VNUE VNUE Inc (PK)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation

History and Organization

VNUE, Inc. (formerly Tierra Grande Resources, Inc.) (“VNUE”, “TGRI”, or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 4, 2006.

On May 29, 2015, VNUE, Inc. entered into a merger agreement with VNUE Washington, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, all of the outstanding shares of any class or series of VNUE Washington were exchanged for an aggregate of 507,629,872 shares of TGRI common stock. As a result of the Merger, VNUE Washington became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and the transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger with VNUE Washington deemed the acquiring company for accounting purposes, and the Company deemed the legal acquirer.

The Company is developing a technology driven solution for Artists, Venues and Festivals to automate the capturing, publishing and monetization of their content.

Basis of Presentation

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and reclassifications and non-recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are ordinary and necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures required under the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The condensed consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2016 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 14, 2017 (the “2016 Annual Report”). These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 and notes thereto included in the 2016 Annual Report. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or for any other period.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit of $2,073,179 at March 31, 2017, and incurred a net loss of $352,647, and used net cash in operating activities of $110,502 for the reporting period then ended. Certain of the Company’s notes payable are also past due and in default. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date that the consolidated financial statements were issued. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, has expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management estimates that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations through June 2017. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to execute its strategy and in its ability to raise additional funds. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of equity securities for cash to operate our business. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in case or equity financing.

VNUE Technology, Inc. and VNUE Media, Inc. were inactive corporations at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the assumptions used to value the derivative liabilities, the valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset and the accruals for potential liabilities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The three levels of fair value hierarchy are described below.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, including cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The fair value of the derivative liabilities of $566,215 and $508,107 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were valued using Level 2 inputs.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Loss per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to Common Stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to Common Stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued, using the treasury stock method. Potential common shares are excluded from the computation as their effect is antidilutive.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share are the same because potential dilutive securities would have an anti-dilutive effect. As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, we excluded the outstanding securities summarized below, which entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock, from our calculation of earnings per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers . ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. Under ASU 2014-09, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services and is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has recently issued ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-11, ASU 2016-12, and ASU 2016-20 all of which clarify certain implementation guidance within ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. The standard can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The Company is currently in the process of analyzing the information necessary to determine the impact of adopting this new guidance on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The Company will adopt the provisions of this statement in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases . ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the standard could have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued the ASU 2016-09,  Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in this ASU require, among other things, that all income tax effects of awards be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. The ASU also allows for an employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares than it can today for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the standard could have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements. 

Note 3 - Related Party Transactions

Note payable to President, CEO and Significant Stockholder

On December 31, 2014 the Company entered into a note payable agreement with its President, CEO and significant stockholder of the Company. The note is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on December 31, 2024. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the note payable to the officer was $74,131 and $74,131, respectively. 

Advances from Stockholders / Employees

From time to time, employees of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purposes. The advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the advances from the employees were $14,720 and $14,720, respectively.

Convertible Notes Payable to the Officers and Directors

In August 2014 the Company issued non-interest bearing convertible notes to certain Officers and Directors of the Company for working capital purposes. The notes are convertible at variable prices and payable on demand at any time after the earlier of (i) 36 months following the note issuance or (ii) the consummation of a corporate transaction if not previously converted. See further discussion in Note 5.

Transactions with Louis Mann

On August 26, 2015, the Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with Louis Mann (“MANN”), a former officer and director with the Company who resigned from his officer and director on August 26, 2015. The Advisory Agreement provided for MANN’s continued and ongoing advisory services to the Company until December 31, 2015 and MANN was to be paid $25,000 for providing such advisory services, which was due and payable on or before December 31, 2015. Such amount is included in accrued expenses at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The Company considered the current FASB guidance of “Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock” which indicates that any adjustment to the fixed amount (either conversion price or number of shares) of the instrument regardless of the probability of whether or not within the issuers’ control means the instrument is not indexed to the issuer’s own stock. Accordingly, the Company determined that the conversion prices of the Notes were not a fixed amount because they were subject to an adjustment based on the occurrence of future offerings or events. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion features of the Notes were not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and characterized the fair value of the conversion features as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The Company determined that upon issuance of the Notes, the initial fair value of the embedded conversion feature was recorded as debt discount offsetting the fair value of the Notes and the remainder recorded as financing costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The discount is being amortized using the effective interest rate method over the life of the debt instruments.

As of December 31, 2016, the unamortized debt discount was $244,534. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued $103,000 of convertible notes and created a derivative liability upon issuance with a fair value of $176,520, of which $103,000 was recorded as a valuation discount, and the remaining $73,520 was recorded as a financing cost. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, amortization of debt discount was $56,581. The unamortized balance of the debt discount was $290,953 as of March 31, 2017.

For the purposes of Balance Sheet presentation, convertible notes payable have been presented as follows:

Note 6 – Derivative Liability

The FASB has issued authoritative guidance whereby instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to be derivative instruments. The conversion prices of the Notes described in Note 5 were not a fixed amount because they were either subject to an adjustment based on the occurrence of future offerings or events or they were variable. Since the number of shares is not explicitly limited, the Company is unable to conclude that enough authorized and unissued shares are available to settle the conversion option. In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion features have been characterized as derivative liabilities to be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the derivative liabilities were valued using a probability weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model with the following assumptions:

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company uses the historical volatility of its common stock to estimate the future volatility for its common stock. The expected life of the conversion feature of the notes was based on the remaining term of the notes. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends in the past and does not expect to pay dividends in the future.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recognized $103 as other income, compared to $231,852 as other income during the three months ended March 31, 2016, which represented the change in the fair value of the derivative from the respective prior period. In addition, the Company recognized derivative liabilities of $176,520 upon issuance of convertible notes during the period and a gain of $118,309 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 which represented the extinguishment of derivative liabilities related to conversion of notes to common stock.

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Deficit

Common stock returned by officer

On March 15, 2017, a Company officer voluntarily returned 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock held by him to the Company for no consideration. The shares were subsequently cancelled.

Shares issued for services

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 25,750,000 shares of its common stock to certain employees and contractors for services valued at $95,125, based upon the closing market price on the date the shares were authorized to be issued.

Equity Purchase Agreement with Tarpon Bay Partners, LLC

On June 15, 2015, the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Equity Purchase Agreement”) with Tarpon Bay Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Tarpon”). Under the terms of the Equity Purchase Agreement, Tarpon was to purchase, at the Company’s election, up to $5,000,000 of the Company’s registered common stock (the “Shares”). On February 18, 2016, the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Equity Purchase Agreement”) with Tarpon Bay Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Tarpon”). Under the terms of the Equity Purchase Agreement, Tarpon will purchase, at the Company’s election, up to $10,000,000 of the Company’s registered common stock (the “Shares”). The February 18, 2016 Purchase Agreement for $10,000,000 effectively supersedes and terminates the prior Equity Purchase Agreement with Tarpon dated June 15, 2015, which was for $5,000,000.

During the term of the Equity Purchase Agreement, the Company may at any time deliver a “put notice” to Tarpon thereby requiring Tarpon to purchase a certain dollar amount of the Shares. Simultaneous with the delivery of such Shares, Tarpon shall deliver payment for the Shares. Subject to certain restrictions, the purchase price for the Shares shall be equal to 125% of the lowest Closing Price during the Valuation Period as such capitalized terms are defined in the Agreement.

The number of Shares sold to Tarpon shall not exceed the number of such shares that, when aggregated with all other shares of common stock of the Company then beneficially owned by Tarpon, would result in Tarpon owning more than 9.99% of all of the Company’s common stock then outstanding. Additionally, Tarpon may not execute any short sales of the Company’s common stock. Further, the Company has the right, but never the obligation to draw down.

The Equity Purchase Agreement shall terminate (i) on the date on which Tarpon shall have purchased Shares pursuant to the Equity Purchase Agreement for an aggregate Purchase Price of $10,000,000, or (ii) on the date occurring 24 months from the date on which the Equity Purchase Agreement was executed and delivered by the Company and Tarpon.

As a condition for the execution of the Equity Purchase Agreements by Tarpon, the Company issued Promissory Notes to Tarpon on June 15, 2015 and February 18, 2016 in the principal amounts of $50,000 and $25,000 with interest rates of 10% per annum. The maturity date of the note issued on June 15, 2015 was December 31, 2015 which was extended to December 31, 2016 as part of the note amendment on February 26, 2016. The maturity date of the note issued on February 18, 2016 is August 31, 2016. The issuance of the notes was recorded as a finance cost in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the period ending March 31, 2016.

In addition, on February 18 2016, the Company and Tarpon entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Agreement”). Under the terms of the Registration Agreement the Company agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Shares within 120 days of February 18, 2016. The Company is obligated to keep such registration statement effective until (i) three months after the last closing of a sale of Shares under the Purchase Agreement, (ii) the date when Tarpon may sell all the Shares under Rule 144 without volume limitations, or (iii) the date Tarpon no longer owns any of the Shares. As of March 31, 2017, Tarpon had not purchased any shares under this agreement.

Note 8 - Commitment and Contingencies

Litigation – Hughes Media Law Group, Inc.

On December 11, 2015, Hughes Media Law Group, Inc. (“HLMG”) filed a lawsuit against VNUE, Inc. in the Superior Court of King County, Washington, under case number 15-2-30108-0. HMLG claims damages of $130,552.78 for unpaid legal fees HMLG alleges are owed pursuant to an April 4, 2014 agreement with VNUE Washington , for legal work performed by HMLG for VNUE Washington prior to the Merger. The Complaint sets forth no legal basis for a lawsuit against VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) and does not, in fact, sue VNUE Washington , HMLG’s former client. The Company believes that VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) is not the proper party for this lawsuit, and reserves all available defenses and counterclaims. Under Washington Superior Court rules, VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) if service of process takes place outside of Washington, a defendant has Sixty (60) days from the date on which it was served the Complaint, to file a response setting forth its defenses. On July 25, 2016, the court issued judgment awarding HLMG $133,482.12 with interest at a rate of 12% per annum. The judgment stipulated that $12,000 be paid within five days of the judgment and payments of $4,000 per month to start in October, 2016. The amount of the settlement has been recorded in accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.