SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant
þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o
Check the appropriate box:
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-
6(e)(2)
)
|
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
o
|
|
Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
|
EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ
|
|
No fee required.
|
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMS TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 1,
2009
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of EMS Technologies, Inc. (the Company) will be held
at 11:00 a.m. local Atlanta time on May 1, 2009, at
the Companys headquarters at 660 Engineering Drive,
Norcross, Georgia 30092 for the following purposes:
1. To elect nine members of the Board of Directors to serve
during the ensuing year;
2. To ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm for
the year ending December 31, 2009; and
3. To transact such other business as may properly come
before the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Only holders of record of common stock of the Company at the
close of business on March 13, 2009, will be entitled to
notice of and to vote at the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
William S. Jacobs
Secretary
Norcross, Georgia
March 20, 2009
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS, PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES BY ONE OF THE METHODS
INDICATED ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY: (1) A TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE
CALL, (2) THE INTERNET, OR (3) COMPLETING, SIGNING,
DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IN
THE POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO VOTE
YOUR SHARES PROMPTLY.
IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING AND DECIDE
THAT YOU WISH TO VOTE IN PERSON, YOU MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EMS TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
660 Engineering Drive, Technology Park/Atlanta,
Norcross, Georgia 30092
PROXY
STATEMENT
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 1,
2009
GENERAL
INFORMATION
Shareholders
Meeting
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation by the Board of Directors of EMS Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) of proxies to be used at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 11:00 a.m.
local Atlanta time on May 1, 2009, at the Companys
headquarters at 660 Engineering Drive, Norcross, Georgia 30092.
This Proxy Statement is being mailed to shareholders on
approximately March 27, 2009.
Matters
to be Acted Upon
The following matters will be acted upon at the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders:
1. The election of nine members of the Board of Directors,
each to serve a term of one year and thereafter until his
successor is duly elected and qualified;
2. The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm for
the year ending December 31, 2009; and
3. The transaction of such other business as may properly
come before the Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on May 1,
2009. The 2009 Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to
Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2008 are also
available at
www.ems-t.com/proxydocs.
Revocation
of Proxies
A proxy form is enclosed herewith. Any shareholder who executes
and delivers a proxy may revoke it at any time prior to its use
by giving written notice of such revocation to the Secretary of
the Company at 660 Engineering Drive, Technology
Park/Atlanta, Norcross, Georgia 30092, or by executing and
delivering to the Secretary of the Company a proxy bearing a
later date. A proxy may also be revoked at the Annual Meeting by
any shareholder present at the Annual Meeting who elects to vote
in person.
Voting of
Proxies
The shares that your proxy represents will be voted at the
Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. In the
absence of such instructions, the shares represented thereby
will be voted in favor of the nine nominees for election to the
Board of Directors, and in favor of the ratification of KPMG LLP
as the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm for the current year. The Board of Directors does not know
of any other business to be brought before the Meeting, and has
not received notice of any such matter within the time periods
specified in the Companys Bylaws or in rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission governing discretionary
voting authority; it is intended that as to such other business,
if any, a vote may be cast pursuant to the proxy in accordance
with the judgment of the person or persons acting thereunder.
Only holders of record of issued and outstanding shares of
common stock of the Company at the close of business on
March 13, 2009, are entitled to notice of, or to vote at,
the Annual Meeting. Each holder is entitled to one vote for each
share of common stock held on the record date. On March 13,
2009, there were 15,152,183 shares of common stock
outstanding and entitled to vote.
Cost of
Solicitation
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company.
Officers, directors and employees of the Company may solicit
proxies by telephone, facsimile transmission, or personal
interview. In addition, Georgeson Inc. has been engaged to
provide soliciting assistance, principally in the nature of
solicitation with respect to shares held by brokers, banks and
institutional holders, at a cost of approximately $7,500.
Shareholder
Proposals for the 2010 Annual Meeting
Any proposals by shareholders intended to be included in the
proxy materials for the 2010 Annual Meeting must be received by
the Company at its principal executive offices, attention of the
Secretary, no later than November 27, 2009.
In addition, for any proposal or nomination that a shareholder
wishes to present at the 2010 Meeting but is not seeking to have
included in the Companys proxy materials, notice as
required by the Companys Bylaws (including the information
specified in the Bylaws) must be received by the Secretary no
later than March 3, 2010; if such notice is not timely
received, the matter or nomination will not be considered at the
2010 Annual Meeting.
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
The Companys Bylaws provide that the number of members of
the Board of Directors shall be determined by the Board, which
has set that number at nine. Unless otherwise directed, it is
the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy
to vote such proxy in favor of the election of the nine persons
named in the following table as directors of the Company. Each
such person will serve until the next Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and thereafter until his successor is elected and
has qualified. In case any named nominee should become unable to
serve, or for good cause will not serve, the persons named in
the proxy will have the right to use their discretion to vote
for a substitute or substitutes or to vote only for the
remaining nominees.
Assuming the presence of a quorum at the Meeting, the nominees
will be elected by favorable vote of a plurality of the shares
actually voted. Abstentions and broker non-vote shares will be
considered as present for the purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum, but will not otherwise be considered in
determining the outcome of the vote.
The following table lists the nominees and their ages, their
other positions with the Company, their principal occupations
and other professional activities at present and during at least
the past five years, and the year each was first elected as a
director. All nine nominees are currently directors of the
Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
Name and Principal Occupations
|
|
|
|
Elected
|
for at Least the Last Five Years
|
|
Age
|
|
Director
|
|
Hermann Buerger
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Until 2004, Regional Board Member and CEO of the Americas,
Commerzbank AG, where Mr. Buerger held various management
positions over a
30-year
career. Mr. Buerger has been a member of the International
Advisory Board of Unibanco of Sao Paulo, Brazil
(2002 2004), and of the Advisory Board of the
Wharton Real Estate Center (1997 2004).
Mr. Buerger is also a director of Sapient Corporation
(since 2006), where he chairs the audit committee, and Alpha
Natural Resource, Inc. (since 2008), where he serves on the
audit committee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
Name and Principal Occupations
|
|
|
|
Elected
|
for at Least the Last Five Years
|
|
Age
|
|
Director
|
|
Paul B. Domorski
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company (since June
2006). For three years prior to joining EMS, he served as Vice
President of Avaya Inc., with operational responsibilities for
its services business. From 2000 to 2002 he served as President
and CEO, and then as a consultant, of RSL Communications, Ltd.
during its restructuring. From 1997 to 2000 he served as
President of British Telecom Syncordia Solutions, a combined
products/services outsourcing and solution provider that was
organized from other British Telecom businesses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francis J. Erbrick
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Former consultant, Business Technology Office,
McKinsey & Company, Stamford, CT (1997
2008), providing information technology consulting services,
typically to large companies. For the previous 12 years,
Mr. Erbrick was Chief Information Officer and a member of
the Management Committee of United Parcel Service, where he
oversaw the development of UPSs information systems
architecture, its telecommunications network, and its Package
Tracking System. Mr. Erbrick was a 1994 recipient of the
Carnegie Mellon Award for Excellence in Information Technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Kreick, Ph.D.
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Private consultant on defense electronics matters (since 1998).
From 2001 to 2008 Dr. Kreick served as Chairman of the
Board of Draper Labs, a research center for NASA and the
Department of Defense. From 1988 until March 1998,
Dr. Kreick was President of a leading defense electronics
firm, the Sanders division of Lockheed Martin Corporation, and
was also a Lockheed Martin Vice President. Dr. Kreick also
serves (since 1998) as a director and (since 2003) as
Chairman, and for five months during 2003 served as Chief
Executive Officer, of The Pennichuck Corporation, a holding
company for water-service utilities and real estate development
in New Hampshire. He holds his Ph.D. in theoretical physics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John B. Mowell
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
1984
|
|
Chairman of the Board of the Company (since 2001); President,
Mowell Financial Group, Inc., Tallahassee, FL, an investment
counseling firm. Director, Capital City Bank, Tallahassee, FL, a
subsidiary of Capital City Bank Group, Inc., and Figg
Engineering Group, Tallahassee, FL, a privately held firm
engaged internationally in the design of concrete segmental
bridges. Formerly Chairman of the Board
(1981-1990)
and Chief Executive Officer
(1985-1989),
Reflectone, Inc., Tampa, FL, a manufacturer of aircraft flight
simulators and training systems for commercial and military
markets. Mr. Mowell is past Chairman of the Florida State
Board of Administrations Investment Advisory Council for
the $100 billion Florida state teachers retirement
fund; and Founding President, past Chairman and Chairman
Emeritus of The Economic Club of Florida.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Honorable Thomas W. OConnell
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Private consultant on defense matters (since 2007). Previously,
Mr. OConnell was Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict
(2003-2007)
and Senior Manager, Intelligence and Information Systems with
Raytheon Company (1996- 2003). Mr. OConnell retired
from the U.S. Army in 1995 as a Colonel, after a highly
decorated
27-year
career that included a three-year assignment as Deputy for
Command Support at the Central Intelligence Agency, and numerous
command assignments in intelligence and special operations, with
combat in Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, and Southwest Asia.
Mr. OConnell is a member of the U.S. Army
Intelligence Hall of Fame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
Name and Principal Occupations
|
|
|
|
Elected
|
for at Least the Last Five Years
|
|
Age
|
|
Director
|
|
Bradford W. Parkinson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Professor Emeritus, Stanford University (currently with
part-time research and student advisory responsibilities, since
2001). Previously, Dr. Parkinson was Professor of
Aeronautics and Astronautics at Stanford, where he directed
NASAs Gravity Probe-B spacecraft development project.
During his career, he has actively participated on teams and
committees responsible for the design or redesign of a number of
space programs, including the GPS system, the Space Station, the
Hubble Telescope repair, and a proposed flyby mission to Pluto.
In 2003, Dr. Parkinson was awarded the Draper Prize by the
National Academy of Engineering for his role in the development
of the GPS system. Since 1984, he has been a member of the Board
of Directors of Trimble Navigation Limited, Sunnyvale, CA, which
provides advanced geographical positioning solutions, typically
to commercial and governmental users. From 1998 to 1999, he
served as Trimbles President and Chief Executive Officer
while that company was seeking a permanent CEO. He holds his
Ph.D. in Astronautical Engineering from Stanford.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norman E. Thagard, M.D.
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
Since 1996, Professor, Bernard F. Sliger Eminent Scholar Chair,
Florida State University, Associate Dean of College Relations,
College of Engineering, Florida A&M University
Florida State University, and aerospace consultant. From 1978
until 1996, Dr. Thagard served as a NASA astronaut,
participating in four Shuttle missions and one mission aboard
the Russian Mir Space Station, for a total of 140 days in
space. He holds advanced degrees in engineering science,
business administration and as a doctor of medicine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John L. Woodward, Jr.
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Associate Partner since 2003, and Senior Executive Vice
President National Security Business Development
since 2005, at Accenture, a global management consulting,
technology services and outsourcing company. Mr. Woodward
retired in 2002 from the U.S. Air Force as a Lieutenant General
with 34 years experience. During his Air Force
career, Mr. Woodward held a wide variety of positions
related to communications and command and control systems,
including experience with space operations and acquisition
management. His last assignment prior to retirement was as
Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications and Information, and
Deputy Chief Information Officer, at Air Force Headquarters in
Washington D.C. from 2000 until 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board
of Directors
The Companys Board of Directors during the past year
comprised each of the nominees identified in the preceding
table. Other than the CEO, Mr. Domorski, all current
directors have been determined by the Board to be
independent within the meaning of the listing
standards of The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. During the last
fiscal year, the Board held six meetings. No director attended
fewer than 75% of the aggregate of all meetings of the Board and
of all committees on which he served.
The Company encourages the members of its Board to attend the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and seeks to schedule Board
meetings in a manner that facilitates such attendance. At the
Annual Meeting held in 2008, eight of the nine Board members
elected at that time were in attendance.
Shareholders who wish to communicate with members of the Board
of Directors may do so by mail addressed to the Chairman of the
Board,
c/o the
Secretary, at the address for the Companys principal
executive offices appearing on the first page of this Proxy
Statement. Items so addressed will be forwarded unopened to the
Chairman.
4
Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee comprises
Messrs. Buerger (Chairman), Erbrick, and Mowell and
Dr. Kreick. Additional information about the Audit
Committee and its responsibilities, processes and actions
appears under the subsequent section, Audit Matters,
in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Committee.
The Compensation
Committee comprises Drs. Thagard (Chairman) and Parkinson,
and Messrs. Mowell and Woodward. Additional information
about the Compensation Committee and its responsibilities,
processes and actions appears under the subsequent section,
Executive Compensation and Related Matters, in this
Proxy Statement.
Governance Committee.
The Governance Committee
comprises Messrs. Mowell (Chairman) and OConnell and
Drs. Parkinson and Thagard. This committee is responsible
for reviewing and evaluating potential members of the Board of
Directors, for considering the qualifications to be sought in
Board members, and for reporting to the full Board its
recommendations with respect to these matters, and with respect
to compensation of non-employee Board members. The Governance
Committee is also responsible for reviewing, and for reporting
to the full Board, concerning the Companys practices and
policies for the allocation and exercise of corporate authority
by and among the Board and its committees and the senior
corporate officers, and for oversight of the Boards
discharge of its responsibilities with respect to the
Companys processes for identifying and managing various
enterprise risks. The Committees Charter is available on
the Companys website, at www.ems-t.com, under the link for
Investor Relations. The Companys Guidelines
for Corporate Governance, which have been adopted by the Board
upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, are also
available under that link.
Each of the members of the Governance Committee is
independent as defined by the listing standards for
The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. During 2008, the members held
three meetings, and in addition they conferred from time to time
on an informal basis, for the purposes of identifying,
evaluating and meeting with potential candidates for Board
membership.
In seeking and evaluating prospective members of the Board, the
Governance Committee considers the nature and scope of the
Companys business activities, and the capacity of the
Board to provide oversight and positive contributions in areas
of particular significance to the long-term creation of
shareholder value. Areas of experience and capability that the
Committee particularly believes should be represented on the
Board include finance and accounting; technology related to the
Companys wireless communications businesses; the
telecommunications, space and defense industries; and business
and manufacturing operations. The Committee believes that
individual candidates should also demonstrate proven success in
business environments, high levels of commitment, adequate
availability to actively participate in the Boards
affairs, and high levels of integrity and sensitivity to current
business and corporate governance trends. Before recommending a
candidate to the full Board, all members of the Committee will
participate in meetings with the candidate, and the Committee
also seeks to arrange meetings between the candidate and other
Board members.
Candidates are typically identified by other Board members or in
Board-member discussions with third parties. The Committee will
also consider individuals recommended by shareholders. A
shareholder who wishes to recommend a candidate for
consideration by the Committee should do so in writing addressed
to the Committee Chairman at the Companys address
appearing on the first page of this Proxy Statement. Candidates
recommended by shareholders will be considered according to the
same standards of perceived Company need and potential
individual contribution as are applied to candidates from other
sources.
Other Committees.
Other committees on which
various directors serve are the Science & Technology
Committee, comprising Drs. Kreick (Chairman) and Parkinson,
and Messrs. Domorski, Erbrick, OConnell and Woodward,
which has authority to review and make recommendations
concerning scientific and technological trends and perceived
opportunities for the Companys technological capabilities;
and the Stock Incentive Plan Committee, comprising
Messrs. Domorski (Chairman), Erbrick and Woodward and
Dr. Thagard, which is generally responsible for
administering the Companys stock option plans with respect
to the participation of employees who are not officers or
directors.
5
Compensation
and Other Arrangements with Directors
Subject to partial or full deferral into deferred stock units,
as described further in this section regarding the
Companys Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, each director who is not an employee of the Company
is paid a $40,000 annual retainer (in quarterly installments),
$2,500 per board meeting attended ($1,000 for telephonic
participation), and $2,000 for committee meetings ($500 for
telephonic participation) occurring on a day other than the day
of either a board meeting or another compensated committee
meeting. The Companys
employee-director,
Mr. Domorski, does not receive fees for his participation
in meetings. Travel expenses are paid to out-of-town directors,
and an additional $1,000 each way is paid to a director
traveling from a home located more than two time zones from a
meeting site.
The Company pays additional compensation to Mr. Mowell, in
the amount of $100,000 per year, for his services as
non-employee Chairman of the Board, to Mr. Buerger, in the
amount of $20,000 per year, for his services as Chairman of the
Audit Committee, to Dr. Thagard, in the amount of $10,000
per year, for his services as Chairman of the Compensation
Committee, and to Dr. Kreick, in the amount of $10,000 per
year, for his services as Chairman of the Science &
Technology Committee.
The Company grants its non-employee directors options to acquire
shares of its common stock. These options include an initial
grant of 15,000 shares, vesting 3,000 shares per year
for the first five years of participation, and further grants of
5,000 (3,000 prior to 2007) shares per year (vesting at the
end of six months of further service) upon each election as a
board member by the shareholders. All options are granted at the
fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant
(which automatically occurs at the date of election). The
exercise price (together with any applicable taxes) may be paid
in cash, by delivery of shares of common stock (valued at their
fair market value at the time of exercise), or by a combination
of cash and stock. Upon the optionee ceasing to be a director
for any reason, these options terminate and are forfeited to the
extent that they are not exercisable at that time. Once
exercisable, these options are non-forfeitable and remain
exercisable until the sixth (tenth prior to
2007) anniversary of the date of grant.
The Company maintains its Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors. Under this Plan, each non-employee
director must defer 40% of the annual retainer into deferred
stock units valued at the date the cash retainer would otherwise
have been paid, and may also at the directors election
defer all other amounts paid for service on the Board or its
committees. Deferred amounts are payable after the director is
no longer a member of the Board, or after five years in the case
of elective deferrals, subject to the directors limited
right to further defer payment. When payable, the value of each
stock unit is paid in cash in an amount equal to the value at
the time of payment of the Companys common stock. The
deferred stock units have no minimum guaranteed value, accrue no
minimum level of income, and have no voting rights.
6
The following table discloses, for the year ended
December 31, 2008, the cash compensation paid by the
Company, as well as other compensation paid, accrued or granted
to each of the non-employee directors.
Director
Compensation in Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid In
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Hermann Buerger
|
|
$
|
74,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
61,808
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,808
|
|
Francis J. Erbrick
|
|
|
44,500
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
95,586
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,086
|
|
John R. Kreick
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
62,057
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,057
|
|
John B. Mowell
|
|
|
93,500
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
61,410
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,910
|
|
Thomas W. OConnell
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
132,630
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,630
|
|
Bradford W. Parkinson
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
95,586
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,586
|
|
Norman E. Thagard
|
|
|
35,750
|
|
|
|
32,750
|
(1)
|
|
|
61,410
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,910
|
|
John L. Woodward, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
61,808
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,808
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Dollar-value of stock units awarded, in lieu of cash
compensation, under the Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors, based on the market value (ranging from
$19.43 to $27.39 in 2008) of the common shares on each
award date. When the director completes his service to the
Company, the units will be paid in cash based on the market
value of the shares at the time of payment. The units do not
have voting or liquidation rights, but their trading-market
economic value is equal to that of the common shares. The
aggregate number of such stock units granted during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 and weighted-average
grant-date market value per share are for Mr. Buerger, 692
at $23.13; for Mr. Erbrick, 692 at $23.13; for
Dr. Kreick, 692 at $23.13; for Mr. Mowell, 1,729 at
$23.13; for Mr. OConnell, 692 at $23.13; for
Dr. Parkinson, 1,729 at $23.13; for Dr. Thagard, 1,544
at $23.16; and for Mr. Woodward, 2,200 at $23.64. The
aggregate number of such stock units held at December 31,
2008, from awards in 2008 and prior years, is detailed in a
table within the Security Ownership section.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Ratable portion of the value of grants made in 2008 and prior
years, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) 123(R), to the extent the vesting
periods for underlying grants applied to 2008. Values of stock
option awards are determined using the Black-Scholes method and
the assumptions provided in Note 7, Stock-Based
Compensation, to the audited consolidated financial
statements, filed as Part IV, Item 15(a)(1), to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The number and grant
date fair value of options underlying the 2008 compensation for
option awards are, for each of Messrs. Buerger, and
Woodward, 15,000 shares granted in 2003 and valued at
$11.93 per share, and 5,000 shares granted in 2008 and
valued at $12.28 per share; for each of Mr. Erbrick and
Dr. Parkinson, 15,000 shares granted in 2006 and
valued at $13.23 per share, and 5,000 shares granted in
2008 and valued at $12.28 per share; for Mr. Mowell and
Dr. Thagard, 5,000 shares granted in 2008 and valued
at $12.28 per share; for Dr. Kreick, 15,000 shares
granted in 2003 and valued at $10.79 per share and
5,000 shares granted in 2008 and valued at $12.28 per
share; and for Mr. OConnell, 15,000 shares
granted in 2007 and valued at $15.15 per share and
5,000 shares granted in 2008 and valued at $12.28 per
share. The aggregate number of shares subject to options at
December 31, 2008, from awards in both 2008 and prior
years, is for Mr. Buerger, 34,334; for Mr. Erbrick,
25,000; for Dr. Kreick, 19,000; for Mr. Mowell,
28,380; for Mr. OConnell, 20,000; for
Dr. Parkinson, 25,000; for Dr. Thagard, 22,384, and
for Mr. Woodward, 34,395.
|
7
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
shares of the Companys common stock beneficially owned as
of March 16, 2009, by the Companys directors and
named officers, and as of December 31, 2008, by persons who
beneficially own more than 5% of the common stock. This
information has been determined in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 based upon information
furnished by the persons listed or contained in filings made by
them with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as
otherwise indicated, each person possessed sole voting and
investment power with respect to the shares shown. In addition
to the shares shown in the following table, the non-employee
directors also hold non-voting deferred share units, acquired in
lieu of all or a portion of their cash compensation; such
deferred share units are summarized in the subsequent table, and
described further in footnote 1 to the Director Compensation
Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of
|
|
Approximate
|
Name
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Eagle Asset Management, Inc
|
|
|
2,031,589
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
880 Carillon Parkway
St. Petersburg, FL 33716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackrock, Inc
|
|
|
1,292,558
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
40 East 52
nd
Street
New York, NY 10022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paradigm Capital Management, Inc
|
|
|
1,073,100
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Nine Elk Street,
Albany, New York 12207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP
|
|
|
822,091
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
Palisades West, Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road
Austin, Texas, 78746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hermann Buerger
|
|
|
46,451
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Francis J. Erbrick
|
|
|
20,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John R. Kreick
|
|
|
23,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John B. Mowell
|
|
|
89,667
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas W. OConnell
|
|
|
11,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Bradford W. Parkinson
|
|
|
21,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Norman E. Thagard
|
|
|
27,474
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
John L. Woodward, Jr.
|
|
|
35,662
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Paul B. Domorski
|
|
|
86,015
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gary B. Shell
|
|
|
16,530
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Don T. Scartz
|
|
|
46,022
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Neilson A. Mackay
|
|
|
50,739
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
David A. Smith
|
|
|
5,989
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Gary W. Hebb
|
|
|
13,524
|
(1)
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)
|
|
|
516,328
|
(1)
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Percentage of shares beneficially owned does not exceed 1%
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes shares that are subject to currently exercisable
options in the amounts of 34,334 for Mr. Buerger, 19,000
for Mr. Erbrick, 19,000 for Dr. Kreick, 28,380 for
Mr. Mowell, 11,000 for Mr. OConnell, 19,000 for
Dr. Parkinson, 22,384 for Dr. Thagard, 34,395 for
Mr. Woodward, 57,500 for Mr. Domorski, 34,825 for
Mr. Scartz, 9,450 for Mr. Shell, 31,550 for
Dr. Mackay, 5,000 for Mr. Smith and 12,275 for
Mr. Hebb, and 354,193 for all directors and executive
officers as a group. For Mr. Mowell, these totals also
include 9,800 shares as to which he shares voting and
investment power with a family member but disclaims beneficial
interest.
|
8
The following table sets forth the aggregate number of shares
represented by the deferred stock units held by each
non-employee director, as of March 6, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Represented By
|
Name
|
|
Deferred Stock Units
|
|
Hermann Buerger
|
|
|
6,690
|
|
Francis J. Erbrick
|
|
|
5,925
|
|
John R. Kreick
|
|
|
6,598
|
|
John B. Mowell
|
|
|
14,365
|
|
Thomas W. OConnell
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
Bradford W. Parkinson
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
Norman E. Thagard
|
|
|
8,264
|
|
John L. Woodward, Jr.
|
|
|
12,466
|
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION AND RELATED INFORMATION
The
Compensation Committee
While our Board of Directors is responsible for the final
approval of executive compensation packages, it relies heavily
on the advice and recommendations of the Compensation Committee,
and has delegated to the Committee responsibility for executive
option and stock awards under the Companys Stock Incentive
Plans.
The Committee is composed solely of non-employee independent
directors, currently Drs. Thagard (Chairman) and Parkinson
and Messrs. Mowell and Woodward. The Committee met four
times during the last fiscal year, and its Charter is available
on the Companys website, at www.ems-t.com, under the link
for Investor Relations.
The Compensation Committee reviews and recommends to the Board
compensation and benefits for the Companys executive
officers, and administers the Companys stock option plans
with respect to the participation of employees who are officers
or directors. The Committees Charter does not provide for
the delegation of these responsibilities to individual members
or other persons, and it has not done any such delegation of
authority.
With respect to officers other than the Chief Executive Officer,
the Committee seeks and receives recommendations of the CEO,
particularly concerning the performance and contributions of the
individual officers reporting to him, and concerning their
appropriate relative compensation. However, before reaching its
conclusions, the Committee reviews and discusses the various
materials and recommendations outside the presence of the CEO.
For 2007 and 2008, the Committee approved compensation packages
for the subordinate officers that closely followed the
CEOs recommendations. The Committee does not request or
accept recommendations from the CEO concerning his own
compensation.
The Committee also requests and receives survey data obtained by
the Companys Human Resources Department from third parties
or developed internally by reviewing publicly filed compensation
data for a group of companies with similar revenues and
dependence on technical personnel. For use in determining 2008
compensation, the latter group of comparator companies was
recommended for this purpose by an independent compensation
consultant, as described in the following paragraph, and
comprised: Adtran, Inc.; Advanced Energy Industries Inc.;
Bookham, Inc.; C-Cor Inc.; Comtech Telecommunications Corp.;
Ducommun Inc.; Extreme Networks; GSI Group Inc.; II-VI
Inc.; Inter-Tel, Incorporated; Itron Inc.; Lojack Corp.; Mercury
Computer Systems Inc.; MRV Communications, Inc.; NETGEAR, Inc.;
Newport Corp.; Park Electrochemical Corp.; Radisys Corp.;
Tekelec, Inc.; United Industrial Corp. and ViaSat Inc.
The Committee from time to time engages independent compensation
consultants for assistance in developing market-appropriate
compensation policies and packages, or in addressing specific
compensation issues, but did not do so during 2008. However, in
benchmarking various elements of its compensation program for
2008, the Committee referred to publicly available compensation
data from a group of comparator
9
companies that were first recommended in 2006 by Clark
Consulting. In connection with that engagement, Clark Consulting
was instructed that its responsibilities and reporting
obligations ran solely to the Committee, and not to the
Companys management.
Related-Party Transactions.
The Company rarely
encounters situations involving a transaction with an officer,
director or other controlling person, other than in their
capacities as an employee, director or shareholder, and
encountered no such situations during 2008. Should such a
transaction arise, the Charter of the Compensation Committee
provides that it (excluding any member having an interest in the
transaction) is responsible for review and approval. The
Committee expects that in considering any such transaction it
would evaluate whether the proposed terms are comparable to
those available in similar arms length transactions, as
well as require persuasive reasons for engaging in the
transaction with the related party rather than a third party.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation.
None of the Committees
members has at any time been an officer or employee of the
Company. During 2008, no member of the Compensation Committee
had any relationship with the Company requiring disclosure under
Item 404 of
Regulation S-K.
In addition, none of the Companys executive officers
serves, or has served, as a member of the board of directors or
compensation committee of any entity that has any of its
executive officers serving on the Companys Board or
Compensation Committee.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
We seek to maintain balanced compensation policies that attract
and retain experienced and well-qualified executive officers,
and that provide incentives for financial and business
achievements that benefit our shareholders.
The Elements of our Compensation Packages.
In
line with our compensation objectives, the Board of Directors
and Compensation Committee seek to maintain the salary component
of each officers compensation at a moderate level; to
provide bonuses based heavily on financial performance; and to
also provide stock awards, consisting primarily of options,
whose value depends on long-term appreciation in the market
value of our common stock. The Board and Committee analyze each
of these elements separately, but typically do so at the same
meetings so that they can readily consider each element in the
context of the overall compensation packages. The Company also
provides what it considers to be a moderate package of
retirement, medical and other benefits.
In determining the proper allocation of each executive
officers compensation among these elements, the Committee
has sought to achieve for each executive an appropriate balance
between economic security and compensation that is at risk based
on the Companys performance. The Committees
conclusions in that regard have been based on consideration by
the members of the Committee of survey materials, their general
knowledge of executive compensation practices, and their
personal evaluations of the likely effects of compensation
levels and structure on the Companys attainment of its
financial objectives. In 2007 and 2008, the Compensation
Committee and CEO placed somewhat greater emphasis on the
incentive-based portions of the overall compensation package, as
compared to base salary, particularly for the divisional general
managers, and thus their numerical relationships changed
somewhat from those in 2006 and earlier years.
Our philosophy as to the mix of current salary and current and
long-term incentives has been followed for many years, but was
first structured in its current general form in 1997 following
an extensive review and recommendations from independent
compensation consultants. Since that time, the Committee also
engaged the assistance of Haigh & Co., compensation
consultants, during late 2003 and to a lesser extent in 2005,
concerning the overall structure of our compensation program,
and utilized the services of Clark Consulting for various
purposes during 2006, including assistance in developing
appropriate compensation for Mr. Domorski as the
Companys new President and CEO.
Base Salary.
In order to initiate the process
of determining base salaries, our management gathers executive
salary data, as compiled in national compensation surveys. For
2008, we primarily used a survey compiled by Radford Surveys, a
division of Aon Consulting, and our internal compilation of data
from the
10
group of comparator companies identified above under The
Compensation Committee. In formulating recommendations
with respect to base salary adjustments, our CEO and
Compensation Committee do not use these materials in any
pre-determined mathematical manner, but they generally have
sought to maintain executive officer base salaries at levels
near the median for comparable positions in comparably sized
companies, with modest deviations based on evaluations of the
experience, qualifications and contributions of individual
officers. They have also assigned substantial significance to
survey data with respect to anticipated general levels of
year-over-year salary increases for executive personnel, and for
2008 followed a policy of a 3.5% guideline for base increases,
with variations in specific circumstances as described in the
following individual discussions. For 2009, the guideline
increase is somewhat lower, at 3%, reflecting a balancing by the
Committee of lower trends of increases in executive compensation
generally and the Companys continued strong performance.
Although a variety of factors are considered, no mathematical or
other relative weightings are assigned. The final
recommendations of the CEO and Compensation Committee reflect
their application of the various factors they consider to be
relevant, in the light of their respective judgments about
fairness and appropriateness, both within the Company and based
on their knowledge and experience of executive compensation
patterns generally. Such factors include, but are not limited
to, the relationship between the compensation of the CEO and
other senior officers as a general matter the
Committee expects the CEOs target compensation as a
multiple of that of the next-most-highly compensated officer to
be in the neighborhood of 1.6, although this figure will vary
from year to year as a result of individual circumstances. The
Committee also believes that it should consider the potential
impact of compensation structures on managements
incentives to engage in transactions that pose greater risk to
long-term performance than is generally believed by the Board to
be appropriate.
Annual Incentive Compensation.
Under the
Companys Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (or
EAICP), which was first implemented in 1997, a
target bonus is designated, as a percentage of base salary, for
each executive officer at the beginning of each calendar year.
Because it is intended that the bonus be heavily affected by the
Companys financial performance during the year, the target
bonus is factored, up or down, based on the Companys (or
in the case of divisional officers, the Companys and
divisions) performance against earnings targets specified
in advance by the Committee. For 2008, the Committee specified a
2-for-1 percentage
increase for actual results above operating income targets
(subject to a limit of 125% of target income where based on
divisional results), a
2-for-1 percentage
decrease for actual results below target but not below 90% of
target, and an
8-for-1 percentage
decrease for actual results below 90% of target. Under this
approach, no award was payable if actual results were not at
least 80% of the target for operating income. We believe that
this highly-leveraged structure, particularly on the downside,
emphasizes to our management the importance of achieving our
financial goals, and the Committees view that no incentive
compensation should be paid when our financial results are at
levels that our shareholders are likely to view as disappointing.
For 2008, the Committee and Board concluded that the CEO and CFO
should also have a major portion of their bonuses tied to the
Companys performance against its target earnings per share
(EPS), because of the critical importance to our
shareholders of this bottom-line performance measure. EPS is
determined not only by the Companys operating performance,
but also by such matters as financing costs, foreign exchange
variations, taxes and discontinued operations. As a result, for
2008 50% of their EAICP payments were based on EPS performance.
For 2009, EPS performance will also be a major factor in
determining the payments for all corporate officers, because of
their general responsibility for managing the various
non-operating contributors to EPS, and the Companys
performance against its EPS target will have the same leveraged
weightings as described above for operating income. Because the
divisional General Managers are responsible for results at the
operating level, the Companys EPS will not be a factor in
their EAICP calculations.
Our 2008 corporate-level EAICP targets were operating
income of $22,642,000 and EPS of $1.30. These amounts were
consistent with the annual earnings guidance that we released at
the beginning of that year. The relevant 2008 division-level
targets were each consistent with the corporate-level target,
required solid revenue growth in the cases of the
Defense & Space (D&S) and SATCOM
divisions, and required excellent execution of the
divisions business plan, but were believed to be
reasonably likely to be achieved.
11
For 2009, our corporate-level targets are consistent with the
annual earnings guidance we released in January. The 2009
divisional operating income targets are set at levels we believe
are reasonably likely to be achieved. However, they will each
require excellent execution of the divisions business plan
for the year, and those for D&S and SATCOM again represent
solid growth from the prior year.
In determining actual performance against the operating income
targets, the Committee adjusts the operating income amounts
determined in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles to exclude the effects of unusual charges or credits
that are determined by the Committee to not have been
contemplated at the time the targets were set, and to be
inappropriate in evaluating executive performance. An example of
such an item is the effects of stock price changes on the
Companys obligations under its phantom-stock
deferred-compensation plan for the non-employee directors.
Another example is unanticipated costs recorded as operating
expenses incurred to obtain benefits, such as
research-&-development tax credits, that are reflected
outside of operating income.
The EAICP awards may also include a portion that is dependent
on, or be factored based on, individual performance evaluations,
which are prepared by the CEO as to all officers other than
himself. The Committee retains the right to modify, either up or
down, the incentive compensation otherwise payable based on the
factoring process, or to make separate discretionary bonus
payments, to take into account individual or Company/division
performance on non-financial objectives and, in the event of
unusual circumstances as determined by the Committee, based on
financial performance. For 2009, EAICP governing parameters
provide for up to an aggregate of $100,000 of such payments,
based on exceptional performance or circumstances and after
consideration of the CEOs recommendations. The Committee
and Board also have the right to make other discretionary
awards, outside the EAICP, based on factors they believe to be
appropriate in the circumstances.
We have a policy of seeking, to the extent practicable, to
recover all or an appropriate portion of performance-based
compensation from any executive officer and certain other senior
management and financial personnel, when the original payment of
such compensation was based on the achievement of financial
results that were subsequently the subject of a material
restatement, and in the Boards view the officer or other
employee engaged in fraud or willful misconduct that inflated
the original results in a manner requiring the restatement.
Long-Term Incentives Stock
Awards.
In order to provide long-term incentive
compensation directly linked to growth in shareholder value, the
Company awards stock-based compensation to the CEO and other
executive officers, primarily in the form of stock options. The
Compensation Committee seeks to grant options annually and on a
systematic basis at levels it believes are competitively
appropriate. In general, the Committee believes that early in
each year options should be granted having a calculated value,
based on the Black-Scholes model, equal to a substantial
percentage of each officers base salary.
The Committee also believes that the percentage of base salary
that should be used in determining annual stock option awards
should increase with an officers level of responsibility
and his or her potential to affect shareholder value. Currently,
the Committee targets percentages of approximately 80% for the
CEO, 60% for the COO and CFO, 50% for General Managers of the
principal divisions, and 25% to 50% for other eligible officers.
However, for any specific officer, or for any specific year,
there may be variations due to individual considerations, a
desire to grant equal numbers of shares to individuals in
similar positions but with somewhat different base salaries, and
the difficulty of precisely determining Black-Scholes value
contemporaneously with the option grant. The guideline
percentages were originally based on compensation-consultant
advice received in 1997. They were reduced significantly for
2005 due to the anticipated effects on financial statement
expense of new option-accounting rules, but in recent years have
been raised back to their original levels as a result of the
CEOs and Committees belief in the importance of
equity-based compensation for executive personnel. Based on
review of latest available comparative data, they are believed
to be somewhat lower than in many comparator companies, but are
nonetheless considered by the Committee to reflect currently
evolving standards.
Consistent with the long-term incentive objective of our option
program, and also in order to encourage long-term retention of
executive personnel, the Committee requires periods of continued
service as a condition
12
to the full exercise of options. For 2008 and 2009, all options
vest based solely on continued employment, over a four-year
period.
The Committee has not adopted a formal program for automatically
granting options, and annual grants remain in the
Committees discretion. All options are granted at exercise
prices equal to market value of our common stock on the date of
grant. With the exception of an option granted effective as of a
future date on which a newly recruited executive commences
employment, the date of grant is the date on which the Committee
meets and approves the particular option. The Committee
generally grants options for each calendar year at its meeting
held in conjunction with the February Regular Meeting of the
Board. This is also the meeting at which executive officer
compensation adjustments and incentive compensation payments are
considered.
Benefits and Perquisites.
We believe that
benefits related to medical, life and disability insurance, and
to retirement, are important and tax-efficient methods of
meeting the basic financial requirements of our executive
officers. They participate in the group medical, life and
disability insurance programs that are provided generally to our
salaried employees. In addition, each is a participant in a
supplemental medical insurance program under which the insurer
pays up to $50,000 per year for medical expenses not otherwise
covered under the standard group policy, subject to a
per-diagnosis limit of $5,000.
For 2008, our retirement program consisted of two tax-qualified
plans, one being a 401(k) plan with a Company match and the
other a defined contribution plan, and one non-qualified bonus
plan. Under our 401(k) plan, all employees may contribute up to
the IRS-specified maximums, and for 2008 the Company matched to
the extent of
66
2
/
3
%
of the individuals contribution, up to a maximum
contribution of 4% of eligible compensation (which in 2008 was
limited to $230,000).
In 2008 we began phasing out the defined contribution plan,
under which the percentage of eligible compensation that is
allocated to a particular individuals account depends on
both the Companys overall contribution and his or her age,
with older employees receiving a progressively greater share. As
part of the phase-out, participation was frozen at
December 31, 2007, and individual allocations are factored
down to reflect attained age of less than 50 and attained
years-of-service of less than 15 as of that date. Contributions
are also limited by various non-discrimination rules, and cannot
be made against that portion of an executives salary
exceeding, for 2008, $230,000. For 2008, the total amount
contributed to the plan was approximately 3% of eligible
compensation, as compared with contributions exceeding 6% in
prior recent years
We do not have a separate non-qualified supplemental plan for
our executives whose compensation exceeds the eligible amount
for either defined contribution plan allocations or 401(k)
matches.
The reduced commitment to the defined contribution plan is being
used by the Company to fund a new non-qualified plan, the
Employee Performance Bonus Plan (the EPB Plan). This
is a Company-wide annual bonus plan with target payments, in
2008, of 3% of base compensation, subject to factoring down by
the same percentage that the Companys and divisions
actual performances fall short of specified earnings targets,
and factoring up by double the percentage that such actual
performance exceeds those targets. For 2009, the target payments
are 4% of base compensation, again subject to factoring for
Company and divisional performance against operating income
targets.
Under the EPB Plan, contributions may be made based on total
base salary, and are not subject to the
eligible-amount
limitations in effect for the tax-qualified plans. For 2008,
payments were 2.65% of base for corporate officers and
employees, and from 1.0% to 4.0% for divisional officers and
employees, based on performance against the same operating
income targets discussed below with respect to EAICP
participation by the named officers. Employees are encouraged to
contribute EPB bonus amounts to their 401(k) or other retirement
accounts, subject to applicable tax limits, but are not required
to do so.
In recent years, our Compensation Committee has reduced other
types of perquisites, based on its understanding of current
trends in executive compensation. At the present time no current
or former executive officer is being provided either an
automobile or payment of club dues. However, we continue in some
cases to provide benefits that we believe have a nexus to
business needs, such as occasional spousal travel to Company
events. We also may provide assistance in relocating an officer,
including local housing and
13
transportation, and transportation to the existing family home,
pending the completion of the relocation. Information about
instances of this nature appears in the notes to the Summary
Compensation Table and in the discussion of employment
arrangements following that table.
Compensation of the Named Executive
Officers.
The following paragraphs discuss the
application during 2008 of the general principles described
under The Elements of our Compensation Package to
our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officers and the three highest-paid other executive officers
during that year. This discussion provides context and
background for the detailed information set forth in the Summary
Compensation Table and other compensation tables following in
this Proxy Statement.
Paul B. Domorski.
Mr. Domorski began his
service as our President and Chief Executive Officer in June
2006. His 2006 compensation was largely determined in
pre-employment negotiations, with the assistance of Clark
Consulting, and included significant awards of performance-based
stock options and shares of restricted stock vesting 50% after
two years of employment, and the other 50% after three years.
Beginning in 2007, the Compensation Committee and Board aligned
Mr. Domorskis compensation package with the
Companys overall executive compensation program. For 2008,
his base salary was increased by 9.3%, to $445,000, reflecting
the Committees desire to bring his base compensation up to
the median levels for comparable companies. For 2009, his base
salary has been further increased to $458,400, reflecting the
guideline 3% increase for executive officers, and a level that
is near the median for the related comparable companies.
The 2008 target award under the EAICP for Mr. Domorski was
80% of his salary, with 50% of the total determined by Company
performance against an operating income target of $22,642,000
and 50% against a 2008 earnings per share target of $1.30. The
$296,202 award reflected in the Summary Compensation Table is
based on achievement of 88% of the operating income target
(after modest adjustments as outlined above in the description
of the EAICP), and 100% of the EPS target, with no variations
for rounding or special business or individual considerations.
For 2009, Mr. Domorskis EAICP target is again 80% of
his base salary, which the Compensation Committee continues to
believe is a level of performance-based cash compensation that
is appropriate in terms of rewarding financial performance that
benefits the shareholders, and in comparison to levels used at
comparator companies. Payment of 80% of this target would occur
for achieving the 2009 consolidated operating income and
earnings per share targets, with equal weightings in determining
the effects of variations from the targets. The remaining 20% is
dependent upon his performance against individual objectives as
evaluated by the Compensation Committee.
In 2008, Mr. Domorski was granted an option to acquire
30,000 shares of common stock, vesting over four years of
continued employment, at an exercise price of $27.82, which was
the closing NASDAQ price on the date of grant. This grant had an
estimated value, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model,
equal to approximately 84% of his 2008 salary, which was a
significant increase from 2007, reflecting both the higher stock
price in effect at the date of that grant and the desire of the
Compensation Committee to increase the emphasis on long-term
performance-based elements of executive compensation. For 2009,
Mr. Domorski has been awarded options to acquire
37,500 shares, also vesting over four years, and
exercisable at $23.86, which was the closing NASDAQ price on the
date of grant. The Black-Scholes estimated value of this award
is approximately 83% of Mr. Domorskis 2009 salary.
Mr. Domorski is receiving the same medical and other
insurance benefits as our other senior personnel, and the other
benefits specified in the Summary Compensation Table. We do not
provide Mr. Domorski with either an automobile or club
membership
Other Officers.
The following paragraphs set
forth specific information about the compensation of each of the
other named executive officers. In each case, variations in
actual results from the targets would affect the award as
discussed above at
Annual Incentive Compensation
. The
EAICP awards (discussed below and indicated in the Summary
Compensation Table) reflect the Committees determination
that during 2008 the Company achieved approximately 88% of its
operating income target and 100% of its EPS target, while the
SATCOM (for Mr. Hebb) and D&S (for Mr. Smith)
divisions exceeded their operating income targets by 12% and
19%, respectively. Stock options granted to all officers in both
2008 and 2009 vest over four years and are
14
exercisable at $27.82 for the 2008 grants and at $23.86 for the
2009 grants, in each case that being the closing NASDAQ price on
the date of grant.
Neilson A. Mackay.
During 2008,
Dr. Mackay initially served as Vice President
Corporate Development, at a salary of $300,000, an increase of
approximately 4% from the $288,000 in effect during the prior
year. The increase was somewhat more than the guideline
increase, reflecting Dr. Mackays anticipated
promotion to Executive Vice President Strategy.
During the year, he was also promoted to the position of
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, but did
not receive a further salary adjustment at the time of that
promotion. For 2009, Dr. Mackays salary has been
increased by 10% to $330,000, based on his increasing
responsibilities within the Companys senior management,
and on comparative data for COOs at similarly sized
companies.
Dr. Mackay also received the other benefits indicated in
the Summary Compensation Table. The 2007 relocation expenses
were offered in connection with Dr. Mackays move from
Ottawa to Atlanta to assume his new corporate role, and included
a direct payment to Dr. Mackay in lieu of the payment of a
real estate commission on the sale of his Ottawa residence.
The 2008 target award under the EAICP for Dr. Mackay was
55% of his salary, an increase from 50% in the prior year to
reflect his increasing responsibilities. Payment of 85% of his
potential award depended on the Company achieving its target
operating income and payment of 15% depended on his performance
against individual objectives as set and evaluated by the CEO.
The calculated award of approximately $118,000 was supplemented
by the Committee, pursuant to the recommendation of the CEO, by
an additional payment of $32,000, based on the CEOs and
Boards evaluation of Dr. Mackays strong
contributions to the Companys 2008 financial results and
to its successful acquisition strategy.
For 2009, Dr. Mackays target award under the EAICP
remains at 55% of his base salary. Payment of 40% of his
potential award will depend on the Company achieving its
operating income target, 40% will depend on the Company
achieving its EPS target, and payment of the remaining 20% will
depend on his performance against individual objectives as set
and evaluated by the CEO. Also, the final award is subject to
decrease by up to 10% based on the CEOs evaluation of
Dr. Mackays overall individual performance during the
year.
The options for 15,000 shares granted to Dr. Mackay in
2008 had a Black-Scholes estimated value equal to approximately
62% of his salary. For 2009, he has been granted options to
acquire 20,000 shares, having a Black-Scholes estimated
value of approximately 61% of his revised salary.
Gary B. Shell.
Mr. Shell became Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in May
2008. At that time, his base salary was increased to $240,000
for the remainder of the year. For 2009, his salary has been
increased by 5% to $252,000, based on the positive evaluation of
the CEO and Board of his development as CFO, and on comparative
data indicating that his base salary is well below the median
for CFOs of similarly sized companies.
At the time of his promotion, Mr. Shells target award
under the EAICP was increased from 40%, which had been
designated when he was Vice President, Finance, to 45% of his
base salary, weighted 85% on corporate performance against
target operating income and 15% on performance against
individual objectives. The award of $89,860 is based on the
Company achieving 88% of its operating income target without
rounding or other adjustment.
For 2009, Mr. Shells EAICP target award has been
increased to 50%, which the Committee believes is a more
appropriate level for the CFO. Payment will be based on the same
weightings, and subject to the same 10% reduction, as explained
above for Dr. Mackay.
During 2008, Mr. Shell was initially granted an option to
acquire 10,000 shares of stock, but at the time of his
promotion to Senior Vice President and CFO, the Committee also
awarded him 3,000 shares of stock that would become
saleable by him as to 1,000 shares after six months of
continued employment, and as to an additional 500 shares on
each of the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. The
Committees grant of restricted stock was based on its
belief that it would provide increased incentive for long-term
service, would
15
increase his exposure to full-value shares and thereby help
align his financial incentives with the Companys
objectives, and would bring his overall compensation package
closer to the level of CFOs in similarly sized companies.
For 2009, Mr. Shell has been granted options to acquire
15,000 shares, having a Black-Scholes value of
approximately 60% of his base salary.
Don T. Scartz.
Mr. Scartz served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for a
portion of 2008, at a salary of $295,000, and for the balance of
the year as part-time Senior Financial Adviser at an hourly rate
equating to $295,000 for full-time employment. He also received
the other benefits indicated in the Summary Compensation Table.
His 2008 salary increase was 2.8% from that in effect for 2007.
This increase reflected primarily normal inflationary
considerations and the expectation that Mr. Scartz would be
retiring from his executive-officer position during the year.
The 2008 target award under the EAICP for Mr. Scartz was
unchanged from the prior year at 50% of his base compensation,
which for 2008 was his salary while a full-time employee and his
actual hourly-based earnings thereafter. The $93,846 award
reflected in the Summary Compensation Table was calculated from
the formulas and targets in effect for 2008, which were the same
for him as described above with respect to Mr. Domorski,
with no variations for rounding or special business or
individual considerations. Mr. Scartz is not participating
in the EAICP for 2009, but he will be considered for
discretionary incentive compensation based on the CEOs and
Boards evaluation of his level of effort and contributions
during 2009 as Senior Financial Adviser.
The options to acquire 7,500 shares granted to
Mr. Scartz in 2008, as reflected in the 2008 Grants of
Plan-Based Awards table, below, were reduced by half from the
prior-year level to reflect Mr. Scartzs planned
retirement during the year.
In connection with Mr. Scartzs planned retirement, in
2007 the Compensation Committee and Board provided
Mr. Scartz with a $100,000 deferred compensation benefit,
as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for that year.
The amount of this benefit approximates the additional amount
that would have been available in Mr. Scartzs account
under the Companys qualified retirement plan but for
limitations under IRS regulations on the amount of salary that
could be considered in calculating Company contributions for his
account over the course of his career. The balance credited to
Mr. Scartz bears interest at the published prime interest
rate of a specified bank, and is being paid to him at $35,000
per year commencing in January 2009.
At the time of Mr. Scartzs retirement, the
Compensation Committee and Board also agreed that in his role as
Senior Financial Adviser, he would be paid an aggregate of
$295,000 over a two-year period ending in May 2010, with a
lump-sum payment at the end of the period to the extent that
amount had not otherwise been paid to him based on his hours
worked. As Senior Financial Adviser, Mr. Scartz has no
longer been eligible for normal employee health or retirement
benefits, but the Company did agree to pay, during the balance
of 2008, the excess of his COBRA health benefit premiums over
the normal premiums paid by employees under the Companys
group health plan.
David A. Smith.
Mr. Smith, who serves as
Vice President and General Manager of the Defense &
Space division, first joined the Company in 2007. During 2008,
he received basic salary compensation of $237,000, an increase
of approximately 4% intended to bring his base compensation into
better alignment with that of the other General Managers. For
2009, his salary has been increased by the guideline 3%, to
$244,100.
Mr. Smiths EAICP award for 2008 is $144,058, and was
calculated, without rounding or other adjustment, based on his
50% target as a percentage of base salary, with 70% determined
by the D&S divisions achievement against its 2008
operating income target, which was exceeded by approximately
18%, 15% by the Companys achievement of 88% of its
operating income target, and 15% by his achievement of personal
objectives.
For 2009, Mr. Smiths target EAICP award remains at
50% of his base salary, and will be payable based 70% on
performance of the D&S division against its 2009 operating
income target, 15% based on performance
16
of the Company against its operating income target, and 15%
based on his performance against individual objectives as
specified and evaluated by the CEO.
In 2008, Mr. Smith received an option to acquire
10,000 shares, the same number as the other General
Managers, having a Black-Scholes estimated value of
approximately 50% of his 2008 salary. For 2009, he has been
granted an option for 12,000 shares, again having a
Black-Scholes estimated value approximating 50% of his base
salary.
Gary W. Hebb.
Mr. Hebb became a Vice
President and the General Manager of the SATCOM division during
2007. For 2008, his salary, as stated in Canadian dollars, was
increased by approximately 4% to better reflect his position,
and equaled approximately US$240,700 based on the currency
exchange rate when approved in January 2008. The Canadian-dollar
salary was further increased for 2009 by the guideline 3%
amount, to approximately US$209,200 based on the currency
exchange rate when approved in January 2009.
Mr. Hebbs 2008 award under the EAICP was calculated
based on SATCOM performance as to 70%, and as to 15% on each of
corporate achievement of 88% of its operating income target and
his personal objectives, with a target award of 50% of his
salary. The actual award was US$114,447, based on average
conversion rates during the year. For the year, the SATCOM
division achieved 112% of its 2008 operating income target.
In February 2009, Mr. Hebb was designated as the
Companys Vice President, Innovation & Strategy.
In that position, his target award under the EAICP will continue
to be 50% of his base salary, which is the same as for the
General Managers and reflects the significance of this position
as the Company seeks to identify and implement cross-divisional
technical and marketing opportunities. As a corporate officer,
Mr. Hebbs award amount will be based on the same
weightings, and subject to the same 10% reduction, as explained
above for Dr. Mackay. However, in connection with his
transition from SATCOM General Manager, and in view of his
service for a portion of the year in the latter capacity, and
his anticipated assistance to the new SATCOM General Manager,
the Company agreed that his EAICP award for 2009 will not be
less than what he would have received as the General Manager of
SATCOM for the full year.
In 2008, Mr. Hebb received an option to acquire
10,000 shares, the same number as the other General
Managers. However, because his salary (after conversion into US
dollars) was somewhat lower than that of the other General
Managers, reflecting his relatively brief tenure in that
position, the Black-Scholes estimated value of these options as
a percentage of salary was a relatively high 59%. The number of
shares optioned to him in 2009 increased to 11,500, but their
Black-Scholes estimated value as a percentage of salary was
somewhat lower than in 2008, at approximately 56%, reflecting
the lower stock price, and also to bring that percentage more
closely in line with those of other officers of similar standing.
Executive Share Ownership Guidelines.
The
Company encourages its officers to accumulate significant
holdings of the Companys common stock, and the CEO
periodically reminds the executive officers of the importance of
doing so. To assist this process, the Company provides officers
with stock-based awards, as well as a Company-subsidized stock
purchase plan that is open to all employees.
17
Report of
the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee of our Board has provided the
following Report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement:
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has
reviewed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis, as
prepared by the Companys management, and has discussed its
content with management as we believed appropriate. Based on our
review and these discussions, the Committee has recommended to
the Board that the foregoing Compensation Discussion and
Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and, through
incorporation by reference from this Proxy Statement, the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Submitted by the members of the Compensation Committee:
Norman E. Thagard (Chairman)
John B. Mowell
Bradford W. Parkinson
John L. Woodward, Jr.
18
Summary
of Executive Compensation
The following table discloses, for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the cash compensation
paid by the Company and its subsidiaries, as well as certain
other compensation paid, accrued or granted for those years, to
the Chief Executive Officer, to the Chief Financial Officer, and
to each of the other three most highly compensated executive
officers. Descriptions of the principal compensation elements
reflected in this table, and of the processes through which each
officers payments or benefits were determined, appear in
the preceding Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Summary
Compensation for Fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 Named
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
Paul B. Domorski
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
443,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,500
|
|
|
|
405,783
|
|
|
|
296,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,848
|
(3)
|
|
|
1,321,195
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
414,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,500
|
|
|
|
252,015
|
|
|
|
358,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,708
|
|
|
|
1,255,497
|
|
Executive
Officer
(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
224,618
|
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
111,666
|
|
|
|
179,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,191
|
|
|
|
606,071
|
|
Gary B.
Shell
(4)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
239,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,582
|
|
|
|
74,469
|
|
|
|
89,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,299
|
(3)
|
|
|
494,839
|
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
166,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,936
|
|
|
|
82,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,577
|
|
|
|
299,401
|
|
Chief Financial
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
153,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,623
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,471
|
|
|
|
245,558
|
|
Officer, and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don T.
Scartz
(5)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
226,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,771
|
|
|
|
93,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,232
|
(3)
|
|
|
470,481
|
|
Executive Vice
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
286,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,026
|
|
|
|
154,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,027
|
|
|
|
722,846
|
|
President,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
277,048
|
|
|
|
53,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,404
|
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,131
|
|
|
|
501,583
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neilson A.
Mackay
(6)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
299,557
|
|
|
|
32,117
|
|
|
|
33,839
|
|
|
|
131,524
|
|
|
|
117,883
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
70,583
|
(3)
|
|
|
687,453
|
|
Executive Vice
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
294,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,765
|
|
|
|
68,750
|
|
|
|
204,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,382
|
|
|
|
726,887
|
|
President & Chief
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
285,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,950
|
|
|
|
26,835
|
|
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,508
|
|
|
|
502,592
|
|
Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A.
Smith
(7)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
236,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,636
|
|
|
|
144,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,661
|
(3)
|
|
|
487,024
|
|
Vice President and
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
162,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,525
|
|
|
|
96,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,234
|
|
|
|
298,217
|
|
General Manager,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defense & Space
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary M.
Hebb
(8)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
228,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,743
|
|
|
|
114,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,114
|
(3)
|
|
|
420,194
|
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
219,678
|
|
|
|
21,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,090
|
|
|
|
118,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,433
|
|
|
|
385,421
|
|
Innovation &
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
191,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,948
|
|
|
|
282,485
|
|
Strategy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Footnotes to Summary Compensation Table:
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Domorski became President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company in June 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Valuation based on the dollar amount recognized for financial
reporting purposes pursuant to SFAS 123(R). Assumptions
used to value stock option grants are provided in Note 7,
Stock-Based Compensation, to the audited
consolidated financial statements, filed as Part IV,
Item 15(a)(1), to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
(3)
|
|
For 2008, includes, in the case of Mr. Domorski, $1,151
under the defined contribution retirement plan, $11,718 under
the EPB plan, as well as the cost (grossed up for Medicare
taxes) of rent and utilities for interim housing in Atlanta and
of travel to his present primary residence, matching
contributions under the 401(k) and employee stock purchase
plans, and supplemental medical and group term life insurance;
in the case of Mr. Shell, $11,995 under the defined
contribution retirement plan, $5,961 under the EPB plan, as well
as matching contributions under the 401(k) and employee stock
purchase plans, and supplemental medical, disability and group
term life insurance; in the case of Mr. Scartz, $11,936
under the defined contribution retirement plan, $3,151 under the
EPB plan, as well as matching contributions under the 401(k) and
employee stock purchase plans, supplemental medical, disability
and group term life insurance, and an auto allowance; in the
case of Dr. Mackay, $23,000 under the defined contribution
retirement plan, $7,908 under the EPB plan, as well as matching
contributions under the retirement and stock purchase plans,
and
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
supplemental medical, disability and group term life insurance;
in the case of Mr. Smith, $13,400 under the EPB plan, as
well as matching contributions under the 401(k) and employee
stock purchase plans, and supplemental medical, disability and
group term life insurance; in the case of Mr. Hebb, $8,255
under the EPB plan, as well as matching contributions under the
retirement and stock purchase plans.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Mr. Shell became Chief Financial Officer in May 2008.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Mr. Scartz retired as Chief Financial Officer in May 2008,
and has served since then as Senior Financial Advisor.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Dr. Mackay was appointed to his present position in July
2008. He previously served in other senior corporate offices and
as General Manager of the SATCOM division.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Mr. Smith joined the Company in April 2007 as Vice
President and General Manager, Defense & Space.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Compensation for Mr. Hebb is paid in Canadian currency.
These compensation amounts have been converted into U.S. dollars
at the average of the exchange rates in effect during the year.
|
2008
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following chart sets forth certain information with respect
to the named executives concerning 2008 grants of plan-based
awards from the Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and
the Companys Stock Incentive Plans. Descriptions of these
Plans and other information concerning these grants are included
in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
Option
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Date Fair
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive
|
|
Stock
|
|
Awards:
|
|
or Base
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity
|
|
Plan Awards
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Number of
|
|
Price of
|
|
Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Thresh-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Securities
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
old
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Stock
|
|
Options
|
|
($/share)
|
|
($/share)
|
|
Paul B. Domorski
|
|
|
2/13/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
11.92
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
2/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Shell
|
|
|
2/13/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
11.92
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
2/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5/2/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.67
|
|
|
$
|
28.67
|
|
Don T. Scartz
|
|
|
2/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
11.92
|
(1)
|
Neilson A. Mackay
|
|
|
2/13/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
11.92
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
2/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Smith
|
|
|
2/13/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
11.92
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
2/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary W. Hebb
|
|
|
2/13/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
11.92
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
2/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,429
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The exercise price for employee stock options granted by the
Company is the closing market price on the date of grant.
Options vest 25% per year based upon continued service. Fair
value is based upon the Black-Scholes valuation method.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Awards for Mr. Hebb were valued in Canadian currency and
converted for this chart into U.S. dollars at the foreign
exchange rate in effect at the beginning of 2008.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Shares of restricted stock, vesting upon continued service.
1,000 shares vested on November 2, 2008, and
500 shares on each anniversary of the grant, beginning
May 2, 2009 and continuing through May 2, 2012.
|
20
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal 2008 Year-End
The following chart sets forth certain information with respect
to the named executives concerning the equity awards outstanding
as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Awards: Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Market
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
Value of
|
|
Shares,
|
|
Shares,
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Shares or
|
|
Units or
|
|
Units or
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
Units of
|
|
Other
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Rights
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
That Have
|
|
That Have
|
|
That Have
|
|
That Have
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Not
|
|
Not
|
|
Not
|
|
Not
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Options(2)
|
|
Price
|
|
Date
|
|
Vested(3)
|
|
Vested
|
|
Vested
|
|
Vested
|
|
Paul B. Domorski
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
$
|
20.13
|
|
|
|
6/2/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.37
|
|
|
|
1/23/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.82
|
|
|
|
2/13/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
258,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary B. Shell
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.88
|
|
|
|
5/14/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.99
|
|
|
|
4/19/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.25
|
|
|
|
3/24/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
18.05
|
|
|
|
2/17/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.37
|
|
|
|
1/23/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.82
|
|
|
|
2/13/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
51,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don T. Scartz
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.70
|
|
|
|
2/5/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.54
|
|
|
|
2/4/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
18.05
|
|
|
|
2/17/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.37
|
|
|
|
1/23/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.82
|
|
|
|
2/13/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neilson A. Mackay
|
|
|
7,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.22
|
|
|
|
2/7/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.70
|
|
|
|
2/5/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,475
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.54
|
|
|
|
2/4/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
18.05
|
|
|
|
2/17/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.37
|
|
|
|
1/23/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.82
|
|
|
|
2/13/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
155,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David A. Smith
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.53
|
|
|
|
5/21/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.82
|
|
|
|
2/13/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary W. Hebb
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.880
|
|
|
|
5/14/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.100
|
|
|
|
3/12/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.990
|
|
|
|
4/19/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.250
|
|
|
|
3/24/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
18.050
|
|
|
|
2/17/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
1,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.37
|
|
|
|
1/23/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.82
|
|
|
|
2/13/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Vesting dates for option share awards that were unexercisable at
December 31, 2008, with vesting subject only to service
conditions, are as follows: Mr. Domorskis option
shares that will expire on June 2, 2012, will vest as to
18,750 shares on June 2, 2009; for Mr. Scartz and
Dr. Mackay, option shares that will expire on
February 4, 2011, will vest on February 4, 2009;
Messrs. Shell and Hebbs option shares that will
expire on March 24, 2011, will vest on March 24, 2009;
for Messrs. Scartz, Shell, and Hebb, and Dr. Mackay,
option shares that will expire on February 17, 2012, will
vest on February 17, 2009; for Messrs. Domorski,
Scartz, Shell and Hebb, and Dr. MacKay, option shares that
will expire on January 23, 2013, will vest in three equal
segments on January 23, 2009, 2010 and 2011;
Mr. Smiths option shares
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
that will expire on May 21, 2013 will vest in three equal
segments on May 21, 2009, 2010 and 2011; and for
Messrs. Domorski, Scartz, Shell, Hebb and Smith, and
Dr. MacKay, option shares that will expire on
February 13, 2014, will vest in four equal segments on
February 13, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Performance option share awards that were unexercisable and
unearned at December 31, 2008, will vest in 2010
(specifically, June 2 of that year for Mr. Domorski and
February 17 of that year for Messrs. Scartz, Shell, and Hebb,
and Dr. Mackay), contingent upon the Company achieving
performance conditions determined annually by the Board of
Directors.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Vesting dates for shares of stock that had not vested at
December 31, 2008, are as follows: Mr. Domorskis
shares will vest on June 2, 2009; for Dr. Mackay, the
shares will vest in three equal segments on July 28, 2009,
2010 and 2011. Mr. Shells shares will vest in four
equal segments on May 2, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.
|
2008
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following chart sets forth certain information with respect
to the named executives concerning option exercises and
stock award vesting during the year ended
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized on
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized on
|
|
Name
|
|
Acquired on Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Acquired on Vesting
|
|
|
Vesting
|
|
|
Paul B. Domorski
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
268,100
|
|
Gary B. Shell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
20,900
|
|
Don T. Scartz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neilson A. Mackay
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
45,600
|
|
David A. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary W. Hebb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth certain information about the
Companys equity compensation plans as of December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
|
|
Securities to be
|
|
|
Average Exercise
|
|
|
Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon
|
|
|
Price of
|
|
|
Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Options,
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding
|
|
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
|
Warrants and
|
|
|
Securities Reflected
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Rights
|
|
|
in Column (a))
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
732,754
|
|
|
$
|
20.13
|
|
|
|
1,801,000
|
(1)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
175,325
|
|
|
|
19.55
|
|
|
|
74,732
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
908,079
|
|
|
|
20.02
|
|
|
|
1,875,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Shares available under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Shares available for future issuance under our 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan, which will expire in 2010.
|
Employment
Arrangements
Payments in the Event of Certain
Terminations.
The Company has entered into
Executive Protection Agreements with various of its executive
officers, including Messrs. Domorski, Shell, Hebb and Smith
and Dr. Mackay, with respect to compensation in the event
of termination following a
change-in-control
that was
22
not approved by the Board of Directors. Rights under the
agreements arise if, within two years following such a
change-in-control,
an officers employment is terminated involuntarily (other
than for cause or as a result of disability or death), or
voluntarily due to Company-initiated adverse changes in duties,
compensation or benefits, or change in principal location for
the performance of the officers duties. In those
circumstances, the affected officer would be entitled to a
lump-sum payment of the discounted value of three years
salary, continuation of health and life insurance benefits for
one year, and full vesting of any then-outstanding stock options.
In addition to the arrangements described in the preceding
paragraph, the Companys agreement with Mr. Domorski
also provides for similar benefits in the event the termination
follows a
change-in-control
approved by the Board, but limited to two years salary,
and in the event of other involuntary or constructive
terminations (other than for cause or as a result of disability
or death), but in that case limited to one years salary.
Had the events triggering rights under the various Executive
Protection Agreements occurred on the last day of 2008, the
following named executive officers would have been entitled to
the following benefits:
Mr. Domorski:
Lump-sum payment of
$1,245,850, $849,532, or $434,542, depending on whether the
circumstances entitled him to three, two or one years
payment of salary (as specified above); immediate vesting of
otherwise-unvested options to acquire 86,250 shares of
common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $22.64, as
compared with the closing market price of the Companys
common stock on December 31, 2008 of $25.87; and
one-years continuation of health and life insurance
benefits having an estimated value of $19,876.
Mr. Shell:
Lump-sum payment of $671,925;
immediate vesting of otherwise-unvested options to acquire
14,875 shares of common stock at a weighted-average
exercise price of $24.91; and one-years continuation of
health and life insurance benefits having an estimated value of
$19,770.
Dr. Mackay:
Lump-sum payment of $839,922;
immediate vesting of otherwise-unvested options to acquire
26,825 shares of common stock at a weighted-average
exercise price of $23.81; and one-years continuation of
health and life insurance benefits having an estimated value of
$19,770.
Mr. Smith:
Lump-sum payment of $663,541;
immediate vesting of otherwise-unvested options to acquire
13,750 shares of common stock at a weighted-average
exercise price of $25.29; and one-years continuation of
health and life insurance benefits having an estimated value of
$9,425.
Mr. Hebb:
Lump-sum payment of $691,290
and immediate vesting of otherwise-unvested options to acquire
12,538 shares of common stock at a weighted-average
exercise price of $26.00.
In addition to the foregoing benefits under the Executive
Protection Agreements, certain vested benefits under the
Companys defined contribution retirement plan and its
401(k) plan are not currently payable to the individual except
upon separation from employment, regardless of cause, but are
available to the named executive officers on the same terms and
conditions as all other employees. These amounts arise from
Company contributions made throughout the period of an
individuals employment with the Company, as well as from
earnings on the investment accounts available under the plans.
All Company contributions have been included in the Summary
Compensation Table for the individuals appearing in that Table
for the relevant years.
Officers Deferred Compensation Plan.
The
Company maintains its Officers Deferred Compensation Plan
under which certain senior personnel, including the executive
officers, may elect to defer payment of compensation that they
are otherwise entitled to receive in cash. Until paid, deferred
amounts accrue interest, compounded semi- annually, at the prime
rate for commercial borrowers established from time to time by a
named commercial bank. Currently, that rate is 7.25% per annum.
Deferred amounts, together with earnings, are paid upon
retirement or other termination of the officers
employment, or at another date specified by the individual at
the time the deferrals are authorized, or thereafter subject to
tax-law limitations on the timing and nature of further
extensions of the payment dates.
23
AUDIT
MATTERS
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for
providing independent oversight of the Companys accounting
and financial reporting functions and internal controls, as set
out in its written Charter, which was last revised in October
2008. The Committee has considered its Charter, and has
determined that the Charter is adequate for the purposes of
providing the Committee with the responsibilities and authority
appropriate for its role in the Companys corporate
governance structure and under applicable requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and The NASDAQ Stock Market,
Inc. listing standards. This Committees Charter is
available on the Companys website, at www.ems-t.com, under
the link for Investor Relations.
During 2008, the Audit Committee comprised four members, each of
whom was and is independent as defined by the NASDAQ
listing standards. Mr. Buerger is Chairman of the
Committee, and has been determined by the Board to be, by virtue
of his professional training and experience, an audit
committee financial expert within the meaning of the
SECs regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The
Committee held eight formal meetings during the year, and its
Chairman also consulted on various occasions during the year
with members of the internal accounting staff and with the
independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee has furnished the following report on its
activities:
Management is responsible for the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. The Companys independent
registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, is responsible for
performing an independent audit of the Companys
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), and for issuing a report thereon. The Audit
Committee has responsibility for monitoring and oversight as set
out in its Charter.
The Audit Committee has met with management and KPMG LLP to
review and discuss the December 31, 2008 consolidated
financial statements. The Audit Committee has also discussed
with the independent registered public accounting firm the
matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61
(Communication with Audit Committees). The Audit Committee also
received written disclosures from the independent registered
public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the
independent registered public accounting firms
communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence.
Based upon the Audit Committees discussions with
management and KPMG LLP, and the Audit Committees review
of the representations and disclosures of management and the
independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited
consolidated financial statements be included in the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management is responsible for the Companys financial
reporting process, including its internal control over financial
reporting, and for the preparation of consolidated financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. The Companys independent registered
public accounting firm is responsible for auditing those
financial statements. Our responsibility is to monitor and
review these processes. It is not our duty or our responsibility
to conduct auditing or accounting reviews or procedures. Our
oversight includes review of financial materials and audit
information provided by management or the auditors, and specific
inquiry concerning matters that we identify as warranting
additional investigation or consideration. Our considerations
and discussions with management and the independent registered
public accounting firm have led us to conclude: that the
Companys financial statements are presented in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; that
the audit of our Companys financial statements has been
carried out in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States); and that our
Companys independent registered public accounting firm is
in fact independent. However, our oversight role,
and our reviews, discussions
24
and consideration, do not enable us either to guarantee that
these conclusions are in fact correct, or to assure the
non-existence of additional facts or other information that
could cause us to reach a different conclusion as to any of
these matters.
Submitted by the members of the Audit Committee:
Hermann Buerger (Chairman)
Francis J. Erbrick
John R. Kreick
John B. Mowell
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
KPMG LLP acted as the Companys independent registered
public accounting firm during the last fiscal year, and has been
appointed by the Audit Committee to continue to act as such
during the current fiscal year, subject to shareholder
ratification. A representative of KPMG LLP is expected to be
present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate
questions, and will have the opportunity to make a statement if
he desires to do so.
Fees for the Audit and Other Services Provided by the
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents fees billed for the audit of the
Companys annual financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, as well as fees for other
services provided by KPMG LLP for those same periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
KPMG LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit
fees
(1)
|
|
$
|
2,374,000
|
|
|
|
2,317,000
|
|
Audit-related
services
(2)
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
fees
(3)
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,825,000
|
|
|
|
2,414,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Audit fees include fees for the annual financial statement
audit, audit of internal control over financial reporting and
quarterly reviews, and fees for other audit or attestation
services required by statute or regulation.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Audit-related services fees include fees related to due
diligence services performed in connection with the
Companys acquisition of Akerstroms Trux in February 2008.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Tax fees paid to KPMG LLP were primarily for tax consultation
and tax compliance services in the U.S.
|
Pre-Approval
of Services by the Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The Audit Committee seeks to pre-approve all services provided
by the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the
pre-approval of services provided by the independent registered
public accounting firm, and all such services provided in 2008
were pre-approved.
Under the policy, the full Committee must pre-approve all audit
and audit-related services. However, the Audit Committee has
authorized its Chairman to act on the Committees behalf to
grant pre-approval of non-audit services, subject to reporting
approvals to the Committee. Non-audit services typically include
tax compliance, tax planning and related tax services,
assistance and consultation on questions raised by
regulatory-agency registration statements, attest services
required by statute or regulation, and due diligence services.
For each proposed service, the independent registered public
accounting firm is required to provide sufficient description of
its services at the time of approval to permit the Audit
Committee or its Chairman to
25
make a determination whether the provision of such services
would impair the independent registered public accounting
firms independence.
RATIFICATION
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm to audit the
Companys 2009 consolidated financial statements and
internal control over financial reporting, subject to
ratification by a majority of the shares represented and voting
on the matter at the Annual Meeting. The Companys auditors
are appointed annually by the Audit Committee, based on a review
of the qualifications, independence, past performance and
quality controls of the auditor. The decision also takes into
account the proposed audit scope, staffing and approach,
including coordination of the external auditors efforts
with the Companys internal audit and finance staffs, as
well as the estimated audit fees for the coming year. KPMG LLP
is considered by management to be well qualified to serve as
independent auditor.
In view of the difficulty and expense involved in changing
auditors on short notice, should the shareholders not ratify the
selection of KPMG LLP, it is contemplated that the firms
appointment for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009,
will be permitted to stand unless the Audit Committee finds
other compelling reasons for making a change. Disapproval by the
shareholders will be considered a recommendation that the Audit
Committee select other auditors for the following year.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares
of common stock present at the Annual Meeting and voting on the
matter is required to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP,
assuming the presence of a quorum. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will be considered as present for the purposes of
determining the presence of a quorum, but will not otherwise be
considered in determining the outcome of the vote.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote
FOR ratification of KPMG LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm for 2009.
SECTION 16(A)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act,
each executive officer, director and beneficial owner of 10% or
more of the Companys common stock is required to file
certain forms with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A
report of beneficial ownership of the Companys common
stock on Form 3 is due at the time such person becomes
subject to the reporting requirement, and a report on
Form 4 or 5 must be filed to reflect changes in beneficial
ownership occurring thereafter. The Company believes that all
forms required to be filed by reporting persons were filed on a
timely basis.
HOUSEHOLDING
If you and other residents with the same last name at your
mailing address own shares of common stock in street name, your
broker or bank may have sent you a notice that your household
will receive only one annual report and proxy statement for each
company in which you hold stock through that broker or bank.
This practice of sending only one copy of proxy materials is
known as householding. If you received a
householding communication, your broker will send one copy of
the Companys Proxy Statement and Annual Report to the
shareholders address unless contrary instructions were
given by any shareholder at that address. If you received more
than one copy of the proxy materials this year and you wish to
reduce the number of reports you receive in the future, and save
the Company the cost of printing and mailing these reports, your
broker will discontinue the mailing of reports on the accounts
you select if you mark the designated box on your proxy card, or
follow the instructions provided when you vote over the Internet.
You may revoke your consent to householding at any time by
calling
1-800-542-1061.
The revocation of your consent to householding will be effective
30 days following its receipt. In any event, if your
household received a single set of proxy materials for this
year, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, we will
26
send a copy to you if you address your written request to: EMS
Technologies, Inc., Investor Relations, 660 Engineering Drive,
Norcross, GA 30092, or contact Investor Relations at
770-263-9200.
AVAILABLE
INFORMATION
The Company files Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A copy of the
Annual Report (including exhibits) for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, is available through the Companys
website at www.ems-t.com. A printed copy of the Annual Report
(excluding exhibits) may be obtained, free of charge, upon
written request by any shareholder to EMS Technologies, Inc.,
Attn: Gary B. Shell, Treasurer, 660 Engineering Drive, P. O. Box
7700, Norcross, Georgia
30091-7700.
Copies of all exhibits to the Annual Report are available
upon a similar request, subject to payment of a $.15 per page
charge to reimburse the Company for its expenses.
Norcross, Georgia
March 20, 2009
27
Electronic Voting Instructions
You can vote by Internet or
telephone!
Available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose
one of the two voting methods outlined
below to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies
submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by
1:00 a.m., Central Time, on May 1, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by Internet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Log on
to the Internet and go to
www.investorvote.com/ELMG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow the steps outlined on the secured website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote by telephone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the United
States, Canada & Puerto Rico any
time on a touch tone telephone. There
is
NO CHARGE
to you for the call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message.
|
|
|
|
Using a
black ink
pen, mark
your votes with an X as shown in this
example. Please do not write outside the
designated areas.
|
|
x
|
6
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET
OR
TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
6
Proposals
The Board of Directors recommends a vote
FOR
all the
nominees listed and
FOR
Proposal 2.
|
|
|
|
|
1. Election of Directors:
|
|
For
|
|
Withhold
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 - Hermann Buerger
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
04 - John R. Kreick
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
07 - Bradford W. Parkinson
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Withhold
|
|
|
|
|
|
02 - Paul B. Domorski
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
05 - John B. Mowell
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
08 - Norman E. Thagard
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Withhold
|
|
|
|
|
|
03 - Francis J. Erbrick
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
06 - Thomas W. OConnell
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
09 - John L. Woodward, Jr.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
2. Proposal to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the
Companys independent registered public accounting
firm for the year ending December 31, 2009.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors is not aware of any
matters to be presented for action at the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, other than the election of
Directors and the proposal specified above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. In accordance with their best
judgment upon such other matters as may
properly come before the Annual Meeting
or any adjournments thereof.
|
|
|
Non-Voting Items
Change
of Address
Please print new address below.
Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. Date and Sign
Below
Please sign
exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give
full title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below.
|
|
Signature 1 Please keep signature within the box.
|
|
Signature 2 Please keep signature within the box.
|
6
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET
OR
TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
6
Proxy EMS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
The undersigned hereby appoints John B. Mowell, Paul B. Domorski and Timothy C. Reis, and each
of them with individual power of substitution, proxies to appear and vote all shares of the common
stock of EMS Technologies, Inc. that the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders to be held on the 1st day of May 2009, and at all adjournments thereof, as
indicated with respect to the matters listed on the reverse side.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote
FOR
all the nominees listed and
FOR
the Proposal listed.
This proxy is revocable at any time prior to its use.
(Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)
Ems Technologies (NASDAQ:ELMG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Ems Technologies (NASDAQ:ELMG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024