TIDMDTL

RNS Number : 0567I

Dexion Trading Limited

19 July 2012

Dexion Trading Limited ("the Company")

June Net Asset Value

The net asset value of the Company's Shares as of 29 June 2012 is as follows:-

GBP Shares

 
      NAV        MTD Performance   YTD Performance 
--------------  ----------------  ---------------- 
 131.56 pence        -1.42%            -1.73% 
--------------  ----------------  ---------------- 
 

In calculating the Company's Net Asset Value the Company's Administrator will rely solely upon the valuation of GBP denominated Permal Macro Holdings Limited ("PMH") Class A shares provided by PMH. The Investment Adviser and third party service providers to PMH, rely on estimates of the value of Underlying Funds in which PMH invests, which are provided, directly or indirectly, by the managers or administrators of those Underlying Funds and such valuations may not be considered 'independent' or may be subject to potential conflicts of interest. Such estimates may be produced as at valuation dates which do not coincide with valuation dates for PMH and may be unaudited or may be subject to little verification or other due diligence and may not comply with generally accepted accounting practices or other valuation principles. The Investment Adviser may not have sufficient information to confirm or review the completeness or accuracy of information provided by those managers or administrators. In addition, these entities may not provide estimates of the value of Underlying Funds in which PMH invests on a regular or timely basis or at all with the result that the values of such investments may be estimated by the Investment Adviser. Both weekly estimates and bi-monthly valuations may be based on valuations provided as of a significantly earlier date and hence the published valuation may differ materially from the actual value of PMH's portfolio. Other risk factors which may be relevant to this valuation are set out in the Company's prospectus dated 12th March 2008.

Monthly Portfolio Review

Investment Adviser Portfolio Outlook

The global economic slowdown appears to have intensified over recent weeks, largely due to the increasingly precarious nature of the European situation, disappointing economic data in the US and the economic slowdown in China. The EU summit represents a step in the right direction, although it has failed to address the fundamental problems in the region, namely that peripheral countries continue to face solvency issues as well as the ongoing lack of growth in the eurozone. Managers view the euro project as being structurally flawed and maintain a bearish stance towards the region. In the US, recent data has surprised to the downside, namely in the manufacturing sector, but the country itself remains in relatively good shape compared to the others in the G3. In China, the slowdown is self-engineered and can be reversed by the authorities, but it is still having negative repercussions on other countries, particularly those impacted by the slowdown in commodity exports. While many managers generally exhibited pro-risk positioning in the first five months of the year, they have recently shifted their portfolios to a more defensive stance in light of the disappointing global economic data.

Market Overview

Global economic data continued to broadly disappoint, but it was the ongoing events in Europe that once more dominated the month's price action. Developments during the month included a pro-eurozone victory in the Greek elections, a recapitalisation plan for Spanish banks and the two day EU summit at the end of the month, which delivered fresh plans to bailout Spanish and Italian banks, while granting the ECB direct supervision of the regions' banks. The EU summit resulted in a surging risk-on rally on the final trading day as market participants interpreted progress from EU leaders as a positive signal. In an attempt to combat the slowdown, the People's Bank of China cut rates for the first time since 2008, and in the US the Federal Reserve opted to extend 'Operation Twist'.

Global equity prices fell sharply on the first day of the month following disappointing Asian manufacturing PMI numbers and a weaker-than-expected US employment report. Stocks quickly recovered on the back of reports that Spain may accept an EU financial rescue and China would cut rates. This positive sentiment continued through to the Greek elections, but despite a positive outcome, markets still declined after Moody's downgraded 15 global banks and general disappointment caused by the lack of QE3 in the US. Equity prices declined for much of the second half before surging higher on the final trading day after the EU Summit exceeded market expectations. Equity positioning is relatively light and is dominated by two camps: the first are those managers who are short European and US indices believing that a synchronised global slowdown will put pressure on equities, and the second includes those managers who are long certain sectors of the US economy that continue to perform well, such as housing, despite weakness in other areas.

Government bond yields ended the month marginally higher as risk aversion abated somewhat, with growing optimism towards policymaker response in Europe, and the central bank action in China and the US. In the US, 10-year treasury yields hit a record low of 1.45% on 1 June 2012 as investors initially sought safe-haven assets following the dismal US jobs report, but later in the month the improving fiscal and monetary expectations helped relieve some of the concerns and triggered sell-offs in fixed income. The yields on peripheral European debt ended the month lower, although Spanish bonds hit euro-era highs mid-month amid growing concerns about the bad loans at Spanish financial institutions. Managers generally hold long positions in US government bonds and along the front-end of the European curve. Emerging markets orientated managers hold long positions in Mexican rates, where policymakers are expected to keep rates lower for longer, particularly in light of recent US economic deceleration. They also hold long positions in Brazilian government bonds as inflation pressures decline.

The US dollar ended the month lower against most major developed and emerging market currencies. Despite the ongoing concerns in Europe, there were bouts of optimism over the short-term fixes which strengthened the euro, with a particularly sharp rise on the back of the EU summit. Demand for riskier currencies increased, along with the euro, with particularly strong performances from the recently criticised Mexican peso, which appreciated more than 7.5% against the US dollar. The New Zealand and Australian dollars were also prime performers, benefiting from easing in China. Being long the US dollar remains the predominant theme in the currency space given the relative outperformance of the US. Managers continue to be short the euro, which has been a long-held position, reflecting the nature of the European situation. They are also short the Australian dollar as an expression of slowing Chinese growth, believing that the currency has yet to fully value the slowdown. Emerging market-focused managers hold long exposures in select emerging market currencies such as the Mexican peso, which they consider undervalued, as well as certain non-Japan Asian currencies with strong fundamentals.

The natural resources sector moved broadly lower through much of June as global growth continued to show signs of slowing. The sector, however, posted a sharp rally at month-end following the EU summit. The energy sector was broadly lower during the month amid signs of slowing global growth, with the Institute of Economic Affairs reporting global oil markets to be better supplied than earlier this year, Saudi Arabia asserting that OPEC may need a higher output limit and the US issuing more exemptions from sanctions on buying Iran's crude oil. Conversely, US natural gas prices increased for the third consecutive month after a US government report showed a smaller--than--expected gain in supplies, in addition to weather concerns. Industrial metals were generally higher on speculation that the EU agreement will help contain the region's debt crisis. Gold prices moved up as investors still sought safe-haven investments. Agricultural commodities were the standout performers in June as price action was primarily driven by the weather. Corn, wheat and soybean prices pushed considerably higher as hot and dry weather throughout the US Midwest threatened to curb yields. Exposure in the sector is muted, with small long positions in oil based commodities driven by the concerns surrounding possible escalating tensions in the Middle East.

Strategy Overview

Discretionary: -0.68%. Most managers were negative for the month, with losses driven largely by currencies. Short euro versus US dollar positions were particularly detrimental to the portfolio as the euro rose 2.4% against the US dollar. Short Australian dollar versus US dollar positions, which many managers held as an expression of slowing growth in China, also proved unfavourable. In fixed income, losses came from being long US government bonds and long the front end of the European curve. Equity positioning was generally light, although short positions in European and US indices detracted marginally from performance. On the positive side, discretionary managers with an emerging market bias fared better, with profits deriving from long positions in the Mexican peso and non-Japan Asia currencies, as well as long positions in Mexican and Brazilian rates.

Systematic: -3.04%. Given the shift in risk sentiment during the month, trend followers suffered from reversals in many of the same asset classes that had contributed so strongly to May's performance. The most pronounced losses came from long US dollar and long US fixed income positions. Smaller losses came from short equity index positions, where exposure shifted from long to short at the end of May, as well as short exposures to energy and metals. On the non-trend following side, managers primarily suffered from being long US treasuries and to a lesser extent German bunds. Additional losses were driven by long positions in the Japanese yen versus the euro and short positions in the Australian dollar.

Natural Resources: +0.36%.Although commodity prices rebounded sharply at the end of the month, many managers had reduced their risk levels after the losses earlier in the month and failed to capture the end of month rally.

Relative Value Arbitrage: +0.60%.Most managers in this category were successful, with particular gains coming from one manager using liquidity based factors.

 
                                               Number of 
                               Allocation      Managers as 
                              as of 29 June        of         Performance by 
 Strategy                           %            29 June        Strategy % 
--------------------------  ---------------  -------------  ----------------- 
                                                              June      YTD 
--------------------------  ---------------  -------------  --------  ------- 
 Discretionary(1)                  54              22         -0.68    +0.72 
--------------------------  ---------------  -------------  --------  ------- 
 Natural Resources                 8               10         +0.36    -4.88 
--------------------------  ---------------  -------------  --------  ------- 
 Relative Value Arbitrage          6               3          +0.60    +0.16 
--------------------------  ---------------  -------------  --------  ------- 
 Systematic(1)                     28              11         -3.04    -2.29 
--------------------------  ---------------  -------------  --------  ------- 
 Cash                              4               -            -        - 
--------------------------  ---------------  -------------  --------  ------- 
 Total                            100            45(1) 
--------------------------  ---------------  -------------  --------  ------- 
 

(1) Discretionary and Systematic have one manager in common.

Strategy returns are in US$, net of underlying manager fees only, and not inclusive of either Dexion Trading's or PMH's fees and expenses.

Supplementary Information

Click on, or paste the following link into your web browser, to view a full review of the Dexion Trading Limited portfolio.

http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/0567I_-2012-7-19.pdf

This information is provided by RNS

The company news service from the London Stock Exchange

END

NAVGGUPAMUPPGUB

Dexion Trading (LSE:DTL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Dexion Trading Charts.
Dexion Trading (LSE:DTL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Dexion Trading Charts.