US$ 343 million
NPV5% with IRR of 44% at US$1,450 per
Ounce Gold
IMPERIAL PROJECT PEA HIGHLIGHTS:
- Robust economics: US$ 343 million
NPV5% post-tax with 44% IRR at US$1,450 per ounce gold
- Low capital intensity project with only US$ 142 million pre-production capital cost
- 146,000 ounces gold per year over 8 years for 1.2 million
ounces total production
- Technically simple project: shallow open pit, run-of-mine heap
leach with existing infrastructure
- Significant leverage to gold price: US$
464 million NPV5% at recent spot
US$1,620 per ounce gold
- Value enhancement through Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho District
exploration and resource expansion
VANCOUVER, April 6, 2020 /CNW/ - KORE Mining Ltd. (TSXV:
KORE | OTCQB: KOREF) ("KORE" or the "Company") is
pleased to announce a positive Preliminary Economic Assessment
("PEA") for the Company's 100% owned Imperial Oxide Gold
Deposit ("Imperial" or "Project"), located in
California, USA. The PEA
demonstrates Imperial's potential to be a robust mid-tier gold mine
with compelling project economics. In addition to the gold price,
Imperial has upside potential from deposit extensions and
exploration on the 100% owned Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho District
which captures 28 kilometers of strike from the operating Mesquite
mine (TSX:EQX) to the historic Picacho heap leach
mine.
Watch a video (40 seconds) of Scott
Trebilcock summarizing the highlights of the PEA
– click here. Refer to the PEA Summary infographic
in Figure 1.
The PEA is preliminary in nature, includes inferred mineral
resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have
the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them
to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty
that the PEA will be realized. Mineral resources that are not
mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
KORE's CEO Scott Trebilcock
stated: "Imperial is a technically simple, high-return gold project
in a safe, politically stable jurisdiction with a long tradition of
gold mining. The PEA delivers robust project economics based on
very reasonable capital expenditures. This low capital intensity
derives from the simplicity of the project which will utilize
conventional open pit mining techniques, proven processing and
existing infrastructure."
Mr. Trebilcock added: "We see the potential to increase value at
Imperial through regional exploration and resource expansion
drilling which are planned for later in 2020. The Imperial PEA
generates strong returns at US$1,450
per ounce, but at near today's spot price of US$1,600 per ounce, the project has potential to
deliver exceptional returns with an NPV5% of US$ 450 million."
Marc Leduc, KORE's COO commented:
"The mine plan at Imperial complies with California's stringent reclamation and
environmental laws while delivering skilled jobs and long-term
regional economic development. We are excited to engage with local
stakeholders and move the project into permitting later this
year."
Mr. Leduc added: "KORE considered several alternative options at
this PEA stage, which have potential to deliver even higher NPVs by
utilizing crushing and additional pre-stripping. A strategic
decision was made to proceed with a lower pre-production
capital plan while still delivering strong economic returns. As we
advance Imperial, we will consider trade-offs and optimization
opportunities to further maximize the project NPV."
KORE will host a webcast on April 7,
2020 at 4PM ET / 1PM PT. See details below.
PEA SUMMARY
The PEA was prepared in accordance with
National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101") by Global Resource
Engineering (Denver) ("GRE") -
Terre Lane, RMSME MMSAQP,
Todd Harvey, PhD, RMSME and
supported by Geo-Logic Associates - Monte
Christie, GE PE. The team was led by Marc Leduc, P.Eng. the COO of KORE Mining. The
Company plans to file the PEA on SEDAR at www.sedar.com within
45 days in accordance with NI 43-101.
This news release contains information from a preliminary
economic assessment, which is a conceptual study, and other
forward-looking information about potential future results and
events. Please refer to the cautionary statements in the footnotes
below and the Cautionary Statements located at the end of this news
release, which include associated assumptions, risks, uncertainties
and other factors.
Unless otherwise stated, all dollar figures are in United States dollars ("$") and masses are in
short tons.
Economics
|
Pre-Tax
|
Post-Tax
|
Net present value
(NPV5%) at 0.75C$/US$
|
C$
millions
|
$583
|
$457
|
Net present value
(NPV5%)
|
US$
millions
|
$437
|
$343
|
Internal rate of
return (IRR)
|
%
|
52%
|
44%
|
Payback
(undiscounted)
|
years
|
2.3
|
2.7
|
LOM avg. annual cash
flow after tax & capital
|
US$
millions
|
$104
|
$90
|
LOM cumulative cash
flow (undiscounted)
|
US$
millions
|
$694
|
$577
|
Gold price
assumption
|
per
ounce
|
$1,450
|
Mine
life
|
years
|
8
|
Average annual mining
rate
|
million
tons/yr
|
43.4
|
Average annual gold
production
|
thousand
ounces/yr
|
146
|
Total LOM recovered
gold
|
million
ounces
|
1.17
|
Initial capital
costs
|
US$
millions
|
$142
|
Life-of-mine ("LOM") calculation and "Mine Life" is defined as
the duration of mining operations, 8 years. There are
additional years of site work for residual leaching, washing,
back-filling and reclamation modelled.
GOLD PRICE SENSITIVITIES
The following table
demonstrates the post-tax sensitivities of NPV and IRR to gold
price per ounce. The base case, highlighted in the table below,
assumes US$1,450 per ounce of
gold:
Economic
Sensitivities to Gold Prices
(post-tax)
|
Per ounce of
gold
|
(NPV5%) millions
|
IRR%
|
US$1,300
|
US$234
|
34%
|
US$1,450
|
US$343
|
44%
|
US$1,600
|
US$450
|
52%
|
US$1,800
|
US$590
|
64%
|
US$2,000
|
US$729
|
75%
|
OPPORTUNITIES
The PEA outlined a number of initiatives
that may enhance the Project including:
- Complete on-strike step-out drilling to potentially expand
resources;
- Investigate targets along the Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho trend
for new discoveries;
- Infill drill inferred areas with a goal of enhancing resource
categorization;
- Consider moving directly to feasibility based on robust
available data and simple trade-offs; a pre-feasibility not
necessarily required;
- Examine potential for recoveries as high as 83% under crushing
scenario; complete formal trade-off study;
- Complete additional run-of-mine ("ROM") metallurgical test
work; and
- Perform additional aggregate tests and marketing studies on the
clean alluvial sand and gravels.
NEXT STEPS
The engineering work completed for the PEA
will also be used to complete an update to the Plan of Operations
which is a key document to re-start the permitting
process. KORE plans to submit an updated Plan of Operations to
the Bureau of Land Management ("BLM") in mid-2020 to re-start the
permitting process for Imperial. The Company aims to be in a
position to make a construction decision in three years from
submission of the Plan of Operations.
In 2020 the Company will also press forward with enhancing the
Project through exploration and further drilling. KORE will be
applying for permits to drill high-priority
Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho District exploration targets, resource
expansion targets, and several infill holes to improve confidence
in geo-tech, metallurgy and resource estimate data. The Company
will also continue to explore the Mesquite-Picacho District claims
to generate additional drill targets.
WEBCAST DETAILS
Management will host a webcast on
April 7, 2020 at 4PM ET / 1PM PT to
discuss the PEA. Register for the webcast here.
Please send your questions to management
at david@koremining.com or at 833-237-2649. A replay
of the webcast will be available with 24 hours on the Company's
website.
IMPERIAL PEA DETAILS
GRE notes that the Imperial
Project has an abundant collection of data as a result of the
exploration, engineering and environmental studies completed in the
1980s and 1990s. During that period, the Project had
geotechnical drilling and modelling, heap leach designs, plant
designs, surface water management designs, and hydrogeological
modelling, to name just a few, that provided a credible data set to
the project team. The Project also has metallurgical sampling
and testing completed both by previous owners and an independent
lab, reviewed by GRE, to support the initial engineering
design. This data will act as an important background and aid
in the design of future work on the project.
MINING & PROCESSING
The PEA presents an open-pit
ROM heap leach scenario where oxide ore is stacked on the leach
pads directly from the mine and is not crushed. In the design
process, the engineering team also looked at several other
scenarios:
- Higher NPV mine plan with earlier higher grades processed with
additional pre-stripping;
- Contractor mining with lower pre-production capital and higher
LOM operating costs; and
- Crushing higher grade ore from pit to increase recovery at
expense of additional capital.
KORE management ultimately selected the scenario with the lowest
pre-production capital. A more capital-intensive approach could
yield a mine and processing plan with higher project NPV and gold
production.
Mining Plan and
Processing Summary
|
Mine life
|
years
|
8
|
Mining
rate
|
average tons per
day
|
124,000
|
Strip
ratio
|
waste:
mineralization
|
2.8
|
Total tonnage
mined
|
million
tons
|
347.4
|
Total mineralized
material mined
|
million
tons
|
91.5
|
Heap leach stacking
rate
|
average tons per
day
|
33,000
|
Average LOM
grade
|
gram per metric
tonne
|
0.60
|
Average LOM
recovery
|
%
|
73%
|
A detailed mine plan by year is included in Table 1 at
the end of this news release.
OPERATING COSTS
Mining costs for owner operated
mining, processing and other costs were developed from a mix of
first-principle engineering and benchmarked to the many ROM heap
leach operations in California and
nearby Nevada. The Imperial
Project is located near a large skilled labour pool and on the same
road and power infrastructure as the operating Mesquite mine,
located nine miles away providing further confidence in the cost
estimates.
Operating Costs
(LOM average) (1)
|
Mining costs (per ton
mined)
|
US$/st
mined
|
$1.47
|
Mining
costs
|
US$/st
processed
|
$5.57
|
Processing
costs
|
US$/st
processed
|
$1.85
|
G&A
costs
|
US$/st
processed
|
$0.74
|
Total site operating
costs
|
US$/st
processed
|
$8.16
|
Cash
Costs*
|
Cash costs
(LOM)*
|
US$/oz
|
$676
|
(1) Not including
post-production reclamation and backfilling. See LOM
description above.
|
The assumed truck diesel fuel price in the PEA is $2.38 per US gallon. About 19% of the
mining cost is fuel so lower fuel prices would decrease mining
costs moderately.
INITIAL PRE-PRODUCTION AND SUSTAINING CAPITAL
COSTS
Initial capital costs in the PEA are US$142 million including a 25% contingency of
US$23.6 million. The initial mine
fleet will be expanded in Year 1 of operations. Infrastructure
costs are low due to the proximity of road, water and power
infrastructure. Initial capital also assumes KORE is the
owner-operator of all equipment. Further enhancements may be
possible with contract mining or processing of the gold from the
carbon columns at an off-site treatment plant. Sustaining capital
is mainly for heap leach pad expansion and additional mining
equipment.
Pre-Production and
Sustaining Capital Costs (US$
millions)
|
Mining and mine
infrastructure
|
$35.3
|
Heap leach pads and
plant
|
$47.0
|
Infrastructure and
G&A
|
$15.7
|
Working
capital
|
$7.6
|
Contingency
(25%)
|
$23.6
|
Pre-production
mining
|
$12.6
|
Total
Pre-Production Cost
|
$141.8
|
LOM sustaining
capital
|
$60.2
|
Closure incl.
backfill (1)
|
$144.6
|
(1)
|
Closure cost includes
final backfilling of the open pit and site reclamation to
California's regulated standards. The cost includes US$107
million in mining cost, US$12 million in site operating G&A
during back-filling of the final pit, in addition to US$25 million
in other site closure costs. Backfill will return the
site to plus 25 feet of original topography while re-establishing
natural desert washes (drainages). A 95-million-ton clean
alluvial sand and gravel stockpile remain and serve as an aggregate
source for local and regional infrastructure. The balance of
the closure cost is for normal non-backfill site closure costs to
remediate disturbances, remove structures, etc.
|
ALL-IN-SUSTAINING-COST*
All-in-sustaining costs
("AISC")* are competitive with peer projects and in the
second quartile when compared to the World Gold Council AISC cost
metric. Imperial's AISC* is built up as follows:
AISC* per
ounce
|
Operating cost
(1)
|
US$647
|
Royalties
(2)
|
US$29
|
Sustaining
capital
|
US$52
|
Closure
|
US$124
|
Total
AISC*
|
US$852
|
(1)
|
Operating costs
includes US$5 per ounce offsite refining.
|
(2)
|
Royalties consist of:
(a) 1% NSR royalty to Newmont-Goldcorp; and (b) 1% NSR royalty to
Macquarie Bank that has a C$6.75 million buyout before May 6,
2020.
|
MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
Imperial is well drilled
with 349 boreholes drilled by various operators during the period
of 1987-1996.
The mineral resource estimate remains unchanged from
December 30, 2019 and was prepared by
SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. -
Glen Cole, PGeo., Anoush Ebrahimi, PEng., and Mark Willow, PEng. The resource block
model derived by SRK was used in the development of this PEA.
The following table shows the Imperial Project mineral resource
estimate as of December 30, 2019:
Classification
|
Quantity
('000
tons)
|
Grade Gold
(oz/t)
|
Contained Gold
('000 oz)
|
Indicated
|
|
Grade Zone (Domains
100, 120)
|
50,379
|
0.0174
|
877
|
Total
Indicated
|
50,379
|
0.0174
|
877
|
Inferred
|
|
Grade Zone (Domains
100, 110, 120)
|
79,869
|
0.0156
|
1,245
|
Gravel with grade
(Domain 200)
|
10,557
|
0.0041
|
43
|
Bedrock with grade
(Domain 300)
|
9,748
|
0.0050
|
48
|
Total
Inferred
|
100,174
|
0.0133
|
1,336
|
Reported at a cut-off
grade of 0.003 oz/ton Au using a price of US$1,500 /oz Au inside a
conceptual pit shell optimized using mining operating costs of
US$1.40 per ton, metallurgical and process recovery of 80%,
combined processing and G&A costs of US$2.30 per ton, US$0.50
per ton of sustaining capital and overall pit slope of 45
degrees. All figures rounded to reflect the relative accuracy
of the estimates.
|
Further details on the mineral resource estimate are available
in the technical report dated December 30,
2019 entitled "Amended Technical Report for the Imperial
Gold Project, California, USA"
available at www.koremining.com and filed on January 20, 2020 at www.sedar.com.
QUALIFIED PERSONS/QUALITY ASSURANCE
The Preliminary
Economic Assessment was prepared by GRE with Terre Lane, PE being
the Qualified Person in charge of its preparation.
The resource portion of the PEA is the same as the previous
technical report dated December 30,
2019 and was prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. - Glen
Cole, PGeo., Anoush Ebrahimi,
PEng., and Mark Willow, PEng.
With regards to technical matters in this press release
Marc Leduc, P.Eng. is the Qualified
Person within the meaning of NI 43-101 and has reviewed and
validated that the information in this press release is consistent
with that provided by the Qualified Persons responsible for the
PEA.
Further information about the PEA referenced in this news
release, including information in respect of data verification, key
assumptions, parameters, risks and other factors, can be found in
the NI 43-101 technical report for the Imperial Oxide Gold Deposit
that the Company intends to file on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) under
KORE's profile and on the Company's website (www.koremining.com)
within the next 45 days from the date of this news release.
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (NON-IFRS
MEASURES)
Items marked with a * in this news release are
alternative performance measures. Alternative performance measures
are furnished to provide additional information. These
non-IFRS performance measures are included in this news release
because the Company believes these statistics are key performance
measures that provide investors, analysts and other stakeholders
with additional information to understand the costs associated with
the Project. These performance measures do not have a standard
meaning within IFRS and, therefore, amounts presented may not be
comparable to similar data presented by other mining companies.
These performance measures should not be considered in isolation as
a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with
IFRS.
"Cash Costs " and "Cash Costs (LOM)" are a non-IFRS measure
reported by KORE on an ounces of gold sold basis. Cash costs
include mining, processing, refining, general and administration
costs and royalties but excludes depreciation, reclamation, income
taxes, capital and exploration costs for the life of the mine,
defined above as 8 years.
"All-In-Sustaining-Costs" ("ASIC") is a non-IFRS measure
reported by KORE on a per ounce of gold sold basis that includes
all cash costs noted above (mining, processing refining, general
and administration and royalties), as well as sustaining capital
and closure costs, but excludes depreciation, capital costs and
income taxes.
ABOUT IMPERIAL OXIDE GOLD DEPOSIT
Imperial is a
structurally controlled intermediate epithermal gold deposit. The
oxide gold deposit is currently 2.44 kilometers long, up to 0.75
kilometers wide and is open both along strike and downdip.
KORE controls the 28 km long Mesquite-Imperial-Picacho exploration
district, including 1,005 claims staked in September 2019, between Mesquite and Picacho that
runs through Imperial. This trend remains underexplored and
open to new oxide discoveries. More details on the deposit
geology and exploration potential can be found in KORE's
January 7, 2020 and September 12, 2019 news releases.
ABOUT KORE
KORE is 100% owner of a portfolio of
advanced gold exploration and development assets in California and British Columbia. KORE is
supported by strategic investors Eric
Sprott and Macquarie Bank who, together with the management
and Board own 66% of the basic shares outstanding.
On behalf of KORE Mining Ltd
"Scott
Trebilcock"
Chief Executive Officer
(888) 407-5450
This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a
solicitation of an offer to sell any KORE common shares in
the United States.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains forward-looking statements relating to
the future operations of the Company and other statements that are
not historical facts. Forward-looking statements are often
identified by terms such as "will", "may", "should", "anticipate",
"expects", "intends", "indicates" and similar expressions. All
statements other than statements of historical fact, included in
this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding
the future plans and objectives of the Company are forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements in this news release
include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to: the
results of the PEA, including future Project opportunities, future
operating and capital costs, closure costs, AISC, the
projected NPV, IRR, timelines, permit timelines, and the ability to
obtain the requisite permits, economics and associated returns of
the Imperial Project, the technical viability of the Imperial
Project, the market and future price of and demand for gold, the
environmental impact of the Imperial Project, and the ongoing
ability to work cooperatively with stakeholders, including the
local levels of government. Such forward-looking statements, and
any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith
and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our
business. Management believes that these assumptions are
reasonable. Forward looking information involves known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual
results, performance or achievements of the Company to be
materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
information.
Such factors include, among others: risks related to exploration
and development activities at the Company's projects, and factors
relating to whether or not mineralization extraction will be
commercially viable; risks related to mining operations and the
hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration,
development and production of minerals, such as unusual and
unexpected geological formations, rock falls, seismic activity,
flooding and other conditions involved in the extraction and
removal of materials; uncertainties regarding regulatory matters,
including obtaining permits and complying with laws and regulations
governing exploration, development, production, taxes, labour
standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances,
land use, environmental protection, site safety and other matters,
and the potential for existing laws and regulations to be amended
or more stringently implemented by the relevant authorities;
uncertainties regarding estimating mineral resources, which
estimates may require revision (either up or down) based on actual
production experience; risks relating to fluctuating metals prices
and the ability to operate the Company's projects at a profit in
the event of declining metals prices and the need to reassess
feasibility of a particular project that estimated resources will
be recovered or that they will be recovered at the rates estimated;
risks related to title to the Company's properties, including the
risk that the Company's title may be challenged or impugned by
third parties; the ability of the Company to access necessary
resources, including mining equipment and crews, on a timely basis
and at reasonable cost; competition within the mining industry for
the discovery and acquisition of properties from other mining
companies, many of which have greater financial, technical and
other resources than the Company, for, among other things, the
acquisition of mineral claims, leases and other mineral interests
as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees
and other personnel; access to suitable infrastructure, such as
roads, energy and water supplies in the vicinity of the Company's
properties; and risks related to the stage of the Company's
development, including risks relating to limited financial
resources, limited availability of additional financing and
potential dilution to existing shareholders; reliance on its
management and key personnel; inability to obtain adequate or any
insurance; exposure to litigation or similar claims;
currently unprofitable operations; risks regarding the ability of
the Company and its management to manage growth; and potential
conflicts of interest.
In addition to the above summary, additional risks and
uncertainties are described in the "Risks" section of the Company's
management discussion and analysis for the interim period ended
September 30, 2019 prepared as of
November 28, 2019 available under the
Company's issuer profile on www.sedar.com.
Forward-looking statements contained herein are made as of the
date of this news release and the Company disclaims any obligation
to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or results, except as may be
required by applicable securities laws. There can be no assurance
that forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as
actual results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not
place undue reliance on forward-looking information.
There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral
resource will be converted into mineral reserve. It is uncertain if
further exploration will allow improving the classification of the
Indicated or Inferred mineral resource. Mineral resources are
not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
Cautionary Note Regarding Mineral Resource Estimates:
Information regarding mineral resource estimates has been prepared
in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws,
which differ from the requirements of United States Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") Industry Guide 7. In October 2018, the SEC approved final rules
requiring comprehensive and detailed disclosure requirements for
issuers with material mining operations. The provisions in Industry
Guide 7 and Item 102 of Regulation S-K, have been replaced with a
new subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K under the United States
Securities Act and will become mandatory for SEC registrants after
January 1, 2021. The changes adopted
are intended to align the SEC's disclosure requirements more
closely with global standards as embodied by the Committee for
Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards (CRIRSCO),
including Canada's NI 43-101 and
CIM Definition Standards. Under the new SEC rules, SEC registrants
will be permitted to disclose "mineral resources" even though they
reflect a lower level of certainty than mineral reserves.
Additionally, under the New Rules, mineral resources must be
classified as "measured", "indicated", or "inferred", terms which
are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101 for
Canadian issuers and are not recognized under SEC Industry Guide
7. An "Inferred Mineral Resource" has a lower level of
confidence than that applying to an "Indicated Mineral Resource"
and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably
expected that the majority of "Inferred Mineral Resources" could be
upgraded to "Indicated Mineral Resources" with continued
exploration. Accordingly, the mineral resource estimates and
related information may not be comparable to similar information
made public by United States
companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements
under the United States federal laws and the rules and
regulations thereunder, including SEC Industry Guide 7.
TABLE 1 – DETAILED MINE PLAN
|
Years
|
|
LOM
Total
|
-1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
Ore (ton)
|
91,486,702
|
-
|
12,013,714
|
12,242,104
|
11,925,634
|
12,085,395
|
12,800,760
|
11,276,396
|
12,572,820
|
6,569,878
|
Alluvium Waste
(ton)
|
208,451,176
|
297,484
|
23,308,335
|
34,289,831
|
32,037,306
|
25,436,635
|
34,779,864
|
33,323,544
|
24,978,176
|
-
|
Hard Rock Waste
(ton)
|
47,490,579
|
-
|
10,462,323
|
2,061,740
|
3,794,258
|
6,121,084
|
4,223,584
|
4,106,393
|
15,563,063
|
1,158,135
|
Total Waste Tons
(ton)
|
255,941,755
|
297,484
|
33,770,657
|
36,351,570
|
35,831,564
|
31,557,720
|
39,003,447
|
37,429,937
|
40,541,239
|
1,158,135
|
Stripping
Ratio
|
2.8
|
-
|
2.8
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
2.6
|
3.0
|
3.3
|
3.2
|
0.2
|
Mined Ore Grade
(g/t)
|
0.60
|
-
|
0.49
|
0.51
|
0.52
|
0.54
|
0.71
|
0.64
|
0.73
|
0.68
|
Contained Gold (troy
oz)
|
1,595,368
|
-
|
173,140
|
181,781
|
179,011
|
188,860
|
265,995
|
210,688
|
266,319
|
129,574
|
View original content to download
multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kore-mining-announces-positive-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-imperial-oxide-gold-deposit-301036228.html
SOURCE Kore Mining