On July 30, 2023, New Relic, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Crewline Buyer, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Crewline Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth therein, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the Company, with the Company (the “Surviving Corporation”) surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger”). Parent and Merger Sub are subsidiaries of an investment fund (“TPG Fund”) affiliated with TPG Global LLC (“TPG”). At the effective time of the Merger, the Surviving Corporation will be indirectly owned by investment funds advised by Francisco Partners Management, L.P. (“FP”), the TPG Fund and certain of their affiliates.
As of the filing of this Current Report on Form 8-K (this “Form 8-K”), seven lawsuits have been filed by purported stockholders of the Company related to the Merger: O’Dell v. New Relic, Inc., et. al., Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-8507 (S.D.N.Y. September 27, 2023) (the “O’Dell Action”), Pond v. New Relic, Inc., et. al., Case No. 3:23-cv-04998 (N.D. Cal. September 28, 2023) (the “Pond Action”), Wang v. New Relic, Inc., et. al., Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-08593 (S.D.N.Y. September 29, 2023) (the “Wang Action”), Schantz v. Arthur, et. al., Case No. CGC-23-609495 (Cal. Super. Ct. October 3, 2023) (the “Schantz Action”), O’Neill v. New Relic, Inc., et. al., Case No. 1:23-cv-08898 (S.D.N.Y. October 10, 2023) (the “O’Neill Action”), Scott v. New Relic, Inc., et. al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01130 (S.D.N.Y. October 10, 2023) (the “Scott Action”), and Michoud v. New Relic, Inc., et. al., Case No. 23-cv-08934 (S.D.N.Y. October 11, 2023) (the “Michoud Action,” and collectively with the O’Dell Action, the Pond Action, the Wang Action, the Schantz Action, the O’Neill Action, and the Scott Action, the “Actions”). The O’Dell Action, the Pond Action, the Wang Action, the Scott Action, and the Michoud Action name as defendants the Company and its board of directors and allege, among other things, that the definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 25, 2023 (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) omits material information with respect to the Merger, rendering the Definitive Proxy Statement false and misleading in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The O’Neill Action alleges similar disclosure deficiencies in the Definitive Proxy Statement against the Company, its board of directors, and one former director. The Schantz Action names as defendants the Company, its board of directors, Francisco Partners Management LLC and TPG, and alleges, among other things, similar disclosure deficiencies in the Definitive Proxy Statement in violation of Section 25401 of the California Corporations Code. The Actions seek, among other relief, an order enjoining the Merger or rescission if the Merger is consummated. In addition, as of the date of this Form 8-K, twelve purported stockholders sent letters and/or draft and unfiled complaints to the Company alleging similar deficiencies in the Definitive Proxy Statement as those noted in the above-referenced Actions (collectively, the “Demand Letters”). The Company believes that the claims in the Actions and Demand Letters are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them.
The Company vigorously denies that the Definitive Proxy Statement is deficient in any respect. The Company believes that the claims asserted in the Actions and Demand Letters are without merit and no further disclosure is required to supplement the Definitive Proxy Statement under applicable laws. However, solely to moot the unmeritorious disclosure claims and minimize the risk, costs, burden, nuisance and uncertainties inherent in litigation, the Company hereby supplements the disclosures contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). Nothing in this Form 8-K will be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under any applicable laws for any of the disclosures set forth herein. The Supplemental Disclosures are set forth below and should be read in conjunction with the Definitive Proxy Statement.
These Supplemental Disclosures do not affect the merger consideration to be paid to the Company’s stockholders in connection with the Merger or the timing of the Company’s virtual special meeting of stockholders scheduled to be held online via live webcast on November 1, 2023 at 7:00 am, Pacific Daylight Time (the “Special Meeting”). The Board of Directors of the Company continues to recommend that you vote “FOR” the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement and “FOR” the other proposals being considered at the Special Meeting.
Supplemental Disclosures to the Definitive Proxy Statement
The disclosure in the section entitled “Background of the Merger,” beginning on page 33 of the Definitive Proxy Statement, is hereby amended by replacing the fourth paragraph on page 49 of the Definitive Proxy Statement with the following:
Beginning on July 31, 2023, representatives of Qatalyst Partners reached out to 53 parties to invite such parties to participate in New Relic’s go-shop process. Such parties were identified as having the most likely strategic interest in acquiring New Relic and the financial capability to complete an acquisition. 28 of the contacted parties were private equity sponsors, and the remaining 25 were potential strategic counterparties. 16 of the contacted parties were ones that representatives of Qatalyst