This Amendment No. 2 (this
Amendment
) to Schedule
14D-9
amends and supplements the Solicitation/Recommendation Statement on Schedule
14D-9
(as amended or supplemented from time to time, the
Schedule
14D-9
), initially filed by Datawatch Corporation, a Delaware corporation (
Datawatch
), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC
) on November 14, 2018,
relating to the tender offer by Dallas Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (
Purchaser
) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Altair Engineering Inc., a Delaware corporation (
Altair
), to purchase all of the
outstanding shares of Datawatchs Common Stock (the
Shares
) at a purchase price of $13.10 per Share, net to the seller in cash, without interest and subject to any required withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated November 14, 2018 (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the
Offer to Purchase
), and the related Letter of Transmittal (as it may be amended or
supplemented from time to time, the
Letter of Transmittal
and, together with the Offer to Purchase, the
Offer
).
Except as otherwise set forth below, the information set forth in the Schedule
14D-9
remains unchanged
and is incorporated by reference as relevant to the items in this Amendment. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Schedule
14D-9.
This Amendment is
being filed to reflect certain updates as reflected below.
ITEM 8. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Item 8 of the Schedule
14D-9
is hereby amended and supplemented by inserting the disclosure set forth
below after the last paragraph in the subsection titled
Antitrust clearance
:
The request for early termination
of the waiting period was granted effective 9:54 a.m., Boston time, on November 27, 2018. Accordingly, the condition to the Offer requiring that any applicable waiting period under the HSR Act shall have expired or been terminated has been
satisfied. Except as set forth in this Schedule
14D-9,
the Offer continues to be subject to the remaining conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase.
Even though the requisite waiting period under the HSR Act has been terminated, at any time before or after Purchasers acceptance for
payment of Shares pursuant to the Offer, if the FTC or Antitrust Division believes that the Offer would violate the U.S. federal antitrust laws by substantially lessening competition in any line of commerce affecting U.S. consumers, the FTC or
Antitrust Division has the authority to challenge the transaction by seeking a federal court order enjoining the transaction or, if Shares have already been acquired, requiring disposition of such Shares, or the divestiture of assets of Altair,
Datawatch or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates. U.S. state attorneys general and private persons may also bring legal action under the U.S. federal or state antitrust laws. While Datawatch believes that the consummation of the Offer
will not violate any U.S. federal or state antitrust law, there can be no assurance that a challenge to the Offer on antitrust grounds will not be made or, if a challenge is made, what the result will be.
Item 8 of the Schedule
14D-9
is hereby amended and supplemented by inserting the disclosure set forth
below after the paragraph in the subsection titled
Certain Litigation
:
On November 26, 2018, a putative
class action lawsuit was filed against Datawatch and the members of the Datawatch Board (other than Mr. Mahony) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned
Robert Stier v. Datawatch Corporation, et
al
. (C.A. No.
1:18-cv-11013)
(the
November
26 Complaint
). The November 26 Complaint alleges, among other things, that
Datawatch and certain members of the Datawatch Board violated Section 14 of the Exchange Act by issuing a Schedule
14D-9
that was materially misleading and omitted material facts related to the proposed
transactions with Altair. The November 26 Complaint also alleges that certain members of the Datawatch Board violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, as controlling persons who had the ability to prevent the Schedule
14D-9
from being materially false and misleading. The November 26 Complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction against the consummation of the proposed transactions with Altair, rescission or an award of
rescissionary damages in the event such transactions are consummated, and an award of costs for the actions, including reasonable attorneys and experts fees. Datawatch believes that the allegations and claims asserted in the
November 26 Complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against the action. A negative outcome in the action could adversely affect Datawatch if it results in preliminary or permanent injunctive relief.
-2-