Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended October 2, 2010
Commission file number 0-6072
EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Georgia   58-1035424
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or   (IRS Employer ID Number)
organization)    
     
660 Engineering Drive, Norcross, Georgia   30092
     
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (770) 263-9200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the close of business on November 5, 2010:
     
Class   Number of Shares
Common Stock, $0.10 par value   15,310,524
 
 

 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page  
       
 
       
       
 
       
    2  
 
       
    3  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    16  
 
       
    30  
 
       
    33  
 
       
       
 
       
    34  
 
       
    34  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    36  
 
       
    37  
 
       
  Exhibit 3.2
  Exhibit 10.1
  Exhibit 31.1
  Exhibit 31.2
  Exhibit 32

 

 


Table of Contents

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 2     October 3     October 2     October 3  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Product net sales
  $ 69,913       65,766       209,896       210,464  
Service net sales
    15,810       19,965       47,206       64,483  
 
                       
Net sales
    85,723       85,731       257,102       274,947  
 
                       
Product cost of sales
    47,098       46,892       140,664       141,014  
Service cost of sales
    7,463       10,843       23,299       45,391  
 
                       
Cost of sales
    54,561       57,735       163,963       186,405  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    21,996       20,496       65,797       65,468  
Research and development expenses
    4,898       5,149       15,028       13,788  
Impairment loss on goodwill related charges
                384        
Acquisition-related items
          (215 )     563       5,307  
 
                       
Operating income
    4,268       2,566       11,367       3,979  
Interest income
    60       14       341       179  
Interest expense
    (467 )     (549 )     (1,486 )     (1,837 )
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net
    18       (154 )     (431 )     (386 )
 
                       
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes
    3,879       1,877       9,791       1,935  
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (408 )     4,112       (1,861 )     4,272  
 
                       
Earnings from continuing operations
  3,471       5,989       7,930       6,207  
Discontinued operations:
                               
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
          (1,143 )           (1,143 )
Income tax benefit
          434             434  
 
                       
Loss from discontinued operations
          (709 )           (709 )
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 3,471       5,280       7,930       5,498  
 
                       
 
                               
Net earnings (loss) per share:
                               
Basic:
                               
From continuing operations
  $ 0.23       0.39       0.52       0.41  
From discontinued operations
          (0.05 )           (0.05 )
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 0.23       0.34       0.52       0.36  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted:
                               
From continuing operations
  $ 0.23       0.39       0.52       0.41  
From discontinued operations
          (0.05 )           (0.05 )
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 0.23       0.34       0.52       0.36  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    15,197       15,175       15,189       15,161  
Diluted
    15,251       15,258       15,229       15,250  
See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
                 
    October 2     December 31  
    2010     2009  
ASSETS
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 49,671       47,174  
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,456 in 2010 and $1,208 in 2009
    65,264       60,959  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on long-term contracts
    17,418       25,290  
Inventories
    48,779       40,655  
Deferred income taxes
    4,426       4,306  
Other current assets
    10,122       19,117  
 
           
Total current assets
    195,680       197,501  
 
           
Property, plant and equipment:
               
Land
    1,150       1,150  
Buildings and leasehold improvements
    18,879       18,792  
Machinery and equipment
    115,097       107,712  
Furniture and fixtures
    10,750       10,542  
 
           
Total property, plant and equipment
    145,876       138,196  
Less accumulated depreciation
    97,785       90,256  
 
           
Net property, plant and equipment
    48,091       47,940  
Deferred income taxes
    9,436       9,421  
Goodwill
    60,476       60,336  
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $25,399 in 2010 and $18,817 in 2009
    43,504       49,256  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on long-term contracts
    15,156       7,771  
Other assets
    1,535       1,920  
 
           
 
               
Total assets
  $ 373,878       374,145  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited), continued
(in thousands, except share data)
                 
    October 2     December 31  
    2010     2009  
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current liabilities:
               
Current installments of long-term debt
  $ 1,477       1,398  
Accounts payable
    28,468       27,333  
Billings in excess of contract costs and estimated earnings on long-term contracts
    12,204       9,380  
Accrued compensation and related costs
    15,500       13,946  
Deferred revenue
    10,333       9,805  
Contingent consideration arrangement liability
    6,833       13,729  
Other current liabilities
    10,546       23,763  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    85,361       99,354  
 
               
Long-term debt, excluding current installments
    28,234       26,352  
Deferred income taxes
    4,933       5,757  
Other liabilities
    7,261       5,591  
 
           
Total liabilities
    125,789       137,054  
 
           
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock of $1.00 par value per share; Authorized 10,000 shares; none issued
           
Common stock of $0.10 par value per share; Authorized 75,000 shares; issued and outstanding 15,311 in 2010 and 15,249 in 2009
    1,531       1,525  
Additional paid-in capital
    137,487       136,112  
Accumulated other comprehensive income — foreign currency translation adjustment
    7,753       6,066  
Retained earnings
    101,318       93,388  
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    248,089       237,091  
 
           
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
               
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 373,878       374,145  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    October 2     October 3  
    2010     2009  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net earnings
  $ 7,930       5,498  
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    14,434       15,050  
Deferred income taxes
    (959 )     (2,865 )
Loss on sale of assets
          68  
Loss from discontinued operations
          709  
Stock-based compensation expense
    1,425       1,662  
Change in fair value of contingent consideration liability
    304       1,510  
Payment for acquisition of business under contingent consideration arrangement
    (1,248 )      
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
               
Trade accounts receivable
    (4,243 )     12,624  
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on long-term contracts
    1,003       2,625  
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on long-term contracts
    2,747       976  
Inventories
    (7,808 )     2,467  
Accounts payable
    (254 )     (1,479 )
Income taxes
    555       (541 )
Accrued compensation and retirement costs
    1,453       (2,433 )
Deferred revenue
    2,556       151  
Other
    3,844       (3,062 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities in continuing operations
    21,739       32,960  
Net cash used in operating activities in discontinued operations
    (8,824 )     (484 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    12,915       32,476  
 
           
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
    (7,091 )     (10,689 )
Payments for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
          (87,264 )
Proceeds from sales of assets
    222       58  
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (6,869 )     (97,895 )
 
           
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net borrowings under revolving credit facility
    3,000       18,500  
Repayment of other debt
    (1,037 )     (961 )
Deferred financing costs paid
    (28 )     (251 )
Payment for acquisition of business under contingent consideration arrangement
    (5,952 )      
Payments for repurchase and retirement of common shares
    (61 )     (125 )
Proceeds from exercises of stock options
    15       620  
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (4,063 )     17,783  
 
           
 
               
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
    514       1,343  
 
           
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    2,497       (46,293 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    47,174       86,979  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 49,671       40,686  
 
           
See accompanying notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009
1. Basis of Presentation
EMS Technologies, Inc. (“EMS”) is a leading provider of wireless connectivity solutions over satellite and terrestrial networks. EMS keeps people and systems connected, wherever they are — on land, at sea, in the air or in space. Serving the aeronautical, asset-tracking, defense, and mobile computing industries, EMS products and services enable universal mobility, visibility and intelligence.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EMS Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries, each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of EMS (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. There are no other entities controlled by the Company, either directly or indirectly. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2009 consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2010 presentation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and are based on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Regulation S-X and its instructions to Form 10-Q. They do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. We have performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Management’s Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and reporting of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual future results could differ materially from those estimates.
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance amending and clarifying requirements for fair value measurements and disclosures in the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements . The new guidance requires disclosure of transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 and a reconciliation of all activity in Level 3. The guidance also requires detailed disaggregation disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities in all levels, and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques for Level 2 and Level 3. The guidance was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2010 and the disclosure reconciliation of all activity in Level 3 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In October 2009 the FASB issued two accounting standards updates that could result in revenue being recognized earlier in certain revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Both updates are effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. Early adoption is permitted. If the Company adopts this standard in a period other than the beginning of its fiscal year, the Company will be required to apply this standard retrospectively to the beginning of its fiscal year, and disclose certain financial information as revised for all interim periods previously reported in the fiscal year adopted. The Company is evaluating when to adopt the updates and the effect the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, amends the accounting for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Among other things, ASU 2009-13:
    Eliminates the requirement for objective evidence of fair value of an undelivered item for treatment of the delivered item as a separate unit of accounting;
    Requires use of the relative selling price method for allocating total consideration to elements of the arrangement instead of the relative-fair-value method or the residual method;
    Allows the use of an estimated selling price for any element within the arrangement to allocate consideration to individual elements when vendor-specific objective evidence or other third-party evidence of selling price do not exist; and
    Expands the required disclosures.
ASU 2009-14, Software — Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements , amends the guidance for revenue arrangements that contain tangible products and software elements. ASU 2009-14 redefines the scope of arrangements that fall within software revenue recognition guidance by specifically excluding tangible products that contain software components that function together to deliver the essential functionality of the tangible product.
Under current guidance, products that contain software that is more than incidental to the product as a whole fall within the scope of software revenue recognition guidance, which requires, among other things, the existence of vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of all undelivered items to allow a delivered item to be treated as a separate unit of accounting. Such tangible products excluded from the requirements of software revenue recognition requirements under ASU 2009-14 would follow the revenue recognition requirements for other revenue arrangements, including the new requirements for multiple-deliverable arrangements contained in ASU 2009-13.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, which provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development arrangements in which one or more payments are contingent upon achieving uncertain future events or circumstances. This update is effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2011. Early adoption is permitted. If the Company adopts this standard in a period other than the beginning of its fiscal year, the Company will be required to apply this standard retrospectively to the beginning of its fiscal year, and disclose certain financial information as revised for all interim periods previously reported in the fiscal year adopted. The Company is evaluating when to adopt the updates and the effect, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses . ASU 2010-20 requires a greater level of disaggregation in disclosures relating to the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for doubtful accounts, and also requires enhanced disclosures around nonaccrual and past due financing receivables, impaired loans and loan modifications. The provisions of this ASU are effective for the Company for the annual reporting period ending December 31, 2010. Except for the expanded disclosure requirements, the adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
2. Business Combinations
During the nine months ended October 3, 2009, the Company completed the acquisitions of two businesses that expanded its technology base. The Company completed the acquisition of all of the equity interest in Formation, Inc. (“Formation”), of Moorestown, New Jersey, and Satamatics Global Limited (“Satamatics”), of Tewkesbury, UK, on January 9, 2009 and February  13, 2009, respectively.
The Company was required to adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141(R), Business Combinations , which is included in FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (“ASC”) Topic 805 , Business Combinations , effective January  1, 2009, and these acquisitions were reflected in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with these revised standards.

 

7


Table of Contents

The aggregate cash purchase price for these two entities was approximately $90.7 million. In addition, one of the purchase agreements included a contingent consideration arrangement of up to $15 million. The final payment amount under the contingent consideration arrangement has been determined to be $14.0 million, of which $7.2 million was paid in the second quarter of 2010. The remaining $6.8 million is due December 31, 2010. Of the $7.2 million paid in the second quarter of 2010, $6.0 million is reflected in the financing activities section of the consolidated statement of cash flows since that amount was included in the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability as of the acquisition date. The remaining $1.2 million, which is reflected as an acquisition-related charge in the consolidated statement of operations since the acquisition date, is reflected as an operating activity in the consolidated statement of cash flows. In the third quarter 2010, $4.8 million of cash that had been previously distributed into an escrow account for the purchase of these two businesses was released to the sellers.
For the acquired companies, the results for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2010 included net sales of $9.9 million and $36.0 million, respectively, and a loss before income taxes from continuing operations of $2.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively. The results for the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009 included net sales of $13.3 million and $44.9 million, and a loss before income taxes from continuing operations of $1.6 million and $0.5 million respectively. During the nine months ended October 3, 2009, the Company recognized net acquisition-related charges of $5.3 million. These net charges were principally a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 141(R), including transaction costs, accretion of the contingent consideration arrangement liability, and a net charge related to an increase in the contingent consideration liability. The Company recognized a credit of $0.2 million in acquisition-related items in the three months ended October 3, 2009, mainly due to a decrease in the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration liability, reflecting a change in the expected probability of paying the projected amounts, net of accretion. The nine months ended October 3, 2009 also included a $1.4 million foreign exchange loss related to the funding of one of the acquisitions, which was required to be paid in British pounds sterling. The loss resulted from changes in foreign currency exchange rates from the date the Company funded the transaction to the date the acquisition was completed.
3. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable operating segment during the nine months ended October 2, 2010 (in thousands):
                                 
            Global              
    Aviation     Tracking     LXE     Total  
Balance as of December 31, 2009
  $ 35,108       23,429       1,799       60,336  
 
                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                140       140  
 
                       
 
                               
Balance as of October 2, 2010
  $ 35,108       23,429       1,939       60,476  
 
                       
The Company had $20.2 million of accumulated impairment losses recorded on LXE’s goodwill as of October 2, 2010.
The following table presents the gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization, in total and by major intangible asset class, for the Company’s intangible assets subject to amortization as of October 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
                         
    As of October 2, 2010  
    Gross             Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount  
 
                       
Developed technology
  $ 41,039       17,514       23,525  
Customer relationships
    19,167       4,224       14,943  
Trade names and trademarks
    6,269       1,744       4,525  
Other
    2,428       1,917       511  
 
                 
 
                       
 
  $ 68,903       25,399       43,504  
 
                 

 

8


Table of Contents

                         
    As of December 31, 2009  
    Gross             Net  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Carrying  
    Amount     Amortization     Amount  
 
                       
Developed technology
  $ 40,385       13,460       26,925  
Customer relationships
    19,052       2,493       16,559  
Trade names and trademarks
    6,208       1,052       5,156  
Other
    2,428       1,812       616  
 
                 
 
                       
 
  $ 68,073       18,817       49,256  
 
                 
Amortization expense related to these intangible assets for the three months and nine months ended October 2, 2010 was $2.0 million and $6.1 million, respectively, and for the three months and nine months ended October 3, 2009 was $2.1 million and $7.3 million, respectively. Expected amortization expense for the remainder of 2010 and for each of the five succeeding years is as follows: 2010 — $1.9 million, 2011 — $7.7 million, 2012 — $7.9 million, 2013 — $7.3 million, 2014 - $3.8 million and 2015 — $3.6 million.
As of October 2, 2010, we had approximately $60.5 million of goodwill and $43.5 million of other intangible assets on our consolidated balance sheet, collectively representing approximately 28% of our total assets. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of the year. We are also required to test goodwill and other long-lived assets on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change which indicate that an asset might be impaired. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include a sustained, significant decline in our share price and market capitalization, a decline in expected future cash flows for one or more of our business units (including our recently acquired businesses), a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition and/or slower-than-expected growth rates, among others. If we are required to recognize an impairment loss related to goodwill or long-lived assets, the related charge, although a noncash charge, could materially reduce reported earnings or result in a loss for the period in which the impairment loss is recognized.
4. Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures financial and non-financial assets and liabilities in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures . This guidance states that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, this guidance establishes a three-tier fair-value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
    Level 1 — Observable inputs consisting of quoted prices in active markets;
    Level 2 — Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
    Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

 

9


Table of Contents

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily in the form of foreign currency forward contracts, in order to mitigate the risks associated with currency fluctuations on future fair values of foreign denominated assets and liabilities. The fair values of foreign currency contracts of $336,000 net asset at October 2, 2010 and $39,000 net asset at December 31, 2009 are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments using the income approach (a level 2 input per the provisions of ASC Topic 820) and are recorded in other current assets and other current liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses related to these forward contracts are included in foreign exchange gain (loss), net, in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company has two fixed-rate mortgages and has borrowings under its revolving credit facility. One mortgage has an 8.0% interest rate and a carrying amount as of October 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 of $5.8 million and $6.4 million, respectively. The other mortgage has a 7.1% interest rate and a carrying amount as of October 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 of $2.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively. The Company’s outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility were $21.5 million and $18.5 million as of October 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The estimated fair value of the Company’s total debt was $29.4 million at October 2, 2010 and is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments (a level 2 input).
Management believes that these assets and liabilities can be liquidated without restriction.
5. Interim Segment Disclosures
The Company is organized into four reportable operating segments: Aviation, LXE, Defense & Space and Global Tracking. The Company determines operating segments in accordance with the Company’s internal management structure, which is organized based on products and services that share distinct operating characteristics. Each segment is separately managed and is evaluated primarily upon operating income and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”).
The Aviation segment designs and develops satellite-based communications solutions through a broad array of terminals and antennas for the aeronautical market that enable end-users in aircraft and other mobile platforms to communicate over satellite and air-to-ground links. This segment also designs equipment to process data on board aircraft, including rugged data storage, cabin-wireless connectivity, and air-to-ground connectivity equipment.
The LXE segment manufactures mobile terminals and wireless data collection equipment for logistics management systems. LXE operates mainly in three markets: the Americas market, which is comprised of North, South and Central America; the International market, which is comprised of all other geographic areas with the highest concentration in Europe; and direct sales to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”).
The Defense & Space segment manufactures custom-designed, highly engineered subsystems for defense electronics and satellite applications. These applications include products from military communications, radar, surveillance and countermeasures to high-definition television, satellite radio, and live TV for commercial airlines. Orders typically involve development and production schedules that can extend a year or more.
The Global Tracking segment provides satellite-based machine-to-machine mobile communications equipment and services to track, monitor and control remote assets, regardless of whether they are fixed, semi-fixed or mobile. Additionally, Global Tracking provides equipment for the Cospas-Sarsat search-and-rescue system and incident-management solutions for rescue coordination worldwide.
Prior to 2010, the Company operated under three reportable operating segments: Communications & Tracking, D&S and LXE. The Aviation and Global Tracking segments were previously included in our Communications & Tracking segment. The Company’s historical financial data has been recast in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to conform to its 2010 segment presentation.

 

10


Table of Contents

Following is a summary of the Company’s interim segment data (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 2     October 3     October 2     October 3  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net sales:
                               
Aviation
  $ 24,161       25,669     $ 75,685       93,589  
LXE
    35,613       26,237       102,551       79,988  
Defense & Space
    16,784       23,056       50,076       75,153  
Global Tracking
    9,399       10,769       29,785       26,217  
Less intercompany sales
    (234 )           (995 )      
 
                       
Global Tracking external sales
    9,165       10,769       28,790       26,217  
 
                       
Total
  $ 85,723       85,731     $ 257,102       274,947  
 
                       
 
                               
Operating income (loss):
                               
Aviation
  $ 1,479       (451 )   $ 3,604       8,415  
LXE
    2,096       (1,348 )     5,065       (6,195 )
Defense & Space
    1,655       2,140       4,267       7,333  
Global Tracking
    68       883       906       119  
Corporate & Other
    (1,030 )     1,342       (2,475 )     (5,693 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 4,268       2,566     $ 11,367       3,979  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:
                               
Aviation
  $ 1,382       (479 )   $ 3,187       9,077  
LXE
    2,434       (1,213 )     5,267       (6,373 )
Defense & Space
    1,660       2,218       4,276       7,411  
Global Tracking
    (80 )     647       855       478  
Corporate & Other
    (1,517 )     704       (3,794 )     (8,658 )
 
                       
Total
  $ 3,879       1,877     $ 9,791       1,935  
 
                       
The results before income taxes for Corporate & Other for the first nine months of 2009 includes $5.3 million of acquisition-related charges, (which includes a $1.4 million foreign exchange loss related to the funding of the Satamatics acquisition) and other expenses that are not allocated to operating segments in the financial data reviewed by the chief operating decision maker.

 

11


Table of Contents

                 
    October 2     December 31  
    2010     2009  
Assets:
               
Aviation
  $ 146,994       144,483  
LXE
    80,101       71,632  
Defense & Space
    47,725       53,883  
Global Tracking
    79,551       75,922  
Corporate & Other
    19,507       28,225  
 
           
Total
  $ 373,878       374,145  
 
           
 
               
Concentration of net assets by geographic region:
               
United States
  $ 69,166       72,826  
Canada
    67,577       62,239  
Europe
    103,223       97,216  
Other
    8,123       4,810  
 
           
Total
  $ 248,089       237,091  
 
           
Sales to no individual customer exceeded 10% of our net sales during the three and nine months ended October 2, 2010, or October 3, 2009.
6. Earnings Per Share
Following is a reconciliation of the denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 2     October 3     October 2     October 3  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
    15,197       15,175       15,189       15,161  
Dilutive potential shares using the treasury share method
    54       83       40       89  
 
                       
Diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
    15,251       15,258       15,229       15,250  
 
                       
 
                               
Shares that were not included in computation of diluted earnings per share that could potentially dilute future basic earnings per share because their effect on the periods were antidilutive
    1,005       526       1,031       557  
 
                       

 

12


Table of Contents

7. Comprehensive Income
Following is a summary of comprehensive income (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 2     October 3     October 2     October 3  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
                               
Net earnings
  $ 3,471       5,280       7,930       5,498  
Other comprehensive income:
                               
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    4,932       5,922       1,687       8,818  
 
                       
 
  $ 8,403       11,202       9,617       14,316  
 
                       
8. Inventories
Inventories as of October 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 include the following (in thousands):
                 
    October 2     December 31  
    2010     2009  
 
               
Parts and materials
  $ 29,493       25,221  
Work-in-process
    6,406       5,142  
Finished goods
    12,880       10,292  
 
           
 
  $ 48,779       40,655  
 
           
Costs included in inventories related to long-term programs or contracts are primarily for materials and work performed on programs that are awaiting funding, or on contracts not yet finalized. Such costs were $2.1 million at October 2, 2010, and $1.1 million at December 31, 2009.
9. Revolving Credit Facility
As of October 2, 2010, the Company had $21.5 million of borrowings outstanding under its revolving credit facility.
The Company has $2.1 million of standby letters of credit to satisfy performance guarantee requirements under certain customer contracts. While these obligations are not normally called, they could be called by the beneficiaries at any time before the expiration date should the Company fail to meet certain contractual requirements. After deducting outstanding letters of credit, at October 2, 2010 the Company had $38.5 million available for borrowing in the U.S. and $12.9 million available for borrowing in Canada under the revolving credit agreement.
10. Warranty Liability
The Company provides a limited warranty for a variety of its products. The specific terms and conditions of the warranties vary depending upon the specific products and markets. The Company records a liability at the time of sale for the estimated costs to be incurred under warranties, which is included in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of this liability is based upon historical, as well as expected, experience.

 

13


Table of Contents

The warranty liability is periodically reviewed for adequacy and adjusted as necessary. Following is a summary of the activity for the periods presented related to the Company’s liability for limited warranties (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 2     October 3     October 2     October 3  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Balance at beginning of the period
  $ 4,524       3,796       4,085       2,789  
Additions at dates of acquisition for businesses acquired during period
                      516  
Accruals for warranties issued during the period
    831       734       2,887       2,987  
Settlements made during the period
    (679 )     (694 )     (2,296 )     (2,456 )
 
                       
Balance at end of period
  $ 4,676       3,836       4,676       3,836  
 
                       
11. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has granted nonvested restricted stock and nonqualified stock options to key employees and directors under several stock award plans. The Company granted stock awards with an aggregate fair value of approximately $2.6 million during the first nine months of 2010, and $2.5 million during the first nine months of 2009. The Company recognized expense in the third quarter and first nine months of $0.5 million and $1.4 million in 2010, and $0.6 million and $1.7 million in 2009, respectively, before income tax benefits for all the Company’s stock plans.
12. Income Taxes
The Company’s effective income tax rate is generally less than the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% due to a portion of earnings being earned in Canada, where the Company’s effective rate is much lower than the rate in the U.S. due to research-related tax benefits. In the three and nine months ended October 2, 2010, the rate was impacted by tax benefits for certain loss jurisdictions that have not been recognized. In the three and nine months ended October 3, 2009, the Company recognized a benefit of $1.9 million for its prior-year research and development credits in the U.S. after completion of an Internal Revenue Service examination. Furthermore, a benefit of $2.2 million and $2.4 million was recognized in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively, related to the year-to-date loss before income taxes in certain jurisdictions since a loss had been projected for the full year in those jurisdictions. Of this benefit, $0.4 million was allocated to discontinued operations.
The Company is under audit in Canada at the federal level for the years 2008 and 2009. The Company expects the audits to be completed in the next twelve months. Any related unrecognized tax benefits could be adjusted based on the results of the audits. The Company cannot estimate the range of the change that is reasonably possible at this time.
13. Discontinued Operations
Prior to 2009, the Company disposed of its S&T/Montreal, SatNet, and EMS Wireless divisions. The sales agreements for each of these disposals contained standard indemnification provisions for various contingencies that could not be resolved before the dates of closing and for various representations and warranties provided by the Company and the purchasers. The purchaser of EMS Wireless asserted claims under such representations and warranties. The parties agreed to arbitration, which commenced in the third quarter of 2009. In March of 2010, the Company received an interim decision from the arbitrator on these claims awarding the purchaser a total of approximately $9.2 million under the warranty provisions of the purchase agreement. As a result, the Company accrued a liability for the award costs, based on the interim decision, in discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2009. On April 30, 2010, the arbitrator issued the final decision awarding the purchaser of the Company’s former EMS Wireless division $8.6 million. Based on this final award, the Company reduced its estimated liability by $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2010. This favorable adjustment in discontinued operations in the three months ended April 3, 2010 was offset by additional charges related to estimated contingent liabilities associated with other divisions disposed of prior to 2009.

 

14


Table of Contents

In conjunction with the sale of S&T/Montreal in 2005, an existing contractual requirement for the Company to post approximately $3 million to secure in-orbit incentive performance of the Radarsat-2 payload was eliminated, but the Company continues to warrant that amount in the event of specified in-orbit payload failures. Based upon the available information, management believes that the outcome for this particular contingency is not probable and cannot be estimated. As a result, the Company has not incurred any costs to date, and has not recorded a liability as of October 2, 2010, with respect to this contingency. The Company incurred no additional costs related to this disposition through the third quarter of 2010.
The Company has an agreement with the purchaser of the former S&T/Montreal division to acquire a license for $8 million in payments over a seven-year period, beginning in December 2008, for the rights to a certain satellite territory. The Company and the purchaser have a corresponding sublicense agreement that granted the territory rights back to the purchaser, under which the Company is to receive a portion of the satellite service revenues from the specific market territory over the same period. The purchaser had previously guaranteed that the revenues derived under the sublicense would equal or exceed the acquisition cost of the license. As part of the agreement to sell the net assets of S&T/Montreal, the Company released the purchaser from this guarantee. Without the guarantee, the Company estimates that its portion of the satellite service revenues will be less than the acquisition cost, and the Company has accordingly reflected a liability for the net cost in its consolidated balance sheet. As of October 2, 2010, no payments have been made by the Company under this license agreement. The satellite service revenues from the specific market territory included under the sublicense agreement are considerably lower than expected. The Company believes that sufficient efforts are not being made by the purchaser of the former S&T/Montreal division to market this satellite service. The parties are finalizing a settlement under these agreements. The Company believes that the net liability recorded in its consolidated balance sheet is its best estimate of the settlement amount. If a settlement is reached, it is expected to be paid in the following twelve months, and therefore the net liability is recorded as a current liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of October 2, 2010.
14. Repurchases of Common Shares
On July 29, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $20 million of the Company’s common shares. As of October 2, 2010, the Company had repurchased 495,000 common shares for approximately $10.1 million. Further repurchases are no longer permitted under the terms of the Company’s principal credit agreements. There were no repurchases of common shares under this program during the nine months ended October 2, 2010.
15. Litigation
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

15


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this Quarterly Report and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
We are a leading provider of wireless connectivity solutions over satellite and terrestrial networks. We keep people and systems connected, wherever they are — on land, at sea, in the air or in space. Serving the aeronautical, asset-tracking, defense, and mobile computing industries, our products and services enable universal mobility, visibility and intelligence. Our operations include the following four reportable operating segments:
    Aviation — Designs and develops satellite-based communications solutions through a broad array of terminals and antennas for the aeronautical market that enable end-users in aircraft and other mobile platforms to communicate over Inmarsat and Iridium satellites and air-to-ground links. This segment also designs and builds aircraft cabin equipment to process data on board aircraft, including rugged data storage, cabin-wireless connectivity, and air-to-ground connectivity equipment;
    LXE — Provides rugged mobile terminals and wireless data networks used for logistics applications such as distribution centers, warehouses and container ports. LXE operates mainly in three markets: the Americas market, which is comprised of North, South and Central America; the International market, which is comprised of all other geographic areas, with the highest concentration in Europe; along with direct sales to original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”);
    Defense & Space (“D&S”) — Supplies highly engineered subsystems for defense electronics and satellite applications from military communications, radar, surveillance and countermeasures to high-definition television, satellite radio, and live TV for commercial airlines; and
    Global Tracking — Provides satellite-based machine-to-machine mobile communications equipment and services to track, monitor and control remote assets, regardless of whether they are fixed, semi-fixed or mobile. Additionally, Global Tracking provides equipment for the Cospas-Sarsat search-and-rescue system and incident-management solutions for rescue coordination worldwide.
Following is a summary of significant factors affecting or related to our results of operations for the three months and nine months ended October 2, 2010:
    Consolidated net sales from continuing operations were $85.7 million and $257.1 million in third quarter and first nine months of 2010, reflecting another quarter of strong sales, though down by 7% compared with the first nine months of 2009. Net sales in 2010 reflect a recovery in our logistics business and the additional net sales from the acquisitions made in 2008 and 2009.
    Operating profits were contributed by each of the four operating segments in the third quarter and the first nine months of 2010, respectively. In total, operating profits improved by $1.7 million and $7.4 million from the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively, mainly from the higher volume of logistics products shipped, the lower cost-of-sales percentages reported by our operating segments, and lower acquisition-related charges and amortization expense in 2010. For the first nine months of 2010, acquisition-related charges were lower by $4.7 million and amortization expense was lower by $1.2 million compared with the same period of 2009.
    As certain of our markets continue to be impacted by the economy, they may face continuing pressures and risks. We expect that we will continue to be faced with these economic pressures at least through the middle of 2011. These and other factors could cause a decline in expected future cash flows for one or more of our business units (including our recently acquired businesses), and as a result it is reasonably possible that we may be required to recognize an impairment loss related to goodwill or other long-lived assets in the future.

 

16


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
The following table sets forth items from the consolidated statements of operations as reported and as a percentage of net sales (or product net sales and service net sales for product cost of sales and service cost of sales, respectively) for each period (in thousands, except percentages):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    October 2     October 3     October 2     October 3  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Product net sales
  $ 69,913       81.6 %   $ 65,766       76.7 %   $ 209,896       81.6 %   $ 210,464       76.5 %
Service net sales
    15,810       18.4       19,965       23.3       47,206       18.4       64,483       23.5  
 
                                               
Net sales
    85,723       100.0       85,731       100.0       257,102       100.0       274,947       100.0  
 
                                               
Product cost of sales
    47,098       67.4       46,892       71.3       140,664       67.0       141,014       67.0  
Service cost of sales
    7,463       47.2       10,843       54.3       23,299       49.4       45,391       70.4  
 
                                                       
Cost of sales
    54,561       63.6       57,735       67.4       163,963       63.9       186,405       67.8  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    21,996       25.7       20,496       23.9       65,797       25.6       65,468       23.8  
Research and development expenses
    4,898       5.7       5,149       6.0       15,028       5.8       13,788       5.0  
Impairment loss on goodwill related charges
                            384       0.1              
Acquisition-related items
                (215 )     (0.3 )     563       0.2       5,307       1.9  
 
                                               
Operating income
    4,268       5.0       2,566       3.0       11,367       4.4       3,979       1.5  
Interest income
    60             14             341       0.2       179       0.1  
Interest expense
    (467 )     (0.5 )     (549 )     (0.6 )     (1,486 )     (0.6 )     (1,837 )     (0.7 )
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net
    18             (154 )     (0.2 )     (431 )     (0.2 )     (386 )     (0.2 )
 
                                               
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes
    3,879       4.5       1,877       2.2       9,791       3.8       1,935       0.7  
Income tax (expense) benefit
    (408 )     (0.5 )     4,112       4.8       (1,861 )     (0.7 )     4,272       1.6  
 
                                               
Earnings from continuing operations
  3,471       4.0   5,989       7.0   7,930       3.1   6,207       2.3
 
                                                               
Loss from discontinued operations
                (709 )     (0.8 )                 (709 )     (0.3 )
 
                                               
 
                                                               
Net earnings
  $ 3,471       4.0 %   $ 5,280       6.2 %   $ 7,930       3.1 %   $ 5,498       2.0 %
 
                                               
Three Months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009:
Net sales of $85.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 were the same level as the net sales in 2009. Higher net sales from our LXE segment were offset by lower net sales from our D&S, Aviation and Global Tracking segments. LXE’s net sales in the third quarter of 2010 were $9.4 million higher than in the same period in 2009, an increase of 35.7%, driven primarily by higher product shipments in the Americas market. LXE’s product sales were also higher, but to a lesser extent, in the International market, and from a new source of revenue from direct sales to OEMs. Net sales were lower at D&S mainly due to the conclusion of work performed on a significant military communications research project in the fourth quarter of 2009, and therefore not included in the 2010 results. Net sales were lower at Aviation primarily due to a lower volume of shipments of air-to-ground in-cabin connectivity products into the air transport market due to a change in the airline’s rollout schedule of connectivity, partially offset by an increase in Inmarsat high-speed-data and antenna product shipments to the military market. The decrease in net sales at Global Tracking was primarily a result of the completion of a significant emergency management project in the third quarter of 2009 that triggered revenue recognition in that period, partially offset by an increase in airtime revenue from a higher number of terminals in use from our asset-tracking product lines.
Product net sales of $69.9 million in the third quarter of 2010 were 6.3% higher than product net sales in the third quarter of 2009. These higher product net sales were primarily due to a higher volume of terminals shipped by LXE, partially offset by lower product net sales at Aviation, Global Tracking and D&S. The lower product net sales at Aviation were mainly due to a lower volume of shipments of air-to-ground connectivity products. The lower product net sales at Global Tracking were primarily due to the timing of revenue recognized on emergency management projects as described above. The lower sales level at D&S was mainly due to the timing of revenue recognized on long-term contracts. Service net sales of $15.8 million in the third quarter of 2010 were 20.8% lower than service net sales in the same period in 2009, mainly due to the conclusion of significant work performed on a military communications research project by D&S partially offset by an increase in airtime revenue at Global Tracking generated from our asset-tracking product line acquired during the first quarter of 2009. As a result, product net sales comprised a higher percentage of total net sales in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009.

 

17


Table of Contents

Overall cost of sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales was lower in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the same period of 2009 due to lower cost-of-sales percentages reported by each of our four reportable operating segments and a higher percentage of net sales generated from our LXE segment, which has a lower cost-of-sales percentage than the consolidated group. Product cost of sales and service cost of sales as a percentage of their respective net sales were lower in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. The product cost-of-sales percentage was lower in all four of our segments due to a more favorable product mix, cost reduction efforts targeted at reducing product costs at Aviation and Global Tracking, a higher production volume at LXE, and improved program execution at D&S. The decrease in the service cost-of-sales percentage was mainly due to a lower proportion of service revenues generated from our D&S segment, which has a higher service cost-of-sales percentage than our other three reportable operating segments.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1.5 million higher in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 mainly due to additional marketing and selling costs related to the higher sales at LXE which has a higher commission structure than our other operating segments, higher incentive compensation costs due to the improved performance projected for the Company in 2010 as compared with 2009, and an increase in outside service expense mainly for tax related services.
Research and development expenditures were slightly lower in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009. Expenditures during the third quarter 2010 were higher than the third quarter in 2009 from the development of new product offerings in 2010. However, a higher proportion of these expenditures were recoverable in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 from the Canadian government and certain commercial contracts.
We recognized income tax expense of $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2010 equal to 11% of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes. The Company’s effective income tax rate is generally less than the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% due to a portion of earnings being earned in Canada, where the Company’s effective rate is much lower than the rate in the U.S. due to research-related tax benefits. In the three months ended October 2, 2010, the rate was higher than it otherwise would have been since tax benefits for certain loss jurisdictions have not been recognized. We recognized an income tax benefit of $4.1 million in the third quarter of 2009. During the quarter we recognized a benefit of $1.9 million for prior-year R&D credits in the U.S. after completion of an Internal Revenue Service examination. Furthermore, a benefit of $2.2 million was recognized related to the year-to-date losses before income taxes in certain jurisdictions in which losses had been projected for the full year. The effective rate in 2010 was also higher than 2009 since the earnings in Canada in 2010 are expected to be subject to higher rates due to provincial taxes, and the rate used for U.S. taxable income is higher since certain key provisions of the U.S. tax law, including the research and development credit, have not been extended to be in effect for 2010 as of the end of the third quarter. If these provisions are extended, our effective tax rate will be lower than the year-to-date rate for the remainder of 2010. However, we can make no assurances that these provisions will be extended to be in effect for 2010.
Nine Months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009:
Net sales of $257.1 million in the first nine months of 2010 were 6.5% lower than the $274.9 million in the same period in 2009. Lower net sales from our D&S and Aviation segments were partially offset by higher net sales from our LXE and Global Tracking segments. Net sales were lower at D&S mainly due to the conclusion of work performed on a significant military communications research project in the fourth quarter of 2009, and therefore not included in the 2010 results. Net sales were lower at Aviation primarily due to a lower volume of shipments of connectivity products and Inmarsat high-speed-data and antenna products reflecting the slow-down in the Aviation commercial business since the third quarter of 2009. LXE’s net sales in the first nine months of 2010 were $22.6 million higher than in the same period in 2009, an increase of 28.2%, mainly due to higher product shipments in the Americas market. LXE’s product sales were also higher, but to a lesser extent, in the International market, and from a new source of revenue from direct sales to OEMs. The increase in net sales at Global Tracking was primarily a result of the timing of the acquisition of our asset-tracking product line February 2009 and additional airtime revenues.

 

18


Table of Contents

Product net sales of $209.9 million in the first nine months of 2010 were relatively unchanged from the same period in 2009. A higher volume of terminals shipped by LXE, and the additional product net sales generated from our asset-tracking product lines acquired in February 2009, were offset by lower product net sales at Aviation and D&S. The lower product net sales at Aviation were mainly due to a lower volume of shipments of our connectivity products and Inmarsat high-speed-data and antenna products to the commercial markets. The lower product net sales at D&S were mainly due to the timing of revenue recognized on long-term contracts. Service net sales of $47.2 million in the first nine months of 2010 were 26.8% lower than service net sales in the same period in 2009, mainly due to the conclusion of significant work performed on a military communications research project by D&S partially offset by an increase in airtime revenue at Global Tracking and Aviation generated from our new lines of business acquired during the first quarter of 2009. As a result, product net sales comprised a higher percentage of total net sales in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months of 2009.
Overall cost of sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales was lower in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period of 2009 due to lower cost-of-sales percentages reported by three of our four reportable operating segments and a higher percentage of net sales generated from our LXE and Global Tracking segments which have lower cost-of-sales percentages than our other two segments. Product cost of sales and service cost of sales as a percentage of their respective net sales were lower in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. Product cost of sales was lower in three of our four segments due to a more favorable product mix, and cost reduction efforts targeted at reducing product costs at Aviation and Global Tracking, a higher production volume at LXE, and improved program execution at D&S. The lower service cost-of-sales percentage was mainly due to a lower proportion of service revenues generated from our D&S segment, which has a higher service cost-of-sales percentage than our other three reportable operating segments.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated net sales increased for the first nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months in 2009. Actual expenses were only $0.3 million higher in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 mainly due to additional marketing and selling costs related to the higher sales at LXE which has a higher commission structure than our other operating segments, additional costs related to the acquired product lines, and higher incentive compensation costs due to the improved performance projected for the Company in 2010 as compared with 2009. These increased costs were partially offset by management’s cost reduction efforts at our Aviation and D&S segments, and the net favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our international operations. The first nine months of 2009 also included higher severance charges of approximately $1.1 million.
Research and development expenses were $1.2 million higher in the first nine months of 2010 than in the comparable period in 2009 mainly for the development of new product offerings, and the expansion of our technology base in 2010. Research and development expenses also increased in the first nine months of 2010 due to the unfavorable effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on our Canadian operations. A higher proportion of these expenditures were recoverable in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 from the Canadian government and certain commercial contracts which partially offset the higher research and development expenditures.
Acquisition-related items included charges of $0.6 million in the first nine months of 2010. These costs were primarily for professional fees related to acquired research and development tax credits and an adjustment in the earn-out liability for changes in payments to be made for one of the acquisitions completed in the first quarter of 2009. Acquisition-related charges were $5.3 million in the first nine months of 2009. These costs were primarily related to professional fees for legal, due-diligence, valuation, and integration services for the acquisition of our Formation and Satamatics businesses (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report for additional information on these business acquisitions).
We recognized income tax expense of $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2010 equal to 19% of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes. The Company’s effective income tax rate is generally less than the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% due to a portion of earnings being earned in Canada, where the Company’s effective rate is much lower than the rate in the U.S. due to research-related tax benefits. In the nine months ended October 2, 2010, the rate was higher than it otherwise would have been since tax benefits for certain loss jurisdictions have not been recognized. We recognized an income tax benefit of $4.3 million in the first nine months of 2009. This benefit was primarily realized during the third quarter, an explanation for which is included in the quarterly comparisons section of our management’s discussion and analysis section of this Quarterly Report. In addition, the effective rate in 2010 was higher than 2009 since the earnings in Canada in 2010 are expected to be subject to higher rates due to provincial taxes and the rate used for U.S. taxable income is higher since certain key provisions of the U.S. tax law, including the research and development credit, have not been extended to be in effect for 2010 as of the end of the third quarter.

 

19


Table of Contents

Segment Analysis
Our segment net sales, cost of sales as a percentage of respective segment net sales, segment operating income (loss) and Adjusted EBITDA were as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
                                                 
                                    Percentage  
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended     Increase (Decrease)  
    October 2     October 3     October 2     October 3     Three     Nine  
    2010     2009     2010     2009     Months     Months  
 
                                               
Net sales:
                                               
Aviation
  $ 24,161       25,669       75,685       93,589       (5.9) %     (19.1 )
LXE
    35,613       26,237       102,551       79,988       35.7       28.2  
Defense & Space
    16,784       23,056       50,076       75,153       (27.2 )     (33.4 )
Global Tracking
    9,399       10,769       29,785       26,217       (12.7 )     13.6  
Less intercompany sales
    (234 )           (995 )                  
 
                                       
Global Tracking external sales
    9,165       10,769       28,790       26,217       (14.9 )     9.8  
 
                                       
Total
  $ 85,723       85,731       257,102       274,947             (6.5 )
 
                                       
 
                                               
Cost of sales percentage:
                                               
Aviation
    65.4 %     67.2       65.1       63.3       (1.8 )     1.8  
LXE
    60.1       62.9       59.4       63.5       (2.8 )     (4.1 )
Defense & Space
    75.4       79.6       75.8       79.5       (4.2 )     (3.7 )
Global Tracking
    46.0       52.7       50.0       61.8       (6.7 )     (11.8 )
Total
    63.6       67.3       63.9       67.8       (3.7 )     (3.9 )
 
                                               
Operating income (loss):
                                               
Aviation
  $ 1,479       (451 )     3,604       8,415         2     (57.2 )
LXE
    2,096       (1,348 )     5,065       (6,195 )       2       2
Defense & Space
    1,655       2,140       4,267       7,333       (22.7 )     (41.8 )
Global Tracking
    68       883       906       119       (92.3 )     661.3  
Corporate & Other
    (1,030 )     1,342       (2,475 )     (5,693 )       2       2
 
                                       
Total
  $ 4,268       2,566       11,367       3,979       66.2       185.7  
 
                                       
 
                                               
Adjusted EBITDA (1)
                                               
Aviation
  $ 3,418       1,755       9,290       15,586       94.8       (40.4 )
LXE
    3,229       (361 )     8,012       (3,348 )       2       2
Defense & Space
    2,343       3,047       6,790       10,028       (23.1 )     (32.3 )
Global Tracking
    863       1,514       3,626       3,252       (43.0 )     11.5  
Corporate & Other
    (352 )     1,738       365       1,642         2     (77.8 )
 
                                       
Total
  $ 9,501       7,693       28,083       27,160       23.5       3.4  
 
                                       
     
(1)   Adjusted EBITDA is a financial measure that is not defined with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. See section entitled “Adjusted EBITDA” for an explanation of this measure and a reconciliation to net earnings.
 
(2)   The percentage change is not calculable.
Aviation: Net sales decreased by $1.5 million and $17.9 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2009, mainly due to a lower volume of shipments of Aviation’s air-to-ground connectivity products. Shipments were lower for Aviation’s air-to-ground in-cabin connectivity products into the air transport market due to delays in customer orders resulting from changes in the airline’s rollout schedule of connectivity, and to a transition to a new buying pattern by our customer to acquire inventory as needed to meet scheduled installations instead of maintaining a stock of inventory of on-hand. The lower shipments of air-to-ground connectivity products in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the same period of 2009 were partially offset by an increase in Aviation’s Inmarsat high-speed-data terminal and antenna products, mainly to the military market, indicating continued strength in the demand for Aviation products in that market. The decrease in net sales in the first nine months of 2010 were also due to a lower volume of shipment of Aviation’s Inmarsat high-speed-data terminal and antenna products reflecting the slow-down in the Aviation commercial business beginning in the third quarter of 2009.

 

20


Table of Contents

Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was lower in the third quarter 2010 as compared with the third quarter of 2009 mainly due to a more favorable mix of Inmarsat products partially offset by the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates that affected our reported international costs, and the negative impact of a net increase in estimated costs on long-term projects in the third quarter of 2010. The cost-of-sales percentage was higher in the first nine months of 2010 as compared with the same period of 2009 mainly due to a lower production volume over which fixed costs were absorbed, the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and the negative impact of a net increase in estimated costs on long-term projects. These increases in the cost-of-sales percentage were partially offset by lower amortization costs of intangible assets and a more favorable mix of Inmarsat products in the first nine months of 2010.
Operating income increased by $1.9 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009 due to a lower cost-of-sales percentage, and lower selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses in the third quarter of 2010. These lower selling, general and administrative expenses were mainly due to staff reductions made in the second quarter of 2010, and from certain cost centers that supported the Aviation segment in 2009 that began supporting Global Tracking in 2010. The lower research and development expenses were primarily a result of additional funding received from the Canadian government under a program to encourage technology development in areas such as satellite communications. Operating income decreased by $4.8 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 mainly as a result of lower net sales in 2010. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 6.1% and a negative 1.8% in the third quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was 4.8% and 9.0% in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 mainly due to an increase in operating income in the third quarter of 2010. Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $6.3 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009 due to a decrease in operating income and an unfavorable swing in foreign currency gains and losses.
LXE: Net sales exceeded $35 million in both the second and third quarters of 2010, and were higher than the net sales of each of the preceding five quarters, indicating a recovery in the North American markets for our logistics business. Net sales were higher by $9.4 million in the third quarter of 2010, and by $22.6 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same periods of 2009 mainly due to an increase in net sales in the Americas market, and to a lesser extent in the International market in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010. The increase in net sales in the Americas market resulted primarily from a higher volume of terminals shipped in that market in response to a higher demand for rugged handheld computer products. The increase in net sales in the International market was mainly due to a higher volume of terminals shipped in that market partially offset by the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the reported net sales. Sales generated from handheld computer products introduced in the fourth quarter of 2009 to the OEM market gained acceptance in certain service industries in 2010 and represents $1.7 million, or 4.7%, and $6.1 million, or 5.9%, of net sales in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was lower in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 compared with the same periods in 2009 mainly due to management’s cost reduction efforts, and a higher production volume over which fixed costs were absorbed. Another factor impacting the cost of sales as a percentage of net sales in the first nine months of 2010 was a $0.9 million reduction in cost of sales for purchased items previously included in accounts payable that were determined to no longer be liabilities. The effects of these reductions in cost of sales as a percentage of net sales were partially offset by an unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates that affected our reported International net sales in the first nine months of 2010. Revenues are generally denominated in the local functional currency but product costs are denominated in the U.S. dollar, which was stronger relative to the foreign currencies in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009.

 

21


Table of Contents

LXE’s operating income improved in each of the first three quarters of 2010 compared with the previous quarter mainly due to the strength of the recovering North American markets. LXE generated operating income of $2.1 million and $5.1 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 compared with operating losses of $1.3 million and $6.2 million in the third quarter and the first nine months of 2009, respectively. These increases in operating income in 2010 were mainly a result of the margin contributed by the higher net sales and more favorable cost-of-sales percentages. These increases in operating income were partially offset by higher research and development expenses reflecting the development of three new products to be released in early 2011 and higher selling, general and administrative expenses mainly due to increased commissions and other selling expenses as a result of higher sales. These higher selling, general and administrative expenses were partially offset by the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on reported costs and lower severance charges. Severance charges were lower by approximately $1.4 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 5.9% and negative 5.1% in the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was 4.9% and negative 7.7% in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA increased by $3.6 million and $11.4 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively, compared with the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, in line with the increases in operating income in 2010.
Defense & Space : Net sales were $6.3 million and $25.1 million lower in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2009 mainly due to work performed on military programs that were included in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, including a large military satellite communications research project, but were completed in the fourth quarter of 2009 and will not contribute to net sales in future quarters. Order backlog of long-term contracts was $71.2 million at October 2, 2010, a decrease of $18.4 million from December 31, 2009. Orders for long-term defense contracts slowed during the third quarter of 2010 as a result of delays in customer funding.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was lower in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 compared with the same periods in 2009. These lower cost-of-sale percentages were mainly due to a net decrease in estimated costs to complete long-term programs resulting from improved program execution, and production efficiencies gained on certain long-term defense-related projects in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010. Cost of sales for the first nine months of 2009 included approximately $0.7 million of severance changes.
Operating income was lower by $0.5 million and $3.1 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively, compared with the third quarter and first nine months of 2009. The lower operating income was mainly due to the decrease in net sales generated in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010. The lower operating income in the first nine months of 2010 was also due to higher research and development expenses, partially offset by lower selling, general and administrative expenses. The lower selling, general and administrative costs reflect the impact of management’s cost reduction efforts initiated in 2009. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 9.9% and 9.3% in the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and was 8.5% and 9.8% in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $0.7 million and $3.2 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010, respectively, compared with the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, in line with the decrease in operating income in 2010.

 

22


Table of Contents

Global Tracking: Net sales were $1.4 million lower in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009 mainly due to the completion of a significant emergency management project in the third quarter of 2009 that triggered revenue recognition in that period, partially offset by an increase in airtime revenue in the third quarter of 2010. The increase in airtime revenue in the third quarter 2010 was mainly a result of a higher number of terminals in use by customers. Net sales were $3.6 million higher in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. The increase in net sales in the first nine months of 2010 was mainly due to timing of the acquisition of our new asset-tracking product line (acquired on February 13, 2009), and higher airtime revenue, which contributed $3.3 million of additional net sales in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in airtime revenue in the first nine months of 2010 was a result of a higher number of terminals in use, and a more favorable mix of airtime contracts reflecting the migration of existing customers to current network platforms which yield higher airtime rates. As a result, the average revenue being generated per terminal by the new asset-tracking product line has grown in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months of 2009. Net sales also included a higher concentration of product shipments to the security market in the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 compared with the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, reflecting growth in that market.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was lower for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 as compared with the same periods in 2009. The cost-of-sales percentage for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 included a more favorable product mix, the effects of management’s efforts to lower costs on certain hardware products targeted for improvement, and a higher proportion of airtime revenue, which has a lower cost-of-sales percentage than product net sales. The cost-of-sales percentage comparison was also affected by lower intangible asset amortization expense in 2010.
Operating income was $0.8 million lower in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009, mainly due to higher selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses. The lower net sales in the third quarter of 2010 were offset by the lower cost of sales in that period compared with the same period in 2009. Operating income was $0.8 million higher in the first nine months of 2010, compared with the same period in 2009 primarily as a result of the increased gross margin contributed from higher net sales and the lower cost-of-sales percentage, partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses. These higher selling, general and administrative costs were mainly from certain cost centers that supported the Aviation segment in 2009 that began supporting Global Tracking in 2010, and the timing of the acquisition of our new line of business in the first quarter of 2009; the costs related to the newly acquired business were included in the operating results of our Global Tracking segment for the first nine months in 2009 from the date of acquisition, but were included in the full nine months of 2010. Research and development expenses were higher for the third quarter and first nine months of 2010 compared with the same period of 2009 due to increased efforts on development projects for next generation products. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 0.7% and 8.2% in the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively and was 3.1% and 0.5% in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $0.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared with the third quarter of 2009, primarily due to a decrease in operating income in 2010. Adjusted EBITDA increased by $0.4 million in the first nine months of 2010 compared with the first nine months of 2009 mainly due to an increase in operating income in 2010. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA for the first nine months of 2010 as compared with the same period of 2009 was partially offset by an unfavorable change in foreign currency gains year over year.

 

23


Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA
In addition to traditional GAAP financial measures, we also measure our performance based on the non-GAAP financial measure of earnings before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, and before impairment loss on goodwill related charges, stock-based compensation, acquisition-related items and acquisition-related foreign exchange adjustments (“Adjusted EBITDA”). The following table is a reconciliation of net earnings (which is the most directly comparable GAAP operating performance measure) and earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes by segment to Adjusted EBITDA for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2010 and October 3, 2009 (in thousands):
                                                 
                                    Corp &        
    Aviation     LXE     D&S     GT     Other     Total  
Three Months Ended October 2, 2010
                                               
Net earnings
                                          $ 3,471  
Income tax expense
                                            408  
 
                                             
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ 1,382       2,434       1,660       (80 )     (1,517 )     3,879  
Interest expense
          (21 )           2       486       467  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,972       762       638       923       320       4,615  
Stock-based compensation
    64       54       45       18       359       540  
 
                                   
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 3,418       3,229       2,343       863       (352 )   $ 9,501  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Nine Months Ended October 2, 2010
                                               
Net earnings
                                          $ 7,930  
Income tax expense
                                            1,861  
 
                                             
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ 3,187       5,267       4,276       855       (3,794 )     9,791  
Interest expense
    4       (3 )           3       1,482       1,486  
Depreciation and amortization
    5,892       2,551       2,348       2,716       927       14,434  
Impairment loss on goodwill related charges
                            384       384  
Stock-based compensation
    207       197       166       52       803       1,425  
Acquisition-related items
                            563       563  
 
                                   
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 9,290       8,012       6,790       3,626       365     $ 28,083  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Three Months Ended October 3, 2009
                                               
Net earnings
                                          $ 5,280  
Loss from discontinued operations
                                            709  
Income tax benefit from continuing operations
                                            (4,112 )
 
                                             
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ (479 )     (1,213 )     2,218       646       705       1,877  
Interest expense
    (2 )     63       (78 )           566       549  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,190       728       838       858       276       4,890  
Stock-based compensation
    46       61       69       10       406       592  
Acquisition-related items
                            (215 )     (215 )
 
                                   
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 1,755       (361 )     3,047       1,514       1,738     $ 7,693  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Nine Months Ended October 3, 2009
                                               
Net earnings
                                          $ 5,498  
Loss from discontinued operations
                                            709  
Income tax benefit from continuing operations
                                            (4,272 )
 
                                             
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ 9,077       (6,373 )     7,411       478       (8,658 )     1,935  
Interest expense
    68       205       (78 )           1,642       1,837  
Depreciation and amortization
    6,322       2,636       2,493       2,758       841       15,050  
Stock-based compensation
    119       184       202       16       1,140       1,661  
Acquisition-related items
                            5,307       5,307  
Acquisition-related foreign exchange adjustment
                            1,370       1,370  
 
                                   
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 15,586       (3,348 )     10,028       3,252       1,642     $ 27,160  
 
                                   

 

24


Table of Contents

We believe that earnings that are based on this non-GAAP financial measure provide useful information to investors, lenders and financial analysts because (i) this measure is more comparable with the results for prior fiscal periods, and (ii) by excluding the potential volatility related to the timing and extent of nonoperating activities, such as acquisitions or revisions of the estimated value of post-closing earn-outs, such results provide a useful means of evaluating the success of our ongoing operating activities. Also, we use this information, together with other appropriate metrics, to set goals for and measure the performance of our operating businesses, and to assess our compliance with debt covenants. Management further considers Adjusted EBITDA an important indicator of operational strengths and performance of our businesses. EBITDA measures are used historically by investors, lenders and financial analysts to estimate the value of a company, to make informed investment decisions and to evaluate performance. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA facilitates comparisons of our results of operations with those of companies having different capital structures. In addition, a measure similar to Adjusted EBITDA is a component of our bank lending agreement, which requires certain levels of Adjusted EBITDA to be achieved. This information should not be considered in isolation or in lieu of our operating and other financial information determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, because EBITDA and adjustments to EBITDA are not determined consistently by all entities, Adjusted EBITDA as presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Backlog
Backlog is very important for our D&S segment due to the long delivery cycles for its projects. Many customers of our LXE segment typically require short delivery cycles. As a result, LXE usually converts orders into revenues within a few weeks, and it generally does not build up an order backlog that extends substantially beyond one fiscal quarter except for annual or multi-year maintenance service agreements. Our Aviation and Global Tracking businesses have customer arrangements with both short delivery cycles and delivery cycles that extend beyond the next twelve months. Our segment backlog levels as of October 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows (in millions):
                 
    October 2     December 31  
    2010     2009  
Aviation
  $ 45.8       49.4  
LXE
    23.1       22.0  
Defense & Space
    71.2       89.6  
Global Tracking
    18.5       17.2  
 
           
Total
  $ 158.6       178.2  
 
           
Included in the backlog of firm orders for our D&S segment were approximately $2.6 million and $22.5 million of unfunded orders, mainly for military contracts, as of October 2, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively. Of the orders in backlog as of October 2, 2010, the following are expected to be filled in the following twelve months: Aviation — 84%; LXE — 73%; D&S — 52%; and Global Tracking — 72%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the first nine months of 2010, net cash and cash equivalents increased by $2.5 million to $49.7 million as of October 2, 2010. Of the $49.7 million of cash as of October 2, 2010, $45.8 million is held by subsidiaries outside of the U.S. and is not available for our use in the U.S. since the undistributed earnings of these subsidiaries are considered to be permanently reinvested.
The primary cash flow activities during the period included the following:
    Operating activities from continuing operations contributed $21.7 million in positive cash flow;
    We paid the final award of $8.6 million to the purchaser of our former EMS Wireless division in the second quarter of 2010 related to claims made by the purchaser;
    We made a payment of $7.2 million for the contingent consideration agreement related to one of the acquisitions completed in 2009; and
    We invested $7.7 million in property, plant and equipment.

 

25


Table of Contents

Operating activities from continuing operations contributed $21.7 million in positive cash flows in the first nine months of 2010, through net earnings for the period of $7.9 million and noncash charges of $14.4 million, primarily for depreciation and amortization.
During 2009, we completed acquisitions of two entities. Of the total purchase price of these businesses, $4.8 million of cash was held in escrow and payable to the sellers within specified periods following the respective dates of acquisition, subject to claims made against the sellers. This amount was released to the sellers in the third quarter of 2010.
During the first nine months of 2009, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $46.3 million to $40.7 million at October 3, 2009. The primary factor contributing to the decrease during the period was cash utilized for our Formation and Satamatics acquisitions.
Operating activities from continuing operations contributed $33.0 million in positive cash flows in the first nine months of 2009. We generated positive cash flow during the period mainly due to net earnings of $5.5 million, noncash charges of $15.1 million for depreciation and amortization, and decreases in working capital. We experienced good customer collections during the period and were able to lower inventory levels. Acquisition-related charges of $3.0 million paid in the first nine months of 2009 are included as reductions of cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Discontinued operations used cash of $0.5 million mainly for legal fees to defend the Company against claims asserted by the purchaser of our EMS Wireless division, net of tax benefits.
During the first nine months of 2009, we used $87.3 million of cash to acquire our Formation and Satamatics businesses. These acquisitions were partially funded with approximately $33.8 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We subsequently repaid approximately $15.3 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We spent $10.7 million on capital expenditures during the first nine months of 2009.
We have a revolving credit facility under an agreement with a syndicate of banks with a $60 million total capacity for borrowing in the U.S. and $15 million total capacity for borrowing in Canada. The agreement also has a provision permitting an increase in the total borrowing capacity of up to an additional $50 million, subject to additional commitments from the current lenders or from new lenders. The existing lenders have no obligation to increase their commitments. The credit facility provides for borrowings through February 28, 2013, with no principal payments required prior to that date. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets, with certain exceptions for real estate that secures existing mortgages, for other permitted liens, and for certain assets outside the U.S.
As of October 2, 2010, we had $21.5 million of borrowings outstanding, $2.1 million of outstanding letters of credit, and $51.4 million available borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility. At October 2, 2010, we were in compliance with all the covenants under the credit agreement.
We expect that capital expenditures in 2010 will range from $10 million to $12 million, excluding acquisitions of businesses. These expenditures are being used to purchase equipment that increases or enhances capacity and productivity, and to upgrade the enterprise reporting system of our LXE division.
Management believes that existing cash and cash equivalent balances, cash provided from operations, and borrowings available under our credit facility will provide sufficient liquidity to meet the operating and capital expenditure needs for existing operations during the next twelve months.
Our Board of Directors has authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $20 million of our common shares. As of October 2, 2010, we had repurchased approximately 495,000 of our common shares for approximately $10.1 million. Further repurchases are no longer permitted under the terms of the Company’s credit agreement. There were no repurchases under the program during the nine months ended October 2, 2010.

 

26


Table of Contents

A cash payment of $7.2 million was made in the first nine months of 2010 related to an acquisition completed in 2009 based upon the achievement of performance targets in 2009, and an additional $6.8 million is due December 31, 2010 based on an agreement to settle the 2010 earn-out amount. Refer to Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information on these acquisitions.
On April 30, 2010, the arbitrator issued the final award related to claims made by the purchaser of our former EMS Wireless division. The final award of $8.6 million was paid by EMS to the purchaser in the first nine months of 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have $2.1 million of standby letters of credit outstanding under our revolving credit facility to satisfy performance guarantee requirements under certain customer contracts. While these obligations are not normally called, they could be called by the beneficiaries at any time before the expiration date if we failed to meet certain contractual requirements. After deducting the outstanding letters of credit, at October 2, 2010 we had $38.5 million available for borrowing in the U.S. and $12.9 million available for borrowing in Canada under the revolving credit facility.
We have an agreement with the purchaser of our former S&T/Montreal division to warrant approximately $3 million in the event of specified in-orbit failures of the Radarsat-2 payload. Based upon the available information, management believes that the outcome for this particular contingency is not probable and cannot be estimated. As a result, we have not incurred any costs to date, and have not recorded a liability as of October 2, 2010, with respect to this contingency.
We also have an agreement with the purchaser of our former S&T/Montreal division to acquire a license for $8 million in payments over a seven-year period, beginning in December 2008, for the rights to a certain satellite territory. We have a corresponding sublicense agreement with the purchaser that granted the territory rights back to the purchaser, under which we are to receive a portion of the satellite service revenues from the specific market territory over the same period. The purchaser had previously guaranteed that the revenues derived under the sublicense would equal or exceed the acquisition cost of the license. As part of the agreement to sell the net assets of S&T/Montreal, we released the purchaser from this guarantee. Without the guarantee, we estimate that our portion of the satellite service revenues will be less than the acquisition cost, and we have accordingly reflected a liability for the net cost in our consolidated balance sheet. As of October 2, 2010, we have made no payments under this license agreement. The satellite service revenues from the specific market territory included under the sublicense agreement are considerably lower than expected. We believe that sufficient efforts are not being made by the purchaser of the former S&T/Montreal division to market this satellite service. The parties are finalizing a settlement under these agreements. We believe that the net liability recorded in our consolidated balance sheet is our best estimate of the settlement amount. If a settlement is reached, it is expected to be paid in the following twelve months, and therefore the net liability is recorded as a current liability in our consolidated balance sheet as of October 2, 2010.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
As of October 2, 2010, our material contractual cash commitments and material other commercial commitments have not changed significantly from those disclosed in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, other than an increase in purchase commitments of $16.1 million and a decrease of $7.2 million in our obligation of acquisition costs for earn-out provisions. Longer-term purchase commitments required by certain suppliers to maintain minimum stock levels of materials for our products as a result of current market conditions, and additional materials needed to support higher production levels anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2010, and the launch of new product offerings in the fourth quarter of 2010 and in early 2011, have resulted in a higher level of purchase commitments outstanding as of October 2, 2010 compared with December 31, 2009. In addition, purchase commitments are higher due to a significant order placed by D&S in the third quarter of 2010 for a key component needed for a significant commercial airborne antenna program that is ready for production. Our obligation of acquisition costs for earn-out provisions decreased as a result of earnout amounts paid in the second quarter of 2010.

 

27


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which often require the judgment of management in the selection and application of certain accounting principles and methods. We discuss our critical accounting policies in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies since the end of 2009.
Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Statements
We have included forward-looking statements in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, or that necessarily depend upon future events, including such matters as our expectations with respect to future financial performance, future capital expenditures, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, expansion, market and industry developments, and the growth of our businesses and operations, are forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statements as a result of a variety of factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to:
    economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad and their effect on capital spending in our principal markets;
    difficulty predicting the timing of receipt of major customer orders, and the effect of customer timing decisions on our results;
    our successful completion of technological development programs and the effects of technology that may be developed by, and patent rights that may be held or obtained by, competitors;
    U.S. defense budget pressures on near-term spending priorities and contract-award schedules;
    uncertainties inherent in the process of converting contract awards into firm contractual orders in the future;
    volatility of foreign currency exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar and their effect on purchasing power by international customers, and on the cost structure of our operations outside the U.S., as well as the potential for realizing foreign exchange gains and losses associated with assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies;
    successful resolution of technical problems, proposed scope changes, or proposed funding changes that may be encountered on contracts;
    changes in our consolidated effective income tax rate caused by the extent to which actual taxable earnings in the U.S., Canada and other taxing jurisdictions may vary from expected taxable earnings, changes in tax laws, including the provisions of the U.S. tax law that have not been extended for 2010, such as the research and development credit, and the extent to which deferred tax assets are considered realizable;
    successful transition of products from development stages to an efficient manufacturing environment;
    changes in the rate at which our products are returned for repair or replacement under warranty;
    customer response to new products and services, and general conditions in our target markets (such as logistics, space-based communications and commercial and private aviation), and whether these responses and conditions develop according to our expectations;
    the increased potential for asset impairment charges as unfavorable economic or financial market conditions, or other developments might affect the estimated fair value of one or more of our business units;

 

28


Table of Contents

    the success of certain of our customers in marketing our line of high-speed commercial airline communications products as a complementary offering with their own lines of avionics products;
    the availability of financing for various mobile and high-speed data communications systems;
    risk that unsettled conditions in the credit markets may make it more difficult for some customer to obtain financing and adversely affect their ability to pay, which in turn could have an adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition;
    development of successful working relationships with local business and government personnel in connection with the distribution and manufacture of products in foreign countries;
    the demand growth for various mobile and high-speed data communications services;
    our ability to attract and retain qualified senior management and other personnel, particularly those with key technical skills;
    our ability to effectively integrate our acquired businesses, products or technologies into our existing businesses and products, and the risk that any such acquired businesses, products or technologies do not perform as expected, are subject to undisclosed or unanticipated liabilities, or are otherwise dilutive to our earnings;
    the potential effects, on cash and results of discontinued operations, of final resolution of potential liabilities under warranties and representations that we made, and obligations assumed by purchasers, in connection with our dispositions of discontinued operations;
    the availability, capabilities and performance of suppliers of basic materials, electronic components and sophisticated subsystems on which we must rely in order to perform according to contract requirements, or to introduce new products on the desired schedule;
    uncertainties associated with U.S. export controls and the export license process, which restrict our ability to hold technical discussions with customers, suppliers and internal engineering resources and can reduce our ability to obtain sales from customers outside the U.S. or to perform contracts with the desired level of efficiency or profitability; and
    our ability to maintain compliance with the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Federal Communications Commission, and with other government regulations affecting our products and their production, service and functioning.
Further information concerning relevant factors and risks are identified under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part II Item 1A. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In October 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued two accounting standards updates that could result in revenue being recognized earlier in certain revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Both updates will become effective for us in the first quarter of 2011. Early adoption is permitted. If we adopt this standard in a period other than the beginning of its fiscal year, we will be required to apply this standard retrospectively to beginning of its fiscal year, and disclose certain financial information as revised for all interim periods previously reported in the fiscal year adopted. We are evaluating when to adopt the updates and the effect the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

29


Table of Contents

ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, amends the accounting for revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Among other things, ASU 2009-13:
    Eliminates the requirement for objective evidence of fair value of an undelivered item for treatment of the delivered item as a separate unit of accounting;
    Requires use of the relative selling price method for allocating total consideration to elements of the arrangement instead of the relative-fair-value method or the residual method;
    Allows the use of an estimated selling price for any element within the arrangement to allocate consideration to individual elements when vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of selling price do not exist; and
    Expands the required disclosures.
ASU 2009-14, Software — Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements , amends the guidance for revenue arrangements that contain tangible products and software elements. ASU 2009-14 redefines the scope of arrangements that fall within software revenue recognition guidance by specifically excluding tangible products that contain software components that function together to deliver the essential functionality of the tangible product.
Under current guidance, products that contain software that is more than incidental to the product as a whole fall within the scope of software revenue recognition guidance, which requires, among other things, the existence of vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of all undelivered items to allow a delivered item to be treated as a separate unit of accounting. Such tangible products excluded from the requirements of software revenue recognition requirements under ASU 2009-14 would follow the revenue recognition requirements for other revenue arrangements, including the new requirements for multiple-deliverable arrangements contained in ASU 2009-13.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, which provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development arrangements in which one or more payments are contingent upon achieving uncertain future events or circumstances. This update is effective for us in the first quarter of 2011. Early adoption is permitted. If we adopt this standard in a period other than the beginning of its fiscal year, we will be required to apply this standard retrospectively to beginning of its fiscal year, and disclose certain financial information as revised for all interim periods previously reported in the fiscal year adopted. We are evaluating when to adopt the updates and the effect, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
As of October 2, 2010, we had the following market-risk sensitive instruments (in thousands):
         
Government-obligations money market funds, other money market instruments, and interest-bearing time deposits, with maturity dates of less than 3 months interest payable monthly at variable rates (a weighted-average rate of 0.62% at October 2, 2010)
  $ 8,234  
 
       
Revolving credit facility with U.S. and Canadian banks, maturing in February 2013, interest payable quarterly at a variable rate (4.0% at October 2, 2010)
  $ 21,500  
A 100 basis-point change in the interest rates of our market-risk sensitive instruments would have changed interest income by approximately $36,000 for the third quarter of 2010 based upon their respective average outstanding balances.
Our revolving credit agreement includes variable interest rates based on the lead bank’s prime rate or the then-published LIBOR for the applicable borrowing period. As of October 2, 2010, we had approximately $21.5 million of borrowings outstanding in the U.S., and no borrowings outstanding in Canada under our revolving credit agreement. A 100 basis-point change in the interest rate on our revolving credit facility would have changed interest expense by approximately $59,000 for the third quarter of 2010 based upon the average outstanding borrowings under these obligations.

 

30


Table of Contents

At October 2, 2010, we also had intercompany accounts that eliminate in consolidation but that are considered market-risk sensitive instruments because they are denominated in a currency other than the local functional currency. These include short-term amounts due to the parent (payable by international subsidiaries arising from purchase of the parent’s products for sale), intercompany sales of products from foreign subsidiaries to a U.S. subsidiary, and cash advances to foreign subsidiaries as follows:
             
    Exchange Rate   USD  
    (USD per unit of   in thousands  
    local currency)   (reporting currency)  
 
           
Australia
  0.9730 /AUD   $ 3,253  
Canada
  0.9799 /CAD     1,772  
Sweden
  0.1490 /SEK     1,490  
Belgium
  1.3780 /EUR     509  
Netherlands
  1.3780 /EUR     307  
France
  1.3780 /EUR     251  
Italy
  1.3780 /EUR     107  
United Kingdon
  1.5836 /GBP     33  
Germany
  1.3780 /EUR     (35 )
 
         
Total amount subject to foreign currency risk
      $ 7,687  
 
         
We had accounts receivable and accounts payable balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the local entity at October 2, 2010 as follows:
                     
        Exchange Rate        
        Functional        
        Currency per     USD  
Currency   Functional   Denominated     Equivalent  
Denomination   Currency   Currency     (in thousands)  
Accounts Receivable
                   
USD
  CAD     1.0205     $ 17,752  
USD
  EUR     0.7257       664  
EUR
  CAD     1.4049       392  
GBP
  CAD     1.6167       287  
GBP
  EUR     1.1508       240  
Other currencies
                84  
 
                 
 
              $ 19,419  
 
                 
 
                   
Accounts Payable
                   
USD
  CAD     1.0205     $ 1,029  
EUR
  USD     1.3780       271  
GBP
  USD     1.5836       226  
Other currencies
                129  
 
                 
 
              $ 1,655  
 
                 

 

31


Table of Contents

We also had cash accounts denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the local entity at October 2, 2010 as follows:
                         
            Exchange Rate        
            Functional        
            Currency per     USD  
Currency   Functional     Denominated     Equivalent  
Denomination   Currency     Currency     (in thousands)  
 
                       
USD
  CAD     1.0205     $ 8,250  
GBP
  CAD     1.6167       1,325  
GBP
  USD     1.5836       446  
AUD
  CAD     0.9919       436  
USD
  GBP     0.6315       292  
Other currencies
                    802  
 
                     
 
                  $ 11,551  
 
                     
We enter into foreign currency forward contracts in order to mitigate the risks associated with currency fluctuations on future fair values of foreign denominated assets and liabilities. At October 2, 2010, we had forward contracts as follows (in thousands, except average contract rate):
                         
            Average     Fair  
    Notional     Contract     Value  
    Amount     Rate     (USD)  
Foreign currency forward contracts:
                       
U.S. dollars (sell for Canadian dollars)
  19,000 USD     1.0380     $ 340  
Euros (sell for U.S. dollars)
  850 EUR     1.3741       (4 )
 
                     
 
                  $ 336  
 
                     

 

32


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)). The objective of these controls and procedures is to ensure that information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, and required to be filed by it in reports under the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, is effectively communicated to the Company’s CEO and CFO, and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.
The CEO and CFO have evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered in this report. Based upon this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of October 2, 2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management including its CEO and CFO as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the third quarter of 2010, there were no changes that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a — 15(f) under the Exchange Act).

 

33


Table of Contents

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table summarizes the Company’s purchases of its common shares for the three months ended October 2, 2010:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
                                 
                            (d) Maximum Number  
                    (c) Total Number     (or Approximate  
                    of Shares     Dollar Value) of  
                    Purchased as     Shares that May Yet  
                    Part of Publicly     Be Purchased  
    (a) Total Number     (b) Average     Announced     Under the Plans or  
    of Shares     Price Paid     Plans or     Programs (3)  
Period   Purchased (1)     Per Share     Program (2)     (in millions)  
Period 7 2010 (July 4 to July 31)
    635     $ 16.18                
Period 8 2010 (August 1 to August 28)
                           
Period 9 2010 (August 29 to October 2)
                         
 
                       
Total
    635     $ 16.18           $  
 
                       
     
(1)   The category includes 635 shares delivered to us by employees to pay withholding taxes due upon vesting of restricted share awards.
 
(2)   During the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, no shares were repurchased under the Company’s $20 million repurchase program (the Program) which was initially announced on July 30, 2008. Further repurchases are no longer permitted under the terms of the Company’s credit agreement.
 
(3)   This balance represents the value of shares that could be repurchased under the Program as of October 2, 2010.

 

34


Table of Contents

Item 5. Other Information
On November 5, 2010, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of EMS Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) voted to amend and restate the Company’s Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), effective immediately, to update the Company’s advance notice provisions applicable to proposals for nominations of directors or other business at shareholder meetings. The amended Bylaws change the period for shareholders to provide notice of proposals for nominations of directors or other business at an annual meeting to not less than 90 days and not more than 120 days before the anniversary of the Company’s prior annual meeting. However, if the annual meeting is not held within 30 days of the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting, notice must be provided by the later of (i) the tenth day after the public announcement of the annual meeting date or (ii) 90 days before the annual meeting. As a result, for the Company’s 2011 annual meeting, notices of proposals for nominations of directors or other business must be delivered to the corporate secretary not before the close of business on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 and not after the close of business on Thursday, February 10, 2011.
The amended Bylaws require shareholders (and certain of their affiliates) proposing nominations or other business to disclose additional information, including hedging and derivative positions relating to the Company’s stock, whether they intend to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting, whether they intend to solicit proxies in support of the nomination or proposal and any other information related to such shareholder or affiliate (or any proposed nominee) required to be disclosed in a proxy statement for a contested solicitation or election of directors. The amended Bylaws also require shareholders to update the information disclosed with any changes, as of the record date and shortly before the meeting date. In addition, the amended Bylaws apply the informational disclosure requirements described above to shareholders requesting a special meeting and conform certain of the Bylaws’ previously-existing provisions applicable to proposals of director nominations to those applicable to proposals of other business.
The foregoing summary of the amendments to the Bylaws is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Bylaws, as amended and restated, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 3.1 to this report and incorporated herein by reference.

 

35


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
         
  3.1    
Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of EMS Technologies, Inc., effective March 22, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2009).
       
 
  3.2    
Bylaws of EMS Technologies, Inc. as amended and restated through November 5, 2010. *
       
 
  10.1    
Letter dated July 30, 2010 between the Company and Marion Van Fosson concerning the terms of his employment as General Manager of D&S. *
       
 
  31.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
       
 
  31.2    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
       
 
  32    
Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
     
*   Filed herewith

 

36


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
             
EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.        
 
           
By:
  /s/ Neilson A. Mackay       Date: November 8, 2010
 
           
 
  Neilson A. Mackay        
 
  President, and Chief Executive Officer        
 
  (Principal Executive Officer)        
 
           
By:
  /s/ Gary B. Shell       Date: November 8, 2010
 
           
 
  Gary B. Shell        
 
  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial        
 
  Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)        
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
EMS Technologies, Inc. makes available free of charge, on or through its website at www.ems-t.com , its annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained on the Company’s website is not part of this report.

 

37

Ems Technologies (NASDAQ:ELMG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Ems Technologies Charts.
Ems Technologies (NASDAQ:ELMG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Ems Technologies Charts.