|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
OTELCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
(in thousands, except share par value and share amounts)
|
(unaudited, with the exception of December 31, 2017, being audited)
|
|
|
June 30,
2018
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,238
|
|
|
$
|
3,570
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from subscribers, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $254 and $206, respectively
|
|
|
4,533
|
|
|
|
4,647
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,196
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
2,826
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
3,122
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
15,078
|
|
|
|
15,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
50,782
|
|
|
|
50,888
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
44,976
|
|
|
|
44,976
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
1,328
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
Interest rate cap
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
113,650
|
|
|
$
|
114,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
705
|
|
|
$
|
1,619
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,927
|
|
|
|
4,803
|
|
Advance billings and payments
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Current maturity of long-term notes payable, net of debt issuance cost
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
3,891
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
11,149
|
|
|
|
12,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
18,939
|
|
|
|
18,939
|
|
Advance billings and payments
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Long-term notes payable, less current maturities and debt issuance cost
|
|
|
75,079
|
|
|
|
80,058
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
107,469
|
|
|
|
113,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value-authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 3,388,624 and 3,346,689 shares, respectively
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
4,056
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
2,091
|
|
|
|
(2,812
|
)
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
1,507
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
113,650
|
|
|
$
|
114,939
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
OTELCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
16,890
|
|
|
$
|
17,406
|
|
|
$
|
33,616
|
|
|
$
|
34,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
7,483
|
|
|
|
8,044
|
|
|
|
15,447
|
|
|
|
15,857
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
5,310
|
|
|
|
5,174
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
|
|
3,681
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
11,718
|
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
24,383
|
|
|
|
24,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
5,172
|
|
|
|
5,053
|
|
|
|
9,233
|
|
|
|
10,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,467
|
)
|
|
|
(2,571
|
)
|
|
|
(2,925
|
)
|
|
|
(5,182
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(1,466
|
)
|
|
|
(2,571
|
)
|
|
|
(2,757
|
)
|
|
|
(4,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
(1,573
|
)
|
|
|
(1,951
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,908
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
4,903
|
|
|
$
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
3,388,624
|
|
|
|
3,346,689
|
|
|
|
3,388,624
|
|
|
|
3,346,689
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
3,439,659
|
|
|
|
3,445,632
|
|
|
|
3,429,974
|
|
|
|
3,445,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
OTELCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
(in thousands)
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,903
|
|
|
$
|
3,144
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
3,458
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Amortization of loan costs
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Paid in kind interest - subordinated debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
189
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(790
|
)
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
Advance billings and payments
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
9,485
|
|
|
|
9,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and construction of property and equipment
|
|
|
(3,298
|
)
|
|
|
(3,758
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,298
|
)
|
|
|
(3,758
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan origination costs
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Principal repayment of long-term notes payable
|
|
|
(5,175
|
)
|
|
|
(5,125
|
)
|
Interest rate cap
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Retirement of CoBank equity
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
Tax withholdings paid on behalf of employees for restricted stock units
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(5,519
|
)
|
|
|
(5,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
3,570
|
|
|
|
10,538
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
4,238
|
|
|
$
|
11,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
2,701
|
|
|
$
|
4,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Class A common stock
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
June 30, 2018
(unaudited)
|
1.
|
Organization and Basis of Financial Reporting
|
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, all of which are either
directly or indirectly wholly owned. These include: Blountsville Telephone LLC; Brindlee Mountain Telephone LLC; CRC Communications
LLC; Granby Telephone LLC; Hopper Telecommunications LLC; Mid-Maine Telecom LLC; Mid-Maine TelPlus LLC; Otelco Mid-Missouri LLC
(“MMT”) and its wholly owned subsidiary I-Land Internet Services LLC; Otelco Telecommunications LLC; Otelco Telephone
LLC (“OTP”); Pine Tree Telephone LLC; Saco River Telephone LLC; Shoreham Telephone LLC; and War Telephone LLC.
The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of the aforesaid subsidiaries after elimination of
all material intercompany balances and transactions. The unaudited operating results for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2018, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018, or any
other period.
The condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The interim condensed consolidated financial information herein is unaudited, with the condensed consolidated balance sheet as
of December 31, 2017, being derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. The information reflects
all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results
of operations for the periods included in this report.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09,
Revenue
from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
(“ASU 2014-09”). This ASU requires that an entity recognize revenue to
depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also provides a more robust framework for revenue issues
and improves comparability of revenue recognition practices across industries. This ASU was the product of a joint project between
the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common
revenue standard. ASU 2014-09 permits the use of either a retrospective or modified retrospective application. This guidance was
to be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016, with early
adoption not permitted. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral
of the Effective Date.
This ASU confirmed a one-year delay in the effective date of ASU 2014-09, making the effective date
for the Company the first quarter of fiscal 2018 instead of the first quarter of fiscal 2017.
In March 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-08,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Consideration (Reporting
Revenues Gross versus Net)
. This ASU is further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies principal versus agent considerations.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations
and Licensing.
This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies the identification of performance obligations.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical
Expedients.
This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies assessing the narrow aspects of recognizing revenue.
In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20,
Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers.
This ASU is also further guidance to ASU 2014-09, and clarifies technical corrections and improvements for recognizing
revenue.
In January 2017, the
FASB issued ASU 2017-03,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures
(Topic 323)
(“ASU 2017-03”). This ASU requires registrants to evaluate the impact ASU 2014-09 will have on financial
statements and adequately disclose this information to assist the reader in assessing the significance of ASU 2014-09 on the financial
statements when adopted. The Company commenced its assessment of ASU 2014-09 beginning in June 2016. This assessment included analyzing
ASU 2014-09’s impact on the Company’s various revenue streams, comparing the Company’s historical accounting
policies and practices to the requirements of ASU 2014-09, and identifying potential differences from applying the requirements
of ASU 2014-09 to the Company’s contracts. The Company has used a five-step process to identify the contract with the customer,
identify the performance obligations, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations
and recognize revenue when or as the performance obligations are satisfied. The Company has implemented the appropriate changes
to its business processes, systems and controls to support revenue recognition and disclosures under ASU 2014-09.
The Company adopted
ASU 2014-09 at the beginning of its 2018 fiscal year using the modified retrospective method applied to those contracts which were
not completed as of January 1, 2018. Prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with
historic accounting standards in effect during those periods. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 and related amendments did not have a
material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-01,
Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10)
(“ASU 2016-01”). This ASU addresses
certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 requires separate
presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities
or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements. That presentation provides
financial statement users with more decision-useful information about an entity’s involvement in financial instruments. The
provisions of this ASU were to be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those
years, with early adoption permitted. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-03,
Technical Corrections and Improvements
to Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10),
which made targeted improvements to address certain aspects of recognition,
measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This ASU also confirmed a six-month delay in the effective
date of ASU 2016-01, making the effective date for the Company the second quarter of fiscal 2018 instead of the first quarter of
fiscal 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2016-01 as of March 31, 2018, and that adoption did not have
a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-15
, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
.
This ASU addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under
Topic 230,
Statement of Cash Flows
, and other Topics. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods
therein, beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted this ASU and that adoption did not
have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB
issued ASU 2017-09,
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718)
(“ASU 2017-09”). ASU 2017-09 provides guidance
about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting
in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718,
Stock Compensation
. ASU 2017-09 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for any interim
period for which financial statements have not been issued. ASU 2017-09 should be applied prospectively to an award modified on
or after the adoption date. The Company adopted this ASU and that adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB
issued ASU 2017-10,
Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853)
(“ASU 2017-10”). The objective of this ASU is
to specify that an operating entity should not account for a service concession arrangement that meets certain criteria as a lease
in accordance with ASC Topic 840,
Leases
. ASU 2017-10 further states that the infrastructure used in a service concession
arrangement should not be recognized as property, plant, and equipment of the operating entity. The provisions of this ASU are
effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted.
The Company adopted this ASU and that adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2018, the
FASB issued ASU 2018-05,
Income Taxes (Topic 740)
. The objective of this ASU is to amend ASC 740,
Income Taxes
to
reflect Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, issued by the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SAB 118”),
which addresses the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). SAB 118 outlines the approach companies
may take if they determine that the necessary information is not available (in reasonable detail) to evaluate, compute, and prepare
accounting entries to recognize the effects of the Tax Act by the time the financial statements are required to be filed. Companies
may use this approach when the timely determination of some or all of the income tax effects from the Tax Act are incomplete by
the due date of the financial statements. A reporting entity must act in good faith and update provisional amounts as soon
as more information becomes available, evaluated and prepared, during a measurement period that cannot exceed one year from the
enactment date. Initial reasonable estimates and subsequent changes to provisional amounts should be reported in income tax expense
or benefit from continuing operations in the period in which they are determined. As of December 31, 2017, the provisional amount
recorded related to the remeasurement of the Company’s deferred tax liability balance was $9.3 million and reflected a one-time
reduction in the Company’s income tax provision.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
During 2017, the FASB
issued ASUs 2017-01 through 2017-15 and, during 2018, the FASB has issued ASUs 2018-01 through 2018-08. Except for the ASUs discussed
above and below, these ASUs provide technical corrections or simplifications to existing guidance and to specialized industries
or entities and therefore have minimal, if any, impact on the Company.
In February 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
(“ASU 2016-02”)
.
This ASU requires lessees to recognize most
leases on the balance sheet. The provisions of this guidance are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018,
and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-03, which requires
registrants to evaluate the impact ASU 2016-02 will have on financial statements and adequately disclose this information to assist
the reader in assessing the significance of ASU 2016-02 on the financial statements when adopted. In January 2018, the FASB issued
ASU 2018-01,
Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842
. This ASU provides an optional
transition practical expedient to not evaluate under ASU 2016-02 existing or expired land easements that were not previously accounted
for as leases under ASC Topic 840,
Leases
. An entity that elects this practical expedient should evaluate new or modified
land easements under ASU 2016-02 beginning at the date that the entity adopts ASU 2016-02. The Company is evaluating the requirements
of this guidance and implementing the processes necessary to adopt ASU 2016-02. The Company will adopt ASU 2016-02 at the beginning
of its 2019 fiscal year using the modified retrospective approach.
In January 2017, the
FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)
(“ASU 2017-04”). The objective of this ASU
is to simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.
ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early
adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company
does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the FASB
issued ASU 2018-07,
Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718).
This ASU expands the scope of ASU 2017-09, which
currently only includes share-based payments issued to employees, to also include share-based payments issued to nonemployees for
goods and services. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than the Company’s adoption
date of ASU 2014-09. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
2017 Refinancing
On November 2, 2017,
the Company refinanced its senior loan agreement with Cerberus Business Finance, LLC (the “Senior Loan Agreement”)
and its subordinated loan agreement with NewSpring Mezzanine Capital III, L.P. (the “Subordinated Loan Agreement”)
with a new $92 million, five-year credit facility from a consortium of banks led by CoBank, ACB (the “New Credit Facility”).
The New Credit Facility includes an $87.0 million term loan and a $5.0 million revolving loan, which is undrawn. The New Credit
Facility also includes a $20.0 million accordion feature that could be used to increase the term-loan portion of the New Credit
Facility. Proceeds from the New Credit Facility and cash on hand were used to pay all amounts due in respect of principal, interest,
prepayment premiums and fees under the Senior Loan Agreement and the Subordinated Loan Agreement, as well as fees associated with
the transaction. The Company recorded costs of $28 thousand and write-off of loan costs of $3.7 million in connection with this
refinancing.
Notes payable consists
of the following (in thousands, except percentages) as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Long-term
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
New Credit Facility with CoBank, ACB; variable interest rate of 6.48% at June 30, 2018, interest is quarterly, paid in arrears on the last business day of each quarter. The New Credit Facility is secured by the total assets of the subsidiary guarantors. The unpaid balance is due November 3, 2022.
|
|
$
|
4,350
|
|
|
$
|
76,387
|
|
|
$
|
80,737
|
|
|
$
|
85,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance cost
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, net of debt issuance cost
|
|
$
|
3,897
|
|
|
$
|
75,079
|
|
|
$
|
78,976
|
|
|
$
|
83,949
|
|
The Senior Loan Agreement
was fully repaid on November 2, 2017. Associated with the Senior Loan Agreement, the Company had $4.9 million in deferred financing
cost. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost associated with the Senior Loan Agreement was $541 thousand for the
six months ended June 30, 2017, which is included in interest expense.
The Subordinated Loan
Agreement was fully repaid on November 2, 2017. Associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement, the Company had $892 thousand
in deferred financing cost. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost associated with the Subordinated Loan Agreement
was $80 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2017, which is included in interest expense.
Associated with the
New Credit Facility, the Company has $2.1 million in deferred financing cost. Amortization expense for the deferred financing cost
associated with the New Credit Facility was $238 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2018, which is included in interest
expense.
The Company had a revolving
credit facility of $5.0 million associated with the Senior Loan Agreement. There was no balance outstanding as of June 30, 2017.
The Senior Loan Agreement was terminated on November 2, 2017. The Company paid a monthly fee of 0.75% per annum on the unused portion
of the revolver loan under the Senior Loan Agreement, payable in arrears. The fee expense was $19 thousand for the six months ended
June 30, 2017.
The revolving credit
facility associated with the Company’s New Credit Facility had a maximum borrowing capacity of $5.0 million on June 30, 2018.
The revolving credit facility is available until November 3, 2022. There was no balance outstanding as of June 30, 2018. The Company
pays a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears, on the unused portion of the revolver loan under the New
Credit Facility. The commitment fee expense was $13 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2018.
Maturities of notes
payable for the next five years, assuming no future annual excess cash flow payments, are as follows (in thousands):
2018 (remaining)
|
|
$
|
2,175
|
|
2019
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
2020
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
2021
|
|
|
4,350
|
|
2022
|
|
|
65,512
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
80,737
|
|
A total of $2.1 million
of debt issuance cost is amortized over the life of the loan and is recorded net of the notes payable on the condensed consolidated
balance sheets.
The Company made a
voluntary principal prepayment of $3.0 million under the New Credit Facility on May 31, 2018, which is reflected in the remaining
balance of the notes payable total listed above.
The Company’s
notes payable agreements are subject to certain financial covenants and restrictions on indebtedness, financial guarantees, business
combinations and other related items. As of June 30, 2018, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants and restrictions.
As of each of June
30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, the Company had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $0 and $33 thousand,
respectively. The Company had no alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards as of June 30, 2018, or December 31, 2017.
The Company establishes valuation allowances when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.
As of June 30, 2018, the Company had no valuation allowance recorded.
The effective income tax rate as of June
30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, was 24.3% and (184.5)%, respectively.
|
4.
|
Net Income per Common Share
|
Basic net income per
common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
net income per common share reflects the potential dilution that would occur should all of the shares of Class A common stock underlying
restricted stock units (“RSUs”) be issued.
A reconciliation of
the common shares for purposes of the calculation of the Company’s basic and diluted net income per common share is as follows
(weighted average number of common shares outstanding in whole numbers and net income in thousands):
|
|
Three Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic
|
|
|
3,388,624
|
|
|
|
3,346,689
|
|
|
|
3,388,624
|
|
|
|
3,346,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
51,035
|
|
|
|
98,943
|
|
|
|
41,350
|
|
|
|
98,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares - diluted
|
|
|
3,439,659
|
|
|
|
3,445,632
|
|
|
|
3,429,974
|
|
|
|
3,445,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,908
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
4,903
|
|
|
$
|
3,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share - basic
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share - diluted
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
5.
|
Revenue Streams and Concentrations
|
Revenue Streams
The Company identifies its revenue streams
with similar characteristics as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
|
|
Local services
|
|
$
|
5,427
|
|
|
$
|
10,917
|
|
Network access
|
|
|
5,564
|
|
|
|
10,798
|
|
Internet
|
|
|
3,814
|
|
|
|
7,710
|
|
Transport services
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
Video and security
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
Managed services
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
16,890
|
|
|
$
|
33,616
|
|
ASU 2014-09 requires
that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. As stated above in Note 1,
Organization
and Basis of Financial Reporting – Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
, the Company has used a five-step process
to identify the contract with the customer, identify the performance obligations, determine the transaction price, allocate the
transaction price to the performance obligations and recognize revenue when or as the performance obligations are satisfied. The
majority of the Company’s revenue is recognized at the point in time control of the service is transferred to the customer.
For certain other services, such as unlimited long distance, revenue is recognized over the period of time the service is provided.
The Company has implemented the appropriate changes to its business processes, systems and controls to support revenue recognition
and disclosures under ASU 2014-09.
The following table
identifies revenue generated from customers (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018
|
|
Local services
|
|
$
|
5,427
|
|
|
$
|
10,917
|
|
Network access
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
Internet
|
|
|
3,814
|
|
|
|
7,710
|
|
Transport services
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
Video and security
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
Managed services
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
12,477
|
|
|
$
|
25,166
|
|
The following table
summarizes the revenue generated from contracts with customers among each revenue stream as of June 30, 2018 (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
% In-Scope
|
|
|
% Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month to month (“MTM”) customers
|
|
$
|
7,584
|
|
|
|
61.6
|
%
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
Competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”) business customers
|
|
|
3,545
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Network access
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Total revenue streams
|
|
|
11,815
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
Global access*
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Total revenue from contracts with customers
|
|
|
12,318
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
Indefeasible rights-of-use agreements**
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Managed services**
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Network access**
|
|
|
4,375
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
16,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
*Fixed fees charged to MTM customers and CLEC business customers.
** Revenue generated from sources not within the scope of ASU 2014-09.
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
% In-Scope
|
|
|
% Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MTM customers
|
|
$
|
15,266
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
CLEC business customers
|
|
|
7,142
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
Network access
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Total revenue streams
|
|
|
23,818
|
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
70.9
|
|
Global access*
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Total revenue from contracts with customers
|
|
|
24,831
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
73.9
|
|
Indefeasible rights-of-use agreements**
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Managed services**
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Network access**
|
|
|
8,375
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
33,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
*Fixed fees charged to MTM customers and CLEC business customers.
** Revenue generated from sources not within the scope of ASU
2014-09.
Payment terms vary
by customer. The Company typically invoices customers in the month following when the service was provided. The term between invoicing
and when payment is due is less than a year and is not considered significant. Certain customers are invoiced in advance of the
service being provided. Revenue is deferred until the point in time control of the service is transferred to the customer or over
the term the service is provided.
Revenue is recognized
net of taxes collected on behalf of third parties.
As of June 30, 2018,
the Company had approximately $8.9 million of unsatisfied performance obligations. As of June 30, 2018, the Company expected to
recognize approximately $1.2 million of revenue within the next year and $7.7 million in the next 2 to 5 years related to such
unsatisfied performance obligations. The Company does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts
with an original expected life of one year or less or for contracts for which the Company has a right to invoice for services performed.
The deferred revenue
balance as of January 1, 2018, was $4.1 million. Approximately $1.5 million of revenue from that balance was recognized as revenue
during the three months ended March 31, 2018, offset by payments received as of March 31, 2018, in advance of control of the service
being transferred to the customer.
The deferred revenue
balance as of April 1, 2018, was $4.0 million. Approximately $1.4 million of revenue from that balance was recognized as revenue
during the three months ended June 30, 2018, offset by payments received as of June 30, 2018, in advance of control of the service
being transferred to the customer.
Revenue Concentrations
Revenues for interstate
access services are based on reimbursement of costs and allowed rate of return. Revenues of this nature are received from the National
Exchange Carrier Association in the form of monthly settlements. Such revenues amounted to 22.8% and 21.9% of the Company’s
total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, respectively.
|
6.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
From time to time,
the Company may be involved in various claims, legal actions and regulatory proceedings incidental to and in the ordinary course
of business, including administrative hearings of the Alabama Public Service Commission, the Maine Public Utilities Commission,
the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Cable, the Missouri Public Service Commission, the New Hampshire Public
Utilities Commission, the Vermont Public Utility Commission and the West Virginia Public Service Commission, relating primarily
to rate making and customer service requirements. In addition, the Company may be involved in similar proceedings with interconnection
carriers and the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”). Currently, none of the Company’s legal proceedings
are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
Sprint Communications
L.P. (“Sprint”), MCI Communications Services, Inc. (“MCI”) and Verizon Select Services, Inc. (“Verizon”)
filed more than 60 lawsuits in federal courts across the United States alleging that over 400 local exchange carriers (“LECs”
or “LEC Defendants”) overcharged Sprint, MCI and Verizon for so-called intraMTA traffic (wireless phone calls that
originate and terminate in the same metropolitan transit area). The lawsuits seek a refund of previously-paid access charges for
intraMTA traffic, as well as a discount related to intraMTA traffic on a going-forward basis. One of the Company’s subsidiaries,
MMT, was named as a defendant in two of the lawsuits that are being brought before the District Court for the Western District
of Missouri (one filed on May 2, 2014, by Sprint and the other filed on September 5, 2014, by MCI and Verizon). In addition, one
of the Company’s other subsidiaries, OTP, was named as a defendant in a lawsuit relating to these issues filed by MCI and
Verizon in the District Court for the District of Delaware on September 5, 2014. In addition, MMT filed suit, along with other
LECs, against Level 3 Communications LLC (“Level 3”) seeking payment of access charges that Level 3 was refusing to
pay because of its position on intraMTA traffic. As all of the lawsuits relating to these issues raise the same fundamental questions
of law, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has consolidated the lawsuits in the District Court for the
Northern District of Texas (the “Court”). On May 5, 2018, the Court granted the LEC Defendants’ request to dismiss
all of the claims brought by Sprint, MCI and Verizon. The Court also granted the LECs’ motion for summary judgment against
Level 3. Sprint, MCI and Verizon have appealed the Court’s ruling and the parties are preparing to file appearances
and begin the briefing process.
On November 10, 2014,
a large coalition of the LEC Defendants, including MMT and OTP, filed a petition for declaratory ruling with the FCC seeking a
ruling by the FCC that: (1) any traffic intentionally routed over Interexchange carrier (“IXC”) trunks by IXCs should
be subject to access charges; (2) only carriers with specific agreements with an LEC may use alternative billing arrangements;
(3) federal tariffing rules require the LECs to assess access charges for switched access traffic routed through Feature Group
D trunks; and (4) the IXCs may not engage in self-help by refusing to pay the LEC Defendants’ properly assessed access charges.
On March 11, 2015, the LEC Defendants filed their reply brief with the FCC. No timeline has been established for a decision by
the FCC.
During the six months
ended June 30, 2018, 34,755 RSUs were granted by the Company. Prior to that time, the Company had previously granted RSUs underlying
366,356 shares of Class A common stock. The RSUs (or a portion thereof) vest with respect to each recipient over a one to three
year period from the date of grant, provided the recipient remains in the employment or service of the Company as of the vesting
date and, in selected instances, certain performance criteria are attained. Additionally, the RSUs (or a portion thereof) could
vest earlier in the event of a change in control of the Company, or upon involuntary termination without cause. Of the 366,356
RSUs granted prior to the six months ended June 30, 2018, RSUs underlying 267,413 shares of Class A common stock had vested or
were cancelled as of December 31, 2017. The RSU grants were made primarily to executive-level personnel at the Company and, as
a result, no compensation costs have been capitalized.
The following
table summarizes RSU activity as of June 30, 2018:
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
98,943
|
|
|
$
|
4.51
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
34,755
|
|
|
$
|
13.30
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(67,386
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.56
|
|
Forfeited or cancelled
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2018
|
|
|
66,312
|
|
|
$
|
9.06
|
|
Stock-based compensation
expense related to RSUs was $151 thousand and $166 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Accounting
standards require that the Company estimate forfeitures for RSUs and reduce compensation expense accordingly. The Company has reduced
its expense by the assumed forfeiture rate and will evaluate actual experience against the assumed forfeiture rate going forward.
The forfeiture rate has been developed using historical performance metrics which could impact the size of the final issuance of
Class A common stock. The Company has no history before 2014 with RSU forfeiture.
As of June 30, 2018,
the unrecognized total compensation cost related to unvested RSUs was $359 thousand. That cost is expected to be recognized by
the end of 2021.
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
Overview
General
Since 1999, we have
acquired and operate eleven rural local exchange carriers (“RLECs”) serving subscribers in north central Alabama, central
Maine, western Massachusetts, central Missouri, western Vermont and southern West Virginia. We also operate a competitive local
exchange carrier (“CLEC”) serving subscribers in Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire. Our services include a broad
suite of communications and information services including local and long distance telephone services; internet and broadband data
services; network access to other wireline, long distance and wireless carriers for calls originated or terminated on our network;
other telephone related services; cloud hosting and professional engineering services for small and mid-sized companies who rely
on mission-critical software applications; digital high-speed transport services (in our New England market); and video and security
(in some markets). As of June 30, 2018, we operated 93,435 voice, data and other access lines, which we refer to as access line
equivalents. We view, manage and evaluate the results of operations from the various telecommunications services as one company
and therefore have identified one reporting segment as it relates to providing segment information.
The Federal Communications
Commission (the “FCC”) released its Universal Service Fund and Intercarrier Compensation Order (the “FCC ICC
Order”) in November 2011. The FCC ICC Order has made and continues to make substantial changes in the way telecommunication
carriers are compensated for serving high cost areas and for completing traffic with other carriers. We began seeing the significant
impact of the FCC ICC Order to our business in July 2012, with additional impacts beginning in July 2013 and July 2014. The initial
consequence to our business was to reduce access revenue from intrastate calling in Maine and other states where intrastate rates
were higher than interstate rates. A portion of this revenue loss for our RLEC properties is returned to us through the Connect
America Fund (the “CAF”). There is no recovery mechanism for the lost revenue in our CLEC. The impact of the FCC ICC
Order is expected to continue reducing our revenue and net income through 2020.
Support under the Alternative
Connect America Model (“ACAM”) increased revenue in 2017 by approximately $1.5 million compared to 2016 support received
under legacy rate-of-return regulation. Without the ACAM support, in 2017 our RLECs would have seen a normal year-over-year funding
decrease under Universal Service Fund High Cost Loop (“USF HCL”) and the FCC’s Budget Control mechanism. ACAM
support requires additional investment in plant and equipment to reach target broadband speeds and covered locations. A portion
of ACAM support represents transition payments that will decline through 2026 as the additional investment is completed.
On March 23, 2018,
the FCC issued a Report and Order, Third Order on Reconsideration, and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Report and Order”)
on high-cost rate-of-return reform that offers additional high-cost support to some carriers that previously accepted ACAM support.
One of our RLECs qualifies for additional support under the Report and Order, and we have accepted the FCC’s offer for an
additional $1.5 million of support under the Report and Order over a 10 year period.
On June 25, 2018, the
FCC named us one of 220 qualified bidders who are authorized to participate in the FCC’s Connect America Fund Phase II auction.
This reverse auction will award support payments over the next 10 years to service providers who successfully bid to offer service
in unserved, high-cost areas, which are defined by the FCC. Winning service providers must complete a long-form application process
and meet various other requirements before being authorized to receive support payments. Winning service providers must also commit
to offer voice and broadband services to a fixed number of locations. The auction began on July 24, 2018, and will continue as
needed to satisfy all areas receiving competitive bids.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act (the “Tax Act”) passed in December 2017 has reduced, and is expected to continue to reduce, our cash tax liability.
Specifically, both the lower income tax rate and the extension of bonus depreciation under the Tax Act have positively impacted,
and are expected to continue to positively impact, our federal tax requirements. The limitation on interest deductibility under
the Tax Act is not expected to impact our tax liabilities. For the 2018 tax year, the Tax Act is expected to reduce our cash tax
liability by approximately $2.1 million.
The following discussion
and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included in Item 1 of Part I and the other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report. The following discussion and
analysis relates to our financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated basis.
Revenue Sources
Our revenues are derived
from six sources:
|
·
|
Local services
. We receive revenues from providing local exchange telecommunication services
in our eleven rural territories and on a competitive basis throughout Maine, New Hampshire and western Massachusetts through both
wholesale and retail channels. These revenues include monthly subscription charges for basic service, calling beyond the local
territory on a fixed price and on a per minute basis, local private line services and enhanced calling features, such as voicemail,
caller identification, call waiting and call forwarding. We also provide billing and collections services for other carriers under
contract and receive revenues from directory advertising. A significant portion of our rural subscribers take bundled service plans,
which include multiple services, including unlimited domestic calling, for a flat monthly fee.
|
|
·
|
Network access
. We receive revenues from charges established to compensate us for the origination,
transport and termination of calls of long distance, wireless and other interexchange carriers. These include subscriber line charges
imposed on end users and switched and special access charges paid by carriers. Switched access charges for long distance services
within Alabama, Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, Vermont and West Virginia have historically been based on rates
approved by the Alabama Public Service Commission, the Maine Public Utilities Commission, the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications
and Cable, the Missouri Public Service Commission, the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission, the Vermont Public Utility Commission
and the West Virginia Public Service Commission, respectively, where appropriate. The FCC ICC Order preempted the state commissions’
authority to set terminating intrastate access service rates, and required companies with terminating access rates higher than
interstate rates to reduce their terminating intrastate access rates to a rate equal to interstate access service rates by July
1, 2013, and to move to a “bill and keep” arrangement by July 1, 2020, which will eliminate access charges between
carriers. The FCC ICC Order prescribes a recovery mechanism for the recovery of any decrease in intrastate terminating access revenues
through the CAF for RLEC companies. This recovery is limited to 95% of the previous year’s revenue requirement. Interstate
access revenue is based on an FCC regulated rate-of-return on investment and recovery of expenses and taxes. From 1990 through
June 2016, the rate-of-return had been authorized up to 11.25%. In March 2016, the FCC reduced the authorized rate-of-return to
9.75% effective July 1, 2021, using a transitional approach to reduce the impact of an immediate reduction. Rate-of-return transition
began on July 1, 2016, when the authorized rate was reduced to 11.0%, with further 25 basis point reductions each July 1 thereafter
until the authorized rate reaches 9.75% on July 1, 2021. Switched and special access charges for interstate and international services
are based on rates approved by the FCC. We also receive revenue from the Universal Service Fund for the deployment of voice and
broadband services to end-user customers. Since January 1, 2017, ten of our RLECs receive support payments through ACAM and one
of our RLECs receives support payments through modified legacy rate-of-return support mechanisms for USF HCL and Interstate Common
Line Support.
|
|
·
|
Internet
. We receive revenues from monthly recurring charges for digital high-speed data
lines, legacy dial-up internet access and ancillary services such as web hosting and computer virus protection.
|
|
·
|
Transport services
. We receive monthly recurring revenues for the rental of fiber to transport
data and other telecommunication services in Maine and New Hampshire.
|
|
·
|
Video and security
. We offer basic, digital, high-definition, digital video recording, video
on demand and pay per view cable television services to a portion of our telephone service territory in Alabama, including Internet
Protocol (“IP”) television (“IPTV”). We offer wireless security systems and system monitoring in Alabama
and Missouri.
|
|
·
|
Managed services
. We provide private/hybrid cloud hosting services, as well as consulting
and professional engineering services, for mission-critical software applications for small and mid-sized North American companies.
Revenues are generated from monthly recurring hosting Infrastructure as a Service fees, monthly maintenance fees,
à la
carte
professional engineering services and pay-as-you-use Software as a Service fees. Services are domiciled in two diverse
owned data centers.
|
Access Line and Customer
Trends
The number of voice,
data and other access lines serves as a fundamental factor in determining revenue stability for a telecommunications provider.
Reflecting general trends in the RLEC industry, the number of residential voice access lines we serve has been decreasing when
normalized for territory acquisitions, whereas business access lines have remained generally steady or grown. We expect that these
trends will continue, and may be potentially affected by competition from cable and co-operative electric providers in our RLEC
territories, the availability of alternative telecommunications products, such as cellular and IP-based services, as well as general
economic conditions. Historically, these residential trends have been partially offset by the growth of residential data access
lines, also called digital high-speed internet access service. As the penetration of data lines in our RLEC markets has increased,
growth in residential data lines no longer offsets the decline in residential voice lines. Our competitive carrier voice and data
access lines have grown as we continue to offer new services and further penetrate our chosen markets. Our ability to continue
this growth and our response to rural trends will have an important impact on our future revenues. Our primary strategy consists
of leveraging our strong incumbent market position, selling additional services to our rural customer base, such as alarm and medical
alert monitoring services, and providing better service and support levels and a broader suite of services, including managed services
and hybrid/cloud-based hosting, than the incumbent and other competitive carriers to our CLEC customer base.
Key Operating Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
|
March 31,
2018
|
|
|
% Change from
March 31, 2018
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
% Change from
December 31,
2017
|
|
Business Enterprise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLEC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voice lines
|
|
|
15,713
|
|
|
|
16,030
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
16,239
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
HPBX seats
|
|
|
11,924
|
|
|
|
11,369
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
11,338
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
Data lines
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
Wholesale network lines
|
|
|
2,391
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
RLEC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voice lines
|
|
|
15,119
|
|
|
|
15,212
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
15,400
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
Data lines
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
Access line equivalents
(1)
|
|
|
49,941
|
|
|
|
49,920
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
50,355
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLEC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voice lines
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
Data lines
|
|
|
2,712
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
RLEC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voice lines
|
|
|
18,375
|
|
|
|
18,725
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
|
19,147
|
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)%
|
Data lines
|
|
|
18,370
|
|
|
|
18,558
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
18,771
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)%
|
Other services
|
|
|
3,421
|
|
|
|
3,485
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
3,561
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
Access line equivalents
(1)
|
|
|
43,494
|
|
|
|
44,181
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
44,922
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otelco access line equivalents
(1)
|
|
|
93,435
|
|
|
|
94,101
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
95,277
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
(1)
|
We define access line equivalents as retail and wholesale voice lines, data lines (including cable modems, digital subscriber
lines, other broadband connections and dedicated data access trunks) and other services (including entertainment and security services).
|
Our business and enterprise
customers represented over 53% of our access line equivalents as of June 30, 2018. During the first half of 2018, our Hosted PBX
offering increase more than offset customer churn of traditional telephone lines in our New England CLEC and the decrease in multi-use
voice lines when compared to December 31, 2017. Residential access line equivalents decreased 1.9%, compared to March 31, 2018,
reflecting the industry-wide trends of reduced residential voice lines.
We offer competitively
priced location-specific bundled service packages, many including unlimited domestic calling, tailored to the varying telecommunications
requirements of our customers. Competitive pricing and bundling of services have led our long distance service to be the choice
of the majority of our voice customers in the rural markets we serve. In addition, almost all of our CLEC customers have selected
us as their long distance carrier. We also provide other services primarily to our residential customers, including cable television,
IPTV, over-the-top entertainment services and security monitoring and medical alert services.
Our Rate and Pricing
Structure
Our CLEC enterprise
pricing is based on market requirements. We combine varying services to meet individual customer requirements, including technical
support and managed services, and provide multi-year contracts which are both market sensitive for the customer and stabilizing
for our sales process.
Our RLECs operate in
six states and have limited regulation by the respective state regulatory authorities. The impact on pricing flexibility varies
by state. Our rates for other services we provide, including cable, IPTV, long distance, data lines and high-speed internet access,
are not price regulated. The market for competitive services, such as wireless, also affects our ability to adjust prices. With
the increase of bundled services offerings, including unlimited long distance, pricing for individual services takes on reduced
importance to revenue stability. We expect this trend to continue into the immediate future.
Categories of Operating
Expenses
Our operating expenses
are categorized as cost of services; selling, general and administrative expenses; and depreciation and amortization.
Cost of services
.
This includes expenses for salaries, wages and benefits relating to our telephone central office and outside plant operation, maintenance,
sales and customer service; other plant operations, maintenance and administrative costs; network access costs; data center operations;
and costs of services for long distance, cable television, internet and directory services.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses
. This includes expenses for salaries, wages and benefits and contract service payments (for example,
legal fees) relating to engineering, financial, human resources and corporate operations; information management expenses, including
billing; allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable; expenses for travel, lodging and meals; internal and external communications
costs; insurance premiums; stock exchange and banking fees; and postage.
Depreciation and
amortization
. This includes depreciation of our telecommunications, cable and internet networks and equipment, and amortization
of intangible assets. Certain of these amortization expenses continue to be deductible for tax purposes.
Our Ability to Control
Operating Expenses
We strive to control
expenses in order to maintain our operating margins. As our revenue continues to shift to non-regulated services and CLEC customers
and our residential RLEC revenue continues to decline, operating margins decrease, reflecting the lower margins associated with
non-regulated services. The years of reductions in FCC-controlled payments has made it difficult to fully offset revenue decline
through expense control and pricing action. With the introduction of ACAM funding in 2017, there was an increase in revenue which
can be used to support additional capital investment in our network to enhance broadband speeds and coverage. The funds received
through ACAM funding will decline over the remaining nine years of the program.
Results of Operations
The following table
sets forth our results of operations as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local services
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
32.7
|
%
|
Network access
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
32.5
|
|
Internet
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
22.6
|
|
Transport services
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Video and security
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Managed services
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
44.3
|
%
|
|
|
46.2
|
%
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
45.6
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
|
|
71.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)
|
|
|
(14.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Three Months and Six Months
Ended June 30, 2018, Compared to Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Total revenues
.
Total revenues decreased 3.0% in the three months ended June 30, 2018, to $16.9 million from $17.4 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2017. Total revenues decreased 3.4% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, to $33.6 million from $34.8 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in traditional access revenue affected by the
FCC ICC Order and residential RLEC access line equivalents.
The
tables below provide
the components of our revenues for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to the same periods of 2017
.
For the three months
ended June 30, 2018, and 2017
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Local services
|
|
$
|
5,427
|
|
|
$
|
5,763
|
|
|
$
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
Network access
|
|
|
5,564
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
Internet
|
|
|
3,814
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
Transport services
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Video and security
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
Managed services
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,890
|
|
|
$
|
17,406
|
|
|
$
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)%
|
Local services
.
Local services revenue decreased 5.8% in the three months ended June 30, 2018, to $5.4 million from $5.8 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2017. T
he decline in RLEC residential voice access lines and the impact of
the
FCC ICC Order, which reduced or eliminated intrastate and local cellular revenue,
accounted
for a decrease of just under $0.2 million.
A portion of the RLEC decrease is recovered through the CAF, which is categorized
as interstate access revenue. Long distance and directory services accounted for a decrease of $0.1 million and HPBX equipment
and fiber installation revenue accounted for a decrease of $0.1 million.
Network access
.
Network access revenue decreased 0.7% to remain at $5.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018, and the three months ended
June 30, 2017. ACAM, CAF and transition support payments increased $0.4 million and special access increased $0.1 million. These
increases were offset by a decrease of $0.4 million in switched access and $0.1 million in end-user fees.
Internet
. Internet
revenue decreased 3.7% in the three months ended June 30, 2018, to $3.8 million from $4.0 million in the three months ended June
30, 2017. A decrease in customers and equipment rental charges accounted for the decline.
Transport services
.
Transport services revenue increased 3.7% in the three months ended June 30, 2018, to just over $1.2 million from just under $1.2
million in the three months ended June 30, 2017, reflecting an increase in wide area network services.
Video and security
.
Video and security revenue decreased 4.2% to remain at just over $0.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018, and the
three months ended June 30, 2017, reflecting an increase in IPTV revenue, offset by decreases in basic cable and pay-per-view revenue.
Managed services
.
Managed services revenue decreased 4.2% to remain at just under $0.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018, and the three
months ended June 30, 2017.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2018, and 2017
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Local services
|
|
$
|
10,917
|
|
|
$
|
11,363
|
|
|
$
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
Network access
|
|
|
10,798
|
|
|
|
11,316
|
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
Internet
|
|
|
7,710
|
|
|
|
7,867
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
Transport services
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Video and security
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
Managed services
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(18.9
|
)%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
33,616
|
|
|
$
|
34,786
|
|
|
$
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)%
|
Local services
.
Local services revenue decreased 3.9% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, to $10.9 million from $11.4 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2017. T
he decline in RLEC residential voice access lines and the impact of
the
FCC ICC Order, which reduced or eliminated intrastate and local cellular revenue,
accounted
for a decrease of just under $0.2 million.
A portion of the RLEC decrease is recovered through the CAF, which is categorized
as interstate access revenue. Long distance and directory services accounted for a decrease of $0.2 million and HPBX equipment
and fiber installation revenue accounted for a decrease of $0.1 million.
Network access
.
Network access revenue decreased 4.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, to $10.8 million from $11.3 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2017. ACAM, CAF and transition support payments increased $0.2 million which was offset by a decrease of $0.5 million
in switched access and $0.2 million in end-user fees.
Internet
. Internet
revenue decreased 2.0% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, to $7.7 million from $7.9 million in the six months ended June 30,
2017. A decrease in customers and equipment rental charges accounted for the decline.
Transport services
.
Transport services revenue increased 3.7% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, to $2.4 million from $2.3 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2017, reflecting an increase in wide area and wholesale network services.
Video and security
.
Video and security revenue decreased 3.7% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, to just under $1.5 million from just over $1.5
million in the six months ended June 30, 2017, reflecting an increase in IPTV revenue, offset by decreases in basic cable and pay-per-view
revenue.
Managed services
.
Managed services revenue decreased 18.9% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, to $0.3 million from $0.4 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2017, reflecting decreases in professional services and cloud hosting revenue.
Operating expenses
.
Operating expenses in the three months ended June 30, 2018, decreased 5.1% to $11.7 million from $12.4 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2017. Operating expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2018, decreased 1.3% to $24.4 million from $24.7 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2017. The tables below provide the components of our operating expenses for the three months and
six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to the same periods of 2017.
For the three months
ended June 30, 2018, and 2017
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
$
|
7,483
|
|
|
$
|
8,044
|
|
|
$
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,718
|
|
|
$
|
12,353
|
|
|
$
|
(635
|
)
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
Cost of services
.
Cost of services decreased 7.0% to just under $7.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018, from just over $8.0 million
in the three months ended June 30, 2017. Customer service and sales; digital and circuit; pole rental; and network operations expenses
each decreased $0.1 million, while access and internet expense decreased $0.2 million.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses
. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 1.6% to $2.4 million in the three months
ended June 30, 2018, from $2.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease was composed of a $0.2 million increase
in training expense associated with our new billing and operating support system, which was more than offset by a decrease of $0.1
million in cloud hosting and uncollectible expense and a decrease of $0.2 million in senior management incentive compensation expense.
Depreciation and
amortization
. Depreciation and amortization was unchanged at $1.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018, and June
30, 2017.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2018, and 2017
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
$
|
15,447
|
|
|
$
|
15,857
|
|
|
$
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,310
|
|
|
|
5,174
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,626
|
|
|
|
3,681
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,383
|
|
|
$
|
24,712
|
|
|
$
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
Cost of services
.
Cost of services decreased 2.6% to $15.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018, from $15.9 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2017. Access decreased $0.4 million; customer service and sales decreased $0.1 million; and toll and directory decreased
$0.1 million. An increase in internet costs of $0.1 million and network operations expense of $1.0 million partially offset the
reductions.
Selling, general
and administrative expenses
. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 2.6% to $5.3 million in the six months
ended
June 30
, 2018, from $5.2 million in the six months ended
June
30
, 2017. The increase was composed of a $0.4 million training expense associated with our new billing and operating support
system, and a $0.1 million increase in legal expense, which were partially offset by a decrease of $0.1 million in cloud hosting
and uncollectible expense and $0.3 million in senior management incentive compensation expense.
Depreciation and
amortization
. Depreciation and amortization decreased 1.5% in the six months ended
June
30
, 2018, to $3.6 million from $3.7 million in the six months ended
June 30
,
2017. The amortization of intangibles and CLEC depreciation accounted for the decrease.
For the three months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(1,467
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,571
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,104
|
)
|
|
|
(42.9
|
)%
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)
|
Interest expense
.
Interest expense decreased 42.9% in the three months ended
June 30
, 2018, to $1.5
million from $2.6 million in the three months ended
June 30
, 2017. Lower interest
rates and lower principal balance accounted for just under $0.9 million of the decrease and lower loan cost amortization accounted
for $0.2 million of the decrease. We refinanced our previous credit facilities with a new credit facility on November 2, 2017,
which reduced our effective interest rate by approximately four percentage points. Our new credit facility matures in November
2022. See additional information in the
Liquidity and Capital Resources
section below.
Income tax expense
.
Provision for income tax expense was $0.8 million in the three months ended
June 30
,
2018, compared to $1.0 million in the three months ended
June 30
, 2017. The Tax Act,
implemented at the end of 2017, increased bonus depreciation from 50% to 100% and reduced the maximum federal corporate tax rate
from 35% to 21%. While lower interest expense increased net income, the net effect of the new law was to lower the provision for
federal income taxes and raise the provision for state income taxes, producing the reduction in the provision for income taxes
of just under $0.2 million for the three months ended
June 30
, 2018, when compared
to the same period in 2017. The effective income tax rate as of
June 30
, 2018, and
December 31, 2017, was 24.3% and (184.5)%, respectively. The December 31, 2017, rate reflects the impact of the Tax Act on deferred
taxes.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(2,925
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,257
|
)
|
|
|
(43.6
|
)%
|
Other income
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(17.2
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(1,573
|
)
|
|
|
(1,951
|
)
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)
|
Interest expense
.
Interest expense decreased 43.6% in the six months ended
June 30
, 2018, to $2.9 million
from $5.2 million in the six months ended
June 30
, 2017. Lower interest rates and
lower principal balance accounted for $1.9 million of the decrease and lower loan cost amortization accounted for $0.4 million
of the decrease. We refinanced our previous credit facilities with a new credit facility on November 2, 2017, which reduced our
effective interest rate by approximately four percentage points. Our new credit facility matures in November 2022.
Other income
.
Other income decreased 17.2% in the six months ended June 30, 2018, to just under $0.2 million from just over $0.2 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2017, primarily related to the annual CoBank dividend received in the first quarter of each year.
Income tax expense
.
Provision for income tax expense was just under $1.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to just under $2.0
million in the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Tax Act, implemented at the end of 2017, increased bonus depreciation from 50%
to 100% and reduced the maximum federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. While lower interest expense increased net income,
the net effect of the new law was to lower the provision for federal income taxes and raise the provision for state income taxes,
producing the reduction in the provision for income taxes of just under $0.4 million for the three months ended
June
30
, 2018, when compared to the same period in 2017. The effective income tax rate as of
June
30
, 2018, and December 31, 2017, was 24.3% and (184.5)%, respectively. The December 31, 2017, rate reflects the impact of
the Tax Act on deferred taxes.
Net income
.
As a result of the foregoing, there was net income of $2.9 million and $1.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2018, and
2017, respectively. As a result of the foregoing, there was net income of $4.9 million and $3.1 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The difference in both periods was primarily driven by the impact of the Tax Act and lower
interest expense.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity needs
arise primarily from: (i) interest and principal payments related to our credit facility; (ii) capital expenditures for investment
in our business, including ACAM requirements; and (iii) working capital requirements.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2018, we generated cash from our business to invest in additional property and equipment of $3.3 million, pay loan
principal of $5.2 million and pay scheduled interest on our debt of $2.7 million. After meeting all of these needs of our business,
cash increased to $4.2 million as of June 30, 2018, from $3.6 million as of December 31, 2017.
Cash flows from operating
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018, amounted to $9.5 million compared to $9.7 million for the six months ended June
30, 2017, reflecting an increase in net income offset by changes in working capital items.
Cash flows used in
investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018, were $3.3 million compared to $3.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2017, reflecting RLEC fiber installation associated with the FCC’s ACAM program and investment in our new billing
and operations support system.
Cash flows used in
financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2018, were $5.5 million compared to $5.2 million in the six months ended
June 30, 2017, reflecting a voluntary principal prepayment of $3.0 million in 2018 under our new credit facility and an excess
cash flow payment of $3.1 million in 2017 under our former senior credit facility.
We do not invest in
financial instruments as part of our business strategy. However, our new credit facility requires that we acquire an interest rate
hedge on at least 50% of our outstanding notes payable balance for a period of at least two years. Accordingly, we purchased
a two-year 3.0% interest rate cap on one-month LIBOR covering $45.0 million on February 26, 2018. The interest rate cap
is accounted for as an asset and marked to market each quarter.
Our prior credit facilities
were funded on February 17, 2016, and consisted of a senior credit facility, providing for a five year term loan facility in the
aggregate principal amount of $85.0 million and a five year $5.0 million revolving credit facility, and a subordinated credit
facility, providing for a five and a half year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $15.3 million. On
November 2, 2017, we refinanced those credit facilities with a new $92 million, five-year credit facility from a consortium of
banks led by CoBank, ACB. The new credit facility includes an $87.0 million term loan and a $5.0 million revolving loan, which
is undrawn. The new credit facility also includes a $20.0 million accordion feature that could be used to increase the term-loan
portion of the new credit facility, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and lender participation. Proceeds from the
new term loan and cash on hand were used to pay all amounts due in respect of principal, interest, prepayment premiums and fees
under our prior credit facilities, as well as fees associated with the transaction. Our new credit facility requires annual principal
reduction of $4.3 million paid equally on a quarterly basis and, beginning in 2019, an annual principal payment equal
to 50% of our excess cash flow for the year. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we made scheduled principal payments of
$2.2 million and a voluntary principal prepayment of $3.0 million, reducing the outstanding principal under our new credit facility
to $80.7 million. The voluntary principal prepayment incurred no prepayment penalty and may be used to offset the 2019 excess cash
flow payment.
We anticipate that
operating cash flow, together with borrowings under our revolving credit facility, will be adequate to meet our currently anticipated
operating and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. Our cash position reflects the continuing strength
of our operations.
We use consolidated
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Consolidated EBITDA”) and the ratio of our debt, net
of cash, to Consolidated EBITDA for the last twelve months (the “Leverage Ratio”) as operational performance measurements.
Consolidated EBITDA, as presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, corresponds to the definition of Consolidated EBITDA in
our credit facility. Consolidated EBITDA and the Leverage Ratio, as presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, are supplemental
measures of our performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with, accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). The lenders under our credit facility use Consolidated EBITDA to determine compliance
with credit facility requirements. We report Consolidated EBITDA and the Leverage Ratio in our quarterly earnings press release
to allow current and potential investors to understand these performance metrics and because we believe that they provide current
and potential investors with helpful information with respect to our operating performance, including our ability to generate earnings
sufficient to service our debt, and enhance understanding of our financial performance and highlight operational trends. However,
Consolidated EBITDA and the Leverage Ratio should not be considered as an alternative to net income or any other performance measures
derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our presentation of Consolidated EBITDA and the Leverage Ratio may not be comparable to similarly
titled measures used by other companies. Consolidated EBITDA for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017,
and the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, and its reconciliation to net income, is reflected in the table below (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,908
|
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
|
$
|
4,903
|
|
|
$
|
3,144
|
|
|
$
|
13,874
|
|
Add: Depreciation
|
|
|
1,723
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
3,458
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
|
|
6,980
|
|
Interest expense less interest income
|
|
|
1.348
|
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
|
6,551
|
|
Interest expense - amortized loan cost
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
4,440
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
1,573
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
(8,234
|
)
|
Amortization - intangibles
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Loan fees
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
Stock-based compensation (senior management)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
$
|
7,078
|
|
|
$
|
7,005
|
|
|
$
|
13,216
|
|
|
$
|
14,203
|
|
|
$
|
26,653
|
|
The table below provides
the calculation of the Leverage Ratio, as of June 30, 2018 (dollar amounts in thousands).
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
78,976
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
Notes outstanding
|
|
$
|
80,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less cash
|
|
|
(4,238
|
)
|
Notes outstanding, net of cash
|
|
$
|
76,499
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA for the last twelve months
|
|
$
|
26,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage Ratio
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
As we reduce our debt,
the Leverage Ratio would be expected to decline if Consolidated EBITDA remains consistent.
Recently Adopted Accounting
Pronouncements
See Note 1,
Organization
and Basis of Financial Reporting
, to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for a description of the recently adopted accounting pronouncements that are applicable to us, including details relating
to our adoption of ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
, at the beginning of 2018, which adoption
did not have a material impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1,
Organization
and Basis of Financial Reporting
, to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for a description of the recent accounting pronouncements that are applicable to us.