SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant
|
|
þ
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
|
|
o
|
Check the appropriate box:
o
Preliminary Proxy Statement
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ
Definitive Proxy Statement
o
Definitive Additional Materials
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)
þ
|
|
No fee required.
|
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
1.
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
2.
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
3.
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
4.
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing.
|
|
6.
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
7.
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
130 Baytech Drive
San Jose, California 95134
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On July 21, 2010
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Endwave
Corporation, a Delaware corporation. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 21, 2010, at 8:00
a.m. local time at 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California, for the following purposes:
|
1.
|
|
To elect our Board of Directors nominee for director to hold office
until the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and his successor is duly elected
and qualified;
|
|
|
2.
|
|
To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010; and
|
|
3.
|
|
To conduct any other business properly brought before the meeting.
|
These items of business are more fully described in the Proxy Statement accompanying this
Notice.
The record date for the Annual Meeting is May 28, 2010. Only stockholders of record at the
close of business on that date may vote at the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
We will not mail printed proxy materials to most of our stockholders. If you are one of these
stockholders, you will have received a notice informing you of the availability of proxy materials
and also providing you with instructions on how to vote your shares. Certain of our stockholders,
including all stockholders of record and all stockholders that have elected to receive printed
proxy materials will receive a printed set of proxy materials and a printed proxy card. We intend
to commence mailing to all of our stockholders either a notice or printed proxy materials on or
about June 11, 2010.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Curt P. Sacks
Corporate Secretary
San Jose, California
June 11, 2010
You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the
meeting, please vote your shares either by voting electronically or by completing and returning a
proxy card as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the meeting. Even if
you have voted by proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the meeting. Please note,
however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to
vote at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to Be Held
on July 21, 2010, at 8:00 a.m. local time at 130 Baytech Drive, San
Jose, California.
The proxy materials are available electronically at https://materials.proxyvote.com/29264A.
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
.
ENDWAVE CORPORATION
130 Baytech Drive
San Jose, California 95134
PROXY STATEMENT
FOR THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
July 21, 2010
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING
Why did I receive either a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or printed proxy
materials in the mail?
We will not mail printed proxy materials to most of our stockholders. If you are one of these
stockholders, you will have received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the
Notice) informing you of the availability of proxy materials and also providing you with
instructions on how to vote your shares. Certain of our stockholders, including all stockholders
of record and all stockholders that have elected to receive printed proxy materials will receive a
printed set of proxy materials and a printed proxy card. We intend to commence mailing to all of
our stockholders either a notice or printed proxy materials on or about June 11, 2010.
We have made these proxy materials available because the Board of Directors of Endwave
Corporation (sometimes referred to as the Company or Endwave) is soliciting your proxy to vote
at the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. You are invited to attend the annual meeting to vote
on the proposals described in this proxy statement. However, you do not need to attend the meeting
to vote your shares. Instead, you may follow the voting instructions in the Notice or simply
complete, sign and return the printed proxy card that you received.
How do I attend the annual meeting?
The meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 21, 2010, at 8:00 a.m. local time at 130 Baytech
Drive, San Jose, California. Information on how to vote in person at the annual meeting is
discussed below.
Who can vote at the annual meeting?
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on May 28, 2010 will be entitled to vote
at the annual meeting. On this record date, there were 9,794,206 shares of common stock
outstanding and entitled to vote.
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
If on May 28, 2010, your shares were registered directly in your name with Endwaves transfer
agent, Computershare Trust Company, then you are a stockholder of record. As a stockholder of
record, you may vote in person at the meeting or vote by proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend
the meeting, we urge you to fill out and return the enclosed proxy card to ensure your vote is
counted.
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of a Broker or Bank
If on May 28, 2010, your shares were held, not in your name, but rather in an account at a
brokerage firm, bank, dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of
shares held in street name. The organization holding your account is considered to be the
stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have
the right to direct your broker or other agent regarding how to vote the shares in your account.
You are also invited to attend the annual meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of
record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you request and obtain a valid
proxy from your broker or other agent.
2.
Most beneficial owners will have received a copy of the Notice in the mail. The Notice will
provide you with instructions on accessing proxy materials electronically, requesting written
proxy materials if you desire and voting your shares. Please follow the instructions in the Notice
to ensure your vote is counted.
Some beneficial owners will have received printed proxy materials and a printed proxy card in
lieu of the Notice. If that is the case, simply complete and mail the proxy card to ensure your
vote is counted, or follow any other instructions on the proxy card.
What am I voting on?
There are two matters scheduled for a vote:
|
|
|
Election of our Board of Directors nominee as director to hold office until the
2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and his successor is duly elected and qualified;
and
|
|
|
|
|
Ratification of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.
|
What if another matter is properly brought before the meeting?
The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at
the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting, it is the
intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on those matters in accordance
with their best judgment.
How do I vote?
You may either vote For the nominee to the Board of Directors or you may Withhold your
vote for the nominee. For each of the other matters to be voted on, you may vote For or
Against or abstain from voting. The procedures for voting are fairly simple:
Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name
If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the annual meeting or vote by
proxy using the enclosed proxy card. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to
vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the meeting and vote in person
even if you have already voted by proxy.
|
|
|
To vote in person, come to the annual meeting and we will give you a ballot when you
arrive.
|
|
|
|
|
To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the enclosed
proxy card and return it promptly in the envelope provided. If you return your signed
proxy card to us before the annual meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.
|
Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank
Most beneficial owners will have received a copy of the Notice in the mail. The Notice will
provide you with instructions on accessing proxy materials electronically, requesting written
proxy materials if you desire and voting your shares. Please follow the instructions in the Notice
to ensure your vote is counted.
Some beneficial owners will have received printed proxy materials and a printed proxy card in
lieu of the Notice. If that is the case, simply complete and mail the proxy card to ensure your
vote is counted, or follow any other instructions on the proxy card.
To vote in person at the annual meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker,
bank, or other agent. Follow the instructions from your broker or bank included with these proxy
materials, or contact your broker or bank to request a proxy form.
3.
How many votes do I have?
On each matter to be voted upon, you have one vote for each share of common stock you owned
as of May 28, 2010.
What if I return a proxy card but do not make specific choices?
If you return a signed and dated proxy card without marking any voting selections, your
shares will be voted For the election of the nominee for director and For the ratification of
the selection of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm. If
any other matter is properly presented at the meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals
named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his or her best judgment.
Who is paying for this proxy solicitation?
We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these proxy materials,
our directors and employees may also solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of
communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting
proxies. We may also reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding
proxy materials to beneficial owners.
What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice or set of proxy materials?
If you receive more than one Notice or set of proxy materials, your shares may be registered
in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on the proxy
cards in the proxy materials or the Notice, as applicable, to ensure that all of your shares are
voted.
Can I change my vote after submitting my proxy?
Yes. You can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the meeting. If you are
the record holder of your shares, you may revoke your proxy in any one of three ways:
|
|
|
You may submit another properly completed proxy card with a later date.
|
|
|
|
|
You may send a timely written notice that you are revoking your proxy to
Endwaves Corporate Secretary at 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California 95134.
|
|
|
|
|
You may attend the annual meeting and vote in person. Simply attending the
meeting will not, by itself, revoke your proxy.
|
If your shares are held by your broker or bank as a nominee or agent, you should follow the
instructions provided by your broker or bank.
When are stockholder proposals due for next years annual meeting?
To be considered for inclusion in next years proxy materials, your proposal must be
submitted in writing by February 11, 2011, to our Corporate Secretary at 130 Baytech Drive, San
Jose, California 95134. If you wish to submit a proposal that is not to be included in next years
proxy materials or nominate a director, you must do so no earlier than March 24, 2011, and no
later than by April 23, 2011, or within such other period as is specified in our bylaws. You are
advised to review our bylaws, which contain additional requirements concerning stockholder
proposals and director nominations.
How are votes counted?
Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the meeting, who will
separately count For, Withhold and Against votes, abstentions and broker non-votes.
Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for each proposal, and will have the same
effect as Against votes. Broker non-votes have no effect and will not be counted towards the
vote total for any proposal.
4.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held by your broker as your nominee and you do not
give instructions to your broker, your broker can vote your shares with respect to discretionary
items, but not with respect to non-discretionary items. Discretionary items are proposals
considered routine under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on which your broker
may vote shares held by it in the absence of your voting instructions. Non-discretionary items are
proposals considered non-routine under the rules of the NYSE, including those involving a
contest or a matter that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of shareholders, such
as mergers or shareholder proposals. On non-discretionary items for which you do not give your
broker instructions, the shares will be treated as broker non-votes.
How many votes are needed to approve each proposal?
|
|
|
For Proposal No. 1, the election of one director, the nominee receiving the
most For votes from the holders of shares present in person or represented by proxy
and entitled to vote on the election of such director will be elected. Only votes
For or Withheld will affect the outcome. Broker non-votes will have no effect.
|
|
|
|
To be approved, Proposal No. 2, the ratification of the selection of Burr
Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm, must receive
For votes from the holders of a majority of votes present and entitled to vote
either in person or by proxy. If you Abstain from voting, it will have the same
effect as an Against vote. Broker non-votes will have no effect.
|
What is the quorum requirement?
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if a
majority of the outstanding votes entitled to vote at the meeting are represented by stockholders
present at the meeting or by proxy. On the record date, there were 9,794,206 shares of common
stock. Thus, the holders of 4,897,104 votes must be present in person or represented by proxy at
the meeting to have a quorum.
Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is
submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you vote in person at the
meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there
is no quorum, either the Chairman of the Meeting or the holders of a majority of votes present at
the meeting in person or represented by proxy may adjourn the meeting to another date.
How can I find out the results of the voting at the annual meeting?
Preliminary voting results will be announced at the annual meeting. Final voting results will
be published in a current report on Form 8-K within four business days of the annual meeting.
Are proxy materials available on the internet?
Proxy materials are available at https://materials.proxyvote.com/29264A.
5.
Proposal
1
Election Of Director
Our Board of Directors (the Board) is divided into three classes, with each class
having a three-year term. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes present in person or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting.
Unless the Board determines otherwise, vacancies on the Board may be filled only by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors. This includes vacancies created by an
increase in the number of directors. A director elected by the Board to fill a vacancy (including
a vacancy created by an increase in the authorized number of directors on the Board) shall serve
for the remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which the vacancy occurred and
until such directors successor is elected and has qualified or until the directors death,
resignation or removal.
The Board presently has three independent members. The nominee named below is currently a
director of Endwave who was previously elected by our stockholders. There is one director in the
class whose term of office expires in 2010. If elected at the annual meeting, the nominee would
serve until the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is duly elected and
qualified, or until the directors death, resignation or removal. It is our policy to encourage
directors and nominees for director to attend the annual meeting. All current directors who were
serving as directors at the time of the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended the 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld,
for the election of the nominee named below. In the event that the nominee should be unavailable
for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, such shares will be voted for the election of
such substitute nominee as the Board may propose. The person nominated for election has agreed to
serve if elected, and the Board has no reason to believe that the nominee will be unable to serve.
The following is a brief biography of the nominee and each director whose term will continue
after the annual meeting. The age specified for each director is as of June 11, 2010.
Nominee for Election for a Three-year Term Expiring at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
Joseph Lazzara
Mr. Lazzara
, age 58, has served as a director of Endwave since February 2004. From September
2006 to March 2008, Mr. Lazzara served as the Vice Chairman and a director of Omron Scientific
Technologies, Inc. (formerly known as Scientific Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: STIZ)), a
manufacturer of machine safeguarding products and automation sensors acquired by Omron Corporation
in September 2006. Prior to the acquisition of Scientific Technologies, Mr. Lazzara served as the
Chief Executive Officer between June 1993 and September 2006, as the President of Scientific
Technologies between 1989 and 2006 and as the Treasurer and a director of Scientific Technologies
between 1984 and 2006. Mr. Lazzara also served as a Vice President of Scientific Technologies
between September 1984 and June 1989. From 2006, Mr. Lazzara also serves as the Vice Chairman and
Director of Automation Products Group, Inc., a privately held manufacturer of automation sensors.
He also served as Treasurer and a director of Scientific Technologies parent company, Scientific
Technology Incorporation, from 1981 and 2006. Prior to 1981, Mr. Lazzara was employed by
Hewlett-Packard Company, a global technology solutions provider, in Process and Engineering
Management. Mr. Lazzara received a B.S. in Engineering from Purdue University and an M.B.A. from
Santa Clara University. We believe that Mr. Lazzaras extensive business expertise, both as the
Chief Executive Officer and Board Member of a publicly traded company as well as his technical
background qualify him to sit on our Board of Directors.
The Board Of Directors Recommends
A Vote In Favor Of the Named Nominee
.
6.
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
John F. McGrath, Jr.
Mr. McGrath,
age 45, has served as a director of Endwave since January 2005. Mr. McGrath is an
Executive in Residence at Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers (KPCB), a leading venture capital firm.
Prior to KPCB, Mr. McGrath served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Network
Equipment Technologies, Inc., a position he held from 2001 to 2009. Prior experience includes Vice
President of Finance for Aspect Communications, Director of Finance for TCSI Corporation, and
Manager in the High Technology and Manufacturing practice at Ernst & Young. Mr. McGrath is a
registered C.P.A. (inactive) in the State of California and holds a B.S. in Accounting from the
University of Wyoming and an M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Mr. McGrath is
currently on the board of the Presidio Fund, a publicly traded mutual fund, and has previously
served as Audit Committee Chairman on the board of Actel Corporation. We believe that Mr. McGraths
financial expertise working as the Chief Financial Officer of a publicly traded company, his
service as the Audit Committee Chair of another company and his background as a C.P.A. qualify him
to sit on our Board of Directors.
Wade Meyercord
Mr. Meyercord,
age 69, has served as a director of Endwave since March 2004. From 1987 to
present, Mr. Meyercord has served as President of Meyercord and Associates, a consulting firm
specializing in board of directors and executive compensation. From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Meyercord
served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of RioPort.com, Inc., a company that
delivers an integrated, secure platform for acquiring, managing and experiencing music and spoken
audio programming from the Internet. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Meyercord Served as Senior Vice
President, e-commerce of Diamond Multimedia. Prior to 1998, Mr. Meyercord held various management
and/or executive level positions with Read-Rite Corporation, Memorex Corporation and IBM
Corporation. Mr. Meyercord received a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Purdue University and an
M.B.A. in engineering administration from Syracuse University. Mr. Meyercord serves as a member on
the Board of Directors of Microchip Technology Inc.. Mr. Meyercord also has served as a member on
the Board of Directors of Magma Design Automation and California Micro Devices which was acquired
by ON Semiconductor. We believe that Mr. Meyercords extensive business expertise, both as a key
executive with a number of large technology companies and as a Chief Financial Officer qualify him
to sit on our Board of Directors.
Director Continuing in Office Until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
John Mikulsky
Mr. Mikulsky,
age 65, has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since December
1, 2009. From August 2005 until November 2009, Mr. Mikulsky served as our Chief Operating Officer
and Executive Vice President. From May 2001 until August 2005, Mr. Mikulsky served as our Chief
Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President, Marketing and Business Development. From May 1996
until April 2001, Mr. Mikulsky served as our Vice President of Product Development. From 1993 until
1996, Mr. Mikulsky worked as a Technology Manager for Balazs Analytical Laboratory, a provider of
analytical services to the semiconductor and disk drive industries. Prior to 1993, Mr. Mikulsky
worked at Raychem Corporation, most recently as a Division Manager for its Electronic Systems
Division. Mr. Mikulsky holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Marquette University, an M.S. in
electrical engineering from Stanford University and an S.M. in Management from the Sloan School at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We believe Mr. Mikulskys extensive industry knowledge
and experience, including his nearly 14 years at Endwave as a Vice President and an Officer, in
both technical and leadership roles, qualify him to sit on our Board of Directors.
Meetings of the Board of Directors
The Board met seven times during 2009. Each Board member attended 75% or more of the
aggregate of the meetings of the Board and of the committees on which he served, held during the
period for which he was a director or committee member.
7.
Independence of the Board of Directors
As required under the Nasdaq Stock Market (Nasdaq) listing standards, a majority of the
members of our Board of Directors must qualify as independent, as affirmatively determined by
the Board. The Board consults with our counsel to ensure that the Boards determinations are
consistent with relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of
independent, including those set forth in pertinent listing standards of the Nasdaq, as in
effect time to time.
Consistent with these considerations, after review of all relevant identified transactions or
relationships between each director, or any of his or her family members, and Endwave, its senior
management and its independent auditors, the Board has affirmatively determined that the following
three directors are independent directors within the meaning of the applicable Nasdaq listing
standards: Mr. Lazzara, Mr. McGrath and Mr. Meyercord. In making this determination, the Board
found that none of these directors had a material or other disqualifying relationship with
Endwave. Mr. Mikulsky, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is not an independent director
by virtue of his employment with us.
As required under applicable Nasdaq listing standards, in 2009, our independent directors met
seven times in regularly scheduled executive sessions at which only independent directors were
present. Each executive session was led by our previous Chairman, Mr. Winn. Persons interested in
communicating with the independent directors with their concerns or issues may address
correspondence to a particular director, or to the independent directors generally, in care of
Endwave Corporation at 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California 95134. If no particular director is
named, letters will be forwarded, depending on the subject matter, to the Chairman of the Board or
the Chairpersons of the Audit, Compensation, or Nominating and Governance Committees.
Information Regarding the Board of Directors and Its Committees
The Board has three committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating
and Governance Committee. The following table provides membership and meeting information for
fiscal 2009 for each of the Board committees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating and
|
Name
|
|
Audit
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Lazzara
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
John F. McGrath, Jr.
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wade Meyercord
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
*
|
|
|
X
|
|
Eric D. Stonestrom**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Edward C.V. Winn**
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Total meetings in fiscal 2009
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Committee Chairperson
|
|
**
|
|
Mr. Stonestrom and Mr. Winn both resigned from the Board of Directors in 2010.
|
Below is a description of each committee of the Board. Each of the committees has authority
to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate, to carry out its
responsibilities. The Board has determined that each member of each committee meets the applicable
rules and regulations regarding independence and that each member is free of any relationship
that would interfere with his or her individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to
us.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors was established by the Board in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), to
oversee our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our financial
statements. For this purpose, the Audit
8.
Committee performs several functions. The Audit Committee evaluates the performance of and
assesses the qualifications of the independent registered public accounting firm; determines and
approves the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm; determines whether
to retain or terminate the existing independent registered public accounting firm or to appoint
and engage a new independent registered public accounting firm; reviews and approves the retention
of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform any proposed permissible non-audit
services; monitors the rotation of partners of the independent registered public accounting firm
on our audit engagement team as required by law; confers with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm regarding the effectiveness of internal controls over financial
reporting; establishes procedures, as required under applicable law, for the receipt, retention
and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or
auditing matters and the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters; and meets to review our annual audited financial
statements and quarterly financial statements with management and the independent registered
public accounting firm, including reviewing our disclosures under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The Audit Committee is composed of
three non-employee directors: Messrs. Lazzara, McGrath (Chairman) and Meyercord. The Audit
Committee has adopted a written charter that is available to stockholders on our website at
www.endwave.com.
The Board of Directors annually reviews the Nasdaq listing standards definition of
independence for Audit Committee members and has determined that all members of our Audit Committee
are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 4350(d)(2)(A)(i) and (ii) of the
Nasdaq listing standards). The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. McGrath qualifies as
an audit committee financial expert, as defined in applicable rules promulgated by the Securities
and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. The Board made a qualitative assessment of Mr. McGraths level
of knowledge and experience based on a number of factors, including his respective formal education
and experience as chief financial officer for a public reporting company.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors reviews and approves our overall
compensation strategy and policies. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves corporate
performance goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our executive officers and other
senior management; reviews and approves the compensation and other terms of employment of our
Chief Executive Officer; reviews and approves the compensation and other terms of employment of
our other officers; and administers our stock option and purchase plans, pension and profit
sharing plans, stock bonus plans, deferred compensation plans and other similar programs. The
Compensation Committee is composed of three non-employee directors: Messrs. Lazzara, McGrath and
Meyercord (Chairman). All current members of our Compensation Committee are independent within the
meaning of Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ listing standards. The Compensation Committee has
adopted a written charter that is available to stockholders on our website at
www.endwave.com
The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, as stated in its charter, include the
following:
|
|
|
developing compensation policies that will attract and retain the highest
quality executives, that will clearly articulate the relationship of corporate
performance to executive compensation and will reward executives for Endwaves
progress;
|
|
|
|
proposing to the Board of Directors the adoption, amendment and termination of
stock option plans, stock appreciation rights plans, pension and profit sharing plan,
stock bonus plans, stock purchase plans, bonus plans, deferred compensation plans and
other similar plans;
|
|
|
|
granting rights, participation and interests in such plans to eligible
participants, subject in certain cases to ratification by the Board; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving such other compensation matters as may be necessary or
appropriate in view of the Compensation Committees overall responsibility.
|
Our Compensation Committee plays an integral role in setting executive officer compensation
each year. In the first quarter of each year, our Compensation Committee holds a regular meeting
in which our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer review with the Compensation
Committee Endwaves financial and business performance for the previous year and managements
business outlook and operating plan for the current year. In
9.
reviewing the prior years performance, the Compensation Committee compares our performance to the
financial and operational goals set for such year and the bonus targets. In this meeting, the
Chief Executive Officer also reviews with the Compensation Committee his assessment of the
individual performance of each executive officer, including his own performance, according to a
variety of qualitative performance criteria and salary and bonus trends. In addition, during the
fourth quarter of each year, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee discusses with the full
Board, recent data and current trends in equity ownership programs for comparable companies.
Taking into account the information conveyed and discussed at these meetings and the
recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee then determines,
subject in some cases to ratification by the full Board of Directors:
|
|
|
the amount of bonus to be awarded to each executive officer in respect of the prior years
performance;
|
|
|
|
|
whether to raise, lower or maintain the executive officers base salary for the current year;
|
|
|
|
|
the bonus targets to be set for the executive officers for the current year; and
|
|
|
|
|
option grants, if any, to be awarded to each executive officer.
|
Each year, the Compensation Committee also reviews with management our Compensation
Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) and considers whether to recommend that it be included in proxy
statements and other filings.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for
identifying, reviewing and evaluating candidates to serve as our directors consistent with
criteria approved by the Board; reviewing and evaluating incumbent directors, recommending
candidates for election to the Board of Directors; making recommendations to the Board regarding
the membership of the committees of the Board; and assessing the performance of management and our
Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee is composed of three non-employee
directors: Messrs. Lazzara (Chairman), McGrath and Meyercord. All members of the Nominating and
Governance Committee are independent (as independence is currently defined in Rule 4200(a)(15) of
the Nasdaq listing standards). The Nominating and Governance Committee has adopted a written
charter that is available to stockholders on our website and www.endwave.com.
The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that candidates for director should have
certain minimum qualifications, including being able to read and understand basic financial
statements and having the highest personal and professional integrity and ethics. The Nominating
and Governance Committee will seriously consider only those candidates who have demonstrated
exceptional ability and judgment and who are expected to be effective, in connection with the other
nominees to the Board, in providing the skills and expertise appropriate for us and serving the
long-term interests of our stockholders. However, the Nominating and Governance Committee retains
the right to modify these qualifications from time to time. Candidates for director nominees are
reviewed in the context of the current composition of the Board, our operating requirements and the
long-term interests of stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the Nominating and Governance
Committee considers diversity, age, skills and such other factors as it deems appropriate, given
the current needs of Endwave and the Board, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and
capability. In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the
Nominating and Governance Committee reviews such directors overall service to Endwave during their
term, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance,
and any other relationships and transactions that might impair such directors independence. In the
case of new director candidates, the Nominating and Governance Committee also determines whether
the nominee must be independent for Nasdaq purposes, which determination is based upon applicable
Nasdaq listing standards, applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC and the advice of
counsel, if necessary. The Nominating and Governance Committee then uses its network of contacts to
compile a list of potential candidates, but may also engage, if it deems appropriate, a
professional search firm. The Nominating and Governance Committee conducts any appropriate and
necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after
considering the function and needs of the Board. The Nominating and Governance Committee meets to
discuss and consider such candidates qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation
to the Board by majority vote. In fiscal 2009, the Nominating and Governance Committee paid no fees
to any outside entity or director to assist in the process of identifying or evaluating director
candidates.
10.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider any qualified director candidates
recommended by stockholders. The Nominating and Governance Committee does not intend to alter the
manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the minimum criteria set forth above, based on
whether or not the candidate was recommended by a stockholder. Stockholders who wish to recommend
individuals for consideration by the Nominating and Governance Committee to become nominees for
election to the Board may do so by delivering a written recommendation to the Nominating and
Governance Committee at 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California 95134 no sooner than 120 days and
no later than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the most recent Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Submissions must include the full name of the proposed nominee, a description of the
proposed nominees business experience for at least the previous five years, complete biographical
information, a description of the proposed nominees qualifications as a director and a
representation that the nominating stockholder is a beneficial or record holder of our stock and
has been a holder for at least one year. Any such submission must be accompanied by the written
consent of the proposed nominee to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected.
Role of the Board in Risk Oversight
One of the boards key functions is informed oversight of the Companys risk management
process. The Board does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this
oversight function directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through various Board standing
committees that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our
Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, including a
determination of the nature and level of risk appropriate for the Company. The Audit Committee has
the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk exposures and the steps our
management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to
govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The Audit Committee also
monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in addition to oversight of the
performance of our internal audit function. The Nominating and Governance Committee monitors the
effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines, including whether they are successful in
preventing illegal or improper liability-creating conduct. The Compensation Committee assesses and
monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage
excessive risk-taking. Typically, the entire Board meets with management at least annually, and the
applicable Board committees meet at least annually with the employees responsible for risk
management in the committees respective areas of oversight. Both the Board as a whole and the
various standing committees receive periodic reports from management, as well as incidental reports
as matters may arise. It is the responsibility of the committee chairs to report findings regarding
material risk exposures to the Board as quickly as possible. The Board has delegated to the Boards
lead independent director the responsibility of coordinating between the Board and management with
regard to the determination and implementation of responses to any problematic risk management
issues.
Stockholder Communications With The Board
The Board has adopted a formal process by which stockholders may communicate with the Board
or any of its directors. Stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board may do so by sending
written communications addressed to the Corporate Secretary of Endwave Corporation at 130 Baytech
Drive, San Jose, California 95134. These communications will be reviewed by one or more employees
of the Company designated by the Board, who will determine whether they should be presented to the
Board. The purpose of this screening is to allow the Board to avoid having to consider irrelevant
or inappropriate communications (such as advertisements, solicitations and hostile
communications). The screening procedures have been approved by a majority of the independent
Directors of the Board. All communications directed to the Audit Committee in accordance with our
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that relate to questionable accounting or auditing matters
involving Endwave will be promptly and directly forwarded to the Audit Committee without
screening.
Code Of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted the Endwave Corporation Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to
all officers, directors and employees. The Endwave Corporation Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
is available on our website at www.endwave.com. We will post on our website any amendments
to this code or any waivers of this code that apply to directors or executive officers.
11.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 with our management. The Audit Committee has discussed
with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114,
The Auditors Communication with Those Charged With
Governance
, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) in Rule 3200T.
The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent
registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the
independent registered public accounting firms communications with the audit committee concerning
independence, and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the
independent registered public accounting firms independence. Based on the foregoing, the Audit
Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial
statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009.
Mr. John F. McGrath (Chairperson)
Mr. Joseph Lazzara
Mr. Wade Meyercord
|
|
|
1
|
|
The material in this report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any
of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general
incorporation language in any such filing.
|
12.
Proposal
2
Ratification Of Selection Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.
(BPM) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2010 and has further directed that management submit the selection of the independent
registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the annual meeting. BPM
has audited our financial statements since 2005. Representatives of BPM are expected to be present
at the annual meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and
will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Neither our bylaws nor other governing documents or law require stockholder ratification of
the selection of BPM as our independent registered public accounting firm. However, the Audit
Committee of the Board is submitting the selection of BPM to the stockholders for ratification as
a matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit
Committee of the Board will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection
is ratified, the Audit Committee of the Board in its discretion may direct the appointment of a
different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if they
determine that such a change would be in the best interests of Endwave and its stockholders.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes present in person or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the annual meeting will be required to ratify the
selection of BPM. Abstentions will be counted toward the tabulation of votes cast on proposals
presented to the stockholders and will have the same effect as negative votes. Broker non-votes are
counted towards a quorum, but are not counted for any purpose in determining whether this matter
has been approved.
Independent Registered Accounting Firms Fees
The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by Endwave for the audit and other
services provided by BPM for fiscal 2008 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
Audit-related Fees(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of
our annual consolidated financial statements, review of our quarterly condensed consolidated
financial statements and services that are normally provided by Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. in
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Audit-related fees consist of assurance and related services that are reasonably related to
the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not
reported above under audit fees. The services provided for the fees disclosed under this
category include due diligence and accounting consultations in connection with acquisitions.
|
Independence of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Pre-Approval Policy
Our Audit Committee has determined that the provision by BPM of non-audit services is
compatible with maintaining the independence of BPM. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for
the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by our independent registered public
accounting firm. The policy generally pre-approves specified services in the defined categories of
audit services, audit-related services and tax services for up to $5,000. Pre-approval may also be
given as part of the Audit Committees approval of the scope of the engagement of the independent
registered public accounting firm or on an individual explicit case-by-case basis before the
independent registered public accounting firm is engaged to provide each service. The pre-approval
of services may be delegated to one or more of the Audit Committees members, but the decision must
be reported to
the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. During fiscal 2009, all services provided
by BPM were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
The Board Of Directors Recommends
A Vote In Favor Of Proposal
2
.
13.
Security Ownership Of
Certain Beneficial Owners And Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the ownership of our common
stock as of May 14, 2010 by: (i) each of our named executive officers; (ii) each director; (iii)
our executive officers and directors as a group; and (iv) all those known by us to be beneficial
owners of more than five percent of our common stock. Except as otherwise indicated, the address of
each of the persons set forth below is c/o Endwave Corporation, 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose,
California 95134.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
Name and Address
|
|
Number
|
|
Percent(2)
|
Entities affiliated with Empire Capital Management, LLC(3)
|
|
|
1,336,592
|
|
|
|
13.67
|
|
1 Gorham Island, Suite 201
Westport, CT 06880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Eagle Rock
|
|
|
957,525
|
|
|
|
9.79
|
|
Capital Management(4)
551 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Dimensional
|
|
|
752,035
|
|
|
|
7.69
|
|
Fund Advisors LP(5)
1299 Ocean Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Potomac Capital
|
|
|
597,541
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
Management(6)
825 Third Avenue.
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward A. Keible, Jr. (7)**
|
|
|
384,700
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
Brett W. Wallace (8)**
|
|
|
6,081
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John J. Mikulsky(9)
|
|
|
307,298
|
|
|
|
3.14
|
|
Curt P. Sacks(10)
|
|
|
130,959
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
Daniel P. Teuthorn(11)
|
|
|
104,011
|
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
Steven F. Layton(12)
|
|
|
97,268
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Joseph J. Lazzara(13)
|
|
|
18,088
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
John F. McGrath, Jr.(14)
|
|
|
17,262
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Wade Meyercord(14)
|
|
|
17,127
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)(15)
|
|
|
692,013
|
|
|
|
7.08
|
|
14.
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than one percent.
|
|
**
|
|
Under applicable SEC rules, Mr. Keible and Mr. Wallace constitute named executive
officers because they served as principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
respectively, during fiscal 2009. They are not currently executive officers of the Company,
however, and their shares are not included in the line of the table above entitled All
directors and executive officers as a group.
|
|
(1)
|
|
This table is based upon information supplied to us by our officers, directors and principal
stockholders and upon any Schedules 13D or 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange. Unless
otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, and subject to community property laws
where applicable, we believe that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Applicable percentages are based on 9,777,536 shares outstanding on May 14, 2010, adjusted
as required by rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Empire GP, the general partner of Empire Capital, has the power to direct the affairs of
Empire Capital, including decisions respecting the disposition of the proceeds from the sale
of the Common Stock. Empire Management, the investment manager of the Empire Overseas Fund
has the power to direct the affairs of the Empire Overseas Fund, including decisions
respecting the disposition of the proceeds from the sale of the Common Stock. Empire
Management, pursuant to investment management agreements with Charter Oak, Charter Oak II and
Charter Oak Master, has the power to dispose of the proceeds from the sale of the Common
Stock with respect to those assets of the Charter Oak Funds under its discretion. Empire
Management, pursuant to an investment management agreement with the Enhanced Master Fund, has
the power to dispose of the proceeds from the sale of the Common Stock with respect to those
assets under its discretion. Messrs. Fine and Richards are the Members of Empire GP and
Empire Management, and in their capacities direct the operations of Empire GP and Empire
Management.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The shares are held by EagleRock Master Fund, L.P. (ERMF) and EagleRock Institutional
Partners LP (ERIP). EagleRock Capital Management, LLC (EagleRock) is the investment
manager of ERMF and ERIP and has sole power to vote and dispose of the shares held by ERMF
and ERIP and may be deemed to beneficially own such shares. Nader Tavakoli is the Manager of
EagleRock and may direct the voting and disposition of the shares held by ERMF and ERIP and
may be deemed to beneficially own such shares.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (formerly, Dimensional Fund Advisors, Inc.) (Dimensional), an
investment advisor registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisors Act of 1940,
furnishes investment advice to four investment companies registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, and serves as investment manager to certain other commingled group
trusts and separate accounts. These investment companies, trusts and accounts are the
Funds. In its role as investment advisor or manager, Dimensional possesses investment
and/or voting power over the securities of the Issuer described in this schedule that are
owned by the Funds, and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of the Issuer
held by the Funds. However, all securities reported are owned by the Funds. Dimensional
disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities. Mr. Christopher Crossan, Global Chief
Compliance Officer, is a General Partner of Dimensional Holdings Inc.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Potomac Capital Partners LP is a private investment partnership formed under the laws of the
State of Delaware. Potomac Capital Management LLC is the General Partner of Potomac Capital
Partners LP. Mr. Paul J. Solit is the Managing Member of Potomac Capital Management LLC.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 242,102 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the
date of this table.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 6,081 shares held jointly in the name of Brett W. Wallace and Deborah S. Wallace.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes 236,393 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the
date of this table. If exercised in full within 60 days of the date of this table, 179,150
shares would be subject to repurchase by us.
|
15.
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 115,873 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of
the date of this table. If exercised in full within 60 days of the date of this table, 87,670
shares would be subject to repurchase by us.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Includes 75,456 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the
date of this table. If exercised in full within 60 days of the date of this table, 56,824
shares would be subject to repurchase by us.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Includes 91,821 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the
date of this table. If exercised in full within 60 days of the date of this table, 59,467
shares would be subject to repurchase by us.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Includes 17,088 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the
date of this table. Also includes 1,000 shares held jointly in the name of Joseph J. and
Nancy B. Lazzara.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Represents shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the date of
this table.
|
|
(15)
|
|
See footnotes 7 through 14 above, as applicable. Includes 813,122 shares issuable upon
exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table. If exercised in
full within 60 days of the date of this table, 383,111 shares would be subject to a
repurchase right by us.
|
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons
who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock.
Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by the Securities and
Exchange Commissions regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and
written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009, our officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners complied with all
applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements except that one report, covering one transaction, was
filed late by Empire Capital Management, L.L.C. and three reports, covering 11 transactions, were
filed late by EagleRock Capital Management, LLC.
16.
Compensation
Of Executive Officers
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our primary objectives with respect to executive compensation are to attract and retain the
best possible executive talent, to link annual cash compensation and long-term stock-based
compensation to achievement of measurable corporate goals and individual performance, and to align
executives incentives with stockholder value creation. To achieve these objectives, we have
implemented and maintain compensation plans that tie a portion of executives overall compensation
to our financial performance and common stock price. Overall, the total compensation opportunity is
intended to create an executive compensation program that is competitive with comparably-sized
companies, as it is these companies with whom we compete most vigorously for executive and
technical talent. We refer to these companies in this compensation discussion and analysis as
comparable companies.
Role of Compensation Committee and Chief Executive Officer
Our Compensation Committee approves, administers and interprets our executive compensation
and benefit policies and plans. Our Compensation Committee is appointed by our Board of Directors,
and consists entirely of directors who are outside directors for purposes of Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code and non-employee directors for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the
Exchange Act. Our Compensation Committee is comprised of Mr. Joseph J. Lazzara,, Mr. John F.
McGrath and Mr. Wade Meyercord. Our Compensation Committee is chaired by Mr. Meyercord, President
of Meyercord and Associates, a consulting firm specializing in board member and executive
compensation.
Our Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for ensuring that our executive
compensation and benefit program is consistent with our compensation philosophy and corporate
governance guidelines and is responsible for determining the executive compensation packages
offered to our executive officers. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, as stated
in its charter, include the following:
|
|
|
Developing compensation policies that will attract and retain the highest
quality executives, will clearly articulate the relationship of corporate performance
to executive compensation and will reward executives for Endwaves progress;
|
|
|
|
|
Proposing to the Board of Directors the adoption, amendment and termination of
stock option plans, stock appreciation rights plans, pension and profit sharing plan,
stock bonus plans, stock purchase plans, bonus plans, deferred compensation plans and
other similar plans;
|
|
|
|
|
Granting rights, participation and interests in such plans to eligible
participants, subject in certain cases to ratification by the Board of Directors; and
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewing and approving such other compensation matters as may be necessary or
appropriate in view of the Compensation Committees overall responsibility.
|
Our Compensation Committee plays an integral role in setting executive officer compensation
each year. Generally during the fourth quarter of each year, the Chairman of the Compensation
Committee discusses with the full Board recent data and current trends in equity ownership
programs for comparable companies. Generally in the first quarter of the following year, our
Compensation Committee holds a regular meeting in which our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer review with the Compensation Committee Endwaves financial and business
performance for the prior year and managements business outlook and operating plan for the
current year. In reviewing the prior years performance, the Compensation Committee compares our
performance to the financial and operational goals set for such year and the bonus targets set for
such year. In this meeting, the Chief Executive Officer also reviews with the Compensation
Committee his assessment of the individual performance of each executive officer, including his
own performance, according to a variety of qualitative performance criteria and salary and bonus
trends. Taking into account the information conveyed and discussed at these meetings and the
recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee then determines,
subject in some cases to ratification by the full Board of Directors:
|
|
|
The amount of bonus to be awarded to each executive officer in respect of the prior years
performance;
|
17.
|
|
|
Whether to raise, lower or maintain the executive officers base salary for the current year;
|
|
|
|
|
The bonus targets to be set for the executive officers for the current year; and
|
|
|
|
|
Option grants and restricted stock units, if any, to be awarded to each
executive officer.
|
|
Each element of our executive compensation system is described
in more detail below.
|
Comparable Company Comparisons
Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the executive compensation programs and amounts
at comparable companies. Endwaves total cash compensation packages are designed to be at the
median of total target cash compensation among comparable companies for median performance by
comparable executives. Our equity compensation program is designed to provide a percentage
ownership of Endwave that is comparable to the median percentage ownership among these comparable
companies. However, the individual elements of our executive program (base salary, annual
incentive compensation, equity compensation and benefits) may vary from group medians as the
Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors deems appropriate.
Since our initial public offering in 2000, the Compensation Committee has studied comparable
companies to calibrate executive compensation. For this purpose, for 2009, the Compensation
Committee looked at companies with more than $50 million but less than $200 million in annual
revenues as described in the quarterly executive salary survey published by Radford, a unit of Aon
Consulting Company, or Radford. We believe this survey is appropriate for benchmarking executive
compensation because: the companies surveyed are similar in size, both in terms of revenues and
market capitalization, to Endwave; Endwave competes with many of the surveyed companies for
executive and technical talent; and companies in the indices are selected independently by
Radford. We do not benchmark our executive compensation solely against companies in our industry
because few of our competitors are close to our size. Most of our competitors are very large,
diversified companies or very small, privately-held companies. Rather, we focus on the companies
with whom we compete most vigorously for executive and technical talent.
Elements of Executive Compensation
Our executive compensation consists of base salary, annual cash incentive, equity plan
participation and customary broad-based employee benefits. Consistent with our pay for performance
philosophy, the Compensation Committee believes that we can better motivate executive officers to
enhance stockholder return if a portion of their compensation is at risk that is, contingent
upon the achievement of performance objectives and overall strong company performance. The mix of
base salary, annual cash bonus opportunity based on achievement of objectives and anticipated
long-term stock-based compensation incentive (in the form of appreciation in shares underlying
stock options) varies depending on the officers position level. Long-term stock-based compensation
has always been a significant component of executive compensation, as we believe that best aligns
our executive officers interests with that of our stockholders. An annual cash bonus opportunity
has historically also formed a significant component of executive compensation; however, as
explained in more detail below, it was not a component of executive compensation in 2009 and is not
likely to form a significant component of executive compensation in 2010.
Base Salary:
Base salaries for our executives are established based on the scope of their
responsibilities, taking into account market compensation paid by comparable companies for
equivalent positions. Base salaries are reviewed on an annual basis and any increases are similar
in scope to our overall corporate salary increase. For comparison purposes, we have utilized
compensation survey data from Radford. Our philosophy is to target executive base salaries near
the median range of salaries for executives in equivalent positions at comparable companies. We
believe targeting executive salaries at the median relative to comparable companies reflects our
best efforts to ensure we are neither overpaying nor underpaying our executives.
Annual Cash Incentive:
Our executive cash incentive compensation plan typically provides for
a cash bonus award, payable once per year, that is dependent, in part, upon attaining stated
corporate objectives for the prior fiscal year. The goal of our executive cash incentive
compensation plan is to reward executives in a manner that is commensurate with the level of
achievement of certain financial and strategic goals that we believe, if attained, result in
greater long-term shareholder value. The Compensation Committee approves these financial and
strategic
18.
goals on an annual basis. These financial and strategic goals typically have a one-year time
horizon. During 2009, the Compensation Committee suspended the cash incentive compensation plan
due to the difficult economic environment and its impact on Endwaves financial performance.
Therefore in 2009, the Compensation Committee determined there would be no payment of 2009 annual
bonuses for our Chief Executive Officer or our other officers. For 2010, the Compensation
Committee has not established any cash incentive program, but may determine to award bonuses on a
discretionary basis, which it currently does not intend to do unless Endwave is profitable in
2010.
Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units:
We believe that stock ownership is an important
factor in aligning corporate and individual goals. Therefore, we utilize stock options and,
beginning in 2010, restricted stock units, to encourage long-term performance, with excellent
corporate performance (as manifested in our common stock price) and extended officer tenure
producing potentially significant value. Upon joining Endwave, executive officers have received an
initial stock option grant. This grant has been based on relevant industry comparisons including
data from Radford and were intended to be commensurate with the experience level and scope of
responsibilities of the incoming executive officer. In addition, all executive officers receive
annual option grants, and beginning in 2010, restricted stock unit grants. On an annual basis, the
Compensation Committee reviews with the Board the percentage ownership of Endwave held by
employees and compares that to the employee ownership of comparable companies. The Compensation
Committee uses this metric because it is easy to measure and compare to comparable companies.
Based on its review, the Compensation Committee approves an annual grant. For 2009, the aggregate
annual grant to all employees was approximately 3.4% of fully-diluted shares.
All option and restricted stock unit grants are approved by the Compensation Committee at
Endwaves regular quarterly Board of Directors meeting. The options and restricted stock units are
approved so that the grant date is three days after the release of our financial results for the
preceding quarter. The exercise price for option awards is determined as the closing price on the
day prior to grant. As permitted under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, Endwave has
historically determined fair market value under its stock option plans based upon the closing
market price as reported by the NASDAQ Global Market for the day preceding the date of grant.
Other Benefits:
Executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit
plans, such as medical, dental, group life, disability, and accidental death and dismemberment
insurance, our 401(k) plan and our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). During 2009, we made
group life insurance payments as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below. We do not
maintain any pension plan, retirement benefit or deferred compensation arrangements other than our
401(k) plan. During 2009, Endwave suspended its program applicable to all of its 401(k) plan
participants under which it matched 50% of employee contributions up to a maximum of 4% of base
salary.
19.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
In general, the factors utilized in determining Mr. Mikulskys compensation were similar to
those applied to the other executive officers in the manner described in the preceding paragraphs.
A significant percentage of his potential compensation was, and continues to be, subject to
consistent, positive, long-term company performance. Based on a review of the above mix of
factors, for 2009, the Compensation Committee granted to Mr. Mikulsky compensation as detailed in
the Summary Compensation Table below. Based on these figures, over 34% of Mr. Mikulskys total
compensation (measured according to the Summary Compensation Table and reflecting the Estimated
Possible Target Payout as discussed in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table) was based on
variable components such as stock options.
Employment, Severance and Change in Control Agreements
We believe that the retention of our executive officers is critical to our business. Given the
competitive nature of the technology industry, the demand for experienced executives is high.
Moreover, the level of involuntary terminations of executives in the technology industry is high.
In order to encourage our key employees to remain with Endwave, our board of directors has
established and maintains our Senior Executive Officer Severance and Retention Plan and our
Executive Officer Severance Plan. Our Chief Executive Officer participates in the Senior Executive
Officer and Retention Plan and our Senior Vice Presidents participate in the Executive Officer
Severance Plan.
Executive Officer Severance and Retention Plan Assuming No Change of Control:
Under the
Senior Executive Officer Severance and Retention Plan, if our Chief Executive Officer is
terminated without cause, or resigns for certain specified reasons constituting constructive
termination, the executive officer will receive (i) salary and benefits continuation based on the
executive officers position and length of service with us and (ii) acceleration of vesting of all
of his stock options. The salary and benefits continuation period for our Chief Executive Officer
will be equal to the greater of 1.5 months for every year of service to us, or a total of nine
months, if the termination of employment does not occur in connection with a change of control
transaction.
Under the Executive Officer Severance Plan, if a participating executive officer is
terminated without cause, or resigns for certain specified reasons constituting constructive
termination, the executive officer will receive salary and benefits continuation based on the
executive officers position and length of service with us. In the case of the participating
Senior Vice Presidents, the salary and benefits continuation period will be equal to the greater
of one month for every year of service to us, or a total of 6 months, if the termination of
employment does not occur in connection with a change of control transaction.
Potential 2009 Severance and Retention Benefits Assuming No Change of Control
The following table shows the potential payout to our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice
Presidents assuming termination does not occur in connection with, or within six months after, a
change of control. The analysis assumes the employees were terminated without cause on December
31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COBRA
|
|
Option
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
Salary (l)
|
|
Benefits (2)
|
|
Awards (3)
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Mikulsky
|
|
$
|
458,250
|
|
|
$
|
48,623
|
|
|
$
|
39,728
|
|
|
$
|
546,601
|
|
Curt P. Sacks
|
|
$
|
105,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,017
|
|
|
$
|
2,563
|
|
|
$
|
114,580
|
|
Daniel P. Teuthorn
|
|
$
|
229,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,108
|
|
|
$
|
3,554
|
|
|
$
|
246,662
|
|
Steven F. Layton
|
|
$
|
197,083
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,695
|
|
|
$
|
224,778
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects the greater of 9 months salary or 1.5 months salary for each full year of
employment for Mr. Mikulsky (19.5 months) and the greater of 6 months salary or 1 month
salary for each full year of employment up to a maximum of 12 months for Mr. Sacks (6
months), Mr. Teuthorn (12 months) and Mr. Layton (11 months).
|
20.
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects the greater of 9 months coverage or 1.5 months coverage for each full year of
employment for Mr. Mikulsky (20 months) and the greater of 6 months coverage or 1 month
coverage for each full year of employment up to a maximum of 12 months for Mr. Sacks (6
months), Mr. Teuthorn (12 months) and Mr. Layton (11 months).
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects value of options accelerated in the event of termination without cause without a
change of control. Since the closing price of Endwaves common stock on December 31, 2009,
was $2.44 and the exercise prices of certain options outstanding and in-the-money on December
31, 2009 were below the closing price, the value of the options that would have been
accelerated are reflected above.
|
Executive Officer Severance and Retention Plan Assuming a Change of Control:
The Compensation
Committee believes that it is in the best interests of stockholders if our executive officers are
able to focus on our business during both strong and weak business cycles without being distracted
by the near-term financial impact that a potential termination of employment might have on them
personally. The Compensation Committee also believes it is in the best interests of stockholders if
our executive officers are able to evaluate the potential merits of a change of control transaction
objectively without being distracted by the potentially adverse personal impact on themselves. The
Compensation Committee believes that the total potential value of all change of control agreements
with our executive officers is not disproportionate to the overall market value of Endwave.
Under the Senior Executive Officer Severance and Retention Plan, if our Chief Executive
Officer is terminated without cause, or resigns for certain specified reasons constituting
constructive termination, he will receive (i) salary and benefits continuation based on his length
of service with us and (ii) acceleration of vesting of all of his stock options. If our Chief
Executive Officers employment is terminated by us without cause or by the Chief Executive Officer
for certain specified reasons in connection with, or within six months after, the change of
control transaction, the Chief Executive Officer will receive salary continuation for twice the
period that would have applied had such termination not occurred in connection with a change of
control as well as the acceleration of vesting of all of his stock options.
Under the Executive Officer Severance Plan, if an executive officer is terminated without
cause, or resigns for certain specified reasons constituting constructive termination, the
participating Senior Vice Presidents will receive salary and benefits continuation based on the
executive officers position and length of service with us. Upon the closing of a change of
control transaction, if an executive officers employment is terminated by us without cause or by
the executive officer for certain specified reasons in connection with, or within six months
after, the change of control transaction, the executive officer will receive salary continuation
for twice the period that would have applied had such termination not occurred in connection with
a change of control, and the accelerated vesting for all of the executive officers outstanding
stock options.
The following table shows the potential payout to named executive officers under our
Executive Officer Severance and Retention Plan assuming termination occurs in connection with, or
within six months after, a change of control. The analysis assumes the employees were terminated
without cause on December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COBRA
|
|
Option
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
Salary (l)
|
|
Benefits (2)
|
|
Awards (3)
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Mikulsky
|
|
$
|
916,500
|
|
|
$
|
48,623
|
|
|
$
|
39,728
|
|
|
$
|
1,004,851
|
|
Curt P. Sacks
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,035
|
|
|
$
|
14,200
|
|
|
$
|
238,235
|
|
Daniel P. Teuthorn
|
|
$
|
229,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,108
|
|
|
$
|
13,791
|
|
|
$
|
256,899
|
|
Steven F. Layton
|
|
$
|
215,000
|
|
|
$
|
21,819
|
|
|
$
|
20,295
|
|
|
$
|
257,114
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects the greater of 18 months salary or 3 months salary for each full year of employment
for Mr. Mikulsky (39 months) and the 12 months salary for Mr. Sacks, Mr. Teuthorn and Mr.
Layton.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Reflects the greater of 9 months coverage or 1.5 months coverage for each full year of
employment for Mr. Mikulsky (20 months) and 12 months coverage for Mr. Sacks, Mr. Teuthorn and
Mr. Layton.
|
21.
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects value of options accelerated in the event of termination without cause in
connection with a change of control. Since the closing price of Endwaves common stock on
December 31, 2009, was $2.44 and the exercise prices of certain options outstanding and
in-the-money on December 31, 2009 were below the closing price, the value of the options that
would have been accelerated are reflected above.
|
Named Executive Officer Compensation
The following table provides information regarding all plan and non-plan compensation awarded
to, earned by or paid to our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, each of our
other executive officers serving as such at the end of 2009 for all services rendered in all
capacities to us during 2007, 2008 and 2009. We refer to these executive officers as our named
executive officers.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
(3)
|
|
(4)
|
|
(5)
|
|
(6)
|
|
(7)
|
Edward A. Keible, Jr.
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
365,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
304,986
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,070,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,740,327
|
|
Former President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
384,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
467,699
|
|
|
$
|
77,200
|
|
|
$
|
9,492
|
|
|
$
|
939,006
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
371,923
|
|
|
$
|
1,741
|
|
|
$
|
707,542
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
11,827
|
|
|
$
|
1,093,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brett W. Wallace
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
130,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,703
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
215,198
|
|
|
$
|
386,228
|
|
Former Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
249,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,128
|
|
|
$
|
37,600
|
|
|
$
|
6,324
|
|
|
$
|
427,321
|
|
and Executive Vice President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
233,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
280,214
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2,785
|
|
|
$
|
515,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Mikulsky
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
282,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
130,576
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2,618
|
|
|
$
|
415,194
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
280,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
222,316
|
|
|
$
|
42,300
|
|
|
$
|
7,287
|
|
|
$
|
552,288
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
266,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
280,214
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
5,773
|
|
|
$
|
552,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curt P. Sacks
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
199,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,430
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
9,718
|
|
|
$
|
321,763
|
|
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven F. Layton
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
215,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,289
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2,243
|
|
|
$
|
282,532
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
213,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
111,158
|
|
|
$
|
21,500
|
|
|
$
|
5,492
|
|
|
$
|
351,881
|
|
Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
201,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,107
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
55,903
|
|
|
$
|
397,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel F. Teuthorn
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
229,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,862
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2,333
|
|
|
$
|
292,195
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
227,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,540
|
|
|
$
|
22,900
|
|
|
$
|
86,921
|
|
|
$
|
431,092
|
|
Product Development and Operations
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
216,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,107
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
57,172
|
|
|
$
|
413,318
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Keible resigned from the company in November, 2009 and Mr. Wallace resigned in June,
2009. Mr. Mikulsky was promoted to the position of Chief Executive Officer in December 2009
and Mr. Sacks was promoted to the position of Chief Financial Officer in June 2009.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts in this column reflect annual salary earned.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Reflects cash bonus paid to Mr. Keible for the award of a patent.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The amounts in this column represent the compensation cost related to stock option awards
issued to named executive officers. For purposes of this table, the fair value excludes the
impact of estimated forfeitures.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The amounts in this column represent total performance-based bonuses earned for services
rendered during the fiscal year.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The amounts in this column represent all other compensation payments. For Mr. Keible all
other compensation of $1,070,126 includes $965,000 of severance to be paid over 30 months
beginning in 2010. For Mr. Wallace
|
22.
|
|
|
|
|
all other compensation of $215,198 includes $188,250 of severance paid during 2009. Also
included are total payments made by Endwave for group insurance, educational reimbursement and
401(k) employer matching contributions. Other Compensation for Mr. Teuthorn included
educational reimbursement of $81,123 in 2008 and $52,459 in 2007.
|
|
(7)
|
|
The dollar value in this column for each named executive officer represents the sum of all
compensation reflected in the preceding columns.
|
The following table provides information with regard to potential cash bonuses paid or payable
in 2009 under our performance-based, non-equity incentive plan, and with regard to stock options
granted to each named executive officer during 2009. During 2009, Endwave offered to exchange
certain fully-vested out-of-the-money options for new options with a two-year vesting period,
except for options to purchase 67,143 shares issued to non-employee members of our Board of
Directors, which primarily have a one-year vesting period, and an exercise price based on the
prevailing per share price of our common stock. All Endwave employees including executive officers
and non-executive directors were offered the opportunity to exchange options with exercise prices
above $5.00 per share for these newly-issued options. The Compensation Committee took this action
with the intent of aligning our employees interests with our stockholders interests and fostering
employee retention. Believing that these out-of-the-money options no longer provided the long-term
incentive and retention objectives that they were intended to provide, the exchange offer addressed
this situation by providing employees with an opportunity to exchange eligible option grants for
new option grants. This exchange offer was completed on September 11, 2009. The table below
reflects options that were granted as part of this exchange offer as well as annual option grants
for 2009. Other than the option awards noted below, there were no other stock awards granted during
2009.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Option
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Closing Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts
|
|
Awards: Number
|
|
or Base
|
|
Price of
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
of Securities
|
|
Price of
|
|
Securities
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Options
|
|
Awards
|
|
Option
|
|
Option Awards
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
($/Sh)
|
|
($/Sh) (1)
|
|
($)
|
Edward A. Keible, Jr
|
|
|
2/6/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
$
|
101,756
|
(4)
|
Edward A. Keible, Jr
|
|
|
9/11/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
142,102
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
203,229
|
(4)
|
Brett W. Wallace
|
|
|
2/6/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
$
|
40,703
|
(4)
|
John J. Mikulsky
|
|
|
2/6/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
$
|
40,703
|
(2)
|
John J. Mikulsky
|
|
|
9/11/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
66,639
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
89,874
|
(3)
|
Curt P. Sacks
|
|
|
2/6/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
$
|
20,351
|
(2)
|
Curt P. Sacks
|
|
|
7/31/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
2.38
|
|
|
$
|
53,900
|
(2)
|
Curt P. Sacks
|
|
|
9/11/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
31,873
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
38,178
|
(3)
|
Daniel P. Teuthorn
|
|
|
2/6/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
$
|
20,351
|
(2)
|
Daniel P. Teuthorn
|
|
|
9/11/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
30,518
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
40,511
|
(3)
|
Steven F. Layton
|
|
|
2/6/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
$
|
20,351
|
(2)
|
Steven F. Layton
|
|
|
9/11/09
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
34,747
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
$
|
44,938
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The exercise price for option awards is determined as the closing price on the day prior
to grant. Therefore, the grant date closing price of the security underlying the option can
differ materially, positively or negatively, from the exercise price of the option award.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Each option vests as to 1/8 of the shares of common stock underlying it on the six month
anniversary of the grant date, with the remaining seven-eighths of the grant vesting in equal
quarterly installments over the remaining four-year vesting period. For the purposes of this
table, the value excludes the impact of estimated forfeitures.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Each option vests as to 25% of the shares of common stock underlying it on the six-month
anniversary of the grant date, with the remainder vesting in equal quarterly installments
over the following six quarters. For the purposes of this table, the value excludes the
impact of estimated forfeitures.
|
23.
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The vesting of such options was accelerated in full upon termination of employment.
|
The following table provides information regarding each unexercised stock option held by each
of our named executive officers as of December 31, 2009. Other than stock options as noted, there
were no other stock awards outstanding at December 31, 2009.
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Unexercised Options(1)(2)
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
Name of Executive Officers
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Price
|
|
Date
|
Edward A. Keible, Jr.
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
2/5/2019
|
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
9,579
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
12,128
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
Brett W. Wallace
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
2/5/2019
|
|
John J. Mikulsky
|
|
|
5,860
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
1/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
13,894
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
6/5/2013
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
2/5/2019
|
|
|
|
|
13,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
3,447
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
6,295
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
1,641
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
13,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
Curt P. Sacks
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
2/5/2019
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
7/30/2019
|
|
|
|
|
6,666
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
13,333
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
833
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
6,666
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
Steven F. Layton
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
1/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
6/5/2013
|
|
|
|
|
8,910
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
6/5/2013
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
2/5/2019
|
|
|
|
|
6,666
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
947
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
24.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Unexercised Options(1)(2)
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
Name of Executive Officers
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Price
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,916
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
3,554
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
6,666
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
Daniel P. Teuthorn
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
1/30/2013
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
2/5/2019
|
|
|
|
|
6,666
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
829
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
2,961
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
6,666
|
(3)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
9/10/2019
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Each option vests as to 1/8 of the shares of common stock underlying it on the six month
anniversary of the grant date, with the remaining seven-eighths of the grant vesting in equal
quarterly installments over the remaining four-year vesting period. Each option expires ten
years after the date of grant or, if earlier, three months after termination of employment in
most cases.
|
|
(2)
|
|
All options described in the above table are reflected as exercisable because all options
granted to our executive officers have an early exercise feature that allows optionees to
exercise unvested options, subject to our right to repurchase the unvested shares at cost
upon the optionees termination of employment. Options unvested as of December 31, 2009 are
as follows: Keible, 0; Wallace, 0; Mikulsky, 99,139; Sacks, 83,123; Layton, 50,997; and
Teuthorn, 46,768.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This option was replaced in our 2009 option exchange program for an option with an exercise
price per share of $2.53. As required by such program, the new option vests over two years
beginning in September, 2009.
|
2009 Option Exercises
There were no stock options exercised by our named executive officers during 2009.
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
The following table provides information regarding compensation paid to our non-employee
directors who served on our board as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Paid
|
|
Option
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
In Cash
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward C.V. Winn, Chairman
|
|
$
|
44,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,712
|
|
|
$
|
62,712
|
|
Joseph J. Lazzara
|
|
$
|
34,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,989
|
|
|
$
|
45,989
|
|
John F. McGrath
|
|
$
|
41,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,989
|
|
|
$
|
52,989
|
|
Wade Meyercord
|
|
$
|
33,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,989
|
|
|
$
|
44,989
|
|
Eric D. Stonestrom
|
|
$
|
28,000
|
|
|
$
|
16,336
|
|
|
$
|
44,336
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The amounts included in the Option Awards column represent the compensation cost related to
stock option awards issued in 2009. For purposes of this table, the value excludes the impact
of estimated forfeitures.
|
At its April 2010 meeting, the Compensation Committee completed its annual review of cash and
equity compensation of the board. The Compensation Committee reviewed the cash and equity board
compensation paid by a set of technology companies with revenues and market capitalization similar
to those of Endwave. The
25.
Compensation Committee recommended to the full Board of Directors the levels of cash compensation
set forth below and the Board of Directors approved. The levels of cash compensation shown below
were reviewed and approved based on projected current median pay levels of the peer group. The
members of the Board of Directors are also eligible for reimbursement for travel expenses incurred
in connection with attendance at Board of Directors and committee meetings in accordance with
Endwave company policy.
Board Membership Fees Payable to Non-Employee Directors
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Employee Director Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Board Chair Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Audit Committee Chair Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
Audit Committee Member Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
Compensation Committee Chair Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
Compensation Committee Member Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
Nominating and Governance Committee Chair Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
Nominating and Governance Committee Member Annual Retainer
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
Board Meeting Fee
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Committee Meeting Fee
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Non-employee directors are eligible to receive automatic option and restricted stock unit
award grants made under our Companys 2000 Non-Employee Director Plan and our Companys 2007
Equity Incentive Plan. Pursuant to these plans, each non-employee director is granted an option or
restricted stock unit award , referred to as an initial option, to purchase 20,000 shares of
common stock automatically upon his or her initial election or appointment to the Board of
Directors. Each non-employee director is also granted an option and/or restricted stock unit
award, referred to as an annual option, to purchase an additional 10,000 shares of common stock
each year after his or her election or appointment to the Board of Directors. Such annual option
or restricted stock unit award is granted on May 1. In either case, if any non-employee director
has not served in that capacity for the entire period since the preceding grant date, then the
number of shares subject to the annual grant will be reduced, pro rata, for each full quarter the
director did not serve during the previous period. All such options expire after ten years and
have an exercise price equal to the closing fair market value on the day before the date of grant.
All initial options vest over four years at the rate of 1/48 of the total option shares per month.
Annual options granted after February 2008 vest over one year at the rate of 1/12 of the total
option shares per month. Annual restricted stock units granted after April 2010 vest in full one
year after grant. Our Companys non-employee directors are also eligible to participate in our
Companys 2007 Equity Incentive Plan on a discretionary basis. No discretionary awards were made
to non-employee directors during 2009.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
1
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, contained in this report. Based on this review and discussion,
the Compensation Committee has recommended to our board of directors that the CD&A be included in
this report as well as our proxy statement for our 2010 annual meeting of stockholders.
Wade Meyercord
(Chairperson)
Joseph
Lazzara
John F. McGrath
|
|
|
1
|
|
The material in this report is not soliciting material, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any
of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any
general incorporation language in any such filing.
|
26.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Indemnification
Our bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and executive officers and may
indemnify our other officers, employees and other agents to the extent not prohibited by Delaware
law. The bylaws also require us to advance litigation expenses in the case of stockholder
derivative actions or other actions. The indemnified party must repay such advances if it is
ultimately determined that the indemnified party is not entitled to indemnification.
Related-Person Transactions Policy and Procedures
We have a corporate policy with regard to our policies and procedures for the identification,
review, consideration and approval or ratification of related-person transactions. For purposes
of our policy only, a related-person transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship
(or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which Endwave and any
related person are participants involving an amount that exceeds $5,000. Transactions involving
compensation for services provided to Endwave as an employee, director, consultant or similar
capacity by a related person are not covered by this policy. A related person is any executive
officer, director, or more than 5% stockholder of the Company, including any of their immediate
family members, and any entity owned or controlled by such persons. This policy is not currently
in writing but instead is dictated by principles of Delaware corporate law as in effect at the
time and the discharge of our directors fiduciary duties to Endwave.
In the event any transaction in which we propose to engage is a related-person transaction,
our management must present information regarding the proposed related-person transaction to the
disinterested non-employee members of our board of directors for consideration and approval or
ratification. The presentation must include a description of, among other things, the material
facts, the interests, direct and indirect, of the related persons, the benefits to Endwave of the
transaction and whether any alternative transactions were available. To identify related-person
transactions in advance, we rely on information supplied by our executive officers, directors and
significant stockholders. In considering related-person transactions, the disinterested
non-employee members of the board take into account the relevant available facts and circumstances
including, but not limited to (a) the risks, costs and benefits to Endwave, (b) the impact on a
directors independence in the event the related person is a director, immediate family member of a
director or an entity with which a director is affiliated, (c) the terms of the transaction, (d)
the availability of other sources for comparable services or products and (e) the terms available
to or from, as the case may be, unrelated third parties or to or from employees generally. In the
event a director has an interest in the proposed transaction, the director must recuse himself or
herself form the deliberations and approval. The policy requires that, in determining whether to
approve, ratify or reject a related-person transaction, the disinterested non-employee members of
the board look at, in light of known circumstances, whether the transaction is in, or is not
inconsistent with, the best interests of Endwave and its stockholders, as determined in the good
faith exercise of such directors discretion.
Certain Related-Person Transactions
In January 2010, Endwave entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Oak Investment Partners
XI, Limited Partnership (Oak), pursuant to which Endwave repurchased 300,000 shares of Endwave
Series B Preferred Stock held by Oak for $36 million in cash. Such shares had entitled Oak to a
liquidation preference equal to its original investment of $45 million before any proceeds from a
liquidation or sale of the company would have been paid to the holders of Endwaves common stock.
Oak originally acquired such shares in April 2006. Endwave and Oak also agreed to terminate the
Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 24, 2006, between Endwave and
Oak, and Eric Stonestrom, Oaks designee to the Endwave Board of Directors, resigned from
Endwaves board of directors. In addition, Oak agreed that neither it nor its affiliates would
directly or indirectly participate in any acquisition of shares or assets of the Company, or seek
to control or influence the management or board of directors of the Company, for five years.
27.
Householding of Proxy Materials
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to
satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy materials or notices of internet availability of proxy
materials with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single
set of materials or notice addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly
referred to as householding, potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost
savings for companies.
This year, a number of brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be
householding our proxy materials. A single set of materials or notice will be delivered to
multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the
affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be
householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified
otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in
householding and would prefer to receive a separate set of materials or notice, please notify
your broker. If you are subject to householding and wish to receive a separate set of materials
or notice, direct your written request to Endwave Corporation, Attn: Curt Sacks, Corporate
Secretary, 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California 95134 or contact Mr. Sacks at 408-522-3100.
Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the set of materials or notice at their
addresses and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their
brokers.
Other Matters
The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for
consideration at the annual meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the meeting,
it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on such matters in
accordance with their best judgment.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Curt P. Sacks
Corporate Secretary
June 11, 2010
Our Annual Report to the SEC on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 is
included is these proxy materials. Additional copies of our Annual Report to the SEC on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 are available without charge upon written request to
Investor Relations, Endwave Corporation, 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California 95134.
28.
Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write
outside the designated areas. Annual Meeting Proxy Card PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH
AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. A Proposals The Board of Directors
recommends a vote FOR the nominee listed and FOR Proposal 2. 1. To elect the director listed below
to hold office until the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Joseph J. Lazzara Mark here to vote
Mark here to WITHHOLD FOR the nominee vote from the nominee For Against Abstain 2. To ratify the
selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as the
independent registered public accounting firm of Endwave Corporation for its fiscal year ending
December 31, 2010. B Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be
counted. Date and Sign Below Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should
each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian,
or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below. Signature 1
Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 Please keep signature within the box. 1 U P X 0
2 5 5 9 0 2 0178FB
|
PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Proxy ENDWAVE CORPORATION PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS For The Annual Meeting of
Stockholders To be held July 21, 2010 The undersigned hereby appoints John J. Mikulsky and Curt P.
Sacks, and each of them, as attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of
substitution, to vote all of the shares of stock of Endwave Corporation, which the undersigned may
be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Endwave Corporation to be held at the
corporate headquarters of Endwave Corporation at 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California, on
Wednesday, July 21, 2010 at 8:00 am (PDT), and at any and all postponements, continuations and
adjournments thereof with all powers that the undersigned would possess if personally present, upon
and in respect of the following matters and in accordance with the following instructions, with
discretionary authority as to any and all other matters that may properly come before the meeting.
UNLESS A CONTRARY DIRECTION IS INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEE LISTED IN
PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR PROPOSAL 2, AS MORE SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT. IF SPECIFIC
INSTRUCTIONS ARE INDICATED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE THEREWITH. PLEASE VOTE, DATE
AND PROMPTLY RETURN THIS PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE WHICH IS POSTAGE PREPAID IF MAILED IN THE
UNITED STATES. (continued on reverse side)
|
Endwave (NASDAQ:ENWV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Endwave (NASDAQ:ENWV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024