NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Operations
SM Energy Company, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is an independent energy company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, gas, and NGLs in the state of Texas.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and the instructions to Form 10-K and Regulation S-X. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In connection with the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluated events subsequent to the balance sheet date of December 31, 2020, through the filing of this report. Additionally, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of proved oil and gas reserves, assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates of proved oil and gas reserve quantities provide the basis for the calculation of DD&A expense, impairment of proved and unproved oil and gas properties, and asset retirement obligations, each of which represents a significant component of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all liquid investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
Accounts Receivable
The Company’s accounts receivable primarily consists of receivables due from oil, gas, and NGL purchasers and from joint interest owners on properties the Company operates. For receivables due from joint interest owners, the Company generally has the ability to withhold future revenue disbursements to recover non-payment of joint interest billings. Generally, the Company’s oil, gas, and NGL receivables are collected within 30 to 90 days and the Company has had minimal bad debts.
Although diversified among many companies, collectibility is dependent upon the financial wherewithal of each individual company and is influenced by the general economic conditions of the industry. Receivables are not collateralized. Please refer to Note 13 – Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses for additional disclosure.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Major Customers
The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonpayment by counterparties, a significant portion of which are concentrated in energy related industries. The creditworthiness of customers and other counterparties is subject to regular review.
The Company does not believe the loss of any single purchaser of its production would materially impact its operating results, as oil, gas, and NGLs are products with well-established markets and numerous purchasers in the Company’s operating areas. The following major customers and entities under common control accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company’s total oil, gas, and NGL production revenue for at least one of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Major customer #1 (1)
|
—
|
%
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
18
|
%
|
Major customer #2 (1)
|
20
|
%
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
5
|
%
|
Major customer #3 (1)
|
24
|
%
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
7
|
%
|
Major customer #4 (1)
|
6
|
%
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
10
|
%
|
Major customer #5 (1)
|
15
|
%
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
—
|
%
|
Group #1 of entities under common control (2)
|
5
|
%
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
18
|
%
|
Group #2 of entities under common control (2)
|
7
|
%
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
12
|
%
|
____________________________________________
(1)These major customers are purchasers of a portion of the Company’s production from its Midland Basin assets and South Texas assets.
(2)In the aggregate, these groups of entities under common control represented purchasers of more than 10% of total oil, gas, and NGL production revenue for at least one of the periods presented; however, no individual entity comprising either group was a purchaser of more than 10% of the Company’s total oil, gas, and NGL production revenue.
The Company generally contracts with the affiliates of the lenders under its Credit Agreement as its derivative counterparties, and the Company’s policy is that each counterparty must have certain minimum investment grade senior unsecured debt ratings.
The Company maintains its primary bank accounts with a large, multinational bank that has branch locations in the Company’s areas of operations. The Company’s policy is to diversify its concentration of cash and cash equivalent investments among multiple institutions and investment products to limit the amount of credit exposure to any single institution or investment.
Oil and Gas Producing Activities
Proved properties. The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and gas properties. Under this method, the costs of development wells are capitalized whether those wells are successful or unsuccessful. Capitalized drilling and completion costs, including lease and well equipment, intangible development costs, and operational support facilities in the field, are depleted on an asset group basis (properties aggregated based on geographical and geological characteristics) using the units-of-production method based on estimated proved developed oil and gas reserves. Similarly, proved leasehold costs are depleted on the same asset group basis; however, the units-of-production method is based on estimated total proved oil and gas reserves. The computation of DD&A expense takes into consideration restoration, dismantlement, and abandonment costs as well as the anticipated proceeds from salvaging equipment.
Proved oil and gas property costs are evaluated for impairment on a pool-by-pool basis and reduced to fair value when there is an indication that associated carrying costs may not be recoverable. The Company uses Level 3 inputs and the income valuation technique, which converts future cash flows to a single present value amount, to measure the fair value of proved properties using a discount rate, price and cost forecasts, and certain reserve risk-adjustment factors, as selected by the Company’s management. The Company uses a discount rate that represents a current market-based weighted average cost of capital. The discount rate typically ranges from 10 percent to 15 percent. The prices for oil and gas are forecasted based on NYMEX strip pricing, adjusted for basis differentials, for the first five years, after which a flat terminal price is used for each commodity stream. The prices for NGLs are forecasted using OPIS Mont Belvieu pricing, for as long as the market is actively trading, after which a flat terminal price is used. Future operating costs are also adjusted as deemed appropriate for these estimates. Certain undeveloped reserve estimates are also risk-adjusted given the risk to related projected cash flows due to performance and exploitation uncertainties.
The partial sale of a proved property within an existing field is accounted for as a normal retirement and no net gain or loss on divestiture activity is recognized as long as the treatment does not significantly affect the units-of-production depletion rate. The sale of a partial interest in an individual proved property is accounted for as a recovery of cost. A net gain or loss on divestiture activity is recognized in the accompanying statements of operations for all other sales of proved properties.
Unproved properties. The unproved oil and gas properties line item on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets (“accompanying balance sheets”) consists of the costs incurred to acquire unproved leases. Leasehold costs allocated to those leases, or partial leases that have associated proved reserves recorded, are reclassified to proved properties and depleted on an asset group basis using the units-of-production method based on estimated total proved oil and gas reserves. Unproved oil and gas property costs are evaluated for impairment and reduced to fair value when there is an indication that the carrying costs may not be recoverable. Lease acquisition costs that are not individually significant are aggregated by asset group and the portion of such costs estimated to be
nonproductive prior to lease expiration are recognized as a valuation allowance and amortized over the appropriate period. The estimate of what could be nonproductive is based on historical trends or other information, including current drilling plans and the Company’s intent to renew leases. To measure the fair value of unproved properties, the Company uses a market approach, which takes into account the following significant assumptions: remaining lease terms, future development plans, risk-weighted potential resource recovery, estimated reserve values, and estimated acreage value based on price(s) received for similar, recent acreage transactions by the Company or other market participants.
For the sale of unproved properties where the original cost has been partially or fully amortized by providing a valuation allowance on an asset group basis, neither a gain nor loss is recognized unless the sales price exceeds the original cost of the property, in which case a gain shall be recognized in the accompanying statements of operations in the amount of such excess.
Exploratory. Exploratory geological and geophysical, including exploratory seismic studies, and the costs of carrying and retaining unproved acreage are expensed as incurred. Under the successful efforts method, exploratory well costs are capitalized pending further evaluation of whether economically recoverable reserves have been found. If economically recoverable reserves are found, exploratory well costs will be capitalized as proved properties and will be accounted for following the successful efforts method of accounting described above. If economically recoverable reserves are not found, exploratory well costs are expensed as dry holes. The application of the successful efforts method of accounting requires management’s judgment to determine the proper designation of wells as either development or exploratory, which will ultimately determine the proper accounting treatment of costs of dry holes. Once a well is drilled, the determination that economic proved reserves have been discovered may take considerable time and judgment. Exploratory dry hole costs are included in the cash flows from investing activities section as part of capital expenditures within the accompanying statements of cash flows.
Please refer to Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements for additional information.
Other Property and Equipment
Other property and equipment such as facilities, office furniture and equipment, buildings, and computer hardware and software are recorded at cost. The Company capitalizes certain software costs incurred during the application development stage. The application development stage generally includes software design, configuration, testing, and installation activities. Costs of renewals and improvements that substantially extend the useful lives of the assets are capitalized. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed when incurred. Depreciation is calculated using either the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 3 to 30 years, or the unit of output method when appropriate. When other property and equipment is sold or retired, the capitalized costs and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts.
Other property and equipment costs are evaluated for impairment and reduced to fair value when there is an indication the carrying costs may not be recoverable. To measure the fair value of other property and equipment, the Company uses an income valuation technique or market approach depending on the quality of information available to support management’s assumptions and the circumstances. The valuation includes consideration of the proved and unproved assets supported by the property and equipment, future cash flows associated with the assets, and fixed costs necessary to operate and maintain the assets.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company recognizes an estimated liability for future costs associated with the abandonment of its oil and gas properties, including facilities requiring decommissioning. A liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation and corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived asset are recorded at the time a well is drilled or acquired, or a facility is constructed. The increase in carrying value is included in the proved oil and gas properties line item in the accompanying balance sheets. The Company depletes the amount added to proved oil and gas property costs and recognizes expense in connection with the accretion of the discounted liability over the remaining estimated economic lives of the respective long-lived assets. Cash paid to settle asset retirement obligations is included in the cash flows from operating activities section of the accompanying statements of cash flows.
The Company’s estimated asset retirement obligation liability is based on historical experience in plugging and abandoning wells, estimated economic lives, estimated plugging and abandonment cost, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability is discounted using the credit-adjusted risk-free rate estimated at the time the liability is incurred or revised. The credit-adjusted risk-free rates used to discount the Company’s plugging and abandonment liabilities range from 5.5 percent to 12 percent. In periods subsequent to initial measurement of the liability, the Company must recognize period-to-period changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time, revisions to either the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows or economic life, or changes in inflation factors or the Company’s credit-adjusted risk-free rate as market conditions warrant. Please refer to Note 14 – Asset Retirement Obligations for a reconciliation of the Company’s total asset retirement obligation liability as of December 31, 2020, and 2019.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company periodically enters into commodity derivative instruments to mitigate a portion of its exposure to potentially adverse market changes in commodity prices for its expected future oil, natural gas, and NGL production and the associated impact on cash flows. These instruments typically include commodity price swaps and costless collars, as well as, basis differential and roll differential swaps. Commodity derivative instruments are measured at fair value and are included in the accompanying balance sheets as derivative assets and liabilities, with the exception of derivative instruments that meet the “normal purchase normal sale” exclusion. The Company does not designate its commodity derivative contracts as hedging instruments. Accordingly, the Company reflects changes in the fair value of its derivative instruments in its accompanying statements of operations as they occur. Gains and losses on derivatives are included within the cash flows from operating activities section of the accompanying statements of cash flows. For additional discussion on derivatives, please refer to Note 10 – Derivative Financial Instruments.
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives revenue primarily from the sale of produced oil, gas, and NGLs. Revenue is recognized at the point in time when custody and title (“control”) of the product transfers to the purchaser, which may differ depending on the applicable contractual terms. Revenue accruals are recorded monthly and are based on estimated production delivered to a purchaser and the expected price to be received. Variances between estimates and the actual amounts received are recorded in the month payment is received. Please refer to Note 2 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers for additional discussion.
Stock-Based Compensation
At December 31, 2020, the Company had stock-based employee compensation plans that included RSUs and PSUs issued to employees, RSUs and restricted stock issued to non-employee directors, and an employee stock purchase plan available to eligible employees. These are more fully described in Note 7 – Compensation Plans. The Company records expense associated with the fair value of stock-based compensation in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, which is based on the estimated fair value of these awards determined at the time of grant, and is included within the general and administrative and exploration expense line items in the accompanying statements of operations. For stock-based compensation awards containing non-market based performance conditions, the Company evaluates the probability of the number of shares that are expected to vest, and then adjusts the expense to reflect the number of shares expected to vest and the cumulative vesting period met to date. Further, the Company accounts for forfeitures of stock-based compensation awards as they occur.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for deferred income taxes whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts on the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, as measured using current enacted tax rates. These differences will result in taxable income or deductions in future years when the reported amounts of the assets or liabilities are recorded or settled, respectively. The Company records deferred tax assets and associated valuation allowances, when appropriate, to reflect amounts more likely than not to be realized based upon Company analysis. The cumulative effect of enacted tax rate changes on the net balance of reported amounts of assets and liabilities is recognized in the period of enactment. Please refer to Note 4 – Income Taxes for additional discussion.
Earnings per Share
The Company uses the treasury stock method to determine the effect of potentially dilutive instruments. Please refer to Note 9 - Earnings Per Share for additional discussion.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is used to refer to net income (loss) plus other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of revenues, expenses, gains, and losses that under GAAP are reported as separate components of stockholders’ equity instead of net income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) is presented net of income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) (“accompanying statements of comprehensive income (loss)”). The Company’s policy for releasing income tax effects within accumulated other comprehensive loss is an incremental, unit-of-account approach. Please refer to Note 8 – Pension Benefits for detail on the changes in the balances of components comprising other comprehensive income (loss).
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The recorded value of the Company’s revolving credit facility approximates its fair value as it bears interest at a floating rate that approximates a current market rate. The Company had a $93.0 million balance under its revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2020, compared with a $122.5
million balance as of December 31, 2019. The Company’s Senior Notes, as defined in Note 5 – Long-Term Debt in Part II, Item 8 of this report, are recorded at cost, net of any unamortized discount and deferred financing costs, and their respective fair values are disclosed in Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements. The Company’s warrants were recorded at fair value upon issuance, with no recurring fair value measurement required. Additionally, the Company has derivative financial instruments that are recorded at fair value. Considerable judgment is required to develop estimates of fair value. The estimates provided are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize upon the sale or refinancing of such instruments.
Industry Segment and Geographic Information
The Company operates in the exploration and production segment of the oil and gas industry, onshore in the United States. The Company reports as a single industry segment.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has not participated in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or SPEs, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
The Company evaluates its transactions to determine if any variable interest entities exist. If it is determined that the Company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, that entity is consolidated. The Company has not been involved in any unconsolidated SPE transactions in 2020 or 2019.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), followed by other related ASUs that provided targeted improvements and additional practical expedient options (collectively “ASU 2016-02” or “Topic 842”). The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method. The Company elected as part of its adoption to also use the optional transition methodology whereby lease accounting for previously reported periods continues to be reported in accordance with historical accounting guidance for leases in effect for those prior periods. Policy elections and practical expedients the Company implemented in connection with the adoption of ASU 2016-02 include (a) excluding from the balance sheet leases with terms that are less than one year, (b) for agreements that contain both lease and non-lease components, combining these components together and accounting for them as a single lease, (c) the package of practical expedients, which among other requirements, allows the Company to avoid reassessing contracts that commenced prior to adoption that were properly evaluated under legacy GAAP, and (d) excluding land easements that existed or expired before adoption of ASU 2016-02. The scope of ASU 2016-02 does not apply to leases used in the exploration or use of minerals, oil, natural gas, or other similar non-regenerative resources.
Upon adoption on January 1, 2019, the Company recognized approximately $50.0 million in right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and related lease liabilities for its operating leases. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings upon the adoption of this guidance. Please refer to Note 12 - Leases for additional discussion.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, followed by other related ASUs that provided targeted improvements (collectively “ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 provides financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, using the modified retrospective method, and there was no material impact to the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract (“ASU 2018-15”). ASU 2018-15 aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The Company adopted ASU 2018-15 on January 1, 2020, with prospective application, and there was no material impact to the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”). ASU 2019-12 was issued as a means to reduce the complexity of accounting for income taxes for those entities that fall within the scope of the accounting standard. The guidance is to be applied using a prospective method, excluding amendments related to franchise taxes, which should be applied on either a retrospective basis for all periods presented or a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company adopted ASU 2019-12 on January 1, 2020, and there was no material impact on the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”) followed by ASU No. 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope (“ASU 2021-01”), issued in January 2021 to provide clarifying guidance regarding the scope of Topic 848. ASU 2020-04 was issued to provide optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. Generally, the guidance is to be applied as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. ASU 2020-04 and ASU 2021-01 are effective for all entities through December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has not elected to use the optional guidance and continues to evaluate the options provided by ASU 2020-04 and ASU 2021-01. Please refer to Note 5 – Long-Term Debt for discussion of the use of the LIBOR in connection with borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40) (“ASU 2020-06”). ASU 2020-06 was issued to reduce the complexity associated with accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. The guidance is to be applied using either a modified retrospective or a fully retrospective method. ASU 2020-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2020-06 on January 1, 2022, and does not expect a material impact on the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
There are no other ASUs applicable to the Company that would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures that have been issued but not yet adopted by the Company as of December 31, 2020, and through the filing of this report.
Note 2 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The Company recognizes its share of revenue from the sale of produced oil, gas, and NGLs from its Midland Basin and South Texas assets. Oil, gas, and NGL production revenue presented within the accompanying statements of operations is reflective of the revenue generated from contracts with customers.
The tables below present oil, gas, and NGL production revenue by product type for each of the Company’s operating areas for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2020
|
|
Midland Basin
|
|
South Texas
|
|
Total
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Oil production revenue
|
$
|
802,494
|
|
|
$
|
51,074
|
|
|
$
|
853,568
|
|
Gas production revenue
|
76,759
|
|
|
110,700
|
|
|
187,459
|
|
NGL production revenue
|
324
|
|
|
84,837
|
|
|
85,161
|
|
Total
|
$
|
879,577
|
|
|
$
|
246,611
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,188
|
|
Relative percentage
|
78
|
%
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
____________________________________________
Note: Amounts may not calculate due to rounding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2019
|
|
Midland Basin
|
|
South Texas
|
|
Total
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Oil production revenue
|
$
|
1,119,786
|
|
|
$
|
63,426
|
|
|
$
|
1,183,212
|
|
Gas production revenue
|
75,827
|
|
|
186,702
|
|
|
262,529
|
|
NGL production revenue
|
123
|
|
|
139,886
|
|
|
140,009
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,195,736
|
|
|
$
|
390,014
|
|
|
$
|
1,585,750
|
|
Relative percentage
|
75
|
%
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
____________________________________________
Note: Amounts may not calculate due to rounding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
Midland Basin
|
|
South Texas
|
|
Rocky Mountain (1)
|
|
Total
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Oil production revenue
|
$
|
938,004
|
|
|
$
|
72,821
|
|
|
$
|
54,851
|
|
|
$
|
1,065,676
|
|
Gas production revenue
|
125,603
|
|
|
227,252
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
354,450
|
|
NGL production revenue
|
1,000
|
|
|
214,441
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
216,231
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,064,607
|
|
|
$
|
514,514
|
|
|
$
|
57,236
|
|
|
$
|
1,636,357
|
|
Relative percentage
|
65
|
%
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
____________________________________________
Note: Amounts may not calculate due to rounding.
(1) Following the divestiture of the Company’s remaining assets in the Rocky Mountain region during the first half of 2018, there has been no production revenue from this region after the second quarter of 2018.
The Company recognizes oil, gas, and NGL production revenue at the point in time when custody and title (“control”) of the product transfers to the purchaser, which differs depending on the applicable contractual terms. Transfer of control drives the presentation of transportation, gathering, processing, and other post-production expenses (“fees and other deductions”) within the accompanying statements of operations. Fees and other deductions incurred by the Company prior to control transfer are recorded within the oil, gas, and NGL production expense line item on the accompanying statements of operations. When control is transferred at or near the wellhead, sales are based on a wellhead market price that is impacted by fees and other deductions incurred by the purchaser subsequent to the transfer of control. In general, the Company generates production revenue from a combination of the following types of contracts:
•The Company sells oil and gas production at or near the wellhead and receives an agreed-upon market price from the purchaser. Under this type of arrangement, control transfers at or near the wellhead.
•The Company has certain processing arrangements that include the delivery of unprocessed gas to a midstream processor’s facility for processing. Upon completion of processing, the midstream processor purchases the NGLs and redelivers residue gas back to the Company in-kind. For the NGLs extracted during processing, the midstream processor remits payment to the Company. For the residue gas taken in-kind, the Company has separate sales contracts where control transfers at points downstream of the processing facility. The Company also has certain oil sales that occur at market locations downstream of the production area. Given the structure of these arrangements and where control transfers, the Company separately recognizes fees and other deductions incurred prior to control transfer. These fees are recorded within the oil, gas, and NGL production expense line item on the accompanying statements of operations.
Significant judgments made in applying the guidance in ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, relate to the point in time when control transfers to purchasers in gas processing arrangements with midstream processors. The Company does not believe that significant judgments are required with respect to the determination of the transaction price, including amounts that represent variable consideration, as volume and price carry a low level of estimation uncertainty given the precision of volumetric measurements and the use of index pricing with generally predictable differentials. Accordingly, the Company does not consider estimates of variable consideration to be constrained.
The Company’s performance obligations arise upon the production of hydrocarbons from wells in which the Company has an ownership interest. The performance obligations are considered satisfied upon control transferring to a purchaser at the wellhead, inlet, or tailgate of the midstream processor’s processing facility, or other contractually specified delivery point. The time period between production and satisfaction of performance obligations is generally less than one day; thus, there are no material unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations at the end of the reporting period.
Revenue is recorded in the month when performance obligations are satisfied. However, settlement statements from the purchasers of hydrocarbons and the related cash consideration are received 30 to 90 days after production has occurred. As a result, the Company must estimate the amount of production delivered to the customer and the consideration that will ultimately be received for sale of the product. Estimated revenue due to the Company is recorded within the accounts receivable line item on the accompanying balance sheets until payment is received. The accounts receivable balances from contracts with customers within the accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, were $108.9 million and $146.3 million, respectively. To estimate accounts receivable from contracts with customers, the Company uses knowledge of its properties, historical performance, contractual arrangements, index pricing, quality and transportation differentials, and other factors as the basis for these estimates. Differences between estimates and actual amounts received for product sales are recorded in the month that payment is received from the purchaser.
Note 3 – Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Assets Held for Sale
2020 Acquisition Activity
During the third quarter of 2020, the Company completed a non-monetary acreage trade of primarily undeveloped properties located in Upton County, Texas, resulting in the exchange of approximately 535 net acres, with $6.5 million of carrying value attributed to the properties transferred by the Company. This trade was recorded at carryover basis with no gain or loss recognized.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company acquired approximately 380 net acres of proved and unproved properties located in Martin County, Texas, in two separate transactions which closed in 2020. Combined total cash consideration paid by the Company was $7.9 million.
2019 Acquisition Activity
During 2019, the Company completed several non-monetary acreage trades of primarily undeveloped properties located in Howard, Martin, and Midland Counties, Texas, resulting in the exchange of approximately 2,200 net acres, with $73.4 million of carrying value attributed to the properties transferred by the Company. These trades were recorded at carryover basis with no gain or loss recognized.
2018 Acquisition Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company acquired approximately 1,030 net acres of primarily unproved properties located in Howard and Martin Counties, Texas, in two separate transactions which closed in 2018. Combined total cash consideration paid by the Company was $33.3 million. Under authoritative accounting guidance, these transactions were both individually considered to be asset acquisitions. Therefore, the properties were recorded based on the fair value of the total consideration transferred on the acquisition date and the transaction costs were capitalized as a component of the cost of the assets acquired.
During the third quarter of 2018, the Company completed two non-monetary acreage trades of primarily undeveloped properties located in Howard and Martin Counties, Texas, which resulted in the exchange of approximately 2,650 net acres, with $95.1 million of carrying value attributed to the properties transferred by the Company. These trades were recorded at carryover basis with no gain or loss recognized.
2018 Divestiture Activity
PRB Divestiture. On March 26, 2018, the Company completed the PRB Divestiture, divesting of approximately 112,000 net acres for total cash received at closing, net of costs (“net divestiture proceeds”), of $492.2 million, and recorded a final net gain of $410.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Divide County Divestiture and Halff East Divestiture. During the second quarter of 2018, the Company completed the Divide County Divestiture and the Halff East Divestiture, for combined net divestiture proceeds of $252.2 million, and recorded a combined final net gain of $15.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Divide County Divestiture was considered a disposal of a significant asset group. The loss before income taxes from the Divide County, North Dakota assets sold for the year ended December 31, 2018, was $29.0 million. Loss before income taxes reflects oil, gas, and NGL production revenue, less oil, gas, and NGL production expense, depletion, depreciation, amortization, and asset retirement obligation liability accretion expense, impairment expense, and net loss on divestiture activity.
The Company determined that executed asset sales in 2018 did not qualify for discontinued operations accounting under financial statement presentation authoritative guidance.
Note 4 – Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Current portion of income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,826
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
State
|
(449)
|
|
|
(1,618)
|
|
|
(1,662)
|
|
Deferred portion of income tax (expense) benefit
|
192,540
|
|
|
41,835
|
|
|
(141,708)
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
$
|
192,091
|
|
|
$
|
44,043
|
|
|
$
|
(143,370)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
The components of the net deferred tax liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties excluding asset retirement obligation liabilities
|
$
|
83,816
|
|
|
$
|
224,686
|
|
Derivative assets
|
—
|
|
|
4,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
10,054
|
|
|
12,361
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
93,870
|
|
|
241,693
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
36,311
|
|
|
—
|
|
Debt discount and deferred financing costs
|
23,925
|
|
|
—
|
|
Asset retirement obligation liabilities
|
18,424
|
|
|
19,658
|
|
Credit carryover
|
7,543
|
|
|
11,270
|
|
Pension
|
7,183
|
|
|
5,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal and state tax net operating loss carryovers
|
3,898
|
|
|
4,172
|
|
Stock compensation
|
2,701
|
|
|
3,503
|
|
Other liabilities
|
7,273
|
|
|
10,803
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
107,258
|
|
|
55,377
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
(13,388)
|
|
|
(3,070)
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
93,870
|
|
|
52,307
|
|
Total net deferred tax liabilities
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
189,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current federal income tax refundable
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current state income tax payable
|
$
|
853
|
|
|
$
|
1,404
|
|
As of December 31, 2020, the Company has recorded the utilization of its federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforward and has remaining state NOL carryforwards of $4.9 million. The state NOLs and de minimus state tax credits expire between 2021 and 2040. The Company has a federal research and development (“R&D”) credit carryforward of $7.5 million, which will expire between 2028 and 2033 if not used. The Company’s current valuation allowance relates to state NOL carryforwards and state tax credits, which are expected to expire before they can be utilized, and tax-effected unrealized derivative liabilities in excess of its net deferred liability balance.
Recorded income tax expense or benefit differs from the amount that would be provided by applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate to income or loss before income taxes. These differences primarily relate to the effect of state income taxes, excess tax benefits and deficiencies from stock-based compensation awards, tax limitations on compensation of covered individuals, changes in valuation allowances, the cumulative impact of other smaller permanent differences, and can also reflect the
cumulative effect of an enacted tax rate change, in the period of enactment, on the Company’s net deferred tax asset and liability balance. These differences are reported as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Federal statutory tax (expense) benefit
|
$
|
200,908
|
|
|
$
|
48,519
|
|
|
$
|
(136,873)
|
|
(Increase) decrease in tax resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax (expense) benefit (net of federal benefit)
|
5,722
|
|
|
(260)
|
|
|
(2,771)
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
(10,318)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
(105)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee share-based compensation
|
(2,578)
|
|
|
(3,346)
|
|
|
(2,508)
|
|
Other
|
(1,643)
|
|
|
(883)
|
|
|
(1,113)
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
$
|
192,091
|
|
|
$
|
44,043
|
|
|
$
|
(143,370)
|
|
Acquisitions, divestitures, drilling activity, and basis differentials, which impact the prices received for oil, gas, and NGLs, impact the apportionment of taxable income to the states where the Company owns oil and gas properties. As these factors change, the Company’s state income tax rate changes. This change, when applied to the Company’s total temporary differences, impacts the total state income tax (expense) benefit reported in the current year. Items affecting state apportionment factors are evaluated upon completion of the prior year income tax return, after significant acquisitions and divestitures, if there are significant changes in drilling activity, or if estimated state revenue changes occur during the year. As a result of the 2018 divestitures, the Company’s state apportionment rate reflects its significant Texas presence.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted on March 27, 2020. The primary feature of the CARES Act that the Company benefited from was the acceleration of its refundable Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”) credits. On April 1, 2020, the Company filed an election to accelerate its remaining refundable AMT credits of $7.6 million. The Company received the refund in July 2020.
For all years before 2017, the Company is generally no longer subject to United States federal or state income tax examinations by tax authorities.
The Company complies with authoritative accounting guidance regarding uncertain tax provisions. The entire amount of unrecognized tax benefit reported by the Company would affect its effective tax rate if recognized. Interest expense in the accompanying statements of operations includes a negligible amount associated with income taxes. The total amount recorded for unrecognized tax benefits for each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, was $446,000. The Company does not expect a significant change to the recorded unrecognized tax benefits in 2021.
Note 5 – Long-Term Debt
The following table summarizes the Company’s total outstanding balance on its revolving credit facility, Senior Secured Notes net of unamortized discount and deferred financing costs, and Senior Unsecured Notes, net of unamortized deferred financing costs, as of December 31, 2020, and 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Revolving credit facility
|
$
|
93,000
|
|
|
$
|
122,500
|
|
Senior Secured Notes (1)
|
460,656
|
|
|
—
|
|
Senior Unsecured Notes (1)
|
1,660,663
|
|
|
2,610,298
|
|
Total
|
$
|
2,214,319
|
|
|
$
|
2,732,798
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) Senior Secured Notes and Senior Unsecured Notes are defined below.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company executed multiple transactions to reduce outstanding debt. During the second quarter of 2020, the Company initiated an offer to exchange certain of its outstanding senior unsecured notes, as presented in the Senior Unsecured Notes section below (“Senior Unsecured Notes”), other than the 1.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2021 (“2021 Senior Convertible Notes,” and together with the Senior Unsecured Notes, “Old Notes”), and entered into a private exchange of certain of its outstanding 2021 Senior Convertible Notes and portions of its outstanding Senior Unsecured Notes (“Private Exchange”), in each case for newly issued 10.0% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due January 15, 2025 (“2025 Senior Secured Notes”), referred to together as “Exchange Offers.” In connection with the Exchange Offers, the Company and its lenders amended the Credit
Agreement to increase the amount of permitted second lien indebtedness to an aggregate amount of $1.0 billion, inclusive of the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes (“Permitted Second Lien Debt”). Additionally, the Company amended the indenture governing its 2021 Senior Convertible Notes, by entering into the Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 29, 2020 (“Third Supplemental Indenture”), to the original Indenture, dated as of May 21, 2015, as supplemented and amended by the Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 12, 2016, collectively referred to as the (“2021 Notes Indenture”). The Third Supplemental Indenture provides that the Company will satisfy any conversion obligation solely in cash.
On June 17, 2020 (“Settlement Date”), the Company exchanged $611.9 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Unsecured Notes and $107.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2021 Senior Convertible Notes for $446.7 million in aggregate principal amount of 2025 Senior Secured Notes, as well as, in connection with the Private Exchange, (a) $53.5 million in cash to certain holders of the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes and (b) warrants to acquire up to an aggregate of approximately 5.9 million shares, or approximately five percent of its outstanding common stock, exercisable upon the occurrence of certain future triggering events, to certain holders who exchanged Old Notes in the Private Exchange. Please refer to Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements for more information regarding the warrants issued by the Company. Pursuant to the 2021 Notes Indenture, upon the issuance of Permitted Second Lien Debt, the remaining outstanding 2021 Senior Convertible Notes became secured and are subsequently referred to as the “2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes,” and together with the 2025 Senior Secured Notes, the “Senior Secured Notes.”
For a summary of the principal amounts of the Senior Unsecured Notes tendered as of the Settlement Date, please refer to the Senior Unsecured Notes section below.
The Company retired $611.9 million and $107.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its Senior Unsecured Notes and 2021 Senior Convertible Notes, respectively, upon the closing of the Exchange Offers. Upon closing, the Company paid $8.9 million of accrued and unpaid interest and accelerated $5.6 million of previously unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the retired Senior Unsecured Notes and 2021 Senior Convertible Notes and accelerated $6.1 million of previously unamortized debt discount associated with the retired 2021 Senior Convertible Notes. The Exchange Offers resulted in a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $227.3 million. The Company cancelled all retired Senior Unsecured Notes and 2021 Senior Convertible Notes upon the closing of the Exchange Offers.
Additionally, during 2020, in open market transactions, the Company repurchased a total of $190.3 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2022 Senior Notes and 2024 Senior Notes for a total settlement amount, excluding accrued interest, of $136.5 million. In connection with the repurchases, the Company recorded a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $52.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This amount included discounts realized upon repurchase of $53.8 million partially offset by approximately $1.0 million of accelerated unamortized deferred financing costs. The Company canceled all repurchased 2022 Senior Notes and 2024 Senior Notes upon settlement.
Please refer to the Credit Agreement and Senior Notes sections below for additional information.
Credit Agreement
The Company’s Credit Agreement provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility with a maximum loan amount of $2.5 billion. During the second quarter of 2020, as a result of lower commodity prices and a corresponding decrease in the value of the Company’s proved reserves, the borrowing base and aggregate lender commitments under the Credit Agreement were both reduced to $1.1 billion. Also during the second quarter of 2020, the Company entered into the Third Amendment and the Fourth Amendment to the Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Amendments”), which permitted the Company to incur new second lien debt of up to $827.5 million prior to October 1, 2020, provided that all principal amounts of such debt are used to redeem unsecured senior debt of the Company for less than or equal to 80% of par value. The Amendments also permitted the Company to grant a second-priority security interest to the holders of the Company’s outstanding 2021 Senior Convertible Notes to secure the Company’s obligations under the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes. Additionally, the Amendments reduced the amount of dividends that the Company may declare and pay on an annual basis from $50.0 million to $12.0 million. During the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company and its lenders completed the fall semi-annual borrowing base redetermination and entered into the Fifth Amendment to the Credit Agreement, which reaffirmed the Company’s borrowing base and aggregate lender commitments at existing levels and extended the Company’s ability to incur Permitted Second Lien Debt until the next scheduled borrowing base redetermination date of April 1, 2021. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had $380.8 million of available Permitted Second Lien Debt capacity.
The Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature on September 28, 2023, except that, pursuant to the Amendments, newly issued Permitted Second Lien Debt used to redeem any portion of the remaining 2022 Senior Notes must have maturities on or after 180 days after September 28, 2023; otherwise, the maturity date of the Credit Agreement will be July 2, 2023. Without regard to which maturity date is in effect, the maturity date could occur earlier on August 16, 2022, if the Company has not completed certain repurchase, redemption, or refinancing activities associated with its 2022 Senior Notes, and does not have certain unused availability for borrowing under the Credit Agreement, as outlined in the Credit Agreement.
Interest and commitment fees associated with the revolving credit facility are accrued based on a borrowing base utilization grid set forth in the Credit Agreement. The Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement amended the borrowing base utilization grid as presented in the table below. At the Company’s election, borrowings under the Credit Agreement may be in the form of Eurodollar,
Alternate Base Rate (“ABR”), or Swingline loans. Eurodollar loans accrue interest at LIBOR, plus the applicable margin from the utilization grid, and ABR and Swingline loans accrue interest at a market-based floating rate, plus the applicable margin from the utilization grid. Commitment fees are accrued on the unused portion of the aggregate lender commitment amount at rates from the utilization grid and are included in the interest expense line item on the accompanying statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing Base Utilization Percentage
|
|
<25%
|
|
≥25% <50%
|
|
≥50% <75%
|
|
≥75% <90%
|
|
≥90%
|
Eurodollar Loans (1)
|
|
1.750
|
%
|
|
2.000
|
%
|
|
2.500
|
%
|
|
2.750
|
%
|
|
3.000
|
%
|
ABR Loans or Swingline Loans
|
|
0.750
|
%
|
|
1.000
|
%
|
|
1.500
|
%
|
|
1.750
|
%
|
|
2.000
|
%
|
Commitment Fee Rate
|
|
0.375
|
%
|
|
0.375
|
%
|
|
0.500
|
%
|
|
0.500
|
%
|
|
0.500
|
%
|
____________________________________________
(1) The Credit Agreement specifies that if LIBOR is no longer a widely used benchmark rate, or if it is no longer used for determining interest rates for loans in the United States, a replacement interest rate that fairly reflects the cost to the lenders of funding loans shall be established by the Administrative Agent, as defined in the Credit Agreement, in consultation with the Company. Please refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for discussion of FASB ASU 2020-04, which provides guidance related to reference rate reform.
The following table presents the outstanding balance, total amount of letters of credit outstanding, and available borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement as of February 4, 2021, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of February 4, 2021
|
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Revolving credit facility (1)
|
$
|
121,500
|
|
|
$
|
93,000
|
|
|
$
|
122,500
|
|
Letters of credit (2)
|
42,000
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
Available borrowing capacity
|
936,500
|
|
|
965,000
|
|
|
1,077,500
|
|
Total aggregate lender commitment amount
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,200,000
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) Unamortized deferred financing costs attributable to the revolving credit facility are presented as a component of the other noncurrent assets line item on the accompanying balance sheets and totaled $4.3 million and $5.9 million as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. These costs are being amortized over the term of the revolving credit facility on a straight-line basis.
(2) Letters of credit outstanding reduce the amount available under the revolving credit facility on a dollar-for-dollar basis.
Senior Notes
Senior Secured Notes. Senior Secured Notes, net of unamortized debt discount and deferred financing costs, included within the Senior Notes, net line item on the accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
Unamortized Debt Discount
|
|
Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs
|
|
Net
|
|
(in thousands)
|
10.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2025
|
$
|
446,675
|
|
|
$
|
37,943
|
|
|
$
|
11,558
|
|
|
$
|
397,174
|
|
1.50% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2021 (1)
|
65,485
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
63,482
|
|
Total
|
$
|
512,160
|
|
|
$
|
39,771
|
|
|
$
|
11,733
|
|
|
$
|
460,656
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) As discussed above, as required by the 2021 Notes Indenture and as permitted by the Credit Agreement, as the Company issued Permitted Second Lien Debt upon the closing of the Exchange Offers, its remaining 2021 Senior Convertible Notes contemporaneously became secured.
2025 Senior Secured Notes. On June 17, 2020, the Company issued $446.7 million in aggregate principal amount of 2025 Senior Secured Notes due January 15, 2025. The Company incurred fees of $13.1 million, which are being amortized as deferred financing costs over the life of the 2025 Senior Secured Notes. Upon the issuance of the 2025 Senior Secured Notes, the Company recorded $405.0 million as the initial carrying amount, which approximated their fair value at issuance. The excess of the principal amount of the 2025 Senior Secured Notes over its fair value was recorded as a debt discount. The debt discount and deferred financing costs are amortized to interest expense through the maturity date.
In connection with the issuance of the 2025 Senior Secured Notes, the Company entered into an indenture dated as of June 17, 2020 with UMB Bank, N.A., as trustee, governing the 2025 Senior Secured Notes (“2025 Notes Indenture”). The Company may redeem some or all of its 2025 Senior Secured Notes prior to their maturity at redemption prices based on a premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest as described in the 2025 Notes Indenture.
The 2025 Senior Secured Notes are senior obligations of the Company, secured on a second-priority basis, ranking junior to the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement and equal in priority with the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes. The 2025 Senior Secured Notes rank senior in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and any future unsecured senior or subordinated debt.
2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes. On August 12, 2016, the Company issued $172.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 1.50% Senior Convertible Notes due July 1, 2021, unless earlier converted. The Company received net proceeds of $166.6 million after deducting fees of $5.9 million, of which a portion is being amortized over the life of the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes. Upon the issuance of the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes, the Company recorded $132.3 million as the initial carrying amount of the debt component, which approximated its fair value at issuance, and, was estimated by using an interest rate for nonconvertible debt with terms similar to the Senior Convertible Notes. The effective interest rate used was 7.25%. The $40.2 million excess of the principal amount of the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes over the fair value of the debt component was recorded as a debt discount and a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital. The Company incurred fees of $5.9 million relating to the issuance of the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes, which were allocated between the debt and equity components in proportion to their determined fair value amounts.
During the second quarter of 2020, pursuant to the Third Supplemental Indenture, the Company agreed to satisfy any conversion obligation solely in cash, resulting in reclassification of the fair value of the equity components out of additional paid-in capital. As of December 31, 2019, the net carrying amount of the equity component of the Senior Convertible Notes recorded in additional paid-in capital on the accompanying balance sheets was $33.6 million. The debt discount and debt-related issuance costs are being amortized to the principal value of the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes as interest expense through the maturity date. Interest expense recognized on the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes related to the stated interest rate and amortization of the debt discount totaled $7.7 million, $11.0 million, and $10.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
Upon the closing of the Exchange Offers, the Company retired $107.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2021 Senior Convertible Notes. Upon issuance of the 2025 Senior Secured Notes, which was Permitted Second Lien Debt, as required by the 2021 Notes Indenture, and as permitted by the Credit Agreement, the remaining 2021 Senior Convertible Notes became secured senior obligations of the Company on a second-priority basis, ranking junior to the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement and equal in priority with the 2025 Senior Secured Notes. The 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of the Company’s existing and any future unsecured senior or subordinated debt.
Prior to January 1, 2021, holders could convert their 2021 Senior Convertible Notes at their option only under certain circumstances as defined by the 2021 Notes Indenture. The 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes were not convertible at the option of holders as of December 31, 2020. Notwithstanding the inability to convert as of December 31, 2020, the if-converted value of the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes did not exceed the principal amount as of December 31, 2020, or through the filing of this report. On or after January 1, 2021, until the maturity date, holders may convert their 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes at any time. Holders may convert their notes based on a conversion rate of 24.6914 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes, which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $40.50 per share, subject to adjustment. The Company may not redeem the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes prior to the maturity date.
The Company has the ability, and currently intends to settle its 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes obligation, due July 1, 2021, with borrowings under its revolving credit facility.
If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, as defined by the 2021 Notes Indenture, holders of the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or any portion of their notes at a fundamental change repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 2021 Notes Indenture contains customary events of default with respect to the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes, including that upon certain events of default, the trustee by notice to the Company, or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes by notice to the Company, may declare 100% of the principal and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, due and payable immediately. In case of certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization involving the Company or a significant subsidiary, 100% of the principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the Senior Convertible Notes will automatically become due and payable.
In connection with the issuance of the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes, the Company entered into capped call transactions with affiliates of the underwriters of such issuance. The aggregate cost of the capped call transactions was
approximately $24.2 million. The capped call transactions are generally expected to partially offset any cash payments the Company is required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes in the event that the market price per share of the Company’s common stock is greater than the strike price of the capped call transactions, which initially corresponds to the approximate $40.50 per share conversion price of the 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes. The cap price of the capped call transactions is initially $60.00 per share. If the market price per share exceeds the cap price of the capped call transactions, there would not be an offset of such potential cash payments. The Company classified the costs associated with the capped call transactions as equity instruments with no recurring fair value measurement recorded. As discussed above, during the second quarter of 2020, the fair value of this equity instrument was reclassified out of additional paid-in capital upon the Company’s agreement to satisfy any conversion obligation solely in cash.
Senior Unsecured Notes Senior Unsecured Notes, net of unamortized deferred financing costs, included within the Senior Notes, net line item on the accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs
|
|
Principal Amount, Net
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
Unamortized Deferred Financing Costs
|
|
Principal Amount, Net
|
|
(in thousands)
|
6.125% Senior Notes due 2022
|
$
|
212,403
|
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
211,548
|
|
|
$
|
476,796
|
|
|
$
|
2,920
|
|
|
$
|
473,876
|
|
5.0% Senior Notes due 2024
|
277,034
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
275,458
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
3,766
|
|
|
496,234
|
|
5.625% Senior Notes due 2025
|
349,118
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
346,326
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
495,097
|
|
6.75% Senior Notes due 2026
|
419,235
|
|
|
3,970
|
|
|
415,265
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
5,571
|
|
|
494,429
|
|
6.625% Senior Notes due 2027
|
416,791
|
|
|
4,725
|
|
|
412,066
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
6,601
|
|
|
493,399
|
|
1.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2021 (1)(2)
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
172,500
|
|
|
15,237
|
|
|
157,263
|
|
Total
|
$
|
1,674,581
|
|
|
$
|
13,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,660,663
|
|
|
$
|
2,649,296
|
|
|
$
|
38,998
|
|
|
$
|
2,610,298
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) Unamortized deferred financing costs attributable to the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes include $13.9 million related to the unamortized debt discount as of December 31, 2019.
(2) As discussed above, as required by the 2021 Notes Indenture and as permitted by the Credit Agreement, as the Company issued Permitted Second Lien Debt upon the closing of the Exchange Offers, its remaining 2021 Senior Convertible Notes contemporaneously became secured.
The senior unsecured notes listed above (collectively referred to as “Senior Unsecured Notes,” and together with the Senior Secured Notes, “Senior Notes”) are unsecured senior obligations and rank equal in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and any future unsecured senior debt and are senior in right of payment to any future subordinated debt. The Company may redeem some or all of its Senior Unsecured Notes prior to their maturity at redemption prices based on a premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest as described in the indentures governing the Senior Unsecured Notes.
Upon the closing of the Exchange Offers, the Company retired $611.9 million in aggregate principal amount of its Senior Unsecured Notes. Portions of the then-outstanding principal amount of each series of our Senior Unsecured Notes listed below were tendered and retired in connection with the Exchange Offers. The following table summarizes the principal amounts of the Senior Unsecured Notes tendered as of the Settlement Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Senior Unsecured Notes Tendered
|
|
Principal Amount of Senior Unsecured Notes Tendered
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
6.125% Senior Notes due 2022
|
|
$
|
141,701
|
|
5.0% Senior Notes due 2024
|
|
155,339
|
|
5.625% Senior Notes due 2025
|
|
150,882
|
|
6.75% Senior Notes due 2026
|
|
80,765
|
|
6.625% Senior Notes due 2027
|
|
83,209
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
611,896
|
|
2022 Senior Notes. On November 17, 2014, the Company issued $600.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2022 at par, which mature on November 15, 2022. The Company received net proceeds of $590.0 million after deducting fees of $10.0 million, which are being amortized as deferred financing costs over the life of the 2022 Senior Notes. During 2016, the Company repurchased $38.2 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2022 Senior Notes
for a settlement amount of $24.3 million, excluding accrued interest. During 2018, the Company retired $85.0 million of its 2022 Senior Notes for a total settlement amount of $88.1 million, excluding accrued interest. During 2020, the Company repurchased $122.7 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2022 Senior Notes for a settlement amount of $94.2 million, excluding accrued interest.
2024 Senior Notes. On May 20, 2013, the Company issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.0% Senior Notes due 2024 at par, which mature on January 15, 2024. The Company received net proceeds of $490.2 million after deducting fees of $9.8 million, which are being amortized as deferred financing costs over the life of the 2024 Senior Notes. During 2020, the Company repurchased $67.6 million in aggregate principal amount of its 2024 Senior Notes for a total settlement amount of $42.3 million, excluding accrued interest.
2025 Senior Notes. On May 21, 2015, the Company issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.625% Senior Notes due 2025 at par, which mature on June 1, 2025. The Company received net proceeds of $491.0 million after deducting fees of $9.0 million, which are being amortized as deferred financing costs over the life of the 2025 Senior Notes.
2026 Senior Notes. On September 12, 2016, the Company issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Senior Notes due 2026, at par, which mature on September 15, 2026. The Company received net proceeds of $491.6 million after deducting fees of $8.4 million, which are being amortized as deferred financing costs over the life of the 2026 Senior Notes.
2027 Senior Notes. On August 20, 2018, the Company issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.625% Senior Notes due 2027, at par, which mature on January 15, 2027. The Company received net proceeds of $492.1 million after deducting fees of $7.9 million, which are being amortized as deferred financing costs over the life of the 2027 Senior Notes.
Covenants
The Company is subject to certain financial and non-financial covenants under the Credit Agreement and the indentures governing the Senior Notes that, among other terms, limit the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments including dividends, sell assets, with respect to the Company’s restricted subsidiaries, permit the consensual restriction on the ability of such restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or indebtedness owing to the Company or to any other restricted subsidiaries, create liens that secure debt, enter into transactions with affiliates, and merge or consolidate with another company. The financial covenants under the Credit Agreement require that the Company’s (a) total funded debt, as defined in the Credit Agreement, to 12-month trailing adjusted EBITDAX ratio cannot be greater than 4.00 to 1.00 on the last day of each fiscal quarter; and (b) adjusted current ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, cannot be less than 1.00 to 1.00 as of the last day of any fiscal quarter. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement and the indentures governing the Senior Notes as of December 31, 2020, and through the filing of this report.
Capitalized Interest
Capitalized interest costs for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, totaled $15.8 million, $18.5 million, and $20.6 million, respectively. The amount of interest the Company capitalizes generally fluctuates based on the amount borrowed, the Company’s capital program, and the timing and amount of costs associated with capital projects that are considered in progress. Capitalized interest costs are included in total costs incurred. Please refer to Costs Incurred in Overview of the Company in Part II, Item 7, and Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (unaudited) in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
As of December 31, 2020, the Company has entered into various agreements, which include drilling rig contracts of $5.9 million, gathering, processing, transportation throughput, and delivery commitments of $161.6 million, office leases, including maintenance, of $22.1 million, fixed price contracts to purchase electricity of $45.4 million, and other miscellaneous contracts and leases of $14.3 million. As of December 31, 2020, the annual minimum payments for the next five years and total minimum payments thereafter are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
2021
|
|
$
|
86,776
|
|
2022
|
|
79,919
|
|
2023
|
|
45,474
|
|
2024
|
|
12,455
|
|
2025
|
|
11,463
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
13,233
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
249,320
|
|
Drilling Rig and Completion Service Contracts. The Company has drilling rig and completion service contracts in place to facilitate its drilling and completion plans. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, and through the filing of this report, the Company entered into new and amended drilling rig contracts resulting in the reduction of day rates and potential early termination fees and the extension of contract terms. As of the filing of this report, the Company’s drilling rig commitments totaled $19.9 million under contract terms extending through the first quarter of 2022. If all of these contracts were terminated as of the filing of this report, the Company would avoid a portion of the contractual service commitments; however, the Company would be required to pay $11.6 million in early termination fees. Excluded from these amounts are variable commitments and potential penalties determined by the number of completion crews the Company has in operation in a particular area under a completion service agreement. As of December 31, 2020, potential penalties under this completion service agreement, which expires on December 31, 2023, range from zero to a maximum of $10.1 million. No material expenses related to early termination or standby fees were incurred by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2020, and the Company does not expect to incur material penalties with regard to its drilling rig and completion service contracts during 2021.
Pipeline Transportation Commitments. The Company has gathering, processing, transportation throughput, and delivery commitments with various third-parties that require delivery of a minimum amount of oil, gas, and produced water. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has commitments to deliver a minimum of 16 MMBbl of oil and 257 Bcf of gas through 2024, and 17 MMBbl of produced water through 2027. The Company will be required to make periodic deficiency payments for any shortfalls in delivering the minimum volume commitments under certain agreements. As of December 31, 2020, if the Company fails to deliver any product, as applicable, the aggregate undiscounted deficiency payments total approximately $161.6 million. This amount does not include deficiency payment estimates associated with approximately 11.9 MMBbl of future oil delivery commitments where the Company cannot predict with accuracy the amount and timing of these payments, as such payments are dependent upon the price of oil in effect at the time of settlement. The Company expects to fulfill the delivery commitments from a combination of production from existing productive wells, future development of proved undeveloped reserves, and future development of resources not yet characterized as proved reserves. Under certain of the Company’s commitments, if the Company is unable to deliver the minimum quantity from its production, it may deliver production acquired from third-parties to satisfy its minimum volume commitments. As of the filing of this report, the Company does not expect to incur material shortfalls with regard to these commitments.
Office Leases. The Company leases office space under various operating leases with terms extending as far as 2026. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, was $5.4 million, $5.5 million, and $4.5 million, respectively.
Electrical Power Purchase Contracts. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had a fixed price contract for the purchase of electrical power through 2027 with a total remaining obligation of $45.4 million.
Delivery and Purchase Commitments. As of December 31, 2020, the Company had a sand sourcing agreement with certain commitments and potential penalties that vary based on the amount of sand the Company uses in well completions occurring in a particular area. This sand sourcing agreement expires on December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2020, potential penalties under this sand sourcing agreement range from zero to a maximum of $10.0 million. The Company does not expect to incur penalties with regard to this agreement.
Drilling and Completion Commitments. During the second quarter of 2020, the Company entered into an agreement that included minimum drilling and completion footage requirements on certain existing leases in South Texas. If these minimum
requirements are not satisfied by March 31, 2021, the Company will be required to pay liquidated damages based on the difference between the actual footage drilled and completed and the minimum requirements. As of December 31, 2020, the liquidated damages could range from zero to a maximum of $26.9 million, with the maximum exposure assuming no additional development activity occurred prior to March 31, 2021. The Company also entered into an agreement that included a minimum number of wells drilled and completed on certain existing leases in South Texas. If these minimum requirements are not satisfied by December 31, 2021, the Company will be required to pay liquidated damages based on the difference between the actual number of wells drilled and completed and the minimum requirements. As of December 31, 2020, the liquidated damages could range from zero to a maximum of $11.5 million, with the maximum exposure assuming no additional development activity occurred prior to December 31, 2021. No liquidated damages related to these agreements were incurred by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2020, and the Company expects to meet its obligations under both agreements.
Contingencies
The Company is subject to litigation and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues for such items when a liability is both probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In the opinion of management, the anticipated results of any pending litigation and claims are not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, the financial position, or the cash flows of the Company.
Note 7 – Compensation Plans
Equity Incentive Compensation Plan
There are several components to the Company’s Equity Plan that are described in this section. As of December 31, 2020, approximately 3.8 million shares of common stock were available for grant under the Equity Plan. The issuance of a direct share benefit, such as a share of common stock, a stock option, a restricted share, an RSU, or a PSU, counts as one share against the number of shares available to be granted under the Equity Plan. Each PSU has the potential to count as two shares against the number of shares available to be granted under the Equity Plan based on the final performance multiplier.
Performance Share Units
The Company generally grants PSUs to eligible employees as part of its Equity Plan. The number of shares of the Company’s common stock issued to settle PSUs ranges from zero to two times the number of PSUs awarded and is determined based on certain criteria over a three-year performance period. PSUs generally vest on the third anniversary of the date of the grant or upon other triggering events as set forth in the Equity Plan. Employees who are retirement eligible at the time a PSU award was granted, vest in each portion of that award equally in six-month increments over a three-year period beginning at grant date. Retirement eligible employees must stay with the Company through the entire six-month vesting period to receive that increment of vesting and any non-vested portions of a PSU award will be forfeited when the employee leaves the Company.
The fair value of PSUs is measured at the grant date with a stochastic Monte Carlo simulation using geometric Brownian motion (“GBM Model”). A stochastic process is a mathematically defined equation that can create a series of outcomes over time. These outcomes are not deterministic in nature, which means that by iterating the equations multiple times, different results will be obtained for those iterations. In the case of the Company’s PSUs, the Company cannot predict with certainty the path its stock price or the stock prices of its peers will take over the three-year performance period. By using a stochastic simulation, the Company can create multiple prospective stock pathways, statistically analyze these simulations, and ultimately make inferences regarding the path the stock price may take. As such, because future stock prices are stochastic, or probabilistic with some direction in nature, the stochastic method, specifically the GBM Model, is deemed an appropriate method by which to determine the fair value of the PSUs. Significant assumptions used in this simulation include the Company’s expected volatility, dividend yield, and risk-free interest rate based on U.S. Treasury yield curve rates with maturities consistent with a three-year vesting period, as well as the volatilities and dividend yields for each of the Company’s peers.
For PSUs granted in 2017, which the Company determined to be equity awards, the settlement criteria included a combination of the Company’s Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) on an absolute basis, and the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of certain peer companies over the associated three-year performance period. The fair value of the PSUs granted in 2017 was measured on the grant date using the GBM Model. As these awards depended entirely on market-based settlement criteria, the associated compensation expense was recognized on a straight-line basis within general and administrative expense and exploration expense over the vesting period of the awards. These awards fully vested during 2020 and were settled as discussed below.
For PSUs granted in 2018 and 2019, the settlement criteria include a combination of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of certain peer companies and the Company’s cash return on total capital invested (“CRTCI”) relative to the CRTCI of certain peer companies over the associated three-year performance period. In addition to these performance criteria, the award agreements for these grants also stipulate that if the Company’s absolute TSR is negative over the three-year performance period, the maximum number of shares of common stock that can be issued to settle outstanding PSUs is capped at one times the number of PSUs granted on the award date, regardless of the Company’s TSR and CRTCI performance relative to its peer group. The fair value of the PSUs granted in 2018 and 2019 was measured on the applicable grant dates using the GBM Model, with the assumption that the associated
CRTCI performance condition will be met at the target amount at the end of the respective performance periods. Compensation expense for PSUs is recognized within general and administrative expense and exploration expense over the vesting periods of the respective awards. As these awards depend on a combination of performance-based settlement criteria and market-based settlement criteria, compensation expense may be adjusted in future periods as the number of units expected to vest increases or decreases based on the Company’s expected CRTCI performance relative to the applicable peer companies.
The Company records compensation expense associated with the issuance of PSUs based on the fair value of the awards as of the date of grant. Total compensation expense recorded for PSUs was $4.4 million, $10.9 million, and $10.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, there was $4.4 million of total unrecognized expense related to PSUs, which is being amortized through 2022.
A summary of the status and activity of non-vested PSUs is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
PSUs (1)
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
|
|
PSUs (1)
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
|
|
PSUs (1)
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
|
Non-vested at beginning of year
|
2,022,585
|
|
|
$
|
16.87
|
|
|
1,711,259
|
|
|
$
|
20.68
|
|
|
1,533,491
|
|
|
$
|
22.97
|
|
Granted
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
793,125
|
|
|
$
|
12.80
|
|
|
572,924
|
|
|
$
|
24.45
|
|
Vested
|
(792,572)
|
|
|
$
|
15.85
|
|
|
(346,021)
|
|
|
$
|
26.32
|
|
|
(233,102)
|
|
|
$
|
44.25
|
|
Forfeited
|
(399,549)
|
|
|
$
|
17.56
|
|
|
(135,778)
|
|
|
$
|
16.98
|
|
|
(162,054)
|
|
|
$
|
21.79
|
|
Non-vested at end of year
|
830,464
|
|
|
$
|
17.52
|
|
|
2,022,585
|
|
|
$
|
16.87
|
|
|
1,711,259
|
|
|
$
|
20.68
|
|
____________________________________________
(1)The number of shares of common stock assumes a multiplier of one. The actual final number of shares of common stock to be issued will range from zero to two times the number of PSUs awarded depending on the three-year performance multiplier.
The fair value of the PSUs granted in 2019, and 2018, was $10.2 million and $14.0 million, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company settled PSUs that were granted in 2017, which earned a 0.9 times multiplier. The Company and the majority of grant participants mutually agreed to net share settle a portion of the awards to cover income and payroll tax withholdings, as provided for in the Equity Plan and applicable award agreements. After withholding 215,451 shares to satisfy income and payroll tax withholding obligations that occurred upon delivery of the shares underlying those PSUs, 485,060 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in accordance with the terms of the applicable PSU awards. During the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, PSUs that were granted in 2016, and 2015, respectively, did not satisfy the minimum performance requirements. This resulted in a multiplier of zero times and therefore no shares of common stock were issued upon settlement.
The total fair value of PSUs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, was $12.6 million, $9.1 million, and $10.3 million, respectively.
Employee Restricted Stock Units
The Company grants RSUs to eligible persons as part of its Equity Plan. Each RSU represents a right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock upon settlement of the award at the end of the specified vesting period. RSUs generally vest one-third of the total grant on each anniversary date of the grant over the applicable vesting period or upon other triggering events as set forth in the Equity Plan. Employees who are retirement eligible at the time an RSU award is granted, vest in each portion of that award equally in six-month increments over the applicable vesting period beginning at grant date. Retirement eligible employees must stay with the Company through the entire six-month vesting period to receive that increment of vesting and any non-vested portions of an RSU award will be forfeited when the employee leaves the Company.
The Company records compensation expense associated with the issuance of RSUs based on the fair value of the awards as of the date of grant. The fair value of an RSU is equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the day of the grant. Compensation expense for RSUs is recognized within general and administrative expense and exploration expense over the vesting periods of the respective awards. Total compensation expense recorded for employee RSUs for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, was $8.7 million, $11.1 million, and $10.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, there was $14.7 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested RSU awards, which is being amortized through 2023.
A summary of the status and activity of non-vested RSUs granted to employees is presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
RSUs
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
|
|
RSUs
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
|
|
RSUs
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
|
Non-vested at beginning of year
|
1,532,131
|
|
|
$
|
16.01
|
|
|
1,243,163
|
|
|
$
|
21.50
|
|
|
1,244,262
|
|
|
$
|
20.25
|
|
Granted
|
1,458,869
|
|
|
$
|
5.98
|
|
|
978,932
|
|
|
$
|
12.36
|
|
|
583,552
|
|
|
$
|
25.77
|
|
Vested
|
(746,132)
|
|
|
$
|
16.74
|
|
|
(466,535)
|
|
|
$
|
21.94
|
|
|
(407,529)
|
|
|
$
|
24.30
|
|
Forfeited
|
(147,008)
|
|
|
$
|
15.34
|
|
|
(223,429)
|
|
|
$
|
18.16
|
|
|
(177,122)
|
|
|
$
|
17.26
|
|
Non-vested at end of year
|
2,097,860
|
|
|
$
|
8.83
|
|
|
1,532,131
|
|
|
$
|
16.01
|
|
|
1,243,163
|
|
|
$
|
21.50
|
|
The fair value of RSUs granted to eligible employees in 2020, 2019, and 2018, was $8.7 million, $12.1 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
A summary of the shares of common stock issued to settle employee RSUs is presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Shares of common stock issued to settle RSUs (1)
|
746,132
|
|
|
466,535
|
|
|
407,529
|
|
Less: shares of common stock withheld for income and payroll taxes
|
(209,173)
|
|
|
(132,136)
|
|
|
(115,784)
|
|
Net shares of common stock issued
|
536,959
|
|
|
334,399
|
|
|
291,745
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company issued shares of common stock to settle RSUs that related to awards granted in previous years. The Company and a majority of grant recipients mutually agreed to net share settle a portion of the awards to cover income and payroll tax withholdings in accordance with the Company’s Equity Plan and individual award agreements.
The total fair value of employee RSUs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, was $12.5 million, $10.2 million, and $9.9 million, respectively.
Director Shares
In 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company issued 267,576, 96,719, and 63,741 shares, respectively, of its common stock to its non-employee directors under the Equity Plan. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, the Company recorded $990,000, $1.2 million, and $1.7 million, respectively, of compensation expense related to director shares and RSUs issued. All shares issued to non-employee directors fully vest on December 31 of the year granted.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), eligible employees may purchase shares of the Company’s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15 percent of eligible compensation, without accruing in excess of $25,000 in value from purchases for each calendar year. The purchase price of the stock is 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of the stock on either the first or last day of the purchase period. The ESPP is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the IRC. The Company had approximately 834,246 shares of its common stock available for issuance under the ESPP as of December 31, 2020. There were 464,757, 314,868, and 199,464 shares issued under the ESPP in 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Total proceeds to the Company for the issuance of these shares was $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, and $3.2 million for each of the years ended 2019 and 2018.
The fair value of ESPP grants is measured at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatility is calculated based on the Company’s historical daily common stock price, and the risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yield curve rates with maturities consistent with a six-month vesting period.
The fair value of ESPP shares issued during the periods reported were estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Risk free interest rate
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Volatility factor of the expected market price of the Company’s common stock
|
166.2
|
%
|
|
56.6
|
%
|
|
55.9
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
0.5
|
|
0.5
|
|
0.5
|
The Company expensed $874,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020, and $1.1 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, based on the estimated fair value of the ESPP grants.
401(k) Plan
The Company has a defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to contribute a maximum of 60 percent of their base salaries up to the contribution limits established under the IRC. For employees hired before December 31, 2014, the Company matches 100 percent of each employee’s contribution in cash on a dollar for dollar basis, up to six percent of the employee’s base salary and performance bonus, and may make additional contributions at its discretion. The Company matches 150 percent of contributions made by employees hired after December 31, 2014, up to six percent of the employee’s base salary and performance bonus in lieu of pension plan benefits, and may make additional contributions at its discretion. Please refer to Note 8 – Pension Benefits for additional discussion of pension benefits. The Company’s matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan were $4.2 million, $5.1 million, and $4.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
Note 8 – Pension Benefits
The Company has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering employees who meet age and service requirements and who began employment with the Company prior to January 1, 2016 (“Qualified Pension Plan”). The Company also has a supplemental non-contributory pension plan covering certain management employees (“Nonqualified Pension Plan” and together with the Qualified Pension Plan, “Pension Plans”). The Company froze the Pension Plans to new participants, effective as of January 1, 2016. Employees participating in the Pension Plans prior to the plans being frozen will continue to earn benefits.
Obligations and Funded Status for the Pension Plans
The Company recognizes the funded status (i.e. the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation) of the Company’s Pension Plans in the accompanying balance sheets as either an asset or a liability and recognizes a corresponding adjustment within the other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, line item in the accompanying statements of comprehensive income (loss). The projected benefit obligation is the actuarial present value of the benefits earned to date by plan participants based on employee service and compensation including the effect of assumed future salary increases. The accumulated benefit obligation uses the same factors as the projected benefit obligation, but excludes the effects of assumed future salary increases. The Company’s measurement date for plan assets and obligations is December 31.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$
|
70,843
|
|
|
$
|
66,086
|
|
Service cost
|
4,516
|
|
|
5,582
|
|
Interest cost
|
2,358
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
7,483
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
Benefits paid
|
(905)
|
|
|
(5,651)
|
|
Settlements
|
(10,702)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
73,593
|
|
|
70,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
35,634
|
|
|
30,100
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
2,837
|
|
|
3,985
|
|
Employer contribution
|
6,030
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
Benefits paid
|
(905)
|
|
|
(5,651)
|
|
Settlements
|
(10,702)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
32,894
|
|
|
35,634
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
$
|
(40,699)
|
|
|
$
|
(35,209)
|
|
The Company’s underfunded status for the Pension Plans as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, was $40.7 million and $35.2 million, respectively, and is recognized in the accompanying balance sheets within the other noncurrent liabilities line item. There are no plan assets in the Nonqualified Pension Plan.
Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets for the Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
$
|
73,593
|
|
|
$
|
70,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
$
|
63,934
|
|
|
$
|
60,877
|
|
Less: fair value of plan assets
|
(32,894)
|
|
|
(35,634)
|
|
Underfunded accumulated benefit obligation
|
$
|
31,040
|
|
|
$
|
25,243
|
|
Pension expense is determined based upon the annual service cost of benefits (the actuarial cost of benefits earned during a period) and the interest cost on those liabilities, less the expected return on plan assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is applied to a calculated value of plan assets that recognizes changes in fair value over a five-year period. This practice is intended to reduce year-to-year volatility in pension expense, but it can have the effect of delaying recognition of differences between actual returns on assets and expected returns based on long-term rate of return assumptions. Amortization of the unrecognized net gain or loss resulting from actual experience different from that assumed and from changes in assumptions (excluding asset gains and losses not yet reflected in market-related value) is included as a component of net periodic benefit cost for the year. If, as of the beginning of the year, the unrecognized net gain or loss exceeds 10 percent of the greater of the projected benefit obligation and the market-related value of plan assets, then the amortization is the excess divided by the average remaining service period of participating employees expected to receive benefits under the plan.
The pre-tax amounts not yet recognized in net periodic pension costs, but rather recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive loss line item within the accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Unrecognized actuarial losses
|
$
|
17,328
|
|
|
$
|
14,406
|
|
Unrecognized prior service costs
|
14
|
|
|
31
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
$
|
17,342
|
|
|
$
|
14,437
|
|
The pension liability adjustments recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) during 2020, 2019, and 2018, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Net actuarial gain (loss)
|
$
|
(6,381)
|
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
$
|
4,329
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
17
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
950
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
Settlements
|
2,509
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total pension liability adjustment, pre-tax
|
(2,905)
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
5,674
|
|
Tax (expense) benefit
|
626
|
|
|
(291)
|
|
|
(4,265)
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
Total pension liability adjustment, net
|
$
|
(2,279)
|
|
|
$
|
1,061
|
|
|
$
|
4,378
|
|
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost for the Pension Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
4,516
|
|
|
$
|
5,582
|
|
|
$
|
6,730
|
|
Interest cost
|
2,358
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
2,622
|
|
Expected return on plan assets that reduces periodic pension benefit cost
|
(1,735)
|
|
|
(1,574)
|
|
|
(1,862)
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
17
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
950
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
6,106
|
|
|
7,774
|
|
|
8,835
|
|
Settlements
|
2,509
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total net benefit cost
|
$
|
8,615
|
|
|
$
|
7,774
|
|
|
$
|
8,835
|
|
Pension Plan Assumptions
The weighted-average assumptions used to measure the Company’s projected benefit obligation are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
Projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
2.9%
|
|
3.6%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.4%
|
|
4.5%
|
The weighted-average assumptions used to measure the Company’s net periodic benefit cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
3.6%
|
|
4.4%
|
|
3.8%
|
Expected return on plan assets (1)
|
5.3%
|
|
5.0%
|
|
5.5%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.5%
|
|
6.2%
|
|
6.2%
|
____________________________________________
(1)There is no assumed expected return on plan assets for the Nonqualified Pension Plan because there are no plan assets in the Nonqualified Pension Plan.
The Company’s pension investment policy includes various guidelines and procedures designed to ensure that assets are prudently invested in a manner necessary to meet the future benefit obligation of the Pension Plans. The policy prohibits the direct investment of plan assets in the Company’s securities. The Qualified Pension Plan’s investment horizon is long-term and accordingly the target asset allocations encompass a strategic, long-term perspective of capital markets, expected risk and return behavior and perceived future economic conditions. The key investment principles of diversification, assessment of risk, and targeting the optimal expected returns for given levels of risk are applied.
The Qualified Pension Plan’s investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of investments, which may reflect varying rates of return. The investments are further diversified within each asset classification. This portfolio diversification provides protection against a single security or class of securities having a disproportionate impact on aggregate investment performance. The actual asset allocations are reviewed and rebalanced on a periodic basis to maintain the target allocations.
The weighted-average asset allocation of the Qualified Pension Plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
As of December 31,
|
Asset Category
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
Equity securities
|
|
36.0
|
%
|
|
37.0
|
%
|
|
36.9
|
%
|
Fixed income securities
|
|
37.0
|
%
|
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
38.1
|
%
|
Other securities
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
|
38.1
|
%
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
Total
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
There is no asset allocation of the Nonqualified Pension Plan since there are no plan assets in the plan. An expected return on plan assets of 5.3 percent, 5.0 percent, and 5.5 percent was used to calculate the Company’s net periodic pension cost under the Qualified Pension Plan for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 respectively. The expected long-term rate of return assumption of the Qualified Pension Plan is based upon the target asset allocation and is determined using forward-looking assumptions in the context of historical returns and volatilities for each asset class, as well as correlations among asset classes. The Company evaluates the expected rate of return on plan assets assumption on an annual basis.
Pension Plan Assets
The fair values of the Company’s Qualified Pension Plan assets as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, utilizing the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using:
|
|
Actual Asset Allocation (1)
|
|
Total
|
|
Level 1 Inputs
|
|
Level 2 Inputs
|
|
Level 3 Inputs
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic (2)
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,149
|
|
|
$
|
4,165
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
International (3)
|
18.3
|
%
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total equity securities
|
37.0
|
%
|
|
12,159
|
|
|
10,175
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core fixed income (4)
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
5,447
|
|
|
5,447
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Floating rate corporate loans (5)
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
2,755
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
24.9
|
%
|
|
8,202
|
|
|
8,202
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate (6)
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
Collective investment trusts (7)
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hedge fund (8)
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
9,165
|
|
|
5,299
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
Total other securities
|
38.1
|
%
|
|
12,533
|
|
|
5,299
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
5,736
|
|
Total investments
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
32,894
|
|
|
$
|
23,676
|
|
|
$
|
3,482
|
|
|
$
|
5,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic (2)
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,176
|
|
|
$
|
4,130
|
|
|
$
|
2,046
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
International (3)
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
6,958
|
|
|
6,958
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total equity securities
|
36.9
|
%
|
|
13,134
|
|
|
11,088
|
|
|
2,046
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core fixed income (4)
|
31.4
|
%
|
|
11,199
|
|
|
11,199
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Floating rate corporate loans (5)
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total fixed income securities
|
38.1
|
%
|
|
13,578
|
|
|
13,578
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate (6)
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
Collective investment trusts (7)
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hedge fund (8)
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
5,825
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
Total other securities
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
8,922
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
5,748
|
|
Total investments
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,634
|
|
|
$
|
26,672
|
|
|
$
|
3,214
|
|
|
$
|
5,748
|
|
____________________________________________
(1)Percentages may not calculate due to rounding.
(2)Level 1 equity securities consist of United States large and small capitalization companies, which are actively traded securities that can be sold upon demand. Level 2 equity securities are investments in a collective investment fund that is valued at net asset value based on the value of the underlying investments and total units outstanding on a daily basis. The objective of these funds is to approximate the S&P 500 by investing in one or more collective investment funds.
(3)International equity securities consists of a well-diversified portfolio of holdings of mostly large issuers organized in developed countries with liquid markets, commingled with investments in equity securities of issuers located in emerging markets that are believed to have strong sustainable financial productivity at attractive valuations.
(4)The objective of core fixed income funds is to achieve value added from sector or issue selection by constructing a portfolio to approximate the investment results of the Barclay’s Capital Aggregate Bond Index with a modest amount of variability in duration around the index.
(5)Investments consist of floating rate bank loans. The interest rates on these loans are typically reset on a periodic basis to account for changes in the level of interest rates.
(6)The investment objective of direct real estate is to provide current income with the potential for long-term capital appreciation. Ownership in real estate entails a long-term time horizon, periodic valuations, and potentially low liquidity.
(7)Collective investment trusts invest in short-term investments and are valued at the net asset value of the collective investment trust. The net asset value, as provided by the trustee, is used as a practical expedient to estimate fair value. The net asset value is based on the fair value of the underlying investments held by the fund less its liabilities.
(8)The hedge fund portfolio includes investments in actively traded global mutual funds that focus on alternative investments and a hedge fund of funds that invests both long and short using a variety of investment strategies.
Included below is a summary of the changes in Level 3 plan assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2019
|
$
|
5,507
|
|
Purchases
|
—
|
|
Realized gain on assets
|
190
|
|
Unrealized gain on assets
|
51
|
|
Disposition
|
—
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
$
|
5,748
|
|
Purchases
|
—
|
|
Realized gain on assets
|
526
|
|
Unrealized gain on assets
|
41
|
|
Disposition
|
(579)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2020
|
$
|
5,736
|
|
Contributions
The Company contributed $6.0 million, $7.2 million, and $8.1 million to the Pension Plans for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The Company expects to make a $7.0 million contribution to the Pension Plans in 2021.
Benefit Payments
The Pension Plans made actual benefit payments of $11.6 million, $5.7 million, and $8.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Expected benefit payments over the next 10 years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
2021
|
|
$
|
9,564
|
|
2022
|
|
$
|
3,769
|
|
2023
|
|
$
|
5,390
|
|
2024
|
|
$
|
4,765
|
|
2025
|
|
$
|
5,996
|
|
2026 through 2030
|
|
$
|
24,132
|
|
Note 9 - Earnings Per Share
Basic net income or loss per common share is calculated by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the basic weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the respective period. Diluted net income or loss per common share is calculated by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, which includes the effect of potentially dilutive securities. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, potentially dilutive securities for this calculation consisted primarily of non-vested RSUs, contingent PSUs, and shares into which the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes were convertible, which were measured using the treasury stock method. Shares of the Company’s common stock traded at an average closing price below the $40.50 conversion price for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, therefore, the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes had no dilutive impact. In connection with the offering of the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes, the Company entered into capped call transactions with affiliates of the underwriters that would effectively prevent dilution upon settlement up to the $60.00 cap price. The capped call transactions will always be anti-dilutive and therefore will never be reflected in diluted net income or loss per share. On April 29, 2020, pursuant to the Third Supplemental Indenture, the Company elected to satisfy any conversion obligation with respect to the 2021 Senior Convertible Notes solely in cash. As a result, the Company’s 2021 Senior Secured Convertible Notes are no longer convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock and thus, were not considered to be a potentially dilutive instrument as of December 31, 2020. Please refer to Note 5 – Long-Term Debt for additional discussion.
On June 17, 2020, the Company issued warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately 5.9 million shares, or approximately five percent of its outstanding common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, as discussed in Note 5 – Long-Term Debt. The Warrant Agreement dated as of June 17, 2020 (“Warrant Agreement”), states that the warrants are only exercisable upon the Triggering Date, as defined in Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements. The warrants were not exercisable for the year ended December 31, 2020, and therefore had no dilutive impact. The Triggering Date occurred on January 14, 2021, and the warrants became exercisable at the election of the holders. The warrants may be exercised either in full or from time to time in part, until their expiration on June 30, 2023. Please refer to Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements for additional detail regarding the terms of the warrants.
As of December 31, 2020, potentially dilutive securities for this calculation consist primarily of non-vested RSUs, contingent PSUs, and warrants, which were measured using the treasury stock method.
PSUs represent the right to receive, upon settlement of the PSUs after the completion of the three-year performance period, a number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may range from zero to two times the number of PSUs granted on the award date. The number of potentially dilutive shares related to PSUs is based on the number of shares, if any, which would be issuable at the end of the respective reporting period, assuming that date was the end of the contingency period applicable to such PSUs. For additional discussion on PSUs, please refer to Note 7 – Compensation Plans under the heading Performance Share Units.
When the Company recognizes a net loss from continuing operations, all potentially dilutive shares are anti-dilutive and are consequently excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per common share. The following table details the weighted-average anti-dilutive securities for the years presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Anti-dilutive
|
265
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
—
|
|
The following table sets forth the calculations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
Net income (loss)
|
$
|
(764,614)
|
|
|
$
|
(187,001)
|
|
|
$
|
508,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
113,730
|
|
|
112,544
|
|
|
111,912
|
|
Dilutive effect of non-vested RSUs and contingent PSUs
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
113,730
|
|
|
112,544
|
|
|
113,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
$
|
(6.72)
|
|
|
$
|
(1.66)
|
|
|
$
|
4.54
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
$
|
(6.72)
|
|
|
$
|
(1.66)
|
|
|
$
|
4.48
|
|
Note 10 – Derivative Financial Instruments
Summary of Oil, Gas, and NGL Derivative Contracts in Place
The Company regularly enters into commodity derivative contracts to mitigate a portion of its exposure to potentially adverse market changes in commodity prices and the associated impact on cash flows. As of December 31, 2020, all derivative counterparties were members of the Company’s Credit Agreement lender group and all contracts were entered into for other-than-trading purposes. The Company’s commodity derivative contracts consist of swap and collar arrangements for oil production, and swap arrangements for gas and NGL production. In a typical commodity swap agreement, if the agreed upon published third-party index price (“index price”) is lower than the swap fixed price, the Company receives the difference between the index price and the agreed upon swap fixed price. If the index price is higher than the swap fixed price, the Company pays the difference. For collar arrangements, the Company receives the difference between an agreed upon index price and the floor price if the index price is below the floor price. The Company pays the difference between the agreed upon ceiling price and the index price if the index price is above the ceiling price. No amounts are paid or received if the index price is between the floor and ceiling prices.
The Company has entered into fixed price oil basis swaps in order to mitigate exposure to adverse pricing differentials between certain industry benchmark prices and the actual physical pricing points where the Company’s production volumes are sold.
Currently, the Company has basis swap contracts with fixed price differentials between NYMEX WTI and WTI Midland for a portion of its Midland Basin production with sales contracts that settle at WTI Midland prices, NYMEX WTI and Intercontinental Exchange Brent Crude (“ICE Brent”) for a portion of its Midland Basin oil production with sales contracts that settle at ICE Brent prices, and between NYMEX WTI and Argus WTI Houston Magellan East Houston Terminal ("MEH”) for a portion of its South Texas production with sales contracts that settle at Argus WTI Houston MEH prices. The Company has also entered into crude oil swap contracts to fix the differential in pricing between the NYMEX calendar month average and the physical crude oil delivery month (“Roll Differential”) in which the Company pays the periodic variable Roll Differential and receives a weighted-average fixed price differential. The weighted-average fixed price differential represents the amount of net addition (reduction) to delivery month prices for the notional volumes covered by the swap contracts.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had commodity derivative contracts outstanding through the fourth quarter of 2023 as summarized in the tables below.
Oil Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Period
|
|
NYMEX WTI Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average
Contract Price
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
$
|
42.91
|
|
Second quarter 2021
|
|
5,072
|
|
|
$
|
39.90
|
|
Third quarter 2021
|
|
4,862
|
|
|
$
|
40.10
|
|
Fourth quarter 2021
|
|
4,744
|
|
|
$
|
39.85
|
|
2022
|
|
6,601
|
|
|
$
|
43.99
|
|
2023
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
$
|
45.20
|
|
Total
|
|
26,082
|
|
|
|
Oil Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Period
|
|
NYMEX WTI Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average
Floor Price
|
|
Weighted-Average
Ceiling Price
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
551
|
|
|
$
|
48.97
|
|
|
$
|
51.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Basis Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Period
|
|
WTI Midland-NYMEX WTI Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract
Price (1)
|
|
NYMEX WTI-ICE Brent Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract
Price (2)
|
|
WTI Houston MEH-NYMEX WTI Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract
Price (3)
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
$
|
0.79
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
$
|
(7.86)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Second quarter 2021
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
910
|
|
|
$
|
(7.86)
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Third quarter 2021
|
|
3,574
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
(7.86)
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Fourth quarter 2021
|
|
3,824
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
$
|
(7.86)
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
2022
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
(7.78)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
23,506
|
|
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) Represents the price differential between WTI Midland (Midland, Texas) and NYMEX WTI (Cushing, Oklahoma).
(2) Represents the price differential between NYMEX WTI (Cushing, Oklahoma) and ICE Brent (North Sea).
(3) Represents the price differential between Argus WTI Houston MEH (Houston, Texas) and NYMEX WTI (Cushing, Oklahoma).
Oil Roll Differential Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Period
|
|
NYMEX WTI Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
$
|
(0.30)
|
|
Second quarter 2021
|
|
4,065
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24)
|
|
Third quarter 2021
|
|
3,708
|
|
|
$
|
(0.25)
|
|
Fourth quarter 2021
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
$
|
(0.24)
|
|
2022
|
|
6,002
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04)
|
|
Total
|
|
20,425
|
|
|
|
Gas Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Period
|
|
IF HSC Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
|
|
WAHA Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
|
|
|
(BBtu)
|
|
(per MMBtu)
|
|
(BBtu)
|
|
(per MMBtu)
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
11,592
|
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
|
6,544
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
Second quarter 2021
|
|
13,672
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
7,230
|
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
Third quarter 2021
|
|
12,575
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
8,086
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
Fourth quarter 2021
|
|
12,412
|
|
|
$
|
2.41
|
|
|
7,627
|
|
|
$
|
1.82
|
|
2022
|
|
21,119
|
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
|
10,066
|
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
Total (1)
|
|
71,370
|
|
|
|
|
39,553
|
|
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) The Company has natural gas swaps in place that settle against Inside FERC Houston Ship Channel (“IF HSC”), Inside FERC West Texas (“IF WAHA”), and Platt’s Gas Daily West Texas (“GD WAHA”). As of December 31, 2020, WAHA volumes were comprised of 59 percent IF WAHA and 41 percent GD WAHA.
NGL Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPIS Propane Mont Belvieu Non-TET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MBbl)
|
|
(per Bbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
$
|
21.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
$
|
21.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
$
|
21.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
$
|
21.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
21.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity Derivative Contracts Entered Into Subsequent to December 31, 2020
Subsequent to December 31, 2020, the Company entered into the following fixed price commodity derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Start Date
|
|
Through Date
|
|
Volumes
(MBbl)
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
(per Bbl)
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
Third quarter 2021
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
51.91
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
Fourth quarter 2022
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
$
|
48.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Start Date
|
|
Through Date
|
|
Volumes
(MBbl)
|
|
Weighted-Average Floor Price
(per Bbl)
|
|
Weighted-Average Ceiling Price
(per Bbl)
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
Fourth quarter 2022
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
$
|
50.00
|
|
|
$
|
53.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Basis Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Start Date
|
|
Through Date
|
|
Volumes
(MBbl)
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
(per Bbl)
|
WTI Midland-NYMEX WTI
|
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
Third quarter 2021
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
$
|
0.95
|
|
WTI Houston MEH-NYMEX WTI
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
Fourth quarter 2022
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Roll Differential Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Start Date
|
|
Through Date
|
|
Volumes
(MBbl)
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
(per Bbl)
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
Fourth quarter 2021
|
|
2,213
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
Fourth quarter 2022
|
|
5,276
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Start Date
|
|
Through Date
|
|
Volumes
(BBtu)
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
(per MMBtu)
|
IF HSC
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
Fourth quarter 2022
|
|
7,813
|
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
IF WAHA
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
Fourth quarter 2022
|
|
3,650
|
|
|
$
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Start Date
|
|
Through Date
|
|
Volumes
(MBbl)
|
|
Weighted-Average Contract Price
(per Bbl)
|
OPIS Propane Mont Belvieu Non-TET
|
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
Fourth quarter 2021
|
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
27.72
|
|
OPIS Propane Mont Belvieu Non-TET
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
24.78
|
|
OPIS Normal Butane Mont Belvieu Non-TET
|
|
First quarter 2021
|
|
Fourth quarter 2021
|
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
30.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL Collars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Start Date
|
|
Through Date
|
|
Volumes
(MBbl)
|
|
Weighted-Average Floor Price
(per Bbl)
|
|
Weighted-Average Ceiling Price
(per Bbl)
|
OPIS Propane Mont Belvieu Non-TET
|
|
First quarter 2022
|
|
Fourth quarter 2022
|
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
22.05
|
|
|
$
|
27.30
|
|
Derivative Assets and Liabilities Fair Value
The Company’s commodity derivatives are measured at fair value and are included in the accompanying balance sheets as derivative assets and liabilities, with the exception of derivative instruments that meet the “normal purchase normal sale” exclusion. The Company does not designate its commodity derivative contracts as hedging instruments. The fair value of the commodity derivative contracts at December 31, 2020, and 2019, was a net liability of $168.2 million and a net asset of $21.5 million, respectively.
The following table details the fair value of commodity derivative contracts recorded in the accompanying balance sheets, by category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Derivative assets:
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
$
|
31,203
|
|
|
$
|
55,184
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
23,150
|
|
|
20,624
|
|
Total derivative assets
|
$
|
54,353
|
|
|
$
|
75,808
|
|
Derivative liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
$
|
200,189
|
|
|
$
|
50,846
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
22,331
|
|
|
3,444
|
|
Total derivative liabilities
|
$
|
222,520
|
|
|
$
|
54,290
|
|
Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
As of December 31, 2020, and 2019, all derivative instruments held by the Company were subject to master netting arrangements with various financial institutions. In general, the terms of the Company’s agreements provide for offsetting of amounts payable or receivable between it and the counterparty, at the election of both parties, for transactions that settle on the same date and in the same currency. The Company’s agreements also provide that in the event of an early termination, the counterparties have the right to offset amounts owed or owing under that and any other agreement with the same counterparty. The Company’s accounting policy is to not offset these positions in its accompanying balance sheets.
The following table provides a reconciliation between the gross assets and liabilities reflected on the accompanying balance sheets and the potential effects of master netting arrangements on the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Gross amounts presented in the accompanying balance sheets
|
|
$
|
54,353
|
|
|
$
|
75,808
|
|
|
$
|
(222,520)
|
|
|
$
|
(54,290)
|
|
Amounts not offset in the accompanying balance sheets
|
|
(53,598)
|
|
|
(35,075)
|
|
|
53,598
|
|
|
35,075
|
|
Net amounts
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
$
|
40,733
|
|
|
$
|
(168,922)
|
|
|
$
|
(19,215)
|
|
The Company recognizes all gains and losses from changes in commodity derivative fair values immediately in earnings rather than deferring such amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company had no commodity derivative contracts designated as hedging instruments for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018. Please refer to Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements for more information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments, including its valuation techniques.
The following table summarizes the commodity components of the derivative settlement (gain) loss, as well as the components of the net derivative (gain) loss line item presented in the accompanying statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Derivative settlement (gain) loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil contracts
|
$
|
(331,559)
|
|
|
$
|
19,685
|
|
|
$
|
68,860
|
|
Gas contracts
|
(11,898)
|
|
|
(23,008)
|
|
|
13,029
|
|
NGL contracts
|
(7,804)
|
|
|
(35,899)
|
|
|
53,914
|
|
Total derivative settlement (gain) loss:
|
$
|
(351,261)
|
|
|
$
|
(39,222)
|
|
|
$
|
135,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative (gain) loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil contracts
|
$
|
(205,180)
|
|
|
$
|
172,055
|
|
|
$
|
(192,002)
|
|
Gas contracts
|
30,038
|
|
|
(41,205)
|
|
|
35,411
|
|
NGL contracts
|
13,566
|
|
|
(33,311)
|
|
|
(5,241)
|
|
Total net derivative (gain) loss:
|
$
|
(161,576)
|
|
|
$
|
97,539
|
|
|
$
|
(161,832)
|
|
Credit Related Contingent Features
As of December 31, 2020, and through the filing of this report, all of the Company’s derivative counterparties were members of the Company’s Credit Agreement lender group. Under the Credit Agreement, the Company is required to provide mortgage liens on assets having a value equal to at least 85 percent of the total PV-9, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of the Company’s proved oil and gas properties evaluated in the most recent reserve report. Collateral securing indebtedness under the Credit Agreement also secures the Company’s derivative agreement obligations.
Note 11 – Fair Value Measurements
The Company follows fair value measurement accounting guidance for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value. This guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Market or observable inputs are the preferred sources of values, followed by assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. The fair value hierarchy for grouping these assets and liabilities is based on the significance level of the following inputs:
•Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
•Level 2 – quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable
•Level 3 – significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable
The following table is a listing of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in the accompanying balance sheets and where they are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
54,353
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
222,520
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) This represents a financial asset or liability that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
The following table is a listing of the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in the accompanying balance sheets and where they are classified within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
75,808
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives (1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
54,290
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) This represents a financial asset or liability that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Both financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are categorized within the above fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the above fair value hierarchy.
Please refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on the Company’s policies for determining fair value for the categories discussed below.
Derivatives
The Company uses Level 2 inputs to measure the fair value of oil, gas, and NGL commodity derivatives. Fair values are based upon interpolated data. The Company derives internal valuation estimates taking into consideration forward commodity price curves, counterparties’ credit ratings, the Company’s credit rating, and the time value of money. These valuations are then compared to the respective counterparties’ mark-to-market statements. The considered factors result in an estimated exit price that management believes provides a reasonable and consistent methodology for valuing derivative instruments. The commodity derivative instruments utilized by the Company are not considered by management to be complex, structured, or illiquid. The oil, gas, and NGL commodity derivative markets are highly active.
Generally, market quotes assume that all counterparties have near zero, or low, default rates and have equal credit quality. However, an adjustment may be necessary to reflect the credit quality of a specific counterparty to determine the fair value of the instrument. The Company monitors the credit ratings of its counterparties and may require counterparties to post collateral if their ratings deteriorate. In some instances, the Company will attempt to novate the trade to a more stable counterparty.
Valuation adjustments are necessary to reflect the effect of the Company’s credit quality on the fair value of any commodity derivative liability position. This adjustment takes into account any credit enhancements, such as collateral margin that the Company may have posted with a counterparty, as well as any letters of credit between the parties. The methodology to determine this adjustment is consistent with how the Company evaluates counterparty credit risk, taking into account the Company’s credit rating, current revolving credit facility margins, and any change in such margins since the last measurement date.
The methods described above may result in a fair value estimate that may not be indicative of net realizable value or may not be reflective of future fair values and cash flows. While the Company believes that the valuation methods utilized are appropriate and consistent with authoritative accounting guidance and other marketplace participants, the Company recognizes that third parties may use different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments that could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Refer to Note 10 – Derivative Financial Instruments for more information regarding the Company’s derivative instruments.
Oil and Gas Properties and Other Property and Equipment
The Company had no assets included in total property and equipment, net, measured at fair value as of December 31, 2020, or December 31, 2019.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded impairment expense of $956.7 million related to its South Texas proved oil and gas properties and related support facilities due to the decrease in commodity price forecasts at the end of the first quarter of 2020, specifically decreases in oil and NGL prices. The Company used a discount rate of 11 percent in its calculation of the present value of expected future cash flows based on the prevailing market-based weighted average cost of capital as of March 31, 2020. No proved property impairment expense was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2019, or 2018.
The following table presents impairment of proved properties expense and abandonment and impairment of unproved properties expense recorded for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in millions)
|
Impairment of proved oil and gas properties and related support equipment
|
$
|
956.7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Abandonment and impairment of unproved properties (1)
|
59.3
|
|
|
33.8
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
Impairment
|
$
|
1,016.0
|
|
|
$
|
33.8
|
|
|
$
|
49.9
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) These impairments related to actual and anticipated lease expirations, as well as actual and anticipated losses on acreage due to title defects, changes in development plans, and other inherent acreage risks. The balances in the unproved oil and gas properties line item on the accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, are recorded at carrying value.
Please refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for information on the Company’s policies for determining fair value of its oil and gas producing properties and related impairment expense.
Long-Term Debt
The following table reflects the fair value of the Company’s senior note obligations measured using Level 1 inputs based on quoted secondary market trading prices. These notes were not presented at fair value on the accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, or 2019, as they were recorded at carrying value, net of any unamortized discounts and deferred financing costs. Please refer to Note 5 – Long-Term Debt for additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
(in thousands)
|
1.50% Senior Secured Convertible Notes due 2021 (1)
|
$
|
65,485
|
|
|
$
|
61,449
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
10.0% Senior Secured Notes due 2025
|
$
|
446,675
|
|
|
$
|
482,887
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
6.125% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2022
|
$
|
212,403
|
|
|
$
|
205,379
|
|
|
$
|
476,796
|
|
|
$
|
481,564
|
|
5.0% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2024
|
$
|
277,034
|
|
|
$
|
240,072
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
479,815
|
|
5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2025
|
$
|
349,118
|
|
|
$
|
289,401
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
475,835
|
|
6.75% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2026
|
$
|
419,235
|
|
|
$
|
342,385
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
494,860
|
|
6.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2027
|
$
|
416,791
|
|
|
$
|
331,220
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
493,750
|
|
1.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2021 (1)
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
172,500
|
|
|
$
|
164,430
|
|
___________________________________________
(1) The Company’s 2021 Senior Convertible Notes became secured in the second quarter of 2020 upon the closing of the Exchange Offers. Please refer to Note 5 – Long-Term Debt for additional information.
The carrying value of the Company’s revolving credit facility approximates its fair value, as the applicable interest rates are floating, based on prevailing market rates.
Warrants
As discussed in Note 5 – Long-Term Debt, on June 17, 2020, the Company issued warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of approximately 5.9 million shares, or approximately five percent of its outstanding common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The warrants are exercisable any time from and after the Triggering Date, as subsequently defined, until June 30, 2023. The Triggering Date is defined by the Warrant Agreement as the first trading day following five consecutive trading days on which the product of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding on four of the five trading days multiplied by the closing price per share of common stock for each such trading day exceeds $1.0 billion (“Triggering Date”). The warrants issued are indexed to the Company’s common stock and are required to be settled through physical settlement or net share settlement if exercised. The warrants were not exercisable during the year ended December 31, 2020. The Triggering Date occurred on January 14, 2021, and the warrants became exercisable at the election of the holders. The warrants may be exercised either in full or from time to time in part, until their expiration on June 30, 2023.
The fair value of the warrants on the issuance date was determined using a stochastic Monte Carlo simulation using the GBM Model. The Company evaluated the warrants under authoritative accounting guidance and determined that they should be classified as equity instruments. Upon issuance, the warrants were recorded in additional paid-in capital on the accompanying balance sheets at a fair value of $21.5 million, with no recurring fair value measurement required. There have been no changes to the initial carrying amount of the warrants since issuance.
Note 12 - Leases
Topic 842 requires lessees to recognize operating and finance leases with terms greater than 12 months on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2020, and 2019, the Company did not have any agreements in place that were classified as finance leases under Topic 842. Arrangements classified as operating leases are included on the accompanying balance sheets within the other noncurrent assets, other current liabilities, and other noncurrent liabilities line items. For any agreement that contains both lease and non-lease components, such as a service arrangement that also includes an identifiable ROU asset, the Company’s policy for all asset classes is to combine lease and non-lease components together and account for the arrangement as a single lease. Aside from the recognition of ROU assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the accompanying balance sheets, Topic 842 does not have a material impact on the timing or classification of costs incurred for those agreements considered to be leases.
As outlined in Topic 842, a ROU asset represents a lessee’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, while the associated lease liability represents the lessee’s obligations to make lease payments. At the commencement date, which is the date on which a lessor makes an underlying asset available for use by a lessee, a lease ROU asset and corresponding lease liability is recognized based on the present value of the future lease payments. The initial measurement of lease payments may also be adjusted for certain items, including options that are reasonably certain to be exercised, such as options to purchase the asset at the end of the lease term, or options to extend or early terminate the lease. Excluded from the initial measurement of a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability are certain variable lease payments, such as payments made that vary depending on actual usage or performance.
The Company evaluates a contractual arrangement at its inception to determine if it is a lease or contains an identifiable lease component as defined by Topic 842. When evaluating a contract to determine appropriate classification and recognition under Topic 842, significant judgment may be necessary to determine, among other criteria, if an embedded leasing arrangement exists, the length of the term, classification as either an operating or financing lease, which options are reasonably likely to be exercised, fair value of the underlying ROU asset or assets, upfront costs, and future lease payments that are included or excluded in the initial measurement of the ROU asset. Certain assumptions and judgments made by the Company when evaluating a contract that meets the definition of a lease under Topic 842 include:
•Discount Rate - Unless implicitly defined, the Company determines the present value of future lease payments using an estimated incremental borrowing rate based on a yield curve analysis that factors in certain assumptions, including the term of the lease and credit rating of the Company at lease inception. The weighted-average discount rate used to determine the operating lease liability at December 31, 2020, and 2019, was 7.0 percent and 6.6 percent, respectively.
•Lease Term - The Company evaluates each contract containing a lease arrangement at inception to determine the length of the lease term when recognizing a ROU asset and corresponding lease liability. When determining the lease term, options available to extend or early terminate the arrangement are evaluated and included when it is reasonably certain an option will be exercised. Because of the Company’s intent to maintain financial and operational flexibility, there are no available options to extend that the Company is reasonably certain it will exercise. Additionally, based on expectations for those agreements with early termination options, there are no leases in which material early termination options are reasonably certain to be exercised by the Company. Exercising an early termination option may result in an early termination penalty depending on the terms of the underlying agreement.
Currently, the Company has operating leases for asset classes that include office space, office equipment, drilling rigs, midstream agreements, vehicles, and equipment rentals used in field operations. For those operating leases included on the accompanying balance sheets, which only includes leases with terms greater than 12 months at commencement, remaining lease terms range from less than one year to approximately five years. The weighted-average lease term remaining for these leases is approximately three years as of each of the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019. Certain leases also contain optional extension periods that allow for terms to be extended for up to an additional 10 years. An early termination option also exists for certain leases, some of which allow for the Company to terminate a lease within one year.
Subsequent to initial measurement, costs associated with the Company’s operating leases are either expensed or capitalized depending on how the underlying ROU asset is utilized and in accordance with GAAP requirements. For example, costs associated with drilling rigs and completion crews that are considered ROU assets are typically capitalized as part of the development of the Company’s oil and gas properties. Please refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information on its accounting policies for oil and gas development and producing activities. When calculating the Company’s ROU asset and liability for a contractual arrangement that qualifies as an operating lease, the Company considers all of the necessary payments made or that are expected to be made upon commencement of the lease. As discussed above, excluded from the initial measurement are certain variable lease payments, which for the Company’s drilling rigs, completion crews, and midstream agreements, may be a significant component of the total lease costs.
The following table reflects the components of the Company’s total costs, whether capitalized or expensed, related to operating leases, including short-term leases, and variable lease payments made for leases with initial lease terms greater than 12 months, for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019. This total does not reflect amounts that may be reimbursed by other third parties in the normal course of business, such as non-operating working interest owners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Operating lease cost
|
$
|
17,980
|
|
|
$
|
35,570
|
|
Short-term lease cost (1)
|
143,892
|
|
|
301,373
|
|
Variable lease cost (2)
|
70,858
|
|
|
106,006
|
|
Total lease cost
|
$
|
232,730
|
|
|
$
|
442,949
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) Costs associated with short-term lease agreements relate primarily to operational activities where underlying lease terms are less than one year. This amount includes drilling and completion activities and field equipment rentals, most of which are contracted for 12 months or less. It is expected that this amount will fluctuate primarily with the number of drilling rigs and completion crews the Company is operating under short-term agreements.
(2) Variable lease payments include additional payments made that were not included in the initial measurement of the ROU asset and corresponding liability for lease agreements with terms longer than 12 months. Variable lease payments relate to the actual volumes transported under certain midstream agreements, actual usage associated with drilling rigs, completion crews, and vehicles, and variable utility costs associated with the Company’s leased office space. Fluctuations in variable lease payments are driven by actual volumes delivered and the number of drilling rigs and completion crews operating under long-term agreements.
ROU assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities totaled $745,000 and $25.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Operating cash flows from operating leases
|
$
|
12,046
|
|
|
$
|
12,074
|
|
Investing cash flows from operating leases
|
$
|
7,313
|
|
|
$
|
24,129
|
|
Maturities for the Company’s operating lease liabilities included on the accompanying balance sheets as of December 31, 2020, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2020
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
2021
|
|
$
|
12,781
|
|
2022
|
|
5,891
|
|
2023
|
|
3,591
|
|
2024
|
|
2,081
|
|
2025
|
|
1,222
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
417
|
|
Total Lease payments
|
|
$
|
25,983
|
|
Less: Imputed interest (1)
|
|
(2,426)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,557
|
|
____________________________________________
(1) The weighted-average discount rate used to determine the operating lease liability as of December 31, 2020, was 7.0 percent.
Amounts recorded on the accompanying balance sheets for operating leases as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
$
|
21,701
|
|
|
$
|
39,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
$
|
11,659
|
|
|
$
|
19,189
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
$
|
11,898
|
|
|
$
|
23,137
|
|
As of December 31, 2020, and through the filing of this report, the Company has no material lease arrangements which are scheduled to commence in the future.
Note 13 – Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts receivable are comprised of the following accruals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Oil, gas, and NGL production revenue
|
$
|
108,928
|
|
|
$
|
146,308
|
|
Amounts due from joint interest owners
|
31,514
|
|
|
22,681
|
|
State severance tax refunds
|
2,301
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
Derivative settlements
|
16,348
|
|
|
6,868
|
|
Other
|
3,364
|
|
|
4,806
|
|
Total accounts receivable
|
$
|
162,455
|
|
|
$
|
184,732
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses are comprised of the following accruals:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Drilling and lease operating cost accruals
|
$
|
65,365
|
|
|
$
|
96,925
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
63,006
|
|
|
52,094
|
|
Revenue and severance tax payable
|
105,233
|
|
|
109,847
|
|
Property taxes
|
20,584
|
|
|
24,535
|
|
Compensation
|
30,907
|
|
|
41,540
|
|
Derivative settlements
|
1,146
|
|
|
5,851
|
|
Interest
|
52,802
|
|
|
44,175
|
|
Other
|
32,627
|
|
|
27,041
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
371,670
|
|
|
$
|
402,008
|
|
Note 14 – Asset Retirement Obligations
Please refer to Asset Retirement Obligations in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a discussion of the initial and subsequent measurements of asset retirement obligation liabilities and the significant assumptions used in the estimates.
The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s total asset retirement obligation liability as of December 31, 2020, and 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Beginning asset retirement obligations
|
$
|
86,846
|
|
|
$
|
94,194
|
|
Liabilities incurred (1)
|
1,018
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
Liabilities settled (2)
|
(1,404)
|
|
|
(4,105)
|
|
Accretion expense
|
4,034
|
|
|
4,016
|
|
Revision to estimated cash flows
|
(5,169)
|
|
|
(11,186)
|
|
Ending asset retirement obligations (3)
|
$
|
85,325
|
|
|
$
|
86,846
|
|
____________________________________________
(1)Reflects liabilities incurred through drilling activities and acquisitions of drilled wells.
(2)Reflects liabilities settled through plugging and abandonment activities and divestitures of properties.
(3)Balances as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, included $2.0 million and $2.7 million, respectively, related to the Company’s current asset retirement obligation liability, which is recorded in the accounts payable and accrued expenses line item on the accompanying balance sheets.
Note 15 – Suspended Well Costs
The following table reflects the net changes in capitalized exploratory well costs during 2020, 2019, and 2018. The table does not include amounts that were capitalized and either subsequently expensed or reclassified to producing well costs in the same year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Beginning balance
|
$
|
11,925
|
|
|
$
|
11,197
|
|
|
$
|
49,446
|
|
Additions to capitalized exploratory well costs pending the determination of proved reserves
|
3,346
|
|
|
11,925
|
|
|
11,197
|
|
Divestitures
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(109)
|
|
Reclassifications based on the determination of proved reserves
|
(9,573)
|
|
|
(11,197)
|
|
|
(49,337)
|
|
Capitalized exploratory well costs charged to expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Ending balance
|
$
|
5,698
|
|
|
$
|
11,925
|
|
|
$
|
11,197
|
|
As of December 31, 2020, there were no material exploratory well costs that were capitalized for more than one year.
Supplemental Oil and Gas Information (unaudited)
Costs Incurred
Costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration, and development activities, whether capitalized or expensed, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Development costs (1)
|
$
|
490,935
|
|
|
$
|
913,959
|
|
|
$
|
1,147,574
|
|
Exploration costs
|
77,911
|
|
|
114,957
|
|
|
184,930
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved properties
|
5,579
|
|
|
(310)
|
|
|
1,312
|
|
Unproved properties (2)
|
10,854
|
|
|
11,633
|
|
|
55,688
|
|
Total, including asset retirement obligations (3)(4)
|
$
|
585,279
|
|
|
$
|
1,040,239
|
|
|
$
|
1,389,504
|
|
____________________________________________
(1)Includes facility costs of $27.2 million, $28.3 million, and $72.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
(2)Includes amounts related to leasing activity and acquiring surface rights outside of acquisitions of proved and unproved properties totaling $8.6 million, $8.7 million, and $23.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
(3)Includes amounts relating to estimated asset retirement obligations of $(4.7) million, $(9.9) million, and $7.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
(4)Includes capitalized interest of $15.8 million, $18.5 million, and $20.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively.
Oil and Gas Reserve Quantities
The reserve estimates presented below were made in accordance with GAAP requirements for disclosures about oil and gas producing activities and SEC rules for oil and gas reporting of reserve estimation and disclosure.
Proved reserves are the estimated quantities of oil, gas, and NGLs which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined, and the price to be used is the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions. All of the Company’s estimated proved reserves are located in the United States.
The table below presents a summary of changes in the Company’s estimated proved reserves for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2020. The Company engaged Ryder Scott to audit internal engineering estimates for at least 80 percent of the Company’s total calculated proved reserve PV-10 for each year presented. The Company emphasizes that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise and that estimates of new discoveries and undeveloped locations are more imprecise than estimates of established producing oil and gas properties. Accordingly, these estimates are expected to change as future information becomes available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020 (1)
|
|
2019 (2)
|
|
2018 (3)
|
|
Oil
|
|
Gas
|
|
NGLs
|
|
Oil
|
|
Gas
|
|
NGLs
|
|
Oil
|
|
Gas
|
|
NGLs
|
|
(MMBbl)
|
|
(Bcf)
|
|
(MMBbl)
|
|
(MMBbl)
|
|
(Bcf)
|
|
(MMBbl)
|
|
(MMBbl)
|
|
(Bcf)
|
|
(MMBbl)
|
Total proved reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
184.1
|
|
|
1,223.2
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
175.7
|
|
|
1,321.8
|
|
|
107.4
|
|
|
158.2
|
|
|
1,280.1
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
Revisions of previous estimate
|
(28.2)
|
|
|
(246.6)
|
|
|
(24.7)
|
|
|
(19.2)
|
|
|
(212.5)
|
|
|
(40.0)
|
|
|
(24.0)
|
|
|
(219.5)
|
|
|
(8.0)
|
|
Discoveries and extensions
|
19.6
|
|
|
96.5
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Infill reserves in an existing proved field
|
20.5
|
|
|
91.1
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
41.8
|
|
|
190.2
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
391.5
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
Sales of reserves (4)
|
(0.5)
|
|
|
(8.9)
|
|
|
(1.1)
|
|
|
(0.2)
|
|
|
(0.7)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(29.6)
|
|
|
(48.1)
|
|
|
(2.7)
|
|
Purchases of minerals in place (4)
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
—
|
|
Production
|
(23.0)
|
|
|
(103.9)
|
|
|
(6.1)
|
|
|
(21.9)
|
|
|
(109.8)
|
|
|
(8.1)
|
|
|
(18.8)
|
|
|
(103.2)
|
|
|
(7.9)
|
|
End of year
|
172.7
|
|
|
1,052.0
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
|
184.1
|
|
|
1,223.2
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
175.7
|
|
|
1,321.8
|
|
|
107.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
85.0
|
|
|
712.1
|
|
|
43.4
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
699.1
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
642.9
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
End of year
|
89.8
|
|
|
643.9
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
85.0
|
|
|
712.1
|
|
|
43.4
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
699.1
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
Proved undeveloped reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
99.1
|
|
|
511.1
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
107.6
|
|
|
622.7
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
|
637.2
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
End of year
|
82.9
|
|
|
408.1
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
|
511.1
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
107.6
|
|
|
622.7
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
____________________________________________
Note: Amounts may not calculate due to rounding.
(1)For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company added 85.8 MMBOE from its drilling program and through further development plan optimization, and had net downward revisions of 94.0 MMBOE, which were primarily driven by the removal of certain longer term proved undeveloped reserves and declining commodity prices during 2020. Please refer to Areas of Operation in Part I, Items 1 and 2 of this report, and to Oil and Gas Reserve Quantities in Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in Part II, Item 7 of this report for additional information.
(2)For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company added 98.4 MMBOE from its drilling program and through further development plan optimization. These additions were offset by net downward revisions of 94.7 MMBOE, which were primarily driven by declining commodity prices during 2019.
(3)For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company added 188.0 MMBOE from its drilling program and through development plan optimization. The Company divested 40.3 MMBOE during 2018, primarily as a result of the PRB Divestiture, Divide County Divestiture, and Halff East Divestiture. The Company also had net downward revisions of 68.8 MMBOE, which resulted primarily from changes in development plans in its Eagle Ford shale program.
(4)Please refer to Note 3 – Acquisitions, Divestitures, and Assets Held for Sale for additional information.
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
The Company computes a standardized measure of future net cash flows (“Standardized Measure”) and changes therein relating to estimated proved reserves in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Future cash inflows and production and development costs are determined by applying prices and costs, including transportation, quality, and basis differentials, to the year end estimated future reserve quantities. Each property the Company operates is also charged with field-level overhead in the estimated reserve calculation. Estimated future income taxes are computed using the current statutory income tax rates, including consideration for estimated future statutory depletion. The resulting future net cash flows are reduced to present value amounts by applying a 10 percent annual discount factor.
Future operating costs are determined based on estimates of expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the estimated proved reserves in place at the end of the period using year end costs and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions, plus Company overhead incurred by the central administrative office attributable to operating activities.
The assumptions used to compute the Standardized Measure are those prescribed by the FASB and the SEC. These assumptions do not necessarily reflect the Company’s expectations of actual revenues to be derived from those reserves, nor their present value amount. The limitations inherent in the reserve quantity estimation process, as discussed previously, are equally applicable to the Standardized Measure computations since these reserve quantity estimates are the basis for the valuation process.
The following prices as adjusted for transportation, quality, and basis differentials were used in the calculation of the Standardized Measure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Oil (per Bbl)
|
$
|
37.63
|
|
|
$
|
53.68
|
|
|
$
|
57.76
|
|
Gas (per Mcf)
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
NGLs (per Bbl)
|
$
|
14.64
|
|
|
$
|
18.88
|
|
|
$
|
26.23
|
|
The following summary sets forth the Company’s future net cash flows relating to proved oil, gas, and NGL reserves based on the Standardized Measure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Future cash inflows
|
$
|
9,227,390
|
|
|
$
|
14,327,131
|
|
|
$
|
17,579,432
|
|
Future production costs
|
(3,429,288)
|
|
|
(4,579,119)
|
|
|
(5,386,264)
|
|
Future development costs
|
(1,259,395)
|
|
|
(2,108,859)
|
|
|
(2,679,488)
|
|
Future income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
(579,815)
|
|
|
(1,012,209)
|
|
Future net cash flows
|
4,538,707
|
|
|
7,059,338
|
|
|
8,501,471
|
|
10 percent annual discount
|
(1,856,250)
|
|
|
(2,955,340)
|
|
|
(3,847,088)
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
|
$
|
2,682,457
|
|
|
$
|
4,103,998
|
|
|
$
|
4,654,383
|
|
The principle sources of changes in the Standardized Measure were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Standardized Measure, beginning of year
|
$
|
4,103,998
|
|
|
$
|
4,654,383
|
|
|
$
|
3,024,142
|
|
Sales of oil, gas, and NGLs produced, net of production costs
|
(734,971)
|
|
|
(1,085,041)
|
|
|
(1,148,991)
|
|
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
(2,251,636)
|
|
|
(1,539,042)
|
|
|
1,010,335
|
|
Extensions, discoveries and other including infill reserves in an existing proved field, net of related costs
|
482,717
|
|
|
887,254
|
|
|
2,218,475
|
|
Sales of reserves in place
|
(10,755)
|
|
|
(2,788)
|
|
|
(147,887)
|
|
Purchase of reserves in place
|
2,120
|
|
|
57,519
|
|
|
1,818
|
|
Previously estimated development costs incurred during the period
|
431,926
|
|
|
736,770
|
|
|
445,638
|
|
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
215,460
|
|
|
132,825
|
|
|
(34,871)
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
(172,197)
|
|
|
(398,409)
|
|
|
(611,168)
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
436,284
|
|
|
510,427
|
|
|
305,657
|
|
Net change in income taxes
|
258,844
|
|
|
191,040
|
|
|
(449,884)
|
|
Changes in timing and other
|
(79,333)
|
|
|
(40,940)
|
|
|
41,119
|
|
Standardized Measure, end of year
|
$
|
2,682,457
|
|
|
$
|
4,103,998
|
|
|
$
|
4,654,383
|
|