UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10 – Q
 
(MARK ONE)
 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended  March 31, 2014
 
OR
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _________ TO _________
 
INTERNATIONAL SILVER, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Arizona
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
333-147712
 
86-0715596
(Commission File Number)
 
(IRS Employer Identification Number)
 
5210 E. Williams Circle, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85711
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
 
(520) 889-2040
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically or posted on its Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Paragraph 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "small reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
       
Non–Accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS.
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12,13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes o No o

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
Class
 
Shares Outstanding at May 12, 2014
Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value
 
37,092,095
 


 
 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Financial Statements:
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance Sheets
 
 
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement of Income
 
 
5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement of Cash Flows
 
 
6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-cash Financing Activities:
 
 
7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Statement of Shareholders' Equity
 
 
8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes To The Financial Statements
 
 
9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND PLAN OF OPERATIONS
 
 
32
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
 
37
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
 
37
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1A
RISK FACTORS
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 3
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 4
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 5
OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 6
EXHIBITS
 
 
40
 
 
 
2

 
 
PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 
Item 1 – Financial Statements
 
International Silver, Inc.
 
(An Exploration Stage Company)
 
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
 
For The Three Months March 31, 2014
(Unaudited)

and

For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
(Audited)
 
 
3

 
 
International Silver, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
   
As At
   
As at
 
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
             
ASSETS
             
CURRENT ASSETS
           
 Cash
  $ 1,667     $ 98,411  
 Accounts receivable
    121,057       38,719  
 Prepaid expenses - Note C
    47,339       130,013  
 Total Current Assets
  $ 170,063     $ 267,143  
 
               
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT- Note D
               
 Mineral properties
  $ 153,388     $ 153,388  
 Leasehold improvements
    26,812       26,812  
 Equipment
    7,485       7,485  
 Furniture & fixtures
    14,637       14,637  
 Computer software
    8,390       8,390  
 Computer equipment
    26,304       26,304  
    $ 237,016     $ 237,016  
 Accumulated depreciation
    (17,671 )     (14,701 )
    $ 219,345     $ 222,315  
                 
Other Assets - Note E
               
 Deposit toward investment - Note F
  $ 191,142     $ 191,142  
 Other deposits - Note G
    2,500       2,500  
 
  $ 193,642     $ 193,642  
                 
 TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 583,050     $ 683,100  
                 
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
                 
CURRENT LIABILITIES
               
 Accounts payable
  $ 156,657     $ 122,532  
 Payroll taxes payable
    69,085       24,092  
 Accrued expenses
    753,445       543,319  
 Due to related parties - Note L
    52,651       26,186  
 Convertible notes payable - Note H
    3,776,861       3,459,047  
 Deferred income - Note M
    87,808       100,000  
 Total Current Liabilities
  $ 4,896,507     $ 4,275,176  
                 
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
               
 Convertible notes payable - Note H
  $ -     $ -  
 
  $ -     $ -  
                 
 Total Liabilities
  $ 4,896,507     $ 4,275,176  
                 
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - Note K
               
 Common stock
  $ 3,709     $ 3,706  
 authorized shares - 500,000,000
               
 par value $0.0001 per share
               
 issued & o/s at 03/31/14 - 37,092,095
               
 issued & o/s at 12/31/13 - 37,066,799
               
 Additional paid-in capital
    5,317,133       5,279,977  
 Accumulated deficit prior to exploration stage
    (176,034 )     (176,034 )
 Accumulated deficit during exploration stage
    (9,458,265 )     (8,699,725 )
 Total Shareholders' Equity
  $ (4,313,457 )   $ (3,592,076 )
                 
 TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
  $ 583,050     $ 683,100  
 
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
 
 
4

 
 
International Silver, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Inception (June 16, 2006) of Exploration Stage through
 
   
March 31,
2014
   
March 31,
2013
   
(March 31,
2014)
 
Revenues
                 
 Mineral lease income
  $ 12,192     $ 12,329     $ 162,192  
 Consulting-third parties
    196,810       85,154       473,414  
 Consulting-related parties
    -       -       650,855  
 Total Revenues
  $ 209,002     $ 97,483     $ 1,286,461  
 
                       
Operating Expenses
                       
 Exploration costs
  $ 128,099     $ 117,085     $ 1,980,248  
 General and administration
                       
 Rent expense - related party
     35,354       30,839       406,049  
 Rent expense - third party
    -       7,500       67,772  
 Bad debt expense
    -       -       41,860  
 All other general & administrative
    374,944       445,251       5,389,117  
 Depreciation and depletion
    2,970       1,194       12,881  
 Total operating expenses
  $ 541,367     $ 601,869     $ 7,897,927  
                         
 Operating Income/(Loss)
  $ (332,365 )   $ (504,386 )   $ (6,611,466 )
                         
Other Income/(Expense)
                       
 Gain on settlement of debt
  $ -     $ -     $ 1,678,634  
 Impairment loss
    -       -       (1,733,456 )
 Interest expense
    (426,175 )     (965,058 )     (2,791,977 )
 Total other income/(expense)
  $ (426,175 )   $ (965,058 )   $ (2,846,799 )
                         
 Net Income/(Loss)
  $ (758,540 )   $ (1,469,444 )   $ (9,458,265 )
Basic Earnings per Share
                       
Income/(Loss) per Share
  $ (0.02 )   $ (0.04 )        
                         
Weighted Average Shares
                       
 Outstanding
    37,090,409       37,052,280          
 
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
 
 
5

 
 
International Silver, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Inception (June 16,
2006) of Exploration
Stage through
 
 
 
March 31,
   
March 31,
   
(March 31,
 
   
2014
   
2013
   
2014)
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
                 
 Net Income/(Loss)
  $ (758,540 )   $ (1,469,444 )   $ (9,458,265 )
 Adjustments used to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used) by operating activities:
                       
 Non-controlling interest in subsidiary
    -       -       (3,530 )
 Dissolution of subsidiary
    -       -       3,530  
 Depreciation and depletion
    2,970       1,194       12,881  
 Impairment loss
    -       -       1,733,456  
 Gain on settlement on debt
    -       -       (1,678,634 )
 Financing cost
    317,814       873,512       1,969,237  
 Purchase options cancelled
    -       -       91,000  
 Reclamation bond
    -       -       14,406  
 Stock compensation expense
    -       -       424,000  
 Issuance of common stock
                       
 In exchange for land
    -       -       30,000  
 In exchange for services
    -       -       157,000  
 In exchange for exploration costs
    -       -       55,385  
 In exchange for debt
    -       -       50,000  
 Changes in operating assets and liabilities
                       
 Decrease/(Increase) in receivables
    (82,338 )     (25,923 )     128,604  
 Decrease/(Increase) in employee receivable
    -       -       2,317  
 Decrease/(Increase) in prepaid expenses
    82,674       23,665       (50,813 )
 (Decrease)/Increase in payables
    105,583       (163,265 )     265,225  
 (Decrease)/Increase in accrued expenses
    210,126       48,867       777,066  
 (Decrease)/Increase in deferred income
    (12,192 )     37,671       87,808  
 Net Cash Flows (used by) Operating Activities
  $ (133,903 )   $ (673,723 )   $ (5,389,327 )
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
                       
 Lease/purchase option on land
  $ -     $ -     $ (90,000 )
 Purchase of land
    -       -       (137,500 )
 Leasehold Improvements
    -       -       (26,812 )
 Purchase of equipment, furniture & fixtures
    -       (11,800 )     (57,938 )
 Building improvements
    -       -       (14,822 )
 Deposits towards investment
    -       (10,000 )     (191,142 )
 Nonrefundable deposit - Option payment
    -       -       (91,000 )
 Refundable deposits
    -       -       (16,906 )
 Purchase of mineral land - Deposit method
    -       -       (105,888 )
 Net Cash Flows from Investment Activities
  $ -     $ (21,800 )   $ (732,008 )
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                       
 Issuance of common stock:
                       
 Net proceeds from stock issuance
  $ 2,603     $ -     $ 1,333,345  
 Less: Stock issuance costs
    -       -       (139,724 )
 Sale of mining property
                       
 For treasury stock
    -       -       (30,000 )
 Exchange for securities
    -       -       (25,000 )
 Return of deed of trust - mining property
    -       -       90,000  
 Disposal of vehicle
    -       -       215  
 Third-party loan
    34,556       1,000,000       4,809,556  
 Debt service payments
    -       -       (100,000 )
 Borrowings from related parties
    -       -       152,980  
 Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities
  $ 37,159     $ 1,000,000     $ 6,091,372  
                         
 Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash
  $ (96,744 )   $ 304,477     $ (29,963 )
 Beginning Cash Balance
  $ 98,411     $ 211,188     $ 31,630  
 Ending Cash Balance
  $ 1,667     $ 515,665     $ 1,667  
 
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
 
 
6

 
 
International Silver, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Financing Activities
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Exploration Stage
(June 16, 2006 through
 
   
March 31,
   
March 31,
   
March 31,
 
   
2014
   
2013
   
2013)
 
                   
The Company issued shares of its common stock in exchange for the following:
       
                   
For services rendered:
 
 
   
 
   
 
 
Director services
  $ -     $ -     $ 21,000  
Legal and professional services
    -       -       116,350  
Stock transfer agent services
    -       -       5,500  
Accounting services
    -       -       6,150  
Geology and engineering
    -       -       8,000  
Sub-total
  $ -     $ -     $ 157,000  
For land/mining property
    -       -       42,000  
For equipment
    -       -       3,000  
For exploration costs
    -       -       55,385  
For debt retirement
    -       -       156,651  
For contributed capital
    -       -       315,072  
Total non-cash issuances of stock
  $ -     $ -     $ 729,108  
                         
Shares of common stock issuable
                       
For debt interest
  $ -     $ -     $ 16,250  
    $ -     $ -     $ 16,250  
                         
Shares of common stock cancelled
                       
Repurchase of its common stock
  $ -     $ -     $ 30,000  
                         
Issuance of incentive stock option grants
                       
Grants issued
  $ -     $ -     $ 424,000  
                         
The Company relinquished its mining property in exchange for the following:
         
                         
For repurchase of its common stock
  $ -     $ -     $ (30,000 )
For marketable securities in another company
  $ -     $ -     $ (25,000 )
For deed of trust in the mining property
  $ -     $ -     $ 90,000  
 
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
 
 
7

 
 
International Silver, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders' Equity
 
                                       
Accumulated Deficit
       
 
       
Common Stock
   
Additional
   
Treasury Stock/
   
Prior
   
During
       
   
Share
   
No. of
    $ 0.0001    
Paid-In
   
Shares Issuable
   
Exploration
   
Exploration
       
   
Price
   
Shares
   
Par Value
   
Capital
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Stage
   
Stage
   
Total
 
                                               
 
       
At December 31, 2012
          37,052,280       3,705       3,260,984       0       0       (176,034 )     (5,005,566 )     (1,916,911 )
                                                                       
Convertible Debt
                                                                     
 Issuance of Warrants
                                                                     
 February 21, 2013
                          917,542                                       917,542  
Convertible Debt
                                                                     
 Issuance of Warrants
                                                                     
 May 22, 2013
                          500,000                                       500,000  
Convertible Debt
                                                                     
 Issuance of Warrants
                                                                     
 July 31, 2013
                          500,000                                       500,000  
Exercise of Warrants
                                                                     
 December 2, 2013
          14,519       1       1,451                                       1,452  
Convertible Debt
                                                                     
 December 20, 2013
                          100,000                                       100,000  
Net Income/(Loss)
                                                          (3,694,159 )     (3,694,159 )
                                                                       
At December 31, 2013
          37,066,799       3,706       5,279,977       0       0       (176,034 )     (8,699,725 )     (3,592,076 )
                                                                       
Exercise of Warrants
                                                                     
 January 21, 2014
          25,296       3       2,600                                       2,603  
Issuance of Warrants
                                                                     
Convertible Debt  January 7, 2014
                          34,556                                       34,556  
Net Income/(Loss)
                                                          (758,540 )     (758,540 )
                                                                       
At March 31, 2014
          37,092,095       3,709       5,317,133       0       0       (176,034 )     (9,458,265 )     (4,313,457 )
 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements

 
8

 
 
International Silver, Inc.
(An Exploration Stage Company)
Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note A – Organization and Business
 
General
International Silver, Inc. (the “Company”) is an exploration stage company, as set forth in FASB ASC 915 – Development Stage Entities and “Industry Guide 7” of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Guides for the Preparation of Registration Statements and with the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration’s “Guide for Reporting Exploration Information, Mineral Resources, and Mineral Reserves” dated March 1, 1999. The Company’s strategy is to acquire and explore high-grade silver properties throughout North and South America.

On September 4, 1992, the Company was incorporated in Arizona as ARX Engineering, Inc. and then changed its name to Western States Engineering, Inc. On June 20, 2006, the Company changed its name to International Silver, Inc. to reflect its new business plan of acquiring exploration properties, along with providing engineering services.

The Company’s business strategy consists of acquiring and exploring high-grade silver properties throughout North and South America. Contingent upon adequate funding, the Company intends to continue a reconnaissance and exploration program in the Pioche Mining District located in Nevada, in Silver Bow County, Montana to identify potentially high-grade silver targets and to evaluate other properties in each of the districts for possible acquisition. The Company will continue to seek and evaluate new opportunities for exploration and/or development properties.

Key Mineral Properties

Prince Mine Property, Lincoln County, Nevada
On November 6, 2010, the Company entered into a lease /purchase agreement to explore and acquire the historic Prince Mine in Lincoln County, Nevada, USA. The property consists of 227 acres of surface and mineral rights and 495 acres in lode mining claims. The Prince Mine is a former producer of silver, gold, lead, zinc and manganese sulfide and oxide fluxing ore. The Company has completed a preliminary drilling program and is analyzing its findings. At March 31, 2014 there are no proven and probable reserves.

Caselton Tailings Project
On March 27, 2012, the Company entered into a joint venture operating agreement to evaluate, remediate, reclaim and develop the Caselton Tailings that are located in the Pioche Mining District in Lincoln County, Nevada. The Company has deposited funds towards this investment (refer to Note E – Deposit in Investment) representing the Company’s capital contribution towards the joint venture. As of March 31, 2014, formation of the joint venture entity is pending.

New Butte Mining Properties, Silver Bow County, Montana
On December 1, 2011, the Company executed a mining lease agreement on 954 acres of mineral rights and an additional 362 acres of surface and mineral rights located in the Butte District of Montana. The lease provides full access for mining on the land for a term of fifty years and thereafter as long as minerals are produced. The New Butte Properties were historically owned and operated as silver-zinc and silver-copper mines by the Anaconda Company. The major formerly operating underground mines now held by the Company are known as the Alice, the Lexington, the Badger, the Diamond and the High One.
 
Magna Charta Property, Silver Bow County, Montana
On March 1, 2012, the Company purchased 18 acres of land, a patented mining claim, which includes surface rights situated in the County of Silver Bow, Montana under a fee simple contract.
 
 
9

 

Continental Public Land Trust, Silver Bow County, Montana
On April 23, 2012, the Company executed a 99-year mining lease on 1,100 acres of mineral rights with Continental Public Land Trust with an option to purchase certain patented lode and placer mining claims, including surface rights and other interests Silver Bow County, Montana. The Belmont mine property is part of the CPLT lease.

West Butte - Chattel Property. Silver Bow County Montana
On August 7, 2012, the Company entered into a purchase agreement and contract for deed with Chattel, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, for 1,022 acres of land and mineral rights, located in Silver Bow County, Montana.

Calico Silver Project, San Bernardino County, California
The Calico Silver Project is located in the Calico Silver Mining District about 15 miles northeast of Barstow or 145 miles northeast of Los Angeles in the Mojave Desert of Southern California. The Company wholly owns approximately 1,300 acres of U.S federal lode mining claims. In 2012, the Company leased this property to Calico Exploration, LLC. The mineral lease was renewed on January 1, 2014.

Going Concern
The Company’s interim condensed financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. There is substantial doubt of the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern since it is dependent upon obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources, which may include, a private placement, a public offering, convertible notes, secured loans or any combination of the foregoing.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to secure financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
 
Note B – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation
The financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 include the accounts of International Silver, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Western States Engineering, Inc. International Silver Nevada, Inc. and Butte Silver Mines, Inc. The Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based on its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP).

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Management has reviewed and evaluated recent and relevant accounting pronouncements issued since its last audited financial statements and in managements’ opinion, these pronouncements have no material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
 
Use of Estimates
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include the determination of mineral ore quantities; the depletion expense calculation, if applicable; useful lives of property and equipment for depreciation; impairment valuations and calculation of any deferred taxes. Actual results may differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the condensed financial statements.
 
 
10

 

In management’s opinion all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been made, and the adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
 
Concentration of Credit Risk
Our cash equivalents, prepaid expenses and trade receivables are exposed to concentrations of credit risk. We manage and control risk by maintaining cash with major financial institutions. Management believes that the financial institutions are financially sound and the risk of loss is low.

Concentrations and Economic Vulnerability
During 2013 and 2012, the Company negotiated additional financing with ISLV Partners, LLC; as a result, the Company’s entire tangible property, currently owned or acquired hereafter, is collateral in connection with the ISLV Partners, LLC financing. (Refer to  Note H – Convertible Note Payable).

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Due to their short-term nature, the carrying value of our current financial assets and liabilities approximates their fair values. The fair value of our borrowings, if recalculated based on current interest rates, would not significantly differ from the recorded amounts.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
For the statement of cash flows, any liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of acquisition are considered to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. At March 31, 2014, trade receivables were $121,057 and at December 31, 2013, trade receivables were $38,719. No allowance for uncollectible accounts was established, as management deem the accounts as fully collectible.
 
Investments
Investments in marketable securities are classified under one of three methods:
 
1)
available for sale
 
 
2)
held to maturity
 
 
3)
trading securities

The accounting treatment accorded any investment will depend on whether the presence of “significant influence” over an investee exists. If the investor owns at least 20% of its common stock, then significant influence is assumed. If there is less than 20% ownership or if there is no significant influence over an investee, the investment is valued at the Fair Value Method, otherwise the Equity Method is utilized. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company held securities in Continental Mining & Smelting, which are considered “available for sale” and were reported under the Equity Method. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the value of the Company’s investments in Continental Mining & Smelting Limited was considered fully impaired. See  Note E – Other Assets – Investments in Stocks.
 
Mineral Development
Costs associated with the acquisition of mineral interests, in the exploration stage, are “expensed”. Mineral exploration costs are also “expensed” as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed, the costs incurred to develop such property, including costs to further delineate the ore body and remove overburden to initially expose the ore body, are capitalized as incurred. These costs will then be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on estimated recoverable ounces of proven and probable reserves.

 
11

 
 
To the extent that any development costs benefit an entire mineralized property, they are amortized over the estimated life of the property. The specific capitalized cost bases subject to depletion are calculated on a formula based on the number of tons of ore that are expected to be mined divided by the total tons in proven and probable reserves in the property. To date, no development has occurred, nor has depletion has been taken, since production has not commenced.

Mineral Interests and Property
Mineral interests include the costs of acquired mineral rights and royalty interests in production, development and exploration stage properties.

Production stage mineral interests represent interests in operating properties that contain proven and probable reserves. Development stage mineral interests represent interests in properties under development that contain proven and probable reserves. Exploration stage mineral interests represent interests in properties that are believed to potentially contain mineralized material.

Mineral interests related to mining properties in the production stage are amortized over the life of the related property using the Units of Production method in order to match the amortization with the expected underlying future cash flows. Development stage mineral interests are not amortized until such time as the underlying property is converted to the production stage. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, all mineral interests were in the exploration stage.
 
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, except for those fixed assets acquired and accounted for under the “Asset Acquisition Method” utilizing fair value measurements, if any. Maintenance and repair are charged to expense as incurred, renewals and improvements that extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized. Depreciation on property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives as follows:
 
Leasehold Improvements
15 years
Equipment
5 years
Office furniture and equipment
5 years

Development stage mineral interests are not amortized until such time as the underlying property is converted to the production stage. As of March 31, 2014, there was $17,671 in accumulated depreciation and no amortization has taken place on any of the mineral interests, as the Company is in the exploration stage.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company adheres to ASC 360-10-20 and 360-10-35, "Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," which requires that long-lived assets to be held and used be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset and would be calculated based on discounted cash flows.
 
Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset incorporate the Company’s assumptions about its use of the asset and all available evidence was considered. For impairment purposes, the asset groupings were considered at their lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities.

At March 31, 2014, an impairment test was conducted on the Company’s mineral land holdings and no impairment loss is required. Refer to  Note D – Property. Plant and Equipment – Mining Properties .

Revenue Recognition and Production Costs
The Company recognizes revenue when sales contracts or consulting contracts have been properly executed, delivery of product has occurred or services have been rendered, the contract price is readily determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

 
12

 
 
Income was recognized from engineering contracts rendered by Western States Engineering, Inc., a subsidiary of International Silver, Inc. for the three months ended March 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2014, there has been no production from any of the Company's mineral properties, as these properties are still in the exploratory stage.
 
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) attributable to the common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if dilutive securities and other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share.
 
On November 1, 2010, the Company adopted and granted stock options to its directors, employees and key consultants. On November 7, 2012, the Company granted its members of the Board of Directors additional stock options. (Refer to Note K – Shareholders’ Equity)

On December 22, 2013 and January 7, 2014, the Company executed additional convertible note to ISLV Partners, LLC. Refer to Note H – Convertible Notes Payable.

On January 21, 2014, 16,864 unit purchase options were exercised on a “cashless exercise”, resulting in an issuance of 25,296 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of March 31, 2014, there are 31,483,907 warrants outstanding. During the year ended December 31, 2013, 9,679 unit purchase options were exercised.

Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740-10-30 - Accounting for Income Taxes. ASC 740-10-30 is an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, ASC 740-10-35 generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of changes in the tax law or rates. Income tax information is disclosed in  Note J- Income Taxes .

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax assets are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
 
Statement of Cash Flows Information and Supplemental Non-Cash Financing Activities
Non-cash investing and financing transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $317,814 and $873,512 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, non-cash investing and financing activities reflected amortization of discount on notes issued by ISLV Partners, LLC. ( refer to  Note H – Convertible Notes Payable )

Comprehensive Income
ASC 220-10-55-2 - Comprehensive Income requires companies to classify items of other comprehensive income by their nature in a financial statement and display the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of a statement of financial position. On March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company did not have any material items of comprehensive income.

Derivative Instruments
The Company revalues derivative liabilities as of each balance sheet date, and otherwise complies with the provisions of ASC 815-10.

 
13

 
 
Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, issued ASC 718 - Share-Based Payment, which requires “public” companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity instruments, based on the grant-date fair value of those instruments, with limited exceptions. ASC 718 also affects the pattern in which compensation cost is recognized, the accounting for employee share purchase plans, and the accounting for income tax effects of share-based payment transactions. In 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a resolution for the stock issuance to officers and employees to recognize the cost of employee services. The Company adopted a stock option plan on November 1, 2010, which is accounted for pursuant to ASC 718.
 
Note C – Prepaid Expense
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the lease on New Butte, located in the State of Montana, was renewed, including a newly-acquired mineral lease. At March 31, 2014, prepaid expenses reflect the unexpired portion of mineral property leases, which are treated as operating leases, pursuant to FASB ASC 840-20. Also reflected in prepaid expenses is the unexpired portion of commercial insurance on our Nevada and Montana properties and a retainer a consulting arrangement with Gustavson Associates for a preliminary economic assessment on the Caselton Tailings located in Nevada, resulting in a prepaid expense balance of $47,339 at March 31, 2014, compared to a balance of $130,013 at December 31, 2013, summarized below:
 
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
 
December 31,
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prepaid mine leases
 
$
13,493
 
 
$
91,097
 
Prepaid commercial insurance
 
 
4,122
 
 
 
9,063
 
Prepaid director & officer insurance
 
 
3,063
 
 
 
3,063
 
Prepaid expense – metallurgical services
 
 
841
 
 
 
841
 
Prepaid expense – economic assessment study
 
 
25,000
 
 
 
25,000
 
Prepaid expense – other
 
 
820
 
 
 
949
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total prepaid expenses 
 
$
47,339
 
 
$
130,013
 
 
Note D – Property, Plant and Equipment

Mining Properties
The Company’s mining interests, include property acquired by staking, purchasing and leasing mining claims located in the states of California, Nevada and Montana. At March 31, 2014, mining properties valued at $153,388 were as follows:

Calico Silver Project
The Calico Silver Project consists of 60 unpatented mining claims on 1,300 acres of surface rights, which were acquired through staking and filing Notices of Location with the Bureau of Land Management. At March 31, 2014, this property was under a mineral lease agreement with Calico Exploration, LLC (Leasee). The leasee is obligated to pay annual maintenance fees to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on its 60 unpatented lode-mining claims, located in San Bernadino County, California.

Magna Charta Mining Claim - Silver Bow County, Montana
On March 1, 2012, the Company acquired title to a fee simple estate or interest in the Magna Charta Lode Mining claim for $47,500. The mining claim comprised of 18 acres in surface rights, with a patented mining claim, is located in the County of Silver Bow in the State of Montana.

 
14

 
 
West Butte - Chattel Property - Silver Bow County Montana
On April 27, 2012, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Chattel, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, for 1,022 acres of land and mineral rights, located in Silver Bow County, Montana at a purchase price of $1,500,000. The contract for deed was executed on August 7, 2012, at which time an initial deposit of $50,000 was made, plus title fees of $5,888. The terms of the purchase agreement are disclosed in  Note I – Contract Payable.

Pursuant to ASC 360-20-55-2, the minimal initial investment requirement for the full recognition of the purchase price on land held for commercial or industrial purposes, requires a minimal investment of 20% of the value. On August 7, 2013, the Company made the first anniversary payment of $50,000, plus interest accrued up to that date. At September 30, 2013, installments applied towards the purchase of the Chattel property were $105,888.

Prince Mine Lease – Lincoln County, Nevada
On November 6, 2010, the Company entered into a lease /purchase agreement to explore and acquire the Prince Mine in Lincoln County, Nevada, that includes 227 acres of surface and mineral rights and 495 acres in lode mining claims. The Prince Mine is a former producer of silver, gold, lead, zinc and manganese sulfide and oxide fluxing ore. During 2012, a preliminary drilling program was undertaken by the Company. See Note D – Property, Plant and Equipment.
 
At March 31, 2014, there were no proven or probable reserves.

The five-year lease requires annual lease payments of $50,000 payable on each anniversary date from the date of the lease agreement. Pursuant to FASB ASC 840 – 20 Operating Leases, the lease meets the criteria to be treated as an operating lease. Future minimum lease payments are as follows:

November 6, 2013 (Extended to June 4, 2014)
 
$
50,000
 
November 6, 2014
 
$
50,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
100,000
 
 
Lease expense on the Prince Mine since inception of the lease on November 6, 2010 through March 31, 2014 is $150,000. For three months ended March 31, 2014, there was no lease expense. The lease payment due November 6, 2013 was extended until June 4, 2014. Refer to Note O - Subsequent Events.

Should the Company exercise the purchase option, the total purchase price shall be $2,750,000, less any amounts paid as advance/lease payments. The initial payment is due within 30 days of the option exercise. Installment payments are as follows:

No. 1 - Initial payment
 
$
687,500
 
No. 2 - 1st anniversary of exercise
 
$
687,500
 
No. 3 - 2nd anniversary of exercise
 
$
687,500
 
No. 4 - 3rd anniversary of exercise
 
$
687,500
 

Prepayment of all or any portion of the principal balance are not subject to penalty.
 
 
15

 
 
New Butte Lease – Silver Bow County, Montana
On December 1, 2011, the Company entered into a mineral lease agreement with FL Leasing, LLC (“lessor”), now known as New Butte Leasing, LLC, to examine the mineral potential of the Silver Bow/Butte Area located in Silver Bow County, Montana. The property consists of 362 acres of surface and mineral rights and 954 acres of mineral rights only.

The term of the agreement is for fifty (50) years and for so long as Product is produced, or until sooner terminated, extended or canceled. The lease requires annual lease payments commencing January 15, 2012 and on each anniversary date thereafter. The initial annual lease payment of $15,000, the first and second anniversary payments due January 15, 2013 and January 15, 2014, respectively, were timely paid. The annual lease payment for year 2015 is $15,000 and $20,000 each year thereafter up through year 2020. Annual lease payments for years 2021 – 2030 are scheduled to increase to $25,000 annually. Thereafter, annual lease payments are variable and increase progressively. Pursuant to FASB ASC 840 – 20 Operating Leases, the lease meets the criteria to be treated as an operating lease. Future minimum lease payments, based on an amended agreement executed on May 22, 2012, are as follows:

January 15, 2014 - $15,000 annually – timely paid
 
$
15,000
 
January 15, 2015 - $15,000 annually
 
$
15,000
 
Each January 15th - $20,000 annually - Years 2016 – 2020
 
$
100,000
 
Each January 15th - $25,000 annually - Years 2021 – 2030
 
$
250,000
 
Each January 15th - $50,000 annually - Years 2031 – 2060
 
$
1,500,000
 
Each January 15th - $75,000 annually - Years 2061 – 2062
 
$
150,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
$
2,030,000
 
 
Additionally, the Company agrees to pay the “lessor” a Net Smelter Returns Royalty of three percent (3%) on production of gold, silver and various other metals.

Lease expense on the New Butte property since inception of the lease on December 1, 2011 through March 31, 2014 was $33,082. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, lease expense was $3,699.
 
Continental Public Land Trust Lease – Silver Bow County, Montana
On April 23, 2012, the Company entered into a mineral lease and option to purchase agreement with Continental Public Land Trust, a Montana non-profit organization, to explore the mineral potential of certain patented lode and placer mining claims located in located in Silver Bow County, Montana. The property consists of 1,103 acres of mineral rights only.

The term of the agreement is for ninety-nine (99) years and for so long as Product is produced, or until sooner terminated, extended or canceled. The lease requires annual lease payments commencing April 23, 2012 and on each anniversary date thereafter. The initial annual lease payment of $20,000 and the first anniversary payment of $25,000 were timely paid. Annual lease payments of $25,000 are due thereafter for the next ten years period from years 2014 through 2024; thereafter, the annual lease payment of $25,000 shall be adjusted in proportion to the United States Bureau of Labor Producer Price Index.

Each April 23rd - $25,000 annually - Years 2014 – 2024
 
$
250,000
 
Each April 23rd - $25,000 annually - Years 2015 – 2112, as adjusted by US Producer Price Index
 
$
2,175,000
 
Total
 
$
2,425,000
 
 
Additionally, the Company agrees to pay the owner a royalty of two percent (2.0%) of the net cash flow from its operating activities (free cash flow royalty) derived from production of all mineral commodities produced from the owner’s property.

Lease expense on the Continental Public Land Trust since inception of the lease on April 23, 2012 through March 31, 2014 was $43,425. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, lease expense was $6,164.
 
 
16

 

MG & A property lease
On December 17, 2013, the Company entered into a mineral lease agreement with SMC, a Montana corporation, to perform its due diligence of the property in Montana. The term of the agreement is for twenty (20) years and for so long as Product is produced, or until sooner terminated, extended or canceled. The lease requires an initial payment of $100,000 at inception, which grants the Company the right to perform its due diligence study up to February 1, 2014. If by February 1, 2014, the Company decides to continue the lease, a payment of $350,000 is required. The first anniversary payment of $200,000 is due December 15, 2014, with the second and third anniversary payments due in the amounts of $300,000 and $400,000, respectively. Thereafter, annual lease payments of $400,000 will be due.

Pursuant to FASB ASC 840 – 20 Operating Leases, the lease meets the criteria to be treated as an operating lease. Future minimum lease payments, based on the agreement executed on December 17, 2013, are as follows:

December 17, 2013 - $100,000 – initial payment - timely paid
 
$
100,000
 
February 1, 2014 - $350,000 – additional initial payment
 
$
350,000
 
December 15, 2014 - $200,000 – First anniversary payment
 
$
200,000
 
December 15, 2015 - $300,000 – Second anniversary payment
 
$
300,000
 
December 15, 2016 - $400,000 – Third anniversary payment and thereafter annually
 
$
6.800,000
 
Total
 
$
7,750,000
 
 
Additionally, the Company agrees to pay the “lessor” a Production Royalty Payment of three percent (3%) on “net smelter returns” received by the Lessee from the sale or other dispositions of “leased substances”. In addition, if the Company makes a “net profit” resulting from mineral production from the property, a twenty-five percent (25%) “Net Profits Interest Payment” may be required.
 
On January 31, 2014, the Company negotiated an extension until August 15, 2014 on the MG & A mineral lease that was due February 1, 2014, in the amount of $350,000. Lease expense on the property since inception of the lease on December 17, 2013 through March 31, 2014 was $100,000.
 
Leasehold Improvements, Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures
Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2013 consisted of office furniture, scanner/plotter and computers and auto cad software for the newly-established exploration office at Butte, Montana. There were no capital acquisitions during the first quarter ended March 31, 2014. At March 31, 2014, the net book value of fixed assets was $219,345.
 
At March 31, 2014, property, plant and equipment is comprised of the following:

Land – Mining Properties
 
$
153,388
 
Leasehold Improvements
 
 
26,812
 
Equipment
 
 
7,485
 
Furniture and Fixtures
 
 
14,637
 
Computer Software and Equipment
 
 
34,694
 
 
 
$
237,016
 
Accumulated Depreciation
 
 
(17,671
)
 
 
$
219,345
 

Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $2,970 and accumulated depreciation was $17,671.
 
 
17

 
 
Note E – Other Assets

Investments in Stock
On November 30, 2010, the Company exchanged a 70% interest in the Estrades Mining Lease #795 (Quebec) and associated equipment in consideration for 6,000,000 shares of common stock from Continental Mining and Smelting Limited (“Continental”), a Canadian company. At March 31, 2014, the Company owned a 16.7 % interest in Continental, whose outstanding shares were 36,028,001. At the date of acquisition, the Company determined that the “Equity Method” of accounting was warranted because the Company was deemed to exercise significant influence and control over Continental’s policies and operations, although the percentage was below the 20% threshold pursuant to FASB ASC 323-10-15-6 – Significant Influence. The Company has one director and an officer who represent Continental as directors.

The Company’s policy regarding the Equity Method pursuant to FASB ASC 323-10 – Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures will be to record the initial investment, at cost, and then recognize the increase or reduction in its investment based on its proportional share of Continental’s income, losses and dividends, as the case may be, at the end of each reporting period. At the date of acquisition and at December 31, 2013 and March 31, 2014, there was no measurable value in the common stock of Continental Mining and Smelting Limited. Continental Mining and Smelting Limited has been attempting to obtain financing to enter the development stage of their mining operations, but has thus far been unsuccessful in doing so,

At March 31, 2014, the Company’s share of losses for the three months then ended were $1,155 and cumulative losses inception to–date are $267,012. These losses are held “in suspension” until such time that a measurable valuation of Continental’s common stock is ascertained, pursuant to ASC 323-10-35-20.

At March 31, 2014, the Company held the following securities:
 
 
 
No. of Shares
 
 
Share Price
 
 
Fair Value
 
Common Stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available for Sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continental Mining and Smelting Limited
 
 
6,000,000
 
 
$
0.000
 
 
$
0
 
 
Note F – Deposits Towards Investment

On March 27, 2012, the Company, executed a contract with Aurum, LLC (“Aurum”), a Colorado limited liability company, to form a joint venture with the Company for the purpose of conducting the evaluation, remediation, reclamation and processing of the Caselton Tailings owned by “Aurum”. Pursuant to the agreement, “Aurum” and the Company will each have a 50% interest. As consideration, the Company will undertake to arrange all capital funding required and provide custom processing availability for the tailings material owned by “Aurum”.

The Company is obligated to make an initial cash capital contribution of $50,000 and sequential funding to be used to complete a Phase 1 site investigation.

As of March 31, 2014, the Company had reimbursed Aurum, LLC $190,000 for land royalty payments, plus a reimbursement of $1,142 for recording fees for a total of $191,142 for holding costs on property associated with a joint venture between the Company and Aurum, LLC. These funds are recognized as a deposit towards the investment in the joint venture with Aurum, LLC. Pursuant to the joint venture agreement, these costs, upon formation of the joint venture will be considered as part of International Silver Nevada, Inc.’s capital contribution.
 
 
18

 
 
Note G – Other Deposits
 
Non-Refundable Deposits – Option to Purchase the Assets of Pan American
On October 29, 2012, the Company executed an option to purchase the assets of Pan American Zinc, a Nevada corporation. The terms of the option required an option payment of $35,000, which has been paid, with the option period effective from October 29, 2012 and terminating on July 31, 2013, unless extended by either party to the contract. The total purchase price shall be $5,000,000, payable in four (4) annual installments of $500,000, starting with the closing date of August 15, 2013 and extending for the next three anniversary dates and three (3) annual installments of $1,000,000, thereafter for the next three anniversary dates. Management made the decision not to exercise the purchase option. The option price of $35,000 was written off to expense as of December 31, 2013.
 
Non-Refundable Deposits – Option to Purchase Acid Plant
On April 1, 2013, the Company executed an exclusive right to purchase agreement with Atlas Precious Metals Inc., a related party, for the purchase of a sulfuric acid plant. The purchase price agreed to is the lower of either the market value or $5,000,000 during the term of 18 months. Under the agreement, the Company will make an initial payment of $14,000, payable at the signing of the agreement and $7,000, payable on the 20th day of each month. All payments shall be applied towards the purchase price of the asset. Payment may be tendered in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination thereof. The common stock transaction is based on a per share price of $0.50 of the Company’s common stock.

On October 1, 2013, Management made the decision to opt out of this purchase option. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had made a total of $56,000 in option payments. These option payments were written off as an exploration cost as a result of Management’s decision at December 31, 2013.
 
Refundable Deposits – Reclamation Bond
On June 18, 2012, the Company placed a reclamation bond with the Bureau of Land Management in the amount of $14,406 to provide surface reclamation coverage for the drilling program at the Caselton Mine tailings. With the conclusion of the drilling program, the Company is obligated to do any reclamation work required pursuant to the terms and conditions of the operation. Once fulfilled, the Office of the United States Department of Interior will authorize a refund. As of December 31, 2013, a provision was made to offset reclamation costs against the bond, therefore, the amount reflected in Other Assets is zero.
 
Note H – Related Party Convertible Notes Payable

Convertible Note Purchase Agreement – Initial Financing
On February 6, 2012, the Company entered into a Convertible Note Purchase Agreement with ISLV Partners, LLC (the Lenders) to provide funding in the amount of $600,000 for working capital and other corporate purposes. The general terms and conditions of the loan provide that the “lenders” retain out of the funding, the sum of the $90,300 and $80,000, to satisfy full repayment of the promissory notes which were assigned to the lender, including all unpaid accrued interest to the closing date. The initial note in the principal amount of $600,000 is secured by the mortgages, deeds of trust, fixture filings, security agreements and assignment of leases and rents, and such security agreements executed and delivered on the closing date, pursuant to which certain real properties owned by the Company and /or any subsidiary, as more particularly specified in such mortgages, deeds of trust, assignment of leases and rents are pledged as collateral security for the obligations (Initial Mortgages). The principal and unpaid interest, at a per annum interest rate of eight (8%) percent was due on or before February 14, 2014, but was extended until June 22, 2014. Refer to the section entitled “Convertible Note – Fifth Amendment”.

Convertible Note Agreement – First Amendment
On May 17, 2012, the Company executed an amendment to the Convertible Note Agreement, dated February 6, 2012, giving ISLV Partners, LLC, the option to make an additional loan in the principal amount of up to $2,000,000. Under the terms of the First Amendment, ISLV Partners, LLC advanced the Company an amount of $130,000 on May 17, 2012 and a loan for an additional $1,870,000 on May 25, 2012. The note is convertible into International Silver, Inc. common stock at $0.20 per share. In addition, the Company issued to ISLV Partners, LLC a warrant to purchase 10,000,000 additional common stock shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, exercisable through May 25, 2015. Net proceeds from the loan will be used for working capital, exploration and corporate development purposes.
 
 
19

 
 
Convertible Note Agreement – Second Amendment
On February 13, 2013, the Company executed a second amendment to the Convertible Note Agreement, dated February 6, 2012, giving ISLV Partners, LLC, the option to make an additional loan in the principal amount of up to $2,200,000. Under the terms of the Second Amendment, ISLV Partners, LLC loaned an initial amount of $1,000,000 on February 21, 2013 and shall have the right to loan an additional amount up to $1,200,000 by April 15, 2013. The note is convertible into International Silver, Inc. common stock at $0.20 per share. In addition, the Company issued to ISLV Partners, LLC a warrant to purchase 5,000,000 additional common stock shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, exercisable through February 21, 2016. Net proceeds from the loan will be used for working capital, exploration and corporate development purposes.

Convertible Note Agreement – Third Amendment
On May 22, 2013, the Company executed a third amendment to the Convertible Note Agreement, dated February 6, 2012, as amended by the First and Second amendments, dated May 17, 2012 and February 13, 2013, respectively, giving ISLV Partners, LLC, the option to make an additional loan in the principal amount of up to $1,200,000. Under the terms of the Third Amendment, ISLV Partners, LLC loaned an initial amount of $500,000 on May 22, 2013 and shall have the right to loan an additional amount up to $700,000 by July 1, 2013. The note is convertible into International Silver, Inc. common stock at $0.20 per share. In addition, the Company issued to ISLV Partners, LLC a warrant to purchase 2,500,000 additional common stock shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, exercisable through May 22, 2016. Net proceeds from the loan will be used for working capital, exploration and corporate development purposes.
 
Convertible Note Agreement – Fourth Amendment
On July 24, 2013, the Company executed a fourth amendment to the Convertible Note Agreement, dated February 6, 2012, as amended by the First, Second and Third amendments, dated May 17, 2012, February 13, 2013 and May 22, 2013, respectively. The “financing option” was amended to allow for multiple closings or tranches, and if ISLV Partners, LLC funds at least $500,000 of the Financing Option prior to August 12, 2103, ISLV Partners, LLC shall have until November 1, 2013 to fund the remaining portion (up to $1,000,000 additional) of the financing Option.
 
On July 31, 2013, ISLV Partners, LLC loaned an additional amount of $500,000 and shall have the right to loan an additional amount up to $1,000,000 by November 1, 2013. The note is convertible into International Silver, Inc. common stock at $0.20 per share. In addition, the Company issued to ISLV Partners, LLC a warrant to purchase 2,500,000 additional common stock shares at an exercise price of $0.40 per share, exercisable through July 31, 2016. Net proceeds from the loan will be used for working capital, exploration and corporate development purposes
 
Convertible Note Agreement – Fifth Amendment
On December 20, 2013, the Company executed a fifth amendment to the Convertible Note Agreement, dated February 6, 2012, as amended by the First, Second, Third and Fourth amendments, dated May 17, 2012, February 13, 2013, May 22, 2013 and July 24, 2013, respectively.

On December 20, 2013, ISLV Partners, LLC loaned an additional amount of $100,000. The note is convertible into International Silver, Inc. common stock at $0.20 per share. Net proceeds from the loan will be used for working capital, exploration and corporate development purposes.

On January 7, 2014, ISLV Partners, LLC loaned an additional amount of $34,556. The note is convertible into International Silver, Inc. common stock at $0.20 per share. Net proceeds from the loan will be used for working capital, exploration and corporate development purposes.

 
20

 
 
The following table summarizes the net carrying value, after the discount on the notes resulting from the issuance of warrants:

   
March 31,
2014
   
December 31,
2013
 
Convertible Notes Payable issued to ISLV Partners, LLC:
           
Issued February 6, 2012
 
$
600,000
   
$
600,000
 
Issued May 17, 2012
   
130,000
     
130,000
 
Issued May 25, 2012
   
1,870,000
     
1,870,000
 
Issued February 21, 2013
   
1,000,000
     
1,000,000
 
Issued May 22, 2013
   
500,000
     
500,000
 
Issued July 31, 2013
   
500,000
     
500,000
 
Issued December 20, 2013
 
 
100,000
     
100,000
 
Issued January 7, 2014
   
34,556
     
0
 
 Total
 
$
4,734,556
   
$
4,700,000
 
 Discount on Notes Payable
   
(957,695
)
   
(1,240,953
)
 Net Carrying Value
 
$
3,776,861
   
$
3,459,047
 
 
Optional Conversion
The “Lender” may, at its option, upon written notice to the Company, convert all or any portion of the unpaid principal balance of the note and/or unpaid accrued interest into shares of common stock of the Company, at a price of $0.20 per share of common stock. At March 31, 2014, no conversion had occurred.
 
Security
The Notes shall be secured by a first priority security interest in all tangible property of the Company, whether now owned or hereafter acquired, and all proceeds thereof.

Registration rights
Upon demand by the Lenders, the Company will file a registration statement on Form S-1 covering all shares issued or issuable upon conversion of the Notes and exercise of the Warrants. The Lenders will have customary piggy-back registration rights.
 
Lender’s Option on Certain Projects
The Lenders or their designees have a three-year (3) option to acquire a 20% interest in each of the Company’s Projects located in the Pioche Mining District in Nevada at a price equal to approximately the fair market value for each respective Project.

Outstanding convertible instrument
An optional conversion feature was included in the convertible term notes issued. The terms of the optional conversion grants the “Lender” the option to convert all or any portion of the unpaid principal balance of the note and/or unpaid accrued interest into shares of common stock of the Company, at a price of $0.20 per share of common stock. At March 31, 2014, the convertible note instruments had no beneficial conversion feature, and thus a discount on the notes themselves was not recognized, but the “detachable” warrants issued in conjunction with this financing were assigned a fair value due to their beneficial conversion feature on a “fully-converted” basis. In addition, an “intrinsic value” was also assigned on the warrants, pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles, as governed by ASC 470-20-55-12.

 
21

 
 
Qualified Financing
In the event that the Company, at any time after the original issuance of the Notes, proposes to consummate any equity offering or series of related equity offerings resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of not less than $250,000, the Company shall give written notice to the holder not less than 20 days prior to the consummation of such Qualified Financing. Upon consummation of such Qualified Financing, the Notes shall then and thereafter be convertible into shares of the same class as the shares issued in the Qualified Financing, and the conversion price per share shall be equal to the lesser of a) 90% of the implied price per share of common stock in such Qualified Financing, or b) the then-effective conversion price, subject to adjustments.
 
Warrants
Detachable warrants issued by the Company providing the Lender with the option to purchase 23,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as of March 31, 2014 are as follows:
 
Warrants Issued February 6, 2012
On February 6, 2012, the Company, in conjunction with the issuance of the initial convertible note in the amount of $600,000, issued a total of 3,000,000 “detachable” warrants to ISLV Partners, LLC for an option to purchase additional shares of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The number of such warrants issued equals the number of shares into which the applicable Lender’s note is convertible. The beneficial conversion option was derived as follows:
 
   
Allocation
   
Relative
 
   
of Proceeds
   
Value
 
             
Face Value of Convertible Note
 
$
600,000
       
No. of Common Shares
   
3,000,000
       
Current Market Value
             
Market Share price at Feb. 6, 2012
 
$
0.200
       
Market Value of Stock, if converted
 
$
600,000
   
$
533,333
 
                 
Fair Value - Warrants - At Time of Issuance - Feb 6, 2012
               
No. of Warrants Issued
   
3,000,000
         
Exercise Price
 
$
0.400
         
Fair Value - Based on Black-Scholes Method
               
Black-Scholes Value
 
$
0.025
         
Fair Value of Warrants
 
$
75,000
   
$
66,667
 
                 
Total/Relative Value
 
$
675,000
   
$
600,000
 
                 
Beneficial Conversion Option Calculation
               
Relative Note Value
         
$
533,333
 
                 
Face value of Note
         
$
600,000
 
                 
Conversion Price
         
$
0.200000
 
Intrinsic Conversion price/share
         
$
0.177778
 
Difference in price/share
         
$
0.022222
 
Number of shares convertible
           
3,000,000
 
Beneficial Conversion Option for fully converted note
         
$
66,667
 
 
 
22

 
 
Warrants Issued May 25, 2012
On May 25, 2012, the Company, in conjunction with the issuance of the two additional convertible notes in the amount of $130,000 and $1,870,000, issued a total of 10,000,000 “detachable” warrants to ISLV Partners, LLC for an option to purchase additional shares of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The number of such warrants issued equals the number of shares into which the applicable Lender’s note is convertible. The beneficial conversion option was derived as follows:
 
 
 
Allocation
 
 
Relative
 
 
 
of Proceeds
 
 
Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Face Value of Convertible Notes
 
$
2,000,000
 
 
 
 
No. of Common Shares
 
 
10,000,000
 
 
 
 
Current Market Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Share price at May 25, 2012
 
$
0.200
 
 
 
 
Market Value of Stock, if converted
 
$
2,000,000
 
 
$
1,777,778
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value - Warrants - At Time of Issuance – May 25, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No. of Warrants Issued
 
 
10,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise Price
 
$
0.400
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value - Based on Black-Scholes Method
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Black-Scholes Value
 
$
0.0250
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Warrants
 
$
250,000
 
 
$
222,222
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total/Relative Value
 
$
2,250,000
 
 
$
2,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beneficial Conversion Option Calculation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relative Note Value
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,777,778
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Face value of Note
 
 
 
 
 
$
2,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conversion Price
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.200000
 
Intrinsic conversion price/share
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.177778
 
Difference in price/share
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.022222
 
Number of shares convertible
 
 
 
 
 
 
10,000,000
 
Beneficial Conversion Option for fully converted note
 
 
 
 
 
$
222,222
 
 
Warrants Issued on February 21, 2013
On February 21, 2013, the Company, in conjunction with the issuance of the an additional convertible note in the amount of $1,000,000, issued a total of 5,000,000 “detachable” warrants to ISLV Partners, LLC for an option to purchase additional shares of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The number of such warrants issued equals the number of shares into which the applicable Lender’s note is convertible. The beneficial conversion option was derived as follows:
 
 
23

 
 
 
 
Allocation
 
 
Relative
 
 
 
of Proceeds
 
 
Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Face Value of Convertible Notes
 
$
1,000,000
 
 
 
 
No. of Common Shares
 
 
5,000,000
 
 
 
 
Current Market Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Share price at February 21, 2013
 
$
0.35
 
 
 
 
Market Value of Stock, if converted
 
$
1,750,000
 
 
$
916,230
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value - Warrants - At Time of Issuance – February 21, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No. of Warrants Issued
 
 
5,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise Price
 
$
0.400
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value - Based on Black-Scholes Method
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Black-Scholes Value
 
$
0.032
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Warrants
 
$
160,000
 
 
$
83,770
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total/Relative Value
 
$
1,910,000
 
 
$
1,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beneficial Conversion Option Calculation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relative Note Value
 
 
 
 
 
$
916,230
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Face value of Note
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,000,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conversion Price
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.200
 
Intrinsic conversion price/share
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.183
 
Beneficial Conversion Option for fully converted note
 
 
 
 
 
$
833,770
 
 
Warrants Issued on May 22, 2013
On May 22, 2013, the Company, in conjunction with the issuance of the an additional convertible note in the amount of $500,000, issued a total of 2,500,000 “detachable” warrants to ISLV Partners, LLC for an option to purchase additional shares of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The number of such warrants issued equals the number of shares into which the applicable Lender’s note is convertible. The beneficial conversion option was derived as follows:
 
 
 
Allocation
 
 
Relative
 
 
 
of Proceeds
 
 
Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Face Value of Convertible Notes
 
$
500,000
 
 
 
 
No. of Common Shares
 
 
2,500,000
 
 
 
 
Current Market Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Share price at May 22, 2013
 
$
0.45
 
 
 
 
Market Value of Stock, if converted
 
$
1,125,000
 
 
$
429,389
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value - Warrants - At Time of Issuance – May 22, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No. of Warrants Issued
 
 
2,500,000
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise Price
 
$
0.400
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value - Based on Black-Scholes Method
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Black-Scholes Value
 
$
0.074
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Warrants
 
$
185,000
 
 
$
70,611
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total/Relative Value
 
$
1,310,000
 
 
$
500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beneficial Conversion Option Calculation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relative Note Value
 
 
 
 
 
$
429,389
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Face value of Note
 
 
 
 
 
$
500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conversion Price
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.200
 
Intrinsic conversion price/share
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.172
 
Beneficial Conversion Option for fully converted note (limited to face value of note)
 
 
 
 
 
$
429,389
 
 
 
24

 
 
Warrants Issued on July 31, 2013
On July 31, 2013, the Company, in conjunction with the issuance of the an additional convertible note in the amount of $500,000, issued a total of 2,500,000 “detachable” warrants to ISLV Partners, LLC for an option to purchase additional shares of common stock of the Company, at an exercise price of $0.40 per share. The number of such warrants issued equals the number of shares into which the applicable Lender’s note is convertible. The beneficial conversion option was derived as follows:
 
 
 
Allocation
 
 
Relative
 
 
 
of Proceeds
 
 
Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Face Value of Convertible Notes
 
$
500,000
 
 
 
 
No. of Common Shares
 
 
2,500,000
 
 
 
 
Current Market Value
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Share price at July 31, 2013
 
$
0.38
 
 
 
 
Market Value of Stock, if converted
 
$
950,000
 
 
$
451,306
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value - Warrants - At Time of Issuance – July 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No. of Warrants Issued
 
 
2,500,000
 
 
 
 
 
Exercise Price
 
$
0.400
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value - Based on Black-Scholes Method
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Black-Scholes Value
 
$
0.041
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value of Warrants
 
$
102,500
 
 
$
48,694
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total/Relative Value
 
$
1,052,500
 
 
$
500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Beneficial Conversion Option Calculation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Relative Note Value
 
 
 
 
 
$
451,306
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Face value of Note
 
 
 
 
 
$
500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conversion Price
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.200
 
Intrinsic conversion price/share
 
 
 
 
 
$
0.181
 
Beneficial Conversion Option for fully converted note (limited to face value of note)
 
 
 
 
 
$
451,306
 
 
Adjustment to Warrant Price
The exercise price and the number of shares purchasable are subject to adjustment, but in no case shall the exercise price be reduced to below the par value of the class of stock for which this warrant is exercisable at such time, and the Company shall not take or permit to be taken any action which would cause the exercise price to be reduced below the par value per share of the class of stock for which this warrant is exercisable at such time.
 
If the Company makes a dividend or distribution on its common stock payable in common shares, the exercise price shall be proportionately adjusted effective as of the record date for the dividend or distribution. Other provisions requiring the adjustment to the warrant price relate to distributions other than common stock, adjustment upon merger, consolidation or exchange, recapitalization or reclassification.
 
 
25

 
 
Note I – Contract Payable

Contract Payable – Chattel, LLC
On April 27, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with Chattel, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, for the purchase of certain real property located in Silver Bow County, Montana. The contract for deed executed on August, 2012 was for a total purchase price was $1,500,000, with an earnest deposit of $50,000 placed prior to close of escrow. Interest on the unpaid balance is at a rate of four (4%) percent per annum. Payment terms are 1) $50,000 at close of escrow, plus accrued interest, 2) $50,000, plus accrued interest, due on the first and second anniversary date of the date of closing and 3) the balance due, including accrued interest, on the third anniversary date of the date of closing. In case of default, seller’s sole recourse shall be to reclaim all rights under the contract and buyer shall be liable for all payments in arrears, including interest.

Pursuant to ASC 360-20-55-2, the minimal initial investment requirement for the full recognition of the purchase price on land held for commercial or industrial purposes, requires a minimal investment of 20% of the value. Upon execution of the contract for deed on August 7, 2012, only the initial deposit of $50,000, plus title fees paid were capitalized, and thus no liability was recognized on August 7, 2012. On August 7, 2013, the first anniversary payment of $50,000, plus interest of $58,000 was paid. As of March 31, 2014, interest accrued was $36,208.
 
Note J – Income Taxes
 
The Company has reported (for income tax purposes) federal net operating losses for 2013, 2012 and prior years as follows:

Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2006
 
$
106,508
 
Net Operating Income - Year 2006 (Applied)
 
 
(4,693
)
Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2007
 
$
101,815
 
Net Operating Loss - Year 2007
 
 
111,921
 
Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2008
 
$
213,736
 
Net Operating Loss - Year 2008
 
 
237,958
 
Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2009
 
$
451,694
 
Net Operating Loss - Year 2009
 
 
62,811
 
Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2010
 
$
514,505
 
Net Operating Loss - Year 2010
 
 
47,369
 
Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2011
 
$
561,874
 
Net Operating Loss - Year 2011
 
 
1,061,616
 
Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2012
 
$
1,623,490
 
Net Operating Loss - Year 2012
 
 
1,393,549
 
Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2013
 
$
3,017,039
 
Net Operating Loss - Year 2013
 
 
1,706,747
 
Net Operating Loss carry-forward to Year 2014
 
$
4,723,786
 
 
Pursuant to the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company has elected to forego the carry-back provisions, allowable under the IRS regulations, for the stated accounting periods.

At March 31, 2014, the Company recorded a deferred tax benefit of $1,823,797 but due to a going-concern issue, management made an allowance for a provision of an equal amount, should the Company not be able to avail itself of that tax benefit. Deferred tax asset is based on prevailing IRS graduated tax tables, which average 34% at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. 

 
26

 
 
Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components:
 
 
 
March 31,
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2014
 
 
2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Tax Asset
 
$
1,823,797
 
 
$
1,706,747
 
Valuation Account
 
 
(1,823,797
)
 
 
(1,706,747
)
Net Deferred Tax Asset
 
$
0
 
 
$
0
 

At December 31, 2013, the Company had a net operating loss carry-forward of $4,723,786 for federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income from years 2014 through 2026-34. Our deferred tax benefit is adjusted for interim results, but we simultaneously adjust the allowance for a net zero effect. Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards for federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.
 
Note K – Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
 
Common Stock Issued and Outstanding

On August 28, 2012, the Company issued 271,452 shares of common stock at $0.20 per share in exchange for an outstanding debt owed to a shareholder/officer.

On December 2, 2013, the Company issued 14,519 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 9,679 Unit Purchase Options (UPO) at an exercise price of $0.15 per unit. The exercise of these UPO’s resulted in the issuance of 9,679 warrants which were exercised as a cashless exercise.

On January 21, 2014, the Company issued 25,296 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 16,864 Unit Purchase Options (UPO) at an exercise price of $0.15 per unit. The exercise of these UPO’s resulted in the issuance of 16,864 warrants which were exercised as a cashless exercise.

At March 31, 2014, the Company had 37,092,095 shares issued and outstanding. The Company has 500,000,000 shares of common stock authorized.
 
Stock Option Plan
At November 1, 2010, the Board of Directors (“Board”) of the Company authorized the approval of a stock option plan (the “Plan”). The Plan allows the Board, or a committee thereof at the Board’s discretion, to grant stock options to officers, directors, key employees and consultants of the company and its affiliates.

On February 28, 2013, the Board amended the Plan establishing the maximum number of shares of common stock to be reserved for issuance under the Plan at 5,000,000.

Pursuant to the Plan, in the case of Incentive Stock Options, the exercise price shall not be less than (i) 100% of the fair market value of one (1) share of common stock on the date the option is granted, or (ii) 110% of the fair market value of one (1) share of common Stock on the date the option is granted if, at that time the option is granted, the participant owns, directly or indirectly more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the company. In the case of Non-Statutory Stock Options, the per share price to be paid by the Participant, at the time the option is exercised, shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

On November 1, 2010, stock options for 3,300,000 shares were granted to directors, officers, key employees and consultants at an exercise price of $0.20, which was in excess of the quoted market price of $0.12 of the Company’s shares at the date of the grant. All these options were deemed as “incentive stock options” by the Board in accordance with the Plan. These option grants are fully vested and expire on November 1, 2015. Stock compensation expense of $396,000 was recognized based on the Black-Scholes valuation of $0.12 per share of common stock.

 
27

 
 
On November 5, 2012, stock options for 400,000 shares were granted to directors at an exercise price of $0.34, which was in excess of the quoted market price of $0.30 of the Company’s shares at the date of the grant. Stock options for 150,000 shares granted to new directors are fully vested and expire on November 5, 2015. The additional stock options for 250,000 shares issued to all directors vested on September 15, 2013. All these options were deemed as “incentive stock options” by the Board in accordance with the Plan. Stock compensation expense of $28,000 was recognized based on the Black-Scholes valuation of $0.07 per share of common stock.
 
No stock options were exercised or forfeited for the three months ended March 31, 2014 or for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Compensation expense has been recorded pursuant to ASC 718 – Compensation – Stock Compensation based on fair value derived by means of applying the Black Scholes (BSM) option-pricing model as follows.

The fair value of each option granted on November 1, 2010 was calculated assuming an expected life of five years, current stock price of $0.12 per share, an exercise price of $0.20 per share, an annual risk-free interest rate of 3.0% and a dividend yield of zero yielding a volatility of greater than 823%.
 
The fair value of each option granted on November 5, 2012 was calculated assuming an expected life of five years, current stock price of $0.30 per share, an exercise price of $0.34 per share, an annual risk-free interest rate of 3.0% and a dividend yield of zero yielding a volatility of less than 1%.
 
A summary status of stock option activity as of March 31, 2014 is as follows:

   
Number of
   
Weighted
Average
   
Options
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
   
(in years)
Average
Contractual
 
   
Stock Options
   
Exercise Price
   
Exercisable
   
Price
   
Life
 
Outstanding, January 1, 2010
    0    
 
      0              
Granted - November 1, 2010
    3,300,000     $ 0.20       3,300,000     $ 0.20       5.0  
Exercised
    0               0                  
Outstanding, December 31, 2011
    3,300,000     $ 0.20       3,300,000     $ 0.20       4.8  
Granted - November 5, 2012
    400,000     $ 0.34       400,000     $ 0.34          
Exercised
    0               0                  
Outstanding, December 31, 2012
    3,700,000     $ 0.22       3,700,000     $ 0.22       3.0  
Granted
    0       0       0                  
Exercised
    0       0       0                  
Outstanding, December 31, 2013
    3,700,000     $ 0.22       3,700,000     $ 0.22       2.3  
Granted
    0       0       0                  
Exercised
    0       0       0                  
Outstanding, March 31, 2014
    3,700,000     $ 0.22       3,700,000     $ 0.22       2.3  

Warrants
To date 31,483,907 warrants have been issued resulting from 1) a private placement occurring in 2011 in which 8,238,998 warrants were issued, 2) six convertible notes in which an aggregate of 23,000,000 warrants were issued, 3) 271,452 warrants issued in settlement of outstanding debt due the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Board Chairman, Harold R. Shipes, 4) 13,272 warrants issued in conjunction with the exercise of Unit Purchase Options (UPO’s), less 39,815 UPO’s exercised.

On May 20, 2011 and June 14, 2011, as a component of the 8,238,998 “units” the Company sold in private placements, the Company issued 8,238,998 Class A common stock warrants, each granting the holder the right to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. Each warrant expires in three years.

 
28

 

On February 6, 2012, the Company negotiated a convertible note agreement, whereby the lender was issued 3,000,000 warrants, with an expiry date of February 6, 2015, exercisable at $0.40 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares into which the initial note is convertible.

On May 17 and May 25, 2012, the Company negotiated convertible term notes of $130,000 and $1,870,000, respectively, aggregating $2,000,000, whereby the lender was issued an additional 10,000,000 warrants, with an expiration date of May 25, 2015, exercisable at $0.40 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares into which the notes are convertible

On August 28, 2012, the Company issued Harold R. Shipes, its Chief Executive Officer and Director, a total of 271,452 shares of common stock in exchange for debt, plus 271,452 warrants, exercisable at $0.40 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares issued. These warrants expire on August 28, 2015.

On February 21, 2013, the Company negotiated a convertible term note of $1,000,000 whereby the lender was issued an additional 5,000,000 warrants, with an expiry date of February 21, 2016, exercisable at $0.40 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares into which the notes are convertible.
 
On May 22, 2013, the Company negotiated a convertible term note of $500,000 whereby the lender was issued an additional 2,500,000 warrants, with an expiry date of May 22, 2016, exercisable at $0.40 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares into which the notes are convertible.
 
On July 31, 2013, the Company negotiated a convertible term note of $500,000 whereby the lender was issued an additional 2,500,000 warrants, with an expiry date of July 31, 2016, exercisable at $0.40 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares into which the notes are convertible.

On December 2, 2013, 9,679 unit purchase options were exercised and a cashless warrant exercise occurred, resulting in the issuance of 14,519 shares of common stock for $1,452 and an additional 4,840 warrants issued.
 
On January 21, 2014, 16,864 unit purchase options were exercised and a cashless warrant exercise occurred, resulting in the issuance of 25,296 shares of common stock for $2,530 and an additional 8,432 warrants issued.

As of March 31, 2014, there are 31,483,907 warrants outstanding.
 
A summary of warrant activity From January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2014 as follows:

   
Number of
   
Weighted
Average
   
Warrants
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise
 
   
Warrants
   
Exercise Price
   
Exercisable
   
Price
 
Outstanding, January 1, 2010
   
0
   
 
     
0
       
Granted
   
8,238,998
   
$
0.20
     
8,238,998
   
$
0.20
 
Exercised
   
0
             
0
         
Outstanding, December 31, 2011
   
8,238,998
   
$
0.20
     
8,238,998
   
$
0.20
 
Granted
   
13,271,452
   
$
0.40
     
13,271,452
   
$
0.40
 
Exercised
   
0
             
0
         
Outstanding, December 31, 2012
   
21,510,450
   
$
0.32
     
21,510,450
   
$
0.32
 
Granted
   
10,004,840
   
$
0.40
     
10,004,840
   
$
0.40
 
Exercised
   
14,519
             
14,519
         
Outstanding, December 31, 2013
   
31,500,771
   
$
0.35
     
31,500,771
   
$
0.35
 
Granted
   
8,432
             
8,432
         
Exercised
   
25,296
             
25,296
         
Outstanding, March 31, 2014
   
31,483,907
   
$
0.35
     
31,483,907
   
$
0.35
 
 
 
29

 
 
At March 31, 2014, the range of warrant prices for shares under warrants and the weighted-average remaining contractual life is as follows:
 
     
 Warrants O/S
   
Warrants Exercisable
 
Range of
Warrant Exercise
Price
   
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
   
Number of
Warrants
   
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
   
Number of
Warrants
   
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
                             
 
 
$
0.20
     
0.38
     
7,699,998
   
$
0.20
     
7,699,998
   
$
0.20
 
$
0.20
     
0.45
     
512,457
   
$
0.20
     
512,457
   
$
0.20
 
$
0.40
     
1.10
     
3,000,000
   
$
0.40
     
3,000,000
   
$
0.40
 
$
0.40
     
1.40
     
10,000,000
   
$
0.40
     
10,000,000
   
$
0.40
 
$
0.40
     
1.66
     
271,452
   
$
0.40
     
271,452
   
$
0.40
 
$
0.40
     
2.14
     
5,000,000
   
$
0.40
     
5,000,000
   
$
0.40
 
$
0.40
     
2.39
     
2,500,000
   
$
0.40
     
2,500,000
   
$
0.40
 
$
0.40
     
2.58
     
2,500,000
   
$
0.40
     
2,500,000
   
$
0.40
 
         
1.40
     
31,483,907
             
31,483,907
         
 
Note L – Related Party Transactions
 
Amounts due from and to related parties, are receivable from or payable to entities controlled by the shareholders, officers, or directors of the Company (“Related Entities”). The underlying transactions are with these related parties. These amounts are unsecured and not subject to specific terms of repayment.
 
 
 
March 31,
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2014
 
 
2013
 
Due To Related Parties
 
 
 
 
 
 
Harold R. Shipes - Shareholder/Officer
 
$
43,069
 
 
$
18,308
 
Eileen Shipes
 
 
3,048
 
 
 
2,683
 
Matthew J. Lang
 
 
1,385
 
 
 
1,102
 
Danielle Lang
 
 
2,417
 
 
 
1,361
 
Clarity Management, LP
 
 
2,732
 
 
 
2,732
 
 Total
 
$
52,651
   
$
26,186
 
 
At March 31, 2014, we owed $52,651 to related parties.
 
Related party transactions have occurred with the following related party officer and directors:

Harold R. Shipes, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, travels extensively in connection with the Company’s holdings or prospective holdings which is reimbursable by the Company. At March 31, 2014, there were reimbursable expenses due Mr. Shipes in the amount of $43,069 and at December 31, 2013, Mr. Shipes was owed $18,308. Other related party transactions involve reimburseable expenses to an officer and employees related to the Chief Executive Officer.

 
30

 
 
Note M – Deferred Income

Calico Mineral Lease Agreement 
On November 10, 2012, the Company, as the “Lessor”, entered into a mineral lease agreement with Calico Exploration, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Calico”), which provides for the Company’s lease of certain claims located in San Bernadino County, California. The lease provides for a 10-year term with Calico’s option to continue the lease for up to a maximum of 75 years. Calico was required to make a $100,000 down payment to the Company, which Calico has already paid. Calico is also required to pay the Company annual lease payments of $50,000 and a net smelter return production royalty of two percent (2%) on a quarterly basis, commencing January 1, 2013. Prior to the payment of any net smelter return, the Company has a pre-emptive right and the first right of refusal to participate in up to forty (40%) percent of the claims plus an area of influence of two thousand (2,000) feet in any direction of the outside boundaries.

At March 31, 2014, there was $37,808 of deferred income from the Calico mineral lease agreement.
 
G.I Canoas S.A.P.I de C.V. Engineering Services Contract
On October 1, 2013, the Company entered into a contract with G.I. Canoas S.A.P.I de C.V., a Mexican company, for the design engineering and procurement services on construction of leach and solvent extraction electro-winning facilities. The term of the agreement is for twelve months, renewable upon reasonable terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by both parties. A retainer of $50,000 was received by the client and will be applied to the last invoice upon termination of services.

At March 31, 2014, there was a balance of $50,000 in the retainage account.
 
Note N – Exploration Costs

Acquired mineral interests are presented as “exploration costs” as required by “Industry Guide 7” of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Guides for the Preparation of Registration Statements and with the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration’s “Guide for Reporting Exploration Information, Mineral Resources, and Mineral Reserves”. Exploration costs incurred since inception through March 31, 2014 are $1,980,248. Exploration costs incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $128,099.
 
Note O – Subsequent Events
 
Management has reviewed all subsequent events through the issuance date of the audited financial statements and has represents that the following material events that have transpired subsequent to March 31, 2014 up through the issuance date.

On April 10, 2014, the Company negotiated an extension until June 4, 2014 on the Prince Mine lease that was due November 6, 2013. See Note D – Property, Plant and Equipment.
 
The Fifth Amendment to the Convertible Note Agreement, dated February 21, 2014, granted an extension on the notes and obligations for a period of 60 days through April 22, 2014. A contingent 60-day extension (“Extension Option Date”) through June 22, 2014 is in effect.
 
 
31

 
 
ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION’S AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and its related notes. Additionally, this Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and related notes for the Company’s Fiscal Year ending December 31, 2012. The terms “we,” “our” or “us” refer to International Silver, Inc. This discussion contains forward-looking statements based on our current expectations, assumptions, and estimates. The words or phrases “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “anticipates,” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements.” The results shown herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in any future periods. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of risks and uncertainties pertaining to our business, included the risk factors contained herein.

We are an exploration stage company that engages in minerals exploration activities in the United States and Mexico involving silver, gold, zinc, copper and other minerals. To date, we have not generated any revenues from any of these activities since approximately June, 2006, when we switched our emphasis in our business plan and commenced our mineral exploration business. To date, our exploration activities have been limited to the exploration and purchasing of mineral interests in the United States and Mexico.

Results of Operations

Operating Performance for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (the “March 2014 Quarter”) as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013 (the “March, 2013 Quarter”) was as follows:

For the March 2014 Quarter, we recorded a net loss of $758,540, as compared to a net loss of $1,469,444 for the March 2013 Quarter or a decrease in net loss of $710,904 or 48%, as compared to the March 31, 2014 Quarter. The decrease in the net loss resulted primarily from decreased interest/financing costs.
 
Operating expenses reflected during the March 2014 Quarter were $541,367, a decrease of $60,502 or 10% as compared to operating expenses of $601,869 for the March 31, 2013 Quarter. The decrease in operating expenses was in the area of director’s fees, insurance expense, legal fees and travel.

Other Income/(Expense) during the March 2014 Quarter was $426,175, a net decrease of $538,883, as compared to the March 2013 Quarter of $965,058. The decrease in the net loss resulted primarily from the amortization of discount on notes due to the recognition of a substantially higher “beneficial conversion feature” of the conversion option on the convertible notes issued to ISLV Partners, LLC during the March 2013 Quarter.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our financial statements as presented in Item 1 of this report have been prepared in conformity with US GAAP, which contemplate our continuation as a going concern. However, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our financial statements, for the three months ended March 31, 2014, contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The “going concern” qualification results from, among other things, our development-stage status, no revenue recognized since inception, other than from management and engineering consulting services, and our net losses from inception as a development stage company, which total 9,458,265 and the uncertainty in raising additional capital. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if we were unable to continue as a going concern.
 
 
32

 
 
Currently, we have funded our operations through private placements, short-term convertible notes, and some on-going engineering consulting services. The capital required to execute our total business vision and objectives is significant. Since February 6, 2012, we have negotiated convertible term notes totaling $4,734,556. During 2014, we will continue our efforts to raise additional capital to fund the working capital requirements and exploration and development activities necessary to meet our business objectives.

Our capital budget for 2014 for the completion of acquisitions, exploration and development programs in the Pioche Mining District in Nevada and in Silver Bow County, Montana is approximately $1.7 million.
 
Cash and Cash Flows

Cash on hand at March 31, 2014 was $1,667 compared to $98,411 at December 31, 2013. A build-up in trade receivables has resulted in the decrease in cash reserves, as engineering contracts are presently the only source of income to the Company. Cash has decreased $96,744 from the cash balance reflected as of December 31, 2013. Aside from $134,556 received in the last four months from the issuance of convertible notes, funding have been minimal. Exploration activities have been sustained primarily by providing engineering and procurement services on two third-party contracts.

Net cash flows from operating activities were ($133,903) for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to ($673,723) for the three months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $539,820. The increase in net cash flows over the prior comparative period is attributable to increased revenue from engineering services, lower operating and administrative costs and an increase in payables.

Investment activities during the three months ended March 31, 2014 were nil. Capital purchases during the three months ended March 31, 2013 were $11,800 spent on furniture & fixtures for our Butte Montana exploration office and a $10,000 deposit towards an investment.

Financing activities undertaken during the three months ended March 31, 2014, included the issuance of an additional convertible note to ISLV Partners, LLC in the amount of $34,566 and $2,603 in proceeds received from the exercise of unit purchase options. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued a convertible note in the amount of $1,000,000 to ISLV Partners, LLC.
 
Going forward, our business plan does not reflect, nor do we anticipate, any revenues from our properties during the remaining part of our exploration phase until we confirm previously demonstrated mineralization, obtain operating permits, and construct mining and processing facilities. We have generated $209,002 in revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2014 from engineering contracts through our affiliate Western States Engineering, Inc.
 
 
33

 
 
Exploration Costs – Inception to Date
 
On June 16, 2006, our Board of Directors passed a resolution to change the nature of its operations from an engineering services company to an exploration company. Since converting our business plan to conducting exploration activities, we have purchased the following properties and engaged in the exploration activities and incurred the following exploration costs since inception:
 
Capital Acquisitions:
 
 
 
A) Purchase of Tecoma Mine - Year 2007
 
$
90,000
 
B) Sale of Tecoma Mine - Year 2008
 
 
(90,000
)
C) Purchase of Magna Charta property - Silver Bow County, Montana
 
 
47,500
 
D) Purchase of Chattel property - Silver Bow County, Montana
 
 
105,888
 
Total Capital Acquisitions
 
$
153,388
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exploration Costs:
 
 
 
 
A) Acquisition of 98% interest in Metals Preciosos, S.A. de C.V.,
 
 
 
 
a Mexican company
 
 
 
 
1) El Cumbro property
 
$
14,260
 
2) El Cusito property
 
 
15,000
 
3) Canada de Oro property
 
 
15,000
 
4) La Moneda property
 
 
10,000
 
B) Langtry property - options expired - exploration abandoned
 
 
 
 
1) Option payments
 
 
100,000
 
2) Exploration costs
 
 
21,075
 
C) Calico Mining District - San Bernadino County, California
 
 
 
 
1) Silverado mining claims - acquisition of BLM mineral claims
 
 
4,760
 
2) Leviathon mining claims - acquisition of BLM mineral claims
 
 
47,609
 
D) Pioche Mining District - Lincoln County, Nevada
 
 
 
 
1) Prince Mine lease
 
 
792,245
 
2) Caselton Tailings exploration costs
 
 
514,532
 
3) Caselton Mine/Mill exploration costs
 
 
53,332
 
E) Silver Bow County, Montana
 
 
 
 
1) New Butte property lease
 
 
84,280
 
2) Continental Public Land Trust lease
 
 
43,424
 
3) Chattel property
 
 
1,256
 
4) Magna Charta property
   
432
 
4) MG&A
 
 
159,330
 
3) Silver Bar property (option) – abandoned
 
 
6,819
 
4) Butte properties - General exploration costs
 
 
54,262
 
F) Other Exploration Sites (evaluated)
 
 
 
 
1) Anaconda
 
 
7,500
 
2) Oro Blanco
 
 
8,840
 
3) SE Arizona Silver
 
 
4,829
 
4) Mohave Gold
 
 
1,050
 
5) Zonia Mine
 
 
6,650
 
6) General Administrative costs
 
 
13,763
 
Total Exploration Costs
 
$
1,980,248
 
 
These direct exploration costs account for approximately 25% of the total operating expenditures of $7,897,927, since our exploration activities commenced on June 16, 2006. General and administrative expenses, which include salaries, consulting, director’s fees, insurance, rent, mineral leases and travel, comprise the majority of the remaining of the operating expenditures for this time period.
 
 
34

 

Uncertainties and Trends

Our revenues are dependent now, and in the future, upon the following factors:
 
·
Price volatility in worldwide commodity prices, including silver, gold, and other minerals, which is affected by: (a) sale or purchase of silver by central banks and financial institutions; (b) interest rates; (c) currency exchange rates; (d) inflation or deflation; (e) speculation; and (f) fluctuating prices in worldwide and local commodities for petroleum-related products, chemicals, and solvents, which will affect our ability to obtain additional and continuing funding;
   
·
Global and regional supply and demand of silver, gold, and other minerals, including investment, industrial and jewelry demand;
   
·
Political and economic conditions associated with major silver, gold or other mineral-producing countries;
   
·
Threatened changes to the U.S. Mining Law that may cause increasing federal land royalties, or other unanticipated consequences and increased US mining operations cost; and
   
·
Global economic conditions may affect pricing and availability of materials and supplies.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement with an entity unconsolidated with us under whom we have

·
An obligation under a guarantee contract

·
a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to the unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity for such assets,
 
 
·
any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument, or

·
any obligation, including a contingent obligation, arising out of a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that is held by us and material to us where such entity provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.”

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments that have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material, other than those which may be disclosed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.
 
Changes in Accounting Policies
 
The significant accounting policies outlined within our interim condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31, 2014 have been applied consistently with the year ended December 31, 2013.
 
Recently Enacted Accounting Standards
 
Management has evaluated recent accounting pronouncements issued since the audited financial statements and in management’s opinion, relevant pronouncements reviewed have no material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
 
 
35

 
 
PLAN OF OPERATIONS

Overview
Our Plan of Operations has been organized for each of our properties and claims to account for the similarities and differences in the location, geology, the prospective metals that may be hosted by each property or claim, and the current stage of exploration of each property and claim; accordingly, we have several Plans of Operations to account for those similarities and differences among our various properties and claims. Our Plans of Operations represent our expected exploration activities and are for a period of twelve months. The total amount budgeted for exploration, acquisition and development in 2014 is $ 1,712,000.

At the Butte Silver Mines properties, we will be evaluating and compiling the voluminous historic exploration and mining data on the properties and will commence with preliminary mine development planning. We believe that we have adequate mineral resources defined on the Butte properties to merit initiation of this planning which will be concurrent with geologic mapping and sampling of mineralized structures and surveying of existing underground development. Based upon our analysis of the test results and studies, we will determine whether to proceed with development plans. We cannot determine, predict, or assure whether we will be able to proceed with advanced exploration and development activities regarding any of our properties or claims. Our exploration activities will be conducted under the overall direction of our registered consulting geologist using industry standard quality assurance and control procedures.

We are   continuing with the evaluation of the Pioche area, Phase II drill program and resource potential of the Prince Mine. Phase 1 Drill program of the projected extensions of the known silver mineralization was completed in the fall of 2012.
 
Properties -The Butte Silver Mines properties in Silver Bow County, Montana, the Pioche Mining District properties in Lincoln County, Nevada and The Calico Silver Project in San Bernardino County, California

Our exploration program is shown below:

Exploration at Butte Silver Mines
 
1)
Data and property acquisition.
Our staff will continue to compile the exploration records from these historic Anaconda Company mines. While much data is in our possession, other sources will be utilized in order to make the records as complete as possible. Once acquired, the exploration and development data will be compiled using mine planning software to regenerate resource estimates. Underground levels will be plotted as will drift sampling records and exploration drill holes. Selected mineral and surface interests ancillary to our properties are also slated for acquisition.

2)
Development Planning.
Based on the presently known historic resources and proposed AMC underground mine plans, we expect to be able to create new preliminary mine development plans for the Project. This will require underground mapping, surveying and confirmation sampling. As the condition of much of the existing underground development headings is presently unknown, the extent of this work to be conducted in 2013 is uncertain.
 
Exploration at Pioche Properties:
 
 
Surface and underground drilling.
All accumulated data from the 2012 Phase I Drill Program, geochemical and geophysical studies will be evaluated to confirm the highest priority targets for Phase II exploration on the Prince Mine.
 
Exploration at Calico Property
 
 
We have leased the Calico Silver property to another exploration company and will focus our exploration efforts on the Pioche and Butte Mining Districts.
 
 
36

 
 
Our ability to complete any of the activities described under “Plan of Operations” will require significant funding. To the extent that we are able to secure funding for a portion of our needs, we will have to allocate such funding among the projects, and we may be unable to complete components of these projects. If we are able to obtain only limited funding, it may result in significant dilution to our shareholders. Further, our use of proceeds may be determined by the investors based on their priorities, which may be different from our priorities.

We have leased the Calico Silver property to another exploration company and will focus our exploration efforts on the Pioche and Butte Mining Districts. We will use employees, consultants and existing infrastructure to conduct our activities in the Pioche Nevada and the Butte, Montana properties.
 
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. This information is accumulated and communicated to our executive officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation and the requirements of the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures needed to be declared as ineffective. The small size of our company does not provide for the desired separation of control functions, and we do not have the required level of documentation of our monitoring and control procedures. The potential remedies for this situation are described below.
 
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and determined that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of March 31, 2014 due to material weaknesses. A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Audit Standard No. 5 as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of our financial reporting. Management’s assessment identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting:
 
 
37

 
 
Our small size limits our ability to achieve the desired level of separation our internal controls and financial reporting. We have a separate CEO, CFO and an Audit Committee to review and oversee the financial policies and procedures of the Company, but due to lack of independence, management considers this a material weakness. Although, we have installed an audit committee, we still do not meet the full requirement for separation. In the interim, we will continue to strengthen the role of our CEO and CFO and their review of our internal control procedures.

We have not achieved the desired level of documentation of our internal controls and procedures. This documentation will be strengthened to limit the possibility of any lapse in controls occurring.
 
In light of the material weaknesses described above, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

Subject to the Company’s financial resources management hopes to further mitigate the risk of the material weaknesses going forward by utilizing external financial consulting services, in a more effective manner, prior to the review by our principal independent accounting firm to ensure that all information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately and within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rule and forms.
 
Changes in internal controls
 
Our management, with the participation our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation as to whether any change in our internal controls over financial reporting occurred during the financial quarter ending March 31, 2014. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that no change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting during the financial quarter ending March 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 
38

 
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1 – Legal Proceedings.

We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us or our officers and directors.

ITEM 1A – Risk Factors.

Risk Factors

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

As a Smaller Reporting Company, we are not required to provide risk factors; however, please consult our Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, which contains risk factors and is available for review at sec.gov.
 
ITEM 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On December 2, 2013, we issued 14,519 shares of common stock to Kevin Wilson, as a result of his exercise of 9,679 units purchase options (UPO’s) for $1,452 and a “cashless exercise” of warrants thereof.

On January 21, 2014, we issued 25,296 shares of common stock to Matthew Eitner, as a result of his exercise of 16,864 units purchase options (UPO’s) for $2,530 and a “cashless exercise” of warrants thereof.

We relied upon Sections 4(2) and 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended for the offer and sale of the above shares. We believed that Section 4(2) was available because: (a) there was no general solicitation in the offer or sale; (b) all purchasers were accredited investors; (c) we placed restrictive legends on the certificates representing these securities issued to the accredited investors stating that the securities were not registered under the Securities Act and are subject to restrictions on their transferability and resale; and (d) the offer and sale did not involve a public offering.
 
ITEM 3 – Defaults upon Senior Securities.

None
 
ITEM 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable
 
ITEM 5 – Other Information.

None
 
 
39

 
 
ITEM 6 – Exhibits.
 
Exhibit 31.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
Exhibit 31.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.1
 
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.2
 
Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
101.INS **
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101.CAL **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.DEF **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.LAB **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.PRE **
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
_______________
** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
 
 
40

 
 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
INTERNATIONAL SILVER, INC.
 
 
 
 
 
Dated: May 12, 2014
By:
/s/ Harold R. Shipes
 
 
 
Harold R. Shipes,
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer/Chairman of the Board
 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.
 
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Harold R. Shipes
 
Chairman of the Board/Director
 
May 12, 2014
Harold R. Shipes
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ John A. McKinney
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
May 12, 2014
John A. McKinney
 
Executive Vice President
 
 
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
41

International Silver (CE) (USOTC:ISLV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024 Click Here for more International Silver (CE) Charts.
International Silver (CE) (USOTC:ISLV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024 Click Here for more International Silver (CE) Charts.