
monitoring data and issue alerts in real time. All of the
continuous integration, continuous deployment, and monitoring
systems that we have developed allow us to develop, test, and
deploy our products quickly and safely.
We
believe that improving performance, stability, and user experience
is the primary focus of our product development efforts for our
front-end systems. For our back-end systems, we hope to improve the
integration between sub-systems to create a more seamless and
efficient interface and also develop machine learning algorithms to
increase the usage of our automated and data-driven credit
assessment processes. Also, we hope to discover and purchase
additional third party software that could help us save development
and maintenance costs on generic back-end systems that require
little customization.
Employees
As of
December 31, 2017 our employee headcount was as
follows:
Product
Development
|
218
|
Administrative
|
31
|
Finance &
Audit
|
84
|
Operations &
Marketing
|
94
|
Risk
Management
|
85
|
Sales
Staff
|
1,447
|
Office Leasing
Operations
|
44
|
Hotel
Operations
|
388
|
Total
|
2,391
|
As
required by laws and regulations in China, we participate in
various employee social security plans that are organized by
municipal and provincial governments, including, among other
things, housing, pension, medical insurance and unemployment
insurance. We are required under PRC law to make contributions to
employee benefit plans at specified percentages of the salaries,
bonuses and certain allowances of our employees, up to a maximum
amount determined by the local government from time to
time.
Insurance
We provide social security insurance including pension insurance,
unemployment insurance, work-related injury insurance and medical
insurance for our employees. We have property insurance covering
our equipment on all floors of the Kaiyuan Finance Center and also
various property insurance policies insuring the different floors
of the office space and hotel. We have also purchased terrorism
insurance and business interruption insurance for our hotel
operations. We do not maintain product liability insurance or
key-man insurance. We consider our insurance coverage to be
sufficient for our business operations in China.
Facilities
Our
headquarters is based in Shijiazhuang, the capital of Hebei
Province. We own the Kaiyuan Finance Center where our headquarters
occupy approximately 8,005 square meters of office space. We also
lease office space with an area of roughly 2,560 square meters in
Beijing for our product development and IT teams. We also rent
approximately 22,350 square meters of office space in cities across
China for our regional headquarters and company-owned
stores.
Trademarks and Intellectual Property
Fincera,
CeraPay, and CeraVest are registered trademarks of the Company in
the United States. We have also been granted software copyrights in
China for four of our mobile applications. We have successfully
registered over 44 trademarks of different variations of our
current and potential product logos and names and have several
other trademark applications in China that are pending
approval.
Legal Proceedings
We may
from time to time be subject to various legal or administrative
claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
Litigation or any other legal or administrative proceeding,
regardless of the outcome, is likely to result in substantial cost
and diversion of our resources, including our management's time and
attention. We currently are not a party to any material legal or
administrative proceedings.
Governmental Regulations
This
section sets forth a summary of the most significant rules and
regulations that affect our business activities in
China.
Because
we provide online lending services and operate e-commerce websites,
we are regulated by various government authorities, including,
among others:
(i)
|
the
People’s Bank of China, or the PBOC, as the central bank of
China, regulating the formation and implementation of monetary
policy, issuing the currency, supervising the commercial banks,
assisting the administration of the financing and acting as the
regulator for third party payment platforms;
|
(ii)
|
China
Banking Regulatory Commission, or the CBRC, regulating financial
institutions, promulgating the regulations related to the
administration of financial institutions and acting as the
regulator for the online lending industry; and
|
(iii)
|
the
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, or the MIIT,
regulating the telecommunications and telecommunications-related
activities, including, but not limited to, internet information
services and other value-added telecommunication
services.
|
Regulations Relating to Online Lending Services
Regulations on Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
In July
2015, ten PRC regulatory agencies, including the PBOC, the MIIT and
the CBRC, jointly issued the
Guidelines on Promoting the Healthy
Development of Internet Finance
, or the Internet Finance
Guidelines. The Internet Finance Guidelines call for active
government support of China's internet finance industry, including
the online peer-to-peer lending service industry, and clarify the
division of responsibility among regulatory agencies. The Internet
Finance Guidelines specify that the CBRC will have primary
regulatory responsibility for the online peer-to-peer lending
service industry in China and state that online peer-to-peer
lending service providers shall act as an intermediary platform to
provide information exchange, matching, credit assessment and other
intermediary services, and must not provide credit enhancement
services and/or engage in illegal fundraising. The Internet Finance
Guidelines provide additional requirements for China's internet
finance industry, including the use of custody accounts with
qualified banks to hold customer funds as well as information
disclosure requirements.
In
April 2016, to further implement the requirements specified in the
Internet Finance Guidelines, the General Office of the State
Council issued the
Implementation
Plan of Specific Rectification for Risks Related to Internet
Finance
and fifteen regulatory agencies (including the CBRC)
issued
the Implementation Plan of
Specific Rectification for Risks Related to Online Peer-to-Peer
Lending
, or the Implementation Plans. The Implementation
Plans emphasize several requirements that are contemplated for the
rectification of the peer-to-peer lending service industry, which
include, among others, (i) that an online peer-to-peer lending
service provider is an information intermediary; (ii) the lending
through the online platform conducted by such service provider
meets the standards of direct lending, namely the direct lending
from individuals to individuals realized through the online
platform; (iii) the online peer-to-peer lending service provider
shall not violate regulatory "red lines", including setting up any
capital pools, financing for itself, promising on a guarantee of
principal and interest and etc.; (iv) the funds of lenders and
borrowers shall be deposited with eligible third-party custodian
accounts and (v) full, timely and objective disclosure of the
information, and the establishment of information security
measures.
In
August 2016, four PRC regulatory agencies, including the CBRC, the
MIIT, the MPS and Cyberspace Administration of China, issued the
Interim Measures for
Administration of Business Activities of Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
, or the Interim Measures. The Interim
Measures define online lending information intermediaries as the
financial information intermediaries that are engaged in the online
peer-to-peer lending information business and provide lenders and
borrowers with lending information services, such as information
collection and publication, credit rating, information interaction
and loan facilitation. Consistent with the Internet Finance
Guidelines, the Interim Measures prohibit online lending
information intermediaries from providing credit enhancement
services and collecting funds directly or indirectly, and require
that, among other things, that (i) online lending information
intermediaries intending to provide online lending information
agency services and their subsidiaries and branches must make
relevant record-filing with local financial regulatory authorities
with which they are registered after obtaining the business
license; (ii) online lending information intermediaries operating
telecommunication services must apply for relevant
telecommunication service license after the completion of the
record-filing and registration with the local financial regulatory
authority; and (iii) online lending information intermediaries must
materially specify the “online lending information
intermediary” in the business scope.
The
Interim Measures list the following businesses that an online
lending information intermediary must not, by itself or on behalf
of a third party, participate in: (i) financing for themselves,
whether or not in disguised form; (ii) accepting or collecting
directly or indirectly the funds of lenders; (iii) providing
lenders with guarantees or promises on guarantees of principal and
interest directly or in disguised form; (iv) publicizing or
promoting financing projects at physical locations; (v) extending
loans, except otherwise as provided by laws and regulations; (vi)
splitting the term of any financing project; (vii) offering wealth
management and other financial products by themselves to raise
funds, and selling as an agent bank wealth management, securities
company asset management, fund, insurance or trust products and
other financial products; (viii) conducting asset securitization
business or realizing transfer of creditors' rights in the forms of
asset packaging, asset securitization, trust assets, fund shares,
etc.; (ix) engaging in any form of mixture, bundling or agency with
other institutions in investment, agency in sale, brokerage and
other business except as permitted by laws, regulations and
relevant regulatory provisions on online peer-to-peer lending; (x)
falsifying or exaggerating earnings outlooks of financing projects,
concealing the defects and risks of financing projects, making
false advertising or promotion, etc., by using ambiguous words or
other fraudulent means, fabricating or spreading false or
incomplete information impairing the business reputation of others
or otherwise misleading lenders or borrowers; (xi) providing
information intermediary services for high-risk financing which
uses the borrowed funds for investment in stocks, over-the-counter
fund distribution, futures contracts, structured funds and other
derivative products; (xii) engaging in businesses such as
crowd-funding in equity; and (xiii) other activities prohibited by
the laws, regulations and the regulatory provisions on online
peer-to-peer lending.
In
addition, the Interim Measures stipulate that online lending
information intermediaries shall not operate businesses other than
risk management and necessary business processes such as
information collection and confirmation, post-facilitation loan
management in accordance with online lending regulations, via
offline physical locations. Furthermore, the Interim Measures
provide that online lending information intermediaries shall, based
on their risk management capabilities, set upper limits on the loan
balance of a single borrower borrowing both from one online lending
information intermediary and from all online lending information
intermediaries. In the case of natural persons, this limit shall
not be more than RMB 200,000 (US$30,608) for one online lending
information intermediary and not more than RMB 1 million
(US$153,041) in total from all platforms, while the limit for a
legal person or organization shall not be more than RMB 1 million
(US$153,041) for one online lending information intermediary and
not more than RMB 5 million (US$765,205) in total from all
platforms. Moreover, the Interim Measures require that each online
lending information intermediary (i) separate its own capital from
funds received from lenders and borrowers and (ii) select a
qualified banking financial institution as its fund custodian
institution, which shall perform custody and administrative
responsibilities as required.
The
Interim Measures also set out certain additional requirements
applicable to online lending information intermediaries on, among
other things, the real-name registration of lenders and borrowers,
risk management procedures, internet and information security,
limits on the loan funding period (no more than 20 business days),
personal credit management, file management, lenders and borrowers
protection, prohibition on making decisions by online lending
information intermediaries on behalf of the lender without the
authorization of the lender, administration of electronic
signatures and information disclosure.
Any
violation of the Interim Measures by an online lending information
intermediary may subject such online lending information
intermediary to certain penalties as determined by applicable laws
and regulations, or by relevant government authorities if the
applicable laws and regulations are silent on the penalties. The
applicable penalties may include, but are not limited to, criminal
liabilities, warning, rectification, tainted integrity record and
fines of up to RMB 30,000 (US$4,591). If any online lending
information intermediary established prior to the implementation of
these Interim Measures fails to conform to the provisions of these
Interim Measures, the local financial regulatory authority shall
require such online lending information intermediary to make
rectification, and the rectification period shall not exceed 12
months. See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our
Business—If our online lending services are deemed to violate
any PRC laws or regulations governing the online lending industry
in China, our business, financial condition and results of
operations would be materially and adversely
affected."
Regulations on Record-filings of Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
In
November 2016, the CBRC, the MIIT and the General Office of the
State Administration for Industry and Commerce, jointly issued the
Guidelines on the Administration
of Record-filings of Online Lending Information Intermediary
Agencies
, or the Record-filings Guidelines, to establish and
improve the record-filing mechanisms for online lending information
intermediaries.
According
to the Record-filings Guidelines, a newly established online
lending information intermediary shall make the record-filings with
the local financial regulatory authority after obtaining the
business license. With respect to any online lending information
intermediary that was established and conducting business prior to
the publication of this Record-filings Guidelines, the local
financial regulatory authority shall, pursuant to relevant
arrangement of specific rectification work for risks in online
peer-to-peer lending, accept the application for record-filings
submitted by a qualified online lending information intermediary,
or any online lending information intermediary which has completed
the rectification confirmed by relevant authorities.
In
December 2017, the Online Lending Rectification Office issued the
Notice on Rectification and
Inspection Acceptance of Risk of Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
, or Circular 57, which provides for further
clarification on several matters in connection with the
rectification and record-filing of online lending information
intermediaries, including, among other things:
●
Circular 57 sets
forth certain requirements that an online lending information
intermediary must meet before it can qualify for the record-filing,
including: (i) an online lending information intermediary may not
conduct the "thirteen prohibited actions" or exceed the Individual
Lending Amount Limit after August 24, 2016, and shall gradually
reduce the balance; (ii) an online lending information intermediary
which has participated in businesses of real estate mortgages,
campus loans or "cash loans" is required to suspend new loan
facilitation and the outstanding balance of the abovementioned
loans shall be gradually reduced within a certain timetable as
required under CBRC Circular 26 and Circular 141; and (iii) the
online lending intermediaries are required to set up custody
accounts with qualified banks that have passed certain testing and
evaluation procedures conducted by the Online Lending Rectification
Office to hold customer funds. For the online lending
intermediaries that are unable to accomplish the rectification and
record-filing but are continuing to participate in the online
lending business, the relevant authorities shall subject online
lending intermediaries to administrative sanctions, including but
not limited to revoking their telecommunicating business operation
licenses, shutting down their business websites and requesting
financial institutions not to provide any financial services to
such online lending intermediaries.
●
the local
governmental authorities shall conduct and complete acceptance
inspection of the rectification with the following timetable: (i)
completion of record-filing for major online lending information
intermediaries by the end of April 2018; (ii) with respect to
online lending information intermediaries with substantial
outstanding balance of those loans prohibited under the relevant
laws and regulations and where timely reduction of those balance is
difficult, the relevant business and outstanding balance shall be
disposed of and/or carved out, and record-filing shall be completed
by the end of May 2018; and (iii) with respect to those online
lending information intermediaries with complex and extraordinary
circumstances and substantial difficulties exist to complete
rectification, the "relevant work" shall be completed by the end of
June 2018.
●
the online lending
information intermediaries shall discontinue setting aside
additional funds as risk reserve funds or originating new risk
reserve funds. In addition, the existing balance of risk reserve
funds shall be gradually reduced. Moreover, online lending
information intermediaries are prohibited from promoting their
services by publicizing the risk reserve funds, and authorities
shall actively encourage the online lending information
intermediaries to seek third parties to provide lenders with
alternate means of investor protection, including third-party
guarantee arrangements.
See
"Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—If our
online lending services are deemed to violate any PRC laws or
regulations governing the online lending industry in China, our
business, financial condition and results of operations would be
materially and adversely
affected—Record-Filing."
Regulations on Custody of Funds of Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
The
Interim Measures require an online lending information intermediary
to carry out isolated management of its proprietary funds and the
funds of lenders and borrowers and to choose an eligible banking
financial institution as the custodian institution for the funds of
lenders and borrowers. Pursuant to the Interim Measures, the
depositary shall enter into fund custodian agreements with an
online information intermediary, the borrowers, the lenders and/or
other related parties, and conduct custodian, transfer, payment,
accounting and supervision of the funds of lenders and borrowers
pursuant to such agreements.
In
February 2017, the CBRC issued the
Guidelines on Online Lending Funds Custodian
Business
, or the Custodian Guidelines, which define
depositories as commercial banks that provide online lending fund
custodian services, and stipulate that the depositories shall not
engage in offering any guarantee, including: (i) offering
guarantees for lending transaction activities conducted by online
lending intermediaries, or undertaking any liability for breach of
contract related to such activities; and (ii) offering guarantees
to lenders, guaranteeing principal and dividend payments or bearing
the risks associated with fund lending operations for
lenders.
Apart
from the requirements set forth in the Interim Measures and the
Internet Finance Guidelines, the Custodian Guidelines impose
certain responsibilities on online lending information
intermediaries, including entering into fund custodian agreements
with only one commercial bank to provide fund custodian services,
and organizing independent audit on funds custodian accounts of
borrowers and investors and various other services. The Custodian
Guidelines also provide that online lending information
intermediaries are permitted to entrust a custodian bank to render
fund custodian services only after satisfying certain conditions,
including: (i) completing registration, filing records and
obtaining a business license from the competent industry and
commerce administration authority; (ii) filing records with the
local financial regulatory authority (but according to Circular 57
issued after the Custodian Guidelines and other relevant
regulations, opening a fund custodian account with qualified banks
may be a pre-condition for the online lending information
intermediaries to file with the local financial regulatory
authority); and (iii) applying for a corresponding
telecommunications service license pursuant with the relevant
telecommunication authorities. The Custodian Guidelines also
require online lending information intermediaries to perform
various obligations and prohibits them from advertising their
services except in accordance with certain exposure requirements,
the interpretation and applicability of which is unclear, as well
as certain oversight requirements. The Custodian Guidelines also
sets forth other business standards and miscellaneous requirements
for depositories and online lending information intermediaries.
Online lending information intermediaries and commercial banks
conducting the online custodian services prior to the effectiveness
of the Custodian Guidelines have a six-month grace period to
rectify any activities not in compliance with the Custodian
Guidelines.
Furthermore,
Circular 57 requires online lending information intermediaries to
set up custody accounts with qualified banks that have passed
certain testing and evaluation procedures run by the Online Lending
Rectification Office.
We have
entered into an agreement XWBank, under which the bank provides
custodian services for funds of customers and investors, we
implemented the XWBank custody program for customer funds on March
20, 2018. However, if XWBank fails such testing and evaluation
procedures required by Circular 57, we may have to seek an
alternative custodian bank other than these banks to satisfy the
relevant regulatory requirement, which may materially affect our
rectification progress and record-filing application, which in turn
may materially and adversely affect our business. See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—If our online
lending services are deemed to violate any PRC laws or regulations
governing the online lending industry in China, our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be materially
and adversely affected—Custody of Funds."
Regulations on Information Disclosure by Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
The
Interim Measures stipulate certain requirements on the information
disclosure by an online lending information intermediary, which
include, among other things: (i) full disclosure of the basic
information of borrowers and the financing projects, the risk
assessment results and potential risk of the projects, the use of
funds, and other related information on the official websites; and
(ii) submission of the regular information disclosure announcements
and other relevant documents to the local financial regulatory
authorities for records, and preservation of such documents at the
intermediary's domicile for inspection by the public. Pursuant to
the Interim Measures, detailed rules on the information disclosure
by an online lending information intermediary shall be formulated
separately.
In
August 2017, the General Office of the CBRC issued the
Guidelines on Information Disclosure of the
Business Activities of Online Lending Information
Intermediaries
, or the Disclosure Guidelines. Consistent
with the Interim Measures, the Disclosure Guidelines emphasize the
requirement of information disclosure by an online lending
information intermediary and detail the frequency and scope of such
information disclosure. Pursuant to the Disclosure Guidelines,
online lending information service providers should disclose
certain information on their websites and all other internet
channels, including mobile applications, WeChat official accounts
or Weibo, including, among others, (i) the record-filing and
registration information, the organization information, the
examination and verification information, and transaction related
information, including transactions matched through the online
lending information service providers for the previous month, all
of which shall be disclosed to the public; (ii) the basic
information of the borrowers and the loans, the risk assessment of
such loans, and the information of the outstanding transactions
matched, all of which shall be disclosed to the investors; and
(iii) any event that would result in a material adverse effect to
the operations of online lending information providers, which shall
be disclosed to the public within 48 hours upon occurrence. The
Disclosure Guidelines also require online lending information
service providers to record all the disclosed information and
retain such information for no less than five years from the date
of the disclosure. Any violation of the Disclosure Guidelines by an
online lending information intermediary may subject the online
lending information intermediary to certain penalties under Interim
Measures. In addition, the Disclosure Guidelines require online
lending information intermediaries that do not fully comply with
the Disclosure Guidelines in conducting their business to rectify
the relevant activities within six months after the release of the
Disclosure Guidelines.
Regulations on Cash Loans
In
April 2017, the Online Lending Rectification Office issued the
Notice on the Performance of Check
and Rectification of Cash Loan Business Activities
and a
supplementary notice, or the Notice on Cash Loan. The Notice on
Cash Loan requires the local branches of the Online Lending
Rectification Office to conduct a comprehensive review and
inspection of the cash loan business of online lending platforms
and require such platforms to implement necessary improvements and
remediation within a specific period to comply with the relevant
requirements under the applicable laws and regulations. The Notice
on Cash Loan focuses on preventing malicious fraudulent activities,
loans that are offered at excessive interest rates and violence in
the loan collection processes in the cash loan business operation
of online lending platforms. The Online Lending Rectification
Office also issued a list of cash loan business activities that are
to be examined.
In
December 2017, the Internet Finance Rectification Office and the
Online Lending Rectification Office jointly issued the
Notice on Regulating and Rectifying "Cash
Loan" Business
, or Circular 141, which specifies the
features of "cash loans" as not relying on consumption scenarios,
with no specified use of loan proceeds, no qualification
requirement on customers and unsecured, etc.
Circular
141 sets forth several general requirements with respect to the
"cash loan" business, including, without limitation, that: (i) no
organizations or individuals may conduct the lending business
without obtaining approvals for the lending business; (ii) the
aggregate borrowing costs of borrowers charged by institutions in
the forms of interest and various fees should be annualized and
subject to the limit on interest rate of private lending set forth
in the
Provisions on Several
Issues Concerning Laws Applicable to Trials of Private Lending
Cases
issued by the Supreme People’s Court on August
6, 2015, or the Private Lending Judicial Interpretations; (iii) all
relevant institutions shall follow the "know-your-customer"
principle and prudentially assess and determine the borrower's
eligibility, credit limit and cooling-off period, etc., loans to
any borrower without income sources are prohibited; and (iv) all
relevant institutions shall enhance the internal risk control and
prudentially use the "data-driven" risk management
model.
Moreover,
Circular 141 provides that online lending information
intermediaries are prohibited from facilitating any loans to
students or other persons without repayment source or repayment
capacity, or loans with no designated use of proceeds, or
participating in the real estate mortgage business. Also, such
intermediaries are not permitted to deduct interest, handling fees,
management fees or deposits from the principal of loans provided to
the borrowers in advance.
Online lending information
intermediaries shall not match or match in a disguised form any
loans in violation of the provisions on the interest
rate.
Regulations on Microcredit Companies
In May
2008, the CBRC and the PBOC jointly issued the
Guiding Opinions of the China Banking
Regulatory Commission and the People’s Bank of China on the
Pilot Operation of Microcredit Companies
, or the Microcredit
Companies Guidelines, which provide that a microcredit company is a
company specialized in operating a small or micro lending business,
established with investments from natural persons, legal-person
enterprises or other social organizations, and not accepting any
public deposits. Currently there is no regulatory authority at the
national level with respect to the administration and supervision
of microcredit companies in the PRC.
Pursuant
to the Microcredit Companies Guidelines, if a provincial government
determines a competent department (office of finance or relevant
organizations) to be responsible for the supervision and
administration of microcredit companies and the regulation of risks
associated with microcredit companies, such provincial government
may carry out the pilot operation of microcredit companies within
such province. The applicant is required to file an application
with the competent department of the provincial government for
approval to establish a microcredit company. The major sources of
funds of a microcredit company are required to be the capital paid
by shareholders, donated capital and the capital borrowed from a
maximum of two banking financial institutions. Furthermore, the
balance of the capital borrowed from banking financial institutions
within the scope as prescribed by applicable laws and regulations
cannot exceed 50% of the net capital.
When
granting credit, microcredit companies are required to adhere to
the principle of "small loan amounts and diversification." They are
encouraged to provide credit services for farmers and small
businesses and make greater efforts to increase their number of
clients and expand their coverage of services. The outstanding
amount of credit granted by a microcredit company to the same
borrower cannot exceed 5% of the net capital of the company.
Microcredit companies are required to operate on the
market-oriented principle. The interest ceiling is floating but
cannot exceed the ceiling prescribed by the judicatory authority,
and the interest floor is required to be 0.9 times the base
interest rate published by the PBOC. The specific floating range is
required to be determined independently according to market
principles.
In
addition, according to the Microcredit Companies Guidelines,
microcredit companies are required to establish and improve the
corporate governance structure, the loan management system, the
enterprise financial accounting system, a prudent and normative
asset classification system and provision system for accurate asset
classification and adequate provision of bad debt reserves as well
as the information disclosure system and are required to accept
public scrutiny and cannot carry out illegal fund-raising in any
form.
In July
2015, the Internet Finance Guidelines firstly defined “Online
Microcredit”, which means small-sum loans provided to
customers over the internet by internet companies through
microcredit companies under their control. Online microcredit shall
comply with existing regulatory requirements for microcredit
companies. The online microcredit business shall be subject to the
supervision and administration of the CBRC.
In
August 2015, the Legislative Affairs Office of the State Council
issued the
Regulation on the
non-
depository lending institutions (Opinion
Soliciting
Draft)
. The draft regulation proposed that organizations
or individuals not licensed by regulatory authorities should be
prohibited from issuing or providing loans. In addition, for those
non-depository lending institutions that engage in lending business
through internet platforms, the draft regulation proposed to
specify that such institutions shall comply with this regulation as
well.
In
November 2017, the Internet Finance Rectification Office issued the
Notice on the Immediate Halt on
Approvals for Establishing Online Microcredit Companies
, or
the Halt Notice, which states that in the recent years, select
regional governments have approved online microcredit companies to
conduct small loan businesses online, and many of these companies
have conducted high interest "cash loan" businesses that hold a
high level of potential risk. The Halt Notice orders all local
financial regulatory authorities to stop approving the
establishment of new online microcredit companies and to prohibit
all microcredit companies from conducting lending business outside
the region for which they were approved by local
authorities.
As of
December 2017, Circular 141 requires the relevant regulatory
authorities to suspend the approval of the establishment of online
microcredit companies and the approval of any microcredit business
across provinces. Circular 141 also specifies that online
microcredit companies shall not provide campus loans and should
suspend the funding of network micro-loans with no specific
scenario or designated use of loan proceeds, gradually reduce the
volume of the existing business relating to such loans and take
rectification measures in a period to be separately specified by
authorities.
In the
event that our lending platforms are
considered to be conducting direct
lending, we may have to apply for the necessary permits to operate
such business. If we are required to obtain a “microcredit
approval” and establish an online microcredit company like
many other industry peers have done for their direct lending
business through the online marketplace, we may encounter
substantial obstacles as Circular 141 requires the relevant
regulatory authorities to suspend the approval of the establishment
of online microcredit companies and the approval of any microcredit
business conducted across provincial jurisdictions. The failure to
obtain such necessary approval or permit may have a material
adverse effect on our business. See "Risk Factors—Risks
Related to Our Business—If our online lending services are
considered providing direct loans to the customers, we may have to
obtain the relevant approval for such business, and the failure to
obtain such approval may have a material adverse effect on our
business."
Regulations on Third-Party Payment Providers
We rely
on commercial banks and other third-party payment providers to
manage the investor funds, originate and service loans, collect
service fees and ensure compliance with the relevant PRC laws and
regulations that may be relevant to our business. Third-party
payment agents in China are subject to oversight by the PBOC and
must comply with complex rules and regulations.
In
2010, the PBOC issued the
Measures
for the Administration of Payment Services of Non-Financial
Institutions
and its implementation rules, which require any
non-financial institution engaging in payment services, such as
online payment, issuance and acceptance of prepaid cards, and bill
collection via bankcard, to obtain a Payment Service License. The
registered capital of an applicant that engages in a nationwide
payment business must be at least RMB 100 million (US$14.4
million), while that of an applicant engaging in payment business
within a province must be at least RMB 30 million (US$4.3
million).
In
December 2015, the PBOC issued the
Administrative Measures for Online Payment
Services of Non-Bank Payment Institutions
, which provide
that a payment institution must follow the principles of "know your
clients" and establish a sound client identification mechanism. A
payment institution must not open payment accounts for financial
institutions, or other institutions engaging in financial services
such as credit extension, financing, wealth management, guarantee,
trust or currency exchange. In addition, it must not engage in,
directly or in a disguised form, businesses such as securities,
insurance, credit loans, financing, wealth management, guarantee,
trust, currency exchange, cash deposit and withdrawal
services.
In the
last few years, some third-party payment providers have been
punished by the PBOC for various violations. If our third-party
payment providers were to suspend, limit or cease their operations,
we would need to arrange substantially similar arrangements with
other third-party payment agents, and the operation of our platform
could be materially impaired and our results of operations would
suffer. See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our
Business—If we cannot continue to maintain relationships with
third-party service providers, or if increases in fees are incurred
by third-party service providers, our profitability could be
adversely affected."
Regulations on Private Loans
Interest Rate
The
Contract Law of the PRC
(i)
governs the formation, validity, performance, enforcement and
assignment of contracts, (ii) confirms the validity of loan
agreements between individuals and provides that the loan agreement
becomes effective when the individual lender provides the loan to
the individual borrower, and (iii) requires that the interest rates
charged under the loan agreement must not violate the applicable
provisions of the PRC laws and regulations.
In
accordance with the Private Lending Judicial Interpretations,
“private lending” is defined as financing between
individuals, legal entities and other organizations. When private
loans between individuals are paid by wire transfer, through online
lending platforms or by other similar means, the loan contracts
between individuals are deemed to be validated upon the deposit of
funds to the borrower’s account. In the event that the loans
are made through an online lending platform and the platform only
provides intermediary services, the courts shall dismiss the claims
of the parties concerned against the platform demanding the
repayment of loans by the platform as guarantors. However, if the
online lending information intermediary guarantees repayment of the
loans as evidenced by its web page, advertisements or other media,
or the court is provided with other proof, the lender’s claim
alleging that the online lending information intermediary shall
assume the obligations of a guarantor will be upheld by the
courts.
The
Private Lending Judicial Interpretations also provide that
agreements between the lender and borrower on loans with interest
rates below 24% per annum are valid and enforceable. As to loans
with interest rates per annum between 24% and 36%, if the interest
on the loans has already been paid to the lender, and so long as
such payment has not damaged the interest of the state, the
community and any third parties, the courts will turn down the
borrower’s request to demand the return of the interest
payment. If the annual interest rate of a private loan is higher
than 36%, the excess will not be enforced by the
courts.
In
August 2017, the Supreme People’s Court issued the
Circular of Several Suggestions on
Further Strengthening the Judicial Practice Regarding Financial
Cases
, or the Financial Cases Judicial Interpretations,
which provides, among others, that: (ⅰ) the claim of the
borrower under a financial loan agreement to adjust or cut down the
part of interest exceeding 24% per annum on the basis that the
aggregate amount of interest, compound interest, default interest,
liquidated damages and other fees collectively claimed by the
lender is overly high shall be supported by the PRC courts; and
(ⅱ) in the context of internet finance disputes, if the
online lending information intermediary platforms and the lender
circumvent the upper limit of the judicially protected interest
rate by charging intermediary fees, it shall be determined as
invalid.
Circular
141 outlines general requirements on the "cash loan" business
conducted by online microcredit companies, banking financial
institutions and online lending information intermediaries.
Circular 141 requires that (i) the aggregated borrowing costs of
borrowers charged by institutions in the forms of interest and
various fees should be annualized and subject to the limit on
interest rate of private lending set forth in the Private Lending
Judicial Interpretations; and (ii) the online lending information
intermediaries are not permitted to deduct interest, handling fees,
management fees or deposits from the principal of loans provided to
the borrowers in advance.
The
effective annual percentage rate for term loans facilitated by our
platform currently ranges from 14.1% to 20.8%, which comprises a
nominal interest rate and a loan facilitation fee we charge
borrowers and takes into account the effect on cost of the security
deposit that we deduct in advance. The interest rate component,
which is stipulated in the loan agreements, does not and is not
expected to exceed the mandatory limit for loan interest rates.
However, to deter borrowers from submitting later payments, we do
contractually charge high late fees of 10% one time and 0.1% daily.
These fees, combined with outstanding interest due on delinquent
accounts, would far exceed the limit of 36%.
In practice, we often forgive or
reduce these late fees if the borrower is cooperative in
negotiating a repayment schedule. In addition, we currently deduct
the loan facilitation fee and certain deposits in advance from the
principal, which is not in compliance with the requirements imposed
by Circular 141. We plan to re-examine our fee policies and make
the necessary changes as required by the local financial
regulators. See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our
Business—The transaction fees we charge borrowers and
merchants may decline in the future and any material decrease in
such fees could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations."
Intermediary Contractual Relationship
According
to the
Contract Law of the
PRC
, an intermediation contract is defined as a contract
whereby an intermediary presents to its client an opportunity for
entering into a contract or provides the client with other
intermediary services in connection with the conclusion of a
contract, and the client pays the intermediary service fees.
Pursuant to the same law, an intermediary must provide true
information relating to the proposed contract. If an intermediary
conceals any material fact intentionally or provides false
information in connection with the conclusion of the proposed
contract, which results in harm to the client's interests, the
intermediary may not claim for service fees and is liable for the
damages caused. The Financial Cases Judicial Interpretations
further specify that the relationship between an online lending
information intermediary and each party of an online lending loan
agreement shall be defined as an intermediary contractual
relationship, and the intermediary service fees charged by an
online lending information intermediary to circumvent the legal
limit of interest of private lending shall be invalid.
Transfer of Loans
Pursuant
to the
Contract Law of the
PRC
, a creditor may assign its rights under an agreement to
a third party, provided that the debtor is notified. Upon due
assignment of the creditor’s rights, the assignee is entitled
to the creditor’s rights and the debtor must perform the
relevant obligations under the agreement for the benefit of the
assignee. we operate a secondary loan market on our platform where
investors can transfer the loans they hold to other investors
before the loan reaches maturity. To facilitate the assignment of
the loans, the template loan agreement applicable to the lenders
and borrowers on our platform specifically provides that a lender
has the right to assign his/her rights under the loan agreement to
any third parties and the borrower agrees to such assignment.
However, Circular 57 only permits the low-frequency debts transfer
between the lender and the borrower. Though there is no clear
explanation of low-frequency debts transfer, our secondary loan
market may be considered in violation of Circular 57, and we may
need to modify our products accordingly, which may have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations. See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our
Business—Limited liquidity for the loans on our marketplace
may adversely affect the appeal of our marketplace to
investors."
Regulations on Illegal Fund-Raising
Raising
funds by entities or individuals from the general public must be
conducted in strict compliance with applicable PRC laws and
regulations to avoid administrative and criminal
liabilities.
In July
1998, the State Council promulgated the
Measures for the Banning of Illegal Financial
Institutions and Illegal Financial Business Operations
,
which became effective on July 1, 1998 and were amended in 2011. In
July 2007, the General Office of the State Council issued the
Notice on Relevant Issues
Concerning the Penalty on Illegal Fund-Raising
. These
measures explicitly prohibit illegal public fund-raising. The main
features of illegal public fund-raising include:
(i)
illegally
soliciting and raising funds from the general public by means of
issuing stocks, bonds, lotteries or other securities without
obtaining the approval of relevant authorities;
(ii)
promising a return
of interest or profits or investment returns in cash, properties or
other forms within a specified period of time; and
(iii)
using a legitimate
form to disguise an unlawful purpose.
In
December 2010, the Supreme People's Court issued the
Judicial Interpretations to Issues Concerning
Applications of Laws for Trial of Criminal Cases on Illegal
Fund-Raising
, or the Illegal Fund-Raising Judicial
Interpretations, in order to further clarify the criminal charges
and punishments relating to illegal public fund-raising. The
Illegal Fund-Raising Judicial Interpretations provide that a public
fund-raising will constitute a criminal offense related to
"illegally soliciting deposits from the public" under the
Criminal Law of the PRC
, if
it meets all the following four criteria:
(i)
the fund-raising
has not been approved by the relevant authorities or is concealed
under the guise of legitimate acts;
(ii)
the fund-raising
employs general solicitation or advertising such as social media,
promotion meetings, leafleting and SMS advertising;
(iii)
the fundraiser
promises to repay, after a specified period of time, the capital
and interests, or investment returns in cash, properties in kind
and other forms; and
(iv)
the fund-raising
targets the general public as opposed to specific
individuals.
Pursuant
to the Illegal Fund-Raising Judicial Interpretations, an offender
that is an entity will be subject to criminal liabilities, if it
illegally solicits deposits from the general public or illegally
solicits deposits in disguised form (i) with the amount of deposits
involved exceeding RMB 1,000,000 (US$147,507.9), (ii) with over 150
fund-raising targets involved, or (iii) with direct economic loss
caused to fund-raising targets exceeding RMB 500,000 (US$73,753.9),
or (iv) the illegal fund-raising activities have caused baneful
influences to the public or have led to other severe consequences.
An individual offender is also subject to criminal liabilities but
with lower thresholds. In addition, an individual or an entity who
has aided in illegal fund-raising from the general public and
charges fees including but not limited to agent fees, rewards,
rebates and commission, may be considered an accomplice in the
crime of illegal fund-raising.
In
March 2014, the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's
Procurator and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued the
Opinions of the Supreme People's
Court, the Supreme People's Procurator and the Ministry of Public
Security on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the
Illegal Fund-Raising Criminal Cases
, which provide that the
administrative proceeding for determining the nature of illegal
fund-raising activities is not a prerequisite procedure for the
initiation of criminal proceedings concerning the crime of illegal
fund-raising, and the administrative departments' failure in
determining the nature of illegal fund-raising activities does not
affect the investigation, prosecution and trial of cases concerning
the crime of illegal fund-raising.
In
addition, the Interim Measures and the Custodian Guidelines require
each online lending information intermediary to separate its own
funds from the funds of investors and borrowers, choose one
qualified commercial bank as the fund custodian institutions for
the funds of lenders and borrowers, and limit the maximum amount of
the loan borrowed by one person. According to the Custodian
Guidelines, online lending information intermediaries are further
required to review and verify the records and information of their
custody accounts with its fund custodian institution on a daily
basis.
Though
our marketplace only acts as a service provider in the facilitation
of loans between borrowers and investors, in some situations we may
be negligently liable as a facilitator of an illegal
use.
See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—The facilitation
of loans through our marketplace could give rise to liabilities
under PRC laws and regulations that prohibit illegal
fundraising."
Regulations on Unauthorized Public Offerings
The
Securities Law of the PRC
stipulates that no organization or individual is permitted to issue
securities for public offering without obtaining prior approval in
accordance with the provisions of the law. The following offerings
are deemed to be public offerings under the
Securities Law of the PRC
:
(i)
offering of
securities to non-specific targets;
(ii)
offering of
securities to more than 200 specific targets; and
(iii)
other offerings
provided by the laws and administrative regulations.
Additionally,
private offerings of securities shall not be carried out through
advertising, open solicitation and disguised publicity campaigns.
If any transaction between one borrower and multiple investors on
our marketplace is identified as a public offering by PRC
government authorities, we may be subject to sanctions under PRC
laws and our business may be adversely affected. See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—The facilitation
of loans through our marketplace could give rise to liabilities
under PRC laws and regulations that prohibit unauthorized public
offerings."
Regulations on Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism
Financing
In
October 2006, the Standing Committee of the National People’s
Congress, or the SCNPC, promulgated the
Anti-Money Laundering Law of the PRC
,
which became effective on January 1, 2007 and sets forth the
principal anti-money laundering requirements applicable to
financial institutions as well as non-financial institutions with
anti-money laundering obligations, including the adoption of
precautionary and supervisory measures, establishment of various
systems for client identification, retention of clients’
identification information and transactions records, and reports on
large transactions and suspicious transactions. According to the
Anti-Money Laundering Law of the
PRC
, financial institutions subject to the
Anti-Money Laundering Law of the PRC
include banks, credit unions, trust investment companies, stock
brokerage companies, futures brokerage companies, insurance
companies and other financial institutions as listed and published
by the State Council, while the list of the non-financial
institutions with anti-money laundering obligations will be
published by the State Council. The PBOC and other governmental
authorities issued a series of administrative rules and regulations
to specify the anti-money laundering obligations of financial
institutions and certain non-financial institutions, such as
payment institutions. However, the State Council has not
promulgated the list of the non-financial institutions with
anti-money laundering obligations.
The
Internet Finance Guidelines require internet finance service
providers to comply with certain anti-money laundering
requirements, including the establishment of a customer
identification program, the monitoring and reporting of suspicious
transactions, the preservation of customer information and
transaction records, and the provision of assistance to the public
security department and judicial authority in investigations and
proceedings in relation to anti-money laundering matters. The PBOC
will formulate implementation rules to further specify the
anti-money laundering obligations of internet finance service
providers.
The
Interim Measures and the Custodian Guidelines also require internet
finance service providers, including online lending information
intermediaries, to comply with certain anti-money laundering
requirements, including the establishment of a customer
identification program, the monitoring and reporting of suspicious
transactions, the preservation of customer information and
transaction records, and the provision of assistance to the public
security department and judicial authority in investigations and
proceedings in relation to anti-money laundering
matters.
In
December 2015, the SCNPC promulgated the
Anti-Terrorism Law of the PRC
, which
became effective on January 1, 2006 and requires telecoms and
internet companies to cooperate with the government on
counter-terrorism investigations. For example, companies are
required to provide "technical interfaces, decryption and other
technical support assistance to public security organs and state
security organs conducting prevention and investigation of
terrorist activities in accordance with law." In addition,
telecommunications operators and internet service providers shall,
according to provisions of law and administrative regulations, put
into practice cybersecurity systems and information content
monitoring systems, technical prevention and safety measures, to
avoid the dissemination of information with terrorist or extremist
content.
In
August 2017, the General Office of the State Council issued the
Opinions of the General Office of
the State Council on Improving Anti-Money Laundering,
Anti-Terrorism Financing and Anti-Tax Evasion Regulatory Systems
and Mechanisms,
which clarify that the state will strengthen
risk monitoring over particular non-financial institutions and
explore the establishment of anti-money laundering and
anti-terrorism financing regulatory systems for particular
non-financial institutions. Anti-money laundering related
authorities should, under the principle of "one policy for one
industry", jointly with specific non-financial industry related
authorities, issue anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism
financing regulatory systems for particular
industries.
In
cooperation with our partnering custody bank and third party
payment companies, we have adopted various policies and procedures,
such as internal controls and "know-your-customer" procedures, for
anti-money laundering purposes. We are in the process of ensuring
that all of our policies and procedures fully comply with the
requirements set forth in the Interim Measures. However, the
implementation rules of the Guidelines have not been published,
there is uncertainty as to how the anti-money laundering
requirements in the Guidelines will be interpreted and implemented,
and whether online consumer finance service providers like us must
abide by the rules and procedures set forth in the
Anti-Money Laundering Law of the PRC
that are applicable to non-financial institutions with anti-money
laundering obligations remains unclear. Therefore, we cannot assure
you that our existing anti-money laundering policies and procedures
will be deemed to be in full compliance with any anti-money
laundering laws and regulations. In addition, we cannot assure you
that the anti-money laundering policies and procedures we adopt
will be effective in protecting our marketplace from being
exploited for money laundering purposes or will be deemed to be in
compliance with applicable anti-money laundering implementation
rules if and when adopted. See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to
Our Business—If our online lending services are deemed to
violate any PRC laws or regulations governing the online lending
industry in China, our business, financial condition and results of
operations would be materially and adversely
affected—Anti-Money Laundering."
Regulations Relating to Internet-based Services
Regulations on Value-Added Telecommunication Services
In
September 2000, the State Council promulgated the
Telecommunications Regulations of the
PRC
, or the Telecommunications Regulations, which became
effective on September 25, 2000 and were amended in 2014 and 2016,
respectively. The Telecommunications Regulations (i) provide a
regulatory framework for telecommunications services providers in
the PRC; (ii) require telecommunications services providers to
obtain an operating license prior to the commencement of their
operations; (iii) categorize telecommunications services into basic
telecommunication services and value-added telecommunications
services. According to the
Catalog
of Telecommunications Business
, attached to the
Telecommunications Regulations, information services provided via
fixed network, mobile network and internet fall within value-added
telecommunications services.
In September 2000, the State Council also promulgated the
Administrative
Measures on Internet Information Services
, which became effective on September
25, 2000 and were amended in 2011. Pursuant to the measures,
"internet information services" refer to provision of internet
information to online users, and are divided into "commercial
internet information services" and "non-commercial internet
information services." A commercial internet information services
operator must obtain an ICP License from the relevant government
authorities before engaging in any commercial internet information
services operations in China, while the ICP license will not be
required if the operator only provides internet information on a
non-commercial basis. The ICP License has a term of five years and
can be renewed within 90 days before
expiration.
In March 2009, the MIIT issued the
Administrative
Measures on Telecommunications Business Operating
Licenses
, which
became effective on April 10, 2009 and were amended in 2017 and set
forth more specific provisions regarding the types of licenses
required to operate value-added telecommunications services, the
qualifications and procedures for obtaining such licenses and the
administration and supervision of such licenses. Under these
regulations, a commercial operator of value-added
telecommunications services must first obtain a license for
value-added telecommunications business, or VATS License, from the
MIIT or its provincial level counterparts, otherwise such operator
might be subject to sanctions including corrective orders and
warnings from the competent administration authority, fines and
confiscation of illegal gains and, in the case of significant
infringements, the websites may be ordered to
close.
Qingyi Technology, one of the subsidiaries of our consolidated
variable interest entity, has obtained an ICP License for provision
of commercial internet information services issued by the Hebei
Telecommunication Administration Bureau in May 2016. In addition,
the other subsidiaries of our consolidated variable interest entity
that operate online services, Beijing Yihaoche Technology and
Dianfubao Investments Limited have each applied for the applicable
VATS License and have the necessary file number to operate until
the final VATS License is granted.
Before the issuance of the Interim Measures in August 2016, there
was no clear or official regulation or guidance from the PRC
government as to whether online lending information service was a
type of value-added telecommunication services and whether its
provider should be subject to value-added telecommunication
regulations. Since then the Interim Measures came into
force,
such that an
online lending information intermediary
must apply for
an appropriate telecommunication
business license in accordance with relevant provisions of
competent telecommunications departments. However, as the
implementation rules of the Interim Measures have not been
published, there is uncertainty as to how the registration
requirements in the Interim Measures will be interpreted and
implemented, and which type of telecommunication business operating
licenses that online lending service providers like us are required
to obtain. We plan to apply for any requisite telecommunication
services license once the detailed implementation rules become
available.
Furthermore,
as we are providing mobile applications to mobile device users, it
is uncertain if the subsidiaries of our consolidated variable
interest entity that operate mobile applications will be required
to obtain a separate operating license in addition to the ICP
License. We have not applied for such separate license. We cannot
assure you that we will not be required to apply for an operating
license for our mobile applications in the future. See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—We may
be adversely affected by the complexity, uncertainties and changes
in PRC regulation of internet-related businesses and companies, and
any lack of requisite approvals, licenses or permits applicable to
our business may have a material adverse effect on our business and
results of operations."
Regulations on Mobile Internet Applications Information
Services
In June
2016, the Cyberspace Administration of China issued the
Administrative Provisions on
Mobile Internet Applications Information Services
, or the
APP Provisions. Under the APP Provisions, mobile application
information service providers (including App owners or operators)
are required to obtain relevant qualifications prescribed by laws
and regulations and shall be responsible for the supervision and
administration of mobile application information required by laws
and regulations and to implement the information security
management responsibilities strictly, including but not limited
to:
(i)
authenticating the
identity information of the registered users;
(ii)
protecting user
information, and obtaining the consent of users while collecting
and using users’ personal information in a lawful and proper
manner;
(iii)
establishing
information content audit and management mechanism, and take
against any information content in violation of laws or regulations
depending on circumstances;
(iv)
establishing and
improving the verification and management mechanism for the
information content;
(v)
adopting proper
sanctions and measures relating to the release of illegal
information content;
(vi)
respecting and
protecting intellectual property rights of others; and
(vii)
recording and
retaining users’ log information the same for sixty (60)
days.
See
"Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business —We may be
held liable for information or content displayed on, retrieved from
or linked to our mobile applications, which may materially and
adversely affect our business and operating results."
Regulations on Online Transactions
In
January 2014, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce,
or the SAIC, issued the
Administrative Measures for Online
Transactions
, or the Online Transactions Measures, which
strengthen the protection of consumers and impose stringent
requirements and obligations on online business operators and
third-party online marketplace operators. Online business operators
and third-party online marketplace operators are prohibited from
collecting any information on consumers and business operators or
disclosing, selling or providing any such information to any third
party, or sending commercial electronic messages to consumers
without their consent. Fictitious transactions, deletion of adverse
comments and technical attacks on competitors’ websites are
prohibited as well. In addition, third-party online marketplace
operators are required to examine and verify the identifications of
the online business operators and set up and retain relevant
records for at least two years. Moreover, any third-party online
marketplace operator that simultaneously engages in online trading
for products and services should clearly distinguish itself from
other online business operators on the marketplace platform. For an
entity or individual that has been registered with the SAIC or its
local counterparts and obtained a business license, if it engages
in online commodity trading and related services, it shall disclose
the information indicated in its business license or an electronic
linkage identifier of its business license at a notable position of
the homepage of its website or the web-page where it conducts its
business activities. We are subject to these measures as a result
of our online platform services.
The
Online Transaction Measures also specify that online distributors
or related service operators, as well as marketplace platform
providers, shall conduct their business in full compliance with the
Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the
PRC
and other relevant PRC laws and regulations, and shall
not unfairly compete with other operators or disturb social and
economic orders, including but not limited to carrying out any
fictitious transactions and deleting any unfavorable
comments.
Regulations on Internet Advertising
In July
2016, the SAIC issued the
Interim
Measures for Administration of Internet Advertising
, or the
Internet Advertising Measures, which provide that the internet
advertisers are responsible for the authenticity of the content of
advertisements. The identity, administrative license, cited
information and other certificates that advertisers are required to
obtain in publishing internet advertisements shall be true and
valid. Internet advertisements shall be distinguishable and
prominently marked as "advertisements" in order to enable consumers
to identify them as advertisements. Publishing and circulating
advertisements through the internet shall not affect the normal use
of the internet by users. It is not allowed to induce users to
click on the content of advertisements by any fraudulent means, or
to attach advertisements or advertising links in the emails without
permission.
The
Internet Advertising Measures also impose several restrictions on
the forms of advertisements and activities used in advertising.
"Internet advertising" as defined in the Internet Advertising
Measures refers to commercial advertisements that directly or
indirectly promote goods or services through websites, web pages,
internet applications or other internet media in various forms,
including texts, pictures, audio clips and videos. Where internet
advertisements are not identifiable and marked as "advertisements",
a fine of not more than RMB 100,000 (US$15,304) may be imposed in
accordance with the
Advertising
Law of the PRC
. A fine ranging from RMB 5,000 (US$765) to
RMB 30,000 (US$4,591) may be imposed for any failure to provide a
prominently marked "CLOSE" button to ensure "one-click closure".
Advertisers who induce users to click on the content of
advertisements by fraudulent means or without permission, attach
advertisements or advertising links in the emails shall be imposed
a fine ranging from RMB 10,000 (US$1,530) to RMB 30,000
(US$4,591).
Regulations on Cybersecurity
PRC
government authorities have enacted laws and regulations with
respect to internet information security and protection of personal
information from any abuse or unauthorized disclosure. Internet
information in China is also regulated and restricted from a
national security standpoint.
In
December 2000, the SCNPC promulgated the
Decisions on Maintaining Internet
Security
, which became effective on December 28, 2000 and
may subject violators to criminal punishment in China for any
effort to: (i) gain improper entry into a computer or system of
strategic importance; (ii) disseminate politically disruptive
information; (iii) leak state secrets; (iv) spread false commercial
information; or (v) infringe intellectual property rights. The
Ministry of Public Security has issued measures that prohibit use
of the internet in ways which, among other things, result in a
leakage of state secrets or a spread of socially destabilizing
content. If an internet information service provider violates these
measures, the Ministry of Public Security and the local security
bureaus may revoke its operating license and shut down its
websites.
In
September 2016, the MIIT issued the
Trial Administrative Measures on Use,
Operation and Maintenance of Internet Information Security
Management System,
or the Trial Administrative
Measures
,
to regulate
internet-based service providers' internet information security
management systems' operation and maintenance
to provide guidance on the use,
operation and maintenance of internet information security
management systems for both local communications administrations
and internet access service providers. The "internet information
security management systems" referred to in the Trial
Administrative Measures include ministerial-level systems,
provincial-level systems, and enterprise systems constructed or
rented by telecommunications business operators operating internet
data centers (including internet resource collaboration services)
and providing internet access services and content delivery network
services. The MIIT, along with local communications
administrations, is responsible for directing, supervising and
coordinating the use and operation & maintenance of respective
levels of those systems. The Trial Administrative Measures mainly
include three parts:
(i)
use requirements
such as system data management, management of violating websites
and illegal information, and access log management;
(ii)
operation &
maintenance requirements such as system operation monitoring,
capacity expansion and upgrade, security protection, privilege
management, audit of operational log, and data security;
and
(iii)
auxiliary
requirements such as organizational framework, education and
training, and offering assistance.
In
particular, the Trial Administrative Measures require telecom
authority and enterprises to introduce a privilege management model
for staff of the internet information security management system,
to keep an operational log and conduct audits regularly, and to
retain such log and audit record for at least six months. In
addition, enterprises are required to use their own enterprise
systems to keep access log, and provide such log within two hours
upon a lawful request of review from relevant
departments.
In
November 2016, the SCNPC promulgated the
Cybersecurity Law of the PRC
, or the
Cybersecurity Law, which became effective on June 1, 2017 and
requires information technology network operators, including online
lending service providers, to take technical measures and other
necessary measures to ensure the secure and stable operation of the
network, effectively respond to cyber security incidents, prevent
illegal crimes committed on the network, and maintain the
integrity, confidentiality and availability of network data. The
Cybersecurity Law emphasizes that any individuals and organizations
that use networks is required to comply with the
Constitution of the PRC
and the laws of
the PRC, abide by public order and cannot endanger network security
or make use of networks to engage in unlawful activities such as
endangering national security, economic order and social order, and
infringing the reputation, privacy, intellectual property rights
and other lawful rights and interests of other people. Any
violation of the provisions and requirements under the
Cybersecurity Law may subject the internet service provider to
warnings, fines, confiscation of illegal gains, revocation of
licenses, cancellation of filings, closedown of websites or even
criminal liabilities.
In
addition, the Guidelines purport, among other things, to require
online lending information intermediaries to improve technology
security standards and safeguard customer and transaction
information. The Interim Measures requires the online lending
information intermediaries, among other things, to (i) carry out
grading filing and testing for their information systems, (ii)
implement thorough cyberspace security facilities and management
measures, including firewall, intrusion detect, data encryption,
and disaster recovery, etc., (iii) establish information technology
management, technology risk management, technology auditing and
related systems, (iv) allocate sufficient resources and implement
thorough management and control measures and technological means to
ensure safe and steady operation of their information systems, (v)
protect the security of the information of lenders and borrowers,
(vi) carry out a comprehensive security evaluation at least once
every two years, (vii) accept the information security inspection
and auditing by competent authorities, and (viii) establish or
adopt application-level disaster recovery systems and facilities
compatible with their business scales within two years after their
establishment.
In
August 2017, the MIIT issued the
Notice on Promulgating the Measures for
Monitoring and Handling Threats to the Cyber Security of Public
Internet
, which provide that the telecommunications
authorities may take one or more measures from the following
options on cybersecurity threats:
(i)
notify the basic
telecommunication enterprises, internet enterprises, and management
and services agencies for domain name registration to adopt
measures such as suspension of services or blockage on malicious IP
address (or broadband access account), malicious domain name,
malicious URL, malicious e-mail account or malicious mobile phone
number;
(ii)
notify the network
service providers to clear the malicious programmers in the
network, system or website of their entities which may be
spread;
(iii)
notify the
providers of network services and products that have loopholes, the
back door of which may have already been illegally invaded,
controlled or altered to adopt rectification measures and to
eliminate safety risks; if the problems are related to the
infrastructures of the party and government organs and key
information, the upper authorities and the network cyberspace
administration shall also be notified.
See
"Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—A security
breach or malicious attack by way of hacking, cyber-attacks,
infiltration of computer viruses, physical or e-sabotage, could
damage our reputation, expose us to the risks of litigation and
liability, disrupt our business or otherwise harm our results of
operations."
Regulations on Privacy Protection
In
recent years, PRC government authorities have enacted laws and
regulations on internet use to protect personal information from
any unauthorized disclosure.
In
December 2011, the MIIT issued the
Several Provisions on Regulating the Market
Order of Internet Information Services
, pursuant to which an
internet information service provider may not collect any
user’s personal information or provide any such information
to third parties without the consent of the user. An internet
information service provider must expressly inform the users of the
method, content and purpose of the collection and processing of
such user personal information and may only collect such
information necessary for the provision of its services. An
internet information service provider is also required to properly
maintain the user’s personal information, and in case of any
leak or likely leak of the user’s personal information, the
internet information service provider must take immediate remedial
measures and, in severe circumstances, make an immediate report to
the telecommunications regulatory authority.
In
addition, pursuant to the
Decision
on Strengthening the Protection of Online Information
promulgated by the SCNPC in December 2012 and the
Order for the Protection of Telecommunication
and Internet User Personal Information
issued by the MIIT in
July 2013, any collection and use of user personal information must
be subject to the consent of the user, abide by the principles of
legality, rationality and necessity and be within the specified
purposes, methods and scopes. An internet information service
provider must also keep such information strictly confidential, and
is further prohibited from divulging, tampering or destroying of
any such information, or selling or providing such information to
other parties. An internet information service provider is required
to take technical and other measures to prevent the collected
personal information from any unauthorized disclosure, damage or
loss. Any violation of these laws and regulations may subject the
internet information service provider to warnings, fines,
confiscation of illegal gains, revocation of licenses, cancellation
of filings, closedown of websites or even criminal
liabilities.
In
August 2015, the SCNPC promulgated the
Ninth Amendment to the Criminal Law of the
PRC
, pursuant to which any internet service provider that
fails to fulfill the obligations related to internet information
security administration as required by applicable laws and refuses
to rectify upon orders shall be subject to criminal penalty for the
result of (i) any dissemination of illegal information in large
scale; (ii) any severe effect due to the leakage of the
client’s information; (iii) any serious loss of criminal
evidence; or (iv) other severe situation; and any individual or
entity that sells or provides personal information to others in a
way violating the applicable law, or steals or illegally obtain any
personal information, shall be subject to criminal penalty in
severe situations.
In May
2017, the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme
People’s Procuratorate jointly issued the
Interpretations of the Supreme People’s
Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate on Several
Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Handling of
Criminal Cases Involving Infringement of Citizens’ Personal
Information
, which provide more practical conviction and
sentencing criteria for the infringement of citizens’
personal information and mark a milestone for the criminal
protection of citizens’ personal information. Pursuant to the
Interpretations, the following activities may constitute the crime
of infringing upon a citizen’s personal
information:
(i)
providing a
citizen’s personal information to specified persons or
releasing a citizen’s personal information online or through
other methods in violation of relevant national
provisions;
(ii)
providing
legitimately collected information relating to a citizen to others
without such citizen’s consent (unless the information is
processed, not traceable to a specific person and not
recoverable);
(iii)
collecting a
citizen’s personal information in violation of applicable
rules and regulations when performing a duty or providing services;
or
(iv)
collecting a
citizen’s personal information by purchasing, accepting or
exchanging such information in violation of applicable rules and
regulations.
The
Cybersecurity Law has reaffirmed the basic principles and
requirements as specified in other existing laws and regulations on
personal information protections, such as the requirements on the
collection, use, processing, storage and disclosure of personal
information, and internet service providers being required to take
technical and other necessary measures to ensure the security of
the personal information they have collected and prevent the
personal information from being divulged, damaged or lost.
Moreover, the Cybersecurity Law requires network operators to
perform certain functions related to internet security protection
and the strengthening of network information management. For
instance, under the Cybersecurity Law, network operators of key
information infrastructure generally shall, during their operations
in the PRC, store the personal information and important data
collected and produced within the territory of the
PRC.
Furthermore,
the Interim Measures require online lending information
intermediaries to reinforce the management of lenders’ and
borrowers’ information, so as to ensure the legitimacy and
security regarding the collection, processing and use of
lenders’ and borrowers’ information. Also, online
lending information intermediaries should keep confidential the
lenders’ and borrowers’ information collected in the
course of their business, and should not use such information for
any other purpose except for services they provide without approval
of lenders or borrowers.
We are
currently in the process of ensuring that our policies and
procedures will be deemed to be in full compliance with the above
laws and regulations. However, we cannot assure you that our
existing policies and procedures will be deemed to be in full
compliance with any laws and regulations that are applicable, or
may become applicable to us in the future. See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—We may be subject
to liabilities imposed by relevant governmental regulations due to
the personal data and other confidential information of borrowers
and investors which we collect or are provided access
to."
Regulations Relating to the Trucking Industry
Regulations on Emission Standards
In
September 1987, the SCNPC promulgated the
Law of the PRC on Prevention and Control of
Atmospheric Pollution
, or the Atmospheric Pollution Law,
which became effective on June 1, 1988 and was amended in 1995,
2000 and 2015, respectively. According to this law, the State
adopts fiscal, tax and government procurement measures etc. to
promote energy-saving and environmental-friendly and new energy
motor vehicles and vessels, restricts the development of high fuel
consumption, high emission motor vehicles and vessels. The
Atmospheric Pollution Law also stipulates that Motor vehicles shall
not emit atmospheric pollutants beyond the standards, and
manufacturing, importation or sale of motor vehicles which emit
atmospheric pollutants beyond the standards shall be prohibited.
Motor vehicle manufacturing and importing enterprises shall post
emission inspection information for motor vehicles manufactured and
imported by them, information on pollution control techniques and
information on the relevant maintenance and repair techniques, and
they should recall the motor vehicles when it is a case of design
or manufacturing defect or non-compliance with the stipulated
requirements for sustainable environmental protection.
In
January 2016, The Ministry of Environmental Protection, or the MEP,
and the MIIT issued the
Notice on
the implementation of the fifth stage motor vehicle emission
standards,
the main content concerning
the implementation of the
Limits and Measurement Methods for
Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles(CHINA 5)( GB
18352.5-2013)
, and the fifth stage of the
Limits and measurement methods for exhaust
pollutants from compression ignition and gas fueled positive
ignition engines of vehicles(Ⅲ, Ⅳ,
Ⅴ)( GB 17691-2005),
or the National-V standard.
The National-V standard is similar to the level V of European
emission standards, or the Euro V standard, and requires sulfur
content in fuel to be no more than 10 parts per million, one-fifth
of the National IV’s 50 ppm requirement. The notice calls for
nationwide implementation of the National V standard for light
petrol vehicles and heavy diesel vehicles used for public
transportation, environmental sanitation and postal services from
January 1, 2017. It also requires all heavy diesel vehicles across
the country to meet the standard from July 1, 2017. All light
diesel vehicles throughout China must conform to the standard from
January 1, 2018.
In
December 2016, the MEP and the MIIT jointly issued the
Limits and Measurement Methods for Emissions
from Light-Duty Vehicles(CHINA 6)
(GB18352.6-2016), or the National-VI standard, which will come into
effect on July 1, 2020 and replace the
CHINA 5, GB 18352.5-2013
. Compared to
National-V standard, National-VI standard emission limits for
heavy-duty diesel vehicles: NOx limit reduced 80% from 2.0 to 0.4
g/kWh; PM limit reduced 50% from 0.02 to 0.01 g/kWh, most
importantly, to meet this PM limit, diesel vehicles must install
wall-flow diesel particulate filters (DPFs), which trap 99% of
particles including black carbon.
If our
customers are affected by such emission regulations, we may see a
decrease in our loan volumes and an increase in default which, in
turn, would adversely and materially affect our operating results.
See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our
Business—Stringent regulations on the trucking industry and
the proliferation of electric vehicles as transportation tools may
have a material adverse effect on our trucking related
businesses."
Regulations on Safety Standards
In
October 2003, the SCNPC promulgated the
Law of the PRC on Road Traffic Safety
,
which became effective on May 1, 2004 and was amended in 2007 and
2011, respectively. Under the
Law
of the PRC on Road Traffic Safety
and its implementation
rules, passenger vehicles, heavy trucks and semi-trailer tractors
used for public roads operation shall be installed the national
standard vehicle driving data recorder. As to the verified loading
capacity, the cargo motor vehicle carrying capacity shall not
exceed the verified loading capacity approved by the motor vehicle
driving license, the loading length and width shall not exceed the
carriage, and shall comply with other special regulations. If a
cargo motor vehicle operator violates the relevant loading capacity
regulations, a fine of not less than 200 yuan but not more than 500
yuan shall be imposed; and if the verified loading capacity is
exceeded by 30 per cent or the vehicle carries passengers in
violation of relevant regulations, a fine of not less than 500 yuan
but not more than 2,000 yuan shall be imposed.
In
August 2016, the Ministry of Transportation issued the
Administrative Provisions concerning the
Running of Cargo Vehicles with Out-of-Gauge Goods
, pursuant
to which, cargo vehicles running on public roads shall not carry
cargo weighing more than the limits prescribed by this regulation
and their dimensions shall not exceed those as set forth in the
same regulation. Vehicle operators who violate this regulation may
be subject to a fine of up to RMB 30,000 for each violation. In the
event of repeated violations, the regulatory authority may suspend
the operating license of the vehicle operator and/or revoke the
business operation registration of the relevant
vehicle.
In
April 2017, the Ministry of Transportation issued the
Notice of the Ministry of Transportation on
Issues concerning the Implementation of Running of Cargo Vehicles
with Out-of-Gauge Good
, which further emphasizes the
strengthening of illegal over-limit transport management, and
stipulates that if the outer dimensions exceed the specified
standard for the transport of special vehicles on the public roads,
the license administration shall be implemented.
See "Risk Factors—Risks
Related to Our Business—Stringent regulations on the trucking
industry and the proliferation of electric vehicles as
transportation tools may have a material adverse effect on our
trucking related businesses."
Regulations Relating to Hotel Operation
The
hotel industry in China is subject to a number of laws and
regulations, including laws and regulations relating specifically
to hotel operation and management, as
well as those relating to environmental and consumer protection. As
of the date of this Annual Report, we have complied with all such
related laws and regulations in all material respects, and we have
never been subject to any material fines or other penalties under
any such related laws and regulations. The principal regulation
gov
erning foreign ownership of hotel businesses in the PRC
is the
Guidance Catalog of
Industries for Foreign Investment,
or the
Foreign Investment Industry
Catalog. Pursuant to this catalog, there are no restrictions on
foreign investment in limited service hotel businesses in China
aside from business licenses and other permits that every hotel
must obtain. Relative to other industries in China, regulations
governing the hotel industry in China are still developing and
evolving. As a result, most legislative actions have consisted of
general measures such as industry standards, rules or circulars
issued by different ministries rather than detailed
legislations.
Regulations on Hotel Operation
In
April 1987, the State Council promulgated the
Regulations on the Administration of Public
Area Hygiene
, which became effective on April 1, 1987 and
were amended in 2016. According to these regulations, a hotel must
obtain a public area hygiene license before opening for business,
and hotels failing to obtain a public area hygiene license may be
subject to the following administrative penalties depending on the
seriousness of their respective activities: (i) warnings; (ii)
fines; or (iii) orders to suspend or cease continuing business
operations. In March 2011, the Ministry of Health issued the
Implementation Rules of the Public
Area Hygiene Administration Regulation
, which became
effective on May 1, 2011 and were amended in 2016 and 2017,
respectively. According to the implementation rules, starting from
May 1, 2011, hotel operators shall establish hygiene administration
system and keep records of hygiene administration.
In
November 1987, the Ministry of Public Security issued the
Measures for the Control of
Security in the Hotel Industry
, which became effective on
November 10, 1987 and were amended in 2011. Pursuant to the
Measures for the Control of
Security in the Hotel Industry
and the
Decision of the State Council on Establishing
Administrative License for the Administrative Examination and
Approval Items Really Necessary to Be Retained
(promulgated
by the State Council
in June 2004), anyone who applies
to operate a hotel is subject to examination and approval by the
local public security authority and must obtain a special industry
license. The
Measures for the
Control of Security in the Hotel Industry
impose certain
security control obligations on the operators. For example, the
hotel must examine the identification card of any guest to whom
accommodation is provided and make an accurate registration. The
hotel must also report to the local public security authority if it
discovers anyone violating the law or behaving suspiciously or an
offender wanted by the public security authority. Pursuant to the
Measures for the Control of
Security in the Hotel Industry
, hotels failing to obtain the
special industry license may be subject to warnings or fines of up
to RMB200 (US$31). In addition, pursuant to various local
regulations, hotels failing to obtain the special industry license
may be subject to warnings, orders to suspend or cease continuing
business operations, confiscations of illegal gains or
fines.
In
April 1998, the SCNPC promulgated the
Fire Prevention Law of the PRC
, which
became effective on September 1, 1998 and was amended in 2008. In
April 2009, the Ministry of Public Security issued the
Provisions on Supervision and Inspection on
Fire Prevention and Control
, which became effective on May
1, 2009 and were amended in 2012. Pursuant to these regulations,
public gathering places such as hotels shall submit a fire
prevention design plan to apply for the completion acceptance of
fire prevention facilities for their construction projects and to
pass a fire prevention safety inspection by the local public
security fire department, which is a prerequisite for opening
business; and hotels failing to obtain approval of fire prevention
design plans or failing fire prevention safety inspections may be
subject to: (i) orders to suspend the construction of projects, use
or operation of business; and (ii) fines between RMB30,000
(US$4,591) and RMB300,000 (US$45,912).
In
January 2006, the State Council promulgated the
Regulations for Administration of
Entertainment Places
, which became effective on March 1,
2006 and were amended in 2016. In March 2006, the Ministry of
Culture issued the
Circular on
Carrying Out the Regulations for Administration of Entertainment
Places
. In February 2013, the Ministry of Culture issued the
Administrative Measures for
Entertainment Places
, which became effective on March 11,
2013 and were amended in 2017. Under these regulations, hotels that
provide entertainment facilities are required to obtain a license
for entertainment business operations.
In
February 2009, the SCNPC promulgated the
Food Safety Law of the PRC
, which
became effective on June 1, 2009 and was amended in 2015. According
to the
Food Safety Law of the
PRC
, any hotel that provides food must obtain a food service
license and any food hygiene license which had been obtained prior
to June 1, 2009 will be replaced by the food service license once
the food hygiene license expires.
In
October 2010, the General Administration of Quality Supervision,
Inspection and Quarantine and Standardization Administration issued
Classification and Accreditation
for Star-rated Tourist Hotels (GB/T14308-2010)
, which became
effective on January 1, 2011. In November 2010, the National
Tourist Administration issued the
Implementation Measures of Classification and
Accreditation for Star-rated Tourist Hotels
, which became
effective on January 1, 2011. Under these regulations, all hotels
with operations of over one year are eligible to apply for a star
rating assessment. There are five ratings from one star to five
stars for tourist hotels, assessment based on the level of
facilities, management standards and quality of service. A star
rating, once granted, is valid for three years.
In
September 2012, the Ministry of Commerce, or the MOFCOM, issued the
Provisional Administrative
Measures for Single-purpose Commercial Prepaid Card
s, which
became effective on November 1, 2012 and were amended in 2016.
According to the measures, if an enterprise engaged in retail,
accommodation and catering, or residential services issues any
single-purpose commercial prepaid card to its customers, it shall
undergo a record-filing procedure. For a hotel primarily engaged in
the business of accommodation, the aggregate balance of the advance
payment under the single-purpose commercial prepaid cards it issued
shall not exceed 40% of its income from its primary business in the
previous financial year.
In
April 2013, the SCNPC promulgated the
Tourism Law of the PRC
, which became
effective on October 1, 2013 and was amended in 2016. According to
this law, the accommodation operators shall fulfill their
obligations under the agreements with consumers. If the
accommodation operators subcontract part of their services to any
third party or involve any third party to provide services to
customers, the accommodation operators shall assume the joint and
several liabilities with the third parties for any damage caused to
the customers.
Regulations on Environmental Protection
According
to the following laws and regulations, hotels shall submit a Report
on Environmental Impact Assessment and an Application Letter for
Acceptance of Environmental Protection Facilities in Construction
Projects to competent environmental protection authorities for
approvals before commencing the operation:
(i)
Environmental Protection Law of the
PRC
,
promulgated by the SCNPC in
December 1989 and amended in 2014;
(ii)
Environmental Impact Assessment Law of the
PRC
,
promulgated by the SCNPC in
October 2002 and amended in 2016;
(iii)
Regulations Governing Environmental Protection
in Construction Projects
, promulgated by the State Council
in November 1998 and amended in 2017; and
(iv)
Regulations Governing Completion Acceptance of
Environmental Protection in Construction Projects
, issued by
the MEP in December 2001 and amended in 2010.
Pursuant
to the
Environmental Impact
Assessment Law of the PRC
, any hotel failing to obtain the
approval of the Report/Form of Environmental Impact Assessment may
be ordered to cease construction and restore the property to its
original state, and according to the violation activities committed
and the harmful consequences thereof, be subject to fines of no
less than 1% but no more than 5% of the total investment amount for
the construction project of such hotel. The person directly
responsible for the project may be subject to certain
administrative penalties. Pursuant to the
Regulations Governing Completion Acceptance of
Environmental Protection in Construction Projects
, any hotel
failing to obtain an Acceptance of Environmental Protection
Facilities in Construction Projects may be subject to fines and an
order to obtain approval within a specified time
limit.
In June
2002, the SCNPC promulgated the
Law of the PRC on Promoting Clean
Production
, which
became effective on January 1,
2003 and was amended in 2012. This law regulates service
enterprises such as restaurants, entertainment establishments and
hotels and requires them to use technologies and equipment that
conserve energy and water, serve other environmental protection
purposes, and reduce or stop the use of consumer goods that waste
resources or pollute the environment.
Regulations Relating to Office Leasing
In July
1994, the SCNPC promulgated the
Law of the PRC on Urban Real Estate
Administration
, which became effective on January 1, 1995
and was amended in 2007 and 2009, respectively. In December 2010,
the Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Construction issued the
Administrative Measures for
Commodity House Leasing
, which became effective on February
1, 2011. According to these laws and regulations, when leasing
premises, the lessor and lessee are required to enter into a
written lease contract, prescribing such provisions as the leasing
term, use of the premises, rental and repair liabilities, and other
rights and obligations of both parties. Both lessor and lessee are
also required to go through registration procedures to record the
lease with the real estate administration department. Pursuant to
these laws and regulations and various local regulations, if the
lessor and lessee fail to go through the registration procedures,
both lessor and lessee may be subject to fines, and the leasing
interest will be subordinated to an interested third party acting
in good faith.
According
to the
Contract Law of the
PRC
, subject to consent of the lessor, the lessee may
sublease the leased item to a third party. Where the lessee
subleases the lease item, the leasing contract between the lessee
and the lessor remains valid. The lessor is entitled to terminate
the contract if the lessee subleases the lease item without the
consent of the lessor.
Pursuant
to the
Property Law of the
PRC
, if a mortgagor leases the mortgaged property before the
mortgage contract is executed, the previously established leasehold
interest will not be affected by the subsequent mortgage; and where
a mortgagor leases the mortgaged property after the creation and
registration of the mortgage interest, the leasehold interest will
be subordinated to the registered mortgage.
Regulations Relating to Consumer Rights Protection
Business Operators
In
October 1993, the SCNPC promulgated the
Law of the PRC on the Protection of the Rights
and Interests of Consumers
, or the Consumer Protection Law,
which became effective on January 1, 1994 and was amended in 2013.
Under the Consumer Protection Law, a business operator providing a
commodity or service to a consumer is subject to a number of
requirements, including the following:
(i)
to ensure that
commodities and services meet with certain safety
requirements;
(ii)
to protect the
safety of consumers;
(iii)
to disclose serious
defects of a commodity or a service and to adopt preventive
measures against damage occurrence;
(iv)
to provide
consumers with accurate information and to refrain from conducting
false advertising;
(v)
to obtain consents
of consumers and to disclose the rules for the collection and/or
use of information when collecting data or information from
consumers; to take technical measures and other necessary measures
to protect the personal information collected from consumers; not
to divulge, sell, or illegally provide consumers’ information
to others; not to send commercial information to consumers without
the consent or request of consumers or with a clear refusal from
consumers;
(vi)
not to set
unreasonable or unfair terms for consumers or alleviate or release
itself from civil liability for harming the legal rights and
interests of consumers by means of standard contracts, circulars,
announcements, shop notices or other means;
(vii)
to remind consumers
in a conspicuous manner to pay attention to the quality, quantity
and prices or fees of commodities or services, duration and manner
of performance, safety precautions and risk warnings, after-sales
service, civil liability and other terms and conditions vital to
the interests of consumers under a standard form of agreement
prepared by the business operators, and to provide explanations as
required by consumers; and
(viii)
not to insult or
slander consumers or to search the person of, or articles carried
by, a consumer or to infringe upon the personal freedom of a
consumer.
Business
operators may be subject to civil liabilities for failing to
fulfill the obligations discussed above. These liabilities include
restoring the consumer’s reputation, eliminating the adverse
effects suffered by the consumer, and offering an apology and
compensation for any losses incurred. The following penalties may
also be imposed upon business operators for the infraction of these
obligations: issuance of a warning, confiscation of any illegal
income, imposition of a fine, an order to cease business operation,
revocation of its business license or imposition of criminal
liabilities under circumstances that are specified in laws and
statutory regulations.
Online Service Providers
The
Consumer Protection Law and the Online Transaction Measures have
provided stringent requirements and obligations on business
operators, including internet business operators and platform
service providers. For example, consumers are entitled to return
goods purchased online, subject to certain exceptions, within seven
days upon receipt of such goods for no reason. To ensure that
sellers and service providers comply with these laws and
regulations, the platform operators are required to implement rules
governing transactions on the platform, monitor the information
posted by sellers and service providers, and report any violations
by such sellers or service providers to the relevant authorities.
In addition, online marketplace platform providers may, pursuant to
the relevant PRC consumer protection laws, be exposed to
liabilities if the lawful rights and interests of consumers are
infringed upon in connection with consumers' purchase of goods or
acceptance of services on online marketplace platforms and the
online marketplace platform providers fail to provide consumers
with the contact information of the seller or manufacturer. In
addition, online marketplace platform providers may be jointly and
severally liable with sellers and manufacturers if they are aware
or should be aware that any seller or manufacturer is using the
online platform to infringe upon the lawful rights and interests of
consumers and fail to take measures necessary to prevent or stop
such activity. See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our
Business—We may be subject to claims under consumer
protection laws, including health and safety claims and product
liability claims, if property or people are harmed by the
merchandise and services offered on our marketplace."
In
December 2009, the SCNPC promulgated the
Tort Liability Law of the PRC
, which
became effective on July 1, 2010 and provides that if an online
service provider is aware that an online user is committing
infringing activities, such as selling counterfeit products,
through its internet services and fails to take necessary measures,
it shall be jointly liable with the said online user for such
infringement. If the online service provider receives any notice
from the infringed party on any infringing activities, the online
service provider shall take necessary measures, including deleting,
blocking and unlinking the infringing content, in a timely manner.
Otherwise, it will be jointly liable with the relevant online user
for the extended damages.
See "Risk Factors—Risks
Related to our Business—We could be subject to allegations
and lawsuits claiming that items listed on our ecommerce websites
by merchants are pirated, counterfeit or illegal."
Hotel Operators
In
December 2003, the Supreme People’s Court issued the
Interpretation of Some Issues
Concerning the Application of Law for the Trial of Cases on
Compensation for Personal Injury
, which further increases
the liabilities of business operators engaged in the operation of
hotels, restaurants, or entertainment facilities and subjects such
operators to compensatory liabilities for failing to fulfill their
statutory obligations to a reasonable extent or to guarantee the
personal safety of others.
Regulations Relating to Foreign Investment
The Draft PRC Foreign Investment Law
In
January 2015, the MOFCOM published a discussion draft of the
proposed
Foreign Investment
Law
for public review and comment. The draft law purports to
change the existing "case-by-case" approval regime to a "filing or
approval" procedure for foreign investments in China. The State
Council will determine a list of industry categories that are
subject to special administrative measures, which is referred to as
a "negative list," consisting of a list of industry categories
where foreign investments are strictly prohibited, or the
"prohibited list" and a list of industry categories where foreign
investments are subject to certain restrictions, or the "restricted
list." Foreign investments in business sectors outside of the
"negative list" will only be subject to a filing procedure, in
contrast to the existing prior approval requirements, whereas
foreign investments in any industry categories that are on the
"restricted list" must apply for approval from the foreign
investment administration authority.
The
draft for the first time defines a foreign investor not only based
on where it is incorporated or organized, but also by using the
standard of "actual control." The draft specifically provides that
entities established in China, but "controlled" by foreign
investors, will be treated as foreign invested enterprises, or
FIEs. Once an entity is considered to be an FIE, it may be subject
to the foreign investment restrictions in the "restricted list" or
prohibitions set forth in the "prohibited list." If an FIE proposes
to conduct business in an industry subject to foreign investment
restrictions in the "restricted list," the FIE must go through a
market entry clearance approval by the MOFCOM before it can be
established. If an FIE proposes to conduct business in an industry
subject to foreign investment prohibitions in the "prohibited
list," it must not engage in the business. However, an FIE that
conducts business in an industry that is in the "restricted list,"
upon market entry clearance, may apply in writing for being treated
as a PRC domestic investment if it is ultimately "controlled" by
PRC government authorities and its affiliates and/or PRC citizens.
According to the draft, variable interest entities would also be
deemed as FIEs, if they are ultimately "controlled" by foreign
investors, and be subject to restrictions on foreign investments.
However, the draft law has not taken a position on what actions
will be taken with respect to the existing companies with the
"variable interest entity" structure, whether or not these
companies are controlled by Chinese parties.
The
draft emphasizes on security review requirements, whereby all
foreign investments that jeopardize or may jeopardize national
security must be reviewed and approved in accordance with the
security review procedure. In addition, the draft imposes stringent
ad hoc
and periodic
information reporting requirements on foreign investors and the
applicable FIEs. Aside from the investment implementation report
and the investment amendment report that are required at each
investment and alteration of specific investment terms, an annual
report is mandatory, and large foreign investors meeting certain
criteria are required to report on a quarterly basis. Any company
found to be non-compliant with these information reporting
obligations may potentially be subject to fines and/or
administrative or criminal liabilities, and the persons directly
responsible may be subject to criminal liabilities.
The
draft is now open for public review and comments. It is still
uncertain when the draft would be signed into law and whether the
final version would have any substantial changes from the draft.
When the
Foreign Investment
Law
becomes effective, the trio of existing laws regulating
foreign investment in China, namely, the
Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise
Law of the PRC,
the
Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture
Enterprise Law of the PRC
and the
Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law of the
PRC
, together with their implementation rules and ancillary
regulations, will be abolished. See "Risk Factors—Risks
related to Our Corporate Structure—Contractual arrangements
in respect of certain companies in the PRC may be subject to
challenge by the relevant governmental authorities and may affect
our investment and control over these companies and their
operations."
Regulations on M&A by Foreign Investors
In
August 2006, six PRC regulatory agencies issued the
Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of
Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors,
or the M&A
Rules
,
which became
effective on September 8, 2006 and were amended in 2009. The
M&A Rules and other recently adopted regulations and rules
concerning mergers and acquisitions established additional
procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition
activities by foreign investors more time consuming and complex.
For example, the M&A Rules require that MOFCOM be notified in
advance of any change-of-control transaction in which a foreign
investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise, if (i) any
important industry is concerned, (ii) such transaction involves
factors that impact or may impact national economic security, or
(iii) such transaction will lead to a change in control of a
domestic enterprise which holds a famous trademark or PRC
time-honored brand.
In
August 2007, the SCNPC promulgated the
Anti-Monopoly Law of the PRC
, which
became effective on August 1, 2008 and requires that transactions
which are deemed concentrations and involve parties with specified
turnover thresholds must be cleared by MOFCOM before they can be
completed.
In
February 2011, the General Office of the State Council issued the
Notice of the General Office of
State Council on Establishment of Security Review System Pertaining
to Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign
Investors,
or Circular 6, which officially established a
security review system for mergers and acquisitions of domestic
enterprises by foreign investors. In August 2011, the MOFCOM issued
the
Provisions of the Ministry of
Commerce on the Implementation of the Security Review System for
Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises by Foreign
Investors
, or the
Security Review Regulations, to
implement Circular 6. Under Circular 6, a security review is
required for mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors having
"national defense and security" concerns and mergers and
acquisitions by which foreign investors may acquire the "de facto
control" of domestic enterprises with "national security" concerns.
Under these regulations, the MOFCOM will focus on the substance and
actual impact of the transaction when deciding whether a specific
merger or acquisition is subject to security review. If MOFCOM
decides that a specific merger or acquisition is subject to
security review, it will submit it to the Inter-Ministerial Panel,
an authority established under Circular 6 led by the National
Development and Reform Commission, or the NDRC, and MOFCOM under
the leadership of the State Council, to carry out the security
review. The Security Review regulations also prohibit foreign
investors from bypassing the security review by structuring
transactions through trusts, indirect investments, leases, loans,
control through contractual arrangements or offshore
transactions.
See
"Risk Factors—Risk Related to Doing Business in
China—The M&A Rules and certain other PRC regulations
establish complex procedures for some acquisitions of Chinese
companies by foreign investors, which could make it more difficult
for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in
China."
Regulations on Establishment of Foreign Invested
Enterprises
The
establishment, operation and management of corporate entities in
China is governed by the
Company
Law of the PRC
, which was promulgated by the SCNPC in
December 1993 and became effective on July 1, 1994 and was amended
in 1999, 2004, 2005 and 2013, respectively. According to the
Company Law of the PRC
,
companies established in the PRC are either limited liability
companies or joint stock limited liability companies.
The
Company Law of the PRC
applies to both PRC domestic companies and foreign invested
companies. Our PRC subsidiaries, Hebei Anyong Trading and Ganglian
Finance Leasing are wholly foreign-owned enterprises, and
Chuanglian Finance Leasing is a Sino-foreign equity joint venture
enterprise under the PRC laws. The establishment procedures,
approval procedures, registered capital requirements, foreign
exchange matters, accounting practices, taxation and labor matters
of our PRC subsidiaries are regulated by the following laws and
regulations:
(i)
Wholly Foreign Owned Enterprise Law
,
promulgated in 1986 and amended in 2000 and 2016;
(ii)
Implementation Rules for Wholly Foreign Owned
Enterprise
, promulgated in 1990 and amended in 2001 and
2014;
(iii)
Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise
Law
, promulgated in 1979 and amended in 1990, 2001 and 2016;
and
(iv)
Implementation Rules for Sino-Foreign Equity
Joint Ventures Enterprise Law Implementation Rules
,
promulgated in 1983 and amended in 1986, 1987, 2001, 2011 and
2014.
In
September 2016, the SCNPC promulgated the
Decision of the Standing Committee of the
National People's Congress on Amending Four Laws,
including
the
Wholly Foreign-Owned
Enterprise Law of the PRC
and the
Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise
Law of the PRC
, which provides that the establishment of
foreign invested enterprises will be subject to the recording
administration if the implementation of special entry management
measures as prescribed by the state is not applicable.
In
October 2016, the MOFCOM issued the
Interim Measures for the Record-Filing
Administration of the Establishment and Change of Foreign Invested
Enterprise
s, which became effective on October 8 and were
amended in 2017. According to the measures, if the establishment
and changes of foreign invested enterprises are not subject to the
approvals under the special entry management measures, they shall
be filed with the relevant authorities.
Regulations on Foreign Investment Industry Catalog
Investment
activities in the PRC by foreign investors are principally governed
by the Foreign Investment Industry Catalog, which was issued and
has been amended from time to time by the MOFCOM and the NDRC, with
the most recent revision made in 2017. Industries listed in the
Foreign Investment Industry Catalog are divided into three
categories: encouraged, restricted and prohibited. Industries not
listed in the Foreign Investment Industry Catalog are generally
deemed as constituting a fourth "permitted" category. Establishment
of wholly foreign-owned enterprises is generally allowed in
encouraged and permitted industries. Some restricted industries are
limited to equity or contractual joint ventures, while in some
cases Chinese partners are required to hold the majority interests
in such joint ventures. In addition, restricted category projects
are subject to higher-level government approvals. Foreign investors
are not allowed to invest in industries in the prohibited category.
Industries not listed in the Foreign Investment Industry Catalog
are generally open to foreign investment unless specifically
restricted by other PRC regulations.
Our PRC
subsidiaries are engaged in providing many different services, some
of which fall into the "encouraged" or "permitted" category under
the Foreign Investment Industry Catalog. Our PRC subsidiaries have
obtained all material approvals required for their business
operations. However, industries such as value-added
telecommunication services (except e-commerce), including internet
information services, are restricted from foreign investment. We
provide the value-added telecommunication services that are
restricted to foreign investment through the operating subsidiaries
of our consolidated variable interest entities. See "Risk
Factors—Risks related to Our Corporate
Structure—Contractual arrangements in respect of certain
companies in the PRC may be subject to challenge by the relevant
governmental authorities and may affect our investment and control
over these companies and their operations."
Regulations on Foreign Investment in Value-Added Telecommunication
Services
In
December 2001, the State Council promulgated the
Provisions on Administration of Foreign
Invested Telecommunications Enterprises
, which became
effective on January 1, 2002 and were amended in 2008 and 2016,
respectively. The provisions prohibit a foreign investor from
owning more than 50% of the total equity interest in any
value-added telecommunications service business in China and
require the major foreign investor in any value-added
telecommunications service business in China to have a good and
profitable record and operating experience in this industry. Since
2015, the
Foreign Investment
Industry Catalog
allows a foreign investor to own more than
50% of the total equity interest in an e-commerce
business.
In July
2006, the Ministry of Information Industry, the predecessor of the
MIIT, issued the
Circular on
Strengthening the Administration of Foreign Investment in the
Operation of Value-added Telecommunications Business
,
pursuant to which a domestic PRC company that holds an operating
license for value-added telecommunications business, which we refer
to as a VATS License, is prohibited from leasing, transferring or
selling the VATS License to foreign investors in any form and from
providing any assistance, including resources, sites or facilities,
to foreign investors that conduct a value-added telecommunications
business illegally in China. Further, the domain names and
registered trademarks used by an operating company providing
value-added telecommunications services must be legally owned by
that company or its shareholders. In addition, the VATS License
holder must have the necessary facilities for its approved business
operations and to maintain the facilities in the regions covered by
its VATS License. If a license holder fails to comply with the
requirements in the MIIT Circular and cure such non-compliance, the
MIIT or its local counterparts have the discretion to take measures
against such license holder, including revoking its VATS
License.
In
light of the above restrictions and requirements, we conduct our
value-added telecommunications businesses through subsidiaries of
our consolidated variable interest entities. See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate
Structure—Contractual arrangements in respect of certain
companies in the PRC may be subject to challenge by the relevant
governmental authorities and may affect our investment and control
over these companies and their operations." and "Risks Related to
Doing Business in China—We may be adversely affected by the
complexity, uncertainties and changes in PRC regulation of
Internet-related businesses and companies, and any lack of
requisite approvals, licenses or permits applicable to our business
may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations."
Regulations on Dividend Distribution by Foreign Invested
Enterprises
Under
our current corporate structure, our Cayman Islands holding company
may rely on dividend payments from our PRC subsidiaries, including
but not limited to a wholly foreign-owned enterprise and
a
Sino-foreign equity
joint venture enterprise, to fund any cash and financing
requirements we may have.
Under
the relevant laws and regulation, foreign invested enterprises in
China may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits, if
any, determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and
regulations. In addition, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in China
are required to set aside at least 10% of their respective
accumulated profits each year, if any, to fund certain reserve
funds as well as employee’s bonus and welfare fund, unless
such funds have reached 50% of their respective registered capital.
Wholly foreign-owned companies may, at their discretion, allocate a
portion of their after-tax profits based on PRC accounting
standards to staff welfare and bonus funds. As for the Sino-foreign
equity joint venture, the allocations for reserve funds, employee
bonus and welfare funds and development funds of the joint venture,
as well as the proportion of the allocations to such funds, are
decided by the board of directors.
Profit of a
foreign-invested enterprise shall
not be distributed before the losses thereof for the previous
accounting years have been made up. Profits retained from prior
fiscal years may be distributed together with distributable profits
from the current fiscal year.
See "Risk Factors—Risks
Related to Doing Business in China—We rely on dividends and
other distributions on equity paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund
any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation
on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to make payments to us could
have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our
business."
Regulations Relating to Foreign Exchange Controls
Regulations on Foreign Exchange Outbound
Dividend Distribution
Foreign
currency exchange in the PRC is governed by a series of
regulations, including the
Foreign
Currency Administrative Rules
promulgated by the State
Council in January 1996 and amended in 2008, and the
Administrative Regulations Regarding
Settlement, Sale and Payment of Foreign Exchange
issued by
the PBOC in June 1996. Under these regulations, payments of current
account items, such as profit distributions, interest payments and
trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions can be made
in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State
Administration of Foreign Exchange, or the SAFE, by complying with
certain procedural requirements.
In
January 2017, the SAFE issued the
Circular on Further Improving Reform of
Foreign Exchange Administration and Optimizing Genuineness and
Compliance Verification
, or SAFE Circular 3, which
stipulates several capital control measures with respect to the
outbound remittance of profit from domestic entities to offshore
entities, including (i) under the principle of genuine transaction,
banks shall check board resolutions regarding profit distribution,
the original version of tax filing records and audited financial
statements; and (ii) domestic entities shall hold income to account
for previous years’ losses before remitting the profits.
Moreover, pursuant to SAFE Circular 3, domestic entities shall make
detailed explanations of the sources of capital and utilization
arrangements, and provide board resolutions, contracts and other
proof when completing the registration procedures in connection
with an outbound investment.
Offshore Loans
In
response to the persistent capital outflow and RMB's depreciation
against the U.S. dollar in the fourth quarter of 2016, the PBOC and
the SAFE have implemented a series of capital control measures over
recent months, including stricter vetting procedures for
China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas
acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments.
For instance, in November 2016, the PBOC issued the
Circular on Further Clarification of Relevant
Matters Relating to Offshore RMB Loans Provided by Domestic
Enterprises
, or PBOC Circular 306, which provides that
offshore RMB loans provided by a domestic enterprise to offshore
enterprises that it holds equity interests in shall not exceed 30%
of such equity interests. PBOC Circular 306 may constrain our PRC
subsidiaries' ability to provide offshore loans to us. See "Risk
Factors—Risks related to Doing Business in China—We
rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our PRC
subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may
have, and any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to
make payments to us could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to conduct our business."
Offshore Investment
In July
2014, the SAFE issued the
Circular
on Relevant Issues Concerning Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic
Residents’ Offshore Investment and Financing and Round-trip
Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles
, or SAFE
Circular 37, which replaced the former circular commonly known as
"SAFE Circular 75". SAFE Circular 37 requires PRC residents to
register with local branches of SAFE in connection with their
direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore entity, for
the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC
residents’ legally owned assets or equity interests in
domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests, referred to
in SAFE Circular 37 as a "special purpose vehicle". SAFE Circular
37 further requires amendment to the registration in the event of
any significant changes with respect to the special purpose
vehicle, such as increase or decrease of capital contributed by PRC
individuals, share transfer or exchange, merger, division or other
material event. In the event that a PRC shareholder holding
interests in a special purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the
required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special
purpose vehicle may be prohibited from making profit distributions
to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent
cross-border foreign exchange activities.
In
February 2015, the SAFE issued the
Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving
the Administration of the Foreign Exchange Concerning Direct
Investment
,
or
SAFE Notice 13. This notice has amended SAFE Circular 37 by
requiring PRC residents or entities to register with qualified
banks rather than SAFE or its local branch in connection with their
establishment or control of an offshore entity established for the
purpose of overseas investment or financing.
We
cannot assure you that all of our shareholders or beneficial owners
who are PRC residents or entities have complied with, and will in
the future make or obtain any applicable registrations or approvals
required by, SAFE regulations. Failure by such shareholders or
beneficial owners to comply with SAFE regulations, or failure by us
to amend the foreign exchange registrations of our PRC
subsidiaries, could subject us to fines or legal sanctions,
restrict our overseas or cross-border investment activities, limit
our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions or pay
dividends to us or affect our ownership structure, which could
adversely affect our business and prospects. See "Risk
Factors—Risks related to Doing Business in China—PRC
regulations relating to offshore investment activities by PRC
residents may limit our PRC subsidiaries' ability to increase their
registered capital or distribute profits to us or otherwise expose
us or our PRC resident beneficial owners to liability and penalties
under PRC law.
Regulations on Foreign Exchange Inbound
In
November 2012, the SAFE issued the
Circular of Further Improving and Adjusting
Foreign Exchange Administration Policies on Foreign Direct
Investment
, which substantially amends and simplifies the
current foreign exchange procedure by revoking the approval for (i)
the opening of various special purpose foreign exchange accounts,
such as pre-establishment expenses accounts, foreign exchange
capital accounts, and guarantee accounts asset realization accounts
under direct investment; (ii) the reinvestment of domestic
legitimate RMB proceeds derived by foreign investors in the PRC;
and (iii) remittance of foreign exchange profits and dividends by a
investee enterprise of a foreign-funded investment holding company
to the foreign-funded investment holding company. In addition,
multiple capital accounts for the same entity may be opened in
different provinces, which was not possible
previously.
In May
2013, the SAFE issued the
Notice
of SAFE on Promulgation of the Provisions on Foreign Exchange
Control on Direct Investments in China by Foreign Investors and
Supporting Documents
, which specifies that the
administration by the SAFE or its local branches over direct
investment by foreign investors in the PRC must be conducted by way
of registration and banks must process foreign exchange business
relating to the direct investment in the PRC based on the
registration information provided by SAFE and its branches. Where a
foreign invested enterprise needs to remit funds overseas in the
event of capital reduction, liquidation, advance recovery of
investment, profit distribution, etc., the foreign investment
enterprise may do so upon completion of the related registration
for foreign exchange purchase.
In July
2014, the SAFE issued the
Notice
of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Pilot Reform
of the Administrative Approach Regarding the Settlement of the
Foreign Exchange Capitals of Foreign Invested Enterprises in
Certain Areas
, or SAFE Circular 36, which was repealed in
2015 and purports to reform the administration of settlement of the
foreign exchange capitals of foreign invested enterprises in
certain designated areas on a trial basis. Under the pilot program,
some of the restrictions under SAFE Circular 142 will not apply to
the settlement of the foreign exchange capitals of the foreign
invested enterprises established within the designated
areas.
In
February 2015, the SAFE issued the
Notice on Further Simplifying and Improving
the Administration of the Foreign Exchange Concerning Direct
Investment
, or SAFE Notice 13, which requires the entities
and individuals to apply for foreign exchange registrations of
foreign direct investment and overseas direct investment from
qualified banks instead of applying for such approvals from the
SAFE. The qualified banks, under the supervision of the SAFE, will
directly examine the applications and conduct the
registration.
In
March 2015, the SAFE issued the
Notice of the SAFE on Reforming the
Administration of Foreign Exchange Settlement of Capital of Foreign
Invested Enterprises
, or SAFE Circular 19, to expand the
reform nationwide. SAFE Circular 19 came into force and replaced
both SAFE Circular 142 and SAFE Circular 36 on June 1, 2015. SAFE
Circular 19 allows foreign invested enterprises to make equity
investments by using RMB funds converted from foreign exchange
capital. However, SAFE Circular 19 continues to prohibit foreign
invested enterprises from, among other things, using RMB funds
converted from its foreign exchange capitals for expenditure beyond
its business scope, providing entrusted loans or repaying loans
between non-financial enterprises.
In June
2016, the SAFE issued the
Notice
of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and
Standardizing the Administrative Provisions on Capital Account
Foreign Exchange Settlement
, or SAFE Circular 16, which
reiterates some of the rules set forth in SAFE Circular 19, but
compared to SAFE Circular 19, SAFE Circular 16 provides that
discretionary foreign exchange settlement applies to foreign
exchange capital, foreign debt offering proceeds and remitted
foreign listing proceeds, and the corresponding RMB capital
converted from foreign exchange is not restricted from being used
to extend loans to related parties or repay inter-company loans
(including advances by third parties). However, SAFE Circular 19
and SAFE Circular 16 continue to prohibit foreign invested
enterprises from, among other things, using RMB funds converted
from their foreign exchange capitals for expenditure beyond their
business scope, investment and financing (except for security
investment or guarantee products issued by bank), providing loans
to non-affiliated enterprises or constructing or purchasing real
estate not for self-use.
See
"Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in
China—PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC
entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of
currency conversion may delay or prevent us from making loans to or
making additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries,
which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our
ability to fund and expand our business."
Regulations Relating to Tax
Regulations on Enterprise Income Tax
In
March 2007, the National People’s Congress of the PRC
promulgated the
Enterprise Income
Tax Law of the PRC,
or
the
ETI Law
,
which became effective on January 1,
2008 and was amended in 2017. The EIT Law and its implementation
rules are the principal regulations governing enterprise income tax
in the PRC. The EIT Law imposes a uniform enterprise income tax
rate of 25% on all resident enterprises in the PRC, including
foreign invested enterprises.
Uncertainties
exist with respect to how the EIT Law applies to the tax residence
status of Fincera Inc. and our offshore subsidiaries. Under the EIT
Law, an enterprise established outside China with its "de facto
management bodies" located within China is considered a "resident
enterprise", which means that it is treated in a manner similar to
a PRC domestic enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes. The
implementation rules of the EIT Law define "de facto management
body" as a managing body that in practice exercises "substantial
and overall management and control over the production and
operations, personnel, accounting, and properties" of the
enterprise.
In
April 2009, the State Administration of Taxation, or the SAT,
issued
Circular of the State
Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Identification
of Chinese-Controlled Overseas Registered Enterprises as Resident
Enterprises in Accordance with the Actual Standards of
Organizational Management,
or SAT Circular 82, which
provides certain specific criteria for determining whether the "de
facto management body" of a PRC-controlled enterprise that is
incorporated offshore is located in China. Further to SAT Circular
82, in July 2011, the SAT issued
the
Administrative Measures for Income Tax of
Chinese-Controlled Resident Enterprises Registered Abroad (For
Trial Implementation),
or SAT Bulletin 45, to provide more
guidance on the implementation of SAT Circular 82.
According
to SAT Circular 82, a Chinese-controlled offshore incorporated
enterprise will be regarded as a PRC tax resident by virtue of
having a "de facto management body" in China and will be subject to
PRC enterprise income tax on its worldwide income only if all of
the following criteria are met:(a) the primary location of the
day-to- day operational management is in China; (b) decisions
relating to the enterprise’s financial and human resource
matters are made or are subject to approval by organizations or
personnel in China; (c) the enterprise’s primary assets,
accounting books and records, company seals, and board and
shareholders meeting minutes are located or maintained in China;
and (d) 50% or more of voting board members or senior executives
habitually reside in China.
Although
SAT Circular 82 and SAT Bulletin 45 only apply to
offshore-incorporated enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises or
PRC enterprise groups and not those controlled by PRC individuals
or foreign persons, the determination criteria set forth therein
may reflect the SAT’s general position on how the term "de
facto management body" could be applied in determining the tax
resident status of offshore enterprises, regardless of whether they
are controlled by PRC enterprises, individuals or
foreigners.
If we meet all of the aforesaid criteria under SAT Circular
82, we would be treated as a “resident enterprise” for
PRC tax purposes. As we do not believe that we meet all of the
criteria,
so we
believe that Fincera Inc. and our offshore subsidiaries should not
be treated as a "resident enterprise" for PRC tax purposes.
However, as most of our management members are based in China, it
remains unclear how the tax residency rule will apply to our case.
As the tax residency status of an enterprise is subject to
determination by the PRC tax authorities and uncertainties remain
with respect to the interpretation of the term "de facto management
body" as applicable to our offshore entities, we may be treated as
a resident enterprise for PRC tax purposes under the EIT Law, and
we may therefore be subject to PRC income tax on our global income.
We are actively monitoring the possibility of "resident enterprise"
treatment for the applicable tax years and are evaluating
appropriate organizational changes to avoid this treatment, to the
extent possible. See "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing
Business in China—If we are classified as a PRC resident
enterprise for PRC income tax purposes, such classification could
result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC
shareholders."
Regulations on Withholding Tax for Dividend
Distribution
According
to the ETI Law and its implementation rules, if a non-resident
enterprise has not set up an organization or establishment in the
PRC, or has set up an organization or establishment but the income
derived has no actual connection with such organization or
establishment, it will be subject to a withholding tax on its
PRC-sourced income at a rate of 10%. Pursuant to the
Arrangement between Mainland China and the
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Avoidance of Double
Taxation and Tax Evasion on Income
, the withholding tax rate
in respect to the payment of dividends by a PRC enterprise to a
Hong Kong enterprise is reduced to 5% from a standard rate of 10%
if the Hong Kong enterprise directly holds at least 25% of the PRC
enterprise.
In
February 2009, the SAT issued the
Notice of the State Administration of Taxation
on the Issues concerning the Application of the Dividend Clauses of
Tax Agreements
, or SAT Circular 81, which stipulates a Hong
Kong resident enterprise must meet the following conditions, among
others, in order to enjoy the reduced withholding tax: (i) it must
directly own the required percentage of equity interests and voting
rights in the PRC resident enterprise; and (ii) it must have
directly owned such percentage in the PRC resident enterprise
throughout the 12 months prior to receiving the dividends. There
are also other conditions for enjoying the reduced withholding tax
rate according to other relevant tax rules and
regulations.
In
August 2015, the SAT issued the
Announcement of the State Administration of
Taxation on Promulgation of the Administrative Measures for
Non-Resident Taxpayers to Enjoy Treatments under Tax
Treaties
, or SAT Circular 60, which became effective on
November 1, 2015. SAT Circular 60 provides that non-resident
enterprises are not required to obtain pre-approval from the
relevant tax authority in order to enjoy the reduced withholding
tax rate. Instead, non-resident enterprises and their withholding
agents may, by self-assessment and on confirmation that the
prescribed criteria to enjoy the tax treaty benefits are met,
directly apply the reduced withholding tax rate, and file necessary
forms and supporting documents when performing tax filings, which
will be subject to post-tax filing examinations by the relevant tax
authorities. Accordingly, Fancy Think Limited, our Hong Kong
subsidiary, may be able to enjoy the 5% withholding tax rate for
the dividends they receive from our PRC subsidiaries, if it
satisfies the conditions prescribed under SAT Circular 81 and other
relevant tax rules and regulations. However, according to SAT
Circular 81 and SAT Circular 60, if the relevant tax authorities
consider the transactions or arrangements we have are for the
primary purpose of enjoying a favorable tax treatment, then we
shall not enjoy the tax treatment prescribed in the tax treaty, the
relevant tax authorities have the right to make adjustments. See
"Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in
China—We may not be able to obtain certain benefits under
relevant tax treaty on dividends paid by our PRC subsidiaries to us
through our Hong Kong subsidiary."
Regulations on Withholding Tax for Indirect Share
Transfer
According
to the following rules, if a non-resident enterprise transfers the
equity interests of a PRC resident enterprise indirectly by
transfer of the equity interests of an offshore holding company
(other than a purchase and sale of shares issued by a PRC resident
enterprise in public securities market) without a reasonable
commercial purpose, the PRC tax authorities have the power to
reassess the nature of the transaction and the indirect equity
transfer will be treated as a direct transfer:
(i)
Notice on Strengthening Administration of
Enterprise Income Tax for Share Transfers by Non-Resident
Enterprises
, or SAT Circular 698, which was issued by the
SAT in December 2009 and was repealed in 2017;
(ii)
Announcement of the SAT on Several Issues
Concerning the Enterprise Income Tax on Indirect Property Transfer
by Non-Resident Enterprises
, or SAT Circular 7, which was
issued by the SAT in February 2015 and amended in 2017;
and
(iii)
Announcement of the SAT on Several Issues
Relating to the Administration of Income Tax on Non-resident
Enterprises,
or SAT Circular 24, which was issued by the SAT
in March 2011 and was partially repealed in 2015 and
2017.
As a
result, the gain derived from such transfer, which means the equity
transfer price less the cost of equity, will be subject to PRC
withholding tax at a rate of up to 10%. In addition, if a non-PRC
resident enterprise indirectly transfers so-called PRC Taxable
Properties, referring to properties of an establishment or a place
of business in China, real estate properties in China and equity
investments in a PRC tax resident enterprise, by disposition of the
equity interests in an overseas non-public holding company without
a reasonable commercial purpose and resulting in the avoidance of
PRC enterprise income tax, the transfer will be re-characterized as
a direct transfer of the PRC Taxable Properties and gains derived
from the transfer may be subject to a PRC withholding tax of up to
10%.
Under
the terms of Circular 7, the transfer which meets all of the
following circumstances shall be directly deemed as having no
reasonable commercial purposes: (i) over 75% of the value of the
equity interests of the offshore holding company are directly or
indirectly derived from PRC taxable properties; (ii) at any time
during the year before the indirect transfer, over 90% of the total
properties of the offshore holding company are investments within
PRC territory, or in the year before the indirect transfer, over
90% of the offshore holding company's revenue is directly or
indirectly derived from PRC territory; (iii) the function performed
and risks assumed by the offshore holding company are insufficient
to substantiate its corporate existence; or (iv) the foreign income
tax imposed on the indirect transfer is lower than the PRC tax
imposed on the direct transfer of the PRC taxable properties. On
the other hand, indirect transfers falling into the scope of the
safe harbors under SAT Circular 7 may not be subject to PRC tax.
The safe harbors include qualified group restructurings, public
market trades and exemptions under tax treaties.
In
October 2017, the SAT issued the
Bulletin of SAT on Issues Concerning the
Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source
,
or SAT Bulletin 37, which, among others, repeals SAT Circular 698
and certain rules stipulated in SAT Circular 7. SAT Bulletin 37
further details and clarifies the tax withholding methods in
respect of income of non-resident enterprises.
Under
the EIT Law and other applicable PRC tax regulations, payers of
PRC-sourced income to non-PRC residents are generally obligated to
withhold PRC income taxes from the payment. In the event of a
failure to withhold, the non-PRC residents are required to pay such
taxes on their own. Failure to comply with the tax payment
obligations by the non-PRC residents will result in penalties,
including full payment of taxes owed, fines and default interest on
those taxes. Pursuant to SAT Circular 7 and other PRC tax
regulations, in the case of an indirect transfer, entities or
individuals obligated to pay the transfer price to the transferor
must act as withholding agents and are required to withhold the PRC
tax from the transfer price. If they fail to do so, the seller is
required to report and pay the PRC tax to the PRC tax authorities.
If neither party complies with the tax payment or withholding
obligations under SAT Circular 7, the tax authority may impose
penalties such as late payment interest on the seller. In addition,
the tax authority may also hold the withholding agents liable and
impose a penalty of 50% to 300% of the unpaid tax on them. The
penalty imposed on the purchasers may be reduced or waived if the
withholding agents have submitted the relevant materials in
connection with the indirect transfer to the PRC tax authorities in
accordance with SAT Circular 7. See "Risk Factors—Risks
Related to Doing Business in China—We face uncertainty with
respect to indirect transfers of equity interests in PRC resident
enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies."
Regulations on Transfer Pricing and Tax
In
China, the fundamental rules on transfer pricing are provided under
the EIT Law and its implementation rules. The SAT sets out more
detailed transfer pricing rules under the tax circular of
Implementation Measures for
Special Tax Adjustments
which was issued in January 2009, or
SAT Circular 2, and was partially repealed by other regulations.
Under the EIT Law, if business dealings between an enterprise and
its related parties fail to comply with the arm's length principle,
and reductions are made to the taxable income or the amount of
income of the enterprise or its interested parties, the tax
authorities have a right to make adjustments according to a
reasonable method. Where intangible assets are jointly developed or
transferred by an enterprise and its related party, or labour
services are jointly provided or received by an enterprise and its
related party, costs shall be apportioned according to the arm's
length principle when computing the taxable amount of income. The
tax authorities also have right to make adjustments if the taxable
income or amount of income of an enterprise is reduced as a result
of arrangements with no reasonable commercial
objectives.
In
March 2017, the SAT issued the
Administrative Measures on Special Tax
Investigation, Adjustment and Mutual Agreement Procedure
, or
SAT Notice 6, which became effective on May 1, 2017 and supersedes
the relevant provisions in implementation measures of SAT Circular
2 and certain other regulations. It provides procedures for special
tax investigation adjustments. Moreover, SAT Notice 6 reinforces
the transfer pricing administration on intercompany intangibles and
services transactions, and provides certain methods and principles
for investigations and adjustments. Taxpayers are advised to review
and adjust, if necessary, their transfer pricing policies on such
transactions to ensure compliance with the new rules. See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate
Structure—Contractual arrangements in relation to our
variable interest entity, may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax
authorities and they may determine that we, or our variable
interest entity and its subsidiaries, owe additional taxes, which
could negatively affect our financial condition and the value of
your investment.
Regulations on Value-Added Tax
Pursuant
to applicable PRC tax regulations, any entity or individual
conducting business in the service industry is generally required
to pay a business tax at the rate of 5% on the revenues generated
from providing such services. However, pursuant to the following
pilot plan and relevant notices, VAT of a rate of 6% applied to
revenue is generally imposed in lieu of business tax in the modern
service industries, including the value-added telecommunication
service industry and online information services, on a nationwide
basis:
(i)
Pilot Plan for Imposition of Value-Added Tax
to Replace Business Tax
, issued by the Ministry of Finance
and the SAT in November 2011; and
(ii)
Notice on Fully Promoting the Pilot Plan for
Replacing Business Tax by Value-Added Tax
, issued by the
Ministry of Finance and the SATI in March 2016 and amended in
2017.
Unlike
business tax, a taxpayer is allowed to offset the qualified input
VAT paid on taxable purchases against the output VAT chargeable on
the modern services provided.
Regulations Relating to Intellectual Property Rights
The PRC
has adopted comprehensive legislation governing intellectual
property rights, including copyrights, patents, trademarks and
domain names. Moreover, the PRC is a signatory to major
international conventions on intellectual property rights and is
subject to the
Agreement on Trade
Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
as a result
of its accession to the World Trade Organization in December
2001.
Copyright
The
SCNPC, the State Council and the National Copyright Administration
have promulgated various rules and regulations relating to the
protection of copyright (including copyrighted software) in the
PRC, including without limitation the
Copyright Law of the PRC
, which was
promulgated in September 1990 and amended in 2001 and 2010,
respectively.
Pursuant
to the
Copyright Law of the
PRC
and its implementation rules, creators of protected
works enjoy personal and property rights, including, among others,
the right of disseminating the works through information networks.
Internet service providers will be jointly liable with the
infringer if they (i) participate in, assist in or abet infringing
activities committed by any other person through the internet, (ii)
are or should be aware of the infringing activities committed by
their website users through the internet, or (iii) fail to remove
infringing content or take other action to eliminate infringing
consequences after receiving a warning with evidence of such
infringing activities from the copyright holder. In addition, where
an internet service operator is clearly aware of the infringement
of certain content against another’s copyright through the
internet, or fails to take measures to remove relevant contents
upon receipt of the copyright owner’s notice, and as a
result, it damages the public interest, the internet service
operator could be ordered to stop the tortious act and be subject
to other administrative penalties such as confiscation of illegal
income and fines.
According
to the
Copyright Law of the
PRC
and the
Regulations for
the Protection of Computer Software
(promulgated by the
State Council in December 2001 and amended in 2011 and 2013,
respectively), copyrights of works of foreigners and Stateless
persons vested pursuant to the agreement entered into between the
home country or the country of habitual residence of the author and
China or the international treaty to which the home country or the
country of habitual residence of the author and China are
participants shall be protected by this law. We may violate
software copyright laws if any of our employees uses unauthorized
pirated software at work, such as an unauthorized Microsoft
product. Microsoft is an American legal person, China and the
United States are members of the
Berne convention
, and the PRC laws
should protect the works of member states. See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to our Business—We may be subject
to intellectual property infringement claims, which may be
expensive to defend and may disrupt our business and
operations."
Patent
The
Patent Law of the PRC
(promulgated by the SCNPC in March 1984 and amended in 1992, 2000
and 2008, respectively) provides for patentable inventions, utility
models and designs, which must meet three conditions: novelty,
inventiveness and practical applicability. The State Intellectual
Property Office under the State Council is responsible for
examining and approving patent applications. The duration of a
patent right is either 10 years or 20 years from the date of
application, depending on the type of patent right.
Trademark
The
Trademark Law of the PRC
(promulgated by the SCNPC in August 1982 and amended in 1993, 2001
and 2013, respectively) and its implementation rules protect
registered trademarks. The
Trademark Law of the PRC
has adopted a
"first-to-file" principle with respect to trademark registration.
The Trademark Office under the SAIC is responsible for the
registration and administration of trademarks throughout the PRC,
and grants a term of ten years to registered trademarks and another
ten years if requested upon expiry of the initial or extended term.
Trademark license agreements must be filed with the Trademark
Office for record.
Domain Name
Domain
names are protected under the
Administrative Measures on the China Internet
Domain Names
issued by the MIIT in 2004, which was replaced
by the
Administrative Measures on
the Internet Domain Names
effective on November 1, 2017. The
MIIT is the major regulatory authority responsible for the
administration of the PRC internet domain names. The registration
of domain names in PRC is on a "first-apply-first-registration"
basis. A domain name applicant will become the domain name holder
upon the completion of the application procedure.
Regulations Relating to Employment
Regulations on Employment
The
Labor Law of the PRC
and
the
Labor Contract Law of the
PRC
require that employers must execute written employment
contracts with full-time employees. If an employer fails to enter
into a written employment contract with an employee within one year
from the date on which the employment relationship is established,
the employer must rectify the situation by entering into a written
employment contract with the employee and pay the employee twice
the employee's salary for the period from the day following the
lapse of one month from the date of establishment of the employment
relationship to the day prior to the execution of the written
employment contract. All employers must compensate their employees
with wages equal to at least the local minimum wage standards. In
addition, employers must establish a system for labor safety and
sanitation, strictly abide by state standards and provide relevant
education to its employees. Employees are also required to work in
safe and sanitary conditions.
Regulations on Employee Benefit Plans
Enterprises
in China are required by PRC laws and regulations to participate in
certain employee benefit plans, including social insurance funds,
namely a pension plan, a medical insurance plan, an unemployment
insurance plan, a work-related injury insurance plan and a
maternity insurance plan, and a housing provident fund, and
contribute to the plans or funds in amounts equal to certain
percentages of salaries, including bonuses and allowances, of the
employees as specified by the local government from time to time at
locations where they operate their businesses or where they are
located. Failure to make adequate contributions to various employee
benefit plans may be subject to fines and other administrative
sanctions. According to the
Social
Insurance Law of the PRC
promulgated by the SCNPC in October
2010, an employer that fails to make social insurance contributions
may be ordered to rectify the non-compliance and pay the required
contributions within a stipulated deadline and be subject to a late
fee of up to 0.05% or 0.2% per day, as the case may be. If the
employer still fails to rectify the failure to make social
insurance contributions within the stipulated deadline, it may be
subject to a fine ranging from one to three times the amount
overdue. In addition, the
Individual Income Tax Law of the PRC
requires companies operating in China to withhold individual income
tax on employees’ salaries based on the actual salary of each
employee upon payment.
We have
not made adequate contributions to employee benefit plans in the
past, as required by applicable PRC laws and regulations. Pursuant
to the
Social Insurance Law of the
PRC
, the social security authority may order an enterprise
to pay the outstanding contributions within a prescribed time
limit, and may impose penalties if there is a failure to do so,
such that some of our PRC subsidiaries may be required to pay
outstanding contributions and penalties to the extent they did not
make full contributions to the social security. See "Risk
Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in
China—Increases in labor costs in the PRC may adversely
affect our profitability."
Regulations on Stock Incentive Plans
In
February 2012, the SAFE issued the
Notice of the State Administration of Foreign
Exchange on the Relevant Issues Concerning the Administration of
Foreign Exchange for Domestic Individuals' Participation in Equity
Incentive Programs of Overseas Listed Companies,
or the
Stock Option Rules, which replaced the
Application Procedures of Foreign Exchange
Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in Employee
Stock Ownership Plans or Stock Option Plans of Overseas
Publicly-Listed Companies
issued by the SAFE in March
2007.
Under
the Stock Option Rules and other relevant rules and regulations,
individuals participating in any stock incentive plan of any
overseas publicly listed company who are PRC citizens or non-PRC
citizens who reside in China for a continuous period of not less
than one year, subject to a few exceptions, are required to
register with SAFE through a domestic qualified agent, which could
be a PRC subsidiary of such overseas listed company, and complete
certain other procedures. In addition, the PRC agent is required to
amend the SAFE registration with respect to the stock incentive
plan if there is any material change to the stock incentive plan,
the PRC agent or other material changes. The PRC agent must, on
behalf of the PRC residents who have the right to exercise the
employee share options, apply to SAFE or its local branches for an
annual quota for the payment of foreign currencies in connection
with the PRC residents' exercise of the employee share options. The
foreign exchange proceeds received by the PRC residents from the
sale of shares under the stock incentive plans granted and
dividends distributed by the overseas listed companies must be
remitted into the bank accounts in the PRC opened by the PRC agents
before their distribution to such PRC residents.
We have
adopted a share incentive plan, under which we have the discretion
to grant a broad range of equity-based awards to eligible
participants. See "ITEM 6 DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND
EMPLOYEES—B. Compensation—Fincera Inc. 2009 Equity
Incentive Plan, Fincera Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan."
However, we cannot assure you that the participants can
successfully register with SAFE in full compliance with the Stock
Option Rules. Any failure to complete the registration pursuant to
the Stock Option Rules and other foreign exchange requirements may
subject these PRC individuals to fines and legal sanctions, and may
also limit our ability to contribute additional capital to our PRC
subsidiaries, limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to
distribute dividends to us or otherwise materially adversely affect
our business. See "Risk Factors—General Risks Relating to
Conducting Business in China —Any failure to comply with PRC
regulations regarding the registration requirements for employee
stock incentive plans may subject the PRC plan participants or us
to fines and other legal or administrative sanctions."
In
addition, the Ministry of Finance and the SAT have issued certain
circulars concerning employee share options and restricted shares,
including the
Notice of Taxation
on Issues relating to Collection of Individual Income Tax on
Personal Income from Shares and Options
issued in March
2005,
the
Notice of Taxation on the Issues concerning
the Imposition of Individual Income Tax on Incomes from Stock
Appreciation Right and Restricted Stock
issued in January
2009. Under these circulars, our employees working in China who
exercise share options will be subject to PRC individual income
tax. Our PRC subsidiaries have obligations to file documents
related to employee share options with relevant tax authorities and
to withhold individual income taxes of those employees who exercise
their share options. If our employees fail to pay or we fail to
withhold their income taxes according to relevant laws and
regulations, we may face sanctions imposed by the tax authorities
or other PRC governmental authorities.
Periodic Reporting and Audited Financial Statements
Fincera
has registered its securities under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and has reporting obligations, including the requirement to
file annual reports with the SEC. In accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
Fincera’s annual report contains financial statements audited
and reported on by Fincera’s independent registered public
accounting firm.
As a
foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, prescribing the
furnishing and content of proxy statements. In addition, we will
not be required under the Exchange Act to file current reports with
the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States companies
whose securities are registered under the Exchange
Act.
C.
Organizational
Structure.
See
Item 4.A. “Information on the Company — A. History and
Development of the Company.”
D.
Property and
Equipment.
Our
headquarters are located in Shijiazhuang, China, where we own the
Kaiyuan Finance Center building and occupy a portion of it. This
space has served as our headquarters since April 2013. Fincera
leases out the unoccupied space, consisting of 56,092 square
meters. Our principal offices are located at 27/F, Kaiyuan Finance
Center, No. 5 East Main Street, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province,
050011, People’s Republic of China, and its telephone number
is +86 311 8382 7688.
We
lease office space with an area of roughly 2,560 square meters in
Beijing for our product development and IT teams. We also rent
approximately 22,350 square meters of office space in cities across
China for our regional headquarters and company-owned
stores.