pumper_stumper
5 days ago
Again, I know the popular belief is the SEC is "looking into ENZC and investigating fraud" as far as the business itself. The SEC has only identified Zhabilov selling restricted shares as "fraud". I have been saying for years here, that just like most scams, what is being done here will not be anything criminal or actionable by the SEC. It's almost NINE MONTHS since the SEC case against one person, not the company, but Zhabilov (and those that assisted with assisting the effort) was filed. Does anyone think the SEC is spending a freakin year on this, looking to build a case against ENZC that will be announced shortly? Sorry... that's a dream.
At some point are people going to realize what I've said and known for years, that there is no case against ENZC as a company for business fraud?
I'll ask again, someone show me exactly what laws were broken. Ranting about "fraud" and having others agree with you isn't proof. Go ahead, anyone show me a case against Chandra or Cotropia, as far as fraud, and I will show you why it doesn't hold. (yes I know, you won't agree with what I have to say...just like you didn't understand or agree with what I posted here for years! )
You know who should be the best one to know why and how there is no case? TERRY of course. The man who spent 9 months trying to file a lawsuit. Guess why it isn't coming? There is no freakin case of course.
Wake up people! What went on here is really no different that goes on every day in most OTCs. Yet how many SEC cases are there against OTC companies? A handful? And when you look at them there are specific reasons there is a case.
ENZC shareholders, no one is going to or should save you for ignoring here for YEARS, what I and others have posted... basic clear due diligence that ENZC is and was a scam. You shouldn't be bailed out for pure ignorance! You cannot be rewarded for this or compensated for this... and.. you won't!
SEC probably won't save the day, I doubt we receive any significant details about how intricate the scheme really was.
I have a lot more to say on the other side, about things that are pretty damning about what this company did... but I don't want to even discuss them here as it might actually help Terry's fake case. So, likely it will be at least another year until I discuss some of those. And yes TJ, it know this part is going to set you off! lol
pumper_stumper
6 days ago
docsetc lives! Mr fake lawsuit has reappeared on X the last 2 days, but only for meaningless and pointless attacks on Adnexus, which isn't even public, and against CBDW since the word still hasn't got to Terry that the Adnexus LOI was reported to be ended, MONTHS ago! Terry being Terry!
ZERO and I repeat ZERO posts out of the 10 or so of his that addresses the fake lawsuit at all. It's pretty clear that he isn't even making an effort to try to show that the "lawsuit" is still in progress! Sad day!
Wondering if Terry will do what a pink sheet scam company would do, and try to save face by claiming not filing the lawsuit is better than filing one, or something silly like that? Or will he just walk away in shame and silence?
pumper_stumper
6 days ago
He failed on due diligence on so many levels. All in all, (not that you don't have valid points, you do), in his case none of the science mattered because ENZC never did a funding and so the unsafe SAFE never has, and never will be convertible. I'm sure TJ took that into consideration before sending in his check (lol).
At least ENZC shareholders had some equity which they could decide to sell at any time and salvage something. Meanwhile TJ's investment NEVER in 7 or so years, ever, had any cash value! Yet he is here (while even 99% of ENZC shareholders have disappeared) arguing away, blaming others, etc ....simply insane!
Because Safes have no maturity date, the traditional critique is that investors can end up in 'no mans' land if the company fails to secure additional financing (thus Safe holders have no option to convert or receive back principal - they just sit there with their SAFE indefinitely).
I do love that Terry told TJ that his "attorneys" said that TJ would be eligible for settlement in the fake lawsuit, despite never having a single cent, ever, in equity. Again, insane to think or to say. This is the beauty of having a fake lawsuit, you get to make shit up!
TheCoach
1 week ago
Hey HomeB. Obviously you've never coached. You've got to play every angle. But, hey, what do I know. 11 conference championships, 3 state titles, working with international teams, and, a robost portfolio. To all responders, just remember, jealousy is a stinky cologne. Have a great day everyone and good luck!
Cheers,
Coach
pumper_stumper
1 week ago
I could only try to talk sense to you people but can't give you the education to understand these obvious red flags. Yes, your losses are YOUR fault not managements! You ignored these obvious signs and hundreds more!!
August 2022:
I ask the question, how many vague, meaningless terms will shareholders accept from the company before they see through the bull? The answer appears to be this many, and the many more to come!
Hasn't "days and weeks ahead" taught shareholders anything?
No one can see that "ongoing and near completion" it just as meaningless and vague?
No one can see that "finalizing" is just as meaningless and vague?
How about " testing and use of the therapeutics are expected to be made possible ", and just as hilarious "plans are in place to proceed"? Now there's something you can hang your hat onto, right? LOL Yet they are quoted on this very board as if they were progress! This is beyond ridiculous!
NOT ONE shareholder will stand up and say date "xxxx" is the latest date that those meaningless phrases can mean! It was attempted back after the "days and weeks ahead" to say it meant 2 months max, which then was conveniently taken back... after 2 months. lol
I'll tell you, this company knows how to string along shareholders. If I didn't read the words, I'd say "no this is fiction, they don't really believe this. It's an act"
As I have said, there is a price for wearing blinders and not seeing plain in your face bull from the company. That price is a declining stock price!
Wishing, hoping and dreaming, while ignoring the reality of the failures of this company is NOT a valid investing strategy!
WE WILL SEE LOWER PRICES! Markets teach expensive lessons..
ENZC
Enzolytics Inc (PK)
0.0007
Its_TradingG
2 weeks ago
I showed you all the information that I had received from the Cotropias.
which was pure BS, congrats you got duped. Along with the rest of us, except you had no investment in ENZC lol good luck trying to recoup from the "SAFE" or should I say, not so safe.
Specific risks of investing in a SAFE:
Uncertain Conversion Event: SAFEs rely on a future equity financing round for conversion. If the company fails to raise funds or achieve a liquidity event, the SAFE may not convert, leaving investors with no equity.
Limited Control: SAFE investors generally have no voting rights or say in company decisions.
Potential for High Dilution: While SAFEs may have valuation caps and discounts, investors can still be diluted if the company raises more funding or issues additional SAFEs.
Risk of Total Loss: If the startup fails, SAFE investors could lose their entire investment. (THIS IS YOU)
SEC warnings: The SEC has issued warnings about investing in SAFEs, cautioning that they may not be as "safe" as the name suggests.
As you've been told for the 100th time, maybe you'll get it soon.
TJ24
2 weeks ago
The following information was provided by the Cotropias as part of their Wefunder offering:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the following reasons, we expect the human antibody Clone 3 to be an effective an immuotherapeutic treatment for individuals with HIV/AIDS.
In Vitro Testing Has Demonstrated the Neutralizing Capability of Our Monoclonal Antibody Clone 3
The ability of HIV to mutate renders anti-retroviral therapies ineffective against HIV in many cases. Because the Company's monoclonal antibody therapy targets a portion of the virus that does not change, such mutations are not expected to affect the monoclonal antibody therapy.
Significant testing demonstrates the basis for this expectation. Specifically, in in vitro tests conducted in five independent laboratories, Clone 3 has been tested against 41 clinical HIV isolates (strains) of the virus. Clone 3 has demonstrated that it successfully neutralizes 37 of them (100% effective against 92% of the HIV strain against which it was tested).
Clone 3 neutralizes the Clade B isolate that is predominate in North America and Europe. Clone 3 has also demonstrated the ability to neutralize the Clade C isolate found in Africa, China and India. In view of these test results, the Company is moving forward with animal trials to establish Clone 3 as a significant means for treatment of those that have HIV.
The lab results quoted were the product of testing in 5 independent laboratories. In tests conducted at the University of California of San Francisco (by Jay Levy, M.D.), Clone 3 Antibody was shown to have in vitro neutralization effect against geographically distinct clinical HIV (primary) isolates. Research conducted at four additional international institutes has confirmed these results of in vitro neutralization. In total, the neutralizing capabilities of Clone 3 have been verified at the following 5 laboratories:
1. University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA (Jay Levy, M.D.)
2. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA (Kenneth Ugen, Ph.D.)
3. Polymun Scientific, GmbH, Vienna, AUSTRIA, (Hermann Katinger, Ph.D.)
4. Duke University, Durham, NC, USA (David Montefiori, Ph.D.)
5. Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, (Ruth Ruprecht, M.D., Ph.D.)
In these tests, Clone 3 neutralized [at IC90] 37 of 41 (>90%) of the clinical HIV-1 group M, N, and O isolates. Clone 3 neutralized 3 of 3 group O HIV isolates tested at 10 µg/ml in PBMC-based assay. In another study of Clone 3 tested against one group N primary HIV-1 isolate, results indicated that the IC90 for Clone 3 versus the HIV primary isolate YBF30 was 3.72 µg/ml. Further, Clone 3 has also been demonstrated to effectively neutralize 4 of 4 virulent pediatric South African clade C isolates [ZA349, ZA562, ZA600, ZA737]; and at 10 µg/ml, neutralize [IC99] a pediatric Zambian clade C HIV-1157, as well as the simian immunodeficiency virus construct SHIV-1157ip. Therefore, of the 45 HIV isolates against which Clone 3 has been tested, it neutralized 41 (over 91%).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems that the Cotropias provided a good amount of of data in the above information.
Furthermore, between 2017 and 2020, the Cotropias had success in creating the recombinant form of the monoclonal antibody. The recombinant form is the form that is mass produced. They showed that the antibody could be mass produced.
The Cotropias were raising money for animal and human trials on the recombinant form. As far as I know, the animal and human trials have not taken place yet.
pumper_stumper
2 weeks ago
Stop it! You're hitting on many of the common pink sheet themes in a day! You are going to overload their brains!
Here is a fact to remember - 95-97% of all patents have no commercial value.
In the top 10 of pink sheet pumps is patents. Most pink sheet investors think patents validate the marketability of the product. Of course a patent means nothing in that regard. A patent doesn't even mean a product WORKS or has potential to work! It doesn't matter, as OTC investors don't understand patents. They flock to companies PRing patents like moths to light!
It really is a waste of time trying to educate TJ. But I'd love to challenge any ENZC pumper in this way. I will put up $20,000 in cash, if you put up $5,000 in cash, and can then demonstrate you've ever researched what percentage of drugs that are in lab testing, and then make it into a fully approved drug. Yes, this is the most basic of due diligence, yet these fools don't know and don't want to know. But of course the assumption is, despite having next to zero drug test reading knowledge, that THESE small handful of drugs by ENZC are going to magically be the exception. This again is insanity, pure and simple.
The lack of periodic test data published in PRs, over YEARS, is red flag number 1,032. But, hey Panther is bullish, and Chandra is working hard in silence, and that's all that matters, right? lol
pumper_stumper
2 weeks ago
Not odd at all. Again, the case is about one thing. It's not about ENZC as a company at all. It's about Zhabilov selling restricted shares (that he legally owned) years ago. So, it makes perfect sense that there is nothing in the complaint about Cotropia. Simple, because he didn't sell restricted shares.
In fact, it would be reasonable to think that either Chandra or Cotropia went to the SEC with their knowledge of Zhabilov selling his shares to get back at him for canning them, and that's what started this whole thing. There is no way the SEC is looking at ENZC stock transactions from the 2021-2 era, in 2024 unless someone tipped them off. This case is not about "investigations", it's about pink sheet execs turning on each other, which is VERY common, and part of the fun of watching this insanity.
pumper_stumper
2 weeks ago
Simple concept. If they were guilty of any criminal offense, show us the arrest, show us the charges!
You have very little understanding of the law (as well as investing). You have a silly idea that scamming is illegal. There are no criminal charges, nor will there ever be. There are zero legal actions against the company, from shareholders or the SEC. Not even a civil case! You rant about criminality and illegal actions by the company... show me the damn cases, show me the damn charges (which by the way, even if they existed, they'd then have to succeed and be proven)! It doesn't take years to file a damn case.
The reason why you have Terry creating a fake lawsuit is that even lowly Terry knows there is no case, otherwise it would have been filed, a YEAR ago!
If the execs could read your posts claiming they are criminals, I'd love to see them sue you for defamation! Maybe Terry's attorneys could defend you? lol
This is getting old. I keep trying to explain the same simple concepts, but you keep bringing up these things again and again. If you are right show me the damn cases!
price_and_volume
2 weeks ago
Dude it takes 2 to tango.
So, to you, scamming people is simply part of capitalism? Madoff was guilty of fraud, and deserved jail.
His investors were guilty of foolishly believing in returns that were too good to be true.
They believed they were the smarter-than-everyone-else chosen-ones - so yeah, some would say they deserved losses, which amazingly they never had to suffer during the belief-stage.
Whatever - get over yourself & Madoff - why not hold docsetc accountable for his fraud?
After all, this is the $ENZC board
#seeyouatthetop!
News
Market Data
Register for streaming realtime charts, analysis tools, and prices.
I-Glow
6 days ago
Homebrew
1 week ago
