UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 29, 2008
Commission file number 0-6072
EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
58-1035424
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer ID Number)
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
660 Engineering
Drive, Norcross,
Georgia
|
|
30092
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (770) 263-9200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.10 par value
|
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the close
of business on April 29, 2008:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.10 par Value
|
|
15,596,308
|
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
EMS Technologies, Inc. makes available free of charge, on or through its website at
www.ems-t.com
,
its annual, quarterly and current reports, and any amendments to those reports, as soon as
reasonably practicable after electronically filing such reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Information contained on the Companys website is not part of this report.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Mar 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Product net sales
|
|
$
|
63,715
|
|
|
|
56,342
|
|
Service net sales
|
|
|
11,779
|
|
|
|
10,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
75,494
|
|
|
|
66,574
|
|
Product cost of sales
|
|
|
39,642
|
|
|
|
34,715
|
|
Service cost of sales
|
|
|
7,196
|
|
|
|
6,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
46,838
|
|
|
|
41,636
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
20,198
|
|
|
|
17,603
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
4,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3,437
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(369
|
)
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
4,118
|
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations (note 2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(568
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
From discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares (note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
15,768
|
|
|
|
15,380
|
|
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
2
EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Dec 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
121,558
|
|
|
|
133,959
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net (note 5)
|
|
|
92,819
|
|
|
|
85,085
|
|
Inventories, net (note 6)
|
|
|
31,600
|
|
|
|
28,949
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,430
|
|
|
|
7,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
257,226
|
|
|
|
257,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
Buildings and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
15,971
|
|
|
|
15,954
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
89,133
|
|
|
|
87,377
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
9,821
|
|
|
|
9,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
116,075
|
|
|
|
114,146
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
76,255
|
|
|
|
74,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
39,820
|
|
|
|
39,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes non-current
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
|
5,490
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
9,281
|
|
|
|
5,837
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
21,525
|
|
|
|
9,982
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,731
|
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
337,815
|
|
|
|
323,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
3
EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited), continued
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Dec 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
26,329
|
|
|
|
22,389
|
|
Billings in excess of contract costs
|
|
|
6,941
|
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
Accrued compensation costs
|
|
|
10,456
|
|
|
|
9,553
|
|
Accrued retirement costs
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
Deferred service revenue
|
|
|
10,278
|
|
|
|
8,578
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
8,528
|
|
|
|
5,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
68,602
|
|
|
|
58,566
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current installments
|
|
|
10,235
|
|
|
|
10,546
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
|
|
7,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
85,200
|
|
|
|
76,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock of $1.00 par value per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 10,000,000 shares; none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock of $.10 par value per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 75,000,000 shares, issued and
outstanding 15,585,000 in 2008 and
15,581,000 in 2007
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
140,148
|
|
|
|
139,727
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income -
foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
13,767
|
|
|
|
12,859
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
97,142
|
|
|
|
92,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
252,615
|
|
|
|
247,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
337,815
|
|
|
|
323,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
4
EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Mar 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
Intangibles amortization
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,919
|
)
|
|
|
8,625
|
|
Billings in excess of contract costs
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,674
|
)
|
|
|
(2,598
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
(4,510
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
1,923
|
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
Accrued compensation and retirement costs
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
Accrued costs, and other
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
(1,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities in continuing operations
|
|
|
5,896
|
|
|
|
8,984
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
5,896
|
|
|
|
5,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(2,530
|
)
|
|
|
(2,686
|
)
|
Payments for asset acquisitions
|
|
|
(15,147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(17,611
|
)
|
|
|
(1,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of term debt
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Change in book overdrafts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
Deferred financing costs paid
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options, net of withholding taxes paid
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(12,767
|
)
|
|
|
4,815
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
133,959
|
|
|
|
109,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
121,558
|
|
|
|
114,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to interim consolidated financial statements.
5
EMS Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007
1. Basis of Presentation
EMS Technologies, Inc. (EMS) designs, manufactures and markets products to satellite and wireless
communications markets for both commercial and defense applications. EMSs products are focused on
the needs of the mobile information user, with an increasing emphasis on broadband applications for
high-data-rate, high-capacity wireless communications.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EMS Technologies, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, LXE Inc. and EMS Technologies Canada, Ltd. (collectively, the
Company). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all normal
and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results for such periods. The
results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full
year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company has accounted for its
Space & Technology/Montreal (S&T/Montreal), Satellite Networks (SatNet) and EMS Wireless
divisions as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Following is a summary of the Companys significant accounting policies:
Managements Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance
sheet date and reporting of revenue and expenses during the period. Actual future results could
differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with initial or remaining terms of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents at March 29, 2008 and December 31, 2007
included investments of $94.6 million and $115.3 million, respectively, in a government obligations
money-market fund, in other money market instruments, and in interest-bearing deposits.
Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and requires expanded disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under
other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and accordingly,
does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and for interim periods
within those years. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements
That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under
Statement 13 and FSP No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. FSP No. 157-1 amends
SFAS No. 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and its related interpretive
accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions. FSP No. 157-2 delays the effective
date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that
are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at
least annually) until the beginning of the first quarter of 2009. The Companys adoption of SFAS
No. 157 for
6
financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157
for non-financial assets and liabilities on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that
are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for
which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 does not
affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be
carried at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective at the beginning of fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Companys adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on its
2008 consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, which establishes
principles for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in a business combination, and determines what information to disclose to enable
users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of a business
combination. The Company is required to apply this Statement prospectively to business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 141R on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS No. 160 requires noncontrolling ownership interests (previously referred to as
minority interests) to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other
item outside of permanent equity. In addition, it requires that the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and
presented on the face of the statement of operations. SFAS No. 160 is effective for all periods
beginning after December 15, 2008. The Companys adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have a
material impact on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities-An Amendment of SFAS No. 133. The new standard is intended to improve financial
reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to
enable investors to better understand their effects on an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. It is effective for all periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS. No. 161 on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
2. Discontinued Operations
In 2005 and 2006, we disposed of our S&T/Montreal, SatNet, and EMS Wireless divisions, which have
been reported as discontinued operations. The sales agreements for each of these disposals
contained standard indemnification provisions for various contingencies that could not be resolved
before the dates of closing and for various representations and warranties provided by the Company
and the purchasers. The Company accrues for a liability related to a contingency, representation
or warranty when management considers that the liability is both probable and can be reasonably
estimated. Management believes that it is reasonably possible, but not probable, that an
additional accrual for these purposes may be made, relating to the repair of certain products
manufactured by the Companys former EMS Wireless divisions. Under the terms of the sales
agreement, the Company is potentially liable for up to $1.2 million should the purchaser encounter
unanticipated warranty obligations during the first two years after the closing (through November
2008) on products previously sold by EMS Wireless. At present, the Company cannot reasonably
estimate the range of this potential liability, or whether such liability would be material. No
accrual has been recorded for this potential liability as of March 29, 2008.
As part of the agreement to sell the net assets of S&T/Montreal, the Company released the purchaser
from a corporate guarantee, as a result the Company has a $2.2 million liability as of March 29,
2008. This liability represents the Companys estimated loss under an agreement to acquire a
sub-license from the purchaser for $8 million in payments over a seven-year period, which would
entitle the Company to receive a portion of the satellite service revenues from a specific market
territory over the same period. The purchaser had previously guaranteed
7
that the revenues derived under the sub-license would equal or exceed the acquisition cost of the
sub-license; however, without the guarantee, the Company currently estimates that its portion of
the satellite service revenues will be less than the acquisition cost, and the Company has
accordingly accrued a net liability.
Discontinued operations had no effect on the Companys net earnings in the first quarter of 2008,
and reported a loss of $568,000 in the first quarter of 2007, which mainly related to expenses to
settle various contingent items.
3. Earnings Per Share
Following is a reconciliation of the denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share
calculations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
Mar 31
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Basic-weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
15,545
|
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
Dilutive shares using the treasury stock method
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted-weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
15,768
|
|
|
|
15,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Comprehensive Income
Following is a summary of comprehensive income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Mar 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
3,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable include the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Dec 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Amounts billed
|
|
$
|
64,224
|
|
|
|
62,188
|
|
Unbilled revenues under long-term contracts (1)
|
|
|
29,740
|
|
|
|
24,001
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1,145
|
)
|
|
|
(1,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
92,819
|
|
|
|
85,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unbilled net sales under long-term contracts are usually
billed and collected within one year (except $1.0 million and $2.0 million has been included in long-term assets at March 29, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively).
|
8
6. Inventories
Inventories include the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Dec 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Parts and materials
|
|
$
|
20,661
|
|
|
|
18,864
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
|
3,733
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
7,979
|
|
|
|
6,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
$
|
31,600
|
|
|
|
28,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Interim Segment Disclosures
The Company is organized into three reportable segments: Defense & Space Systems (D&SS), LXE and
SATCOM. Each segment is separately managed and comprises a range of products and services that
share distinct operating characteristics. The Company evaluates each segment primarily upon
operating profit.
The D&SS segment manufactures custom-designed, highly engineered hardware for use in space,
airborne, and terrestrial applications for communications, radar, surveillance, precision tracking
and electronic countermeasures. Orders typically involve development and production schedules that
can extend a year or more, and most revenues are recognized under percentage-of-completion
accounting. Hardware is sold to prime contractors or systems integrators rather than to end-users.
The LXE segment manufactures mobile terminals and wireless data collection equipment for supply
chain execution. The manufacturing cycle for each order is generally just a few days, and revenues
are recognized upon shipment of hardware. Hardware is marketed to end-users and to third parties
that incorporate their products and services with the Companys hardware for delivery to end-users.
The SATCOM segment principally manufactures antennas and other hardware for satellite
communications systems. The manufacturing cycle for each order is generally just a few days, and
revenues are recognized upon shipment of hardware. Hardware is marketed to third parties that
incorporate their products and services with the Companys hardware for delivery to end-users.
SATCOM also derives a portion of its net sales from performance on longer-term development
contracts. Net sales on these contracts are accounted for using percentage-of-completion
accounting.
9
Following is a summary of the Companys interim segment data (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Mar 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense & Space Systems
|
|
$
|
15,462
|
|
|
|
13,709
|
|
LXE
|
|
|
34,210
|
|
|
|
32,561
|
|
SATCOM
|
|
|
25,822
|
|
|
|
20,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
75,494
|
|
|
|
66,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense & Space Systems
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
LXE
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
SATCOM
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,437
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense & Space Systems
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
LXE
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
SATCOM
|
|
|
3,364
|
|
|
|
2,523
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Warranty Liability
The Company generally provides a limited warranty for each of its products. The basic warranty
periods vary from one to five years, depending upon the type of product. For certain products,
customers can purchase warranty coverage for specified additional periods.
The Company records a liability for the estimated costs to be incurred under warranties, which is
included in other current liabilities on the Companys consolidated balance sheets. The amount of
this liability is based upon historical, as well as expected, rates of warranty claims. The
warranty liability is periodically reviewed for adequacy and adjusted as necessary. Following is a
reconciliation of the aggregate product warranty liability (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Mar 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Balance at beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
Accruals for warranties issued during the period
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
Settlements made during the period
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(589
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
2,869
|
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Revolving Credit Facilities
On February 29, 2008, the Company entered into a new revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of
banks. This new agreement replaced the previous U.S. revolving credit and Canadian revolving credit
agreements. Under the new agreement, the Company has $60.0 million total capacity for borrowing in the U.S. and $15.0
million total capacity for borrowing in Canada. The agreement also has a provision permitting an
increase in the total borrowing capacity of up to an additional $50.0 million with additional
commitments from the current lenders or from new lenders. The existing lenders have no obligation
to increase their commitment. The credit agreement provides for borrowings through February 28,
2013 (the Maturity Date), with no principal payments required until maturity. The credit agreement
is secured by substantially all of the Companys tangible and intangible assets, with certain
exceptions for real estate that secures existing mortgages and other permitted liens and for
certain assets in foreign countries.
10
Interest will be, at the Companys option, a function of either the banks prime rate or LIBOR. A
commitment fee equal to 0.30% per annum of the daily unused credit is payable quarterly. At March
29, 2008, the Company had no borrowings under its revolving credit facility.
The credit agreement includes a financial covenant that establishes a maximum ratio of total funded
debt to historical consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
(EBITDA). The credit agreement also establishes a minimum ratio of consolidated EBITDA less
capital expenditures and taxes paid to specific fixed charges, primarily interest, scheduled
principal payments under all debt agreements and dividends. The credit agreement includes various
other covenants that are customary in such borrowings. The agreement also restricts the ability of
the Company to declare or pay cash dividends. At March 29, 2008, the Company was in compliance
with all the covenants under its credit agreement.
The Company has $6.4 million of standby letters of credit to satisfy performance guarantee
requirements under certain customer contracts.
While these obligations are not normally called, they could be called by the beneficiaries at any
time before the expiration date should we fail to meet certain contractual requirements. The
Company has an additional $70,000 of standby letters of credit outstanding under another Canadian
bank as a contract performance guarantee. As collateral for these standby letters of credit, the
Company has deposited $81,000 at a Canadian bank, which is classified as restricted cash on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet; this cash will become available in the first quarter of 2010
when the underlying letters of credit expire or are settled. After deducting outstanding letters
of credit, at March 29, 2008 the Company had $59.3 million available for borrowing in the U.S. and
$9.3 million available for borrowing in Canada under the revolving credit agreement.
10. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has granted non-qualified stock options to key employees and directors under several
stock option plans. At March 29, 2008, there were options exercisable under all plans for
approximately 599,000 shares of stock, and there were approximately 1,916,000 shares available for
future option grants. Upon exercise of an option, the Companys policy is to issue new shares.
Also from these plans, the Company occasionally makes grants of nonvested stock to selected
personnel. These grants are valued on the date of grant at the fair value of the underlying stock.
Typically, the only restriction related to these grants is a service condition. The Company
expenses the value of a nonvested grant on a straight-line basis over the related service period.
During 2008 and 2007, the Company has granted 46,000 nonvested shares to senior executives, of
which 7,000 shares were vested as of March 29, 2008.
For all grants of stock options and nonvested shares, the Company recognized share-based, pre-tax
charges to income in the first quarter of $387,000 in 2008 and $278,000 in 2007, respectively. The
related tax benefits for the first quarter were $66,000 in 2008 and $70,000 in 2007, respectively.
11. Income Taxes
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 on January 1, 2007. FIN
48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition
and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits.
The Company had $2,802,000 of unrecognized tax benefits at March 29, 2008, of which $2,340,000
would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized.
The Companys policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in
income tax expense. As of March 29, 2008, the Company had approximately $121,500 of accrued
interest related to uncertain tax positions.
11
The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction,
and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is generally no longer subject to U.S.
Federal, state and local, or non-US income tax examination by tax authorities for years before
2002.
12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, for financial assets and liabilities
on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the
amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that
should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tier fair
value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active market;
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable
either directly or indirectly; and
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require
the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
The following table presents the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis at March 29, 2008 consistent with the fair value hierarchy provisions of SFAS
No. 157:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
|
Assets (Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Carrying
|
(in thousands)
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Value
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
94,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,614
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
(648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents include investments in government obligations money-market fund, in other money
market instruments, and in interest-bearing deposits with initial or remaining terms of three
months or less. The fair value of cash equivalents approximates its carrying value due to the
short-term nature of the instruments.
The Company uses derivative financial instruments in the form of foreign currency forward contracts
in order to mitigate the risks associated with currency fluctuations on future cash flows. The
Companys policy is to execute such instruments with creditworthy financial institutions and does
not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is based on quoted market prices
and is recorded in other current liabilities on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
These assets and liabilities can be liquidated without restriction.
13. Litigation
The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
12
14. Acquisition
On February 8, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of Akerstroms Trux AB (Trux), of
Bjorbo, Sweden. Trux manufactures and markets vehicle-mount computing solutions for warehousing
and production environments in the Nordic region. The total purchase price was $15.1 million, of
which $12.0 million was paid at closing and $3.1 million of cash was deposited in escrow through an
escrow agent which is payable to the seller fourteen months following the date of acquisition,
barring no claims against the seller. The total purchase price is subject to adjustment upon
finalizing the closing balance sheet.
The purchase price was allocated to the underlying assets and liabilities based on their estimated
fair values.
Approximately $3.8 million of the cost to acquire Trux was allocated to intangible assets, and
$11.5 million was allocated to goodwill. These allocations are preliminary and subject to change
as better information is obtained by the Company.
Trux is now an operating entity of the Companys LXE segment, and is being included in the
Companys results of operations from the acquisition date. No pro forma financial statements have
been included, as this acquisition is not significant to the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
13
ITEM 2. Management
s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated
financial statements and related notes included in Item 1 of Part 1 of this quarterly report and
the audited consolidated financial statements and notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
We are a leading innovator in the design, manufacture, and marketing of wireless communications
solutions and address the markets for enterprise mobility, communications-on-the-move and in-flight
connectivity markets for both commercial and government end-users. We focus on the needs of the
mobile information user and the increasing demand for wireless broadband communications. Our
products enable communications across a variety of coverage areas, ranging from global to regional
to within a single facility. Our continuing operations include the following three segments:
|
|
|
Defense & Space Systems (D&SS) Highly engineered hardware for satellites and defense
electronics applications;
|
|
|
|
|
LXE Rugged mobile computer terminals and related equipment for wireless local area
networks; and
|
|
|
|
|
SATCOM Satellite communications antennas and terminals for aircraft and ground-based
vehicles, and satellite ground stations for search and rescue operations.
|
Following is a summary of significant factors affecting the Company in the first quarter of 2008:
For continuing operations:
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales increased by 13.4% to $75.5 million mainly due to the strong
growth in net sales reported by our SATCOM and D&SS segments.
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income was 11.7% higher for the first quarter of 2008 as compared with 2007
mainly due to the continued high profitability in our SATCOM segment and lower corporate
expenses.
|
For discontinued operations:
|
|
|
The financial results for discontinued operations reflect the resolution of various
contingencies under the asset-sale agreements, and discontinued operations had no effect on
the 2008 first quarter results.
|
Description of Net Sales, Costs and Expenses
Net sales
The amount of net sales is the most significant factor affecting our operating income in a period.
We recognize product-related net sales under most of our customer agreements when we ship units or
complete the installation of our products. If multiple deliverables are involved or included software is
not incidental to a product as a whole (both mainly experienced at SATCOM), we recognize revenue in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, or Statement of Position No.
97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as applicable. If the customer agreement is in the form of a
construction contract (mainly at D&SS and to a lesser degree at SATCOM), we recognize revenue under
the percentage-of-completion method, using the ratio of cost-incurred-to-date to
total-estimated-cost-at-completion as the measure of performance.
We also generate net sales from product-related service contracts and repair services for D&SS, LXE
and SATCOM, and engineering services projects for D&SS. We recognize revenue from product-related
service contracts ratably over the life of the contract. We recognize revenue from contracts for
engineering services using
14
the percentage-completion method for fixed price contracts, or as costs are incurred for cost-type
contracts. We recognize revenue from repair services as services are rendered and extended warranties.
Cost of sales
For our LXE and D&SS products, we conduct most of our manufacturing efforts in our Atlanta-area
facilities. We manufacture all SATCOM products at our facility in Ottawa, Canada.
Product cost of sales includes the cost of materials, payroll and benefits for direct and indirect
manufacturing labor, engineering and design costs, outside costs such as subcontracts, consulting
or travel related to specific contracts, and manufacturing overhead expenses such as depreciation,
utilities and facilities maintenance.
We sell a wide range of advanced wireless communications products into markets with varying
competitive conditions, and cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, varies with each product.
Consequently, the mix of products sold in a given period is a significant factor affecting our
operating income. In recent years, the cost-of-sales percentage has generally been lower for LXE
and SATCOM products, as compared with products from D&SS.
The cost-of-sales percentage is principally a function of competitive conditions, but SATCOM is
also affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. SATCOM derives most of its net sales
from contracts denominated in U.S. dollars, but the Canada-based SATCOM segment incurs most of its
costs in Canadian dollars. As the U.S. dollar weakens against the Canadian dollar, our reported
manufacturing costs may increase relative to our net sales, which increases the cost-of-sales
percentage.
Service cost of sales is based on labor and non-labor costs recognized as incurred to fulfill
obligations under most of the Companys service contracts. Cost of sales for long-term engineering
services contracts are based on labor and non-labor costs incurred, relative to the estimated
cost-to-complete the contractual deliverables.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include salaries, commissions, bonuses and
related overhead costs for our personnel engaged in sales, administration, finance, information
systems and legal functions. Also included in SG&A are the costs of engaging outside professional
services for consultation on legal, accounting, tax and management information system matters,
auditing and tax compliance, and general corporate expenditures to other outside suppliers and
service providers.
Research and development expenses
Research and development (R&D) expenses represent the cost of our development efforts, net of
reimbursement under specific customer-funded R&D agreements. R&D expenses include salaries of
engineers and technicians and related overhead expenses, the cost of materials utilized in
research, and additional engineering or consulting services provided by independent companies. R&D
costs are expensed as they are incurred. We also often incur significant development costs to meet
the specific requirements of customer contracts in D&SS and SATCOM, and we report these costs in
the consolidated statements of operations as cost of sales.
Interest income
Interest income mainly includes interest income from investments in government obligations
money-market funds, in other money market instruments, and in interest-bearing deposits.
15
Interest expense
We incur interest expense principally related to mortgages on certain facilities, and amortize
deferred financing costs related to our revolving credit facilities. We do not presently incur
interest related to our revolving credit facilities because in February 2006, the Company repaid
all of its borrowings under these facilities from the proceeds of a public stock offering.
Foreign exchange gains and losses
We recognize foreign exchange gains and losses, mainly in our SATCOM and LXE segments, related to
assets or liabilities that are denominated in a currency different from the local functional
currency. For our Canada-based SATCOM segment, most trade receivables relate to contracts
denominated in U.S. dollars; when the U.S. dollar weakens against the Canadian dollar, the value of
SATCOMs trade receivables decreases and foreign exchange losses result. For our LXE segments
international subsidiaries, most trade payables are in U.S. dollars and relate to their purchases
of hardware from LXEs U.S. operations for sale in Europe and Asia; when the U.S. dollar weakens
against the Euro or other international currency, the value of the LXE subsidiaries trade payables
decreases and foreign exchange gains result.
We regularly assess the Companys exposures to changes in foreign exchange rates and as a result,
we enter into forward currency contracts to reduce those exposures. The notional amount of each
forward currency contract is based on the amount of exposure for net assets or liabilities subject
to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We record changes in the fair value of these
contracts in our consolidated statements of operations.
Income taxes
Typically, the main factor affecting our effective income tax rate each year is the relative
proportion of taxable income that we expect to earn in Canada, where the effective rate is lower
than in the U.S., or other locations. The lower effective rate in Canada results from certain
Canadian tax benefits for research-related expenditures.
Discontinued operations
In 2005 and 2006, we disposed of Space & Technology/Montreal (S&T/Montreal), Satellite
Networks (SatNet), and EMS Wireless, which have been reported as discontinued operations. In
2007, the expenses reported under discontinued operations mainly relate to the resolution of
various contingencies, representations or warranties under standard indemnification provisions in
the sales agreements. The Company records a liability related to a contingency, representation or
warranty when management considers that the liability is both probable and can be reasonably
estimated. Management believes that it is reasonably possible, but not probable, that additional
accruals for these purposes may be made, in particular, for the cost of repair of certain products
manufactured by one of the disposed divisions. At present, the Company cannot reasonably estimate
the range of cost for this potential liability or whether such liability would be material. No
accrual has been recorded for this potential liability as of March 29, 2008.
16
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
Mar 31
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
Product net sales
|
|
|
84.4
|
%
|
|
|
84.6
|
%
|
Service net sales
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Product cost of sales, as a percentage of product net sales
|
|
|
62.2
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
|
Service cost of sales, as a percentage of service net sales
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
67.6
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing operations
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended March 29, 2008 and March 31, 2007:
Net sales increased by 13.4% to $75.5 million from $66.6 million for the first quarter of 2008 as
compared with the same period in 2007, as net sales grew in each of the Companys three segments.
The largest quarterly growth was a 27.2% increase in net sales to $25.8 million for the SATCOM
segment, mainly due to the continued high level of aeronautical product sales, and revenues
generated from the development of the Inmarsat global satellite/GSM phone. D&SS quarterly net
sales increased by 12.8% mainly due to increased activity on two new commercial satellite programs.
Net sales for LXE were slightly higher reflecting growth in net sales from international markets.
Product net sales increased by $7.4 million to $63.7 million in the first quarter of 2008 as
compared with the first quarter of 2007. This was mainly due the continued high level of
aeronautical product sales, and revenues generated from the development of the Inmarsat global
satellite/GSM phone. Service net sales increased by 15.1% to $11.8 million in the first quarter of
2008 as compared with the same period of 2007 mainly due to growth in the SATCOM and LXE service
businesses, which supports the increased number of products placed into service. As a percentage
of total net sales, both product net sales and service net sales remained relatively unchanged in
the first quarter of 2008 as compared with the first quarter of 2007.
Overall cost of sales, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, remained relatively unchanged in
the first quarter of 2008 as compared with the same period of 2007. Product cost of sales, as a
percentage of its respective net sales, was also relatively unchanged in the first quarter of 2008
as compared with the same period of 2007. Service cost of sales, as a percentage of its respective
net sales, decreased in the first quarter of 2008 as compared with the same period of 2007, mainly
due to lower repair rates experienced under existing maintenance contracts by LXE.
17
SG&A, as a percentage of consolidated net sales, was relatively unchanged for the first quarter of
2008 as compared with the first quarter of 2007. Actual expenses increased by $2.6 million mainly due to the effect
of changes in foreign exchange rates that increased the reported costs of the international
activities of our SATCOM and LXE segments, and sales-related efforts, such as selling and
marketing, to support the growth in net sales. SG&A expenses for the first quarter of 2008 also
included costs from Akerstroms Trux AB (Trux) which was acquired in February 2008 (see Note 14 of
the consolidated financial statements), as well as professional fees related to additional U.S.
Federal tax credits for prior year qualifying research and development costs which were not
included in the first quarter of 2007. These costs were offset somewhat by lower corporate
expenses.
R&D expenses increased by $764,000 mainly due to additional internal development programs for new
product introductions, and the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on the reported costs of
our SATCOM segment.
Interest income decreased by $368,000 as a result of lower average interest rates earned on the
Companys investment balances.
The Company recognized a 17% effective income tax rate in the first quarter of 2008, excluding the
benefit of a $742,000 increase in estimated research and development credits available in the U.S.,
as compared with 25% in the first quarter of 2007. This estimated effective income tax rate for
2008 is based upon managements expectations for taxable income associated with various tax jurisdictions
for the full year. The decrease is due to a higher expected proportion of profits to be earned in
Canada, where we have a much lower effective rate than in the U.S. or other locations, and to a
higher expected U.S. Federal tax credit for current year qualifying research and development costs.
The lower effective tax rate in Canada is due to research-related tax benefits. The overall
effective rate is subject to change during the remainder of the year, as actual results and revised
forecasts may change managements expectations for the taxable income associated with various tax
jurisdictions.
Net Sales, Cost of Sales, and Operating Income (Loss) by Segment
Our segment net sales, cost of sales as a percentage of respective segment net sales, and segment
operating income (loss) were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
Mar 29
|
|
|
Mar 31
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Months
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense & Space Systems
|
|
$
|
15,462
|
|
|
|
13,709
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
LXE
|
|
|
34,210
|
|
|
|
32,561
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
SATCOM
|
|
|
25,822
|
|
|
|
20,304
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
75,494
|
|
|
|
66,574
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost-of-sales percentage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense & Space Systems
|
|
|
78.3
|
%
|
|
|
76.8
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
LXE
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
SATCOM
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
57.1
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense & Space Systems
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
(42.2
|
)%
|
LXE
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
(45.5
|
)
|
SATCOM
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
2,561
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
|
(48.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,437
|
|
|
|
3,078
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Defense & Space Systems:
Net sales increased by 12.8% for the first quarter of 2008 as compared
with the first quarter of 2007 mainly due to activity on two new commercial satellite programs.
Strong orders in 2008 for long-term defense contracts resulted in a record backlog totaling $74.1
million at March 29, 2008.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was relatively unchanged in the first quarter of 2008 as
compared with the same period of 2007.
LXE:
Net sales in the first quarter of 2008 were 5.1% higher than the same period of 2007. The
increase in net sales reflects higher net sales in international markets. This increase in
international net sales can be attributed to the continued strengthening of international
currencies. Net sales in the Americas markets were approximately the same in both periods.
Cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, were comparable in the first quarter of 2008 and the
first quarter of 2007.
SG&A
expenses increased by $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2008 as compared with the same
period of 2007 primarily due to the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates, and the costs
related to Trux which was acquired in February 2008.
SATCOM:
Net sales in the first quarter of 2008 increased by 27.2% compared with the first quarter
of 2007. This increase was mainly a result of continued strong demand for high-speed-data
aeronautical products, and revenues generated from the development of the Inmarsat global
satellite/GSM phone.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was relatively unchanged in the first quarter of 2008 as
compared with the same period of 2007.
Discontinued Operations
In 2005 and 2006, we disposed of our S&T/Montreal, SatNet, and EMS Wireless divisions, which have
been reported as discontinued operations, and their net assets were classified as assets held for
sale through their dates of disposition. In 2007, the activity reported under discontinued
operations mainly relates to the resolution of various contingencies, representations, or
warranties under standard indemnification provisions in the sales agreements. The Company accrues
for a liability related to a contingency, representation or warranty when management considers that
the liability is both probable and can be reasonably estimated.
Discontinued operations had no effect on the Companys net earnings in the first quarter of 2008,
and reported a loss of $568,000 in the first quarter of 2007, which mainly related to expenses to
settle various contingent items.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the
first quarter of 2008, net cash and cash equivalents decreased by
$12.8 million.
Continuing operating activities contributed $5.9 million in positive cash flow mainly due to
earnings generated by SATCOM, and an increase in deferred revenue from LXEs service contract
business. This was partially offset by an increase in receivables and inventory balances in the
first quarter of 2008. The cash flow generated from operating activities was offset by $15.1
million of cash used in investing activities to acquire Trux in February 2008, and $.8 million of
cash was used to pay financing costs for the Companys new revolving credit agreement.
During the
first quarter of 2007, continuing operating activities contributed $9.0 million in
positive cash flow mainly due to significant collections received by D&SS, and the net earnings
generated by each of the three divisions. This was partially offset by a decrease in payables and
an increase in inventory balances in the first quarter of 2007. The $3.0 million of net cash used
in operating activities in discontinued operations was mainly for payments of working capital
adjustments in accordance with the terms of the sales agreements for our SatNet and EMS Wireless
divisions.
19
On February 29, 2008, the Company entered into a new revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of
banks. This new agreement replaced the previous U.S. revolving credit and Canadian revolving credit
agreements. Under the new agreement, the Company has $60.0 million total capacity for borrowing in the U.S. and $15.0
million total capacity for borrowing in Canada. The agreement also has a provision permitting an
increase in the total borrowing capacity of up to an additional $50.0 million with additional
commitments from the current lenders or from new lenders. The existing lenders have no obligation
to increase their commitment. The credit agreement provides for borrowings through February 28,
2013, with no principal payments required prior to that date. The credit agreement
is secured by substantially all of the Companys tangible and intangible assets, with certain
exceptions for real estate that secures existing mortgages and other permitted liens and for
certain assets in foreign countries.
At March 29, 2008, the Company had a $60 million maximum borrowing capacity in the U.S. and a $15
million maximum borrowing capacity in Canada under its revolving credit facility, and no borrowings
were outstanding. The Company had $6.4 million of outstanding letters of credit at the end of the
first quarter of 2008, and the net total available for borrowing under this revolving credit
facility was $68.6 million.
The Company expects that capital expenditures in 2008 will range from $15.0 million to $17.0
million. These expenditures will be used to purchase equipment that increases or enhances capacity
and productivity.
Management believes that existing cash and cash equivalent balances, cash provided from operations,
and borrowings available under its credit agreement will provide sufficient liquidity to meet the
operating and capital expenditure needs for existing operations during the next 12 months. On
February 8, 2008, the Company used $15.1 million of cash to acquire Trux. Additional information
on this acquisition is contained in Note 14 of the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has $6.4 million of standby letters of credit outstanding under its revolving credit
facility to satisfy performance guarantee requirements under certain customer contracts. While
these obligations are not normally called, they could be called by the beneficiaries at any time
before the expiration date, if we fail to meet certain contractual requirements. The Company has
an additional $70,000 of standby letters of credit outstanding under another Canadian bank as a
contract performance guarantee. As collateral for these standby letters of credit, the Company has
deposited $81,000 at a Canadian bank, which is classified as restricted cash on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet. This cash will become available to the Company in the first quarter of
2010 when the underlying letters of credit expire or are settled. After deducting the outstanding
letters of credit, at March 29, 2008 the Company had $59.3 million available for borrowing in the
U.S. and $9.3 million available for borrowing in Canada under the revolving credit agreement.
On February 8, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of Trux for a total purchase price of
$15.1 million of cash paid at closing. $3.1 million of which was deposited in escrow through an
escrow agent and is payable to the seller fourteen months following the date of acquisition,
barring no claims against the seller.
The sales agreements for the disposal of the S&T/Montreal, SatNet, and EMS Wireless divisions
contain standard indemnification provisions for various contingencies that could not be resolved
before the dates of closing and for various representations and warranties by the Company and the
purchasers. The Company accrues for a liability related to a contingency, representation or
warranty when management considers that the liability is both probable and can be reasonably
estimated.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
As of March 29, 2008, the Companys material contractual cash commitments and material other
commercial commitments have not changed significantly from those disclosed in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
20
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, which often require the judgment of management in the selection and
application of certain accounting principles and methods. We consider the following accounting
policies to be critical to understanding our consolidated financial statements, because the
application of these policies requires significant judgment on the part of management, and as a
result, actual future developments may be different from those expected at the time that we make
these critical judgments.
Revenue recognition on long-term contracts
Revenue recognition for fixed-price, construction contracts is a critical accounting policy
involving significant management estimates by D&SS and SATCOM. Construction contracts use the ratio
of cost-incurred-to-date to total-estimated-cost-at-completion as the measure of performance that
determines how much revenue should be recognized (percentage-of-completion method of accounting).
Cost incurred and estimates of cost to complete include overhead expenses, which are applied at a
budgeted rate; the budgeted overhead rate has historically been closely comparable with the
periodic actual overhead rate, but any budget-versus-actual rate variance during an accounting
period is expensed in that period, with no effect on revenues recognized.
The determination of total estimated cost relies on engineering estimates of the cost to complete
the contract, with allowances for identifiable risks and uncertainties. If changes in engineering
estimates result in an expected cost overrun (i.e., the estimated cost to complete exceeds the
revenue to be recognized on the remainder of the contract), then revenue recognized-to-date will be
adjusted downward, so that the revenue to be recognized on the remainder of the contract will equal
the estimated cost to complete. Engineering estimates are frequently reviewed and updated; however,
unforeseen problems can occur to substantially reduce the rate of future revenue recognition in
relation to costs incurred.
Billings under a long-term contract are often subject to the accomplishment of contractual
milestones or specified billing arrangements that are not directly related to the rate of costs
being incurred under a contract. As a result, revenue recognized under percentage-of-completion
for any particular period may vary from billings for the same period. At March 29, 2008, the
Company had recognized a cumulative total of $30.7 million in revenues from continuing operations
under percentage-of-completion accounting, but which revenues were unbilled as of that date due to
the billing milestones specified in the respective customer contracts.
Net sales under cost-reimbursement contracts in D&SS are recorded as costs are incurred and include
an estimate of fees earned under specific contract terms. Costs incurred include overhead, which
is applied at rates approved by the customer. Fixed fees are earned ratably over the life of a
contract. Incentive fees are based upon achievement of objective criteria for technical product
performance or delivery milestones, although such fees may also be based upon subjective criteria
(for example, the customers qualitative assessment of the Companys project management). In all
cases related to incentive fee arrangements, the Company does not record revenue until the fee has
been earned under the terms of the contract.
Net sales under all other contracts are recognized when units are shipped or services are
performed, unless multiple deliverables are involved or included software is more than incidental to a
product as a whole (mainly experienced at SATCOM), in which case we recognize revenue in accordance
with either FASB EITF Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, or
Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition as applicable. Net sales do not
include sales tax collected.
Inventory valuation
Management assesses the value of inventory based upon an analysis of the aging of the inventory and
assumptions that management develops concerning how the value of inventory for specific products,
markets or applications may decrease over time. Inventory write-downs are accounted for as
adjustments to the related inventorys cost basis, and reserves are reduced only upon subsequent
sale, disposal or usage of the inventory, rather than upon any subsequent improvement in the
inventory aging.
21
Evaluation of long-lived assets for impairment
All long-lived assets on the consolidated balance sheet are periodically reviewed for impairment.
If an indication of impairment arises, we test recoverability by estimating the cash flows expected
to result from the long-lived assets under several different scenarios, including the potential
sale of assets, as well as continued holding of the assets under several different kinds of
business conditions.
Evaluation of contingencies related to discontinued operations
In 2005 and 2006, we disposed of S&T/Montreal, SatNet, and EMS Wireless, all of which have been
reported as discontinued operations. In 2007, the expenses reported under discontinued operations
mainly relate to the resolution of various contingencies, representations or warranties under
standard indemnification provisions in the sales agreements. The Company records a liability
related to a contingency, representation or warranty when management considers that the liability
is both probable and can be reasonably estimated. As of March 29, 2008, we had accrued amounts related
to the expected resolution of the dispositions of discontinued operations that could vary from the
actual amounts. The most significant accrued cost is a $2.2 million liability for the estimated
loss under a sub-license agreement with the purchaser of S&T/Montreal which, as part of the sales agreement, we released from a corporate
guarantee that previously protected us against such loss.
Management believes that it is reasonably possible, but not probable, that an additional accrual
may be made, relating to the repair of certain products manufactured by the
Companys former EMS Wireless division. Under the terms of the sales agreement for this division, the Company is
potentially liable for up to $1.2 million should the purchaser encounter unanticipated warranty
obligations during the first two years after the closing (through November 2008) on products
previously sold by EMS Wireless. At present, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the range of
this potential liability, or whether such liability would be material. No accrual has been
recorded for this potential liability as of March 29, 2008.
Establishment of valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets
It had been managements expectation until 2005 that our Canadian operations would generate enough
research-related tax benefits each year to offset any Canadian federal tax liability for any given
year. We had a valuation allowance for substantially all the net deferred tax assets associated
with these research-related tax benefits (totaling approximately $40.8 million at the beginning of
2005), because the extent to which these deferred income tax assets were to be realized in the
future was not more likely than not.
With the disposal of unprofitable operations beginning in 2005 and the profitability of continuing
operations in Canada, the Company reassessed the valuation of its research-related deferred tax
assets in Canada. The Company concluded in both 2005 and 2006 that future pre-tax profitability in
Canada was expected to increase, and qualified research in Canada was expected to decrease. As a
result of these factors, the Company expected to utilize at least a portion of its research-related
deferred tax assets, and, therefore, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets was reduced by
$1.7 million and $400,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company did not further reduce the
valuation allowance in 2007 or in the first quarter of 2008 because of legislation enacted in 2007
to harmonize the tax regimes of the province of Ontario and the Canadian federal government, and
the resulting uncertainty caused by harmonization regarding the future availability of certain
deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance for Canadian deferred tax assets may be reduced in the
future resulting in an income tax benefit to future consolidated statements of operations if
the uncertainty regarding the effect of harmonization is favorably resolved, and if profitability
expectations for the future continue to increase.
22
Forward-Looking Statements
The Company has included forward-looking statements in managements discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations. All statements, other than statements of historical
fact, included in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect or
anticipate will or may occur in the future, or that necessarily depend upon future events,
including such matters as our expectations with respect to future financial performance, future
capital expenditures, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, expansion, market and
industry developments and the growth of our businesses and operations, are forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking
statements as a result of a variety of factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to:
|
§
|
|
economic conditions in the U.S. and abroad and their effect on capital spending in the
Companys principal markets;
|
|
|
§
|
|
difficulty predicting the timing of receipt of major customer orders, and the effect of
customer timing decisions on the Companys quarterly results;
|
|
|
§
|
|
successful completion of technological development programs by the Company and the
effects of technology that may be developed by, and patent rights that may be held or
obtained by, competitors;
|
|
|
§
|
|
U.S. defense budget pressures on near-term spending priorities;
|
|
|
§
|
|
uncertainties inherent in the process of converting contract awards into firm
contractual orders in the future;
|
|
|
§
|
|
volatility of foreign exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar and their effect on
purchasing power by international customers, and the cost structure of the Companys
non-U.S. operations, as well as the potential for realizing foreign exchange gains and
losses associated with non-U.S. assets or liabilities held by the Company;
|
|
|
§
|
|
successful resolution of technical problems, proposed scope changes, or proposed funding
changes that may be encountered on contracts;
|
|
|
§
|
|
changes in the Companys consolidated effective income tax rate caused by the extent to
which actual taxable earnings in the U.S., Canada and other taxing jurisdictions may vary
from expected taxable earnings;
|
|
|
§
|
|
successful transition of products from development stages to an efficient manufacturing
environment;
|
|
|
§
|
|
changes in the rate at which the Companys products are returned for repair or
replacement under warranty;
|
|
|
§
|
|
customer response to new products and services, and general conditions in the Companys
target markets (such as logistics, and space-based communications), and whether these
responses and conditions develop according to our expectations;
|
|
|
§
|
|
the success of certain of the Companys customers in marketing our line of high-speed
commercial airline communications products as a complementary offering with their own lines
of avionics products;
|
|
|
§
|
|
the availability of financing for our customers major programs, such as satellite data
communications systems;
|
|
|
§
|
|
development of successful working relationships with local business and government
personnel in connection with distribution and manufacture of products in foreign countries;
|
|
|
§
|
|
the demand growth for various mobile and high-speed data communications services;
|
|
|
§
|
|
the Companys ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, particularly those with
key technical skills;
|
23
|
§
|
|
the ability to negotiate successfully with potential acquisition candidates, finance
acquisitions, or effectively integrate the acquired businesses, products or technologies
into the Companys existing businesses and products, and the risk that any acquired
businesses, products or technologies do not perform as expected, are subject to undisclosed
or unanticipated liabilities, or are otherwise dilutive to our earnings;
|
|
|
§
|
|
the potential effects, on cash and results of discontinued operations, of final
resolution of potential liabilities under warranties and representations made by the
Company, and obligations assumed by purchasers, in connection with the Companys
dispositions of discontinued operations;
|
|
|
§
|
|
the availability, capabilities and performance of suppliers of basic materials,
electronic components and sophisticated subsystems on which the Company must rely in order
to perform according to contract requirements, or to introduce new products on the desired
schedule; and
|
|
|
§
|
|
uncertainties associated with U.S. export controls and the export license process, which
restrict the Companys ability to hold technical discussions with customers, suppliers and
internal engineering resources and can reduce the Companys ability to obtain sales from
foreign customers or to perform contracts with the desired level of efficiency or
profitability.
|
Additional information concerning these and other potential risk factors is included in Item 1A. of
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This Statement defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosure about
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require
or permit fair value measurements and accordingly, does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, and for interim periods within those years. In February 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB
Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for
Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 and FSP No. 157-2, Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157. FSP No. 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, and its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address
leasing transactions. FSP No. 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually) until the beginning of the first
quarter of 2009. The Companys adoption of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and liabilities on
January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and
liabilities on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits
entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that
are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for
which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 does not
affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be
carried at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective at the beginning of fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The Companys adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material impact on its
2008 consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, which establishes
principles for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, recognizes and measures the
goodwill acquired in a business combination, and determines what information to disclose to enable
users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of a business
combination. The Company is required to apply this Statement prospectively to business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 141R on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
24
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS No. 160 requires noncontrolling ownership interests (previously referred to as
minority interests) to be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability or other
item outside of permanent equity. In addition, it requires that the amount of consolidated net
income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and
presented on the face of the statement of operations. SFAS No. 160 is effective for all periods
beginning after December 15, 2008. The Companys adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have a
material impact on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities-An Amendment of SFAS No. 133. The new standard is intended to improve financial
reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to
enable investors to better understand their effects on an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. It is effective for all periods beginning after November 15, 2008,
with early application encouraged. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS. No. 161 on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
25
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
As of March 29, 2008, the Company had the following market risk sensitive instrument (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit loan with a bank in the United Kingdom, matured
in April 2008, interest payable monthly at a variable rate (6.25%
at the end of the quarter)
|
|
$
|
1,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government obligations money-market funds, other money market
instruments, and interest-bearing deposits, with maturity dates
of less than 3 months, interest payable month at variable rates
(an average rate of 2.73% at March 29, 2008)
|
|
|
94,614
|
|
A 1% increase in the interest rates of our market risk sensitive instruments would have increased
interest expense by $5,000, and increased interest income by $237,000 for the quarter based upon
their respective average outstanding balances.
At March 29, 2008, the Company also had intercompany accounts that eliminate in consolidation but
that are considered market risk sensitive instruments as follows. These include short-term amounts
due to the parent (payable by international subsidiaries arising from purchase of the parents
products for sale), intercompany sales of products from foreign subsidiaries to a U.S. subsidiary,
and cash advances to a foreign subsidiary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Rate
|
|
|
$U.S.
|
|
|
|
($U.S. per unit of
|
|
|
in thousands
|
|
|
|
local currency)
|
|
|
(reporting currency)
|
|
Australia
|
|
0.9187 /Dollar
|
|
$
|
1,810
|
|
Italy
|
|
1.5761 /Euro
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
Canada
|
|
0.9822 /Dollar
|
|
|
963
|
|
France
|
|
1.5761 /Euro
|
|
|
835
|
|
Germany
|
|
1.5761 /Euro
|
|
|
712
|
|
Belgium
|
|
1.5761 /Euro
|
|
|
290
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
1.5761 /Euro
|
|
|
153
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
1.9892 /Pound
|
|
|
89
|
|
Sweden
|
|
0.1679 /Krona
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intercompany payable (receivable) subject to
foreign currency risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 29, 2008, Company has foreign currency risks associated with forward contracts as follows
(in thousands, except average contract rate):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
($U.S.)
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian dollars (sell for U.S. dollars)
|
|
1,550 AUD
|
|
|
0.8292
|
|
|
$
|
(107
|
)
|
British pounds (buy with Canadian dollars)
|
|
1,000 GBP
|
|
|
2.0351
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Euros (sell for U.S. dollars)
|
|
1,250 EURO
|
|
|
1.5401
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
U.S. dollars (sell for Canadian dollars)
|
|
23,200 USD
|
|
|
0.9984
|
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts in order to mitigate the risks
associated with currency fluctuations on future cash flows.
26
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e). The objective of these controls and procedures is to ensure
that information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, and required to
be filed by it in reports under the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, is effectively
communicated to the Companys CEO and CFO, and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a
timely basis.
The CEO and CFO have evaluated the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered in this report. Based upon this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that
the Companys disclosure controls over financial reporting and procedures are adequate to
accomplish their objective and are functioning effectively.
During the first quarter of 2008, there were no changes that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rule 13a 15(f) under the Exchange Act).
27
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, carefully consider the factors
discussed in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our
Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to
be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or
operating results.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
3.1 Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of EMS Technologies, Inc. effective
March 22, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2004).
3.2 Bylaws of EMS Technologies, Inc., as amended through November 2, 2007. *
4.01 Credit Agreement, dated as of February 29, 2008, among the Company and EMS Technologies
Canada, LTD., the lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of America as Domestic and
Canadian Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the Companys Report on
Form 8-K dated March 6, 2008).
10.1 Compensation Arrangements with Certain Executive Officers. *
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. *
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. *
32 Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *
28
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Paul B. Domorski
|
|
Date: May 8, 2008
|
|
|
Paul B. Domorski
|
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Gary B. Shell
|
|
Date: May 8, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Shell
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
|
|
|
|
|
Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
29
Ems Technologies (NASDAQ:ELMG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Ems Technologies (NASDAQ:ELMG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024