UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
S
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
|
£
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission File Number 0-16761
HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
West Virginia
|
55-0650743
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
3 North Main Street P.O. Box 929 Petersburg, WV
|
26847
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 304-257-4111
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common
Stock, $5 par value
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a
well-know seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 or the Securities Act
£
Yes
S
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act
£
Yes
S
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
S
No
£
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this form, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
S
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
S
No
£
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.
£
Large Accelerated Filer
£
Accelerated
Filer
£
Non-accelerated filer
S
Smaller
Reporting Company
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 126-2 of the Act) Yes
£
No
S
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and
asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
quarter:
The aggregate market value of the 1,231,452 shares of common stock
of the registrant, issued and outstanding, held by non- affiliates on June 30, 2011, was approximately $20,934,684 based on the
closing sale price of $17.00 per share on June 30, 2011. For the purposes of this calculation, the term “affiliate”
refers to all directors and executive officers of the registrant.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s
classes of common stock as of the last practicable date: As of March 30, 2012: 1,336,873 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates certain information by reference from the
registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders, which proxy statement will be filed
on or about April 15, 2012, for the 2012 annual shareholders’ meeting to be held May 8, 2012.
|
FORM 10-K INDEX
|
|
|
|
Part I
|
|
Page
|
|
Item 1.
|
Business
|
3
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
9
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
9
|
|
Item 2.
|
Properties
|
9
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
9
|
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
9
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
10
|
|
Item 7.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
11
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
25
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
26
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
67
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
67
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other Information
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part III
|
|
|
|
*Item 10.
|
Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
68
|
|
*Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
68
|
|
*Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
68
|
|
*Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence
|
68
|
|
*Item 14.
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part IV
|
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
70
|
* The information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, to the
extent not included in this document, is incorporated herein by reference to the information included under the captions “Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act,” “ELECTION OF DIRECTORS,” “INFORMATION CONCERNING DIRECTORS
AND NOMINEES,” “REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE,” “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION,” “SECURITY OWNERSHIP
OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT” and “CERTAIN RELATED TRANSACTIONS” in the registrant’s definitive
proxy statement which is expected to be filed on or about April 15, 2012, for the 2012 annual shareholders’ meeting to be
held May 8, 2012.
PART I
General
Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (hereinafter referred
to as “Highlands,” or the “Company”), incorporated under the laws of the State of West Virginia in 1985,
is a multi bank holding company subject to the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. Highlands owns 100%
of the outstanding stock of its subsidiary banks, The Grant County Bank and Capon Valley Bank (hereinafter referred to as the “Banks”
or “Capon” and/or “Grant”), and its life insurance subsidiary, HBI Life Insurance Company (hereinafter
referred to as “HBI Life”).
The Grant County Bank was chartered on August
6, 1902, and Capon Valley Bank was chartered on July 1, 1918. Both are state banks chartered under the laws of the State of West
Virginia. HBI Life was chartered in April 1988 under the laws of the State of Arizona.
Services Offered by the Banks
The Banks offer all services normally offered
by a full service commercial bank, including commercial and individual demand and time deposit accounts, commercial and individual
loans, drive in banking services, internet banking services, and automated teller machines. No material portion of the Banks' deposits
have been obtained from a single or small group of customers and the loss of the deposits of any one customer or of a small group
of customers would not have a material adverse effect on the business of the Banks. Credit life and accident and health insurance
are sold to customers of the subsidiary Banks through HBI Life.
Employees
As of December 31, 2011, The Grant County Bank
had 73 full time equivalent employees, Capon Valley Bank had 48 full time equivalent employees and Highlands had four full time
equivalent employees. No person is employed by HBI Life on a full time basis.
Competition
The Banks' primary trade area is generally
defined as Grant, Hardy, Mineral, Randolph, Pendleton and Tucker Counties in West Virginia, portions of Frederick County in Virginia
and portions of Western Maryland. This area includes the towns of Petersburg, Wardensville, Moorefield and Keyser in West Virginia,
the town of Stephen City in Virginia, and several smaller rural communities mainly in West Virginia. The Banks' secondary trade
area includes portions of Hampshire County in West Virginia. The Banks primarily compete with four state chartered banks, three
national banks, and three credit unions. In addition, the Banks compete with money market mutual funds and investment brokerage
firms for deposits in their service area. No financial institution has been chartered in the area within the last five years although
other state and nationally chartered banks have opened branches in this area within this time period. Competition for new loans
and deposits in the Banks' service area is quite intense.
Regulation and Supervision
The Company, as a registered bank holding company,
and its subsidiary Banks, as insured depository institutions, operate in a highly regulated environment and are regularly examined
by federal and state regulators. The following description briefly discusses certain provisions of federal and state laws and regulations
and the potential impact of such provisions to which the Company and subsidiary are subject. These federal and state laws and regulations
are designed to reduce potential loss exposure to the depositors of such depository institutions and to the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation’s insurance fund and are not intended to protect the Company’s security holders. Proposals to change the
laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised in Congress, in state legislatures, and before the various
bank regulatory agencies. The likelihood and timing of any changes and the impact such changes might have on the Company are impossible
to determine with any certainty. A change in applicable laws or regulations, or a change in the way such laws or regulations are
interpreted by regulatory agencies or courts, may have a material impact on the business, operations and earnings of the Company.
To the extent that the following information describes statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified entirely by reference
to the particular statutory or regulatory provision.
As a bank holding company registered under
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), the Company is subject to regulation by the Federal
Reserve Board. Federal banking laws require a bank holding company to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary
depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so otherwise.
Additionally, the Federal Reserve Board has jurisdiction under the BHCA to approve any bank or non-bank acquisition, merger or
consolidation proposed by a bank holding company. The BHCA generally limits the activities of a bank holding company and its subsidiaries
to that of banking, with the managing or controlling of banks as to be a proper incident thereto. The BHCA also prohibits a bank
holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring more than 5% of the voting shares of any company and from engaging in
any business other than banking or managing or controlling banks. The Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation that certain
activities are closely related to banking within the meaning of the BHCA. These activities include: operating a mortgage company,
finance company, credit card company or factoring company; performing certain data processing operations; providing investment
and financial advice; and acting as an insurance agent for certain types of credit-related insurance.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“Gramm-Leach”)
became law in November 1999. Gramm-Leach established a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, investment
banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers. Gramm-Leach permits qualifying bank holding
companies to register with the Federal Reserve Board as “financial holding companies” and allows such companies to
engage in a significantly broader range of financial activities than were historically permissible for bank holding companies.
Although the Federal Reserve Board provides the principal regulatory supervision of financial services permitted under Gramm-Leach,
the Securities and Exchange Commission and state regulators also provide substantial supervisory oversight. In addition to broadening
the range of financial services a bank holding company may provide, Gramm-Leach also addressed customer privacy and information
sharing issues and set forth certain customer disclosure requirements. The Company has no current plans to petition the Federal
Reserve Board for consideration as a financial holding company.
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching
Efficiency Act of 1994 (“Riegle-Neal”) permits bank holding companies to acquire banks located in any state. Riegle-Neal
also allows national banks and state banks with different home states to merge across state lines and allows branch banking across
state lines, unless specifically prohibited by state laws.
The International Money Laundering Abatement
and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act of 2001 (“Patriot Act”) was adopted in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks. The Patriot Act provides law enforcement with greater powers to investigate terrorism and prevent future terrorist acts.
Among the broad-reaching provisions contained in the Patriot Act are several designed to deter terrorists’ ability to launder
money in the United States and provide law enforcement with additional powers to investigate how terrorists and terrorist organizations
are financed. The Patriot Act creates additional requirements for banks, which were already subject to similar regulations. The
Patriot Act authorizes the Secretary of Treasury to require financial institutions to take certain “special measures”
when the Secretary suspects that certain transactions or accounts are related to money laundering. These special measures may be
ordered when the Secretary suspects that a jurisdiction outside of the United States, a financial institution operating outside
of the United States, a class of transactions involving a jurisdiction outside of the United States or certain types of accounts
are of “primary money laundering concern.” The special measures include the following: (a) require financial institutions
to keep records and report on transactions or accounts at issue; (b) require financial institutions to obtain and retain information
related to the beneficial ownership of any account opened or maintained by foreign persons; (c) require financial institutions
to identify each customer who is permitted to use the account; and (d) prohibit or impose conditions on the opening or maintaining
of correspondence or payable-through accounts. Failure of a financial institution to maintain and implement adequate programs to
combat money laundering and terrorist financing or to comply with all of the relevant laws or regulations could have serious legal
and reputational consequences for an institution.
The operations of the insurance subsidiary
are subject to the oversight and review by the State of Arizona Department of Insurance.
On July 30, 2002, the United States
Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a law that addresses corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive
compensation and enhanced timely disclosure of corporate information. As Sarbanes-Oxley directs, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer are each required to certify that the Company’s quarterly and annual reports do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact. Additionally, these individuals must certify the following: they are responsible for establishing,
maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls; they have made certain disclosures
to the Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors about the Company’s internal controls;
and they have included information in the Company’s quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there
have been significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the evaluations.
Capital Adequacy
Federal banking regulations set forth capital
adequacy guidelines, which are used by regulatory authorities to assess the adequacy of capital in examining and supervising a
bank holding company and its insured depository institutions. The capital adequacy guidelines generally require bank holding companies
to maintain total capital equal to at least 8% of total risk-adjusted assets, with at least one-half of total capital consisting
of core capital (i.e., Tier I capital) and the remaining amount consisting of “other” capital-eligible items (i.e.,
Tier II capital), such as perpetual preferred stock, certain subordinated debt, and, subject to limitations, the allowance for
loan losses. Tier I capital generally includes common stockholders’ equity plus, within certain limitations, perpetual preferred
stock and trust preferred securities. For purposes of computing risk-based capital ratios, bank holding companies must meet specific
capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items, calculated under
regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and its subsidiaries’ capital accounts and classifications are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
In addition to total and Tier I capital requirements,
regulatory authorities also require bank holding companies and insured depository institutions to maintain a minimum leverage capital
ratio of 3%. The leverage ratio is determined as the ratio of Tier I capital to total average assets, where average assets exclude
goodwill, other intangibles, and other specifically excluded assets. Regulatory authorities have stated that minimum capital ratios
are adequate for those institutions that are operationally and financially sound, experiencing solid earnings, have high levels
of asset quality and are not experiencing significant growth. The guidelines also provide that banking organizations experiencing
internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory
levels. In those instances where these criteria are not evident, regulatory authorities expect, and may require, bank holding companies
and insured depository institutions to maintain higher than minimum capital levels.
Additionally, federal banking laws require
regulatory authorities to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to depository institutions that do not satisfy
minimum capital requirements. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institutions in question are “well capitalized,”
“adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically
undercapitalized,” as such terms are defined under uniform regulations defining such capital levels issued by each of the
federal banking agencies. As an example, a depository institution that is not well capitalized is generally prohibited from accepting
brokered deposits and offering interest rates on deposits higher than the prevailing rate in its market. Additionally, a depository
institution is generally prohibited from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management
fee to its holding company, may be subject to asset growth limitations and may be required to submit capital restoration plans
if the depository institution is considered undercapitalized.
The Company’s and its subsidiaries’ regulatory capital
ratios are presented in the table below:
|
|
|
|
Actual Ratio
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Actual Ratio
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Regulatory
Minimum
|
|
|
Total Risk Based Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands Bankshares
|
|
|
15.17
|
%
|
|
|
14.49
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
The Grant County Bank
|
|
|
15.31
|
%
|
|
|
14.58
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
Capon Valley Bank
|
|
|
13.16
|
%
|
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands Bankshares
|
|
|
10.22
|
%
|
|
|
9.91
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
The Grant County Bank
|
|
|
10.55
|
%
|
|
|
10.26
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
Capon Valley Bank
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.33
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands Bankshares
|
|
|
13.91
|
%
|
|
|
13.24
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
The Grant County Bank
|
|
|
14.06
|
%
|
|
|
13.32
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
Capon Valley Bank
|
|
|
11.90
|
%
|
|
|
11.24
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Dividends and Other Payments
The Company is a legal entity separate and
distinct from its subsidiaries. Dividends and management fees from Grant County Bank and Capon Valley Bank are essentially the
sole source of cash for the Company, although HBI Life will periodically pay dividends to the Company. The right of the Company,
and shareholders of the Company, to participate in any distribution of the assets or earnings of Grant County Bank and Capon Valley
Bank through the payment of such dividends or otherwise is necessarily subject to the prior claims of creditors of Grant County
Bank and Capon Valley Bank, except to the extent that claims of the Company in its capacity as a creditor may be recognized. Moreover,
there are various legal limitations applicable to the payment of dividends to the Company as well as the payment of dividends by
the Company to its shareholders. Under federal law, Grant County Bank and Capon Valley Bank may not, subject to certain limited
exceptions, make loans or extensions of credit to, or invest in the securities of, or take securities of the Company as collateral
for loans to any borrower. Grant County Bank and Capon Valley Bank are also subject to collateral security requirements for any
loans or extensions of credit permitted by such exceptions.
Grant County Bank and Capon Valley Bank are
subject to various statutory restrictions on their ability to pay dividends to the Company. Specifically, the approval of the appropriate
regulatory authorities is required prior to the payment of dividends by Grant County Bank and Capon Valley Bank in excess of earnings
retained in the current year plus retained net profits for the preceding two years. The payment of dividends by the Company, Grant
County Bank and Capon Valley Bank may also be limited by other factors, such as requirements to maintain adequate capital above
regulatory guidelines. The Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have the authority to prohibit any
bank under their jurisdiction from engaging in an unsafe and unsound practice in conducting its business. Depending upon the financial
condition of Grant County Bank and Capon Valley Bank, the payment of dividends could be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or
unsound practice. The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have indicated their view that it’s generally unsafe and unsound
practice to pay dividends except out of current operating earnings. The Federal Reserve Board has stated that, as a matter of prudent
banking, a bank or bank holding company should not maintain its existing rate of cash dividends on common stock unless (1) the
organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fund fully the dividends
and (2) the prospective rate or earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality,
and overall financial condition. Moreover, the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that bank holding companies should serve as
a source of managerial and financial strength to their subsidiary banks. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve Board has stated that
a bank holding company should not maintain a level of cash dividends to its shareholders that places undue pressure on the capital
of bank subsidiaries, or that can be funded only through additional borrowings or other arrangements that may undermine the bank
holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength.
Governmental Policies
The Federal Reserve Board regulates money and
credit and interest rates in order to influence general economic conditions. These policies have a significant influence on overall
growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits and affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for time and
savings deposits. Federal Reserve monetary policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks
in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.
Various other legislation, including proposals
to overhaul the banking regulatory system and to limit the investments that a depository institution may make with insured funds,
are from time to time introduced in Congress. The Company cannot determine the ultimate effect that such potential legislation,
if enacted, would have upon its financial condition or operations.
Beginning in late 2008, the economic
environment caused higher levels of bank failures, which dramatically increased FDIC resolution costs and led to a significant
reduction in the Deposit Insurance Fund. As a result, the FDIC has significantly increased the initial base assessment rates paid
by financial institutions for deposit insurance. The base assessment rate was increased by seven basis points (7 cents for every
$100 of deposits) for the first quarter of 2009. Effective April 1, 2009, initial base assessment rates were changed to range
from 12 basis points to 45 basis points across all risk categories with possible adjustments to these rates based on certain debt-related
components. These increases in the base assessment rate have increased our deposit insurance costs and negatively impacted our
earnings. In addition, in May 2009, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on all insured institutions due to recent bank and savings
association failures. The emergency assessment amounted to five basis points on each institution's assets minus tier one (core)
capital as of June 30, 2009, subject to a maximum equal to 10 basis points times the institution's assessment base. The Company’s
special assessment, which was reflected in earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, was approximately $179,000. The FDIC
may impose additional emergency special assessments if necessary to maintain public confidence in federal deposit insurance or
as a result of deterioration in the deposit insurance fund reserve ratio due to institution failures. Any additional emergency
special assessment imposed by the FDIC will negatively impact our earnings.
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC
adopted a final rule requiring that all institutions prepay their assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and all of 2010, 2011
and 2012. This pre-payment was due on December 30, 2009. However, the FDIC may exempt certain institutions from the prepayment
requirement if the FDIC determines that the prepayment would adversely affect the safety and soundness of the institution.
In April 2011, the FDIC implemented
rulemaking under the Dodd-Frank Act to reform the deposit insurance assessment system. The final rule redefined the
assessment base used for calculating deposit insurance assessments. Specifically, the rule bases assessments on an institution’s
total assets less tangible capital, as opposed to total deposits. Since the new base is larger than the prior base,
the FDIC also lowered the assessment rates so that the rules would not significantly alter the total amount of revenue collected
from the industry. The new assessment scale ranges from 2.5 basis points for the least risky institutions to 45 basis
points for the riskiest. Either an increase in the Risk Category or adjustments to the base assessment rates could have
a material adverse effect on our earnings.
The Company is subject to extensive
regulation, supervision and examination by federal and state banking authorities. Any change in applicable regulations or laws
could have a substantial impact on the Company and the Company’s operations. Additional legislation and regulations that
could significantly affect the Company’s powers, authority and operations may be enacted or adopted in the future, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. New legislation proposed
by Congress may give bankruptcy courts the power to reduce the increasing number of home foreclosures by giving bankruptcy judges
the authority to restructure mortgages and reduce a borrower's payments. Property owners would be allowed to keep their property
while working out their debts. Other similar bills placing additional temporary moratoriums on foreclosure sales or otherwise modifying
foreclosure procedures to the benefit of borrowers and the detriment of lenders may be enacted by either Congress or the States
of West Virginia, Pennsylvania or Maryland in the future. These laws may further restrict the Company’s collection efforts
on one-to-four single-family mortgage loans. Additional legislation proposed or under consideration in Congress would give current
debit and credit card holders the chance to opt out of an overdraft protection program and limit overdraft fees, which could result
in additional operational costs and a reduction in the Company’s non-interest income.
Further, the Company’s regulators
have significant discretion and authority to prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of laws by financial institutions
and holding companies in the performance of their supervisory and enforcement duties. In this regard, banking regulators are considering
additional regulations governing compensation, which may adversely affect the Company’s ability to attract and retain employees.
On July
21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”).
The Act has resulted in financial regulatory reform aimed at strengthening the nation’s financial services sector. The Act’s
provisions and rules promulgated there under that have received the most public attention generally have been those applying to
larger institutions or institutions that engage in practices in which we do not engage. These provisions include growth restrictions,
credit exposure limits, higher prudential standards, prohibitions on proprietary trading, and prohibitions on sponsoring and investing
in hedge funds and private equity funds. However, the Act contains numerous other provisions that likely will directly impact us
and our banking subsidiaries. These include increased fees payable by banks to regulatory agencies, new capital guidelines for
banks and bank holding companies, permanently increasing the FDIC insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor, new
liquidation procedures for banks, new regulations affecting consumer financial products, new corporate governance disclosures and
requirements, and the increased cost of supervision and compliance more generally. Many aspects of the law continue to be subject
to rulemaking by various government agencies and will take effect over several years. This time table, combined with the Act’s
significant deference to future rulemaking by various regulatory agencies, makes it difficult for us to anticipate the Act’s
overall financial, competitive and regulatory impact on us, our customers, and the financial industry more generally.
Available Information
The Company files annual, quarterly
and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The Company’s SEC filings are filed electronically
and are available to the public via the Internet at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. In addition, any document filed by the
Company with the SEC can be read and copies obtained at the SEC’s public reference facilities at 100 F Street, NE, Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of documents can be obtained at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100
F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the
SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of documents can also be obtained free of charge by writing to Highlands Bankshares, Inc., P.O. Box
929, Petersburg, WV 26847.
Executive Officers
|
|
Age
|
Position with the Company
|
Principal Occupation (Past Five Years)
|
|
C.E. Porter
|
63
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
CEO of Highlands since 2004, President of The Grant County Bank 1991 through 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan L. Brill
|
57
|
Secretary and Treasurer; President of Capon Valley Bank
|
President of Capon Valley Bank since 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey B. Reedy
|
49
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
CFO of Highlands since March 2010, Prior to Highlands, Corporate
Controller for American Woodmark Corporation.
|
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
None.
The table below lists the primary properties utilized in operations
by the Company. All listed properties are owned by the Company.
|
Location
|
Description
|
|
3 N. Main Street, Petersburg, WV 26847
|
Primary Office, The Grant County Bank
|
|
Route 33, Riverton, WV 26814
|
Branch Office, The Grant County Bank
|
|
500 S. Main Street, Moorefield, WV 26836
|
Branch Office, The Grant County Bank
|
|
Route 220 & Josie Dr., Keyser, WV 26726
|
Branch Office, The Grant County Bank
|
|
Main Street, Harman, WV 26270
|
Branch Office, The Grant County Bank
|
|
William Avenue, Davis, WV 26260
|
Branch Office, The Grant County Bank
|
|
5502 Appalachian Hwy., Davis, WV 26260
|
Branch Office, The Grant County Bank
|
|
2 W. Main Street, Wardensville, WV 26851
|
Primary Office, Capon Valley Bank
|
|
717 N. Main Street, Moorefield, WV 26836
|
Branch Office, Capon Valley Bank
|
|
17558 SR55, Baker, WV 26801
|
Branch Office, Capon Valley Bank
|
|
6701 Northwestern Pike, Gore, VA 22637
5511 Main Street, Stephens City, VA 22655
|
Branch Office, Capon Valley Bank
Branch Office, Capon Valley Bank
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
Management
is not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation in which Highlands or its subsidiaries may be involved as a defendant.
In the normal course of business, the Banks periodically must initiate suits against borrowers as a final course of action in collecting
past due indebtedness.
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures – Not Applicable.
|
PART II
|
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrant’s Common
Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
The Company had approximately 825 shareholders
as of December 31, 2011. This amount includes all shareholders, whether titled individually or held by a brokerage firm or custodian
in street name. The Company's stock is not traded on any national or regional stock exchange although brokers may occasionally
initiate or be a participant in a trade. The Company’s stock is listed on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol
HBSI.OB. The Company may not know terms of an exchange between individual parties.
The table on the following page outlines the
dividends paid and market prices of the Company's stock based on prices disclosed to management. Prices have been provided using
a nationally recognized online stock quote system. Such prices may not include retail mark-ups, mark-downs, or commissions. Dividends
are subject to the restrictions described in Note Nine to the Financial Statements.
Highlands Bankshares, Inc. Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Dividends Per
|
|
|
|
Estimated Market Range
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
19.35
|
|
|
$
|
18.20
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
18.75
|
|
|
$
|
16.80
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
17.25
|
|
|
$
|
14.45
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
13.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
25.75
|
|
|
$
|
20.55
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
29.75
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
24.00
|
|
|
$
|
18.50
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
24.00
|
|
|
$
|
18.10
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
The following table is not required for smaller reporting companies;
however, the Company believes this information may be important to the reader.
|
|
|
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total Interest Income
|
|
$
|
21,130
|
|
|
$
|
22,897
|
|
|
$
|
24,274
|
|
|
$
|
26,203
|
|
|
$
|
27,664
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
|
4,583
|
|
|
|
6,214
|
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
8,866
|
|
|
|
10,703
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
16,547
|
|
|
|
16,683
|
|
|
|
16,433
|
|
|
|
17,337
|
|
|
|
16,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses
|
|
|
12,923
|
|
|
|
13,196
|
|
|
|
14,569
|
|
|
|
16,428
|
|
|
|
16,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
Other Expenses
|
|
|
13,145
|
|
|
|
13,109
|
|
|
|
12,053
|
|
|
|
11,419
|
|
|
|
10,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
5,048
|
|
|
|
7,708
|
|
|
|
7,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
1,692
|
|
|
|
2,738
|
|
|
|
2,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
1,392
|
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
$
|
3,356
|
|
|
$
|
4,970
|
|
|
$
|
4,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets at Year End
|
|
$
|
404,194
|
|
|
$
|
399,900
|
|
|
$
|
407,810
|
|
|
$
|
378,295
|
|
|
$
|
380,936
|
|
|
Long Term Debt at Year End
|
|
$
|
11,245
|
|
|
$
|
9,393
|
|
|
$
|
10,866
|
|
|
$
|
11,317
|
|
|
$
|
11,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Per Share of Common Stock
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
$
|
3.59
|
|
|
$
|
3.24
|
|
|
Dividends Per Share of Common Stock
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.16
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Assets
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
|
Return on Average Equity
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.33
|
%
|
|
|
12.38
|
%
|
|
|
12.03
|
%
|
|
Dividend Payout Ratio
|
|
|
43.25
|
%
|
|
|
87.39
|
%
|
|
|
46.19
|
%
|
|
|
30.12
|
%
|
|
|
30.88
|
%
|
|
Year End Equity to Assets Ratio
|
|
|
10.31
|
%
|
|
|
10.34
|
%
|
|
|
10.16
|
%
|
|
|
10.41
|
%
|
|
|
10.66
|
%
|
|
Item 7.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results or Operations
|
Forward
Looking Statements
Certain statements in this report may constitute
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise
are not statements of historical fact. Such statements are often characterized by the use of qualified words (and their derivatives)
such as “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “anticipate”
or other similar words. Although the Company believes that its expectations with respect to certain forward-looking statements
are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its existing knowledge of its business and operations, there can be
no assurance that actual results, performance or achievements of the Company will not differ materially from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Actual future results and trends may differ
materially from historical results or those anticipated depending on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the effects
of and changes in: general economic conditions, the interest rate environment, legislative and regulatory requirements, competitive
pressures, new products and delivery systems, inflation, changes in the stock and bond markets, technology, downturns in the trucking,
mining, and timber industries, downturns in the housing market affecting manufacturers of household cabinetry and thus, employment,
effects of mergers and/or downsizing in the poultry industry in Hardy County, continued challenges in the current economic environment
affecting our financial condition and results of operations, continued deterioration in the financial condition of the U.S. banking
system impacting the valuations of investments the Company has made in the securities of other financial institutions, and consumer
spending and savings habits, particularly in the current economic environment. Additionally, actual future results and trends may
differ from historical or anticipated results to the extent: (1) any significant downturn in certain industries, particularly the
trucking and timber industries are experienced; (2) loan demand decreases from prior periods; (3) the Company may make additional
loan loss provisions due to negative credit quality trends in the future that may lead to a deterioration of asset quality; (4)
the Company may not continue to experience significant recoveries of previously charged-off loans or loans resulting in foreclosure;
(5) the Company is unable to control costs and expenses as anticipated, (6) legislative and regulatory changes could increase expenses
(including changes as a result of rules and regulations adopted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act); (7) the effects of the last year’s down grade of U.S. Government Securities by one of the credit rating agencies could
have a material adverse effect on the company’s operations, earnings and financial condition; and (8) any additional assessments
imposed by the FDIC. Additionally, consideration should be given to the cautionary language contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
The Company does not update any forward-looking statements that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
Introduction
The following
discussion focuses on significant results of the Company’s operations and significant changes in our financial condition
or results of operations for the periods indicated in the discussion. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and related notes included in this report.
Current performance does not guarantee, and may not be indicative
of, similar performance in the future.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s
financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).
The financial statements contained within these statements are, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on
measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the
ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability.
In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of these transactions
would be the same, the timing of events that would impact these transactions could change.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is an estimate
of the losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (i) ASC
450,
Contingencies,
which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable and (ii) ASC
310,
Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality
which requires that losses be accrued based on
the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary
market and the loan balance.
The allowance consists of specific,
general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are determined to be impaired. The general component
covers non-impaired loans and is based on management’s internal risk ratings as well as historical loss experience adjusted
for qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate
of probable losses.
GAAP does not specify how an institution should
identify loans that are to be evaluated for collectability, nor does it specify how an institution should determine that a loan
is impaired. Each subsidiary of Highlands uses its standard loan review procedures in making those judgments so that allowance
estimates are based on a comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio. For loans that are individually evaluated and found to be
impaired, the associated allowance is based upon the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, of any collateral securing the loan
as compared to the existing balance of the loan as of the date of analysis.
All other loans, including individually evaluated
loans determined not to be impaired, are included in a group of loans that are measured under ASC 450 to provide for estimated
credit losses that have been incurred on groups of loans with similar risk characteristics. The methodology for measuring estimated
credit losses on groups of loans with similar risk characteristics in accordance with ASC 450 is based on each group’s historical
net charge-off rate, adjusted for the effects of the qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit
losses as of the evaluation date to differ from the group’s historical loss experience.
Post Retirement Benefits
and Life Insurance Investments
The Company has invested in and owns life insurance
policies on key officers. The policies are designed so that the company recovers the interest expenses associated with carrying
the policies and the officer will, at the time of retirement, receive any earnings in excess of the amounts earned by the Company.
The Company recognizes as an asset the net amount that could be realized under the insurance contract as of the balance sheet date.
This amount represents the cash surrender value of the policies less applicable surrender charges. The portion of the benefits,
which will be received by the executives at the time of their retirement, is considered, when taken collectively, to constitute
a retirement plan. Therefore the Company accounts for these policies using guidance found in ASC 715,
Compensation –Retirement
Benefits
. ASC 715 requires that an employer’s obligation under a deferred compensation agreement be accrued over the
expected service life of the employee through their normal retirement date.
Assumptions are
used in estimating the present value of amounts due officers after their normal retirement date. These assumptions include the
estimated income to be derived from the investments and an estimate of the Company’s cost of funds in these future periods.
In addition, the discount rate used in the present value calculation will change in future years based on market conditions.
Intangible
Assets
The Company carries intangible assets
related to the purchase of two banks. Amounts paid to purchase these banks were allocated as intangible assets. Generally accepted
accounting principles were applied to allocate the intangible components of the purchases. The excess was allocated between identifiable
intangibles (core deposit intangibles) and unidentified intangibles (goodwill). Goodwill is required to be evaluated for impairment
on an annual basis, and the value of the goodwill adjusted accordingly, should impairment be found. As of December 31, 2011, the
Company did not identify an impairment of this intangible. In addition to the intangible assets associated with the purchases of
banks, the company also carries intangible assets relating to the purchase of naming rights to certain features of a performing
arts center in Petersburg, WV. Intangible assets other than goodwill, which are determined to have finite lives, are amortized
based upon the estimated economic benefits received.
A summary
of the change in balances of intangible assets can be found in Note Twenty One to the Financial Statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note Two of the Company’s consolidated
financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
Overview of 2011 Results
Net income for 2011 decreased by 12.56%
as compared to 2010. The Company’s net interest income decreased slightly as the reduction in interest expenses matched
the decreases in interest income. The Company experienced an increase in the provision for loan losses of 3.93% or $137,000
from 2010 to 2011. Non-interest income increased 0.33%. The increase in non-interest income was the result of increase in
life insurance investment income in excess of the decreases in overdraft fees, service charge fees, and non-recurring gains
on the sale of securities during 2010. Non-interest expense increased 0.27% due largely to decreases in employee related
costs and decreased FDIC insurance premium rates offset by impairment write-downs of other real estate owned.
The table below compares selected commonly used measures of bank
performance for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Annualized return on average assets
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
Annualized return on average equity
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
Net interest margin (1)
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
Efficiency Ratio (2)
|
|
|
70.30
|
%
|
|
|
69.87
|
%
|
|
Earnings per share (3)
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
(1)
|
On a fully taxable equivalent basis and including loan origination fees
|
|
(2)
|
Non-interest expenses for the period indicated divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income for the period indicated.
|
|
(3)
|
Per weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period indicated.
|
Net Interest Income
2011 Compared to 2010
Net interest income, on a fully taxable equivalent
basis, decreased 0.97% from 2010 to 2011. The decrease in net interest income was driven by changes in average rates earned on
assets and paid on interest bearing liabilities and by changes in the relative mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.
For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company’s
average earning assets decreased 0.53%; the percent of average loan balances, the highest earning of the Company’s earning
assets, to total average earning assets decreased slightly to 86.79% in 2011 compared to 89.26% in 2010. The decrease in earning
assets was more than offset by the decrease in interest bearing liabilities of 2.28% from 2010 to 2011. These changes in the relative
mix of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and the change in the average yields offset resulting in the decrease of
the Company’s net interest income.
Federal Reserve target rate for federal funds
sold continues to impact yields on earning assets and average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities. The Company experienced
declining rates for 2011 as compared to 2010 on all components of earning assets and on the savings and time deposit components
of interest bearing liabilities.
The Company believes that its deposits
will be sufficient to fund the current and expected loan demand. Should the loan demand increase beyond the Company’s
current expectations, the Company may be required to fund these loans with borrowings which could result in a reduction of net
interest margin. However, management believes total net interest income would not be adversely affected.
Also, balances of non-performing loans and
other real estate acquired through foreclosure have increased from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011. Increases in balances
of non-accrual loans and other real estate acquired through foreclosure often have adverse effects on net interest income. Should
balances of non-accrual loans and other real estate acquired through foreclosure continue to increase, net interest margin may
decrease accordingly. Further discussion relating to the Company’s loan portfolio and credit quality can be found as part
of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the headings of “Loan Portfolio” and “Credit Quality.”
The table below illustrates the effects on
net interest income of changes in average volumes of interest bearing liabilities and earning assets from 2010 to 2011 and changes
in average rates on interest bearing liabilities and earning assets from 2010 to 2011 (in thousands of dollars):
|
EFFECT OF RATE-VOLUME CHANGES ON NET INTEREST
|
|
(On a fully taxable equivalent basis)
|
|
Increase (Decrease) 2011 Compared to 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to change in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Volume
|
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
|
Total Change
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
(695
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,001
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
Taxable investment securities
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
Non-taxable investment securities
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Total Interest Income
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
(1,794
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
(1,313
|
)
|
|
|
(1,547
|
)
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(1,420
|
)
|
|
|
(1,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
$
|
(405
|
)
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
(163
|
)
|
The table below sets forth an analysis of net
interest income for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (average balances and interest income/expense shown in thousands
of dollars):
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance(2)
|
|
|
Income
/Expense
|
|
|
Yield
/Rate(1)
|
|
|
Average
Balance(2)
|
|
|
Income
/Expense
|
|
|
Yield
/Rate(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans(3)(4)
|
|
$
|
321,908
|
|
|
$
|
20,448
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
332,846
|
|
|
$
|
22,144
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
%
|
|
Taxable investment securities
|
|
|
32,156
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
|
|
25,243
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
Non-taxable investment securities
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
3.78
|
%
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
.18
|
%
|
|
|
2,928
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
.27
|
%
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
11,742
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
.15
|
%
|
|
|
8,502
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
.16
|
%
|
|
Total Earning Assets
|
|
|
370,904
|
|
|
|
21,149
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
|
|
372,876
|
|
|
|
22,943
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(5,635
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-earning assets
|
|
|
40,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
405,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
408,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$
|
24,740
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
.12
|
%
|
|
$
|
23,337
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
.12
|
%
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
56,314
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
.23
|
%
|
|
|
52,857
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
.33
|
%
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
207,423
|
|
|
|
3,988
|
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
219,593
|
|
|
|
5,535
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
10,742
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
10,412
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Liabilities
|
|
|
299,219
|
|
|
|
4,583
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
|
|
306,199
|
|
|
|
6,214
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
|
57,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
7,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
40,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
405,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
408,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Yield on Earning Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
|
Notes:
|
|
(1)
|
Yields are computed on a taxable equivalent basis using a 30% tax rate
|
|
(2)
|
Average balances are based upon daily balances
|
|
(3)
|
Includes loans in non-accrual status
|
|
(4)
|
Income on loans includes fees
|
Loan Portfolio
The Company
is an active residential mortgage and construction lender and extends commercial loans to small and medium sized businesses within
its primary service area. The Company’s commercial lending activity extends across its primary service areas of Grant, Hardy,
Hampshire, Mineral, Randolph, Tucker and Pendleton counties in West Virginia and Frederick County, Virginia. Consistent with the
Company’s focus on providing community-based financial services, the Company does not attempt to diversify its loan portfolio
geographically by making significant amounts of loans to borrowers outside of its primary service area.
The table below summarizes the Company’s
loan portfolio at December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
$
|
162,214
|
|
|
$
|
168,226
|
|
|
$
|
162,619
|
|
|
$
|
156,877
|
|
|
$
|
169,122
|
|
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
23,711
|
|
|
|
33,746
|
|
|
|
30,759
|
|
|
|
27,210
|
|
|
|
15,560
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
101,517
|
|
|
|
97,089
|
|
|
|
97,606
|
|
|
|
97,709
|
|
|
|
79,892
|
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
25,614
|
|
|
|
30,275
|
|
|
|
44,499
|
|
|
|
43,958
|
|
|
|
45,625
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
313,056
|
|
|
|
329,336
|
|
|
|
335,483
|
|
|
|
325,754
|
|
|
|
310,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(6,111
|
)
|
|
|
(5,407
|
)
|
|
|
(4,021
|
)
|
|
|
(3,667
|
)
|
|
|
(3,577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans
|
|
$
|
306,945
|
|
|
$
|
323,929
|
|
|
$
|
331,462
|
|
|
$
|
322,087
|
|
|
$
|
306,622
|
|
There were no foreign loans outstanding
during any of the above periods.
The following table illustrates the Company’s
loan maturity distribution as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
Maturity Range
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 Year
|
|
|
|
1-5 Years
|
|
|
|
Over 5 Years
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loan Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
34,889
|
|
|
$
|
19,231
|
|
|
$
|
47,397
|
|
|
$
|
101,517
|
|
|
Real estate mortgage and construction
|
|
|
49,198
|
|
|
|
33,334
|
|
|
|
103,393
|
|
|
|
185,925
|
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
5,695
|
|
|
|
16,774
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
25,614
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
$
|
89,782
|
|
|
$
|
69,339
|
|
|
$
|
153,935
|
|
|
$
|
313,056
|
|
Credit Quality
The principal
economic risk associated with each of the categories of loans in the Company’s portfolio is the creditworthiness of its borrowers.
Within each category, such risk is increased or decreased depending on prevailing economic conditions. The risk associated with
the real estate mortgage loans and installment loans to individuals varies based upon employment levels, consumer confidence, fluctuations
in value of residential real estate and other conditions that affect the ability of consumers to repay indebtedness. The risk associated
with commercial, financial and agricultural loans varies based upon the strength and activity of the local economies of the Company’s
market areas. The risks associated with real estate construction loans vary based upon the supply of and demand for the type of
real estate under construction.
An
inherent risk in the lending of money is that the borrower will not be able to repay the loan under the terms of the original
agreement. The allowance for loan losses (see subsequent section) provides for this risk and is reviewed at least quarterly
for adequacy. This review also considers concentrations of loans in terms of geography, business type or level of risk. While
lending is geographically diversified within the service area, the Company does have some concentration of loans in the area
of agriculture (primarily poultry farming), and the timber and coal extraction industries. The Company recognizes these
concentrations and considers them when structuring its loan portfolio.
Non-performing
loans include non-accrual loans and loans 90 days or more past due (including non-performing restructured loans). Non-accrual loans
are loans on which interest accruals have been discontinued. Loans are typically placed in non-accrual status when the collection
of principal or interest is 90 days past due and collection is uncertain based on the net realizable value of the collateral and/or
the financial strength of the borrower. Also, the existence of any guaranties by federal or state agencies is given consideration
in this decision. The policy is the same for all types of loans. Non-performing loans do not represent or result from trends or
uncertainties which management reasonably expects will materially impact future operating results, liquidity, or capital resources.
The following table summarizes the Company’s
non-performing loans, restructured loans accruing interest and other real estate owned at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Loans on non-accrual status
|
|
$
|
8,021
|
|
|
$
|
6,979
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or more still accruing
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
8,557
|
|
|
$
|
7,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans still accruing
|
|
$
|
13,055
|
|
|
$
|
1,037
|
|
|
Other real estate owned (OREO)
|
|
$
|
7,070
|
|
|
$
|
4,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans and other risk assets
|
|
$
|
28,682
|
|
|
$
|
13,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured loans are loans on which
the interest rate or repayment terms have been changed due to financial hardship of the borrower. Restructured loans that are performing
in accordance with modified terms are $11,233,000 and $5,219,000 at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Restructured
loans not performing in accordance with modified terms totaled $2,919,000 as of December 31, 2011. All restructured loans are included
in impaired loans in Note Five. The increase in restructured loans is the result of including loan balloon renewal agreements for
troubled borrowers in accordance with the new guidelines adopted with ASU 2011-02.
The carrying
value of real estate acquired through foreclosure was $7,070,000 at December 31, 2011 and $4,700,000 at December 31, 2010. The
Company's practice is to value real estate acquired through foreclosure at the lower of (i) an independent current appraisal or
market analysis less anticipated costs of disposal, or (ii) the existing loan balance. The Company does not anticipate further
losses from the disposal of other real estate owned.
Because
of its large impact on the local economy, management continues to monitor the economic health of the poultry industry. The Company
has direct loans to poultry growers and the industry is a large employer in the Company’s trade area. In addition, multiple
manufacturers of household cabinetry are large employers in the Company’s primary trade area. Due to the downturn in the
housing market nationally, there have been indications that the demand for cabinetry has decreased, impacting the performance of
these manufacturers. Because of the impact on the local economy, management has begun to monitor the performance of this industry
as it relates to local employment trends. Additionally, the Company’s loan portfolio contains a segment of loans collateralized
by heavy equipment, particularly in the trucking, mining and timber industries. Because of the impact of the slowing economic conditions
on the housing market, the timber sector has experienced a recent downturn. While the Company has experienced some losses related
to the downturn in this industry, no material losses related to foreclosures of loans collateralized by assets typical to the timber
harvest industry have occurred. This industry has seen some improvement during the current year, resulting in reduced financial
stresses on the Company’s borrowers.
Allowance For Loan Losses
The allowance
for loan losses is an estimate of the losses in the current loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two principles of accounting:
(i) ASC 450, “
Contingencies
” which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable
and (ii) ASC 310, “
Receivables
”, which requires that loans be identified which have characteristics of impairment
as individual risks (e.g. the collateral, present value of cash flows or observable market values are less than the loan balance).
Each of the Company’s banking subsidiaries
determines the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses independently using the same allowance for loan loss methodology. The
allowance is calculated quarterly and adjusted prior to the issuance of the quarterly financial statements. All loan losses charged
to the allowance are approved by the boards of directors of each bank at their regular meetings. In addition the boards of directors
of each bank review the allowance methodology for consistency and reasonableness. The allowance is reviewed for adequacy after
considering historical loss rates, current economic conditions (both locally and nationally) delinquency trends and charge-off
activity, status of past due and non-performing loans, growth within the portfolio, the amount and types of loans comprising the
loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to pay, the estimated value of underlying collateral,
prevailing economic conditions and any known credit problems that have not been considered elsewhere in the calculation. Although
the loan portfolios of the two banks are similar to each other, some differences exist which result in divergent risk patterns
and different historical charge-off rates amongst the functional areas of the banks’ loan portfolios. Each bank pays particular
attention to the individual loan performance, collateral values, borrower financial condition and economic conditions. A committee,
with representatives from both subsidiary banks, meets to discuss the overall economic conditions that impact both subsidiary banks
in the same fashion.
The determination of an adequate allowance
at each bank is done in a four step process. The first step is to identify impaired loans. Impaired loans are problem loans above
a certain threshold which are not expected to perform in accordance with the original loan agreement. A loan is considered impaired
when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Banks will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of
principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining
impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments
when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of
the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s
prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on
a loan by loan basis for commercial loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s
effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral
dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous
loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Banks do not separately identify individual consumer and residential
loans for impairment disclosures, unless the loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.
Impaired loans and their resulting valuation
allowance are disclosed in the table below
.
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified
|
|
|
Loan Type
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
$
|
26,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,018
|
|
|
$
|
24,147
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
|
Commercial other
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Consumer mortgage
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
25,388
|
|
|
$
|
925
|
|
The second step is to allocate losses
to non-impaired loans based on historical loss rates of loans, by category, and considering the potential impact of other
qualitative factors on future loan performance.
Management has determined that the allowance
for loan losses is adequate to absorb any losses inherent in the portfolio. Although management believes that it uses the best
information available to make such determinations, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary, and the
results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions
used in making the determinations. Because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty,
there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that material increases will not be necessary
should the quality of the loans deteriorate as a result of factors previously discussed.
Both banks have outsourced independent
loan review performed at least annually, the results of which are reviewed by both bank boards and the Company’s audit committee,
with changes factored into the allowance calculations. Independent outsourced loan review considers the adequacy of loan underwriting,
asset quality, the accuracy of the banks’ loan risk ratings and the appropriateness of specific reserves as well as the overall
reasonableness of the allowance for loan losses.
Provisions for loan losses are charged
to operations in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level management considers adequate to absorb credit losses
inherent in the loan portfolio. Credit exposures deemed uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries
of previously charged-off loans are credited to the allowance for loan losses. During 2011, the Company’s net charge-offs,
as compared to gross loan balances, was greater than that experienced in 2010. As a result of the impact of increased net charge-offs,
the Company’s provision for loan losses during 2011 was $137,000 greater than in 2010. The Company’s ratio of allowance
for loan losses to gross loans increased from 1.64% at December 31, 2010 to 1.95% at December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011, the
ratio of the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 71.43% compared to 68.93% at December 31, 2010.
Cumulative net loan losses, after recoveries, for the five-year
period ending December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
4,066
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
2,255
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses is set
forth in the following table (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
|
$
|
3,667
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
Total Charge-offs:
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
1,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
Total Recoveries
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Charge-offs
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,111
|
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
|
$
|
3,667
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of net charge-offs to average net loans outstanding during the period
|
|
|
.92
|
%
|
|
|
.63
|
%
|
|
|
.46
|
%
|
|
|
.26
|
%
|
|
|
.24
|
%
|
The table below shows the allocation of loans in the loan portfolio
and the corresponding amounts of the allowance allocated by loan type (dollar amounts in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
3,363
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
1,959
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
6,111
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,667
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
As certain
loans identified as impaired are paid current, collateral values increase or loans are removed from watch lists for other reasons,
and as other loans become identified as impaired, the allocation of the allowance among the loan types may change. The allocation
also changes because delinquency levels within each of the respective portfolios change. The Company feels that the allowance is
a fair representation of the losses present in the portfolio given historical loss trends, economic conditions and any known credit
problems as of any quarter's end. The Company believes that the allowance is to be taken as a whole, and allocation between loan
types is an estimation of potential losses within each loan type given information known at the time.
Non-Interest Income
2011 Compared to 2010
Non-interest income increased 0.33%, or $7,000 from 2010 to 2011.
The increase in non-interest income was the result of increase in
life insurance investment income in excess of the decreases in overdraft fees, service charge fees, and non-recurring gains on
the sale of securities during 2010.
Service
charges on deposit accounts decreased 7.57%. The largest portion of these charges is non-sufficient funds fees on non-interest
bearing transaction accounts. The subsidiary banks continued to see decreases in service charges associated with the program commonly
referred to as the “courtesy overdraft” program. This is the result of customer’s choice not to participate in
the subsidiary bank’s automatic overdraft protection coupled with better management, by customers, of their accounts.
Net insurance earnings and commissions decreased
$37,000 from 2010 to 2011. Insurance earnings for the Company consist of commissions earned by the subsidiary banks on life and
accident and health insurance sold in relation to the extension of credit and insurance revenues, net of benefits paid, expense
allowances and policy and claim reserves earned by the life insurance subsidiary. As the Company’s balances of installment
loans and the volume of installment loans, which are primary markets for credit life and accident and health insurance, have decreased
over the past several years, gross revenues from insurance earnings have decreased. In relation to this decrease, required policy
reserves have also declined. The table below illustrates the components of insurance commissions and income for 2010 and 2011 (in
thousands of dollars), which is reported as other operating income.
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross commissions and insurance revenues
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits Paid
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Changes in required policy and claim reserves
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Expense allowance
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net insurance income
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
Non-interest Expense
2011 compared to 2010
Non-interest expense increased 0.27% in 2011
as compared to 2010.
Changes in salary and benefits expense
The following table compares the components
of salary and benefits expense for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands of dollars):
Salary and Benefits Expense
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Employee salaries
|
|
$
|
4,450
|
|
|
$
|
4,493
|
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
Employee benefit insurance
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Payroll taxes
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
Non-recurring post retirement adjustment
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
Post retirement plans
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,425
|
|
|
$
|
6,936
|
|
|
$
|
(511
|
)
|
The decrease of 7.37% in employee related
cost during 2011 compared to 2010 is mainly the result of the implementation of the Financial Accounting Standard ASC 310-20 Nonrefundable
Fees and Other Costs. The Company began deferral of costs associated with loan origination at the beginning of 2011 and is amortizing
the cost over the life of the loan. Additionally, the Company did not contribute to the discretionary employee stock ownership
plan or the profit sharing plan during 2011 as part of a cost cutting initiative for 2011 which also included a reduction in director
fees paid.
Changes in data processing expense
Data processing expense increased 5.09% or
$56,000 during 2011 compared to 2010. The increase was driven by a credit received from the Company’s core system vendor
during 2010 for an error in billing during the system conversion in the fall of 2009 partially offset by additional costs attributed
to increased costs at one of the subsidiary banks as a result of increase in the number of customer deposit accounts, internet
banking costs, and a full year of costs during 2011 for a branch location which was not open the full year in 2010.
Changes in occupancy and equipment expense
The following table illustrates the components
of occupancy and equipment expense for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Depreciation of buildings and equipment
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
Maintenance expense on buildings and equipment
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
Utilities expense
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Real estate and personal property tax
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Other expense related to occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Total occupancy and equipment expense
|
|
$
|
1,483
|
|
|
$
|
1,487
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
Occupancy and equipment expenses decreased
0.3% during 2011 compared to 2010. Increases in utilities and taxes were offset by decreases in maintenance expenses.
Other changes in non-interest expense
Director fees decreased by 14.43% during 2011
driven by the number of meetings held during 2011 compared to 2010 and a reduction in fees paid to directors per meeting.
Legal and professional fees decreased by $95,000
or 15.73% from 2010 to 2011 driven by non-recurring legal expenses incurred during 2010 and a reduction in third party internal
audit fees compared to 2010.
Office supplies and postage and freight expenses
decreased 14.99% or $61,000 during 2011 compared to 2010, largely driven by the reduction of courier services between branches.
FDIC premium expense decreased 21.45% or $142,000
during 2011 compared to 2010 driven by the decreased premiums rates adjusted by the FDIC during 2011.
Loan and foreclosed asset expenses increased
153.35% or $871,000 during 2011 compared to 2010 due to the increased number of foreclosures during 2011, valuation adjustments
on foreclosed properties, and increased costs associated with obtaining updated appraisals on impaired relationships.
The table below illustrates components of other
non-interest expense for 2011 and 2010 (in thousands of dollars).
Significant other non-interest expense are
in the following table:
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
ATM expense
|
|
$
|
(109
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
Advertising and marketing expense
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
Franchise taxes
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Miscellaneous components of other
non-interest expense
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
934
|
|
|
$
|
956
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
Securities Portfolio
The Company’s
securities portfolio serves several purposes. Portions of the portfolio are used to secure certain public deposits. The remaining
portfolio is held as investments or used to assist the Company in liquidity and asset liability management. Total securities, including
restricted securities, represented 10.22% of total assets and 99.10% of total shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2011.
The securities
portfolio typically will consist of three components: securities held to maturity, securities available for sale and restricted
securities. Securities are classified as held to maturity when management has the intent and the Company has the ability at the
time of purchase to hold the securities to maturity. Held to maturity securities are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization
of premiums and accretion of discounts. Securities to be held for indefinite periods of time are classified as available for sale
and accounted for at market value. Securities available for sale include securities that may be sold in response to changes in
market interest rates, changes in the security's prepayment risk, increases in loan demand, general liquidity needs and other similar
factors. Restricted securities are those investments purchased as a requirement of membership in certain governmental lending institutions
and cannot be transferred without the issuer’s permission. The Company's purchases of securities have generally been limited
to securities of high credit quality with short to medium term maturities.
The Company
identifies at the time of acquisition those securities that are available for sale. These securities are valued at their market
value with any difference in market value and amortized cost shown as an adjustment in stockholders' equity. Changes within the
year in market values are reflected as changes in other comprehensive income, net of the deferred tax effect. As of December 31,
2011, the fair value of the securities available for sale exceeds their cost basis by $430,000 ($271,000 after tax effect of $159,000).
The table below summarizes the carrying value
of the Company’s securities at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
$
|
21,932
|
|
|
$
|
9,258
|
|
|
$
|
12,426
|
|
|
Mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
|
5,651
|
|
|
|
5,836
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
State and municipals
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
3,946
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
4,703
|
|
|
Marketable equities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
39,557
|
|
|
$
|
25,324
|
|
|
$
|
26,936
|
|
The carrying amount and estimated market
value of securities (in thousands of dollars) at December 31, 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities
will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call
or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Equivalent Average Yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in next twelve months
|
|
$
|
9,495
|
|
|
$
|
9,572
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
%
|
|
Due after one year through five
|
|
|
20,788
|
|
|
|
20,968
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
Due beyond five years
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
Mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
Total Available For Sale
|
|
$
|
39,127
|
|
|
$
|
39,557
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
%
|
Yields on tax exempt securities are stated
at actual yields.
Any changes
in market values of securities deemed by management to be attributable to reasons other than changes in market rates of interest
would be recorded through results of operations.
It is the Company’s determination that all securities held at December
31, 2011 which have fair values less than the amortized cost, have these gross unrealized losses related to increases in the current
interest rates for similar issues of securities, and that no material impairment for any securities in the portfolio exists because
of downgrades of the securities or as a result of a change in the financial condition of any of the issuers. A summary of the length
of time of unrealized losses for all securities held at December 31, 2011 can be found in the footnotes to the consolidated financial
statements. The Company reviews all securities with unrealized losses, and all securities in the portfolio on a regular basis to
determine whether the potential for other than temporary impairment exists. One of the criteria for making this determination is
the rating given to each bond by the major ratings agencies, Moody’s and Standard & Poors.
A summary of the Company’s securities portfolio at December
31, 2011, based on the ratings of the securities in the portfolio given by these ratings agencies, is shown below (in thousands
of dollars):
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
|
Market
Value
|
|
Ratings Provided by Ratings Agencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moody’s
|
S&P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aaa
|
AA+
|
|
$
|
17,655
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
No Rating
|
No Rating
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Backed Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS Agency
|
MBS Agency
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MBS Agency
|
MBS Agency
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and Municipals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aa3
|
AA-
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
Aa2
|
AA
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
No Rating
|
AA-
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
No Rating
|
No Rating
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
195
|
Deposits
The Company’s
primary source of funds is local deposits. The Company's deposit base is comprised of demand deposits, savings and money market
accounts and other time deposits. The majority of the Company's deposits are provided by individuals and businesses located within
the communities served.
Total
balances of deposits increased 0.4% from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011.
A summary
of the maturity range of time deposits over $100,000 is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
10,472
|
|
|
$
|
11,725
|
|
|
$
|
11,133
|
|
|
Four to twelve months
|
|
|
32,040
|
|
|
|
36,431
|
|
|
|
36,512
|
|
|
One year to three years
|
|
|
22,066
|
|
|
|
22,419
|
|
|
|
23,447
|
|
|
Four years to five years
|
|
|
9,534
|
|
|
|
4,428
|
|
|
|
4,504
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
74,112
|
|
|
$
|
75,003
|
|
|
$
|
75,596
|
|
Debt Instruments
Long-Term
Borrowings
The Company borrows funds from the Federal
Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) to reduce market rate risks or to provide operating liquidity. The Company typically will initiate
these borrowings in response to a specific need for managing market risks or for a specific liquidity need and will attempt to
match features of these borrowings to best suit the specific need. Therefore, the borrowings on the Company’s balance sheet
as of December 31, 2011 and throughout the twelve month period ended December 31, 2011 have varying features of amortization or
single payment with periodic, regular interest payment and also have interest rates which vary based on the terms and on the features
of the specific borrowing. More information regarding the Company’s FHLB advances can be found in Note Thirteen of the consolidated
financial statements.
Short-Term
Borrowings
As it
becomes necessary for short-term liquidity needs and when beneficial for assisting in managing profitability the Company will periodically
utilize either the FHLB or other available credit facilities for overnight or other short term borrowings. The use of short-term
debt instruments is not a frequently utilized borrowing mechanism of the Company; however, during the third quarter of 2010, circumstances
prescribed use of these borrowing facilities. At December 31, 2011, the Company had no balance in overnight and other short-term
borrowings.
Capital Resources
The assessment
of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset quality, liquidity, earnings performance and changing competitive
conditions and economic forces. The Company seeks to maintain a strong capital base to support growth and expansion activities,
to provide stability to current operations, and to promote public confidence.
The Company’s capital position continues
to exceed regulatory minimums. The primary indicators relied on by the Federal Reserve Board and other bank regulators in measuring
strength of capital position are the Tier 1 Capital, Total Capital and Leverage ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of common stockholders'
equity adjusted for unrealized gains and losses on securities. Total Capital consists of Tier 1 Capital and a portion of the allowance
for loan losses. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated with reference to risk-weighted assets, which consist of both on and
off-balance sheet risks.
The capital
management function is an ongoing process. The Company looks first and foremost to maintain capital levels adequate to satisfy
regulatory requirements through earnings retention. The maintenance of capital adequacy is weighed against the management of capital
for satisfactory return on equity, typically via use of dividends and/or
share repurchases. During 2011, the Company’s
capital position increased $306,000 versus the decrease of $54,000 during 2010. The return on average equity was 3.41% in 2011
compared to 4.00% for 2010. Total cash dividends declared represented 43.25% of net income for 2011 compared to 87.39% for 2010.
Book value per share was $31.17 at December 31, 2011 compared to $30.94 at December 31, 2010.
Liquidity
Operating
liquidity is the ability to meet present and future financial obligations. Short-term liquidity is provided primarily through cash
balances, deposits with other financial institutions, federal funds sold, non-pledged securities and loans maturing within one
year. Additional sources of liquidity available to the Company include, but are not limited to, loan repayments, the ability to
obtain deposits through the adjustment of interest rates and the purchasing of federal funds. To further meet its liquidity needs,
the Company also maintains lines of credit with correspondent financial institutions, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, and
the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh.
Historically,
the Company’s primary need for additional levels of operational liquidity has been to fund increases in loan balances.
The
Company has normally funded increases in loans by increasing deposits and balances of borrowed funds and decreases in secondary
liquidity sources such as balances of federal funds sold and balances of securities. The Company maintains credit facilities which
are typically sufficient to adequately fulfill any short-term liquidity needs, and management of deposit balances and long term
borrowings are utilized for longer term liquidity management. Increases in liquidity requirements may cause the Company to offer
above market rates on deposit products to attract new depositors, which would impact the Company’s net interest income.
The Company’s operating funds, funds
with which to pay shareholder dividends and funds for the exploration of new business ventures have been supplied primarily through
dividends paid by the Company’s two subsidiary Banks, Capon Valley Bank and The Grant County Bank. The various regulatory
authorities impose restrictions on dividends paid by a state bank. A state bank cannot pay dividends without the consent of the
relevant banking authorities in excess of the total net profits of the current year and the combined retained profits of the previous
two years. As of December 31, 2011, the subsidiary Banks could pay dividends to the Company of approximately $3,307,000 without
permission of the regulatory authorities.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation
primarily affects industries having high levels of property, plant and equipment or inventories. Although the Company is not significantly
affected in these areas, inflation does have an impact on the growth of assets. As assets grow rapidly, it becomes necessary to
increase equity capital at proportionate levels to maintain the appropriate equity to asset ratios. Traditionally, the Company’s
earnings and high capital retention levels have enabled the Company to meet these needs.
The Company’s reported earnings results have
been minimally affected by inflation. The different types of income and expense are affected in various ways. Interest rates are
affected by inflation, but the timing and magnitude of the changes may not coincide with changes in the consumer price index. The
Company actively monitors interest rate sensitivity in order to minimize the effects of inflationary trends on interest rates.
Other areas of non-interest expenses may be more directly affected by inflation.
|
Item7A.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2011
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2010
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and due from banks
|
|
$
|
9,321
|
|
|
$
|
8,282
|
|
|
Interest
bearing deposits in banks
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
|
Federal
funds sold
|
|
|
11,253
|
|
|
|
5,836
|
|
|
Investment
securities available for sale
|
|
|
39,557
|
|
|
|
25,324
|
|
|
Restricted
investments, at cost
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
313,056
|
|
|
|
329,336
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
|
|
(6,111
|
)
|
|
|
(5,407
|
)
|
|
Bank
premises and equipment, net of depreciation
|
|
|
9,411
|
|
|
|
9,901
|
|
|
Interest
receivable
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
Investment
in life insurance contracts
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
|
Foreclosed
assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
7,070
|
|
|
|
4,700
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
|
Other
intangible assets, net of amortization
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
5,560
|
|
|
|
5,123
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
404,194
|
|
|
$
|
399,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
61,710
|
|
|
$
|
54,693
|
|
|
Interest
bearing transaction and savings accounts
|
|
|
82,915
|
|
|
|
77,392
|
|
|
Time
deposits over $100,000
|
|
|
74,112
|
|
|
|
75,003
|
|
|
All
other time deposits
|
|
|
125,335
|
|
|
|
135,724
|
|
|
Total
Deposits
|
|
|
344,072
|
|
|
|
342,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
term debt instruments
|
|
|
11,245
|
|
|
|
9,393
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
7,203
|
|
|
|
6,327
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
362,520
|
|
|
|
358,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $5
par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized, 1,436,874 shares issued, 1,336,873 shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,184
|
|
|
|
7,184
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
Treasury
stock (100,001 shares, at cost)
|
|
|
(3,372
|
)
|
|
|
(3,372
|
)
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
37,955
|
|
|
|
37,165
|
|
|
Other
accumulated comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,755
|
)
|
|
|
(1,271
|
)
|
|
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
41,674
|
|
|
|
41,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
404,194
|
|
|
$
|
399,900
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements
HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Share
Data)
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December
31
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and fees on loans
|
|
$
|
20,448
|
|
|
$
|
22,144
|
|
|
Interest
on federal funds sold
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Interest
on deposits in other banks
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Interest
and dividends on securities
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
Total
Interest Income
|
|
|
21,130
|
|
|
|
22,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
on deposits
|
|
|
4,145
|
|
|
|
5,740
|
|
|
Interest
on borrowed money
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
Total
Interest Expense
|
|
|
4,583
|
|
|
|
6,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Interest Income
|
|
|
16,547
|
|
|
|
16,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Loan Losses
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses
|
|
|
12,923
|
|
|
|
13,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
charges
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
Life
insurance investment income
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
Gains
on securities transactions
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Other
non-interest income
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
Total
Non-interest Income
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
2,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
|
|
6,425
|
|
|
|
6,936
|
|
|
Occupancy
and equipment expense
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
Data
processing expense
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
Directors
fees
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
Legal
and professional fees
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
Office
supplies, postage and freight expense
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
FDIC
premiums
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
Loan
and foreclosed asset expense
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
Losses
on sale of foreclosed property
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Losses
on impairment of other real estate
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
Other
non-interest expense
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
956
|
|
|
Total
Non-interest Expense
|
|
|
13,145
|
|
|
|
13,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Before Provision For Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$
|
1,392
|
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
Cash
Dividends
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
1,336,873
|
|
|
|
1,336,873
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2011 and
2010
(In Thousands of Dollars)
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balances
at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
7,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,662
|
|
|
($
|
3,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,963
|
|
|
($
|
1,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial
gain/(loss) on defined pension benefit plan, net of tax of $86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains or losses on investment securities available for sales, net of tax of $45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)
on sale of securities, net of tax $19 – reclassification adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax of $150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
Paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
Balances December
31, 2010
|
|
$
|
7,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,662
|
|
|
($
|
3,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,165
|
|
|
($
|
1,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December
31, 2010
|
|
$
|
7,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,662
|
|
|
($
|
3,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,165
|
|
|
($
|
1,271
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial
(loss) on defined pension benefit plan, net of tax of $317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains or losses on investment securities available for sales, net of tax $38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain)
on sale of securities, net of tax of $5 - reclassification adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax of $284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
Paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
Balances December
31, 2011
|
|
$
|
7,184
|
|
|
$
|
1,662
|
|
|
($
|
3,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,955
|
|
|
($
|
1,755
|
)
|
|
$
|
41,674
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements
|
HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands of Dollars)
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December
31
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$
|
1,392
|
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gains)
on securities transactions
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
Losses
on sale of foreclosed property
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
Income
from life insurance contracts
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
Net
amortization of securities premiums
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
Write-down
on foreclosed assets
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
Deferred
income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
Amortization of
intangibles
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
Decrease
in interest receivable
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
Decrease
in other assets
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
Increase
in accrued expenses
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
7,022
|
|
|
|
7,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of foreclosed assets and fixed assets
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
Proceeds
from maturity of securities available for sale
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
19,650
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
9,087
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Purchase
of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(26,390
|
)
|
|
|
(18,297
|
)
|
|
Net
change in other investments
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Net
change in interest bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
(1,652
|
)
|
|
Net
change in federal funds sold
|
|
|
(5,417
|
)
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
Net
decrease in loans
|
|
|
8,926
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
|
Net
Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
|
|
|
(8,493
|
)
|
|
|
3,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in time deposits
|
|
|
(11,280
|
)
|
|
|
(13,719
|
)
|
|
Net
change in other deposit accounts
|
|
|
12,540
|
|
|
|
6,654
|
|
|
Proceeds
from long term borrowing
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Repayment
of long term borrowings
|
|
|
(1,648
|
)
|
|
|
(1,473
|
)
|
|
Dividends
paid in cash
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
2,510
|
|
|
|
(9,928
|
)
|
|
Net
increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
|
|
|
8,282
|
|
|
|
7,062
|
|
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
|
|
$
|
9,321
|
|
|
$
|
8,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
743
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$
|
4,712
|
|
|
$
|
6,382
|
|
|
Noncash
Investing and Financing Activities for other real estate acquired in settlement of loans
|
|
$
|
4,434
|
|
|
$
|
2,522
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these financial statements.
NOTE ONE: SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS
Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company")
is a bank holding company and operates under a charter issued by the State of West Virginia. The Company owns all of the outstanding
stock of The Grant County Bank ("Grant") and Capon Valley Bank ("Capon"), which operate under charters issued
by the State of West Virginia. The Company also owns all of the outstanding stock of HBI Life Insurance Company, Inc. ("HBI
Life"), which operates under a charter issued by the State of Arizona. State chartered banks are subject to regulation by
the West Virginia Division of Banking, The Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, while the insurance
company is regulated by the Arizona Department of Insurance. The Banks provide services to customers located mainly in Grant, Hardy,
Hampshire, Mineral, Pendleton, Randolph and Tucker counties of West Virginia, including the towns of Petersburg, Keyser, Moorefield,
Davis and Wardensville through ten locations and in the county of Frederick in Virginia through two locations. The insurance company
sells life and accident coverage exclusively through the Company's subsidiary Banks.
NOTE TWO: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of Highlands
Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to
accepted practice within the banking industry.
|
(a)
|
Principles of Consolidation
|
The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of The Grant County Bank, Capon Valley Bank and HBI Life Insurance Company, Inc. All significant inter-company accounts
and transactions have been eliminated.
|
(b)
|
Use of Estimates in the
Preparation of Financial Statements
|
In preparing the consolidated financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. A material
estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant changes in the near term is the determination of the allowance for loan
losses, which is sensitive to changes in local economic conditions, deferred tax and the fair value of financial instruments.
|
(c)
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
For purposes of the consolidated statements
of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and non-interest bearing funds at correspondent institutions.
|
(d)
|
Foreclosed Real Estate
|
Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan
foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of the loan balance or fair value, less cost to sell, at
the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Capitalized costs include accrued interest, and any costs that significantly
improve the value of the properties. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets
are carried at the loser of carrying amount or the fair value less cost to sell. Gains and losses resulting from the sale or write-down
of foreclosed real estate are recorded in other expenses. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance
are also included in other operating expenses.
Loans
that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at unpaid
principal balances net of unearned interest and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income is computed using the effective
interest method based on the daily amount of principal outstanding and is credited to income as earned.
Loans are considered past due when they
are not paid in accordance with contractual terms. Past due loans are monitored by portfolio segment and by severity of delinquency
– 30-59 days past due; 60-89 days past due; and 90 days and greater past due.
The accrual of interest on loans in
all loan segments (nonaccrual loans) is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past
due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing.
A loan may remain on accrual status if it is well secured and in the process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual
status, all unpaid interest credited to income in the current calendar year is reversed and all unpaid interest accrued in prior
calendar years is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Interest payments received on nonaccrual loans are either applied
against principal or reported as interest income according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal.
Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual
terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer
in doubt.
Securities that the Company has both the positive
intent and ability to hold to maturity (at time of purchase) are classified as held to maturity securities. All other securities
are classified as available for sale. Securities held to maturity are carried at historical cost and adjusted for amortization
of premiums and accretion of discounts, using the effective interest method. Securities available for sale are carried at fair
value with any valuation adjustments reported, net of deferred taxes, as other accumulated comprehensive income.
Restricted investments consist of investments
in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and West Virginia Bankers’ Title Insurance
Company. Such investments are required as members of these institutions and these investments cannot be sold without a change in
the members' borrowing or service levels. Because there is no readily determinable market value for these investments, restricted
investments are carried at cost on the Company’s balance sheet.
Interest and dividends on securities and amortization
of premiums and discounts on securities are reported as interest income using the effective interest method. Gains (losses) realized
on sales and calls of securities are determined using the specific identification method.
Investment securities are impaired when fair
value is less than cost. An impairment is considered “other than temporary” if any of the following conditions are
met: the Company intends to sell the security, it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security
before the recovery of its amortized cost basis, or the Company does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized
cost basis (even if the entity does not intend to sell). The Company does not have any securities impairment that is considered
“other than temporary” at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
(g)
|
Allowance For Loan Losses
|
The allowance for loan losses is established
as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against
the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are
credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated
on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light
of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s
ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently
subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific,
general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are determined to be impaired. For such loans,
an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan
is lower than the carrying value of that loan.
The general component covers non-impaired
loans and is based on management’s internal risk ratings as well as historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.
The following risk factors relevant to each portfolio segment are reviewed and evaluated:
|
·
|
Changes
in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards or collection, charge-off and recovery practices.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio,
including unemployment trends and GDP and other leading economic indicators.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in the nature and volume of the portfolio.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in the volume and severity of past due and classified loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, troubled debt restructurings
and other loan modifications.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in the quality of the Banks’ loan review systems.
|
|
·
|
The
existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and the changes in the level of such concentrations.
|
|
·
|
Changes
in the value of underlying collateral.
|
|
·
|
The
effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit
losses in the existing portfolio.
|
An unallocated component is maintained
to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance
reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and
general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when,
based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payment of principal
or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining
impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments
when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of
the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment
record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
Impairment is measured on a loan by
loan basis for commercial loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective
interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous
loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Banks do not separately identify individual consumer and residential
loans for impairment disclosures, unless the loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.
Authoritative accounting guidance does
not specify how an institution should identify loans that are to be evaluated for collectability, nor does it specify how an institution
should determine that a loan is impaired. Each subsidiary of the Company uses its standard loan review procedures in making those
judgments so that allowance estimates are based on a comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio. For loans that are individually
evaluated and found to be impaired, the associated allowance is based upon the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, of any
collateral securing the loan as compared to the existing balance of the loan as of the date of analysis.
All other loans, including individually
evaluated loans determined not to be impaired, are included in a group of loans that are measured under the general component of
the allowance for loan losses to provide for estimated credit losses that have been incurred on groups of loans with similar risk
characteristics. The methodology for measuring estimated credit losses on groups of loans with similar risk characteristics is
based on each group’s historical net charge-off rate, adjusted for the effects of the qualitative or environmental factors
that are likely to cause estimated credit losses as of the evaluation date to differ from the group’s historical loss experience.
|
(h)
|
Per Share Calculations
|
Earnings per share are based on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding.
|
(i)
|
Bank Premises and Equipment
|
|
Land is carried at cost. Bank premises and
equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is charged to income over the estimated useful lives of
the assets using a combination of the straight line and accelerated methods. The costs of maintenance, repairs, renewals, and improvements
to buildings, equipment and furniture and fixtures are charged to operations as incurred. Gains and losses on routine dispositions
are reflected in other income or expense.
Accounting principles generally require that
recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized
gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and accrued pension liabilities, are reported along with net income as the components
of comprehensive income.
|
(k)
|
Bank Owned Life Insurance
Contracts
|
The Company has invested in and owns life insurance
policies on certain officers. The policies are designed so that the Company recovers the interest expenses associated with carrying
the policies and the officer will, at the time of retirement, receive any earnings in excess of the amounts earned by the Company.
The Company recognizes as an asset the net amount that could be realized under the insurance contract as of the balance sheet date.
This amount represents the cash surrender value of the policies less applicable surrender charges. The portion of the benefits
which will be received by the executives at the time of their retirement is considered, when taken collectively, to constitute
a retirement plan. Authoritative accounting guidance requires that an employers' obligation under a deferred compensation agreement
be accrued over the expected service life of the employee through their normal retirement date.
Assumptions
are used in estimating the present value of amounts due officers after their normal retirement date. These assumptions include
the estimated income to be derived from the investments and an estimate of the Company’s cost of funds in these future periods.
In addition, the discount rate used in the present value calculation will change in future years based on market conditions.
Advertising costs are expensed as they are
incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $150,000 and $ 158,000, respectively.
|
(m)
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets
|
In accordance with authoritative accounting
guidance, goodwill resulting from the purchase of a bank is not amortized over an estimated useful life, but is tested at least
annually for impairment. Core deposit and other intangible assets include premiums paid for acquisitions of core deposits (core
deposit intangibles) and other identifiable intangible assets. Intangible assets other than goodwill, which are determined to have
finite lives, are amortized based upon the estimated economic benefits received, which is ten years for the core deposit intangibles.
Core deposit and other intangible assets include
premiums paid for acquisitions of core deposits (core deposit intangibles) and other identifiable intangible assets related to
business acquisitions. I
n addition to the intangible
assets
associated with the purchase of banking organizations, the Company also carries intangible assets related to the purchase of certain
naming rights to a performing arts center in Petersburg, WV. This intangible asset is being amortized over four years.
Amounts provided for income tax expense are
based on income reported for financial statement purposes rather than amounts currently payable under federal and state tax laws.
Deferred taxes, which arise principally from differences between the period in which certain income and expenses are recognized
for financial accounting purposes and the period in which they affect taxable income, are included in the amounts provided for
income taxes.
When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain
that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty
about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position
is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is
more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes,
if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon
settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the
amount measured as described above would be reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance
sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.
Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized
tax benefits would be classified as additional income taxes in the statement of income.
At December 31, 2011 there were no unrecognized
tax benefits.
Certain reclassifications have been made to
prior period balances to conform with the current year’s presentation format.
|
(p)
|
Recent Accounting Standards
|
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing disclosures,
require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit
plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures
are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption
of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20,
“Receivables (Topic 310) – Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses.” The new disclosure guidance significantly expands the existing requirements and will lead to greater transparency
into an entity’s exposure to credit losses from lending arrangements. The extensive new disclosures of information
as of the end of a reporting period became effective for both interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December
15, 2010. Specific disclosures regarding activity that occurred before the issuance of the ASU, such as the allowance roll
forward and modification disclosures, will be required for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company has
included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-28, “Intangible – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test
for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” The amendments in this ASU modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment
test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step
2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The amendments in this ASU are
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted.
The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.”
The guidance requires pro forma disclosure for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period as though the
acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting
period. If comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma information should be reported as though the acquisition
date for all business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual
reporting period. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of the
new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Securities
Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Final Rule No. 33-9002, “Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting.” The rule
requires companies to submit financial statements in extensible business reporting language (XBRL)
format with their SEC
filings on a phased-in schedule. L
arge accelerated filers and foreign large accelerated filers using U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) were required to provide interactive data reports starting with their first quarterly report for fiscal
periods ending on or after June 15, 2010.
All remaining filers were required to provide interactive
data reports starting with their first quarterly report for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2011. The Company has submitted
financial statements in extensible business reporting language (XBRL)
format with their SEC filings in accordance with the
phased-in schedule.
In March
2011, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 114. This SAB revises or rescinds portions of the interpretive guidance included
in the codification of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series. This update is intended to make the relevant interpretive guidance
consistent with current authoritative accounting guidance issued as a part of the FASB’s Codification. The principal changes
involve revision or removal of accounting guidance references and other conforming changes to ensure consistency of referencing
through the SAB Series. The effective date for SAB 114 is March 28, 2011.
The adoption of the new guidance did not have
a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In January
2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-01, “Receivables (Topic 310) – Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled
Debt Restructurings.” The amendments in this ASU temporarily delayed the effective date of the disclosures about troubled
debt restructurings in Update 2010-20 for public entities. The delay was intended to allow the Board time to complete its deliberations
on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings
for public entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring was effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2011.
The Company has adopted ASU 2011-01 and included the required disclosures in
its consolidated financial statements.
In April
2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310) – A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring
Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” The amendments in this ASU clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether
it has granted a concession to a debtor. They also clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is
experiencing financial difficulty. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on
or after June 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. Retrospective application to the beginning of the annual period of adoption
for modifications occurring on or after the beginning of the annual adoption period is required. As a result of applying these
amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered to be impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of
those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after
June 15, 2011.
The Company has adopted ASU 2011-02 and included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.
In April
2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Reconsideration of Effective Control for
Repurchase Agreements.” The amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring
the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the
event of default by the transferee and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments
in this ASU are effective for the
first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should
be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early
adoption is not permitted.
The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-03 will have
on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04,
“Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements
in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB) to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how (not when) to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide
about fair value measurements. The ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP (Topic
820), with many of the amendments made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with
prospective application. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-04 will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05,
“Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The objective of this ASU is to improve
the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other
comprehensive income by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of
changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented
either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The single statement
of comprehensive income should include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive
income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. In the two-statement approach, the first
statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present all
the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The
amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income, the option for an entity to present components
of other comprehensive income either net of related tax effects or before related tax effects, or the calculation or reporting
of earnings per share. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. The amendments are effective for fiscal years
and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted because compliance with the
amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require transition disclosures. The Company is currently assessing the impact
that ASU 2011-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In August 2011, the SEC issued Final
Rule No. 33-9250, “Technical Amendments to Commission Rules and Forms related to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification.” The
SEC has adopted technical amendments to various rules and forms under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the Investment Company Act of 1940. These revisions were necessary to conform those rules and forms to the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The technical amendments include revision of certain rules in Regulation S-X,
certain items in Regulation S-K, and various rules and forms prescribed under the Securities Act, Exchange Act and Investment Company
Act. The Release was effective as of August 12, 2011. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU
2011-08, “Intangible – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” The
amendments in this ASU permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors related to goodwill to determine whether it is more
likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it
is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined
as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity is not required to calculate
the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than
its carrying amount. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment
tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or
interim period have not yet been issued.
The Company is currently assessing the impact that
ASU 2011-08 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU
2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” This ASU requires
entities to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in
the balance sheet and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. An entity is
required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within
those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative
periods presented. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In December
2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments
to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update
No. 2011-05.”
The amendments are being made to allow the Board time to redeliberate whether to present on the face
of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of
net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the Board is considering the operational concerns about
the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information
about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive
income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before ASU 2011-05. All other requirements in ASU 2011-05 are not
affected by ASU 2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement
or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities should begin applying these requirements
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter.
The Company
is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
No other
recent accounting pronouncements had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and it is believed
that none will have a material impact on the Company’s operations in future years.
NOTE THREE: SECURITIES
The income derived from taxable and non-taxable securities for the
years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is shown below (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Investment
securities, taxable
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
Investment
securities, non-taxable
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
The carrying amount and estimated fair value
of securities available for sale at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Available for Sale Securities
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
$
|
21,741
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
21,932
|
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
3,387
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
|
State
and municipals
|
|
|
2,642
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
Certificates of
deposit
|
|
|
5,901
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
Total
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
$
|
39,127
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
39,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
$
|
9,132
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
9,258
|
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
5,505
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5,651
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
State
and municipals
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
Certificates of
deposit
|
|
|
6,442
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
Marketable
equities
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Total
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
$
|
24,981
|
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
25,324
|
|
The carrying amount and fair value of securities
at December 31, 2011, by contractual maturity are shown below (in thousands of dollars). Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
in next twelve months
|
|
$
|
9,495
|
|
|
$
|
9,572
|
|
|
Due
after one year through five
|
|
|
20,788
|
|
|
|
20,968
|
|
|
Due
beyond five years
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
5,456
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
Total
Available For Sale
|
|
$
|
39,127
|
|
|
$
|
39,557
|
|
Securities having a carrying value of $9,449,000
at December 31, 2011 and $7,195,000 at December 31, 2010 were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required
by law.
Information pertaining to securities with gross
unrealized losses at December 31, 2011 and 2010, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous loss position is shown in the table below (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
$
|
2,494
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,494
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Certificates of
deposit
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,348
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,348
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
$
|
993
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
993
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of
deposit
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,597
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,597
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
The number of securities available for sale
that were in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2011 is summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Loss
Position less than 12 Months
|
|
|
Loss
Position greater than 12 Months
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Certificates of
deposit
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
It is management’s determination
that all securities held at December 31, 2011, which have fair values less than the amortized cost, have gross unrealized losses
related to increases in the current interest rates for similar issues of securities, and that no material impairment for any securities
in the portfolio exists because of downgrades of the securities or as a result of a change in the financial condition of any of
the issuers.
NOTE FOUR: RESTRICTED INVESTMENTS
Restricted
investments consist of investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank and West Virginia Bankers’ Title
Insurance Company. Investments are carried at face value and the level of investment is dictated by the level of participation
with each institution. Amounts are restricted as to transferability. Investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank act as collateral
against the outstanding borrowings from that institution.
NOTE FIVE: LOANS
Loans outstanding as of December 31,
2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
101,517
|
|
|
$
|
97,089
|
|
|
Real
Estate Construction
|
|
|
23,711
|
|
|
|
33,746
|
|
|
Real
Estate Mortgage
|
|
|
162,214
|
|
|
|
168,226
|
|
|
Consumer
Installment
|
|
|
25,614
|
|
|
|
30,275
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
$
|
313,056
|
|
|
$
|
329,336
|
|
The following is a summary of information
pertaining to impaired loans by portfolio segment at December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands of dollars):
Impaired Loans
As of December 31, 2011
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowance
|
|
|
Average
Recorded Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With
no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Mortgage
|
|
$
|
21,160
|
|
|
$
|
21,160
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
23,065
|
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
|
Commercial Other
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consumer
Mortgage
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
$
|
22,351
|
|
|
$
|
22,351
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
24,305
|
|
|
$
|
1,359
|
|
|
With
an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage
|
|
|
5,383
|
|
|
|
5,383
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
5,468
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
Commercial Other
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consumer
Mortgage
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
$
|
6,849
|
|
|
$
|
6,849
|
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
6,979
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage
|
|
|
26,543
|
|
|
|
26,543
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
28,534
|
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
Commercial Other
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Consumer
Mortgage
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29,200
|
|
|
$
|
29,200
|
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
31,285
|
|
|
$
|
1,549
|
|
Impaired Loans
As of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowance
|
|
|
Average
Recorded Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With
no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Mortgage
|
|
$
|
18,455
|
|
|
$
|
18,455
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
26,557
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
Commercial Other
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Consumer
Mortgage
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
$
|
19,548
|
|
|
$
|
19,548
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
27,972
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
With
an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage
|
|
|
5,692
|
|
|
|
5,692
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
6,871
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
Commercial
Other
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
$
|
5,840
|
|
|
$
|
5,840
|
|
|
$
|
925
|
|
|
$
|
7,074
|
|
|
$
|
291
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage
|
|
|
24,147
|
|
|
|
24,147
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
33,428
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
Commercial Other
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Consumer
Mortgage
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,388
|
|
|
$
|
25,388
|
|
|
$
|
925
|
|
|
$
|
35,046
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
No loans were identified as impaired
with potential loss as of December 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010 for which an allowance was not provided. The table above includes
troubled debt restructurings (TDR) of $14,152,000 and $5,607,000 as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Loans
are identified as TDR if concessions are made related to the terms of the loan beyond regular lending practices in response to
a borrower’s financial condition. Restructured loans performing in accordance with modified terms consist of twenty commercial
mortgages and fifteen consumer mortgages. Restructured loans not performing in accordance with modified terms consist of six commercial
mortgages and seven consumer mortgages. These loans were balloon renewals or restructurings of borrowers experiencing financial
difficulties at either current market rates for borrowers not experiencing financial difficulties, were modified to reduce interest
rates, or provide for interest-only payment periods. These loans did not have any additional commitments to extend credit at December
31, 2011.
Balances of non-accrual loans at December
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are shown below (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Loans
on non-accrual status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Mortgage
|
|
$
|
4,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,215
|
|
|
Commercial Other
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
Consumer Mortgage
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
4,240
|
|
|
Consumer
Other
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
Total non-accrual
loans
|
|
$
|
8,021
|
|
|
$
|
6,979
|
|
Certain loans identified as impaired are placed
into non-accrual status, based upon the loan’s performance compared with contractual terms. Not all loans identified as impaired
are placed into non-accrual status. The interest on loans identified as impaired and placed into non-accrual status that was not
recognized as income throughout the year (foregone interest) was $396,000 and $427,000 in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The following table presents the contractual
aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands of dollars):
Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables
As of December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
30-59
Days Past Due
|
|
|
|
60-89
Days Past Due
|
|
|
|
Greater
Than 90 Days
|
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
Total
Financing Receivables
|
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
> 90 Days and Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
- Mortgage
|
|
$
|
3,541
|
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
|
$
|
3,599
|
|
|
$
|
8,630
|
|
|
$
|
130,744
|
|
|
$
|
139,374
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
Commercial
-Other
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
13,072
|
|
|
|
13,709
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
Consumer
- Mortgage
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
|
|
10,207
|
|
|
|
126,265
|
|
|
|
136,472
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
Consumer
- Other
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
22,398
|
|
|
|
23,501
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,909
|
|
|
$
|
4,587
|
|
|
$
|
7,081
|
|
|
$
|
20,577
|
|
|
$
|
292,479
|
|
|
$
|
313,056
|
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables
As of December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
30-59
Days Past Due
|
|
|
|
60-89
Days Past Due
|
|
|
|
Greater
Than 90 Days
|
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
Total
Financing Receivables
|
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
> 90 Days and Accruing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
- Mortgage
|
|
$
|
3,691
|
|
|
$
|
663
|
|
|
$
|
2,188
|
|
|
$
|
6,542
|
|
|
$
|
136,354
|
|
|
$
|
142,896
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
Commercial
-Other
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
14,361
|
|
|
|
15,037
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Consumer
- Mortgage
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
|
|
4,089
|
|
|
|
12,432
|
|
|
|
130,073
|
|
|
|
142,505
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
Consumer
- Other
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
27,230
|
|
|
|
28,898
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,233
|
|
|
$
|
4,591
|
|
|
$
|
6,494
|
|
|
$
|
21,318
|
|
|
$
|
308,018
|
|
|
$
|
329,336
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
The following tables present the Company’s
loans restructured during the twelve month reporting period ending December 31, 2011 considered troubled debt restructuring by
loan type (in thousands of dollars except number of contracts):
|
|
|
Troubled
Debt Restructurings
|
|
|
|
|
For
the twelve month period ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Contacts
|
|
|
Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
|
|
Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
|
|
Troubled
Debt Restructurings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Mortgage
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
12,039
|
|
|
$
|
11,874
|
|
|
Commercial Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
Consumer Mortgage
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
14,077
|
|
|
$
|
13,935
|
|
The following table presents the Company’s restructured loans
for which there was a payment default during the twelve month reporting period ended December 31, 2011:
|
|
|
Defaulted
Troubled Debt Restructurings
|
|
|
|
|
For
the twelve month period ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Contacts
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Allowance
associated with Defaulted TDR’s
|
|
|
Troubled
debt restructurings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Mortgage
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1,826
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
Commercial Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
Consumer Mortgage
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
2,898
|
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
NOTE SIX: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share represents
income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
During 2011 and 2010, there were no changes to the outstanding shares of common stock.
NOTE SEVEN: ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
A summary of the changes in the allowance for
loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is shown below (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
|
Provision
charged to operating expenses
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
Loan
recoveries
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
Loans
charged off
|
|
|
(3,422
|
)
|
|
|
(2,747
|
)
|
|
Balance
at end of year
|
|
$
|
6,111
|
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses as percentage of outstanding loans at year end
|
|
|
1.95
|
%
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded
Investment in Financing Receivables
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
|
|
|
Commercial
Mortgage
|
|
|
Commercial
Other
|
|
|
Consumer
Mortgage
|
|
|
Consumer
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Credit Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
Balance 12/31/2010
|
|
$
|
1,345
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
$
|
1,662
|
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,422
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
Ending Balance 12/31/2011
|
|
$
|
2,898
|
|
|
$
|
465
|
|
|
$
|
1,959
|
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
361
|
|
|
$
|
6,111
|
|
|
Ending
Balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
Ending
Balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
4,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
|
139,374
|
|
|
|
13,709
|
|
|
|
136,472
|
|
|
|
23,501
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
313,056
|
|
|
Ending
Balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
26,543
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
1,966
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
29,200
|
|
|
Ending
Balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
112,831
|
|
|
$
|
13,018
|
|
|
$
|
134,506
|
|
|
$
|
23,501
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
283,856
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded
Investment in Financing Receivables
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Commercial
Mortgage
|
|
|
Commercial
Other
|
|
|
Consumer
Mortgage
|
|
|
Consumer
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Credit Losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
Balance 12/31/2010
|
|
$
|
1,345
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
$
|
1,662
|
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
Ending
Balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
Ending
Balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
4,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
|
142,896
|
|
|
|
15,037
|
|
|
|
142,505
|
|
|
|
28,898
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
329,336
|
|
|
Ending
Balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
|
24,147
|
|
|
|
988
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
25,388
|
|
|
Ending
Balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
118,749
|
|
|
$
|
14,049
|
|
|
$
|
142,252
|
|
|
$
|
28,898
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
303,948
|
|
The following table presents the Company’s loans by internally
assigned grades and by loan type for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands of dollars).
Credit Quality Indicators
As of December 31, 2011
Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
|
$
|
2,437
|
|
|
$
|
2,740
|
|
|
$
|
7,309
|
|
|
Very Good
|
|
|
14,049
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
28,026
|
|
|
|
4,128
|
|
|
|
46,810
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
70,462
|
|
|
|
9,693
|
|
|
|
88,752
|
|
|
|
14,942
|
|
|
|
183,849
|
|
|
Pass-Watch
|
|
|
12,050
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
13,377
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
13,887
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
5,449
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
21,459
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
28,161
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
9,849
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
39,366
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
139,374
|
|
|
$
|
13,709
|
|
|
$
|
136,472
|
|
|
$
|
23,501
|
|
|
$
|
313,056
|
|
Credit Quality Indicators
As of December 31, 2010
Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent
|
|
$
|
1,573
|
|
|
$
|
968
|
|
|
$
|
2,964
|
|
|
$
|
2,793
|
|
|
$
|
8,298
|
|
|
Very Good
|
|
|
16,509
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
28,611
|
|
|
|
5,765
|
|
|
|
52,533
|
|
|
Pass
|
|
|
90,198
|
|
|
|
8,901
|
|
|
|
96,776
|
|
|
|
18,244
|
|
|
|
214,119
|
|
|
Pass-Watch
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
5,127
|
|
|
Special Mention
|
|
|
7,262
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
6,050
|
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
|
|
16,714
|
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
24,194
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
6,747
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
32,416
|
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
142,896
|
|
|
$
|
15,037
|
|
|
$
|
142,505
|
|
|
$
|
28,898
|
|
|
$
|
329,336
|
|
Loans classified as, “special
mention” have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. Loans classified as “substandard”
have been determined to be inadequately protected by the current collateral pledged, if any, the cash flow and or the net worth
of the borrower. “Doubtful” loans have all the weaknesses inherent in substandard loans, with the added characteristic
that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly
questionable and improbable. Loans classified as “loss” are loans with expected loss of the entire principal balance.
The loan may be carried in this classified status if circumstances indicate a remote possibility that the amount will be repaid,
however, the principal balance is included in the impairment calculation and carried in the allowance for loan losses. Loans not
categorized as special mention, substandard, or doubtful are classified as “pass”, “very good” or “excellent”
loans and are considered to exhibit acceptable risk. Additionally the company classifies certain loans as “pass-watch”
loans. This category includes satisfactory borrowing relationships that require close monitoring because of complexity, information
deficiencies, or emerging signs of weakness.
NOTE EIGHT: BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Bank premises and equipment as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are
summarized as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
2,368
|
|
|
$
|
2,237
|
|
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
|
|
9,308
|
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
|
|
5,942
|
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Cost
|
|
|
17,618
|
|
|
|
17,487
|
|
|
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(8,207
|
)
|
|
|
(7,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value
|
|
$
|
9,411
|
|
|
$
|
9,901
|
|
Provisions for depreciation charged to operations
during 2011 and 2010 were as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
Year
|
|
|
Provision
for Depreciation
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
787
|
|
NOTE NINE: RESTRICTIONS ON DIVIDENDS OF SUBSIDIARY BANKS
The principal
source of funds of the Company is dividends paid by its subsidiary Banks. The various regulatory authorities impose restrictions
on dividends paid by a state bank. A state bank cannot pay dividends (without the consent of state banking authorities) in excess
of the total net profits (net income less dividends paid) of the current year to date and the combined retained profits of the
previous two years. As of December 31, 2011, the Banks could pay dividends to the Company of approximately $3,307,000 without permission
of the regulatory authorities.
At December 31, 2011, the scheduled maturities of time deposits
were as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
Year
|
|
|
Amount
Maturing
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
119,283
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
34,409
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
11,569
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
9,979
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
24,187
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
199,447
|
|
Included in the table above are CDARS
deposits totaling $3,393,000 at December 31, 2011.
Interest expense on time deposits of $100,000
and over aggregated $1,515,000 and $2,020,000 for 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The aggregate amount of demand deposit overdrafts
reclassified as loan balances were $180,000 and $214,000 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
|
NOTE ELEVEN: CONCENTRATIONS
|
The Banks
grant commercial, residential real estate and consumer loans to customers located primarily in the eastern portion of the State
of West Virginia. Although the Banks have a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the debtors' ability to honor
their contracts is dependent upon the agribusiness, mining, trucking and logging sectors. Collateral required by the Banks is determined
on an individual basis depending on the purpose of the loan and the financial condition of the borrower. The ultimate collectability
of the loan portfolios is susceptible to changes in local economic conditions. Of the $313,056,000 and $329,336,000 loans held
by the Company at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, $273,785,000 and $282,882,000 are secured by real estate.
The Company’s
subsidiaries had cash deposited in and federal funds sold to other commercial banks totaling $13,582,000 and $9,368,000 at December
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Deposits with other correspondent banks are generally unsecured and have limited insurance under
current banking insurance regulations, which management considers to be a normal business risk.
|
NOTE TWELVE: TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
|
During the year, officers and directors
(and companies controlled by them) of the Company and subsidiary Banks were customers of and had transactions with the subsidiary
Banks in the normal course of business. These transactions were made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing for other
customers and did not involve any abnormal risk. The table below summarizes changes to balances of loans and to unused commitments
to related parties during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Loans
to related parties, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
8,677
|
|
|
$
|
8,402
|
|
|
New
loans
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
Additions
for new executives
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
Deletions
for former executives
|
|
|
(1,509
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
|
|
(780
|
)
|
|
Loans
to related parties, end of year
|
|
$
|
6,639
|
|
|
$
|
8,677
|
|
At December 31, 2011, deposits of related parties
including directors, executive officers, and their related interests of the Company and subsidiaries approximated $7,163,000, and
at December 31, 2010, deposits of related parties including directors, executive officers, and their related interests of the Company
and subsidiaries approximated $8,349,000.
NOTE THIRTEEN: DEBT INSTRUMENTS
The Company has borrowed money from the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLB). This debt consists of both borrowings with terms of maturities of six months or greater and
also certain debts with maturities of thirty days or less.
The borrowings with long term maturities may
have either single payment maturities or amortize. The various borrowings mature from 2012 to 2020. The interest rates on the various
borrowings at December 31, 2011 range from 1.68% to 5.96%. The weighted average interest rate on the borrowings at December 31,
2011 was 3.76%. Repayments of long-term debt are due monthly, quarterly or in a single payment at maturity. The maturities of long-term
debt as of December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
Year
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
5,597
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
4,544
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,245
|
|
In addition to utilization of the FHLB for
borrowings of long term debt, the Company also can utilize the FHLB for overnight and other short term borrowings; however, at
December 31, 2011, the Company had no balances in overnight and other short term borrowings. The Company has total borrowing capacity
from the FHLB of $73,394,000. The Banks have pledged mortgage loans and securities as collateral on the FHLB borrowings in the
approximate amount of $73,394,000 at December 31, 2011.
The subsidiary Banks also have short term borrowing
capacity from each of their respective correspondent banks. As of December 31, 2011 the Company has total borrowing capacity from
its correspondent banks of $13,500,000. The interest rates on these lines are variable and are subject to change daily based on
current market conditions. There were no borrowings outstanding on these lines as of December 31, 2011 or 2010.
NOTE FOURTEEN: INCOME TAX EXPENSE
The Company files an income tax return in the
U.S. federal jurisdiction and an income tax return in the State of West Virginia. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2008.
Included in the balance sheet at December 31,
2011 are tax positions related to loan charge offs for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is
uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties,
the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment
of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period.
The components of income tax expense for the
years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are summarized in the table on the following page (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Current
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
988
|
|
|
$
|
984
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
Total
Current Expense
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Expense (Benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
|
State
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
Total
Deferred Expense (Benefit)
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Tax Expense
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
The deferred tax effects of temporary differences for the years
ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
$
|
(122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(519
|
)
|
|
OREO
deferred costs
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Pension
Expense
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
Deferred
compensation
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Net
increase in deferred income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
(576
|
)
|
|
$
|
(483
|
)
|
The net deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences as
of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are shown in the table on the following page (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deferred
Tax Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
$
|
1,846
|
|
|
$
|
1,725
|
|
|
OREO
deferred expenses
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Insurance
commissions
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Deferred
compensation
|
|
|
957
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
Pension
obligation
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
4,223
|
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
gains on securities available for sale
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
$
|
3,468
|
|
|
$
|
2,605
|
|
The Company has not recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred
tax assets as management believes it is more likely than not that they will be ultimately realized.
The following table summarizes the differences between income tax
expense and the amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate for the two years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands
of dollars):
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amounts
at federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
656
|
|
|
$
|
759
|
|
|
Additions
(reductions) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
exempt income
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
Partially
exempt income
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
State
income taxes, net
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Income
from life insurance contracts
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
Non
deductible expenses related to branch acquisitions
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Income
tax credits
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
NOTE FIFTEEN: EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
In addition to an Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (ESOP), which provides stock ownership to all employees of the Company, the Company’s two subsidiary Banks, The Grant
County Bank (Grant) and Capon Valley Bank (Capon) have separate retirement and profit sharing plans which cover substantially all
full time employees at each Bank. A summary of the employee benefits provided by each Bank is provided below.
The
Company’s ESOP plan provides stock ownership to all employees of the Company. The Plan provides total vesting upon the attainment
of seven years of service. Contributions to the plan are made at the discretion of the board of directors and are allocated based
on the compensation of each employee relative to total compensation paid by the Company. All shares held by the Plan are considered
outstanding in the computation of earnings per share. Shares of Company stock, when distributed, will have restrictions on transferability.
Certain executives of both Grant and Capon have post retirement benefits related to the Banks’ investment in life
insurance policies (see Note Nineteen).
Expenses related to all retirement benefit plans charged
to operations totaled $649,000 in 2011 and $976,000 in 2010.
Capon Valley Bank
Capon has a defined contribution pension plan
with 401(k) features that is funded with discretionary contributions. Capon matches on a limited basis the contributions of the
employees. Investment of employee balances is done through the direction of each employee. Employer contributions are vested over
a six-year period.
The Grant County Bank
Grant is a member of the West Virginia Bankers’
Association Retirement Plan (the “Plan”). This Plan is a defined benefit plan with benefits under the Plan based on
compensation and years of service with full vesting after seven years of service. Prior to 2002, the Plan’s assets were in
excess of the projected benefit obligations and thus Grant was not required to make contributions to the Plan during 2001, 2002,
or 2003. Beginning 2004, Grant has been required to make contributions. The contribution expected during 2012 is $1,451,000. At
December 31, 2011, Grant has recognized liabilities of $2,715,000 relating to unfunded pension liabilities. As a result of the
Plan’s inability to meet expected returns in recent years, a portion of this liability is reflected as a decrease in other
comprehensive income of $2,025,000 (net of $1,190,000 tax benefit).
The following table provides a reconciliation
of the changes in the Plan’s obligations and fair value of assets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 using a measurement date
of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
in Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit
obligation, beginning
|
|
$
|
6,011
|
|
|
$
|
5,136
|
|
|
Service
Cost
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
Interest
Cost
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
Actuarial
Loss (Gain)
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
Benefits
Paid
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
Benefit obligation,
ending
|
|
$
|
6,852
|
|
|
$
|
6,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
Benefit Obligation
|
|
$
|
5,830
|
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets,
beginning
|
|
$
|
4,249
|
|
|
$
|
3,858
|
|
|
Actual
return on assets, net of administrative expenses
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
Employer
contributions
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Benefits
paid
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
Fair value of assets,
ending
|
|
$
|
4,137
|
|
|
$
|
4,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded
Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan
assets
|
|
$
|
4,137
|
|
|
$
|
4,249
|
|
|
Projected
benefit obligation
|
|
|
6,852
|
|
|
|
6,011
|
|
|
Funded
status
|
|
|
(2,715
|
)
|
|
|
(1,762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized in the Statements of Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
3,215
|
|
|
$
|
2,356
|
|
|
(Prepaid) pension expense
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
Net
liability recognized
|
|
$
|
2,715
|
|
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized
actuarial loss
|
|
$
|
3,215
|
|
|
$
|
2,356
|
|
The following table provides the components of the net periodic
pension expense for the Plan for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
Expected
return on plan assets
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
Recognized
net actuarial loss
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
Net
Periodic Pension Expense
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
The expected pension expense for 2012 is $282,000.
The amount of estimated loss accumulated in other comprehensive income expected to be recognized in net periodic benefit cost in
2012 is $207,000.
The table below summarizes the benefits expected
to be paid to participants in the plan (in thousands of dollars):
|
Year
|
|
|
Expected
Benefit Payments
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
Years 2017 – 2021
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
The weighted average assumption used in the
measurement of Grant’s benefit obligation and net periodic pension expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Discount
rate
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
Expected
return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
Rate
of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
The plan
sponsor estimates the expected long-term rate of return on assets in consultation with their advisors and the plan actuary. This
rate is intended to reflect the average rate of earnings expected to be earned on the funds invested or to be invested to provide
plan benefits. Historical performance is reviewed, especially with respect to real rate of return (net of inflation) for the major
asset classes held or anticipated to be held by the trust. Undue weight is not given to recent experience, which may not continue
over the measurement period, with higher significance placed on current forecasts of future long-term economic conditions.
The following table provides the pension plan’s asset allocation
as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
The trust fund is sufficiently diversified
to maintain a reasonable level of risk without imprudently sacrificing return. The targeted asset allocation and allowable range
of allocation is set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
Target
Allocation
|
|
Allowable
Allocation Range
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
40%-80%
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
20%-40%
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
3%-10%
|
The Investment
Manager selects investment fund managers with demonstrated experience and expertise, and funds with demonstrated historical performance,
for the implementation of the Plan’s investment strategy. The Investment Manager will consider both actively and passively
managed investment strategies and will allocate funds across the asset classes to develop an efficient investment structure.
Fair Value
The fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets at December
31, 2011 and 2010, by asset category is as follows:
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Markets
for
|
|
|
|
Significant
Other
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
as
of
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Asset
Category
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Level
1)
|
|
|
|
(Level
2)
|
|
|
|
(Level
3)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Companies
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
Companies
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
4,137
|
|
|
$
|
2,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,451
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
Active
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Markets
for
|
|
|
|
Significant
Other
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
as
of
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Asset
Category
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Level
1)
|
|
|
|
(Level
2)
|
|
|
|
(Level
3)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Companies
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
Companies
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short Term
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
4,249
|
|
|
$
|
2,936
|
|
|
$
|
1,313
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
The Grant County Bank also
maintains a profit sharing plan covering substantially all employees to which contributions are made at the discretion of the board
of directors. Portions of employer contributions to this plan are, at individual employees’ discretion, available to employees
as immediate cash payment while portions are allocated for deferred payment to the employee. The portions of the plan contribution
by the employer which are allocated for deferred payment to the employee are vested over a five year period.
NOTE SIXTEEN: COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES
The Banks
make commitments to extend credit in the normal course of business and issue standby letters of credit to meet the financing needs
of their customers. The amount of the commitments represents the Banks' exposure to credit loss that is not included in the balance
sheet.
The Banks use the same credit policies in making
commitments and issuing letters of credit as used for the loans reflected in the balance sheet. Commitments to extend credit are
agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected
to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Banks
evaluate each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the
Banks upon the extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies but may
include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment.
As of
December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Banks had outstanding the following commitments (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
10,036
|
|
|
$
|
11,138
|
|
|
Standby letter of credit
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
NOTE SEVENTEEN: CHANGES IN OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of changes in other comprehensive
income, net of deferred tax, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
Gains(losses) on Securities
|
|
|
|
Defined
Benefit Plan Obligation
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
(1,338
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,015
|
)
|
|
2010 change
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
Balance, December
31, 2010
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
(1,484
|
)
|
|
|
(1,271
|
)
|
|
2011 change
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(540
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
Balance, December
31, 2011
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
|
$
|
(2,024
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,755
|
)
|
NOTE EIGHTEEN: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company
uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.
In accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance regarding fair value measurements and disclosures, the fair value of a
financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based on quoted market prices. However, in the
event there are no quoted market prices available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques.
Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows.
Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
The recent
fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that
is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants as the measurement date under current market conditions.
If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation
technique or the use of multiple valuation
techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which
willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances
and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable amount within the range that is most representative
of fair value under current market conditions.
ASC 820,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
,
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure
of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon
the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as
follows:
|
·
|
Level
One:
Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in
active markets.
|
|
·
|
Level Two
:
I
nputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and
inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the
financial instrument.
|
|
·
|
Level Three
: Inputs to the valuation
methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
|
Following is a description of the valuation
methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value on the Company’s balance sheet, as well as the general classification
of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:
Securities
Where quoted prices are available in an active
market, securities are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would include highly liquid government
bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated
by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flow. Level 2 securities
would include U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain
corporate, asset backed and other securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs
to the valuation, securities are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Currently, all of the Company’s securities
are considered to be Level 2 securities.
Impaired Loans
The fair value measurement guidance applies
to loans measured for impairment using the practical expedients permitted by authoritative accounting guidance, including impaired
loans measured at an observable market price (if available), or at the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if the loan is
collateral dependent). Fair value of the loan’s collateral, when the loan is dependent on collateral, is determined by appraisals
or independent valuation which is then adjusted for the estimated cost related to liquidation of the collateral. Fair value of
collateral dependent loans are considered level two if the most recent appraisal or independent valuation is complete within the
preceding twelve months. Fair value of collateral dependent loans are considered level three if the most recent appraisal or independent
valuation is over twelve months old. At December 31, 2011, the Company had impaired loans of $29,200,000 of which $6,849,000 required
an allowance of $1,513,000. (see Note Five).
Other Real Estate Owned
Certain assets such as other real estate owned
(OREO) are measured at fair value. Real estate acquired through foreclosure is recorded at an estimated fair value less cost to
sell. At or near the time of foreclosure, a real estate appraisal is obtained on the properties. The real estate is then valued
at the lesser of the appraised value or the loan balance, including interest receivable, at the time of foreclosure less an estimate
of costs to sell the property. Appraised values are typically determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based
on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser (Level 2). If the acquired property is a house or building in the
process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over twelve months old, the fair value is considered
Level 3. The estimate of costs to sell the property is based on historical transactions of similar holdings.
The Company, at December 31, 2011, had no liabilities subject to
fair value reporting requirements. The tables below summarize assets at December 31, 2011 and 2010 measured at fair value on a
recurring basis (in thousands of dollars):
|
December
31, 2011
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
|
Total
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
21,932
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
21,932
|
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,413
|
|
|
States
and municipalities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
Certificates
of deposit
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
Total
Available For Sale Securities
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
39,557
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
39,557
|
|
|
December
31, 2010
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
|
Total
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasuries and Agencies
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
9,258
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
9,258
|
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,651
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,651
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
States
and municipalities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
Certificates of
deposit
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
Marketable
equities
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Total
Available For Sale Securities
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
25,324
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
25,324
|
|
The tables below summarize assets at December 31, 2011 and 2010
measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
|
Total
Fair Value
Measurements
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ended December 31, 2011
Total gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
real estate owned
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
5,862
|
|
|
$
|
1,208
|
|
|
$
|
7,070
|
|
|
$
|
(912
|
)
|
|
Impaired
Loans
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
5,336
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
10,633
|
|
|
$
|
1,773
|
|
|
$
|
12,406
|
|
|
$
|
(912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Months Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
|
Total
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
Total
Gains/(Losses)
|
|
|
Other
real estate owned
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
|
$
|
3,658
|
|
|
$
|
4,700
|
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
|
Impaired
Loans
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
4,915
|
|
|
$
|
4,915
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,042
|
|
|
$
|
8,573
|
|
|
$
|
9,615
|
|
|
$
|
(88
|
)
|
The information above discusses financial instruments
carried on the Company’s balance sheet at fair value. Other financial instruments on the Company’s balance sheet, while
not carried at fair value, do have market values which may differ from the carrying value. The following information shows the
carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments and discusses the methods and assumptions used in determining
these fair values.
The fair
value of the Company's assets and liabilities is influenced heavily by market conditions. Fair value applies to both assets and
liabilities, either on or off the balance sheet. Fair value is defined as the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged
in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.
The methods
and assumptions detailed below were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable
to estimate that value.
Cash,
Due from Banks and Money Market Investments
The carrying
amount of cash, due from bank balances, interest bearing deposits and federal funds sold is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Securities
Fair values
of securities are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated
using quoted market prices for similar securities.
Restricted
Investments
The carrying
amount of restricted investments is a reasonable estimate of fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.
Loans
The fair
value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to
borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities, taking into consideration the credit risk in various
loan categories.
Deposits
The fair
value of demand, interest checking, regular savings and money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting
date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar
remaining maturities.
Long-Term
Debt Instruments
The fair
value of fixed rate loans is estimated using the rates currently offered by the Federal Home Loan Bank for indebtedness with similar
maturities.
Interest
Payable and Receivable
The carrying values of interest receivable
and payable are reasonable estimates of fair value.
Life Insurance
The carrying
amount of life insurance contracts is assumed to be a reasonable fair value. Life insurance contracts are carried on the balance
sheet at their redemption value as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. This redemption value is based on existing market conditions
and therefore represents the fair value of the contract.
Off-Balance-Sheet
Items
The carrying
amount and estimated fair value of off-balance-sheet items were not material at December 31, 2011 or 2010.
The carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments
as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are shown in the table below (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
December
31, 2011
|
|
|
December
31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
|
Financial
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and due from banks
|
|
$
|
9,321
|
|
|
$
|
9,321
|
|
|
$
|
8,282
|
|
|
$
|
8,282
|
|
|
Interest
bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
2,329
|
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
|
Federal
funds sold
|
|
|
11,253
|
|
|
|
11,253
|
|
|
|
5,836
|
|
|
|
5,836
|
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
|
39,557
|
|
|
|
39,557
|
|
|
|
25,324
|
|
|
|
25,324
|
|
|
Restricted
investments
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
1,741
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
Loans,
net
|
|
|
306,945
|
|
|
|
307,629
|
|
|
|
323,929
|
|
|
|
324,780
|
|
|
Interest
receivable
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
Life
insurance contracts
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
7,300
|
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
|
|
7,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
and savings deposits
|
|
|
144,625
|
|
|
|
144,625
|
|
|
|
132,085
|
|
|
|
132,085
|
|
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
199,447
|
|
|
|
201,074
|
|
|
|
210,727
|
|
|
|
211,590
|
|
|
Long
term debt instruments
|
|
|
11,245
|
|
|
|
11,667
|
|
|
|
9,393
|
|
|
|
10,142
|
|
|
Interest
payable
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
NOTE NINETEEN: INVESTMENTS IN LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS
|
Investments in insurance contracts consist
of single premium insurance contracts, which have the purpose of providing a rate of return to the Company and providing a source
of funding for retirement benefits to certain executives.
A summary of the changes to the balance of
investments in insurance contracts for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are shown in the
table below (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance,
beginning of period
|
|
$
|
7,031
|
|
|
$
|
6,755
|
|
|
Increases
in value of policies
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
Balance,
end of period
|
|
$
|
7,300
|
|
|
$
|
7,031
|
|
NOTE TWENTY: REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company
is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken,
could have a direct material effect on the Company's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of
the Company's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The
Company's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings and other factors.
Quantitative
measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth
in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier
I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). The Company meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject
and as of the most recent examination, the Company was classified as well capitalized.
To be categorized as well capitalized the Company
must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions
or events that management believes have changed the Company's category from a well-capitalized status.
Capital
ratios and amounts are applicable both at the individual Bank level and on a consolidated basis. At December 31, 2011 both subsidiary
Banks had capital levels in excess of minimum requirements.
In addition,
HBI Life Insurance Company is subject to certain capital requirements and dividend restrictions. At present, HBI Life is well within
any capital limitations and no conditions or events have occurred to change this capital status, nor does management expect any
such occurrence in the foreseeable future.
The actual and required capital amounts and ratios of the Company
and its subsidiary banks at December 31, 2011 are presented in the following table (in thousands of dollars):
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Requirements
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adequately Capitalized
|
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Risk Based Capital Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands
Bankshares
|
|
$
|
44,970
|
|
|
|
15.17
|
%
|
|
$
|
23,715
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capon
Valley Bank
|
|
|
14,619
|
|
|
|
13.16
|
%
|
|
|
8,887
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,109
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
The
Grant County Bank
|
|
|
28,172
|
|
|
|
15.31
|
%
|
|
|
14,721
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
18,401
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier
1 Leverage Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands
Bankshares
|
|
|
41,235
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
%
|
|
|
16,139
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capon
Valley Bank
|
|
|
13,219
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
6,221
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
7,776
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
The
Grant County Bank
|
|
|
25,874
|
|
|
|
10.55
|
%
|
|
|
9,810
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
12,262
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier
1 Risk Based Capital Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands
Bankshares
|
|
|
41,235
|
|
|
|
13.91
|
%
|
|
|
11,858
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capon
Valley Bank
|
|
|
13,219
|
|
|
|
11.90
|
%
|
|
|
4,443
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
6,665
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
The
Grant County Bank
|
|
|
25,874
|
|
|
|
14.06
|
%
|
|
|
7,361
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
11,042
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
The actual and required capital amounts and ratios of the Company
and its subsidiary banks at December 31, 2010 are presented in the following table (in thousands of dollars):
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Requirements
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adequately Capitalized
|
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Risk Based Capital Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands
Bankshares
|
|
$
|
44,086
|
|
|
|
14.49
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,340
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capon
Valley Bank
|
|
|
14,496
|
|
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
|
|
9,277
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,597
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
The
Grant County Bank
|
|
|
27,306
|
|
|
|
14.58
|
%
|
|
|
14,983
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
18,728
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier
1 Leverage Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands
Bankshares
|
|
|
40,275
|
|
|
|
9.91
|
%
|
|
|
16,256
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capon
Valley Bank
|
|
|
13,029
|
|
|
|
8.33
|
%
|
|
|
6,256
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
The
Grant County Bank
|
|
|
24,953
|
|
|
|
10.26
|
%
|
|
|
9,728
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
12,160
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier
1 Risk Based Capital Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands
Bankshares
|
|
|
40,275
|
|
|
|
13.24
|
%
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capon
Valley Bank
|
|
|
13,029
|
|
|
|
11.24
|
%
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
6,955
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
The
Grant County Bank
|
|
|
24,953
|
|
|
|
13.32
|
%
|
|
|
7,493
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
11,240
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
NOTE TWENTY ONE: INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company’s balance sheet contains
several components of intangible assets. At December 31, 2011, the total balance of intangible assets was comprised of Goodwill
and Core Deposit Intangible Assets acquired as a result of the acquisition of other banks and also an intangible asset related
to the purchased naming rights for a performing arts center located within the Company’s primary business area.
A summary of the changes in balances of intangible assets for the
twelve month periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are shown below (in thousands of dollars):
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance
beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2,364
|
|
|
$
|
2,554
|
|
|
Additional
intangible assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
Balance end of period
|
|
$
|
2,194
|
|
|
$
|
2,364
|
|
The expected amortization of the intangible balances at December
31, 2011 for the next five years is summarized in the table below (in thousands of dollars):
|
Year
|
|
|
Expected
Expense
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE TWENTY TWO: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company evaluates subsequent events
that have occurred after the balance sheet, but before the financial statements are issued. There are two types of subsequent events:
(1) recognized, or those that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including
the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements, and (2) non-recognized, or those that provide evidence
about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date.
Based on management’s evaluation
through the date these financial statements were issued, the Company did not identify any recognized or non-recognized subsequent
events that would have required adjustment or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.
NOTE TWENTY THREE: PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Balance Sheets
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
Investment
in subsidiaries
|
|
|
41,443
|
|
|
|
41,105
|
|
|
Receivable
from subsidiaries
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
Fixed
assets, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
41,889
|
|
|
$
|
41,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $5 per share, 3,000,000 shares authorized, 1,436,874 issued
|
|
|
7,184
|
|
|
|
7,184
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
Treasury
stock, at cost, 100,001 shares
|
|
|
(3,372
|
)
|
|
|
(3,372
|
)
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
37,955
|
|
|
|
37,165
|
|
|
Other
accumulated comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,755
|
)
|
|
|
(1,271
|
)
|
|
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
41,674
|
|
|
|
41,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
41,889
|
|
|
$
|
41,507
|
|
Statements of
Income and Retained Earnings
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Years
ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
from subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
1,740
|
|
|
Management
fees from subsidiaries
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
Total
Income
|
|
|
1,183
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
and benefits expense
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
Professional
fees
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
Directors
fees
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
Other
expenses
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
Total
Expenses
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income before income tax benefit and undistributed subsidiary net income
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax (benefit)
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before undistributed subsidiary net income
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed
subsidiary net income
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$
|
1,392
|
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
earnings, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
37,165
|
|
|
$
|
36,963
|
|
|
Dividends
paid in cash
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
Retained
earnings, end of period
|
|
$
|
37,955
|
|
|
$
|
37,165
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$
|
1,392
|
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Undistributed
subsidiary income
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in payables
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in receivables from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in receivables
|
|
|
815
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in other assets
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(payments to) subsidiaries
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(715
|
)
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
paid in cash
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
|
|
(602
|
)
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Decrease in Cash
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
beginning of year
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
end of year
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Highlands Bankshares, Inc.
Petersburg, West Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended
December 31, 2011. The management of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) is responsible
for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate
in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC
Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC
Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2012
|
Item 9.
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
The Company’s management, with the participation
of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2011. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting
them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Highlands Bankshares, Inc. is responsible for
the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The
consolidated financial statements and notes included in this annual report have been prepared in conformity with United States
generally accepted accounting principles and necessarily include some amounts that are based on management’s best estimates
and judgments.
The management of Highland’s Bankshares,
Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements or may not prevent the possibility that a control
can be circumvented or overridden. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework. Based on the assessment using those criteria, management concluded that the internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation
report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s
report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm.
Changes in Internal Controls
During the period reported upon, there were
no significant changes in internal controls of the Company pertaining to its financial reporting and control of its assets or in
other factors that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect such control.
|
Item 9B.
|
Other Information
|
None
.
|
Item 10.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Information
required by this item is set forth as portions of our 2012 Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company’s
fiscal year end, and is incorporated herein by reference. Applicable information required by this item can be found in the 2012
Proxy Statement under the following captions:
|
●
|
“Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act”
|
|
●
|
“ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS”
|
|
●
|
“INFORMATION CONCERNING DIRECTORS AND NOMINEES”
|
|
●
|
“REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE”
|
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that
applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and all directors, officers
and employees of the Company. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics covering all employees will be mailed without charge
upon request to
Corporate Governance, Highlands Bankshares, Inc., P.O. Box 929, Main Street, Petersburg, West Virginia
26847. Any amendments to or waiver from any provision of the Code of Ethics, applicable to the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or Chief Accounting Officer will be disclosed in a timely fashion via the Company’s filing
of a Current Report on Form 8-K regarding and amendments to, or waivers of, any provision of the Code of Ethics applicable to the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Chief Accounting Officer.
|
Item 11.
|
Executive Compensation
|
Information
required by this item is set forth under the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” of our 2012 Proxy Statement, to be filed
within 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year end, and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
Item 12.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
Information
required by this item is set forth under the caption “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT”
of our 2012 Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year end, and is incorporated
herein by reference
|
Item 13.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
|
Information
required by this item is set forth under the caption “CERTAIN RELATED TRANSACTIONS” of our 2012 Proxy Statement, to
be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year end, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Most of
the directors, limited liability companies of which they may be members, partnerships of which they may be general partners and
corporations of which they are officers or directors, maintain normal banking relationships with the Bank. Loans made by the Bank
to such persons or other entities were made in the ordinary course of business, were made, at the date of inception, on substantially
the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other
persons, and did not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. See Note Twelve of
the consolidated financial statements.
Director
John Van Meter is a partner with the law firm of Van Meter and Van Meter, which has been retained by the Company as legal counsel,
and it is anticipated that the relationship will continue. Director Jack H. Walters is a partner with the law firm of Walters,
Krauskopf & Baker, which provides legal counsel to the Company, and it is anticipated that the relationship will continue.
|
Item 14.
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
|
Information required by this
item is set forth under the caption “
Fees of Independent Registered Certified Public Accountants”
of
our 2012 Proxy Statement, to be filed within 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year end, and is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules
|
|
(a)(1)
|
Financial Statements:
Reference is made to Part II, Item 8
of the Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
(a)(2)
|
Financial Statement Schedules: These schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes
|
|
(a)(3)
|
Exhibits. The exhibits listed in the “Exhibits Index” on Page 71 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K included herein are filed herewith or are incorporated by reference from previous filings.
|
|
(b)
|
See (a)(3) above
|
|
(c)
|
See (a)(1) and (a)(2) above
|
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly cause this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES, INC.
|
/s/ C.E. Porter
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
B. Reedy
|
|
|
C.E. Porter
|
|
Jeffrey B. Reedy
|
|
|
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 30, 2012
|
|
Date: March 30, 2012
|
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Name
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leslie A. Barr
|
|
/s/ Leslie A. Barr
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan L. Brill
|
|
/s/ Alan L. Brill
|
|
Director;
Secretary & Treasurer
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jack H. Walters
|
|
/s/ Jack H. Walters
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald W. Smith
|
|
/s/ Gerald W. Smith
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morris M. Homan
|
|
/s/ Morris M. Homan
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathy G. Kimble
|
|
/s/ Kathy G. Kimble
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George L. Ford
|
|
/s/ George L. Ford
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.E. Porter
|
|
/s/ C.E. Porter
|
|
Director;
President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John G. Van Meter
|
|
/s/ John G. Van Meter
|
|
Director;
Chairman of The Board of Directors
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Keith Wolfe
|
|
/s/ L. Keith Wolfe
|
|
Director
|
|
March 30, 2012
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
3(i)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Highlands Bankshares, Inc., as restated, are hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Highlands Bankshares Inc.’s Form 10-Q filed November 13, 2007 .
|
|
3(ii)
|
|
Amended Bylaws of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to Highlands Bankshares Inc.’s Report on Form 8-K filed January 9, 2008
|
|
14
|
|
Code of Ethics. The
HIGHLANDS BANKSHARES, INC. CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS is hereby incorporated by reference filed as Exhibit 14.1 with Highlands Bankshares Inc.’s Report on Form 8-K filed January 14, 2008
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith)
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant
to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Chapter 63, Title 18 USC Section 1350
(A) and (B).
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Chapter 63, Title 18 USC Section 1350
(A) and (B).
|
|
32.1
|
|
Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350.
|
|
32.2
|
|
Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350.
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document (1)
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase (1)
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase (1)
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase (1)
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase (1)
|
|
Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
(a)
|
|
The Grant County Bank (incorporated in West Virginia) doing business as The Grant County Bank
|
|
(b)
|
|
Capon Valley Bank (incorporated in West Virginia) doing business as Capon Valley Bank
|
|
(c)
|
|
HBI Life Insurance Company (incorporated in Arizona) doing business as HBI Life
|
71
Highlands Bankshares (PK) (USOTC:HBSI)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024
Highlands Bankshares (PK) (USOTC:HBSI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024
