iQSTEL Inc (QX) (IQST) Quote

These bidders too have their own agenda which has nothing to do with any interviews until a sufficient number of traders react then they simply adjust their "commissions" up or down. The bidders agree with nobody. It is only coincidental should a trader agree with their pricings. Big news moves the market. The rest of the times it is played by the bidders.

"The CDC says...."

Yikes. What's the underlying clinical data beyond social distancing? Masks aren't an effective NPI concerning aerosolized viral particulate. Even N95's aren't an effect solution due to car, handling, for and their actual label claims saying they aren't effective.

Randomized Clinical Trials. That's top flight data. There is a dozen or so of them concerning this very subject. 

During flu season: masked subjects vs unmasked subjects. Masked subjects also used extra hygiene (washing hands, alcohol based hand cleanser etc) outcomes measured by number of confirmed flu cases in each respective group. 

In all 12? 

No difference. You can certainly go read the meta for them anytime you wish. Randomized, in this case, doesn't mean what you think it does.

And the flu isn't transmitted 1:1 like SARS-CoV-2.  

With all the data and evidence out there I can't believe this is still being argued.

I don't invest for 1 year out Snow. 3 years out, 2027... I would expect they hit their 1B revenue goal. 25 to 50M net (2.5 to 5%) but focus would still mainly be on growth to achieve the 1B revenue so net will probably be closer to the 25M. At that point I'd say average P/E is 25-30 but they should trade well above that bc YOY performance will be well above average (8-10% annual improvements). Maybe 60x earnings would be fair. But going conservative, 25M net and only a 25 P/E that'd be a 625M market cap which is a 1,916% improvement from today's valuation. On the higher end, which will be alot more realistic if they have streams of revenue from multiple industries by then... 50M x 60 P/E = 3 billion market cap. So low end bearish case would be around $3 a share with high end being well over $10.

You'll say I'm crazy, just pumping. But is a net income of 2.5% and 25 P/E pumper talk? No, it's an extremely bearish prediction.

What would you project the 2027 numbers and valuations to be on the high and low end?

I sggest that those who disagree with me regarding the recent interview with management listen to what they stated. I regard their performance as weak. It looks as if the biddders agree with me:

"GTSM 0.1627 10,741 11:12
CSTI 0.162 10,000 10:36
CFGN 0.162 5,000 09/17
CDEL 0.161 5,478 11:13
INTL 0.161 5,000 11:13"

Gigantor, disagree. How is the Flu spread? How is Covid Spread? they are very similar in transmissibility. To ignore science is foolish. RCT is just that, randomized. Much in the same way that some become infected, and some are immune, both Flu and Covid cannot be measured accurately through RCT studies. Masking suggestions are a bit different for people at higher risk of serious illness. This includes people with risk factors such as advanced age. It also includes people with weakened immune systems and those who live with or care for someone with these risk factors

The flu mainly spreads from person to person, and the CDC says that infected people can spread the virus to people up to six feet away. The flu usually spreads through respiratory droplets that emerge when infected people cough, sneeze, or talk. A mask prevents the majority of those respiratory droplets from leaving the mask, but not all, so there is science to back up their use.

Not only are you wrong on this topic, but also IQST.

Best to all longs...enough of this Covid talk now...back to the stock!

Can't explain how wrong you are. The scientific evidence is strong in supporting the facts that wearing of masks and social distancing helps to slow the transmission of airborne viruses.

Social distancing wasn't based on any real objective science. 

Neither was masking, the data (12 RCTs) told us that.

RCTs from years and years prior. 

BM Your assumption is false. It was based on net earnings of 3 million dollars. That is way above current profitability if the company is currently profitable at all. What sort of net earnings do you expect for 2025?

Great snow job.

Still trying to convince people a P/E ratio of 20 is realistic for a company crossing into profitability and growing over 100%? You're pathetic.

I listened to part of the interview. I was not impressed by the performance of management. What is positive is that the company will try to expand the sms business that has better profit margins than the voice business. If I did not misunderstand the hope is to improve the bottom line by two million dollars this way. I did not hear the time frame. Assuming net earnings of 3 million dollars,185 million shares and a p/e ratio of 20, the stock price wo uld have been about 35 cents. That is very far indeed from 2 dollars, which is the minimum requirement for a NASDAQ listing.

News out

$IQST - IQSTEL, Interview with the management in Madrid, Sept 2024 #otc #otcmarkets #otcqb #otcqx #nasdaq #telecom #fintech #ev #ai #metaverse #bright #future #record #revenue #billion #million

$.16s hit today -- disappointing!!!!

mdb1: agreed. Wish that the "social distancing" and "precaution" message would have been taken by the former guy.

Back to IQST now...Bullish and waiting for Nasdaq.

Best to all True longs!

Anyone heard from Oldman or Joe?

Sauceman, agreed. Back to IQST and the potential future growth!

Patiently waiting...best to all longs!

No Fool Like an Ignorant Old Fool. when quiet your just quiet fool when you speak you remove ALL DOUBT.

moneyman, I see where you're going with the financial thought. Thanks, I get it. I'm not going to discuss politics or any presumption thereof, other than to say any stock with a political basis has already shrunk its market strength. It's like hoping to reach only half of the investors from the get-go.

Do you remember the old folks dying outside of hospitals in India because for whatever the reason the Indian system was slow in vaccinating the public in India. Millions of unnecessary deaths.

My almost last post on this topic: The latest study I read on Covid was that masks and social distancing had little effect in slowing down the spread of Covid. But I definitely would wear a mask regardless. It definitely felt/feels like PROTECTION. I would encourage others to wear masks even if they were/are ineffective in preventing the spread of COVID.
The important thing was having a VACCINE available to the public in hundreds-of-millions of doses. Trump/Pence accomplished this at WARP speed.

Back to the $.17s .. Oh well.

lol

"Is IQST involved in GOVID19?" Yes, it was spread by EV bikes

I'm Reading The Last Several Post!!
Is IQST Involved in COVID19 ??
I Just Wish This Stock Would Start Movin on Up !!

Sauceman, it does...I realize that. I was talking about stocks and comparing IQST with Revenues to DJT which is basically a shell company, and how this DJT stock is selling for ~$17 now but has nothing...it's a celebrity stock, much like all the garbage he sells. And here we are, with a company with growing revenues year over year, and struggling to get traction for Nasdaq.

When you have to speak about comparisons, the simpler ones are the easiest...gonna be a LOT of bag holders on that one when he dumps his ~114 Million shares and walks away.

Best to all longs on IQST!

mdb1, I agree, and am thankful they brought the vaccines to us in such a short period of time - that was great. However, he did undermine everything he did on that front by saying "I am not wearing a mask"...not saying that masks were the 100% answer, but they did help those who were sick from transmitting it to others. Again, not the perfect fix, but helpful, and all he had to do was tell his supporters "wear one for a few months, everywhere you go, and it can help us minimize the effects to our Country" - he didn't, and that was a failure.
Kind of like saying "I believe 100% in marriage and what it stands for" and then going out and having an affair.

And vaccines take much longer than 5-7 years, so again, it was a HUGE win for Trump...but again, his failure on Covid led to ~1 Million dead "fellow Americans" who might not have died had he pushed his supporters to wear masks, and get vaccinated...he wouldn't even come out and say HE got vaccinated.

The ~1 million who died might have been less than 100K had he followed through...but he was focused on winning in Nov...

I knew two young people that died of it...was not a farce. People still got the flu, but a much lower percentage. That is the effect of social distancing, masks and washing your hands more. That's how an air borne virus works. I thought the government did an amazing job on encouraging industry to produce vaccines that slowed the spread of the virus in such as short time period and gave it away for free! The technique for using mRNA to make vaccines was already being used, just not in massive batches as required to vaccinate the world population so people develop conspiracy. Folks, no one is out to get you...you are not that special or important. If you have no faith in your government or country there is a plane or boat with your name on it.

Snow, agree 100%. Wasn't trying to be political with my DJT example - just the easiest low hanging fruit to see. As an Independent (former Reagan Republican) I vote on facts, not feelings. If others like him, fine, but it shows that they are willing to allow Adultery, lying, cheating, sexual abuse and a slew of other horrid traits in their own home through their support of Trump - not sure how they square this with their kids - maybe they tell them that it's ok to be like those Jerry Springer types...would be diff if they told their kids "yeah, we know he did these things, but we're ok with it" rather than making excuses for his behavior or saying "fake news". Dems aren't much better at times, but they have never stood on the "family values" platform anyway, so when they screw up, I expect it (i.e. Clinton)

Says more about his supporters, than it does about him. Me, Clinton should have been removed for the Lewinski lying, Bush for Iraq WMD's, and even today, after knowing what I know, Reagan too for Iran/Contra and the drugs he allowed into the inner cities (look up Freeway Ricky Ross).

If you know truth, and still support wrong, it's now all about YOU.

Ok, off my soapbox. Apologies to the group for this quick lecture.

Go IQST...let's let this baby grow...Best to all.

Strange how nobody caught the flu for two years.

Data says otherwise.

The clinical trials confirmed that it wasn't all that effective in preventing hospitalizations, preventing transmission or reducing symptoms.

In fact, the trials had a hard time getting enough data because they weren't getting enough "sick" people. 

It was a farce. No one should be proud of it. 

180 % Right Bro

mdb1 I don't think the ignorant and constantly lying president you referred to has anything to do with the following: "After more than three billion doses, the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid vaccine is being withdrawn.

AstraZeneca said it was "incredibly proud" of the vaccine, but it had made a commercial decision.

It said the rise of new coronavirus variants meant demand had shifted to the newer updated vaccines.

Its vaccine was estimated to have saved millions of lives during the pandemic, but also caused rare, and sometimes fatal, blood clots.

In the race to lift the world out of pandemic lockdowns, the Covid vaccine was developed by scientists at the University of Oxford in record time. A process that normally takes 10 years was accelerated down to about 10 months."

COVID vaccines in 9 months and given to public. Saved tens-of-MILLIONS of lives worldwide.

Did you notice during the 2 years of covid nobody got the flu? Yet every other year millions catch it.

mdb1 Trump demonstrated his ignorance in relation to COVID-19

"Throughout the pandemic, and even as cases and deaths increased, the President has downplayed the threat of COVID-19. For example:

On January 22, in response to a question about whether he was worried given the first report of known U.S. case, he said, “No. Not at all. And– we’re– we have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China, and we have it under control. It’s—going to be just fine.”
On February 2, “We pretty much shut it down coming in from China.”
On February 25, “We have very few people with it.”
On April 28, “But I think what happens is it’s going to go away. This is going to go away.”
On June 17, he said it was “fading away.”
On July 19, “I think we’re gonna be very good with the coronavirus. I think that at some point that’s going to sort of just disappear. I hope.”
On August 5, “It’s going away. Like things go away. No question in my mind that it will go away, hopefully sooner rather than later.”

The President has also given conflicting messages and conveyed misinformation about coronavirus and has sometimes been at odds with public health officials (including those in the government) and scientific evidence. For example:

He has touted the use of the drug, hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19, despite the lack of evidence of its effectiveness, warnings of potential harms, and even after federal COVID-19 treatment guidelines recommended against its use.
He suggested that applying ultraviolet light to or inside the body, or injecting disinfectant, could combat coronavirus.
He has attributed rising COVID-19 cases to increased testing, despite the fact that this claim is not backed up by the data.
He has questioned the use of face masks, and given inconsistent messages about their use, even after CDC guidelines recommended them. It was only in July that he began to wear one in public at times and talk about their importance."

Pres. Trump/VP Pense worked tirelessly to have American companies develop COVID vaccines in 9 months (from scratch to finish). This usually takes like 5 to 7 years. 9 months!!!!! (Warp Speed). This effort saved tens-of-millions of lives. They deserve great credit and THANKS for this.

theSauceman My quote was from that board. I tried to explain why the market cap is absurdly high.

I think DJT has it's own board. Yeah. It does. I checked.

LoL Go to social pages if you want to spin politics.

moneyman To me it is scandalous that the unstopping liar Trump seems to stand a good chance of becoming the next president of the USA. This country used to consider itself the foremost democracy in the world. Now the country may elect as their president a person who admires some of the best-known dictators in the world. On that background it is not so strange that some of the same people give his company an absurdly high market cap.

I quote from a post on that website: "Of course, as Ohlrogge noted, “a lot of banks are reluctant to do business with an owner due to their past interactions with him.”

But even if banks won’t lend to the owner, rich supporters could.

“It could be a wealthy individual who either thinks it’s good business or they see it as an opportunity to get on the good side of someone who might be the next president,” Ohlrogge said."

Snow, all you have to do is look at one example, and ask yourself why THIS other company has a SP of ~$19 with losses and no real product...

This is a pure celebrity stock: DJT

Then reask yourself that question

Prepare for a bounce this week
Best wishes everyone
Time for the train to ve the station

Can a bounce up to $.25s happen on the news? I wonder.

Saw the news and bought a small ticket this morning.

Just waiting for it to get to a bigger board and take off.

SHOULD I don my spacesuit and dust off my helmet?

WILL it be... the final squeeze?

I've got to wonder... IS the squeeze approaching?

That's why I'm willing to look at whether I believe what they're saying or the bashers that call them liars, and the stats. And I'm willing to sort the stats to the ones that either show or don't show growth. And when the grow becomes continuous and is multiple, approaching exponential, then I'm willing to understand the costs taken out before net profit. Like I said, for me, it boils down to what I believe about who's truthful and who's mistaken (or lying). Afterall there is more motivation to lie against the company than from within (at least as much).

STRICTLY MY OPINION FOR ME ONLY. CHOOSE YOUR OWN PATHS AND I HOPE YOU ALL PROSPER.

Unlike everyone else on this board, I never said I had a problem with a properly implemented RS. Yet it still remains to be seen whether they will need that tool or not. Btw, I don't see that they ever said it wasn't on the table. Look back to see that they always PREFERRED organic. Necessities are always chosen over preferences. biz101

But you are laying no your back

PPS direction is on my side.....lol