Optec International Inc (CE) (OPTI) Quote

The experts who have t been arohnd for 4 months suddenly appear. lol

Wrong Auctus suit. The Case numbers are different. And there is STILL a Judgment in the EMI suit, I don't see an order dismissing it. The Nano suit was not settled... There was an agreement, but Roger didn't follow through so Nano moved ahead with a motion for Judgment and got it. Cal Bay is related to Roger Pawson and is more proof Roger is a lying scammer that filed fraudulent disclosure statements. There are many other lawsuits as well. Roger lied about everything. He's a serial fraudster and cannot say anything without lying.


.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Still posting that ANCIENT crap?? Really?

Cal Bay not related to Optec....

The Auctus case was dismissed by Auctus on April 7 2022....

The EMA case was discontinued with prejudice on July 9 2020....

The Nanao Filter case was settled.

For EXCELLENT DD (THANK YOU MAXINVESTOR89) and links to all those documents please see post #90843 and your follow up post admitting Nano Filter was settled, links provided.

Maxinvestor89 post 90843
td post 90844

A double negative! That means I'm NOT confused! LOL.

4.6 million in judgements that OPTI never disclosed... Obvious FRAUD....

Cal Bay Judgment:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qsYfiXJf2ClQBOA_E2esVHAgYVjd8eV-/view

Auctos Judgment:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z4urb_wGKDyotcf_-mV1gzHINcJ6gHl4/view

EMA Judgment:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P8xaGRfOriMVoNG0WTqcxk1Lnzm2Px_0/view


And of course, this one...

Judgment was entered as follows: Judgment entered for Nano Filter Inc and against Optec International Inc for $ 3499197.51, punitive damages: $ 0.00, attorney fees: $ 0.00, interest: $ 0.00, prejudgment costs: $ 0.00, other costs: $ 0.00, amount payable to court: $ .00, for a grand total of $ 3499197.51.
https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/cdea6e30-ff69-4bf3-9eb7-2adcb8f7a4ef/downloads/Nano%20Filter%20Judgment.pdf?ver=1698271498041


..

.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

I think your confused about being confused...

.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

MADE to LOOK confused

Your still confused...


.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump






..

Thank you for your kind response and explanation.

1. Wasn't talking about past financials, was talking about financials that would be posted from here on out, they can ONLY be posted if they are not fraudulent, and those were YOUR words.

2. You are correct, I should not have used the word "approved". Process is a much better word. My apologies. I'll be more careful of my wording in the future if you promise to do the same.

The financials that are already posted are fraudulent. To post true, correct, and complete financials Brett would need to go back many years and restate all those fraudulent disclosure statements with true, correct, and complete disclosure statements to get to the many missing disclosure statements. How can he do that if Roger Pawson will not and cannot provide the information because it would incriminate them ALL, including Brett Rosen ??

And FINRA does not "approve" anything. They process IF they find the information is correct and their questions are satisfactorily answered. How is Brett going to do that?? They will deem any corporate action request and application for a 211 by Market Maker deficient, meaning they cannot process. I doubt very much a Market Maker would even try to submit a 211 application to FINRA.


.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Dear Mr. Knife:

Actually, I do know how this works. You said:
A Market Maker will insist and financials that are not a complete fraud. So will FINRA.


Doesn't that mean that a market maker and FINRA will insist that any financials posted cannot be fraudulent?? I was simply thanking you for letting us all know that once financials are posted they CANNOT be fraudulent, as a market maker and FINRA would not approve.

Signed,

Not so much "clueless" as "the one who holds others accountable for their own words"

Lmfao we got action on the board. Sure glad I loaded early.    Weeee gonna pay nice.  

I am not so much confused as I am MADE to LOOK confused. That's what happens when the other person BACK PEDALS!

You said:
A Market Maker will insist (on a 211) and financials that are not a complete fraud. So will FINRA
meaning that when financials are posted they cannot be fraudulent!!

Lol.

Your confused. I was referring to Market Makers filing a 211 with FINRA.

And ya can't restate financials if ya don't have the information to do so.... And any admission of fraud would incriminate the company. When it comes to fraud companies are treated the same as an individual. And do you think Brett is going to incriminate himself? He had to know Roger Pawson was scamming everybody. The fraud was glaringly obvious.

.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Ugh this is getting very tiresome.  Your claim that it’s “impossible to post non-fraudulent financials based Your claim that it’s “impossible to post non-fraudulent financials based on fraudulent financials” is flawed. While fraudulent financials can create challenges, companies regularly issue restated or corrected reports to rectify past misstatements. Auditors, regulatory agencies, and independent analysts scrutinize financials to ensure compliance with accounting standards.
As for Market Makers, they do not prepare or certify financial statements—they provide liquidity in the market. Their role is to facilitate trading, not to validate a company’s financials. If fraud is discovered, liability primarily falls on the company, its executives, and auditors, not Market Makers. Market Makers manage risk through regulatory compliance, due diligence, and risk-adjusted pricing, making the claim that they “become liable as well” an oversimplification.
Ultimately, financial fraud is a serious issue, but markets have mechanisms to address it, and your statement ignores the checks and balances in place. on fraudulent financials” is flawed. While fraudulent financials can create challenges, companies regularly issue restated or corrected reports to rectify past misstatements. Auditors, regulatory agencies, and independent analysts scrutinize financials to ensure compliance with accounting standards.
As for Market Makers, they do not prepare or certify financial statements—they provide liquidity in the market. Their role is to facilitate trading, not to validate a company’s financials. If fraud is discovered, liability primarily falls on the company, its executives, and auditors, not Market Makers. Market Makers manage risk through regulatory compliance, due diligence, and risk-adjusted pricing, making the claim that they “become liable as well” an oversimplification.
Ultimately, financial fraud is a serious issue, but markets have mechanisms to address it, and your statement ignores the checks and balances in place.

And yet when the financials get posted, they MUST be non-fraudulent.

It's imposable to post non-fraudulent financials based on fraudulent financials'

Why would a Market Maker take the chance?? They become liable as well if there is fraud. It's just not worth the risk.


.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Thank you for your kind response and explanation.

1. Wasn't talking about past financials, was talking about financials that would be posted from here on out, they can ONLY be posted if they are not fraudulent, and those were YOUR words.

2. You are correct, I should not have used the word "approved". Process is a much better word. My apologies. I'll be more careful of my wording in the future if you promise to do the same.

2. How do YOU know what a Market Maker would do??

The financials that are already posted are fraudulent. To post true, correct, and complete financials Brett would need to go back many years and restate all those fraudulent disclosure statements with true, correct, and complete disclosure statements to get to the many missing disclosure statements. How can he do that if Roger Pawson will not and cannot provide the information because it would incriminate them ALL, including Brett Rosen ??

And FINRA does not "approve" anything. They process IF they find the information is correct and their questions are satisfactorily answered. How is Brett going to do that?? They will deem any corporate action request and application for a 211 by Market Maker deficient, meaning they cannot process. I doubt very much a Market Maker would even try to submit a 211 application to FINRA.


.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Of course that is completely wrong. Obviously, you are clueless to how any of that works.

.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Great news!!! So when the financials are posted, they’ll be approved by market makers and FINRA!!! Awesome!

Still need a 211. A Market Maker will insist and financials that are not a complete fraud. So will FINRA.

.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Yeah it's financials they dont and wont need to be audited.   Just. Need to be done and uploaded and accepted by the otciq and then tbr tier level will change to limited 

Technical chart is positive.

He has to post SOMETHING every once in a while or he loses his status as a moderator.

If it's sure a scam why do people care geez

OPTI "audited" financials are Impossible... Years of fraud, missing documents and information.

Geeezz...


.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

The next steps.   
1-  audited fins to be completed.  
2-  ceo uploads 2023 fins to otciq
3- upon review. Tier level changed from expert to pink limited.   And then most will be able to be traded !!!!!!!

Getting closer ⚡️⚡️⚡️

Here is a post that I saw on X.    Here are some brokers that allow buying opti.  

Brett is scamming ya all...


.


Buyer Beware
Pump and Dump



..

Looks like receiver report came in.  Someone posted it    

Verified profile.   Now he has access to upload   !!!!

Verified profile !!!!

Verified Profile: $OPTI Verified Profile✅ https://t.co/PGpaRPDRKS pic.twitter.com/OefMEPergM— JMoney💸 (@jmoney_hoops) February 18, 2025

OPTI!!!   Let's go.  $OPTI. What are the next steps you ask? 1- await for log in credentials should be (wed/thurs)
2- with access/ update profile/verify (immediate)
3- now can begin process uploading fins which will get us to Pink Limited status.
Look for updates as we get to these steps.… pic.twitter.com/sS8VAcpGaR— Cold Hard Cash (@coldhardcash_mb) February 17, 2025

Looks like it's getting close to boom time

I wanna post again.  !!

I know this has been mentioned, but to make sure no one missed it:
"Next box checked! $OPTI received final approval from OTC Markets compliance and the OTCIQ fee for 2025 has been paid. Just waiting for login credentials to update and verify profile...Next Stop for OPTEC train: getting off expert market!!!!"

My girl loves money!

We're going straight to .10

OPTI.  BABY. !!!!!!!!!! GREG getting it done !!!

OTCIQ Application Approved: $OPTI OTCIQ Application Approved🚀 https://t.co/IdIoNIhSL5— JMoney💸 (@jmoney_hoops) February 14, 2025

0032 close.   Oh yeah !!!!!!!

Tick tock.  I wouldn't wanna be without shares.    Watch.  !  

0.0033 ask is THIN! 

There's some talk about a merger, but with whom? My first guess was a downstream merger with WeShield, but that doesn't quite align with the AI sector. We'll have to wait and see once they dot the I's and cross the T's. Movement on the Expert Market suggests interest, but given the size, it's probably just those Canadians.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/02/27/2836036/0/en/RB-Capital-Partners-Inc-Officially-Moves-Forward-with-Appointment-of-a-Receiver-for-Optec-International-Inc.html

What's next you reckon?

Decent day here 👏

Added, OTCIQ Access on the horizon 

For sure. Been here for years as many others. Still holding all my shares and looking forward to the AI future of this company. Lets get it done!