RLBY Reliability Incorporated (PK)

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There are numerous and varied risks that may prevent us from achieving our goals, including those described below. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Our business, financial condition, and or results of operations, could be harmed by any of the following risks. If any of the events or circumstances described below were to occur, our business, the financial condition and the results of operations could be materially adversely affected. As a result, the trading price of Company Common Stock could decline, and investors could lose part or all of their investment. The risks below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

An investment in our common stock should be considered high risk.

An investment in RLBY should be considered high risk and requires a long-term commitment, with no certainty of return.

We face risks related to health pandemics, wars, inflation, and other widespread outbreaks of contagious disease, including COVID-19 and its variants, or other potential causes of global instability which could significantly disrupt our operations and impact our financial results.

The demand for staffing services has been and will be significantly affected by general economic conditions. Uncertainties related to the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic have had and are expected to have an adverse impact on the staffing industry and the Company’s ability to forecast its financial performance. As such, any resulting financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but may materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have had clients implement vaccine mandates which has on occasion had an adverse impact on our business when associates have elected not to comply. In some cases, we are able to backfill the post and in some we may not have the opportunity. When are able to backfill, there are still gaps in the period of revenue generation until a selection is made and a start date is determined. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus, rollout of vaccines, and federal, state and local government and client actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others. Our executive management team continues to track COVID-19 news and developments, including the deployment of vaccines.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMPANY

Disputes between Reliability and the Vivos Group have put our growth plans on hold as Reliability cannot tap the public markets for capital.

Approximately 84.4% of common stock is owned by two (2) groups of related parties (“Vivos Group”);

On June 5, 2020, Reliability commenced an arbitration seeking to address purported merger violations before the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) in New York, New York, as permitted by the Merger Agreement against Mr. Doki; Mrs. Valleru; Mrs. Janumpally (individually and in her capacity as trustee of Judos Trust); Mr. Pathuri (individually in his capacity as trustee of Igly Trust) and Federal Systems (the “Respondents”).as The Respondents filed a counterclaim, but changed their mind, refused to pay the AAA’s fee, and ultimately refused to participate in the arbitration. Thereafter, Reliability petitioned the state court in New York to compel arbitration, but this action was removed to federal court, and not granted until August 26, 2021.

The Company subsequently entered into Arbitration and Tolling Agreements with alleged shareholder Naveen Doki, M.D., and his affiliates and all other persons who were parties to the pending litigation previously reported in the Texas, New York and Maryland courts and before the American Arbitration Association. The Agreements call for the stay or dismissal of the pending litigation, with the parties agreeing to resolve their disputes before a single arbitrator in Maryland. The arbitration hearing commenced on March 21, 2022, will conclude on March 30, 2022, with a decision anticipated in the second quarter 2022.

The Company is seeking damages which if granted will likely be the remedy set forth within the merger agreement which is primarily the relinquishment in whole or in part shares of Company Common Stock received by the Respondents in connection with the Merger.

Until which time this pending arbitration settles the matter, the Vivos Group continues to control virtually all matters submitted to shareholders for a vote. If they prevail in some form, they could in the future control our management, policies, and operations. Our other shareholders will not have voting control over our actions, including the determination of other industries and markets that we may enter and the entities we acquire, which may be affiliated with Vivos. The various actions taken by the Company against the Vivos Group are motivated by ensuring that either the Vivos Group no longer controls the vote of the shareholders or, in the alternative, that no Vivos Group votes or actions can harm the Company or the minority shareholders. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in these actions, however on December 23, 2020, at a hearing in the Maryland District Court, a motion by Vivos Group to compel a shareholder meeting was summarily dismissed. The judge agreed that permitting Vivos Group to vote their shares at a meeting of shareholders could materially harm the interests of the Company as a whole, its employees and minority shareholders. Until this dispute with Vivos is settled, we will be unable to execute our business plan. The Company’s business plan contemplates issuing additional shares of Common Stock to raise capital and to use as currency for our acquisition growth strategy. Presently, the Company does not have any authorized shares that are not issued. No shares are expected to become available to the Company until this matter is resolved. The Company will suffer a material adverse effect if the Company continues to have no shares of Common Stock available for issuance.

Related Party Indebtedness; Default.

Prior to the Merger, shareholders of Vivos, (“Vivos Debtors”) directly and through affiliated entities, borrowed amounts from Maslow (the “Related Party Debt”) that reached an aggregate outstanding balance (including principal and interest) as of December 31, 2019, of approximately $4,169. The Related Party Debt is evidenced by several promissory notes and a personal guaranty of Mr. Naveen Doki, also a Majority Shareholder. The Related Party Debt is currently in default and as of December 31, 2021, had a balance of $4,985. In February 2020, Maslow brought an action in the District Court of Montgomery County, Maryland, to enforce the promissory notes and guaranty. Failure of the Company to recover the Related Party Debt could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The case is currently pending with arbitration having commenced on March 21, 2022, and running through March 30, 2022. A decision is anticipated within 60 days of the hearing’s completion.

In addition, prior to the Merger, some of the Vivos Group incurred obligations at a number of other businesses they own and caused Maslow to become obligated thereon as co-obligor or guarantor, and pledged assets of Maslow to secure certain of these obligations. During the five months prior to the consummation of the Merger, Maslow paid approximately $450 in satisfaction of these obligations. Maslow continues to be a contingent obligor on certain of these debts. For instance, in December of 2019, the Company’s executive management learned that prior to the Merger, in January 2017, one of the Company’s related parties, on behalf of MMG, executed a guarantee of obligations of Vivos Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“VREH”), under a mortgage loan for the purchase of the property at 22 Baltimore Rd., Rockville, Maryland. From April 2018 until April 2020, MMG leased this space from Vivos Real Estate. The company learned through mortgage holder FVCBank on March 6, 2022, that this loan is now in default.

On July 21, 2021, Maslow settled the obligation which with it had been committed by Vivos Holdings, LLC in July 2018, with Libertas Funding, LLC and Kinetic for $475. The agreement which included $100 in legal fees Libertas was entitled to, released MMG from all claims judgements and obligation against MMG but did not release Naveen Doki, Silvija Valleru, Judos Trust, Igly Trust, Srinivas Kalidindi, Shirisha Janumpally, Federal Systems, Kalyan Pathuri, US IT Solutions Inc., 360 IT Professionals Inc., Alliance Micro Inc. Vivos’ IT LLC, Vivos Global Holdings LLC, Vivos Acquisitions LLC, or Vivos Holdings from the remaining obligation. This debt belonged to Vivos Holdings LLC, and the aforementioned Liquidation Agreement, (See Note 1A & Item 3) had been created as a safeguard to shelter MMG should the Vivos Group default, which actually transpired prior to the merger closing in October 2019.

Maslow felt compelled to settle Vivos’ Holdings due to 1) added pressure placed by Libertas to collect a balance that now exceeded $1,700, 2) a desire to clear liens against the Company to improve its credit status, and 3) its ability to negotiate a much lower and separate settlement.

The existence of these obligations has significantly affected our liquidity, as well as our ability to obtain loans. Certain members of Vivos Group entered into that certain Agreement for the Contingent Liquidation of the Common Stock of Maslow Media Group, Inc., dated as of October 28, 2019 (the “Liquidation Agreement”), pursuant to which those Vivos Group thereto pledged their shares of Company common stock to be sold or granted to the applicable creditors in satisfaction of the debts owed to the creditors and terminate any guarantees, liens and obligations affecting Maslow. The sale of the shares subject to the Liquidation Agreement could adversely impact the value of the common stock. In addition, the value of the shares of Company common stock may be insufficient to pay off all outstanding obligations. The Company expects this to be resolved as part of arbitration and the sale of these shares may need to be registered under applicable securities laws, which would distract management and increase expenses.

The Company could be subject to unknown liabilities incurred by its previous sole shareholder, Vivos Holdings LLC.

Maslow was previously a wholly owned subsidiary of Vivos Holdings, LLC (“Vivos Holdings”). Vivos is owned and controlled by the seven parties that we are currently in dispute. Vivos Holdings had caused Maslow to be a guarantor or direct obligor for loans, advances, or other liabilities for the benefit of Vivos related entities other than Maslow. These obligations were often incurred by Vivos Holdings on behalf of Maslow without the knowledge of Maslow’s senior management. There may be additional obligations of other Vivos Group entities for which Maslow may have liability as a result of these arrangements that are not known to the management of Maslow. These liabilities could have a material adverse effect on the Company and the value of the common stock. Reliability runs periodic lien checks, the latest as late as January 2021 and have not seen any new uncommunicated pre-existing liabilities.

The Arbitration outcome could lead to a new shareholder base where the new affiliated parties decide a different strategic direction for the company and take appropriate action.

If a new shareholder base is the outcome of the arbitration, a new shareholder base may decide to change the strategic direction of the company in a significant way. This might include but is not limited to capitalization plans, whether company remains a public company, merger and acquisition plans, corporate structure, and executive management.

The success of our business depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified employees that possess the skills demanded by clients and intense competition may limit the ability to attract and retain such qualified employees.

For the Company’s staffing, executive recruiting, and video production services, the success of the Company depends on the ability to attract and retain qualified employees who possess the skills and experience necessary to meet the requirements of clients or to successfully bid for new client projects. The ability to attract and retain qualified employees could be impaired by improvement in economic conditions resulting in lower unemployment, increases in compensation, or increased competition. During periods of economic growth, the Company faces increasing competition from other staffing companies for retaining and recruiting qualified temporary and permanent employees, which in turn leads to greater advertising and recruiting costs and increased salary expenses. These problems can be exacerbated by the fact that the Company often must attract and retain employees with skills specific to the video production industry, which narrows the pool of available, qualified employees that the Company may draw upon. If the Company cannot attract and retain qualified temporary and permanent employees, the quality of its services may deteriorate and the financial condition, business, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Our success depends to a large degree on growth in market acceptance of human resources outsourcing and related services we provide.

Because the majority of our revenues currently comes from EOR services, a large portion of our success depends on the willingness of clients to outsource their human resources (“HR”) function to a third-party service provider. Many companies have invested substantial personnel, infrastructure and financial resources in their own internal HR organizations and therefore may be reluctant to switch to our solution. Companies may not engage us for other reasons, including a desire to maintain control over all aspects of their HR activities, a belief that they manage their HR activities more effectively using their internal administrative organizations, perceptions about the expenses associated with our services, perceptions about whether our services comply with laws and regulations applicable to them or their businesses, or other considerations that may not always be evident. Additional concerns or considerations may also emerge in the future. We must address our potential clients’ concerns and explain the benefits of our approach in order to convince them to change the way that they manage their HR activities, particularly in parts of the United States where our Company and solution are less well-known. If we are not successful in addressing potential clients’ concerns and convincing companies that our solution can fulfil their HR needs, then the market for our solution may not develop as we anticipate thus our business may not grow.

Any significant or prolonged economic downturn could result in clients using fewer staffing and executive recruiting services offered by the Company, terminating their relationship with the Company, or becoming unable to pay for services on a timely basis, or at all.

Because demand for the types of services our Company offers is sensitive to changes in the level of economic activity, the Company’s business has in the past and may in the future suffer during economic downturns. Demand for the services we provide are highly correlated to changes in the level of economic activity and employment. Consequently, as economic activity begins to slow down, it has been the Company’s experience that companies tend to reduce their use of our services, resulting in decreased revenues and profit levels. In addition, the Company may experience pricing pressure during economic downturns which could have a negative impact on the results of operations. Further, many of our clients are corporate media departments and broadcast networks. As a result, any industry downturn that affects these kinds of companies could have a major effect on our business.

The deterioration of the financial condition and business prospects of clients could reduce their need for the staffing and executive recruiting services we provide and could result in a significant decrease in the Company’s revenues and earnings derived from these clients. In addition, during economic downturns, companies may slow the rate at which they pay their vendors, seek more flexible payment terms or become unable to pay their debts as they become due.

State unemployment insurance expense is a direct cost of doing business in the staffing industry. State unemployment tax rates are established based on a company’s specific experience rate of unemployment claims and a state’s required funding formula on covered payroll. Economic downturns have in the past, and may in the future, result in a higher occurrence of unemployment claims resulting in higher state unemployment tax rates. This would result in higher direct costs to us. In addition, many states unemployment funds have been depleted during the recent economic downturn and many states have borrowed from the federal government under the Title XII loan program. Employers in all states receive a credit against their federal unemployment tax liability if the employer’s federal unemployment tax payments are current and the applicable participating state is also current with its Title XII loan program. If a state fails to repay such loans within a specific time period, employers in such states may lose a portion of their tax credit.

The Company is exposed to employment-related claims and costs as well as periodic litigation that could materially adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, business, and results of operations.

Our business often entails employing individuals and placing such individuals in our clients’ workplaces. The Company’s ability to control the workplace environment of clients is limited. As the employer of record of these employees, the Company incurs a risk of liability to its employees and clients for various workplace events, including:

The Company may incur fines and other losses and negative publicity with respect to any of these situations. Some of the claims may result in litigation, which is expensive and distracts attention from the operation of ongoing business.

The Company assumes the obligation to make wage, tax, and regulatory payments for our employees, and, as a result, is exposed to client credit risks.

The Company generally assumes responsibility for and manages the risks associated with employees’ payroll obligations, including liability for payment of salaries, wages, and certain taxes. These obligations are fixed, whether clients make payments as required by service contracts with the Company, which exposes the Company to credit risks of clients. As a result of the broad economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, our clients may be more likely to breach their payment obligations.

Workers’ compensation costs for employees may rise and reduce our margins and require more liquidity.

The Company is responsible for, and pays, workers’ compensation costs for individuals employed by the Company – both regular staff and client employees for which the Company is the employer of record. At times, these costs have risen substantially as a result of increased claims and claim trends, general economic conditions, changes in business mix, increases in healthcare costs, and government regulations. Although the Company carries insurance, unexpected changes in claim trends, including the severity and frequency of claims, actuarial estimates, and medical cost inflation could result in costs that are significantly different than initially reported. If future claims-related liabilities increase due to unforeseen circumstances, or if new laws, rules, or regulations are passed, costs could increase significantly. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to increase the fees charged to clients in a timely manner and in a sufficient amount to cover increased costs as a result of any changes in claims-related liabilities.

We currently depend on four customers for a material portion of our net revenue. The loss of or a substantial reduction in business of four customers would significantly reduce our net revenue and adversely impact our operating results.

Although revenue reliance was previously concentrated in two clients AT&T (AT&T and DirectTV combined), and Janssen Pharmaceuticals (which includes workforce partners Johnson & Johnson), in 2021 this reliance is not as prolific as it has been in previous years, due in part to a reduction in revenue by AT&T due tom programming cancellations and COVID-19 and increased demand and revenue by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. In 2021 AT&T and Janssen Pharmaceuticals accounted for approximately 27.9%, 14.5% of our total revenues. This is comparison to AT&T delivering 37.9% of the revenue in 2020. In 2021, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley exceeded 10% of revenues with contributions of 14.9% and 10.9% respectively. No other client exceeded 10% of revenues

In addition, AT&T comprised 41.1% of the accounts receivable balance on December 31, 2021, compared to 48.5% in 2020 and 49.6% in 2019. Janssen Pharmaceuticals comprised of 32.9% in 2021 compared to and 18.4% and 18.7% of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. The loss of, or a substantial reduction in business from, these 4 customers would have a significant negative impact on our business and our operating results. We may not be successful in finding a client or clients that could replace the level of loss of these customers, and as such, it could have a negative impact on our revenue and results of operations for a prolonged period.

Improper disclosure of employee and client data could result in liability and harm to the reputation of the Company.

The business of the Company involves the use, storage, and transmission of information about employees and clients. It is possible that security controls over personal and other data and practices that the Company follows may not prevent the improper access to, or disclosure of, personally identifiable or otherwise confidential information. Our security controls may be inadequate, or hackers or other malicious groups or organizations may attempt to interfere with our data through different means, including but not limited to malware attacks, denial of service attacks, consensus-based attacks. Any event that results in a disclosure of our clients’ and employees’ data could harm the reputation of the Company and subject the Company to liability under contracts and the laws that protect personal data and confidential information, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenue. Further, data privacy is subject to frequently changing rules and regulations, which sometimes conflict among the various jurisdictions in which the Company provides services. The failure to adhere to or successfully implement processes in response to changing regulatory requirements in this area could result in legal liability or impairment to the reputation of the Company in the marketplace.

The Company could face disruption and increased costs from outsourcing and offshoring various aspects of its business.

The Company may outsource aspects of its business to lower cost of employment areas in the United States and potentially to places such as India. This outsourcing solution would focus predominantly on shared service activities which traditionally consist of back-office functions such as “hire to retire”, “procure to pay” and “order to cash” processes. Although a goal of outsourcing our operations is to reduce the operational costs of our business, it is possible that we will not realize any benefit from outsourcing such aspects of our business, or even increase our overhead expenses. A transition may create risk of errors and omissions or technical disruptions that could negatively impact our clients, and in turn damage our reputation resulting in a loss of customers of our business.

The Company is obligated to pay certain fees and expenses.

The Company will pay various fees and expenses related to its ongoing operations regardless of whether or not the Company’s activities are profitable. These fees and expenses will require dependence on third-party relationships. The Company is generally dependent on relationships with its strategic partners and vendors, and the Company may enter into similar agreements with future potential strategic partners and alliances. The Company must be successful in securing and maintaining its third-party relationships to be successful. There can be no assurance that such third parties may regard their relationship with the Company as important to their own business and operations, that they will not reassess their commitment to the business at any time in the future, or that they will not develop their own competitive services, either during their relationship with the Company or after their relations with the Company expire. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the Company’s existing relationships or future relationships will result in sustained business partnerships, successful service offerings, or significant revenues for the Company.

The Company depends on its management team to manage its business effectively.

The Company’s future success is dependent in large part upon its ability to understand, develop, and execute the business plan and to attract and retain highly skilled management, operational and executive personnel. Thus, the Company is highly dependent on its officers to provide the necessary skills, experience and background to execute the Company’s business plan. Additionally, the employer of record business is a specialty service which requires a full understanding of the service and its merits to be able to educate clients and potential clients to win business and operate optimally. The loss of any officer’s services with this knowledge could stifle the Company’s growth for 4-9 months, and could impede, particularly initially as the Company builds a record and reputation, its ability to develop and execute on its objectives, and as such would negatively impact the Company’s possible overall development.

To mitigate this risk, on September 1, 2021, Reliability entered into new employment agreements with President/CEO Nick Tsahalis and CFO Mark Speck, respectively. The board of directors acted in accordance with the advice of its compensation committee to grant Mr. Tsahalis who has served as wholly owned subsidiary Maslow Media Group’s (MMG) CEO since November of 2016, and Mr. Speck who has served MMG since April of 2019.

Government regulation could negatively impact the business.

The Company’s business is subject to various government regulations in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Currently, the Company has clients and places employees in all 50 U.S. states and in numerous foreign countries. Due to the wide scope of the Company’s operations, the Company could be subject to regulation by various political and regulatory entities, including various local and municipal agencies and government sub-divisions. The Company may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply. The Company’s operations could be adversely affected, directly or indirectly, by existing or future laws and regulations relating to its business or industry, such as the imposition of additional licensing or tax requirements. Currently mask and vaccine mandates have adversely impacted the business (although some are related to customer compliance requirements vs. government mandates) as some of our associates have elected not to comply meaning they cannot report to work for our customers. Failure to comply with the legal regulations in places we do business, or the regulatory prohibition or restriction of employment services, could lead to financial liability and regulatory action against the Company, which could significantly harm our development as a business.

The Company may face significant competition from companies that serve its industries.

The Company may face competition from other companies that offer similar solutions. Some of these potential competitors may have longer operating histories, greater brand recognition, larger client bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than the Company possesses. These advantages may enable such competitors to respond more quickly to new or emerging trends and changes in customer preferences. These advantages may also allow them to engage in more extensive market research and development, undertake extensive far-reaching marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and make more attractive offers to potential customers, employees and strategic partners. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margin and loss of market share. The Company may not be able to compete successfully, and competitive pressures may adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition.

The staffing industry is highly competitive with low barriers to entry which could limit the Company’s ability to maintain or increase our market share or profitability.

The staffing services industry is highly competitive with limited barriers to entry. Although we specialize in EOR and providing staffing services specifically for video production, where the market is not yet saturated by competitors, we still face significant competition on a national, regional and a local scale with full-service and specialized temporary staffing companies. We expect that the level of competition will remain high, which could limit our ability to maintain or increase our market share or profitability.

Several of our existing or potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do, which may enable them to:

The Company is subject to the potential factors of market and customer changes, which could result in our inability to timely respond to the needs of our clients.

The business of the Company is susceptible to rapidly changing preferences of the marketplace and its customers. The needs of customers are subject to constant change. Although the Company intends to continue to develop and improve its services to meet changing customer needs of the marketplace, there can be no assurance that funds for such expenditures will be available or that the Company’s competition will not develop similar or superior capabilities or that the Company will be successful in its internal efforts. The future success of the Company will depend in part on its ability to respond effectively to rapidly changing trends, industry standards and customer requirements by adapting and improving the features and functions of its services. In the Company’s industry, failure by a business to adapt to the changing needs and demands of customers is likely to render the business obsolete.

Negative publicity could adversely affect our business and operating results.

Negative publicity about our industry or our Company, including the utility of our services, even if inaccurate, could adversely affect our reputation and the confidence in, and the use of, our services, which could harm our business and operating results. Harm to our reputation can arise from many sources, including poor performance or misconduct by the workers we supply and recruit for our clients, misconduct by our partners, outsourced service providers or other counterparties, and failure by us to meet minimum standards of service expected by clients in our industry.

The Company has generated revenues, but limited profits, to date.

The business model of the Company involves significant costs of services, resulting in a low gross and net margins on revenues. Coupling this fact with the required operating expenses incurred by the Company, the Company has only generated approximately $1,000 in operating income and net income from operations in any one year of approximately $500 since 2015. Net income for the Company specifically was $195 in 2019 and $386 in 2018. In 2020, with the Company taking on the added expense of being a public company, additional expenses of approximately $900 for management compensation, administrative costs, insurance, consulting, and legal fees for reporting and regulatory compliance, had the most impact on our incurring a net loss of $789. In 2021 the company earned a record $7,893 in net income, but $9,631 was garnered as Other Income based on eligibility for government programs. The Company hopes and expects that as its business expands, it will enjoy economies of scale resulting in higher operating and net margins and improved cash flows, but there is no guarantee this will occur.

The Company may suffer from lack of availability of additional funds.

We have ongoing needs for working capital in order to fund operations, pay costs associated with being a public company, and to continue to expand our operations. To that end, we will be required to raise additional funds through equity or debt financing. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in securing additional capital on favorable terms, if at all. There is a potential that we will continue to lack shares of Company Common Stock available for an equity financing. If additional debt is incurred, the Company may fail to comply with the terms of such financing, which could result in significant liability for our Company. If we are unsuccessful, we may need to (a) initiate cost reductions; (b) forego business development opportunities; (c) seek extensions of time to fund liabilities, or (d) seek protection from creditors. In addition, any future sale of our equity securities would dilute the ownership and control of your shares and could be at prices substantially below prices at which our shares currently trade. Our inability to raise capital could require us to significantly curtail or terminate our operations. Our plan is to increase our cash reserves through the sale of additional equity or debt securities. The sale of convertible debt securities or additional equity securities could result in additional and potentially substantial dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations and liquidity. In addition, our ability to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms is subject to a variety of uncertainties.

In addition, if we are unable to generate adequate cash from operations, and if we are unable to find sources of funding, it may be necessary for us to sell all or a portion of our assets, enter into a business combination, or reduce or eliminate operations. These possibilities, to the extent available, may be on terms that result in significant dilution to our shareholders or that result in our shareholders losing all of their investment in our Company.

Our acquisition strategy creates risks for our business.

We expect that we will pursue acquisitions of other businesses, assets or technologies to grow our business. We may fail to identify attractive acquisition candidates, or we may be unable to reach acceptable terms for future acquisitions. We might not be able to raise enough cash to compete for attractive acquisition targets. If we are unable to complete acquisitions in the future, our ability to grow our business at our anticipated rate will be impaired.

We may pay for acquisitions by issuing additional shares of common stock, if such shares become available, which would dilute our shareholders, or by issuing debt, which could include terms that restrict our ability to operate our business or pursue other opportunities and subject us to meaningful debt service obligations. We may also use significant amounts of cash to complete acquisitions. Most acquisitions will include “Earn Out” provisions which ensure adequate generation of revenue and profits, but cash required to pay Earn Outs likely will exceed that total or incremental cash flow generated by the acquired business. To the extent that we complete acquisitions in the future, we likely will incur future depreciation and amortization expenses associated with the acquired assets. We may also record significant amounts of intangible assets, including goodwill, which could become impaired in the future. Acquisitions involve numerous other risks, including:

The Company may suffer from a lack of liquidity.

By incurring indebtedness, the Company may subject itself to increased debt service obligations which could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations and liquidity. This would impair our ability to hire the necessary senior and support personnel required for our business, as well carry out its acquisition strategy and other business objectives.

The Company has only been able to secure asset-based lending at this time

The Company relies on its factoring relationship with Triumph Business Capital (TBC) which is based on account receivable balance. As of December 31, 2021, Maslow could raise an additional $4,321 in cash through factoring. In the past Maslow has tried to tap non-asset-based lending but the market for such loans is challenging and the Vivos Group’s association has prevented loans from proceeding in the past. Thus, Maslow at this time is limited in borrowing based on the amount of unfactored accounts receivable that is available.

The Company lacks some of the technology necessary to manage its planned staffing operations, payroll, and sales activities.

The Company relies heavily on its software providers to manage payroll, accounting; billing; financial reporting; recruitment, onboarding, benefits administration, scheduling, year-end reporting, and other related human resources issues. Currently, we rely on software provided by Paycom, Intacct., Salesforce, and to a lesser extent, advanced search B2B sales facilitator Zoom Info to help manage these operations; all which have made our business more efficient and effective. However, this segmented technology is not an integrated ERP and will not handle the growing complexity of our needs as we evolve our operations through mergers and acquisitions of other businesses. This could hamper our ability to successfully reduce the general and administrative costs of businesses that we acquire, as contemplated by our acquisition strategy, which would ultimately impair our ability to generate a healthy profit.

No formal market survey has been conducted.

No independent marketing survey has been undertaken to determine the potential demand for the Company’s services over the longer term. The Company has conducted no marketing studies regarding whether its business would continue to be marketable. No assurances can be given that upon marketing, sufficient customer markets and business can be developed to sustain the Company’s operations on a continued basis.

The Company services numerous geographic areas, and therefore may be subject to risks such as natural disasters and travel-related disruptions, which may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in all U.S. states and in numerous countries around the world. To do so, we often send workers to locations that could be affected by various factors beyond our control that could adversely affect our ability to service our clients. These factors could also affect our employees, vendors, insurance carriers and other contractual counterparties. Such factors include:

Any one or more of these factors could adversely affect our ability to offer services to clients, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A downturn of the U.S. or global economy could result in our clients using fewer workforce solutions or becoming unable to pay us for our services on a timely basis or at all, which would materially adversely impact our business.

Because demand for workforce solutions and services, particularly staffing services, is sensitive to changes in the level of economic activity, our business may suffer during an economic downturn resulting from among other things the COVID-19 pandemic. During periods of weak economic growth or economic contraction, the demand for staffing services typically declines. When demand drops, our operating profit is typically impacted unfavorably as we experience a deleveraging of our selling and administrative expense base as expenses may not decline as quickly as revenues. In periods of decline, we can only reduce selling and administrative expenses to a certain level without negatively impacting our long-term prospects. Additionally, during economic downturns companies may slow the rate at which they pay their vendors, or they may become unable to pay their obligations. If our clients become unable to pay amounts owed to us, or pay us more slowly, then our cash flow and profitability may suffer.

Client services may be terminated on short notice, leaving us vulnerable to a significant loss in revenue

Client staffing needs can change and as a result we could lose staffing or EOR headcount rather quickly. In early 2020, this was the case when AT&T announced the cancellation of two (2) live anchor multiple hour DirecTV sports programs, which had an estimated $4,000 impact on the Company. A reduction in such needs and resulting loss of clients or placements at clients could result in a significant decrease in revenue within a short period of time that would be difficult to quickly replace.

Inability to retain or attract new clients.

Growth and profitability of our business is dependent upon our ability to retain and capture new clients. Our ability to achieve success in both areas is reliant on our sales and service organization. If we are unable to execute effectively, or our selected business development efforts falter, we may not be able to attract a significant number of new clients and our existing client base could shrink, resulting in an adverse impact on our revenues and profitability.

We could be required to write-off goodwill and intangible assets.

In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to review our goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at least annually. Our goodwill and intangibles assets related to IQS which were $688 at the end of 2020 were determined to be impaired and thus were written off in 2021. An unfavorable evaluation could cause us to write-off assets in future periods. Any future write-offs could have a material adverse impact on our operational results or Operating Income Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (“OIBITDA”). OIBITDA is a non-GAAP metric we use to better reflect the operating results of the Company.

Our business is subject to federal, state and local labor and employment laws and a failure to comply could materially harm our business.

We are subject to regulation by a host of federal, state and local regulatory agencies in the jurisdictions within which we operate including but not limited to the U.S. Department of Labor. There are local agencies which have similar state and city regulations as well with specific laws and regulations varying among these jurisdictions. This acts both as an opportunity for the Company since we manage these risks as a matter of course for our EOR service, and a risk as compliance with these requirements imposes some additional burden on us. However, in the past challenges complying with these local, state and federal regulations has not resulted in a material adverse event on Maslow’s business. Any inability or failure to comply with government regulation could however materially harm our business. Increased government regulation of the workplace or of the employer-employee relationship, or judicial or administrative proceedings related to such regulation, could create additional business for the Company, but could also materially harm our business

In reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, federal and state legislatures have pushed through legislation, and chief executives have issued executive orders, much of which affects the employee-employer relationship, and these new laws may have a material impact on our operations, business, finances and prospects. No certainty can be provided as to the nature of these new regulations or their impact.

Concentration Risk of Customers

Workforce clients AT&T and DirecTV (under a single AT&T agreement) and Janssen Pharmaceuticals (which includes workforce partners Johnson & Johnson) made up approximately 27.9% and 14.5% of our 2021 revenues, respectively. In addition, these two customers account for approximately 41.1% and 32.9% of our accounts receivables as of December 31, 2021, respectively. Our business relies on relationships with several large customers, to generate a large portion of our revenue. This revenue concentration in a relatively small number of customers (5 clients make up 74% of revenue in 2021, compared to 60.7% in 2020) makes us particularly dependent on factors affecting those companies.

We face risks related to health pandemics, wars, inflation, and other widespread outbreaks of contagious disease, including COVID-19 and its variants, or other potential causes of global instability which could significantly disrupt our operations and impact our financial results.

RISKS RELATED TO OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK

Our stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, resulting in substantial losses for our shareholders.

The market price of common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile for the foreseeable future. The market price of common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the factors listed below:

In addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many business services companies. Stock prices of many business services companies have fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. In the past, shareholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Common stock is subject to risks arising from restrictions on reliance on Rule 144 by shell companies or former shell companies.

Under a regulation of the SEC known as “Rule 144,” a person who beneficially owns restricted securities of an issuer and who is not an affiliate of that issuer may sell them without registration under the Securities Act provided that certain conditions have been met. One of these conditions is that such person has held the restricted securities for a prescribed period, which will be 6 months for common stock. However, Rule 144 is unavailable for the resale of securities issued by an issuer that is a shell company (other than a business combination related shell company) or, unless certain conditions are met, that has been at any time previously a shell company.

The SEC defines a shell company as a company that has (a) no or nominal operations and (b) either (i) no or nominal assets, (ii) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or (iii) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets.

As a result of the Merger described in Item 1.01, the Company ceased being a shell company as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act.

While we believe that as a result of the Merger, Reliability ceased to be a shell company, the SEC and others whose approval is required for shares to be sold under Rule 144 might take a different view.

Rule 144 is available for the resale of securities of former shell companies if and for as long as the following conditions are met:

Although the Company has filed Form 10 Information with the SEC on its Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 29, 2019, shareholders who receive the Company’s restricted securities will not be able to sell them pursuant to Rule 144 without registration until the Company has met the other conditions to this exception and then for only as long as the Company continues to meet the condition described in subparagraph (iii), above, and is not a shell company. No assurance can be given that the Company will meet these conditions or that, if it has met them, it will continue to do so, or that it will not again be a shell company.

The issuance of the additional shares of common stock could cause the value of common stock to decline.

The sale or issuance of a substantial number of shares of common stock, or anticipation of such sales, could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish. Further, if we do sell or issue more common stock, any investors’ investment in the Company will be diluted. Moreover, the Company has outstanding warrants. The conversion or exercise of the warrants for shares of Company common stock would dilute the common shareholders. If significant dilution occurs, any investment in common stock could significantly decline in value.

The application of the “penny stock” rules could adversely affect the market price of common stock and increase transaction costs to sell those shares. This can be exacerbated by the current low float of the stock in relation to the shares outstanding.

The SEC has adopted Rule 3a51-1 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, Rule 15g-9 requires:

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of common stock and cause a decline in the market value of Common Stock.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted Rule 2111 that requires a broker-dealer to have reasonable grounds for believing that an investment is suitable for a customer before recommending the investment. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy Common Stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our stock and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all our future earnings for use in the development of our business and for general corporate purposes. Any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR PREVIOUS STATUS AS A SHELL COMPANY

We may have contingent liabilities related to our operations prior to the Merger of which we are not aware and for which we have not adequately provided for. For example, in July 2021 the Company paid $475 plus $3 in attorney fees to settle a debt owed by the Vivos Group to Libertas Funding, LLC (“Libertas”). This settlement relieved MMMG from obligation to Libertas given the Vivos Group had included MMG as a signing company to its debt in July 2018 (See Item 1). In March 2022, Vivos Real Estate defaulted on its mortgage loan with FVCBank for which Maslow was listed as a guarantor.

We identified as a shell company with no operating activities prior to the Merger. Upon completion of the Merger, we acquired all of the operations of The Maslow Media Group, Inc. Prior to the consummation of the Merger, Reliability Incorporated was engaged from 1971 to 2007 in the design, manufacture, market, and support of high-performance equipment used to test and condition integrated circuits. This business was closed in 2007. We cannot assure you that there are no material claims outstanding, or other circumstances of which we are not aware, that would give rise to a material liability relating to those prior operations, even though we do not record any provisions in our financial statements related to any such potential liability. If we are subject to past claims or material obligations relating to our operations prior to the consummation of the Merger, such claims could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

RISK RELATED TO THE MERGER AND OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK

Costs of being a public company and risks associated with having been a shell.

We are now incurring increased costs with demands upon management and accounting and finance resources as a result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting public companies; any failure to establish and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or to recruit, train and retain necessary accounting and finance personnel could have an adverse effect on our ability to accurately and timely prepare our consolidated financial statements.

We identified as a shell company with no recent operating activities prior to the Merger. Upon completion of the Merger, we acquired all the operations of The Maslow Media Group. Inc. As a public operating company, we are now incurring significant administrative, legal, accounting and other burdens and expenses beyond those of a private company, including those associated with corporate governance requirements and public company reporting obligations. We have already enhanced and supplemented our internal accounting resources with additional accounting and finance personnel, with the requisite technical and public company experience and expertise, as well as refined our quarterly and annual financial statement closing process, to enable us to satisfy such reporting obligations. Additionally, in the fall of 2020 we implemented an enhanced accounting system. However, even with perceived success in doing so, there can be no assurance that our finance and accounting organization will be able to adequately meet the increased demands that result from being a public company.

Furthermore, we are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we are required to document and test our internal control procedures and prepare annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. These assessments will need to include disclosure of identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Testing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting will involve significant costs and could divert management’s attention from other matters that are important to our business. Additionally, we cannot provide any assurances that we will be successful in remediating any deficiencies that may be identified. If we are unable to remediate any such deficiencies or otherwise fail to establish and maintain adequate accounting systems and internal control over financial reporting, or we are unable to recruit, train and retain necessary accounting and finance personnel, we may not be able to accurately and timely prepare our consolidated financial statements and otherwise satisfy our public reporting obligations. Any inaccuracies in our consolidated financial statements or other public disclosures (in particular if resulting in the need to restate previously filed financial statements), or delays in our making required SEC filings, could have a material adverse effect on the confidence in our financial reporting, our credibility in the marketplace and the trading price of common stock.

In addition, our management team will also have to adapt to other requirements of being a public company. We will need to devote significant resources to address these public company-associated requirements, including compliance programs and investor relations, as well as our financial reporting obligations. Complying with these rules and regulations will substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

Common Stock may not be eligible for listing on a national securities exchange.

Common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, and we do not currently meet the initial quantitative listing standards of a national securities exchange. We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet the initial listing standards of any national securities exchange, or, if we do meet such initial qualitative listing standards, that we will be able to maintain any such listing. Common stock is currently quoted on the pink sheets OTCQB of the OTC Marketplace under the symbol of “RLBY”, and, unless and until Common Stock is listed on a national securities exchange, we expect that it will continue to be eligible and quoted on the “pink sheets,” to which time we are eligible to apply to the OTCQB or OTCQX. However, in order to qualify for the OTCQB for instance, we would need our float to be a minimum of 5% of outstanding shares to even apply for an exception. Currently our float is under 3% of outstanding. Until outstanding shares are increased, or sufficient number of shares registered and eligible for trade we will be unable to apply for an exception to move to the OTCQB or OTCQX. In those venues, however, an investor may find it difficult to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of Common Stock. In addition, if we continue to fail to meet the criteria set forth in SEC regulations, various requirements would be imposed by law on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Consequently, such regulations normally deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling common stock, which may further affect its liquidity. This would also make it more difficult for us to raise additional capital.

We cannot predict whether there will be an active trading market for our common stock and the market price of our common stock may remain volatile.

Given our low float of approximately 21,245,047 shares and the absence of an active trading market shareholders may have difficulty buying and selling our common stock at all or at the price you consider reasonable. Market visibility for shares of our common stock may be limited, which may have a depressive effect on the market price for shares of our common stock and on our ability to raise capital or make acquisitions by issuing our common stock.

Our compliance with regulations concerning corporate governance and public disclosure has resulted and may in the future result in additional expenses.

Evolving disclosure, governance and compliance laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. New or changing laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards of a public company are likely to continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.