NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Introduction and Basis of Presentation
Overview
Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (including its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” or “Farmer Bros.”), is a national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products. The Company serves a wide variety of customers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to large institutional buyers like restaurant and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, healthcare facilities, and gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand and consumer-branded coffee and tea products. The Company’s product categories consist of roast and ground coffee, frozen liquid coffee; flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas; culinary products; spices; and other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and ready-to-drink iced coffee. The Company was founded in
1912
, incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. The Company operates in one business segment.
In fiscal 2015 the Company began the process of relocating its corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to a new facility housing these operations in Northlake, Texas (the “New Facility”) (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”). In order to focus on the Company’s core product offerings, in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company sold certain assets associated with its manufacture, processing and distribution of raw, processed and blended spices and certain other culinary products (collectively, the “Spice Assets”) to Harris Spice Company Inc. (“Harris”). In fiscal 2017, the Company completed the construction of and exercised the purchase option to acquire the New Facility, relocated its Torrance operations to the New Facility, and sold its facility in Torrance, California (the “Torrance Facility“). The Company commenced distribution activities at the New Facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and initial production activities late in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company began roasting coffee in the New Facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company completed the Corporate Relocation Plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
In fiscal 2017, the Company completed the following acquisitions. On October 11, 2016, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist Brands, Inc. dba China Mist Tea Company (“China Mist”), a provider of flavored iced teas and iced green teas, and on February 7, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee Company, Inc. (“West Coast Coffee”), a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on the convenience store, grocery and foodservice channels.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company commenced a restructuring plan to reorganize its direct-store-delivery, or DSD, operations in an effort to realign functions into a channel-based selling organization, streamline operations, acquire certain channel specific expertise, and improve selling effectiveness and financial results (the “DSD Restructuring Plan”). The Company expects to complete the DSD Restructuring Plan by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018.
The Company operates production facilities in Northlake, Texas; Houston, Texas; Portland, Oregon; Hillsboro, Oregon; and Scottsdale, Arizona. Distribution takes place out of the New Facility, the Portland, Hillsboro and Scottsdale facilities, as well as separate distribution centers in Northlake, Illinois; and Moonachie, New Jersey. The Company commenced distribution activities at the New Facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and initial production activities late in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company began roasting coffee in the New Facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
The Company’s products reach its customers primarily in the following ways: through the Company’s nationwide direct-store-delivery, or DSD, network of
450
delivery routes and
114
branch warehouses as of June 30, 2017, or direct-shipped via common carriers or third-party distributors. The Company operates a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles to distribute and deliver its products, and relies on third-party logistic (“3PL”) service providers for its long-haul distribution. DSD sales are made “off-truck” by the Company to its customers at their places of business.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company reviews its estimates on an ongoing basis using currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from those estimates.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity dates of
90 days
or less to be cash equivalents. Fair values of cash equivalents approximate cost due to the short period of time to maturity.
Investments
The Company’s investments, from time to time, consist of money market instruments, marketable debt, equity and hybrid securities. Investments are held for trading purposes and stated at fair value. The cost of investments sold is determined on the specific identification method. Dividend and interest income are accrued as earned. See
Note 9
.
Fair Value Measurements
The Company groups its assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
•
Level 1—Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
•
Level 2—Valuation is based upon inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly (i.e. interest rate and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, default rates, etc.). Observable inputs include quoted prices for similar instruments in active and non-active markets. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued with industry standard valuation models that incorporate inputs that are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, or can otherwise be derived from or supported by observable market data in the marketplace. Level 2 inputs may also include insignificant adjustments to market observable inputs.
•
Level 3—Valuation is based upon one or more unobservable inputs that are significant in establishing a fair value estimate. These unobservable inputs are used to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available and are developed based on the best information available. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
Securities with quotes that are based on actual trades or actionable bids and offers with a sufficient level of activity on or near the measurement date are classified as Level 1. Securities that are priced using quotes derived from implied values, indicative bids and offers, or a limited number of actual trades, or the same information for securities that are similar in many respects to those being valued, are classified as Level 2. If market information is not available for securities being valued, or materially-comparable securities, then those securities are classified as Level 3. In considering market information, management evaluates changes in liquidity, willingness of a broker to execute at the quoted price, the depth and consistency of prices from pricing services, and the existence of observable trades in the market (see
Note 10
).
Derivative Instruments
The Company purchases various derivative instruments to create economic hedges of its commodity price risk. These derivative instruments consist primarily of forward and option contracts. The Company reports the fair value of derivative instruments on its consolidated balance sheets in “Short-term derivative assets,” “Other assets,” “Short-term derivative liabilities,” or “Other long-term liabilities.” The Company determines the current and noncurrent classification based on the
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
timing of expected future cash flows of individual trades and reports these amounts on a gross basis. Additionally, the Company reports cash held on deposit in margin accounts for coffee-related derivative instruments on a gross basis on its consolidated balance sheet in “Restricted cash” if restricted from withdrawal due to a net loss position in such margin accounts.
The accounting for the changes in fair value of the Company's derivative instruments can be summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
Derivative Treatment
|
|
Accounting Method
|
Normal purchases and normal sales exception
|
|
Accrual accounting
|
Designated in a qualifying hedging relationship
|
|
Hedge accounting
|
All other derivative instruments
|
|
Mark-to-market accounting
|
The Company enters into green coffee purchase commitments at a fixed price or at a price to be fixed (“PTF”). PTF contracts are purchase commitments whereby the quality, quantity, delivery period, price differential to the coffee “C” market price and other negotiated terms are agreed upon, but the date, and therefore the price at which the base “C” market price will be fixed has not yet been established. The coffee “C” market price is fixed at some point after the purchase contract date and before the futures market closes for the delivery month and may be fixed either at the direction of the Company to the vendor, or by the application of a derivative that was separately purchased as a hedge. For both fixed-price and PTF contracts, the Company expects to take delivery of and to utilize the coffee in a reasonable period of time and in the conduct of normal business. Accordingly, these purchase commitments qualify as normal purchases and are not recorded at fair value on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
The Company follows the guidelines of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), to account for certain coffee-related derivative instruments as accounting hedges in order to minimize the volatility created in the Company's quarterly results from utilizing these derivative contracts and to improve comparability between reporting periods. For a derivative to qualify for designation in a hedging relationship, it must meet specific criteria and the Company must maintain appropriate documentation. The Company establishes hedging relationships pursuant to its risk management policies. The hedging relationships are evaluated at inception and on an ongoing basis to determine whether the hedging relationship is, and is expected to remain, highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the underlying risk being hedged. The Company also regularly assesses whether the hedged forecasted transaction is probable of occurring. If a derivative ceases to be or is no longer expected to be highly effective, or if the Company believes the likelihood of occurrence of the hedged forecasted transaction is no longer probable, hedge accounting is discontinued for that derivative, and future changes in the fair value of that derivative are recognized in “Other, net
.”
For coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is reported as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold in the period or periods when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the derivative instrument's change in fair value is recognized currently in “Other, net.
”
Gains or losses deferred in AOCI associated with terminated derivative instruments, derivative instruments that cease to be highly effective hedges, derivative instruments for which the forecasted transaction is reasonably possible but no longer probable of occurring, and cash flow hedges that have been otherwise discontinued remain in AOCI until the hedged item affects earnings. If it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction designated as the hedged item in a cash flow hedge will not occur, any gain or loss deferred in AOCI is recognized in “Other, net” at that time. For derivative instruments that are not designated in a hedging relationship, and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected, the changes in fair value are reported in “Other, net.”
The following gains and losses on derivative instruments are netted together and reported in “Other, net” in the Company's consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
•
|
Gains and losses on all derivative instruments that are not designated as cash flow hedges and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected; and
|
|
|
•
|
The ineffective portion of unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges.
|
The fair value of derivative instruments is based upon broker quotes. At
June 30, 2017
and 2016 approximately
94%
and
96%
, respectively, of the Company's outstanding coffee-related derivative instruments were designated as cash flow hedges. See
Note 8
.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Concentration of Credit Risk
At
June 30, 2017
, the financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash in financial institutions (in excess of federally insured limits), short-term investments, investments in the preferred stocks of other companies, derivative instruments and trade receivables. Cash equivalents and short-term investments are not concentrated by issuer, industry or geographic area. Maturities are generally shorter than
180 days
. Investments in the preferred stocks of other companies are limited to high quality issuers and are not concentrated by geographic area or issuer.
The Company does not have any credit-risk related contingent features that would require it to post additional collateral in support of its net derivative liability positions. At June 30, 2017 and 2016, because the Company had a net gain position in its coffee-related derivative margin accounts,
none
of the cash in these accounts was restricted. Changes in commodity prices and the number of coffee-related derivative instruments held could have a significant impact on cash deposit requirements under the Company's broker and counterparty agreements.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables for the Company is limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across many different geographic areas. The trade receivables are generally short-term and all probable bad debt losses have been appropriately considered in establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts. In fiscal 2017 and 2016, the Company increased the allowance for doubtful accounts by
$7,000
and
$71,000
, respectively. In fiscal 2015, the Company decreased the allowance for doubtful accounts by
$8,000
.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. The Company accounts for coffee, tea and culinary products on a last in, first out (“LIFO”) basis, and coffee brewing equipment parts on a first in, first out (“FIFO”) basis. The Company regularly evaluates these inventories to determine the provision for obsolete and slow-moving inventory. Inventory reserves are based on inventory obsolescence trends, historical experience and application of specific identification.
At the end of each quarter, the Company records the expected effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities, if any, and records the actual impact at fiscal year-end. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made only at the end of each fiscal year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. If inventory quantities decline at the end of the fiscal year compared to the beginning of the fiscal year, the reduction results in the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities carried at the cost prevailing in prior years. This LIFO inventory liquidation may result in a decrease or increase in cost of goods sold depending on whether the cost prevailing in prior years was lower or higher, respectively, than the current year cost. As these estimates are subject to many forces beyond management's control, interim results are subject to the final fiscal year-end LIFO inventory valuation. See
Note 12
.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The following useful lives are used:
|
|
|
Buildings and facilities
|
10 to 30 years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
3 to 10 years
|
Equipment under capital leases
|
Shorter of term of lease or estimated useful life
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
5 to 7 years
|
Capitalized software
|
3 to 5 years
|
Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining lease term. When assets are sold or retired, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective account balances and any gain or loss on disposal is included in operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and enhancements are capitalized. See
Note 13
.
Assets to be disposed of by sale are recorded as held for sale at the lower of carrying value or estimated net realizable value. The Company considers properties to be assets held for sale when (1) management commits to a plan to sell the property; (2) it is unlikely that the disposal plan will be significantly modified or discontinued; (3) the property is available for immediate
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
sale in its present condition; (4) actions required to complete the sale of the property have been initiated; (5) sale of the property is probable and the Company expects the completed sale will occur within one year; and (6) the property is actively being marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable given the Company's estimate of current market value. Upon designation of a property as an asset held for sale, the Company records the property’s value at the lower of its carrying value or its estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell and ceases depreciation. See
Note 7
.
Coffee Brewing Equipment and Service
The Company classifies certain expenses related to coffee brewing equipment provided to customers as cost of goods sold. These costs include the cost of the equipment as well as the cost of servicing that equipment (including service employees’ salaries, cost of transportation and the cost of supplies and parts) and are considered directly attributable to the generation of revenues from its customers. Accordingly, such costs included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are
$26.3 million
,
$27.0 million
and
$26.6 million
, respectively.
The Company capitalizes coffee brewing equipment and depreciates it over five years and reports the depreciation expense in cost of goods sold. Such depreciation expense related to capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported in cost of goods sold in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was
$9.1 million
,
$9.8 million
and
$10.4 million
, respectively. The Company capitalized coffee brewing equipment (included in machinery and equipment) in the amounts of
$10.8 million
and
$8.4 million
in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Leases
Leases are categorized as either operating or capital leases at inception. Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. An asset and a corresponding liability for the capital lease obligation are established for the cost of a capital lease. Capital lease obligations are amortized over the life of the lease.
For build-to-suit leases, the Company establishes an asset and liability for the estimated construction costs incurred to the extent that it is involved in the construction of structural improvements or takes construction risk prior to the commencement of the lease. A portion of the lease arrangement is allocated to the land for which the Company accrues rent expense during the construction period. The amount of rent expense to be accrued is determined using the fair value of the leased land at construction commencement and the Company’s incremental borrowing rate, and recognized on a straight-line basis. Upon exercise of the purchase option on a build-to-suit lease, the Company records an asset equal to the value of the option price that includes the value of the land and reverses the rent expense and the asset and liability established to record the construction costs incurred through the date of option exercise. See
Note 5
.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which differences are expected to reverse. Estimating the Company’s tax liabilities involves judgments related to uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. The Company makes certain estimates and judgments to determine tax expense for financial statement purposes as it evaluates the effect of tax credits, tax benefits and deductions, some of which result from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue or expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Changes to these estimates may result in significant changes to the Company’s tax provision in future periods. Each fiscal quarter the Company re-evaluates its tax provision and reconsiders its estimates and assumptions related to specific tax assets and liabilities, making adjustments as circumstances change.
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance
The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if a valuation allowance is required and considers whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets based on the likelihood that the benefits of the deferred tax assets will or will not ultimately be realized in future periods. In making this assessment, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified, such as recent operating results, and less consideration is given to less objective indicators, such as future income projections. After consideration of positive and negative evidence, including the recent history of income, if the Company determines that it is more likely than not that it will generate future income sufficient to realize its deferred tax assets, the Company will record a reduction in the valuation allowance. See
Note 21.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes sales revenue when all of the following have occurred: (1) delivery; (2) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists; (3) pricing is fixed or determinable; and (4) collection is reasonably assured. When product sales are made “off-truck” to the Company’s customers at their places of business or products are shipped by third-party delivery “FOB Destination,“ title passes and revenue is recognized upon delivery. When customers pick up products at the Company's distribution centers, title passes and revenue is recognized upon product pick up.
Net Income Per Common Share
Net income per share (“EPS”) represents net income attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unallocated shares held by the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”). See
Note 17
. Diluted EPS represents net income attributable to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, inclusive of the dilutive impact of common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. However, nonvested restricted stock awards (referred to as participating securities) are excluded from the dilutive impact of common equivalent shares outstanding in accordance with authoritative guidance under the two-class method. The nonvested restricted stockholders are entitled to participate in dividends declared on common stock as if the shares were fully vested and hence are deemed to be participating securities. Under the two-class method, net income attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders is excluded from net income attributable to common stockholders for purposes of calculating basic and diluted EPS. Computation of EPS for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 includes the dilutive effect of
117,007
,
124,879
and
139,524
shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices below the closing price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period, but excludes the dilutive effect of
24,671
,
30,931
and
10,455
shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices above the closing price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. See
Note 22
.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Compensation cost for the ESOP is based on the fair market value of shares released or deemed to be released to employees in the period in which they are committed. Dividends on allocated shares retain the character of true dividends, but dividends on unallocated shares are considered compensation cost. As a leveraged ESOP with the Company as lender, a contra equity account is established to offset the Company’s note receivable. The contra account will change as compensation expense is recognized. See
Note 17
. The cost of shares purchased by the ESOP which have not been committed to be released or allocated to participants are shown as a contra-equity account “Unearned ESOP Shares” and are excluded from earnings per share calculations.
Share-based Compensation
The Company measures all share-based compensation cost at the grant date, based on the fair values of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest, and recognizes that cost as an expense on a straight line-basis in its consolidated statements of operations over the requisite service period. Fair value of restricted stock is the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The Company estimates the fair value of option awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which requires management to make certain assumptions for estimating the fair value of stock options at the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates, in management’s opinion, the existing models may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options. Although the fair value of stock options is determined using an option valuation model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
In addition, the Company estimates the expected impact of forfeited awards and recognizes share-based compensation cost only for those awards ultimately expected to vest. If actual forfeiture rates differ materially from the Company’s estimates, share-based compensation expense could differ significantly from the amounts the Company has recorded in the current period. The Company periodically reviews actual forfeiture experience and will revise its estimates, as necessary. The Company will recognize as compensation cost the cumulative effect of the change in estimated forfeiture rates on current and prior periods in earnings of the period of revision. As a result, if the Company revises its assumptions and estimates, the Company’s share-based compensation expense could change materially in the future.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The Company has outstanding share-based awards that have performance-based vesting conditions in addition to time-based vesting. Awards with performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain financial and other performance criteria as a condition to the vesting. The Company recognizes the estimated fair value of performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based compensation expense over the performance period based upon the Company’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, the Company reassesses the probability of achieving the performance criteria and the performance period required to meet those targets. Determining whether the performance criteria will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of share-based compensation expense may be revised periodically based on changes in the probability of achieving the performance criteria. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If performance goals are not met, no share-based compensation expense is recognized for the cancelled shares, and, to the extent share-based compensation expense was previously recognized for those cancelled shares, such share-based compensation expense is reversed. See
Note 18
.
Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”). Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but instead are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change which indicate that an asset might be impaired. Pursuant to ASC 350, the Company performs a qualitative assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on its consolidated balance sheets, to determine if there is a more likely than not indication that its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired as of June 30. If the indicators of impairment are present, the Company performs a quantitative assessment to determine the impairment of these assets as of the measurement date.
Testing for impairment of goodwill is a two-step process. The first step requires the Company to compare the fair value of its reporting units to the carrying value of the reporting units, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is potentially impaired and the Company then completes step two to measure the impairment loss, if any. The second step requires the calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is the residual fair value remaining after deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment by comparing their fair values to their carrying values. An impairment charge is recorded if the estimated fair value of such assets has decreased below their carrying values. There were
no
intangible asset or goodwill impairment charges recorded in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets consist of finite-lived intangible assets including acquired recipes, non-compete agreements, customer relationships, trade names, trademarks and a brand name. These assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are tested for impairment by grouping them with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made. The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. There were no other intangible asset impairment charges recorded in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs incurred through outside carriers are recorded as a component of the Company's selling expenses and were
$23.5 million
,
$13.3 million
and
$8.3 million
, respectively, in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015. The Company moved to 3PL for its long-haul distribution in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. As a result, payroll, benefits, vehicle costs and other costs associated with the Company’s internal operation of its long-haul distribution included elsewhere in selling expenses in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, are represented in outsourced shipping and handling costs beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2016. The amount associated with outside carriers for the Company's long-haul distribution recorded in shipping and handling costs in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 and in fiscal 2017 was less than the comparable aggregate operating costs associated with internally managing the Company’s long-haul distribution in the respective prior-year periods.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Collective Bargaining Agreements
Certain Company employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. The duration of these agreements extend to
2020
. At June 30, 2017, approximately
27%
of the Company's workforce was covered by such agreements.
Self-Insurance
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance mechanisms to provide for the potential liability of certain risks including workers’ compensation, health care benefits, general liability, product liability, property insurance and director and officers’ liability insurance. Liabilities associated with risks retained by the Company are not discounted and are estimated by considering historical claims experience, demographics, exposure and severity factors and other actuarial assumptions.
The Company's self-insurance for workers’ compensation liability includes estimated outstanding losses of unpaid claims. and allocated loss adjustment expenses (“ALAE”), case reserves, the development of known claims and incurred but not reported claims. ALAE are the direct expenses for settling specific claims. The amounts reflect per occurrence and annual aggregate limits maintained by the Company. The estimated liability analysis does not include estimating a provision for unallocated loss adjustment expenses.
The estimated gross undiscounted workers’ compensation liability relating to such claims was
$9.4 million
and
$14.7 million
respectively, and the estimated recovery from reinsurance was
$1.5 million
and
$2.4 million
, respectively, as of June 30, 2017 and 2016. The short-term and long-term accrued liabilities for workers’ compensation claims are presented on the Company's consolidated balance sheets in “Other current liabilities” and in “Accrued workers' compensation liabilities,” respectively. The estimated insurance receivable is included in “Other assets” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
At June 30, 2016, the Company had posted a
$7.4 million
letter of credit, as a security deposit with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers for workers’ compensation liability in California. The State of California notified the Company on December 13, 2016 that it had released and authorized the cancellation of the letter of credit. At June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company had also posted
$3.4 million
in cash and a
$4.3 million
letter of credit, respectively, as a security deposit for self-insuring workers’ compensation, general liability and auto insurance coverages outside of California.
The estimated liability related to the Company's self-insured group medical insurance at June 30, 2017 and 2016 was
$2.5 million
and
$1.3 million
, respectively, recorded on an incurred but not reported basis, within deductible limits, based on actual claims and the average lag time between the date insurance claims are filed and the date those claims are paid.
The Company is self-insured for general liability, product liability and commercial auto liability and accrues the cost of the insurance based on estimates of the aggregate liability claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions and historical claims experience.
The Company's liability reserve for such claims was
$0.9 million
at June 30, 2017 and 2016.
The estimated liability related to the Company's self-insured group medical insurance, general liability, product liability and commercial auto liability is included on the Company's consolidated balance sheets in “Other current liabilities.”
Pension Plans
The Company’s pension plans are not admitting new participants, therefore, changes to pension liabilities are primarily due to market fluctuations of investments for existing participants and changes in interest rates. All plans are accounted for using the guidance of ASC 710, “Compensation—General“ and ASC 715 “Compensation-Retirement Benefits“ and are measured as of the end of the fiscal year.
The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension or postretirement plan as an asset or liability on its consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the funded status are recognized through AOCI, in the year in which the changes occur. See
Note 15
.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Business Combinations
The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting. The purchase price of each business acquired is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on information regarding their respective fair values on the date of acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the separately identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill. Management determines the fair values used in purchase price allocations for intangible assets based on historical data, estimated discounted future cash flows, and expected royalty rates for trademarks and trade names, as well as certain other information. The valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires a number of judgments and is subject to revision as additional information about the fair value of assets and liabilities becomes available. Additional information, which existed as of the acquisition date but unknown to the Company at that time, may become known during the remainder of the measurement period, a period not to exceed twelve months from the acquisition date. Adjustments in the purchase price allocation may require a recasting of the amounts allocated to goodwill and intangible assets. If such an adjustment is required, the Company will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment, including the effect on earnings of any amounts it would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Transaction costs, including legal and accounting expenses, are expensed as incurred and are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. Contingent consideration, such as earnout, is deferred as a short-term or long-term liability based on an estimate of the timing of the future payment. These contingent consideration liabilities are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date and are re-measured quarterly based on the then assessed fair value and adjusted if necessary. The results of operations of businesses acquired are included in the Company's consolidated financial statements from their dates of acquisition. See
Note 3
.
Restructuring Plans
The Company accounts for exit or disposal of activities in accordance with ASC 420, “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.“ The Company defines a business restructuring as an exit or disposal activity that includes but is not limited to a program which is planned and controlled by management and materially changes either the scope of a business or the manner in which that business is conducted. Business restructuring charges may include (i) one-time termination benefits related to employee separations, (ii) contract termination costs and (iii) other related costs associated with exit or disposal activities.
A liability is recognized and measured at its fair value for one-time termination benefits once the plan of termination is communicated to affected employees and it meets all of the following criteria: (i) management commits to a plan of termination, (ii) the plan identifies the number of employees to be terminated and their job classifications or functions, locations and the expected completion date, (iii) the plan establishes the terms of the benefit arrangement and (iv) it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or the plan will be withdrawn. Contract termination costs include costs to terminate a contract or costs that will continue to be incurred under the contract without benefit to the Company. A liability is recognized and measured at its fair value when the Company either terminates the contract or ceases using the rights conveyed by the contract.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB“) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU“) No. 2016-19, “Technical Corrections and Improvements“ (“ASU 2016-19“). The amendments cover a wide range of topics in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments represent changes to make corrections or improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. ASU 2016-19 is effective for the Company immediately. Adoption of ASU 2016-19 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments” (“ASU 2015-16”). ASU 2015-16 eliminates the requirement that an acquirer in a business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment, including the effect on earnings of any amounts it would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The Company adopted ASU 2015-16 beginning July 1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2015-16 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-12, “Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965), (Part I) Fully Benefit-Responsive Investment Contracts, (Part II) Plan Investment Disclosures, (Part III) Measurement Date Practical Expedient” (“ASU 2015-12”). ASU 2015-12 eliminates requirements that employee benefit plans measure the fair value of fully benefit-responsive investment contracts (“FBRICs“) and provide the related fair value disclosures. As a result, FBRICs are measured, presented and disclosed only at contract value. Also, plans will be required to disaggregate their investments measured using fair value by general type, either on the face of the financial statements or in the notes, and self-directed brokerage accounts are one general type. Plans no longer have to disclose the net appreciation/depreciation in fair value of investments by general type or individual investments equal to or greater than 5% of net assets available for benefits. In addition, a plan with a fiscal year end that does not coincide with the end of a calendar month is allowed to measure its investments and investment-related accounts using the month end closest to its fiscal year end. The new guidance for FBRICs and plan investment disclosures should be applied retrospectively. The measurement date practical expedient should be applied prospectively. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-12 beginning July 1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2015-12 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)” (“ASU 2015-07”). ASU 2015-07 removes the requirement to categorize investments for which the fair values are measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient within the fair value hierarchy. It also limits certain disclosures to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using the practical expedient. ASU 2015-07 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-07 beginning July 1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2015-07 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern“ (“ASU 2014-15“). ASU 2014-15 amended ASC 205-40-Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern and requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are available to be issued and provide related disclosures of such conditions and events. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 apply to all entities and are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company adopted ASU 2014-15 beginning July 1, 2016. Adoption of ASU 2014-15 did not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost“ (“ASU 2017-07“). ASU 2017-07 amends the requirements in GAAP related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for an entity’s sponsored defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The guidance in ASU 2017-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption will not have a significant impact on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment“ (“ASU 2017-04“). The amendments in ASU 2017-04 address concerns regarding the cost and complexity of the two-step goodwill impairment test, and remove the second step of the test. An entity will apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 does not amend the optional qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment. The guidance in ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2020. Adoption of ASU 2017-04 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business“ (“ASU 2017-01“). The amendments in ASU 2017-01 clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses and provide a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) is not a business. If the screen is not met, the amendments (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace the missing elements. The guidance in ASU 2017-01 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted in certain circumstances. ASU 2017-01 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2017-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”). The amendments require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As a result, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments do not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The guidance in ASU 2016-18 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted in certain circumstances. ASU 2016-18 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2016-18 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified in classifying certain cash receipts and cash payments based on the guidance in ASC 230. ASC 230 is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. The application of judgment has resulted in diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are classified. Certain cash receipts and cash payments may have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 clarifies that an entity will first apply any relevant guidance in ASC 230 and in other applicable topics. If there is no guidance that addresses those cash receipts and cash payments, an entity will determine each separately identifiable source or use and classify the receipt or payment based on the nature of the cash flow. If a receipt or payment has aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannot be separated, classification will depend on the predominant source or use. The guidance in ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted in certain circumstances. ASU 2016-15 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting“ (“ASU 2016-09“). ASU 2016-09 is being issued as part of the FASB's Simplification Initiative. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The guidance in ASU 2016-09 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. ASU 2016-09 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)“ (“ASU 2016-02“), which introduces a new lessee model that brings substantially all leases onto the balance sheet. Under the new guidance, lessees are required to recognize a lease liability, which represents the discounted obligation to make future minimum lease payments and a related right-of-use asset. For public business entities, ASU 2016-02 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption will have a significant impact on the Company's financial position resulting from the increase in assets and liabilities.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Under ASU 2016-01, entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale equity securities in other comprehensive income, and they will no longer be able to use the cost method of accounting for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. The guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair values into different categories (that is trading or available for sale) is no longer required. ASU 2016-01 eliminates certain disclosure requirements related to financial instruments measured at amortized cost and adds disclosures related to the measurement categories of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-01 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Entities will continue to apply their existing impairment models to inventories that are accounted for using last-in first-out or LIFO and the retail inventory method or RIM. Under current guidance, net realizable value is one of several calculations an entity needs to make to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. ASU 2015-11 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, and the guidance must be applied prospectively after the date of adoption. ASU 2015-11 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2015-11 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers under ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09“). ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. On August 12, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,“ which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year allowing early adoption as of the original effective date of January 1, 2017. The deferral results in the new accounting standard being effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 along with the related amendments and interpretations issued under ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20 on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Note 3. Acquisitions
China Mist Brands, Inc.
On October 11, 2016, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist, a provider of flavored iced teas and iced green teas. As part of the transaction, the Company assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing
17,400
square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice.
The Company acquired China Mist for aggregate purchase consideration of
$12.2 million
consisting of
$11.2 million
in cash paid at closing, including estimated working capital adjustments of
$0.4 million
, post-closing final working capital adjustments of
$0.6 million
and up to
$0.5 million
in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018. This contingent earnout liability is currently estimated to have a fair value of
$0.5 million
and is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017. The earnout is estimated to be paid in calendar 2019.
In fiscal 2017, the Company incurred
$0.2 million
in transaction costs related to the China Mist acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and accounting expenses, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
The financial effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not significant to the Company's consolidated results of operations.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is final.
The following table summarizes the final allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Fair Value
|
|
Estimated Useful Life (years)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid, net of cash acquired
|
$
|
11,183
|
|
|
|
Post-closing final working capital adjustments
|
553
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
500
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
$
|
12,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
811
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
544
|
|
|
|
Prepaid assets
|
48
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
189
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
2,927
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
Recipes
|
930
|
|
|
7
|
Non-compete agreement
|
100
|
|
|
5
|
Customer relationships
|
2,000
|
|
|
10
|
Trade name/Trademark—indefinite-lived
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
Total consideration, net of cash acquired
|
$
|
12,236
|
|
|
|
In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of
$2.9 million
, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded
$3.0 million
in finite-lived intangible assets that included recipes, a non-compete agreement and customer relationships and
$5.1 million
in indefinite-lived trade name/trademark. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is
8.9
years.
The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP.
The fair value assigned to the recipes was determined utilizing the replacement cost method, which captures the direct cost of the development effort plus lost profits over the time to re-create the recipes.
The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreement was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings with the agreement in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreement in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of China Mist's non-compete agreement.
The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined based on management's estimate of the retention rate and utilizing certain benchmarks. Revenue and earnings projections were also significant inputs into estimating the value of customer relationships.
The fair value assigned to the trade name/trademark was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge.
West Coast Coffee Company, Inc.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
On February 7, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee, a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on the convenience store, grocery and foodservice channels. As part of the transaction, the Company entered into a three-year lease on West Coast Coffee’s existing
20,400
square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, which expires January 31, 2020, and assumed leases on six branch warehouses consisting of an aggregate of
24,150
square feet in Oregon, California and Nevada, expiring on various dates through November 2020. The Company acquired West Coast Coffee for aggregate purchase consideration of
$15.7 million
, which included
$14.7 million
in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of
$1.2 million
, and up to
$1.0 million
in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the twenty-four months following the closing. This contingent earnout liability is currently estimated to have a fair value of
$0.6 million
and is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017. The earnout is estimated to be paid within the next twenty-four months.
In fiscal 2017, the Company incurred
$0.3 million
in transaction costs related to the West Coast Coffee acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and accounting expenses, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
The financial effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not significant to the Company's consolidated results of operations.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is preliminary as the Company is in the process of finalizing the valuation.
The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Fair Value
|
|
Estimated Useful Life (years)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid, net of cash acquired
|
$
|
14,671
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
600
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
$
|
15,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
$
|
955
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
939
|
|
|
|
Prepaid assets
|
20
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
7,797
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
100
|
|
|
5
|
Customer relationships
|
4,400
|
|
|
10
|
Trade name—finite-lived
|
260
|
|
|
7
|
Brand name—finite-lived
|
250
|
|
|
1.7
|
Accounts payable
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
Total consideration, net of cash acquired
|
$
|
15,271
|
|
|
|
The preliminary purchase price allocation is subject to change based on numerous factors, including the final adjusted purchase price and the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of
$7.8 million
, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded
$5.0 million
in finite-lived intangible assets that included non-compete agreements,
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
customer relationships, a trade name and a brand name. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is
9.3
years.
The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP.
The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreements was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings with the agreements in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreements in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of West Coast Coffee's non-compete agreements.
The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge.
The fair values assigned to the trade name and the brand name were determined utilizing the relief from royalty method. The relief from royalty method is based on the premise that the intangible asset owner would be willing to pay a royalty rate to license the subject asset. The analysis involves forecasting revenue over the life of the asset, applying a royalty rate and a tax rate, and then discounting the savings back to present value at an appropriate discount rate.
Rae’ Launo Corporation
On January 12, 2015, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Rae’ Launo Corporation (“RLC”) relating to its DSD and in-room distribution business in the Southeastern United States (the “RLC Acquisition”). The purchase price was
$1.5 million
, consisting of
$1.2 million
in cash paid at closing and annual earnout payments of
$0.1 million
each year over a
three
-year period based on achievement of certain milestones.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired at the date of acquisition, based on the final purchase price allocation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Assets Acquired
|
|
Estimated Useful Life (years)
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreement
|
20
|
|
|
3.0
|
Customer relationships
|
870
|
|
|
4.5
|
Total finite-lived intangible assets
|
890
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
272
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
Definite-lived intangible assets consist of a non-compete agreement and customer relationships. Total net carrying value of definite-lived intangible assets as of June 30, 2017 and 2016 was
$0.4 million
and
$0.6 million
, respectively, and accumulated amortization as of June 30, 2017 and 2016 was
$0.5 million
and
$0.3 million
, respectively. Estimated aggregate amortization of definite-lived intangible assets, calculated on a straight-line basis and based on estimated fair values is
$0.2 million
in each of the next two fiscal years.
Note 4. Restructuring Plans
Corporate Relocation Plan
On February 5, 2015, the Company announced the Corporate Relocation Plan to close its Torrance, California facility and relocate its corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to the New Facility in Northlake, Texas. Approximately
350
positions were impacted as a result of the
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Torrance Facility closure. The Company’s decision resulted from a comprehensive review of alternatives designed to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities.
Expenses related to the Corporate Relocation Plan in fiscal 2017 consisted of
$1.1 million
in employee retention and separation benefits,
$6.2 million
in facility-related costs including lease of temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company's headquarters and the relocation of certain distribution operations and
$1.3 million
in other related costs including travel, legal, consulting and other professional services. Facility-related costs in fiscal 2017 also included
$2.5 million
in non-cash charges, including
$1.1 million
in depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and
$1.4 million
in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.
The following table sets forth the activity in liabilities associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Balances,
June 30, 2016
|
|
Additions
|
|
Payments
|
|
Non-Cash Settled(2)
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Balances,
June 30, 2017(1)
|
Employee-related costs(1)
|
$
|
2,342
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
3,150
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
Facility-related costs
|
—
|
|
|
6,187
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
200
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
$
|
2,542
|
|
|
$
|
8,590
|
|
|
$
|
8,356
|
|
|
$
|
2,475
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion
|
$
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
Non-current portion
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total
|
$
|
2,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
_______________
(1) Included in “Accrued payroll expenses” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Non-cash settled facility-related costs represent (a) depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and included in “Property, plant and equipment, net” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets, and (b) non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.
The Company estimated that it would incur approximately
$31 million
in cash costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan consisting of
$18 million
in employee retention and separation benefits,
$5 million
in facility-related costs and
$8 million
in other related costs. Since the adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan through June 30, 2017, the Company has recognized a total of
$31.5 million
in aggregate cash costs including
$17.1 million
in employee retention and separation benefits,
$7.0 million
in facility-related costs related to the temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company's headquarters, relocation of the Company’s Torrance operations and certain distribution operations and
$7.4 million
in other related costs. The Company completed the Corporate Relocation Plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and had
$0.3 million
in accrued costs remaining to be paid in fiscal 2018. The Company also recognized from inception through June 30, 2017 non-cash depreciation expense of
$2.3 million
associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and
$1.4 million
in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility. On July 13, 2017, the Company received correspondence from the WCT Pension Trust stating that it had liability for a share of the WCTPP unfunded vested benefits based on the WCT Pension Trust’s claim that certain of our employment actions resulting from the Corporate Relocation Plan amounted to a partial withdrawal from the WCTPP. See
Note 26
.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table sets forth the activity in liabilities associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan from the time of adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan through the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Balances,
June 30, 2014
|
|
Additions
|
|
Payments
|
|
Non-Cash Settled
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Balances,
June 30, 2017
|
Employee-related costs(1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17,352
|
|
|
$
|
17,051
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
Facility-related costs(2)
|
—
|
|
|
10,779
|
|
|
7,048
|
|
|
3,731
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
—
|
|
|
7,424
|
|
|
7,424
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total(2)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
35,555
|
|
|
$
|
31,523
|
|
|
$
|
3,731
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
_______________
(1) Included in “Accrued payroll expenses” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Non-cash settled facility-related costs represent (a) depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and included in “Property, plant and equipment, net” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets and (b) non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.
DSD Restructuring Plan
On February 21, 2017, the Company announced the DSD Restructuring Plan to reorganize its DSD operations in an effort to realign functions into a channel-based selling organization, streamline operations, acquire certain channel specific expertise, and improve selling effectiveness and financial results. The strategic decision to undertake the DSD Restructuring Plan resulted from an ongoing operational review of various initiatives within the DSD selling organization. The Company expects to complete the DSD Restructuring Plan by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018.
The Company estimates that it will recognize approximately
$3.7 million
to
$4.9 million
of pre-tax restructuring charges by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018 consisting of approximately
$1.9 million
to
$2.7 million
in employee-related costs, including severance, prorated bonuses for bonus eligible employees, contractual termination payments and outplacement services, and
$1.8 million
to
$2.2 million
in other related costs, including legal, recruiting, consulting, other professional services, and travel. The Company may also incur other charges not currently contemplated due to events that may occur as a result of, or associated with, the DSD Restructuring Plan.
Expenses related to the DSD Restructuring Plan in fiscal 2017 consisted of
$1.1 million
in employee-related costs and
$1.3 million
in other related costs. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had paid a total of
$1.7 million
of these costs and had a balance of
$0.7 million
in DSD Restructuring Plan-related liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.
Note 5. New Facility
Lease Agreement and Purchase Option Exercise
On June 15, 2016, the Company exercised the purchase option to purchase the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement dated as of July 17, 2015, as amended (the “Lease Agreement“). On September 15, 2016 (“Purchase Option Closing Date“), the Company closed the purchase option and acquired the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon for an aggregate purchase price of
$42.5 million
(the “Purchase Price”), consisting of the purchase option price of
$42.0 million
based on actual construction costs incurred as of the Purchase Option Closing Date plus the option exercise fee, plus amounts paid in respect of real estate commissions, title insurance, and recording fees. Upon closing of the purchase option, the Company recorded the aggregate purchase price of the New Facility in “Property, plant and equipment, net“ on its consolidated balance sheet. The asset related to the New Facility lease obligation included in “Property, plant and equipment, net,“ the offsetting liability for the lease obligation included in “Other long-term liabilities“ and the rent expense related to the land were reversed. Concurrent with the purchase option closing, on September 15, 2016, the Company terminated the Lease Agreement. The Company did not pay any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the Lease Agreement.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Development Management Agreement
In conjunction with the Lease Agreement, the Company also entered into a Development Management Agreement with an affiliate of Stream Realty Partners (the “DMA“) to manage, coordinate, represent, assist and advise the Company on matters from the pre-development through construction of the New Facility. Pursuant to the DMA, the Company will pay the developer a development fee, an oversight fee and a development services fee the amounts of which are included in the construction costs incurred-to-date. As of June 30, 2017, the DMA has concluded and the Company had incurred
$4.0 million
under this agreement which amount is included in “Building and Facilities—New Facility“ (see
Note 13
) of which
$0.4 million
remains to be paid which is included in Accounts payable on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017.
Amended Building Contract
On September 17, 2016, the Company and The Haskell Company (“Builder”) entered into a Change Order, which, among other things, amended the building contract previously entered into between the Company and Builder to provide a guaranteed maximum price and the basis for the price and the scope of Builder’s services in connection with the construction of the New Facility (the “Amended Building Contract“).
Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, Builder will provide pre-construction and construction services, including specialized industrial design and construction work in connection with Builder’s construction of certain production equipment that will be installed in portions of the New Facility (the “Project”). The Company engaged other designers and builders to provide traditional construction work on the Project site, including for the foundation, building envelope and roof of the New Facility. Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, the Company will pay Builder up to
$21.9 million
for Builder’s services in connection with the Project. This amount is a guaranteed maximum price and is subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Amended Building Contract. The Amended Building Contract includes an “IDB Work Contract Schedule,” which sets forth interim milestones, durations and material dates in relation to the performance and timing of Builder’s work. The Amended Building Contract includes remedies for the Company in the event agreed milestone dates relating to Builder’s services are not met. The Amended Building Contract is subject to customary undertakings, covenants, obligations, rights and conditions. In April 2017, the Company and Builder entered into a change order to change the scope of work which added
$0.6 million
to the Amended Building Contract. Builder’s work on the Project has been completed as of June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has paid
$20.3 million
under this agreement, with a remaining
$2.2 million
to be paid which amount is included in “Building and Facilities—New Facility.“ See
Note 13
.
New Facility Costs
The Company estimated that the total construction costs including the cost of land for the New Facility would be approximately
$60 million
. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has incurred an aggregate of
$60.8 million
and has outstanding contractual obligations of
$1.6 million
, which amounts are included in “Building and Facilities-New Facility.” See
Notes 13
and
23
. In addition to the costs to complete the construction of the New Facility, the Company estimated that it would incur approximately
$35 million
to
$39 million
for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related expenditures of which the Company has incurred an aggregate of
$33.2 million
as of June 30, 2017, including
$20.3 million
under the Amended Building Contract, and has outstanding contractual obligations of
$2.8 million
. See
Note 23
. The majority of the capital expenditures associated with machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related expenditures for the New Facility were incurred in the first three quarters of fiscal 2017. The Company commenced distribution activities at the New Facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and initial production activities late in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company began roasting coffee in the New Facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
Note 6. Sales of Assets
Sale of Spice Assets
In order to focus on its core products, on December 8, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the Spice Assets to Harris. Harris acquired substantially all of the Company’s personal property used exclusively in connection with the
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
manufacture, processing and distribution of raw, processed and blended spices and certain other culinary products (collectively, the “Spice Assets”), including certain equipment; trademarks, trade names and other intellectual property assets; contract rights under sales and purchase orders and certain other agreements; and a list of certain customers, other than the Company’s DSD customers, and assumed certain liabilities relating to the Spice Assets. The Company received
$6.0 million
in cash at closing, and is eligible to receive an earnout amount of up to
$5.0 million
over a
three
year period based upon a percentage of certain institutional spice sales by Harris following the closing. Gain from the earnout on the sale is recognized when earned and when realization is assured beyond a reasonable doubt. The Company recognized
$1.0 million
and
$0.5 million
in earnout during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, a portion of which is included in “Net gains from sale of Spice Assets” in the Company's consolidated statements of operations. The sale of the Spice Assets does not represent a strategic shift for the Company and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's results of operations because the Company will continue to sell a complete portfolio of spice and other culinary products purchased from Harris under a supply agreement to its DSD customers.
Sale of Torrance Facility
On July 15, 2016, the Company completed the sale of the Torrance Facility, consisting of approximately
665,000
square feet of buildings located on approximately
20.3
acres of land, for an aggregate cash sale price of
$43.0 million
, which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes. Cash proceeds from the sale of the Torrance Facility were
$42.5 million
.
Following the closing of the sale, the Company leased back the Torrance Facility on a triple net basis through October 31, 2016 at zero base rent, and exercised two one-month extensions at a base rent of
$100,000
per month. In accordance with ASC 840, “Leases,” due to the Company’s continuing involvement with the property, the Company accounted for the transaction as a financing transaction, deferred the gain on sale of the Torrance Facility and recorded the net sale proceeds of
$42.5 million
and accrued non-cash interest expense on the financing transaction in “Sale-leaseback financing obligation” on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2016. The Company vacated the Torrance Facility in December 2016 and concluded the leaseback transaction. See
Note 7
. As a result, at December 31, 2016, the financing transaction qualified for sales recognition under ASC 840. Accordingly, in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized the net gain from sale of the Torrance Facility in the amount of
$37.4 million
, including non-cash interest expense of
$0.7 million
and non-cash rent expense of
$1.4 million
, representing the rent for the zero base rent period previously recorded in “Other current liabilities” and removed the amounts recorded in “Assets held for sale” and the “Sale-leaseback financing obligation” on its consolidated balance sheet.
Sale of Northern California Branch Property
On September 30, 2016, the Company completed the sale of its branch property in Northern California for a sale price of
$2.2 million
and leased it back through March 31, 2017, at a base rent of
$10,000
per month. The Company recognized a net gain on sale of the Northern California property in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 in the amount of
$2.0 million
.
Note 7. Assets Held for Sale
The Company had designated its Torrance Facility and one of its branch properties in Northern California as assets held for sale and recorded the carrying values of these properties in the aggregate amount of
$7.2 million
as “Assets held for sale“ on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016. As of June 30, 2017, these assets were sold. See
Note 6
.
Note 8. Derivative Instruments
Derivative Instruments Held
Coffee-Related Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to commodity price risk associated with its PTF green coffee purchase contracts, which are described further in
Note 2
. The Company utilizes forward and option contracts to manage exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows from forecasted purchases of green coffee attributable to commodity price risk. Certain of these
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
coffee-related derivative instruments utilized for risk management purposes have been designated as cash flow hedges, while other coffee-related derivative instruments have not been designated as cash flow hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting despite hedging the Company's future cash flows on an economic basis.
The following table summarizes the notional volumes for the coffee-related derivative instruments held by the Company at June 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
Long coffee pounds
|
|
33,038
|
|
|
32,550
|
|
Derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
Long coffee pounds
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
Less: Short coffee pounds
|
|
—
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
Total
|
|
35,159
|
|
|
33,980
|
|
Coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges outstanding as of
June 30, 2017
will expire within
18 months
.
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Financial Statements
Balance Sheets
Fair values of derivative instruments on the Company's consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments
Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Accounting Hedges
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Financial Statement Location:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term derivative assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee-related derivative instruments(1)
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
3,771
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
Long-term derivative assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee-related derivative instruments(2)
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
2,575
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Short-term derivative liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee-related derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
1,733
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Long-term derivative liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee-related derivative instruments(2)
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
________________
(1) Included in “Short-term derivative liabilities” on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017.
(2) Included in “Other long-term liabilities” on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017.
Statements of Operations
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table presents pretax net gains and losses for the Company's coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, as recognized in “AOCI,” “Cost of goods sold” and “Other, net”:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
Financial Statement Classification
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
Net (losses) gains recognized in AOCI (effective portion)
|
|
$
|
(4,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
(14,295
|
)
|
|
AOCI
|
Net gains (losses) recognized in earnings (effective portion)
|
|
$
|
1,732
|
|
|
$
|
(13,184
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,211
|
|
|
Costs of goods sold
|
Net losses recognized in earnings (ineffective portion)
|
|
$
|
(456
|
)
|
|
$
|
(575
|
)
|
|
$
|
(325
|
)
|
|
Other, net
|
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, there were
no
gains or losses recognized in earnings as a result of excluding amounts from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or as a result of reclassifications to earnings following the discontinuance of any cash flow hedges.
Net losses (gains) on derivative instruments in the Company's consolidated statements of cash flows also includes net losses (gains) on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges reclassified to cost of goods sold from AOCI in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Gains and losses on derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges are included in “Other, net” in the Company's consolidated statements of operations and in “Net losses (gains) on derivative instruments and investments” in the Company's consolidated statements of cash flows.
Net gains and losses recorded in “Other, net” are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
(298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,992
|
)
|
Net gains (losses) on investments
|
|
286
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
Net (losses) gains on derivative instruments and investments(1)
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
|
313
|
|
|
(3,262
|
)
|
Other gains, net
|
|
325
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
248
|
|
Other, net
|
|
$
|
(1,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
(3,014
|
)
|
___________
(1) Excludes net losses and net gains on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges recorded in cost of goods sold in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
The Company has agreements in place that allow for the financial right of offset for derivative assets and liabilities at settlement or in the event of default under the agreements. Additionally, the Company maintains accounts with its brokers to facilitate financial derivative transactions in support of its risk management activities. Based on the value of the Company’s positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to deposit cash into these broker accounts.
The following table presents the Company’s net exposure from its offsetting derivative asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral on deposit with its counterparty as of the reporting dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount Reported on Balance Sheet
|
|
Netting Adjustments
|
|
Cash Collateral Posted
|
|
Net Exposure
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
(132
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,369
|
|
|
$
|
(132
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,237
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
$
|
6,586
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,586
|
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Cash Flow Hedges
Changes in the fair value of the Company's coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, to the extent effective, are deferred in AOCI and reclassified into cost of goods sold in the same period or periods in which the hedged forecasted purchases affect earnings, or when it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. Based on recorded values at June 30, 2017,
$(1.6) million
of net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are expected to be reclassified into cost of goods sold within the next twelve months. These recorded values are based on market prices of the commodities as of June 30, 2017. Due to the volatile nature of commodity prices, actual gains or losses realized within the next twelve months will likely differ from these values.
Note 9. Investments
In fiscal 2017, the Company liquidated substantially all of its trading securities to fund expenditures associated with its New Facility in Northlake, Texas. The Company had
$0.4 million
and
$25.6 million
in short-term investments at June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table shows gains and losses on trading securities by the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Total gains (losses) recognized from trading securities
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
$
|
(270
|
)
|
Less: Realized gains from sales of trading securities
|
|
1,909
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
89
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains from trading securities
|
|
$
|
(1,623
|
)
|
|
$
|
582
|
|
|
$
|
(359
|
)
|
Note 10. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock(1)
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee-related derivative assets(2)
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2)
|
|
$
|
2,179
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,179
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2)
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock(1)
|
|
$
|
25,591
|
|
|
$
|
21,976
|
|
|
$
|
3,615
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee-related derivative assets(2)
|
|
$
|
6,346
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,346
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee-related derivative assets(2)
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________
|
|
(1)
|
Included in “Short-term investments” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
|
(2)
|
The Company's coffee derivative instruments are traded over-the-counter and, therefore, classified as Level 2.
|
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no transfers between the levels.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 11. Accounts Receivable, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
44,531
|
|
|
$
|
43,113
|
|
Other receivables(1)
|
|
2,636
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
(721
|
)
|
|
(714
|
)
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
46,446
|
|
|
$
|
44,364
|
|
__________
(1) At June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, the Company had recorded
$0.4 million
and
$0.5 million
in “Other receivables“ included in “Accounts receivable, net“ on its consolidated balance sheets representing earnout receivable from Harris.
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2014
|
$
|
(651
|
)
|
Recovery
|
8
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2015
|
$
|
(643
|
)
|
Provision
|
(71
|
)
|
Write-off
|
$
|
—
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2016
|
$
|
(714
|
)
|
Provision
|
(325
|
)
|
Write-off
|
318
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2017
|
$
|
(721
|
)
|
Note 12. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Coffee
|
|
|
|
|
Processed
|
|
$
|
14,085
|
|
|
$
|
12,362
|
|
Unprocessed
|
|
17,083
|
|
|
13,534
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,168
|
|
|
$
|
25,896
|
|
Tea and culinary products
|
|
|
|
|
Processed
|
|
$
|
20,741
|
|
|
$
|
15,384
|
|
Unprocessed
|
|
74
|
|
|
377
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
20,815
|
|
|
$
|
15,761
|
|
Coffee brewing equipment parts
|
|
$
|
4,268
|
|
|
$
|
4,721
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
56,251
|
|
|
$
|
46,378
|
|
In addition to product cost, inventory costs include expenditures such as direct labor and certain supply and overhead expenses incurred in bringing the inventory to its existing condition and location. The “Unprocessed” inventory values as stated in the above table represent the value of raw materials and the “Processed” inventory values represent all other products consisting primarily of finished goods.
Inventories were higher at the end of fiscal 2017 due to the commencement of the New Facility's manufacturing operations and incremental inventory from China Mist and West Coast Coffee as compared to lower levels of inventory at the Torrance Facility at the end of fiscal 2016 due to its anticipated closing. Notwithstanding this increase in total inventories at the end of fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 levels, inventories of manufactured spice products decreased at the end of fiscal 2017 compared to fiscal 2016 levels, primarily due to the liquidation of spice inventories in connection with the sale of the
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Spice Assets. As a result, the Company recorded
$3.4 million
in beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold in fiscal 2017, which increased income before taxes in fiscal 2017 by
$3.4 million
.
Inventories decreased at the end of fiscal 2016 compared to fiscal 2015, primarily due to production consolidation and the sale of certain processed and unprocessed inventories to Harris at cost upon conclusion of the transition services provided by the Company in connection with the sale of the Spice Assets. Inventories decreased at the end of fiscal 2015 compared to fiscal 2014, primarily due to the consolidation and the sale of certain manufactured inventories to Harris. As a result, the Company recorded in cost of goods sold
$4.2 million
and
$4.9 million
in beneficial effect of liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which increased income before taxes in fiscal 2016 and 2015 by
$4.2 million
and
$4.9 million
, respectively.
Current cost of coffee, tea and culinary product inventories exceeds the LIFO cost by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Coffee
|
|
$
|
13,351
|
|
|
$
|
14,462
|
|
Tea and culinary products
|
|
4,043
|
|
|
7,139
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,394
|
|
|
$
|
21,601
|
|
Note 13. Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Buildings and facilities
|
|
$
|
108,682
|
|
|
$
|
82,878
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
201,236
|
|
|
182,227
|
|
Equipment under capital leases
|
|
7,540
|
|
|
11,982
|
|
Capitalized software
|
|
21,794
|
|
|
21,545
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
12,758
|
|
|
16,077
|
|
|
|
$
|
352,010
|
|
|
$
|
314,709
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
(192,280
|
)
|
|
(206,162
|
)
|
Land
|
|
16,336
|
|
|
9,869
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
176,066
|
|
|
$
|
118,416
|
|
Capital leases consisted mainly of vehicle leases at June 30, 2017 and 2016. Depreciation and amortization expense includes amortization expense for assets recorded under capitalized leases.
The Company capitalized coffee brewing equipment (included in machinery and equipment) in the amounts of
$10.8 million
and
$8.4 million
in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. Depreciation expense related to the capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported as cost of goods sold was
$9.1 million
,
$9.8 million
and
$10.4 million
in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Maintenance and repairs to property, plant and equipment charged to expense for the years ended June 30, 2017, 2016, and 2015 were
$8.0 million
,
$7.7 million
and
$8.2 million
, respectively.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 14. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of changes in the carrying value of goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Balance at June 30, 2015
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
Additions
|
|
—
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2016
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
Additions (China Mist)
|
|
2,927
|
|
Additions (West Coast Coffee)(1)
|
|
7,797
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
10,996
|
|
___________
(1) Reflects the preliminary purchase price allocation for West Coast Coffee. Subject to change based on numerous factors, including the final adjusted purchase price and the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Adjustments in the purchase price allocation may require a recasting of the amounts allocated to goodwill and intangible assets.
The following is a summary of the Company’s amortized and unamortized intangible assets other than goodwill:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount(1)
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization(1)
|
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
17,353
|
|
|
$
|
(10,883
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,953
|
|
|
$
|
(10,373
|
)
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
220
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
20
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Recipes
|
|
930
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Trade name/brand name
|
|
510
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total amortized intangible assets
|
|
$
|
19,013
|
|
|
$
|
(11,093
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,973
|
|
|
$
|
(10,383
|
)
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names with indefinite lives
|
|
$
|
3,640
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,640
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Trademarks and brand name with indefinite lives
|
|
7,058
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total unamortized intangible assets
|
|
$
|
10,698
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,628
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$
|
29,711
|
|
|
$
|
(11,093
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,601
|
|
|
$
|
(10,383
|
)
|
___________
(1) Reflects the preliminary purchase price allocation for West Coast Coffee. Subject to change based on numerous factors, including the final adjusted purchase price and the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. Adjustments in the purchase price allocation may require a recasting of the amounts allocated to goodwill and intangible assets.
Aggregate amortization expense for the past three fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended:
|
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
710
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
June 30, 2015
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ending:
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
$
|
1,197
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
1,081
|
|
June 30, 2020
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
June 30, 2022
|
|
$
|
828
|
|
Remaining weighted average amortization periods for intangible assets with finite lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
9.1
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
4.4
|
Recipes
|
|
6.3
|
Trade name/brand name
|
|
4.3
|
Note 15. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company provides benefit plans for most full-time employees, including 401(k), health and other welfare benefit plans and, in certain circumstances, pension benefits. Generally the plans provide benefits based on years of service and/or a combination of years of service and earnings. In addition, the Company contributes to
two
multiemployer defined benefit pension plans,
one
multiemployer defined contribution pension plan and
ten
multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. In addition, the Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees and provides retiree medical coverage and, depending on the age of the retiree, dental and vision coverage. The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit to certain of its employees and retirees.
The Company is required to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company is also required to recognize in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules.
Single Employer Pension Plans
The Company has a defined benefit pension plan, the Farmer Bros. Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Farmer Bros. Plan”), for Company employees hired prior to January 1, 2010, who are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement. The Company amended the Farmer Bros. Plan, freezing the benefit for all participants effective June 30, 2011. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the Farmer Bros. Plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the Farmer Bros. Plan. As all plan participants became inactive following this pension curtailment, net (gain) loss is now amortized based on the remaining life expectancy of these participants instead of the remaining service period of these participants.
The Company also has two defined benefit pension plans for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements (the “Brewmatic Plan” and the “Hourly Employees' Plan”). Effective October 1, 2016, the Company froze benefit accruals and participation in the Hourly Employees' Plan. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the plan. After the freeze the participants in the plan are eligible to receive the Company's matching contributions to their 401(k).
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Obligations and Funded Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
|
|
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
|
|
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Change in projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
152,325
|
|
|
$
|
136,962
|
|
|
$
|
4,574
|
|
|
$
|
4,064
|
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
|
$
|
3,145
|
|
Service cost
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
389
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
5,277
|
|
|
5,875
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
137
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
(4,556
|
)
|
|
15,999
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
682
|
|
|
(233
|
)
|
|
687
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(6,755
|
)
|
|
(6,511
|
)
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Projected benefit obligation at the end of the year
|
|
$
|
146,291
|
|
|
$
|
152,325
|
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
|
$
|
4,574
|
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
91,201
|
|
|
$
|
94,815
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
3,291
|
|
|
$
|
2,447
|
|
|
$
|
2,104
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
10,874
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
85
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
287
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(6,755
|
)
|
|
(6,511
|
)
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
(344
|
)
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year
|
|
$
|
97,304
|
|
|
$
|
91,201
|
|
|
$
|
3,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
2,999
|
|
|
$
|
2,447
|
|
Funded status at end of year (underfunded) overfunded
|
|
$
|
(48,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,882
|
)
|
Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
(48,987
|
)
|
|
(61,124
|
)
|
|
(964
|
)
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
(1,882
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(48,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61,124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,882
|
)
|
Amounts recognized in AOCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
59,007
|
|
|
70,246
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
988
|
|
Total AOCI (not adjusted for applicable tax)
|
|
$
|
59,007
|
|
|
$
|
70,246
|
|
|
$
|
2,135
|
|
|
$
|
2,756
|
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
988
|
|
Weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
3.80
|
%
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost and
Other Changes Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (OCI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
|
|
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
|
|
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
5,277
|
|
|
5,875
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
137
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(6,067
|
)
|
|
(6,470
|
)
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
(149
|
)
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
1,085
|
|
|
$
|
816
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
Other changes recognized in OCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(9,363
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,913
|
|
|
$
|
(519
|
)
|
|
$
|
859
|
|
|
$
|
(317
|
)
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
(1,875
|
)
|
|
(1,411
|
)
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Total recognized in OCI
|
|
$
|
(11,238
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,502
|
|
|
$
|
(621
|
)
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
(370
|
)
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and OCI
|
|
$
|
(10,153
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,318
|
|
|
$
|
(550
|
)
|
|
$
|
812
|
|
|
$
|
(213
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,127
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
3.55
|
%
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
7.50
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Basis Used to Determine Expected Long-term Return on Plan Assets
The expected long-term return on plan assets assumption was developed as a weighted average rate based on the target asset allocation of the plan and the Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions (CMA) 2014. The capital market assumptions were developed with a primary focus on forward-looking valuation models and market indicators. The key fundamental economic inputs for these models are future inflation, economic growth, and interest rate environment. Due to the long-term nature of the pension obligations, the investment horizon for the CMA 2014 is 20 to 30 years. In addition to forward-looking models, historical analysis of market data and trends was reflected, as well as the outlook of recognized economists, organizations and consensus CMA from other credible studies.
Description of Investment Policy
The Company’s investment strategy is to build an efficient, well-diversified portfolio based on a long-term, strategic outlook of the investment markets. The investment markets outlook utilizes both the historical-based and forward-looking return forecasts to establish future return expectations for various asset classes. These return expectations are used to develop a core asset allocation based on the specific needs of each plan. The core asset allocation utilizes investment portfolios of various asset classes and multiple investment managers in order to maximize the plan’s return while providing multiple layers of diversification to help minimize risk.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Additional Disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Farmer Bros. Plan
June 30,
|
|
Brewmatic Plan
June 30,
|
|
Hourly Employees’ Plan
June 30,
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Comparison of obligations to plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
146,291
|
|
|
$
|
152,325
|
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
|
$
|
4,574
|
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
146,291
|
|
|
$
|
152,325
|
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
|
$
|
4,574
|
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at measurement date
|
|
$
|
97,304
|
|
|
$
|
91,201
|
|
|
$
|
3,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
2,999
|
|
|
$
|
2,447
|
|
Plan assets by category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$
|
65,270
|
|
|
$
|
58,094
|
|
|
$
|
2,133
|
|
|
$
|
1,909
|
|
|
$
|
1,973
|
|
|
$
|
1,542
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
26,241
|
|
|
27,586
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
758
|
|
Real estate
|
|
5,793
|
|
|
5,521
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
147
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
97,304
|
|
|
$
|
91,201
|
|
|
$
|
3,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
2,999
|
|
|
$
|
2,447
|
|
Plan assets by category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
63
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
31
|
%
|
Real estate
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
6
|
%
|
Total
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
Fair values of plan assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
Farmer Bros. Plan
|
|
$
|
97,304
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
97,304
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Brewmatic Plan
|
|
$
|
3,115
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,115
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Hourly Employees’ Plan
|
|
$
|
2,999
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,999
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
Farmer Bros. Plan
|
|
$
|
91,201
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
91,201
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Brewmatic Plan
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Hourly Employees’ Plan
|
|
$
|
2,447
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,447
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
As of June 30, 2017, approximately
6%
of the assets of each of the Farmer Bros. Plan, the Brewmatic Plan and the Hourly Employees’ Plan were invested in pooled separate accounts which invested mainly in commercial real estate and included mortgage loans which were backed by the associated properties. These underlying real estate investments are able to be redeemed at net asset value per share and therefore, are considered Level 2 assets.
The following is the target asset allocation for the Company's single employer pension plans—Farmer Bros. Plan, Brewmatic Plan and Hourly Employees' Plan—for fiscal 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2018
|
U.S. large cap equity securities
|
40.0
|
%
|
U.S. small cap equity securities
|
4.8
|
%
|
International equity securities
|
19.2
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
30.0
|
%
|
Real estate
|
6.0
|
%
|
Total
|
100.0
|
%
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Estimated Amounts in OCI Expected To Be Recognized
In fiscal 2018, the Company expects to recognize net periodic benefit cost of
$1.5 million
for the Farmer Bros. Plan and
$68,000
for the Brewmatic Plan, and a net periodic benefit credit of
$(4,000)
for the Hourly Employees’ Plan.
Estimated Future Contributions and Refunds
In fiscal 2018, the Company expects to contribute
$2.6 million
to the Farmer Bros. Plan,
$0.1 million
to the Brewmatic Plan, and
$0.4 million
to the Hourly Employees’ Plan. The Company is not aware of any refunds expected from single employer pension plans.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The following benefit payments are expected to be paid over the next 10 fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Farmer Bros. Plan
|
|
Brewmatic Plan
|
|
Hourly Employees’
Plan
|
Year Ending:
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
$
|
7,490
|
|
|
$
|
310
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
7,650
|
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
June 30, 2020
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
June 30, 2021
|
|
$
|
8,130
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
June 30, 2022
|
|
$
|
8,330
|
|
|
$
|
270
|
|
|
$
|
160
|
|
June 30, 2023 to June 30, 2027
|
|
$
|
42,660
|
|
|
$
|
1,220
|
|
|
$
|
990
|
|
These amounts are based on current data and assumptions and reflect expected future service, as appropriate.
Multiemployer Pension Plans
The Company participates in
two
multiemployer defined benefit pension plans that are union sponsored and collectively bargained for the benefit of certain employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, of which the WCTPP is individually significant. The Company makes contributions to these plans generally based on the number of hours worked by the participants in accordance with the provisions of negotiated labor contracts.
The risks of participating in multiemployer pension plans are different from single-employer plans in that: (i) assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers; (ii) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers; and (iii) if the Company stops participating in the multiemployer plan, the Company may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.
The Company's participation in WCTPP is outlined in the table below. The Pension Protection Act (“PPA”) Zone Status available in the Company's fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2016 is for the plan's year ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The zone status is based on information obtained from WCTPP and is certified by WCTPP's actuary. Among other factors, plans in the green zone are generally more than
80%
funded. Based on WCTPP's 2016 Annual Funding Notice, WCTPP was
91.7%
and
91.8%
funded for its plan year beginning January 1, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is expected to be
90.0%
funded for its plan year beginning January 1, 2017. The “FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented” column indicates if a funding improvement plan (“FIP”) or a rehabilitation plan (“RP”) is either pending or has been implemented.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plan
|
|
Employer
Identification
Number
|
|
Pension
Plan
Number
|
|
PPA Zone Status
|
|
FIP/RP
Status
Pending/
Implemented
|
|
Surcharge
Imposed
|
|
Expiration Date
of Collective
Bargaining
Agreements
|
|
|
July 1, 2016
|
|
July 1,
2015
|
|
|
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan
|
|
91-6145047
|
|
001
|
|
Green
|
|
Green
|
|
No
|
|
No
|
|
January 31, 2020
|
Based upon the most recent information available from the trustees managing WCTPP, the Company's share of the unfunded vested benefit liability for the plan was estimated to be approximately
$7.0 million
if the withdrawal had occurred in the plan year ending December 31, 2016. These estimates were calculated by the trustees managing WCTPP. Although the Company believes the most recent plan data available from WCTPP was used in computing this 2016 estimate, the actual withdrawal liability amount is subject to change based on, among other things, the plan's investment returns and benefit levels, interest rates, financial difficulty of other participating employers in the plan such as bankruptcy, and continued participation by the Company and other employers in the plan, each of which could impact the ultimate withdrawal liability.
If withdrawal liability were to be triggered, the withdrawal liability assessment can be paid in a lump sum or on a monthly basis. The amount of the monthly payment is determined as follows: Average number of hours reported to the pension plan trust during the
three
consecutive years with highest number of hours in the
10
-year period prior to the withdrawal is multiplied by the highest hourly contribution rate during the 10-year period ending with the plan year in which the withdrawal occurred to determine the amount of withdrawal liability that has to be paid annually. The annual amount is divided by 12 to arrive at the monthly payment due. If monthly payments are elected, interest is assessed on the unpaid balance after
12 months
at the rate of
7%
per annum.
On July 13, 2017, the Company received correspondence from the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (the “WCT Pension Trust”) stating that the Company had liability for a share of the WCTPP unfunded vested benefits based on the WCT Pension Trust’s claim that certain of the Company’s employment actions resulting from the Corporate Relocation Plan amounted to a partial withdrawal from the WCTPP. See
Note 26
.
In fiscal 2012, the Company withdrew from the Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund (“Pension Fund”) and recorded a charge of
$4.3 million
associated with withdrawal from this plan, representing the present value of the estimated withdrawal liability expected to be paid in quarterly installments of
$0.1 million
over
80
quarters. On November 18, 2014, the Pension Fund sent the Company a notice of assessment of withdrawal liability in the amount of
$4.4 million
, which the Pension Fund adjusted to
$4.9 million
on January 5, 2015. The Company is in the process of negotiating a reduced liability amount. The Company has commenced quarterly installment payments to the Pension Fund of
$91,000
pending the final settlement of the liability. The present value of the total estimated withdrawal liability of
$4.0 million
and
$3.8 million
, respectively, is reflected in the Company's consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, with the short-term and long-term portions reflected in current and long-term liabilities, respectively. At June 30, 2017, the Company has classified the present value of the total estimated withdrawal liability as short-term with the expectation of paying off the liability in fiscal 2018. See
Note 23
.
Future collective bargaining negotiations may result in the Company withdrawing from the remaining multiemployer pension plans in which it participates and, if successful, the Company may incur a withdrawal liability, the amount of which could be material to the Company's results of operations and cash flows.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Company contributions to the multiemployer pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
WCTPP(1)(2)(3)
|
|
All Other Plans(4)
|
Year Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
2,114
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
June 30, 2016
|
|
$
|
2,587
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
June 30, 2015
|
|
$
|
3,593
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
____________
|
|
(1)
|
Individually significant plan.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Less than
5%
of total contribution to WCTPP based on WCTPP's FASB Disclosure Statement for the calendar year ended December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
(3)
|
The Company guarantees that one hundred seventy-three (
173
) hours will be contributed upon for all employees who are compensated for all available straight time hours for each calendar month. An additional
6.5%
of the basic contribution must be paid for PEER or the Program for Enhanced Early Retirement.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes one plan that is not individually significant.
|
The Company's contribution to multiemployer plans decreased in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016 and 2015, as a result of reduction in employees due to the Corporate Relocation Plan. The Company expects to contribute an aggregate of
$2.2 million
towards multiemployer pension plans in fiscal 2018.
Multiemployer Plans Other Than Pension Plans
The Company participates in
ten
multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. The plans are subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and provide that participating employers make monthly contributions to the plans in an amount as specified in the collective bargaining agreements. Also, the plans provide that participants make self-payments to the plans, the amounts of which are negotiated through the collective bargaining process. The Company's participation in these plans is governed by collective bargaining agreements which expire on or before July 31, 2020. The Company's aggregate contributions to multiemployer plans other than pension plans in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were
$5.3 million
,
$6.3 million
and
$6.9 million
, respectively. The Company expects to contribute an aggregate of
$5.0 million
towards multiemployer plans other than pension plans in fiscal 2018.
401(k) Plan
The Company's 401(k) Plan is available to all eligible employees who have worked more than
1,000
hours during a calendar year and were employed at the end of the calendar year. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may choose to contribute a percentage of their annual pay subject to the maximum contribution allowed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company's matching contribution is discretionary, based on approval by the Company's Board of Directors. For the calendar years 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company's Board of Directors approved a Company matching contribution of
50%
of an employee's annual contribution to the 401(k) Plan, up to
6%
of the employee's eligible income. The matching contributions (and any earnings thereon) vest at the rate of
20%
for each of the participant's first
5 years
of vesting service, so that a participant is fully vested in his or her matching contribution account after
5 years
of vesting service, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan due to the closure of the Company’s Torrance Facility or a reduction-in-force at another Company facility designated by the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans. A participant is automatically vested in the event of death, disability or attainment of age
65
while employed by the Company. Employees are
100%
vested in their contributions. For employees subject to a collective bargaining agreement, the match is only available if so provided in the labor agreement.
The Company recorded matching contributions of
$1.6 million
,
$1.6 million
and
$1.4 million
in operating expenses for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees (“Retiree Medical Plan”). The plan provides medical, dental and vision coverage for retirees under age 65 and
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
medical coverage only for retirees age 65 and above. Under this postretirement plan, the Company’s contributions toward premiums for retiree medical, dental and vision coverage for participants and dependents are scaled based on length of service, with greater Company contributions for retirees with greater length of service, subject to a maximum monthly Company contribution. The Company's retiree medical, dental and vision plan is unfunded, and its liability was calculated using an assumed discount rate of
4.1%
at
June 30, 2017
. The Company projects an initial medical trend rate of
8.6%
in fiscal 2018, ultimately reducing to
4.5%
in 10 years.
The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit (“Death Benefit”) to certain of its employees and retirees, subject, in the case of current employees, to continued employment with the Company until retirement and certain other conditions related to the manner of employment termination and manner of death. The Company records the actuarially determined liability for the present value of the postretirement death benefit. The Company has purchased life insurance policies to fund the postretirement death benefit wherein the Company owns the policy but the postretirement death benefit is paid to the employee's or retiree's beneficiary. The Company records an asset for the fair value of the life insurance policies which equates to the cash surrender value of the policies. In fiscal 2016, the Company actuarially determined that no postretirement benefit costs related to the Corporate Relocation Plan were required to be recognized.
Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit
The following table shows the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for fiscal 2017 was based on employee census information as of
June 30, 2017
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (Credit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
1,388
|
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
829
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
943
|
|
Amortization of net gain
|
|
(630
|
)
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
(500
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
|
(1,757
|
)
|
|
(1,757
|
)
|
|
(1,757
|
)
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit (credit) cost
|
|
$
|
(798
|
)
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
|
$
|
(119
|
)
|
The difference between the assets and the Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation (APBO) at the adoption of ASC 715-60 was established as a transition (asset) obligation and is amortized over the average expected future service for active employees as measured at the date of adoption. Any plan amendments that retroactively increase benefits create prior service cost. The increase in the APBO due to any plan amendment is established as a base and amortized over the average remaining years of service to the full eligibility date of active participants who are not yet fully eligible for benefits at the plan amendment date. Gains and losses due to experience different than that assumed or from changes in actuarial assumptions are not immediately recognized. The tables below show the remaining bases for the transition (asset) obligation, prior service cost (credit), and the calculation of the amortizable gain or loss.
|
|
|
|
Amortization Schedule
|
|
|
Transition (Asset) Obligation: The transition (asset) obligations have been fully amortized.
|
Prior service cost (credit)-Medical only ($ in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Established
|
|
Balance at
July 1, 2016
|
|
Annual
Amortization
|
|
Years Remaining
|
|
Curtailment
|
|
Balance at
June 30, 2017
|
January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
(732
|
)
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(502
|
)
|
July 1, 2012
|
|
(11,475
|
)
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9,949
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12,207
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10,451
|
)
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retiree Medical Plan
|
|
Death Benefit
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Amortization of Net (Gain) Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (gain) loss as of July 1
|
|
$
|
(10,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,710
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,523
|
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
Net (gain) loss subject to amortization
|
|
(10,298
|
)
|
|
(8,710
|
)
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
690
|
|
Corridor (10% of greater of APBO or assets)
|
|
1,214
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
(854
|
)
|
|
(729
|
)
|
Net (gain) loss in excess of corridor
|
|
$
|
(9,084
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,986
|
)
|
|
$
|
669
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Amortization years
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the benefit obligation and plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
Projected postretirement benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
21,867
|
|
|
$
|
24,522
|
|
Service cost
|
|
760
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
829
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
741
|
|
|
795
|
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
(2,377
|
)
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(1,140
|
)
|
|
(1,773
|
)
|
Projected postretirement benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
20,680
|
|
|
$
|
21,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
399
|
|
|
978
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
741
|
|
|
795
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
(1,140
|
)
|
|
(1,773
|
)
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Projected postretirement benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
20,680
|
|
|
21,867
|
|
Funded status of plan
|
|
$
|
(20,680
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets Consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
(893
|
)
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
(19,787
|
)
|
|
(20,807
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(20,680
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,867
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Amounts Recognized in AOCI Consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain
|
|
$
|
(8,775
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,027
|
)
|
Prior service credit
|
|
(10,450
|
)
|
|
(12,207
|
)
|
Total AOCI
|
|
$
|
(19,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,234
|
)
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in OCI:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
(2,377
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,259
|
)
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
630
|
|
|
196
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
Total recognized in OCI
|
|
10
|
|
|
(2,306
|
)
|
Net periodic benefit (cost) credit
|
|
(798
|
)
|
|
629
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and OCI
|
|
$
|
(788
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,677
|
)
|
The estimated net gain and prior service credit that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2018 are
$0.8 million
and
$1.8 million
, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Estimated Future Benefit Payments:
|
|
Year Ending:
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
$
|
911
|
|
June 30, 2019
|
$
|
956
|
|
June 30, 2020
|
$
|
1,004
|
|
June 30, 2021
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
June 30, 2022
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
June 30, 2023 to June 30, 2027
|
$
|
5,830
|
|
|
|
Expected Contributions:
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
$
|
911
|
|
Sensitivity in
Fiscal 2018
Results
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects in fiscal 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Percentage Point
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Increase
|
|
Decrease
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
983
|
|
|
$
|
(963
|
)
|
Note 16. Bank Loan
The Company maintains a senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Facility”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), with revolving commitments of
$75.0 million
as of June 30, 2017, and a sublimit on letters of credit and swingline loans of
$30.0 million
and
$15.0 million
, respectively. The Revolving Facility includes an accordion feature whereby the Company may increase the Revolving Commitment by up to an additional
$50.0 million
, subject to certain conditions. Advances are based on the Company’s eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory, and the value of certain real property and trademarks, less required reserves. As of June 30, 2017, the commitment fee ranges from
0.25%
to
0.375%
per annum based on average revolver usage. Outstanding obligations are collateralized by all of the Company’s assets, excluding certain real property not included in the borrowing base, machinery and equipment (other than inventory), and the Company's preferred stock portfolio. Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of
PRIME - 0.25%
to
PRIME + 0.50%
or
Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25%
to
Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%
. The Company is subject to a variety of affirmative and negative covenants of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances, and the right of the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of credit otherwise available to the Company. The Company is allowed to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain excess availability requirements are met, and no event of default exists or has occurred and is continuing as of the date
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
of any such payment and after giving effect thereto. The Revolving Facility expires on
March 2, 2020
. Subsequent to the year ended June 30, 2017, the Company, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries and its Lenders, amended the credit facility to provide additional borrowing capacity and extended the term of the Revolving Facility. See
Note 26
.
Subsequent Events
.
At
June 30, 2017
, the Company was eligible to borrow up to a total of
$55.6 million
under the Revolving Facility and had outstanding borrowings of
$27.6 million
, utilized
$0.1 million
of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of
$27.9 million
. Fair value of the loan approximates carrying value. At
June 30, 2017
, the weighted average interest rate on the Company's outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was
3.02%
and the Company was in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants under the Revolving Facility.
Note 17. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Company’s ESOP was established in
2000
. The plan is a leveraged ESOP in which the Company is the lender. One of the two loans established to fund the ESOP matured in fiscal 2016 and the remaining loan is scheduled to mature in December 2018. The loan is repaid from the Company’s discretionary plan contributions over the original
15
year term with a variable rate of interest. The annual interest rate was
2.50%
at
June 30, 2017
, which is updated on a quarterly basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the years ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Loan amount (in thousands)
|
|
$4,289
|
|
$6,434
|
|
$11,234
|
Shares are held by the plan trustee for allocation among participants as the loan is repaid. The unencumbered shares are allocated to participants using a compensation-based formula. Subject to vesting requirements, allocated shares are owned by participants and shares are held by the plan trustee until the participant retires.
Historically, the Company used the dividends, if any, on ESOP shares to pay down the loans, and allocated to the ESOP participants shares equivalent to the fair market value of the dividends they would have received. No dividends were paid in fiscal 2017, 2016 or 2015.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company charged
$2.5 million
,
$3.4 million
and
$4.4 million
, respectively, to compensation expense related to the ESOP. The decrease in ESOP expense in fiscal 2017 and 2016 was primarily due to the reduction in the number of shares being allocated to participant accounts as a result of paying down the loan amount. The difference between cost and fair market value of committed to be released shares, which was
$0.5 million
,
$36,000
and
$1.0 million
for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, is recorded as additional paid-in capital.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Allocated shares
|
|
1,717,608
|
|
|
1,941,934
|
|
Committed to be released shares
|
|
74,983
|
|
|
169,603
|
|
Unallocated shares
|
|
145,941
|
|
|
220,925
|
|
Total ESOP shares
|
|
1,938,532
|
|
|
2,332,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of ESOP shares
|
|
$
|
58,641
|
|
|
$
|
74,779
|
|
Note 18. Share-based Compensation
Farmer Bros. Co. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan
On June 20, 2017 (the “Effective Date“), the Company’s stockholders approved the Farmer Bros. Co. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”). The 2017 Plan succeeded the Company's prior long-term incentive plans, the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Amended Equity Plan“) and the Farmer Bros. Co. 2007
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Omnibus Plan (collectively, the “Prior Plans“). On the Effective Date, the Company ceased granting awards under the Prior Plans; however, awards outstanding under the Prior Plans will remain subject to the terms of the applicable Prior Plan.
The 2017 Plan provides for the grant of stock options (including incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents, performance shares and other stock- or cash-based awards to eligible participants. The 2017 Plan also authorizes the grant of awards that are intended to qualify as “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Non-employee directors of the Company and employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the 2017 Plan. The 2017 Plan authorizes the issuance of (i)
900,000
shares of common stock plus (ii) the number of shares of common stock subject to awards under the Company’s Prior Plans that are outstanding as of the Effective Date and that expire or are forfeited, cancelled or similarly lapse following the Effective Date. Subject to certain limitations, shares of common stock covered by awards granted under the 2017 Plan that are forfeited, expire or lapse, or are repurchased for or paid in cash, may be used again for new grants under the 2017 Plan. Shares of common stock granted under the 2017 Plan may be authorized but unissued shares, shares purchased on the open market or treasury shares. In no event will more than
900,000
shares of common stock be issuable pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options under the 2017 Plan.
The 2017 Plan is administered by the Board or another Board committee or subcommittee, as may be determined by the Board from time to time (subject to limitations that may be imposed under Section 162(m) of the Code, Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and/or stock exchange rules, as applicable). The administrator of the 2017 Plan (the “Administrator”) or its delegatee will have the authority to determine which eligible persons receive awards and to set the terms and conditions applicable to awards within the confines of the 2017 Plan’s terms. The Administrator will have the authority to make all determinations and interpretations under, and adopt rules and guidelines for the administration of, the 2017 Plan. In addition, the Administrator (which, for purposes of any such awards will be a Board committee comprised solely of two or more directors, each of whom is intended to be an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code) will determine whether specific awards are intended to constitute “qualified performance-based compensation,” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.
The 2017 Plan includes annual limits on certain awards that may be granted to any individual participant. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock with respect to all stock options and stock appreciation rights that may be granted to any one person during any calendar year is
250,000
shares. The maximum number of shares of common stock with respect to all awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and other stock- or cash-based awards that are intended to qualify as “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code that may be granted to any one person during any calendar year is
250,000
shares. The 2017 Plan also includes limits on the maximum aggregate amount that may become payable pursuant to all performance bonus awards that may be granted to any one person during any calendar year and the maximum amount that may become payable pursuant to all cash-based awards granted under the 2017 Plan and the aggregate grant date fair value of all equity-based awards granted under the 2017 Plan to any non-employee director during any calendar year for services as a member of the Board.
The 2017 Plan contains a minimum vesting requirement, subject to limited exceptions, that awards made under the 2017 Plan may not vest earlier than the date that is one year following the grant date of the award. The 2017 Plan also contains provisions with respect to payment of exercise or purchase prices, vesting and expiration of awards, adjustments and treatment of awards upon certain corporate transactions, including stock splits, recapitalizations and mergers, transferability of awards and tax withholding requirements.
The 2017 Plan may be amended or terminated by the Board at any time, subject to certain limitations requiring stockholder consent or the consent of the applicable participant. In addition, the Administrator may not, without the approval of the Company’s stockholders, authorize certain re-pricings of any outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under the 2017 Plan. The 2017 Plan will expire on June 20, 2027.
As of June 30, 2017,
no
awards have been granted under the 2017 Plan.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Non-qualified stock options with time-based vesting (“NQOs”)
In fiscal 2017, the Company granted
no
shares issuable upon the exercise of NQOs. In fiscal 2016 and 2015, the Company granted 21,595 and 25,703 shares, respectively, issuable upon the exercise of NQOs with a weighted average exercise price of $29.48 and $23.91 per share, respectively, to eligible employees under the Amended Equity Plan which vest ratably over a three-year period. Following are the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model for NQOs granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Weighted average fair value of NQOs
|
|
$
|
12.63
|
|
|
$
|
10.38
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Average expected term (years)
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
47.1
|
%
|
|
47.9
|
%
|
The Company’s assumption regarding expected stock price volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues at the date of grant with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the stock options. The average expected term is based on historical weighted time outstanding and the expected weighted time outstanding calculated by assuming the settlement of outstanding awards at the midpoint between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term of the award. Currently, management estimates an annual forfeiture rate of
4.8%
based on actual forfeiture experience. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
The following table summarizes NQO activity for the three most recent fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding NQOs:
|
|
Number
of NQOs
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014
|
|
412,454
|
|
|
12.44
|
|
5.30
|
|
4.4
|
|
3,782
|
|
Granted
|
|
25,703
|
|
|
23.91
|
|
10.38
|
|
6.8
|
|
—
|
Exercised
|
|
(95,723
|
)
|
|
16.17
|
|
5.86
|
|
—
|
|
747
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(13,134
|
)
|
|
11.26
|
|
5.00
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2015
|
|
329,300
|
|
|
12.30
|
|
5.54
|
|
3.9
|
|
3,700
|
|
Granted
|
|
21,595
|
|
|
29.48
|
|
12.63
|
|
6.4
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(112,895
|
)
|
|
12.35
|
|
5.37
|
|
—
|
|
1,853
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(18,371
|
)
|
|
13.45
|
|
6.17
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
|
219,629
|
|
|
13.87
|
|
6.28
|
|
3.7
|
|
3,995
|
|
Granted
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised(1)
|
|
(67,482
|
)
|
|
12.38
|
|
5.57
|
|
—
|
|
1,407
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(18,683
|
)
|
|
25.13
|
|
10.90
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2017
|
|
133,464
|
|
|
13.05
|
|
5.99
|
|
2.6
|
|
2,299
|
|
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2017
|
|
125,376
|
|
|
12.13
|
|
5.64
|
|
2.5
|
|
2,274
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2017
|
|
133,073
|
|
|
13.00
|
|
5.97
|
|
2.6
|
|
2,298
|
|
___________
(1) Includes
11,147
shares that were withheld to cover option cost and meet the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding and retired.
The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Company’s closing stock price of
$30.25
at June 30, 2017,
$32.06
at June 30, 2016 and
$23.50
at
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
June 30, 2015, representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal years, which would have been received by NQO holders had all award holders exercised their NQOs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of NQO exercises in each fiscal period above represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. NQOs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.
Total fair value of NQOs vested during fiscal 2017, 2016, and 2015 was
$0.2 million
,
$0.3 million
and
$0.5 million
, respectively. The Company received
$0.5 million
,
$1.4 million
and
$1.5 million
in proceeds from exercises of vested NQOs in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The following table summarizes nonvested NQO activity for the three most recent fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested NQOs:
|
|
Number
of
NQOs
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (Years)
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014
|
|
167,798
|
|
|
10.65
|
|
5.06
|
|
5.3
|
Granted
|
|
25,703
|
|
|
23.91
|
|
10.38
|
|
6.8
|
Vested
|
|
(101,172
|
)
|
|
9.87
|
|
4.72
|
|
—
|
Forfeited
|
|
(12,134
|
)
|
|
10.31
|
|
4.91
|
|
—
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2015
|
|
80,195
|
|
|
15.94
|
|
7.21
|
|
5.2
|
Granted
|
|
21,595
|
|
|
29.48
|
|
12.63
|
|
6.4
|
Vested
|
|
(47,418
|
)
|
|
14.05
|
|
6.44
|
|
—
|
Forfeited
|
|
(15,641
|
)
|
|
12.95
|
|
6.09
|
|
—
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
|
38,731
|
|
|
27.02
|
|
11.63
|
|
6.1
|
Vested
|
|
(15,765
|
)
|
|
26.45
|
|
11.41
|
|
—
|
Forfeited
|
|
(14,878
|
)
|
|
27.44
|
|
11.96
|
|
—
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2017
|
|
8,088
|
|
|
27.33
|
|
11.47
|
|
5.3
|
As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, there was
$80,000
and
$0.4 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs at June 30, 2017 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of
1.3
years. Total compensation expense for NQOs was
$0.1 million
,
$0.2 million
and
$0.4 million
in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Non-qualified stock options with performance-based and time-based vesting (
“
PNQs”)
In the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2017
, the Company granted
149,223
shares issuable upon the exercise of PNQs to eligible employees under the Amended Equity Plan, with 20% of each such grant subject to forfeiture if a target modified net income goal for fiscal 2017 (“Fiscal 2017 Target”) is not attained. For this purpose, “Modified Net Income” is defined as net income (GAAP) before taxes and excluding any gains or losses from sales of assets, and excluding the effect of restructuring and other transition expenses related to the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters to Northlake, Texas. These PNQs have an exercise price of
$32.85
per share which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant. One-third of the total number of shares subject to each such stock option vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, contingent on continued employment, and subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances.
In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, the Company granted
143,466
shares issuable upon the exercise of PNQs with an exercise price of
$29.48
per share to eligible employees under the Amended Equity Plan. With the exception of a portion of the award to the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer as described below, these PNQs vest over a three-year period with one-third of the total number of shares subject to each such PNQ becoming exercisable each year on the anniversary of the grant date, based on the Company’s achievement of modified net income targets for fiscal 2016 (“Fiscal 2016 Target“) as approved by the Compensation Committee, subject to the participant’s employment by the Company or service on the Board of Directors of the Company on the applicable vesting date and the acceleration provisions contained in the Amended Equity Plan and the applicable award agreement. But if actual modified net income for fiscal 2016 is less than the Fiscal 2016 Target, then only
80%
of the total shares issuable under such grant will vest subject to continued employment with the Company on the relevant vesting dates.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
On June 3, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company determined that a portion of the performance non-qualified stock option granted to Michael H. Keown, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, on December 3, 2015 (the “Original Option”) was invalid because such portion caused the total number of option shares granted to Mr. Keown in calendar year 2015 to exceed the limit of
75,000
shares that may be granted to a participant in a single calendar year under the Amended Equity Plan by
22,862
shares. Therefore, the Compensation Committee reduced the total number of shares of common stock issuable under the Original Option by
22,862
shares. The reduction of the
22,862
excess option shares brought the total number of option shares granted to Mr. Keown in calendar 2015 within the limitation of the Amended Equity Plan.
In addition, on June 3, 2016, the Compensation Committee, in accordance with the provisions of the Amended Equity Plan, granted Mr. Keown a performance non-qualified stock option to purchase
22,862
shares of the Company's common stock (the “New Option”) with an exercise price of
$29.48
per share, which was the greater of the exercise price of the Original Option and the closing price of the Company's common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on June 3, 2016, the date of grant. The New Option is subject to the same terms and conditions of the Original Option including an expiration date of December 3, 2022, and the three-year vesting schedule, except that to comply with the Amended Equity Plan's minimum vesting schedule of one year from the grant date, one-third of shares issuable under the New Option will vest on June 3, 2017, and the remainder of the New Option shares will vest one-third each on the second and third anniversaries of the grant date of the Original Option, based on the Company’s achievement of the same performance goals as the Original Option, subject to Mr. Keown’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date.
In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Company granted
121,024
shares issuable upon the exercise of PNQs with an exercise price of
$23.44
per share to eligible employees under the Amended Equity Plan. These PNQs vest over a three-year period with one-third of the total number of shares subject to each such PNQ becoming exercisable each year on the anniversary of the grant date, based on the Company’s achievement of modified net income targets for fiscal years within the performance period as approved by the Compensation Committee, subject to catch-up vesting of previously unvested shares in a subsequent year within the three year period in which a cumulative modified net income target as approved by the Compensation Committee is achieved, in each case, subject to the participant’s employment by the Company or service on the Board of Directors of the Company on the applicable vesting date and the acceleration provisions contained in the Amended Equity Plan and the applicable award agreement.
Following are the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model for PNQs granted during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Weighted average fair value of PNQs
|
|
$
|
11.42
|
|
|
$
|
11.38
|
|
|
$
|
10.16
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Average expected term (years)
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
47.9
|
%
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table summarizes PNQ activity for the three most recent fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding PNQs:
|
|
Number
of
PNQs
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in
thousands)
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014
|
|
112,442
|
|
|
21.27
|
|
10.49
|
|
6.5
|
|
38
|
|
Granted
|
|
121,024
|
|
|
23.44
|
|
10.16
|
|
6.6
|
|
—
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(9,399
|
)
|
|
21.33
|
|
10.52
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2015
|
|
224,067
|
|
|
22.44
|
|
10.31
|
|
6.0
|
|
237
|
|
Granted
|
|
143,466
|
|
|
29.48
|
|
11.38
|
|
6.2
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(14,144
|
)
|
|
21.20
|
|
10.45
|
|
—
|
|
107
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(64,790
|
)
|
|
23.20
|
|
10.37
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
|
288,599
|
|
|
25.83
|
|
10.82
|
|
5.7
|
|
1,798
|
|
Granted
|
|
149,223
|
|
|
32.85
|
|
11.42
|
|
4.6
|
|
—
|
|
Exercised(1)
|
|
(15,321
|
)
|
|
26.26
|
|
10.98
|
|
—
|
|
109
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(63,715
|
)
|
|
31.39
|
|
11.39
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2017
|
|
358,786
|
|
|
27.75
|
|
10.96
|
|
5.2
|
|
1,181
|
|
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2017
|
|
150,761
|
|
|
23.97
|
|
10.58
|
|
4.3
|
|
947
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2017
|
|
347,766
|
|
|
27.64
|
|
10.95
|
|
5.2
|
|
1,173
|
|
___________
(1) Includes
6,326
shares that were withheld to cover option cost and meet the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding and retired.
The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of
$30.25
at June 30, 2017,
$32.06
at June 30, 2016 and
$23.50
at June 30, 2015 representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal years, which would have been received by PNQ holders had all award holders exercised their PNQs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of PNQ exercises in each fiscal period represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. PNQs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.
Total fair value of PNQs vested during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was
$1.3 million
,
$0.3 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively. The Company received
$0.2 million
and
$0.3 million
in proceeds from exercises of vested PNQs in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
No
PNQs were exercised during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company met the performance targets for the fiscal 2016 PNQ awards and the first two tranches of the fiscal 2015 PNQ awards. The Company expects to meet the performance targets for the remainder of the fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 awards, and for the fiscal 2017 awards.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table summarizes nonvested PNQ activity for the three most recent fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested PNQs:
|
|
Number
of
PNQs
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life (Years)
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014
|
|
112,442
|
|
|
21.27
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Granted
|
|
121,024
|
|
|
23.44
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Vested
|
|
(34,959
|
)
|
|
21.27
|
|
|
10.49
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(9,399
|
)
|
|
21.33
|
|
|
10.52
|
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2015
|
|
189,108
|
|
|
22.66
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Granted
|
|
143,466
|
|
|
29.48
|
|
|
11.38
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Vested
|
|
(27,317
|
)
|
|
10.16
|
|
|
23.44
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(64,790
|
)
|
|
23.20
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
|
240,467
|
|
|
26.49
|
|
|
10.92
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
Granted
|
|
149,223
|
|
|
32.85
|
|
|
11.42
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Vested
|
|
(119,403
|
)
|
|
24.91
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
|
—
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(62,262
|
)
|
|
31.39
|
|
|
11.39
|
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2017
|
|
208,025
|
|
|
30.48
|
|
|
11.24
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, there was
$1.8 million
and
$1.9 million
, respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to PNQs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to PNQs at June 30, 2017 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of
1.3
years. Total compensation expense related to PNQs in fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 was
$1.1 million
,
$0.5 million
and
$0.5 million
, respectively.
Restricted Stock
During fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 the Company granted
5,106
shares,
10,170
shares and
13,256
shares of restricted stock under the Amended Equity Plan, respectively, with a weighted average grant date fair value of
$35.25
,
$29.99
and
$23.64
per share, respectively, to eligible employees and directors. Shares of restricted stock generally vest at the end of three years for eligible employees. Unlike prior-year awards to non-employee directors, which vest ratably over a period of three years, the fiscal 2017 restricted stock awards cliff vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant subject to continued service to the Company through the vesting date and the acceleration provisions of the LTIP and restricted stock agreement. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017,
7,458
shares of restricted stock vested and were released.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the three most recent fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding and Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards:
|
|
Shares
Awarded
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2014
|
|
96,212
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
2,079
|
|
Granted
|
|
13,256
|
|
|
23.64
|
|
|
—
|
|
313
|
|
Exercised/Released(1)
|
|
(53,402
|
)
|
|
8.43
|
|
|
—
|
|
1,377
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(8,984
|
)
|
|
8.36
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2015
|
|
47,082
|
|
|
16.48
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
1,106
|
|
Granted
|
|
10,170
|
|
|
29.99
|
|
|
—
|
|
305
|
|
Exercised/Released(2)
|
|
(24,841
|
)
|
|
14.08
|
|
|
—
|
|
747
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(8,619
|
)
|
|
13.06
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2016
|
|
23,792
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
763
|
|
Granted
|
|
5,106
|
|
|
35.25
|
|
|
—
|
|
180
|
|
Exercised/Released
|
|
(7,458
|
)
|
|
24.16
|
|
|
—
|
|
253
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
(5,995
|
)
|
|
26.41
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2017
|
|
15,445
|
|
|
29.79
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
467
|
|
Expected to vest at June 30, 2017
|
|
14,989
|
|
|
29.79
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
453
|
|
__________
(1) Includes
4,297
shares that were withheld to meet the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding and retired.
(2) Includes
5,177
shares that were withheld to meet the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding and retired.
The aggregate intrinsic value of shares outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of
$30.25
at June 30, 2017,
$32.06
at June 30, 2016 and
$23.50
at June 30, 2015, representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal years. Restricted stock that is expected to vest is net of estimated forfeitures.
As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, there was
$0.3 million
and
$0.5 million
of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock. The unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock at June 30, 2017 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of
1.0
year. Total compensation expense for restricted stock was
$0.2 million
,
$0.2 million
, and
$0.3 million
, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Note 19. Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
$
|
893
|
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
Short-term pension liabilities
|
|
3,956
|
|
|
347
|
|
Earnout payable—RLC acquisition
|
|
100
|
|
|
100
|
|
Other (including net taxes payable)
|
|
2,868
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
9,702
|
|
|
$
|
6,946
|
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Note 20. Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
New Facility lease obligation(1)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
28,110
|
|
Earnout payable(2)
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
100
|
|
Derivative liabilities—noncurrent
|
|
380
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
28,210
|
|
___________
(1) Lease obligation associated with construction of the New Facility. The lease obligation was reversed upon termination of the Lease Agreement concurrent with the closing of the purchase option on September 15, 2016. See
Note 5
.
(2) Includes in fiscal 2017,
$0.5 million
and
$0.6 million
in earnout payable in connection with the Company’s acquisition of substantially all of the assets of China Mist completed on October 11, 2016 and the Company's acquisition of West Coast Coffee completed on February 7, 2017, respectively; includes in fiscal 2016
$0.1 million
in earnout payable in connection with the Company's acquisition of substantially all of the assets of RLC in fiscal 2016. See
Note 3
.
Note 21. Income Taxes
The current and deferred components of the provision for income taxes consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
State
|
|
340
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
309
|
|
Total current income tax expense
|
|
472
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
279
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
13,110
|
|
|
(66,648
|
)
|
|
106
|
|
State
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
(13,666
|
)
|
|
17
|
|
Total deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
15,482
|
|
|
(80,314
|
)
|
|
123
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
15,954
|
|
|
$
|
(79,997
|
)
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) to the federal statutory tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Statutory tax rate
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
34
|
%
|
Income tax expense at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
14,121
|
|
|
$
|
3,472
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
State income tax expense, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
1,819
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
260
|
|
Dividend income exclusion
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
(83,230
|
)
|
|
(185
|
)
|
Change in tax rate
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,061
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Retiree life insurance
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
135
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in contingency reserve (net)
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other (net)
|
|
229
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
23
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
15,954
|
|
|
$
|
(79,997
|
)
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The primary components of the temporary differences which give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
$
|
30,253
|
|
|
$
|
33,273
|
|
|
$
|
31,100
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
7,885
|
|
|
11,760
|
|
|
10,091
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
38,985
|
|
|
38,196
|
|
|
41,544
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
—
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
594
|
|
Other
|
|
6,824
|
|
|
6,881
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
83,947
|
|
|
90,181
|
|
|
90,123
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on investments
|
|
—
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
(2,242
|
)
|
Fixed assets
|
|
(17,096
|
)
|
|
(5,370
|
)
|
|
(2,647
|
)
|
Other
|
|
(2,181
|
)
|
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
(1,943
|
)
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
(19,277
|
)
|
|
(7,768
|
)
|
|
(6,832
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
(1,615
|
)
|
|
(1,627
|
)
|
|
(84,857
|
)
|
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
63,055
|
|
|
$
|
80,786
|
|
|
$
|
(1,566
|
)
|
At June 30, 2017, the Company had approximately
$101.8 million
in federal and
$97.7 million
in state net operating loss carryforwards that will begin to expire in the years ending June 30, 2030 and June 30, 2017, respectively. Additionally, at June 30, 2017, the Company had
$0.8 million
of federal business tax credits that begin to expire in June 30, 2025 and approximately
$1.7 million
of federal alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire.
The Company recognizes windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of share-based compensation directly to stockholders' equity only when realized. Accordingly deferred tax assets are not recognized for net operating loss carryforwards resulting from windfall tax benefits occurring from July 1, 2006 onward. At June 30, 2017, deferred tax assets do not include
$1.6 million
in excess tax benefits from stock compensation. As discussed in
Note 2
, the Company will adopt ASU 2016-09 beginning July 1, 2017. Upon adoption the excess tax benefits of
$1.6 million
will be recorded as an increase to deferred tax assets and a corresponding increase to retained earnings.
At June 30, 2017, the Company had total deferred tax assets of
$83.9 million
and net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance of
$64.7 million
. The Company considered whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets based on the likelihood that the benefits of the deferred tax assets would or would not ultimately be realized in future periods. In making such assessment, significant weight was given to evidence that could be objectively verified such as recent operating results and less consideration was given to less objective indicators such as future income projections.
After consideration of positive and negative evidence, including the recent history of income, the Company concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate future income sufficient to realize the majority of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2017, the Company cannot conclude that certain state net operating loss carry forwards and tax credit carryovers will be utilized before expiration. Accordingly, the Company will maintain a valuation allowance of
$1.6 million
to offset this deferred tax asset. There was
no
change to the valuation allowance in fiscal 2017. The valuation allowance decreased
$83.2 million
and increased
$12.3 million
, in fiscal 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Total unrecognized tax benefits attributable to uncertain tax positions taken in tax returns in each of fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 were
zero
and at June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company had
no
unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. and in various state jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. income tax examinations for the fiscal years prior to June 30, 2013. The Internal Revenue Service completed its examination of the Company's tax years ended June 30, 2013 and 2014 and accepted the returns as filed.
The Company’s policy is to recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense. In each of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded
$0
in accrued interest and
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
penalties associated with uncertain tax positions. Additionally, the Company recorded income of
$0
related to interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions in the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Note 22. Net Income Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders—basic
|
|
$
|
24,370
|
|
|
$
|
89,812
|
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
Net income attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders
|
|
30
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
24,400
|
|
|
$
|
89,918
|
|
|
$
|
652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic
|
|
16,668,745
|
|
|
16,502,523
|
|
|
16,127,610
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issuable under stock options
|
|
117,007
|
|
|
124,879
|
|
|
139,524
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted
|
|
16,785,752
|
|
|
16,627,402
|
|
|
16,267,134
|
|
Net income per common share—basic
|
|
$
|
1.46
|
|
|
$
|
5.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Net income per common share—diluted
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
5.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Note 23. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
As part of the China Mist transaction, the Company assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing
17,400
square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice. As part of the West Coast Coffee transaction, the Company entered into a three-year lease on West Coast Coffee’s existing production, distribution and warehouse facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, which expires January 31, 2020, and assumed leases on six branch warehouses in Oregon, California and Nevada, expiring on various dates through November 2020. See
Note 3
.
The Company is also obligated under operating leases for branch warehouses, distribution centers and its production facility in Portland, Oregon. Some operating leases have renewal options that allow the Company, as lessee, to extend the leases. Rent expenses paid for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were
$5.1 million
,
$4.5 million
and
$3.8 million
, respectively.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Contractual obligations for future fiscal years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Capital Lease
Obligations
|
|
Operating
Lease
Obligations
|
|
New Facility Construction and Equipment Contracts (1)
|
|
Pension Plan
Obligations(2)
|
|
Postretirement
Benefits Other
Than Pension Plans(3)
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
Purchase Commitments (4)
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
994
|
|
|
$
|
4,907
|
|
|
$
|
4,439
|
|
|
$
|
14,097
|
|
|
$
|
5,880
|
|
|
$
|
27,621
|
|
|
$
|
76,359
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
3,996
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,050
|
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
2,151
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,340
|
|
|
$
|
1,004
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
2021
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
769
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,560
|
|
|
$
|
1,049
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
2022
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,760
|
|
|
$
|
1,082
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
44,870
|
|
|
$
|
5,830
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,009
|
|
|
$
|
4,439
|
|
|
$
|
92,677
|
|
|
$
|
15,801
|
|
|
$
|
27,621
|
|
|
$
|
76,359
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: imputed interest
(0.82% to 10.66%)
|
|
$
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of future minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
___________
(1) Includes
$1.6 million
in outstanding contractual obligations for the construction of the New Facility including
$0.4 million
outstanding under the DMA (see
Note 5
) and
$2.8 million
in outstanding contractual obligations for the purchase of machinery and equipment for the New Facility, including
$2.2 million
under the Amended Building Contract. See
Note 5
.
(2) Includes
$86.5 million
in estimated future benefit payments on single employer pension plan obligations,
$4.0 million
in estimated payments in fiscal 2018 towards settlement of withdrawal liability associated with the Company’s withdrawal from the Local 807 Labor Management Pension Plan and
$2.2 million
in estimated fiscal 2018 contributions to the multiemployer pension plans. See
Note 15
.
(3) Includes
$10.8 million
in estimated future benefit payments on postretirement benefit plan obligations and
$5.0 million
in estimated 2018 contributions to multiemployer plans other than pension plans. See
Note 15
.
(4) Purchase commitments include commitments under coffee purchase contracts for which all delivery terms have been finalized but the related coffee has not been received as of June 30, 2017. Amounts shown in the table above: (a) include all coffee purchase contracts that the Company considers to be from normal purchases; and (b) do not include amounts related to derivative instruments that are recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.
Earn-Out Obligations
Certain of the Company’s business acquisitions involve the payment of contingent consideration. Certain of these payments are based on achievement of certain sales levels during the earn-out period and, consequently, the Company cannot currently determine the total payments. However, the Company have developed an estimate of the maximum potential contingent consideration for each of its acquisitions with an outstanding earn-out obligation. The estimated maximum fair value of future contingent consideration that the Company could be required to pay associated with its business acquisitions is
$1.2 million
recorded in “Other current liabilities“ and “Other long-term liabilities” on the
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Company’s consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2017 (see
Note 19
and
Note 20
). Subject to achievement of certain milestones, the contingent consideration is estimated to be paid before the end of calendar 2019. Since it is not possible to estimate when, or even if, the acquired companies will reach their performance milestones or the amount of contingent consideration payable based on future sales, the maximum contingent consideration has not been included in the table above.
Self-Insurance
At June 30, 2016, the Company had posted a
$7.4 million
letter of credit as a security deposit with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers for workers’ compensation liability in California. The State of California notified the Company on December 13, 2016 that it had released and authorized the cancellation of the letter of credit. At June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company had also posted
$3.4 million
in cash and a
$4.3 million
letter of credit, respectively, as a security deposit for self-insuring workers’ compensation, general liability and auto insurance coverages outside of California.
Non-cancelable Purchase Orders
As of June 30, 2017, the Company had committed to purchase green coffee inventory totaling
$66.7 million
under fixed-price contracts, equipment for the New Facility totaling
$3.5 million
and other purchases totaling
$6.1 million
under non-cancelable purchase orders.
Legal Proceedings
Council for Education and Research on Toxics (“CERT”) v. Brad Berry Company Ltd., et al., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles
On August 31, 2012, CERT filed an amendment to a private enforcement action adding a number of companies as defendants, including CBI, which sell coffee in California. The suit alleges that the defendants have failed to issue clear and reasonable warnings in accordance with Proposition 65 that the coffee they produce, distribute and sell contains acrylamide. This lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court (the “Court”). CERT has demanded that the alleged violators remove acrylamide from their coffee or provide Proposition 65 warnings on their products and pay
$2,500
per day for each and every violation while they are in violation of Proposition 65.
Acrylamide is produced naturally in connection with the heating of many foods, especially starchy foods, and is believed to be caused by the Maillard reaction, though it has also been found in unheated foods such as olives. With respect to coffee, acrylamide is produced when coffee beans are heated during the roasting process-it is the roasting itself that produces the acrylamide. While there has been a significant amount of research concerning proposals for treatments and other processes aimed at reducing acrylamide content of different types of foods, to our knowledge there is currently no known strategy for reducing acrylamide in coffee without negatively impacting the sensorial properties of the product.
The Company has joined a Joint Defense Group, or JDG, and, along with the other co-defendants, has answered the complaint, denying, generally, the allegations of the complaint, including the claimed violation of Proposition 65 and further denying CERT’s right to any relief or damages, including the right to require a warning on products. The Joint Defense Group contends that based on proper scientific analysis and proper application of the standards set forth in Proposition 65, exposures to acrylamide from the coffee products pose no significant risk of cancer and, thus, these exposures are exempt from Proposition 65’s warning requirement.
To date, the pleadings stage of the case has been completed. The Court has phased trial so that the “no significant risk level” defense, the First Amendment defense, and the preemption defense will be tried first. Fact discovery and expert discovery on these “Phase 1” defenses have been completed, and the parties filed trial briefs. Trial commenced on September 8, 2014, and testimony completed on November 4, 2014, for the three Phase 1 defenses.
Following final trial briefing, the Court heard, on April 9, 2015, final arguments on the Phase 1 issues. On September 1, 2015, the Court ruled against the JDG on the Phase 1 affirmative defenses. The JDG received permission to file an interlocutory appeal, which was filed by writ petition on October 14, 2015. On January 14, 2016, the Court of Appeals denied the JDG’s writ petition thereby denying the interlocutory appeal so that the case stays with the trial court.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
On February 16, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a motion for summary adjudication arguing that based upon facts that had been stipulated by the JDG, the Plaintiff had proven its prima facie case and all that remains is a determination of whether any affirmative defenses are available to Defendants. On March 16, 2016, the Court reinstated the stay on discovery for all parties except for the four largest defendants. Following a hearing on April 20, 2016, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication on its prima facie case. Plaintiff filed its motion for summary adjudication of affirmatives defenses on May 16, 2016. At the August 19, 2016 hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication (and the JDG’s opposition), the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion, thus maintaining the ability of the JDG to defend the issues at trial. On October 7, 2016, the Court continued the Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction until the trial for Phase 2.
In November 2016, the parties pursued mediation, but were not able to resolve the dispute.
In December 2016, discovery resumed for all defendants. Depositions of “person most knowledgeable” witnesses for each defendant in the JDG commenced in late December and proceeded through early 2017, followed by new interrogatories served upon the defendants. The Court set a fact and discovery cutoff of May 31, 2017 and an expert discovery cutoff of August 4, 2017. Depositions of expert witnesses were completed by the end of July. On July 6, 2017, the Court held hearings on a number of discovery motions and denied Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions as to all the defendants.
All pre-trial motions and briefs have been filed with the Court. There was a final case management conference on August 21, 2017 at which the Court set August 31, 2017 as the new trial date for Phase 2, though later changed the starting date for trial to September 5, 2017. Phase 2 will focus on remedies and the plain meaning of “alternative significant risk level.” Trial is currently ongoing at this time.
At this time, the Company is not able to predict the probability of the outcome or estimate of loss, if any, related to this matter.
The Company is a party to various other pending legal and administrative proceedings. It is management’s opinion that the outcome of such proceedings will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Note 24. Unusual and Infrequent Expenses
The Company incurred expenses of
$5.2 million
, or
$0.31
per diluted common share, during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 which were unusual in nature and infrequent in occurrence. These expenses incurred for successfully defending against the 2016 proxy contest included non-recurring legal fees, financial advisory fees, proxy solicitor fees, mailing and printing costs of proxy solicitation materials and other costs.
Note 25. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following tables set forth certain unaudited quarterly information for each of the eight fiscal quarters in the
two
year period ended
June 30, 2017
. This quarterly information has been prepared on a consistent basis with the audited consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments which management believes are necessary for a fair presentation of the information for the periods presented.
The Company's quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, and operating results for any fiscal quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for a full fiscal year or future fiscal quarters.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
March 31,
2017
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
130,488
|
|
|
$
|
139,025
|
|
|
$
|
138,187
|
|
|
$
|
133,800
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
51,198
|
|
|
$
|
55,096
|
|
|
$
|
53,820
|
|
|
$
|
53,618
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
2,505
|
|
|
$
|
35,910
|
|
|
$
|
2,058
|
|
|
$
|
1,693
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,618
|
|
|
$
|
20,076
|
|
|
$
|
1,594
|
|
|
$
|
1,112
|
|
Net income per common share—basic
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Net income per common share—diluted
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2015
|
|
December 31,
2015
|
|
March 31,
2016
|
|
June 30,
2016
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
133,445
|
|
|
$
|
142,307
|
|
|
$
|
134,468
|
|
|
$
|
134,162
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
50,579
|
|
|
$
|
52,908
|
|
|
$
|
52,560
|
|
|
$
|
52,428
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
$
|
(563
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,361
|
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
3,075
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,561
|
|
|
$
|
1,192
|
|
|
$
|
84,239
|
|
Net (loss) income) per common share—basic
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
5.09
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share—diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
5.05
|
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate future earnings sufficient to realize the majority of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2016. Accordingly, the Company recorded a reduction in its valuation allowance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 in the amount of
$83.2 million
. See
Note 21.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company completed the sale of the Torrance Facility, and recognized a net gain from sale in the amount of
$37.4 million
, including non-cash interest expense of
$0.7 million
and non-cash rent expense of
$1.4 million
. See
Note 6
.
Note 26. Subsequent Events
Boyd Coffee Company Purchase Agreement
On August 18, 2017, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Boyd Assets Co., a Delaware corporation (“Buyer“), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Boyd Coffee Company (“Seller”), and each of the parties set forth on Exhibit A to the Purchase Agreement (collectively with Seller, the “Seller Parties”). Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Seller will sell and Buyer will purchase substantially all of the assets of Seller (the “Transaction”) in consideration of cash and preferred stock.
Each share of Preferred Stock will have a purchase price and an initial stated value of
$1,000.00
(“Stated Value”). Each holder of Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, equal to
3.5%
per annum of the Stated Value of such share in effect on the applicable regular dividend record date (“Regular Dividends”). Regular Dividends on each share of Preferred Stock will begin to accrue from, and including, the closing date; and if not declared and paid, will be cumulative.
Each share of Preferred Stock may be converted at the election of the holder thereof (i) upon a change of control of the Company or (ii) as follows: of the initial
21,000 shares
of Preferred Stock, (x)
4,200 shares
may be converted beginning one year after the closing date, (y)
6,300
additional shares may be converted beginning two years after the closing date, and (z) the remaining
10,500
shares may be converted beginning three years after the closing date. In addition, the Company will have the right, at any time on or after the first anniversary of the closing date, to cause all, but not less than all, of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock to automatically convert, based on certain market conditions.
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, the holder(s) of Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, per share of Preferred Stock, out of the assets of the Company or proceeds thereof legally available for distribution to the Company’s stockholders, before any distribution of such assets or proceeds is made or set aside for the holders of junior stock, an amount equal to the Preferred Stock liquidation preference. The liquidation preference will be the greater of the (x) the Stated Value, plus accrued and unpaid Regular Dividends, per share of Preferred Stock as of the date the liquidation preference is paid, and (x) the amount, per share of Preferred Stock, that the holder thereof would have received is such holder had converted such share into the Company’s common stock immediately before such liquidation, dissolution or winding up.
Except as otherwise required by applicable law, each share of Preferred Stock outstanding will entitle the holder(s) thereof to vote together with the holders of the Company’s common stock on all matters submitted for a vote of, or consent by, holders of the Company’s common stock. For these purposes, each holder will be deemed to be the holder of record of a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the quotient (rounded down to the nearest whole number) obtained by dividing (i) the aggregate Stated Value of the shares of Preferred Stock held by such holder on such record date by (ii) the Conversion Price in effect on such record date.
The Purchase Agreement contains representations, warranties, and indemnification provisions of the parties customary for transactions of this type. The Purchase Agreement contains specified termination rights for the parties, including a mutual termination right in the event the closing has not occurred on or prior to November 30, 2017. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the foregoing conditions and the other terms and conditions contained in the Purchase Agreement, the Transaction is expected to close in the Company's second quarter of fiscal 2018.
Amendment to Revolving Facility
On
August 25, 2017
, the Company and China Mist Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (together with the Company, the “Borrowers”), together with the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, as additional Loan Parties and as Guarantors, entered into that certain First Amendment to Credit Agreement and First Amendment to Pledge and Security Agreement (the “Amendment”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), as Administrative Agent, and the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (the “Lenders”). The Amendment amends (i) the Company’s original Credit Agreement dated as of March 2, 2015 (the “Original Credit Agreement”), entered into by the Borrowers, the guarantor subsidiaries party thereto, the Administrative Agent and the financial institutions party thereto as lenders (the Original Credit Agreement as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended Credit Agreement”), and (ii) the Company’s original Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of March 2, 2015 (the “Original Pledge and Security Agreement”). Capitalized terms used without definition below are defined in the Amended Credit Agreement.
The Amended Credit Agreement increases the aggregate commitments (“Revolving Commitment”) of the Revolving Facility from
$75.0 million
to
125.0 million
. Chase agreed to provide
$75.0 million
of the Revolving Commitment and SunTrust Bank agreed to provide
$50.0 million
of the Revolving Commitment. The Amended Credit Agreement also includes an accordion feature whereby the Company may increase the Revolving Commitment by an aggregate amount not to exceed
$50.0 million
, subject to certain conditions.
The Amended Credit Agreement increases (i) the advance rate on Borrowers’ eligible accounts receivable that are with investment grade customers from
85%
to
90%
and (ii) the amount of Borrowers’ eligible real property which can be included in the Borrowing Base from the lesser of
$25.0 million
and
75%
of the fair market value of such eligible real property, to the lesser of
$60.0 million
and
75%
of the fair market value of such eligible real property, subject to certain limitations.
The Amended Credit Agreement provides for an increase to the margin of
0.375%
per annum on any drawn loans under the Revolving Facility up to an amount equal to the value of eligible real property in the Borrowing Base. The interest rates are otherwise unchanged in the Amended Credit Agreement and continue to be based on Average Historical Excess Availability levels with a range of
PRIME - 0.25%
to
PRIME + 0.50%
or
Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25%
to
Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%
. The Amended Credit Agreement reduces the commitment fee from a range of between
0.25%
to
0.375%
per annum based on Average Revolver Usage, to a flat fee of
0.25%
per annum irrespective of Average Revolver Usage. The Amended Credit Agreement also extends the maturity date of the Revolving Facility from March 2, 2020 to August 25, 2022.
The Amended Credit Agreement contains a variety of affirmative and negative covenants of types customary in an
Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
asset-based lending facility, including financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances. The Amended Credit Agreement also allows the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of credit otherwise available to the Borrowers, and provides for customary Events of Default.
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust
On July 13, 2017, the Company received correspondence (the “WCT Letter”) from the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (the “WCT Pension Trust”) stating that the Company had liability for a share of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan (the “Plan”) unfunded vested benefits based on the WCT Pension Trust’s claim that certain of the Company’s employment actions resulting from the Corporate Relocation Plan amounted to a partial withdrawal from the Plan. The Company has not yet decided whether it will submit a request for review to the WCT Pension Trust with respect to the asserted liability or take any other action.