SCAMBUSTERKING
11 hours ago
Forget money, if I get SONG cooked (very close) that is easy #1. Is is technically cooked now, but Jake the Snake and his idiot lawyer are still free. So when that problem is solved, it cannot be touched. The remaining order:
#2 HPIL, if SONG is easy #1, HPIL is the EASY #2
#3 CRNK, same one, easy #3... the rest are in order of just happiness it brings reminding me of the win
-----
#4 PHIL
#5 STGZ - trickier, I saved the ticker. The CEO coming in was a scammer and got him booted before he could ruin it. So I love the fact I saved a ticker from a criminal
#6 PSWW
#7 GGII
#8 PVSP
#9 HTSC
#10 GRLF
#11 IDGC
Honestly, the list is about 20+, I can't even remember some of them. The top three are for sure the ones that I am the most proud of and will be so proud when Jake and his idiot lawyer are arrested. I've literally NEVER lost.
P-Rawl
14 hours ago
So .... Jake has paid around $400 for a press release basically saying he might do something in the next few days.
Why didn't you wait those few days Jake, and then if you actually do the thing, then spend some money on a press release announcing that you've done it.
Think about all that money you wasted getting Small Cap Voice to say you are going to buy "between $36 million and $250 million in royalty-generating IP assets for 2025" .... and have you bought any royalty-generating IP assets yet? If you have you've kept it very quiet from your loyal shareholders.
Anyway, it's almost 3pm EDT in Naples, Florida, so I expect you're working hard on that application for OTCID Basic Market Qualification.
Sorry, my mistake. You're just working on your abs again: https://www.skimble.com/people/7m867yeltdn4
SCAMBUSTERKING
20 hours ago
Jake thinks making false copyright infringement claims will save him from the judge realizing he and his lawyer are defrauding the courts. Let's not forget, Jake and his idiot lawyer committed the unforced error of submitting into evidence my posts directly noting and citing the law showing Jake and his idiot lawyer have been defrauding the courts over. Not the opposing party, Jake and his idiot lawyer. On their own, unprompted.
This is the greatest win in my OTC bashing career by far. I've shut down scams many times, but never has the idiots scamming made such an unforced error in my entire time. They might as well just let me make a filing in the case 🤣 Holy crap. And they did it because they want to make the false claim that the defendant is me, which is stupid because they have been trying to sue me for over a year now and the defendant wasn't sued until October 24.
I cannot wait to hear them stumble and jammer on the 3rd after the judge has read all my post pointing her to the 3a10 bulletin to read because they have been hiding it from her. Which of course she wouldn't have known, had they not willingly loaded it up as evidence last week 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Walter4
2 days ago
How do you suppose this kid will go about obtaining the $6 mil he's seeking? Promises of no RS, buyback, share reductions only to turn around gag the TA, dump massive amounts of shares then went on to implement a massive RS. He even encouraged investors to average down, stating shares post split would be around 6,000 yet they ballooned to well over 20 million in the blink of an eye He tells everyone what they want to hear while doing the exact opposite. He is a pathological liar that's not to be trusted, his track record over the past decade speaks to this
SCAMBUSTERKING
2 days ago
No, because when Jake files he has to reveal the info and update the "amount due." While in the moment he will lie on repeat on it, when he files he has to admit the selling. Soon to stay listed as OTCIQ and not Pink Limited, Jake will have to enter the TA program where the SS is kept up to date and verified. Meaning we will get constant updates on what was deposited.
Second, these are UNREGISTERED shares as a registered shares require some sort of registration statement on EDGAR. Jake says clearly in filings these are unregistered.
Jake is selling unregistered shares, he has admitted to it in filings, but will lie about it not in filings. I literally documented it for you in that thread.
The_Golden_One
2 days ago
Open Letter to Buffalo Fireside Chat
June 23, 2025
Dear Buffalo Fireside Chat,
I hope this message finds you well and continuing to offer your thoughtful insights to a growing and attentive audience.
I’m writing to respectfully request your opinion—and if possible, a public stance—on a matter that touches both content rights and corporate integrity. A video uploaded to YouTube, featuring statements made by Jake Noch, is currently being referenced and circulated by others under what they claim to be fair use. Do you believe this reuse qualifies as protected commentary under fair use standards? And more broadly, how do you view the ethical boundaries around republishing or amplifying such content when the implications could affect public markets?
In the video, Jake Noch appears to make a clear and unambiguous claim: that he would not reissue the billions of shares that had been previously canceled. He further stated that to do so would constitute fraud. This exact stance was also relayed to me personally several months ago, in consistent terms.
Yet here we are—seeing activity in the market that contradicts those commitments. Given the massive recent trading volume in $SONG and apparent issuance activity, it raises serious questions. Who is selling these shares? How is this possible, and under what justification, if Jake’s earlier commitment still stands?
I believe your voice, with its independent lens and grounded analysis, could help cut through the noise. We’d deeply value your take on what might actually be happening behind the scenes—and who the real sellers might be. There is a growing concern that investors, creators, and small businesses alike may be facing the fallout of contradictions between public statements and backroom maneuvers.
Thank you for your time, your diligence, and your integrity. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
With respect,
The Golden One
MusicExec
3 days ago
Please can someone on this forum check my dates and working assumption's below please
Hey on initial inspection the dates don't seem to stack up here and probably warrant further analysis by people with more knowledge of such matters than me
According to the Financial statements of Music Licensing Inc for the year ended as of December 31, 2023 :
On Jujy 19, 2022 Jake P Noch Family Office LLC acquired control of the Company by purchasing 37,900,000 Shares .....
But it looks to me from the Bloomberg link below that Jake P Noch Family Office LLC, a ST. KITTS & NEVIS company wax not formally invorporated until April 24, 2023
https://lei.bloomberg.com/leis/view/254900JATU42HHH27O31
Crucially the apparent incorporation date of April 24, 2023 is after the date of August 15, 2022 that the company signed an agreement to acquire the issued share capital of PRO Music Rights which the company subsequently argued justified an increase in the company share price
The dates matter here to the IRS as the market value of the SONG share price on April 24,2023 or a later transfer date would have presumably been higher than the fair market value share price at July 19,2022
If my incorporation date working assumption is correct then presumably the shares in the company were initially acquired by Jake or by another entity prior to a transfer to the family office on or after it's incorporation and hence there would have been a capital gain or capital loss to account for to the IRS and / or local tax offices between Jujy 19, 2022 and April 24, 2023 or a later transfer date
Or was Jake P Noch Family Office LLC initially incorporated as a US corporation or a company in another territory's which complied with all approptautr taxes when it subsequently made a transfer at the prevailing fair market value to the company referred to in the Bloomberg link above at a later date ?