ITEM 4.01 CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
a)
Previous Independent Accountant
On February 13, 2008, Geopulse Exploration, Inc., Inc. (the Company), a Nevada corporation, dismissed Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte, LLP, Chartered Accountants (Dale Matheson), whose address is Suite 1500, 1140 Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 4G1 as the Companys principal independent accountant for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008. The decision to dismiss the auditor was recommended and approved by the Board of Directors.
The reports of Dale Matheson, for the past two fiscal years did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, except for a going concern qualification, and were not qualified or modified as to any uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle. During the Companys two most recent fiscal year and any subsequent interim period up to and including the date of the Company's dismissal of Dale Matheson, there have been no disagreements with Dale Matheson, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Dale Matheson, would have caused them to make reference thereto in their report on the financial statements for such periods.
On or about February 13, 2008 the Company provided a draft copy of this report on Form 8-K to Dale Matheson, requesting their comments on the information contained therein. The responsive letter from Dale Matheson, is filed as an exhibit to their report on Form 8-K.
b)
New Independent Accountant
On February 15, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed the firm Madsen & Associates, CPAs Inc. (Madsen), whose address is 684 East Vine Street, #3, Murray, Utah 84107, as the principal independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008. During the two most recent fiscal years or subsequent interim period, neither the Company, nor anyone on its behalf, consulted with Madsen regarding the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, nor did Madsen provide advice to the Company, either written or oral, that was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue. Further, during the Company's two most recent fiscal years or subsequent interim period, the Company has not consulted Madsen, on any matter that was the subject of a disagreement or a reportable event.
- 2 -
ITEM 9.01