HIGHLIGHTS INCLUDE:
- The updated Mineral
Resource estimate for the Kora North deposit comprises a Measured
Resource of 154,000 tonnes @ 18.7 g/t Au, 8.9 g/t Ag and 0.5% Cu;
an Indicated Resource of 690,000 tonnes @ 11.6 g/t Au, 14.1 g/t Ag
and 0.8% Cu and an Inferred Resources of 1.92 million tonnes @ 11.4
g/t Au, 13.1 g/t Ag and 0.7% Cu.
- The total Measured,
Indicated and Inferred Resource covers an area of approximately 400
to 500 metres on strike by 200 to 350 metres vertically,
representing approximately 15% of the target area to be drilled
over the next 12 months.
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, Nov. 13, 2018
(GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- K92 Mining Inc. (TSXV: KNT; OTCQX: KNTNF)
(“K92” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce that an updated
resource estimate has been completed at its Kora North deposit,
based on results from underground grade control, exploration
diamond drilling and face sampling. The updated resource estimate
comprises a Measured Resource of 154,000 tonnes @ 18.7 g/t Au, 8.9
g/t Ag and 0.5% Cu; an Indicated Resource of 690,000 tonnes @ 11.6
g/t Au, 14.1 g/t Ag and 0.8% Cu and an Inferred Resource of 1.92
million tonnes @ 10.7 g/t Au, 13.3 g/t Ag and 0.7% Cu. This
represents an increase of over 20% in the contained gold equivalent
ozs for the Measured and Indicated Resource and almost 30% for the
Inferred Resource. See Table 1 below.
This updated resource estimate is based on
results from 80 diamond drill holes drilled from Diamond Drill
Cuddies 1, 2, 3 and 4 (DDC1, DDC2, DDC3 & DDC4) and over 1,300
face samples taken from horizontal development and from cut and
fill faces along the K1 and K2 lodes. The resource estimate covers
an area of approximately 400 to 500 metres along strike by 200 to
350 metres vertically (see K1 and K2 long sections below),
representing approximately 15% of the target area of 1,000 metres
along strike by up to 1,000 metres vertically which the Company
plans to drill from underground over the coming 12 months.
The updated resource estimate has been defined
after just twelve months of underground exploration drilling and
represents, at the design production levels of 50 - 70,000 ounces
per annum; almost seventeen years of production.
Table 1 - Kora North Mineral
Resource
Global Mineral Resources Kora North
Gold-Copper Mine October 2018 |
Category |
Tonnes |
Gold |
Silver |
Copper |
AuEq |
|
Mt |
g/t |
Mozs |
g/t |
Mozs |
% |
Mlbs |
g/t |
Mozs |
Measured |
0.15 |
18.7 |
0.09 |
8.9 |
0.04 |
0.5 |
1.6 |
19.6 |
0.09 |
Indicated |
0.69 |
11.6 |
0.26 |
14.1 |
0.31 |
0.8 |
11.8 |
12.9 |
0.29 |
Total M & I |
0.85 |
12.9 |
0.35 |
13.1 |
0.36 |
0.7 |
13.3 |
14.1 |
0.39 |
Inferred Total |
1.92 |
10.7 |
0.66 |
13.3 |
0.82 |
0.7 |
29.5 |
11.9 |
0.74 |
Mineral Resources estimated prepared and
verified by Simon Tear (PGEO), consultant to the Company and a
director of independent consultancy H & S Consultants Pty.
Ltd., Sydney, Australia (October 2018)
Key Assumptions and Parameters
Mineralization comprises two parallel, steeply
west dipping, N-S striking quartz-sulphide vein systems, K1 &
K2, within an encompassing dilatant structural zone hosted by
phyllite. An additional structure, the Kora Link, has also been
defined and provides a possible link between the two main vein
systems.
Underground drilling consists of diamond core
for a range of core sizes depending on length of hole and expected
ground conditions. Sampling is sawn half core under geological
control and generally ranges between 0.5m and 1m. Underground face
sampling is completed for every fired round and is to industry
standard.
QAQC data indicated no significant issues with
the accuracy of the on-site analysis.
Core recovery of the mineral zone was initially
90%, this has improved to >95%. There is no relationship between
core recovery and gold grade.
Geological logging is consistent and is based on a full set of
logging codes covering lithology, alteration and
mineralization.
The geological interpretation of the vein
systems is represented as 3D wireframe solids snapped to a
combination of diamond drillhole data and underground face
sampling. Definition of the wireframes is based on identified gold
mineralization in drillcore nominally at a 0.2g/t Au cut off in
conjunction with geological control/sense and current mining
widths.
Gold Equivalent (Au Eq) g/t was calculated using
the formula Au g/t +(Cu% x 1.53) + Ag g/t x 0.0127. (No account of
metal recoveries through the plant have been used in calculating
the metal equivalent grade. However, production is currently
achieving 93% metal recovery for both gold and copper and gold is
currently providing 95% and copper 5% of the total revenue of the
mine).
Gold price US$1,300/oz; Silver US$16.5/oz;
Copper US$2.90/lb.
The wireframes were used to extract a total of
2,159 1-metre composites from the drillhole & sampling database
for gold, copper and silver. No gold top cuts were applied to
composites for the two main vein systems; the Kora Link had a top
cut of 200ppm Au. Silver top cuts of 50 and 200ppm were applied to
the K1 and K2 composite data. No top cut was applied to the copper
composites. Coefficients of variation for the gold composite data
were relatively low for this mineral type, around the 2 to 2.5
mark. Variography indicated modest strike continuity with a
tendency for greater grade continuity in the dip direction,
downhole grade continuity was poor as would be expected for this
type of mineralization.
Grade interpolation of the composite data was
completed using Ordinary Kriging with a block size of 1m by 5m by
5m to reflect the close spaced drilling for K1 and the face
sampling. A larger block size check model indicated no evidence of
over-smoothing of gold grade with the smaller block size.
Default average density values have been applied
to the different lodes. The defaults are based on limited core
measurements using the Archimedes Method (weight in air/weight in
water).
An initial 3 Pass search strategy was applied in
the grade interpolation with two additional passes. Search ellipse
parameters are listed below. Search ellipse orientations generally
reflected the subtle changes in dip and strike of the vein systems.
Two search domains were used for K1, four search domains were used
for K2 and one for the Kora Link.
Pass No |
X radius (m) |
Y radius (m) |
Z radius (m) |
Min Data |
Min Octants |
Max Data |
1 |
2 |
25 |
25 |
12 |
4 |
32 |
2 |
4 |
50 |
50 |
12 |
4 |
32 |
3 |
4 |
75 |
75 |
12 |
4 |
32 |
4 |
5.25 |
100 |
100 |
12 |
4 |
32 |
5 |
5.25 |
100 |
100 |
6 |
2 |
32 |
Allocation of the classification of the Mineral
Resources is derived from the search pass numbers which essentially
is a function of the drillhole and face sample data point
distribution. Additional considerations were included in the
assessment of the classification; in particular, the geological
understanding and complexity of the deposit, sample recovery,
quality of the QAQC sampling and outcomes, density data and
reconciliation with production.
Pass Category |
Resource Classification |
1 |
Measured |
2 |
Indicated |
3 |
Inferred |
4 |
Inferred |
5 |
Inferred |
All material mined within the mineral wireframes
up to the effective date (as of the end of September 2018) has been
removed from the model. Gold reconciliation of the resource model
with production up to the effective date has been good with the
mill production in terms of recovered ounces being less than 10%
above that estimated by the model.
The Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimate
have a lower level of confidence than that applied to an Indicated
Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It
is reasonably expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral
Resource could be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with
continued exploration.
The estimate of Mineral Resources may be
materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title,
taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves
do not have demonstrated economic viability.
John Lewins, K92 Chief Executive Officer and
Director, states, “In just twelve months of underground
drilling, K92 has gone from commencing a resource definition
program to defining a Measured and Indicated Resource at Kora North
of 850,000 tonnes at 14.1 g/t AuEq containing 390,000 AuEq ozs and
an Inferred Resource of 1.92 million tonnes at 11.9 g/t AuEq
containing 740,000 AuEq ozs. This resource covers under 15% of the
total area of 1,000 metres by 1,000 metres that we plan to drill
out from underground over the next twelve months. The Measured and
Indicated Resources alone represents almost six years of production
at current design levels of 50 - 70,000 ozs AuEq. This has been
achieved while at the same time establishing a new mining operation
on the Kora deposit which is on track to produce 45,000 ozs AuEq
for 2018 at a cash cost of less than US$600 per oz AuEq and an AISC
of less than US$800 per ounce.”
This new resource estimate is currently being
used to update the existing Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA)
which K92 has filed and made available for download on the
Company's SEDAR profile. It is anticipated that the new PEA will be
completed in approximately one month.
The updated Mineral Resource Estimate
supersedes the PEA and the PEA can no longer be considered
current.
The technical report titled, "Independent
Technical Report, Mineral Resource Update and Preliminary Economic
Assessment of Irumafimpa and Kora Gold Deposits, Kainantu Project,
Papua New Guinea," with an effective date of March 2, 2017,
provides additional information on the geology of the deposits,
drilling and sampling procedures, lab analysis, and quality
assurance/quality control for the project, and additional details
on the resource estimates.
The existing PEA estimates for Kora, based on
the resource estimate filed on March 2, 2017 (4.36 million tonnes
of 7.3 g/t Au, 35 g/t Ag and 2.23 percent Cu), therefore excluding
Kora North:
- Over a nine-year operating life,
the plant would treat 3.2 million tonnes averaging 7.1 g/t Au, 25
g/t Ag and 1.7 percent Cu (9.3 g/t AuEq(1));
- This would generate an estimated
positive cash flow of US $537 million using current metal prices if
15-metre levels are used in mining; if 25-metre levels are used,
then net cash flows are estimated as US $558 million; this cash
flow includes conceptual allowances for capital;
- Production of an estimated average
of 108,000 AuEq(1) ounces per annum over an eight-year
period from year 2 through to year 9;
- An estimated pretax net present
value (NPV) of US $415 million for 25-metre levels, or US $397
million for 15-metre levels, using current metal prices, exchange
rates and a 5 percent discount;
- An estimated after-tax NPV of US
$329 million for 25-metre levels, or US $316 million for 15-metre
levels, using current metal prices, exchange rates and a 5 percent
discount;
- Initial capital cost is estimated
to be US $13.8 million, including the US $3.3 million for the plant
upgrade identified in the Mincore scoping study, but excluding the
proposed Kora exploration inclines and diamond drilling; sustaining
capital cost is estimated to a further $64-million (U.S.) spent
over the life of the Kora mining for 25-metre levels, or US $83
million for 15-metre levels; and
- Operating cost per tonne is
estimated to be US $125 per tonne for 25-metre levels, or US $126
per tonne for 15-metre mining levels;
- Excluding initial capital
expenditure of US $14 million, cash cost is estimated to be US $547
per ounce AuEq (inclusive of a 2.5 percent net smelter return (NSR)
royalty) and all-in sustaining cost (AISC) of US $619 per ounce
AuEq for 25-metre mining levels, or US $549 per ounce (inclusive of
a 2.5 percent NSR royalty) and AISC of US $644 per ounce AuEq for
15-metre mining levels.
(1) Gold equivalent calculated on metal
prices.
Metal prices used were $1,300 per ounce for
gold, $18 per ounce for silver and $4,800 per tonne for copper.
Kora remains open for expansion in every
direction and strongly mineralized at the extent of all
drilling.
The PEA is preliminary in nature and includes
inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative
geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them
that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and
there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. The technical
report contains a full description of all underlying assumptions
relating to the PEA. Mineral resources that are not mineral
reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. The
resource estimate used within this PEA has not incorporated the
updated mineral resource estimate. The results and conclusions
of any updated PEA incorporating the revised mineral resource, if
completed, will be materially different than those previously
disclosed.
Table 2 |
IRUMAFIMPA AND KORA/EUTOMPI
RESOURCES |
|
Resource by Deposit and Category |
Deposit |
Resource
Category |
Tonnes |
Gold |
Silver |
Copper |
Gold Equivalent |
Mt |
g/t |
Moz |
g/t |
Moz |
% |
Mlb |
g/t |
Moz |
Irumafimpa |
Indicated |
0.56 |
12.8 |
0.23 |
9 |
0.16 |
0.28 |
37 |
13.4 |
0.24 |
Inferred |
0.53 |
10.9 |
0.19 |
9 |
0.16 |
0.27 |
74 |
11.5 |
0.20 |
Kora/Eutompi |
Inferred |
4.36 |
7.3 |
1.02 |
35 |
4.9 |
2.23 |
215 |
11.2 |
1.57 |
Total Indicated |
0.56 |
12.8 |
0.23 |
9 |
0.16 |
0.3 |
4 |
13.4 |
0.24 |
Total Inferred |
4.89 |
7.7 |
1.21 |
32 |
5.06 |
2.0 |
218 |
11.2 |
1.76 |
M in Table is millions. Reported tonnage and
grade figures are rounded from raw estimates to reflect the order
of accuracy of the estimate. Minor variations may occur during the
addition of rounded numbers. Gold equivalents are calculated as
AuEq = Au g/t + Cu%*1.52+ Ag g/t*0.0141.
K92 Mine Geology Manager and Mine Exploration
Manager, Mr. Andrew Kohler, PGeo, a Qualified Person under the
meaning of Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects, has reviewed and is
responsible for the technical content of this news release. Data
verification by Mr. Kohler includes significant time onsite
reviewing drill core, face sampling, underground workings and
discussing work programs and results with geology and mining
personnel.
ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY,
John Lewins
Chief Executive Officer and Director
For further information, please contact the Company at
+1-604-687-7130.
K92 has a standard underground face sampling
procedure in place in which face geological mapping and channel
samples are taken across the strike, at right angles to the drive
walls at intervals of approximately of 1.5m apart coinciding with
the development advance of the heading. A geologist determines the
interval lengths across the face for each sample depending on the
geological character of the material. Two samples are taken per
interval at waist and knee height and the corresponding widths
recorded. No greater than 1.5m intervals are allowed during
sampling. Samples are approximately 3.5kg in size. Assay for Au, Ag
and Cu are averaged using length weighting of the sample interval
and then, coupled with the orientation of channel and placed in the
database. Standard QAQC procedures are used for underground samples
as described in the ITR Mineral Resource Estimate and Preliminary
Economic Assessment of Irumafimpa and Kora Gold Deposits, Kainantu
Project, PNG dated March 2, 2017.
NEITHER TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE NOR ITS REGULATION
SERVICES PROVIDER (AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED IN POLICIES OF THE TSX
VENTURE EXCHANGE) ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR
ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION: This news release includes certain
“forward-looking statements” under applicable Canadian securities
legislation. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon
a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered
reasonable, are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties,
and other factors which may cause the actual results and future
events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. All statements that address future
plans, activities, events, or developments that the Company
believes, expects, or anticipates will or may occur are
forward-looking information, including statements regarding the
realization of the preliminary economic analysis for the Project,
expectations of future cash flows, the proposed plant expansion,
potential expansion of resources and the generation of further
drilling results which may or may not occur. Forward-looking
statements and information contained herein are based on certain
factors and assumptions regarding, among other things, the market
price of the Company’s securities, metal prices, exchange rates,
taxation, the estimation, timing and amount of future exploration
and development, capital and operating costs, the availability of
financing, the receipt of regulatory approvals, environmental
risks, title disputes, failure of plant, equipment or processes to
operate as anticipated, accidents, labour disputes, claims and
limitations on insurance coverage and other risks of the mining
industry, changes in national and local government regulation of
mining operations, and regulations and other matters.. There can be
no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as
actual results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company
disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
Four photos accompanying this announcement are available at
http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/410675ea-dff8-44cb-9d98-43c237cd05f0
http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/0e101f99-9f59-4ae2-a4ed-96363dfaba7f
http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/9ec968ea-e527-4486-8531-5576043af0bf
http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/07c87ad8-823d-404a-9bdd-d6353e812175
K92 Mining (QX) (USOTC:KNTNF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2024 to Jan 2025
K92 Mining (QX) (USOTC:KNTNF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2024 to Jan 2025