UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2012
or
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For The Transition Period From to
Commission file number 000-23377
INTERVEST BANCSHARES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-3699013
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
|
One Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 400
New York, New York 10020-2002
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 218-2800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: YES
x
NO
¨
.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). YES
x
NO
¨
.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer
|
|
¨
|
|
Accelerated Filer
|
|
¨
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
|
x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company
|
|
¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act):
YES
¨
NO
x
.
Indicate number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
As of October 31, 2012, there were 21,589,589 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding.
INTERVEST BANCSHARES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
September 30, 2012 FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Safe Harbor Statement
We are making this statement in order to satisfy the Safe Harbor provision contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The statements contained in this report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact may include forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Words such as may, will,
could, should, would, believe, anticipate, estimate, expect, intend, plan, project, assume, indicate,
continue, target, goal, and similar words or expressions of the future are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Except for historical information, the matters discussed herein are subject to certain
risks and uncertainties that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in forward looking statements:
the regulatory agreements to which we are currently subject to and any operating restrictions arising therefrom including availability of regulatory approvals or waivers; changes in economic conditions and real estate values both nationally and in
our market areas; changes in our borrowing facilities, volume of loan originations and deposit flows; changes in the levels of our non-interest income and provisions for loan and real estate losses; changes in the composition and credit quality of
our loan portfolio; legislative or regulatory changes, including increased expenses arising therefrom; changes in interest rates which may reduce our net interest margin and net interest income; increases in competition; technological changes which
we may not be able to implement; changes in accounting or regulatory principles, policies or guidelines; changes in tax laws and our ability to utilize our deferred tax asset, including NOL and AMT carryforwards; and our ability to attract and
retain key members of management. Reference is made to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for further discussion of risks and uncertainties regarding our business. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future
prospects. Our risk factors are disclosed in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and updated as needed in Item 1A of Part II of our reports on Form 10-Q.
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION - ITEM 1. Financial
Statements
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except par value)
|
|
At September 30,
2012
|
|
|
At December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
89,131
|
|
|
$
|
22,992
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
6,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
94,268
|
|
|
|
29,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits with banks
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
Securities held to maturity, net (estimated fair value of $438,710 and $698,804, respectively)
|
|
|
440,002
|
|
|
|
700,444
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
Loans receivable (net of allowance for loan losses of $28,382 and $30,415, respectively)
|
|
|
1,126,789
|
|
|
|
1,133,375
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
7,216
|
|
Loan fees receivable
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
4,188
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,919
|
|
|
|
4,104
|
|
Foreclosed real estate (net of valuation allowance of $5,328 and $6,037, respectively)
|
|
|
21,858
|
|
|
|
28,278
|
|
Deferred income tax asset
|
|
|
31,992
|
|
|
|
38,836
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
11,375
|
|
|
|
12,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,751,880
|
|
|
$
|
1,969,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposit accounts
|
|
$
|
4,546
|
|
|
$
|
4,702
|
|
Interest-bearing deposit accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking (NOW) accounts
|
|
|
13,069
|
|
|
|
9,915
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
9,074
|
|
|
|
9,505
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
416,095
|
|
|
|
438,731
|
|
Certificate of deposit accounts
|
|
|
989,425
|
|
|
|
1,199,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposit accounts
|
|
|
1,432,209
|
|
|
|
1,662,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
17,500
|
|
Subordinated debentures - capital securities
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
Accrued interest payable on all borrowed funds
|
|
|
5,785
|
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
69,487
|
|
|
|
78,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable on deposits
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
Mortgage escrow funds payable
|
|
|
27,916
|
|
|
|
19,670
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
13,193
|
|
|
|
8,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,544,772
|
|
|
|
1,772,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; 300,000 shares authorized; 25,000 issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital, preferred
|
|
|
24,975
|
|
|
|
24,975
|
|
Preferred stock discount
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
Common stock ($1.00 par value; 62,000,000 shares authorized; 21,589,589 and 21,125,289 issued and outstanding,
respectively)
|
|
|
21,590
|
|
|
|
21,125
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital, common
|
|
|
85,708
|
|
|
|
84,765
|
|
Unearned compensation on restricted common stock awards
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
76,288
|
|
|
|
67,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
207,108
|
|
|
|
197,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,751,880
|
|
|
$
|
1,969,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine-Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
$
|
17,351
|
|
|
$
|
19,912
|
|
|
$
|
53,202
|
|
|
$
|
61,976
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
6,255
|
|
|
|
8,681
|
|
Other interest-earning assets
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
19,082
|
|
|
|
23,160
|
|
|
|
59,486
|
|
|
|
70,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
8,654
|
|
|
|
11,978
|
|
|
|
28,214
|
|
|
|
36,684
|
|
Subordinated debentures - capital securities
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
FHLB advances and all other borrowed funds
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
9,223
|
|
|
|
12,729
|
|
|
|
29,964
|
|
|
|
39,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend income
|
|
|
9,859
|
|
|
|
10,431
|
|
|
|
29,522
|
|
|
|
31,655
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,859
|
|
|
|
8,240
|
|
|
|
29,522
|
|
|
|
26,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from the early repayment of mortgage loans
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
Income from mortgage lending activities
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
793
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
Customer service fees
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Impairment writedowns on investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONINTEREST EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
1,749
|
|
|
|
6,271
|
|
|
|
5,226
|
|
Occupancy and equipment, net
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Professional fees and services
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
Stationery, printing, supplies, postage and delivery
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
FDIC insurance
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
General insurance
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Director and committee fees
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Real estate activities expense
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Provision for real estate losses
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
All other
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
|
6,068
|
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
17,228
|
|
|
|
15,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
5,844
|
|
|
|
16,012
|
|
|
|
14,945
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
7,320
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
8,692
|
|
|
|
8,112
|
|
Preferred stock dividend requirements and discount amortization
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
(1,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
2,225
|
|
|
$
|
2,638
|
|
|
$
|
7,347
|
|
|
$
|
6,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning and end of period
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL, PREFERRED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning and end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCK DISCOUNT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,148
|
)
|
Amortization of preferred stock discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
21,125,289
|
|
|
|
21,125
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
|
|
21,126
|
|
Issuance of 465,400 shares of restricted stock to employees/directors
|
|
|
465,400
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 100 shares upon exercise of common stock option
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of 1,200 shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
21,589,589
|
|
|
|
21,590
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
|
|
21,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL, COMMON
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,705
|
|
Issuance of 465,400 shares of restricted stock to employees/directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeitures of 1,200 shares of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense related to grants of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNEARNED COMPENSATION - RESTRICTED STOCK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
Issuance of 465,400 shares of restricted common stock to employees/directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned compensation to compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RETAINED EARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,026
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,112
|
|
Preferred stock discount amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity at end of period
|
|
|
21,614,589
|
|
|
$
|
207,108
|
|
|
|
21,151,489
|
|
|
$
|
194,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stockholders equity
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,528
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,141
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
|
21,589,589
|
|
|
|
182,580
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
|
|
170,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity at end of period
|
|
|
21,614,589
|
|
|
$
|
207,108
|
|
|
|
21,151,489
|
|
|
$
|
194,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
8,692
|
|
|
$
|
8,112
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Provisions for loan and real estate losses
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
6,957
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
6,844
|
|
|
|
5,997
|
|
Compensation expense related to grants of common stock and options
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
Amortization of deferred debenture offering costs
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Amortization of premiums (accretion) of discounts and deferred loan fees, net
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
(1,104
|
)
|
Net gain from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Net gain from sale/transfer of foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
Impairment writedowns on investment securities
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Net increase in accrued interest payable on debentures
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in official checks outstanding
|
|
|
5,385
|
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
Net decrease in loan fees receivable
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
Net change in all other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
13,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
29,486
|
|
|
|
35,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities and calls of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
501,870
|
|
|
|
562,638
|
|
Purchases of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(243,486
|
)
|
|
|
(627,721
|
)
|
Purchases of interest-earning time deposits with banks
|
|
|
(2,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Redemptions of FRB and FHLB stock, net
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
Repayments of loans receivable, net
|
|
|
6,543
|
|
|
|
129,936
|
|
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
3,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of premises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
266,988
|
|
|
|
65,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits
|
|
|
(229,815
|
)
|
|
|
(88,080
|
)
|
Net increase in mortgage escrow funds payable
|
|
|
8,246
|
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
Net decrease in FHLB advances - original terms of more than 3 months
|
|
|
(10,500
|
)
|
|
|
(8,000
|
)
|
Principal repayments of mortgage note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(232,069
|
)
|
|
|
(88,507
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
64,405
|
|
|
|
12,887
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
29,863
|
|
|
|
23,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
94,268
|
|
|
$
|
36,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
30,264
|
|
|
$
|
39,329
|
|
Cash paid (received) for income taxes, net
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
(10,559
|
)
|
Loans transferred to foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
Loans originated to finance sales of foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividend requirements and amortization of related discount
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 - Principles of Consolidation, Basis of Presentation, Use of Estimates and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements (the financial statements) in this report on Form 10-Q have not been audited except for
information derived from our audited 2011 consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and should be read in conjunction with our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2011 10-K). Certain information and note disclosures normally
included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted in this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Use of Estimates
In preparing our financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities as of the date of
the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change currently relate to the determination of our
allowance for loan losses, valuation allowance for real estate losses, other than temporary impairment assessments of our security investments and the need for and amount of a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset. These estimates involve a
higher degree of complexity and subjectivity and may require assumptions about highly uncertain matters. Current market conditions increase the risk and complexity of the judgments in these estimates.
In our opinion, all material adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods
presented in this report have been made. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Our results of operations for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year or any other interim period.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Our accounting and reporting policies conform to GAAP and general practices within the banking industry and are consistent with those described in note 1
to the financial statements included in our 2011 10-K, as updated by the information in this Form 10-Q.
Allowance for Loan Losses and Loan Chargeoffs
The allowance for loan losses, which also includes a valuation allowance for impaired loans, is netted against loans receivable and is increased by
provisions charged to operations and decreased by chargeoffs (net of recoveries). The adequacy of the allowance is evaluated at least quarterly with consideration given to our historical lending loss rate for each major loan type (exclusive of the
impact of any transaction that is unusual and deemed not reflective of normal charge-off history), which rate is then adjusted either upward or downward based on a review of the following qualitative factors and their estimated impact to the
historical loss rate: the nature and size of our loan portfolio; overall portfolio quality; loan concentrations by type and location of the collateral property; specific problem loans and estimates of fair value of the related collateral; historical
chargeoffs and recoveries; trends in nonaccrual loans; adverse situations which may affect the borrowers ability to repay; our perception of the current and anticipated economic conditions in our lending areas as well as national economic
conditions; trends in our loan volume and associated terms; changes in our risk selection, underwriting standards, and policies and procedures in making new loans; the experience, ability and depth of our lending staff; and for the current
evaluation of collateral value.
We fully or partially charge off a loan when such amount has been deemed uncollectible and confirmed as a
loss. In the case of impaired collateral dependent loans, we normally charge-off the portion of the loans recorded investment that exceeds the appraised value (net of estimated selling costs) of its underlying collateral. The remaining portion
of the valuation allowance that we have provided and maintain on all of our impaired loans for the difference between the net appraised value and our internal estimate of fair value of the collateral is charged off only when such amount has been
confirmed as a loss, either through the receipt of future appraisals or through our quarterly evaluation of the factors described below.
7
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 - Principles of Consolidation, Basis of Presentation, Use of Estimates and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies, Continued
Consistent with regulatory guidance, we normally maintain a specific valuation allowance on each of our
impaired loans. We believe it is prudent to do so because the process of estimating real estate values is imprecise and subject to changing market conditions which could cause fluctuations in estimated values. Estimates are subjective in nature,
involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in any of the market assumptions could cause fair value estimates to deviate substantially. Furthermore, commercial real estate
markets and national and local economic conditions remain weak; unemployment rates and vacancy rates in retail and office properties continue to be high; and the timing of the resolution of impaired loans in many cases remains uncertain, which
increases the negative impact to the portfolio from further declines in real estate values.
Regulatory guidelines require that the appraised
value of collateral should be used as a starting point for determining its estimated fair value. An institution should also consider other factors and events in the environment that may affect the current fair value of the collateral since the
appraisal was performed. The institutions experience with whether the appraised values of impaired collateral-dependent loans are actually realized should also be taken into account. In addition, the timing of when the cash flows are expected
to be received from the underlying collateral could affect the fair value of the collateral if the timing was not contemplated in the appraisal. The consideration of all the above generally results in the appraised value of the collateral being
greater than the institutions estimate of the collaterals fair value, less estimated costs to sell. As a consequence, an institution may necessarily still have a specific reserve on an impaired loan (whether or not a charge off has been
taken) for the amount by which the institutions estimated fair value of the collateral, less estimated costs to sell, is believed to be lower than its appraised value. As a result, we maintain a specific valuation allowance on all of our
impaired loans for the reasons described above.
We estimate the fair value of the properties that collateralize our impaired loans based on a
variety of information, including third party appraisals and our managements judgment of other factors. Our internal policy is to obtain externally prepared appraisals (or in limited cases indications of value from licensed appraisers or local
real estate brokers): for all impaired loans; for restructured or renewed loans; upon classification or downgrade of a loan; upon accepting a deed in lieu of foreclosure; upon transfer of a loan to foreclosed real estate; and at least annually
thereafter for all of our impaired and substandard rated loans and real estate owned through foreclosure.
In addition to obtaining
appraisals, we also consider the knowledge and experience of our two senior lending officers (our Chairman and our President) and our Chief Credit Officer related to values of properties in our geographical market areas. These officers take into
account various information, including: local and national real estate market data provided by third parties; the consideration of the type, condition, location and occupancy of the specific collateral property as well as the current economic
conditions and demand for the specific property in the area the property is located in assessing our internal estimates of fair value.
Our
regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, also periodically review our allowances for loan and real estate losses. Accordingly, we may be required to take chargeoffs and/or recognize additions to these allowances based on the
regulators judgment concerning information available to them during their examination. There were no changes to our methodology for the allowance for loan loss during the nine-months ended September 30, 2012.
Impaired Loans
We normally deem loans to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect both principal and interest due according to the loans
contractual terms. Impairment for larger balance loans can be measured based on either the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loans effective interest rate; the observable market price of the loan; or the estimated
fair value of the loans collateral, if payment of the principal and interest is dependent upon the collateral. When the fair value of the property is less than the recorded investment in the loan, this deficiency is recognized as a specific
valuation allowance (recorded as part of the allowance for loan losses) with a charge to expense through the provision for loan losses.
8
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 - Principles of Consolidation, Basis of Presentation, Use of Estimates and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies, Continued
We consider a variety of factors in determining whether a loan is impaired, including (i) any
notice from the borrower that the borrower will be unable to repay all principal and interest amounts contractually due under the loan agreement, (ii) any delinquency in the principal and/or interest payments other than minimal delays or
shortfalls in payments, and (iii) other information known by us that would indicate the full repayment of principal and interest is not probable. We generally consider delinquencies of 60 days or less to be minimal delays, and accordingly we do
not consider such delinquent loans to be impaired in the absence of other indications. Our impaired loans normally consist of loans on nonaccrual status and those classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs).
Generally, impairment for all of our impaired loans is calculated on a loan-by-loan basis using either the estimated fair value of the loans
collateral less estimated selling costs (for collateral dependent loans) or the present value of the loans cash flows (for non-collateral dependent loans). Any calculated impairment is recognized as a valuation allowance within the overall
allowance for loan losses and a charge through the provision for loan losses. We may charge off any portion of the impaired loan with a corresponding decrease to the valuation allowance when such impairment is deemed uncollectible. The net carrying
amount of an impaired loan (net of the valuation allowance) does not at any time exceed the recorded investment in the loan.
A TDR is a loan
that we have restructured, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrowers financial difficulties, and for which we have granted certain concessions to the borrower that we would not otherwise have considered. These concessions are made
to provide payment relief generally consisting of the deferral of principal and or interest payments for a period of time, or a partial reduction in interest payments. In determining if a concession has been made, we also consider if the borrower is
able to access funds in the general market place at a market rate for debt with similar risk characteristics as the restructured debt. A loan that is extended or renewed at a stated interest rate equal to the current interest rate for a new loan
originated by us with similar risk is not reported as a restructured loan. A TDR that is on nonaccrual status is returned to an accrual status if ultimate collectability of all the contractual principal is assured, and the borrower has demonstrated
satisfactory payment performance either before or after the restructuring, usually consisting of a six-month period.
Note 2 - Description of Business
Intervest Bancshares Corporation (IBC) is the parent company of Intervest National Bank (INB) and IBC owns 100% of INBs capital
stock. INB is a nationally chartered commercial bank that opened on April 1, 1999. References to we, us and our in these footnotes refer to IBC and INB on a consolidated basis, unless otherwise specified.
For a detailed description of our business, see note 1 to the financial statements included in our 2011 10-K.
9
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 3 - Securities Held to Maturity
The carrying value (amortized cost) and estimated fair value of securities held to maturity are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Number of
Securities
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Wtd-Avg
Yield
|
|
|
Wtd-Avg
Expected
Life
|
|
|
Wtd-Avg
Remaining
Maturity
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies (1)
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
346,572
|
|
|
$
|
1,518
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
348,077
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.6 Yrs
|
|
|
|
4.3 Yrs
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed (2)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
88,675
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
89,619
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
%
|
|
|
3.2 Yrs
|
|
|
|
17.9 Yrs
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
4.5 Yrs
|
|
|
|
4.5 Yrs
|
|
Corporate (3)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
|
|
20.5 Yrs
|
|
|
|
21.2 Yrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
440,002
|
|
|
$
|
2,479
|
|
|
$
|
3,771
|
|
|
$
|
438,710
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.3 Yrs
|
|
|
|
7.2 Yrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies (1)
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
$
|
696,066
|
|
|
$
|
2,381
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
698,294
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
1.2 Yrs
|
|
|
|
4.8 Yrs
|
|
Corporate (3)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
%
|
|
|
21.9 Yrs
|
|
|
|
21.9 Yrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
700,444
|
|
|
$
|
2,381
|
|
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
|
$
|
698,804
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
1.2 Yrs
|
|
|
|
5.0 Yrs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Consist of debt obligations of U.S. government sponsored agencies (GSEs) - FHLB, FNMA, FHLMC or FFCB. GSEs are federally chartered corporations privately owned by
shareholders. GSE securities carry no explicit U.S. government guarantee of creditworthiness. Neither principal nor interest payments are guaranteed by the U.S. government nor do they not constitute a debt or obligation of the U.S. government or any
of its agencies or instrumentalities other than the applicable GSE. In September 2008, FNMA and FHLMC were placed under U.S. government conservatorship.
|
(2)
|
Consist of $19.9 million of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) pass-through certificates and $68.8 million of Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
participation certificates. The GNMA pass-through certificates are guaranteed as to the payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government while the FNMA certificates have an implied guarantee by such agency as to
principal and interest payments.
|
(3)
|
Consist of variable-rate pooled trust preferred securities backed by obligations of companies in the banking industry. Amortized cost at September 30, 2012 and
December 31, 2011 is reported net of other than temporary impairment charges of $3.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively.
|
The estimated fair values of securities with gross unrealized losses segregated between securities that have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position for less than twelve months at the respective dates and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Number of
Securities
|
|
|
Less Than Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months or Longer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
8,655
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,655
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
3,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
10,714
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
3,740
|
|
|
$
|
11,195
|
|
|
$
|
3,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
100,058
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100,058
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
100,058
|
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
|
$
|
100,568
|
|
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nearly all of the securities we own have either fixed
interest rates or have predetermined scheduled interest rate increases and nearly all have call or prepayment features that allow the issuer to repay all or a portion of the security at par before its stated maturity without penalty. In general, as
interest rates rise, the estimated fair value of fixed-rate securities will decrease; as interest rates fall, their value will increase. We generally view changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary, which is consistent
with our experience. INB, which holds the portfolio, has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments for a period of time sufficient for the estimated fair value of the securities with unrealized losses to recover, which may be at the
time of maturity. Historically, INB has always recovered the cost of its investments in U.S. government agency securities upon maturity, and expects to do so with its mortgage backed security investments. We view all the gross unrealized losses
related to the agency and mortgaged-backed securities portfolio to be temporary for the reasons noted above. The estimated fair values disclosed in the table above for U.S. government agency and mortgage-backed securities are obtained from
third-party brokers who provide quoted prices derived from active markets for identical or similar securities.
10
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 3 - Securities Held To Maturity, Continued
INB also owns trust preferred securities that are also classified as held to maturity. The investments
in these debt securities represent beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that have contractual cash flows. They consist of mezzanine-class, variable-rate (indexed to 3 month libor) pooled trust preferred securities backed by debt
obligations of companies in the banking industry. At the time of purchase, these securities were investment grade rated. The current estimated fair values of these securities are depressed due to various reasons, including the weak economy, the
financial condition of a large number of the issuing banks, a number of issuing banks that are no longer in business and restrictions that have been or can be placed on the payment of interest by regulatory agencies, all of which have severely
reduced the demand for these securities and rendered their trading market inactive. There has been an adverse change in the estimated future cash flows from these securities due to the reasons cited above that all of these securities have been other
than temporarily impaired (OTTI) to varying degrees as denoted in the table that follows.
11
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 3 - Securities Held to Maturity, Continued
The following table provides various information regarding trust preferred securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write
|
|
|
Adj.
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PV of
|
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Downs
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
% of Collateral
|
|
|
Banks
|
|
|
Discount (4)
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
Cusip # (1)
|
|
Rating
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
Value (3)
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Defaulted
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
in Pool
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Cash Flows
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74041PAEO
|
|
C
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
|
$
|
(765
|
)
|
|
$
|
234
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
35.90
|
%
|
|
|
12.53
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
74040XAD6
|
|
C+
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(604
|
)
|
|
|
15.33
|
%
|
|
|
10.55
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
930
|
|
74040XAE4
|
|
C+
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
15.33
|
%
|
|
|
10.55
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
|
903
|
|
74040XAE4
|
|
C+
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(605
|
)
|
|
|
15.33
|
%
|
|
|
10.55
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
|
903
|
|
74040YAF9
|
|
C
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
25.71
|
%
|
|
|
12.53
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
649
|
|
74040YAE2
|
|
C
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
(695
|
)
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
25.71
|
%
|
|
|
12.53
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
|
|
3.78
|
%
|
|
|
662
|
|
74041UAE9
|
|
C+
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
7.78
|
%
|
|
|
32.30
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
594
|
|
74041UAE9
|
|
C+
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
7.78
|
%
|
|
|
32.30
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,029
|
|
|
$
|
(3,808
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,221
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
(3,740
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74041PAEO
|
|
C
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
|
$
|
(652
|
)
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
35.36
|
%
|
|
|
10.55
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
74040XAD6
|
|
C+
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(606
|
)
|
|
|
14.74
|
%
|
|
|
16.28
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
|
|
784
|
|
74040XAE4
|
|
C+
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(607
|
)
|
|
|
14.74
|
%
|
|
|
16.28
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
|
|
784
|
|
74040XAE4
|
|
C+
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
(608
|
)
|
|
|
14.74
|
%
|
|
|
16.28
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
|
|
784
|
|
74040YAF9
|
|
C
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
(676
|
)
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
24.27
|
%
|
|
|
25.71
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
|
307
|
|
74040YAE2
|
|
C
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
(695
|
)
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
24.27
|
%
|
|
|
25.71
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
|
|
307
|
|
74041UAE9
|
|
C+
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
7.62
|
%
|
|
|
24.97
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
|
|
752
|
|
74041UAE9
|
|
C+
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(567
|
)
|
|
|
7.62
|
%
|
|
|
24.97
|
%
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,029
|
|
|
$
|
(3,651
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,378
|
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
|
$
|
(3,868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
All of these securities were on cash basis accounting because INB is currently not receiving all scheduled contractual interest payments on these securities. A large
portion of the contractual cash flows for the interest payments on these securities are being redirected to a more senior class of bondholders to pay down the principal balance on the more senior class faster. This occurs when deferral and default
activity reduces the securitys underlying performing collateral to a level where a predetermined coverage test fails and requires cash flows from interest payments to be redirected to a senior class of security holders. If no additional
deferrals or defaults occur, such test will eventually be met again through the redirection of the cash flow and cash interest payments would resume on INBs bonds, although no such assurance can be given as to the amount and timing of the
resumption, if any. In January, April, July and October 2012, INB received payments on cusip# 74040XAD6 and 74040XAE4 totaling $52,000.
|
(2)
|
Writedowns are derived from the difference between the book value of the security and the projected present value of the securitys cash flows as indicated per an
analysis performed using guidance prescribed by GAAP.
|
(3)
|
Obtained from Moodys pricing service, which uses a complex valuation model that factors in numerous assumptions and data, including anticipated discounts related
to illiquid trading markets, credit and interest rate risk, which under GAAP would be considered Level 3 inputs. INB believes that the actual values that would be realized in an orderly market under normal credit conditions between a willing buyer
and seller would approximate the projected present value (PV) of the securities cash flows and therefore, these estimated fair values are used for disclosure purposes only and are not used for calculating and recording impairment. INB also has
the intent and the ability to retain these trust preferred securities until maturity and currently has no intention of selling them.
|
(4)
|
In determining whether there is OTTI, INB relies on a cash flow analysis as prescribed under GAAP (ASC 320-10-35) and prepared by a third party specialist to determine
whether conditions are such that the projected cash flows are insufficient to recover INBs principal investment. The basic methodology under GAAP is to compare the present value of the cash flows that are derived from assumptions made with
respect to deferrals, defaults and prepayments from quarter to quarter. A decline in the present value versus that for the previous quarter is considered to be an adverse change. The discount margin in the table above represents the incremental
credit spread used to derive the discount rate for present value computations. Consistent with GAAP, we analyze the specific credit characteristics of the collateral underlying each individual security to develop the deferral/default assumptions for
estimated cash flows. This analysis consists of examining available data regarding trends in earnings and capital and problem asset ratios of each bank in the collateral pool in order to estimate their capacity to continue principal and interest
payments on the investments we own. In order to estimate the expected cash flows, we focused on each banks Texas ratio, which is defined as nonperforming assets plus 90 day past due loans divided by tangible equity plus loan loss reserves. We
concluded that banks with Texas ratios of 75% or more may experience greater difficulties in making payments. As a result, we assigned a default rate of 50% to banks with a Texas ratio of 100% or more and a default rate of 25% to banks with a Texas
ratio of 75% to 99%. The assignment of these rates was based on our judgment. Using these parameters, we also determined and used the following assumptions in measuring cash flows; payments of 1% annually and 100% at maturity and annual defaults of
75 basis points with a 15% recovery after a 2 year lag. It should be noted that the results of any discounted cash flow analysis are significantly affected by variables such as the estimate of the probability of default, discount rates, prepayment
rates and the creditworthiness of the underlying issuers. Therefore, changes in any of these assumptions could cause the results of our cash flow models and OTTI assessments to deviate.
|
12
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 3 - Securities Held to Maturity, Continued
The table below provides a cumulative roll forward of credit losses recognized on securities for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
3,808
|
|
|
$
|
3,555
|
|
|
$
|
3,651
|
|
|
$
|
3,450
|
|
Credit losses on debt securities for which OTTI was not previously recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional credit losses on debt securities for which OTTI was previously recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Less: sale of securities for which OTTI was previously recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
3,808
|
|
|
$
|
3,651
|
|
|
$
|
3,808
|
|
|
$
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the carrying value (amortized cost) and fair value of securities held to maturity as of
September 30, 2012, by remaining period to contractual maturity (ignoring earlier call dates, if any). Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain security issuers have the right to call or prepay their obligations.
The table below does not consider the effects of possible prepayments or unscheduled repayments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
Wtd-Avg
Yield
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
253,508
|
|
|
|
254,634
|
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
104,030
|
|
|
|
104,469
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
82,464
|
|
|
|
79,607
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
440,002
|
|
|
$
|
438,710
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4 - Loans Receivable
Major classifications of loans receivable are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
# of Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
# of Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
$
|
870,938
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
$
|
864,470
|
|
Multifamily loans
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
277,101
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
290,011
|
|
Land loans
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7,210
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
1,155,249
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
1,165,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One to four family loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Commercial business loans
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, gross
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,158,940
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
1,167,573
|
|
Deferred loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163,790
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,415
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,133,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were $48.0 million and $57.2 million of loans, respectively, on nonaccrual
status, and $14.2 million and $9.0 million, respectively, of loans classified as accruing troubled debt restructured loans (TDRs). The total of these loans represented all of our impaired loans as of those dates.
At September 30, 2012, there were four loans totaling $6.5 million, compared to one loan in the amount of $1.9 million at December 31, 2011,
that were 90 days past due and still accruing interest. The balance at September 30, 2012 represents loans that have matured and the borrowers continue to make monthly payments of principal and interest. These loans were in the process of being
extended as of September 30, 2012.
13
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Continued
The recorded investment, corresponding specific impairment valuation allowance and unpaid principal
balance of our impaired loans at the dates indicated are summarized follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded Investment (1) by State
|
|
|
Specific
Valuation
Allowance
(2)
|
|
|
Total
Unpaid
Principal
(3)
|
|
|
# of
Loans
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
NY
|
|
|
FL
|
|
|
NC
|
|
|
NJ
|
|
|
OH
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
$
|
8,396
|
|
|
$
|
9,005
|
|
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
|
$
|
22,006
|
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
|
$
|
27,386
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Office Building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,726
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
16,476
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Mixed Use
|
|
|
5,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
6,393
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
12,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,728
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
16,335
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Land
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
17,263
|
|
|
$
|
38,863
|
|
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
|
$
|
1,393
|
|
|
$
|
1,373
|
|
|
$
|
62,124
|
|
|
$
|
5,147
|
|
|
$
|
70,160
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
$
|
9,285
|
|
|
$
|
9,504
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
2,304
|
|
|
$
|
21,593
|
|
|
$
|
2,741
|
|
|
$
|
26,018
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Office Building
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
|
14,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,787
|
|
|
|
884
|
|
|
|
17,733
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
3,251
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Mixed Use
|
|
|
5,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,508
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
5,796
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
13,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,776
|
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
18,122
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Land
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
20,651
|
|
|
$
|
41,749
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,565
|
|
|
$
|
2,304
|
|
|
$
|
66,269
|
|
|
$
|
8,014
|
|
|
$
|
73,775
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents contractual unpaid principal balance less any partial principal chargeoffs and interest received and applied as a reduction of principal.
|
(2)
|
Represents a specific valuation allowance against the recorded investment included as part of the overall allowance for loan losses. All of our impaired loans have a
specific valuation allowance.
|
(3)
|
Represents contractual unpaid principal balance (for informational purposes only).
|
Other information related to impaired loans is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Average recorded investment in nonaccrual loans
|
|
$
|
49,788
|
|
|
$
|
48,853
|
|
|
$
|
53,809
|
|
|
$
|
49,002
|
|
Total cash basis interest income recognized on nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average recorded investment in accruing TDR loans
|
|
|
14,380
|
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
10,341
|
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
Total interest income recognized on accruing TDR loans under modified terms
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Age analysis of our loan portfolio by segment at September 30, 2012 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Past Due
31-59
Days
|
|
|
Past Due
60-89
Days
|
|
|
Past Due
90 or more
Days
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
Total
Classified
Nonaccrual
|
|
Accruing Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
815,102
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,477
|
|
|
$
|
4,580
|
|
|
$
|
20,057
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
264,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
6,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
3,641
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing loans
|
|
|
1,088,953
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
15,477
|
|
|
|
6,503
|
|
|
|
22,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual Loans (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
31,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,104
|
|
|
|
4,104
|
|
|
|
35,779
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
9,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
11,892
|
|
Land
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
41,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,903
|
|
|
|
6,903
|
|
|
|
47,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
1,130,007
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
15,477
|
|
|
$
|
13,406
|
|
|
$
|
28,933
|
|
|
$
|
47,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
See footnote 1 to table that follows on the next page for an explanation.
|
14
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Continued
Age analysis of our loan portfolio by segment at December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Past Due
31-59
Days
|
|
|
Past Due
60-89
Days
|
|
|
Past Due
90 or more
Days
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
Total
Classified
Nonaccrual
|
|
Accruing Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
794,196
|
|
|
$
|
21,807
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
|
$
|
27,232
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
272,640
|
|
|
|
3,069
|
|
|
|
394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
10,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing loans
|
|
|
1,079,638
|
|
|
|
24,876
|
|
|
|
3,894
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
30,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual Loans (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
39,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
|
43,042
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
7,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
3,738
|
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
|
|
13,908
|
|
Land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
47,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
|
|
7,216
|
|
|
|
10,008
|
|
|
|
57,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
1,126,870
|
|
|
$
|
24,876
|
|
|
$
|
6,686
|
|
|
$
|
9,141
|
|
|
$
|
40,703
|
|
|
$
|
57,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amount of nonaccrual loans in the current column included $38.7 million of TDRs at September 30, 2012 and $45.7 million of TDRs at December 31, 2011 for
which payments are being made in accordance with their restructured terms, but the loans were maintained on nonaccrual status in accordance with regulatory guidance. The remaining portion at both dates was comprised of certain paying loans
classified nonaccrual due to concerns regarding the borrowers ability to continue making payments. Interest income from loan payments on all loans in nonaccrual status is recognized on a cash basis, provided the remaining principal balance is
deemed collectable.
|
Information regarding the credit quality of the loan portfolio based on internally assigned grades follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
Special
Mention
|
|
|
Substandard (1)
|
|
|
Doubtful (1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
789,377
|
|
|
$
|
17,881
|
|
|
$
|
63,680
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
870,938
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
259,984
|
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
|
|
14,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277,101
|
|
Land
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,210
|
|
All other
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
1,057,642
|
|
|
$
|
20,270
|
|
|
$
|
81,028
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,158,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
20,392
|
|
|
$
|
424
|
|
|
$
|
7,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
791,295
|
|
|
$
|
13,108
|
|
|
$
|
59,355
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
864,470
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
270,281
|
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
16,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,011
|
|
Land
|
|
|
8,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
All other
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
1,071,550
|
|
|
$
|
16,062
|
|
|
$
|
79,249
|
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
$
|
1,167,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
20,353
|
|
|
$
|
392
|
|
|
$
|
9,314
|
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
30,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Substandard and doubtful loans consist of $47.9 million of nonaccrual loans, $14.2 million of accruing TDRs and $18.9 million of other performing loans at
September 30, 2012, compared to $57.2 million of nonaccrual loans, $9.0 million of accruing TDRs and $13.7 million of other performing loans at December 31, 2011. For a discussion regarding the rating criteria we use, see note 1 to the
financial statements included in our 2011 10-K.
|
The geographic distribution of the loan portfolio by state follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
New York
|
|
$
|
751,112
|
|
|
|
64.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
763,770
|
|
|
|
65.4
|
%
|
Florida
|
|
|
297,524
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
291,797
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
26,615
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
30,807
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
18,892
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
22,548
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
13,928
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
10,466
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
11,806
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
11,175
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
11,285
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
11,569
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
9,514
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
8,203
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
7,554
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
5,036
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
All other states
|
|
|
3,032
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
3,111
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,158,940
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,167,573
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Continued
We have certain loans that we have restructured (which are identified as TDRs in this report), due to
economic or legal reasons related to a borrowers financial difficulties, and for which we have granted certain concessions to the borrower that we would not otherwise have considered. These concessions generally consist of one or more of the
following: deferral of principal and/or interest payments for a period of time; a partial reduction in interest payments; or an extension of the loans maturity date. In determining if a concession has been made, we also consider if the
borrower is able to access funds in the general market place at a market rate for debt with similar risk characteristics as the restructured debt. A loan that is extended or renewed at a stated interest rate equal to the current interest rate for a
new loan originated by us with similar risk is not reported as a restructured loan.
All TDRs are considered impaired loans. Normally, TDRs
are classified nonaccrual if at the time of restructuring the loan was on nonaccrual status. Once a sufficient amount of time has passed, generally six months, if the restructured loan has performed under the modified terms and the collectability of
all contractual principal (including principal partially charged off) and interest is reasonably assured, the TDR is normally returned to an accruing status. In addition to the passage of time, we also consider the loans payment performance
prior to restructure, collateral value and the ability of the borrower to make principal and interest payments in accordance with the modified terms. Normally, a TDR continues to be considered a TDR until it is paid in full. During the nine-months
ended September 30, 2012, there were two loans restructured and one existing TDR in the amount of $5.5 million returned to accrual status. There were no TDRs modified within the previous 12 months that subsequently defaulted during the three-
and nine-months period ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Information regarding loans restructured during the nine-months ended
September 30, 2012 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Recorded Investment
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
of Loans
|
|
|
Pre-Modification
|
|
|
Post-Modification
|
|
Land extended maturity date
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
|
$
|
520
|
|
The distribution of TDRs by accruing versus non-accruing, by segment and by geographic distribution follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
Non-accruing
|
|
$
|
38,749
|
|
|
$
|
45,705
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
14,167
|
|
|
|
9,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,916
|
|
|
$
|
54,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
40,172
|
|
|
$
|
41,923
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
10,124
|
|
|
|
10,247
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,916
|
|
|
$
|
54,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
$
|
14,586
|
|
|
$
|
14,216
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
36,064
|
|
|
|
37,149
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
1,066
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,916
|
|
|
$
|
54,735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 - Allowance for Loan Losses
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by segment for the periods indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
All
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
18,343
|
|
|
$
|
8,982
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
28,844
|
|
Loan chargeoffs
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
Loan recoveries
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
18,326
|
|
|
$
|
8,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,172
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
28,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
19,103
|
|
|
$
|
11,067
|
|
|
$
|
1,588
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
31,772
|
|
Loan chargeoffs
|
|
|
(946
|
)
|
|
|
(721
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
Loan recoveries
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
20,637
|
|
|
$
|
10,296
|
|
|
$
|
1,421
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
32,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 5 - Allowance for Loan Losses, Continued
Activity in the allowance for loan losses by segment for the periods indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
All
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
19,156
|
|
|
$
|
9,180
|
|
|
$
|
2,069
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
30,415
|
|
Loan chargeoffs
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,476
|
)
|
Loan recoveries
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443
|
|
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
18,326
|
|
|
$
|
8,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,172
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
28,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
21,919
|
|
|
$
|
11,356
|
|
|
$
|
1,553
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
34,840
|
|
Loan chargeoffs
|
|
|
(5,446
|
)
|
|
|
(2,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,554
|
)
|
Loan recoveries
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Provision (credit) for loan losses
|
|
|
4,110
|
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
20,637
|
|
|
$
|
10,296
|
|
|
$
|
1,421
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
32,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables sets forth the balances of our loans receivable by segment and impairment evaluation and the allowance for loan
losses associated with such loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
All
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
44,776
|
|
|
$
|
14,728
|
|
|
$
|
2,620
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,124
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
826,162
|
|
|
|
262,373
|
|
|
|
4,590
|
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
|
1,096,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
870,938
|
|
|
$
|
277,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,210
|
|
|
$
|
3,691
|
|
|
$
|
1,158,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment (1)
|
|
$
|
2,795
|
|
|
$
|
1,837
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,147
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
15,531
|
|
|
|
7,024
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
23,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
18,326
|
|
|
$
|
8,861
|
|
|
$
|
1,171
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
28,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
All
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
46,638
|
|
|
$
|
16,776
|
|
|
$
|
2,855
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
66,269
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
817,832
|
|
|
|
273,235
|
|
|
|
8,363
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
1,101,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
864,470
|
|
|
$
|
290,011
|
|
|
$
|
11,218
|
|
|
$
|
1,874
|
|
|
$
|
1,167,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment (1)
|
|
$
|
4,868
|
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
|
$
|
1,009
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,014
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
14,288
|
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
22,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
19,156
|
|
|
$
|
9,180
|
|
|
$
|
2,069
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
30,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, a specific impairment valuation allowance (included as part of the allowance for loan losses) totaling $5.2
million and $8.0 million, respectively, was maintained on impaired loans (which is detailed in note 4 to financial statements in this report).
|
17
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 6 - Foreclosed Real Estate and Valuation Allowance for Real Estate Losses
Real estate acquired through foreclosure by property type is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
# of Properties
|
|
|
Amount (1)
|
|
|
# of Properties
|
|
|
Amount (1)
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
8,125
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
11,542
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
13,727
|
|
Land
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate acquired through foreclosure
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
21,858
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
28,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Reported net of any associated valuation allowance.
|
Activity in the valuation allowance for real estate losses is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
7,945
|
|
|
$
|
3,966
|
|
|
$
|
6,037
|
|
|
$
|
2,688
|
|
Provision for real estate losses
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
Real estate chargeoffs
|
|
|
(3,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
5,328
|
|
|
$
|
4,667
|
|
|
$
|
5,328
|
|
|
$
|
4,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7 - Deposits
Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit accounts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Wtd-Avg
Stated Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Wtd-Avg
Stated Rate
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
441,072
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
$
|
514,667
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
%
|
Over one to two years
|
|
|
310,292
|
|
|
|
3.71
|
|
|
|
397,394
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
Over two to three years
|
|
|
93,035
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
136,226
|
|
|
|
3.43
|
|
Over three to four years
|
|
|
52,362
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
|
|
67,855
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
Over four years
|
|
|
92,664
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
83,029
|
|
|
|
3.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
989,425
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,199,171
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDs of $100,000 or more totaled $489 million at September 30, 2012 and $600 million at December 31, 2011 and included
brokered CDs of $85 million and $128 million, respectively. At September 30, 2012, all CDs of $100,000 or more (inclusive of brokered CDs) by remaining maturity were as follows: $207 million due within one year; $164 million due over one to two
years; $38 million due over two to three years; $25 million due over three to four years; and $55 million due thereafter. At September 30, 2012, brokered CDs had a weighted average rate of 4.89% and their remaining maturities were as follows:
$36 million due within one year; $31 million due over one to two years; none due over two to three years and over three to four years; and $18 million due thereafter.
Note 8 - FHLB Advances and Lines of Credit
At September 30, 2012, INB had $30 million of unsecured credit lines that were cancelable at any time. As a member of the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRB), INB can borrow from these institutions on a secured basis. At September 30, 2012, INB had available collateral consisting of investment securities and certain
loans that could be pledged to support additional total borrowings of approximately $481 million from the FHLB and FRB if needed.
The
following is a summary of certain information regarding FHLB advances in the aggregate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
At or For the Nine-Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Balance at period end
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
17,500
|
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
|
$
|
17,500
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end for the period
|
|
$
|
10,500
|
|
|
$
|
22,500
|
|
|
$
|
13,500
|
|
|
$
|
25,500
|
|
Average outstanding balance for the period
|
|
$
|
9,511
|
|
|
$
|
21,446
|
|
|
$
|
11,215
|
|
|
$
|
22,947
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate paid for the period
|
|
|
4.31
|
%
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
Weighted-average interest rate at period end
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
18
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 8 - FHLB Advances and Lines of Credit, Continued
Scheduled contractual maturities of outstanding FHLB advances as of September 30, 2012 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Due March 11, 2013
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
Due September 9, 2013
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 - Subordinated Debentures - Capital Securities
Capital Securities (commonly referred to as trust preferred securities) outstanding are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Accrued
Interest
Payable
|
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Accrued
Interest
Payable
|
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
Capital Securities II - debentures due September 17, 2033
|
|
$
|
15,464
|
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
%
|
|
$
|
15,464
|
|
|
$
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
Capital Securities III - debentures due March 17, 2034
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
%
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
Capital Securities IV - debentures due September 20, 2034
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
%
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
%
|
Capital Securities V - debentures due December 15, 2036
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,702
|
|
|
$
|
5,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,702
|
|
|
$
|
4,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The securities are obligations of IBCs wholly owned statutory business trusts, Intervest Statutory Trust II, III, IV and V,
respectively. Each Trust was formed with a capital contribution from IBC and for the sole purpose of issuing and administering the Capital Securities. The proceeds from the issuance of the Capital Securities together with the capital contribution
for each Trust were used to acquire IBCs Junior Subordinated Debentures that are due concurrently with the Capital Securities. The Capital Securities, net of IBCs capital contributions of $1.7 million, total $55 million and qualify as
regulatory Tier 1 capital up to certain limits. IBC has guaranteed the payment of distributions on, payments on any redemptions of, and any liquidation distribution with respect to the Capital Securities. Issuance costs associated with Capital
Securities II to IV were capitalized and are being amortized over the contractual life of the securities using the straight-line method. The unamortized balance totaled approximately $0.7 million at September 30, 2012 and $0.8 million at
December 31, 2011. There were no issuance costs associated with Capital Securities V.
Interest payments on the Junior Subordinated
Debentures (and the corresponding distributions on the Capital Securities) are payable in arrears as follows:
|
|
|
Capital Securities II - quarterly at the rate of 2.95% over 3 month libor;
|
|
|
|
Capital Securities III - quarterly at the rate of 2.79% over 3 month libor;
|
|
|
|
Capital Securities IV- quarterly at the rate of 2.40% over 3 month libor; and
|
|
|
|
Capital Securities V - quarterly at the rate of 1.65% over 3 month libor.
|
Interest payments may be deferred at any time and from time to time during the term of the Junior Subordinated Debentures at IBCs election for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods, or 5 years.
There is no limitation on the number of extension periods IBC may elect, provided, however, no deferral period may extend beyond the maturity date of the Junior Subordinated Debentures. During an interest deferral period, interest will continue to
accrue on the Junior Subordinated Debentures and interest on such accrued interest will accrue at an annual rate equal to the interest rate in effect for such deferral period, compounded quarterly from the date such interest would have been payable
were it not deferred. At the end of the deferral period, IBC will be obligated to pay all interest then accrued and unpaid. During the deferral period, among other restrictions, IBC and any affiliate cannot, subject to certain exceptions:
(i) declare or pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem, purchase or acquire any capital stock of IBC or its affiliates (other than payment of dividends to IBC); or (ii) make any payment of principal or interest or premium on, or
repay, repurchase or redeem any debt securities of IBC or its affiliates that rank pari passu with or junior to the Junior Subordinated Debentures. In February 2010, as required by its primary regulator, IBC exercised its right to defer interest
payments. This deferral does not constitute a default under the indentures governing the securities. At September 30, 2012, IBC had accrued and expensed a total of $5.8 million of interest payments on the Junior Subordinated Debentures.
19
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 9 - Subordinated Debentures - Capital Securities, Continued
The Capital Securities are subject to mandatory redemption as follows: (i) in whole, but not in
part, upon repayment of the Junior Subordinated Debentures at stated maturity or earlier, at the option of IBC, within 90 days following the occurrence and continuation of certain changes in the tax or capital treatment of the Capital Securities, or
a change in law such that the statutory trust would be considered an investment company, contemporaneously with the redemption by IBC of the Junior Subordinated Debentures; and (ii) in whole or in part at any time contemporaneously with the
optional redemption by IBC of the Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole or in part. Any redemption would be subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals.
Note 10 - Stockholders Equity and Preferred Dividends in Arrears
Prior to May 24, 2012, IBC was authorized to issue up to 63,000,000 shares of its capital stock, consisting of 62,000,000 shares
of Class A common stock, 700,000 shares of Class B common stock and 300,000 shares of preferred stock. At IBCs 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 24, 2012, stockholders approved a proposal to amend and restate IBCs
Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate any and all references to Class B common stock and to rename its Class A common stock common stock. As a result, as of September 30, 2012, IBC was authorized to issue up to 62,300,000
shares of its capital stock, consisting of 62,000,000 shares of common stock and 300,000 shares of preferred stock. IBCs board of directors determines the powers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations, and restrictions
thereof on any series of preferred stock issued. A total of 25,000 shares of preferred stock are designated as Series A and are owned by the U.S. Treasury.
As described in note 11 to the financial statements included in our 2011 10-K, in February 2010, IBC ceased the declaration and payment of dividends on its Series A preferred stock held by the U.S.
Treasury as required by IBCs primary regulator. IBC has missed 11 dividend payments as of the date of filing of this report. At September 30, 2012, the amount of preferred dividends undeclared, unpaid and in arrears totaled $3.8 million.
The preferred stock carries a 5% per year cumulative preferred dividend rate, payable quarterly, which increases to 9% beginning in December 2013. Dividends compound if they accrue and are not paid and they also reduce earnings or increase
losses available to our common stockholders. A failure to pay a total of six preferred share dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, gives the holders of the shares the right to elect two directors to IBCs board of directors. That right
will continue until IBC pays all dividends in arrears. In March and October 2012, the Treasury exercised its right and appointed a director to IBCs Board for a total of two directors.
Note 11 - Common Stock Options and Restricted Common Stock
IBC has a shareholder-approved Long Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) under which stock options, restricted stock and other
forms of incentive compensation may be awarded from time to time to officers, employees and directors of IBC and its subsidiaries. The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be awarded under the Plan is 1,500,000. At September 30,
2012, 329,960 shares of common stock were available for award under the Plan. There were no grants of stock options in the first nine months of 2012 or 2011.
A summary of the activity in IBCs outstanding common stock warrant and options and related information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price Per Warrant/Option
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Wtd-Avg
Exercise
Price
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
$5.42 (1)
|
|
|
$17.10
|
|
|
$7.50
|
|
|
$4.02
|
|
|
$3.00
|
|
|
$2.55
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
691,882
|
|
|
|
117,840
|
|
|
|
121,390
|
|
|
|
70,510
|
|
|
|
39,900
|
|
|
|
44,100
|
|
|
|
1,085,622
|
|
|
$
|
6.62
|
|
Forfeited/expired (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(900
|
)
|
|
|
(900
|
)
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
(5,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.95
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2012
|
|
|
691,882
|
|
|
|
116,940
|
|
|
|
120,490
|
|
|
|
69,210
|
|
|
|
38,500
|
|
|
|
42,600
|
|
|
|
1,079,622
|
|
|
$
|
6.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration date
|
|
|
12/23/18
|
|
|
|
12/13/17
|
|
|
|
12/11/18
|
|
|
|
12/10/19
|
|
|
|
12/09/20
|
|
|
|
12/08/21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable (3)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Wtd-avg remaining contractual term (in years)
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value at September 30, 2012 (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents a warrant held by the U.S. Treasury as described in note 11 to the financial statements in our 2011 10-K.
|
(2)
|
Represent options forfeited or expired unexercised.
|
(3)
|
The $4.02 options become 100% vested and exercisable on December 10, 2012.
|
The $3.00 options further vest and become exercisable at the rate of 33.33% on December 9, 2012 and 2013.
The $2.55 options vest and become exercisable at the rate of 33.33% on December 8, 2012, 2013 and 2014.
Full vesting may occur earlier for all options upon the occurrence of certain events as defined in the option agreements.
(4)
|
Intrinsic value was calculated using the closing price of the common stock on September 30, 2012 of $ 3.80.
|
20
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 11 - Common Stock Options and Restricted Common Stock, Continued
On January 19, 2012, a total of 465,400 shares of restricted common stock were awarded under the
Plan as follows: a total of 175,000 shares to five executive officers; a total of 240,000 shares to six non-employee directors; and a total of 50,400 shares to 31 other officers and employees. For the executive officers, the restricted stock awards
vest in two installments, with two thirds vesting on the second anniversary of the grant and the remaining one third on the third anniversary of the grant. For the non-employee directors, the restricted stock awards vest 100% on the first
anniversary of the grant. For the other officers and employees, the restricted stock awards vest in three equal installments, with one third on each of the next three anniversary dates of the grant. Vesting is subject to the grantees continued
employment with us or, in the case of non-employee directors, the grantee continuing to serve as our director on the aforementioned anniversary dates. All of the awards are subject to accelerated vesting upon the death or disability of the grantee
or upon a change in control of our company, as defined in the restricted stock agreements. The grant date fair value for each restricted stock award was $2.90 per share, or a total fair value of $1.4 million, based on the closing market price of the
common stock on the grant date of January 19, 2012. There were no restricted stock awards made in 2011.
A summary of the activity in
IBCs outstanding restricted common stock follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.35
|
|
|
$2.90
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
318,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318,100
|
|
Shares granted to executive officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
Shares granted to non-employee directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
Shares granted to other officers and employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,400
|
|
|
|
50,400
|
|
Shares forfeited by former employees
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2012 (1)
|
|
|
317,500
|
|
|
|
464,800
|
|
|
|
782.300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
All outstanding shares of restricted common stock were unvested at September 30, 2012 and subject to forfeiture. Shares issued at a price of $2.35 on
December 9, 2010 will vest 100% on December 9, 2013. Shares issued at a price of $2.90 on January 19, 2012 will vest as follows: 256,600 on January 19, 2013, 133,267 on January 19, 2014 and 74,933 on January 19, 2015.
All shares may vest earlier upon the occurrence of certain events as defined in the restricted stock agreements. The record holder of the restricted shares possesses all the rights of a holder of our common stock, including the right to receive
dividends on and to vote the restricted shares. The restricted shares may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, encumbered, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated until they become fully vested and transferable in accordance with the
agreements. Shares held by certain executive officers of IBC have further restrictions on transferability as long IBC is a participant in the TARP program.
|
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis with a corresponding increase to stockholders equity over
the vesting period of each award and is as follows: for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, $309,000 and $78,000, respectively, and for the nine-months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, $885,000 and $233,000, respectively. At
September 30, 2012, pre-tax, stock-based compensation cost related to all nonvested awards of options and restricted stock not yet recognized totaled $1.1 million and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.6 years.
Note 12 - Deferred Tax Asset
At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had a deferred tax asset totaling $32.0 million and $38.8 million,
respectively. The tax asset relates to the unrealized benefit for net temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of our existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases that will result in future income tax
deductions as well as an unused net operating loss carryforward (NOL) and Federal AMT credit carryforward, all of which can be applied against and reduce our future taxable income and tax liabilities. At September 30, 2012, the gross NOL
amounted to approximately $21 million for Federal purposes and $52 million for state and local purposes and the Federal AMT credit carryforward amounted to $1.3 million. The NOL carryforwards expire in 2030. The AMT credit carryforward has no
expiration date.
We have determined that a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset was not required at any time during the reporting
periods in this report because we believe that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax asset will be fully realized.
21
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 12 - Deferred Tax Asset, Continued
This conclusion is based on our prior taxable earnings history (exclusive of the NOL generated in the
second quarter of 2010) coupled with positive evidence (such as taxable earnings generated in 2011 and the first nine months of 2012, and our future projections of taxable income) indicating that we will be able to generate an adequate amount of
future taxable income over a reasonable period of time to fully utilize the deferred tax asset. Our ability to realize our deferred tax asset could be reduced in the future if our estimates of future taxable income from our operations and tax
planning strategies do not support the realization of our deferred tax asset. In addition, the amount of our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes realizable for income tax purposes may be reduced under Section 382
of the Internal Revenue Code as a result of future offerings of our capital securities, which could trigger a change in control as defined in Section 382. IBC currently has no plan to issue additional capital securities other than
the issuance of shares of common stock in connection with awards under the Plan discussed in note 11.
Note 13 - Earnings Per Common Share
Net earnings applicable to common stockholders and the weighted-average number of shares used for basic and diluted earnings per common
share computations are summarized in the table that follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
2,225,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,638,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,347,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,822,000
|
|
Weighted-Average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,589,744
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
|
|
21,558,092
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Common Share
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings applicable to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
2,225,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,638,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,347,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,822,000
|
|
Weighted-Average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,589,744
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
|
|
21,558,092
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
Potential dilutive shares resulting from exercise of warrants /options (1)
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average number of common shares outstanding used for dilution
|
|
|
21,590,722
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
|
|
21,558,368
|
|
|
|
21,126,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
For both periods of 2011, outstanding options/warrants to purchase 1,045,422 shares were not dilutive and were not included in computing diluted earnings per share. For
both periods of 2012, outstanding options/warrants to purchase 1,041,122 shares were not dilutive and were not included in computing diluted earnings per share. Potential dilutive common stock shares consist of shares that may arise from the
exercise of outstanding dilutive common stock warrants and options (the number of which is computed using the treasury stock method).
|
Note 14 - Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
We are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our
customers. These instruments can be in the form of commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit and standby letters of credit, and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized
in our financial statements. Our maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract.
Such commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and normally require payment
of fees to us. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case
basis. INB from time to time issues standby letters of credit, which are conditional commitments issued by INB to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in the underwriting of letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in originating loans. We had no standby letters of credit outstanding at September 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
22
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 14 - Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments, Continued
The contractual amounts of off-balance sheet financial instruments are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
Unfunded loan commitments
|
|
$
|
27,606
|
|
|
$
|
18,199
|
|
Available lines of credit
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,299
|
|
|
$
|
19,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 15 - Regulatory Matters and Regulatory Capital
IBC and INB are both currently operating under formal agreements with their primary regulators, including various restrictions arising
therefrom that affect our business. For a discussion of these formal agreements and restrictions, see note 20 the financial statements in our 2011 10-K. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we believe that IBC and INB met all
regulatory capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. As of the date of filing of this report, we are not aware of any conditions or events that would have changed the status of such compliance with those requirements from
September 30, 2012.
Information regarding our regulatory capital and related ratios is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INB
|
|
|
IBC Consolidated
|
|
|
|
At September 30,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
At September 30,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (1)
|
|
$
|
236,868
|
|
|
$
|
218,590
|
|
|
$
|
242,809
|
|
|
$
|
226,325
|
|
Tier 2 Capital
|
|
|
16,235
|
|
|
|
17,176
|
|
|
|
16,290
|
|
|
|
17,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital (2)
|
|
$
|
253,103
|
|
|
$
|
235,766
|
|
|
$
|
259,099
|
|
|
$
|
243,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
1,286,615
|
|
|
$
|
1,360,811
|
|
|
$
|
1,291,033
|
|
|
$
|
1,365,322
|
|
Average assets for regulatory purposes
|
|
$
|
1,789,215
|
|
|
$
|
1,950,445
|
|
|
$
|
1,795,585
|
|
|
$
|
1,958,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
19.67
|
%
|
|
|
17.33
|
%
|
|
|
20.07
|
%
|
|
|
17.84
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
18.41
|
%
|
|
|
16.06
|
%
|
|
|
18.81
|
%
|
|
|
16.58
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
|
13.24
|
%
|
|
|
11.21
|
%
|
|
|
13.52
|
%
|
|
|
11.56
|
%
|
(1)
|
IBCs consolidated Tier 1 capital included $55 million of IBCs outstanding qualifying trust preferred securities and $25 million of IBCs Series A
cumulative perpetual preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury.
|
(2)
|
See note 10 for a discussion of preferred dividends in arrears totaling $3.8 million at September 30, 2012 and $2.8 million and December 31, 2011. Dividends
in arrears have not been deducted from capital and are recorded as reduction in capital only when they are declared and payable.
|
The table that follows presents information regarding our capital adequacy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Requirements
|
|
|
|
Actual Capital
|
|
|
Minimum Under
Prompt
Corrective
Action
Provisions
|
|
|
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
|
|
Minimum
Under
Agreement with
OCC
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Consolidated at September 30, 2012: (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
259,099
|
|
|
|
20.07
|
%
|
|
$
|
103,283
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
242,809
|
|
|
|
18.81
|
%
|
|
$
|
51,641
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
$
|
242,809
|
|
|
|
13.52
|
%
|
|
$
|
71,823
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Consolidated at December 31, 2011
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
243,557
|
|
|
|
17.84
|
%
|
|
$
|
109,226
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
226,325
|
|
|
|
16.58
|
%
|
|
$
|
54,613
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
$
|
226,325
|
|
|
|
11.56
|
%
|
|
$
|
78,336
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
INB at September 30, 2012
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
253,103
|
|
|
|
19.67
|
%
|
|
$
|
102,929
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
128,662
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
154,394
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
236,868
|
|
|
|
18.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
51,465
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
77,197
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
128,662
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
$
|
236,868
|
|
|
|
13.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
71,569
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
89,461
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
161,029
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
INB at December 31, 2011
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
235,766
|
|
|
|
17.33
|
%
|
|
$
|
108,865
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
136,081
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
163,297
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
218,590
|
|
|
|
16.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
54,432
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
81,649
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
136,081
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
$
|
218,590
|
|
|
|
11.21
|
%
|
|
$
|
78,018
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
97,522
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
175,540
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
(1)
|
Assuming IBC had excluded all of its eligible outstanding trust preferred securities (which totaled $55 million) from its Tier 1 capital and included the entire amount
in its Tier 2 capital, consolidated proforma capital ratios at September 30, 2012 would have been 20.07%, 14.55% and 10.46%, respectively.
|
23
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 15 - Regulatory Matters and Regulatory Capital, Continued
The table that follows presents additional information regarding our capital adequacy at
September 30, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
INB
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Capital
|
|
|
Regulatory Capital
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Required
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Required
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
259,099
|
|
|
$
|
103,283
|
|
|
$
|
155,816
|
|
|
$
|
253,103
|
|
|
$
|
154,394
|
|
|
$
|
98,709
|
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
242,809
|
|
|
$
|
51,641
|
|
|
$
|
191,168
|
|
|
$
|
236,868
|
|
|
$
|
128,662
|
|
|
$
|
108,206
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
$
|
242,809
|
|
|
$
|
71,823
|
|
|
$
|
170,986
|
|
|
$
|
236,868
|
|
|
$
|
161,029
|
|
|
$
|
75,839
|
|
Note 16 - Contingencies
We are periodically a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, such as foreclosure
proceedings. Based on review and consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe that there is any pending or threatened proceeding against us, which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on our business, results of
operations, financial position or liquidity.
Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value
disclosures. Currently, we have no assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, such as a securities available for sale portfolio. From time to time, we are required to record at fair value other assets or liabilities
on a non-recurring basis, such as our impaired loans, impaired investment securities and foreclosed real estate. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or writedowns of individual
assets. In accordance with GAAP, we group our assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. For level 3, valuations are
generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These assumptions reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques
may include the use of discounted cash flow models. The results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. See note 21 to the financial statements in our 2011 10-K
for a further discussion of valuation levels 1 and 2. All of our assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis use level 3 inputs.
24
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements, Continued
The following tables provide information regarding our assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Carrying Value
|
|
|
|
At September 30,
2012
|
|
|
At December 31,
2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Impaired loans (1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
44,776
|
|
|
$
|
46,638
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
14,728
|
|
|
|
16,776
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
|
62,124
|
|
|
|
66,269
|
|
Impaired securities (2)
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
4,378
|
|
Real estate acquired through foreclosure
|
|
|
21,858
|
|
|
|
28,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Losses (Gains) (3)
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Losses on
Outstanding Balance
as of
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
8,624
|
|
|
$
|
10,593
|
|
|
$
|
(254
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,025
|
|
|
$
|
(241
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,267
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
4,027
|
|
Land
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
|
12,496
|
|
|
|
15,057
|
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
5,369
|
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
|
|
7,302
|
|
Impaired securities
|
|
|
3,808
|
|
|
|
3,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
5,328
|
|
|
|
6,037
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
1,790
|
|
(1)
|
Comprised of all nonaccrual loans and accruing TDRs. Outstanding carrying value excludes a specific valuation allowance included in the overall allowance for loan
losses. See note 4 to the financial statements included in this report on Form 10-Q.
|
(2)
|
Comprised of certain held-to maturity investments in trust preferred securities considered other than temporarily impaired. See note 3 to the financial statements
included in this report on Form 10-Q.
|
(3)
|
Represents total losses recognized on all assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period indicated. The losses for impaired loans represent the
change (before net chargeoffs) during the period in the corresponding specific valuation allowance, while the losses for foreclosed real estate represent writedowns in carrying values subsequent to foreclosure (recorded as provisions for real estate
losses) adjusted for any gains or losses from the transfer/sale of the properties during the period. The losses on investment securities represent OTTI charges recorded as a component of noninterest income as described in note 3 to the financial
statements in this report on Form 10-Q.
|
The following table presents information regarding the change in assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Impaired
Securities
|
|
|
Impaired
Loans
|
|
|
Foreclosed
Real Estate
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
4,221
|
|
|
$
|
65,240
|
|
|
$
|
26,370
|
|
Net new impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans transferred to foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,457
|
)
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Principal repayments/sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
(4,944
|
)
|
Chargeoffs of impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Writedowns of carrying value subsequent to foreclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
4,221
|
|
|
$
|
62,124
|
|
|
$
|
21,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
4,378
|
|
|
$
|
66,269
|
|
|
$
|
28,278
|
|
Net new impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans transferred to foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,457
|
)
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Other than temporary impairment write downs
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments/sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,466
|
)
|
|
|
(4,944
|
)
|
Chargeoffs of impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Writedowns of carrying value subsequent to foreclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,933
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
4,221
|
|
|
$
|
62,124
|
|
|
$
|
21,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements, Continued
The following table presents information regarding the change in assets measured at fair value on a
nonrecurring basis for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Impaired
Securities
|
|
|
Impaired
Loans
|
|
|
Foreclosed
Real Estate
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
4,475
|
|
|
$
|
50,971
|
|
|
$
|
25,786
|
|
Net new impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than temporary impairment writedowns
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments/sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Chargeoffs of impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans transferred to foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
Gain on transfers of impaired loans at estimate fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Writedowns of carrying value subsequent to foreclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(701
|
)
|
All other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
4,378
|
|
|
$
|
65,308
|
|
|
$
|
27,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
4,580
|
|
|
$
|
56,555
|
|
|
$
|
27,064
|
|
Net new impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than temporary impairment writedowns
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments/sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Chargeoffs of impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans transferred to foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
Gain on transfers of impaired loans at estimate fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
Writedowns of carrying value subsequent to foreclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,979
|
)
|
All other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
4,378
|
|
|
$
|
65,308
|
|
|
$
|
27,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are required by GAAP to disclose the estimated fair value of each class of our financial instruments for which it is practicable to
estimate. The fair value of a financial instrument is the current estimated amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many
instances, there are no quoted market prices for our various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument. Additionally, the estimated fair
value of our non-financial instruments is excluded from these disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented in the table that follows may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of our Company.
The fair value estimates shown in the table that follows are made at a specific point in time based on available information. Where
available, quoted market prices are used, which are level 1 valuations. A significant portion of our financial instruments, such as our mortgage loans, do not have an active marketplace in which they can be readily sold or purchased to determine
fair value. Consequently, fair value estimates for such instruments are based on assumptions made by us that include the instruments credit risk characteristics and future estimated cash flows and prevailing interest rates, which are level 3
valuations. As a result, these fair value estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Accordingly, changes in any of our assumptions could cause
the fair value estimates to deviate substantially.
A discussion regarding the assumptions used to compute the estimated fair values disclosed
in the table that follows can be found in note 21 to the financial statements in our 2011 10-K. Fair value estimates included herein are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of
anticipated future business and the fair value of assets and liabilities that are not required to be recorded or disclosed at fair value like premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized
gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.
26
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements, Continued
The carrying and estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Carrying
Value
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (1)
|
|
$
|
94,268
|
|
|
$
|
94,268
|
|
|
$
|
29,863
|
|
|
$
|
29,863
|
|
Time deposits with banks (1)
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
Securities held to maturity, net (2)
|
|
|
440,002
|
|
|
|
438,710
|
|
|
|
700,444
|
|
|
|
698,804
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock (3)
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
Loans receivable, net (3)
|
|
|
1,126,789
|
|
|
|
1,149,004
|
|
|
|
1,133,375
|
|
|
|
1,167,523
|
|
Loan fees receivable (3)
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
4,188
|
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
Accrued interest receivable (3)
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
7,216
|
|
|
|
7,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Assets
|
|
$
|
1,682,736
|
|
|
|
1,703,016
|
|
|
$
|
1,885,805
|
|
|
$
|
1,917,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (3)
|
|
$
|
1,432,209
|
|
|
|
1,463,569
|
|
|
$
|
1,662,024
|
|
|
$
|
1,705,419
|
|
Borrowed funds plus accrued interest payable (3)
|
|
|
69,487
|
|
|
|
69,210
|
|
|
|
78,606
|
|
|
|
78,331
|
|
Accrued interest payable on deposits (3)
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
|
|
3,676
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to lend (3)
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Liabilities
|
|
|
1,504,262
|
|
|
$
|
1,535,345
|
|
|
$
|
1,744,895
|
|
|
$
|
1,788,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Financial Assets
|
|
$
|
178,474
|
|
|
$
|
167,671
|
|
|
$
|
140,910
|
|
|
$
|
129,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
We consider these fair value measurements to be Level 1.
|
(2)
|
We consider these fair value measurements to be Level 1, except for our trust preferred security investments held to maturity which are considered Level 3.
|
(3)
|
We consider these fair value measurements to be Level 3.
|
Note 18 - Recent Accounting Standards Update
In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2011-03 Transfers and Servicing: Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements, which applies to all public entities that enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the
transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The amendments do not affect other transfers of financial assets. ASU 2011-03 removes from the assessment of effective control the criterion relating to the
transferors ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. Consequently, it also eliminates the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses
adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement financial assets. ASU 2011-03 became effective January 1, 2012 and is to be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that
occur on or after such date. We adopted ASU 2011-03 on January 1, 2012 and it had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 Fair Value Measurement: Amendments to Achieve
Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 applies to all reporting entities that are required or permitted to measure or disclose the fair value of an asset, a liability, or an instrument
classified in a reporting entitys shareholders equity in the financial statements. ASU 2011-04 is expected to result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, it changes the
wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. Some of the amendments clarify the application of existing fair value measurement requirements.
Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including the following: (1) measuring the fair value of financial instruments that are managed
within a portfolio; (2) application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement; and (3) additional disclosures about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2011 and is to be applied prospectively. We adopted ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012 and it had no impact on our consolidated financial statements other than to increase financial disclosures already provided.
27
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 18 - Recent Accounting Standards Update, Continued
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive
Income. ASU No. 2011-05 allows an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive
income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive
income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The statement(s) are required to be presented with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other
comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders equity but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.
The provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 became effective for interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required. We adopted ASU No. 2011-05 on January 1, 2012 and it had no impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for
Impairment. ASU No. 2011-08 permits an entity an option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity
believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is
required. ASU No. 2011-08 includes examples of events and circumstances that may indicate that a reporting units fair value is less than its carrying amount. ASU No. 2011-08 became effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment
tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted ASU No. 2011-08 on January 1, 2012 and it had no impact on our consolidated financial statements. We have never had any goodwill.
In December 2011, ASU No. 2011-12 Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications
of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in ASU No. 2011-05 was issued. In order to defer only those changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in this ASU
supersede certain pending paragraphs in ASU 2011-05. The amendments were made to allow the FASB time to re-deliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive
income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the Board is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial
statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities are required to continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before
ASU 2011-05. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not affected by this ASU, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The
provisions of ASU 2011-123 have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
28
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Review by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Hacker, Johnson & Smith P.A., P.C., our independent registered public accounting firm, has made a limited review of our financial data as of September 30, 2012 and for the three- and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 presented in this document, in accordance with the standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
The report of Hacker, Johnson & Smith P.A., P.C. furnished pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation S-X is included on the following
page herein.
29
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Intervest Bancshares Corporation
New York, New York:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) as
of September 30, 2012 and the related condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related condensed consolidated statements of changes in stockholders
equity and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein);
and in our report dated March 9, 2012, we, based on our audit, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2011 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
|
/s/ Hacker, Johnson & Smith P.A., P.C.
|
HACKER, JOHNSON & SMITH P.A., P.C.
|
Tampa, Florida
November 5, 2012
|
30
ITEM 2.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
General
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations that follows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements in this report on Form 10-Q as well as our entire 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2011 10-K).
Intervest Bancshares Corporation (IBC) is the parent company of Intervest National Bank (INB). References in this report to
we, us and our refer to these entities on a consolidated basis, unless otherwise specified. For a discussion of our business, see note 1 to the financial statements included in our 2011 10-K. Our business is also
affected by various risk factors, which are disclosed beginning on page 31 of our 2011 10-K in Item 1A thereof and updated as needed in Item 1A of Part II of our reports on Form 10-Q.
Available Information
IBCs
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements and any amendments to those reports can be obtained (excluding exhibits) without charge by writing to: Intervest Bancshares Corporation,
Attention: Secretary, One Rockefeller Plaza (Suite 400) New York, New York 10020. In addition, the reports (with exhibits) are available on the Securities and Exchange Commissions website at www.sec.gov. IBC has a website at
www.intervestbancsharescorporation.com that is used for limited purposes and contains certain reports after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. INB also has a website at www.intervestnatbank.com. The information on both of
these web sites is not and should not be considered part of this report and is not incorporated by reference in this report.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We consider our critical accounting policies to be those that relate to the determination of the following: our
allowance for loan losses; our valuation allowance for real estate losses; other than temporary impairment assessments of our security investments; and the need for and amount of a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset. These items are
considered critical accounting estimates because each is highly susceptible to change from period to period and require us to make numerous assumptions about a variety of information that directly affect the calculation of the amounts reported in
our consolidated financial statements. For example, the impact of a large unexpected chargeoff could deplete the allowance for loan losses and potentially require us to record increased loan loss provisions to replenish the allowance, which could
negatively affect our operating results and financial condition. A detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies and the factors and estimates we use in applying them can be found under the caption Critical Accounting Policies
on pages 46 to 51 in our 2011 10-K.
Overview
Net earnings for the third quarter of 2012 (Q3-12) amounted to $2.2 million, or $0.10 per diluted common share, compared to $2.6 million, or $0.12 per share, for the third quarter of 2011
(Q3-11). For the first nine months of 2012 (9mths-12), net earnings amounted to $7.3 million or $0.34 per share, compared to $6.8 million, or $0.32 per share, for the first nine months of 2011 (9mths-11).
Key components of our performance are summarized below.
|
|
|
Intervest National Banks regulatory capital ratios continued to increase through the retention of earnings and a gradual reduction in the size of
its balance sheet. The Banks ratios at September 30, 2012 were as follows: Tier One Leverage - 13.24%; Tier One Risk-Based - 18.41%; and Total Risk-Based Capital - 19.67%; well above its minimum requirements of 9%, 10% and 12%,
respectively. Tier One capital amounted to $237 million and was $76 million in excess of the required minimum for the Tier One Leverage ratio.
|
|
|
|
New loan originations increased to $159 million in the 9mths-12 period, from $50 million in 9mths-11.
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans decreased to $48 million at September 30, 2012, from $57 million at December 31, 2011. Nonaccrual loans include certain
restructured loans (TDRs) that are current as to payments and performing in accordance with their renegotiated terms, but are required to be classified nonaccrual based on regulatory guidance. At September 30, 2012, such loans totaled $39
million compared to $46 million at December 31, 2011. These loans were yielding approximately 5% at September 30, 2012.
|
31
|
|
|
Real estate owned through foreclosure (REO) decreased to $21.9 million at September 30, 2012, from $28.3 million at December 31, 2011,
reflecting $4.9 million of sales and $2.9 million of writedowns, partially offset by $1.4 million of additions.
|
|
|
|
Provisions for loan and real estate losses decreased to $1.0 million in Q3-12 from $2.9 million in Q3-11, and $2.9 million in 9mths-12 from $6.9
million in 9mths-11.
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses amounted to $4.2 million in Q3-12, compared to $3.6 million in Q3-11, and $12.5 million in 9mths-12, compared to $12.1 million in
9mths-11. The Companys efficiency ratio (which measures its ability to control expenses as a percentage of revenues) continued to be favorable and was 38% for Q3-12 and 9mths-12, compared to 29% for Q3-11 and 35% for 9mths-11.
|
|
|
|
The net interest margin (exclusive of loan prepayment income) increased to 2.32% in Q3-12 and 2.23% in 9mths-12, from 2.13% and 2.17%, respectively,
for the same periods of 2011. Net interest and dividend income, which was affected by a smaller balance sheet, amounted to $9.8 million in Q3-12 compared to $10.4 million in Q3-11, and $29.5 million in 9mths-12 compared to $31.7 million in 9mths-11.
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share (after subtracting preferred dividends in arrears) increased to $8.28 at September 30, 2012, from $8.07 at
December 31, 2011.
|
Since early 2010 through September 30, 2012, INB has steadily lowered the interest rates
offered on its deposit products to encourage deposit outflow and reduce the overall size of its balance sheet. This posture combined with the retention of operating earnings has increased INBs regulatory capital ratios significantly during
this period. During the same time, INB has also successfully focused on the reduction of its nonperforming and underperforming assets. In addition, as described in our 2011 10-K and 2012 Form10-Q filings to date, each of IBC and INB has also been
operating under a formal agreement with its primary regulator during this period which has increased our regulatory expenses, imposed various operating restrictions on us and consumed a large amount of our senior managements time and focus.
As of September 30, 2012, we believe that we were in compliance with all the requirements of both formal agreements. INBs
regulator has communicated to us that INB must have sustained performance with respect to several articles in its formal agreement in order to achieve full compliance. We cannot predict when the regulators will consider us in full compliance and
when they will lift the formal agreements.
Our real estate lending activities continue to receive increased oversight from the regulators,
including among other things, requiring us to reduce our internal commercial real estate loan concentration limits as a percentage of our regulatory capital, as that ratio is defined by the regulators. Furthermore, we cannot predict if additional
regulatory burdens may be imposed on us in the future. Depending on market conditions and available lending opportunities that are suitable for us as described below, as well as any regulatory constraints that may affect us, the overall size of
INBs balance sheet or its loan portfolio may continue to decline in the near term.
We rely on INBs lending activities for the
bulk of our revenues. INB has always emphasized the origination of first mortgage loans secured by commercial and multifamily real estate. Historically, the amount of our loans in these two categories was more closely divided in proportion to each
other. Over the past few years, due to increased liquidity in the banking system and widespread increasing competition for these types of loans, particularly multifamily loans in the New York City metropolitan area, the effective loan rates for many
of these types of loans (both multifamily and commercial real estate) have been driven down substantially from historical levels, with rates currently being offered at 3% or below for 5 to 10 year multifamily balloon product, with a portion being
interest only loans. In addition to this aggressive pricing by our competitors, government agency programs have increased the attractiveness of these loans and have further fueled interest rate and term competition. Further, the low rates have
driven up the size of these loans in relation to the value of the underlying collateral.
As a matter of policy, we pursue the financing of
multifamily and commercial real estate when we can get loan terms and rates we believe are suitable for us and which meet our underwriting standards. Current conditions in the marketplace have resulted in a large number of our existing loans being
repaid through refinancing by other institutions and our new loan originations being more weighted towards commercial real estate loans, with an emphasis on mixed-use type properties and retail strip centers in the New York City metropolitan area.
32
This trend, in addition to reducing the overall yield on our loan portfolio as well as that of the banking
industry in general, has caused our total commercial real estate loans as a percentage of our total loans to increase from December 31, 2006 to September 30, 2012 from 57% to 75%, compared to a decrease in our multifamily loans from 40% to
24% during the same period. Additionally, during the same time frame, as a result of lower market interest rates, competitive market conditions and lower pricing in originating loans, we have placed greater reliance on fixed-rate loan originations
with somewhat longer maturities. To illustrate, fixed-rate loans constituted approximately 78% of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2012, compared to approximately 40% at December 31, 2006. Loans in the portfolio had an average life of
approximately 3.7 years at September 30, 2012, compared with 3 years at December 31, 2006. We cannot predict whether all the trends or factors noted above will continue for an additional extended period and how they will impact our loan
origination volumes and profitability over the long term.
As a result of our increased capital levels, we are exploring opportunities to
repurchase our securities held by the U.S. Treasury as part of the Capital Purchase Program. Any repurchase would require regulatory approvals from both of our primary regulators. We would also need to repay accrued but unpaid interest on our junior
subordinated debentures as well as accrued but unpaid dividends on our Series A preferred stock held by the Treasury in connection with the repurchase. See the section entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources in this report.
Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
A comparison of selected consolidated balance sheet information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
% of
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
94,268
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
29,863
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Security investments, net
|
|
|
452,129
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
711,163
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees and loan loss allowance
|
|
|
1,126,789
|
|
|
|
64.3
|
|
|
|
1,133,375
|
|
|
|
57.6
|
|
Foreclosed real estate, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
21,858
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
28,278
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
All other assets
|
|
|
56,836
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
66,861
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,751,880
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,969,540
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,432,209
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,662,024
|
|
|
|
84.4
|
%
|
Borrowed funds and related interest payable
|
|
|
69,487
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
78,606
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
All other liabilities
|
|
|
43,076
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
31,379
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,544,772
|
|
|
|
88.2
|
|
|
|
1,772,009
|
|
|
|
90.0
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
207,108
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
197,531
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,751,880
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,969,540
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Total assets at September 30, 2012 decreased to $1.75 billion from $1.97 billion at December 31, 2011, primarily reflecting a decrease in security investments and loans, partially offset by an
increase in cash and short-term investments. The net decrease in assets was funded by a reduction in deposit liabilities and borrowed funds.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash
and cash equivalents increased to $94 million at September 30, 2012 from $30 million at December 31, 2011. The level of cash and cash equivalents fluctuates based on various factors, including our liquidity needs, loan demand, deposit
flows, calls of securities, repayments of borrowed funds and alternative investment opportunities. See the following section for the explanation as to the primary factor causing the increase in this line item. INB expects to utilize a large portion
of the September 30 balance to fund new loans over the next several quarters.
See the section Liquidity and Capital
Resources in this report for a discussion of our liquidity and funding commitments.
33
Security and Other Investments
The table below sets forth information about the composition of and changes to our security and other investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Activity for the Period
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
At
Dec 31,
2011
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Matured
or
Redeemed
|
|
|
Called
By
Issuer
|
|
|
Principal
Payments
|
|
|
Amortization
(Premium)
Discount
|
|
|
OTTI
|
|
|
At
Sep 30,
2012
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies (1)
|
|
$
|
696,066
|
|
|
$
|
143,513
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(491,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
346,572
|
|
Residential MBS (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,900
|
)
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,675
|
|
State and municipal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
Corporate (3)
|
|
|
4,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,444
|
|
|
|
243,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(491,970
|
)
|
|
|
(9,900
|
)
|
|
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
440,002
|
|
Other investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock (4)
|
|
|
9,249
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(1,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
Time deposits with banks (5)
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
711,163
|
|
|
$
|
245,931
|
|
|
$
|
(1,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
(491,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,900
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,901
|
)
|
|
$
|
(157
|
)
|
|
$
|
452,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Consist of investment grade debt obligations of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC).
|
(2)
|
Consist of investment grade residential mortgage-backed securities (MBS) issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) and FNMA.
|
(3)
|
Consist of non-investment grade corporate securities (consisting of variable-rate pooled trust preferred securities (or TRUPs) backed by obligations of companies in the
banking industry). As discussed in greater detail in note 3 to the financial statements in this report, other than temporary impairment charges totaling $3.8 million have been recorded on the TRUPs as of September 30, 2012.
|
(4)
|
In order for INB to be a member of the FRB and FHLB, INB must maintain an investment in the capital stock of each entity, which amounted to $5.8 million and $2.6
million, respectively, at September 30, 2012. The FRB stock has historically paid a dividend of 6%, while the FHLB stock dividend fluctuates quarterly and was most recently at the rate of 4.50% on August 17, 2012. The total required
investment fluctuates based on INBs capital level for the FRB stock and INBs loans and outstanding FHLB borrowings for the FHLB stock.
|
(5)
|
At September 30, 2012, time deposits with banks had a weighted-average yield of 1.23% and remaining maturity of 2.68 years.
|
All of the investments in the above table were held by INB. Securities are classified as held to maturity and are carried at amortized cost when INB has
the intent and ability to hold them to maturity. INB invests primarily in U.S. government agency debt obligations to emphasize safety and liquidity. In March 2012, INB also began purchasing MBS in an effort to increase the overall yield on its
investment portfolio. The resulting proceeds from the reduction in total investments from December 31, 2011 was used to fund planned deposit outflow and a portion was being held temporarily in cash and short-term investments for anticipated
funding of new loans as denoted earlier.
At September 30, 2012, the securities held to maturity portfolio had a weighted-average yield
to earliest call date of 1.32% and a weighted-average remaining expected life and contractual maturity of 1.3 years and 7.2 years, respectively. Nearly all of the securities have fixed interest rates or have predetermined rate increases and call
features that allow the issuer to call the security before its stated maturity without penalty. Over the next twelve months, approximately $300 million of securities in the portfolio could potentially be called or repaid assuming market interest
rates remain at or near current levels. A large portion of the resulting proceeds would then be reinvested into similar securities and potentially at lower rates. At the time of purchase, securities with callable features routinely have higher
yields than non-callable securities with the same maturity. However, the callable features or the expiration of the non-callable period of the security will most likely result in the early call of securities in a declining or flat rate environment,
which results in re-investment risk of the proceeds.
At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the securities held-to-maturity
portfolios estimated fair value was $439 million and $699 million, respectively. At September 30, 2012, the portfolio had a net unrealized loss of $1.3 million, compared to a net unrealized loss of $1.6 million at December 31, 2011.
For additional information concerning our securities held to maturity portfolio, see note 3 to the financial statements included in this
report.
34
Loans Receivable, Net of Deferred Fees
Total loans receivable, net of deferred fees, amounted to $1.16 billion at September 30, 2012, unchanged from December 31, 2011.
The table below sets forth information regarding our loan portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2012
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
# of Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
# of Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
$
|
870,938
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
$
|
864,470
|
|
Multifamily loans
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
277,101
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
290,011
|
|
Land loans
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7,210
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
1,155,249
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
1,165,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One to four family loans
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Commercial business loans
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, gross (1)
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,158,940
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
1,167,573
|
|
Deferred loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163,790
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,415
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,133,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth the activity in the net loan portfolio during the first nine months of 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net, at December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
1,133,375
|
|
Originations
|
|
|
159,476
|
|
Principal repayments and sales
|
|
|
(164,619
|
)
|
Transfers to foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
(1,457
|
)
|
Chargeoffs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(2,033
|
)
|
Net decrease in deferred loan fees
|
|
|
14
|
|
Net decrease in allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net, at September 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
1,126,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New loan originations during the period had nearly all fixed interest rates and a weighted-average yield, term and
loan-to-value ratio of 4.64%, 6.0 years and 58%, respectively. The new originations were comprised of $93 million of commercial real estate loans, $64 million of multifamily loans and $2 million of other loans. Loans paid off during the first nine
months of 2012 had a weighted-average yield of 6.24%.
Loans in the portfolio that had fixed interest rates constituted approximately 85% of
the loan portfolio at September 30, 2012. The portfolio also included loans (approximately 13% of the portfolio) that have terms that call for predetermined interest rate increases over the life of the loan. The entire loan portfolio had a
short weighted-average remaining life of approximately 3.7 years as of September 30, 2012. See the section Asset and Liability Management in our 2011 10-K for a further discussion of our fixed-rate loans and their impact on our
interest rate risk.
The loan portfolio at September 30, 2012 was also concentrated in mortgage loans secured by commercial and
multifamily real estate properties located in New York (65%) and Florida (26%). We also have loans in Connecticut, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Virginia.
The properties collateralizing our loans include rental and cooperative/condominium apartment buildings, office buildings, mixed-use properties, shopping
centers, hotels, restaurants, industrial/warehouse properties, parking lots/garages, mobile home parks, self storage facilities and some vacant land. At September 30, 2012, our loans secured by the aforementioned real estate consisted of 535
loans with an aggregate principal balance of $1.16 billion and an average loan size of $2.2 million. Loans with principal balances of more than $10 million consisted of 11 loans totaling $141 million, with the largest loan being $16.8 million. Loans
with principal balances of $5 million to $10 million consisted of 46 loans and aggregated to $296 million.
35
The following table sets forth information regarding loans of more than $10 million at September 30,
2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Property Type
|
|
Property Location
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Past Due
|
|
Status
|
Retail
|
|
White Plains, New York
|
|
$
|
16,837
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
%
|
|
Apr 2017
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Office building
|
|
New York, New York
|
|
|
15,701
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
Aug 2013
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Office building
|
|
New York, New York
|
|
|
15,317
|
|
|
|
6.13
|
%
|
|
Apr 2015
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Office building
|
|
Miami, Florida
|
|
|
14,834
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
Oct 2018
|
|
None
|
|
TDR-nonaccrual (1)
|
Multifamily
|
|
Tampa, Florida
|
|
|
12,596
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
Sep 2020
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Hotel
|
|
New York, New York
|
|
|
11,370
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
Dec 2016
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Office building
|
|
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
May 2016
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Retail
|
|
Brooklyn, New York
|
|
|
11,085
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
Nov 2013
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Hotel
|
|
New York, New York
|
|
|
10,880
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
Jul 2014
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Retail
|
|
Manorville, New York
|
|
|
10,608
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
Sep 2024
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
Retail
|
|
New York, New York
|
|
|
10,481
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
Jul 2022
|
|
None
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
141,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Loan was restructured in June 2011 and is performing in accordance with its restructured terms. Monthly payments are interest only based on 5.00% to June 1, 2013.
Beginning July 1, 2013, monthly principal and interest payments resume with a 5.125% interest rate. Thereafter, the interest rate increases each year on June 1 as follows: 5.25%, 5.375%, 5.50%, 5.625% and 5.75%. Regulatory guidance
requires the loan to remain on nonaccrual status as of September 30, 2012.
|
The table below sets forth the location of
properties securing the real estate loan portfolio at September 30, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
Other States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
$
|
378,649
|
|
|
$
|
95,914
|
|
|
$
|
8,863
|
|
|
$
|
5,775
|
|
|
$
|
47,653
|
|
|
$
|
536,854
|
|
Office buildings
|
|
|
89,055
|
|
|
|
50,221
|
|
|
|
14,597
|
|
|
|
3,765
|
|
|
|
11,219
|
|
|
|
168,857
|
|
Industrial/warehouses
|
|
|
26,069
|
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,160
|
|
Hotels
|
|
|
38,481
|
|
|
|
14,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,007
|
|
Mobile home parks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
20,745
|
|
Parking lots/garages
|
|
|
23,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,444
|
|
Mini storage
|
|
|
21,073
|
|
|
|
8,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,657
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,159
|
|
|
|
3,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,214
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
165,253
|
|
|
|
95,824
|
|
|
|
2,487
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
11,792
|
|
|
|
277,101
|
|
Land
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,210
|
|
One to four family
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
$
|
750,921
|
|
|
$
|
295,897
|
|
|
$
|
26,615
|
|
|
$
|
11,285
|
|
|
$
|
72,355
|
|
|
$
|
1,157,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans on nonaccrual status
|
|
$
|
8,034
|
|
|
$
|
33,925
|
|
|
$
|
1,393
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,605
|
|
|
$
|
47,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth the location of properties securing the real estate loan portfolio at December 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
New York
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
Other States
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
$
|
312,727
|
|
|
$
|
89,576
|
|
|
$
|
10,942
|
|
|
$
|
4,562
|
|
|
$
|
40,058
|
|
|
$
|
457,865
|
|
Office buildings
|
|
|
128,075
|
|
|
|
51,540
|
|
|
|
14,987
|
|
|
|
3,824
|
|
|
|
11,638
|
|
|
|
210,064
|
|
Industrial/warehouses
|
|
|
61,326
|
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,061
|
|
Hotels
|
|
|
39,973
|
|
|
|
14,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,841
|
|
Mobile home parks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,025
|
|
Parking lots/garages
|
|
|
23,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,896
|
|
Mini storage
|
|
|
4,729
|
|
|
|
8,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,428
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
|
|
8,048
|
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
14,290
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
187,418
|
|
|
|
85,497
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
1,788
|
|
|
|
12,293
|
|
|
|
290,011
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
|
|
8,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
One to four family
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
$
|
763,739
|
|
|
$
|
294,892
|
|
|
$
|
30,807
|
|
|
$
|
11,463
|
|
|
$
|
64,823
|
|
|
$
|
1,165,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans on nonaccrual status
|
|
$
|
17,055
|
|
|
$
|
36,315
|
|
|
$
|
1,566
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,304
|
|
|
$
|
57,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
The following table sets forth information regarding loans outstanding at September 30, 2012 by year of
origination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Balance Rated
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Year Originated
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
2004 and prior
|
|
$
|
176,835
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
81,840
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10,868
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4,273
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
2006
|
|
|
106,680
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
4,105
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2007
|
|
|
191,478
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
52,305
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
34,370
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
2008
|
|
|
216,757
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
5,666
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5,064
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2009
|
|
|
128,967
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
43,142
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2011
|
|
|
63,142
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
150,099
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,158,940
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
81,028
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
47,957
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below sets forth information regarding loans outstanding at December 31, 2011 by year of origination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
Year Originated
|
|
Balance
Outstanding
|
|
|
% of
Total
|
|
|
Balance Rated
Substandard
|
|
|
% of
Outstanding
|
|
|
Balance Rated
Doubtful
|
|
|
% of
Outstanding
|
|
|
Balance
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
% of
Outstanding
|
|
2004 and prior
|
|
$
|
186,081
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
89,807
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
14,119
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,422
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
2006
|
|
|
130,070
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2007
|
|
|
235,658
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
52,130
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
39,751
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
2008
|
|
|
229,684
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
7,815
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,318
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2009
|
|
|
159,687
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
65,890
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,799
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
2011
|
|
|
70,696
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,167,573
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
79,249
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
$
|
57,240
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table that follows summarizes loans we have rated as substandard and doubtful as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Sep 30, 2012
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2012
|
|
|
Mar 31, 2012
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2011
|
|
Impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans on nonaccrual status
|
|
$
|
47,957
|
|
|
$
|
50,643
|
|
|
$
|
53,208
|
|
|
$
|
57,240
|
|
TDRs on accruing status
|
|
|
14,167
|
|
|
|
14,596
|
|
|
|
8,980
|
|
|
|
9,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
|
62,124
|
|
|
|
65,239
|
|
|
|
62,188
|
|
|
|
66,270
|
|
Other non-impaired accruing substandard loans (1)
|
|
|
18,904
|
|
|
|
17,535
|
|
|
|
17,759
|
|
|
|
13,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total substandard and doubtful rated loans
|
|
$
|
81,028
|
|
|
$
|
82,774
|
|
|
$
|
79,947
|
|
|
$
|
79,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represent loans for which there were concerns regarding the ability of the borrowers to meet existing repayment terms. These loans reflect the distinct possibility, but
not the probability, that we will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loans. These loans may never become delinquent, nonaccrual or impaired. Potential problem loans, such as these, are closely monitored
and considered in the determination of the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
|
For additional information
concerning our loan portfolio, see note 4 to the financial statements included in this report.
37
Nonperforming Assets and Troubled Debt Restructured Loans (TDRs)
The table below summarizes nonperforming assets, TDRs, past due loans and selected ratios at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Sep 30, 2012
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2012
|
|
|
Mar 31, 2012
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2011
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
$
|
6,903
|
|
|
$
|
11,157
|
|
|
$
|
6,326
|
|
|
$
|
7,216
|
|
Loans past due 31-89 days (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
2,792
|
|
Loans past due 0-30 days (1)
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
811
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
TDR loans past due 0-30 days (2)
|
|
|
38,749
|
|
|
|
38,986
|
|
|
|
44,204
|
|
|
|
45,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans on nonaccrual status
|
|
|
47,957
|
|
|
|
50,643
|
|
|
|
53,208
|
|
|
|
57,240
|
|
Real estate acquired through foreclosure
|
|
|
21,858
|
|
|
|
26,370
|
|
|
|
27,767
|
|
|
|
28,278
|
|
Investment securities on a cash basis (3)
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
4,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets considered nonperforming
|
|
$
|
74,036
|
|
|
$
|
81,234
|
|
|
$
|
85,196
|
|
|
$
|
89,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TDRs on an accruing status and 0-30 days past due (4)
|
|
$
|
14,167
|
|
|
$
|
14,597
|
|
|
$
|
8,980
|
|
|
$
|
9,030
|
|
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing (5)
|
|
$
|
6,503
|
|
|
$
|
5,290
|
|
|
$
|
2,798
|
|
|
$
|
1,925
|
|
Loans past due 60-89 days and still accruing
|
|
$
|
15,477
|
|
|
$
|
1,902
|
|
|
$
|
6,303
|
|
|
$
|
3,894
|
|
Loans past due 31-59 days and still accruing
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,840
|
|
|
$
|
24,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to total gross loans
|
|
|
4.14
|
%
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
4.36
|
%
|
|
|
4.46
|
%
|
|
|
4.56
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total net loans
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
59.18
|
%
|
|
|
56.96
|
%
|
|
|
54.82
|
%
|
|
|
53.14
|
%
|
(1)
|
We may place a loan on nonaccrual status prior to it becoming past due 90 days based on the specific facts and circumstances associated with each loan that indicate
that it is probable the borrower may not be able to continue making monthly payments. Interest income from payments made on nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis (when collected) if the outstanding principal is determined to be collectible.
|
(2)
|
Represent loans whose terms have been modified through the deferral of principal and/or a partial reduction in interest payments, or extension of maturity term and are
current as to payments and performing in accordance with their restructured terms, but are classified nonaccrual in accordance with regulatory guidance. At September 30, 2012, such loans totaled $39 million and were yielding 4.55%. Interest
income from payments on such classified loans is also recognized on a cash basis.
|
A TDR that is on nonaccrual
status can only be returned to accrual status if ultimate collectability of contractual principal is assured and the borrower has demonstrated satisfactory payment performance either before or after the restructuring (usually for a period of no
shorter than six months). For those TDRs (which aggregate to 7 loans or $19.3 million at September 30, 2012) that have been partially charged-off (by a cumulative total of $7.4 million as of September 30, 2012), the evaluation for full
repayment of contractual principal must also include the collectability of amounts charged off. Although the loans have been partially charged off for financial statement purposes, the borrowers remain obligated to pay all contractual principal due
on all of the TDRs.
(3)
|
See note 3 to the financial statements included in this report for a discussion of these securities.
|
(4)
|
Represent loans whose terms have been modified through the deferral of principal and/or a partial reduction in interest payments, or extension of maturity term and are
maintained on accrual status. All loans were performing and current and had a weighted-average yield of approximately 6.12% as of September 30, 2012.
|
(5)
|
At September 30, 2012, balance consisted of 4 loans that have matured and the borrowers were making monthly loan payments. The loans were in the process of being
extended as of September 30, 2012.
|
The table that follows summarizes the change in total nonaccrual loans for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Quarter Ended
Sep 30, 2012
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
Jun 30, 2012
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
Mar 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended
Sep 30,
2012
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
50,643
|
|
|
$
|
53,208
|
|
|
$
|
57,240
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
57,240
|
|
Net new additions
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,020
|
|
Transfers to accruing TDR category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,453
|
)
|
Chargeoffs
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
(1,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(2,476
|
)
|
Payoffs and principal repayments
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(2,586
|
)
|
|
|
(3,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(7,917
|
)
|
Transfers to foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
(1,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
47,957
|
|
|
$
|
50,643
|
|
|
$
|
53,208
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
47,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table that follows summarizes the change in accruing TDRs for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Quarter Ended
Sep 30, 2012
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
Jun 30, 2012
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
Mar 31, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended
Sep 30,
2012
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
14,597
|
|
|
$
|
8,980
|
|
|
$
|
9,030
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,030
|
|
Net new additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Transfers from non-accruing TDR category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,453
|
|
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
14,167
|
|
|
$
|
14,597
|
|
|
$
|
8,980
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
The table below sets forth information regarding TDRs at September 30, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Type
|
|
Property Location
|
|
Principal
Balance Due
|
|
|
Carrying
Value (1)
|
|
|
Current
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
Status/Classification
|
Warehouse
|
|
Brooklyn, New York
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
Dec 2012
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Retail
|
|
Maple Heights, Ohio
|
|
|
4,757
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
Apr 2017
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Retail
|
|
West Palm, Florida
|
|
|
5,549
|
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
Aug 2014
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Retail
|
|
Lake Worth, Florida
|
|
|
5,452
|
|
|
|
4,685
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
Sep 2014
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Retail
|
|
Hempstead, New York
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
Sep 2013
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Office building
|
|
Miami, Florida
|
|
|
14,834
|
|
|
|
14,834
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
Sep 2018
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Multifamily
|
|
Miami, Florida
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
Feb 2016
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Multifamily
|
|
Miramar, Florida
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
Aug 2016
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Office building
|
|
Verona, New Jersey
|
|
|
1,643
|
|
|
|
893
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
Apr 2013
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Retail
|
|
New York, New York
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
Dec 2012
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Multifamily
|
|
Orlando, Florida
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
Nov 2015
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
Land
|
|
LIC, New York
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
Jan 2013
|
|
Performing/nonaccrual-cash basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,524
|
|
|
|
38,749
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
Woodmere, New York
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
Apr 2013
|
|
Performing/accrual
|
Retail
|
|
Monroe, New York
|
|
|
2,957
|
|
|
|
2,957
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
Mar 2017
|
|
Performing/accrual
|
Multifamily
|
|
St. Pete, Florida
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
May 2013
|
|
Performing/accrual
|
Retail
|
|
New York, New York
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
Oct 2012
|
|
Performing/accrual
|
Multifamily
|
|
Lake Worth, Florida
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
Oct 2016
|
|
Performing/accrual
|
Land
|
|
Carrabelle, Florida
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
Dec 2012
|
|
Performing/accrual
|
Land
|
|
Shelter Island, New York
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
10.25
|
%
|
|
Jun 2013
|
|
Performing/accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,167
|
|
|
|
14,167
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,691
|
|
|
$
|
52,916
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents contractual unpaid principal balance less any partial principal chargeoffs and interest received and applied as a reduction of principal. The borrowers
remain obligated to pay all contractual amounts due.
|
Foreclosed Real Estate, Net of Valuation Allowance
The table that follows details real estate we owned through foreclosure at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Carrying Value (1)
|
|
|
Last
|
Property Type and Description
|
|
City
|
|
State
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Sep 30, 2012
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2011
|
|
|
Appraised
|
1.1 acres of vacant waterfront land (2)
|
|
Hollywood
|
|
FL
|
|
2/08
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,876
|
|
|
Sep 2011
|
335 room vacant hotel
|
|
Orlando
|
|
FL
|
|
4/09
|
|
|
5,335
|
|
|
|
5,645
|
|
|
Sep 2011
|
7 story vacant office building and vacant lot
|
|
Yonkers
|
|
NY
|
|
8/09
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
Jun 2012
|
146 unit garden apartment complex - 75% occupied
|
|
Austell
|
|
GA
|
|
9/09
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
Sep 2011
|
39 acres of vacant land partially waterfront
|
|
Perryville
|
|
MD
|
|
4/10
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
Dec 2011
|
622 unit garden apartment complex - 71% occupied
|
|
Louisville
|
|
KY
|
|
7/10
|
|
|
6,685
|
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
Jun 2012
|
192 unit garden apartment complex - 94% occupied
|
|
Louisville
|
|
KY
|
|
7/10
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
3,389
|
|
|
Jun 2012
|
4 building office park - 65% occupied (3)
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
FL
|
|
7/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
Jun 2012
|
4 story office building - 50% occupied (4)
|
|
Ft. Lauderdale
|
|
FL
|
|
10/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,643
|
|
|
Mar 2012
|
27,000 sq. foot industrial warehouse - 65% occupied
|
|
Sunrise
|
|
FL
|
|
9/12
|
|
|
1,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,858
|
|
|
$
|
28,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Reported net of any valuation allowance that has been recorded due to decreases in the estimated fair value of the property subsequent to the date of foreclosure.
|
(2)
|
Property sold in the third quarter of 2012 for $1.5 million. Propertys original cost basis upon transfer to real estate owned was $4.0 million.
|
(3)
|
Property sold in the third quarter of 2012 for $1.7 million. Propertys original cost basis upon transfer to real estate owned was $1.9 million.
|
(4)
|
Property sold in the third quarter of 2012 for $1.7 million. Propertys original cost basis upon transfer to real estate owned was $2.6 million.
|
We review our portfolio of real estate owned through foreclosure at least quarterly by performing market valuations of the
properties, which normally consist of obtaining externally prepared appraisals at least annually for every property, as well as performing reviews of economic and real estate market conditions in the local area where the property is located,
including taking into consideration discussions with real estate brokers and interested buyers, in order to determine if a valuation allowance is needed to reflect any decrease in the estimated fair value of the property since acquisition. All of
the properties owned at September 30, 2012 were being marketed for sale.
39
At September 30, 2012, the total valuation allowance amounted to $5.3 million, compared to $6.0 million
at December 31, 2011. During the first nine months of 2012, based on the factors described above, the real estate valuation allowance was increased by a total of $2.9 million through a charge to the provision for real estate losses. During the
third quarter of 2012, three properties were sold as disclosed in the notes below the above table detailing real estate owned for a total of $4.9 million. In connection with these sales, total real estate chargeoffs of $3.6 million were recorded
during the quarter ended September 30, 2012, which offset the above described increase to the valuation allowance.
The table that
follows summarizes the change in foreclosed real estate for the period indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Quarter Ended
Sep 30, 2012
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
Jun 30, 2012
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
Mar 31, 2012
|
|
|
Nine-Months Ended
Sep 30,
2012
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
26,370
|
|
|
$
|
27,767
|
|
|
$
|
28,278
|
|
|
$
|
28,278
|
|
Transfers from loan portfolio
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Writedowns to carrying values subsequent to foreclosure
|
|
|
(1,025
|
)
|
|
|
(1,397
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
(2,933
|
)
|
Sales
|
|
|
(4,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
21,858
|
|
|
$
|
26,370
|
|
|
$
|
27,767
|
|
|
$
|
21,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For additional information on nonaccrual loans, TDRs, past due loans and real estate owned and its corresponding
valuation allowance, see notes 4 and 6 to the financial statements included in this report.
Allowance For Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses amounted to $28.4 million at September 30, 2012, compared to $30.4 million at December 31,
2011. The allowance represented 2.46% of total loans (net of deferred fees) outstanding at September 30, 2012, compared to 2.61% at December 31, 2011. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the allowance for loan losses
included a specific valuation allowance in the aggregate amount of $5.1 million and $8.0 million, respectively, for our impaired loans, which consist of all or our nonaccrual loans and accruing TDRs. All of our impaired loans had a related valuation
allowance as described below.
The net decrease in the allowance of $2.0 million was due to $2.5 million of chargeoffs, partially offset by
$0.5 million of partial recoveries of prior chargeoffs. The chargeoffs consisted of the following. A portion of 4 loans classified as nonaccrual TDRs (or $1.6 million of aggregate principal) was charged off for financial statement purposes based on
annual updated appraisals received on the underlying collateral properties. Although these TDR loans continue to perform as agreed under the modified terms, we reduced their carrying value by these chargeoffs to reflect the lower appraised amounts
of the underlying property. The borrowers remain obligated to pay all contractual principal due on the TDRs. In addition, chargeoffs totaling $0.3 million were recorded in connection with satisfaction of 3 nonaccrual loans at a discount and another
$0.6 million was partially charged off on 2 other nonaccrual loans due to decreases in the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral.
At September 30, 2012, with respect to all of our impaired loans, which totaled $62.1 million, we have obtained current appraisals as follows: 13%
dated within the last 3 months; 26% dated within the last 4-6 months; 47% dated within the last 7-9 months; and 15% within the last 10-12 months. Our policy is to obtain externally prepared appraisals for impaired loans and real estate owned at
least annually.
For additional information on the allowance for loan losses, including the factors we use in maintaining a specific valuation
allowance for our impaired loans and our policy regarding loan chrageoffs, see notes 1 and 5 to the financial statements included in this report.
All Other Assets
All other assets at September 30, 2012 (as denoted in the
table under the caption Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011) decreased to $57 million, from $67 million at December 31, 2011, primarily due to a $6.8 million decrease in our
deferred tax asset resulting from the partial utilization of the asset to offset our taxable earnings (for additional information on the deferred tax asset, see note 12 to the financial statements included in this report).
Deposits
Total deposits at
September 30, 2012 decreased to $1.43 billion from $1.66 billion at December 31, 2011, primarily reflecting decreases of $210 million in certificate of deposit accounts (CDs) and $23 million in money market deposit accounts.
40
At September 30, 2012, CDs totaled $989 million, and checking, savings and money market accounts
aggregated to $443 million. The same categories of deposit accounts totaled $1.20 billion and $463 million, respectively, at December 31, 2011. INB has steadily lowered its overall deposit rates offered for its deposit products since early 2010
to encourage deposit outflow (including the ongoing repayment of maturing higher-cost brokered CDs) and reduce the overall size of its balance sheet.
CDs represented 69% of total consolidated deposits at September 30, 2012, compared to 72% at December 31, 2011. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, CDs included $85 million
and $128 million of brokered deposits, respectively. For additional information on deposits and restrictions on deposit rates we can offer, see the section Liquidity and Capital Resources and note 7 to the financial statements included
in this report.
Borrowed Funds and Related Interest Payable
Total borrowed funds and related interest payable decreased to $69.5 million at September 30, 2012, from $78.6 million at December 31, 2011, due to the maturity and repayment of $10.5 million of
FHLB borrowings, partially offset by a $1.4 million increase in accrued interest payable on IBCs outstanding debt, which is in the form of junior subordinated notes relating to its outstanding trust preferred securities. For additional
information on and discussion of borrowed funds, see notes 8 and 9 to the financial statements included in this report, as well as the section entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources.
All Other Liabilities
All other
liabilities at September 30, 2012 (as denoted in the table under the caption Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011) amounted to $43 million, compared to $31 million at from
December 31, 2011. The increase was due to higher levels of mortgage escrow funds payable ($8 million) and official checks outstanding ($5 million), partially offset by a $2 million decrease in accrued interest payable on deposits.
Mortgage escrow funds payable (which represent advance payments made to us by borrowers for property taxes and insurance that we remit to third parties)
fluctuate based on the size of the loan portfolio, timing of payments by us to third parties and increases in general property tax and insurance rates.
Stockholders Equity
Stockholders equity increased to $207 million at
September 30, 2012 from $198 million at December 31, 2011, primarily due to $8.7 million of net earnings before preferred dividend requirements.
The following table sets forth the changes in stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Common
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
Per Share (2)
|
|
Common stockholders equity at December 31, 2011
|
|
$
|
173,293
|
|
|
|
21,125,289
|
|
|
$
|
8.20
|
|
Net earnings before preferred dividend requirements
|
|
|
8,692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
Preferred dividends declared and paid (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of preferred stock discount
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Issuance of common stock from option exercises
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
Issuance of restricted common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation from stock options and restricted stock
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity at September 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
182,580
|
|
|
|
21,589,589
|
|
|
$
|
8.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stockholders equity at December 31, 2011 (1)
|
|
$
|
24,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of preferred stock discount
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stockholders equity at September 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
24,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity at September 30, 2012
|
|
$
|
207,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents 25,000 shares of IBCs Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, owned by the U.S. Treasury. See note 11 to the financial statements
included in our 2011 10-K and note 10 to the financial statements included in this report on Form 10-Q.
|
|
In February 2010, IBC suspended the declaration and payment of preferred dividends on the Series A preferred stock. IBC has missed 11 dividend payments as of the date
of filing of this report. At September 30, 2012, the amount of preferred dividends unpaid and in arrears totaled $3.8 million. Dividends in arrears are recorded as reduction in common stockholders equity only when they are declared and
payable.
|
(2)
|
Common book value per share, after adjusting for preferred dividends in arrears of $3.8 million, was $8.28 at September 30, 2012.
|
41
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended September 30, 2012 and
2011
Overview
We reported net earnings available to common stockholders for the third quarter of 2012 (Q3-12) of $2.2 million or $0.10 per diluted share,
compared to net earnings of $2.6 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2011 (Q3-11). The results and per share amounts reported for both periods were net of preferred dividend requirements related to IBCs
outstanding preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury.
Selected information regarding our results of operations follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended, September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
19,082
|
|
|
$
|
23,160
|
|
|
$
|
(4,078
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,223
|
|
|
|
12,729
|
|
|
|
(3,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend income
|
|
|
9,859
|
|
|
|
10,431
|
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
(2,191
|
)
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
(817
|
)
|
Noninterest expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for real estate losses
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Real estate activities expenses
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
5,844
|
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
Less: preferred dividend requirements and discount amortization (1)
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
2,225
|
|
|
$
|
2,638
|
|
|
$
|
(413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents dividend requirements on cumulative preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury and amortization of related preferred stock discount. See note 10 to the
financial statements in this report on Form 10-Q.
|
Net Interest and Dividend Income
Net interest and dividend income is our primary source of earnings and is influenced by the amount, distribution and repricing characteristics of our
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as by the relative levels and movements of interest rates. Net interest and dividend income is the difference between interest income earned on our interest-earning assets, such as
loans and securities, and interest expense paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings.
Our net interest and
dividend income (detailed in the table on the next page) decreased by $0.6 million to $9.8 million in Q3-12 from $10.4 million in Q3-11. The decrease largely reflected a planned reduction in the size of our balance sheet, as well as fewer suitable
lending opportunities, particularly in 2011.
In Q3-12, our total average interest-earning assets decreased by $245 million from Q3-11,
reflecting decreases of $66 million in average loans and $179 million in average total securities and overnight investments. At the same time, average deposits and borrowed funds decreased by $222 million and $12 million, respectively, while average
stockholders equity increased by $13 million. The reduction in the balance sheet positively impacted our regulatory capital ratios, but negatively impacted our total net interest and dividend income.
Our net interest margin increased to 2.32% in Q3-12 from 2.13% in Q3-11. The margin benefited from an improved interest rate spread, partially offset by
an $11 million decrease in net average interest-earning assets due to a higher level of cash on hand.
The interest rate spread improved by 20
basis points due to the steady reduction in the rates we paid on deposits and the run off of higher-cost CDs and borrowings, largely offset by payoffs of higher yielding loans and calls of higher yielding security investments, coupled with the
re-investment of a large portion of these cash inflows into new loans and securities at lower market interest rates. Overall, our average cost of funds decreased by 46 basis points to 2.35% in Q3-12, from 2.81% in Q3-11, while our average yield on
interest-earning assets decreased at a slower pace or by 26 basis points to 4.48% in Q3-12, from 4.74% in Q3-11.
See the section
Liquidity and Capital Resources in this report for additional discussion on our deposits, borrowings and brokered CDs.
42
The following table provides information on our: average assets, liabilities and stockholders equity;
yields earned on interest-earning assets; and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. The yields and rates shown are based on a computation of income/expense (including any related fee income or expense) for each period
divided by average interest-earning assets/interest-bearing liabilities during each period. Average balances are derived from daily balances. Net interest margin is computed by dividing net interest and dividend income by the average of total
interest-earning assets during each period. The interest rate spread is the difference between the average yield earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin is greater than the
interest rate spread due to the additional income earned on those assets funded by non-interest-bearing liabilities, primarily demand deposits, and stockholders equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
Inc./Exp.
|
|
|
Yield/
Rate (2)
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
Inc./Exp.
|
|
|
Yield/
Rate (2)
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
$
|
870,223
|
|
|
$
|
13,063
|
|
|
|
5.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
892,795
|
|
|
$
|
14,499
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
Multifamily loans
|
|
|
279,794
|
|
|
|
4,094
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
|
|
|
321,664
|
|
|
|
5,191
|
|
|
|
6.40
|
|
Land loans
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
6.78
|
|
|
|
11,371
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
6.73
|
|
All other loans
|
|
|
2,511
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
5.07
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (1)
|
|
|
1,162,038
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
5.94
|
|
|
|
1,228,049
|
|
|
|
19,912
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies securities
|
|
|
417,780
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
691,396
|
|
|
|
3,093
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
92,897
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
4,475
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
8,568
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
|
|
|
9,420
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
524,000
|
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
705,291
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest-earning assets
|
|
|
7,987
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
1,694,025
|
|
|
$
|
19,082
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
%
|
|
|
1,939,519
|
|
|
$
|
23,160
|
|
|
|
4.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
120,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,814,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,036,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking deposits
|
|
$
|
13,387
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,471
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
9,298
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
9,052
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
422,297
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
433,634
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,049,265
|
|
|
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
1,263,372
|
|
|
|
10,998
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposit accounts
|
|
|
1,494,247
|
|
|
|
8,654
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
|
|
1,716,529
|
|
|
|
11,978
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
9,511
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
21,446
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
Debentures - capital securities
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
66,213
|
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
78,148
|
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,560,460
|
|
|
$
|
9,223
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,794,677
|
|
|
$
|
12,729
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
4,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
44,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stockholders equity
|
|
|
24,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
|
180,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
205,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,814,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,036,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend income/spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,859
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,431
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets/margin (3)
|
|
$
|
133,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
$
|
144,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of total interest-earning assets to total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (2)
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average common equity (2)
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on total average equity (2)
|
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense to average assets (2) (5)
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio (4)
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average stockholders equity to average assets
|
|
|
11.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes average nonaccrual loans of $49.6 million in the 2012 period versus $48.4 million in the 2011 period. Total interest income not accrued on such loans and
excluded from the table totaled $0.2 million in both 2012 and 2011 periods.
|
(3)
|
Net interest margin is reported exclusive of income from loan prepayments, which is included as a component of our noninterest income. Inclusive of income from loan
prepayments, the margin would compute to 2.49% and 2.46% for the 2012 and 2011 period, respectively.
|
(4)
|
Defined as noninterest expenses (excluding the provisions for loan and real estate losses and real estate activities expenses) as a percentage of net interest and
dividend income plus noninterest income.
|
(5)
|
Noninterest expenses for this ratio exclude real estate activities expenses.
|
43
The following table provides information regarding changes in interest and dividend income and interest
expense. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior volume), (2) changes in volume (change in
volume multiplied by prior rate) and (3) changes in rate-volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2012 vs. September 30,
2011
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due To Change In:
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate/Volume
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
(1,515
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(2,561
|
)
|
Securities
|
|
|
(920
|
)
|
|
|
(1,224
|
)
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
(1,527
|
)
|
Other interest-earning assets
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
(2,428
|
)
|
|
|
(2,283
|
)
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
(4,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking deposits
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
|
|
(1,847
|
)
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(2,825
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposit accounts
|
|
|
(1,587
|
)
|
|
|
(1,865
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(3,324
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
|
(1,986
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(3,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
(790
|
)
|
|
$
|
(297
|
)
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
There was no required provision for loan losses in Q3-12, compared to a provision of $2.2 million in Q3-11. The decrease was based on our review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and was
primarily attributable to fewer loans outstanding and fewer credit rating downgrades in Q3-12 compared to Q3-11. A detailed discussion of the factors and estimates we use in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses can be found
under the caption Critical Accounting Policies on pages 46 to 51 in our 2011 10-K.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income decreased to $1.2 million in Q3-12 from $2.0 million in Q3-11, primarily due to a $0.8 million decrease in income from loan
prepayments, which consists of the full recognition of any unearned fees associated with such loans at the time of payoff and the receipt of prepayment penalties and interest in certain cases.
Noninterest Expenses
The
provision for real estate losses amounted to $1.0 million in Q3-12, compared to $0.7 million in Q3-11. The provisions are a function of lower estimated values on several properties we own through foreclosure. See the section entitled
Nonperforming Assets and Troubled Debt Restructured Loans (TDRs), for a list of real estate owned and related information thereon and an explanation on how the provision is derived.
Real estate activities expenses increased to $0.9 million in Q3-12 from $0.1 million in Q3-11, primarily reflecting a higher level of expenses (primarily
increased repairs, maintenance and insurance costs) associated with real estate owned. Additionally, the amount for Q3-11 was reduced by a $0.2 million gain recognized from the transfer of one loan to foreclosed real estate (due to the collateral
propertys then estimated fair value being greater than the loans outstanding balance) and $0.2 million of rental income on one property, both of which did not recur in the Q3-12 period. Real estate activities expenses are comprised of
real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, insurance, utilities and other charges (net of any rental income earned from the operation of the property) that are required in protecting our interest in real estate acquired through foreclosure and
various properties collateralizing our nonaccrual loans.
Operating expenses amounted to $4.2 million in Q3-12, compared to $3.6 million in
Q3-11, reflecting primarily a $0.4 million aggregate increase in salaries, benefits and stock compensation expense, including the impact of several new officer positions filled during 2012, and a $0.2 million increase in deposit insurance expense.
We employed 77 people as of September 30, 2012, versus 75 at September 30, 2011. The higher deposit insurance expense in Q3-12 compared to Q3-11 was a function of a favorable adjustment of $0.3 million recorded in Q3-11 arising from a
change in the FDICs formula for assessing premiums resulting from the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act as more fully described in our September 30, 2011 10Q and our 2011-10K.
44
Notwithstanding the adjustment, FDIC insurance expense reported in Q3-12 would have declined from Q3-11 due to a lower level of deposits outstanding.
Stock compensation expense in Q3-12 amounted to $309,000, compared to $78,000 in Q3-11, with the increase resulting from stock awards described below. On
January 19, 2012, we awarded a total of 465,400 shares of restricted common stock under our shareholder-approved equity incentive plan as follows: a total of 175,000 shares to our executive officers; a total of 240,000 shares to our
non-employee directors; and a total of 50,400 shares to our other officers and employees. For the executive officers, the awards vest in two installments, with two thirds vesting on the second anniversary of the grant and the remaining one third on
the third anniversary of the grant. For the non-employee directors, the awards vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant. For the other officers and employees, the awards vest in three equal installments, with one third on each of the first
three anniversaries of the grant date. Vesting is subject to the grantees continued employment with us, or in the case of non-employee directors, the grantee continuing to serve as our director, on the aforementioned anniversary dates. All of
the awards are subject to accelerated vesting upon the death or disability of the grantee or upon a change in control of our company, as defined in the restricted stock agreements. The grant date fair value for each award was $2.90 per share, or a
total fair value of $1.4 million, based on the closing market price of the common stock on the grant date of January 19, 2012. Such amount is being recognized as stock compensation expense over the related vesting periods. There were no equity
compensation awards made in 2011.
For additional information on our outstanding stock compensation awards, see note 11 to the financial
statements included in this report on Form 10-Q.
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $2.3 million in Q3-12 on pre-tax income of $5.0 million, compared to income tax expense of $2.8 million
on pre-tax income of $5.8 million in Q3-11. Our effective income tax rate (inclusive of state and local taxes) was approximately 46% in Q3-12 and 47% in Q3-11. Income tax expense for both periods reflects the partial utilization of our deferred tax
asset.
For additional information on our deferred tax asset, a large portion of which is attributable to a net operating loss carryforward
generated in the second quarter of 2010, see note 12 to the financial statements included in this report.
45
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2012
and 2011
Overview
We reported net earnings available to common stockholders for the nine-months ended September 30, 2012 (9mths-12) of $7.3 million or $0.34 per diluted share, compared to net earnings of
$6.8 million, or $0.32 per diluted share, for the nine-months ended September 30, 2011 (9mths-11). The results and per share amounts reported for both periods were net of preferred dividend requirements related to IBCs
outstanding preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury.
Selected information regarding our results of operations follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine-Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
59,486
|
|
|
$
|
70,671
|
|
|
$
|
(11,185
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
29,964
|
|
|
|
39,016
|
|
|
|
(9,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend income
|
|
|
29,522
|
|
|
|
31,655
|
|
|
|
(2,133
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
(4,978
|
)
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
3,718
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Noninterest expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for real estate losses
|
|
|
2,933
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
Real estate activities expenses
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
12,473
|
|
|
|
12,087
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
16,012
|
|
|
|
14,945
|
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
7,320
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
8,692
|
|
|
|
8,112
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Less: preferred dividend requirements and discount amortization (1)
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
7,347
|
|
|
$
|
6,822
|
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents dividend requirements on cumulative preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury and amortization of related preferred stock discount. See note 10 to the
financial statements in this report on Form 10-Q.
|
Net Interest and Dividend Income
Our net interest and dividend income (detailed in the table on the next page) decreased by $2.2 million to $29.5 million in 9mths-12 from $31.7 million in
9mths-11 due to a smaller balance sheet. In 9mths-12, our total average interest-earning assets decreased by $183 million from 9mths-11, reflecting a $119 million decrease in average loans and a $64 million decrease in average total security and
overnight investments. At the same time, average deposits and borrowed funds decreased by $155 million and $12 million, respectively, while average stockholders equity increased by $13 million.
Our net interest margin increased to 2.23% in 9mths-12 from 2.17% in 9mths-11 as a 10 basis point increase in the interest rate spread was partially
offset by a $16 million decrease in net average interest-earning assets due to a higher level of cash on hand. Overall, our average cost of funds decreased by 45 basis points to 2.45% in 9mths-12, from 2.90% in 9mths-11, while our average yield on
interest-earning assets decreased at a slower pace or by 35 basis points to 4.50% in 9mths-12, from 4.85% in 9mths-11.
The reasons for the
changes described above are the same as those noted for the quarterly period and are described in the section entitled Comparison of Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 under the caption
Net Interest and Dividend Income.
See the section Liquidity and Capital Resources in this report for additional
discussion on our deposits, borrowings and brokered CDs.
46
The following table provides information for the periods indicated, the contents of which are described
above in a similar table in the section entitled Comparison of Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 under the caption Net Interest and Dividend Income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine-Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
Inc./Exp.
|
|
|
Yield/
Rate (2)
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
Inc./Exp.
|
|
|
Yield/
Rate (2)
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
$
|
868,936
|
|
|
$
|
39,992
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
914,068
|
|
|
$
|
44,282
|
|
|
|
6.48
|
%
|
Multifamily loans
|
|
|
280,615
|
|
|
|
12,587
|
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
352,974
|
|
|
|
16,984
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
Land loans
|
|
|
10,552
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
|
12,016
|
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
All other loans
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
|
|
|
2,068
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (1)
|
|
|
1,162,224
|
|
|
|
53,202
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
1,281,126
|
|
|
|
61,976
|
|
|
|
6.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies securities
|
|
|
529,327
|
|
|
|
5,319
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
639,808
|
|
|
|
8,233
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
52,863
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal securities
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
4,272
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
4,510
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
8,755
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
9,625
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
595,455
|
|
|
|
6,255
|
|
|
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
653,943
|
|
|
|
8,681
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest-earning assets
|
|
|
7,576
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
13,204
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
1,765,255
|
|
|
$
|
59,486
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
|
1,948,273
|
|
|
$
|
70,671
|
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
117,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,882,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,037,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking deposits
|
|
$
|
12,828
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,451
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
9,235
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
430,322
|
|
|
|
1,723
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
429,891
|
|
|
|
2,891
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,112,883
|
|
|
|
26,413
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
1,270,631
|
|
|
|
33,686
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposit accounts
|
|
|
1,565,268
|
|
|
|
28,214
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
1,720,306
|
|
|
|
36,684
|
|
|
|
2.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
11,216
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
22,947
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
Debentures - capital securities
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
Mortgage note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
67,918
|
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
79,678
|
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
|
3.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,633,186
|
|
|
$
|
29,964
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,799,984
|
|
|
$
|
39,016
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
4,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
42,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stockholders equity
|
|
|
24,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity
|
|
|
177,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
201,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,882,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,037,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and dividend income/spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,522
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,655
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest-earning assets/margin (3)
|
|
$
|
132,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
$
|
148,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of total interest-earning assets to total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (2)
|
|
|
0.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average common equity (2)
|
|
|
6.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on total average equity (2)
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.71
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense to average assets (2) (5)
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio (4)
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average stockholders equity to average assets
|
|
|
10.73
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes average nonaccrual loans of $53.9 million in the 2012 period versus $48.1 million in the 2011 period. Total interest income not accrued on such loans and
excluded from the table totaled $0.4 million in the 2012 period and $0.6 million in the 2011 period.
|
(3)
|
Net interest margin is reported exclusive of income from loan prepayments, which is included as a component of our noninterest income. Inclusive of income from loan
prepayments, the margin would compute to 2.44% and 2.31% for the 2012 and 2011 period, respectively.
|
(4)
|
Defined as noninterest expenses (excluding the provisions for loan and real estate losses and real estate activities expenses) as a percentage of net interest and
dividend income plus noninterest income.
|
(5)
|
Noninterest expenses for this ratio exclude real estate activities expenses.
|
47
The following table provides information regarding changes in interest and dividend income and interest
expense. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in rate (change in rate multiplied by prior volume), (2) changes in volume (change in
volume multiplied by prior rate) and (3) changes in rate-volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine-Months Ended September 30, 2012 vs. September
30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due To Change In:
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate/Volume
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
(3,442
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,758
|
)
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
$
|
(8,774
|
)
|
Securities
|
|
|
(1,806
|
)
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
(2,426
|
)
|
Other interest-earning assets
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
(5,211
|
)
|
|
|
(7,229
|
)
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
(11,185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking deposits
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
(1,193
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(3,526
|
)
|
|
|
(4,188
|
)
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
(7,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposit accounts
|
|
|
(4,756
|
)
|
|
|
(4,171
|
)
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
(8,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
(4,966
|
)
|
|
|
(4,532
|
)
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
(9,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,697
|
)
|
|
$
|
809
|
|
|
$
|
(2,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
There was no provision for loan losses in 9mths-12, compared to a provision of $5.0 million in 9mths-11. The decrease was based on our review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and was
primarily attributable to fewer loans outstanding and fewer credit rating downgrades in 9mths-12 compared to 9mths-11. A detailed discussion of the factors and estimates we use in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses can be
found under the caption Critical Accounting Policies on pages 46 to 51 in our 2011 10-K.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income increased to $3.7 million in 9mths-12 from $3.3 million in 9mths-11, primarily due to a $0.7 million increase in
income from loan prepayments (which consists of the full recognition of any unearned fees associated with such loans at the time of payoff and the receipt of prepayment penalties and interest in certain cases), partially offset by a $0.3 million
decrease in income from other mortgage related service fees.
Noninterest Expenses
The provision for real estate losses amounted to $3.0 million in 9mths-12, compared to $2.0 million in 9mths-11.
Real estate activities expenses increased to $1.8 million in 9mths-12, from $1.0 million in 9mths-11.
Operating expenses increased to $12.5 million in 9mths-12, from $12.1 million in 9mths-11, primarily due to a $1.0 million aggregate increase in salaries,
benefits and stock compensation expense, including the impact of several new officer positions filled during 2012, partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in FDIC deposit insurance expense. Stock compensation expense in 9mths-12 amounted to
$885,000, compared to $233,000 in 9mths-11.
See the section entitled Comparison of Results of Operations for the Quarters Ended
September 30, 2012 and 2011 under the caption Noninterest Expenses for a further discussion of the reasons for the changes in the above categories of noninterest expenses.
Provision for Income Taxes
We
recorded a provision for income tax expense of $7.3 million in 9mths-12 on pre-tax income of $16.0 million, compared to income tax expense of $6.8 million on pre-tax income of $14.9 million in 9mths-11. Our effective income tax rate (inclusive of
state and local taxes) was approximately 46% in 9mths-12 and 9mths-11. Income tax expense for both periods reflects the partial utilization of our deferred tax asset.
For additional information on our deferred tax asset, a large portion of which is attributable to a net operating loss carryforward generated in the second quarter of 2010, see note 12 to the financial
statements included in this report.
48
Off-Balance Sheet and Other Financing Arrangements
We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of our business to meet the financing needs of our customers.
For a further information on and discussion of these instruments, see note 14 to the financial statements included in this report.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General.
The following discussion serves as
an update to the section Liquidity and Capital Resources beginning on page 65 of our 2011 10-K, and should be read in conjunction with that discussion. For detail concerning our actual cash flows for the nine-months ended
September 30, 2012, see the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows included in this report.
Intervest National Bank.
At
September 30, 2012, INB had cash and short-term investments totaling $92 million and approved commitments to lend of $28 million (which excludes an additional $38 million of potential new loan commitments that were in process as of
September 30, 2012), most of which are anticipated to be funded over the next 12 months from the sources of funds described below.
Credit lines.
At September 30, 2012, INB had available collateral consisting of investment securities and certain loans that could be pledged
to support additional total borrowings of approximately $481 million from the FHLB and FRB, and INB also had access to overnight unsecured lines of credit totaling $30 million. This total borrowing capacity of $511 million represents a decrease of
$250 million from December 31, 2011, due to a lower level of outstanding security investments. At September 30, 2012, INBs secured lines of credit represented approximately 56% of INBs deposits that are considered sensitive
(money-market accounts and all certificate of deposit accounts (CDs), inclusive of brokered CDs, maturing within one year). In the event that any of INBs existing lines of credit were not accessible or were limited, INB could designate all or
a portion of its un-pledged U.S. government agency investment securities portfolio as available for sale and sell such securities as needed to provide liquidity.
Deposits.
At September 30, 2012, total consolidated deposits amounted to $1.43 billion consisting of CDs totaling $989 million, and checking, savings and money market accounts aggregating to
$443 million. CDs represented 69% of total deposits and CDs of $100,000 or more totaled $489 million and included $85 million of brokered deposits. Brokered deposits had a weighted-average remaining term and stated interest rate of 1.9 years and
4.89%, respectively, at September 30, 2012, and $36 million mature by September 30, 2013. At September 30, 2012, $441 million, or 45%, of total CDs (inclusive of brokered deposits) mature within one year. INB expects to repay its
brokered deposits as they mature and to retain or replace a significant portion of its remaining maturing CDs, although no assurance can be given that the deposit restrictions discussed below will not negatively impact INBs ability to retain
or attract deposits in the future. These restrictions may negatively impact INBs ability to offer competitive deposit rates in its primary deposit-gathering market areas.
In the first nine months of 2012, INB experienced net deposit outflow of $230 million, consisting of the repayment of $43 million of maturing brokered deposits and $167 million of other maturing CDs and a
$20 million net reduction in money market and checking deposit accounts. INB has steadily lowered its overall deposit rates offered for its deposit products since early 2010 to encourage deposit outflow and reduce the overall size of its balance
sheet. Depending on market conditions and available lending opportunities, INB may decrease the size of its balance sheet further in the near term. INBs total deposits may also decrease further due to the expected repayment of its maturing
brokered deposits and from the potential effects of deposit rate restrictions that have been imposed on INB.
As a result of its Formal
Agreement with the OCC, its primary regulator, INB is required (in the absence of obtaining a waiver from the FDIC) to maintain its deposit pricing at or below the national rates published by the FDIC, plus 75 basis points. The FDICs national
rate is a simple average of rates paid by U.S. depository institutions as calculated by the FDIC. At September 30, 2012, INB was in compliance with this requirement on all of its deposit products. Rates offered by INB on certain of its deposit
products as of September 30, 2012 ranged as follows: money market accounts offered at 0.38% or 50 basis points below the maximum; 1 year CD offered at 0.60% or 40 basis points below the maximum; 3 year CD offered at 1.00%
or 32 basis points below the maximum; and a 5 year CD offered at 1.69% and at the maximum. Furthermore, INB is also not allowed to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits without the prior approval of the OCC. INB has not accessed the
brokered deposit market since September 2009.
49
INB expects to fund future deposit outflow, if any, through a portion of the cash flows from the repayments
of loans and/or expected calls of its agency security investments. INBs current objective is to maintain its deposit rates at levels that are in compliance with its deposit rate restrictions while attempting to promote a stable deposit base
that can be adjusted to meet its cash flow needs. INB has historically targeted its loan-to-deposit ratio in a range from 75% to 85%. This ratio stood at 76% as of September 30, 2012.
Loans and Securities.
At September 30, 2012, INB had $212 million, or 18%, of its loan portfolio (excluding nonaccrual loans) scheduled to mature within one year. INB expects to extend or
refinance a portion of these maturing loans. Additionally, over the next twelve months, approximately $300 million of INBs security investments could potentially be called if interest rates remain at or near current levels. Absent a need for
these cash inflows, a large portion is expected to be reinvested into similar securities, with potentially lower market rates.
Borrowed
Funds.
In the first nine months of 2012, INB repaid $10.5 million of its maturing FHLB advances. At September 30, 2012, INB had $7.0 million of FHLB advances outstanding, of which $3.0 million and $4.0 million mature in March and September
2013, respectively. INB expects to have the flexibility to either repay or replace its outstanding borrowings as they mature from the sources of funds described above.
Capital Resources.
As discussed in note 15 to the financial statements included in this report, at September 30, 2012, INBs regulatory capital ratios exceeded its current minimum
requirements. INB does not expect to need additional capital over the next twelve months
.
Intervest Bancshares Corporation.
At
September 30, 2012, IBC had cash and short-term investments totaling $8.2 million, of which $7.9 million was available for use (inclusive of $6.2 million on deposit with INB). At September 30, 2012, IBC had accumulated and unpaid preferred
(TARP) dividends in arrears of $3.8 million and accrued and unpaid interest of $5.8 million on its outstanding debt, which is in the form of trust preferred securities.
Dividend and Interest Payment Restrictions.
IBC has historically received cash dividends from INB to fund the interest payments due on IBCs trust preferred securities as well as for
IBCs payment of dividends on the preferred stock, which is held by the U.S. Treasury. Since January 2010, INB has suspended the declaration and payment of dividends to IBC as required by its primary regulator, the OCC.
Since February 2010, IBC, as required by its primary regulator, the FRB, has also suspended the declaration and payment of dividends on its capital stock
and payment of interest on its trust preferred securities. Dividends in arrears are recorded as a reduction in common stockholders equity only when they are declared and payable. The regularly scheduled interest payments on the trust preferred
securities continue to be accrued for payment in the future and are recorded as interest expense in our financial statements. The interest and preferred dividend payments referred to above can only resume at such time as both IBC and INB are
permitted to do so and upon the determination that such payments are consistent with IBCs and INBs overall financial performance and capital requirements.
The deferral of interest payments does not constitute a default under the indentures governing the trust preferred securities. With respect to the preferred stock, if IBC misses six quarterly preferred
dividend payments, whether or not consecutive, the U.S.Treasury, the current holder of the preferred stock, has the right to appoint two directors to IBCs Board of Directors until all accrued but unpaid dividends have been paid. IBC has missed
11 dividend payments as of the date of filing of this report. See note 10 to the financial statements included in this report for a further discussion of missed dividend payments and the U.S. Treasurys appointment of two directors.
Capital Resources.
As discussed in note 15 to the financial statements included in this report, IBCs regulatory capital ratios at
September 30, 2012 exceeded its current minimum requirements and IBC does not expect to need additional capital over the next twelve months.
TARP.
As a result of our increased capital levels, we have begun exploring opportunities to repurchase our securities held by the U.S. Treasury as part of the Capital Purchase Program. Any
repurchase would require regulatory approvals from both the OCC and the FRB. We would also need to repay accrued but unpaid interest on our junior subordinated debentures as well as accrued but unpaid dividends on our Series A preferred stock held
by the Treasury in connection with any such repurchase.
50
Because IBCs main source of funds to take the foregoing actions would be a cash dividend from INB,
these actions would require the approval of both INBs primary regulator, the OCC, and IBCs primary regulator, the FRB. There can be no assurance that we will receive the required approvals. See note 10 to the financial statements
included in this report for a further discussion of the TARP securities.
Other.
We consider our current liquidity and sources of funds
sufficient to satisfy our outstanding lending commitments and maturing liabilities. We are not aware of any trends, known demands, commitments or uncertainties other than those discussed above in this section or elsewhere in this report that are
expected to have a material impact on our future operating results, liquidity or capital resources. However, there can be no assurances that adverse conditions will not arise in the credit and capital markets or from the restrictions placed on us by
our regulators (with respect to brokered deposits, caps on deposit rates offered, payment of cash dividends and interest on debt obligations and the incurrence of new debt) that would adversely impact our liquidity and ability to raise funds
(through attracting and retaining deposits or from borrowings or sales of assets) to meet our operations and satisfy our outstanding lending commitments and maturing liabilities or raise new working capital if needed.
Additional information concerning investment securities, deposits, borrowings and preferred stock, including interest rates, dividends and maturity dates
thereon, can be found in notes 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 15 to the financial statements included in this report.
Contractual Obligations
The table below summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Due In the Period
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Oct 1 to Dec
31,
2012
|
|
|
2013 and
2014
|
|
|
2015 and
2016
|
|
|
2017 and
Later
|
|
Deposits with stated maturities
|
|
$
|
989,425
|
|
|
$
|
103,728
|
|
|
$
|
670,270
|
|
|
$
|
137,879
|
|
|
$
|
77,548
|
|
Deposits with no stated maturities
|
|
|
442,784
|
|
|
|
442,784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debentures - capital securities
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
Unfunded loan commitments and lines of credit (1)
|
|
|
28,299
|
|
|
|
28,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage escrow payable and official checks outstanding
|
|
|
38,301
|
|
|
|
38,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease payments
|
|
|
17,765
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,075
|
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable on all borrowed funds (2)
|
|
|
5,785
|
|
|
|
5,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred cumulative dividends unpaid and in arrears (2)
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest payable on deposits
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred cumulative dividends (3)
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death benefit payments
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,593,943
|
|
|
$
|
625,456
|
|
|
$
|
681,958
|
|
|
$
|
140,954
|
|
|
$
|
145,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
|
(2)
|
Assumes dividends in arrears and accrued interest payable on TRUPs will be repaid by December 31, 2012.
|
(3)
|
Assumes $25 million of cumulative preferred stock will be outstanding through December 2013 with a dividend rate of 5% per year.
|
Regulatory Capital and Other Matters
IBC and INB are subject to various regulatory capital requirements and each is operating under a formal agreement with its primary regulator as discussed in more detail in the section Supervision
and Regulation in Item 1 Business in our 2011 10-K and in note 20 to the financial statements included in our 2011 10-K, and in note 15 to the financial statements included in this report on Form 10-Q.
Asset and Liability Management
We have interest rate risk that arises from differences in the repricing of our assets and liabilities within a given time period. We have never engaged in trading or hedging activities, nor invested in
interest rate derivatives or entered into interest rate swaps. The primary objective of our asset/liability management strategy is to limit, within established guidelines, the adverse effect of changes in interest rates on our net interest income
and capital.
To this regard, INB, whose assets represent 99% of our consolidated assets, engages an outside consultant to prepare quarterly
reports using an earnings simulation model to quantify the effects of various interest rate scenarios on its projected net interest and dividend income over projected periods.
51
These computations begin with our gap analysis that is adjusted for additional assumptions regarding balance
sheet growth and composition, and the pricing and re-pricing and maturity characteristics of INBs assets and liabilities. Gap analysis measures the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that mature or
reprice within a given time period. For a further discussion of gap analysis, including the factors that affect its computation and results, see pages 68 and 69 of our 2011 10-K. As noted in the footnotes to the gap table below, there are numerous
assumptions that are made by us to compute the gap. A change in any of these assumptions would materially alter the results of the gap analysis as well as the simulation model.
At September 30, 2012, the gap analysis that follows indicated that our interest-bearing liabilities that were scheduled to mature or reprice within one-year exceeded our interest-earning assets that
were scheduled to mature or reprice within one-year. This one-year interest rate sensitivity gap amounted to a negative $320 million, or a negative 18.3% of total assets, at September 30, 2012. As a result of the negative one-year gap, the
composition of our balance sheet at September 30, 2012 was considered liability-sensitive, indicating that our interest-bearing liabilities would generally reprice with changes in interest rates more rapidly than our
interest-earning assets.
The table below summarizes our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of September 30,
2012, that are scheduled to mature or reprice within the periods shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
0-3
Months
|
|
|
4-12
Months
|
|
|
Over 1-5
Years
|
|
|
Over 5
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Loans (1)
|
|
$
|
64,325
|
|
|
$
|
234,432
|
|
|
$
|
647,281
|
|
|
$
|
164,945
|
|
|
$
|
1,110,983
|
|
Loans - performing nonaccrual TDRs (1)
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
31,046
|
|
|
|
3,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,749
|
|
Securities held to maturity (2)
|
|
|
188,184
|
|
|
|
98,392
|
|
|
|
139,446
|
|
|
|
9,759
|
|
|
|
435,781
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,839
|
|
|
|
8,457
|
|
Interest-earning time deposits with banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rate-sensitive assets
|
|
$
|
264,634
|
|
|
$
|
363,870
|
|
|
$
|
793,730
|
|
|
$
|
180,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,602,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit accounts (3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking deposits
|
|
$
|
13,069
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,069
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
9,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,074
|
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
416,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,095
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
103,728
|
|
|
|
337,344
|
|
|
|
540,659
|
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
|
|
989,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
541,966
|
|
|
|
337,344
|
|
|
|
540,659
|
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
|
|
1,427,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
Subordinated debentures- capital securities (1)
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,702
|
|
Accrued interest on all borrowed funds (1)
|
|
|
5,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowed funds
|
|
|
62,487
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rate-sensitive liabilities
|
|
$
|
604,453
|
|
|
$
|
344,344
|
|
|
$
|
540,659
|
|
|
$
|
7,694
|
|
|
$
|
1,497,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP (repricing differences)
|
|
$
|
(339,819
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,526
|
|
|
$
|
253,071
|
|
|
$
|
172,849
|
|
|
$
|
105,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP
|
|
$
|
(339,819
|
)
|
|
$
|
(320,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
105,627
|
|
|
$
|
105,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP to total assets
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(18.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant assumptions used in preparing the gap table above follow:
(1)
|
Floating-rate loans, loans with predetermined rate increases and floating-rate borrowings are included in the period in which their interest rates are next scheduled to
adjust rather than in the period in which they mature. Fixed-rate loans and borrowings are scheduled according to their contractual maturities. Deferred loan fees and the effect of possible loan prepayments are excluded from the analysis. Nonaccrual
loans of $9.2 million are also excluded from the table.
|
(2)
|
Securities are scheduled according to the earlier of their next callable date or the date on which the interest rate on the security is scheduled to change. Nearly all
have predetermined interest rate increases or steps up to a specified rate on one or more predetermined dates. Generally, the security becomes eligible for redemption by the issuer at the date of the first scheduled step-up. The net
carrying value ($4.2 million) of corporate securities that are on a cash basis of accounting are excluded from the table.
|
(3)
|
Interest checking, savings and money market deposits are regarded as 100% readily accessible withdrawable accounts and certificates of deposit are scheduled according
to their contractual maturity dates. This assumption contributes significantly to the liability sensitive position reported per the one-year gap analysis. However, if such deposits were treated differently, the one-year gap would then change.
Depositors may not necessarily immediately withdraw funds in the event deposit rates offered by INB did not change as quickly and uniformly as changes in general market rates.
|
52
Based on our recent analysis of the earnings simulation model described earlier, the one year risk to our
net interest and dividend income (from a base case net interest and dividend income of $37.9 million) would be a negative 0.09% for a 100 basis point rate decrease shock and a negative 1.06% for a 200 basis point rate increase shock, while the
two-year cumulative risk to our net interest and dividend income (from a base case cumulative net interest and dividend income of $80.0 million) would be a negative 2.33% for a 100 basis point rate decrease shock and a negative 2.14% for a 200 basis
point rate increase shock. The model covers a 24 month horizon and assumes interest rate changes are gradually ramped up or down over a 12 month horizon using various assumptions based upon a parallel yield curve shift and are subsequently sustained
at those levels for the remainder of the simulation horizon. For determining the assumed rates offered on our deposit accounts in the model, we use internally developed beta factors that utilize historical data based on a five-year look-back period.
There can be no assurances that a sudden and substantial change in interest rates may not adversely impact our net interest and dividend
income to a larger extent than noted above if interest rates on our assets and liabilities do not change at the same speed, to the same extent, or on the same basis, as those assumed in the model.
Recent Accounting Standards
See note 18
to the financial statements included in this report for a discussion of this topic.
ITEM 3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates.
Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in our lending, security investing, deposit-taking and borrowing activities. We do not engage in and accordingly have no risk related to trading accounts, commodities, interest rate
hedges or foreign exchange. The measurement of market risk associated with financial instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting on-and off-balance sheet transactions are aggregated, and the resulting net positions are identified.
Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments, which reflect changes in market prices and rates, can be found in note 17 to the financial statements included in this report. We also actively monitor and manage our interest rate risk
exposure as discussed in Item 2 above under the caption Asset and Liability Management.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Principal Executive and Financial Officers, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our companys disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Principal Executive and Financial Officers have concluded that as of
September 30, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or
15d-15 that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
We are periodically a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business, such as foreclosure proceedings. Based on review and consultation with legal counsel,
management does not believe that there is any pending or threatened proceeding against us, which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on our business, results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
This item requires disclosure of any new or material changes to our risk factors disclosed in our 2011 10-K, where such factors are discussed on pages 31 through 39. There were no material changes to the
risk factors during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not Applicable
53
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
As required by its primary regulator, in February 2010, IBC deferred regularly scheduled interest payments on its outstanding $55 million of junior
subordinated notes relating to its trust preferred securities and suspended cash dividend payments on its Series A Preferred Stock held by the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The deferral of the interest payments does not
constitute a default under the indenture governing the trust preferred securities. During the deferral period, interest will continue to accrue on the junior subordinated notes at the stated coupon rate, including on the deferred interest. At
September 30, 2012, IBC had accrued and owing a total of $5.8 million of interest payments on the junior subordinated notes.
Cash
dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are cumulative and accrue and compound on each subsequent payment date. At September 30, 2012, IBC had accumulated and unpaid preferred stock dividends in arrears of $3.8 million. Because IBC missed the
sixth dividend payment in the second quarter of 2011, the Treasury has the right to appoint two directors to IBCs board of directors until all unpaid dividends have been paid. As reported on Forms 8-K filed on March 28, 2012 and on
October 29, 2012, on March 23, 2012 and October 26, 2012, the Treasury appointed a director to IBCs Board of Directors for a total of two directors.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable
ITEM 5. Other Information
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. Exhibits
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to the Exhibit Index included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, immediately
following the signature page.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
INTERVEST BANCSHARES CORPORATION
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
Date: November 5, 2012
|
|
By: /s/ Lowell S. Dansker
|
|
|
Lowell S. Dansker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
Date: November 5, 2012
|
|
By: /s/ John J. Arvonio
|
|
|
John J. Arvonio, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
54
Intervest Bancshares Corporation and Subsidiaries
Exhibit Index
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report.
|
|
|
Exhibit
#
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
Certification of the principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
Certification of the principal executive and financial officers pursuant to Section 906 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
101.0
|
|
The following materials from Intervest Bancshares Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, formatted in Extensible Business
Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings; (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) related financial statement footnotes. **
|
**
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for
purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.
|
55
Intervest Bancshares (NASDAQ:IBCA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024
Intervest Bancshares (NASDAQ:IBCA)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024