Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (CE) (IPIX) News

I don't think he MEANT to tell us that, no.

The post you linked to is a CTIX/IPIX classic.

Does Snowy Owl mean to tell this board that he has been fleeced twice by Leo Ehrlich?

Sure! Wouldn't want to miss out.
Losing big time so far though:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174475328

Shareholder huh?

OK

Nothing misleading about my post.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139794656

Don't feel bad....you have plenty of company.

It's so unlike you to be misleading professor. Got to be a first.

"The real question is why would you care about what a complete stranger’s opinion is about the CEO Leo Erlich?"
Because you seem to be such an asstute investor.

Some time ago you expressed this concern:
"Well I'm worried. Worried I won't have enough shares when the big news hits!"

I hope you've addressed that concern, as you intended to:
"I need to buy more."

Can't have enough of these $.0004 honeys! (They were going for $.54 when you worried that you wouldn't have enough when the big news hit.)

But I'm not a non-investor...I'm an IPIX shareholder. Besides, holding shares of IPIX can't possibly considered investing by any reasonable definition.

The real question is why would you care about what a complete stranger’s opinion is about the CEO Leo Erlich? Why, as a non-investor, would this be of any concern to you?

The valid question is why, as a non-investor, you offer your opinion and almost daily reporting of all things IPIX for years and years now?

These are the real questions professor.

Didn't miss it professor. I know your game.

Carry on.

In case you missed it:
"Do you still deny that your money is gone along with the guy you trusted to run the show?"

Hahaha....ok professor. You are a funny man.

Carry on now.

Why would anyone compensate me for merely telling the truth about this failure? Do you still deny that your money is gone along with the guy you trusted to run the show?

This party's over.

Money mismanagement.

Silly me. I neglected to consider all the additional boards where you regularly dispense your compensated “intellectual curiosity”.

Be thankful...unless you are looking to throw your money away.

Dats cause da shit is dead.

"...guardian angles..."?? Some are beyond saving.

Update on the IPIX appeal. Below is from the Appeals Court website:

10/02/2024 #16 MOTION of Appellee to extend brief due date filed for Cummings Properties, LLC by Attorney Michael Barker.
10/02/2024 RE#16: Allowed to 10/28/2024. *Notice sent.

But I don't. No wonder you're stuck in this mess.

I’m surprised they don’t slap you on the side of your head for even trying.

E*trade won’t let me buy

That must be why you have over 32K posts on the subject?

"Such a promising compound is more and likely why the Clown show is here in force".

You mean they are NOT our financial guardian angles saving us from ourselves?

"Such a promising compound".
And yet with a market value for the WHOLE COMPANY of a little over $200K (today....yesterday it was $100K) no pharma has seen fit to make an offer. The industry has deemed this thing to be worthless, if not toxic, or they'd buy it if just for a looksee.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171488994
$.02 at the time.

No internet from prison (hopefully).

Hard to believe this stock has plummeted down so far with such promising compound.... And the BeaMed hope. But No buying in sight. The CEO used to time his PR releases to keep the stock price up. But I see neglect, as the last PR from the company was Aug 2023.

Such a promising compound is more and likely why the Clown show is here in force.

The rest of us just likes to screw with them. Of course we do hold shares like lottery tickets. Till the Ipix train runs out of tracks.

I cannot believe there are still posters here! Such a promising compound…..

Ehrlich should consider doing time for creating the dire situation in the IPIX investment.

I consider time an investment

Yes. That’s it!

Oh, so THAT'S it. With all this "education" it would appear we all have PHD's in investing now?

OK professor, quite the guardian angel you are. 😝

Carry on.

People try to educate those defending worthless stocks because of the psychological and financial risks involved. When someone defends a bad investment, they might be experiencing cognitive biases, such as *loss aversion* or the *sunk cost fallacy*. These biases cause people to hold onto losing investments because they don't want to admit failure or accept the loss.

Educating them can help provide a clearer perspective, encouraging more rational decision-making and protecting them from further financial damage. The goal is often to foster critical thinking, prevent emotional decision-making, promote healthier investment strategies in the future, and alerting others to stock scams. Reference https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171556989

When people defend stocks that have become worthless, it can be tied to emotional attachment, pride, or the psychological discomfort of acknowledging a loss. Here are several reasons why others try to educate them:

1. **Cognitive Biases**: As mentioned, biases like the *sunk cost fallacy* (holding onto something because they've already invested a lot) or *confirmation bias* (seeking information that supports their belief) cloud judgment. Educators aim to counteract these biases, helping investors recognize the reality of their situation.

2. **Avoiding Further Loss**: By educating them, people hope to prevent further bad decisions. Defending a worthless stock can lead to additional investments in the same failing asset or similar risky ventures, increasing financial losses. Teaching sound investing principles, like cutting losses, can save future wealth.

3. **Emotional Well-being**: Losing money in stocks can trigger denial, anxiety, or frustration. Those defending their bad investment may feel isolated or judged, so education is often an attempt to offer support, helping them understand that poor investments happen to everyone. It provides an opportunity for personal growth and emotional resilience.

4. **Encouraging Financial Literacy**: Many people defending bad investments may not have a strong background in financial literacy. Educators see this as a chance to help them understand market risks, diversification, proper research, and risk management strategies to make more informed decisions next time.

5. **Avoiding Scams and Manipulation**: In some cases, stocks become worthless due to pump-and-dump schemes, where individuals are misled into buying overhyped stocks. Education is a way to protect people from falling into these traps again by teaching them how to spot fraudulent practices.

6. **Long-term Thinking**: Helping someone understand why defending a worthless stock may be harmful is often an attempt to instill long-term investment thinking. Shifting from short-term emotional reactions to a disciplined, researched approach can set up the individual for better financial health in the future.

7. **Social Responsibility**: In some cases, those defending worthless stocks may share their beliefs with others, spreading misinformation or misguided optimism. Educators often intervene to prevent this cycle, ensuring that others don't fall into the same trap.

Ultimately, the goal of educating such individuals is to foster financial discipline, rational decision-making, and self-awareness, which are crucial for sustainable wealth building.

Sure is a whole lotta time spent here on a "dead company". Seems perfectly logical. 😏

Funny Logic too 😁

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/hashem-al-ghaili-1b30679b_drug-resistant-bacteria-are-projected-to-activity-7246464071565201410-sAL9?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios

Based on your representation regarding the number of shares you hold, you also appear to be the biggest loser. Math is sometimes not funny.

Correction, not everyone here is invested!!!!

Everyone here is invested. 2025 marks 10 years of mako

“If I was the CEO I'd be hiding in shame as well.”

Or at least posting under a sneery alias that was first used on this board almost a decade ago blissfully unaware that everyone knows who that alias really is.

So now they're short 2 10-Qs and a 10-K. And in Default with Nevada.

If I was the CEO I'd be hiding in shame as well.

You’re not invested in IPIX. IPIX is dead.

More funny math. I am the only moderator in a Ipix message board with actual investment in Ipix.
The other 4 say they have no interest in such silly zero company with zero value and zero products.

And they say this many many times every day.
This is funny math.

Pitiful whiney puppy.

You both should delete your accounts.

Oh my Mr. Hound! What are we shareholders to do now? Please advise.

More french fried lies.

Here is funny math.
If I believe Ipix is a zero company I will have zero attention for Ipix in social media or any where. Life is short.
If I believe Brilacidin is a zero drug product I will have zero attentions on Brilacidin in social media or any where. Life is short.
If I sell my Ipix action for zero I will have zero attention after for Ipix in social media or any where. Life.
If I hold investment in Ipix of zero I will have zero thoughts or words for Ipix in social media or any where. More life.
I think for some life is too long and full of difficult faeces.
I hold a big investment in Ipix for this: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_sdt=40007&q=brilacidin&hl=en

Math = Bankrupt company. Broke shareholders. Rich retired CEO.

Baguette and Taguette - IPIX’s Frenchy Cannoli has been fried.