UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No._)
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
☐
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
☒
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
☐
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
☐
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
MID-AMERICA APARTMENT COMMUNITIES,
INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement,
if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒
|
No fee required.
|
|
|
☐
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) (1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11
(set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
☐
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
|
|
☐
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for
which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
MID-AMERICA
APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.
April
14, 2016
To
our shareholders:
You
are invited to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. to be held at 11:00 a.m.,
Central Daylight Time, on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, at our corporate headquarters, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138.
The Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement, both of which accompany this letter, provide details regarding
the business to be conducted at the meeting, as well as other important information about us.
During
the meeting, management will review our 2015 fiscal year and provide a report on our progress, including recent developments.
Shareholders will also have the opportunity to ask us questions.
Along
with the other members of the Board of Directors and management, I look forward to greeting you at the meeting if you are able
to attend.
|
Cordially,
|
|
|
|
H. Eric Bolton, Jr.
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
|
MID-AMERICA
APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.
6584
Poplar Avenue
Memphis,
Tennessee 38138
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO
BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2016
|
The
2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or the Annual Meeting, will be held at 11:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, on Tuesday, May
17, 2016, at our corporate headquarters, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138.
Shareholders
will consider and vote on the following items at the Annual Meeting:
|
1.
|
Election
of the ten directors named herein to serve for one year and until their successors have
been duly elected and qualified;
|
|
2.
|
An
advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers
as disclosed in the accompanying Proxy Statement;
|
|
3.
|
Ratification
of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016;
and
|
|
4.
|
Such
other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
|
OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
FOR
ALL ITEMS.
Shareholders
of record at the close of business on Friday, March 11, 2016, are entitled to receive this notice and vote at the Annual Meeting
and any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders To Be Held on May 17, 2016. The Proxy
Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at http://materials.proxyvote.com/59522J.
Your
vote is important. Please refer to the Proxy Card and the accompanying Proxy Statement for information regarding your voting options.
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please take advantage of one of the advance voting options to assure that your
shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by following the procedures
described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.
|
By Order of the Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
Leslie B.C. Wolfgang
Senior Vice President, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, and Corporate Secretary
|
Memphis, Tennessee
April 14, 2016
Whether
or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please submit your proxy prior to the Annual Meeting by following the instructions
on the enclosed Proxy Card or voter instruction form. Shareholders who attend the Annual Meeting may vote even
if they have already sent in a proxy.
|
MID-AMERICA
APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.
6584
Poplar Avenue
Memphis,
Tennessee 38138
PROXY
STATEMENT FOR THE
2016
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
|
Mid-America
Apartment Communities, Inc. is soliciting proxies, and your vote is very important. For this reason, our Board of Directors requests
that you allow your shares to be represented at the Annual Meeting by the proxies named on the enclosed Proxy Card. In connection
with our solicitation of proxies, we are mailing this Proxy Statement, the enclosed Proxy Card, and our Annual Report to Shareholders
to shareholders beginning on or about April 14, 2016.
In
this Proxy Statement, terms such as “MAA”, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Mid-America
Apartment Communities, Inc.
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE MEETING
|
WHEN
IS THE ANNUAL MEETING?
|
The
Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, at 11:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time.
WHERE
WILL THE ANNUAL MEETING BE HELD?
Our
Annual Meeting will be held at our corporate headquarters, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138.
WHAT
ITEMS WILL BE VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?
You
will vote on the following matters:
|
1.
|
Election
of ten directors named herein to serve for one year and until their successors have been
duly elected and qualified;
|
|
2.
|
An
advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers
as disclosed in this Proxy Statement;
|
|
3.
|
Ratification
of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016;
and
|
|
4.
|
Such
other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
|
As
of the date of this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any other matters that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
1
|
WHAT
ARE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONS?
Our
Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
|
1.
|
“
FOR
”
the election of the ten nominees named herein to serve on the Board of Directors;
|
|
2.
|
“
FOR
”
the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers
as disclosed in this Proxy Statement; and
|
|
3.
|
“
FOR
”
the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for 2016.
|
If
any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors
or, if no recommendation is given, in accordance with their best judgment.
DO
DIRECTORS ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING?
We
do not require our directors to attend our Annual Meeting, but our Board of Directors encourages its members to attend.
WHO
IS ENTITLED TO VOTE AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?
Only
shareholders of record at the close of business on the record date, March 11, 2016, are entitled to receive notice of the Annual
Meeting and to vote the shares that they held on the record date at the Annual Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment of
the Annual Meeting. The only class of stock that can be voted at the Annual Meeting is our common stock. Each share of common
stock is entitled to one vote on all matters that come before the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on March 11, 2016,
we had 75,463,218 shares of common stock outstanding.
Shareholders
of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
. If on March 11, 2016 your shares were registered directly in your name with our
transfer agent, then you are a shareholder of record. As a shareholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting
or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to fill out and return the enclosed Proxy
Card, or vote by proxy over the telephone or on the Internet as instructed below, to ensure your vote is counted.
Beneficial
Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank
. If on March 11, 2016 your shares were held in an account at a brokerage
firm, bank, dealer or similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and
these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the
shareholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker
or other agent on how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you
are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request and obtain
a valid proxy from your broker or other agent or nominee.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
2
|
HOW
DO I VOTE MY SHARES?
Shareholders
of Record:
If you are a shareholder of record (your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent) you
may vote your shares in person or by proxy:
In
Person
: You may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.
By
Proxy
: You can vote by telephone, on the Internet or by mail. We encourage you to vote by telephone or Internet, both of which
are convenient, cost-effective, and reliable alternatives to returning your Proxy Card by mail.
|
·
|
By
Telephone
: You may submit your voting instructions by telephone by following the
instructions printed on the Proxy Card. If you submit your voting instructions by telephone,
you do not have to mail in your Proxy Card.
|
|
·
|
On
the Internet
: You may vote on the Internet by following the instructions printed
on the Proxy Card. If you vote on the Internet, you do not have to mail in your Proxy
Card.
|
|
·
|
By
Mail
: If you properly complete and sign the enclosed Proxy Card and return it in
the enclosed envelope, it will be voted in accordance with your instructions. The enclosed
envelope requires no additional postage if mailed in the United States.
|
Beneficial
Owner:
If you are a beneficial owner (your shares are held in an account with a brokerage firm, bank, dealer or similar organization),
you may vote your shares in person or by proxy:
In
Person
: You may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person; however, you will need to present a valid proxy from your broker
permitting you to vote the shares in person at the Annual Meeting.
By
Proxy
: If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should receive
a Proxy Card and voting instructions with these proxy materials from that organization rather than from us. Complete and mail
the Proxy Card to ensure that your vote is counted. Alternatively, follow the instructions provided by your broker or bank to
vote by telephone or over the Internet as that organization allows.
WHAT
IF I HAVE SHARES IN THE MAA EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN?
If
you have shares in an account under our Employee Stock Ownership Plan, you have the right to vote the shares in your account.
To do this, you must sign and timely return the Proxy Card you received with this Proxy Statement, or grant your proxy by telephone
or over the Internet by following the instructions on the Proxy Card.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
3
|
HOW
WILL MY VOTE BE CAST?
Your
vote will be cast as you indicate on your Proxy Card. If you submit an executed Proxy Card without marking your voting selections,
your shares will be voted as follows:
|
1.
|
“FOR”
the election of the ten nominees named herein to serve on the Board of Directors;
|
|
2.
|
“FOR”
the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of our named executive
officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement; and
|
|
3.
|
“FOR”
the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent registered public
accounting firm for 2016.
|
If
any additional matters are properly presented at the meeting, your proxy (one of the individuals named on your Proxy Card) will
vote your shares as recommended by the Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in accordance with his or her best
judgment. Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately count “For”,
“Against” and “Abstain” votes.
If
your shares are held by your broker as your nominee (that is, in “street name”), you will need to obtain a proxy form
from the institution that holds your shares and follow the instructions included on that form regarding how to instruct your broker
to vote your shares. In the event that a broker, bank, custodian, nominee or other record holder of our common stock indicates
on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote certain shares on a particular matter, then those shares will
be treated as broker non-votes. Shares represented by such broker non-votes will be counted in determining whether there is a
quorum.
CAN
I CHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I RETURN MY PROXY?
Yes.
You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are the record holder of your shares,
you may revoke your proxy in any one of three ways:
|
1.
|
You
may submit another properly completed Proxy bearing a later date;
|
|
2.
|
You
may send a written notice that you are revoking your proxy to our Corporate Secretary,
6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138; or
|
|
3.
|
You
may attend the Annual Meeting and notify the election officials that you wish to revoke
your proxy and vote in person. Attending the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke
your proxy.
|
If
your shares are held by your broker or bank as nominee or agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker or
bank.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
4
|
HOW
MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED TO APPROVE EACH PROPOSAL?
|
1.
|
For
the election of directors, the votes cast “For” the nominee must exceed the
votes cast “Against” the nominee for the nominee to be elected. Neither abstentions
nor broker non-votes will have any legal effect on whether this proposal is approved.
If a nominee fails to receive more “For” votes than votes cast “Against”
and is an incumbent director, the nominee is required to tender his or her resignation
to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors for consideration,
and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether it is advisable
to accept or reject the resignation and will submit a recommendation to the Board of
Directors for consideration.
|
|
2.
|
For
the advisory (non-binding) vote on the compensation of our named executive officers to
be approved, the votes cast “For” the proposal must exceed the votes cast
“Against” the proposal. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have
any legal effect on whether this proposal is approved.
|
|
3.
|
Shareholder
approval for the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm is
not required, but the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of Ernst & Young
LLP for ratification in order to obtain the views of our shareholders. This proposal
will be approved if the votes cast “For” the proposal exceed the votes cast
“Against” the proposal. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have
any legal effect on whether this proposal is approved. The Audit Committee will consider
a vote against the firm by the shareholders in selecting our independent registered public
accounting firm in the future.
|
HOW
MANY SHARES MUST BE PRESENT TO CONSTITUTE A QUORUM FOR THE MEETING?
A
quorum of shareholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if at least a majority of the outstanding
shares of common stock are represented by shareholders present at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy. On March 11, 2016,
the record date, there were 75,463,218 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Thus, 37,731,610 shares of common
stock must be represented by shareholders present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to have a quorum.
Your
shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy or vote at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the Chairman of the meeting or a majority of
the votes present at the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date.
HOW
CAN I FIND OUT THE RESULTS OF THE VOTING AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?
Preliminary
voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final results will be disclosed in a Form 8-K, which can be found using
the “SEC Filings and Reports” link on the “For Investors” page of our website (http://ir.maac.com) following
the report’s filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, within four business days of the Annual Meeting.
Information from our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
5
|
HOW
AND WHEN MAY I SUBMIT A SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS?
Proposals
of shareholders intended for inclusion in the proxy statement to be furnished to shareholders entitled to vote at our 2017 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders must comply with our Bylaws and all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. The proposals must be sent to the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, Attention: Corporate Secretary, MAA, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138 and be received no later than the
close of business on December 15, 2016.
Pursuant
to our Bylaws, shareholders wishing to submit proposals or director nominations that are not to be included in our proxy materials
must give timely notice thereof in writing to our Corporate Secretary. To be timely for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
you must notify our Corporate Secretary, in writing, no later than the close of business on February 16, 2017 nor earlier than
the close of business on January 17, 2017. We also advise you to review our Bylaws, which contain additional requirements about
advance notice of shareholder proposals and director nominations, including the different notice submission date requirements
in the event that we do not hold our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders between April 17, 2017 and July 16, 2017. The Chairman
of the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders may determine, if the facts warrant, that a matter has not been properly brought before
the meeting and, therefore, may not be considered at the meeting. In addition, the proxy solicited by the Board of Directors for
the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will confer discretionary voting authority with respect to any matter presented by a shareholder
at that meeting for which we have not been provided with timely notice. Shareholder proposals must be sent to Attention: Corporate
Secretary, MAA, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138.
HOW
CAN I OBTAIN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K?
Our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC, including the financial statements, and
financial statement schedules is being mailed along with this Proxy Statement. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2015, including all exhibits may be obtained from the “SEC Filings and Reports” link on the “For
Investors” page of our website at http://ir.maac.com or received free of charge by writing Investor Relations at MAA, 6584
Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138. Information from our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
WHO
IS PAYING FOR THIS PROXY SOLICITATION?
We
will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. We expect that this Proxy Statement will first be sent to shareholders on
or about April 14, 2016.
In addition to these mailed proxy materials, our directors and employees
may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid
any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost
of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.
HOW
MANY COPIES SHOULD I RECEIVE IF I SHARE AN ADDRESS WITH ANOTHER SHAREHOLDER?
The
SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy materials
with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single Proxy Statement addressed to those shareholders.
This process, which is
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
6
|
commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially provides extra convenience for shareholders
and cost savings for companies.
We
and some brokers household proxy materials, delivering one copy of proxy materials to multiple shareholders sharing an address,
unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your broker
or us that they or we will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise
or until you revoke your consent. If at any time you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive
separate proxy materials, or if you are receiving multiple copies of the Proxy Statement and wish to receive only one, please
do one of the following: (a) notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account or by marking the appropriate box
on your Proxy Card if you hold registered shares; or (b) notify us in writing at MAA, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138,
Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by calling (901) 682-6600.
We
can only household registered shares. If you own registered shares as well as hold shares in a brokerage account, you will continue
to receive multiple copies of the Proxy Statement. Similarly, if you own shares in more than one brokerage firm, you can only
household the Proxy Statements you receive within each individual brokerage house.
WHOM
SHOULD I CONTACT IF I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
If
you have any questions about the Annual Meeting, these proxy materials or your ownership of our common stock, please contact our
Legal Department at 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138, or email investor.relations@maac.com or call (901) 682-6600.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
7
|
INFORMATION
ABOUT
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
OVERVIEW
OF 2015 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Committee
Membership
|
Other
Public
Boards
|
Name
|
Age
|
Director
Since
|
Primary
Occupation
|
A
|
C
|
NCG
|
REI
|
H.
Eric Bolton, Jr.
|
59
|
1997
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of MAA
|
|
|
|
XC
|
1
|
Alan
B. Graf, Jr.
(2)
|
62
|
2002
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FedEx Corporation
|
XC
|
|
|
|
1
|
Ralph
Horn
(2)
|
75
|
1998
|
Past
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of First Horizon National Corporation
|
|
X
|
XC
|
|
1
|
James
K. Lowder
(2)
|
66
|
2013
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors of The Colonial Company
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
Thomas
H. Lowder
|
66
|
2013
|
Past
Chairman of the Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Properties Trust
|
|
|
|
X
|
0
|
Claude
B. Nielsen
(2)
|
65
|
2013
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc.
|
|
X
|
|
|
0
|
Philip
W. Norwood
(2)
|
68
|
2007
|
Past
President and Chief Executive Officer of Faison Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
XC
|
X
|
X
|
0
|
W.
Reid Sanders
(2)
|
66
|
2010
|
President
of Sanders Properties, LLC and Sanders Investments, LLC
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
1
|
William
B. Sansom
(2)
|
74
|
2006
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of H.T. Hackney Co.
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
1
|
Gary
Shorb
(2)
|
65
|
2012
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer of Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare
|
X
|
|
|
|
0
|
John
W. Spiegel
(2)
|
75
|
2013
|
Past
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of SunTrust Banks, Inc.
|
X
|
|
|
|
0
|
(1)
Monica
McGurk
(2)
, who is standing for election, joined the Board of Directors in March 2016
(2)
Indicates an Independent Director
A = Audit Committee,
C = Compensation Committee, NCG = Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, REI = Real Estate Investment Committee, XC =
Committee Chair
WHAT IS OUR
PHILOSOPHY REGARDING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE?
|
We believe
that effective corporate governance is critical to our long-term health and our ability to create value for our shareholders.
We have continued to review our corporate governance policies and practices and to compare them to the practices of other public
companies. We will continue to monitor emerging developments in corporate governance and enhance our policies and procedures when
required or when our Board of Directors determines that it would benefit us and our shareholders. Based on this review, the Board
of Directors has established and maintains Corporate Governance Guidelines that include detailed specifications for director qualification
and responsibility. You may find a copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines in the “Governance Documents” section
of the “Corporate Overview” link on the “For Investors” page of our website at http://ir.maac.com.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
8
|
The responsibilities
of our Board of Directors and its committees are described below, along with other corporate governance-related disclosures. All
of our Board of Directors’ committees have written charters, which can be found in the “Governance Documents”
section of our “Corporate Overview” link on the “For Investors” page of our website at http://ir.maac.com.
We will also provide a copy of any committee charter, the Corporate Governance Guidelines or our Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics without charge upon written request sent to: MAA, Attention: Investor Relations, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee
38138. Our Board of Directors may, from time-to-time, form other committees as circumstances warrant. Such committees will have
authority and responsibility as delegated by our Board of Directors.
Information
from our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
HOW MANY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
DO WE HAVE?
|
Our Board
of Directors has affirmatively determined that ten of our current twelve directors are independent: Alan B. Graf, Jr., Ralph Horn,
James K. Lowder, Monica McGurk, Claude B. Nielsen, Philip W. Norwood, W. Reid Sanders, William B. Sansom, Gary Shorb and John
W. Spiegel. Each of these ten directors meets the independence standards of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the listing standards
of the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, and applicable SEC rules.
Our Corporate
Governance Guidelines provide that no director who is or would be over the age of 75 at the expiration of his or her current term
may be nominated to a new term, unless the Board of Directors waives the retirement age for a specific director for special circumstances.
In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board of Directors has determined to not re-nominate Ralph Horn, age
75, or John W. Spiegel, age 75, for re-election at the Annual Meeting. In connection therewith, the size of our Board of Directors
will be reduced from twelve to ten directors with eight independent directors.
HOW DO WE
DETERMINE WHETHER A DIRECTOR IS INDEPENDENT?
|
A director
is considered independent if our Board of Directors affirmatively determines that the director has no direct or indirect material
relationship with us. Consistent with the requirements of the SEC and the NYSE, our Board of Directors reviews all relevant transactions
or relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and us, our senior management and our independent
auditors. Our Board of Directors has adopted the following categorical standards:
|
·
|
A
director who is an employee or whose immediate family member is one of our executive
officers is not independent until three years after the end of such employment relationship.
|
|
·
|
A
director who receives, or whose immediate family member receives, more than $120,000
per year in direct compensation from us, other than director and committee fees and pension
or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation
is not contingent in any way on continued service), is not independent until three years
after he or she ceases to receive more than $120,000 per year in such compensation.
|
|
·
|
A
director who is affiliated with or employed by, or whose immediate family member is affiliated
with or employed in a professional capacity by, any of our present or former internal
or external auditors is not independent until three years after the end of the affiliation
or the employment or auditing relationship.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
9
|
|
·
|
A
director who is employed, or whose immediate family member is employed, as an executive
officer of another company where any of our present executive officers serve on that
company’s Compensation Committee is not independent until three years after the
end of such service or the employment relationship.
|
|
·
|
A
director who is an executive officer or an employee, or whose immediate family member
is an executive officer, of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from,
us for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the
greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues,
is not independent until three years after falling below such threshold.
|
Our Board
of Directors consults with our General Counsel to ensure that the Board of Directors’ determinations are consistent with
all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent”, including those
set forth in pertinent listing standards of the NYSE, as in effect from time-to-time.
DO ANY NON-MANAGEMENT
DIRECTORS HAVE RELATIONSHIPS WITH US THAT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS DETERMINED WERE MATERIAL?
|
Colonial
Insurance Agency, a corporation wholly-owned by The Colonial Company (in which Thomas H. Lowder and James K. Lowder each has a
50% ownership interest), serves as a broker for an unaffiliated insurance carrier, which advertised for its renter’s insurance
program at some of our multifamily properties through August 2015. We did not make any payments to Colonial Insurance Agency under
these arrangements, however, the insurance carrier paid a commission to Colonial Insurance Agency for renter’s insurance
sold to our residents, and Colonial Insurance Agency paid us an advertising fee to permit the sales of rental insurance policies
on our multifamily properties. Pursuant to this arrangement, for 2015, Colonial Insurance Agency paid us approximately $154,000
in advertising fees. Our relationship with Colonial Insurance Agency ceased in 2015.
HOW MANY
TIMES DID OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEET LAST YEAR?
|
Our Board
of Directors met four times during 2015.
DID ANY OF
OUR DIRECTORS ATTEND FEWER THAN 75% OF THE MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THEIR ASSIGNED COMMITTEES?
|
All of
the directors who were serving during the calendar year 2015 attended more than 75% of the meetings of our Board of Directors
and their assigned committees during the calendar year 2015.
HOW IS OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS STRUCTURED?
|
If
all of our director nominees are elected by our shareholders, the leadership structure of our Board of Directors will include
a combined Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, seven independent directors and two non-independent
directors. All of our directors serve with equal importance and have an equal vote on all matters. Our independent directors meet
without management present at regularly scheduled executive sessions. Messrs. Graf and Horn presently serve as co-lead independent
directors. Following the Annual Meeting, Mr. Graf will serve as lead independent director. Our Board of Directors believes that
we have been and continue to be well served by having our Chief Executive Officer also serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors.
Our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are all led by chairmen who are independent directors
and are 100% comprised of independent directors. We believe that the current board leadership model, when combined with the composition
of our Board of Directors, the strong leadership of our independent directors, the board committees listed above and the corporate
governance policies
already in
place, strikes an appropriate balance between consistent leadership and independent oversight of our business and affairs.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
10
|
DOES OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MEET REGULARLY WITHOUT MANAGEMENT PRESENT?
|
Both our
non-management directors and our independent directors regularly meet without management present. As co-lead independent directors
in 2015, Messrs. Graf and Horn lead the meetings of the non-management directors and the meetings of the independent directors.
The non-management directors and the independent directors both held four executive sessions during 2015.
DOES OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAVE ANY STANDING COMMITTEES?
|
We have
four standing committees: Audit Committee; Compensation Committee; Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and Real Estate
Investment Committee. All of the members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee are independent, pursuant to the standards set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the NYSE listing standards
and applicable SEC rules. The Real Estate Investment Committee consists of two independent members and two non-independent members.
Each standing committee of our Board of Directors has a charter, which can be found in the “Governance Documents”
section of the “Corporate Overview” link on the “For Investors” page of our website at http://ir.maac.com.
Information from our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
11
|
The current
membership of, and information about, each committee of our Board of Directors is shown below.
Committee/Current
Members
|
|
Committee
Functions
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Alan
B. Graf, Jr. (Chair)
W.
Reid Sanders
Gary
Shorb
John
W. Spiegel
Number of meetings
held in 2015:
Eight
|
|
·
appoints,
determines the compensation of, oversees and evaluates the work of the independent registered public accounting firm;
·
pre-approves
all auditing services and permitted non-audit services, including the fees and terms thereof, to be performed by the independent
registered public accounting firm;
·
reviews
and discusses with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the annual audited and quarterly unaudited
financial statements and our disclosure under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations” in our Form 10-Qs and Form 10-Ks;
·
reviews
and discusses with management and the independent registered public accounting firm the adequacy and effectiveness of our systems
of internal accounting and financial controls;
·
establishes
procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing
matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
·
reviews
with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our compliance with the requirements for qualification as
a real estate investment trust, or REIT; and
·
issues
a report annually as required by the SEC’s proxy solicitation rules.
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
12
|
Committee/Current
Members
|
|
Committee Functions
|
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Philip W. Norwood (Chair)
Ralph Horn
Claude B. Nielsen
William B. Sansom
Number of meetings
held in 2015:
Five
|
|
·
reviews and approves our compensation objectives;
·
reviews and recommends the compensation programs, plans, and awards for the
CEO to the Board of Directors and approves such for the other executive officers, after taking into consideration any past “Say-on-Pay”
votes by the shareholders;
·
reviews and approves any employment and severance arrangements and benefits
of the CEO and other executive officers;
·
recommends to the Board of Directors how often MAA should submit to the shareholders
the “Say-on-Pay” vote;
·
recommends the compensation for directors to the Board of Directors;
·
evaluates and oversees risks associated with compensation policies and practices;
·
acts as administrator, as may be required, for our equity-related incentive
plans;
·
reviews and discusses with management the information contained in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section of the Proxy Statement;
·
assesses the independence of, retains and oversees compensation consultants,
outside counsel and other advisors assisting the committee with the performance of its duties; and
·
issues a report annually related to executive compensation, as required by
the SEC’s proxy solicitation rules.
|
|
|
|
NOMINATING
AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
Current Members:
Ralph Horn (Chair)
Philip W. Norwood
William B. Sansom
Number of meetings
held in 2015:
Three
|
|
·
provides assistance and oversight in identifying qualified candidates to serve
as members of the Board of Directors;
·
reviews the qualification and performance of incumbent directors to determine
whether to recommend them as nominees for re-election;
·
reviews and considers candidates for directors who may be suggested by any
director or executive officer, or by any shareholder if made in accordance with our charter, bylaws and applicable law; and
·
recommends to the Board of Directors appropriate corporate governance principles
that best serve the practices and objectives of the Board of Directors.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
13
|
Committee/Current
Members
|
|
Committee
Functions
|
REAL
ESTATE INVESTMENT COMMITTEE
Current Members:
H.
Eric Bolton, Jr. (Chair)
Thomas
H. Lowder
Philip
W. Norwood
W.
Reid Sanders
Number of meetings
held in 2015:
Four
|
|
·
considers
and approves or disapproves specific property acquisitions, dispositions or development projects within approval levels established
annually by the Board of Directors;
·
refers
and makes a recommendation on proposed property acquisitions or development projects outside the approval levels established annually
by the Board of Directors; and
·
approves
disposition of individual properties not included in the annual strategic plan reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.
|
DOES THE
AUDIT COMMITTEE HAVE AN AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT?
|
Our Board
of Directors has determined that Alan B. Graf, Jr. meets the qualifications of an audit committee financial expert as defined
by applicable SEC rules and an independent director under applicable NYSE rules.
HOW DOES
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS SELECT DIRECTOR NOMINEES?
|
At the
Annual Meeting, shareholders are being asked to elect H. Eric Bolton, Jr., Alan B. Graf, Jr., James K. Lowder, Thomas H. Lowder,
Monica McGurk, Claude B. Nielsen, Philip W. Norwood, W. Reid Sanders, William B. Sansom and Gary Shorb to serve until the 2017
Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
Director
Nomination Policy
|
It is the
policy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to review and consider all candidates for nomination and election
as directors who may be suggested by any of our directors or executive officers. It is our policy to refer to our Nominating and
Corporate Governance committee for consideration any director candidate recommended by any shareholder if recommended in accordance
with our Charter, Bylaws and applicable law.
We will
consider for inclusion in our proxy materials for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, shareholder proposals that are received
at our executive offices no later than December 15, 2016,
and that comply with our Bylaws and
all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Proposals must be sent to the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee, Attention: Corporate Secretary, MAA, 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138. If you would like to
recommend a director candidate, you must follow the procedures outlined above under the caption “Additional Information
– How and when may I submit a shareholder proposal for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?”
If a shareholder
is recommending a candidate to serve on our Board of Directors, the recommendation must include the information specified in our
Bylaws, including the following:
|
·
|
The
shareholder’s name and address and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf
the nomination is proposed;
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
14
|
|
·
|
The class or series and number of our shares which are, directly
or indirectly, owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder and such beneficial owner;
|
|
·
|
Any option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right,
or similar right with an exercise or conversion privilege or a settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class
or series of our shares or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any class or series of our shares, whether
or not such instrument or right shall be subject to settlement in the underlying class or series of our capital stock or otherwise,
or collectively a “Derivative Instrument,” directly or indirectly owned beneficially by such shareholder and any other
direct or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any profit derived from any increase or decrease in the value of our shares;
|
|
·
|
Any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship
pursuant to which such shareholder has a right to vote any shares of any of our securities;
|
|
·
|
Any short interest in any of our securities;
|
|
·
|
Any rights to dividends on our shares owned beneficially by such
shareholder that are separated or separable from the underlying shares;
|
|
·
|
Any proportionate interest in our shares or Derivative Instruments
held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such shareholder is a general partner or, directly or
indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner;
|
|
·
|
Any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that
such shareholder is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of our shares or Derivative Instruments, if any,
as of the date of such notice, including without limitation any such interests held by members of such shareholder’s immediate
family sharing the same household; and
|
|
·
|
All information regarding the nominee that would be required to be
included in our Proxy Statement by the rules of the SEC, including the nominee’s age, business experience for the past five
years and any other directorships currently held by the nominee or held in the last five years, as well as information regarding
certain legal proceedings involving the nominee over the last 10 years.
|
Minimum
Director Qualifications
The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee along with our Board of Directors is responsible for determining the skills and characteristics that need to be met by
each director and director nominee in exercising their fiduciary duty to shareholders. In determining director or director nominee
qualifications, general requirements applicable to all directors as well as individual skills and experiences that should be represented
on the Board of Directors as a whole, but not necessarily by each director, are considered.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee considers each director nominee’s integrity, judgment, experience, independence, material relationships with us,
time availability, service on other boards of directors and their committees, or any other characteristics that may prove relevant
at any given time as determined by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. A director or director nominee’s knowledge
and/or experience in areas such as, but not limited to, real estate investing or other related industries, REITs, management, leadership,
public companies, equity and debt capital markets, and public company financial accounting are likely to be considered both in
relation to the individual’s qualification to serve on our Board of Directors and the needs of our Board of Directors, as
a whole.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
15
|
The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee seeks to provide diversity on our Board of Directors with a depth of experience and differences in viewpoints and skills.
While the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a policy about diversity as it pertains solely to our Board
of Directors, all of our directors are participants along with our employees in our Code of Conduct which embodies diversity as
a tremendous asset and one which should be actively embraced. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to embody
the spirit of our Code of Conduct by valuing a diversity of experiences and perspectives in our directors and director nominees.
The retirement age for our directors is
75. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that no director who is or would be over the age of 75 at the expiration of his
or her current term may be nominated to a new term, unless the Board of Directors waives the retirement age for a specific director
for special circumstances. While it is believed that a director’s knowledge and/or experience can continue to provide benefit
to our Board of Directors following a director’s retirement from their primary work affiliation, it is recognized that a
director’s knowledge of and involvement in ever changing business environments can weaken and therefore their ability to
continue to be an active contributor to our Board of Directors will be reviewed. Upon a director’s change in employment status,
they are required to notify the Chairman of our Board of Directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of such
change and to offer their resignation for review.
Members of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee as well as other members of the Board of Directors and members of executive management may meet with directors
or director nominees for purposes of determining their qualifications.
CAN
I COMMUNICATE DIRECTLY WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS?
Yes. Shareholders
and other interested parties may communicate in writing with our Board of Directors, any of its committees, its independent directors,
or any individual director by using the following address:
Corporate Secretary
ATTN:
{Group
or director to whom you are addressing}
MAA
6584 Poplar Avenue
Memphis, TN 38138
All letters addressed to our Board of
Directors or its committees will be forwarded to the appropriate chairman. Letters addressed to the independent directors will
be forwarded to our lead independent director. Letters addressed to individual directors will be forwarded to the addressee.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
16
|
DO WE HAVE A CODE OF CONDUCT?
Yes. Our Board of Directors has adopted
a Code of Conduct applicable to our executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer,
or CFO, as well as our directors and employees. The Code of Conduct is available in the “Governance Documents” section
of the “Corporate Overview” link on the “For Investors” page of our website at http://ir.maac.com. We intend
to post amendments to or waivers from our Code of Conduct (to the extent applicable to our CEO, Principal Financial Officer or
Principal Accounting Officer) at this location on our website. No waivers to the Code of Conduct have been made as of the date
of this document. Information from our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
WHAT ROLE DOES THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS PLAY IN RISK MANAGEMENT?
Both the Board of Directors as
a whole and its respective committees serve an active role in overseeing management of our risks. Our Board of Directors regularly
reviews, with members of our senior management and outside advisors, information regarding our strategy and key areas of the company
including operations, finance, legal and regulatory, as well as the risks associated with each. Senior management as well as outside
advisors also periodically meet with each committee and make representations associated with the risks relevant to the respective
committee’s area of focus. The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our
executive compensation plans and reviewing the risks associated with our overall compensation practices and policies for all of
our employees. The Audit Committee oversees risks associated with financial matters such as accounting, internal controls over
financial reporting, tax (including REIT compliance), fraud assessment and financial policies. The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee manages risks associated with corporate governance policies, the independence of our Board of Directors and potential
conflicts of interest. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks,
our Board of Directors is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks.
WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE?
Scope of Authority
. The Compensation
Committee reviews and approves our compensation objectives and our compensation programs, plans, and awards for executive officers,
among other things. The Compensation Committee’s charter can be found in the “Governance Documents” section in
the “Corporate Overview” link on the “For Investors” page of our website at http://ir.maac.com. Information
from our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee reviews its charter on
an annual basis and, if necessary, recommends changes to the charter to our Board of Directors for approval.
Currently, the Compensation Committee consists
of Philip W. Norwood (Chair), Ralph Horn, Claude B. Nielsen and William B. Sansom, each of whom is an independent director as affirmatively
determined by our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors consults with our General Counsel to ensure that our Board of Directors’
determinations are consistent with all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent,”
including those set forth in pertinent listing standards of the NYSE, as in effect from time-to-time.
Mr. Norwood, as Chair of the Compensation
Committee, is responsible for setting the agenda for meetings. The Compensation Committee may delegate any of its responsibilities
to a subcommittee comprised of two or more members of the Compensation Committee, and may delegate authority to make grants and
awards under any equity-based plan to the CEO with such limitations as determined by the Compensation Committee and as may be required
by law or the listing standards of the NYSE. To date, the Compensation Committee has made no such delegation of its responsibilities.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
17
|
Roles of Executives in Establishing
Compensation.
While H. Eric Bolton, Jr., our CEO, does participate in general meetings of the Compensation Committee, he does
not participate in executive sessions nor does he participate in any discussions determining his own compensation. Annually, upon
request from the Compensation Committee, Mr. Bolton provides the Compensation Committee with data pertinent to his and other executive
officer’s compensation. This information may from time-to-time include peer executive compensation levels, achievement of
individual performance components of their annual bonus plans or data pertinent to their annual base salary increases. The Compensation
Committee utilizes this information, along with input from committee members and, at times, outside consultants before making final
independent compensation decisions. Mr. Bolton also provides data pertinent to the terms of our long-term incentive plans to the
Compensation Committee, upon their request. At the end of any incentive or bonus plan measurement period, Mr. Bolton, along with
our Corporate Secretary and/or General Counsel, prepares and presents to the Compensation Committee, the preliminary results of
the plan for the committee’s review and, if necessary, further evaluation and/or adjustment. All incentive plans are ultimately
developed and adopted by the Compensation Committee.
Use of Compensation Consultant
.
The Compensation Committee has the power and authority to hire outside advisors or consultants to assist the committee in fulfilling
its responsibilities, at our expense and upon terms established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has periodically
hired external consultants to review the compensation program offered to executive management, benchmark it against industry and
peer levels, and offer suggestions for changes. The Compensation Committee utilized Semler Brossy to consult on executive and director
compensation for 2015. Semler Brossy does not provide any services to the company or management.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
18
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
GENERAL POLICY
We have adopted a Code of Conduct, which
specifies our policy relating to conflicts of interest. The Code of Conduct states that a “conflict of interest” exists
when an individual’s private interests interfere in any way or appear from the perspective of a reasonable person to interfere
in any way with the interests of the company. Under the Code of Conduct, an employee who becomes aware of a potential conflict
of interest must report the conflict to a supervisor, our legal department, internal audit department or human resources group.
If the potential conflict of interest involves our CEO, any of our executive officers, or a director, our Board of Directors will
determine whether to grant a waiver if a conflict of interest exists. On an annual basis, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, as well as the full Board of Directors, reviews the independence of each director, all transactions involving related
parties and any potential conflicts of interests. All transactions involving related parties must be approved by a majority of
the disinterested members of our Board of Directors.
Based on the information presented to it,
the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determined that no related person transactions occurred
or were proposed since the beginning of 2015, other than the transaction disclosed below.
Colonial Insurance Agency, a corporation
wholly-owned by The Colonial Company (in which Thomas H. Lowder and James K. Lowder each has a 50% ownership interest), serves
as a broker for an unaffiliated insurance carrier, which advertised for its renter’s insurance program at some of our multifamily
properties through August 2015. We did not make any payments to Colonial Insurance Agency under these arrangements, however, the
insurance carrier paid a commission to Colonial Insurance Agency for renter’s insurance sold to our residents, and Colonial
Insurance Agency paid us an advertising fee to permit the sales of rental insurance policies on our multifamily properties. Pursuant
to this arrangement, for 2015, Colonial Insurance Agency paid us approximately $154,000 in advertising fees. Our relationship with
Colonial Insurance Agency ceased in 2015.
INDEBTEDNESS OF MANAGEMENT
None of our executive officers or directors
were indebted to us during 2015.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
19
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The number of shares owned and percentage
ownership in the following table is based on 75,408,571 shares of common stock outstanding on December 31, 2015. The following
table sets forth information as of December 31, 2015, regarding each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than
five percent of our common stock. The information in the following table is based solely on Schedule 13G filings with the SEC by
the respective identified beneficial owners.
Name
and Address
of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Amount
and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
|
|
Percent
of Class
|
|
Notes
|
The Vanguard
Group
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
10,755,085
|
|
14.3%
|
|
The Schedule 13G indicates the entity has sole power to vote or
to direct the vote for 167,121 shares, shared power to vote or direct the vote for 60,546 shares, sole power to dispose or
to direct the disposition of 10,639,194 shares, an
shared
power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 115,891
shares. The shares indicated include the 5,432,182 shares beneficially owned by Vanguard Specialized Funds – Vanguard
REIT Index Fund, an affiliate of Vanguard Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vanguard Specialized
Funds
- Vanguard REIT
Index Fund
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
|
|
5,432,182
|
|
7.2%
|
|
The Schedule 13G indicates the
entity has sole power to vote or to direct th
vote
for 5,432,182 shares. The shares indicated are included in the 10,755,085
shares beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, Inc. and should not be added to those shares to indicate total beneficial
ownership by The Vanguard Group, Inc.
|
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd St
New York, NY 10055
|
|
7,929,043
|
|
10.5%
|
|
The Schedule 13G indicates the
entity has sole power to vote or to di the rect vote for 7,342,696 shares and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition
of 7,929,043 shares.
|
Invesco Ltd.
1555 Peachtree St
NE
Suite 1800
Atlanta, GA 30309
|
|
5,802,105
|
|
7.7%
|
|
The Schedule 13G indicates the
entity has sole power to vote or to direct the vote for 2,267,861 shares, and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition
of 5,802,105 shares.
|
FMR LLC
245 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02210
|
|
4,192,380
|
|
5.6%
|
|
The Schedule 13G indicates the entity has sole power to vote or
to direct the vote for 671,870 shares, and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of 4,192,380 shares.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The number of shares owned and percentage
ownership in the following table is based on 75,438,299 shares of common stock outstanding on February 29, 2016. We have determined
beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities
to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities. In addition, the rules
include shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of February 29, 2016. These shares are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding those
options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the purpose
of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise
indicated, we believe that the persons identified in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares
shown as beneficially owned by them.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
20
|
The following table sets forth the beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of February 29, 2016 by (i) each director, (ii) each director nominee, (iii) each executive officer
named in the Summary Compensation Table, and (iv) all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated,
voting power and investment power are exercisable solely by the named person. The address of each officer, director and/or nominee
listed below is c/o 6584 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38138.
Name
of Beneficial
Owner
|
|
Aggregate
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
|
|
Percent
of
Class
|
|
Notes
|
H.
Eric Bolton, Jr.
(2)
|
|
299,000
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
9,139 shares owned in a joint account with his wife for which Mr. Bolton has shared voting and investment power; 110,000 shares
that Mr. Bolton has the current right to acquire upon redemption of limited partnership units; and 7,414 shares attributed
to Mr. Bolton in our Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
|
Albert
M. Campbell, III
|
|
36,123
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
1,100 shares of which Mr. Campbell has shared voting and investment power, (100 shares held by Mr. Campbell through an individual
retirement account, and 1,000 shares Mr. Campbell owns in a joint account with his wife); and 2,644 shares attributed to Mr.
Campbell in our Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
|
Robert
J. DelPriore
|
|
10,990
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Alan
B. Graf, Jr.
(2)
|
|
31,220
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
23,128 shares held in a deferred compensation account.
|
Thomas
L. Grimes, Jr.
|
|
37,035
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
3,337 shares attributed to Mr. Grimes in our Employee Stock Ownership Plan; and 1,224 shares owned by Mr. Grimes’ spouse.
|
Ralph
Horn
|
|
70,880
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
29,044 shares held in a deferred compensation account.
|
Monica
McGurk
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
James
K. Lowder
(2)
|
|
240,250
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
233,716 shares that Mr. Lowder has the current right to acquire upon redemption of limited partnership units, as to 4,990
of which Mr. Lowder would have shared voting and investment power (4,990 owned by JKL Investments, LLC); and 3,600 shares
that Mr. Lowder has the right to acquire upon the exercise of options. 228,726 of the limited partnership units owned by Mr.
Lowder are pledged as collateral on various loans.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
21
|
Name
|
|
Aggregate
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
|
|
Percent
of Outstanding
Shares
|
|
Additional
Information
|
Thomas
H. Lowder
(2)
|
|
277,736
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
248,654 shares that Mr. Lowder has the current right to acquire upon redemption of limited partnership units, 19,928 of which
Mr. Lowder would have shared voting and investment power (19,928 owned by THL Investments, LLC); 25,791 shares held by Mr.
Lowder through an individual retirement account for which Mr. Lowder has shared voting and investment power; 357 shares indirectly
owned by Mr. Lowder (357 shares owned by THL Investments, LLC).
|
Claude
B. Nielsen
(2)
|
|
39,229
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
4,277 shares held in a deferred compensation account; 2,111 shares that Mr. Nielsen has the current right to acquire upon
redemption of limited partnership units; and 14,223 shares that Mr. Nielsen has the right to acquire upon the exercise of
options.
|
Philip
W. Norwood
(2)
|
|
18,665
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
13,230 shares held in a deferred compensation account.
|
W.
Reid Sanders
(2)
|
|
125,413
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
4,000 shares held by Mr. Sanders through an individual retirement account for which Mr. Sanders has shared voting and investment
power; 107,000 shares that Mr. Sanders has the current right to acquire upon redemption of limited partnership units; 4,540
shares held in a deferred compensation account; and 4,000 shares Mr. Sanders holds indirectly and for which he has shared
voting and investment power, of which 2,800 shares Mr. Sanders has authority to vote as trustee or through a power-of-attorney
and 1,200 shares owned by Mr. Sanders’ spouse.
|
William
B. Sansom
(2)
|
|
15,737
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
8,501 shares held in a deferred compensation account.
|
Gary
Shorb
(2)
|
|
11,312
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
7,562 shares held in a deferred compensation account.
|
John
W. Spiegel
|
|
50,982
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes
14,223 shares that Mr. Spiegel has the right to acquire upon the exercise of options.
|
All
Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers as a group (15 persons)
|
|
1,264,572
|
|
1.66%
|
|
Includes
701,481 shares that may be acquired upon redemption of limited partnership units; 32,046 shares that may be acquired upon
the exercise of options; 13,395 shares held in our Employee Stock Ownership Plan; and 90,282 shares held in deferred compensation
accounts.
|
|
(1)
|
Represents less than 1% of the total.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
22
|
SECTION
16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires
our directors, executive officers and certain beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock, to file with the Commission
initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and furnish us with copies of all forms filed.
To our knowledge, based
solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished us and representations that no other reports were required, during the
past fiscal year all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors and executive officers were completed on a timely
basis.
The following individuals served as
our executive officers in 2015:
Name and Position
|
|
Age
|
|
Experience
|
H. Eric Bolton, Jr.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
59
|
|
Mr. Bolton joined us in 1994 as Vice President of Development and was named Chief Operating Officer in February 1996 and promoted to President in December 1996. Mr. Bolton assumed the position of Chief Executive Officer in October 2001 and became Chairman of the Board of Directors in September 2002. Mr. Bolton was with Trammell Crow Company for more than five years, and prior to joining us was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trammell Crow Realty Advisors.
|
Albert M. Campbell, III
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
49
|
|
Prior to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2010, Mr. Campbell served as our Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Director of Financial Planning and was responsible for managing the funding requirements of the business to support corporate strategy. Mr. Campbell joined us in 1998 and was initially responsible for external reporting and financial planning. Prior to joining us, Mr. Campbell worked as a Certified Public Accountant with Arthur Andersen and served various finance and accounting roles with Thomas & Betts Corporation.
|
Robert J. DelPriore
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
47
|
|
Mr. DelPriore joined us in August 2013. Prior to joining us, Mr. DelPriore was a partner in the securities department of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC from February 2008 through August 2013 and during that time served as counsel to MAA. Prior to that, Mr. DelPriore was a partner in the corporate securities group of Bass, Berry & Sims PLC and during that time served as counsel to MAA.
|
Thomas L. Grimes, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
47
|
|
Mr. Grimes was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in December 2011, having previously served as Executive Vice President and Director of Property Management. Prior to this position, Mr. Grimes served us as an Operations Director over the Central and North Regions. He also served as Director of Business Development where he worked with our joint venture partners, managed our new development efforts and directed our ancillary income business. Mr. Grimes joined us in 1994.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
23
|
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
INTRODUCTION
Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis
provides a detailed discussion of our executive compensation philosophy, objectives and programs, the compensation decisions the
Compensation Committee has made under those programs and the factors considered in making those decisions. Our Compensation Discussion
and Analysis focuses on the compensation of our named executive officers for 2015, who were:
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
|
H. Eric Bolton, Jr.
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
Albert M. Campbell, III
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
Robert J. DelPriore
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
|
|
Thomas L. Grimes, Jr.
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our compensation philosophy is that compensation
for all employees, including our named executive officers, should be:
|
·
|
fair and equitable when viewed both internally and externally;
|
|
·
|
competitive in order to attract and retain the best qualified individuals;
and
|
|
·
|
aligned with performance.
|
We have designed our compensation programs
to reflect each of these characteristics. Our named executive officers receive a compensation package that primarily consists of
an annual base salary, annual incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards. The performance-based incentives seek to reward
both short-term and long-term results and to align the interests of our named executive officers and other participants with the
interests of our shareholders. Generally, our long-term compensation is in the form of restricted shares of our common stock, where
the majority of the opportunity for our named executive officers is in the form of performance shares which may be earned based
on the achievement of specified total shareholder return results and other company performance metrics. Our Board of Directors
has established stock ownership guidelines of three times annual base salary for our Chief Executive Officer and two times annual
base salary for our other named executive officers, which acts to further align the interests of our named executive officers with
those of our shareholders.
2015 SAY ON PAY VOTE
As previously announced at the 2015 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, our executive officer compensation for 2014 was approved by over 97% of the votes cast on the matter.
The Compensation Committee and MAA considered these results to be an endorsement by shareholders of our target level and actual
executive compensation.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
24
|
2015 ACHIEVEMENTS AND VALUE
CREATION
Our Core Funds From Operations, or Core FFO,
was $5.51 per fully diluted common share and unit, which was $0.02 above the top of our guidance for the full year and represented
a record high performance for the company since its IPO in 1994. For a description of how we calculate Core FFO and a reconciliation
to its most comparable GAAP measure, see “Pay for Performance Analysis – Operating Performance” on page 29 and
Appendix A.
We continued to recycle capital, selling
21 multifamily communities (for a combined total gain on sale of approximately $189 million), one commercial asset and 0.23 acres
of land, for a total disposition volume of approximately $363 million, while acquiring seven multifamily communities, 11.4 acres
of adjacent land to existing communities for the development of phase II properties, completing the development of one multifamily
community and one phase II property, and beginning development of five phase II properties for a total new investment of approximately
$377 million. In addition, we completed the redevelopment of 5,781 apartment units for a total investment of approximately $26
million, achieving average rental rate increases of over 10% above non-renovated units.
Total shareholder return for 2015 was 26.5%,
inclusive of approximately $232 million paid to common shareholders in the form of cash dividends, significantly outperforming
the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500 Total Return Index and the SNL U.S. REIT Multifamily Index.
Total shareholder return is
a measure of the performance of shares of stock over time. It combines share price appreciation and the reinvestment of dividends
paid to show the total return to the shareholder expressed as an annualized percentage.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
25
|
SUMMARY OF 2015 NAMED EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS’ COMPENSATION
Base Salary
The following table indicates the base salaries
and percent increases from the prior year for our named executive officers:
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
Increase
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$ 612,000
|
|
$ 600,000
|
|
2.0%
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$ 357,000
|
|
$ 350,000
|
|
2.0%
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$ 340,000
|
|
$ 300,000
|
|
13.3%
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$ 367,200
|
|
$ 360,000
|
|
2.0%
|
Annual Incentive Compensation
Annual incentive compensation is intended
to compensate our named executive officers for achieving our annual financial goals. Our named executive officers earned the following
annual bonuses for 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 Annual Bonus Paid in 2016
|
|
|
Cash
Amount
|
|
Percent of 2015
Base Salary
|
|
Percent of Maximum
Opportunity Earned
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
1,530,000
|
|
250%
|
|
100.0%
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
535,500
|
|
150%
|
|
100.0%
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$
|
503,625
|
|
148%
|
|
98.8%
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
537,030
|
|
146%
|
|
97.5%
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
26
|
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Equity-based plans provide for longer-term
incentives that both align executive officer performance with our long-term goals and offer a retention component to the compensation
package. Under our 2015 Long Term Incentive Program, or 2015 LTIP, our named executive officers have received the following awards
to date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Earned
to Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Potential
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Issue
|
|
|
|
That Can
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Be Earned
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time vested shares
(1)
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
|
|
1/9/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Performance-based shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core FFO per Share
(2)
|
|
|
9,375
|
|
|
|
9,375
|
|
|
|
3/25/2016
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
3-Year total shareholder return
(3)
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time vested shares
(1)
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
1/9/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Performance-based shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core FFO per Share
(2)
|
|
|
3,646
|
|
|
|
3,646
|
|
|
|
3/25/2016
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
3-Year total shareholder return
(3)
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time vested shares
(1)
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
1/9/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Performance-based shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core FFO per Share
(2)
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
3/25/2016
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
3-Year total shareholder return
(3)
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time vested shares
(1)
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
1/9/2015
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Performance-based shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core FFO per Share
(2)
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3/25/2016
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
3-Year total shareholder return
(3)
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
(1)
|
The time vested shares represent 30% of the total award opportunity under the 2015 LTIP for named executive officers. The shares
vest 20% annually on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the issue date subject to continued employment through
each vest date. No additional shares can be issued under this tranche of the 2015 LTIP. See pages 44 and 45 for additional information.
|
|
(2)
|
The Core FFO per fully-diluted common share and unit, or Core FFO per Share, performance shares represent 40% of the total
award opportunity under the 2015 LTIP for named executive officers. The shares vest 50% annually on the first and second anniversary
of the issue date subject to continued employment through each vest date. No additional shares can be earned under this tranche
of the 2015 LTIP. See pages 43 and 44 for additional information.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
27
|
|
(3)
|
The 3-year total shareholder return performance shares represent 30% of the total award opportunity under the 2015 LTIP for
named executive officers. The performance period for this tranche is from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. Any shares
earned under this tranche will be issued on March 26, 2018 and will immediately vest at that time. See page 43 for additional information.
|
As previously announced at the 2015 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, our named executive officer compensation for 2014 was approved by over 97% of the votes cast on the matter.
We believe our programs are effectively designed and working well in alignment with the interests of our shareholders and are instrumental
to achieving our business strategy. In determining executive compensation for 2015, the Compensation Committee considered the overwhelming
shareholder support that the “Say-on-Pay” proposal received. As a result, the Compensation Committee continued to apply
the same effective principles and philosophy it has used previously in determining executive compensation and will continue to
consider shareholder concerns and feedback in the future.
At the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders,
we are again holding an annual advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation (see page 79). The Compensation Committee
will continue to consider the results from this year’s and future advisory votes on executive compensation, as well as feedback
from shareholders throughout the course of such year.
Also as previously announced, in accordance
with a majority of the votes cast at the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we intend to hold an advisory shareholder vote on
our executive compensation annually. We intend to hold an advisory vote on the frequency of such advisory votes on executive compensation
at our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
28
|
PAY FOR PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
|
HOW PAY IS TIED TO COMPANY
PERFORMANCE
Our compensation programs are designed to
reward employees for producing sustainable growth, to attract and retain world-class talent and to align compensation with the
long-term interests of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee strongly believes that executive compensation — both
pay opportunities and pay actually realized — should be tied to our performance. The Compensation Committee views performance
in two primary ways:
|
·
|
our operating performance; and
|
|
·
|
return to shareholders over time relative to other REITs and other
peer companies.
|
Operating Performance
We had strong financial results in 2015,
as more specifically described under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Highlights for 2015 include:
|
·
|
Core FFO for the year was $438.6 million and Core FFO per Share for
the year was $5.51, a record-high performance for MAA;
|
|
·
|
Acquired seven multifamily communities as well as 11.4 acres of adjacent
land to existing communities for the development of phase II properties, completed the development of one multifamily community
and one phase II property, and began development of five phase II properties for a total new investment of approximately $377 million;
|
|
·
|
Sold 21 multifamily communities, one commercial asset and 0.23 acres
of land, for a total disposition volume of approximately $363 million and a combined total gain on sale of approximately $190 million;
|
|
·
|
Completed the redevelopment of 5,781 apartment units for a total investment
of approximately $26 million, achieving average rental rate increases of over 10% above non-renovated units;
|
|
·
|
Ended the year with record low leverage of debt to total capitalization
of 32.2% and net debt to gross assets of 40.6%, a decline of 190 basis points from 2014; and
|
|
·
|
Unencumbered assets increased to 72.8% of gross real estate assets
as of December 31, 2015.
|
Core FFO represents funds from operations,
or FFO, excluding certain non-cash or non-routine items such as acquisition, merger and integration expenses, mark-to-market debt
adjustments and loss or gain on debt extinguishment. FFO represents net income excluding extraordinary items, net income attributable
to noncontrolling interest, asset impairment, gains or losses on disposition of real estate assets, plus depreciation and amortization
of real estate, and adjustments for joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis. While our definition of Core FFO is similar
to others in our industry, our precise methodology for calculating Core FFO may differ from that utilized by other REITs and, accordingly,
may not be comparable to such other REITs. Our financial measure calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
or GAAP, that is most comparable to Core FFO is net income available for MAA common shareholders. A reconciliation of the differences
between Core FFO, a non-GAAP
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
29
|
financial
measure, and net income available for MAA common shareholders is set forth on Appendix A of this Proxy Statement.
Return to Shareholders
We have consistently returned significant
value to shareholders over the long term, based on total shareholder return. We have continuously paid a quarterly dividend since
April 1994 and have never decreased our dividend rate.
|
|
Quarterly Dividend Rate per Share
|
Annualized Total Shareholder Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholder
return is a measure of the performance of shares of stock over time. It combines share price appreciation and the reinvestment
of dividends paid to show the total return to the shareholder expressed as an annualized percentage.
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
30
|
The following chart shows how a $100 investment
in our common stock on December 31, 2010 would have grown to $175.58 on December 31, 2015, with dividends reinvested quarterly.
The chart also compares the total shareholder return on our common stock to the same investment in the S&P 500 Index and the
FTSE NAREIT Equity Index prepared by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT. The performance chart
is not necessarily indicative of future investment performance.
Total Return Performance
UNDERSTANDING MR. BOLTON’S
PAY
This section
provides additional detail on the rationale for Mr. Bolton’s pay.
Mr. Bolton’s Accomplishments as Chief Executive Officer
Under the leadership of Mr. Bolton, who became
Chief Executive Officer in October 2001 and Chairman of the Board of Directors in September 2002, we have performed very well and
delivered significant value to shareholders. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that Mr. Bolton’s strategic
vision and focus on long-term sustainable growth has laid a solid foundation for future growth. The Compensation Committee believes
that Mr. Bolton’s leadership has directly contributed to our excellent performance over the last several years and should
be appropriately rewarded.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
31
|
Recent
MAA Milestones
|
2015
|
Achieved Core FFO of $438.6 million, or $5.51 per Share, a record performance for MAA
|
Acquired multifamily properties and development land
totaling approximately $321 million and invested an additional $56 million in development, completing two multifamily projects
Completed the disposition of approximately $354 million
in multi-family properties and an additional $9 million in non-apartment assets and land to support strategic re-cycling efforts
while recognizing a gain of approximately $190 million
Returned $232.1 million to common shareholders in
dividends
Raised annual dividend rate for 2016 to $3.28
|
2014
|
Achieved Core FFO of $395.7 million, or $4.99 per Share
|
Completed systems conversions related to the merger
with Colonial Properties Trust, or Colonial, and captured 80 basis points improvement in operating margins for the legacy Colonial
portfolio as well as 30 basis points improvement in operating margin for the legacy MAA portfolio
Completed the full integration of the operating and
management teams of both Colonial and MAA
Acquired multifamily properties totaling $400 million
and completed development on an additional $131 million
Completed the disposition of approximately $96 million
in non-apartment assets and land or non-productive assets assumed from the merger with Colonial at a gain of approximately $3.4
million, and completed the disposition of approximately $184 million in older apartment assets from both the legacy MAA and legacy
Colonial portfolios at a book gain of approximately $51 million
Returned $219.3 million to common shareholders in
dividends
Raised annual dividend rate for 2015 to $3.08
|
2013
|
Achieved Core FFO of $262.4 million, or $4.94 per Share
|
Consummated the merger with Colonial, moving MAA from
a total market capital of $4.6 billion to $8.6 billion
Received Upgrade to BBB by Standard & Poor’s Ratings
Agency
Named to S&P MidCap 400 Index
Completed first public bond offering for $350 million
Acquired multifamily properties totaling $129 million
and completed development on an additional $61 million
Returned $140.7 million to common shareholders in
dividends
Raised
annual dividend rate for 2014 to $2.92
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
32
|
Compensation Committee Actions
After considering our operating performance
and return to shareholders, Mr. Bolton’s strong leadership and individual accomplishments, and findings of the Compensation
Committee’s compensation consultant (see page 50), the Compensation Committee took the following actions with respect to
Mr. Bolton’s 2015 compensation:
|
·
|
Base Salary:
Increased base salary from $600,000 to $612,000.
Following the merger with Colonial, the Compensation Committee engaged Semler Brossy to evaluate our peer group and executive compensation
relative to the new size and complexity of the company. Based on their analysis, Semler Brossy reported that Mr. Bolton’s
base salary was 6% below the median of our comparator group at that time. As a result, the Compensation Committee recommended,
and the Board of Directors approved, a significant increase in Mr. Bolton’s base compensation for 2014 to reflect the significant
increase in responsibility resulting from the increased size and complexity of the company and the compensation of chief executive
officers of other REITs of similar size to the company. As Mr. Bolton’s 2014 base salary adjustment reflected his increased
responsibility level following the merger with Colonial, the Compensation Committee felt that an increase in line with the other
base salary adjustments being made across the company for 2015 was appropriate.
|
|
·
|
Annual Incentive:
The percent of salary opportunity available
to Mr. Bolton for 2015 was held consistent with the prior year at 250%. The executive annual incentive program for 2015 allowed
participants to receive all or a portion of the award in shares of restricted stock at 125% of the value of the cash award earned.
The opportunity was increased in 2014 following Semler Brossy’s findings that Mr. Bolton’s previous target annual incentive
was 30% below the median of our comparator group after the merger with Colonial.
|
|
·
|
Long-Term Equity Compensation:
The total percent of salary opportunity
available to Mr. Bolton for 2015 in the form of restricted stock awards through our long-term incentive programs remained consistent
with the prior year at 300%. Performance-based long-term incentive compensation represents a significant component of Mr. Bolton’s
pay. This underscores the Compensation Committee’s belief that this element is directly aligned with the interests of our
shareholders and most closely linked to accomplishing our strategic vision. The Compensation Committee determined to hold constant
Mr. Bolton’s long-term incentive opportunity again for 2015. The amount awarded reflects the Compensation Committee’s
continued confidence in Mr. Bolton’s strategic vision and leadership.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
33
|
SUMMARY
OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PRACTICES
|
Our compensation
philosophy is to drive and support our long-term goal of sustainable growth and total shareholder return by paying for performance,
with due consideration to balancing risk and reward. By “sustainable growth” we mean investing in our long-term opportunities
while meeting our short-term commitments. The main objective of our executive officer compensation program is to align the interests
of our executive officers with the interests of shareholders. To achieve this alignment, we must attract and retain individuals
with the appropriate expertise and leadership ability, and we must motivate and reward them to build long-term shareholder value.
We and our competitors recruit from a limited pool of resources for individuals who are highly experienced, successful and well
rewarded. Accordingly, our executive officer compensation program is designed to link annual and long-term cash and stock incentives
to the achievement of measurable corporate, business unit and individual performance objectives and to align executive officers’
interest with shareholder value creation. To achieve these objectives, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves corporate
goals and objectives relevant to compensation of our executive officers, evaluates executive officer performance in light of those
goals and sets executive officer compensation levels based on this evaluation.
The Compensation
Committee generally sets executive compensation programs to be competitive with other well-managed, multi-family REITs and private
real estate companies, taking into account individually each component of compensation. The Compensation Committee intends for
each component and the aggregate of the compensation program to be competitive and to address the Compensation Committee’s
general underlying philosophy and policies for executive officer compensation:
|
·
|
to
align the financial interests of the executive officers with those of our shareholders,
both in the short and long term;
|
|
·
|
to
provide incentives for achieving and exceeding annual and long-term performance goals;
|
|
·
|
to
attract, retain and motivate highly competent executives by providing total compensation
that is competitive with compensation at other well-managed REITs and real estate companies;
|
|
·
|
to
reward superior corporate and individual performance achieved through ethical leadership;
and
|
|
·
|
to
appropriately reward executive officers for creating long-term shareholder value and
returns.
|
Our Compensation
Committee evaluates the effectiveness of our compensation programs by reviewing our performance as a whole and the performance
of individual named executive officers. In doing so, the Compensation Committee may take into account our strategy as annually
presented to our Board of Directors, the total return being delivered to our shareholders as well as the return being earned by
the shareholders of our peers, market or industry-related indices; our fiscal performance both annually and for longer-term periods;
as well as the named executive officer’s individual goals. The Compensation Committee reviews all plans annually and adopts
plans designed to align management interests with those of our shareholders.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
34
|
Our compensation
program is designed to reward our executive officers when they achieve our annual business goals, build shareholder value and
maintain long-term careers with us. We reward these three aspects so that the team will make balanced annual and long-term decisions
that result in consistent financial performance, innovation and collaboration.
Below,
we summarize certain executive compensation practices, both the practices we have implemented to drive performance and the practices
we have not implemented because we do not believe they would serve our shareholders’ long-term interest.
What We Do
|
·
|
Pay
for performance (see pages 29 through 33)
|
|
·
|
Mitigate
undue risk in compensation programs (see page 47)
|
|
·
|
Include
vesting periods on performance share awards (see page 44)
|
|
·
|
Adopted
share ownership guidelines (see page 51)
|
|
·
|
Prohibit
hedging transactions, pledging and short sales by executive officers or directors (see
page 51)
|
|
·
|
Utilize
an independent compensation consulting firm which provides no other services for us (see
page 50)
|
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable post-employment/change in control provisions (see pages 62 through 65)
|
|
·
|
Adopted
a clawback policy (see page 51)
|
What We Don’t
Do
|
·
|
No
dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance shares
|
|
·
|
No
repricing underwater stock options
|
|
·
|
No
exchanges of underwater stock options for cash
|
|
·
|
No
multi-year guaranteed bonuses
|
|
·
|
No
inclusion of the value of equity awards in severance calculations
|
|
·
|
No
evergreen provisions in equity plans
|
|
·
|
No
tax “gross ups” for excess parachute payments (see page 45 and pages 62 through
65)
|
|
·
|
No
“single trigger” employment or change in control agreements (see page 45
and pages 62 through 65)
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
35
|
WHAT
WE PAY AND WHY: ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION
|
OVERVIEW
We have
three elements of total direct compensation: base salary; annual incentive; and long-term incentive compensation. As illustrated
in the below chart, in 2015, 81% of the reported named executive officers’ total direct compensation opportunity was performance-based
and not guaranteed and 45% was in the form of long-term incentive compensation.
|
2015 Total Compensation Opportunity
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
36
|
Our target
total direct compensation table below summarizes the levels established by our Compensation Committee with respect to salary,
target annual and long-term incentives, and target total direct compensation. We discuss each element of the table in the narrative
that follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
Base Salary
(1)
|
|
$
|
612,000
|
|
$
|
357,000
|
|
$
|
340,000
|
|
$
|
367,200
|
|
Annual Incentive Program
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Percent of Base Salary
|
|
|
0% - 250%
|
|
|
0% - 150%
|
|
|
0% - 150%
|
|
|
0% - 150%
|
|
Target Percent of
Base Salary
|
|
|
125%
|
|
|
94%
|
|
|
94%
|
|
|
94%
|
|
Dollar Target
(3)
|
|
$
|
765,000
|
|
$
|
334,688
|
|
$
|
318,750
|
|
$
|
344,250
|
|
2015 LTIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Percent of Base Salary
|
|
|
0% - 300%
|
|
|
0% - 200%
|
|
|
0% - 200%
|
|
|
0% - 200%
|
|
Target Percent of
Base Salary
|
|
|
195%
|
|
|
130%
|
|
|
130%
|
|
|
130%
|
|
Dollar Target
(4)
|
|
$
|
1,193,400
|
|
$
|
464,100
|
|
$
|
442,000
|
|
$
|
477,360
|
|
Total Target Compensation
|
|
$
|
2,570,400
|
|
$
|
1,155,788
|
|
$
|
1,100,750
|
|
$
|
1,188,810
|
|
|
(1)
|
These
are the base salaries awarded by the Compensation Committee for 2015.
|
|
(2)
|
Does
not reflect the 25% increase of award if participant elects to receive the award as shares
of restricted stock.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
the target potential bonus payment under the Annual Incentive Program. More information
on the Annual Incentive Program can be found in the narrative that follows.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents
the target award under the 2015 LTIP. More information on the 2015 LTIP can be found
in the narrative that follows.
|
The amount
of past compensation, including annual bonus awards and amounts realized or realizable from prior long-term, equity-based incentives,
is generally not a significant factor in the Compensation Committee’s considerations, because these awards would have been
earned based on prior years’ performance. The Compensation Committee does, however, consider the timing of prior awards
when reviewing the retention aspects of compensation packages.
BASE SALARY
We pay
base salaries to attract talented executives and to provide a fixed base of cash compensation. Because several other elements
of compensation are driven by base salary, the Compensation Committee is careful to set the appropriate level of base salary.
A survey of our comparator group’s pay practices was considered in determining the salary range for each named executive
officer. These ranges are used as guidelines in determining individual salaries, but there is no targeted amount in the range.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
37
|
Base salaries
for the named executive officers are individually determined by the Compensation Committee within the appropriate salary range
after consideration of:
|
·
|
breadth,
scope and complexity of the role;
|
|
·
|
fairness
(employees with similar responsibilities, experience and historical performance are rewarded
comparably) and affordability;
|
|
·
|
current
compensation; and
|
|
·
|
individual
and corporate performance.
|
We do not
set the base salary of any employee, including any named executive officer, at a certain multiple of the salary of another employee.
Generally
speaking, there are two situations that may warrant an adjustment to base salary:
|
·
|
Annual
Merit Increases.
All employees’ base salaries are reviewed annually for possible
merit increases, but merit increases are not automatic or guaranteed. Any adjustments
take into account the individual’s performance, responsibilities and experience,
as well as fairness and external market practices.
|
|
·
|
Promotions
or Changes in Role.
Base salary may be increased to recognize additional responsibilities
resulting from a change in an employee’s role or a promotion to a new position.
Increases are not guaranteed for a promotion or change in role.
|
The following
table indicates the base salaries and percent increases from the prior year for our named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Percent
Increase
|
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$612,000
|
|
$600,000
|
|
2.0%
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$357,000
|
|
$350,000
|
|
2.0%
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$340,000
|
|
$300,000
|
|
13.3%
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$367,200
|
|
$360,000
|
|
2.0%
|
Increases
for the named executive officers were approved in December 2014 and effective January 1, 2015. The Compensation Committee believed
the increases to the executive officer salaries reflected not only the executives’ continued contributions to the company’s
achievements, strong leadership, the company’s strong performance and each executive’s individual achievements in
2014, but also reflected the previous year’s increase to adjust for the growth in size and complexity of the company following
the merger with Colonial. The Compensation Committee felt these increases appropriately reflected their respective levels of experience,
past performance for us and tenure in their positions and are in line with how the company approaches salary to market comparables
on a company-wide basis. In regards to Mr. DelPriore, the increase reflects expanded responsibilities and oversight from the prior
year.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
38
|
ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
We pay
annual incentives to drive the achievement of key business results and to recognize individuals based on their contributions to
those results. The Compensation Committee believes that this feature of compensation motivates executive officers to strive to
attain our annual goals. Annual incentives were determined under the 2015 Annual Incentive Program, or 2015 AIP.
For 2015,
total annual bonus plan opportunities for our named executive officers were based on 2015 base salaries as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Percentage
of 2015
Base Salary
(1)
|
|
Maximum Payment
Based on 2015
Performance
(1)
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
612,000
|
|
|
250%
|
|
$
|
1,530,000
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
357,000
|
|
|
150%
|
|
$
|
535,500
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$
|
340,000
|
|
|
150%
|
|
$
|
510,000
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
367,200
|
|
|
150%
|
|
$
|
550,800
|
|
|
(1)
|
Does
not include the impact of the option for participants to elect to have all or a part
of their award issued as shares of restricted stock. Any portion elected to be issued
as shares of restricted stock would be awarded at 125% of the award earned.
|
The annual
incentive program for executive officers for 2015 was based on both Core FFO per Share and the achievement of individual and/or
business unit goals. For Mr. Bolton, the award opportunity was based 100% on Core FFO per Share. For Messrs. Campbell, Grimes
and DelPriore, the award opportunity was based 75% on Core FFO per Share and 25% on the achievement of their respective individual
and/or business unit goals. Funds from operations is a generally accepted measure of overall performance in the REIT industry
because it excludes depreciation expense of real estate assets which is generally not correlated with changes in the value of
those assets, whose value does not diminish predictably over time, as historical cost depreciation implies. The Compensation Committee
feels that Core FFO, which also removes certain items that by their nature are not comparable over periods, is a good measure
of actual operating performance. The Compensation Committee felt it was appropriate to base the 2015 annual incentive on specific
and quantifiable company performance metrics because the award is intended to reward the executive officer for achieving our corporate
financial goals established for the year. When setting the goals for these performance metrics, the Compensation Committee established
annual performance targets that if achieved would continue to promote the long-term health and strength of the company. In determining
the final award, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to apply a discretionary modifier to adjust the amount of the award
up or down, by up to 25%, provided, however, that in no event shall the award exceed 250% of salary for Mr. Bolton and 150% of
salary for Messrs. Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes. The executive officers have the option to elect to receive all or any portion
of their award in shares of restricted stock instead of cash. For any portion of the award elected to be issued in shares of restricted
stock, the executive officer will receive shares of restricted stock valued at 125% of that portion of the award. The shares of
restricted stock would then vest a third a year on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued
employment through each vest date.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
39
|
The
Compensation Committee approved the following payout schedule for Core FFO per Share performance under the 2015 AIP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
Core
FFO
per Share
|
|
|
Percent of
Bonus Opportunity
|
High
|
|
|
$
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Target
|
|
|
$
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
Threshold
|
|
|
$
|
5.09
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
The
Compensation Committee set the Core FFO per Share performance levels to reflect the guidance we provided at the beginning of the
year to align executive officer performance with market and shareholder expectations. No award was eligible to be earned below
the threshold level. Awards earned between the levels were calculated using linear interpolations.
Summary
of Payments
In
February 2016, the Compensation Committee met to consider the payment of bonuses under the 2015 AIP. The Compensation Committee
reviewed the Core FFO per Share result of $5.51 and determined the performance resulted in a payout under the 2015 AIP at the
High level, or 100% of the opportunity.
The
Compensation Committee reviewed the achievement of the individual and/or business unit goals for Messrs. Campbell, DelPriore and
Grimes and determined they had achieved 100%, 95% and 90%, respectively.
Following
these determinations, the Compensation Committee awarded the following annual bonuses to our named executive officers for 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
|
Maximum
Percentage
of Base Salary
|
|
Percent of
Maximum Bonus
Opportunity Earned
|
|
Annual
Incentive
Payment
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
612,000
|
|
|
|
250
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,530,000
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
357,000
|
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
535,500
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
98.75
|
%
|
|
$
|
503,625
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
367,200
|
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
97.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
537,030
|
|
None
of the named executive officers elected to have a portion of their award issued in shares of restricted stock.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
40
|
LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
General
We
provide performance-based long-term incentive compensation to certain employees, including our named executive officers, to directly
tie the interests of these individuals to the interests of our shareholders. We believe that long-term equity compensation is
an important retention tool. We also encourage stock ownership which we regard as important for commitment, engagement and motivation
and have adopted stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers. In 2015, we granted long-term incentive compensation
to 96 employees, including the named executive officers.
Potential
Value of Long-Term Incentive Compensation Awarded
The
Compensation Committee believes that a significant percentage of our long-term incentive compensation should be performance based.
The 2015 LTIP included two performance tranches, representing 70% of the award opportunity. One tranche will award shares on a
sliding scale dependent on relative annualized total shareholder return, or Relative TSR, performance over a three-year performance
period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. The other tranche awarded shares on a sliding scale dependent upon Core
FFO per Share performance for 2015. The 2015 LTIP also included time vested shares dependent on continued employment. Our CEO
had the opportunity to earn up to 300% of his base salary and the remaining named executive officers had the opportunity to earn
up to 200% of their base salary in shares of restricted stock. The following chart indicates the maximum award opportunities as
a percentage of base salary:
|
|
Relative TSR
(30% of
opportunity)
|
|
Core FFO
per Share
(40% of
opportunity)
|
|
Time
Vested
(30% of
opportunity)
|
|
Total
Potential
Percent
of Salary
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
90%
|
|
120%
|
|
90%
|
|
300%
|
Other Named Executive Officers
|
|
60%
|
|
80%
|
|
60%
|
|
200%
|
The
Compensation Committee sets ranges for long-term incentive compensation for each of our named executive officers. A survey of
our comparator group’s pay practices is considered in determining the ranges. The Compensation Committee does not target
a specific percentile ranking against our comparator group.
The
actual value of long-term incentive compensation within such ranges awarded to each named executive officer is individually determined,
at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, after considering:
|
·
|
skills,
experience and time in role;
|
|
·
|
individual
performance and potential; and
|
|
·
|
company
performance in the prior year.
|
In
determining the value of long-term incentive compensation awards to the named executive officers in December 2014, the Compensation
Committee also took into consideration, among other things, the company’s strong operating performance and return to shareholders.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
41
|
Mix of Equity
Vehicles
As
described above, we use a mix of time vested restricted stock and performance shares when making annual long-term equity awards.
Once the value of the 2015 LTIP award was determined, the Compensation Committee granted the named executive officers 70% of the
value in performance shares and 30% in time vested restricted stock. Of the performance shares, 43% (or 30% of the total award
opportunity) may be earned based on Relative TSR; 57% (or 40% of the total award opportunity) may be earned based on Core FFO
per Share.
|
|
Time Vested Restricted Stock
|
Performance Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Compensation Committee believes this mix of equity vehicles strikes the appropriate balance between the achievement of performance
measures (performance shares) and rewarding increases in the market value of, and dividends paid on, our common stock (time vested
restricted stock).
As
noted above, we currently measure performance based on return to shareholders and overall company performance. As a pay for performance
measure, we believe that an allocation of 70% of the potential award opportunity to performance shares creates an appropriate
pay for performance alignment with shareholders.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
42
|
Performance
Shares
Performance
shares provide an opportunity for employees to receive common stock if a performance measure is met for a pre-defined performance
period. No outstanding performance share awards provide for the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents during the performance
period. There are two types of performance shares awarded under the 2015 LTIP: performance shares based on Relative TSR and performance
shares based on Core FFO per Share.
The
following chart shows the performance metrics for the Relative TSR performance shares:
Performance
Level
|
|
MAA
TSR in excess of
SNL US REIT Multifamily Index
|
|
Percent
of
Relative TSR
Opportunity Earned
|
High
|
|
≥
400
basis points
|
|
100%
|
Target
|
|
0 basis
points
|
|
50%
|
Threshold
|
|
-300
basis points
|
|
25%
|
|
|
<
-300 basis points
|
|
0%
|
The
performance period for the Relative TSR tranche is from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017. No awards will be issued for
Relative TSR below the Threshold level and awards related to results between the Threshold and High levels will be straightline
interpolated. Any award earned will be issued as shares of restricted stock on or about March 26, 2018 and will immediately vest.
The
following chart shows the performance metrics for the Core FFO per Share performance shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Level
|
|
Core
FFO
per Share
|
|
Percent
of
Core FFO per Share
Opportunity Earned
|
High
|
|
$
|
5.33
|
|
|
100%
|
Target
|
|
$
|
5.21
|
|
|
50%
|
Threshold
|
|
$
|
5.09
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
|
<$5.09
|
|
|
0%
|
The
performance levels for the Core FFO per Share tranche were based on the company’s guidance at the beginning of the year
to align named executive officer compensation with the expectations of shareholders and the market. The performance period for
the Core FFO per Share tranche was 2015. Awards related to results between the Threshold and High levels will be straightline
interpolated.
Summary
of Payments
In
February 2016, we certified to the Compensation Committee that Core FFO per Share for 2015 was approximately $5.51, which was
at the High performance level, resulting in a 100% payout of the Core FFO per Share opportunity.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
43
|
As
a result of the Core FFO per Share results, the following performance shares were awarded to our named executive officers under
the 2015 LTIP:
|
Shares of
Restricted
Stock
|
Mr. Bolton
|
9,375
|
Mr. Campbell
|
3,646
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
3,473
|
Mr. Grimes
|
3,750
|
Shares
of restricted stock earned under the Core FFO per Share tranche were issued on March 25, 2016 and will vest 50% on each of the
first and second anniversary of the issue date, dependent upon continued employment through each vest date.
No
awards under the Relative TSR tranche are recognizable until the end of the performance period on December 31, 2017.
Time Vested
Restricted Stock
We
believe that time vested restricted stock is performance-based because its value is solely tied to the company’s stock price,
which directly correlates to our shareholders’ interests. We grant time vested restricted stock for several reasons, including:
|
·
|
restricted
shares that vest over time encourage named executive officers to focus on the long term
when making decisions to enhance shareholder value;
|
|
·
|
declines
in stock price following the grant of time vested restricted stock have a negative impact
on named executive officer pay; and
|
|
·
|
feedback
from named executive officers has indicated that time vested restricted stock is highly
valued and is an important retention tool.
|
We
have significant share ownership requirements (see page 51) working to ensure our executives are aligned with investors. This
alignment, by virtue of sustained ownership, helps to mitigate excessive risk-taking in addition to other program features (see
page 47).
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
44
|
Our
named executive officers were awarded the following time vested restricted shares under the 2015 LTIP:
|
Shares
of
Restricted
Stock
|
Mr.
Bolton
|
7,031
|
Mr.
Campbell
|
2,735
|
Mr.
DelPriore
|
2,605
|
Mr.
Grimes
|
2,813
|
The
shares were awarded on January 9, 2015 and will vest 20% a year on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversary of the
issuance, dependent upon continued employment through each vest date.
ONE-TIME
GRANT RELATED TO SURRENDER OF 280G TAX GROSS UP FEATURES
On
February 12, 2015, the Compensation Committee reviewed a new employment agreement for Mr. Bolton and reviewed and approved new
change in control agreements for Messrs. Campbell and Grimes. Subsequently, on March 12, 2015, the Board of Directors reviewed
and approved the new employment agreement for Mr. Bolton as recommended by the Compensation Committee. These agreements are described
in the “Executive Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement under the subheading “Employment Agreements
and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on pages 62 through 65.The primary change in the agreements
was to remove the tax gross-up provisions for excess parachute payments and in Mr. Bolton’s case, to remove the modified,
single-trigger termination right in his legacy employment agreement dated December 5, 2008.
In
consideration of these changes to MAA’s long-standing agreements with Messrs. Bolton, Campbell and Grimes, the Compensation
Committee made a modest one-time grant of restricted shares. The grant values were set at a significant discount from the potential
value of the removed provisions.
The
following chart represents the number of shares of restricted stock awarded to the affected executive officers:
|
Shares of
Restricted
Stock
|
Mr. Bolton
|
2,044
|
Mr. Campbell
|
1,406
|
Mr. Grimes
|
1,406
|
The
shares were awarded on March 24, 2015 and will 100% vest on the fifth anniversary of the issuance date, dependent upon continued
employment in good standing through the vest date.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
45
|
ADDITIONAL
COMPENSATION ELEMENTS
Benefits
In
general, benefits are designed to provide a safety net of protection against the financial catastrophes that can result from illness,
disability or death, and to provide a reasonable level of retirement income based on years of service with us. The named executive
officers generally participate in the same benefit plans as our broader employee population.
Employment
Agreement
Mr.
Bolton is our only named executive officer with an employment agreement. The material terms of his employment agreement and amounts
payable under that agreement are described in the “Executive Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement under the
subheading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” on page 62.
Change in
Control Agreements
Messrs.
Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes have change in control agreements. These change in control agreements are described in the “Executive
Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement under the subheading “Employment Agreements and Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control” on page 62.
Deferred
Compensation Plans
During
2015, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes were eligible to participate in our MAA Non-Qualified Executive Deferred
Compensation Retirement Plan, or Deferred Comp Plan. The Deferred Comp Plan is a supplemental non-qualified deferred compensation
plan made available to select employees to enable them to accumulate retirement benefits without the limitations on contributions
placed on the Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan. We may, but are not obligated to, make matching contributions,
up to 6% of the participant’s compensation. The deferred compensation amounts contributed by Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore
and Grimes, and any resultant matches by MAA are considered general assets of the company and are subject to claims of MAA’s
creditors.
In
accordance with the Deferred Comp Plan, benefits are paid out over five years beginning on the first day following the sixth full
month occurring after either death, disability or the participant’s cessation of employment.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
46
|
HOW
WE MAKE COMPENSATION DECISIONS
|
RISK
CONSIDERATIONS
The
Compensation Committee reviews the risks and rewards associated with our compensation programs. The programs are designed with
features that mitigate risk without diminishing the incentive nature of the compensation. We believe our compensation programs
encourage and reward prudent business judgment and appropriate risk-taking over the short term and the long term.
Management
and the Compensation Committee regularly evaluate the risks involved with compensation programs and do not believe any of our
compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse impact on us. In 2015, we conducted a
review of incentive plans and programs and considered factors such as the plan metrics, number of participants, maximum payments
and risk mitigation factors.
The
Compensation Committee evaluates risks and rewards associated with our overall compensation philosophy and structure. Management
discusses with the Compensation Committee the systems that have been put in place to identify and mitigate, as necessary, potential
risks. With respect to specific elements of compensation:
|
·
|
Base
salary does not encourage risk-taking as it is a fixed amount and but one component of
a balanced, multi-component approach to compensation and rewards.
|
|
·
|
The
annual incentive program for executive officers is designed to reward achievement of
short-term performance metrics. Through a combination of plan design and management procedures,
undue risk-taking is mitigated. Specifically, the plan has a cap on the award for any
individual and constitutes only a portion of the total direct compensation for our executive
officers. The plan is also structured to be self-funding in that portions of the incentive
that are based on performance measurements must be obtained after the expense of the
incentive is considered.
|
|
·
|
Annual
and quarterly incentive plans for employees other than non-executive officers are also
designed to reward achievement of short-term performance metrics. Through a combination
of plan design and management procedures, undue risk-taking is mitigated. Specifically,
the plans are capped on the award for any individual and constitute only a portion of
the total direct compensation for our employees.
|
|
·
|
Our
long-term incentive plans are based on total shareholder return and other performance
metrics. The plans have caps on the award for any individual and constitute only a portion
of the total direct compensation for our executive officers and the other participants.
|
DECISION-MAKING
PROCESS AND ROLE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
We
believe that the levels of compensation we provide should be competitively reasonable and appropriate for our business needs and
circumstances. Our approach is to consider competitive compensation practices and relevant factors rather than establishing compensation
at specific benchmark percentiles. This enables us to respond to dynamics in the labor market and provides us with flexibility
in maintaining and enhancing our executive officers’ engagement, focus, motivation and enthusiasm for our future.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
47
|
We
follow a two-phase process. In the first phase, the Compensation Committee periodically engages a compensation consultant to
conduct a competitive compensation analysis. In 2013, the Compensation Committee hired a consultant to benchmark individual
compensation levels and opportunities for base salary, annual bonus, long-term incentive compensation and total remuneration
(salary plus bonus plus annualized value of long-term incentives) to assist in establishing compensation for 2014 and 2015.
The Compensation Committee does not believe it is competitively reasonable or appropriate for executive compensation to be
above or below a benchmark range. In the second phase, we consider many factors in determining appropriate compensation
levels for each executive officer. These considerations may include:
|
·
|
our
analyses of competitive compensation practices;
|
|
·
|
the
Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the executive officers;
|
|
·
|
individual
performance and contributions to performance goals, which could include, but are not
limited to Core FFO per Share, and total shareholder return;
|
|
·
|
company
performance, including comparisons to market and peer benchmarks;
|
|
·
|
operational
management, such as project milestones and process improvements;
|
|
·
|
internal
working and reporting relationships and our desire to encourage collaboration and teamwork
among our executive officers;
|
|
·
|
individual
expertise, skills and knowledge;
|
|
·
|
leadership,
including developing and motivating employees, collaborating within the company, attracting
and retaining employees and personal development;
|
|
·
|
labor
market conditions, the need to retain and motivate, the potential to assume increased
responsibilities and the perceived long-term value to the company; and
|
|
·
|
information
and advice from an independent, third-party compensation consultant engaged by the Compensation
Committee.
|
We
do not have a pre-defined framework that determines which of these factors may be more or less important, and the emphasis placed
on specific factors may vary among the executive officers and from year to year. Ultimately, it is the Compensation Committee’s
judgment of these factors along with competitive data that form the basis for determining the CEO’s compensation. The Compensation
Committee and the CEO follow a similar practice to determine the basis of the other executive officers’ compensation.
While
Mr. Bolton, our CEO, and Mr. DelPriore, our General Counsel, did participate in general meetings of the Compensation
Committee in 2015, they did not participate in executive sessions nor did they participate in any discussions determining
their own compensation. Annually, upon request from the Compensation Committee, our CEO provides the Compensation Committee
with data pertinent to his and the other executive officers’ compensation. This information may from time-to-time
include peer executive compensation levels, achievement of individual performance components of their annual incentive plans,
or data pertinent to their annual base salary increases. The Compensation Committee utilizes this information, along with
input from committee members, and, at times, outside consultants, and in the case of our CEO, input from all of the members
of the Board of Directors before making final independent compensation decisions. Our CEO also provides data pertinent to the
terms of our long-term incentive plans to the Compensation Committee, upon their request. At the end of any incentive or
incentive plan measurement period, our CEO, along with our Corporate Secretary and/or General Counsel, prepare and present to
the Compensation Committee, the preliminary results of the plan for
the
committee’s review and, if necessary, further evaluation and/or adjustment. All incentive plans are ultimately developed
and adopted by the Compensation Committee. All compensation related to our CEO is recommended by the Compensation Committee to
our full Board of Directors, which ultimately has responsibility for approving CEO compensation.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
48
|
The
Compensation Committee has not awarded any stock options since 2002. When the Compensation Committee was utilizing stock options
as part of the compensation package they consistently maintained a practice to award stock options only at specific times in order
to avoid any claim that grants to executive officers were initiated during periods potentially advantageous to them. During its
winter meeting, the Compensation Committee would grant stock options to a broad group of employees, including executive officers,
in amounts determined by the Compensation Committee. These grants were effective on the day awarded by the Compensation Committee
with exercise prices equal to the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on that day. Other than the annual grants described
above, the Compensation Committee only considered additional grants for new employees. These grants were made in conjunction with
the hiring of the employee and after Compensation Committee approval with the exercise price being equal to the closing price
of our common stock on the NYSE on the day of grant.
COMPENSATION
COMPARATOR GROUP
We
use a comparator group of companies when making certain compensation decisions. Our comparator group is used:
|
·
|
as
an input in developing base salary ranges, annual incentive targets and long-term incentive
award ranges;
|
|
·
|
to
benchmark the mix of equity awarded to employees;
|
|
·
|
to
assess the competitiveness of total direct compensation awarded to senior executives;
|
|
·
|
to
validate whether executive compensation programs are aligned with our performance; and
|
|
·
|
as
an input in designing compensation plans, benefits and perquisite programs.
|
While
the Compensation Committee examines data about executive compensation at other comparator companies, compensation paid at other
companies is not a primary factor in the decision-making process.
The
comparator group consists of other real estate investment trusts, primarily in the residential sector, of similar size to MAA
in terms of enterprise value, total assets, number of employees and/or number of units/properties. The comparator group for 2015
is listed below:
American Campus Communities Inc.
|
Equity Residential
|
Apartment Investment and Management Co
|
Essex Property Trust Inc.
|
AvalonBay Communities Inc.
|
Extra Space Storage Inc.
|
Camden Property Trust
|
Post Properties, Inc.
|
CBL & Associates Properties Inc.
|
SL Green Realty Corp.
|
CubeSmart
|
Sovran Self Storage Inc.
|
Duke Realty Corporation
|
The Macerich Co
|
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc.
|
UDR, Inc.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
49
|
ROLE OF COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee
is authorized to retain and terminate any consultant, as well as to approve the consultant’s fees and other terms of the
engagement. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal,
accounting or other advisors. In 2013, the Compensation Committee engaged Semler Brossy as its compensation consultant with respect
to 2014 and 2015 compensation decisions.
Prior to the retention of a compensation consultant
or any other external advisor, and from time-to-time as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, the Compensation Committee
assesses the independence of such advisor from management, taking into consideration all factors relevant to such advisor’s
independence, including the factors specified in the NYSE listing standards.
The Compensation Committee assessed Semler
Brossy’s independence, taking into account the following factors:
|
·
|
the policies and procedures the consultant has in place to prevent
conflicts of interest;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
any business or personal relationships between the consultant and
the members of the Compensation Committee;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
any ownership of our common stock by the individuals at Semler Brossy
performing consulting services for the Compensation Committee; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
any business or personal relationship of Semler Brossy with any of
our executive officers.
|
Semler Brossy has provided the Compensation
Committee with appropriate assurances and confirmation of its independent status pursuant to the factors indicated above. The Compensation
Committee believes that Semler Brossy has been independent throughout its service for the Committee and that there is no conflict
of interest between Semler Brossy and the Compensation Committee.
FINDINGS OF COMPENSATION CONSULTANT
Semler Brossy presented the final results of
their review at the December 3, 2013 Compensation Committee meeting and the Compensation Committee considered Semler Brossy’s
review in setting the 2014 and 2015 compensation programs.
In total, Semler Brossy reported the compensation
of the named executive officers was in the bottom quartile of the comparator group. Specifically, base salaries were roughly 10%
below market medians, target annual incentives were well below the 25
th
percentile, and target long-term incentives
as a percent of salary were generally between the 25
th
percentile and the median.
Overall, the Compensation Committee believed
these results indicated that compensation was generally lagging in all categories. As a result, the Compensation Committee felt
it was appropriate to adopt increases in base salaries and to increase the total award opportunity as a percent of salary available
under the annual incentive plan in 2014. In considering the total award opportunity for the long-term incentive plan, the Compensation
Committee took into account that as the awards under the plan are based on a percent of salary, the increase in salary effectively
increases the opportunity under the long-term incentive plan without increasing the percent of opportunity within the long-term
incentive plan.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
50
|
SHARE OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
We have share ownership guidelines for our
named executive officers. These guidelines are designed to align the named executive officers’ long-term financial interests
with those of shareholders. Under these guidelines, Mr. Bolton is required to own MAA stock worth three times his annual base salary
and our other named executive officers are required to own MAA stock worth two times their respective annual base salaries. Each
named executive officer has three years from the date he or she becomes subject to the share ownership guidelines to meet his or
her target. If a named executive officer is promoted and the target is increased, an additional three-year period is provided to
meet the target. Stock options do not count toward the ownership guideline and performance shares count only after the performance
criteria has been met.
All named executive officers exceed their share
ownership guidelines.
TRADING CONTROLS AND HEDGING,
PLEDGING AND SHORT SALE POLICIES
Executive officers, including the named executive
officers, are required to receive the permission of our General Counsel (and our General Counsel is required to receive the permission
of our Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer) prior to entering into any transactions in our securities. Generally, trading is permitted
only during announced trading periods. Employees who are subject to trading restrictions, including the named executive officers,
may enter into a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. These trading plans may be entered into only during an open
trading period and must be approved by MAA. We require trading plans to include a waiting period and the trading plans may not
be amended during their term. The named executive officer bears full responsibility if he violates our policy by permitting shares
to be bought or sold without pre-approval or when trading is restricted.
Executive officers are prohibited from entering
into hedging and short sale transactions or pledging common stock.
CLAWBACK PROVISIONS
We have adopted a clawback policy. Under this
policy, if we are required to prepare an accounting restatement, the Compensation Committee may require our named executive officers
to repay to MAA any portion of incentive compensation paid in the preceding three years that would not have been paid if such compensation
had been determined based on the financial results reported in the restated financial statement.
TAX AND ACCOUNTING IMPLICATIONS
OF COMPENSATION
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, prohibits publicly traded companies from taking a tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the
chief executive officer or any of its three other most highly compensated executive officers (other than the chief financial officer)
for any fiscal year, who are referred to as “covered employees” under Section 162(m). Certain “performance-based
compensation” is excluded from this $1 million cap. We believe, however, that because of the structure of MAA and its affiliates,
we do not have “covered employees” whose compensation is subject to the $1 million deduction limit under Section 162(m).
Since MAA qualifies as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and is generally not subject to Federal income taxes, the payment
of compensation that fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) would not have a material adverse consequence to us,
provided we continue to distribute 100% of our taxable income. If we make compensation payments subject to Section 162(m) limitations
on deductibility, we may be required to make additional distributions to shareholders to comply with our REIT distribution requirements
and eliminate our U.S. federal income tax liability or, alternatively, a larger portion of shareholder distributions that would
otherwise have been treated as a return of capital may be subject to federal income
tax expense as dividend income. Any such compensation allocated to the MAA’s taxable REIT subsidiaries whose income is subject
to federal income taxes would result in an increase in income taxes due to the inability to deduct such compensation. Although
we are mindful of the limits imposed by Section 162(m), even if it is determined that Section 162(m) applies or may apply to certain
compensation packages, we nevertheless reserves the right to structure the compensation packages and awards in a manner that may
exceed the limitation on deduction imposed by Section 162(m).
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
51
|
The Compensation Committee believes that our
executive leadership is a key element to our success and that the compensation package offered to the executive officers is a key
element in attracting, retaining and motivating the appropriate personnel.
The Compensation Committee believes it has
historically maintained compensation for our executive officers at levels that are reflective of the talent and success of the
individuals being compensated, and with the inclusion of additional compensation directly tied to performance, the Compensation
Committee believes executive compensation will be sufficiently comparable to our industry peers to allow us to retain our key personnel
at costs which are appropriate for MAA.
The Compensation Committee will continue to develop, analyze
and review its methods for aligning executive management’s long-term compensation with the benefits generated for shareholders.
The Compensation Committee believes the idea of creating ownership in MAA helps align management’s interests with the interests
of shareholders. The Compensation Committee has no pre-determined timeline for implementing new or ongoing long-term incentive
plans. New plans are reviewed, discussed and implemented as the Compensation Committee feels it is necessary or appropriate as
a measure to incent, retain and reward our executive officers.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
|
The Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. has reviewed and discussed with management the information contained in the
Compensation Discussion & Analysis section of this Proxy Statement and recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation
Discussion & Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:
Philip W. Norwood (Chair)
Ralph Horn
Claude B. Nielsen
William B. Sansom
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
52
|
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation
earned by our named executive officers. Values for stock awards represent full grant date fair value in accordance with FASB ASC
Topic 718 and appear in the year of the grant. These values represent the total expense that we expect to recognize over time
related to the award, but due to performance and continued employment requirements, as well as vesting schedules, they may or
may not represent the value of stock realized, or the timing of stock acquired by the named executive officers. For information
on actual shares issued to named executive officers, please see the footnotes to this table and the Outstanding Equity Awards
table found later in this Proxy Statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
|
|
All
Other
Compensation
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Total
|
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
|
($)
|
H. Eric Bolton, Jr.
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
635,077
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
1,733,391
|
|
|
$
|
1,530,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,346
|
|
|
$
|
3,917,314
|
|
CEO
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
596,538
|
|
|
$
|
1,609
|
|
|
$
|
2,779,464
|
|
|
$
|
1,462,500
|
|
|
$
|
17,896
|
|
|
$
|
4,858,007
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
$
|
523,884
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
913,565
|
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,717
|
|
|
$
|
2,503,666
|
|
Albert M. Campbell, III
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
370,462
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
721,916
|
|
|
$
|
535,500
|
|
|
$
|
25,764
|
|
|
$
|
1,654,142
|
|
EVP and CFO
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
348,846
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
1,022,560
|
|
|
$
|
502,031
|
|
|
$
|
20,693
|
|
|
$
|
1,894,630
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
$
|
324,231
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
350,216
|
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
|
$
|
19,234
|
|
|
$
|
1,019,181
|
|
Robert J. DelPriore
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
351,538
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
524,435
|
|
|
$
|
503,625
|
|
|
$
|
23,402
|
|
|
$
|
1,403,250
|
|
EVP and
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
298,846
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
726,480
|
|
|
$
|
441,563
|
|
|
$
|
12,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,479,065
|
|
General Counsel
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
$
|
87,788
|
|
|
$
|
100,205
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
635
|
|
|
$
|
188,628
|
|
Thomas L. Grimes, Jr.
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
381,046
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
739,398
|
|
|
$
|
537,030
|
|
|
$
|
25,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,683,867
|
|
EVP and COO
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
358,385
|
|
|
$
|
1,673
|
|
|
$
|
871,776
|
|
|
$
|
496,125
|
|
|
$
|
21,087
|
|
|
$
|
1,749,046
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
$
|
324,038
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
348,929
|
|
|
$
|
325,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,082
|
|
|
$
|
1,008,549
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents salary actually
paid during the calendar year indicated. This value may vary slightly from the base salary awarded by the Compensation Committee
depending upon when our Compensation Committee awards current year salaries and because our payroll is paid every two weeks and
may carryover a calendar year end or have an extra pay period in a given year.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes an annual
holiday bonus paid to all employees based on length of service. Messrs. Bolton and Grimes also include an additional length of
service payment in 2014 for reaching 20 years of service for which all employees are eligible. Mr. DelPriore became an executive
officer in August 2013 and as a result was not a participant in the 2013 Annual Incentive Program, or 2013 AIP. His 2013 bonus
amount represents an award by the Compensation Committee of the pro rata portion of the annual incentive award Mr. DelPriore would
have received if he had been a participant in the 2013 AIP.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
53
|
|
(3)
|
Represents the grant
date fair value based upon probable outcome in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 in the year of the grant. For a complete description
of the assumptions made in determining the FASB ASC Topic 718 valuation, please refer to Stock Based Compensation in our audited
financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the indicated fiscal year. Additional details for each grant are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Opportunity
|
|
|
Shares
Earned
|
|
Maximum
Future
|
Year, Plan and
Name
|
|
Value to
Participant
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
as of
12/31/2015
|
|
Share
Opportunity
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015
LTIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
1,836,000
|
|
|
|
23,437
|
|
|
|
16,406
|
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
714,000
|
|
|
|
9,116
|
|
|
|
6,381
|
|
|
|
2,735
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$
|
680,000
|
|
|
|
8,683
|
|
|
|
6,078
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
734,400
|
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
|
|
6,563
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
One-time 280G
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
160,025
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
110,076
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
110,076
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 LTIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
|
29,313
|
|
|
|
15,740
|
|
|
|
8,794
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
11,400
|
|
|
|
6,122
|
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
9,773
|
|
|
|
5,248
|
|
|
|
2,932
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
11,726
|
|
|
|
6,297
|
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
One-time Integration
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
24,428
|
|
|
|
24,428
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
8,551
|
|
|
|
8,551
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
4,888
|
|
|
|
4,888
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 LTIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
|
24,188
|
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
|
|
5,088
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
|
|
5,088
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2012 Bonus
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
247,970
|
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
76,241
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
74,954
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4)
|
Represents cash bonuses paid under the Annual Incentive Programs
for executive officers.
|
|
(5)
|
Represents matching company contributions to the Deferred Comp Plan.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
54
|
GRANTS
OF PLAN BASED AWARDS
The
following table summarizes grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers for 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
Number
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
Under Equity Incentive
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards (1)
|
|
Plan Awards (2)
|
|
of Stock
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
or Units (3)
|
|
(4)
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
3/12/2015
|
|
$
|
382,500
|
|
|
$
|
765,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,530,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
|
|
1/9/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,133
|
|
|
|
15,234
|
|
|
|
23,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,573,366
|
|
|
|
3/24/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
$
|
160,025
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
3/12/2015
|
|
$
|
234,281
|
|
|
$
|
334,688
|
|
|
$
|
535,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVP, CFO
|
|
1/9/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,330
|
|
|
|
5,925
|
|
|
|
9,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
611,840
|
|
|
|
3/24/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
$
|
110,076
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
3/12/2015
|
|
$
|
223,125
|
|
|
$
|
318,750
|
|
|
$
|
510,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVP, General Counsel
|
|
1/9/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
|
|
5,643
|
|
|
|
8,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
524,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
3/12/2015
|
|
$
|
240,975
|
|
|
$
|
344,250
|
|
|
$
|
550,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVP, COO
|
|
1/9/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,453
|
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
629,322
|
|
|
|
3/24/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
$
|
110,076
|
|
|
(1)
|
On March 12, 2015, the Compensation Committee, and in regards to
Mr. Bolton, the Board of Directors, approved the 2015 AIP for executive officers. The actual awards earned under the 2015 AIP by
Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes were $1,530,000, $535,500, $503,625 and $537,030, respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
The Compensation Committee, and in regards to Mr. Bolton, the Board
of Directors, approved the 2015 LTIP with a grant date of January 9, 2015. Actual shares earned under the 2015 LTIP as of December
31, 2015 were 16,406, 6,381, 6,078, and 6,563 by Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
The Compensation Committee, and in regards to Mr. Bolton, the Board
of Directors, approved a one-time grant on March 24, 2015, in consideration for the removal of tax gross-up provisions for excess
parachute payments and in Mr. Bolton’s case, to remove the modified, single-trigger termination right in his legacy employment
agreement, which had been previously granted to the executive officers.
|
|
(4)
|
These amounts are also reflected in the Summary Compensation Table
under “Stock Awards”.
|
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END
The
following table summarizes the number of non-fully vested outstanding equity awards held by each of our named executive officers
as of December 31, 2015, including awards earned by December 31, 2015 but not yet issued, and the market value of these awards
as of December 31, 2015. These awards are often related to long-term incentive plans
with
performance periods in prior years. Frequently, the shares were also issued in prior years and are subject to various vesting features.
Please refer to the footnotes of the table for further details. None of our named executive officers holds any stock options.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
55
|
|
|
Stock Awards
Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested
|
|
Market Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock That
Have
Not
Vested
|
Name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
Mr.Bolton
|
|
|
1,934
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
175,627
|
|
CEO
|
|
|
2,362
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
214,493
|
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
166,091
|
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
638,848
|
|
|
|
|
6,840
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
621,140
|
|
|
|
|
9,264
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
841,264
|
|
|
|
|
7,031
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
638,485
|
|
|
|
|
6,946
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
630,766
|
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
185,616
|
|
|
|
|
15,878
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
1,441,881
|
|
|
|
|
9,375
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
851,344
|
|
Mr.Campbell
|
|
|
378
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
34,326
|
|
EVP,CFO
|
|
|
968
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
87,904
|
|
|
|
|
562
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
51,035
|
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
248,456
|
|
|
|
|
2,394
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
217,399
|
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
346,531
|
|
|
|
|
2,735
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
248,365
|
|
|
|
|
2,702
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
245,369
|
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
127,679
|
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
504,722
|
|
|
|
|
3,646
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
331,093
|
|
Mr.DelPriore
|
|
|
2,345
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
212,949
|
|
EVP,General Counsel
|
|
|
1,368
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
124,228
|
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
236,560
|
|
|
|
|
2,316
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
210,316
|
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
288,594
|
|
|
|
|
3,473
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
315,383
|
|
Mr.Grimes
|
|
|
404
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
36,687
|
|
EVP,COO
|
|
|
952
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
86,451
|
|
|
|
|
552
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
50,127
|
|
|
|
|
2,814
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
255,539
|
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
149,019
|
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
(6)
|
|
$
|
346,531
|
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
255,449
|
|
|
|
|
2,779
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
252,361
|
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
(8)
|
|
$
|
127,679
|
|
|
|
|
3,813
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
346,259
|
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
(7)
|
|
$
|
340,538
|
|
|
(1)
|
On January 3, 2012, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell and Grimes were granted
7,739, 1,515 and 1,618 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with the three year program under MAA’s 2008 Long
Term Incentive Program, or 2008 LTIP, respectively. The shares vested equally on an annual basis beginning January 2, 2013 and
ending on January 4, 2016, contingent upon continued employment. No additional shares can be earned under the 2008 LTIP.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
56
|
|
(2)
|
On January 10, 2013, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell and Grimes were granted
4,726, 1,938 and 1,906 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with MAA’s 2012 Long Term Incentive Program, or 2012
LTIP, respectively. The shares vest equally on an annual basis beginning January 10, 2014 and ending on January 10, 2017 contingent
upon continued employment through each vest date. No additional shares can be earned under the 2012 LTIP.
|
|
(3)
|
On March 12, 2013, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell and Grimes were granted
3,659, 1,125 and 1,106 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with the 2012 Annual Bonus Program, or 2012 AIP, respectively.
The shares vest equally on an annual basis beginning January 10, 2014 and ending on January 10, 2017 contingent upon continual
employment through each vest date. No additional shares can be earned under the 2012 AIP.
|
|
(4)
|
On January 13, 2014, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes
were granted 8,794, 3,420, 2,932 and 3,518 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with the 2014 Long Term Incentive Program,
or 2014 LTIP, respectively. The shares vest equally on an annual basis beginning January 13, 2015 and ending on January 13, 2019,
contingent upon continued employment through each vest date. On March 10, 2015, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes
were granted an additional 6,946, 2,702, 2,316 and 2,779 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with the 2014 LTIP, respectively.
The shares vest equally on an annual basis beginning March 10, 2016 and ending on March 10, 2017, contingent upon continued employment
through each vest date. Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes are eligible for a maximum of additional awards under the
2014 LTIP totaling 8,794, 3,420, 2,932 and 3,518 shares of restricted common stock, respectively.
|
|
(5)
|
On January 13, 2014, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes
were granted 8,550, 2,993, 1,710 and 2,052 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, in conjunction with a one-time integration
incentive plan, or IIP, which was granted in connection with our merger with Colonial. The shares vest equally on an annual basis
beginning January 13, 2015 and ending on January 13, 2019, contingent upon continued employment through each vest date. On March
10, 2016, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes were granted an additional 15,878, 5,558, 3,178 and 3,813 shares of restricted
common stock in conjunction with the IIP, respectively. The shares vest equally on an annual basis beginning March 10, 2017 and
ending on March 10, 2019, contingent upon continued employment through each vest date. No additional shares can be earned under
the IIP.
|
|
(6)
|
On January 24, 2014, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell and Grimes were granted
12,353, 5,088 and 5,088 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with the 2013 Long Term Incentive Program, or 2013 LTIP,
respectively. The shares vest equally on an annual basis beginning January 23, 2015 and ending January 24, 2018, contingent upon
continued employment through each vest date. No additional shares can be earned under the 2013 LTIP.
|
|
(7)
|
On
January 9, 2015, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes were granted 7,031, 2,735, 2,605 and 2,813 shares of restricted
common stock in conjunction with the 2015 LTIP, respectively. The shares vest equally on an annual basis beginning January 9,
2016 and ending on January 9, 2020, contingent upon continued employment through each vest date. On March 25, 2016, Messrs. Bolton,
Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes were granted an additional 9,375, 3,646, 3,473 and 3,750 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction
with the 2015 LTIP, respectively. The shares vest equally on an annual basis beginning March 25, 2017 and ending on March 25,
2018, contingent upon continued employment through each vest date.
Messrs. Bolton, Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes are eligible for a maximum of additional awards under the 2015 LTIP totaling 7,031,
2,735, 2,605 and 2,813 shares of restricted common stock, respectively.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
57
|
|
(8)
|
On March 24, 2015, Messrs. Bolton, Campbell and Grimes were granted
2,044, 1,406 and 1,406 shares of restricted common stock, respectively, in consideration for the removal of tax gross-up provisions
for excess parachute payments and in Mr. Bolton’s case, to remove the modified, single-trigger termination right in his legacy
employment agreement, which had been previously granted to the executive officers. The shares vest 100% on March 24, 2020, contingent
upon continued employee through the vest date. No additional shares can be earned under this grant.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
58
|
OPTION
EXERCISE AND STOCK VESTED
|
The
following table summarizes the number of shares acquired upon the vesting of stock awards and the value realized by our named
executive officers as a result of each such occurrence during 2015. None of our named executive officers holds any stock options.
Accordingly, no options were exercised in 2015 by our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
(1)
|
|
|
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
(2)
|
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,350
|
|
CEO
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,177
|
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,129
|
|
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,527
|
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
$
|
136,612
|
|
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
|
|
$
|
253,638
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,861
|
|
EVP, CFO
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,233
|
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,151
|
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,645
|
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,854
|
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
$
|
104,444
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,895
|
|
EVP, General Counsel
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,322
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,765
|
|
EVP, COO
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,602
|
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,836
|
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,243
|
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,835
|
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
$
|
104,444
|
|
|
(1)
|
The
shares represented in this column vested from the following plans:
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
ASC 718
Grant
Date
|
|
Stock
Issue
Date
|
|
Total
Shares
Granted
|
|
Shares
Vested
in 2015
|
|
Remaining
Unvested
Shares
|
|
Vesting
Schedule
|
2008
LTIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Bolton
|
|
7/1/2008
|
|
|
1/3/2012
|
|
|
7,739
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/2/2013
|
|
Mr.
Campbell
|
|
7/1/2008
|
|
|
1/3/2012
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/2/2013
|
|
Mr.
Grimes
|
|
7/1/2008
|
|
|
1/3/2012
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/2/2013
|
|
2012
LTIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Bolton
|
|
1/3/2012
|
|
|
1/10/2013
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/10/2014
|
|
Mr.
Campbell
|
|
1/3/2012
|
|
|
1/10/2013
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/10/2014
|
|
Mr.
Grimes
|
|
1/3/2012
|
|
|
1/10/2013
|
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/10/2014
|
|
2012
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Bolton
|
|
3/12/2013
|
|
|
3/12/2013
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/10/2014
|
|
Mr.
Campbell
|
|
3/12/2013
|
|
|
3/12/2013
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/10/2014
|
|
Mr.
Grimes
|
|
3/12/2013
|
|
|
3/12/2013
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/10/2014
|
|
2014
LTIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Bolton
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
8,794
|
|
|
1,759
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
20% annually beginning 1/13/2015
|
|
Mr.
Campbell
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
20% annually beginning 1/13/2015
|
|
Mr.
DelPriore
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
2,932
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
2,345
|
|
|
20% annually beginning 1/13/2015
|
|
Mr.
Grimes
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
20% annually beginning 1/13/2015
|
|
2013
IIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Bolton
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
6,840
|
|
|
20% annually beginning 1/13/2015
|
|
Mr.
Campbell
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
2,993
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
2,394
|
|
|
20% annually beginning 1/13/2015
|
|
Mr.
DelPriore
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
20% annually beginning 1/13/2015
|
|
Mr.
Grimes
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
1/13/2014
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
20% annually beginning 1/13/2015
|
|
2013
LTIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr.
Bolton
|
|
1/2/2013
|
|
|
1/24/2014
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
|
9,264
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/24/2015
|
|
Mr.
Campbell
|
|
1/2/2013
|
|
|
1/24/2014
|
|
|
5,088
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/24/2015
|
|
Mr.
Grimes
|
|
1/2/2013
|
|
|
1/24/2014
|
|
|
5,088
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
25% annually beginning 1/24/2015
|
|
|
(2)
|
The
value realized on vesting represents the number of shares vesting multiplied by the closing
stock price on the day of vest.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
60
|
NON-QUALIFIED
DEFERRED COMPENSATION
|
We
adopted our Deferred Comp Plan for certain employees who do not participate in our 401(k) Savings Plan. Under the terms of the
Deferred Comp Plan, our executive officers may elect to defer a percentage of their compensation and we may match a portion of
their salary deferral. The Deferred Comp Plan is designed so that the employees’ deferrals and matching contributions under
the Deferred Comp Plan may be invested in the same mutual funds offered in the 401(k) Savings Plan to the extent possible. The
mutual funds and respective rate of returns available for investment in the Deferred Comp Plan for 2015, as well as those fund’s
respective rates of return for 2015, are indicated in the below table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Fund
|
|
2015
Rate of
Return
|
American Beacon Small Cap Value Advisor Fund - AASSX
|
|
|
-5.50
|
%
|
|
Deutsche Real Estate Securities A Fund - RRRAX
|
|
|
2.58
|
%
|
|
Equity Income R5 Fund - PEIQX
|
|
|
-4.13
|
%
|
|
Franklin Small Cap Growth Adv Fund - FSSAX
|
|
|
-4.48
|
%
|
|
Hartford International Opportunities R4 Fund - IHOSX
|
|
|
1.12
|
%
|
|
International Equity Index R5 Fund - PIIQX
|
|
|
-1.17
|
%
|
|
LargeCap Growth I R5 Fund - PPUPX
|
|
|
7.91
|
%
|
|
LargeCap S&P 500 Index R5 Fund - PLFPX
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
MidCap S&P 400 Index R5 Fund - PMFPX
|
|
|
-2.59
|
%
|
|
Money Market Inst Fund - PVMXX
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Oppenheimer Developing Markets A Fund - ODMAX
|
|
|
-14.06
|
%
|
|
Pioneer Bond A Fund - PIOBX
|
|
|
-0.01
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2010 Inst Fund - PTTIX
|
|
|
-1.06
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2015 Inst Fund - LTINX
|
|
|
-1.18
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2020 Inst Fund - PLWIX
|
|
|
-1.17
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2025 Inst Fund - LTSTX
|
|
|
-1.17
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2030 Inst Fund - PMTIX
|
|
|
-0.95
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2035 Inst Fund - LTIUX
|
|
|
-0.79
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2040 Inst Fund - PTDIX
|
|
|
-0.79
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2045 Inst Fund - LTRIX
|
|
|
-0.82
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2050 Inst Fund - PPLIX
|
|
|
-0.74
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2055 Inst Fund - LTFIX
|
|
|
-0.75
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime 2060 Inst Fund - PLTZX
|
|
|
-0.80
|
%
|
|
Principal LifeTime Strategic Income Inst Fund - PLSIX
|
|
|
-0.87
|
%
|
|
Prudential High-Yield A Fund - PBHAX
|
|
|
-2.87
|
%
|
|
RidgeWorth Mid-Cap Value Equity A Fund - SAMVX
|
|
|
-6.27
|
%
|
|
SmallCap S&P 600 Index R5 Fund - PSSPX
|
|
|
-2.46
|
%
|
|
Wells Fargo Advantage Discovery A Fund - WFDAX
|
|
|
-1.48
|
%
|
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
61
|
Distributions
from the plan are made in five equal annual installments beginning on the first day following the sixth full month occurring after
the earliest of death, disability, or separation from service. The following table discloses the participation of named executive
officers in the Deferred Comp Plan in 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Contributions in
Last FY
|
|
Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY (1)
|
|
Aggregate
Earnings (Loss)
in Last FY (2)
|
|
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
|
|
Aggregate
Balance
at Last
FYE
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
Mr. Bolton
|
|
$
|
36,692
|
|
|
$
|
18,346
|
|
|
$
|
(23,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,945,976
|
|
CEO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Campbell
|
|
$
|
85,876
|
|
|
$
|
25,764
|
|
|
$
|
(4,306
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
367,718
|
|
EVP, CFO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. DelPriore
|
|
$
|
62,402
|
|
|
$
|
23,402
|
|
|
$
|
(3,350
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
131,045
|
|
EVP, General Counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Grimes
|
|
$
|
55,452
|
|
|
$
|
25,893
|
|
|
$
|
(3,998
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
259,166
|
|
EVP, COO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
These
amounts are also reported in the Summary Compensation Table under “All Other Compensation”.
|
|
(2)
|
The
losses reflected represent deemed investment earnings or losses from voluntary deferrals
and our contributions, as applicable. The Deferred Comp Plan does not guarantee a return
on deferred amounts.
|
EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENTS AND POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
|
Mr.
Bolton entered into an employment agreement with us on March 24, 2015, that replaced his previous agreement which had been entered
into in 2008. The employment agreement outlines the compensation he will receive and (i) has a term of one year that renews automatically
on the first day of each month for an additional one-month period, so that on the first day of each month, unless sooner terminated
in accordance with the terms of the agreement, the remaining term is one year; (ii) provides for an annual base salary for Mr.
Bolton, subject to change at the discretion of the Compensation Committee; and (iii) allows for annual incentive/bonus compensation.
Upon
Mr. Bolton’s termination due to death or permanent disability or in the event he is terminated without cause or resigns
for good reason, we will pay Mr. Bolton (or his personal representative) all amounts due to him as of the date of termination
under the terms of all incentive and bonus plans, and will also continue to pay him his base salary as then in effect for one
year after the termination. In addition, all stock options or restricted stock granted to Mr. Bolton will become fully vested
and exercisable in accordance with the terms on the termination date. Alternatively, Mr. Bolton may elect to receive an amount
in cash equal to the in-the-money value of the shares covered by all such options. Finally, we will pay to Mr. Bolton all legal
fees incurred by him in connection with his termination without cause or resignation for good reason. In this scenario, our current
equity plans allow for the full vesting of any earned stock options and restricted stock as defined by each individual plan.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
62
|
If Mr. Bolton is terminated without cause
in anticipation of, on, or within three years after a change in control or resigns for good reason within three years after a change
in control, he is entitled to receive a payment equal to the sum of 2.99 times his annual base salary in effect on the date of
termination plus 2.99 times his average annual cash bonus paid during the two immediately preceding fiscal years. However,
if the change in control transaction occurs within three years of the executive’s planned retirement date, the maximum change
in control payment would be the base salary and bonus payable to executive through the anticipated date of retirement.
In addition, all stock options and restricted stock granted to Mr. Bolton shall become fully vested and exercisable in accordance
with the terms on the termination date. Alternatively, Mr. Bolton may elect to receive an amount in cash equal to the greater of
(i) the in-the-money value of the shares covered by all such options or (ii) the difference between the highest per share price
for our shares paid in connection with the change in control and the per share exercise price of the options held by him, multiplied
by the number of shares covered by all such options. Finally, we will pay Mr. Bolton all legal fees incurred by him in connection
with the change in control termination.
The employment agreement also contains certain
confidentiality and non-competition provisions, as well as the agreement of Mr. Bolton, for a period of two years following a change
in control termination, not to have an interest in a competitor or engage in a competitive business, in any capacity, within five
miles of a property we own at the time of termination of employment.
Messrs. Campbell, DelPriore and Grimes have
change in control agreements that were entered into on March 24, 2015. The agreements outline the compensation they will receive
under certain change in control scenarios. For Messrs. Campbell and Grimes, these agreements replaced change in control agreements
originally entered into in December 1999 which were subsequently amended and restated in 2008.
Each change in control agreement provides
that in the event of a change in control termination, each of Messrs. Campbell and/or Grimes, is entitled to receive a payment
equal to the sum of 2.99 times his annual base salary in effect on the date of termination plus 2.99 times his average annual cash
bonus paid during the two immediately preceding fiscal years. In addition, all stock options and restricted stock granted
to Messrs. Campbell, DelPriore and/or Grimes shall become fully vested and exercisable in accordance with the terms on the termination
date. Alternatively, Messrs. Campbell, DelPriore and/or Grimes may elect to receive an amount in cash equal to the greater of (i)
the in-the-money value of the shares covered by all such options or (ii) the difference between the highest per share price for
our shares paid in connection with the change in control and the per share exercise price of the options held by him, multiplied
by the number of shares covered by all such options. Finally, we will pay Messrs. Campbell, DelPriore and/or Grimes all legal fees
incurred by him in connection with the change in control. The change in control agreements also require that Messrs. Campbell,
DelPriore and/or Grimes , for a period of two years following a change in control termination, not have an interest in a competitor
or engage in a competitive business, in any capacity, within five miles of a property we own at the time of termination of employment.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
63
|
Calculation of Benefits
. The following
tables include an estimate of the potential payments we would be required to make upon termination of employment of the named executive
officers in each of the circumstances described below. In providing the estimated potential payments, we have made the following
general assumptions in all circumstances where applicable:
|
·
|
The date of termination is December 31, 2015;
|
|
·
|
The annual salary at the time of termination equals the 2015 base salary
as established by the Compensation Committee for each named executive officer;
|
|
·
|
There is no accrued and unpaid salary; and
|
|
·
|
There is no unpaid reimbursement for expenses incurred prior to the
date of termination.
|
Termination due to death or disability or
by MAA without cause or by the executive officer for good reason in the absence of a change in control:
Severance Benefit Component
|
|
Mr. Bolton
CEO
|
|
12 months base salary
(1)
|
|
$
|
612,000
|
|
Pro-rated bonus
|
|
$
|
765,000
|
|
Equity Awards
(2)
|
|
$
|
7,417,746
|
|
Perquisites
(3)
|
|
$
|
16,610
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,811,356
|
|
|
(1)
|
Semi-monthly payments of base salary for one year following the termination date, subject to the 6-month delayed payment rule
under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate unvested restricted shares as of December 31, 2015 multiplied by $90.81, our closing stock price on the NYSE on December
31, 2015.
|
|
(3)
|
Upon a termination, other than death, lump sum payment for 12 months of insurance coverage for health, dental, life and disability
substantially equivalent to the costs under our benefit plans.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
64
|
Termination by us without cause (or by the
executive officer for good reason) in anticipation of, on, or within three years after a change in control:
Severance Benefit Component
|
|
Mr. Bolton
CEO
|
|
|
Mr.
Campbell
EVP, CFO
|
|
|
Mr.
DelPriore
EVP, General Counsel
|
|
|
Mr. Grimes
EVP, COO
|
|
2.99 x base salary
|
|
$
|
1,829,880
|
|
|
$
|
1,067,430
|
|
|
$
|
1,016,600
|
|
|
$
|
1,097,928
|
|
2.99 x bonus
(1)
|
|
$
|
3,756,188
|
|
|
$
|
1,236,411
|
|
|
$
|
809,943
|
|
|
$
|
1,227,582
|
|
Pro-rated bonus
|
|
$
|
765,000
|
|
|
$
|
334,688
|
|
|
$
|
318,750
|
|
|
$
|
344,250
|
|
Equity awards
(2)
|
|
$
|
7,417,746
|
|
|
$
|
2,836,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,693,933
|
|
|
$
|
2,651,606
|
|
Perquisites
(3)
|
|
$
|
33,220
|
|
|
$
|
41,704
|
|
|
$
|
47,344
|
|
|
$
|
41,704
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,802,034
|
|
|
$
|
5,516,924
|
|
|
$
|
3,886,570
|
|
|
$
|
5,363,070
|
|
|
(1)
|
Bonus is the average annual cash bonus paid for the two immediately preceding fiscal years.
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate unvested restricted shares as of December 31, 2015 multiplied by $90.81, the closing stock price on the NYSE on December
31, 2015.
|
|
(3)
|
For Mr. Bolton, lump sum payment for 24 months of insurance coverage for health, dental, life and disability substantially
equivalent to the costs under the our benefit plans. For Messrs. Campbell, DelPriore, and Grimes, lump sum payment for 24 months
insurance coverage for health, dental and vision. For Mr. DelPriore, value of the unvested employer contributions under our Deferred
Comp Plan.
|
COMPENSATION RISKS
We believe that any risks arising from
our compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.
Furthermore, the Compensation Committee believes that the nature of the various elements of executive compensation do not encourage
management to assume excessive risks.
The Compensation Committee, with input
from independent compensation consultants, extensively reviewed the elements of executive compensation to determine whether any
portion of executive compensation encouraged excessive risk taking and concluded that the long-term nature of incentive plans tied
to total shareholder return or other performance measurements discouraged excessive short-term risk taking. The Compensation Committee
also determined that the capped nature of the long-term incentive plans would serve to discourage excessive or inappropriate risk
taking in the long term. The Compensation Committee feels there is an appropriate mix of compensation elements to minimize any
risk taking by executive officers.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
65
|
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS
|
|
AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
|
As of December 31, 2015, the Compensation
Committee consisted of Philip W. Norwood, as Chair, Ralph Horn, Claude B. Nielsen and William B. Sansom. None of the current members
of the Compensation Committee is or was an officer or employee of the company. During 2015, none of our named executive officers
served as a director or member of the Compensation Committee of any other entity whose executive officers served on our Board of
Directors or Compensation Committee.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
As part of their analysis, consultants hired
by the Compensation Committee to advise on executive officer compensation programs also review our director compensation programs
and offer the Compensation Committee guidance to ensure director compensation programs are appropriate relative to our peer group.
Directors who are our employees do not receive additional remuneration for serving as directors. Each non-employee director receives
$50,000 on an annual basis for serving on our Board of Directors. To compensate for their additional duties, the Audit Committee
chair receives an additional $15,000, the Compensation Committee chair receives an additional $12,500 and the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee chair receives an additional $7,500, all on an annual basis. To compensate non-chair committee members for
their additional duties, Audit Committee members receive an additional $7,500, Compensation Committee members receive an additional
$6,250, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members receive an additional $3,750 and Real Estate Investment Committee
members receive an additional $6,250, on an annual basis. To compensate our Co-Lead Directors for their additional duties, they
both receive an additional $10,000 on an annual basis. These fees remained in place for the duration of 2015.
In accordance with our Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation Plan For Outside Company Directors, the directors have the option of having phantom stock issued into a deferred compensation
account in lieu of receiving cash. If directors choose to defer their compensation in this manner, the compensation is then issued
in two annual installments either in shares of our common stock or in a cash equivalent upon the director’s retirement from
the Board of Directors.
Non-employee directors also received the
equivalent of $90,000 worth of shares of our restricted common stock upon their election to our Board of Directors in May 2015.
The shares vest on the first anniversary of the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders at which the grant was made. At the
discretion of the Compensation Committee, new directors appointed to our Board of Directors mid-term may receive a pro-rata grant
of restricted stock based on the amount of time until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
66
|
The table below represents the compensation
earned by each non-employee director during 2015.
|
|
Fees
Earned
or
Paid in
Cash
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
(1)
|
|
|
($)
(2)
|
|
|
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Earnings
($)
|
|
|
($)
(3)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Alan B. Graf, Jr.
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
67,239
|
|
|
$
|
232,213
|
|
Ralph Horn
|
|
$
|
73,750
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
84,910
|
|
|
$
|
248,634
|
|
James K. Lowder
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
139,974
|
|
Thomas H. Lowder
|
|
$
|
56,250
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
146,224
|
|
Claude B. Nielsen
|
|
$
|
56,250
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9,680
|
|
|
$
|
155,904
|
|
Philip W. Norwood
|
|
$
|
72,500
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
37,780
|
|
|
$
|
200,254
|
|
Harold W. Ripps
(4)
|
|
$
|
26,875
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,655
|
|
|
$
|
30,530
|
|
W. Reid Sanders
|
|
$
|
63,750
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,071
|
|
|
$
|
165,795
|
|
William B. Sansom
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23,966
|
|
|
$
|
173,940
|
|
Gary Shorb
|
|
$
|
57,500
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
19,447
|
|
|
$
|
166,921
|
|
John W. Spiegel
|
|
$
|
57,500
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
147,474
|
|
|
(1)
|
This column represents annual director fees, meeting fees and committee
chair and committee member fees regardless of whether they were paid as cash or deferred by the director and issued as phantom
stock in Mid-America’s Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan For Outside Company Directors.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
67
|
|
(2)
|
This column represents the full grant date fair value in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 718 in the year of the grant. The restricted common stock awards that were granted in 2015 include the following
grants:
|
Name
|
|
|
Date of
Grant
|
|
|
Price
of
Grant
|
|
|
|
Number
of
Shares
|
|
|
Vesting
Schedule
|
|
2015
ASC 718
Expense
|
|
|
Full
Grant
Date
Fair Value
|
|
Alan B. Graf, Jr.
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
Ralph Horn
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
James K. Lowder
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
Thomas H. Lowder
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
Claude B. Nielsen
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
Philip W. Norwood
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
W. Reid Sanders
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
William B. Sansom
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
Gary Shorb
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
John W. Spiegel
|
|
|
5/19/2015
|
|
|
$
|
76.77
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
100% on May 19, 2016
|
|
$
|
52,485
|
|
|
$
|
89,974
|
|
|
(3)
|
This column represents the dividend reinvestment shares acquired
in our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan For Outside Company Directors during the year.
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Ripps did not stand for reelection to the Board of Directors
at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
68
|
The
Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in its charter which include the responsibility to assist our Board
of Directors in its oversight of our accounting and financial reporting principles and policies and internal audit controls and
procedures, the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent
auditor’s qualifications and independence, and the performance of the independent auditor and our internal audit function.
The Audit Committee is also required to prepare this report to be included in our annual Proxy Statement pursuant to the proxy
rules of the SEC.
Management
is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements and for maintaining appropriate accounting
and financial reporting principles and policies and internal controls and procedures to provide for compliance with accounting
standards and applicable laws and regulations. The internal auditor is responsible for testing such internal controls and procedures.
Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for planning and carrying out a proper audit of our annual financial
statements, reviews of our quarterly financial statements prior to the filing of each quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and other
procedures.
The
Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 with management.
In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm,
the matters required to be discussed by the Auditing Standard No. 16,
Communications with Audit Committees
, as adopted
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and other matters required by the charter of this committee.
The
Audit Committee also has received the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board Rule 3526, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence from the company and its
management.
The
Audit Committee has received both management’s and the independent registered public accountant’s reports on internal
control over financial reporting and has discussed those reports.
The
Audit Committee has discussed with management and the independent registered public accountants such other matters and received
such assurances from them as they deemed appropriate.
As
a result of their review and discussions, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors the inclusion of our audited
financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, for filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE:
Alan B. Graf, Jr. (Chair)
W. Reid Sanders
Gary Shorb
John W. Spiegel
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
69
|
The
following table shows the fees paid or accrued by us for audit and other services provided by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent
registered public accounting firm effective October 31, 2005, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. Audit Related Fees
consists of services performed and expenses incurred specifically pertaining to our merger with Colonial. Tax Fees consists
of services performed and expenses incurred relating to tax return preparation and compliance and special projects including modeling
and planning related to our operating partnership, legal entity structure and cost segregation analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
Fees
|
|
Audit
Related
Fees
|
|
Tax
Fees
|
|
All
Other
Fees
|
|
Total
Fees
|
2015
|
|
$ 2,142,296
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
295,767
|
|
$ 1,990
|
|
$ 2,440,053
|
2014
|
|
$ 1,907,800
|
|
$
|
325,400
|
|
$
|
792,475
|
|
$ 1,995
|
|
$ 3,027,670
|
SEC
rules under Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require the Audit Committee to pre-approve audit and non-audit services
provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. In 2002, our Audit Committee began pre-approving all services provided
by our independent registered public accounting firm and has pre-approved all new services since that time.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
70
|
PROPOSAL
NO. 1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
|
Our
Board of Directors proposes that H. Eric Bolton, Jr., Alan B. Graf, Jr., James K. Lowder, Thomas H. Lowder, Monica McGurk, Claude
B. Nielsen, Philip W. Norwood, W. Reid Sanders, William B. Sansom, and Gary Shorb, all of whom are currently serving as directors,
be elected for a term of one year or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. We have no reason to believe that
any nominee for director will not agree or be available to serve as a director if elected. However, should any nominee become
unable or unwilling to serve, the proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee or to allow the vacancy to remain open until filled
by our Board of Directors. The presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by written proxy, and the cast
of more “For” votes than votes cast “Against” for each nominee are necessary at the meeting to elect a
nominee as a director.
Our
Board of Directors believes that it is necessary for our directors to possess a variety of backgrounds and skills in order to
provide a broad voice of experience and leadership. When searching for new candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee considers the evolving needs of our Board of Directors and searches for candidates that fill any current or anticipated
future gap. When evaluating new candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers business management experience
and education, industry knowledge, conflicts of interest, public company experience, integrity and ethics, and commitment to the
goal of maximizing shareholder value. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a policy about diversity,
but does seek to provide our Board of Directors with a depth of experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. In considering
candidates for our Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers both the entirety of each candidate’s
credentials and the current and potential future needs of our Board of Directors. With respect to the nomination of continuing
directors for re-election, the individual’s contributions to our Board of Directors are also considered.
All
our directors bring unique skills to our Board of Directors, integrity, high ethical standards and a dedication to representing
our shareholders. Furthermore, all of our directors live in states in which we currently have real estate investments. This provides
them with geographic expertise related to our portfolio footprint. Certain individual qualifications and skills of our directors
that contribute to our Board of Directors’ effectiveness as a whole are described below.
As
discussed previously, the retirement age for our directors is 75. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that no director
who is or would be over the age of 75 at the expiration of his or her current term may be nominated to a new term, unless the
Board of Directors waives the retirement age for a specific director for special circumstances. In accordance with our Corporate
Governance Guidelines, the Board of Directors has determined to not re-nominate Ralph Horn, age 75, or John W. Spiegel, age 75,
for re-election at the Annual Meeting. In connection therewith, the size of our Board of Directors will be reduced from twelve
to ten directors.
Information
regarding each of the nominees for director is set forth below. Directors’ ages are given as of the date of this Proxy Statement.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
71
|
Terms will expire
at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
H. ERIC BOLTON,
JR.
Chairman of
the
Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer of MAA
|
Mr. Bolton joined
MAA in 1994 as Vice President of Development and was named Chief Operating Officer in February 1996 and promoted to President
in December 1996. Mr. Bolton assumed the position of Chief Executive Officer in October 2001 and became Chairman of the
Board of Directors in September 2002. Mr. Bolton was with Trammell Crow Company for more than five years, and prior to
joining us was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Trammell Crow Realty Advisors.
|
Director
since:
|
February 1997
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
59
|
·
Ethical, decisive and effective leadership
·
Extensive business and operating experience
·
Tremendous knowledge of MAA and the multi-family real estate industry
·
Additional depth to REIT and Apartment experience and knowledge from
service on the Advisory Board of Governors of NAREIT and the Executive Committee of the National Multifamily Housing Council
·
Broad strategic vision for MAA
·
Service as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer creates a critical
link between management and our Board of Directors, enabling our Board of Directors to perform its oversight function with the
benefits of management’s perspectives on the business
|
Board
Committees:
|
Real
Estate
Investment
(Chairman)
|
Other
Public Company
Boards:
|
EastGroup
Properties
(2013–current);
Interstate Hotels
and Resorts, Inc.
(2008–2010)
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
72
|
ALAN B. GRAF,
JR.
Executive Vice
President and
Chief Financial
Officer of
FedEx Corporation
|
Mr. Graf has been
the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FedEx Corporation since 1998 and is a member of FedEx Corporation’s
Executive Committee. Prior to that time, Mr. Graf was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for FedEx Express,
FedEx’s predecessor, from 1991 to 1998. Mr. Graf joined FedEx in 1980. Mr. Graf also serves on the boards of Methodist
LeBonheur Healthcare and the Indiana University Foundation.
|
Director
since:
|
June 2002
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
62
|
·
Offers valuable business leadership, management experience and insight
and guidance on strategic direction and growth opportunities from his 35-year career at FedEx Corporation
·
Provides
financial expertise including an understanding of financial statements, corporate finance, accounting and capital markets
from his financial background and his service on the audit committee
of NIKE, Inc.
|
Board
Committees:
|
Audit
(Chair)
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
NIKE,
Inc.
(2002–current)
|
JAMES K. LOWDER
Chairman of the
Board of Directors
of
The Colonial
Company
|
Mr. Lowder was appointed
to the Board of Directors pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement between us and Colonial Properties Trust. Mr.
Lowder has served as chairman of the board of The Colonial Company and its subsidiaries since 1995. Mr. Lowder is a member
of the Home Builders Association of Alabama, the Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association, and serves on the board
of directors of Alabama Power Company. James K. Lowder is the brother of Thomas H. Lowder, another one of our directors.
|
Director
since:
|
October 2013
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
66
|
·
Vast experience in the real estate development and construction
industries in the Southeast
·
Extensive knowledge of all phases of the commercial real estate industry
and economic cycles
·
Mr. Lowder’s previous service as a trustee for Colonial Properties
Trust provides our Board of Directors with historical knowledge and perspective of the Colonial Properties Trust portfolio and
promotes stability in our operations following our merger with Colonial Properties Trust
|
Board
Committees:
|
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
Colonial
Properties Trust
(1993-2013)
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
73
|
THOMAS H. LOWDER
Past Chairman
of the
Board of Trustees
and
Chief Executive
Officer of
Colonial Properties
Trust
|
Mr. Lowder was appointed
to the Board of Directors pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement between us and Colonial Properties Trust. Mr.
Lowder served as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees for Colonial Properties Trust from 1993 to October 2013 and as
the Chief Executive Officer from 1993 to 2006 and again from 2008 to 2013. Mr. Lowder became President and Chief Executive
Officer of Colonial Properties, Inc., Colonial Properties Trust’s predecessor, in 1976. Mr. Lowder also serves on
the boards of Children’s Hospital of Alabama, and Crippled Children’s Foundation. Mr. Lowder is a past board member of
Greater Birmingham Community Foundation, United Way of Central Alabama, the University of Alabama Health System Board
and the University of Alabama Health Services Foundation. Thomas H. Lowder is the brother of James K. Lowder, another
one of our directors.
|
Director
since:
|
October 2013
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
66
|
·
Depth of experience in the acquisition, development, management,
and sale of multifamily, office and retail properties
·
Tremendous knowledge of the markets in which we operate
·
Mr. Lowder’s previous service as Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board for Colonial Properties Trust provides our Board of Directors with historical knowledge and perspective
of the Colonial Properties Trust portfolio and promotes stability in our operations following our merger with Colonial Properties
Trust
|
Board
Committees:
|
Real
Estate
Investment
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
Colonial
Properties Trust
(1993-2013)
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
74
|
MONICA McGURK
Senior Vice President,
Strategy and
New Ventures
Tyson Foods,
Inc.*
*
Ms. McGurk resigned from The Coca-Cola Company in March 2016 and will begin her employment with Tyson Foods, Inc. during
the second quarter of 2016.
|
Ms. McGurk will
serve as Senior Vice President, Strategy and New Ventures for Tyson Foods, Inc. beginning in the second quarter of 2016.
Prior to joining Tyson Foods, Inc., Ms. McGurk worked for The Coca-Cola Company as Senior Vice President, Strategy, Decision
Support and eCommerce, North America Group from 2014 to March 2016, and as Vice President, Strategy & eCommerce from
2012 to 2014. Prior to her employment with The Coca-Cola Company, Ms. McGurk served for eight months as the Chief Executive
Officer of The Alumni Factor, a digital media and information services start up. From 1992 to 2012, Ms. McGurk served
in a variety of roles, including eight years as a partner, at McKinsey & Company, a global management consulting firm.
|
Director
since:
|
March 2016
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
46
|
·
Valuable guidance on corporate strategy development, consumer
analysis and marketing and eCommerce from her career with The Coca-Cola Company and McKinsey & Company
|
Board
Committees:
|
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
|
CLAUDE B. NIELSEN
Chairman of the
Board of Directors
and
Chief Executive
Officer of
Coca-Cola Bottling
Company United, Inc.
|
Mr. Nielsen was
appointed to the Board Of Directors pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement between us and Colonial Properties Trust.
Mr. Nielsen has served as chief executive officer of Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc. since 1991, following his
appointment as president in 1990, and was elected Chairman of the Board of Directors in 2003. Prior to 1990, Mr. Nielsen
served as president of Birmingham Coca-Cola Bottling Company. Mr. Nielsen currently serves as Chairman for The Coca-Cola
Scholars Foundation and is a board member of the Birmingham Business Alliance.
|
Director
since:
|
October 2013
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
65
|
·
Unique perspective and insight as an experienced participant in the
financial services and beverage industries
·
Extensive experience in the capital markets from his executive leadership
of the Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc. and his tenure as a director of Regions Financial Corporation
·
Mr. Nielsen’s previous service as a trustee for Colonial Properties
Trust provides our Board of Directors with historical knowledge and perspective of the Colonial Properties Trust portfolio and
promotes stability in our operations following our merger with Colonial Properties Trust
|
Board
Committees:
|
Compensation
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
Colonial
Properties Trust
(1993-2013);
Regions
Financial
Corporation
(including
predecessor
AmSouth Bank
Corporation)
(1993-2010)
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
75
|
PHILIP W. NORWOOD
Past President
and
Chief Executive
Officer of
Faison Enterprises,
Inc.
|
Mr. Norwood is a
Principal of Haviland Capital, LLC, an investment company. Mr. Norwood served as the President and Chief Executive Officer
of Faison Enterprises, Inc., a real estate development and investment company, from 1994 until his retirement in March
2013. Prior to joining Faison Enterprises, Inc., Mr. Norwood held several positions for Trammell Crow Company. Mr. Norwood
is a member of several real estate associations and serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors for Pacolet Milliken
Enterprises, Inc.
|
Director
since:
|
August 2007
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
68
|
·
Extensive and in-depth real estate knowledge and experience,
as well as capital markets and financial expertise from his 35-year career in the real estate industry and extensive participation
in some of the most prominent real estate associations
·
Astute insight into operational and strategic matters as well as
potential acquisitions and divestitures
·
Industry
specific operational experience, making him uniquely qualified to serve as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee as he has
a keen understanding of executive compensation, its impact on recruitment and retention and the alignment of management and shareholder
interests
|
Board
Committees:
|
Compensation
(Chair);
Nominating and
Corporate
Governance;
Real
Estate
Investment
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
76
|
W. REID SANDERS
President of
Sanders Properties,
LLC and
Sanders Investments,
LLC
|
Mr. Sanders is the
Co-Founder and former Executive Vice President of Southeastern Asset Management, and the former President of Longleaf
Partners Funds from 1975 to 2000. Prior to co-founding Southeastern Asset Management in 1975, Mr. Sanders served as an
investment officer and worked in credit analysis and commercial lending in the banking industry from 1971 to 1975. Mr.
Sanders currently serves on the Board of Directors, Compensation Committee and Executive Committee for Independent Bank,
serves on the Investment Committee at Cypress Realty, a limited partnership involved in commercial real estate, and is
on the Advisory Board of SSM Venture Partners.
|
Director
since:
|
March 2010
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
66
|
·
Financial expertise and valuable insight into the capital
markets from his 41-year career in the financial industry
·
Valuable insights regarding the evaluation of potential acquisitions
and divestitures from his service on the Investment Committee of a commercial real estate limited partnership
·
Mr. Sanders’ understanding of financial statements, corporate
finance, and accounting makes him a valued member of the Audit Committee
|
Board
Committees:
|
Audit;
Real Estate Investment
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
Two Harbors Investment
Corp.
(2009-current)
|
WILLIAM B. SANSOM
Chairman of the
Board of Directors,
Chief Executive
Officer and
President of
H.T. Hackney
Co.
|
Mr. Sansom is the
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of the H.T. Hackney Co. From 1979 to 1981, Mr.
Sansom served as the Tennessee Commissioner of Transportation, and from 1981 to 1983 as the Tennessee Commissioner of
Finance and Administration. Mr. Sansom served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Tennessee Valley Authority
from 2006 to 2014.
|
Director
since:
|
November 2006
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
74
|
·
Valuable business leadership and management experience, including
expertise leading a large organization with expansive operations depending on localized and empowered management, giving
him a keen understanding of issues facing our operations
·
Strong understanding of risk management, corporate governance, compensation
practices and capital markets from
past
experience on the board of directors of the Tennessee Valley Authority, First Horizon National Corporation and his current service
on Astec Industries
|
Board
Committees:
|
Compensation;
Nominating
and
Corporate Governance
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
First Horizon
Corporation
(1985-2012);
Astec Industries
(2001-current)
|
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
77
|
GARY SHORB
President and
Chief Executive
Officer of
Methodist Le
Bonheur Healthcare
|
Mr. Shorb is the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, an integrated healthcare system that comprises
a seven-hospital operation centered in the Mid-South with over 11,000 employees, a position he has held since 2001. Mr.
Shorb joined Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare in 1990 as Executive Vice President. Before joining Methodist Le Bonheur
Healthcare, Mr. Shorb served as President of the Regional Medical Center in Memphis, Tennessee for 4 years. Prior to his
work in the healthcare industry, Mr. Shorb worked as a project engineer with Exxon and served as a Lieutenant Commander
in the U.S. Navy. Mr. Shorb serves on a number of civil and not-for-profit boards.
|
Director
since:
|
May 2012
|
Key
Attributes, Experiences and Skills
|
Age:
|
65
|
·
Offers valuable business leadership with expertise and experience
in organizational development, management and business finance from his long career at Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare
and senior leadership positions held prior to joining Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare
·
Insights and experience directly attributable to our service-based
operations from his experience as the Chief Executive Officer of a large consumer and service-based operation
|
Board
Committees:
|
Audit
|
Other
Public
Company
Boards:
|
|
Our Board
of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” each of the Director nominees.
Nominees receiving
more “For” votes than votes cast “Against” will be elected. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will
have any legal effect on whether this proposal is approved.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
78
|
PROPOSAL
NO. 2
|
ADVISORY
(NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE
|
THE
COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
AS
DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT
|
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, requires that we provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a nonbinding,
advisory basis, the compensation of our “named executive officers,” as described under the headings “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis” (beginning on page 24) and “Executive Compensation” (beginning on page 53) of this Proxy
Statement.
As described in detail under the heading “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis,” we seek to closely align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our
shareholders. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term
and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total shareholder return, while at the same time
avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. The advisory vote on executive compensation is an advisory,
non-binding vote on the compensation of our “named executive officers,” as described in the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis Section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation, and the accompanying narrative disclosure, set forth
in this Proxy Statement. The advisory vote on executive compensation is not a vote on our general compensation policies, compensation
of the Board of Directors, or our compensation policies as they relate to risk management.
Our philosophy in setting compensation
policies for named executive officers has five fundamental objectives: (1) to align the financial interests of our executives’
interests with those of our shareholders both in the short and long term; (2) to provide incentives for achieving and exceeding
annual and long-term performance goals; (3) to attract and retain a highly skilled team of executives by providing total compensation
that is competitive with compensation at other well-managed REITs and real estate companies; (4) to reward superior corporate
and individual performance achieved through ethical leadership; and (5) to appropriately reward executive officers for creating
long-term shareholder value and returns. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 24 provides a more
detailed discussion of the executive compensation program and compensation philosophy.
The vote on this resolution is not intended
to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers,
as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. The vote under this proposal
is advisory, and therefore, not binding on us, our Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. However, our Board of Directors,
including the Compensation Committee, values the opinions of our shareholders and, to the extent there is any significant vote
against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, we will consider our shareholders’
concerns and evaluate what actions may be appropriate to address those concerns.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
79
|
Our Board of Directors asks you to vote
“FOR” the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation
paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion is hereby approved.
Our Board of Directors recommends
a vote “FOR” the advisory (non-binding) vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed
in this Proxy Statement
For the advisory (non-binding) vote on
the compensation of our named executive officers to be approved, the votes cast “For” the proposal must exceed the
votes cast “Against” the proposal. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have any legal effect on whether this
proposal is approved.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
80
|
PROPOSAL
NO. 3
|
RATIFICATION
OF APPOINTMENT OF
|
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
The Audit Committee is responsible for
selecting our independent registered public accounting firm and has selected Ernst & Young LLP to audit our financial statements
for the 2016 fiscal year. Although shareholder approval is not required to appoint Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016, our Board of Directors believes that submitting the appointment of Ernst & Young
LLP to the shareholders for ratification is a matter of good corporate governance. A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is
expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to make a statement if they so desire and to answer any appropriate questions.
In the event you do not ratify the appointment
of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment
of Ernst & Young LLP. Even if you do ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment
of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it believes that such a change would
be in the best interests of the company and its shareholders.
On behalf of the Audit Committee, our Board of
Directors recommends a vote in favor of Proposal No. 3.
Shareholder approval for the appointment
of our independent registered public accounting firm is not required, but the Board of Directors is submitting the selection of
Ernst & Young LLP for ratification in order to obtain the views of our shareholders. This proposal will be approved if the
votes cast “For” the proposal exceed the votes cast “Against” the proposal. Neither abstentions nor broker
non-votes will have any legal effect on whether this proposal is approved. The Audit Committee will consider a vote against the
firm by the shareholders in selecting our independent registered public accounting firm in the future.
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
81
|
Our Board of Directors, at the time of
the preparation of this Proxy Statement, knows of no business to come before the meeting other than that referred to herein. If
any other business should come before the meeting, the person named in the enclosed proxy will have discretionary authority to
vote all proxies as recommended by the Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in accordance with their best judgment.
|
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
Leslie B.C. Wolfgang
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer,
|
|
and Corporate Secretary
|
April 14, 2016
|
2016 Proxy Statement
|
82
|
APPENDIX A
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The reconciliation of
net income available for MAA common shareholders, determined in accordance with GAAP, to Core FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure,
is set forth below.
Dollars in thousands, except
per share data
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2015
|
|
Net income available for MAA common shareholders
|
|
$
|
332,287
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets
|
|
|
291,572
|
|
Gain on sale of depreciable real estate assets excluded from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(189,958
|
)
|
Gain on disposition within unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets of real estate joint ventures
|
|
|
25
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
18,458
|
|
Funds from operations attributable to MAA
|
|
|
452,372
|
|
Acquisition expense
|
|
|
2,777
|
|
Gain on sale of non-depreciable real estate assets
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
Mark-to-market debt adjustment
|
|
|
(19,955
|
)
|
Loss on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
Core funds from operations attributable to MAA
|
|
$
|
438,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and units - Diluted
|
|
|
79,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core funds from operations per share and unit - Diluted
|
|
|
$5.51
|
|
|
|
C/O
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER
AND TRUST COMPANY
59 MAIDEN LANE
PLAZA LEVEL
NEW YORK, NY 10038
|
VOTE
BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use
the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern
Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow
the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC
DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If
you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all
future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic
delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree
to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE
BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use
any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off
date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE
BY MAIL
Mark,
sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing,
c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
|
|
|
|
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEEP THIS
PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
|
THIS
PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors
recommends you vote FOR the following proposal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Election of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominees
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
|
|
1a
|
H. Eric Bolton, Jr.
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1b
|
Alan B. Graf, Jr.
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1c
|
James K. Lowder
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1d
|
Thomas H. Lowder
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1e
|
Monica McGurk
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1f
|
Claude B. Nielsen
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1g
|
Philip W. Norwood
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1h
|
W. Reid Sanders
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1i
|
William B. Sansom
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
1j
|
Gary Shorb
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon.
When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each
sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by
authorized officer.
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals
2 and 3.
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named
executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement.
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016.
|
☐
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE:
In accordance with their best judgment,
the named proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment
thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOUSEHOLDING ELECTION - Please indicate if you consent
to receive certain future investor communications in a single package per household.
|
☐
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature (Joint Owners)
|
Date
|
0000271815_1 R1.0.1.25
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice & Proxy Statement and 2015 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at
www.proxyvote.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MID-AMERICA
APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MAY 17,
2016, 11:00 AM CDT
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
undersigned hereby appoints H. Eric Bolton, Jr., Albert M. Campbell, III, and Leslie
B.C. Wolfgang and each of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint such person’s
substitute, and hereby authorizes them to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all
the shares of common stock of Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. held of record
by the undersigned on March 11, 2016 at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held
on May 17, 2016, or any adjournment thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS
PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED
SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL PROPOSALS. IF
YOU WISH TO VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONS, JUST
SIGN AND DATE THE REVERSE SIDE. YOU NEED NOT MARK ANY BOXES.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued and to be signed
on reverse side
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0000271815_2 R1.0.1.25
Mid America Apartment Co... (NYSE:MAA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Mid America Apartment Co... (NYSE:MAA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024