Music Licensing Inc (PK) (SONG) Quote

Jake admitted he was selling, the filings say hes the seller, and he warned everyone he would be selling
Jake also said that if he was selling, he should be sued (but keeps pulling down the incriminating video).

Good points. Maybe one day someone will have time to go back and analyze all the great bashers…each company they focused on… the first negative post for each….with that day’s market cap, measure against the current market cap. I’d be curious… to know of which of the great bashers comes out on top $ wise….maybe that total $ amount in market cap might warrant a Guinness Book of World Record or something for them to be formally recognized as the top scam buster / basher of all time. Or…. is there possibility for someone to list the top 25 or so. That recognition might provide additional credibility to each of them and show investors that there is very likely major trouble ahead for anywhere those top bashers post. This would be some excellent DD in my opinion.

Another list of obvious scams retail was told was a scam and bought anyways. Lost money. No need to rehash my entire life.... Jake admitted he was selling, the filings say hes the seller, and he warned everyone he would be selling. Next time... just stick with the DD.

Quite a list there. What is 11 - 20?

Jake might argue that the press release today was successful as the SONG share price only fell by 16.7% in a single day and not by the 40% to 90% daily falls we have often witnessed on this seemingly never ending collapse of the SONG share price since 20 May when one presumes Jake started dumping shares 

Forget money, if I get SONG cooked (very close) that is easy #1. Is is technically cooked now, but Jake the Snake and his idiot lawyer are still free. So when that problem is solved, it cannot be touched. The remaining order:

#2 HPIL, if SONG is easy #1, HPIL is the EASY #2
#3 CRNK, same one, easy #3... the rest are in order of just happiness it brings reminding me of the win
-----
#4 PHIL
#5 STGZ - trickier, I saved the ticker. The CEO coming in was a scammer and got him booted before he could ruin it. So I love the fact I saved a ticker from a criminal
#6 PSWW
#7 GGII
#8 PVSP
#9 HTSC
#10 GRLF
#11 IDGC

Honestly, the list is about 20+, I can't even remember some of them. The top three are for sure the ones that I am the most proud of and will be so proud when Jake and his idiot lawyer are arrested. I've literally NEVER lost.

If this goes down as #1…. What are Top 10 favorites that came before it? Most enjoyable or total $ wise

I just a few examples:

HPIL was over $200M
CRKM over $350M
Song was over $1B
----
All are both worth $0 or almost $0 now

This is SONG's future for sure:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/HPIL/disclosure

- Dark/Defunct
- Caveat Emptor
- Shell

This COULD be SONG's future, if things go right:
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2023/34-99069.pdf

SEC revoked, doesn't exist anymore.

Scambuster - unfortunately for me, I’ve been along for the ride of your most prized takedown. Curious - what do you think the total market cap is as a cumulative total for your efforts that have busted tcompanies? Total cumulative over span of career thus far.

Shouldn’t be too bard to calculate or estimate. What was market cap at entry point? What is market cap when it gets to basically no bid. You get credit for the amount between those two numbers.

The Golden One

Because Jake needs to sell shares today...

.


Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam



..

So .... Jake has paid around $400 for a press release basically saying he might do something in the next few days.
Why didn't you wait those few days Jake, and then if you actually do the thing, then spend some money on a press release announcing that you've done it.

Think about all that money you wasted getting Small Cap Voice to say you are going to buy "between $36 million and $250 million in royalty-generating IP assets for 2025" .... and have you bought any royalty-generating IP assets yet? If you have you've kept it very quiet from your loyal shareholders.

Anyway, it's almost 3pm EDT in Naples, Florida, so I expect you're working hard on that application for OTCID Basic Market Qualification.
Sorry, my mistake. You're just working on your abs again: https://www.skimble.com/people/7m867yeltdn4

Jake is so full of crap...

The company expects to submit its application in the coming days as part of its ongoing commitment to transparency, regulatory compliance, and enhanced engagement with the investor community.

.


Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

One more RS before he turns the TA updates on required for OTCIQ 🤣

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/06/24/3104346/0/en/Music-Licensing-Inc-Announces-Intention-to-Apply-for-OTCID-Basic-Market-Qualification.html

Jake thinks making false copyright infringement claims will save him from the judge realizing he and his lawyer are defrauding the courts. Let's not forget, Jake and his idiot lawyer committed the unforced error of submitting into evidence my posts directly noting and citing the law showing Jake and his idiot lawyer have been defrauding the courts over. Not the opposing party, Jake and his idiot lawyer. On their own, unprompted.

This is the greatest win in my OTC bashing career by far. I've shut down scams many times, but never has the idiots scamming made such an unforced error in my entire time. They might as well just let me make a filing in the case 🤣 Holy crap. And they did it because they want to make the false claim that the defendant is me, which is stupid because they have been trying to sue me for over a year now and the defendant wasn't sued until October 24.

I cannot wait to hear them stumble and jammer on the 3rd after the judge has read all my post pointing her to the 3a10 bulletin to read because they have been hiding it from her. Which of course she wouldn't have known, had they not willingly loaded it up as evidence last week 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Time for another R/S...

.


Watch your wallet


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump Share Selling Scam



..

Does he sell shares while doing abs? 🤣

3.44 pm EDT in Naples, Florida and Jake is already working on his abs again.
Nothing for SONG shareholders.
Nothing for the BCAP cult.
Just working on those abs.
https://www.skimble.com/people/7m867yeltdn4

.0002 - .0003 and the only person with shares to do this was Jake P Noch. No bid this week? Jake about to dump and hide in another country?

How do you suppose this kid will go about obtaining the $6 mil he's seeking? Promises of no RS, buyback, share reductions only to turn around gag the TA, dump massive amounts of shares then went on to implement a massive RS. He even encouraged investors to average down, stating shares post split would be around 6,000 yet they ballooned to well over 20 million in the blink of an eye He tells everyone what they want to hear while doing the exact opposite. He is a pathological liar that's not to be trusted, his track record over the past decade speaks to this

No, because when Jake files he has to reveal the info and update the "amount due." While in the moment he will lie on repeat on it, when he files he has to admit the selling. Soon to stay listed as OTCIQ and not Pink Limited, Jake will have to enter the TA program where the SS is kept up to date and verified. Meaning we will get constant updates on what was deposited.

Second, these are UNREGISTERED shares as a registered shares require some sort of registration statement on EDGAR. Jake says clearly in filings these are unregistered.

Jake is selling unregistered shares, he has admitted to it in filings, but will lie about it not in filings. I literally documented it for you in that thread.

Hypothesis:
Is it possible that shares were created and even registered with the SEC — not with the intent to immediately sell them into the market, but rather as a trap?

A kind of regulatory decoy. A mechanism that, while technically compliant on paper, allows someone to delay or avoid placing those shares in brokerage or custodian accounts — meaning they exist, but can’t be sold by retail.

So who is selling?
There was post about Jake Noch being angry someone sold shares before he could — what if it was a clue about what is going on here?

What if someone is out there selling unregistered securities behind the curtain — and Jake didn’t authorize it?

Just asking… Is it possible?

Just DM him on X, he isn't here. the open letter stuff looks silly. If you have questions just reach out to him.

Here is the video, listen to Jake P Liar yourself. not his channel, not his content, not his copyright. but he went on and lied to everyone and in my X thread you have his social media posts claiming no dilution or selling by the company (he is the company) yet the filings show he was DUMPING. This is what securities fraud looks like:

If you haven't noticed Jake says a lot of things...IMO he's a liar,a thief and a fraud with a track record of fraudulent behavior. Trusted Jake, investment wiped out. The kid used to never shut up, he's awfully quiet now with the exception of his socials set on auto spam. Sure wish I had all of the info now being provided before trusting this kid with one red cent. Jake's "Trust me bro" defense is laughable.

Open Letter to Buffalo Fireside Chat
June 23, 2025

Dear Buffalo Fireside Chat,

I hope this message finds you well and continuing to offer your thoughtful insights to a growing and attentive audience.

I’m writing to respectfully request your opinion—and if possible, a public stance—on a matter that touches both content rights and corporate integrity. A video uploaded to YouTube, featuring statements made by Jake Noch, is currently being referenced and circulated by others under what they claim to be fair use. Do you believe this reuse qualifies as protected commentary under fair use standards? And more broadly, how do you view the ethical boundaries around republishing or amplifying such content when the implications could affect public markets?

In the video, Jake Noch appears to make a clear and unambiguous claim: that he would not reissue the billions of shares that had been previously canceled. He further stated that to do so would constitute fraud. This exact stance was also relayed to me personally several months ago, in consistent terms.

Yet here we are—seeing activity in the market that contradicts those commitments. Given the massive recent trading volume in $SONG and apparent issuance activity, it raises serious questions. Who is selling these shares? How is this possible, and under what justification, if Jake’s earlier commitment still stands?

I believe your voice, with its independent lens and grounded analysis, could help cut through the noise. We’d deeply value your take on what might actually be happening behind the scenes—and who the real sellers might be. There is a growing concern that investors, creators, and small businesses alike may be facing the fallout of contradictions between public statements and backroom maneuvers.

Thank you for your time, your diligence, and your integrity. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

With respect,

The Golden One

Well hes a known pathological liar and he likes to weasel his way out of it. Maybe be sold a block to someone else to dump. In any event, its from his lot of stock and this is all him, no matter what weasel ways hes trying to deny it.

So you think breaking US copyright laws is consistent with his business model? I would agree.

Are you associated with Buffalo Fireside Chat? If not, I’d like to hear their take on the use.

The content takedown seems to align directly with the $SONG business model. I actually see some overall consistency with that move.

Bringing up his statement on the issue is great DD. I brought that point up directly to Jake, and he said it wasn’t him selling and the shares weren’t in a custodial account to be sold.

Not sure what you are looking for, but watch this video then read this thread. Ask yourself why Jake would be DMCA takedown a video of an interview he freely gave and that he has no copyright claim to? Then look at all the screenshots and evidence proving he is a liar and a fraudster. This is just 1/10th of it

https://x.com/flowtarded/status/1936885914430513637?s=46&t=BcHrcgHTNQz16xdPfdAIpg

I’ve been looking for something I think I’d read on this board… it was from a time back when Jake was actively posting.

I seem to recall reading post implying Jake was just upset that someone else was able to sell shares before he could.

Appreciate any insight from when that might have been.

Fifth time. Jake is going to get flagged as a serious weaponized of the DMCA system. At this point he is just getting more eyes on the video and making worse for himself all round 🤣

https://x.com/FLOWtarded/status/1936885914430513637

Great points. Jake said in the video that he wouldn’t sell them, and he should be sued, if so. I reached out over my concern about the shares being sold, and he said it wasn’t him and they aren’t even in a custodial account to be sold.

Back to the real question at hand… who is selling all the phantom shares? What will be the trigger point to reverse the selling?

Thats just one of many "I can't believe he said that while plotting the 3a10 scam." He was in the middle in dumping ~750m shares in that interview as well.

Wow!.

What Jake said in that video, now that he has started to dilute his billions of illegal 3(a)(10) shares, especially right after saying that if he did do that - dilute billions of shares, he should be sued, is an incredibly stupid thing to say, and it's incredibly incriminating.

What a moron!

https://x.com/flowtarded/status/1936842317626855696?s=46&t=BcHrcgHTNQz16xdPfdAIpg

I see them crying, in a cell one day especially since I warned them for over a year now and Jake's response was to brag the judge would never read any of...

... then these geniuses filed all of it to the judge voluntarily 😂😂😂

I don't know what his lawyer will think, but I'm sure the guinea pig-loving free speech advocate Jake Noch will defend your right to freely speak about them.

Did an in depth review of Jake and his idiot lawyers filing in support of an affiliate gaining the 3a10 exemption. Will post page by page review of just how dumb they are.

The arbitration paper claims Jake P. Noch Family Office, LLC., which was formed in May of 2022.
How do we find out whether the incorporation date was that shown on the Bloomberg link or the date shown on the papers drawn up by Jake's lawyers ? 
I have reached a dead end now in my search 

The more one digs the more questions arise 
Assuming that the Jake P Noch Family Office LLC, a ST. KITTS & NEVIS company was not formally invorporated until April 24, 2023
https://lei.bloomberg.com/leis/view/254900JATU42HHH27O31

What sort of KYC ( Know your customer) checks did Jake's lawyers do before filing court papers many the family office LLC before the incorporation date
As one of many examples see link to court paper below dated November 22, 2022 seemingly filed on behalf of the JP Noch family office company and PRO Mueic Rights by Jake's lawyer 
https://www.accesswire.com/media/728122/final-soc.pdf

Good points and questions are being asked.

Honestly, I’ve always questioned the validity of anything in regards to the family office. Music Licensing Inc was in place beforehand, and there is a fiduciary duty/ responsibility to it over family office.

Seems like a self dealing concern. However’, other entities were acquired after the creation of the family office. There wouldn’t be concern with those.

Only reason I’ve stayed tuned in here is because I question the legitimacy / legality of the compensation package that is crippling this stock.

Please can someone on this forum check my dates and working assumption's below please 
Hey on initial inspection the dates don't seem to stack up here and probably warrant further analysis by people with more knowledge of such matters than me 
According to the Financial statements of Music Licensing Inc for the year ended as of December 31, 2023 :
On Jujy 19, 2022 Jake P Noch Family Office LLC acquired control of the Company by purchasing 37,900,000 Shares .....
But it looks to me from the Bloomberg link below that Jake P Noch Family Office LLC, a ST. KITTS & NEVIS company wax not formally invorporated until April 24, 2023
https://lei.bloomberg.com/leis/view/254900JATU42HHH27O31

Crucially the apparent incorporation date of April 24, 2023 is after the date of August 15, 2022 that the company signed an agreement to acquire the issued share capital of PRO Music Rights which the company subsequently argued justified an increase in the company share price 

The dates matter here to the IRS as the market value of the SONG share price on April 24,2023 or a later transfer date would have presumably been higher than the fair market value share price at July 19,2022 
If my incorporation date working assumption is correct then presumably the shares in the company were initially acquired by Jake or by another entity prior to a transfer to the family office on or after it's incorporation and hence there would have been a capital gain or capital loss to account for to the IRS and / or local tax offices  between Jujy 19, 2022 and April 24, 2023 or a later transfer date 
Or was Jake P Noch Family Office LLC initially incorporated as a US corporation or a company in another territory's which complied with all approptautr taxes when it subsequently made a transfer at the prevailing fair market value to the company referred to in the Bloomberg link above at a later date ? 

Extremely grateful for exiting between 7-9. Thursday gave me a day to analyze the board trend, technicals and lack of available information on the OTC website. First thing Friday I initiated the sells.
Thanks for the input here and the discourse.
Good luck all.

What about BCAP?

Jake has a bigger problem. You owe taxes on the stock at the time of issuance based on the value. Jake filed a document claiming they were worth over $1B... so the IRS could at any point now come knocking on his doorstep.

Actually, I am going to file a whistleblower with the IRS now:

https://www.irs.gov/compliance/whistleblower-office

Anyione on this forum a tax expert ?
Would be interesting to know whether tax is payable on the $1.25bn figure set out in the SEC filing below or on $36 million salary figure or on the actual cash banked from share sales and who is responsible for these taxes and possibly related employment taxes and when 
Jake sometimes seemed to get confused between SONG, himself and his family office from his prior posts
Deferring an inflated salary of $12 m per annum and assigning to an overseas based family office and then converting into cash through a complex series of share sales could raise a red flag with IRS who may look at the series of transactions as a whole
If I was Jake I would not be relying on my day to day advisors gor tax advise given the potential errors highlighted on this and other forums concerning other legal documents and instead would be seeking top tier tax advise from a top tier tax specialist as tax on director remuneration, related parties based overseas and share transactions are all complex individualy and this series of transactions feels particularly complex and presuably dreamed up by a financial wizard 
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1671132/000121390025017626/ea0232351-1u_music.htm

"He might not suck in 5 years though" 😂😂😂😂😂

You guys are really invested in Jake!! Is it love disguised as hate?? Lol 😂

Jake hasn't even hit his stride Yet!! 5 years from now he will be even more successful!! You on the other hand??

I would welcome Acme's thoughts on my quick straw man estimate below of the potentially shocking amount of future dilution may be on the horizon over coming quarters for retail investors in SONG just to hold the current residual debt levéis on the company balance sheet steady as Acme claims to be such an expect investor and I am a mere Music Executuve 
Assuming that current share prices hold steady ( in my humble opinion as a non expert a very optimistic assumption for the reasons explained below) then in excess of 5 billion additional new shares would presumably need to be sold each and every quarter going forwards simply to stop the residual debt position on the company balance sheet from increasing even further from it's current position as Jake is presumably still claiming his inflated basic salary of $3 million per quarter 
5,000,000,000 x $0.00055 = $2.75 million 
But with so much more dilution on the horizon the current share prices are surely going to be under ever increasing downward pressure?
Or am I missing something Acme ?
In summary, Rome wasn't built in a day but destroying shareholder value for holders of SONG common shares in a day seems to be a recurring feature of your hero financial wizard friend you admire so much and of the other SONG directors who authorised and signed off on the various actions which led to this potentially never ending downward spiral of share prices ? 

Another 40% loss day for shareholders.