NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
TriCo Bancshares (the “Company” or “we”) is a California corporation organized to act as a bank holding company for Tri Counties Bank (the “Bank”). The Company and the Bank are headquartered in Chico, California. The Bank is a California-chartered bank that is engaged in the general commercial banking business in 29 California counties. The Company has five capital subsidiary business trusts (collectively, the “Capital Trusts”) that issued trust preferred securities, including two organized by the Company and three acquired with the acquisition of North Valley Bancorp.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices in the banking industry. All adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The financial statements include the accounts of the Company. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. For financial reporting purposes, the Company’s investments in the Capital Trusts of $1,792,000 are accounted for under the equity method and, accordingly, are not consolidated and are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The subordinated debentures issued and guaranteed by the Company and held by the Capital Trusts are reflected as debt on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “2019 Annual Report”). The Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading.
Segment and Significant Group Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company grants agribusiness, commercial, consumer, and residential loans to customers located throughout northern and central California. The Company has a diversified loan portfolio within the business segments located in this geographical area. The Company currently classifies all its operation into one business segment that it denotes as community banking.
Geographical Descriptions
For the purpose of describing the geographical location of the Company’s operations, the Company has defined northern California as that area of California north of, and including, Stockton to the east and San Jose to the west; central California as that area of the state south of Stockton and San Jose, to and including, Bakersfield to the east and San Luis Obispo to the west; and southern California as that area of the state south of Bakersfield and San Luis Obispo.
Reclassification
Some items in the prior year consolidated financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Reclassifications had no effect on prior year net income or shareholders’equity.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Net cash flows are reported for loan and deposit transactions and other borrowings. For purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, cash, due from banks with original maturities less than 90 days, interest-earning deposits in other banks, and Federal funds sold are considered to be cash equivalents.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Held to Maturity Securities
The Company measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity debt securities on a collective basis by major security type, then further disaggregated by sector and bond rating. Accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity debt securities totaled $920,000 at March 31, 2020 and is excluded from the estimate of credit losses. The estimate of expected credit losses considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current condition and reasonable and supportable forecasts based on current and expected changes in credit ratings and default rates. Based on the implied guarantees of the U. S. Government or its agencies related to certain of these investment securities, and the absence of any historical or expected losses, substantially all qualify for a zero loss assumption. Management has separately evaluated its HTM investment securities from obligations of state and political subdivisions utilizing the historical loss data represented by similar securities over a period of time spanning nearly 50 years. As a result of this evaluation, management determined that the expected credit losses associated with these securities is not significant for financial reporting purposes and therefore, no allowance for credit losses has been recognized.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity or payoff are reported at principle amount outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs. Loans are placed in nonaccrual status when reasonable doubt exists as to the full, timely collection of interest or principal, or a loan becomes contractually past due by 90 days or more with respect to interest or principal and is not well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income. Income on such loans is then recognized only to the extent that cash is received and where the future collection of principal is considered probable. Interest accruals are resumed on such loans only when they are brought fully current with respect to interest and principal and when, in the judgment of Management, the loan is estimated to be fully collectible as to both principal and interest. Accrued interest receivable is not included in the calculation of the allowance for credit losses.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans
The allowance for credit losses (ACL) is a valuation account that is deducted from the loan's amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loans are charged off against the allowance when management believes the recorded loan balance is confirmed as uncollectible. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off. Regardless of the determination that a charge-off is appropriate for financial accounting purposes, the Company manages its loan portfolio by continually monitoring, where possible, a borrower's ability to pay through the collection of financial information, delinquency status, borrower discussion and the encouragement to repay in accordance with the original contract or modified terms, if appropriate.
Management estimates the allowance balance using relevant information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective (pool) basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses, which captures loan balances as of a point in time to form a cohort, then tracks the respective losses generated by that cohort of loans over the remaining life. The Company identified and accumulated loan cohort historical loss data beginning with the fourth quarter of 2008 and through the current period. In situations where the Company's actual loss history was not statistically relevant, the loss history of peers, defined as financial institutions with assets greater than three billion and less than ten billion, were utilized to create a minimum loss rate. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in relevant current loan-specific risk characteristics, such as historical timing of losses relative to the loan origination. In its loss forecasting framework, the Company incorporates forward-looking information through the use of macroeconomic scenarios applied over the forecasted life of the assets. These macroeconomic scenarios incorporate variables that have historically been key drivers of increases and decreases in credit losses. These variables include, but are not limited to changes in environmental conditions, such as California unemployment rates, household debt levels and U.S. gross domestic product.
A loan is considered to be collateral dependent when repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral. The ACL on collateral dependent loans is measured using the fair value of the underlying collateral, adjusted for costs to sell when applicable, less the amortized cost basis of the financial asset. If the value of underlying collateral is determined to be less than the recorded amount of the loan, a charge-off will be taken. Loans for which the terms have been modified resulting in a concession, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, is considered to be a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). The ACL on a TDR is measured using the same method as all other portfolio loans, except when the value of a concession cannot be measured using a method other than the discounted cash flow method. When the value of a concession is measured using the discounted cash flow method, the ACL is determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at the original interest rate of the loan.
The Company has identified the following portfolio segments to evaluate and measure the allowance for credit loss:
One to four residential term loans: The most significant drivers of potential loss within the Company's residential real estate portfolio relate general, regional, or individual changes in economic conditions and their effect on employment and borrowers cash flow. Risk in this portfolio is best measured by changes in borrower credit score and loan-to-value. Loss estimates are based on the general movement in credit score, economic outlook and its effects on employment and the value of homes and the Bank’s historical loss experience adjusted to reflect the economic outlook and the unemployment rate.
Commercial mortgage loans:
Commercial real estate - Owner occupied: These credits are primarily susceptible to changes in the financial condition of the business operated by the property owner. This may be driven by changes in, among other things, industry challenges, factors unique to the operating geography of the borrower, change in the individual fortunes of the business owner, general economic conditions and changes in business cycles. When default is driven by issues related specifically to the business owner, collateral values tend to provide better repayment support and may result in little or no loss. Alternatively, when default is driven more by general economic conditions, the underlying collateral may have devalued more and thus result in larger losses in the event of default. The terms on these loans at origination typically have maturities from five to ten years with amortization periods from fifteen to thirty years.
Commercial real estate - Non-owner occupied: These commercial properties typically consist of buildings which are leased to others for their use and rely on rents as the primary source of repayment. Property types are predominantly office, retail, or light industrial but the portfolio also has some special use properties. As such, the risk of loss associated with these properties is primarily driven by general economic changes or changes in regional economies and the impact of such on a tenant’s ability to pay. Ultimately this can affect occupancy, rental rates, or both. Additional risk of loss can come from new construction resulting in oversupply, the costs to hold or operate the property, or changes in interest rates. The terms on these loans at origination typically have maturities from five to ten years with amortization periods from fifteen to thirty years.
Multifamily: These commercial properties are generally comprised of more than four rentable units, such as apartment buildings, with each unit intended to be occupied as the primary residence for one or more persons. Multifamily properties are also subject to changes in general or regional economic conditions, such as unemployment, ultimately resulting in increased vacancy rates or reduced rents or both. In addition, new construction can create an oversupply condition and market competition resulting in increased vacancy, reduced market rents, or both. Due to the nature of their use and the greater likelihood of tenant turnover, the management of these properties is more intensive and therefore is more critical to the preclusion of loss.
Farmland: While the Company has few loans that were originated for the purpose of the acquisition of these commercial properties, loans secured by farmland represent unique risks that are associated with the operation of an agricultural businesses. The valuation of farmland can vary greatly over time based on the property's access to resources including but not limited to water, crop prices, foreign exchange rates, government regulation or restrictions, and the nature of ongoing capital investment needed to maintain the quality of the property. Loans secured by farmland typically represent less risk to the Company than other agriculture loans as the real estate typically provides greater support in the event of default or need for longer term repayment.
Consumer loans:
Home equity lines of credit (HELOC): Similar to residential real estate term loans, HELOC performance is also primarily driven by borrower cash flows based on employment status. However, HELOCs carry additional risks associated with the fact that most of these loans are secured by a deed of trust in a position that is junior to the primary lien holder. Furthermore, the risk that as the borrower's financial strength deteriorates, the outstanding balance on these credit lines may increase as they may only be canceled by the Company if certain limited criteria are met. In addition to the allowance for credit losses maintained as a percent of the outstanding loan balance, the Company maintains additional reserves for the unfunded portion of the HELOC.
Home equity loans: Similar to residential real estate term loans but secured by a deed of trust in a position that is junior to the primary lien holder.
Consumer - Automobile and other: The majority of consumer loans are secured by automobiles, with the remainder primarily unsecured revolving debt (credit cards). These loans are susceptible to three primary risks; non-payment due to income loss, over-extension of credit and, when the borrower is unable to pay, shortfall in collateral value, if any. Typically non-payment is due to loss of job and will follow general economic trends in the marketplace driven primarily by
rises in the unemployment rate. Loss of collateral value can be due to market demand shifts, damage to collateral itself or a combination of those factors. Credit card loans are unsecured and while collection efforts are pursued in the event of default, there is typically limited opportunity for recovery. Loss estimates are based on the general movement in credit score, economic outlook and its effects on employment and the Bank’s historical loss experience adjusted to reflect the economic outlook and the unemployment rate.
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial: Primarily based on the cash flow of the borrower, and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. A borrower's cash flow may be unpredictable, and collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most often, collateral includes accounts receivable, inventory, or equipment. Collateral securing these loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise, may be illiquid and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Actual and forecast changes in gross domestic product are believed to be corollary to losses associated with these credits.
Leases: The loss forecasting model applies the historical rate of loss for similar loans over the expected life of the asset. Leases typically represent an elevated level of credit risk as compared to loans secured by real estate as the collateral for leases is often subject to a more rapid rate of depreciation or depletion. The ultimate severity of loss is impacted by the type of collateral securing the exposure, the size of the exposure, the borrower’s industry sector, any guarantors and the geographic market. Assumptions of expected loss are conditioned to the economic outlook and the other variables discussed above.
Agriculture: Repayment is dependent upon successful operation of the agricultural business, which is greatly impacted by factors outside the control of the borrower. These factors include adverse weather conditions, including access to water, that may impact crop yields, loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agriculture products, changes in foreign exchange, and the impact of government regulations. In addition, many farms are dependent on a limited number of key individuals whose injury or death may significantly affect the successful operation of the business. Consequently, agricultural loans may involve a greater degree of risk than other types of loans.
Construction: While secured by real estate, construction loans represent a greater level of risk than term real estate loans due to the nature of the additional risks associated with the not only the completion of construction within an estimated time period and budget, but also the need to either sell the building or reach a level of stabilized occupancy sufficient to generate the cash flows necessary to support debt service and operating costs. The Company seeks to mitigate the additional risks associated with construction lending by requiring borrowers to comply with lower loan to value ratios and additional covenants as well as strong tertiary support of guarantors. The loss forecasting model applies the historical rate of loss for similar loans over the expected life of the asset as adjusted for macroeconomic factors.
Unfunded commitments: The estimated credit losses associated with these unfunded lending commitments is calculated using the same models and methodologies noted above and incorporate utilization assumptions at time of default. The reserve for unfunded commitments is maintained on the balance sheet in other liabilities.
Accounting Standards Adopted in 2020
On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-03 Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the incurred loss methodology that is referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) methodology. The measurement of expected credit losses under the CECL methodology is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized costs, including loan receivables and held-to-maturity debt securities. It also applies to off-balance sheet credit exposures not accounted for as insurance (loan commitments, standby letters of credit, financial guarantees, and other similar instruments) and net investments in certain leases. In addition, ASC 326 made changes to the accounting for available for sale debt securities. One such change is to require increases or decreases in credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down on available for sale debt securities, based on management's intent to sell the security or likelihood the Company will be required to sell the security, before recovery of the amortized cost basis.
The Company adopted ASC 326 using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Results for the reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2020 are presented under ASC 326 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP. The Company adopted ASC 326 using the prospective transition approach for financial assets purchased with credit deterioration (PCD) that were previously classified as purchase credit impaired (PCI) and accounted for under ASC 310-30. In accordance with the Standard, management did not reassess whether PCI assets met the criteria of PCD assets as of the date of adoption. The remaining noncredit discount (based on the adjusted amortized costs basis) will be accreted into interest income at the effective interest rate as of adoption. The Company recognized an increase in the ACL for loans totaling $18,913,000, including a reclassification of $481,000 from discounts on acquired loans to the allowance for credit losses, as a cumulative effect adjustment from change in accounting policies, with a corresponding decrease in retained earnings, net of $5,449,000 in taxes
of $12,983,000. Management has separately evaluated its held-to-maturity investment securities from obligations of state and political subdivisions and determined that no loss reserves were required.
On January 1, 2020 the Company adopted ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350), which eliminates step two of the goodwill impairment test (the hypothetical purchase price allocation used to determine the implied fair value of goodwill) when step one (determining if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value) is failed. Instead, entities simply will compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount and record goodwill impairment for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value. There was no goodwill impairment recorded during the quarter ended March 31, 2020.
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The CARES Act provides optional temporary relief from troubled debt restructuring and impairment accounting requirements for loan modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic made during the period from March 1, 2020 to the earlier of December 31, 2020 or 60 days after the national emergency concerning COVID-19 declared by the President terminates. The election of any such suspension would be applicable for the term of the loan modification but solely with respect to any modification (including a forbearance arrangement, an interest rate modification, a repayment plan and any other similar arrangement that defers or delays the payment of principal or interest) that occurs during the applicable period for a loan that was not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The ability to suspend TDR accounting does not apply to any adverse impact on the credit of a borrower that is not related to the COVID-19 pandemic nor does it apply to borrowers.
Accounting Standards Pending Adoption
FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. This ASU simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The guidance also promotes consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. ASU No. 2019-12 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2021 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. This ASU provides temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform by providing optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this Update apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. Amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022.
Note 2 - Investment Securities
The amortized cost, estimated fair values and allowance for credit losses of investments in debt securities are summarized in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
|
$
|
447,736
|
|
|
$
|
21,482
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
469,218
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
110,564
|
|
|
3,561
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
114,125
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
2,437
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
467,436
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
(51,363)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
416,081
|
|
Total debt securities available for sale
|
$
|
1,028,173
|
|
|
$
|
25,189
|
|
|
$
|
(51,363)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,001,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
|
$
|
345,944
|
|
|
$
|
17,352
|
|
|
$
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
$
|
363,292
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
13,826
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
14,150
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total debt securities held to maturity
|
$
|
359,770
|
|
|
$
|
17,676
|
|
|
$
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
$
|
377,442
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
|
$
|
466,139
|
|
|
$
|
7,261
|
|
|
$
|
(420)
|
|
|
$
|
472,980
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
106,373
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
109,601
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
2,430
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
371,809
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
(6,913)
|
|
|
365,025
|
|
Total debt securities available for sale
|
$
|
946,751
|
|
|
$
|
10,721
|
|
|
$
|
(7,334)
|
|
|
$
|
950,138
|
|
Debt Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
|
361,785
|
|
|
6,072
|
|
|
(480)
|
|
|
367,377
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
13,821
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,148
|
|
Total debt securities held to maturity
|
$
|
375,606
|
|
|
$
|
6,399
|
|
|
$
|
(480)
|
|
|
$
|
381,525
|
|
There were no sales of investment securities during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Investment securities with an aggregate carrying value of $463,165,000 and $466,321,000 at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively, were pledged as collateral for specific borrowings, lines of credit or local agency deposits.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2020 by contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. At March 31, 2020, obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies with a cost basis totaling $793,680,000 consist almost entirely of residential real estate mortgage-backed securities whose contractual maturity, or principal repayment, will follow the repayment of the underlying mortgages. For purposes of the following table, the entire outstanding balance of these mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies is categorized based on final maturity date. At March 31, 2020, the Company estimates the average remaining life of these mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government corporations and agencies to be approximately 3.24 years. Average remaining life is defined as the time span after which the principal balance has been reduced by half.
As of March 31, 2020, the contractual final maturity for available for sale and held to maturity investment securities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year
|
$
|
604
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
$
|
1,279
|
|
|
$
|
1,285
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
18,264
|
|
|
18,958
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
114,545
|
|
|
103,673
|
|
|
22,271
|
|
|
23,136
|
|
Due after ten years
|
894,760
|
|
|
878,761
|
|
|
336,220
|
|
|
353,021
|
|
Totals
|
$
|
1,028,173
|
|
|
$
|
1,001,999
|
|
|
$
|
359,770
|
|
|
$
|
377,442
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on debt securities and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and
length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
March 31, 2020:
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
$
|
166,612
|
|
|
$
|
(13,000)
|
|
|
$
|
248,222
|
|
|
$
|
(38,363)
|
|
|
$
|
414,834
|
|
|
$
|
(51,363)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
$
|
(4)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
$
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
December 31, 2019:
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
|
$
|
36,709
|
|
|
$
|
(309)
|
|
|
$
|
23,852
|
|
|
$
|
(111)
|
|
|
$
|
60,561
|
|
|
$
|
(420)
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
778
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
237,463
|
|
|
(4,535)
|
|
|
99,981
|
|
|
(2,378)
|
|
|
337,444
|
|
|
(6,913)
|
|
Total debt securities available for sale
|
$
|
274,950
|
|
|
$
|
(4,845)
|
|
|
$
|
123,833
|
|
|
$
|
(2,489)
|
|
|
$
|
398,783
|
|
|
$
|
(7,334)
|
|
Debt Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
|
18,813
|
|
|
(142)
|
|
|
62,952
|
|
|
(338)
|
|
|
81,765
|
|
|
(480)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities held to maturity
|
$
|
18,813
|
|
|
$
|
(142)
|
|
|
$
|
62,952
|
|
|
$
|
(338)
|
|
|
$
|
81,765
|
|
|
$
|
(480)
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies: Unrealized losses on investments in obligations of U.S. government agencies are caused by interest rate increases and illiquidity. The contractual cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Entities (principally Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. At March 31, 2020, one debt security representing obligations of U.S. government agencies had unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 0.56% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. The Company evaluates if a credit loss exists by monitoring to ensure it has adequate credit support and as of March 31, 2020, the Company believes there is no expected allowance for credit losses.
Asset backed securities: The unrealized losses on investments in asset backed securities were caused by increases in required yields by investors for these types of securities. At the time of purchase, each of these securities was rated AA or AAA and through March 31, 2020 has not experienced any deterioration in credit rating. At March 31, 2020, 15 asset backed securities had unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 11.02% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. The Company continues to monitor these securities for changes in credit rating or other indications of credit deterioration. Because management believes the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell, there is no impairment on these securities and there has been no allowance for credit losses recorded as of March 31, 2020.
The Company monitors credit quality of debt securities held-to-maturity through the use of credit rating. The Company monitors the credit rating on a monthly basis. The following table summarizes the amortized cost of debt securities held-to-maturity at the dates indicated, aggregated by credit quality indicator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
AAA/AA/A
|
|
|
BBB/BB/B
|
|
AAA/AA/A
|
|
BBB/BB/B
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Debt Securities Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
|
$
|
345,944
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
361,785
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
13,137
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
13,136
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
Total debt securities held to maturity
|
$
|
359,081
|
|
|
|
$
|
689
|
|
|
$
|
374,921
|
|
|
|
$
|
685
|
|
Note 3 – Loans
A summary of loan balances follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
506,833
|
|
|
$
|
509,508
|
|
Commercial
|
2,889,183
|
|
|
2,818,782
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
3,396,016
|
|
|
3,328,290
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
341,461
|
|
|
334,300
|
|
Home equity loans
|
27,110
|
|
|
28,586
|
|
Other
|
82,427
|
|
|
82,656
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
450,998
|
|
|
445,542
|
|
Commercial
|
290,334
|
|
|
283,707
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
42,333
|
|
|
46,146
|
|
Commercial
|
199,381
|
|
|
203,681
|
|
Total construction loans
|
241,714
|
|
|
249,827
|
|
Total loans, net of deferred loan fees and discounts
|
$
|
4,379,062
|
|
|
$
|
4,307,366
|
|
Total principal balance of loans owed, net of charge-offs
|
$
|
4,420,889
|
|
|
$
|
4,351,725
|
|
Unamortized net deferred loan fees
|
(8,794)
|
|
|
(8,927)
|
|
Discounts to principal balance of loans owed, net of charge-offs
|
(33,033)
|
|
|
(35,432)
|
|
Total loans, net of unamortized deferred loan fees and discounts
|
$
|
4,379,062
|
|
|
$
|
4,307,366
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
$
|
(57,911)
|
|
|
$
|
(30,616)
|
|
Note 4 – Allowance for Credit Losses
The following tables summarize the activity in the allowance for credit losses on loans, and ending balance of loans, net of unearned fees for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses – Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
Impact of CECL Adoption
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
Provision
(benefit)
|
|
Ending Balance
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
2,306
|
|
|
$
|
2,675
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
|
$
|
259
|
|
|
$
|
5,650
|
|
Commercial
|
11,995
|
|
|
11,848
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
5,216
|
|
|
29,253
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
14,301
|
|
|
14,523
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
5,475
|
|
|
34,903
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
5,572
|
|
|
4,549
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
10,523
|
|
Home equity loans
|
611
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
(42)
|
|
|
673
|
|
Other
|
1,595
|
|
|
971
|
|
|
(130)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
2,746
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
7,778
|
|
|
5,609
|
|
|
(130)
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
13,942
|
|
Commercial
|
5,149
|
|
|
(2,152)
|
|
|
(380)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
4,471
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
630
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
824
|
|
Commercial
|
2,758
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
3,771
|
|
Total construction loans
|
3,388
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
Total
|
$
|
30,616
|
|
|
$
|
18,913
|
|
|
$
|
(510)
|
|
|
$
|
892
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
$
|
57,911
|
|
In determining the allowance for credit losses, accruing loans with similar risk characteristics are generally evaluated collectively. To estimate expected losses the Company generally utilizes historical loss trends and the remaining contractual lives of the loan portfolios to determine estimated credit losses through a reasonable and supportable forecast period. Individual loan credit quality indicators including loan grade and borrower repayment performance have been statistically correlated with historical credit losses and various econometrics, including California unemployment, gross domestic product, and corporate bond yields. Model forecasts may be adjusted for inherent limitations or biases that have been identified through independent validation and back-testing of model performance to actual realized results. At both January 1, 2020, the adoption and implementation date of ASC Topic 326, and March 31, 2020, the Company utilized a reasonable and supportable forecast period of approximately eight quarters and obtained the forecast data from publicly available sources. The Company also considered the impact of portfolio concentrations, changes in underwriting practices, imprecision in its economic forecasts, and other risk factors that might influence its loss estimation process. During the quarter ended March 31, 2020 the levels of actual and forecasted California unemployment and gross domestic product continued to deteriorate and as a result, were the primary cause for the increase in allowance for credit losses. Management believes that the allowance for credit losses at March 31, 2020 appropriately reflected expected credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at that date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses – Year Ended December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
Provision
(benefit)
|
|
Ending Balance
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
2,676
|
|
|
$
|
(2)
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
(422)
|
|
|
$
|
2,306
|
|
Commercial
|
12,944
|
|
|
(746)
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
(1,731)
|
|
|
11,995
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
15,620
|
|
|
(748)
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
(2,153)
|
|
|
14,301
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
6,042
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
(974)
|
|
|
5,572
|
|
Home equity loans
|
1,540
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
(1,357)
|
|
|
611
|
|
Other
|
793
|
|
|
(765)
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
8,375
|
|
|
(768)
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
(1,085)
|
|
|
7,778
|
|
Commercial
|
6,090
|
|
|
(2,123)
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
5,149
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
464
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
630
|
|
Commercial
|
2,033
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
Total construction loans
|
2,497
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
Total
|
$
|
32,582
|
|
|
$
|
(3,639)
|
|
|
$
|
3,363
|
|
|
$
|
(1,690)
|
|
|
$
|
30,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses – Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
Provision
(benefit)
|
|
Ending Balance
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
2,676
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(178)
|
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
Commercial
|
12,944
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
(1,995)
|
|
|
12,330
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
15,620
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
(2,173)
|
|
|
14,830
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
6,042
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
(122)
|
|
|
6,015
|
|
Home equity loans
|
1,540
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
(341)
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
Other
|
793
|
|
|
(207)
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
8,375
|
|
|
(207)
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
(84)
|
|
|
8,341
|
|
Commercial
|
6,090
|
|
|
(519)
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
6,078
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
464
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
548
|
|
Commercial
|
2,033
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
Total construction loans
|
2,497
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
Total
|
$
|
32,582
|
|
|
$
|
(726)
|
|
|
$
|
1,808
|
|
|
$
|
(1,600)
|
|
|
$
|
32,064
|
|
As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including, but not limited to, trends relating to (i) the level of criticized and classified loans, (ii) net charge-offs, (iii) non-performing loans, and (iv) delinquency within the portfolio. The Company analyzes loans individually to classify the loans as to credit risk and grading. This analysis is performed annually for all outstanding balances greater than $1,000,000 and non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial real estate loans, unless other indicators, such as delinquency, trigger more frequent evaluation. Loans below the $1,000,000 threshold and homogenous in nature are evaluated as needed based on delinquency and borrower credit scores.
The Company utilizes a risk grading system to assign a risk grade to each of its loans. Loans are graded on a scale ranging from Pass to Loss. A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades is as follows:
•Pass– This grade represents loans ranging from acceptable to very little or no credit risk. These loans typically meet most if not all policy standards in regard to: loan amount as a percentage of collateral value, debt service coverage, profitability, leverage, and working capital.
•Special Mention– This grade represents “Other Assets Especially Mentioned” in accordance with regulatory guidelines and includes loans that display some potential weaknesses which, if left unaddressed, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or may inadequately protect the Company’s position in the future. These loans warrant more than normal supervision and attention.
•Substandard– This grade represents “Substandard” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Loans within this rating typically exhibit weaknesses that are well defined to the point that repayment is jeopardized. Loss potential is, however, not necessarily evident. The underlying collateral supporting the credit appears to have sufficient value to protect the Company from loss of principal and accrued interest, or the loan has been written down to the point where this is true. There is a definite need for a well-defined workout/rehabilitation program.
•Doubtful– This grade represents “Doubtful” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines. An asset classified as Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in a loan classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and financing plans.
•Loss– This grade represents “Loss” loans in accordance with regulatory guidelines. A loan classified as Loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off the loan, even though some recovery may be affected in the future. The portion of the loan that is graded loss should be charged off no later than the end of the quarter in which the loss is identified.
Based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows for the period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year – As of March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Prior
|
|
Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis
|
|
Revolving Loans Converted to Term
|
|
Total
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$25,698
|
|
$102,369
|
|
$59,278
|
|
$69,504
|
|
$60,063
|
|
$179,461
|
|
—
|
|
|
$117
|
|
$496,490
|
Special Mention
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
2,953
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
Substandard
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
4,778
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total residential 1-4 family - mortgage loans
|
$25,698
|
|
$102,369
|
|
$59,852
|
|
$71,368
|
|
$60,132
|
|
$187,192
|
|
$—
|
|
$222
|
|
$506,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$82,428
|
|
$457,462
|
|
$364,082
|
|
$443,054
|
|
$407,011
|
|
$967,584
|
|
$102,830
|
|
$1,501
|
|
$2,825,952
|
Special Mention
|
70
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,618
|
|
|
|
11,562
|
|
|
|
10,722
|
|
|
|
12,588
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
44,848
|
|
Substandard
|
200
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
3,191
|
|
|
|
9,801
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
18,383
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial - mortgage loans
|
$82,698
|
|
$461,144
|
|
$365,527
|
|
$452,252
|
|
$421,764
|
|
$988,107
|
|
$116,190
|
|
$1,501
|
|
$2,889,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity line of credit risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$2,859
|
|
$8,591
|
|
$2,967
|
|
$714
|
|
$1,561
|
|
$10,815
|
|
$304,911
|
|
$627
|
|
$333,045
|
Special Mention
|
80
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
Substandard
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4,016
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total home equity lines of credit - consumer loans
|
$2,939
|
|
$8,591
|
|
$3,060
|
|
$1,289
|
|
$1,711
|
|
$12,537
|
|
$310,701
|
|
$633
|
|
$341,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year – As of March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Prior
|
|
Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis
|
|
Revolving Loans Converted to Term
|
|
Total
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$2
|
|
$580
|
|
$290
|
|
$378
|
|
$673
|
|
$21,191
|
|
$500
|
|
$16
|
|
$23,630
|
Special Mention
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
925
|
|
Substandard
|
153
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
2,257
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,555
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total home equity loans - consumer loans
|
$155
|
|
$580
|
|
$309
|
|
$378
|
|
$818
|
|
$24,354
|
|
$500
|
|
$16
|
|
$27,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$7,679
|
|
$40,454
|
|
$20,465
|
|
$6,221
|
|
$1,883
|
|
$1,787
|
|
$1,747
|
|
$1,407
|
|
$81,643
|
Special Mention
|
—
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
Substandard
|
—
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total other - consumer loans
|
$7,679
|
|
$40,566
|
|
$20,635
|
|
$6,374
|
|
$1,938
|
|
$1,980
|
|
$1,846
|
|
$1,409
|
|
$82,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$15,616
|
|
$66,145
|
|
$32,209
|
|
$25,226
|
|
$10,041
|
|
$17,434
|
|
$112,189
|
|
$5,164
|
|
$284,024
|
Special Mention
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
Substandard
|
—
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
1,262
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
4,133
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial loans
|
$15,616
|
|
$66,298
|
|
$32,666
|
|
$27,001
|
|
$11,452
|
|
$17,745
|
|
$113,518
|
|
$6,038
|
|
$290,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year – As of March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Prior
|
|
Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis
|
|
Revolving Loans Converted to Term
|
|
Total
|
Construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$1,725
|
|
$15,703
|
|
$17,067
|
|
$0
|
|
$3,459
|
|
$0
|
|
$0
|
|
$0
|
|
$37,954
|
Special Mention
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
Substandard
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total residential - construction loans
|
$1,725
|
|
$15,703
|
|
$17,067
|
|
$0
|
|
$7,838
|
|
$0
|
|
$0
|
|
$0
|
|
$42,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$14,081
|
|
$35,515
|
|
$82,740
|
|
$43,455
|
|
$15,793
|
|
$5,709
|
|
$0
|
|
$0
|
|
$197,293
|
Special Mention
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
Substandard
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial - construction loans
|
$14,081
|
|
$35,515
|
|
$82,740
|
|
$43,455
|
|
$15,793
|
|
$7,797
|
|
$0
|
|
$0
|
|
$199,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$150,088
|
|
$726,819
|
|
$579,098
|
|
$588,552
|
|
$500,484
|
|
$1,203,981
|
|
$522,177
|
|
$8,832
|
|
$4,280,031
|
Special Mention
|
150
|
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
9,212
|
|
|
|
16,222
|
|
|
|
17,338
|
|
|
|
16,799
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
63,169
|
|
Substandard
|
353
|
|
|
|
1,606
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
4,353
|
|
|
|
4,740
|
|
|
|
18,393
|
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
35,862
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total loans
|
$150,591
|
|
$730,766
|
|
$581,856
|
|
$602,117
|
|
$521,446
|
|
$1,239,712
|
|
$542,755
|
|
$9,819
|
|
$4,379,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year – As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Prior
|
|
Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis
|
|
Revolving Loans Converted to Term
|
|
Total
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$102,613
|
|
$63,542
|
|
$73,195
|
|
$65,050
|
|
$194,214
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$498,614
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,714
|
Substandard
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,180
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
$0
|
Total residential 1-4 family - mortgage loans
|
|
$102,613
|
|
$64,355
|
|
$75,314
|
|
$65,121
|
|
$202,105
|
|
$—
|
|
$—
|
|
$509,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$446,597
|
|
$373,065
|
|
$421,901
|
|
$415,568
|
|
$1,010,057
|
|
$107,965
|
|
$748
|
|
$2,775,901
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,965
|
|
|
|
9,373
|
|
|
|
8,467
|
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,058
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
3,216
|
|
|
|
9,937
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,823
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial - mortgage loans
|
|
$447,427
|
|
$374,519
|
|
$428,457
|
|
$428,157
|
|
$1,028,461
|
|
$111,013
|
|
$748
|
|
$2,818,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity line of credit risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$10,195
|
|
$3,436
|
|
$1,015
|
|
$1,729
|
|
$11,821
|
|
$297,458
|
|
$663
|
|
$326,317
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
4,189
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
3,794
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total home equity lines of credit - consumer loans
|
|
$10,195
|
|
$3,506
|
|
$1,315
|
|
$1,837
|
|
$13,709
|
|
$303,002
|
|
$736
|
|
$334,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year – As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Prior
|
|
Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis
|
|
Revolving Loans Converted to Term
|
|
Total
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$607
|
|
$300
|
|
$382
|
|
$712
|
|
$22,655
|
|
$399
|
|
$37
|
|
$25,092
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total home equity loans - consumer loans
|
|
$607
|
|
$320
|
|
$382
|
|
$868
|
|
$25,973
|
|
$399
|
|
$37
|
|
$28,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$45,675
|
|
$23,014
|
|
$7,176
|
|
$2,245
|
|
$2,099
|
|
$1,602
|
|
$3
|
|
$81,814
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total other - consumer loans
|
|
$45,791
|
|
$23,196
|
|
$7,365
|
|
$2,298
|
|
$2,316
|
|
$1,684
|
|
$6
|
|
$82,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
$77,614
|
|
$37,411
|
|
$27,195
|
|
$11,906
|
|
$17,806
|
|
$100,098
|
|
$3,623
|
|
$275,653
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
1,236
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,827
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial loans
|
|
$77,614
|
|
$37,798
|
|
$29,912
|
|
$13,719
|
|
$18,363
|
|
$102,630
|
|
$3,671
|
|
$283,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year – As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2016
|
|
Prior
|
|
Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis
|
|
Revolving Loans Converted to Term
|
|
Total
|
Construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
$18,516
|
|
$12,990
|
|
$0
|
|
$3,319
|
|
$0
|
|
$6,230
|
|
$889
|
|
$41,944
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,202
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,202
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total residential - construction loans
|
|
$18,516
|
|
$12,990
|
|
$0
|
|
$7,521
|
|
$0
|
|
$6,230
|
|
$889
|
|
$46,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
$31,031
|
|
$72,339
|
|
$76,043
|
|
$15,654
|
|
$7,322
|
|
$975
|
|
$0
|
|
$203,364
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commercial - construction loans
|
|
$31,031
|
|
$72,339
|
|
$76,043
|
|
$15,654
|
|
$7,639
|
|
$975
|
|
$0
|
|
$203,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk ratings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass
|
$732,848
|
|
$586,097
|
|
$606,907
|
|
$516,183
|
|
$1,265,974
|
|
$514,727
|
|
$5,963
|
|
$4,228,699
|
Special Mention
|
56
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
7,832
|
|
|
|
13,844
|
|
|
|
14,244
|
|
|
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
44,218
|
|
Substandard
|
890
|
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
4,049
|
|
|
|
5,148
|
|
|
|
18,348
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
34,449
|
|
Doubtful/Loss
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total loans
|
$733,794
|
|
$589,023
|
|
$618,788
|
|
$535,175
|
|
$1,298,566
|
|
$525,933
|
|
$6,087
|
|
$4,307,366
|
The following table shows the ending balance of current and past due originated loans by loan category as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of Past Due Loans - As of March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
30-59 days
|
|
60-89 days
|
|
> 90 days
|
|
Total Past
Due Loans
|
|
Current
|
|
Total
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
699
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,763
|
|
|
$
|
2,462
|
|
|
$
|
504,371
|
|
|
$
|
506,833
|
|
Commercial
|
18,445
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
22,403
|
|
|
2,866,780
|
|
|
2,889,183
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
19,144
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
4,438
|
|
|
24,865
|
|
|
3,371,151
|
|
|
3,396,016
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
572
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
339,686
|
|
|
341,461
|
|
Home equity loans
|
200
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
26,653
|
|
|
27,110
|
|
Other
|
100
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
82,201
|
|
|
82,427
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
872
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
448,540
|
|
|
450,998
|
|
Commercial
|
1,014
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
288,318
|
|
|
290,334
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
42,333
|
|
|
42,333
|
|
Commercial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
199,381
|
|
|
199,381
|
|
Total construction loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
241,714
|
|
|
241,714
|
|
Total originated loans
|
$
|
21,030
|
|
|
$
|
2,376
|
|
|
$
|
5,933
|
|
|
$
|
29,339
|
|
|
$
|
4,349,723
|
|
|
$
|
4,379,062
|
|
The following table shows the ending balance of current and past due originated loans by loan category as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis of Past Due Loans - As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
30-59 days
|
|
60-89 days
|
|
> 90 days
|
|
Total Past
Due Loans
|
|
Current
|
|
Total
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
1,149
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
|
$
|
1,957
|
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
|
$
|
506,031
|
|
|
$
|
509,508
|
|
Commercial
|
581
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
|
2,815,634
|
|
|
2,818,782
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
1,730
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
4,388
|
|
|
6,625
|
|
|
3,321,665
|
|
|
3,328,290
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
1,083
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
331,898
|
|
|
334,300
|
|
Home equity loans
|
175
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
28,063
|
|
|
28,586
|
|
Other
|
172
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
82,460
|
|
|
82,656
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
1,430
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
3,121
|
|
|
442,421
|
|
|
445,542
|
|
Commercial
|
652
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
282,733
|
|
|
283,707
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
46,146
|
|
|
46,146
|
|
Commercial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
203,681
|
|
|
203,681
|
|
Total construction loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
249,827
|
|
|
249,827
|
|
Total loans
|
$
|
3,812
|
|
|
$
|
1,385
|
|
|
$
|
5,523
|
|
|
$
|
10,720
|
|
|
$
|
4,296,646
|
|
|
$
|
4,307,366
|
|
The following table shows the ending balance of non accrual loans by loan category as of the date indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Accrual Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Non accrual with no allowance for credit losses
|
|
Total non accrual
|
|
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing
|
|
Non accrual with no allowance for credit losses
|
|
Total non accrual
|
|
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
5,169
|
|
|
$
|
5,784
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,023
|
|
|
$
|
5,192
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
5,451
|
|
|
5,514
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,316
|
|
|
|
5,316
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
10,620
|
|
|
11,298
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10,339
|
|
|
|
10,508
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
2,760
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Home equity loans
|
1,523
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
—
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
4,283
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,997
|
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Commercial
|
298
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total construction
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total non accrual loans
|
$
|
15,201
|
|
|
$
|
17,955
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
14,825
|
|
|
$
|
16,864
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Interest income on non accrual loans that would have been recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, if all such loans had been current in accordance with their original terms, totaled $431,000 and $400,000, respectively. Interest income actually recognized on these originated loans during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $47,000 and $93,000, respectively.
The following tables present the amortized cost basis of collateral dependent loans by class of loans as of the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Retail
|
|
Office
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
Other
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
Farmland
|
|
SFR -1st Deed
|
|
SFR -2nd Deed
|
|
Automobile/Truck
|
|
A/R and Inventory
|
|
Equipment
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
Total
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,815
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,815
|
|
Commercial
|
2,483
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,279
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
2,483
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
5,815
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14,094
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
Home equity loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,106
|
|
Other
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
334
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
4,042
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
Commercial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total collateral dependent loans
|
$
|
2,483
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
1,866
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
2,060
|
|
|
$
|
1,359
|
|
|
$
|
5,862
|
|
|
$
|
4,042
|
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,824
|
|
|
$
|
1,012
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
21,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Retail
|
|
Office
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
Other
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
Farmland
|
|
SFR -1st Deed
|
|
SFR -2nd Deed
|
|
Automobile/Truck
|
|
A/R and Inventory
|
|
Equipment
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
Total
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,293
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,293
|
|
Commercial
|
2,506
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
8,120
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
2,506
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
1,640
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
5,293
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13,413
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Home equity loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
Other
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
Commercial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
3,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total collateral dependent loans
|
$
|
2,506
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
1,640
|
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
2,060
|
|
|
$
|
1,242
|
|
|
$
|
5,341
|
|
|
$
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,425
|
|
The CARES Act, in addition to providing financial assistance to both businesses and consumers, provides financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under GAAP related to troubled debt restructurings for a limited period of time to account for the effects of COVID-19. The banking regulatory agencies have likewise issued guidance encouraging financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are, or may be, unable to meet their contractual payment obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. That guidance, with concurrence of the Financial Accounting Standards Board and provisions of the CARES Act, allow modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were generally current with their payments prior to any relief, to not be treated as troubled debt restructurings. To the extent that such modifications meet the criteria previously described, such modifications are not expected to be classified as troubled debt restructurings. The following tables show certain information regarding TDRs that occurred during the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDR Information for the three months ended March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Number
|
|
Pre-mod
outstanding
principal
balance
|
|
Post-mod
outstanding
principal
balance
|
|
Financial
impact due to
TDR taken as
additional
provision
|
|
Number that
defaulted during
the period
|
|
Recorded
investment of
TDRs that
defaulted during
the period
|
|
Financial impact
due to the
default of
previous TDR
taken as charge-
offs or additional
provisions
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
3
|
|
487
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
3
|
|
487
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Home equity loans
|
2
|
|
172
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
2
|
|
172
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
1
|
|
21
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total construction loans
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
6
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
302
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDR Information for the three months ended March 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
Number
|
|
Pre-mod
outstanding
principal
balance
|
|
Post-mod
outstanding
principal
balance
|
|
Financial
impact due to
TDR taken as
additional
provision
|
|
Number that
defaulted during
the period
|
|
Recorded
investment of
TDRs that
defaulted during
the period
|
|
Financial impact
due to the
default of
previous TDR
taken as charge-
offs or additional
provisions
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate
|
1
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Home equity loans
|
1
|
|
121
|
|
120
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
1
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
2
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
Construction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Commercial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total construction loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
299
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
The Company also modified the terms of select loans in an effort to assist borrowers that were not related to the COVID-19 pandemic. If the borrower was experiencing financial difficulty and a concession was granted, the Company considered such modifications as troubled debt restructurings. Modifications classified as TDRs can include one or a combination of the following: rate modifications, term extensions, interest only modifications, either temporary or long-term, payment modifications, and collateral substitutions/additions. The objective of the modifications was to increase loan repayments by customers and thereby reduce net charge-offs. The modified loans are included in impaired loans for purposes of determining the level of the allowance for credit losses.
For all new TDRs, an impairment analysis is conducted. If the loan is determined to be collateral dependent, any additional amount of impairment will be calculated based on the difference between estimated collectible value and the current carrying balance of the loan. This difference could result in an increased provision and is typically charged off. If the asset is determined not to be collateral dependent, the impairment is measured on the net present value difference between the expected cash flows of the restructured loan and the cash flows which would have been received under the original terms. The effect of this could result in a requirement for additional provision to the reserve. The effect of these required provisions for the period are indicated above.
Typically if a TDR defaults during the period, the loan is then considered collateral dependent and, if it was not already considered collateral dependent, an appropriate provision will be reserved or charge will be taken. The additional provisions required resulting from default of previously modified TDR’s are noted above. Loans that defaulted within the twelve month period subsequent to modification were not considered significant for financial reporting purposes.
Note 5 - Leases
The Company records a right-of-use asset (“ROUA”) on the consolidated balance sheets for those leases that convey rights to control use of identified assets for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The Company also records a lease liability on the consolidated balance sheets for the present value of future payment commitments. All of the Company’s leases are comprised of operating leases in which the Company is lessee of real estate property for branches, ATM locations, and general administration and operations. The Company elected not to include short-term leases (i.e. leases with initial terms of twelve months or less) within the ROUA and lease liability. Known or determinable adjustments to the required minimum future lease payments were included in the calculation of the Company’s ROUA and lease liability. Adjustments to the required minimum future lease payments that are variable and will not be determinable until a future period, such as changes in the consumer price index, are included as variable lease costs. Additionally, expected variable payments for common area maintenance, taxes and insurance were unknown and not determinable at lease commencement and therefore, were not included in the determination of the Company’s ROUA or lease liability.
The value of the ROUA and lease liability is impacted by the amount of the periodic payment required, length of the lease term, and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the minimum lease payments. The Company’s lease agreements often include one or more options to renew at the Company’s discretion. If at lease inception, the Company considers the exercising of a renewal option to be reasonably certain, the Company will include the extended term in the calculation of the ROU asset and lease liability. Topic 842 requires the use of the rate implicit in the lease whenever this rate is readily determinable. As this rate is rarely determinable, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate at lease inception, on a
collateralized basis, over a similar term. For operating leases existing prior to January 1, 2019, the rate for the remaining lease term as of January 1, 2019 was used. The lease liability is reduced based on the discounted present value of remaining payments as of each reporting period. The ROUA value is measured using the amount of lease liability and adjusted for prepaid or accrued lease payments, remaining lease incentives, unamortized direct costs (if any), and impairment (if any).
The following table presents the components of lease expense for the three months ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
Operating lease cost
|
$
|
1,294
|
|
|
$
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
Short-term lease cost
|
63
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
Variable lease cost
|
6
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
Sublease income
|
(34)
|
|
|
(34)
|
|
|
|
Total lease cost
|
$
|
1,329
|
|
|
$
|
1,343
|
|
|
|
The following table presents supplemental cash flow information related to leases for the three months ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
|
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows for operating leases
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
ROUA obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities
|
$
|
3,393
|
|
|
$
|
32,006
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the weighted average operating lease term and discount rate as of the periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2020
|
|
As of March 31, 2019
|
Weighted-average remaining lease term
|
10.3
|
|
9.5
|
Weighted-average discount rate
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
At March 31, 2020, future expected operating lease payments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Periods ending December 31,
|
|
2020
|
$
|
3,412
|
|
2021
|
4,428
|
|
2022
|
4,089
|
|
2023
|
3,410
|
|
2024
|
3,130
|
|
Thereafter
|
17,337
|
|
|
35,806
|
|
Discount for present value of expected cash flows
|
(5,799)
|
|
Lease liability at March 31, 2020
|
$
|
30,007
|
|
Note 6 - Deposits
A summary of the balances of deposits follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2020
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
Noninterest-bearing demand
|
$
|
1,883,143
|
|
|
$
|
1,832,665
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
1,243,192
|
|
|
1,242,274
|
|
Savings
|
1,857,684
|
|
|
1,851,549
|
|
Time certificates, $250,000 or more
|
111,262
|
|
|
129,061
|
|
Other time certificates
|
307,417
|
|
|
311,445
|
|
Total deposits
|
$
|
5,402,698
|
|
|
$
|
5,366,994
|
|
Certificate of deposit balances of $30,000,000 from the State of California were included in time certificates, over $250,000, at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. The Company participates in a deposit program offered by the State of California whereby the State may make deposits at the Company’s request subject to collateral and credit worthiness constraints. The negotiated rates on these State deposits are generally more favorable than other wholesale funding sources available to the Company. Overdrawn deposit balances of $1,543,000 and $1,550,000 were classified as consumer loans at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
Note 7 - Commitments and Contingencies
The following table presents a summary of the Bank’s commitments and contingent liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
March 31,
2020
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
Financial instruments whose amounts represent risk:
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
$
|
360,793
|
|
|
$
|
363,793
|
|
Consumer loans
|
541,848
|
|
|
533,576
|
|
Real estate mortgage loans
|
189,921
|
|
|
188,959
|
|
Real estate construction loans
|
204,170
|
|
|
222,998
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
12,084
|
|
|
12,014
|
|
Deposit account overdraft privilege
|
109,752
|
|
|
110,402
|
|
Note 8 - Shareholders’ Equity
Dividends Paid
The Bank paid to the Company cash dividends in the aggregate amounts of $26,754,000 and $8,114,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Bank is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the State of California Department of Business Oversight (DBO). Absent approval from the Commissioner of the DBO, California banking laws generally limit the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the lesser of (1) retained earnings or (2) net income for the last three fiscal years, less cash distributions paid during such period.
Stock Repurchase Plan
On November 12, 2019 the Board of Directors approved the authorization to repurchase up to 1,525,000 shares of the Company's common stock (the 2019 Repurchase Plan), which approximated 5.0% of the shares outstanding as of the approval date. The actual timing of any share repurchases will be determined by the Company's management and therefore the total value of the shares to be purchased under the program is subject to change. The 2019 Repurchase Plan has no expiration date and as of and for quarter ended December 31, 2019, the Company had repurchased no shares. During the quarter ended March 31, 2020, the Company repurchased 553,869 shares with a market value of $17,139,000.
In connection with approval of the 2019 Repurchase Plan, the Company’s previous repurchase program adopted on August 21, 2007 (the 2007 Repurchase Plan) was terminated. There were no shares of common stock repurchased under the 2007 Repurchase Plan during 2019.
Stock Repurchased Under Equity Compensation Plans
The Company's shareholder-approved equity compensation plans permit employees to tender recently vested shares in lieu of cash for the payment of withholding taxes on such shares. During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, employees tendered 4,668 and 26,068 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock in connection with option exercises. Employees also tendered 133 and 91 shares in connection with the tax withholding requirements of other share based awards during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. In total, shares of the Company's common stock tendered had market values of $153,000 and $1,036,000 during the quarter ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The tendered shares were retired. The market value of tendered shares is the last market trade price at closing on the day an option is exercised or the other share based award vests. Stock repurchased under equity incentive plans are not included in the total of stock repurchased under the 2019 or 2007 Stock Repurchase Plans.
Note 9 - Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Incentive Instruments
The Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (2009 Plan) expired on March 26, 2019. While no new awards can be granted under the 2009 Plan, existing grants continue to be governed by the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in any applicable award agreement. On April 16, 2019, the Board of Directors adopted the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (2019 Plan) which was approved by shareholders on May 21, 2019. The 2019 Plan allows for up to 1,500,000 shares to be issued in connection with equity-based incentives. All grants of equity awards made during the three months ended March 31, 2020, if any, were made from the 2019 Plan.
Stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2020 is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
Option Price
per Share
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
|
160,500
|
|
|
$14.54 to $23.21
|
|
$
|
17.60
|
|
Options granted
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Options exercised
|
(8,000)
|
|
|
$17.54 to $19.46
|
|
18.50
|
|
Options forfeited
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2020
|
152,500
|
|
|
$14.54 to $23.21
|
|
$
|
17.55
|
|
The following table shows the number, weighted-average exercise price, intrinsic value, and weighted average remaining contractual life of options exercisable, options not yet exercisable and total options outstanding as of March 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently
Exercisable
|
|
Currently Not
Exercisable
|
|
Total
Outstanding
|
Number of options
|
152,500
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
152,500
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
$
|
17.55
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17.55
|
|
Intrinsic value (in thousands)
|
$
|
1,871
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,871
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual term (yrs.)
|
2.6
|
|
0
|
|
2.6
|
As of March 31, 2020 all options outstanding are fully vested and are expected to be exercised prior to expiration. The Company did not modify any option grants during 2019 or the three months ended March 31, 2020.
Activity related to restricted stock unit awards during the three months ended March 31, 2020 is summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
Condition
Vesting RSUs
|
|
Market Plus
Service
Condition
Vesting RSUs
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2019
|
68,597
|
|
|
51,312
|
|
RSUs granted
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
RSUs added through dividend and performance credits
|
521
|
|
|
—
|
|
RSUs released
|
(362)
|
|
|
—
|
|
RSUs forfeited/expired
|
(80)
|
|
|
(78)
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2020
|
68,676
|
|
|
51,234
|
|
The 68,676 of service condition vesting RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2020 include a feature whereby each RSU outstanding is credited with a dividend amount equal to any common stock cash dividend declared and paid, and the credited amount is divided by the closing price of the Company’s stock on the dividend payable date to arrive at an additional amount of RSUs outstanding under the original grant. The dividend credits follow the same vesting requirements as the RSU awards and are not considered participating securities. The 68,676 of service condition vesting RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2020 are expected to vest, and be released, on a weighted-average basis, over the next 1.1 years. The Company expects to recognize $1,537,782 of pre-tax compensation costs related to these service condition vesting RSUs between March 31, 2020 and their vesting dates. The Company did not modify any service condition vesting RSUs during 2019 or during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
The 51,234 of market plus service condition vesting RSUs outstanding as of March 31, 2020 are expected to vest, and be released, on a weighted-average basis, over the next 1.4 years. The Company expects to recognize $759,307 of pre-tax compensation costs related to these RSUs between March 31, 2020 and their vesting dates. As of March 31, 2020, the number of market plus service condition vesting RSUs outstanding that will actually vest, and be released, may be reduced to zero or increased to 76,851 depending on the total return of the Company’s common stock versus the total return of an index of bank stocks from the grant date to the vesting date. The Company did not modify any market plus service condition vesting RSUs during 2019 or during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
Note 10 - Non-interest Income and Expense
The following table summarizes the Company’s non-interest income for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
ATM and interchange fees
|
$
|
5,111
|
|
|
$
|
4,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
4,046
|
|
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service fees
|
758
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking service fees
|
469
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in value of mortgage servicing rights
|
(1,258)
|
|
|
(645)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service charges and fees
|
9,126
|
|
|
9,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash value of life insurance
|
720
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset management and commission income
|
916
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
891
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease brokerage income
|
193
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of customer checks
|
124
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investment securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on marketable equity securities
|
47
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
(197)
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-interest income
|
2,694
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
$
|
11,820
|
|
|
$
|
11,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of non-interest expense were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
Base salaries, net of deferred loan origination costs
|
$
|
17,623
|
|
|
$
|
16,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive compensation
|
3,101
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and other compensation costs
|
6,548
|
|
|
5,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total salaries and benefits expense
|
27,272
|
|
|
25,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
3,875
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data processing and software
|
3,367
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
|
1,512
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible amortization
|
1,431
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
665
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATM and POS network charges
|
1,373
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees
|
703
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications
|
725
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory assessments and insurance
|
95
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postage
|
290
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational losses
|
221
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
Courier service
|
331
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of foreclosed assets
|
(41)
|
|
|
(99)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
—
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other miscellaneous expense
|
3,000
|
|
|
4,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other non-interest expense
|
17,547
|
|
|
20,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
$
|
44,819
|
|
|
$
|
45,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 - Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represent income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustments to income that would result from assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate to outstanding stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs), and are determined using the treasury stock method. Earnings per share have been computed based on the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
March 31,
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
Net income
|
$
|
16,121
|
|
|
$
|
22,726
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding
|
30,395
|
|
|
30,424
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock
|
128
|
|
|
234
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings
per share
|
30,523
|
|
|
30,658
|
|
Options excluded from diluted earnings per share because the effect of these
options was antidilutive
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Note 12 – Comprehensive Income
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of other comprehensive income.
The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale securities before reclassifications
|
$
|
(29,561)
|
|
|
$
|
12,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect
|
8,739
|
|
|
(3,758)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale securities, net of tax
|
(20,822)
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unfunded status of the supplemental retirement plans before reclassifications
|
448
|
|
|
(89)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
(14)
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of actuarial losses
|
478
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
464
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unfunded status of the supplemental retirement plans after reclassifications
|
912
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unfunded status of the supplemental retirement plans, net of tax
|
912
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
(19,910)
|
|
|
$
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), included in shareholders’ equity, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
March 31,
2020
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities
|
$
|
(26,174)
|
|
|
$
|
3,387
|
|
Tax effect
|
7,738
|
|
|
(1,001)
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available for sale securities, net of tax
|
(18,436)
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
Unfunded status of the supplemental retirement plans
|
(11,193)
|
|
|
(11,193)
|
|
Tax effect
|
3,309
|
|
|
3,309
|
|
Unfunded status of the supplemental retirement plans, net of tax
|
(7,884)
|
|
|
(7,884)
|
|
Joint beneficiary agreement liability
|
1,188
|
|
|
276
|
|
Tax effect
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Joint beneficiary agreement liability, net of tax
|
1,188
|
|
|
276
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
(25,132)
|
|
|
$
|
(5,222)
|
|
Note 13 - Fair Value Measurement
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, income approach, and/or the cost approach. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability including assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and the risk of nonperformance. Marketable equity securities, debt securities available-for-sale, loans held for sale, and mortgage servicing rights are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such loans held for investment and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application impairment write-downs of individual assets.
The Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the observable nature of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
Level 1 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
Level 2 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
Marketable equity securities and debt securities available for sale - Marketable equity securities and debt securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. The Company had no securities classified as Level 3 during any of the periods covered in these financial statements.
Loans held for sale - Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of loans held for sale is based on what secondary markets are currently offering for loans with similar characteristics. As such, we classify those loans subjected to recurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.
Individually evaluated loans - Loans are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, certain loans have individual risk characteristics not consistent with a pool of loans and is individually evaluated for credit reserves.
Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement are typically individually evaluated. The fair value of these loans are estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, fair value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. Loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value which uses substantially observable data, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value, or the appraised value contains a significant unobservable assumption, such as deviations from comparable sales, and there is no observable market price, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Foreclosed assets - Foreclosed assets include assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure. Foreclosed assets are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. When the fair value of foreclosed assets is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value which uses substantially observable data, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value, or the appraised value contains a significant unobservable assumption, such as deviations from comparable sales, and there is no observable market price, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other non-interest expense.
Mortgage servicing rights - Mortgage servicing rights are carried at fair value. A valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis using a discount rate and prepayment speed assumptions is used in the computation of the fair value measurement. While the prepayment speed assumption is currently quoted for comparable instruments, the discount rate assumption currently requires a significant degree of management judgment and is therefore considered an unobservable input. As such, the Company classifies mortgage servicing rights subjected to recurring fair value adjustments as Level 3.
The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at March 31, 2020
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
Marketable equity securities
|
$
|
3,007
|
|
|
$
|
3,007
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Debt securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
|
469,218
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
469,218
|
|
|
—
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
114,125
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
114,125
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
2,575
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
—
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
416,081
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
416,081
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
2,695
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
5,168
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
1,012,869
|
|
|
$
|
3,007
|
|
|
$
|
1,004,694
|
|
|
$
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2019
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
Marketable equity securities
|
$
|
2,960
|
|
|
$
|
2,960
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Debt securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
|
472,980
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
472,980
|
|
|
—
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
109,601
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
109,601
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
2,532
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
—
|
|
Asset backed securities
|
365,025
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
365,025
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
5,265
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,265
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
6,200
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
964,563
|
|
|
$
|
2,960
|
|
|
$
|
955,403
|
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally corresponds with the Company’s quarterly valuation process. There were no transfers between any levels during the three months ended March 31, 2020 or the year ended December 31, 2019.
The following table provides a reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) on a recurring basis during the time periods indicated. Had there been any transfer into or out of Level 3 during the time periods indicated, the amount included in the “Transfers into (out of) Level 3” column would represent the beginning balance of an item in the period (interim quarter) during which it was transferred (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
Beginning
Balance
|
|
Transfers
into (out of)
Level 3
|
|
Change
Included
in Earnings
|
|
Issuances
|
|
Ending
Balance
|
2020: Mortgage servicing rights
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1,258)
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
5,168
|
|
2019: Mortgage servicing rights
|
$
|
7,098
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(645)
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
6,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key unobservable inputs used in determining the fair value of mortgage servicing rights are mortgage prepayment speeds and the discount rate used to discount cash projected cash flows. Generally, any significant increases in the mortgage prepayment speed and discount rate utilized in the fair value measurement of the mortgage servicing rights will result in a negative fair value adjustments (and decrease in the fair value measurement). Conversely, a decrease in the mortgage prepayment speed and discount rate will result in a positive fair value adjustment (and increase in the fair value measurement).
The following table presents quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measurements at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2020:
|
Fair Value
(in thousands)
|
|
Valuation
Technique
|
|
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
Range,
Weighted
Average
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights
|
$
|
5,168
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow
|
|
Constant prepayment rate
|
|
7% - 42%; 11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
10% - 14%; 12%
|
As of December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow
|
|
Constant prepayment rate
|
|
6% - 42.0%; 11.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
10% - 14%; 12%
|
The tables below present the recorded investment in assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, as of the dates indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total Losses
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated loans
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
(107)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total Losses
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated loans
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
|
$
|
(652)
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
417
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
(27)
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
1,472
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,472
|
|
|
$
|
(679)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2019
|
Total
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total Losses
|
Fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated loans
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
(197)
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
214
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
(197)
|
|
The individually evaluated loan amounts above represent collateral dependent loans that have been adjusted to fair value. When the Company identifies a collateral dependent loan with unique risk characteristics, the Company evaluates the need for an allowance using the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs. Depending on the characteristics of a loan, the fair value of collateral is generally estimated by obtaining external appraisals. If the Company determines that the value of the loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the Company recognizes this impairment and adjust the carrying value of the
loan to fair value through the allowance for credit losses. The loss represents charge-offs or impairments on collateral dependent loans for fair value adjustments based on the fair value of collateral. The carrying value of loans fully charged-off is zero.
The foreclosed assets amount above represents impaired real estate that has been adjusted to fair value. Foreclosed assets represent real estate which the Company has taken control of in partial or full satisfaction of loans. At the time of foreclosure, other real estate owned is recorded at fair value less costs to sell, which becomes the property’s new basis. Any write-downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for credit losses. After foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations such that the real estate is carried at the lower of its new cost basis or fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. Fair value adjustments on other real estate owned are recognized within net loss on real estate owned. The loss represents impairments on real estate owned for fair value adjustments based on the fair value of the real estate.
The Company’s property appraisals are primarily based on the sales comparison approach and income approach methodologies, which consider recent sales of comparable properties, including their income generating characteristics, and then make adjustments to reflect the general assumptions that a market participant would make when analyzing the property for purchase. These adjustments may increase or decrease an appraised value and can vary significantly depending on the location, physical characteristics and income producing potential of each property. Additionally, the quality and volume of market information available at the time of the appraisal can vary from period to period and cause significant changes to the nature and magnitude of comparable sale adjustments. Given these variations, comparable sale adjustments are generally not a reliable indicator for how fair value will increase or decrease from period to period. Under certain circumstances, management discounts are applied based on specific characteristics of an individual property.
The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
Fair Value
(in thousands)
|
|
Valuation
Technique
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Range,
Weighted Average
|
Individually evaluated loans
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
Sales comparison
approach
Income approach
|
|
Adjustment for differences between
comparable sales
Capitalization rate
|
|
Not meaningful
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Fair Value
(in thousands)
|
|
Valuation
Technique
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Range,
Weighted Average
|
Individually evaluated loans
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
|
Sales comparison
approach
Income approach
|
|
Adjustment for differences between
comparable sales
Capitalization rate
|
|
Not meaningfulN/A
|
Foreclosed assets (Residential real estate)
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
Sales comparison
approach
|
|
Adjustment for differences between
comparable sales
|
|
Not meaningfulN/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values for financial instruments are management’s estimates of the values at which the instruments could be exchanged in a transaction between willing parties. The Company uses the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments. These estimates are subjective and may vary significantly from amounts that would be realized in actual transactions. In addition, other significant assets are not considered financial assets including, any mortgage banking operations, deferred tax assets, and premises and equipment. Further, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on the fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of these estimates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
$
|
95,364
|
|
|
$
|
95,364
|
|
|
$
|
92,816
|
|
|
$
|
92,816
|
|
Cash at Federal Reserve and other banks
|
90,102
|
|
|
90,102
|
|
|
183,691
|
|
|
183,691
|
|
Level 2 inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity
|
359,770
|
|
|
377,442
|
|
|
375,606
|
|
|
381,525
|
|
Restricted equity securities
|
17,250
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
17,250
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
4,321,151
|
|
|
4,307,323
|
|
|
4,276,750
|
|
|
4,263,064
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
5,402,698
|
|
|
5,401,617
|
|
|
5,366,994
|
|
|
5,365,921
|
|
Other borrowings
|
19,309
|
|
|
19,309
|
|
|
18,454
|
|
|
18,454
|
|
Level 3 inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
57,323
|
|
|
56,254
|
|
|
57,232
|
|
|
56,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Contract
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Contract
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
Off-balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
$
|
1,296,732
|
|
|
$
|
12,967
|
|
|
$
|
1,309,326
|
|
|
$
|
13,093
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
12,084
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
12,014
|
|
|
120
|
|
Overdraft privilege commitments
|
109,752
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
110,402
|
|
|
1,104
|
|
Note 14 - Regulatory Matters
The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total, Tier 1, and common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. The following tables present actual and required capital ratios as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 for the Company and the Bank under applicable Basel III Capital Rules. The minimum capital amounts presented include the minimum required capital levels as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 based on the then phased-in provisions of the Basel III Capital Rules. As of January 1, 2019, the minimum required capital levels of the Basel III Capital Rules have been fully phased-in. Capital levels required to be considered well capitalized are based upon prompt corrective action regulations, as amended to reflect the changes under the Basel III Capital Rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
|
Required to be
Considered Well
Capitalized
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2020:
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
762,763
|
|
|
15.12
|
%
|
|
$
|
529,576
|
|
|
10.50
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Tri Counties Bank
|
$
|
755,893
|
|
|
14.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
529,388
|
|
|
10.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
504,179
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
702,007
|
|
|
13.92
|
%
|
|
$
|
428,705
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Tri Counties Bank
|
$
|
695,137
|
|
|
13.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
428,552
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
403,343
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Common equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
646,407
|
|
|
12.82
|
%
|
|
$
|
353,051
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Tri Counties Bank
|
$
|
695,137
|
|
|
13.79
|
%
|
|
$
|
352,925
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
327,716
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
702,007
|
|
|
11.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
250,216
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Tri Counties Bank
|
$
|
695,137
|
|
|
11.11
|
%
|
|
$
|
250,209
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
312,762
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
|
Required to be
Considered Well
Capitalized
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2019:
|
Amount
|
As of :
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
753,200
|
|
|
15.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
524,944
|
|
|
10.50
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Tri Counties Bank
|
$
|
748,660
|
|
|
14.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
524,759
|
|
|
10.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
499,770
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
719,809
|
|
|
14.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
424,955
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Tri Counties Bank
|
$
|
715,269
|
|
|
14.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
424,805
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
399,816
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Common equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
664,296
|
|
|
13.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
349,963
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Tri Counties Bank
|
$
|
715,269
|
|
|
14.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
349,839
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
324,851
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
$
|
719,809
|
|
|
11.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
249,343
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
Tri Counties Bank
|
$
|
715,269
|
|
|
11.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
249,337
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
311,672
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, capital levels at the Company and the Bank exceed all capital adequacy requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules. Also, at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Bank’s capital levels exceeded the minimum amounts necessary to be considered well capitalized under the current regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
The Basel III Capital Rules require for all banking organizations to maintain a capital conservation buffer above the minimum risk-based capital requirements in order to avoid certain limitations on capital distributions, stock repurchases and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers. The capital conservation buffer is exclusively composed of common equity tier 1 capital, and it applies to each of the risk-based capital ratios but not the leverage ratio. At March 31, 2020, the Company and the Bank are in compliance with the capital conservation buffer requirement.