The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED
AS OF MARCH 31, 2019 AND DECEMBER 31, 2018, AND
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2019 AND 2018
1.
|
The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles
|
Synacor, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “Synacor”),
is a digital technology company that provides email and collaboration software, cloud-based identity management platforms, managed web and mobile portals, and advertising solutions. The Company’s customers include communications providers, media companies, government entities and enterprises. Synacor is a trusted partner for enterprise software platforms and monetization solutions that Synacor delivers through public and private cloud software-as-a-service, software licensing, and professional services. Synacor enable clients to deepen their engagement with their consumers and users
.
Basis of Presentation
—
The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position for the periods presented. These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year or for any subsequent period.
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.
During the first quarter of 2019, the Company made a change to its segment reporting structure which resulted in two segments 1) Software & Services and 2) Portal & Advertising. As a result certain prior year amounts have been restated to conform to current year’s presentation. Historical Amounts in Note 2 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers,
Note 4 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets and Note 7 –
Segment Information have been restated to reflect these changes in reportable segments.
Additionally, the Company has reclassified certain costs and expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018, amounting to $0.3 million, from technology and development to cost of revenue to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported total costs and operating expenses and net loss.
Accounting Estimates
—
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements. Accordingly, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.
Concentrations of Risk
—
As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had concentrations equal to or exceeding 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable as follows:
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Portal & Advertising Customer A
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
For the
three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018,
the Company had concentrations equal to or exceeding 10% of the Company’s revenue as follows:
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Google search
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
Google advertising affiliate
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
Portal & Advertising Customer A
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
*
|
|
|
* - Less than 10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
, the following customers received revenue-share payments equal to or exceeding 10% of the Company’s cost of revenue:
|
|
Cost of Revenue
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Portal & Advertising Customer B
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
—
Not Yet Adopted
In August 2018, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2018-15,
Customer’s Accounting For Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract
(“ASU 2018-15”), which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs in a cloud computing arrangement with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred for an internal-use software license. Adoption of this guidance is required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted. Entities are permitted to choose to adopt the new guidance (1) prospectively for eligible costs incurred on or after the date this guidance is first applied or (2) retrospectively. The Company is evaluating the impact of this new accounting standard on its financial statements.
Recently Adopted
On January 1, 2019 the Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02,
Leases
(Topic 842) (ASU 2016-02), as amended, which generally requires lessees to recognize operating and financing lease liabilities and corresponding right-of-use assets on the balance sheet and to provide enhanced disclosures surrounding the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leasing arrangements.
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-
11
,
Leases (Topic 842), Targeted Improvements,
which provides an additional, optional transition method with which to adopt the new leases standard. This additional transition method allows for a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption, rather than in the earliest period presented in the financial statements, as originally required by ASU 2016-02.
The Company adopted the standard using the additional transition method introduced by ASU 2018-11.
The most significant impact was the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities for operating leases, while our accounting for finance leases remained substantially unchanged. For information regarding the impact of Topic 842 adoption, see
Significant Accounting Policies - Leases
and Note 3 — Leases.
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. ASUs not listed above were assessed and determined to be either not applicable, or had or are expected to have minimal impact on the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures.
8
Significant Accounting Policies – Leases
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Topic 842 using the modified retrospective transition approach by applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application and not restating prior periods. Results and disclosure requirements for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2019 are presented under Topic 842, while prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historical accounting under Topic 840.
The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which allowed for the carryforward of historical lease classification, on whether a contract was or contains a lease, and of the assessment of initial direct costs for any leases that existed prior to January 1, 2019. The Company also elected to combine lease and non-lease components and to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet and recognize the associated lease payments in the consolidated statements of income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
On January 1, 2019, the Company recognized additional ROU assets of $10.2 million, with corresponding liabilities of $10.4 million on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The difference between the lease liability and the ROU asset represents the existing deferred rent liabilities balances before adoption, resulting from historical straight-lining of rent expense, which was reclassified upon adoption to reduce the measurement of the initial ROU asset. This was in addition to the $3.4 million of finance lease ROU assets previously reported in property and equipment, net as capital leases. The adoption did not impact our beginning stockholders’ equity, and did not have a material impact on the condensed consolidated statement of operations and statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2019.
Under Topic 842, the Company determines if an arrangement is a lease and classify that lease as either an operating or finance lease at inception. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. For this purpose, only payments that are fixed and determinable at the time of commencement are considered. As many of the leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The incremental borrowing rate is a hypothetical rate based on factors including the Company’s credit rating. The ROU asset also includes any lease payments made prior to commencement and is recorded net of any lease incentives received. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the options will exercised.
Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities, and current and long-term operating lease liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in property and equipment-net, and on the current and long-term portion of debt and finance leases on our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Significant Accounting Policies – Goodwill and Segments
During the first quarter of 2019, the Company made changes to segment reporting structure that resulted in two reportable segments: 1) Software & Services and 2) Portal & Advertising. Previously the Company concluded that it had one reportable segment. This change resulted in two reporting units for the purpose of our impairment analysis for goodwill.
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment for each of the Company’s reporting units at least annually, during the fourth quarter, and whenever events occur or circumstances change, such as changes in the business climate, poor indicators of operating performance or the sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit. The Company is required to evaluate goodwill for impairment when there is a change in reporting units.
Companies may perform a qualitative assessment as the initial step in the annual goodwill impairment testing process for all or selected reporting units. Companies are also allowed to bypass the qualitative analysis and perform a quantitative analysis if desired. Economic uncertainties and the length of time from the calculation of a baseline fair value are factors that we consider in determining whether to perform a quantitative test.
When the Company evaluates the potential for goodwill impairment using a qualitative assessment, the Company considers factors including, but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry conditions, the competitive environment, changes in the market for our products and services, regulatory and political developments, entity specific factors such as strategy and changes in key personnel and overall financial performance. If, after completing this assessment, it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we proceed to a quantitative two-step impairment test.
Quantitative testing first requires a comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined using a combination of an income approach and a market approach. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired and any loss must be measured.
9
The income approach
uses a
discounted cash flow method to estimate the fair value of our reporting units. The discounted cash flow method incorporates various assumptions, the most significant being projected revenue growth rates, operating margins and cash flows, the termin
al growth rate and the discount rate.
The Company
projects revenue growth rates, operating margins and cash flows based on each reporting unit's current business, expected developments and operational strategies typically over a five-year period.
The market approach determines fair value based on available market pricing for comparable assets. Valuation multiples were calculated utilizing actual transaction prices and revenue or EBITDA data from target companies deemed similar to the reporting unit. Valuation multiples were then applied to certain operating statistics such as revenue or EBITDA, and an estimated control premium is applied.
If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value as determined using the two valuation methodologies described above, an impairment loss is recognized in the amount by which the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit.
The determination of our assumptions is subjective and requires significant estimates. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the results of our reviews for impairment of goodwill.
As stated above during the first quarter of 2019, the Company made changes to our segment reporting structure that resulted in two reportable segments: 1) Software & Services and 2) Portal & Advertising
. This change also resulted in two reporting units used to review goodwill for impairment. The Company performed a quantitative test for both reporting units and both reporting units fair value exceeded carrying value. As such, no impairment charges were recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2019.
2.
|
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
|
The Company generates all of its revenue from contracts with customers. Many of the Company’s contracts with customers contain multiple performance obligations. For these contracts, the Company accounts for individual performance obligations separately if they are distinct. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations on a relative standalone selling price basis. Standalone selling prices of software licenses are typically estimated using the residual approach. Standalone selling prices of services are typically estimated based on observable transactions when these services are sold on a standalone basis. The Company usually expects payment within 30 to 90 days from the invoice date (fulfillment of performance obligations or per contract terms). None of the Company’s contracts as of March 31, 2019 contained a significant financing component. Differences between the amount of revenue recognized and the amount invoiced, collected from, or paid to its customers are recognized as deferred revenue.
Disaggregation of revenue
The following table provides information about disaggregated revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 by the timing of revenue recognition, and includes a reconciliation of the disaggregated revenue by reportable segment (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software & Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and services transferred over time
|
|
$
|
8,875
|
|
|
$
|
8,786
|
|
|
Products transferred at a point in time
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
1,899
|
|
|
Total Software & Services
|
|
$
|
11,158
|
|
|
$
|
10,685
|
|
|
Portal & Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products and services transferred over time
|
|
$
|
1,506
|
|
|
$
|
2,087
|
|
|
Products transferred at a point in time
|
|
|
19,160
|
|
|
|
20,143
|
|
|
Total Portal & Advertising
|
|
$
|
20,666
|
|
|
$
|
22,230
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
$
|
31,824
|
|
|
$
|
32,915
|
|
|
10
Revenue disaggregated by geography, based on the billing address of our customer, consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
26,274
|
|
|
$
|
27,038
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
5,877
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
31,824
|
|
|
$
|
32,915
|
|
|
Remaining Performance Obligations
Deferred revenue is recorded when cash payments are received or due in advance of revenue recognition from software licenses, professional services, and maintenance agreements. The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of billings to customers. The changes in deferred revenue, inclusive of both current and long-term, are as follows (in thousands):
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance - January 1, 2019
|
|
$
|
8,886
|
|
Recognition of deferred revenue
|
|
|
(3,319
|
)
|
Deferral of revenue
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
Ending balance - March 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
8,202
|
|
The majority of the deferred revenue balance above relates to the maintenance and support contracts for Email software licenses. These are recognized straight-line over the life of the contract, with the majority of the balance being recognized within the next twelve months.
Practical Expedients
The Company generally expenses sales commissions when incurred because the amortization period would have been one year or less. These costs are recorded within sales and marketing expenses.
The Company does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (i) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less and (ii) contracts for which revenue is recognized at the amount to which the Company has the right to invoice for services performed.
11
The Company enters into various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for certain of our offices, data centers, colocations and certain network equipment. The Company’s leases have original lease periods expiring between 2019 and 2024. Many leases include one or more options to renew. The Company does not assume renewals in its determination of the lease term unless the renewals are deemed to be reasonably assured at lease commencement.
The Company’s variable lease payments are immaterial and its lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. Lease costs are included in cost of revenue and general and administrative costs in the Company’s
condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The components of lease costs, lease term and discount rate are as follows (lease cost in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
Finance lease cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of right-of-use assets
|
|
$
|
628
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
Operating lease cost
|
|
|
1,090
|
|
|
Total lease cost
|
|
$
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
2.7
|
|
Years
|
Finance leases
|
|
0.5
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Discount Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
%
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
%
|
The following is a schedule, by years, of maturities of lease liabilities as of March 31, 2019 (in thousands):
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
Finance Leases
|
|
The remainder of 2019
|
|
$
|
3,867
|
|
|
$
|
2,220
|
|
2020
|
|
|
3,110
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
2021
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
2022
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2023
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2024
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total undiscounted cash flows
|
|
$
|
10,007
|
|
|
$
|
3,884
|
|
Less imputed interest
|
|
|
(787
|
)
|
|
|
(815
|
)
|
Present value of lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
9,220
|
|
|
$
|
3,069
|
|
As previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and under Accounting Standard Codification Topic 840, the predecessor to Topic 842, the following is a summary of annual future minimum lease and rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
Operating Lease
Commitments
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
5,276
|
|
2020
|
|
|
3,101
|
|
2021
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
2022
|
|
|
782
|
|
2023
|
|
|
250
|
|
2024
|
|
|
33
|
|
Total lease commitments
|
|
$
|
11,036
|
|
12
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases are as follows (in
thousands
):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows from operating leases
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
Operating cash flows from financing leases
|
|
576
|
|
Financing cash flows from finance leases
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use-assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
—
|
|
Finance leases
|
|
|
—
|
|
4.
|
Goodwill and
Intangible Assets
|
As described in Note 1 -
The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting
Principles, the Company changed its reportable segments during the first quarter of 2019. Goodwill was assigned to the new reportable segments on the relative fair value basis.
The changes in the carrying amount of Goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2019 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Software & Services
|
|
|
Portal & Advertising
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
11,318
|
|
|
$
|
4,623
|
|
|
$
|
15,941
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
11,321
|
|
|
$
|
4,623
|
|
|
$
|
15,944
|
|
|
There were no goodwill impairment losses recorded during the three months ending March 31, 2019, and the Company has no accumulated impairment losses.
Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Customer and publisher relationships
|
|
$
|
14,780
|
|
|
$
|
14,780
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
|
|
2,330
|
|
Trademark
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
17,410
|
|
|
|
17,410
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(7,393
|
)
|
|
|
(6,857
|
)
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
10,017
|
|
|
$
|
10,553
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets totaled $0.5 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
. Based on acquired intangible assets recorded at March 31, 2019, amortization is expected to be $1.6 million for the remainder of 2019, $2.0 million in 2020, $1.4 million in 2021, $1.3 million in 2022, and $1.3 million in 2023.
13
5.
|
Property and Equipment –
Net
|
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
27,428
|
|
|
$
|
27,294
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
31,978
|
|
|
|
27,422
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
1,620
|
|
|
|
1,618
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
Work in process (primarily software development costs)
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
4,584
|
|
Other
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
63,048
|
|
|
|
62,353
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(45,360
|
)
|
|
|
(43,646
|
)
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
17,688
|
|
|
$
|
18,707
|
|
Depreciation expense totaled $2.0 million and $1.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
Property and equipment includes computer equipment and software held under finance leases of $8.4 million and $8.0 million as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Accumulated depreciation of computer equipment and software held under finance leases amounted to $5.3 million and $3.0 million as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company capitalized a total of $0.7 million, and $0.8
million of costs that occurred during the application development phase, related to the development of internal-use software. The Company capitalized a total of $0.3 million and $0.8 million of costs related to the development of software for sale or license for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 that occurred after
technological feasibility had been achieved.
Amortization of software capitalized for internal use was $1.1 million and $1.1 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively and included in depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statement of operations. Amortization of software for sale or license for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was not material.
Impairment charges related to software, previously capitalized for internal use, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was $0.2 million and was included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations. There were no impairment charges during the first three months ended March 31, 2018. The impairment charges are a result of circumstances that indicated that the carrying values of the assets were not fully recoverable. The Company utilizes the discounted cash flow method to determine the fair value of the capitalized software assets.
The following table sets forth long-lived tangible assets by geographic area (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Long-lived tangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
17,214
|
|
|
$
|
18,217
|
|
International
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
Total long-lived tangible assets
|
|
$
|
17,688
|
|
|
$
|
18,707
|
|
14
6
.
|
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
$
|
3,111
|
|
|
$
|
5,801
|
|
Accrued content fees and other costs of revenue
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,610
|
|
|
$
|
7,849
|
|
Included in accrued compensation are accrued severance costs. In 2018, the Company initiated a cost reduction program to drive overall efficiency while adding capacity and streamlining the organization. These actions resulted in workforce reductions, office consolidations and consolidating operations. The below table summarizes the activity in the accrued severance account (in thousands).
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2019
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
Charged to expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(113
|
)
|
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
During the first quarter of 2019, the Company made changes to its segment reporting structure that resulted in two reportable segments: 1) Software & Services and 2) Portal & Advertising. All historical amounts have been restated to reflect this change in reportable segments.
Software & Services generates revenue by providing cloud-based identity management solutions and email/collaboration products. Portal & Advertising generates managed portal fees and advertising revenue from its traffic on its Managed Portals and other advertising solutions it provides for publishers.
The Company’s operations are organized and managed by type of products and services and segment information is reported accordingly. The Company’s chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”) is its Chief Executive Officer. The CODM reviews financial performance and allocates resources by reportable segment. There have been no operating segments aggregated to arrive at the Company’s reportable segments.
The accounting policies of each segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies, refer to Note 1
—
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for further details. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on Segment Adjusted EBITDA. Segment Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) adjusted for certain non-cash items and other non-recurring income and expenses.
Revenue for all operating segments include only transactions with unaffiliated customers and there is no intersegment revenue.
The Company does not account for, and does not report to management, its assets or capital expenditures by segment other than goodwill and intangible assets used for impairment analysis purposes.
15
The tables below summarize the financial information for the Company’s reportable segments fo
r the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
(in thousands)
. The “
Corporate Unallocated Expenses
” category, as it relates to Segment Adjusted EBITDA, primarily includes corporate overhead costs, such as
rent,
payroll and related benefit costs and profe
ssional services which are not directly attributable to any individual segment.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
1
|
|
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
Software & Services
|
|
$
|
11,158
|
|
|
$
|
3,503
|
|
|
$
|
2,794
|
|
|
Portal & Advertising
|
|
|
20,666
|
|
|
|
13,003
|
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
Corporate Unallocated Expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(3,711
|
)
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
31,824
|
|
|
$
|
16,506
|
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
1
|
|
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
Software & Services
|
|
$
|
10,685
|
|
|
$
|
3,108
|
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
Portal & Advertising
|
|
|
22,230
|
|
|
|
12,427
|
|
|
|
3,048
|
|
|
Corporate Unallocated Expenses
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,934
|
)
|
|
Total Company
|
|
$
|
32,915
|
|
|
$
|
15,535
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
Notes:
1 Exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately on the condensed consolidated statements of operations
The following table reconciles total Segment Adjusted EBITDA to Net loss:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Total Segment Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,487
|
)
|
|
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
Capitalized software impairment
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
Certain legal expenses *
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Certain professional services fees**
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,375
|
)
|
|
*
|
"Certain legal expenses" include legal fees and other related expenses associated with legal proceedings outside the ordinary course of our business, including the class action securities litigation, and arbitration costs related to the dissolution of a former joint venture.
|
**
|
“Certain professional services fees” includes fees and expenses related to merger and acquisition activities.
|
16
8.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
Litigation
—
The Company was previously awaiting a decision of an arbitration tribunal following a binding arbitration that took place on July 30, 2018 between the Company and Maxit Technology
Incorporated and Maxit Technology Holdings Limited, (“Maxit”), who were formerly the Company’s joint venture partner in China. After unsuccessful settlement discussions between the parties, on January 25, 2016, Maxit requested arbitration under the Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce. In its request for arbitration, Maxit asserted claims for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent misrepresentation, all arising out of the Company’s alleged failure to provide capital and software as required by the joint venture agreement. In its request, Maxit sought an award of money damages based on its share of the lost potential value of the joint venture, as well as a percentage of revenue from any future sales to customers originally introduced by Maxit, interest and legal expenses. On March 18, 2019,
the arbitral tribunal issued a final award finding that the Company has no liability to Maxit. The Company reversed the reserve of $0.3 million that was previously recorded related to this arbitration during the first quarter of 2019.
The Company and its Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Financial Officer were named as defendants in a federal securities class action lawsuit filed on April 4, 2018 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The class includes persons who purchased the Company’s shares between May 4, 2016 and March 15, 2018. The plaintiff alleged that the Company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its contract with AT&T and the timing of revenue to be derived therefrom, and that as a result class members suffered losses because Synacor shares traded at artificially inflated prices. The plaintiff sought an unspecified amount of damages, as well as interest, attorneys’ fees and legal expenses. The court appointed a lead plaintiff and approved plaintiff’s selection of lead counsel on July 6, 2018. On October 16, 2018 the court appointed new lead counsel and confirmed the lead plaintiff. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on November 2, 2018
and the Company filed a motion to dismiss on December 17, 2018. The plaintiff filed its opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on January 19, 2019 and the Company filed its reply to plaintiff’s opposition on February 15, 2019. The Company disputes these claims and intends to defend them vigorously. The Company cannot yet determine whether it is probable that a loss will be incurred in connection with this complaint, nor can the Company reasonably estimate the potential loss, if any. Any liabilities related to this lawsuit are covered by D&O insurance after the Company reaches its deductible.
In addition, the Company is, from time to time, party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. It does not believe that the outcome of these claims will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows based on the status of proceedings at this time. However, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and the Company’s view of these matters may change in the future.
9.
|
Stock-based Compensation
|
The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans for which compensation cost is recognized in its financial statements. The cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award).
The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options granted during the periods indicated:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Expected life of options (in years)
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
17
Total stock-based compensation expense included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented, is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Technology and development
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
$
|
553
|
|
Stock Option Activity
– A summary of the stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2019 is presented below:
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (in
thousands)
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2019
|
|
|
7,669,093
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
120,200
|
|
|
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(24,819
|
)
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(41,512
|
)
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(167,847
|
)
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2019
|
|
|
7,555,115
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2019
|
|
|
7,410,324
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
6.21
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
Vested and exercisable at March 31, 2019
|
|
|
5,652,596
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the Company’s closing stock price of its common stock and the exercise price of outstanding, in-the-money options. The Company’s closing stock price as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market as of March 31, 2019 was $1.57 per share. The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was minimal. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2019 amounted to $0.99 per option share.
As of March 31, 2019, the unrecognized compensation cost related to options granted, for which vesting is probable, and adjusted for estimated forfeitures, was approximately $2.1 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining period of 2.4 years.
RSU Activity
—A summary of RSU activity for the three months ended March 31, 2019 is as follows:
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Fair Value
|
|
Unvested—January 1, 2019
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
383,500
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
Released
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Unvested—March 31, 2019
|
|
|
394,430
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
Unvested expected to vest —March 31, 2019
|
|
|
394,430
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
As of March 31, 2019, total unrecognized compensation cost, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to RSUs was $0.6 million. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining period of 2.88 years.
18
10.
|
Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share Data
|
Basic net (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. The Company’s potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, warrants, and to a lesser extent, shares issuable upon the release of RSUs. The dilutive effect of these potential common shares is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method.
The following securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive equity awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
7,612,104
|
|
|
|
8,901,645
|
|
|
Restricted stock units
|
|
|
202,888
|
|
|
|
51,267
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
19