Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
NOTE 1:
General information
National Bank of Greece S.A. (hereinafter “NBG” or the “Bank”) was founded in 1841 and its shares have been listed on the Athens Exchange since 1880. The Bank’s headquarters are located at 86 Eolou Street, Athens, Greece, (Register number G.E.MH. 237901000), tel.: (+30) 210 334 1000, www.nbg.gr. By resolution of the Board of Directors
, the Bank can establish branches, agencies and correspondence offices in Greece and abroad. In its 178 years of operation, the Bank has expanded on its commercial banking business by entering into related business areas. National Bank of Greece and its subsidiaries (hereinafter the “Group”) provide a wide range of financial services including retail and commercial banking, asset management, brokerage, investment banking, insurance and real estate at a global level. The Group operates in Greece, UK, South East Europe (“SEE”), which includes Romania and FYROM, Cyprus, Malta and Egypt.
The Board of Directors consists of the following members:
The Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
Costas P. Michaelides
The Chief Executive Officer
Paul K. Mylonas (1)
Executive Members
Dimitrios G. Dimopoulos
Panos A. Dasmanoglou (2)
Non-Executive Members
Yiannis G. Zographakis(3)
Independent Non-Executive Members (4), (5), (6)
Haris A. Makkas
Eva Cederbalk
Claude Edgar L.G.Piret
Andrew J.I. McIntyre(7)
John P.J. McCormick(8)
Hellenic Financial Stability Fund representative
Periklis F. Drougkas (9)
(1) On 18 July 2018, Paul K. Mylonas was elected as Chief Executive Officer of the Board of Directors.
(2) On 26 July 2018, Panos A. Dasmanoglou was elected as executive member of the Board of Directors.
(3) On 26 July 2018, Yiannis G. Zographakis was elected as non-executive member of the Board of Directors.
(4) On 28 February 2018, Petros K. Sabatacakis resigned from his position as an independent non-executive member of the Board of Directors.
(5) On 31 January 2018, Arthur Michael Royal Aynsley resigned from his position as an independent non-executive member of the Board of Directors.
(6) Ms Marianne T. Økland was an independent non-executive member of the Board of Directors until 25 July 2018.
(7) On 23 April 2018, Andrew J.I. McIntyre was elected as independent non-executive member of the Board of Directors.
(8) On 26 July 2018, John P.J. McCormick was elected as independent non-executive member of the Board of Directors.
(9) On 26 July 2018, Periklis F. Drougkas was appointed as HFSF Representative in accordance with Law 3864/2010, as in force, in replacement of Christoforos E. Koufalias.
All Directors were elected by the Bank’s General Meeting of Shareholders on 26 July 2018 for a maximum term of 3 years and may be re-elected. The term of the above members expires at the annual General Meeting of the Bank’s shareholders in 2021.
These interim financial statements have been approved for issue by the Bank’s Board of Directors on 29 November 2018.
10
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
NOTE 2:
Summary of significant accounting policies
2.1
Basis of preparation
The condensed interim consolidated financial statements as at and for the 9 month period ended 30 September 2018 (the “interim financial statements”) have been prepared in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 “Interim Financial Reporting”. These interim financial statements include selected explanatory notes and do not include all the information required for full annual financial statements. Therefore, the interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2017, which have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) as endorsed by the European Union (the “EU”).
The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year and corresponding interim period, except for the adoption of new and amended standards as set out below.
The amounts are stated in Euro, rounded to the nearest million (unless otherwise stated) for ease of presentation.
Where necessary, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes in current period’s presentation.
The interim financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for available-for-sale financial assets, fair value through other comprehensive income financial assets, financial assets and financial liabilities held at fair value through profit or loss and all derivative contracts, which have been measured at fair value.
2.2
Going concern
Liquidity
As at 30 September 2018
, the funding from European Central Bank (“ECB”) amounted to €2.25 billion reduced from €2.75 billion at 31 December 2017. Furthermore, as of 30 September 2018 the Bank had entered into secure interbank transactions with foreign financial institutions of €4.2 billion, while the Bank’s ELA liquidity buffer stood at €8.4 billion (cash value).
Capital adequacy
The Group’s Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) ratio at 30 September 2018 was 16.
4% exceeding the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (“SREP”) ratio of 12.875% for 2018 (see Note 17).
Macroeconomic developments
Real Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) growth entered positive territory in 2017 and reached 1.5% y-o-y, despite the tighter-than-initially expected fiscal conditions. This favourable momentum continued in the first half of 2018, with GDP accelerating to 2.2% y-o-y, the strongest pace in 11 years. Greece’s GDP growth is expected to reach 2.0%, y-o-y, in 2018 and 2.3%, y-o-y, in 2019, on average, according to the latest estimates of the European Commission and the International Monetary Fund (the “IMF”).
Furthermore, the Third Program was successfully completed in August 2018 and the Greek state has created a sizable cash buffer covering more than 3 years of sovereign financing needs and Greece’s public debt servicing costs was further reduced by the Eurogroup of 21 June 2018. On the fiscal front, Greece overperformed its fiscal targets in 2017 as well as in 9M:2018.
Therefore, although the sustainability of the economic recovery remains susceptible to downside risks related to a slower-than-initially-expected improvement in liquidity conditions and the still vulnerable financial position of a significant number of households and small business units, following the multiyear crisis, the above factors contribute to a reduction of uncertainty.
2018 Stress Test
Between February and April 2018, the ECB conducted a Stress Test Exercise on the four Greek Systemic Banks. The exercise was performed following the same approach of European Banking Authority (“EBA”) exercise in terms of methodology, templates, scenarios and quality assurance of the results. The 2018 Stress Test results were published on 5 May 2018 and ECB has not requested NBG to submit a capital plan (see Note 1
7).
Going concern conclusion
Management concluded that the Bank is a going concern after considering (a) the NIL ELA funding, the ECB funding solely through TLTRO and the current access to the Eurosystem facilities with significant collateral buffer (b) the Group’s CET1 ratio of 30 September 2018 which exceeded SREP requirements even after the adoption of IFRS 9
, (c) the results of the recent Stress Test exercise, based on which no capital plan was deemed necessary (see Note 17) and (d) the recent developments regarding the Greek economy and the latest estimates regarding macroeconomic indicators, as discussed above.
11
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
2.3
Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
New standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards effective from 1 January 2018
New standards
·
IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”
On 1 January 2018, the Group adopted IFRS 9
Financial Instruments
, which replaces IAS 39 Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement
and changes the requirements for classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities, impairment of financial assets and hedge accounting.
The Group applied IFRS 9 retrospectively, but elected not to restate prior periods, in accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRS 9. Therefore, the comparative information for 2017 is reported under IAS 39 and is not comparable to the information presented for 2018.
The adoption of IFRS 9 on 1 January 2018, decreased the Group’s shareholders’ equity by approximately €1.5 billion, of which €1.3 billion, due to changes in impairment requirements and €0.2 billion, due to classification and measurement. Further information on the impact of IFRS 9 upon adoption, is included in Note
22. The accounting policies and critical judgments applied by the Group in order to comply with the requirements of IFRS 9, are included in Notes 2.4 and 2.5 respectively.
·
IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosures”
The Standard was updated in line with IFRS 9, Financial Instruments. The Group adopted the revised standard on 1 January 2018. Given that the first quarter of 2018 includes the date of initial application of IFRS 9, the Group provides in Note 22 the IFRS 9 transition disclosures as set out by IFRS 7 in the first quarter of 2018. A full set of disclosures as required by the revised IFRS 7 will be provided in the Group’s annual financial statements as of and for the year ending 31 December 2018.
·
IFRS 15 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”
IFRS 15 establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. IFRS 15 replaces the revenue recognition guidance included in IAS 18
Revenue
, IAS 11
Construction Contracts
and the related Interpretations. The core principle of IFRS 15 is that an entity should recognise revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Specifically, the Standard introduces a five-step approach to revenue recognition:
·
Identify the contract with the customer
·
Identify the performance obligations in the contracts
·
Determine the transaction price
·
Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contracts
·
Recognise revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
Under IFRS 15, an entity recognises revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied, i.e. when “control” of the goods or services underlying the particular performance obligation is transferred to the customer. There was no material impact from the adoption of IFRS 15 in the interim financial statements of the Group.
Amendments and interpretations
·
IFRS 4 (Amendment) Applying IFRS 9 Financial Instruments with IFRS 4 Insurance Contracts
. The amendments introduce two approaches. The amended standard will: a) give all companies that issue insurance contracts the option to recognise in other comprehensive income, rather than profit or loss, the volatility that could arise when IFRS 9 is applied before the new insurance contracts standard is issued and b) give companies whose activities are predominantly connected with insurance an optional temporary exemption from applying IFRS 9 until 2021. The entities that defer the application of IFRS 9 will continue to apply IAS 39. On 14 November 2018, the IASB tentatively decided to propose an amendment to IFRS 4 to allow insurers qualifying for deferral of IFRS 9 one additional year of deferral. This would mean that qualifying insurers could apply both standards for the first time in reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022.
The Group has elected to defer the provisions of IFRS 9 for its insurance subsidiary, Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance SA, as allowed by Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1988 from 1 January 2018 to the adoption date of IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts. As of 1 January 2018, Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance SA was classified as a discontinued operation and shall continue applying the requirements of IAS 39 after 1 January 2018.
·
IFRS 15 (Amendment) Clarifications to IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
The amendment clarifies three aspects of the standard (identifying performance obligations, principal versus agent considerations, and licensing) and provides some transition relief for modified contracts and completed contracts. The amendment did not have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
·
IFRS 2 (Amendment) Classification and Measurement of Share-based Payment Transactions.
The amendment clarifies the measurement basis for cash-settled, share-based payments and the accounting for modifications that change an award from cash-settled to equity-settled. It also introduces an exception to the principles in IFRS 2 that will require an award to be treated as if it was wholly equity-settled, where an employer is obliged to withhold an amount for the employee’s tax obligation associated with a share-based payment and pay that amount to the tax authority. The amendment did not have an impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
·
IFRIC 22 Foreign Currency Transactions and Advance Consideration.
The interpretation provides guidance on how to determine the date of the transaction when applying the standard on foreign currency transactions, IAS 21. The interpretation applies where an entity either
12
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
pays or receives consideration in advance for foreign currency-denominated contracts. The interpretation did not have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
·
IAS 40 (Amendment) Transfers to Investment Property.
The amendments clarified that to transfer to, or from, investment properties there must be a change in use. To conclude if a property has changed use there should be an assessment of whether the property meets the definition and the change must be supported by evidence. The amendment did not have an impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
·
Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2014–2016 Cycle.
The amendments applicable to the Group relate solely to IAS 28 and clarify that when venture capital organisations, mutual funds, unit trusts and similar entities use the election to measure their investments in associates or joint ventures at fair value through profit or loss, this election should be made separately for each associate or joint venture at initial recognition. The amendment did not have an impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
·
Amendments to IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements.
In line with amendments to IAS 1, the Group presents interest income and interest expense, calculated using the effective interest method, on financial instruments measured at amortised cost and financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income separately from interest income and expense on financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss, in the notes. The amendment did not have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
New standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards effective after 2018
New standards effective after 2018
·
IFRS 16 Leases
(effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019). IFRS 16 establishes principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases, with the objective of ensuring that lessees and lessors provide relevant information that faithfully represents those transactions. The standard provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognise assets and liabilities for all leases unless the lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset has a low value. Lessees recognise a right of use asset and a corresponding financial liability on the balance sheet. The asset is amortised over the length of the lease, and the financial liability is measured at amortised cost. Lessor accounting remains substantially the same as under IAS 17. The Group is currently assessing the impact of IFRS 16. Existing operating lease commitments are set out in Note 13.
·
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
(effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021, as issued by the IASB). IFRS 17 has been issued in May 2017 and supersedes IFRS 4. On 14 November 2018, the IASB tentatively decided to defer the effective date of IFRS 17 by one year to reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022. IFRS 17 establishes principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of insurance contracts within the scope of the Standard and its objective is to ensure that an entity provides relevant information that faithfully represents those contracts. The new standard solves the comparison problems created by IFRS 4 by requiring all insurance contracts to be accounted for in a consistent manner. Insurance obligations will be accounted for using current values instead of historical cost. The standard has not yet been endorsed by the EU. As of 30 September 2018, the Group’s insurance subsidiary, Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance SA is classified as a discontinued operation, therefore, IFRS 17 is not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
Amendments to standards and interpretations effective after 2018
The Group has not early adopted the following amendments and interpretations, however they are not expected to have a material impact on the Group’s consolidated and separate financial statements.
·
IFRIC 23 Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments
(effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, as issued by the IASB). The interpretation explains how to recognise and measure deferred and current income tax assets and liabilities where there is uncertainty over a tax treatment. IFRIC 23 applies to all aspects of income tax accounting where there is such uncertainty, including taxable profit or loss, the tax bases of assets and liabilities, tax losses and credits and tax rates. The interpretation has not yet been endorsed by the EU.
·
IAS 19 (Amendment) Plan Amendment, Curtailment or Settlement
(effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, as issued by the IASB). The amendments specify how companies determine pension expenses when changes to a defined benefit pension plan occur. The amendments have not yet been endorsed by the EU.
·
Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2015–2017 Cycle
(effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, as issued by the IASB).The amendments, which have not yet been endorsed by the EU, impact the following standards:
IFRS 3
- amended to clarify that a company remeasures its previously held interest in a joint operation when it obtains control of the business.
IFRS 11
- amended to clarify that a company does not remeasure its previously held interest in a joint operation when it obtains joint control of the business
IAS 12
- clarified to state that a company accounts for all income tax consequences of dividend payments in the same way
IAS 23
- clarified to provide that a company treats as part of general borrowings any borrowing originally made to develop an asset when the asset is ready for its intended use or sale.
13
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
·
IFRS 9 (Amendment) Prepayment Features with Negative Compensation
(effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019). The amendments allow companies to measure particular prepayable financial assets with so-called negative compensation at amortised cost or at fair value through other comprehensive income if a specified condition is met—instead of at fair value through profit or loss.
·
IAS 28 (Amendment) Long-Term Interests in Associates and Joint Ventures
(effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, as issued by the IASB). The amendments clarify that companies account for long-term interests in an associate or joint venture—to which the equity method is not applied—using IFRS 9. The amendments have not yet been endorsed by the EU.
Conceptual Framework
In March 2018, the IASB issued a revised version of its Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (the “Framework”), which becomes effective in annual periods beginning on 1 January 2020. The Framework sets out the fundamental concepts of financial reporting that guide the IASB in developing IFRS Standards. The Framework underpins existing IFRS Standards but does not override them. Preparers of financial statements use the Framework as a point of reference to develop accounting policies in rare instances where a particular business transaction is not covered by existing IFRS Standards. The IASB and the IFRS Interpretations Committee will begin to use the new Framework immediately in developing new, or amending existing, financial reporting standards and interpretations. The Group is currently assessing the effect of the amended Framework on its accounting policies.
2.4
Update to significant accounting policies disclosed in the annual Financial Statements of the Group related to IFRS 9
The adoption of IFRS 9
Financial Instruments
resulted in changes to the Group’s accounting policies related to financial instruments applicable from 1 January 2018. The accounting policies set out below replace items 7, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 15 in Note 2 to the annual financial statements of the Group and the Bank for the year ended 31 December 2017. As permitted by the transition provisions of IFRS 9, the Group elected not to restate comparative period information, and the accounting policies as set out in Note 2 of the Group’s consolidated and separate financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 apply to comparative periods.
2.4.1
Classification of financial assets
The Group uses the following measurement categories for financial assets:
·
Debt instruments at amortised cost.
·
Debt instruments at fair value through other comprehensive income (“FVTOCI”) with cumulative gains and losses reclassified to profit and loss on derecognition.
·
Equity instruments designated as measured at FVTOCI with gains and losses remaining in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) without recycling to profit or loss on derecognition.
·
Debt instruments, derivatives, equity instruments and mutual funds at fair value through the profit and loss (“FVTPL”).
Except for debt instruments that are designated at initial recognition as at FVTPL, such assets are classified at amortised cost
or FVTOCI on the basis of:
a)
the Group’s business model for managing the financial asset and
b)
the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset.
IFRS 9 precludes the separation of any embedded derivatives from a hybrid contract when the host contract is a financial asset within its scope. Instead, the entire hybrid financial asset is classified into one of the categories listed above.
2.4.1.1 Business model assessment
The business models reflect how the Group manages its debt financial assets in order to generate cash flows. This assessment is performed on the basis of scenarios that the Group reasonably expects to occur. The assessment is based on all relevant and objective information that is available at the time of the business model assessment. The Group has identified the following business models for debt financial assets:
·
Held to collect contractual cash flows:
The Group’s objective is to hold the financial assets and collect the contractual cash flows. All the assets in this business model give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest (“SPPI”) on the principal amount outstanding. Debt instruments classified in this business model are measured at amortised cost. Loans within this category may be sold to manage the concentration of the Group’s credit risk to a particular obligor, country or industrial sector, without an increase in the asset’s credit risk. Such sales are consistent with the business model’s objective if they are infrequent (even if significant in value) or insignificant in value both individually and in the aggregate (even if frequent).
·
Held to collect contractual cash flows and sell:
The objective of this business model is to meet everyday liquidity needs and such objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling debt instruments. Assets within this business model are not sold with the intention of short-term profit taking, however frequent sales may occur and such sales may be significant in value. All the assets in this business model give rise to cash flows that are SPPI. The debt instruments in this business model are accounted for at FVTOCI.
14
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
·
Held for trading:
Under this business model, the Group actively manages the instruments in order to realise fair value gains arising from changes in credit spreads and yield curves. The assets in this business model are accounted for at FVTPL.
·
Held and managed on a fair value basis:
Refers to assets that are managed by the Group on a fair value basis without the intent to sell them in the near future. The assets in this business model are accounted for at FVTPL.
2.4.1.2 Contractual cash flow characteristics
The Group assesses the characteristics of its financial assets’ contractual cash flows at initial recognition in order to determine whether they are SPPI. This is referred to as the “SPPI test”. Interest amount within a basic lending arrangement, is typically the consideration for the time value of money and the credit risk. Interest may also include consideration for other basic lending risks such as liquidity and costs (e.g. administration associated with holding the financial asset for a particular period of time), as well as a profit margin. Interest may also be negative if the Group decides to effectively pay a fee for the safekeeping of its money for a particular period of time. The Group considers that an originated or a purchased financial asset can be a basic lending arrangement irrespective of whether it is a loan in its legal form and irrespective if it was purchased at a deep discount.
2.4.1.3 Non-recourse loans
When a financial instrument’s contractual cash flows are specifically derived from specified assets of the borrower, the Group assesses whether the cash flows arising from the debt instrument are SPPI. In order to conclude whether the loan represents a basic lending agreement and its return does not vary based on the performance of the underlying asset or project, the Group assesses whether there is an adequate buffer to absorb credit losses.
2.4.1.4 Equity instruments designated at FVTOCI
The Group may acquire an investment in an equity instrument that is not held for trading nor contingent consideration recognised by an acquirer in a business combination to which IFRS 3 applies. At initial recognition, the Group may make an irrevocable election to present in OCI subsequent changes to the fair value of the investment, except for equity securities that give an investor significant influence over an investee, which are accounted for in accordance with IAS 28
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
.
The election to designate an investment in an equity instrument at FVTOCI is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Investments in mutual funds cannot be designated at FVTOCI, as they do not meet the definition of an equity instrument under IAS 32, hence are mandatorily measured at FVTPL.
2.4.2
Measurement of financial assets
2.4.2.1 Financial assets measured at amortised cost
A debt financial asset is measured at amortised cost if it is held in a business model that has an objective to hold financial assets to collect contractual cash flows and the contractual terms of the financial asset result in cash flows that pass the SPPI test.
The financial assets classified within this category, mainly include the following asset classes:
·
Cash and balances with central banks
·
Sight and time deposits with banks
·
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
·
Deposits in margin accounts
·
Other receivables due from banks
·
Loans and advances to customers
·
Debt securities
·
Other receivables included in line item “other assets”
Subsequent to initial recognition, the debt financial asset is measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (“EIR”) method for the allocation and recognition of interest revenue in line item “interest and similar income” of the income statement over the relevant period. The amortised cost is the amount at which the financial asset is measured at initial recognition minus any principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using the EIR method of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount, adjusted for any loss allowance. The gross carrying amount is the amortised cost of a financial asset before adjusting for any loss allowance. Interest income on debt financial assets is calculated on the gross carrying amount if the asset is classified in stage 1 or 2. When a debt financial asset becomes credit-impaired (classified in stage 3), interest income is calculated on the amortised cost (i.e. the gross carrying amount adjusted for the impairment allowance).
The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash receipts through the expected life of the financial asset to the asset’s gross carrying amount. When calculating the EIR, the Group estimates the expected cash flows by considering all the contractual terms of the financial instrument (e.g. prepayment, extension, call and similar options). The calculation includes all fees and points paid or received between parties to the contract that are an integral part of the EIR, transaction costs, and all other premiums or discounts. Fees that are an integral part of the EIR of a financial instrument are treated as an adjustment to the EIR.
15
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
Except for purchased or originated financial assets that are credit-impaired (“POCI”) on initial recognition, expected credit losses (“ECL”) are not considered in the calculation of the EIR. For a POCI financial asset, the credit-adjusted EIR is applied when calculating the interest revenue and it is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash flows through the expected life of the financial asset to the asset’s amortised cost. The Group includes the initial ECL in the estimated cash flows when calculating the credit-adjusted EIR for such assets.
2.4.2.2 Debt instruments measured at FVTOCI
A debt financial asset is measured at FVTOCI if it is held in a business model that has an objective to hold financial assets to collect contractual cash flows and sell the assets and the contractual terms of the financial asset result in cash flows that pass the SPPI test.
After initial recognition, investments in debt financial assets are measured at fair value in the statement of financial position (with no deduction for sale or disposal costs) with unrealised gains and losses reported in OCI, net of applicable income taxes, until such investments are derecognised (i.e. when sold or collected). Upon derecognition, the cumulative gains or losses previously recognised in OCI are reclassified from equity to “net trading income/(loss) and results from investment securities” of the income statement, as a reclassification adjustment.
For debt financial assets measured at amortised cost or FVTOCI, the following items are recognised in the income statement:
·
ECL allowance recognised in “credit provisions and other impairment charges”.
·
Foreign exchange gains and losses, calculated based on the amortised cost of the instrument, are recognised in “net trading income/(loss) and results from investment securities”.
·
Interest revenue calculated with the EIR method is recognised in “interest and similar income”.
·
Modification gains or losses, recognised in “credit provisions and other impairment charges”.
2.4.2.3 Equity instruments designated at FVTOCI
After initial recognition, investments in equity instruments designated at FVTOCI are measured at fair value, with no deduction for sale or disposal costs. With the exception of dividends received, the associated gains and losses (including any related foreign exchange component) is recognised in OCI. Amounts presented in OCI are not subsequently recycled to the income statement, instead the cumulative gain or loss is transferred within equity from accumulated OCI to retained earnings.
Dividends are recognised in “net other income/(expense)” line item of the income statement when all of the following criteria are met:
·
the Group’s right to receive payment of the dividend is established
·
it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the dividend will flow to the Group
·
the amount of the dividend can be measured reliably
·
the dividend clearly does not represent a recovery of part of the cost of the investment.
2.4.2.4 Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at FVTPL
After initial recognition, financial assets and financial liabilities that are classified as at FVTPL are measured at fair value, with no deduction for sale or disposal costs. Gains and losses arising from fair value remeasurement are recognised in their entirety in “net trading income/(loss) and results from investment securities”. All changes to the fair value of a FVTPL liability due to market risk are recorded in profit and loss while changes due to the Group’s own credit risk are recorded in OCI. The amount presented in OCI is not subsequently transferred to profit or loss even when the liability is derecognised and the amounts are realised. The cumulative gain or loss is transferred within equity from accumulated OCI to retained earnings.
2.4.3
Financial assets with legal form of debt
Unrealised gains and losses from changes in the fair value of assets measured at FVTPL are included in “net trading income and results from investment securities”. Interest revenue is calculated with the EIR method on financial assets with legal form of debt measured at FVTPL and recognised in “interest and similar income”. Financial assets which are loan contracts in their legal form and their contractual cash flows are not SPPI, are mandatorily measured at FVTPL, and classified within “loans and advances to customers”. Debt securities that fail the SPPI test are mandatorily measured at FVTPL and classified within “financial assets at FVTPL”.
2.4.4
Financial assets with legal form of derivative
All realised and unrealised gains or losses from changes in fair value of financial assets mandatorily measured at FVTPL, with a legal form of a derivative, are recognised in “net trading income/(loss) and results from investment securities”. Financial assets which are derivatives in their legal form but do not meet the accounting definition of a derivative, are mandatorily measured at FVTPL and classified within “financial assets at FVTPL”.
16
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
2.4.5
Reclassification of financial assets
The Group reclassifies all affected financial assets only when the Group changes its business model for managing financial assets. The reclassification is applied prospectively from the reclassification date, which is the first day of the first quarterly reporting period following the change in the business model.
Changes in the Group’s business models are usually the result of external or internal changes, affecting significantly the Group’s operations.
Investments in equity instruments that are designated as at FVTOCI, or any financial assets or liabilities that are designated at FVTPL, cannot be reclassified because the election to designate them as at FVTOCI or FVTPL respectively, at initial recognition, is irrevocable.
2.4.6
Expected credit losses
ECL are recognised for all financial assets measured at amortised cost, debt financial assets measured at FVTOCI, lease receivables, financial guarantees and certain loan commitments. ECL represent the difference between contractual cash flows and those that the Group expects to receive, discounted at the EIR. For loan commitments and other credit facilities in scope of ECL, the expected cash shortfalls are determined by considering expected future draw downs.
2.4.6.1 Recognition of expected credit losses
At initial recognition, an impairment allowance is required for ECL resulting from default events that are possible within the next 12 months (12-month ECL), weighted by the risk of a default occurring. Instruments in this category are referred to as instruments in Stage 1. For instruments with a remaining maturity of less than 12 months, ECL are determined for this shorter period.
In the event of a significant increase in credit risk (“SICR”), an ECL allowance is required, reflecting lifetime cash shortfalls that would result from all possible default events over the expected life of the financial instrument (“lifetime ECL”), weighted by the risk of a default occurring. Instruments in this category are referred to as instruments in Stage 2.
Lifetime ECL are always recognised on financial assets for which there is objective evidence of impairment, that is they are considered to be in default or otherwise credit-impaired. Such instruments are referred to as instruments in Stage 3.
POCIs are classified as credit impaired. An instrument is POCI if it has been purchased with a material discount to its par value that reflects the incurred credit losses or is originated with a defaulted counterparty.
For POCI financial assets, the Group recognises adverse changes in lifetime ECL since initial recognition as a loss allowance with any changes recognised in the income statement. POCI are initially recognised at fair value with interest income subsequently being recognised based on a credit-adjusted EIR. POCI may also include financial instruments that are newly recognised following a substantial modification and remain a separate category until maturity. Any favourable changes for POCI assets are impairment gain even if the resulting expected cash flows exceed the estimated cash flows on initial recognition.
The Group does not apply the practical expedient that allows a lifetime ECL for lease receivables to be recognised irrespective of whether a SICR has occurred. Instead, all such receivables are incorporated into the standard ECL calculation.
ECL are recognised in the income statement with a corresponding ECL allowance reported as a decrease in the carrying value of financial assets measured at amortised cost on the statement of financial position. For financial assets measured at FVTOCI, the carrying value is not reduced, but the ECL allowance is recognised in OCI. For off-balance sheet financial instruments, the ECL allowance is reported as a provision in “other liabilities”. ECL are recognised within the income statement in “credit provisions and other impairment charges”.
2.4.6.2 Write-off
A write-off is made when the Group does not have a reasonable expectation to recover all or part of a financial asset. Write-offs reduce the principal amount of a claim and are charged against previously established allowances for credit losses. Recoveries, in part or in full, of amounts previously written off are generally credited to “credit provisions and other impairment charges”. Write-offs and partial write-offs represent derecognition or partial derecognition events.
2.4.6.3 Definition of default
The Group has aligned the definition of default for financial reporting purposes, with the non performing exposures (NPE) definition used for regulatory purposes, as per EBA Implementing Technical Standards on Supervisory reporting on forbearance and non-performing exposures, as adopted by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/227 of 9 January 2015 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (“EBA ITS”). The definition of default for financial reporting purposes is consistent with the one used for internal credit risk management purposes.
A debt security is considered as credit impaired, and is classified into Stage 3, when at least one payment of capital or interest is overdue by the issuer, based on the contractual terms of the instrument, irrespective of the days past due. In addition, a debt security is assessed as credit impaired if there is at least one external credit rating on the security or the issuer corresponding to Default or Selective Default.
2.4.6.4 Measurement of expected credit losses
The Group assesses on a forward-looking basis the ECL associated with all financial assets subject to impairment under IFRS 9. The Group recognises an ECL allowance for such losses at each reporting date. The measurement of ECL reflects:
17
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
·
An unbiased and probability-weighted amount that is determined by evaluating a range of possible outcomes. The Group uses three macroeconomic scenarios and estimates the ECL that would arise under each scenario. A weighting is allocated to each scenario, such that the weighted probabilities of all three scenarios are equal to one. The distribution of possible ECL may be non-linear, hence three distinct calculations are performed, where the associated ECLs are multiplied by the weighting allocated to the respective scenario. The sum of the three weighted ECL calculations represents the probability-weighted ECL.
·
The time value of money.
·
Reasonable and supportable information that is available without undue cost or effort at the reporting date about past events, current conditions and forecasts of future economic conditions.
For the purposes of measuring ECL, the estimate of expected cash shortfalls reflects the cash proceeds expected from collateral liquidation (if any) and other credit enhancements that are part of the contractual terms and are not recognised separately by the Group. The estimate of expected cash shortfalls on a collateralized loan exposure reflects the assumptions used regarding the amount and timing of cash flows that are expected from foreclosure on the collateral less the costs of obtaining and selling the collateral, irrespective of whether the foreclosure is probable.
The ECL calculations are based on the following factors:
·
Exposure at Default (“EAD”):
This is an estimate of the exposure at a future default date, taking into account expected changes in the exposure after the reporting date, including repayments of principal and interest, and expected drawdowns on committed facilities.
·
Credit Conversion Factor (“CCF”):
The CCF converts the amount of a credit line and other off-balance sheet amounts to an EAD amount.
·
Probability of Default (“PD”):
Represents the likelihood of a borrower/issuer defaulting on its financial obligation, assessed on the prevailing economic conditions at the reporting date, adjusted to take into account estimates of future economic conditions that are likely to impact the risk of default either over the next 12 months for Stage 1 financial assets, or over the remaining lifetime, for Stage 2 and 3 financial assets.
·
Loss given default (“LGD”):
Represents the Group’s expectation of the extent of loss on a defaulted exposure. The LGD varies by type of counterparty, type and seniority of claim and availability of collateral or other credit support. The determination of LGD takes into account expected future cash flows from collateral and other credit enhancements, or expected payouts from bankruptcy proceedings for unsecured claims and, where applicable, time to realization of collateral and the seniority of claims. LGD is expressed as a percentage loss per unit of EAD.
·
Discount Rate:
The implied discount factor based on the original EIR of the financial asset or an approximation thereof.
The PD and LGD are determined for three different scenarios whereas EAD projections are treated as scenario independent.
The ECL is determined by projecting the PD, LGD and EAD for each time step between future cash flow dates and for each individual exposure or collective segment. These three components are multiplied together and adjusted for the likelihood of survival, if appropriate. This effectively calculates an ECL for each future period, which is then discounted back to the reporting date and summed.
2.4.6.5 Forward looking economic inputs
Forward looking information (FLI) is incorporated in the ECL measurement of collectively assessed loans and debt securities through the PD and LGD models. The expected recoveries (cash flow recoveries or liquidation of collateral) used in the ECL calculation of corporate lending exposures individually assessed, takes into account FLI based on the Bank’s forecasts of the relevant macroeconomic factors.
The Group applies three scenarios, i.e. baseline, optimistic, pessimistic, developed by the Bank’s Economic Research and Analysis Division. The macroeconomic scenarios used for measuring ECL are the same with the ones used for evaluating SICR.
The main macroeconomic variables utilized by the Group, affecting the level of ECL are the following:
·
GDP growth rate
·
Real estate prices
·
Unemployment rate
2.4.6.6 Significant increase of credit risk
A financial asset is considered as non-credit impaired, when the definition for Stage 3 classification is not met. The exposure is classified as Stage 2 if it has suffered a SICR, otherwise it is classified as Stage 1.
At each reporting date, the Group performs the SICR assessment comparing the risk of a default occurring over the remaining expected lifetime of the exposure with the expected risk of a default as estimated at origination.
The Group’s process to assess SICR has three main components:
·
a quantitative element, i.e. reflecting a quantitative comparison of PD or credit rating at the reporting date versus the respective metric at initial recognition (see below);
·
a qualitative element, i.e. all Forborne Performing Exposures (FPE), in accordance with EBA ITS, internal watch list for corporate obligors; and
18
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
·
“backstop” indicators. The Group applies on all lending exposures the IFRS 9 presumption that a SICR has occurred when the financial asset is more than 30 days past due.
The first two criteria are analysed below per type of exposure:
a. Corporate lending exposures
The Group assesses SICR based on changes in the obligor’s internal credit rating since origination.
b. Retail lending exposures
Stage allocation is performed by the comparison of scenario weighted lifetime PDs from the risk assessment performed at origination versus the lifetime PDs at each reporting date, for the financial asset’s residual term. Lifetime PD at origination decreases over time, as the loan gets closer to its maturity.
c. Debt securities and other financial assets
All debt securities and financial assets due from sovereigns and financial institutions are assessed on an individual basis in order to determine if a SICR has occurred since initial recognition, based on external credit ratings. If an external credit rating is available for a debt security, then SICR is assessed based on this rating, rather than the issuer’s rating, in order to incorporate in the analysis any instrument-specific credit characteristics. All other financial assets due from sovereigns and financial institutions, such as money market placements, reverse repurchase agreements and unrated debt securities, are assessed for SICR based on the counterparty’s or issuer’s external credit rating. Any of the aforementioned financial assets rated as ‘investment grade’ at the reporting date, are assumed as having low credit risk and are classified within Stage 1 without any further SICR analysis. The Group applies the low credit risk exception solely on debt securities and financial assets due from sovereigns and financial institutions.
d. Transfer of financial assets from Stage 2 to Stage 1
Lending exposures, debt securities and financial assets due from sovereigns and financial institutions move back to Stage 1 when the SICR criteria are no longer met.
2.5
Critical judgments and estimates
In preparing these interim financial statements, the significant estimates, judgments and assumptions made by Management in applying the Group’s accounting policies and the key sources of estimation uncertainty were similar to those applied to the annual consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2017. The adoption of IFRS 9 on 1 January 2018 required application of significant judgment and resulted to additional critical accounting estimates, which are set out below.
2.5.1
Assessing whether the contractual cash flows are SPPI
Non-recourse features
The Group applies judgment when considering whether non-recourse features significantly affect future cash flows. In order to conclude whether the loan represents a basic lending agreement and its return does not vary based on the performance of the underlying asset or project, the Group assesses whether there is an adequate buffer to absorb credit losses primarily by comparing the value of asset performance indicators, (e.g. loan-to-value and average debt servicing coverage ratio) against predefined thresholds.
2.5.2
Measurement uncertainty in determination of ECL estimates
The calculation of ECL requires management to apply significant judgment and make estimates and assumptions that involve significant uncertainty at the time they are determined. Changes to these estimates and assumptions can result in significant changes to the amount and timing of ECL to be recognised. The most significant sources of measurement uncertainty relate to the following ECL factors:
2.5.2.1 Determination of a significant increase of credit risk
The Group assesses whether a SICR has occurred since initial recognition based on qualitative and quantitative criteria that include significant management judgment. Refer to Note 2.4.6.6 for further information on the criteria applied. More stringent criteria could significantly increase the number of instruments being classified into Stage 2. All staging criteria and thresholds determined based on FLI are subject to validation by the Bank’s Model Validation Unit. Changes in the staging criteria are approved by the Group’s Executive Committee and Board Risk Committee.
2.5.2.2 Model risk inherent in the IFRS 9 models
Compliance with the IFRS 9 impairment model requires the use of a variety of models. The complexity of the models as well as dependency to other model-based inputs is high therefore any changes in inputs and data (e.g. internal credit ratings, behavioural scores etc.), as well as new or revised models, may significantly affect ECL. The models are validated by the Bank’s Model Validation Unit, in accordance with the Group’s Model Validation Framework.
19
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
2.5.2.3 Forward looking information
FLI is incorporated in the ECL measurement of collectively assessed loans and debt securities through the PD and LGD models. The expected recoveries (cash flow recoveries or liquidation of collateral) used in the ECL calculation of corporate lending exposures individually assessed, takes into account FLI based on the Bank’s forecasts of the relevant macroeconomic factors. Management selects forward-looking scenarios and judges the suitability of respective weights to be applied. Each of the scenarios is based on Management’s assumptions around future economic conditions in the form of macroeconomic, market and other factors. Changes in the scenarios and weights, the relevant macroeconomic variables and the assumptions made under those variables for the forecast horizon would have a significant effect on the ECL.
NOTE 3:
Segment reporting
NBG Group manages its business through the following business segments:
Retail banking
Retail banking includes all individual customers, professionals, small-medium and small-sized companies (companies with annual turnover of up to €2.5 million) except for exposures transferred to the Special Assets Unit (“SAU”). The Bank, through its extended network of branches, offers to its retail customers various types of loans, deposit and investment products, as well as a wide range of other traditional services and products.
Corporate & investment banking
Corporate & investment banking includes lending to all large and medium-sized companies and shipping finance except for exposures transferred to the SAU and investment banking activities. The Group offers its corporate customers a wide range of products and services, including financial and investment advisory services, deposit accounts, loans (denominated in both euro and foreign currency), foreign exchange and trade service activities.
Special Assets Unit (“SAU”)
In order to (a) manage more effectively delinquent, non-performing and denounced loans to legal entities, and (b) ensure compliance with the provisions of the Bank of Greece Executive Committee Act 42/30.5.2014 and Act 47/9.2.2015 and the Code of Conduct (referred to in Article 1 para 2 of Law 4224/2013), the Bank established the SAU, which has the overall responsibility for the management of such loans to legal entities (end-to-end responsibility).
Global markets and asset management
Global markets and asset management includes all treasury activities, private banking, asset management (mutual funds and closed end funds), custody services, private equity and brokerage.
Insurance
The Group offers a wide range of insurance products through its subsidiary Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance S.A. (“NIC”) and other subsidiaries in SEE. As of 30 June 2017, NIC was classified as Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations.
International banking operations
The Group’s international banking activities include a wide range of traditional commercial banking services, such as commercial and retail credit, trade financing, foreign exchange and taking of deposits. In addition, the Group offers shipping finance, investment banking and brokerage services through certain of its foreign branches and subsidiaries. As of 30 September 2018, the South African Bank of Athens Ltd (“S.A.B.A.”)
and Banka Romaneasca S.A. (“Romaneasca”), were classified as Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. As of 30 September 2017, S.A.B.A., Romaneasca, Vojvodjanska Banka a.d. Novi Sad (“Vojvodjanska”) and NBG Leasing d.o.o. Belgrade (“NBG Leasing doo”) and NBG Albania were classified as Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. As of 31 December 2017, S.A.B.A., Romaneasca and NBG Albania only, were classified as Held for Sale due to the disposal of Vojvodjanska and NBG Leasing doo on 1 December 2017.
Other
Includes proprietary real estate management, hotel and warehousing business as well as unallocated income and expense of the Group (interest expense of subordinated debt, loans to personnel etc.) and intersegment eliminations.
20
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
|
9 month period ended
30.09.2018
|
|
Retail
Banking
|
|
Corporate &
Investment
Banking
|
|
SAU
|
|
Global
markets &
Asset
Management
|
|
Insurance
|
|
International
Banking
Operations
|
|
Other
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
295
|
|
303
|
|
88
|
|
23
|
|
—
|
|
62
|
|
67
|
|
838
|
|
|
Net fee and commission income
|
|
87
|
|
59
|
|
3
|
|
14
|
|
—
|
|
17
|
|
1
|
|
181
|
|
|
Other
|
|
4
|
|
(21
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
43
|
|
—
|
|
4
|
|
(1
|
)
|
17
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
386
|
|
341
|
|
79
|
|
80
|
|
—
|
|
83
|
|
67
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
(325
|
)
|
(29
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
(25
|
)
|
—
|
|
(55
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
(457
|
)
|
|
Allocated costs and provisions(1)
|
|
(270
|
)
|
10
|
|
(113
|
)
|
14
|
|
—
|
|
(6
|
)
|
(179
|
)
|
(544
|
)
|
|
Profit / (loss) before tax
|
|
(209
|
)
|
322
|
|
(45
|
)
|
69
|
|
—
|
|
22
|
|
(124
|
)
|
35
|
|
|
Tax benefit / (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
Profit / (loss) for the period from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
Profit/(loss) for the period from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Loss attributable to NBG equity shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
(1) Includes depreciation and amortisation on investment property, property & equipment, software & other intangible assets.
Breakdown by business segment
|
9 month period ended
30.09.2017
|
|
Retail
Banking
|
|
Corporate &
Investment
Banking
|
|
SAU
|
|
Global
markets &
Asset
Management
|
|
Insurance
|
|
International
Banking
Operations
|
|
Other
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
389
|
|
389
|
|
92
|
|
128
|
|
—
|
|
70
|
|
118
|
|
1,186
|
|
|
Net fee and commission income
|
|
68
|
|
66
|
|
4
|
|
20
|
|
—
|
|
17
|
|
(1
|
)
|
174
|
|
|
Other
|
|
14
|
|
(31
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
(120
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(7
|
)
|
(154
|
)
|
|
Total income
|
|
471
|
|
424
|
|
86
|
|
28
|
|
—
|
|
87
|
|
110
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
Direct costs
|
|
(327
|
)
|
(29
|
)
|
(9
|
)
|
(26
|
)
|
—
|
|
(55
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
(450
|
)
|
|
Allocated costs and provisions(1)
|
|
(395
|
)
|
(60
|
)
|
(162
|
)
|
(9
|
)
|
—
|
|
(8
|
)
|
(203
|
)
|
(837
|
)
|
|
Share of profit of equity method investments
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
Profit / (loss) before tax
|
|
(251
|
)
|
335
|
|
(85
|
)
|
(7
|
)
|
—
|
|
24
|
|
(96
|
)
|
(80
|
)
|
|
Tax benefit / (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
Profit / (loss) for the period from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
Non controlling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
Profit / (loss) for the period from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
Profit attributable to NBG equity shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
(1) Includes depreciation and amortisation on investment property, property & equipment, software & other intangible assets.
21
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
|
|
|
Retail
Banking
|
|
Corporate &
Investment
Banking
|
|
SAU
|
|
Global
markets &
Asset
Management
|
|
Insurance
|
|
International
Banking
Operations
|
|
Other
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Segment assets as at 30 September 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
15,768
|
|
10,787
|
|
1,769
|
|
5,579
|
|
|
|
3,001
|
|
16,175
|
|
53,079
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and Current income tax advance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,302
|
|
|
Non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
1,547
|
|
|
|
4,772
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment liabilities as at 30 September 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment liabilities
|
|
33,650
|
|
2,540
|
|
182
|
|
8,610
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
6,220
|
|
54,032
|
|
|
Current income and deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets as at 31 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
17,468
|
|
10,813
|
|
2,158
|
|
8,697
|
|
|
|
3,023
|
|
12,262
|
|
54,421
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and current income tax advance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,337
|
|
|
Non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment liabilities as at 31 December 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment liabilities
|
|
32,794
|
|
2,966
|
|
156
|
|
8,217
|
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
6,914
|
|
53,850
|
|
|
Current income and deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,327
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,389
|
|
NOTE 4:
Credit provisions and other impairment charges
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Continuing Operations
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
30.09.2017
|
|
|
a. Impairment charge for credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers
|
|
239
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in debt instruments
|
|
(24
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
589
|
|
|
b. Other provisions and impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of investment property, property and equipment, software & other intangible assets and other assets
|
|
(4
|
)
|
5
|
|
|
Legal and other provisions
|
|
37
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
248
|
|
593
|
|
Restructuring costs of €40 million relate to the estimated cost of the Voluntary Exit Schemes initiated in 2018.
NOTE 5:
Tax benefit /(expense)
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Continuing Operations
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
30.09.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax
|
|
(24
|
)
|
(22
|
)
|
|
Deferred tax
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Tax benefit / (expense)
|
|
(27
|
)
|
(23
|
)
|
22
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
T
he nominal corporation tax rate for the Bank for 2018 and 2017 is 29%. Following the tax law 4387/2016, the withholding tax on dividends distributed from 1 January 2017 onwards is increased from 10% to 15%.
The unaudited tax years of the Group’s equity method investments and subsidiaries are presented in Note 20.
NOTE 6:
Earnings / (losses) per share
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
30.09.2017
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) for the period attributable to NBG equity shareholders from continuing operations
|
|
(19
|
)
|
(129
|
)
|
|
Earnings/(losses) for the period attributable to NBG ordinary shareholders from continuing operations
|
|
(19
|
)
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(losses) for the period from discontinued operations
|
|
55
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
Earnings/(losses) for the period attributable to NBG ordinary shareholders from continuing and discontinued operations
|
|
36
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted EPS
|
|
914,551,736
|
|
914,545,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings/(losses) per share - Basic and diluted from continuing operations
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
Earnings/(losses) per share - Basic and diluted from continuing and discontinued operations
|
|
0.04
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
On 26 July 2018, the Annual General Meeting approved (i) the increase of the share capital by EUR 0.90, due to capitalization of an equal part of the Bank’s special reserve of Article 4.4a of Codified Law 2190/1920, and (ii) the increase of the nominal value of each ordinary share of the Bank from 0.30 Euro to 3.00 Euro and the reduction of the number of the Bank’s existing shares from 9,147,151,527 to 914,715,153 new ordinary shares by means of a reverse split at a rate of ten (10) old ordinary shares of the Bank to one (1) new ordinary share of the Bank. Following this decision, the weighted average number of shares has been adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the reverse split on the earnings / (losses) per share calculation.
NOTE 7:
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at FVTPL as of 30 September 2018 include the amount of €3,391 million for the Swap with the Hellenic Republic and €47 million of debt instruments, both classified mandatorily at FVTPL as they fail the SPPI test (see Notes 8 and 22).
NOTE 8:
Loans and advances to customers
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
Mortgages
|
|
16,097
|
|
16,491
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
3,189
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
Credit cards
|
|
661
|
|
829
|
|
|
Small business lending
|
|
3,117
|
|
3,572
|
|
|
Retail lending
|
|
23,064
|
|
24,578
|
|
|
Corporate and public sector lending
|
|
17,027
|
|
23,602
|
|
|
Total before allowance for impairment on loans and advances to customers
|
|
40,091
|
|
48,180
|
|
|
Less: Allowance for impairment on loans and advances to customers
|
|
(9,950
|
)
|
(10,239
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
30,141
|
|
37,941
|
|
As at 31 December 2017, corporate and public sector lending for the Group included a loan to the Hellenic Republic of €5,873 million. The whole agreement with the Hellenic Republic relating to this loan also included an embedded derivative with fair value €1,871 million that had been bifurcated under IAS 39 and accounted for as a separate derivative liability.
Upon adoption of IFRS 9 on 1 January 2018, the whole agreement did not pass the SPPI test and was mandatorily classified at FVTPL within “financial assets at FVTPL” (see Note 22).
On 2 July 2018 the Bank completed the transaction for the disposal of a portfolio of non-performing unsecured retail and small business loans in Greece, of an outstanding principal amount of c. €2.0 billion. The gross carrying amount and ECL allowance of these loans as at 31 December 2017 are analyzed per portfolio in the table below:
23
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
Disposal of non-performing loans-Group
|
As at 31 December 2017
|
|
Gross carrying
amount
|
|
ECL allowance
|
|
Net carrying
amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
459
|
|
426
|
|
33
|
|
|
Credit Cards
|
|
122
|
|
113
|
|
9
|
|
|
Small business lending
|
|
332
|
|
316
|
|
16
|
|
|
Total loans and advances to customers
|
|
913
|
|
855
|
|
58
|
|
Loans and advances to customers at amortised cost and mandatorily measured at FVTPL-Group
As at 30 September 2018
|
|
|
Stage 1
12-month ECL
|
|
Stage 2
Lifetime ECL
|
|
Credit
impaired
Lifetime ECL
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers at amortised cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
3,254
|
|
5,653
|
|
7,190
|
|
16,097
|
|
|
ECL allowance
|
|
(37
|
)
|
(291
|
)
|
(2,657
|
)
|
(2,985
|
)
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
3,217
|
|
5,362
|
|
4,533
|
|
13,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
1,299
|
|
485
|
|
1,405
|
|
3,189
|
|
|
ECL allowance
|
|
(17
|
)
|
(93
|
)
|
(1,178
|
)
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
1,282
|
|
392
|
|
227
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Cards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
489
|
|
13
|
|
159
|
|
661
|
|
|
ECL allowance
|
|
(4
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
(164
|
)
|
(169
|
)
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
485
|
|
12
|
|
(5
|
)
|
492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small business lending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
407
|
|
642
|
|
2,068
|
|
3,117
|
|
|
ECL allowance
|
|
(4
|
)
|
(75
|
)
|
(1,520
|
)
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
403
|
|
567
|
|
548
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate lending & public sector lending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
9,918
|
|
1,041
|
|
5,916
|
|
16,875
|
|
|
ECL allowance
|
|
(86
|
)
|
(71
|
)
|
(3,752
|
)
|
(3,909
|
)
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
9,832
|
|
970
|
|
2,164
|
|
12,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and advances to customers at amortised cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
15,367
|
|
7,834
|
|
16,738
|
|
39,939
|
|
|
ECL allowance
|
|
(148
|
)
|
(531
|
)
|
(9,271
|
)
|
(9,950
|
)
|
|
Net carrying amount of loans and advances to customers at amortised cost
|
|
15,219
|
|
7,303
|
|
7,467
|
|
29,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers mandatorily measured at FVTPL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans and advances to customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,141
|
|
Movement in ECL allowance-Group
|
|
|
Stage 1
12-month ECL
|
|
Stage 2
Lifetime ECL
|
|
Credit
impaired
Lifetime ECL
|
|
Total
allowance
|
|
|
Balance at 1 January 2018
|
|
131
|
|
528
|
|
10,476
|
|
11,135
|
|
|
Transfers between Stages (net)
|
|
11
|
|
173
|
|
(184
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
Write-offs and Sales
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1,381
|
)
|
(1,381
|
)
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20
|
|
20
|
|
|
Unwind of the discount
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(61
|
)
|
(61
|
)
|
|
Impairment charge for credit losses
|
|
6
|
|
(173
|
)
|
406
|
|
239
|
|
|
FX and other movements
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
(5
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Balance at 30 September 2018
|
|
148
|
|
531
|
|
9,271
|
|
9,950
|
|
24
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
NOTE 9:
Assets and liabilities held for sale and discontinued operations
Non-current assets held for sale at 30 September 2018 and 31 December 2017 comprise of S.A.B.A., Banca Romaneasca, and NIC. The profit or losses from discontinued operations for the period ended 30 September 2018, comprises of S.A.B.A., Banca Romaneasca, NIC and NBG Albania. The comparative profit or loss from discontinued operations includes S.A.B.A., UBB and Interlease (classified as discontinued operations in December 2016) Banca Romaneasca, NIC, Vojvodjanska and NBG Leasing doo (classified as discontinued operations in June 2017) and has been re-presented to also include NBG Albania (classified as discontinued operations in December 2017). Specifically:
United Bulgarian Bank A.D. and Interlease E.A.D. (“Bulgarian operations”)
On 30 December 2016, the Bank entered into a definitive agreement with KBC Group (“KBC”) for the divestment to KBC of its 99.91% stake in UBB and its 100% stake in Interlease, its subsidiaries in Bulgaria. The agreed consideration for the sale of the two subsidiaries amounted to €610 million. On 26 April 2017 UBB made a €50 million dividend distribution to NBG, following approval of its Annual General Assembly.
The above agreement included the sale of the 30.00% stake in UBB-Metlife Life Insurance Company AD and 20.00% stake in UBB Insurance Broker AD held by Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance S.A. The consideration amounted to €10.5 million.
The disposal was completed on 13 June 2017 on which date control of Bulgarian operations passed to KBC. Details of the assets and liabilities disposed of, and the calculation of the profit or loss on disposal of the above transactions, are disclosed in Note 42 of the Annual Financial Report of 31 December 2017.
Vojvodjanska Banka a.d. Novi Sad (“Vojvodjanska”) and NBG Leasing d.o.o. Belgrade (“Serbian operations”)
On 4 August 2017, the Bank entered into a definitive agreement with OTP Bank Serbia (“OTPS”) for the divestment to OTPS of its 100% stake in its subsidiaries in Serbia, Vojvodjanska and NBG Leasing d.o.o. Belgrade (along with the 100% held subsidiary NBG Services d.o.o. Belgrade). The agreed consideration for the sale amounted to €125 million.
The disposal was completed on 1 December 2017 on which date control of Serbian Operations passed to OTPS. Details of the assets and liabilities disposed of, and the calculation of the profit or loss on disposal of the above transactions, are disclosed in Note 42 of the Annual Financial Report of 31 December 2017.
Banka NBG Albania Sh.A.
On 2 February 2018, the Bank entered into a definitive agreement with American Bank of Investments S.A. (“ABI”) for the divestment to ABI of its entire stake (100%) in its subsidiary Banka NBG Albania Sh.A. (“NBG Albania”). The agreed consideration for the sale amounted to €25 million.
Following the decision to dispose of its entire stake in NBG Albania, the Bank, based on the agreed consideration, assessed for impairment the carrying amount of the Cash Generating Unit (“CGU”) and recognized an impairment loss of €30 million at Group level which is included in the profit or loss for the period from discontinued operations.
The disposal was completed on 3 July 2018, following receipt of the required regulatory approvals from i) the Bank of Albania and ii) the Competition Authority of Albania.
Grand Hotel Summer Palace S.A.
On 18 October 2018 the Bank announced the opening of the sale process of its total shareholding in its 100% subsidiary Grand Hotel Summer Palace S.A. (“Grand Hotel”) through an open auction with seal bids on 10 December 2018. The minimum bid for the acquisition of all shares of the company stands at €35 million. The company is presented in segment “Other”. As at 30 September 2018 the criteria for the classification of the company as Held for Sale were not met.
The South African Bank of Athens Ltd
On 22 December 2016, the Group entered into a definitive agreement with AFGRI Holdings Proprietary Limited (“AFGRI”), a company incorporated in the Republic of South Africa for the divestment to AFGRI of its 99.83% stake in its South African subsidiary S.A.B.A. The agreed consideration for the sale of the subsidiary amounts to €20 million (ZAR 301 million).
Following the decision to dispose of its entire stake in S.A.B.A., the Bank, based on the agreed consideration, assessed for impairment the carrying amount of the CGU and concluded to recognize an impairment loss of €1 million at Group level.
The disposal was completed on 4 October 2018, following receipt of the required regulatory approvals from: (i) the South African Reserve Bank (ii) the South African Ministry of Finance and (iii) the South African Competition Commission and Competition Tribunal.
Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance S.A. (“NIC”)
On 27 June 2017, the NBG’s Board of Directors approved the divestiture of a 75.00% stake in NIC to EXIN Financial Services Holdings B.V. (“EXIN”) and the establishment of an exclusive bancassurance agreement, which will govern the distribution of products of NIC via the NBG network.
25
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
However, on 28 March 2018, which was the last date (“Longstop Date”) for EXIN to fulfil certain condition precedents specified in the Share and Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) entered into between NBG and EXIN, the Bank took note that such condition precedents were not fulfilled and henceforth decided to terminate the SPA on the 29
th
of March 2018.
Following a decision of the Bank’s Board of Directors and in consultation with the HFSF, the Bank renewed the sale process of NIC with the remaining selected bidders that participated in the last stage of the binding offers phase in May 2017 and received an updated binding offer. However, following the examination and assessment of the various aspects of the binding offer received, including certainty of the successful conclusion of the transaction, the Bank decided not to proceed with further negotiations with the prospective investor.
NBG remains committed to explore alternative options of compliance with its Commitments under the Restructuring Plan as agreed with the DG Competition.
NBG considers that the sale is highly probable, and, given that it is preparing to relaunch the sales process, it is expecting to conclude the sale within 12 months. For this reason NIC remains classified as held for sale and discontinued operations.
Banca Romaneasca S.A.
On 26 July 2017, the Bank entered into a definitive agreement with OTP Bank Romania (“OTPR”) for the divestment to OTPR of its 99.28% stake in its Romanian subsidiary Banca Romaneasca.
Following the decision to dispose of its entire stake in Banca Romaneasca, the Bank based on the agreed consideration, assessed for impairment the carrying amount of the CGU and concluded to recognize an impairment loss of €90 million at Group level.
On 19 March 2018, the Bank announced that the National Bank of Romania (“NBR”) rejected OTPR’s application to acquire 99.28% of Banca Romaneasca as NBR’s approval of OTPR, as the new shareholder of Banca Romaneasca, was a condition precedent for the closing of the transaction. The Share Purchase agreement between the Bank and OTPR was terminated on 13 April 2018.
Nevertheless, the Bank remains committed to sell Banca Romaneasca, considers that the sale is highly probable, and, given that it is preparing to relaunch the sales process, it is expecting to conclude the sale within 12 months. For this reason Banca Romaneasca remains classified as held for sale and discontinued operations.
Condensed income statement of discontinued operations (1)
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
9 month period ended
|
|
|
€ million
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
30.09.2017
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
80
|
|
171
|
|
|
Net fee and commission income
|
|
9
|
|
32
|
|
|
Earned premia net of claims and commissions
|
|
55
|
|
64
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
13
|
|
20
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
157
|
|
287
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
(91
|
)
|
(180
|
)
|
|
Provisions and impairments
|
|
(14
|
)
|
(169
|
)
|
|
Profit/(loss) before tax
|
|
52
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit/(expense)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(21
|
)
|
|
Profit/(loss) for the period from discontinued operations
|
|
49
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
Profit/(Loss) on disposal (see Note 19)
|
|
6
|
|
34
|
|
|
Total profit/(loss) for the period from discontinued operations (attributable to NBG equity shareholders)
|
|
55
|
|
(49
|
)
|
(1) Includes S.A.B.A., Romaneasca, NIC and NBG Albania while in 2017 UBB, Interlease, Vojvodjanska, NBG Leasing d.o.o., are also included.
Cash Flows from discontinued operations(1)
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
9 month period ended
|
|
|
€ million
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
30.09.2017
|
|
|
Net cash inflows/(outflows) from operating activities
|
|
223
|
|
22
|
|
|
Net cash inflows/(outflows) from investing activities
|
|
(189
|
)
|
(112
|
)
|
|
Net cash inflows/(outflows) from financing activities
|
|
(3
|
)
|
(46
|
)
|
|
Net Cash inflows /(outflows)
|
|
31
|
|
(136
|
)
|
(1) Includes S.A.B.A., Romaneasca, NIC and NBG Albania while in 2017 UBB, Interlease, Vojvodjanska, NBG Leasing d.o.o., are also included.
26
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
Analysis of non-current assets held for sale and liabilities associated with non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018(1)
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances with central banks
|
|
178
|
|
186
|
|
|
Due from banks
|
|
248
|
|
164
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
14
|
|
14
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers
|
|
1,034
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
2,359
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
Investment property
|
|
92
|
|
92
|
|
|
Goodwill, software and other intangible assets
|
|
19
|
|
15
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
135
|
|
135
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
137
|
|
145
|
|
|
Insurance related assets and receivables
|
|
473
|
|
505
|
|
|
Current income tax advance
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
64
|
|
62
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
4,772
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to banks
|
|
4
|
|
8
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|
Due to customers
|
|
929
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
Insurance related reserves and liabilities
|
|
2,230
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|
Retirement benefit obligations
|
|
83
|
|
8
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
141
|
|
182
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
3,387
|
|
3,523
|
|
(1) Includes S.A.B.A., NIC and Romaneasca.
NOTE 10:
Due to banks
“Due to Banks” mainly includes the Bank’s funding from the ECB of €2.3 billion, securities sold under agreements to repurchase of €3.3 billion and other deposits with financial institutions of €1.4 billion (31 December 2017: €2.8 billion, €3.4 billion and €1.2 billion, respectively).
NOTE 11:
Due to customers
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individuals
|
|
31,774
|
|
30,875
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
6,158
|
|
6,242
|
|
|
Government and agencies
|
|
4,080
|
|
3,148
|
|
|
Total
|
|
42,012
|
|
40,265
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
19,088
|
|
18,690
|
|
|
Current & Sight accounts
|
|
8,319
|
|
8,662
|
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
13,759
|
|
12,079
|
|
|
Other deposits
|
|
762
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
|
41,928
|
|
40,219
|
|
|
Securities sold to customers under agreements to repurchase
|
|
84
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
46
|
|
|
Total
|
|
42,012
|
|
40,265
|
|
Included in time deposits are deposits, which contain one or more embedded derivatives. The Group has designated such deposits as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss. As at 30 September 2018, these deposits amounted to €1
,179 million (31 December 2017: €866 million).
In accordance with Law 4151/2013, all dormant deposit accounts are subject to statute of limitations of 20 years in favour of the Greek State. All banks operating in Greece are required by April of every year to remit the cash balances of such dormant accounts to the Greek
27
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
State. According to Article 1, paragraph 6 of the Legislative Act published in the Government Gazette “N.84/18.07.2015”, the aforementioned obligation had been suspended.
Following Ministerial Decision on 14 November 2017, the above suspension was cancelled and the Bank, in 2018, remitted to the Greek State €16 million in respect to dormant account balances.
NOTE 12:
Debt securities in issue and other borrowed funds
The major transactions regarding debt securities in issue and other borrowed funds from 1 January 201
8 to 30 September 2018 are as follows:
·
On 30 July 2018, the Bank issued €200 million of new 5-year fixed rate covered bonds with an annual coupon of 1.85% under its Covered Bond Programme II. The European Investment Bank and the Bank have agreed that the European Investment Bank will initially purchase €100 million of covered bonds in the next 6 months, while the remaining €100 million will be retained by the Bank.
·
On 14 August 2018, the Bank issued under its Covered Bond Programme II, one-year fixed rate €600 million covered bond at 0.75% coupon and yield, which has been retained by the Bank and used as collateral for the main refinancing operations of the ECB.
NOTE 13:
Contingent liabilities, pledged, transfers of financial assets and commitments
a. Legal proceedings
The Group is a defendant in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. For the cases for which a provision has not been recognized, Management is unable to estimate the possible losses because the proceedings may last for many years, many of the proceedings are in early stages, there is uncertainty of the likelihood of the final result, there is uncertainty as to the outcome of the pending appeals and there are significant issues to be resolved. However, in the opinion of Management, after consultation with its legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated Statement of Financial Position, Income Statement and Cash Flow Statement, taking into account that at 30 September 2018 the Group has provided for cases under litigation the amounts of €70 million (31 December 2017: €76 million).
There are pending legal actions against the Bank from the Auxiliary Pension Plan (LEPETE) pensioners who are disputing the defined contribution status of the plan, claiming that the Bank has an obligation to cover any deficit arising. To date, 9 applications for a preliminary injunction, which were rejected, 22 temporary injunctive measures were ruled in favor of the Bank have been filed, whereas five injunction orders were in favor of 417 former employees. For these decisions against the Bank, we recognize the relevant expense as incurred. The Bank has paid in total €416 thousand until 21 November 2018. There have been 95 legal claims of which 72 have been heard in court and four decisions have been issued. Three First Instance Court decisions were not in favor of the Bank and one decision was in favor of the Bank. The Bank has not made any payment yet with respect to any of the decisions against it, has already filed an appeal for the two and is in the process of filing an appeal for the third. The Group has not recorded any provisions for these pending legal actions, because management has assessed that the likelihood of the final outcome of the outstanding legal claims being negative is remote.
b. Pending tax audits
Tax authorities have not yet audited all subsidiaries for certain financial years and accordingly their tax obligations for those years may not be considered final. Additional taxes and penalties may be imposed as a result of such tax audits; although the amount cannot be determined, it is not expected to have a material effect on the consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
The Bank has been audited by the tax authorities up to and including the year 2010. The tax audit certificates for the years 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 were unqualified and issued by the independent auditor, Deloitte Certified Public Accountants S.A., on 27 July 2012, 27 September 2013, 10 July 2014, 30 October 2015, 30 September 2016 and 23 October 2017 respectively in accordance with article 82 of law 2238/1994 and article 65A of law 4174/2013. The tax audit certificate for the year 2017 was unqualified and issued by the independent auditor, PWC, on 26 October 2018.
Based on Ministerial Decision 1006/05.01.2016 there is no exception from tax audit by the tax authorities to those entities that have been tax audited by the independent auditor and its tax audit certificate was unqualified. Therefore, the tax authorities may re-audit the tax books of the Bank for 2011-2017. For the subsidiaries and associates regarding unaudited tax years refer to Note 20.
c. Receivables from withholding taxes on bonds and treasury bills
In October 2018, two decisions of Greek Council of State issued for two other Greek banking institutions relating to taxes prepaid by way of withholding from interest on bonds and T-bills. These two decisions interpreted Greek tax law L.2238/94 applicable for the year 2008 and ruled that such withholding taxes are allowed to be offset only against the bank’s annual corporate income tax and any excess part is not refundable. The Bank’s withholding tax receivable relating to 2008 of €42m has been fully refunded by the Greek State. The Bank is assessing the conclusive implications that the forthcoming decisions may have to the Bank’s 2008 and other similar tax receivables from Greek State, or other amounts relating to similar cases that have already been refunded by the Greek State, considering also the motion to the Ministry of Economy in full cooperation with the other affected Greek banks through the Greek Banks Federation.
28
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
d. Credit commitments
In the normal course of business, the Group enters into a number of contractual commitments on behalf of its customers and is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These contractual commitments consist of commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit and guarantees. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of the conditions established in the contract. Commercial letters of credit ensure payment by the Bank to a third party for a customer’s foreign or domestic trade transactions, generally to finance a commercial contract for the shipment of goods. Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees are conditional commitments issued by the Group to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. All of these arrangements are related to the normal lending activities of the Group. The Group’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and commercial and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual nominal amount of those instruments. The Group uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit*
|
|
9
|
|
7
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written
|
|
2,791
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
Commercial letters of credit
|
|
290
|
|
303
|
|
|
Total
|
|
3,090
|
|
3,139
|
|
* Commitments to extend credit at 30 September 2018 include amounts, which cannot be cancelled without certain conditions being met at any time and without notice, or for which automatic cancellation due to credit deterioration of the borrower is not allowed. Such commitments are used in the Risk Weighted Assets calculation for capital adequacy purposes under regulatory rules currently in force. The total commitments to extend credit at 30 September 2018 are €5,940 million (2017: €6,474 million).
e. Assets pledged
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
Assets pledged as collateral
|
|
5,119
|
|
8,608
|
|
As at 3
0 September 2018, the Group and the Bank have pledged mainly for funding purposes with the ECB and financial institutions, the following instruments:
·
trading and investment debt instruments of €1,490 million;
·
loans and advances to customers amounting to €1,274 million;
·
covered bonds of a nominal value of €2,199 million backed with mortgage loans of total value of €3,636 million; and
·
securitized notes of a nominal value of €156 million backed with small business loans of €219 million.
In addition to the pledged items presented in the table above, as at 3
0 September 2018, the Group and the Bank have pledged an amount of €319 million included in due from banks with respect to a guarantee for the non-payment risk of the Hellenic Republic, as well as Hellenic Republic Treasury bills of €342 million for trade finance purposes.
f. Operating lease commitments
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No later than 1 year
|
|
10
|
|
13
|
|
|
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years
|
|
27
|
|
22
|
|
|
Later than 5 years
|
|
15
|
|
12
|
|
|
Total
|
|
52
|
|
47
|
|
NOTE 14:
Share capital, share premium and treasury shares
Share Capital — Ordinary Shares
The total number of ordinary shares as at 30 September 2018 and 31 December 201
7 was 914,715,153, with a nominal value of 3.00 Euro.
On 26 July 2018, the Annual General Meeting approved (i) the increase of the share capital by EUR 0.90, due to capitalization of an equal part of the Bank’s special reserve of Article 4.4a of Codified Law 2190/1920, and (ii) the increase of the nominal value of each ordinary
29
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
share of the Bank from 0.30 Euro to 3.00 Euro and the reduction of the number of the Bank’s existing shares from 9,147,151,527 to 914,715,153 new ordinary shares by means of a reverse split at a rate of ten (10) old ordinary shares of the Bank to one (1) new ordinary share of the Bank.
On 3 September 2018, the new shares started trading in the Athens Exchange.
Treasury shares
Treasury shares transactions are conducted by the Group subsidiary, NBG Securities S.A. and are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
No of shares
|
|
€ million
|
|
|
At 1 January 2017
|
|
2,410,995
|
|
1
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
115,768,780
|
|
33
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
(117,676,003
|
)
|
(34
|
)
|
|
At 31 December 2017
|
|
503,772
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
53,671,296
|
|
18
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
(53,879,760
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
|
At 30 September 2018
|
|
295,308
|
|
1
|
|
NOTE 15:
Tax effects relating to other comprehensive income / (expense) for the period
|
|
|
9 month period ended
|
|
9 month period ended
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
30.09.2017
|
|
|
Group
|
|
Gross
|
|
Tax
|
|
Net
|
|
Gross
|
|
Tax
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealised gains / (losses) on investments in available-for-sale
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
53
|
|
1
|
|
54
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustments on investments in available-for-sale included in the income statement
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
33
|
|
—
|
|
33
|
|
|
Unrealised gains / (losses) on investments in debt instruments measured at FVTOCI
|
|
(51
|
)
|
6
|
|
(45
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
(Gains) / losses on investments in debt instruments measured at FVTOCI reclassified to profit or loss on disposal
|
|
(59
|
)
|
(21
|
)
|
(80
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Impairment loss recognised on investments in debt instruments classified at FVTOCI
|
|
3
|
|
(1
|
)
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Gain reclassified to income statement on disposal of UBB
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(24
|
)
|
2
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
Gain reclassified to income statement on disposal of NBG Albania
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Investments in debt instruments
|
|
(108
|
)
|
(16
|
)
|
(124
|
)
|
62
|
|
3
|
|
65
|
|
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
(8
|
)
|
—
|
|
(8
|
)
|
(40
|
)
|
—
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
Gain reclassified to income statement on disposal of NBG Albania
|
|
(3
|
)
|
—
|
|
(3
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Currency translation differences
|
|
(11
|
)
|
—
|
|
(11
|
)
|
(40
|
)
|
—
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
Net investment hedge
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
|
Net investment hedge
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
|
Total of items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
|
|
(119
|
)
|
(16
|
)
|
(135
|
)
|
24
|
|
3
|
|
27
|
|
|
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains / (losses) on investments in equity instruments measured at FVTOCI
|
|
(6
|
)
|
1
|
|
(5
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total of items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss
|
|
(6
|
)
|
1
|
|
(5
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income / (expense) for the period
|
|
(125
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
(140
|
)
|
24
|
|
3
|
|
27
|
|
30
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
NOTE 16:
Related party transactions
The nature of the significant transactions entered into by the Group with related parties during the
9-month period ended 30 September 2018 and 30 September 2017 and the significant balances outstanding as at 30 September 2018 and 31 December 2017 are presented below.
a. Transactions with members of the Board of Directors and management
The Group entered into transactions with the members of the Board of Directors, the General Managers and the members of the Executive Committees of the Bank, the key management of other Group companies, as well as with the close members of family and entities controlled or jointly controlled by those persons.
All loans granted to related parties (i) were made in the ordinary course of business, (ii) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons, and (iii) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavourable features.
The list of the members of the Board of Directors of the Bank is presented under Note 1.
As at 30 September 2018, loans, deposits/liabilities and letters of guarantee, at Group level, amounted to €4 million, €6 million and NIL respectively (31 December 20
17: €5 million, €5 million and NIL respectively).
Total compensation to related parties amounted to €7 million (30
September 2017: €7 million) for the Group, mainly relating to short-term benefits and in particular salaries and social security contributions.
b. Transactions with subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures
At a Group level, only transactions and balances with associates and joint ventures are included, as transactions and balances with subsidiaries are eliminated on consolidation.
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
19
|
|
17
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
11
|
|
10
|
|
|
Letters of guarantee, contingent liabilities and other off balance sheet accounts
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
9 month period ended
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
30.09.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, commission and other income
|
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
|
Interest, commission and other expense
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
c. Transactions with other related parties
The total receivables of the Group from the employee benefits related funds as at 30 September 2018 amounted to €746 million (31 December 2017: €746 million).
For these receivables the Group has recognized a provision of €736 million (31 December 2017: €723 million). The interest income for the Group amounted to NIL (30 September 2017: €2 million).
The total payables of the Group to the employee benefits related funds as at 30 September 2018 amounted to €125 million (31 December 2017: €123 million).
d. Hellenic Financial Stability Fund
Taking into consideration the HFSF Law, the Relationship Framework Agreement (“RFA”) between the Bank and the HFSF that was signed in December 2015, the fact that HFSF holds 40.
39% of the Bank’s ordinary shares, of which 38.92% with full voting rights and that HFSF has representation in the Bank’s Board of Directors and other Board Committees of the Bank, HFSF is considered a related party of the Group. Other than the ordinary shares issued by the Bank and held by HFSF, no material transactions or balances exist with HFSF.
31
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
NOTE 17:
Capital adequacy
In June 2013, the European Parliament and the Council of Europe issued Directive 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (known as CRD IV and CRR respectively), which incorporate the key amendments that have been proposed by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (known as Basel III). Directive 2013/36/EU has been transported into Greek Law by virtue of Greek Law 4261/2014 and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 has been directly applicable to all EU Member States since 1 January 2014, but some changes under CRD IV will be implemented gradually, mainly between 2014 and 2019.
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 defines the minimum capital requirements (Pillar 1 requirements) and Directive 2013/36/EU defines the combined buffer requirements for EU institutions. In addition, Directive 2013/36/EU provides (Art. 97 et seq.) that Competent Authorities regularly carry out the SREP, to assess and measure risks not covered, or not fully covered, under Pillar 1 and determine additional capital and liquidity requirements (Pillar 2 requirements). SREP is conducted under the lead of the ECB. The SREP decision is tailored to each bank’s individual profile.
The table below summarises Pillar 1 & 2 capital requirements for NBG Group for 2018 and 2017:
|
|
|
CET1 Capital Requirements
|
|
Total Capital Requirements
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Pillar 1
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
4.5
|
%
|
8.0
|
%
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
Pillar 2
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
3.0
|
%
|
3.0
|
%
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
Capital Conservation Buffer
|
|
1.875
|
%
|
1.25
|
%
|
1.875
|
%
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
9.375
|
%
|
8.75
|
%
|
12.875
|
%
|
12.25
|
%
|
The capital adequacy ratios for the Group are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Equity Tier 1
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
Tier 1
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
17.0
|
%
|
DTC Law
Article 27A of Law 4172/2013 (“DTC Law”), as currently in force, allows credit institutions, under certain conditions, and from 2017 onwards to convert deferred tax assets (“DTAs”) arising from (a) private sector initiative (“PSI”) losses, (b) accumulated provisions for credit losses recognized as at 30 June 2015, (c) losses from final write off or the disposal of loans and (d) accounting write offs, which will ultimately lead to final write offs and losses from disposals, to a receivable (“Tax Credit”) from the Greek State. Items (c) and (d) above were added with Law 4465/2017 enacted on 29 March 2017. The same Law 4465/2017 provided that Tax Credit cannot exceed the tax corresponding to accumulated provisions recorded up to 30 June 2015 less (a) any definitive and cleared tax credit, which arose in the case of accounting loss for a year according to the provisions of par.2 of article 27A, which relate to the above accumulated provisions, (b) the amount of tax corresponding to any subsequent specific tax provisions, which relate to the above accumulated provisions and (c) the amount of the tax corresponding to the annual amortization of the debit difference that corresponds to the above provisions and other losses in general arising due to credit risk.
The main condition for the conversion of DTAs to a Tax Credit is the existence of an accounting loss on a solo basis of a respective year, starting from accounting year 2016 and onwards. The Tax Credits will be calculated as a ratio of IFRS accounting losses to net equity (excluding the year’s losses) on a solo basis and such ratio will be applied to the remaining Eligible DTAs in a given year to calculate the Tax Credit that will be converted in that year, in respect of the prior tax year. The Tax Credit may be offset against income taxes payable. The non-offset part of the Tax Credit is immediately recognized as a receivable from the Greek State. The Bank will issue conversion rights to the Greek State for an amount of 100% of the Tax Credit in favour of the Greek State that was not offset against income taxes payable and will create a specific reserve for an equal amount. Common shareholders have pre-emption rights on these conversion rights. The reserve will be capitalized with the issuance of common shares in favour of the Greek State. This legislation allows credit institutions to treat such DTAs as not “relying on future profitability” according to CRD IV, and as a result such DTAs are not deducted from CET1, hence improving a credit institution’s capital position.
Furthermore, Law 4465/2017 amended article 27 “Carry forward losses” by introducing an amortization period of 20 years for losses due to loan write offs as part of a settlement or restructuring and losses that crystallize as a result of a disposal of loans.
On 7 November 2014 the Bank convened an extraordinary General Shareholders Meeting which resolved to include the Bank in the DTC Law. In order for the Bank to exit the provisions of the DTC Law it requires regulatory approval and a General Shareholders meeting resolution.
As of 30 September 2018, the amount of DTAs that were eligible for conversion to a receivable from the Greek State subject to the DTC Law was €4.6 billion (2017: €4.7 billion). The conditions for conversion rights were not met in the year ended 31 December 2017 and no conversion rights are deliverable in 2018.
32
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
2018 Stress Test
On 31 January 2018 the ECB commenced the stress test exercise relating to the four systemic Greek banks (Alpha Bank, Eurobank, National Bank of Greece and Piraeus Bank) with the publication of the macroeconomic scenarios to be used by the banks. The stress test of the four systemic Greek banks was conducted on an accelerated timeline compared to the other in scope banks in order to allow the results to be published before the end of the Third Program for Greece (August 2018), but following the same EBA approach and methodologies as that applied to the other European Union banks. The results for the four systemic Greek banks were announced by the Supervisory Board of the ECB on 5 May 2018, and showed that in the adverse scenario, the average CET1 capital depletion was 9 percentage points, equivalent to €15.5 billion across the four systemic Greek banks. The results for the other European Union banks
were published on 2 November 2018.
The Bank conducted the stress test exercise using the EBA methodology, the benchmark parameters, macroeconomic scenarios and shocks provided by the EBA and the ECB, as well as any additional guidance and notes published and/or relayed though formal communication channels. As a result, under the EBA adverse scenario, the CET1 ratio declined by 9.6 percentage points (“ppts”), reaching a CET1 level of 6.9% in 2020, including an IFRS 9 impact of -70 basis points (“bps”)
, post 1 January 2018 and a CRD IV impact of -20bps. Under the baseline scenario, the CET1 ratio of the Group declined by 50bps reaching 16.0% in 2020. Following the supervisory dialogue, the Bank was informed that the stress test outcome, along with other factors, have been assessed by SSM’s Supervisory Board pointing to no capital shortfall and that no capital plan was deemed necessary as a result of the exercise.
The stress test results will inform the 2018 SREP, challenging banks’ capital plans and leading to relevant supervisory outcomes. The stress test will also provide enhanced transparency so that market participants can compare and assess the resilience of European Union banks on a consistent basis.
NOTE 18:
Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
a. Financial instruments not measured at fair value
The table below summarises the carrying amounts and the fair values of those financial assets and liabilities that are not presented on the Group’s financial position at fair value and the fair value is materially different from the carrying amount
.
Financial instruments not measured at fair value - Group
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers
|
|
29,989
|
|
29,197
|
|
|
Investment securities at amortised cost
|
|
2,023
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to customers
|
|
40,833
|
|
40,882
|
|
|
Debt securities in issue
|
|
1,150
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
183
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers
|
|
37,941
|
|
36,345
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity investment securities
|
|
696
|
|
711
|
|
|
Loans-and-receivables investment securities
|
|
2,222
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to customers
|
|
39,399
|
|
39,446
|
|
|
Debt securities in issue
|
|
1,026
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
171
|
|
171
|
|
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the above financial instruments at 30 September 2018 and 31 December 2017:
The carrying amount of cash and balances with central banks, due from and due to banks as well as accrued interest, approximates their fair value.
Loans and advances to customers:
The fair value of loans and advances to customers is estimated using discounted cash flow models. The discount rates are based on current market interest rates offered for instruments with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.
33
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
Investment securities at amortised cost:
The fair value of investment securities at amortised cost is estimated using market prices, or using discounted cash flow models based on current market interest rates offered for instruments with similar credit quality.
Due to customers:
The fair value for demand deposits and deposits with no defined maturity is determined to be the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value for fixed-maturity deposits is estimated using discounted cash flow models based on rates currently offered for the relevant product types with similar remaining maturities.
Debt securities in issue:
Fair value is estimated using market prices, or if such are not available, using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on current market rates of similar maturity and credit quality debt securities.
Other borrowed funds:
Fair value of other borrowed funds is estimated using market prices, or discounted cash flow analysis based on the Group’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowings arrangements.
b. Financial instruments measured at fair value
The tables below present the fair values of those financial assets and liabilities presented on the Group’s Statement of Financial Position at fair value by fair value measurement level at 30 September 2018 and 31 December 2017:
Financial instruments measured at fair value - Group
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using
|
|
Total asset/
liability at
|
|
|
As at 30 September 2018
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Financial Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
337
|
|
1,402
|
|
—
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
Financial assets mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
6
|
|
3,406
|
|
178
|
|
3,590
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
87
|
|
3,513
|
|
12
|
|
3,612
|
|
|
Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income
|
|
476
|
|
897
|
|
25
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
Total
|
|
906
|
|
9,218
|
|
215
|
|
10,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to customers designated as at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
—
|
|
1,179
|
|
—
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
1
|
|
2,053
|
|
7
|
|
2,061
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1
|
|
3,232
|
|
7
|
|
3,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using
|
|
Total asset/
liability at
|
|
|
As at 31 December 2017
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
Financial Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
304
|
|
1,489
|
|
—
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
27
|
|
3,629
|
|
25
|
|
3,681
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investment securities
|
|
93
|
|
732
|
|
8
|
|
833
|
|
|
Total
|
|
424
|
|
5,850
|
|
33
|
|
6,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to customers designated as at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
—
|
|
866
|
|
—
|
|
866
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
—
|
|
3,781
|
|
17
|
|
3,798
|
|
|
Total
|
|
—
|
|
4,647
|
|
17
|
|
4,664
|
|
The tables below present the fair values for the assets and liabilities classified as held-for-sale in the Group’s Statement of Financial Position and are measured at fair value for 30 September 2018 and 31 December 2017:
Held for Sale Operations - Financial instruments measured at fair value
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using
|
|
Total asset/
liability at Fair
|
|
|
As at 30 September 2018
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
value
|
|
|
Financial Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
4
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
14
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|
Investment securities at fair value through other comprehensive income
|
|
980
|
|
1,012
|
|
6
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
Insurance related assets and receivables
|
|
165
|
|
118
|
|
—
|
|
283
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1,149
|
|
1,141
|
|
6
|
|
2,296
|
|
34
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using
|
|
Total asset/
liability at Fair
|
|
|
As at 31 December 2017
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
value
|
|
|
Financial Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
4
|
|
10
|
|
—
|
|
14
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investment securities
|
|
956
|
|
1,161
|
|
—
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
Insurance related assets and receivables
|
|
178
|
|
112
|
|
—
|
|
290
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1,138
|
|
1,286
|
|
—
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|
Total
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2
During the period ended on 30 September 2018, certain fair value through profit or loss securities issued by European Financial Stability Fund for which the Group determined that sufficient liquidity and trading did not exist as at 30 September 2018, have been transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 according to the Group fair value hierarchy policy. The carrying amount of the fair value through profit or loss securities transferred as at 30 September 2018 was €39 million.
As at 31 December 2017, certain fair value through profit or loss securities issued by European Financial Stability Fund for which the Group determined that sufficient liquidity and trading did not exist as at 31 December 2017, have been transferred from Level 1 to Level 2 according to the Group fair value hierarchy policy. The carrying amount of the fair value through profit or loss securities transferred as at 31 December 2017 was
€3 million.
Level 3 financial instruments
Level 3 financial instruments at 30 September 2018 and 31 December 2017 include:
(a)
Derivative products, which are valued using valuation techniques with significant unobservable inputs, including certain correlation products, such as correlation between various interest indices. They also include products where implied volatility represents a significant input and derivatives for which the Credit Value Adjustment (“CVA”) is based on significant unobservable inputs and the amount of the CVA is significant relative to the total fair value of the derivative.
(b)
Securities mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss, for which the models used to estimate their fair value is based on unobservable credit spreads or which are price-based and the price is obtained from the issuers of the securities. They also include loans and advances to customers mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss, which are valued using discounted cash flow valuation techniques incorporating unobservable credit spreads.
(c)
Equity securities at fair value through other comprehensive income, which are not traded in active markets and their fair value is estimated using an income or market approach, for which the main inputs used are not market observable.
The table below presents a reconciliation of all Level 3 fair value measurements for the period ended 30 September 2018 and 30 September 2017, including realised and unrealised gains/(losses) included in the “income statement” and “statement of other comprehensive income”.
Transfers into or out of Level 3
The Group conducts a review of the fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. For the periods ended 30 September 2018 and 30 September 2017, transfers from Level 2 into Level 3 include derivative instruments for which the bilateral CVA is significant to the fair value of the respective instruments.
35
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
Reconciliation of fair value measurements in Level 3 — Group
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Derivative
financial
instruments
|
|
Available-
for-sale
investment
securities
|
|
Investment
securities at
FVTOCI
|
|
Mandatorily
at FVTPL
|
|
|
Balance at 1 January
|
|
8
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Impact of IFRS 9
|
|
—
|
|
(8
|
)
|
24
|
|
185
|
|
|
Balance at 1 January
|
|
8
|
|
—
|
|
24
|
|
185
|
|
|
Gain / (loss) included in Income statement
|
|
2
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7
|
|
|
Gain / (loss) included in OCI
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
—
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Settlements
|
|
(1
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
Transfer into/ (out of) level 3
|
|
(4
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Balance at 30 September
|
|
5
|
|
—
|
|
25
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
assets at fair
value
through
profit or loss
|
|
Net
Derivative
financial
instruments
|
|
Available-
for-sale
investment
securities
|
|
|
Balance at 1 January
|
|
8
|
|
12
|
|
9
|
|
|
Gain / (loss) included in Income statement
|
|
—
|
|
12
|
|
—
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
—
|
|
3
|
|
—
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
(8
|
)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Transfer into/ (out of) level 3
|
|
—
|
|
(2
|
)
|
—
|
|
|
Balance at 30 September
|
|
—
|
|
25
|
|
9
|
|
Gains or losses included in the income statement have been reported in Net trading income / (loss) and results from investment securities.
Changes in unrealised gains/ (losses) included in the income statement of financial instruments measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) relate to financial assets mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss and net derivative financial instruments for the period ended 30 September 2018, and amount to €7 million and €3 million respectively.
Changes in unrealised gains/ (losses) included in the income statement of financial instruments measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (level 3) relate to financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and net derivative financial instruments for the period ended 30 September 2017, and amount to NIL and €17 million respectively.
Valuation Process and Control Framework
The Group has various processes in place to ensure that the fair values of its assets and liabilities are reasonably estimated and has established a control framework which is designed to ensure that fair values are validated by functions independent of the risk-taker. To that end, the Group utilizes various sources for determining the fair values of its financial instruments and uses its own independent functions to validate these results, where possible.
Fair values of debt securities are determined either by reference to prices for traded instruments in active markets, to external quotations or widely accepted financial models, which are based on market observable or unobservable information where the former is not available, as well as relevant market based parameters such as interest rates, option volatilities, currency rates, etc.
The Group may, sometimes, also utilize third-party pricing information, and perform validating procedures on this information to the extent possible or base its fair value on the latest transaction prices available, given the absence of an active market or similar transactions or other market observable inputs. All such instruments are categorized within the lowest level of fair value hierarchy (i.e. Level 3).
Generally, fair values of debt securities, including significant inputs on the valuation models are independently checked and validated by the Middle Office and Risk Management function on a systematic basis.
Fair values of derivatives are determined by Management using valuation models which include discounted cash-flow models, option pricing models or other appropriate models. Adequate control procedures are in place for the validation of these models, including the valuation inputs, on a systematic basis. Middle Office and Risk Management function provide the control valuation framework necessary to ensure that the fair values are reasonably determined, reflecting current market circumstances and economic conditions. Furthermore, over-the-counter derivatives are also compared on a daily basis with counterparties’ valuations, under the daily collateral management process.
Market Valuation Adjustments
Counterparty credit risk-adjustments are applied to all over-the-counter derivatives. Own credit-risk adjustments are applied to reflect the Group’s own credit risk when valuing derivatives. Bilateral credit-risk adjustments consider the expected cash flows between the Group and its counterparties under the relevant terms of the derivative instruments and the effect of the credit-risk profile of the counterparties
36
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
on the valuation of these cash flows. Where appropriate, the Group takes into consideration the credit-risk mitigating arrangements, including collateral agreements and master netting arrangements, for the purpose of estimating own and counterparty credit risk valuation adjustments.
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements 30 September 2018
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value (€
|
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable
|
|
Range of Inputs
|
|
|
Financial Instrument
|
|
million)
|
|
Valuation Technique
|
|
Input
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
|
Investment securities mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
8
|
|
Price Based
|
|
Price
|
|
93.76
|
|
93.76
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Discounted Cash Flows
|
|
Credit Spread
|
|
327 bps
|
|
361 bps
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivatives
|
|
4
|
|
Discounted Cash Flows
|
|
Constant Maturity Swap correlation between different tenors
|
|
-50.00%
|
|
100.00%
|
|
|
Other Derivatives
|
|
1
|
|
Discounted Cash Flows, Internal Model (for CVA/DVA)
|
|
Credit Spread
|
|
614 bps
|
|
1025 bps
|
|
|
Investment Securities at fair value through other comprehensive income
|
|
25
|
|
Income and market approach
|
|
n/a(1)
|
|
n/a(1)
|
|
n/a(1)
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss
|
|
152
|
|
Discounted Cash Flows
|
|
Credit Spread
|
|
300 bps
|
|
650 bps
|
|
(1) Equity securities at fair value through other comprehensive income include equity securities which are not traded in active markets. In the absence of an active market, the fair value of these securities is estimated using a market or an income valuation approach. Given the bespoke nature of the valuation method in respect of each holding, it is not practicable to quote a range of unobservable inputs.
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements 31 December 2017
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value (€
|
|
|
|
Significant Unobservable
|
|
Range of Inputs
|
|
|
Financial Instrument
|
|
million)
|
|
Valuation Technique
|
|
Input
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale investment securities
|
|
8
|
|
Price Based
|
|
Price
|
|
93.76
|
|
93.76
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivatives
|
|
4
|
|
Discounted Cash Flows, Internal Model for CVA/DVA
|
|
Credit Spread
|
|
80 bps
|
|
1000 bps
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Discounted Cash Flows
|
|
Constant Maturity Swap correlation between different tenors
|
|
-50.00%
|
|
99.50%
|
|
|
Other Derivatives
|
|
2
|
|
Binomial Model
|
|
Volatility of stock price
|
|
30.74%
|
|
104.83%
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Monte Carlo simulation
|
|
Volatility of stock price
|
|
49.00%
|
|
49.00%
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Discounted Cash Flows, Internal Model for CVA/DVA
|
|
Credit Spread
|
|
70 bps
|
|
1000 bps
|
|
Sensitivity of Fair Value Measurements to Changes in Unobservable Inputs
For structured interest rate derivatives, a significant change in the correlation inputs (e.g. the degree of correlation between two different interest rates, or between interest rates and foreign exchange rates) would have a significant impact on the fair value of the individual instrument; however, the magnitude and the direction of the impact depends on whether the Group is long or short the exposure, among other factors. Due to the limited exposure that the Group has to these instruments, a reasonable change in the above unobservable inputs would not be significant to the Group. Additionally, interest rate derivatives include interest rate swaps for which the bilateral credit valuation adjustment is significant in comparison to their fair value. The counterparty credit-risk adjustment in these cases is mainly driven by the internal ratings of the counterparty. A reasonable increase in the credit spread of these entities would result in an insignificant change in the fair value of the Group’s financial instruments.
Other derivatives include derivatives for which the bilateral credit valuation adjustment is significant in comparison to their fair value. In these cases, the counterparty credit risk adjustment is mainly driven by the internal ratings of the counterparty. A reasonable increase in the credit spread of these entities would result in an insignificant change in the fair value of the Group’s financial instruments.
For loans and advances to customers mandatorily at fair value through profit or loss, the valuation includes a parameter which is not observable in the market, i.e. the credit spread of the client. A reasonable increase in the respective credit spreads used would not have a significant effect on their fair value for the Group.
37
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
NOTE 19:
Acquisitions, disposals and other capital transactions
On 3 July 2018, the Bank disposed of its 100% stake in Banka NBG Albania Sh.A. (“NBG Albania”) to American Bank of Investments S.A. (“ABI”). The consideration less costs to sell was €23 million.
|
|
|
Period ended
30 September 2018
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances with central banks
|
|
11
|
|
|
Due from other banks
|
|
70
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers
|
|
150
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
47
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
9
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
287
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Due to customers
|
|
233
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
31
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
264
|
|
|
Net Assets disposed of
|
|
23
|
|
Gain on disposal of NBG Albania
|
|
|
Period ended
30 September 2018
|
|
|
Consideration received less costs to sell
|
|
23
|
|
|
Net Assets disposed of
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
Cumulative exchange gain in respect of the net assets of NBG Albania reclassified from equity to profit or loss
|
|
5
|
|
|
Cumulative gain on investment securities at FV through OCI reclassified from equity to profit or loss
|
|
1
|
|
|
Gain on disposal
|
|
6
|
|
The gain on disposal of €6 million is included in the Profit / (loss) for the period from discontinued operations (see Note 9).
Net cash inflow on disposal of NBG Albania
|
|
|
Period ended
30 September 2018
|
|
|
Consideration received less costs to sell
|
|
23
|
|
|
Less: Cash and cash equivalent balances disposed of
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
Net cash inflow
|
|
6
|
|
On 26 June 2018, NBG Pangaea Reic acquired in Cyprus the 100% of the share capital of the company LASMANE PROPERTIES LTD for a total consideration of €11 million.
On 9 May 2018, NBG Pangaea Reic established in United Kingdom the company Pangaea UK Finco Plc, a wholly owned subsidiary. The capital contributed amounted to €14 thousand.
On 19 January 2017, the Boards of Directors of the Bank, NBG Training Center S.A. and Bancassurance (wholly owned subsidiaries of the Bank), agreed the merger of the three companies through absorption of the two latter by the Bank. The merger date was agreed to be 31 January 2017 and accounted for at carrying values. On 27 June 2017 the Boards of Directors of the companies approved the Draft Merger Agreement. On 16 May 2018 the merger between the Bank and the two subsidiaries was approved by the Ministry of Development.
38
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
NOTE 20:
Group companies
NBG Pangaea REIC is a subsidiary of the NBG Group although the Group owns a 32.66% ownership interest. Based on the contractual arrangements between the Group and the majority shareholder, the Group has the power to appoint and remove the majority of the members of board of directors and of the investment committee of NBG Pangaea REIC, which have the power to direct the relevant activities of NBG Pangaea REIC. Therefore, the management of NBG concluded that the Group has the practical ability to direct the relevant activities of NBG Pangaea REIC unilaterally and hence the Group has control over NBG Pangaea REIC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
Country
|
|
Tax years unaudited
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Securities S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2012-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Asset Management Mutual Funds S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2009-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Ethniki Leasing S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Property Services S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Pronomiouhos S.A. Genikon Apothikon Hellados
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Innovative Ventures S.A. (I-Ven)(1)
|
|
Greece
|
|
2007-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance S.A.(2)
|
|
Greece
|
|
2012-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Audatex Hellas S.A.(5)
|
|
Greece
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
70.00
|
%
|
|
Grand Hotel Summer Palace S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
KADMOS S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
DIONYSOS S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
99.91
|
%
|
99.91
|
%
|
|
EKTENEPOL Construction Company S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Mortgage, Touristic PROTYPOS S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Hellenic Touristic Constructions S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
78.04
|
%
|
78.04
|
%
|
|
Ethniki Ktimatikis Ekmetalefsis S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Ethniki Factors S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Pangaea REIC
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
32.66
|
%
|
|
Karolou S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2012-2017
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
32.66
|
%
|
|
FB Insurance Agency Inc(5)
|
|
Greece
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
99.00
|
%
|
|
Probank M.F.M.C.(1)
|
|
Greece
|
|
2012-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
I-Bank Direct S.A.(3)
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Probank Leasing S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2009-2017
|
|
99.87
|
%
|
99.87
|
%
|
|
NBG Insurance Brokers S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Malta Holdings Ltd
|
|
Malta
|
|
2006-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Bank Malta Ltd
|
|
Malta
|
|
2005-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
ARC Management Two EAD (Special Purpose Entity)
|
|
Bulgaria
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Bankteco E.O.O.D.
|
|
Bulgaria
|
|
2016-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
PNG Properties E.A.D.
|
|
Bulgaria
|
|
—
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
32.66
|
%
|
|
Banca Romaneasca S.A.(2)
|
|
Romania
|
|
2011-2017
|
|
99.28
|
%
|
99.28
|
%
|
|
NBG Leasing IFN S.A.
|
|
Romania
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
S.C. Garanta Asigurari S.A.(2)
|
|
Romania
|
|
2003-2017
|
|
94.96
|
%
|
94.96
|
%
|
|
ARC Management One SRL (Special Purpose Entity)
|
|
Romania
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Egnatia Properties S.A.
|
|
Romania
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
32.66
|
%
|
|
Stopanska Banka A.D.-Skopje
|
|
F.Y.R.O.M.
|
|
2014-2017
|
|
94.64
|
%
|
94.64
|
%
|
|
NBG Greek Fund Ltd
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
2012-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
National Bank of Greece (Cyprus) Ltd
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
2006 & 2008-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
National Securities Co (Cyprus) Ltd(1)
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
—
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Management Services Ltd
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Ethniki Insurance (Cyprus) Ltd(2)
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
2004-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Ethniki General Insurance (Cyprus) Ltd(2)
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
2004-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
National Insurance Agents & Consultants Ltd(2)
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
2004-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Quadratix Ltd
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
2016-2017
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
32.66
|
%
|
|
Lasmane Properties Ltd
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
2016-2017
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
—
|
|
|
CAC Coral Limited
|
|
Cyprus
|
|
—
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
—
|
|
|
The South African Bank of Athens Ltd (S.A.B.A.)(2)
|
|
S. Africa
|
|
2017
|
|
99.83
|
%
|
99.82
|
%
|
|
NBG Asset Management Luxemburg S.A.
|
|
Luxembourg
|
|
2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG International Ltd
|
|
U.K.
|
|
2003-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBGI Private Equity Ltd(1)
|
|
U.K.
|
|
2003-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Finance Plc
|
|
U.K.
|
|
2003-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Finance (Dollar) Plc
|
|
U.K.
|
|
2008-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Finance (Sterling) Plc(1)
|
|
U.K.
|
|
2008-2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
NBG Funding Ltd
|
|
U.K.
|
|
—
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Titlos Plc (Special Purpose Entity)(1)
|
|
U.K.
|
|
2016-2017
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
Pangaea UK Finco Plc(1) (4)
|
|
U.K.
|
|
—
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
—
|
|
|
SINEPIA Designated Activity Company (Special Purpose Entity)
|
|
Ireland
|
|
2016-2017
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
NBG International Holdings B.V.
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
2017
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
Nash S.r.L.
|
|
Italy
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
32.66
|
%
|
|
Fondo Picasso
|
|
Italy
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
32.66
|
%
|
32.66
|
%
|
|
Banka NBG Albania Sh.a.(6)
|
|
Albania
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
39
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
(1) Companies under liquidation.
(2) Ethniki Hellenic General Insurance S.A. and its subsidiaries, Banca Romaneasca S.A., and The South African Bank of Athens Ltd (S.A.B.A.), have been reclassified to Non-current Assets held for sale (See Note 9).
(3) Profinance S.A. previously under liquidation, was revived and renamed to I-Bank Direct S.A.
(4) Pangaea UK Finco Plc, was incorporated in May 2018, and is under liquidation from June 2018.
(5) Companies were liquidated.
(6) The transfer of the Group’s entire stake in Banka NBG Albania Sh.a., was completed on 4 of July 2018.
The Group’s and Bank’s equity method investments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Tax years
|
|
Group
|
|
|
|
|
Country
|
|
unaudited
|
|
30.09.2018
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Social Security Funds Management S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
Larco S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2009-2017
|
|
33.36
|
%
|
33.36
|
%
|
|
Eviop Tempo S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2011-2017
|
|
21.21
|
%
|
21.21
|
%
|
|
Teiresias S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2010-2017
|
|
39.93
|
%
|
39.93
|
%
|
|
Planet S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2009-2017
|
|
36.99
|
%
|
36.99
|
%
|
|
Pyrrichos Real Estate S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2011-2017
|
|
21.83
|
%
|
21.83
|
%
|
|
SATO S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2012-2017
|
|
23.74
|
%
|
23.74
|
%
|
|
Olganos S.A.
|
|
Greece
|
|
2014-2017
|
|
33.60
|
%
|
33.60
|
%
|
NOTE 21:
Events after the reporting period
Events after the reporting period are disclosed in Note 9.
NOTE 22:
Transition to IFRS 9 as of 1 January 2018
In order to comply with the requirements of the new Standard, the Group established an IFRS 9 implementation program (“the
IFRS 9 Program”) to ensure a timely and high quality implementation, in accordance with the standard and additional regulatory guidance. The IFRS 9 Program involved Finance, GRCAD, Management Information and IT Divisions across the Group and was overseen by a Project Steering Committee. The Committee comprised of the CEO (Chair), Group CFO, Group CRO, Group COO, Group Treasurer and the General Managers of Retail, Corporate Banking, Corporate Special Assets and International Activities Divisions of the Bank. A full-time Project Management Office (PMO) was setup and a Project Manager assigned. Subject matter experts were also appointed to assist in model development of IFRS 9 compliant credit risk parameters. The Board Risk Committee, Audit Committee and Board of Directors were regularly updated by the Executive Management on the status of the IFRS 9 Program.
22.1
Continuation of IAS 39 hedge accounting requirements
IFRS 9 includes an accounting policy choice to continue IAS 39 hedge accounting, which the Group has exercised, although it will implement the revised hedge accounting disclosures required by the related amendments to IFRS 7
Financial Instruments: Disclosures
in the Annual Financial Statements for 2018.
22.2
Impact upon transition to IFRS 9
The adoption of IFRS 9 on 1 January 2018, decreased the Group’s shareholders’ equity by approximately €1.5 billion, of which €1.3 billion, due to changes in impairment requirements and €0.2 billion, due to classification and measurement.
The accounting policies and critical judgments applied by the Group in order to comply with the requirements of IFRS 9 upon transition, are included in Notes 2.4 and 2.5 respectively.
The expected estimates are based on the accounting policies, assumptions and judgments of the Group, as determined to date, which will be finalized during the preparation of the financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2018. Consequently, the aforementioned estimates remain subject to change in 2018.
The tables on the following pages provide a detailed overview of the IFRS 9 transition impact as of 1 January 2018 on the Group’s financial assets, financial liabilities and shareholders’ equity. This includes:
·
Reclassification of IAS 39 carrying amounts to the new categories applicable under IFRS 9
·
Remeasurement of carrying amount due to reclassification (measurement to fair value for assets moving from amortised cost to fair value).
·
Recognition of IFRS 9 ECL for financial instruments scoped into the impairment requirements of IFRS 9.
40
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
Reclassification and remeasurement of carrying amounts and recognition of ECL upon transition to IFRS 9 — Group
|
Financial instruments
|
|
Measurement
category
under IAS 39
|
|
Measurement
category
under IFRS 9
|
|
Carrying
amount
31.12.17
(IAS 39)
|
|
Reclassification
of IAS 39
carrying
amounts
|
|
Measurement
adjustment
(IFRS 9)
|
|
ECL
allowance
adjustment
(IFRS 9)
|
|
Carrying
amount
1.1.18 (IFRS 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances with central banks
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
1,778
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
Due from banks
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
1,736
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
Financial assets at FVTPL
|
|
FVTPL
|
|
FVTPL
|
|
1,793
|
|
4,051
|
(a)
|
(475
|
)(a)
|
—
|
|
5,369
|
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
FVTPL
|
|
FVTPL
|
|
3,681
|
|
(1
|
)(a)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
Loans and advances to customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,941
|
|
(5,832
|
)
|
2
|
|
(1,139
|
)
|
30,972
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
37,941
|
|
(5,997
|
)(b)
|
—
|
|
(1,139
|
)
|
30,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FVTPL (Mandatory)
|
|
—
|
|
165
|
(c)
|
2
|
(j)
|
—
|
|
167
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,780
|
|
(48
|
)
|
229
|
|
(113
|
)
|
3,848
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
FVTOCI
(debt instruments)
|
|
862
|
|
984
|
(d)
|
42
|
(i)
|
—
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
(696
|
)(e)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
2,222
|
|
(425
|
)(f)
|
190
|
(k)
|
(113
|
)
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale
|
|
Designated at FVTOCI (equity instruments)
|
|
—
|
|
89
|
(g)
|
(3
|
)(l)
|
—
|
|
86
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
Loans and receivables
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
1,612
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(19
|
)
|
1,593
|
|
|
Total financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,321
|
|
(1,830
|
)
|
(244
|
)
|
(1,271
|
)
|
48,976
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,916
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6
|
|
4,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to banks
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
7,341
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
7,341
|
|
|
Derivative financial liabilities
|
|
FVTPL
|
|
FVTPL
|
|
3,798
|
|
(1,871
|
)(a)
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
Due to customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,265
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
40,265
|
|
|
|
|
Designated at FVTPL
|
|
Designated at FVTPL
|
|
866
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
39,399
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
39,399
|
|
|
Debt securities in issue
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
1,026
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
Amortised cost
|
|
171
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
171
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
41
|
(h)
|
—
|
|
30
|
|
1,066
|
|
|
Total financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,596
|
|
(1,830
|
)
|
—
|
|
30
|
|
51,796
|
|
Footnotes on reclassifications and remeasurements upon transition to IFRS 9:
(a)
The amount relates to reclassification of financial assets mandatorily measured at FVTPL, which are not loan agreements in their legal form. Under IAS 39 the interest rate swap with the Hellenic Republic maturing in September 2037 (“Swap with the Hellenic Republic”) was bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for as a separate derivative (see Note 19 to the annual Financial Statements of the Group and the Bank for the year ended 31 December 2017). On 1 January 2018, the combined instrument was mandatorily classified at FVTPL and accounted for as a single unit of account, because the hybrid contract failed the SPPI test. The bifurcated derivative liability of €1,871 million and the carrying amount of the host loan of €5,873 million were reclassified from ‘derivative financial liabilities’ and ‘loans and advances to customers’ respectively, into ‘financial assets at FVTPL’. The fair value adjustment recognised upon transition to IFRS 9 in order to reflect the measurement of the hybrid contract at fair value in its entirety, decreased equity by €475 million. An analysis of all reclassifications made into ‘financial assets at FVTPL’ line item, is provided below:
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Bifurcated derivative related to the Swap with the Hellenic Republic reclassified from ‘derivative financial liabilities’
|
|
(1,871
|
)
|
|
Host loan’s carrying amount under IAS 39 related to the Swap with the Hellenic Republic
|
|
5,873
|
|
|
Debt securities previously classified as ‘available for sale’ investments that fail the SPPI test
|
|
26
|
|
|
Debt securities previously classified as ‘loans and receivables’ investments that fail the SPPI test
|
|
16
|
|
|
Reclassification of bifurcated derivative assets for which the host debt securities fail the SPPI test and need to be accounted for as a single unit of account
|
|
1
|
|
|
Investments in mutual funds previously classified as ‘available for sale’ which do not meet the definition of equity instruments
|
|
6
|
|
|
Net amount reclassified into the ‘financial assets at FVTPL’
|
|
4,051
|
|
(b)
The amount consists of the following:
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Reclassification of the host loan’s carrying amount under IAS 39 related to the Swap with the Hellenic Republic into ‘financial assets at FVTPL’ (see (a) above )
|
|
(5,873
|
)
|
|
Reclassification of loans that do not pass the SPPI test into ‘loans and advances to customers’ mandatorily measured at FVTPL
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
Reclassification of IAS 39 allowance for off balance sheet financial assets and commitments into ‘other liabilities’
|
|
41
|
|
|
Net amount reclassified out of ‘loans and advances to customers’ measured at amortised cost
|
|
(5,997
|
)
|
41
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
(c)
The reclassification of €165 million relates to financial assets that have failed the SPPI test, which are loan agreements in their legal form, transferred from ‘loans and advances to customers’ measured at amortised cost into ‘loans and advances to customers’ mandatorily measured at FVTPL.
(d)
The amount consists of the following:
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Reclassification of equity securities into the ‘designated at FVTOCI’ portfolio of IFRS 9 applicable for investments that meet the definition of an equity instrument under IAS 32.
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
Reclassification of mutual funds into ‘financial assets at FVTPL’ (see (a) above)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
Reclassification of debt securities that fail the SPPI test into ‘financial assets at FVTPL’
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
Debt securities reclassified out of ‘held to maturity’ portfolio of IAS 39
|
|
163
|
|
|
Debt securities reclassified into the ‘amortised cost’ investment securities portfolio under IFRS 9
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
Debt securities reclassified out of ‘loans and receivables’ portfolio of IAS 39
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
Net amount reclassified into the ‘FVTOCI’ investment securities portfolio
|
|
984
|
|
(e)
The amount consists of the following:
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Debt securities reclassified into the ‘FVTOCI’ investment securities portfolio under IFRS 9
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
Debt securities reclassified into the ‘amortised cost’ investment securities portfolio under IFRS 9
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
Net amount reclassified out of the ‘held to maturity’ portfolio of IAS 39
|
|
(696
|
)
|
(f)
The amount consists of the following:
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Reclassification of debt securities that fail the SPPI test into ‘financial assets at FVTPL’
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
Debt securities reclassified out of the ‘available for sale’ portfolio of IAS 39
|
|
100
|
|
|
Debt securities reclassified into the ‘FVTOCI’ investment securities portfolio under IFRS 9
|
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
Debt securities reclassified out of the ‘held to maturity’ portfolio of IAS 39
|
|
533
|
|
|
Net amount reclassified into the ‘amortised cost’ investment securities portfolio
|
|
(425
|
)
|
(g)
The Group has elected to classify equity securities of €89 million within the ‘designated at FVTOCI’ measurement category of IFRS 9, applicable for equity instruments. The securities were previously classified as ‘available for sale’ investments.
(h)
The allowance of €
41
million under IAS 39 has been established for off balance sheet financial assets and commitments and is reclassified from ‘loans and advances to customers’ into ‘other liabilities’.
(i)
The amount represents the fair value adjustment recognised directly in the OCI reserve upon transition to IFRS 9, due to the reclassification of debt securities from the ‘loans and receivables’ and ‘held to maturity’ investment securities portfolios of IAS 39 into ‘FVTOCI’.
(j)
Refers to the fair value adjustment of loan agreements that have failed the SPPI, recognised by the Group in retained earnings.
(k)
The adjustment of €190 million is attributable to the GGB previously held by the Bank in the ‘loans and receivables’ investment securities portfolio, maturing in 2057, with nominal amount €550 million and carrying value €965 million as of 31 December 2017 (see Note 21 to the annual Financial Statements of the Group and the Bank for the year ended 31 December 2017). The Group reversed the impact of all reclassifications done in the past and revised the effective interest rate method for inflation linked instruments, by updating the expected cash flows at each period end in line with changes in expectations of inflation.
(l)
The amount represents the fair value adjustment recognised directly in the OCI reserve upon transition to IFRS 9, due to the fair value measurement of investments in equity securities issued by private companies.
42
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
Reconciliation of allowances and provisions on adoption of IFRS 9 as of 1 January 2018
|
|
|
31.12.2017
|
|
1.1.2018
|
|
|
Group
|
|
Loss
Allowances
(IAS 39)
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
Loss Allowances
(IAS 39) after
reclassifications
|
|
ECL
Adjustment
(IFRS 9)
|
|
Final ECL
(IFRS 9)
|
|
|
On Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages
|
|
2,411
|
|
—
|
|
2,411
|
|
486
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
Consumer loans & Credit Cards
|
|
1,681
|
|
—
|
|
1,681
|
|
287
|
|
1,968
|
|
|
Small business lending
|
|
1,719
|
|
(4
|
)
|
1,715
|
|
214
|
|
1,929
|
|
|
Corporate and public sector lending
|
|
4,428
|
|
(239
|
)
|
4,189
|
|
152
|
|
4,341
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
10,239
|
|
(243
|
)
|
9,996
|
|
1,139
|
|
11,135
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
12
|
|
126
|
|
138
|
|
19
|
|
157
|
|
|
Debt Securities at amortized cost
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
113
|
|
113
|
|
|
Total On Balance Sheet
|
|
10,251
|
|
(117
|
)
|
10,134
|
|
1,271
|
|
11,405
|
|
|
Off Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off Balance Sheet financial assets and commitments
|
|
—
|
|
41
|
|
41
|
|
30
|
|
71
|
|
|
Total Off Balance Sheet
|
|
—
|
|
41
|
|
41
|
|
30
|
|
71
|
|
|
Total Allowance
|
|
10,251
|
|
(76
|
)
|
10,175
|
|
1,301
|
|
11,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o/w Stage 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
165
|
|
|
o/w Stage 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
659
|
|
|
o/w Stage 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
10,652
|
|
In addition, an ECL of €3 million has been estimated for debt securities at FVTOCI. The ECL is reflected as a transfer between retained earnings and OCI reserve on 1 January 2018.
Net reclassifications of €76 million relate to allowance of loans mandatorily classified at FVTPL.
Gain/(loss) from transition to IFRS 9 on shareholders’ equity as of 1 January 2018
The tables below present the transition impact recognised in OCI reserve and retained earnings upon adoption of IFRS 9.
|
Impact in OCI reserve
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Reclassification of debt securities from ‘available for sale’ into ‘financial assets at FVTPL’
|
|
1
|
|
|
Fair value measurement of debt securities reclassified from ‘loans and receivables’ into ‘FVTOCI’ investment securities portfolio
|
|
42
|
|
|
ECL allowance for debt securities classified at FVTOCI
|
|
3
|
|
|
Fair value measurement of investments in equity securities issued by private companies designated at FVTOCI
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
Total gain recognised directly in OCI reserve upon transition
|
|
42
|
|
|
Impact in retained earnings
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Reclassification of debt securities from ‘available for sale’ into ‘financial assets at FVTPL’
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Fair value measurement of Swap with the Hellenic Republic
|
|
(475
|
)
|
|
Fair value measurement of loans and advances to customers mandatorily measured at FVTPL
|
|
2
|
|
|
Measurement adjustment of the inflation linked GGB classified at ‘amortised cost’ (see footnote k to note 22.2)
|
|
190
|
|
|
ECL allowance for financial assets classified at amortised cost
|
|
(1,271
|
)
|
|
ECL allowance for off balance sheet commitments
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
ECL allowance for debt securities classified at FVTOCI
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
Deferred tax on ECL allowance
|
|
7
|
|
|
Total loss recognised in retained earnings upon transition
|
|
(1,582
|
)
|
22.3
Estimated impact on regulatory capital
On 12 December 2017 the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union adopted Regulation (EU) 2017/2395 (the “Regulation”), which amended Regulation 575/2013 with Article 473a, allowing credit institutions to gradually apply the impact of the application of IFRS 9 to own funds.
In particular, upon adoption of IFRS 9, credit institutions are allowed to include in the Common Equity Tier 1 capital (CET1), a portion of the increased ECL provisions over a 5-year transitional period starting in 2018. The portion of ECL provisions that can be included in CET1 should decrease over time down to zero to ensure the full implementation of IFRS 9, after the end of the transitional period.
In addition, in accordance with paragraph (4) of the Regulation, if the ECL provisions for Stages 1 and 2 incurred after the first adoption of IFRS 9 are increased, credit institutions are allowed to include the increase in the transitional arrangements.
The percentages of recognition in CET1 of the increased ECL provisions during the 5-year transition period are as follows:
·
0.95 during the period from 01/01/2018-31/12/2018
·
0.85 during the period from 01/01/2019-31/12/2019
43
Notes to the Financial Statements
Group
·
0.70 during the period from 01/01/2020-31/12/2020
·
0.50 during the period from 01/01/2021-31/12/2021
·
0.25 during the period from 01/01/2022-31/12/2022
The Group has decided to apply the transitional arrangements set out in Article 1 of the aforementioned Regulation, including the provisions of paragraph (4), during the transitional period.
By applying the regulatory transitional arrangements for 2018, the Group’s CET1 ratio as at 31 December 2017, decreased by approximately 58bps at 16.4%. On a fully loaded basis, as at 31 December 2017 the Group’s CET1 ratio decreased by approximately 373bps at 13.2%.
44