Item 11. Additional Information
The supplemental disclosures below should be read in conjunction with the Schedule TO in its entirety. Inclusion of the disclosures below is not an
admission that they are material or legally required.
The disclosure in the Offer to Purchase and Item 11 of the Schedule TO is amended and supplemented
by making the following modifications to Section 16Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals U.S. Antitrust Compliance:
The final paragraph is deleted and replaced by the following text:
The waiting period under the HSR Act expired, effective April 12, 2022 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Accordingly, the condition to
the Offer relating to the termination or expiration of any applicable waiting period under the HSR Act (and any extension thereof, including under any agreement entered into in compliance with the Merger Agreement between a party and a governmental
authority agreeing not to consummate the Offer or the Merger prior to a certain date) applicable to the Offer or the Merger, has been satisfied.
The disclosure in the Offer to Purchase and Item 11 of the Schedule TO is amended and supplemented by inserting the following paragraphs in Section 16
Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals:
Delaware Court of Chancery Complaint
A putative class action complaint relating to the Offer and the Merger captioned Reith v. Huttig Building
Products, Inc. et al., Case No. 2022-0332, was filed on April 14, 2022, as amended on April 23, 2022, by a purported Huttig stockholder in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware. The putative class action
complaint names as defendants Huttig, the members of the Huttig Board, Parent and Merger Sub. Neither Parent nor Merger Sub has yet received a summons and complaint from the plaintiff.
The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Huttig Board breached its fiduciary duties to Huttig stockholders in
connection with the Offer and the Merger by (i) executing nondisclosure agreements with prospective bidders that
contain dont-ask-dont-waive standstills and failing to waive the standstills following
Huttigs entry into the Merger Agreement, (ii) executing the Merger Agreement that, according to its terms and in conjunction with the standstills, impedes the Huttig Boards ability to consider and accept superior proposals and
restricts the flow of information necessary to permit the Huttig Board to act on an informed basis and determine whether the Offer and the Merger are reasonable and in the best interest of Huttig stockholders and (iii) misleading Huttig
stockholders with respect to the terms of the nondisclosure agreements entered into with other parties during the sale process and the Huttig Boards ability to receive unsolicited offers from these parties. The complaint also alleges that the
Offer Price is inadequate and that Parent and Merger Sub aided and abetted breaches of fiduciary duty by the Huttig Board.